[Tutor] Take if offline

[Hansen, Mike]

aaaahhhhh!!! You posted in HTML and top posted! OH NO! I top-posted too!


""" runs away screaming and bouncing off the walls like Daffy Duck """ 

  _____   

From: tutor-bounces at python.org [mailto:tutor-bounces at python.org] On
Behalf Of Fiyawerx 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 6:45 PM 
To: Darren Williams 
Cc: tutor at python.org; Shawn Milochik 
Subject: Re: [Tutor] Take if offline 


It also seems, for people like me, I've learned a lot of 'what not to
do' by seeing peoples replies to others posts telling them.. well, what
not to do. If all these were taken 'off list' you'd have a whole lot
more people doing bad things because they wouldn't have seen yet not to
do it, not to mention a whole lot more people having to send 'off-list'
complaints to people, due to the same reason. 


On 9/25/07, Darren Williams <HYPERLINK
"mailto:D3IBZ at hotmail.com"D3IBZ at hotmail.com> wrote: 

All jokes aside now (glad you took it that way Mike).  Maybe I havn't
gave 
the tutor enough attention, but I have never witnessed someone jump down

anothers throat because they posted in all caps, didn't enter a subject 
etc... etc...  The one time I have seen an argument (well heated debate)
was 
about a subject entitled 'Losing the expressiveness of C' (or something 
similar), which I found pretty interesting. 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shawn Milochik" <HYPERLINK
"mailto:Shawn at Milochik.com"Shawn at Milochik.com> 
To: "Darren Williams" <HYPERLINK
"mailto:D3IBZ at hotmail.com"D3IBZ at hotmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 3:06 PM 
Subject: Re: [Tutor] Take if offline 


> No, not really. He had to give everyone the rule once. Otherwise, he'd

> have to do it a hundred times a day, and monitor every single post to 
> find out who he had to inform. He'd end up doing not much else with 
> his life, and would flee to a monastery and give up coding forever. 
> You wouldn't want that to happen, would you? 
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/25/07, Darren Williams <HYPERLINK "mailto:D3IBZ at hotmail.com"
D3IBZ at hotmail.com> wrote: 
>> So by your own rules, you should have sent that to the offending
user(s). 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Hansen, Mike" <HYPERLINK "mailto:Mike.Hansen at atmel.com"
Mike.Hansen at atmel.com> 
>> To: "python tutor" <HYPERLINK
"mailto:tutor at python.org"tutor at python.org> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 2:27 PM 
>> Subject: [Tutor] Take if offline 
>> 
>> 
>> > Anytime someone posts in HTML, or posts without a subject, or 
>> > accidentally 
>> > hijacks a thread, or top-posts, or writes in caps, a couple of
posters 
>> > pop up 
>> > and complain. Rather than posting to the entire list, I think it'd
be 
>> > best if 
>> > you send your complaint directly to the "offending" user. I'd
prefer to 
>> > read 
>> > about Python not read lessons in net/mail-list etiquette. 
>> > 
>> > Thanks, 
>> > 
>> > Mike 
>> > _______________________________________________ 
>> > Tutor maillist  -  HYPERLINK
"mailto:Tutor at python.org"Tutor at python.org 
>> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor 
>> > 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Tutor maillist  -  HYPERLINK
"mailto:Tutor at python.org"Tutor at python.org 
>> HYPERLINK
"http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor"http://mail.python.org/ma
ilman/listinfo/tutor 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Please read: 
> http://milocast.com/2007/07/31/this-i-believe/ 
> 

_______________________________________________ 
Tutor maillist  -  HYPERLINK "mailto:Tutor at python.org"Tutor at python.org 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/attachments/20070925/1840fdeb/attachment.htm