[Tracker-discuss] Reminder: please review tracker schema !

[Brett Cannon]

On 11/30/06, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld at sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> Paul Dubois wrote:
> > It isn't reasonable to expect users to use the web page; in fact it is
> > roundup's big advantage that they do not. Perhaps your working situation
> > is different, but for us this fact was the one single thing that made
> > Roundup work where other bug trackers had failed.
>
> Yes, yes, I think we all agree that the mail gateway is a Good Thing.


Yes.

I'm not sure, though, what we are arguing about now, given that we
> seem to agree *not* to use a 'has_patch' flag, but instead use the
> status to control the work-flow, i.e. let assignees look at an attachment
> in order to triage the issue.
>
> Am I missing something ?


I think at this point people are saying that they don't think that the email
gateway will be used  very much for *creating* new issues and thus we should
not bend over backwards to accomodate it for that purpose.  If that turns
out to be a wrong assumption than we can change things.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20061130/de8ada28/attachment.html