[stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library

[Yuvgoog Greenle]

I'm not sure exactly how your logging API would look, but is there a PyPI
logging module that you would recommend or something similar? It sounds as
though the logging module could have a Class for handling logging
differently as you would propose. Though I'm not sure what that is.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:

>
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Armin Ronacher wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> Raymond Hettinger schrieb:
>>
>>> I think we way just have to live with that one.
>>> While I'm no fan of the logging module, it is widely used.
>>> It was based on a Java version and Guido blessed it early-on.
>>>
>> I'm not insane enough to seriously consider replacing it.  I just wanted
>> to point out why I never wrote a ticket / mail to a mailing list in the
>> first place.
>>
>
>
> That's good.  For a moment, I thought you had lost your marbles ;-)
>
>
> Raymond
>
> _______________________________________________
> stdlib-sig mailing list
> stdlib-sig at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/attachments/20090918/e002300c/attachment-0001.htm>