[Web-SIG] CGI in PEP 444

Klaus Bremer klaus.bremer at bmcct.de
Tue Jan 4 19:18:41 CET 2011


CGI may be old fashioned, but in my opinion Ron got the point. And for simple applications CGI is fast enough.
I don't want to miss this option.

Klaus.

--

Am 04.01.2011 um 18:57 schrieb hidura at gmail.com:

> Because CGI is an old fashion way to make the things and is very different from the strength web programming. I don't say that we have to abandon the easy way but wsgi provides an easy way to work and with the PEP-3333 will be able in Py3k so CGI will be no useless.
> 
> El , Ron Stephens <rdsteph at mac.com> escribió:
> > CGI is by far the quickest and easiest way to write and deploy very simple web site scripts. As you move to improve Python for important industrial strength web programming, why not also continue to support quick and dirty web interactivity scripts?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ron Stephens
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Sent from my iPhone
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:53 AM, "P.J. Eby" pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > At 12:43 PM 1/4/2011 +0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > 
> > >> Alice Bevan McGregor writes: > > [1] http:://bit.ly/e7rtI6 So, while we are at it, could we get rid of the "CGI server example" in this new SWGI spec? This is 2011, and we should promote modern idioms, not encourage people to do 1995 Web programming. 10 years ago, CGI was already frown upon. (and even the idea that WSGI should provide some kind of CGI compatibility sounds a bit ridiculous to me) Regards Antoine.
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > > I still use CGI for the odd one-off, testing, prototyping, etc., and it's by far the easiest thing to deploy on a lot of web hosts.  Hell, even Google App Engine *emulates* CGI in its default deployment configuration, IIRC.  So it's not exactly obsolete.
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > > Also, the main purpose of the example is to show what a web server developer needs to do to hook up their own piping to provide WSGI services...  and most web server developers have something like CGI code already lying around, or at least know what CGI looks like.
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >> _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG at python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/pje%40telecommunity.com
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > > Web-SIG mailing list
> > 
> > > Web-SIG at python.org
> > 
> > > Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> > 
> > > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/rdsteph%40mac.com
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > 
> > Web-SIG mailing list
> > 
> > Web-SIG at python.org
> > 
> > Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> > 
> > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/hidura%40gmail.com
> > 
> >_______________________________________________
> Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG at python.org
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/klaus.bremer%40bmcct.de



More information about the Web-SIG mailing list