From hannon at hannonjewelers.com Fri Mar 4 00:55:02 2011 From: hannon at hannonjewelers.com (Hannon Jewelers) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:55:02 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Window 7 prof Message-ID: <001001cbd9fe$6b079250$4116b6f0$@com> Do you have a version to work with Window 7 professional? If so, what is the one? Bayardo Hannon Jir?n Certified Gemologist Appraiser-AGS Hannon Jewelers 8430 Bluebonnet Blvd Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70810 225.766.8242 Please visit www.hannonjewelers.com hannon new jewelers logo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2426 bytes Desc: not available URL: From amedee at vangasse.eu Sun Mar 6 10:57:46 2011 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 10:57:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Spambayes] Window 7 prof In-Reply-To: <001001cbd9fe$6b079250$4116b6f0$@com> References: <001001cbd9fe$6b079250$4116b6f0$@com> Message-ID: <071657fbbf68cf407184c22a113d3d84.squirrel@amedee.be> On Fri, March 4, 2011 00:55, Hannon Jewelers wrote: > Do you have a version to work with Window 7 professional? If so, what is > the one? Here you go: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/index.html From dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com Tue Mar 8 22:34:38 2011 From: dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com (Dale Schroeder) Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:34:38 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] ham,Re: Bug solution for Spambayes. In-Reply-To: <19816.3717.813624.474521@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <4D64295F.90901@gmx.de> <19816.3717.813624.474521@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <4D76A0EE.9020701@BriannasSaladDressing.com> On 02/25/2011 2:18 PM, skip at pobox.com wrote: > Johann> I have some problems with my sourceforge account, therefore I > Johann> contact you this way. > > Johann, > > I am on holiday, just sneaking a peek at my email. Based on your traceback, > I went ahead and finished off a change suggested recently which should solve > the problem. I incorporated the Python 2.5 versions of the asynchat and > asyncore modules into SpamBayes as the API of those modules changed in > incompatible ways in Python 2.6. > > I made a new source release of SpamBayes, 1.1b1. Please give that a try. > If you continue to have problems, please send an email to > spambayes-dev at python.org. I won't be checking mail much in the next several > days. > I tried the new version today, building a .deb with python-stdeb on Debian Wheezy. Although the build happens and the correct dependencies are applied, this is what I got when I tried to run it. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 96, in from spambayes import Dibbler File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 186, in from spambayes import asyncore, asynchat ImportError: cannot import name asyncore Dale From skip at pobox.com Wed Mar 9 02:28:59 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:28:59 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] ham,Re: Bug solution for Spambayes. In-Reply-To: <4D76A0EE.9020701@BriannasSaladDressing.com> References: <4D64295F.90901@gmx.de> <19816.3717.813624.474521@montanaro.dyndns.org> <4D76A0EE.9020701@BriannasSaladDressing.com> Message-ID: <19830.55259.401408.494213@montanaro.dyndns.org> Dale> Although the build happens and the correct dependencies are Dale> applied, this is what I got when I tried to run it. Dale> Traceback (most recent call last): Dale> File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 96, in Dale> from spambayes import Dibbler Dale> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 186, in Dale> from spambayes import asyncore, asynchat Dale> ImportError: cannot import name asyncore Hmmm... Looks like asyncore (and probably asynchat) probably didn't make it into the distribution. I maybe have a messed up manifest. I'll take a look. Skip From johnnieburg at msn.com Fri Mar 11 01:56:52 2011 From: johnnieburg at msn.com (John Nieburg) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] (no subject) Message-ID: Dear Folks, I have downloaded spambayes, but when I open Outlook I get a message saying There was an error initializing the spam bayes addin. Please restart Outlook and try again. I repeatedly get this message, and there are no spambayes blocks on the upper part of the screen. What shall I do to install the program properly? Thanks, John Nieburg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Fri Mar 11 16:26:14 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:26:14 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] (no subject) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <19834.16150.999530.994882@montanaro.dyndns.org> John> I have downloaded spambayes, but when I open Outlook I get a John> message saying There was an error initializing the spam bayes John> addin. Please restart Outlook and try again. I repeatedly get this John> message, and there are no spambayes blocks on the upper part of John> the screen. John> What shall I do to install the program properly? What versions of Windows, Outlook and SpamBayes are you using? Are the Windows and Outlook versions 64-bit or 32-bit? -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From johnnieburg at msn.com Fri Mar 11 21:18:39 2011 From: johnnieburg at msn.com (John Nieburg) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <19834.16150.999530.994882@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: Skip, Thanks for the reply.I am running Windows 7, Outlook is version 2003, my new computer uses 64 bit Windows, IE version 8, but I am not sure about the bits on Outlook. I hope this helps. John -----Original Message----- From: skip at pobox.com [mailto:skip at pobox.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:26 AM To: John Nieburg Cc: spambayes at python.org Subject: Re: [Spambayes] (no subject) John> I have downloaded spambayes, but when I open Outlook I get a John> message saying There was an error initializing the spam bayes John> addin. Please restart Outlook and try again. I repeatedly get this John> message, and there are no spambayes blocks on the upper part of John> the screen. John> What shall I do to install the program properly? What versions of Windows, Outlook and SpamBayes are you using? Are the Windows and Outlook versions 64-bit or 32-bit? -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From skip at pobox.com Fri Mar 11 22:18:03 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:18:03 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] (no subject) In-Reply-To: References: <19834.16150.999530.994882@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <19834.37259.214651.749211@montanaro.dyndns.org> John> I am running Windows 7, Outlook is version 2003, my new computer John> uses 64 bit Windows, IE version 8, but I am not sure about the John> bits on Outlook. John, I'm afraid I have bad (or at least not good) news for you. It looks like running on 64-bit Windows isn't well sorted out. If you Google for "SpamBayes x64" you'll see some threads related to this problem. For example: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2010-June/thread.html#22818 Unfortunately, I suspect it will require some serious Windows mojo (which I certainly don't have) to solve this problem. -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From philipx at earthlink.net Thu Mar 17 18:00:35 2011 From: philipx at earthlink.net (Philip Xanthopoulos) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:00:35 -0700 Subject: [Spambayes] Compatibility Issue Message-ID: <4D823E33.8020700@earthlink.net> I am using a Lenovo Laptop T61 32 bit with VISTA (soon to be changed to Win7). My mail server is Thunderbird v3.1.9. I tried to load SpamBayes and receive a message indicating it is not compatible with Thunderbird 3.1.9. I got SpamBayes to work when I was back on the east coast using another computer so I am confident there is a work around. Can you help? (again) lol Thank you, -- Phil Phil Xanthopoulos, CFP? 484-366-1006 philipx at earthlink.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Phil Signature_1 (2).jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 50272 bytes Desc: not available URL: From skip at pobox.com Thu Mar 17 19:15:04 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Compatibility Issue In-Reply-To: <4D823E33.8020700@earthlink.net> References: <4D823E33.8020700@earthlink.net> Message-ID: <19842.20392.232808.10174@montanaro.dyndns.org> Phil> I am using a Lenovo Laptop T61 32 bit with VISTA (soon to be Phil> changed to Win7). My mail server is Thunderbird v3.1.9. I tried to Phil> load SpamBayes and receive a message indicating it is not Phil> compatible with Thunderbird 3.1.9. I got SpamBayes to work when I Phil> was back on the east coast using another computer so I am Phil> confident there is a work around. Can you help? (again) lol Phil, Please try ThunderBayes++. There is a link in the table on this page: http://www.spambayes.org/ Note that the original ThunderBayes is outdated and doesn't work with TBird 3, as you discovered. -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From bruce at johnsonclan.net Fri Mar 18 23:08:22 2011 From: bruce at johnsonclan.net (Bruce) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:08:22 -0700 Subject: [Spambayes] I miss my Spambayes:( I have win7 x64... Message-ID: <0bcb01cbe5b8$ffc4ecb0$ff4ec610$@net> Is there anyways, with out dropping down to 32bit, that I can get win7 64 bit with Outlook 2007 working? I run this on a Lenovo Thinkpad t500 with a 2 duo CPU. I am wondering if the POPSERVER method might work. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From beth at admin-resource.com Mon Mar 21 15:19:38 2011 From: beth at admin-resource.com (Beth Hrusch) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? Message-ID: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> I work with a few writers who have a lot of experience writing about your industry. If you want, I could have one of them write a free, custom blog post or article for spambayes.sourceforge.net. The article could be written about free spam filter - or any other topic you choose. Before we send you the article to review, it would first be scanned by Copyscape software to ensure 100% originality, and reviewed by a professional editor to ensure high quality. If you decide to publish it on your site, we would just ask you to mention the author's name at the bottom of the article and link to this category on our yoexpert.com website (we will give you the category link later.) Just let me know what topic you'd like the article written about. If you have a specific page title in mind, that's even better, but not necessary. Feel free to reply or give me a call if you have any questions, Thanks! Beth Beth Hrusch Senior Editor www.yoexpert.com 888-864-8398 From skip at pobox.com Mon Mar 21 17:53:55 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? In-Reply-To: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> References: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> Message-ID: <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> Beth> I work with a few writers who have a lot of experience writing Beth> about your industry. If you want, I could have one of them write a Beth> free, custom blog post or article for spambayes.sourceforge.net. ... This sounds like a content farm to me. Google recently got a lot of press for recent changes to their search engine which dramatically lowered the score (and thus placement in search results) of such sites. Does anyone here have any experience with yoexpert.com? Or is this some other sort of scam? I can't believe there is a company with lots of writers just sitting around waiting to do us a favor. Skip From amedee at vangasse.eu Tue Mar 22 11:41:53 2011 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:41:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? In-Reply-To: <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: On Mon, March 21, 2011 17:53, skip at pobox.com wrote: > > Beth> I work with a few writers who have a lot of experience writing > Beth> about your industry. If you want, I could have one of them write > a > Beth> free, custom blog post or article for spambayes.sourceforge.net. > > ... > > This sounds like a content farm to me. Google recently got a lot of press > for recent changes to their search engine which dramatically lowered the > score (and thus placement in search results) of such sites. Does anyone > here have any experience with yoexpert.com? > > Or is this some other sort of scam? I can't believe there is a company > with > lots of writers just sitting around waiting to do us a favor. Disregard my previous email. All pages on http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki are marked as Immutable page. From amedee at vangasse.eu Tue Mar 22 11:38:18 2011 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:38:18 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? In-Reply-To: <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <563f1e136a51ef963330fdfecf62a59b.squirrel@amedee.be> On Mon, March 21, 2011 17:53, skip at pobox.com wrote: > > Beth> I work with a few writers who have a lot of experience writing > Beth> about your industry. If you want, I could have one of them write > a > Beth> free, custom blog post or article for spambayes.sourceforge.net. > > ... > > This sounds like a content farm to me. Google recently got a lot of press > for recent changes to their search engine which dramatically lowered the > score (and thus placement in search results) of such sites. Does anyone > here have any experience with yoexpert.com? > > Or is this some other sort of scam? I can't believe there is a company > with > lots of writers just sitting around waiting to do us a favor. They don't even need permission. Anyone can edit the wiki at http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki -- Amedee From richie at entrian.com Tue Mar 22 11:51:58 2011 From: richie at entrian.com (Richie Hindle) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:51:58 +0000 Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? In-Reply-To: References: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: [Amedee] > All pages on http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki are marked as Immutable page. Ouch. They should only be marked as Immutable if you're not logged in, but the login form was broken... now fixed. (That explains why I haven't found any spam on there for a while!) -- Richie Hindle richie at entrian.com http://entrian.com/blog http://twitter.com/richiehindle From skip at pobox.com Tue Mar 22 14:19:49 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? In-Reply-To: References: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <19848.41461.732798.233734@montanaro.dyndns.org> >> All pages on http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki are marked as Immutable >> page. Richie> Ouch. They should only be marked as Immutable if you're not Richie> logged in, but the login form was broken... now fixed. Richie> (That explains why I haven't found any spam on there for a Richie> while!) Note also that the note I received specifically referred to the spambayes.sourceforge.net website, not the wiki. I still think the "offer" is likely to be a scam, or if not completely a scam, an attempt to get their pages ranked high in Google searches so they can sell more ads. Skip From amedee at vangasse.eu Tue Mar 22 15:09:47 2011 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:09:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? In-Reply-To: References: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> <19848.41461.732798.233734@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <90717bdf0c93b13f8a3b09cf0aacdfd4.squirrel@amedee.be> On Tue, March 22, 2011 14:24, Richie Hindle wrote: > [Skip] >> [...] an attempt to get their pages ranked high in Google searches so >> they >> can sell more ads. > > Yes. I read it as "We'll give you some hastily knocked-together > article that adds no value to the world, and you give us an inlink > from your nice PR6 site." No thanks. Yes. I guess they haven't taken a look at the website. Prior research of their targets would have yielded better results, if they were legit. Now it just looks like a semi-automated mail based om some keywords they pulled from sf.net. Anyway: ONE good thing has come from it: the wiki was broken, now it's fixed. -- Amedee From richie at entrian.com Tue Mar 22 14:24:21 2011 From: richie at entrian.com (Richie Hindle) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:24:21 +0000 Subject: [Spambayes] Would you accept a free guest article or blog post for spambayes.sourceforge.net? In-Reply-To: <19848.41461.732798.233734@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <20110321101938.-985669687@admin-resource.com> <19847.33443.682424.933318@montanaro.dyndns.org> <19848.41461.732798.233734@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: [Skip] > [...] an attempt to get their pages ranked high in Google searches so they > can sell more ads. Yes. I read it as "We'll give you some hastily knocked-together article that adds no value to the world, and you give us an inlink from your nice PR6 site." No thanks. -- Richie Hindle richie at entrian.com http://entrian.com/blog http://twitter.com/richiehindle From amedee at vangasse.eu Thu Mar 24 13:45:57 2011 From: amedee at vangasse.eu (Amedee Van Gasse) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:45:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Spambayes] UnboundLocalError: local variable 'math' referenced before assignment Message-ID: <82c2e8c0fff5a6a7234781c59a222a85.squirrel@amedee.be> FYI, it's not really a support request. Everything seems to be working just fine. I noticed this in my procmail log. Any ideas/comments? I guess that this is related to "header_score_logarithm=True" that I recently added in my .spambayesrc Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 5, in pkg_resources.run_script('spambayes==1.1a6', 'sb_filter.py') File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 489, in run_script if dist.key not in keys2: File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1207, in run_script NullProvider.__init__(self,module) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.5.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/sb_filter.py", line 277, in main() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.5.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/sb_filter.py", line 268, in main action(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.5.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/sb_filter.py", line 186, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.5.egg/spambayes/hammie.py", line 149, in filter debug, train) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes-1.1a6-py2.5.egg/spambayes/hammie.py", line 124, in score_and_filter x = -math.log10(1.0-prob) UnboundLocalError: local variable 'math' referenced before assignment procmail: Program failure (1) of "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py" procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded -- From ej.spambayes at indicium.org Thu Mar 24 18:11:27 2011 From: ej.spambayes at indicium.org (Eric Johnson) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:11:27 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Outlook plugin and SSL... Message-ID: <4D8B7B3F.7070304@indicium.org> Can Outlook and the Spambayes plugin make use of an SSL connection through port 995 to receive email? Thanks, Eric From skip at pobox.com Thu Mar 24 21:21:56 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Outlook plugin and SSL... In-Reply-To: <4D8B7B3F.7070304@indicium.org> References: <4D8B7B3F.7070304@indicium.org> Message-ID: <19851.42980.205366.462210@montanaro.dyndns.org> Eric> Can Outlook and the Spambayes plugin make use of an SSL connection Eric> through port 995 to receive email? (Sorry if this is a duplicate. I fat-fingered something and my first reply went away. It doesn't look like it was sent, but stranger things have happened.) Unless I misunderstand what you're asking, SpamBayes has nothing to do with how mail is received in your setup. That's Outlook's job. If you were using the POP3 proxy things would/might be different. -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From ej.spambayes at indicium.org Thu Mar 24 23:55:47 2011 From: ej.spambayes at indicium.org (Eric Johnson) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:55:47 -0600 Subject: [Spambayes] Outlook plugin and SSL... In-Reply-To: <19851.42980.205366.462210@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <4D8B7B3F.7070304@indicium.org> <19851.42980.205366.462210@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <4D8BCBF3.5040007@indicium.org> On 11-03-24 02:21 PM, skip at pobox.com wrote: > > Eric> Can Outlook and the Spambayes plugin make use of an SSL connection > Eric> through port 995 to receive email? > > (Sorry if this is a duplicate. I fat-fingered something and my first reply > went away. It doesn't look like it was sent, but stranger things have > happened.) > > Unless I misunderstand what you're asking, SpamBayes has nothing to do with > how mail is received in your setup. That's Outlook's job. If you were > using the POP3 proxy things would/might be different. > I was aware that the POP3 proxy was unable to deal with SSL connections and different port. I was wondering if the Outlook plugin had the same issues... Thanks for the info... Eric From hecht3 at verizon.net Thu Mar 24 23:31:26 2011 From: hecht3 at verizon.net (Laurence Hecht) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] Why does Spam Bayes misclassify good email? Message-ID: <8ECE5FDA22B9404B9CDC891CD7B6E09D@Larry> I have two friends whose emails always end up in my deleted file. What can I do? Larry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Fri Mar 25 00:41:42 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Spambayes] Why does Spam Bayes misclassify good email? In-Reply-To: <8ECE5FDA22B9404B9CDC891CD7B6E09D@Larry> References: <8ECE5FDA22B9404B9CDC891CD7B6E09D@Larry> Message-ID: <19851.54966.670449.807148@montanaro.dyndns.org> Larry> I have two friends whose emails always end up in my deleted Larry> file. What can I do? You can retrain from scratch. There is the possibility that at some point you made mistakes when training. (I have done that many times myself.) -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/ From hecht3 at verizon.net Fri Mar 25 00:55:06 2011 From: hecht3 at verizon.net (Laurence Hecht) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Spambayes] Why does Spam Bayes misclassify good email? In-Reply-To: <19851.54966.670449.807148@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: Thanks. Larry -----Original Message----- From: skip at pobox.com [mailto:skip at pobox.com] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:42 PM To: Laurence Hecht Cc: spambayes at python.org Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Why does Spam Bayes misclassify good email? Larry> I have two friends whose emails always end up in my deleted Larry> file. What can I do? You can retrain from scratch. There is the possibility that at some point you made mistakes when training. (I have done that many times myself.) -- Skip Montanaro - skip at pobox.com - http://www.smontanaro.net/