[Web-SIG] [extension] x-wsgiorg.flush

[Manlio Perillo]

Phillip J. Eby ha scritto:
> [...]
> If we were just now defining WSGI 1.0, I would let it be any method and 
> explicitly document that servers doing cache validation or processing a 
> HEAD method can skip iteration of the body, so that you can get better 
> performance.
> 
> However, if we put this language into WSGI 1.0, I'm wary of breaking 
> stuff that exists in the field; indeed it might be better just to say 
> that it's up to the user to add middleware to do this, rather than 
> trying to get a common standard for how servers should handle it.
> 

You can always publish an addendum or errata to WSGI 1.0, or just WSGI 1.1



Regards  Manlio Perillo