[Tracker-discuss] Feature/Change request handling procedure

[Brett Cannon]

On 11/30/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>
> Stefan Seefeld schrieb:
> > OK, then what about
> >
> > new -> open -> needs_patch_review -> needs_feedback -> closed
>
> That should work. For bugs, something similar should exist:
> how about "confirmed"?


That would be good since bugs need to be verified as  one that can be
reproduced.  I guess that would be a parallel, but mutually exclusive, step
to needs_path_review?  Or should we name it something like needs_patch to be
more explicit?

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/attachments/20061130/8a96455c/attachment.html