[Types-sig] Interface files
Skip Montanaro
skip@mojam.com (Skip Montanaro)
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:54:20 -0600 (CST)
Greg> I stated a preference for allowing this information to reside in
Greg> the same file as the implementation. i.e. I don't want to maintain
Greg> two files.
Paul> The nice thing about having separate files is that it becomes
Paul> instantly clear what is "interesting" to the compiler. We have no
Paul> backwards compatibility constraints. We have no questions about
Paul> what variable are "in scope" and "available". It's just plain
Paul> simpler.
If you're determined to have some sort of syntax to support declarations,
why not separate files for 1.6 and modified syntax for 2.0?
Skip