[Web-SIG] WSGI in standard library

[Alan Kennedy]

[Ian Bicking]
> Anyway, I'm +1 on the object [wsgiref's wsgi header manipulation class]
> going somewhere.  I don't know if the
> parent package has to be named "wsgi" -- and "wsgiref" seems even
> stranger to me, as anything in the standard library isn't a "reference
> implementation" anymore, but an actual implementation.  I personally
> like a package name like "web".  Everyone will know what that means
> (though it would start with most of the web related modules not in it,
> which is a problem).

While we're on the subject, can we find a better home for the HTTP
status codes->messages mapping?

Integer status codes.
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/2004-September/000764.html

Adding status code constants to httplib
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/web-sig/2004-September/000842.html

Regards,

Alan.