From seefeld at sympatico.ca Tue Feb 20 01:20:38 2007 From: seefeld at sympatico.ca (Stefan Seefeld) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] status ? Message-ID: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> An error notification I just received through roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za reminded me that there haven't been any updates in recent weeks. What is the status of this project ? Is the migration blocked on anything in particular ? What does it take to unblock ? Thanks, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin... From brett at python.org Tue Feb 20 02:10:54 2007 From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:10:54 -0800 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] status ? In-Reply-To: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> References: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: On 2/19/07, Stefan Seefeld wrote: > An error notification I just received through roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za > reminded me that there haven't been any updates in recent weeks. > What is the status of this project ? Is the migration blocked on anything in particular ? > What does it take to unblock ? > We need docs on how to use the thing. I am going to give an update at PyCon at the PSF general meeting stating that the work is basically done but we need to write the documentation so people know how to file a bug or patch (are we even supporting feature requests? If we are we can keep them for posterity but I honestly think they are useless). We need the docs for python-dev to initially learn what the workflow is expected to be and for anybody who is wants to submit something and has never used Roundup. Once we have those docs we can get clearance from python-dev to do the transition so we don't do it just before or after a release. I was hoping to start working on them in the Python wiki post-PyCon. -Brett From pfdubois at gmail.com Tue Feb 20 18:20:14 2007 From: pfdubois at gmail.com (Paul Dubois) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:20:14 -0800 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] status ? In-Reply-To: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> References: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: The decision was to have keyword(s) denoting that an issue has a patch attached; I think I remember that another keyword could be added to denote that the patch had been verified, but I'm not certain -- I was not a direct party to the discussion and something may have happened via another channel that I did not see. Anyway, it is important according to Martin that the import from sf preserve information about patches. AFAIK we are awaiting the choice of the keyword(s), and modification of the importer. We should be ready to go other than that. I have not seen people need much education, outside of the existing Roundup user guide, as to how to use Roundup. While having a document for python-dev is nice it probably only needs to be a short explanation of the fields that have choices. On 2/19/07, Stefan Seefeld wrote: > > An error notification I just received through > roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za > reminded me that there haven't been any updates in recent weeks. > What is the status of this project ? Is the migration blocked on anything > in particular ? > What does it take to unblock ? > > Thanks, > Stefan > > -- > > ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin... > _______________________________________________ > Tracker-discuss mailing list > Tracker-discuss at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20070220/c55d3180/attachment.htm From martin at v.loewis.de Tue Feb 20 19:12:18 2007 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:12:18 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] status ? In-Reply-To: References: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: <45DB3A02.8030200@v.loewis.de> Paul Dubois schrieb: > The decision was to have keyword(s) denoting that an issue has a patch > attached; This is indeed pending, yet. > I think I remember that another keyword could be added to > denote that the patch had been verified, but I'm not certain I don't think we agreed here. If I find that the attachment is indeed not a proper patch, I would just remove the patch keyword. If it is merely incorrect, this could be put in a comment first, and then wait and see what happens. > I have not seen people need much education, outside of the existing > Roundup user guide, as to how to use Roundup. While having a document > for python-dev is nice it probably only needs to be a short explanation > of the fields that have choices. For python-dev people, yes. All the Python users need to be directed to the rounup installation, rather than SF, in particular as there is no way to turn off the SF tracker. Regards, Martin From brett at python.org Tue Feb 20 21:11:30 2007 From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 12:11:30 -0800 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] status ? In-Reply-To: References: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: On 2/20/07, Paul Dubois wrote: > The decision was to have keyword(s) denoting that an issue has a patch > attached; I think I remember that another keyword could be added to denote > that the patch had been verified, but I'm not certain -- I was not a direct > party to the discussion and something may have happened via another channel > that I did not see. Anyway, it is important according to Martin that the > import from sf preserve information about patches. AFAIK we are awaiting the > choice of the keyword(s), and modification of the importer. We should be > ready to go other than that. > > I have not seen people need much education, outside of the existing Roundup > user guide, as to how to use Roundup. It's not so much using Roundup itself as what we want fields to be set to. > While having a document for python-dev > is nice it probably only needs to be a short explanation of the fields that > have choices. > Yep. I am not thinking of some epic document. Just something that says "In the keywords field, set 'patch' if the issue has a patch", etc. Simple, straightforward, and makes it obvious what the basic workflow is. -Brett > On 2/19/07, Stefan Seefeld wrote: > > An error notification I just received through > roundup-admin at psf.upfronthosting.co.za > > reminded me that there haven't been any updates in recent weeks. > > What is the status of this project ? Is the migration blocked on anything > in particular ? > > What does it take to unblock ? > > > > Thanks, > > Stefan > > > > -- > > > > ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin... > > _______________________________________________ > > Tracker-discuss mailing list > > Tracker-discuss at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tracker-discuss mailing list > Tracker-discuss at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss > > From forsberg at efod.se Wed Feb 21 22:46:12 2007 From: forsberg at efod.se (Erik Forsberg) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:46:12 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] status ? In-Reply-To: (Paul Dubois's message of "Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:20:14 -0800") References: <45DA3ED6.7070905@sympatico.ca> Message-ID: <87k5yb89qz.fsf@uterus.efod.se> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Paul Dubois" writes: > Anyway, it is important according to Martin that the > import from sf preserve information about patches. AFAIK we are awaiting the > choice of the keyword(s), and modification of the importer. We should be > ready to go other than that. The importer has now been modified to set the 'patch' keyword on all issues that had the 'Patches' artifact_type on sf. New import based on xml backup downloaded this evening is currently underway. Regards, \EF - -- Erik Forsberg http://efod.se GPG/PGP Key: 1024D/0BAC89D9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ iD8DBQFF3L2jrJurFAusidkRAliMAKCfqwTErsO5LIT9blIj2PnyiY0ZLgCghX7m F9CcYFRb7sT/8+KIdZSKrLU= =m+vg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za Sun Feb 25 21:40:33 2007 From: metatracker at psf.upfronthosting.co.za (Georg Brandl) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 20:40:33 -0000 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] [issue85] prevent comment duplication Message-ID: <1172436033.61.0.00273271628417.issue85@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> New submission from Georg Brandl: I don't know how complicated that would be, but can it be implemented that if a comment is submitted that exactly is the same as the previous comment, it is not added to the bug? (other changes to metadata could be made though) I've seen this frequently with the SF.net tracker, obviously because of some user-side reload/back-forward issues. ---------- messages: 412 nosy: gbrandl priority: feature status: unread title: prevent comment duplication ______________________________________________________ Meta Tracker ______________________________________________________ From brett at python.org Sun Feb 25 22:22:58 2007 From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:22:58 -0600 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] status of switch to Roundup off of SF Message-ID: When I gave the PSF members an update on the work to move the python-dev tracker over to Roundup Andrew Kuchling asked me to also send an email to python-dev since October/November. As of right now the biggest thing holding up the transition is documentation. A doc needs to get written explaining basic workflow of how issues should be handled. Also need to go through and remove SF references and make them more general (e.g., mention an "issue tracker" when possible). After that some redirects need to be tweaked. www.python.org/sf/ needs to redirect to the Roundup installation (which is keeping SF bug numbers). bugs.python.org will also be set to point to the Roundup server. After all of that we will find out from Anthony and Neal when a release is going to be so as to do the switch when it won't run into a release (before or after). The current test tracker is at http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/tracker/ . The meta tracker for dealing with this stuff is at http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/ . Feel free to have a look, but please don't go overboard with the suggestions on changes. It is not difficult to change the tracker after it launches. The last thing any of us want to see is the tracker launch delayed because someone wants a feature that takes a while to implement. Unless there is a critical issue you find it would be appreciated if you file the suggestion and just let us push after the launch if it is deemed it will take too much time to implement. The mailing list where all discussions take place is http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-discuss . Fairly low-traffic although all updates to the meta tracker get sent there. Obviously if you have questions feel free to ask. And if you want to help with getting the switch to happen just speak up. =) -Brett From Doug.Napoleone at nuance.com Wed Feb 28 01:19:18 2007 From: Doug.Napoleone at nuance.com (Napoleone, Doug) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Vanilla Roundup instance for PyCon issues Message-ID: <37E3DF6920CC664D924AFA9966C33EE86D01D8@bn-exchdmz> Hello, We really need a bug tracking system for the PyCon and python.org sites. The old trac for python.org was taken down due to spamers. We don't need anything special, we don't need it connected to the pythod-dev stuff, a generic instance should do the job. How hard would this be to set up? Who do I talk to about getting this done? The svn for the pycon apps is currently: https://svn.python.org/conference/django/trunk/ Thanks in advance! -Doug Napoleone From roche at upfrontsystems.co.za Wed Feb 28 08:25:16 2007 From: roche at upfrontsystems.co.za (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roch=E9?= Compaan) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:25:16 +0200 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Vanilla Roundup instance for PyCon issues In-Reply-To: <37E3DF6920CC664D924AFA9966C33EE86D01D8@bn-exchdmz> References: <37E3DF6920CC664D924AFA9966C33EE86D01D8@bn-exchdmz> Message-ID: <1172647516.26201.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 19:19 -0500, Napoleone, Doug wrote: > Hello, > We really need a bug tracking system for the PyCon and python.org sites. > The old trac for python.org was taken down due to spamers. We don't need > anything special, we don't need it connected to the pythod-dev stuff, a > generic instance should do the job. > > How hard would this be to set up? Who do I talk to about getting this done? > > The svn for the pycon apps is currently: > https://svn.python.org/conference/django/trunk/ > > Thanks in advance! We're happy to set up another tracker instance on the Roundup server that will eventually host the PSF tracker. Do you have a URL that you can point to the tracker or would http://roundup.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/pycon be ok? -- Roch? Compaan Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za From forsberg at efod.se Wed Feb 28 09:31:12 2007 From: forsberg at efod.se (Erik Forsberg) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:31:12 +0100 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Vanilla Roundup instance for PyCon issues In-Reply-To: <1172647516.26201.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <37E3DF6920CC664D924AFA9966C33EE86D01D8@bn-exchdmz> <1172647516.26201.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <200702280931.12721.forsberg@efod.se> onsdag 28 februari 2007 08:25 skrev Roch? Compaan: > We're happy to set up another tracker instance on the Roundup server > that will eventually host the PSF tracker. Do you have a URL that you > can point to the tracker or would > http://roundup.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/pycon be ok? Just for clarity - will Upfront take responsibility for the maintenance of this tracker? I remember that we discussed adding more trackers, and if I remember correctly, we agreed that we wanted to know who is responsible for each tracker. Regards, \EF -- http://efod.se/ From roche at upfrontsystems.co.za Wed Feb 28 10:26:21 2007 From: roche at upfrontsystems.co.za (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roch=E9?= Compaan) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:21 +0200 Subject: [Tracker-discuss] Vanilla Roundup instance for PyCon issues In-Reply-To: <200702280931.12721.forsberg@efod.se> References: <37E3DF6920CC664D924AFA9966C33EE86D01D8@bn-exchdmz> <1172647516.26201.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200702280931.12721.forsberg@efod.se> Message-ID: <1172654781.26201.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:31 +0100, Erik Forsberg wrote: > onsdag 28 februari 2007 08:25 skrev Roch? Compaan: > > We're happy to set up another tracker instance on the Roundup server > > that will eventually host the PSF tracker. Do you have a URL that you > > can point to the tracker or would > > http://roundup.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/pycon be ok? > > Just for clarity - will Upfront take responsibility for the maintenance of > this tracker? We will, if none of the current administrators want to. It is a vanilla instance so I don't foresee that it will require to much work or maintenance. -- Roch? Compaan Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za