From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Fri Feb 6 21:35:11 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Jean-Paul Calderone) Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:35:11 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue234] python-dev tracker summary emails contain incorrect "median duration of open issues" information In-Reply-To: <1233952511.91.0.674582983418.issue234@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1233952511.91.0.674582983418.issue234@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Jean-Paul Calderone : The weekly tracker summary emails sent to python-dev contain incorrect information. The value for the "median duration of open issues" it reports has recently wrapped around to 0 and started growing from there. Looking at older reports, it's clear that there's a bug in the calculation of this value, since it jumps from a median of several years to a median of one day in the span of one week. ---------- messages: 1138 nosy: exarkun priority: bug status: unread title: python-dev tracker summary emails contain incorrect "median duration of open issues" information _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Sun Feb 8 01:14:59 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:14:59 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue234] python-dev tracker summary emails contain incorrect "median duration of open issues" information In-Reply-To: <1233952511.91.0.674582983418.issue234@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1234052099.89.0.369894211117.issue234@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: It seems that the problem isn't an overflow. To find the median Roundup sorts on issue id and picks the middle, but bugs.python.org has lots of sf.net ids. Since these ids are higher and older, the sort is broken. Ordering by ID, one can see where the median is now: http://tinyurl.com/d4oowj Click "next" a few times and you'll get to where it was a month ago (i.e, in some ancient sf.net bug). So it's a long-standing bug. I believe the attached patch (against tracker/instances/python-dev/scripts/roundup-summary ) should fix it. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: summary.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 396 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Sun Feb 8 10:43:35 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 09:43:35 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue234] python-dev tracker summary emails contain incorrect "median duration of open issues" information In-Reply-To: <1233952511.91.0.674582983418.issue234@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1234086215.84.0.820705473201.issue234@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks for the patch, committed as r69430. The median duration is now computed as 435 days ---------- nosy: +loewis status: chatting -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Wed Feb 18 06:11:47 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Gregory P Smith) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:11:47 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue235] incorrent To: headers in mail sent from tracker upon error processing email In-Reply-To: <1234933907.44.0.734315958943.issue235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1234933907.44.0.734315958943.issue235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Gregory P Smith : I tried to reply to an issue via email to add a note. That failed. But more interesting is that: A) the To: header in the email from the tracker is messed up (see the headers below). B) I received the failure email from the tracker at all (it apparently used my actual email address to perform the delivery, despite messing up the To: header). It looks like something expecting a sequence got a string. Possibly a mimetools usage issue as headers can often have multiple values thus it expects sequences rather than individual strings somewhere? Delivered-To: greg at krypto.org Received: by 10.103.118.18 with SMTP id v18cs239649mum; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.61.7 with SMTP id o7mr2623482bkk.51.1234927936727; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from psf.upfronthosting.co.za (bugs.python.org [88.198.142.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si6367756bwz.83.2009.02.17.19.32.15; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 88.198.142.26 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za) client-ip=88.198.142.26; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 88.198.142.26 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za) smtp.mail=roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Received: from psf.upfronthosting.co.za (localhost [10.0.0.1]) by psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F387863C for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:32:15 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="88.198.142.26.1006.25012.1234927935.280.1" Subject: Failed issue tracker submission To: g at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, r at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, e at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, g at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, "", k at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, r at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, y at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, p at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, t at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, o at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, "."@psf.upfronthosting.co.za, o at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, r at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, g at psf.upfronthosting.co.za From: Python tracker Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:32:15 +0000 X-Roundup-Name: Python tracker X-Roundup-Loop: hello X-Roundup-Version: 1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090218033215.44F387863C at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> --88.198.142.26.1006.25012.1234927935.280.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable An unexpected error occurred during the processing of your message. The tracker administrator is being notified. .... ---------- messages: 1141 nosy: gregory.p.smith priority: bug status: unread title: incorrent To: headers in mail sent from tracker upon error processing email _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From asmodai at in-nomine.org Wed Feb 18 07:14:19 2009 From: asmodai at in-nomine.org (Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:14:19 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Updating to Roundup 1.4.6 Message-ID: <20090218061419.GK91939@nexus.in-nomine.org> I was talking in private with Daniel about the tracker and getting the desired features and such implemented. I noticed we are currently on 1.4.2 of the official Roundup tree with additional custom changes. Since I've done quite a bit of merging in newer releases from a vendor in my FreeBSD time, I proposed to dig into upgrading our 1.4.2 codebase to 1.4.6. Before I start duplicating work: is anyone else already working on this? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai ????? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B Earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust... From martin at v.loewis.de Wed Feb 18 07:33:32 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:33:32 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue235] incorrent To: headers in mail sent from tracker upon error processing email In-Reply-To: <1234933907.44.0.734315958943.issue235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> References: <1234933907.44.0.734315958943.issue235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <499BABBC.5040507@v.loewis.de> > I tried to reply to an issue via email to add a note. That failed. But more > interesting is that: Do you still have the message that caused the failure? The reply said that I should have received an error message, but I can't find that. From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Wed Feb 18 07:33:39 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:33:39 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue235] incorrent To: headers in mail sent from tracker upon error processing email In-Reply-To: <1234933907.44.0.734315958943.issue235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <499BABBC.5040507@v.loewis.de> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: > I tried to reply to an issue via email to add a note. That failed. But more > interesting is that: Do you still have the message that caused the failure? The reply said that I should have received an error message, but I can't find that. ---------- nosy: +loewis status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From brett at python.org Wed Feb 18 07:52:59 2009 From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:52:59 -0800 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Updating to Roundup 1.4.6 In-Reply-To: <20090218061419.GK91939@nexus.in-nomine.org> References: <20090218061419.GK91939@nexus.in-nomine.org> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 22:14, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven < asmodai at in-nomine.org> wrote: > I was talking in private with Daniel about the tracker and getting the > desired features and such implemented. I noticed we are currently on 1.4.2 > of the official Roundup tree with additional custom changes. Since I've > done > quite a bit of merging in newer releases from a vendor in my FreeBSD time, > I > proposed to dig into upgrading our 1.4.2 codebase to 1.4.6. > > Before I start duplicating work: is anyone else already working on this? > Not that has told this list unless Martin has been planning this quietly. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martin at v.loewis.de Wed Feb 18 07:58:06 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiB2LiBMw7Z3aXMi?=) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:58:06 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Updating to Roundup 1.4.6 In-Reply-To: References: <20090218061419.GK91939@nexus.in-nomine.org> Message-ID: <499BB17E.9030803@v.loewis.de> > Not that has told this list unless Martin has been planning this > quietly. Not at all. Martin From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Wed Feb 18 08:20:16 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Gregory P Smith) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:20:16 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue235] incorrent To: headers in mail sent from tracker upon error processing email In-Reply-To: <1234933907.44.0.734315958943.issue235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1234941616.78.0.531652671754.issue235@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Gregory P Smith added the comment: heres the message in its entirety (i've since cut and pasted my response into the issue via the web interface). Delivered-To: greg at krypto.org Received: by 10.103.118.18 with SMTP id v18cs239649mum; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.61.7 with SMTP id o7mr2623482bkk.51.1234927936727; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from psf.upfronthosting.co.za (bugs.python.org [88.198.142.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si6367756bwz.83.2009.02.17.19.32.15; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 88.198.142.26 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za) client-ip=88.198.142.26; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 88.198.142.26 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za) smtp.mail=roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Received: from psf.upfronthosting.co.za (localhost [10.0.0.1]) by psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F387863C for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:32:15 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="88.198.142.26.1006.25012.1234927935.280.1" Subject: Failed issue tracker submission To: g at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, r at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, e at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, g at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, "", k at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, r at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, y at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, p at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, t at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, o at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, "."@psf.upfronthosting.co.za, o at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, r at psf.upfronthosting.co.za, g at psf.upfronthosting.co.za From: Python tracker Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:32:15 +0000 X-Roundup-Name: Python tracker X-Roundup-Loop: hello X-Roundup-Version: 1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090218033215.44F387863C at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> --88.198.142.26.1006.25012.1234927935.280.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable An unexpected error occurred during the processing of your message. The tracker administrator is being notified. --88.198.142.26.1006.25012.1234927935.280.1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: attachment Content-Description: Message you sent Return-Path: X-Original-To: report at bugs.python.org Delivered-To: roundup+tracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2324078590 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:32:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so580429fge.20 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.5.14 with SMTP id h14mr4199439mui.108.1234927929576; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1234911749.63.0.657212726256.issue4258 at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> References: <1225795512.12.0.546973896448.issue4258 at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> <1234911749.63.0.657212726256.issue4258 at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:32:09 -0800 Message-ID: <52dc1c820902171932p4441cbdfqc6a15a380b8a2d37 at mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [issue4258] Use 30-bit digits instead of 15-bit digits for Python integers. From: "Gregory P. Smith" To: Python tracker Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e649d9a290ce81046329101e --0016e649d9a290ce81046329101e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > => I would suggest to use 2^30 base only if sizeof(long)>=8 (64 bits CPU). Thats not the correct test. Test for an actual 64-bit build target. sizeof(long) and sizeof(long long) are not usefully related to that in any sort of cross platform manner. On windows, we'd define the flag for 15 vs 30 bit longs in the build configs for the various build targets. On every thing else (autoconf), we can use a configure test to check the same things that platform.architecture() checks to return '32bit' vs '64bit'. --0016e649d9a290ce81046329101e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > =3D> I would suggest to use 2^30 base only if sizeof(long)>=3D8= (64 bits
CPU).

Thats not the correct test.  Test for an actual 64-bit bu= ild target.  sizeof(long) and sizeof(long long) are not usefully relat= ed to that in any sort of cross platform manner.  On windows, we'd= define the flag for 15 vs 30 bit longs in the build configs for the variou= s build targets.  On every thing else (autoconf), we can use a configu= re test to check the same things that platform.architecture() checks to ret= urn '32bit' vs '64bit'.

--0016e649d9a290ce81046329101e-- --88.198.142.26.1006.25012.1234927935.280.1-- _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From ajaksu at gmail.com Wed Feb 18 23:34:14 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:34:14 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup roadmap In-Reply-To: References: <2d75d7660902161920g61c83d5btdcaf831ee6b04fa@mail.gmail.com> <499A721E.4060007@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <2d75d7660902181434u6dba8378tc3f693678b9ca6ff@mail.gmail.com> Hi Venkatraman, Venkatraman S wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> >> Don't expect too much >> help from other people - I have been waiting for volunteers to show up >> helping with the tracker for more than a year now. > > I have been mostly a silent spectator around and would like to chip in. Great! Thanks for joining us :) What would you like to help with? Anyway, let's move this thread to tracker-discuss :) > Need some initial throttle(help) for the full-fledged attack :) Well, I'm currently updating the TrackerDevelopment[1] article and trying to make the initial setup easier. These should help a bit, but I'd be glad to (try to) answer any questions you have. Please let me know (or mail tracker-discuss[2]) if something on the guide isn't clear (you can, of course, edit it directly). "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: > Please take a look at the meta tracker. It has various open issues, many > open for many months now. Please tackle one that can be fixed through > patches to the tracker instance preferably; changes to roundup are also > acceptable in principle. Agreed, if you want to get to know the code and at the same time work on something useful, taking a look at the meta tracker[3] is a great first step. Welcome aboard! Daniel [1] http://wiki.python.org/moin/TrackerDevelopment [2] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss [3] http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/ :) From seefeld at sympatico.ca Wed Feb 18 23:57:25 2009 From: seefeld at sympatico.ca (Stefan Seefeld) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:57:25 -0500 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup roadmap In-Reply-To: <2d75d7660902181434u6dba8378tc3f693678b9ca6ff@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d75d7660902161920g61c83d5btdcaf831ee6b04fa@mail.gmail.com> <499A721E.4060007@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902181434u6dba8378tc3f693678b9ca6ff@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <499C9255.3030309@sympatico.ca> Hi there, this is just a little note / reminder to try to submit Roundup patches and enhancements that you may have accumulated while working on the bugs.python.org tracker. A couple of weeks ago I moved the Roundup project's own tracker close to where bugs.python.org is hosted, and am now actively developing Roundup again (at least for a while). So this is a good time to get in touch to merge things upstream. :-) (See http://www.roundup-tracker.org.) Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin... From ajaksu at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 00:46:48 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:46:48 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup roadmap In-Reply-To: <499C9255.3030309@sympatico.ca> References: <2d75d7660902161920g61c83d5btdcaf831ee6b04fa@mail.gmail.com> <499A721E.4060007@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902181434u6dba8378tc3f693678b9ca6ff@mail.gmail.com> <499C9255.3030309@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: <2d75d7660902181546n52e440bfn4b8f238f2ee0e3c0@mail.gmail.com> Hi Stefan, Stefan Seefeld wrote: > Hi there, > > this is just a little note / reminder to try to submit Roundup patches and enhancements that you may have accumulated while working on the bugs.python.org tracker. > A couple of weeks ago I moved the Roundup project's own tracker close to where bugs.python.org is hosted, and am now actively developing Roundup again (at least for a while). So this is a good time to get in touch to merge things upstream. :-) Cool, I saw your recent checkins :) I won't be touching Roundup code for a while. I have yet to take a look at where/how we diverge and Jeroen is working on updating the python-dev instance. I have spotted some issues in your tracker I'd like to fix a bit later on, like scope of AND searches (per message x per issue). Some planned features also have to be implemented in Roundup land, like boolean relations for query terms ('find' in indexer_[xapian|rdbms].py IIRC). FWIW, I've linked to Roundup docs and issue tracker from our TrackerDevelopment article. Cheers, Daniel From ajaksu at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 13:02:29 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:02:29 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Making the local instance easier to install Message-ID: <2d75d7660902190402w59f50e0di453ad021ec972945@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I'm working on a couple of issues/patches that focus on getting a local instance up and running. The TrackerDevelopment article was a bit stale, so I've updated it to include some caveats and tips, that boil down to (* marks a patch to be submitted to the meta tracker): [from a message to Jeroen] 1 - postgresql 8.3 won't work unless patched (looks like it's working, only to break e.g. adding new issues), 8.2 works fine. A simple patch makes 8.3 work: http://issues.roundup-tracker.org/issue2030479 (won't submit this as it's present in Roundup 1.4.6). 2 - Installing psycopg2 from my package manager didn't work, from source works nicely. 3 - SpamBayes can be another problem if you already use it (or doesn't want to), this one I have yet to sort out. A local copy runs fine. [new] 4* - The CIA.vc detector will embarrassingly post your test issues to http://cia.vc/stats/project/python 5* - There are new values for a couple of fields, like Priority and Stages. 6* - SpamBayes dummy config should allow empty string/missing spambayes_uri. 7 - detectors/audit2to3.py isn't present anymore, but the general suggestion about disabling detectors is still useful. 8 - Added links for Roundup docs and issue tracker. I think we should discuss a workflow, will post a message on this (with a couple of suggested features/bugs/RFCs ) soon :) Cheers, Daniel From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 13:03:27 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:03:27 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue236] Disable CIA.vc detector by default In-Reply-To: <1235045007.64.0.745186267851.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235045007.64.0.745186267851.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : The CIA.vc detector in local instances will send mail to Python's page there, which gets embarrassing quickly: http://cia.vc/stats/author/ajaksu :D ---------- files: cia.diff messages: 1144 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: bug status: unread title: Disable CIA.vc detector by default _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cia.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 302 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 13:03:41 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:03:41 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue237] Make SpamBayes' dummy config more tolerant In-Reply-To: <1235045021.33.0.00810434635886.issue237@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235045021.33.0.00810434635886.issue237@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : This patch, from a post by Skip Montanaro[1], allows not declaring or setting spambayes_uri value to an empty string, adding two try:except for handling these. [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/2008-February/001549.html ---------- files: spambayes_uri.diff messages: 1145 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: wish status: unread title: Make SpamBayes' dummy config more tolerant _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spambayes_uri.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 823 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 13:04:23 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:04:23 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue238] Update 'initial_data.py' to match current values In-Reply-To: <1235045063.45.0.472608826025.issue238@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235045063.45.0.472608826025.issue238@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : This patch makes a local instance values for fields match those of bugs.python.org. Maybe making the IDs match would be good, if so I'd need to see the retired values in the official tracker. I could also work on a script to update initial_data.py on demand (or automatically on Class edit?). ---------- files: initial_data.diff messages: 1146 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: wish status: unread title: Update 'initial_data.py' to match current values _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: initial_data.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 6160 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 13:04:36 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:04:36 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue180] Add creator/assignee to search view In-Reply-To: <1200938043.26.0.777887020922.issue180@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235045076.68.0.386052488443.issue180@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: The results of a quick search now include both creator and assignee. I'll add 'type' to it and to the default view. ---------- assignedto: -> ajaksu2 nosy: +ajaksu2 status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 13:19:24 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:19:24 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue180] Add creator/assignee to search view In-Reply-To: <1200938043.26.0.777887020922.issue180@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235045964.86.0.492398120281.issue180@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Here's the patch. _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: display_type.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 999 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ajaksu at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 14:27:19 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:27:19 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow Message-ID: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I'd like to chat about the tracker hacking effort a little, so we can work together more efficiently. Knowing how/what people want to contribute allows us to think about what can be done to make it easier. I'll throw a few ideas to get things started, but feel free to discuss anything else :) Right now, I'm working just like I work on Python issues: small patches (that may be incompatible with each other) sent to the (meta) tracker. Maybe using a public DVCS repository (e.g. at Bitbucket) would make sharing our modifications (before SVN commits) easier. What do you think? The same 'public repository' approach can be useful for discussing goals, using the Python wiki or something similar. When fleshed out enough, goals/task should become tickets in the meta tracker, IMO. Does this work for everybody? I'm planning to create a public python-dev instance for testing: that way, we could get useful feedback from people that don't have a local instance running (or are too busy to patch and test). Maybe a buildbot could be set just for restarting the server after commits. Would that be interesting? Martin, would you prefer another setup? Cheers, Daniel From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 14:45:10 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:45:10 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue239] Add 'Stage' to search page In-Reply-To: <1235051110.26.0.105167036009.issue239@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235051110.26.0.105167036009.issue239@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : This patch makes searching for, sorting or grouping by Stage possible. ---------- files: stage_search.diff messages: 1149 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: feature status: unread title: Add 'Stage' to search page _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: stage_search.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 879 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 15:04:36 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:04:36 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue240] Fix 'not closed' search In-Reply-To: <1235052276.47.0.658195032076.issue240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235052276.47.0.658195032076.issue240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : The search by status for 'not closed' currently searches for 'closed' + 'not set' + 'open' instead of pending' + 'not set' + 'open'. Fix attached. ---------- files: notclosed_search.diff messages: 1150 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: bug status: unread title: Fix 'not closed' search _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: notclosed_search.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 756 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 15:14:47 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:14:47 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue125] typing (just) a tracker ID in the search box should go to that issue In-Reply-To: <1235052887.09.0.640250052467.issue125@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235052887.09.0.640250052467.issue125@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : Closing as issue 123 has advanced more. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 status: unread -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 15:20:56 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:20:56 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue219] Please add link to security tracker from main tracker page In-Reply-To: <1221661962.49.0.99429423588.issue219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235053256.4.0.797608188603.issue219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Is this a won't fix or should I work on a patch? ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 16:18:45 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:18:45 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue207] Denote which dependencies issues have been closed In-Reply-To: <1211141168.1.0.612084028465.issue207@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235056725.61.0.297318356205.issue207@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Here's a patch, the template part is OK-ish but the CSS could use some tweaking. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: closed_dependency.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 1334 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 16:49:52 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:49:52 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue189] Tracker Weekly Summary: 'Closed by' sometimes incorrect In-Reply-To: <1203177616.06.0.45592637075.issue189@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235058592.48.0.25590481497.issue189@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: This one could be fixed by using db.history/db.getjournal and retrieving the last entry containing change to 'closed'. Or _issue could grow a _closedby column. IMHO, either would be too much trouble for a pretty unimportant issue. ---------- assignedto: dubois -> nosy: +ajaksu2 -dubois status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 17:12:12 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:12:12 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue172] Traceback exposed in misformed URL In-Reply-To: <1196951026.1.0.157520960574.issue172@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235059932.34.0.316180084708.issue172@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Oh, well, I didn't want to patch roundup-src just yet but I don't like this one. Patch catches KeyError, returns None and handles that downstream. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: misformed_traceback.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 1002 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 17:34:22 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:34:22 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue224] "Search in All Issues" button In-Reply-To: <1223897016.78.0.0580124380517.issue224@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235061262.44.0.834275778053.issue224@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: I really would like to have a "Search in All Issues" button. Having it as a tiny search box under the "Show issue:" one would be enough. I like the idea of having the second search form in the attached file show for user logged in, while anonymous users would see the first one. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 18:09:38 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:09:38 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue202] Edit Queries screen should include a link to the search page In-Reply-To: <1207668185.49.0.108699616732.issue202@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235063378.23.0.0733433997825.issue202@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Instead of a link, the patch adds a text input and 'Add' button. When a user supplies a name, the search page will open with the selected name in "Query name" and a helpful message telling her to click "Search" to save a new query. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: edit_query_add_new.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 636 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 18:58:23 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:58:23 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue165] Preventing 'Broken Pipe' and similar exceptions In-Reply-To: <1193056360.43.0.794459675532.issue165@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235066303.15.0.944103769513.issue165@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Is this still an issue? ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 19:10:00 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:10:00 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <1194626858.37.0.770894714995.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235067000.8.0.620933095711.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Now we have Stages, "confirmation needed" might be an easier way to flag any unconfirmed bugs (and suggest people try reproducing the issue). That would allow two paths to 'test needed': good bug report -> 'test needed' poor bug report -> 'confirmation needed' -> 'test needed' That would avoid the (immediate) need to change the default view. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 19:28:30 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:28:30 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue87] add # of comments to default issue list In-Reply-To: <1173534188.93.0.690515473058.issue87@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235068110.55.0.386499538174.issue87@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: I think the '''"number of comments" or "number of distinct commenters" fields, which you then can also add into the index''' idea is the way to go. New comments or deletions can increase/decrease those fields, which should be pre-populated by a run-once script that counts current messages/commenters. Is this still a wanted feature? ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From martin at v.loewis.de Thu Feb 19 19:47:03 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:47:03 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Making the local instance easier to install In-Reply-To: <2d75d7660902190402w59f50e0di453ad021ec972945@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d75d7660902190402w59f50e0di453ad021ec972945@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <499DA927.3030509@v.loewis.de> > 3 - SpamBayes can be another problem if you already use it (or doesn't > want to), this one I have yet to sort out. A local copy runs fine. It should be possible to disable it, in detectors/config.ini > [new] > 4* - The CIA.vc detector will embarrassingly post your test issues to > http://cia.vc/stats/project/python We should add code to that detector so that it reads some config.ini as well, so you can disable cia if you want to. It probably should be off by default. Regards, Martin From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 19:48:58 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:48:58 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue236] Disable CIA.vc detector by default In-Reply-To: <1235045007.64.0.745186267851.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235069338.09.0.0507982293158.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: The proposed patch is no solution. The live site must not have any local changes to the code that is in subversion. Reading some configuration value from config.ini would be fine. ---------- nosy: +loewis status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 19:49:21 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Georg Brandl) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:49:21 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue87] add # of comments to default issue list In-Reply-To: <1173534188.93.0.690515473058.issue87@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235069361.94.0.911990160208.issue87@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Georg Brandl added the comment: Yes! _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 19:57:16 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:57:16 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue238] Update 'initial_data.py' to match current values In-Reply-To: <1235045063.45.0.472608826025.issue238@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235069836.43.0.860882556642.issue238@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: It's easy to find out the missing ids; then go to the respective URLs, e.g. http://bugs.python.org/stage1 to find out what the original issue was. Some psql results: 1 | Python 2.6 2 | Python 2.5 3 | Python 2.4 4 | Python 2.3 5 | Python 2.2.3 6 | Python 2.2.2 7 | Python 2.2.1 8 | Python 2.2 9 | Python 2.1.2 10 | Python 2.1.1 11 | 3rd party 12 | Python 3.0 13 | Python 3.1 14 | Python 2.7 15 | Python 2.5.3 1 | Build 2 | Demos and Tools 3 | Distutils 4 | Documentation 5 | Extension Modules 6 | IDLE 7 | Installation 8 | Interpreter Core 9 | Library (Lib) 10 | Macintosh 11 | Regular Expressions 12 | Tests 13 | Tkinter 14 | Unicode 15 | Windows 16 | XML 17 | None 18 | Documentation tools (Sphinx) 19 | 2to3 (2.x to 3.0 conversion tool) 20 | 2to3 (2.x to 3.0 conversion tool) 22 | ctypes 1 | py3k 2 | patch 3 | r-eyyy-mond 4 | rfe 5 | 64bit 6 | easy 7 | 26backport 8 | needs review ---------- nosy: +loewis status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From martin at v.loewis.de Thu Feb 19 20:04:19 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:04:19 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <499DAD33.2050305@v.loewis.de> > Right now, I'm working just like I work on Python issues: small > patches (that may be incompatible with each other) sent to the (meta) > tracker. Maybe using a public DVCS repository (e.g. at Bitbucket) > would make sharing our modifications (before SVN commits) easier. What > do you think? I'm not able to use DVCS software. Feel free to set something up, but please continue to submit patches. The way your progress looks like, I'm willing to grant svn write access shortly (assuming you want it). > I'm planning to create a public python-dev instance for testing: that > way, we could get useful feedback from people that don't have a local > instance running (or are too busy to patch and test). Maybe a buildbot > could be set just for restarting the server after commits. Would that > be interesting? Martin, would you prefer another setup? I think you are overestimating the amount of volunteers that you can attract (although I would be happy to be proven wrong). For the moment, I'm just assuming that is just us two. Regards, Martin From asmodai at in-nomine.org Thu Feb 19 20:07:19 2009 From: asmodai at in-nomine.org (Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:07:19 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090219190719.GO91939@nexus.in-nomine.org> -On [20090219 14:27], Daniel (ajax) Diniz (ajaksu at gmail.com) wrote: >Right now, I'm working just like I work on Python issues: small >patches (that may be incompatible with each other) sent to the (meta) >tracker. Maybe using a public DVCS repository (e.g. at Bitbucket) >would make sharing our modifications (before SVN commits) easier. What >do you think? Right now patches might sound better until we really need to get cracking at some major changes or so. Right now I'm just focusing on getting local changes resolved with the 1.4.6 release. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai ????? ?????? ??? ?? ?????? http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B Earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust... From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:10:19 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:10:19 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue236] Disable CIA.vc detector by default In-Reply-To: <1235045007.64.0.745186267851.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235070619.51.0.226287098343.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: That makes sense :) I think having 'TEMPLATE' and 'parameters' either in config.ini or separated files would be neater. But not much real value would be added, so I'm not doing it yet. _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cia_config.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 1427 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:12:10 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:12:10 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue219] Please add link to security tracker from main tracker page In-Reply-To: <1221661962.49.0.99429423588.issue219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235070730.13.0.993806382638.issue219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: If Barry still wants it, we should do it. _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:28:34 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:28:34 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue165] Preventing 'Broken Pipe' and similar exceptions In-Reply-To: <1193056360.43.0.794459675532.issue165@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235071714.52.0.971812445931.issue165@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: No, I haven't seen any such messages in a long time (although I'm unsure whether I'm getting roundup error messages at all). ---------- nosy: +loewis _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:30:39 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:30:39 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <1194626858.37.0.770894714995.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235071839.08.0.311259627219.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Brett, any opinion? ---------- assignedto: -> brett.cannon nosy: +brett.cannon, loewis _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:31:34 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:31:34 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue87] add # of comments to default issue list In-Reply-To: <1235068110.55.0.386499538174.issue87@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <499DB394.4070203@v.loewis.de> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: > Is this still a wanted feature? I think so, yes. ---------- nosy: +loewis _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From martin at v.loewis.de Thu Feb 19 20:31:32 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:31:32 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue87] add # of comments to default issue list In-Reply-To: <1235068110.55.0.386499538174.issue87@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> References: <1235068110.55.0.386499538174.issue87@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <499DB394.4070203@v.loewis.de> > Is this still a wanted feature? I think so, yes. From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:39:25 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Brett C.) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:39:25 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <1194626858.37.0.770894714995.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235072365.97.0.177039406405.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Brett C. added the comment: A stage before *test needed* makes sense. That way an unset Stage means that a triage is needed and we now have a way for people to say "this is triaged in terms of being categorized and such, but I don't know if the bug is valid". Question is what to name it. Should it be "confirmation needed", "confirm", "verify"? I would like a non-native English speaker to make the final call to make sure it makes sense. _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:41:52 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Brett C.) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:41:52 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue241] Rename *test needed* Stage to *unit test needed* In-Reply-To: <1235072512.23.0.847427107108.issue241@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235072512.23.0.847427107108.issue241@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Brett C. : Daniel pointed out that *test needed* is a little misleading. It would be better to rename it to *unit test needed* to make it very clear what that stage represents. I would make the change myself but I don't remember the magical URL to do it. ---------- messages: 1170 nosy: brett.cannon priority: feature status: unread title: Rename *test needed* Stage to *unit test needed* _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From ajaksu at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 20:48:27 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:48:27 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <499DAD33.2050305@v.loewis.de> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> <499DAD33.2050305@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <2d75d7660902191148g7817e2c1gf9e18133ab24a50@mail.gmail.com> "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: > I'm not able to use DVCS software. Feel free to set something up, but > please continue to submit patches. That would be the idea, but we're settling on patches for now. > The way your progress looks like, > I'm willing to grant svn write access shortly (assuming you want it). I'd feel (current_fear_of_doing_something_stupid)**1000, so I'd rather wait as long as necessary for someone to take a look at and/or commit my patches, if that's not too inconvenient. >> I'm planning to create a public python-dev instance for testing: that >> way, we could get useful feedback from people that don't have a local >> instance running (or are too busy to patch and test). Maybe a buildbot >> could be set just for restarting the server after commits. Would that >> be interesting? Martin, would you prefer another setup? > > I think you are overestimating the amount of volunteers that you can > attract (although I would be happy to be proven wrong). For the moment, > I'm just assuming that is just us two. I think the 'coding and testing' team will always be small. I'm counting three of us with Jeroen (who can help with commits). I'm hopeful that Venkatraman will be able to help too. But that would not be the testing instance's goal. I can offer a patch to solve an issue in the meta tracker, but I don't expect most ticket submitters to set a local instance just to see if I got things right. I don't want bugs.python.org to be the testbed either :) So, short of working with screenshots (see attachment :D), I think the easiest way to get feedback from the submitter is to offer a ride on a patched instance. I have at least two patches I'd like feedback on looks (CSS), one for marking closed dependencies and the screenshot attached :) When I go breaking database stuff to add new features on the Roundup side of our tracker, I'd also like to have people complaining/bikeshedding/outraged at a test instance before they start doing so on the real tracker. But this will take a little while to set up :) Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: edit_queries_new.png Type: image/png Size: 9789 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:48:54 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:48:54 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <1235072365.97.0.177039406405.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <499DB7A4.6030004@v.loewis.de> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: > Question is what to name it. Should it be "confirmation needed", "confirm", > "verify"? I would like a non-native English speaker to make the final call to > make sure it makes sense. How about "not yet verified"? _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From martin at v.loewis.de Thu Feb 19 20:48:52 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:48:52 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <1235072365.97.0.177039406405.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> References: <1235072365.97.0.177039406405.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <499DB7A4.6030004@v.loewis.de> > Question is what to name it. Should it be "confirmation needed", "confirm", > "verify"? I would like a non-native English speaker to make the final call to > make sure it makes sense. How about "not yet verified"? From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:51:56 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Brett C.) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:51:56 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <499DB7A4.6030004@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: Brett C. added the comment: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:48, Martin v. L?wis < metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote: > > Martin v. L?wis added the comment: > > > Question is what to name it. Should it be "confirmation needed", > "confirm", > > "verify"? I would like a non-native English speaker to make the final > call to > > make sure it makes sense. > > How about "not yet verified"? Works for me! _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martin at v.loewis.de Thu Feb 19 20:54:20 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiB2LiBMw7Z3aXMi?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:54:20 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <2d75d7660902191148g7817e2c1gf9e18133ab24a50@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> <499DAD33.2050305@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902191148g7817e2c1gf9e18133ab24a50@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <499DB8EC.8030003@v.loewis.de> > I can offer a patch to solve an issue in the meta tracker, but I don't > expect most ticket submitters to set a local instance just to see if I > got things right. I don't want bugs.python.org to be the testbed > either :) It has been so far, and it worked quite well. So I don't worry too much about breaking it - people will notice us fast enough. > So, short of working with screenshots (see attachment :D), I think the > easiest way to get feedback from the submitter is to offer a ride on a > patched instance. I have at least two patches I'd like feedback on > looks (CSS), one for marking closed dependencies and the screenshot > attached :) Don't get me wrong: if you want to set up a public test installation, go ahead! All I'm saying is that I feel it's not necessary (I will continue to test on my local installation, if I test at all). We can also arrange to host a test installation on the upfronthosting machine - although we'll have to restrict access to that machine to very few people. Martin From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 20:59:32 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:59:32 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue237] Make SpamBayes' dummy config more tolerant In-Reply-To: <1235045021.33.0.00810434635886.issue237@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235073572.22.0.884699795743.issue237@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks, committed as r69778 ---------- nosy: +loewis status: unread -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:02:20 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:02:20 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue180] Add creator/assignee to search view In-Reply-To: <1200938043.26.0.777887020922.issue180@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235073740.35.0.342587444058.issue180@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks, committed as r69779 ---------- nosy: +loewis status: chatting -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:04:06 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:04:06 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue239] Add 'Stage' to search page In-Reply-To: <1235051110.26.0.105167036009.issue239@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235073846.83.0.522069594383.issue239@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks, committed as r69780 ---------- nosy: +loewis status: unread -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:06:16 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:06:16 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue240] Fix 'not closed' search In-Reply-To: <1235052276.47.0.658195032076.issue240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235073976.3.0.308183304399.issue240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks, committed as r69781 ---------- nosy: +loewis status: unread -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:11:40 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:11:40 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <1194626858.37.0.770894714995.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235074300.63.0.240286245738.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: I think the more synthetic 'unconfirmed' or 'unverified' would be easier to understand than 'not yet verified' for us Portuguese speakers. OTOH,'not yet' helps delivering a 'just waiting for your help' message. So, in short, I'm not even sure why I posted this :D _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:12:26 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:12:26 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue207] Denote which dependencies issues have been closed In-Reply-To: <1211141168.1.0.612084028465.issue207@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235074346.94.0.298278682223.issue207@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks, committed as r69782. To see this in action, look at http://bugs.python.org/issue2775 ---------- nosy: +loewis status: chatting -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From ajaksu at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 21:21:21 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:21:21 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <499DB8EC.8030003@v.loewis.de> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> <499DAD33.2050305@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902191148g7817e2c1gf9e18133ab24a50@mail.gmail.com> <499DB8EC.8030003@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <2d75d7660902191221v718e827cg8d819156ae6a9cd4@mail.gmail.com> "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> I can offer a patch to solve an issue in the meta tracker, but I don't >> expect most ticket submitters to set a local instance just to see if I >> got things right. I don't want bugs.python.org to be the testbed >> either :) > > It has been so far, and it worked quite well. So I don't worry too much > about breaking it - people will notice us fast enough. > >> So, short of working with screenshots (see attachment :D), I think the >> easiest way to get feedback from the submitter is to offer a ride on a >> patched instance. I have at least two patches I'd like feedback on >> looks (CSS), one for marking closed dependencies and the screenshot >> attached :) > > Don't get me wrong: if you want to set up a public test installation, > go ahead! All I'm saying is that I feel it's not necessary (I will > continue to test on my local installation, if I test at all). OK, I might even become a little more courageous along the way and not set it up. Right now, the idea of a public sandbox sounds great :) > We can also arrange to host a test installation on the upfronthosting > machine - although we'll have to restrict access to that machine to > very few people. I don't think it'd be necessary, but I'd like to know more about the setup of the Python tracker. Things like which server/module is used, which fulltext indexer, how heavily loaded it is, etc. I'll come back asking the right questions when I find them out :) Daniel From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:21:46 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Brett C.) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:21:46 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue207] Denote which dependencies issues have been closed In-Reply-To: <1235074346.94.0.298278682223.issue207@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: Brett C. added the comment: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:12, Martin v. L?wis < metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote: > > Martin v. L?wis added the comment: > > Thanks, committed as r69782. To see this in action, look at > > http://bugs.python.org/issue2775 Very cool! ---------- status: resolved -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:24:12 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:24:12 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue202] Edit Queries screen should include a link to the search page In-Reply-To: <1207668185.49.0.108699616732.issue202@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235075052.22.0.363846423999.issue202@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks, committed as r69783. The usage of ok_message is very clever, and reconfirms how powerful roundup is; please consider contributing that to the standard template of roundup. ---------- nosy: +loewis status: chatting -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:30:24 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:30:24 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue236] Disable CIA.vc detector by default In-Reply-To: <1235045007.64.0.745186267851.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235075424.44.0.71246089386.issue236@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: Thanks for the patch, committed as r69784 ---------- status: chatting -> resolved _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Thu Feb 19 21:34:02 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v._L=C3=B6wis?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:34:02 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue167] Added resolution keyword "confirmed" In-Reply-To: <1235074300.63.0.240286245738.issue167@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <499DC238.60000@v.loewis.de> Martin v. L?wis added the comment: > I think the more synthetic 'unconfirmed' or 'unverified' would be easier to > understand than 'not yet verified' for us Portuguese speakers. OTOH,'not yet' > helps delivering a 'just waiting for your help' message. I thought of "unconfirmed" as well, but that could be misinterpreted as "someone tried confirming it, and it wasn't reproducible". _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From martin at v.loewis.de Thu Feb 19 21:44:01 2009 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiB2LiBMw7Z3aXMi?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:44:01 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <2d75d7660902191221v718e827cg8d819156ae6a9cd4@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> <499DAD33.2050305@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902191148g7817e2c1gf9e18133ab24a50@mail.gmail.com> <499DB8EC.8030003@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902191221v718e827cg8d819156ae6a9cd4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <499DC491.7010309@v.loewis.de> > I don't think it'd be necessary, but I'd like to know more about the > setup of the Python tracker. Things like which server/module is used, > which fulltext indexer, how heavily loaded it is, etc. I'll come back > asking the right questions when I find them out :) Some are easy to answer: - Linux 2.6.17 vserver, Apache 2.2.3, roundup-server, request-forwarding through mod_rewrite (with a bypass for @@file) - fulltext indexer: no idea, how do I tell? - right now: load average ca. 0.3. From Feb 8 to Feb 15, number of accesses to bugs.python.org: 272589 HTH, Martin From ajaksu at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 22:17:18 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:17:18 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <499DC491.7010309@v.loewis.de> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> <499DAD33.2050305@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902191148g7817e2c1gf9e18133ab24a50@mail.gmail.com> <499DB8EC.8030003@v.loewis.de> <2d75d7660902191221v718e827cg8d819156ae6a9cd4@mail.gmail.com> <499DC491.7010309@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <2d75d7660902191317n737accb3p83ddc05f2f360947@mail.gmail.com> "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: >> I don't think it'd be necessary, but I'd like to know more about the >> setup of the Python tracker. Things like which server/module is used, >> which fulltext indexer, how heavily loaded it is, etc. I'll come back >> asking the right questions when I find them out :) > > Some are easy to answer: > - Linux 2.6.17 vserver, Apache 2.2.3, roundup-server, > request-forwarding through mod_rewrite (with a bypass for @@file) Thanks, @@file was fooling me indeed. > - fulltext indexer: no idea, how do I tell? That's a little fuzzy on docs, I think it'll be Xapian if available, the DB otherwise. That'll only make a difference for trying to have those flexible searches, so it's nothing we should worry about now. > - right now: load average ca. 0.3. From Feb 8 to Feb 15, number > of accesses to bugs.python.org: 272589 Nice, I won't even think of stress testing a local instance then, it seems the server is at ease :) Thanks for the info! Daniel From ajaksu at gmail.com Thu Feb 19 23:10:41 2009 From: ajaksu at gmail.com (Daniel (ajax) Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:10:41 -0300 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Tracker hacking workflow In-Reply-To: <20090219190719.GO91939@nexus.in-nomine.org> References: <2d75d7660902190527m6d2d1b57v149cb5c89f4d77b3@mail.gmail.com> <20090219190719.GO91939@nexus.in-nomine.org> Message-ID: <2d75d7660902191410l1b4a9ea4x3a0410c974303cb3@mail.gmail.com> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > Right now patches might sound better until we really need to get cracking at > some major changes or so. OK :) > Right now I'm just focusing on getting local changes resolved with the 1.4.6 > release. Cool, thanks a lot for looking into this. Daniel From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Fri Feb 20 00:16:18 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:16:18 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue225] Ordering of messages is incorrect for some jython issues. In-Reply-To: <1225134556.68.0.873773412263.issue225@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235085378.52.0.70652453927.issue225@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Quoting http://www.roundup-tracker.org/docs/FAQ.html#id15: ''' How is sorting performed, and why does it seem to fail sometimes? When we sort items in the hyperdb, we use one of a number of methods, depending on the properties being sorted on: [...] Note that if an ?order? property is defined on a Class that is used for sorting, all items of that Class must have a value against the ?order? property, or sorting will result in random ordering. ''' Taking a look at the linked issue, it seems to have two oddities compared to other issues I opened inn the Jython tracker: messages with a SpamBayes score of 0 (as opposed to a very small number > 0) and one message with the "In-reply-to" header set. Could you take a look at other problematic issues (didn't find any) and check these, please? ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Fri Feb 20 00:50:42 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:50:42 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue218] Inline Patch options for python-bugs list and roundup email In-Reply-To: <1220585553.16.0.432911761102.issue218@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235087442.76.0.129833395994.issue218@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: I don't think the potential benefits of inlining would be worth the overhead and maintenance burden. It doesn't seem too hard to inline clean ASCII patches, even to check for a maximum size before inlining. But I wouldn't like to have to fix broken inlining of files with invalid chars, mixed line-endings, whatever. If more people ask for attachments (below a maximum size), I'll try to implement it. ---------- nosy: +ajaksu2 _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Fri Feb 20 00:57:48 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Brett C.) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:57:48 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue218] Inline Patch options for python-bugs list and roundup email In-Reply-To: <1220585553.16.0.432911761102.issue218@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235087868.86.0.690759382979.issue218@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Brett C. added the comment: I say we don't worry about this. Use case is not worth the headache of supporting it. _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Sun Feb 22 23:27:04 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:27:04 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue172] Traceback exposed in misformed URL In-Reply-To: <1196951026.1.0.157520960574.issue172@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235341624.08.0.495696479251.issue172@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Ho, it turns out that passing invalid values for fields also hits something similar to this. This new patch handles DB errors for values like 'type':'123123123123' and also catches '@sort0=FRUTA'. It's not finished. I'm creating new issues with a command-line client (will start editing them soon) and more cases will probably be uncovered :) _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: invalid_input.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 4074 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Tue Feb 24 18:00:05 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:00:05 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue242] Add 'Stage' to results page In-Reply-To: <1235494805.03.0.629781097036.issue242@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235494805.03.0.629781097036.issue242@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : This patch adds 'Stage' as a column to the search results when 'Display' is selected (it already worked for '[Group|Sort] on'). Also removes a spurious ' ' from 'Stage' row in the search page. ---------- files: stages_search_display.diff messages: 1187 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: feature status: unread title: Add 'Stage' to results page _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: stages_search_display.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 1626 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Tue Feb 24 18:04:06 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:04:06 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue238] Update 'initial_data.py' to match current values In-Reply-To: <1235045063.45.0.472608826025.issue238@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235495046.69.0.209407019198.issue238@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: Thanks, Martin! It's been a real time saver for my search tests. Here's an updated diff that should allow local instances to have matching IDs for all field values. _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: initial_data_updated.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 7682 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Tue Feb 24 19:26:34 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:26:34 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue243] Add multiselects for searches In-Reply-To: <1235496930.77.0.173448579527.issue243@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235499994.28.0.905674483616.issue243@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: It seems Multilinks (like Keywords, Components and Versions) won't support searches for "ID in [X, 'not selected']" as effortlessly as they support "ID in [X, Y]". Links work fine already. Another item in another ToDo list :) ---------- status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Tue Feb 24 18:35:30 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:35:30 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue243] Add multiselects for searches In-Reply-To: <1235496930.77.0.173448579527.issue243@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235496930.77.0.173448579527.issue243@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : Currently, the search interface doesn't implement an interesting Roundup feature: multi select fields can be queried in an OR fashion. This allows one to search, e.g., for issues with "Version in ['2.5', '2.6', '2.7']" or "Stage in ['patch review', 'not selected']". Right now Version in ['not selected', 'x.y'] ignores the 'not selected' part. However, displaying all these fields as multi selects makes the search page too complicated. I've worked on a couple (unobtrusive) JavaScript and CSS hacks to expose the feature, any feedback would be of great help. The attached page should work OK with JS enabled and degrade gracefully otherwise. It's more of a request for comments, so only I tried to present alternatives (as opposed to optimizing ease-of-use / looks). Here's example SQL currently generated for Stage, I'll look into the Versions issue later. Stage: Allows multiple stages as OR query (comma-separated) * select _issue.id from _issue where ((_issue._stage in (E'3'))) 'not selected' query is weird: * select id from _stage where _name=E'-1' select _issue.id from _issue where (_issue._stage is NULL) ---------- files: issue_search.html messages: 1189 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: wish status: unread title: Add multiselects for searches _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Wed Feb 25 23:00:59 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:00:59 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue244] Any User can hijack other Users' Queries In-Reply-To: <1235599259.83.0.0315928724687.issue244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235599259.83.0.0315928724687.issue244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Daniel Diniz : Any User has the ability to edit or create Queries, which equates to Admin's ability to edit Classes, as far as Queries are concerned. This ignores Query ownership in the CSV interface, allowing one to edit, steal or delete someone else's Queries. Attached patch blocks this path. ---------- files: actions_query.diff messages: 1191 nosy: ajaksu2 priority: urgent status: unread title: Any User can hijack other Users' Queries _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: actions_query.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 776 bytes Desc: not available URL: From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Wed Feb 25 23:10:47 2009 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Daniel Diniz) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:10:47 +0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue244] Any User can hijack other Users' Queries In-Reply-To: <1235599259.83.0.0315928724687.issue244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Message-ID: <1235599847.61.0.875621183596.issue244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> Daniel Diniz added the comment: And this one removes the UI :) I think 'keyword' (implying 'Developer') might not be strict enough... ---------- status: unread -> chatting _______________________________________________________ PSF Meta Tracker _______________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: _generic_index_query.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 613 bytes Desc: not available URL: