From skip at pobox.com Sun Jan 23 05:18:49 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:18:49 -0600 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Include Python 2.5 asyncore/asynchat in SpamBayes Message-ID: <19771.44073.135333.43391@montanaro.dyndns.org> Python's asyncore (and, I think, asynchat) module changed in incompatible ways in Python 2.6. This causes problems for at least sb_server.py because it accesses an attribute (ac_out_buffer) which was removed. This came to a head because Debian no longer supports Python 2.5. Their suggestion was to include the 2.5 versions of asyncore and asynchat with SpamBayes. Does this fly with the other developers? Skip From skippy.hammond at gmail.com Tue Jan 25 03:41:54 2011 From: skippy.hammond at gmail.com (Mark Hammond) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:41:54 -1000 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Include Python 2.5 asyncore/asynchat in SpamBayes In-Reply-To: <19771.44073.135333.43391@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <19771.44073.135333.43391@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <4D3E3872.2060403@gmail.com> On 22/01/2011 6:18 PM, skip at pobox.com wrote: > > Python's asyncore (and, I think, asynchat) module changed in incompatible > ways in Python 2.6. This causes problems for at least sb_server.py because > it accesses an attribute (ac_out_buffer) which was removed. > > This came to a head because Debian no longer supports Python 2.5. Their > suggestion was to include the 2.5 versions of asyncore and asynchat with > SpamBayes. > > Does this fly with the other developers? > > Skip It seems the most pragmatic option given the lack of resources this project currently enjoys ;) Mark From richie at entrian.com Tue Jan 25 11:45:01 2011 From: richie at entrian.com (Richie Hindle) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:45:01 +0000 Subject: [spambayes-dev] Include Python 2.5 asyncore/asynchat in SpamBayes In-Reply-To: <4D3E3872.2060403@gmail.com> References: <19771.44073.135333.43391@montanaro.dyndns.org> <4D3E3872.2060403@gmail.com> Message-ID: [Skip] > include the 2.5 versions of asyncore and asynchat with > SpamBayes. Does this fly with the other developers? [Mark] > It seems the most pragmatic option given the lack of resources this project > currently enjoys ;) I agree - it's a sensible plan. -- Richie Hindle richie at entrian.com http://entrian.com/blog http://twitter.com/richiehindle