[Web-SIG] routing_args (was url_vars)

Joe Gregorio joe at bitworking.org
Mon Nov 13 20:32:31 CET 2006


I am positive on the spec, but I do have one question:

What is the justification for altering the values
of SCRIPT_NAME and PATH_INFO?

At the very least this breaks conformance
with RFC 3875[1], which PEP 333 references
normatively.

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3875

   Thanks,
   -joe


On 11/6/06, Luke Arno <luke.arno at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, it seemed to me like we had agreement on
> this. Does anyone disagree?
>
> environ['routing_args'] == (list_or_tuple, a_dict)
>
> Should the spec get updated and marked as
> accepted?
>
> Cheers,
> - Luke
> _______________________________________________
> Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG at python.org
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/joe.gregorio%40gmail.com
>


-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org


More information about the Web-SIG mailing list