[Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

[hidura at gmail.com]

I did a solution based on the old PEP and works very well to me, i don't  
know if could be used by others if any are interested i can send it.

El , Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumpleton at gmail.com> escribió:
> Any one care to comment on my blog post?



> http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/10/is-pep-3333-final-solution-for-wsgi-on.html



> As far as web framework developers commenting, Armin at:



> http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/du7bf/is_pep_3333_the_final_solution_for_wsgi_on_python/



> has said:



> """Hopefully not. WSGI could do better and there is a proposal for

> that (444)."""



> So, looks he is very cool on the idea.



> No other developers of actual web frameworks has commented at all on

> PEP 3333 from what I can see.



> Graham

> _______________________________________________

> Web-SIG mailing list

> Web-SIG at python.org

> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig

> Unsubscribe:  
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/hidura%40gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/attachments/20101021/380f5411/attachment.html>