[Spambayes] Spam clues for 0% spam

Kenny Pitt kennypitt at hotmail.com
Mon Dec 13 17:06:34 CET 2004


Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I suppose the interesting thing was that it actually scored a solid
> 0.0 for you, not that it needed training.

Yep.  This is the first time since I started my training over from scratch a
couple of months ago that any spam has scored less than Unsure.  After
training, though, the message went from a solid 0% to a solid 100%.  It'll
be interesting to see what happens next time somebody mentions Google in a
real message (oops, guess I just did <wink>).

-- 
Kenny Pitt



More information about the Spambayes mailing list