[Tracker-discuss] [issue16] Automatic issue expiration

[Tennessee Leeuwenburg]

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>wrote:

>
> > I would agree in general, but not 100% of people operate this way. For
> > example, *I* don't operate this way. I frequently respond to issues a
> > week, two weeks, or even a month later.
>
> Ok, so when you respond, you will have to reopen the issue. No big deal.


Fair enough.


>  > Then I suggest a month ;)
>
> Changing it now is more effort than not changing it. This is bikeshedding.


I hadn't realised it was already in place, I was responding to Senthil's
comments which appeared to be saying that auto-closing was an inherently bad
idea. I thought I'd just help workshop the appropriate closing time. If it's
already implemented then I'm all for calling it done. I still think a month
is better than 14 days, but so what -- done is great!

Cheers,
-T
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20090402/f9291539/attachment.htm>