[Web-SIG] WSGI 2

[André Malo]

* Jim Fulton wrote: 


> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:05 PM, P.J. Eby<pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> >
> > HTTP moves bytes, therefore WSGI should move bytes.  For practical
> > reasons, it would be good to *also* support strings on the application
> > side, especially for application migration.  However, I see no reason
> > to make *servers* provide decoded strings instead of bytes.
>
> +1
>
> I haven't had enough time to follow this and earlier encoding
> discussions and so haven't commented up to now, but I've always been
> uncomfortable with WSGI using anything but bytes or assuming any
> encoding.  I agree that application frameworks should deal with
> conversion between bytes and unicode.

Another +1 from the peanut gallery.

nd