From modestdev at gmail.com Mon Jan 9 06:21:24 2017 From: modestdev at gmail.com (md) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:21:24 +0300 Subject: [stdlib-sig] gzip compression in http.server Message-ID: Hi, current implementation of http.server does not have gzip compression. http.server was previously called SimpleHttpServer and that means that it is supposed to be simple, but I've implemented gzip compression for http.server in my project and I can contribute it back to stdlib if it's necessary. What do you think? Thanks! Nick. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brett at python.org Mon Jan 9 15:28:35 2017 From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon) Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 20:28:35 +0000 Subject: [stdlib-sig] gzip compression in http.server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for the offer, Nick, but for me personally I don't think it's necessary. As you pointed out, http.server is meant to be simple and so worrying about gzip compression for something that's served over localhost doesn't seem worth the maintenance burden. On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 at 12:26 md wrote: > Hi, > current implementation of http.server does not have gzip compression. > http.server was previously called SimpleHttpServer and that means that it > is supposed to be simple, > but I've implemented gzip compression for http.server in my project and I > can contribute it back to stdlib if it's necessary. > > What do you think? > > Thanks! > > Nick. > _______________________________________________ > stdlib-sig mailing list > stdlib-sig at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: