From rdmurray at bitdance.com  Fri Dec 18 21:49:50 2009
From: rdmurray at bitdance.com (R. David Murray)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:49:50 -0500
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] tracker privs for Florent Xicluna (flox)
Message-ID: <20091218204950.AB2AE1FA5A8@kimball.webabinitio.net>

I'd like to recommend that Florent Xicluna (tracker username flox) be
given tracker privileges.  He's been very active on the bug tracker and
I think it would be helpful if he could do bug triage.

--David

From georg at python.org  Sat Dec 19 19:17:27 2009
From: georg at python.org (Georg Brandl)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:17:27 +0100
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] tracker privs for Florent Xicluna (flox)
In-Reply-To: <20091218204950.AB2AE1FA5A8@kimball.webabinitio.net>
References: <20091218204950.AB2AE1FA5A8@kimball.webabinitio.net>
Message-ID: <4B2D18B7.9020304@python.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 18.12.2009 21:49, schrieb R. David Murray:
> I'd like to recommend that Florent Xicluna (tracker username flox) be
> given tracker privileges.  He's been very active on the bug tracker and
> I think it would be helpful if he could do bug triage.

I agree.

Georg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkstGLcACgkQN9GcIYhpnLA5PgCggy2kRkqmjQ8PmnL+XCx1TfLJ
FMwAn2/wdqSrooIDBDfRv7aVTXv+4EJL
=yBcG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From brett at python.org  Sun Dec 20 01:29:23 2009
From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:29:23 -0800
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] tracker privs for Florent Xicluna (flox)
In-Reply-To: <20091218204950.AB2AE1FA5A8@kimball.webabinitio.net>
References: <20091218204950.AB2AE1FA5A8@kimball.webabinitio.net>
Message-ID: <bbaeab100912191629q12558d0clb86dc93d6378de6c@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:49, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>wrote:

> I'd like to recommend that Florent Xicluna (tracker username flox) be
> given tracker privileges.  He's been very active on the bug tracker and
> I think it would be helpful if he could do bug triage.
>

Done (and cc'ing Florent on the email address he has registered in the
tracker)!

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20091219/9ab3e08e/attachment.htm>

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Dec 20 05:12:24 2009
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (R David Murray)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:12:24 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue308] xmlrpc server does not seem to be
	using allow_none=True
In-Reply-To: <1261282344.81.0.701981844474.issue308@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <1261282344.81.0.701981844474.issue308@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>


New submission from R David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>:

I'm trying to make use of the xmlrpc interface to the tracker, but I am getting
a Fault from the server:

xmlrpclib.Fault: <Fault 1: 'exceptions.TypeError:cannot marshal None unless
allow_none is enabled'>

Looking at the source in the tracker directory in svn, it looks like it should
be using allow_none=True by default, unless the version of python it is running
under is less than 2.5....

----------
messages: 1490
nosy: r.david.murray
priority: bug
status: unread
title: xmlrpc server does not seem to be using allow_none=True

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue308>
_______________________________________________________

From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za  Sun Dec 20 09:34:31 2009
From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (=?utf-8?q?Martin_v=2E_L=C3=B6wis?=)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:34:31 +0000
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue308] xmlrpc server does not seem to be
	using allow_none=True
In-Reply-To: <1261282344.81.0.701981844474.issue308@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <4B2DE195.9070507@v.loewis.de>


Martin v. L?wis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

> Looking at the source in the tracker directory in svn, it looks like it should
> be using allow_none=True by default, unless the version of python it is running
> under is less than 2.5....

bugs.python.org indeed uses Python 2.4.

----------
nosy: +loewis
status: unread -> chatting

_______________________________________________________
PSF Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue308>
_______________________________________________________

From martin at v.loewis.de  Sun Dec 20 09:34:29 2009
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:34:29 +0100
Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue308] xmlrpc server does not seem to be
 using allow_none=True
In-Reply-To: <1261282344.81.0.701981844474.issue308@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
References: <1261282344.81.0.701981844474.issue308@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Message-ID: <4B2DE195.9070507@v.loewis.de>

> Looking at the source in the tracker directory in svn, it looks like it should
> be using allow_none=True by default, unless the version of python it is running
> under is less than 2.5....

bugs.python.org indeed uses Python 2.4.