[Tracker-discuss] [issue141] Should send email on assignment

[Paul Dubois]

Paul Dubois added the comment:

Paul has experience with intellectuals who have beliefs but no experience,
and the many wonderful things that has brought to the world. He has learned
not to scream. (:->

Seriously, I have no problem with this at this point, but note that the bad
effect of something that increases mail is hard to measure, consisting of a
numbing effect that causes mail to be ignored.

On 9/24/07, Erik Forsberg <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za> wrote:
>
>
> Erik Forsberg added the comment:
>
> I intend to solve this by modifying the detectors that send mail so that
> they
> send mail even on property-only changes, to all members of the nosy list.
> This
> will make sure a mail is sent to the assignee when the assignee is
> assigned.
>
> This might take a week or so.
>
> We all know that Paul will now start screaming and kicking, but I'll just
> ignore
> that as I believe this is the right way for a public tracker to behave.
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
> <http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue141>
> _______________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Tracker-discuss mailing list
> Tracker-discuss at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss
>

_______________________________________________________
Meta Tracker <metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
<http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue141>
_______________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20070924/34ae1998/attachment.htm