[Spambayes] Is Equal Ham & Spam really the best?
David Abrahams
dave at boost-consulting.com
Sun Jul 29 20:25:46 CEST 2007
on Fri Jul 27 2007, skip-AT-pobox.com wrote:
> Brendon> I've just started using spambayes again after a while away from
> Brendon> it. Now, 3 days in, I notice that I've trained on far more
> Brendon> spam than ham. (Total emails trained: Spam: *432* Ham: *64) I
> Brendon> seem to remember that this was previously my experience in the
> Brendon> past.
>
> Are you training on every message you receive or just the mistakes? Most
> people generally only train on the mistakes and unsures. Your ratio is
> about 7:1. That's a bit high.
Even training only on mistakes and unsures, I have had a steadily
increasing ratio for months. I almost never see a misclassified ham
and only very rarely a ham about which the system is unsure. It's
unsure about spam every day.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com
The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
More information about the SpamBayes
mailing list