From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 09:32:37 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Tshepang Lekhonkhobe)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 08:32:37 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
Message-ID: <1330849957.56.0.65740425457.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com>:

If you go to any issue, you can click on the Submit button, even though you haven't made any changes.

----------
messages: 2377
nosy: tshepang
priority: bug
status: unread
title: make Submit button unselectable when not needed

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 10:14:30 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Georg Brandl)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:14:30 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330849957.56.0.65740425457.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1330852470.38.0.46178215143.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:

AFAICS, no harm is done when you click the button without changes, so I would say it's not worth the effort to "fix" it.

----------
nosy: +gbrandl
status: unread -> resolved

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 10:15:55 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Tshepang Lekhonkhobe)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:15:55 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330852470.38.0.46178215143.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <CAA77j2CVyPJAZG52F7earE1KyVvHxZ3i3XWrbt5GZ2X0ETvSaw@mail.gmail.com>


Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:14, Georg Brandl
<metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote:
> AFAICS, no harm is done when you click the button without changes, so I would say it's not worth the effort to "fix" it.

It still is a usability issue.

----------
status: resolved -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 10:21:23 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Georg Brandl)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:21:23 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330849957.56.0.65740425457.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1330852883.3.0.409684521897.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:

Please be reasonable, we can spend developer time more usefully.

----------
status: chatting -> resolved

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 10:30:47 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Tshepang Lekhonkhobe)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:30:47 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330852883.3.0.409684521897.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <CAA77j2DBBWrD2T9=Ro_HbayiOJk0xeugb_dKPfz=8YO_Fuo1TQ@mail.gmail.com>


Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com> added the comment:

> Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:
>
> Please be reasonable, we can spend developer time more usefully.

Maybe you are also being unreasonable. Why not just leave it open so
that someone willing to spend the time can actually fix the issue? Is
it so bothersome to leave real issues, even if they seem trivial,
open?

----------
status: resolved -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 10:38:35 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Georg Brandl)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:38:35 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330849957.56.0.65740425457.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1330853915.71.0.705641261348.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:

Have a look at the open real issues in this tracker and how long they have been open -- would it be much better if there were twice as many?

----------
status: chatting -> resolved

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 12:52:57 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:52:57 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330849957.56.0.65740425457.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1330861977.15.0.655629999603.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

tshepang: as the tracker operator, I can assert you that I won't do anything about this for the next year, and likely not for the next five years. If you really want to see this resolved, submit a patch to the roundup project.

----------
nosy: +loewis
status: resolved -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From techtonik at gmail.com  Sun Mar  4 13:19:58 2012
From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 15:19:58 +0300
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable
 when not needed
In-Reply-To: <CAA77j2DBBWrD2T9=Ro_HbayiOJk0xeugb_dKPfz=8YO_Fuo1TQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1330852883.3.0.409684521897.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
	<CAA77j2DBBWrD2T9=Ro_HbayiOJk0xeugb_dKPfz=8YO_Fuo1TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPkN8x+D1T2cOa4yscd3JpjkXRPPSLZBuUjN38nt6O1mTcGXqg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
<metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote:
>
> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com> added the comment:
>> Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:
>>
>> Please be reasonable, we can spend developer time more usefully.
>
> Maybe you are also being unreasonable. Why not just leave it open so
> that someone willing to spend the time can actually fix the issue? Is
> it so bothersome to leave real issues, even if they seem trivial,
> open?

+1  Just assign lowest priority and that's it.
--
anatoly t.

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 13:20:19 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (anatoly techtonik)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:20:19 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <CAA77j2DBBWrD2T9=Ro_HbayiOJk0xeugb_dKPfz=8YO_Fuo1TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPkN8x+D1T2cOa4yscd3JpjkXRPPSLZBuUjN38nt6O1mTcGXqg@mail.gmail.com>


anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
<metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote:
>
> Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com> added the comment:
>> Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:
>>
>> Please be reasonable, we can spend developer time more usefully.
>
> Maybe you are also being unreasonable. Why not just leave it open so
> that someone willing to spend the time can actually fix the issue? Is
> it so bothersome to leave real issues, even if they seem trivial,
> open?

+1  Just assign lowest priority and that's it.
--
anatoly t.

----------
nosy: +techtonik
status: resolved -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 13:41:10 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Georg Brandl)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:41:10 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330849957.56.0.65740425457.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1330864870.09.0.334339057122.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:

There isn't even any real priority setting in this tracker.  Now can we please stop this charade and get on with it?

----------
status: chatting -> resolved

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 13:56:35 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (anatoly techtonik)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:56:35 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330864870.09.0.334339057122.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <CAPkN8xJpdG=yxgWcgVuYRMQZdEovrfiB4aJ6Cy66Zg4avhOqrw@mail.gmail.com>


anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Georg Brandl
<metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote:
>
> There isn't even any real priority setting in this tracker. ?Now can we please stop this charade and get on with it?

Do you remember the guy, who were closing tickets on b.p.o just to
keep tracker clean? You risk to become the next one. If Tshepang is
willing to see this feature on the tracker, I see no reason for anyone
to stop him. You expect some Roundup hackers to jump in and help with
maintenance, but all hackers are already busy, so why not just let
ordinary people work on bite-sized, easy stuff until they gain enough
experience to help with your real issues. :)

I respect your responsibility to get everything fixed yourself, but
you're killing the fun. My advice is to create a priority field to
filter out all stuff you're not committed to fix, and let other people
experiment.
--
anatoly t.

----------
status: resolved -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar  4 14:35:51 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Georg Brandl)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:35:51 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue436] make Submit button unselectable when
	not needed
In-Reply-To: <1330849957.56.0.65740425457.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1330868151.36.0.329779508467.issue436@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> added the comment:

OK, let me put it this way: as a feature request for the Python tracker, this is rejected: it is uncommon for web forms to have this behavior, and since there is no harm in pressing the button if one happens to do it, it is also not a usability concern.  That's reason enough to close it: just as with any Python feature request, we as the core developers reserve the right to classify reports as invalid.

If you feel that this is a bug in Roundup, please move it to the Roundup tracker and let the Roundup devs decide.

And please stop reopening the issue; otherwise I will have to retire it.

----------
status: chatting -> resolved

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue436>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Mon Mar  5 13:44:28 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Tshepang Lekhonkhobe)
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:44:28 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue437] Ignore a dot in urls if it's the last
	character
Message-ID: <1330951468.67.0.643931051848.issue437@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com>:

When commit url ends with a dot (e.g. http://bugs.python.org/msg152756), Roundup thinks the dot is part of the url, so it's often like a broken link:

good: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/567767a6df02/Lib/packaging/tests/test_version.py#l68
bad: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/567767a6df02/Lib/packaging/tests/test_version.py#l68.

----------
messages: 2388
nosy: tshepang
priority: bug
status: unread
title: Ignore a dot in urls if it's the last character

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue437>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Mon Mar  5 13:54:09 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Ezio Melotti)
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:54:09 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue437] Ignore a dot in urls if it's the last
	character
In-Reply-To: <1330951468.67.0.643931051848.issue437@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1330952049.03.0.109146884514.issue437@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> added the comment:

This should be fixed already (unless I'm missing something), but for some reason it doesn't seem to work.  I'll check again and see if there is indeed a bug with the code or is there another reason for this.

----------
nosy: +ezio.melotti
status: unread -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue437>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Thu Mar  8 12:03:24 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Tshepang Lekhonkhobe)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:03:24 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue438] don't send me changes I made
Message-ID: <1331204604.65.0.829456081714.issue438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com>:

This is related to issue400, but since ezio actually wants those messages, it would be kool if there was at least an option.

I say this because, for example, I don't need to get email saying that "you are added to the nosy list" if I added myself to that list.

----------
messages: 2390
nosy: tshepang
priority: feature
status: unread
title: don't send me changes I made

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue438>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 14 01:08:20 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (David Malcolm)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:08:20 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue439] Email notifictations not received for
	rietveld review
Message-ID: <1331683700.81.0.418164698072.issue439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat.com>:

dmalcolm isnt on the nosy of:
  http://bugs.python.org/review/13703/show
despite being on the nosy of
  http://bugs.python.org/issue13703

----------
messages: 2391
nosy: dmalcolm
priority: bug
status: unread
title: Email notifictations not received for rietveld review

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue439>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 14 22:12:58 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Tshepang Lekhonkhobe)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:12:58 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue440] unable to log in with
	openid.stackexchange.com
Message-ID: <1331759578.98.0.306317277648.issue440@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang at gmail.com>:

When I use my OpenID (openid.stackexchange.com) to log into bugs.python.org, I get this message on the top of the page, and fail to get a login:

"Not authenticated (no session)"

I have not tried any other OpenID providers, but logging in normally works.

----------
messages: 2392
nosy: tshepang
priority: bug
status: unread
title: unable to log in with openid.stackexchange.com

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue440>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Thu Mar 15 10:42:36 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (anatoly techtonik)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:42:36 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue441] Allow users to specify keywords
Message-ID: <1331804556.63.0.307708043654.issue441@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>:

Allow keywords to be supplied by users. Badly needed for 'bite-sized' and 'easy' issues that people coming from OpenHatch can pick up.

Google folks have just released this http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=9269 and it looks to me like those 111 votes apply to bugs.python.org as well

----------
messages: 2393
nosy: techtonik
priority: feature
status: unread
title: Allow users to specify keywords

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue441>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Mar 25 17:16:52 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 15:16:52 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
Message-ID: <1332688612.07.0.744642194464.issue442@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de>:

We would like to update the psf machine to Squeeze. What is the best procedure for that?

----------
messages: 2394
nosy: izak, loewis, roche
priority: bug
status: unread
title: Upgrade Debian

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Mon Mar 26 09:29:01 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Roch=C3=A9_Compaan?=)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:29:01 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <1332688612.07.0.744642194464.issue442@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <CAK+M6BaHqcyDyJZ8XAZMx2rCuMdNa5OnPWr-WxqiOd6ZOuGdrw@mail.gmail.com>


Roch? Compaan <roche at upfrontsystems.co.za> added the comment:

Hi Martin

We are busy upgrading all our servers to Squeeze. I've asked Izak to
move the psf machine up in the queue, so maybe we can squeeze it in
some time this week :-)

----------
status: unread -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Mon Mar 26 09:43:09 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Izak Burger)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:43:09 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <CAK+M6BaHqcyDyJZ8XAZMx2rCuMdNa5OnPWr-WxqiOd6ZOuGdrw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGscxN29N_Ti5DyOm0VM8Yo5RErk0wf4ciDFHkucPzu+yWQMTQ@mail.gmail.com>


Izak Burger <izak at upfrontsystems.co.za> added the comment:

Last time we made a copy and did a dist-upgrade on that, because we
were scared :-) The upgrade went smoothly and I recall someone made
comments about just winging it and fixing things if they go wrong.

This time I'd probably go with the winging approach. There is a
somewhat large change in the way debian boots, with the new events
based boot system. It works ALMOST flawlessly on a virtual setup such
as this, except for one small problem, none of the sysinit scripts
(those you normally find in /etc/rcS.d) are run, it only runs the
scripts in rc3.d. Luckily there is only about three of those scripts
that are actually important for a virtual server (setting the
hostname, updating /etc/mtab) so this is a simple "patch" that needs
to be made. Also, any of your own init scripts that you may have
written must now have the commented LSB dependency lines at the top. I
did not check it, perhaps you already have it, I just have to mention
it.

regards,
Izak

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Mon Mar 26 09:45:55 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Izak Burger)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:45:55 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <CAGscxN29N_Ti5DyOm0VM8Yo5RErk0wf4ciDFHkucPzu+yWQMTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGscxN0TgLSSHVFYmOTeACRnE7QqGzN-RrJcjW1SJ9f4-xp+QA@mail.gmail.com>


Izak Burger <izak at upfrontsystems.co.za> added the comment:

Another avenue I want to explore, is to check if a newer version of
debian's vserver kernel can do ipv6. If it can, and since we only run
psf and one other server on that machine, it would make sense to do
this as well. I'll keep you posted.

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Tue Mar 27 15:10:25 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Izak Burger)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:10:25 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <CAGscxN0TgLSSHVFYmOTeACRnE7QqGzN-RrJcjW1SJ9f4-xp+QA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGscxN3tO98AEiV0e52JATtJ7YCVeqcgX+idARhBegRRTATsMg@mail.gmail.com>


Izak Burger <izak at upfrontsystems.co.za> added the comment:

Some feedback on ipv6.

Piecing this together, starting with this line from linux-vserver.org:

1. Starting with linux-vserver-2.3 IPv6 support is included in the
main source code. No need to apply any extra patches. You will need to
have util-vserver 0.30.214 or newer if you are using the 2.3+ patches.

2. Heading over to the changelog for the kernel in squeeze
(http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.32-41/changelog.txt)
shows it includes the patch 2.6.32.48-vs2.3.0.36.29.8. That is from
the 2.3 development branch.

3. Ergo, linux-vserver in Debian squeeze has native ipv6 support.

4. Squeeze also has util-vserver 0.30.216, which is new enough.

We can therefore implement ipv6 this time round, provided I upgrade
nina (the host) first.

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Tue Mar 27 22:58:47 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Izak Burger)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:58:47 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <CAGscxN3tO98AEiV0e52JATtJ7YCVeqcgX+idARhBegRRTATsMg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAGscxN0rUfcU6S1gxDguV4odhfxYtDfBuEq8HMjHr0oAC3N7Mg@mail.gmail.com>


Izak Burger <izak at upfrontsystems.co.za> added the comment:

I upgraded the host (nina), resulting in some but very little
downtime. I also obtained an ipv6 subnet. Its ipv6 address will
probably be 2a01:4f8:131:2484::3. To be confirmed once the rest has
been done.

Upgrading the actual virtual host is next.

regards,
Izak

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Tue Mar 27 23:08:32 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:08:32 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <CAGscxN0rUfcU6S1gxDguV4odhfxYtDfBuEq8HMjHr0oAC3N7Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F722C4E.6030207@v.loewis.de>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

> Upgrading the actual virtual host is next.

I should be available most of the day tomorrow. So if you can fix a UTC
time, I can try to be available. Else you proceed at your own pace, and
we'll clean up afterwards.

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From martin at v.loewis.de  Tue Mar 27 23:08:30 2012
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:08:30 +0200
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <CAGscxN0rUfcU6S1gxDguV4odhfxYtDfBuEq8HMjHr0oAC3N7Mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGscxN0rUfcU6S1gxDguV4odhfxYtDfBuEq8HMjHr0oAC3N7Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F722C4E.6030207@v.loewis.de>

> Upgrading the actual virtual host is next.

I should be available most of the day tomorrow. So if you can fix a UTC
time, I can try to be available. Else you proceed at your own pace, and
we'll clean up afterwards.

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Tue Mar 27 23:11:36 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:11:36 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <CAGscxN0rUfcU6S1gxDguV4odhfxYtDfBuEq8HMjHr0oAC3N7Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F722D06.1020402@v.loewis.de>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

> Upgrading the actual virtual host is next.

I notified python-dev about the upcoming outage.

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Tue Mar 27 23:25:36 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:25:36 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <4F722D06.1020402@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <4F72304E.1040108@v.loewis.de>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

Re: init scripts. I added LSB headers to /etc/init.d/roundup
(from the Debian package), and disabled spambayes altogether.

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 00:15:40 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Izak Burger)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:15:40 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <4F72304E.1040108@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <CAGscxN2Wh2HwSSwzEnRBd7zw_vj8dKRZkUx-VequmrRewXL0mA@mail.gmail.com>


Izak Burger <izak at upfrontsystems.co.za> added the comment:

Hi again,

The psf virtual host has been upgraded to Debian squeeze, and the
necessary changes has been made to make it start with the new
dependency based init. I also had to change /etc/init.d/roundup,
because /bin/sh is now provided by dash and it does not understand
"source" among others. I simply changed the bit at the top to say
/bin/bash, since that is what it really wants.

I assigned an ipv6 address to the virtual host. It does not work yet,
I need to implement some kind of routing and this seems to be
sufficiently different to ipv4 that I'm not certain how to do it just
yet.

An upgrade from postgresql 8.3 to 8.4 will also be required at some
point. It is possible to run them side by side, all that is required
is to dump it in 8.3 and load it in 8.4.

regards,
Izak

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From techtonik at gmail.com  Wed Mar 28 07:47:37 2012
From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:47:37 +0300
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <4F72304E.1040108@v.loewis.de>
References: <4F722D06.1020402@v.loewis.de> <4F72304E.1040108@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <CAPkN8xJwJr2DmnvecapTdiM71Ru8605HvSnqeP=gCADdBkcDUw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Martin v. L?wis
<metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote:
>
> Re: init scripts. I added LSB headers to /etc/init.d/roundup
> (from the Debian package), and disabled spambayes altogether.

I can help with porting these to Supervisor.

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 07:47:59 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (anatoly techtonik)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:47:59 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <4F72304E.1040108@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <CAPkN8xJwJr2DmnvecapTdiM71Ru8605HvSnqeP=gCADdBkcDUw@mail.gmail.com>


anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Martin v. L?wis
<metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote:
>
> Re: init scripts. I added LSB headers to /etc/init.d/roundup
> (from the Debian package), and disabled spambayes altogether.

I can help with porting these to Supervisor.

----------
nosy: +techtonik

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 17:55:56 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (R David Murray)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:55:56 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
Message-ID: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from R David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>:

I tried a few keywords that I know appear in issues, and get no results.

----------
messages: 2405
nosy: r.david.murray
priority: critical
status: unread
title: The quick search appears to be broken

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 19:41:42 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (R David Murray)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:41:42 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1332956502.5.0.223158876623.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


R David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

Actually, it is text search that is broken.  It doesn't work from the advanced search either.

----------
status: unread -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 19:48:16 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:48:16 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1332956896.56.0.441509096925.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

Can you provide a specific example? What did you search for, and what should the result have included?

----------
nosy: +loewis

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 20:35:01 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (R David Murray)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:35:01 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1332959701.94.0.219912563209.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


R David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

Hmm.  Maybe there's some sort of index rebuild going on that hasn't finished yet?

Originally I tried 'test_queue' and 'os'.  os obviously should get lots of hits.  I got none for both.  I just tried it again now, and I get one hit for each (and I know there is a second, older issue that has test_queue in the comments...it's the one I was looking for).

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 20:38:59 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (R David Murray)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:38:59 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1332959939.64.0.302270921924.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


R David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

14408 is the hit I get, 14333 is the other issue I *know* has test_queue in the comments.

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Wed Mar 28 22:08:11 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:08:11 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1332965291.13.0.382797351748.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

I think I know what happened. I need to take the tracker offline again for reindexing.

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Thu Mar 29 05:04:51 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:04:51 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1332990291.56.0.432666279746.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

What happened is this: before the Debian upgrade, we were using indexer_dbm. The upgrade installed the Python xapian module, which made indexer_xapian import correctly, making roundup switch to xapian. There still was a xapian index around for the tracker from the last time this happened (when I resolved this by uninstalling the Python xapian module). This index caused some searches to succeed and others to fail.

I have now decided to go with the Xapian indexing for this installation, and have regenerated the xapian index for all instances; I also cleared the __words and __textids tables since they should no longer be used.

----------
status: chatting -> resolved

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Thu Mar 29 05:21:40 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:21:40 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue442] Upgrade Debian
In-Reply-To: <1332688612.07.0.744642194464.issue442@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1332991300.63.0.391057034289.issue442@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

I have now run pg_upgradecluster. At first it would fail because it ran out of disk space. I deleted old log files and backups and seefeld's copy of roundup, so postgres upgrading eventually succeeded.

It turned out that I also had to reindex all instance (see issue443).

With that, it seems that the upgrade is complete. Thanks for your help.

----------
status: chatting -> resolved

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue442>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Thu Mar 29 22:05:00 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (R David Murray)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 20:05:00 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1333051500.56.0.556395912425.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


R David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

Searching is still not finding the expected set of issues.  For example, searching on 'strftime' returns issues 6641, 3091, 2782, and 1459103, yet I know that issue 3173 also mentions strftime (including in the title).

----------
status: resolved -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Thu Mar 29 23:00:27 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:00:27 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue443] The quick search appears to be broken
In-Reply-To: <1332950156.73.0.95153285509.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1333054827.09.0.0309642872837.issue443@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

I don't think this is the original issue anymore ("I tried a few keywords that I know appear in issues, and get no results"), so I think it would have been best to open a new issue.

As this this issue is now reopened, I degrade it to "bug". I have no plans to work on it for the next few days.

----------
priority: critical -> bug

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue443>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sat Mar 31 15:16:08 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Oleg)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:16:08 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue444] Mail delivery failed
Message-ID: <1333199768.96.0.175106528184.issue444@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from Oleg <phd at phdru.name>:

Hello. I have problems sending mail to python.org. Messages are returned with errors like these:

  postmaster at python.org
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<postmaster at python.org>:
    host mail.python.org [82.94.164.166]: 550-5.7.1 Service unavailable; client [93.185.193.14] blocked using b.barracudacentral.org
    550 5.7.1 Contact postmaster at python.org for assistance. Please provide the following information in your problem report:
    time (Mar 31 14:49:20) and client (93.185.193.14).

  python-dev at python.org
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<python-dev at python.org>:
    host mail.python.org [82.94.164.166]: 550-5.7.1 Service unavailable; client [93.185.193.14] blocked using b.barracudacentral.org
    550 5.7.1 Contact postmaster at python.org for assistance. Please provide the following information in your problem report:
    time (Mar 31 15:09:44) and client (93.185.193.14).

----------
messages: 2415
nosy: phd
priority: bug
status: unread
title: Mail delivery failed

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue444>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sat Mar 31 15:17:13 2012
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Oleg)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:17:13 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue444] Mail delivery failed
In-Reply-To: <1333199768.96.0.175106528184.issue444@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1333199833.93.0.613925639304.issue444@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


Oleg <phd at phdru.name> added the comment:

I tried to contact postmaster at python.org but got the same error.

----------
status: unread -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue444>
_______________________________________________________