From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 2 17:11:00 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 08:11:00 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1819910 ] AttributeError, get_statistics_start_date Message-ID: Bugs item #1819910, was opened at 2007-10-25 06:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by heres4 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1819910&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Peter Bengtsson (peterbe) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: AttributeError, get_statistics_start_date Initial Comment: python2.5 in Ubuntu I start sb_server and just enter the remove server and remote proxy and press the Save button. Then I get this error: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 476, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 888, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 587, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 1007, in _recreateState prepare() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 1022, in prepare state.prepare(can_stop) File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 822, in prepare self.createWorkers() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 889, in createWorkers self.stats = Stats.Stats(options, self.mdb) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 60, in __init__ self.from_date = self.messageinfo_db.get_statistics_start_date() AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_statistics_start_date' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Miller (heres4) Date: 2008-02-02 11:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1000620 Originator: NO Wow, this is an ugly one (quote from spambayes.message.Message: This whole message info database thing is a real mess). Anyway, the fix is to do this in State.close() method of sb_server.py: spambayes.message.Message().message_info_db = None instead of this: spambayes.message.Message.message_info_db = None Notice the difference? spambayes.message.Message.message_info_db should be a class attribute, but it's a property (see the Message class for the messy details). The latter statement creates a class attribute, which blows away the property object. At that point the logic to create a new message_info_db is hidden forever in Message._get_class_message_info_db() which will never be called again. It would probably be good to at least make a set of public class methods on Message for managing the message_info_db so we don't need to use such a hackish way to discard the old one and/or create a new one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Head Geek (chadaaronnelson) Date: 2008-01-27 19:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1993365 Originator: NO I ran into this today too. I tracked it down to sbserver.py, the close() function of the State class: if self.mdb is not None: self.mdb.store() self.mdb.close() self.mdb = None spambayes.message.Message.message_info_db = None Commenting out the "self.mdb.close()" and "spambayes.message.Message.message_info_db = None" lines fixes the problem. I'm not certain that the close line has to be removed yet, though I suspect it does. How do we get this fixed in the next release? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Peter Bengtsson (peterbe) Date: 2007-10-25 07:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208160 Originator: YES Tried to downgrade to 1.1a3 but problem persists :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1819910&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 9 21:31:42 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:31:42 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1653494 ] IMAP/RECENT problems Message-ID: Bugs item #1653494, was opened at 2007-02-06 12:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1653494&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: imapfilter Group: 1.1.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Abrahams (david_abrahams) >Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: IMAP/RECENT problems Initial Comment: I've now seen this problem with two different IMAP servers (Communigate and Cyrus) when trying to classify email. *Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1289, in ? run() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1271, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1072, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 975, in Filter msg.Save() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 728, in Save raise BadIMAPResponseError("recent", "Cannot find saved message") __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'recent' failed to give an OK response. Cannot find saved message I wonder if relying on the RECENT command is really such a good idea, as IIUC it's subject to all kinds of race conditions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2008-02-09 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Originator: NO Thanks for the patch. Sorry for the long delay applying it. I finally got a chance to try sb_imapfilter yesterday for the first time and experienced the problem you reported with the RECENT command first-hand. Applying the patch solved the problem. Checked in as r3170. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Abrahams (david_abrahams) Date: 2007-12-21 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=52572 Originator: YES New data: I found a reproducible case of this problem (on dovecot this time). After much analysis, I can say this much: 1. There's no RECENT command; this is an "idle loop" of NOOP commands that times out looking for some evidence that a message move has been completed by the server. 2. It occurs for me when a previously-unclassified message that didn't have a Message-Id header is first given an id with self._generate_id() and self.Save()d, then subsequently self.MoveTo()d a new folder and self.Save()d again. 3. If I comment out the first save on line 882 of sb_imapfilter.py, I don't see the problem, though I don't know if that's a proper fix 4. I have attached a patch that adds much more useful "verbose" info to sb_imapfilter.py, at least where debugging this problem is concerned. It also fixes a bug wherein classification would never move messages into a ham folder, even if one was specified. 5. Matt Stegman had some more data that might be useful in http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2006-August/019611.html it occurs (at least) File Added: sb_imapfilter.py.patch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nicomatsu (nicomatsu) Date: 2007-02-20 12:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1724434 Originator: NO I'm using Dovecot Mailserver and I have the same issue. I'm using spambayes-1.1a3. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1284, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1266, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1067, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 970, in Filter msg.Save() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 723, in Save raise BadIMAPResponseError("recent", "Cannot find saved message") __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'recent' failed to give an OK response. Cannot find saved message ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1653494&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 13 14:47:30 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:47:30 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1892729 ] sb_imapfilter traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1892729, was opened at 2008-02-13 07:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1892729&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter traceback Initial Comment: I've been experimenting with the imap filter and Gmail. It worked for awhile, but I've been getting tracebacks recently. When run in verbose mode it seems to rarely be able to find messages: *[imapfilter] can't find saved message after 100 iterations: 25984 .[imapfilter] classified as None: 25985 Persisting messageinfo.fs state in database Persisting messageinfo.fs state in database *[imapfilter] can't find saved message after 100 iterations: 25985 .[imapfilter] classified as None: 25986 Persisting messageinfo.fs state in database Persisting messageinfo.fs state in database and eventually croaks with a traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1328, in run() File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1310, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 1116, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 962, in Filter for msg in self: File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 818, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 847, in __getitem__ response = self.imap_server.uid("FETCH", key, "RFC822.HEADER") File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.5/imaplib.py", line 752, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.5/imaplib.py", line 1055, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.5/imaplib.py", line 890, in _command_complete self._check_bye() File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.5/imaplib.py", line 807, in _check_bye raise self.abort(bye[-1]) imaplib.abort: System Error I know nothing about IMAP, so I can't tell if this is caused by a bug in sb_imapfilter.py or if it reveals some sort of shortcoming with Gmail's IMAP implementation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1892729&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 13 15:20:28 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:20:28 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1868564 ] Database file: sizelimit? Message-ID: Bugs item #1868564, was opened at 2008-01-10 09:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1868564&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: moby_dick (moby_dick) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database file: sizelimit? Initial Comment: I've encountered following effect: - trained spam bayes on over 20.000 spam an about 3.500 ham mails resulting in a database file about 10 MB size (each) - automatic filtering work well enough - but: manual declaring mail as spam / ham did not work (see attached logfile) - nothing helps, inlcuding: -- removing icons from outlook an reinstall them -- removing complete outlook icons config -- reinstalling spambayes (but reusing old database files) - but the solution was: -- deleted database files -- retrained on only 1.000 spam and 1.000 ham -- result: a database file about 5 MB (bayes) and 1.2 MB (message) - everything worked again and still does So, may there be a problem when the database file(s) exceed a specific size? My system: WinXP Pro, SP2 Outlook 2003 SpamBayes 1.1a3 PS: Same problem with minor version of spambayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2008-02-13 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Originator: NO Moby, Are you still having trouble with this? Can I close it? Skip ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: moby_dick (moby_dick) Date: 2008-01-11 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1978067 Originator: YES Ups, I thought 'the more the better'. Seems to have been wrong. :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2008-01-10 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Originator: NO There is no specific size limit, but there's also no reason to have 1,000 spams or hams. I suggest you try deleting your database altogether and start from scratch. If you want to seed the database, just use the last 10 (ten) or so spams and hams. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1868564&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 13 15:27:04 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:27:04 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1868564 ] Database file: sizelimit? Message-ID: Bugs item #1868564, was opened at 2008-01-10 16:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by moby_dick You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1868564&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: moby_dick (moby_dick) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database file: sizelimit? Initial Comment: I've encountered following effect: - trained spam bayes on over 20.000 spam an about 3.500 ham mails resulting in a database file about 10 MB size (each) - automatic filtering work well enough - but: manual declaring mail as spam / ham did not work (see attached logfile) - nothing helps, inlcuding: -- removing icons from outlook an reinstall them -- removing complete outlook icons config -- reinstalling spambayes (but reusing old database files) - but the solution was: -- deleted database files -- retrained on only 1.000 spam and 1.000 ham -- result: a database file about 5 MB (bayes) and 1.2 MB (message) - everything worked again and still does So, may there be a problem when the database file(s) exceed a specific size? My system: WinXP Pro, SP2 Outlook 2003 SpamBayes 1.1a3 PS: Same problem with minor version of spambayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: moby_dick (moby_dick) Date: 2008-02-13 15:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1978067 Originator: YES Hi Montanaro, sure - you can close this track. Bye Moby ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2008-02-13 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Originator: NO Moby, Are you still having trouble with this? Can I close it? Skip ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: moby_dick (moby_dick) Date: 2008-01-11 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1978067 Originator: YES Ups, I thought 'the more the better'. Seems to have been wrong. :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2008-01-10 18:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Originator: NO There is no specific size limit, but there's also no reason to have 1,000 spams or hams. I suggest you try deleting your database altogether and start from scratch. If you want to seed the database, just use the last 10 (ten) or so spams and hams. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1868564&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 17 21:01:50 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:01:50 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1895575 ] Outlook 2003 SP 3 fails loading 1.0.4 and 1.1a4 on Win2K Message-ID: Bugs item #1895575, was opened at 2008-02-17 20:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1895575&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andy (wardlea) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 SP 3 fails loading 1.0.4 and 1.1a4 on Win2K Initial Comment: Whenever I try to run the 1.0.4 or 1.1a4 versions of SpamBayes (I'm running Windows 2003 Server R2 Service Pack 2) and Outlook 2003 Service Pack 3, Outlook fails during initialisation and offers me the chance to disable the add-in. Enabling it causes the same problem all over again. I've got DEP enabled, but I've excluded all of the executables/dlls in the SpamBayes bin directory - it makes no difference. I suspect it's more of a problem with Windows 2003 than Outlook 2003 SP3 - I think the problem first occurred before I upgraded to SP3. The log file is empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1895575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 18 14:33:09 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:33:09 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1895575 ] Outlook 2003 SP 3 fails loading 1.0.4 and 1.1a4 on Win2K Message-ID: Bugs item #1895575, was opened at 2008-02-17 20:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wardlea You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1895575&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andy (wardlea) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 SP 3 fails loading 1.0.4 and 1.1a4 on Win2K Initial Comment: Whenever I try to run the 1.0.4 or 1.1a4 versions of SpamBayes (I'm running Windows 2003 Server R2 Service Pack 2) and Outlook 2003 Service Pack 3, Outlook fails during initialisation and offers me the chance to disable the add-in. Enabling it causes the same problem all over again. I've got DEP enabled, but I've excluded all of the executables/dlls in the SpamBayes bin directory - it makes no difference. I suspect it's more of a problem with Windows 2003 than Outlook 2003 SP3 - I think the problem first occurred before I upgraded to SP3. The log file is empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andy (wardlea) Date: 2008-02-18 13:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2011950 Originator: YES Jesse Pelton reminded me that excluding Outlook itself from DEP had worked for Athlon x64 CPUs (see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#after-installing-spambayes-outlook-crashes-and-then-asks-for-the-plug-in-to-be-disabled), and this proved to be the resolution for my problem on my Core 2 Duo CPU. Thanks, Jesse :-) As a newbie to this forum I'm not sure whether or not that means this Bug is closed, or simply has a workaround, so hopefully someone more experienced will make that judgement for me ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1895575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 18 14:48:48 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:48:48 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1895575 ] Outlook 2003 SP 3 fails loading 1.0.4 and 1.1a4 on Win2K Message-ID: Bugs item #1895575, was opened at 2008-02-17 14:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1895575&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Andy (wardlea) >Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: Outlook 2003 SP 3 fails loading 1.0.4 and 1.1a4 on Win2K Initial Comment: Whenever I try to run the 1.0.4 or 1.1a4 versions of SpamBayes (I'm running Windows 2003 Server R2 Service Pack 2) and Outlook 2003 Service Pack 3, Outlook fails during initialisation and offers me the chance to disable the add-in. Enabling it causes the same problem all over again. I've got DEP enabled, but I've excluded all of the executables/dlls in the SpamBayes bin directory - it makes no difference. I suspect it's more of a problem with Windows 2003 than Outlook 2003 SP3 - I think the problem first occurred before I upgraded to SP3. The log file is empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2008-02-18 07:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Originator: NO I updated the FAQ with this extra bit of information. I'm closing this ticket, as that's about the best we can do I think. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy (wardlea) Date: 2008-02-18 07:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2011950 Originator: YES Jesse Pelton reminded me that excluding Outlook itself from DEP had worked for Athlon x64 CPUs (see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#after-installing-spambayes-outlook-crashes-and-then-asks-for-the-plug-in-to-be-disabled), and this proved to be the resolution for my problem on my Core 2 Duo CPU. Thanks, Jesse :-) As a newbie to this forum I'm not sure whether or not that means this Bug is closed, or simply has a workaround, so hopefully someone more experienced will make that judgement for me ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1895575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 25 09:44:22 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:44:22 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1835536 ] Office/Outlook SP3 Breaks Spambayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1835536, was opened at 2007-11-21 04:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by powernout You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1835536&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Raymondg (raymondg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Office/Outlook SP3 Breaks Spambayes Initial Comment: Immediately after installing Office 2003 SP3, Spambayes stopped working on Outlook 2003. Tried 1.0.4 and 1.1A. Both are disabled in Outlook. Reference MSKB article 938814 http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=938814 Spambayes log: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxxxxxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxxxxxxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1675 spam and 1746 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Version 1.1a3 (April 2007) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4.4 (#71, Feb 5 2007, 15:24:39) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] Log created Tue Nov 20 22:22:36 2007 *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 177, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 332, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 659, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 593, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1365, in OnStartupComplete File "win32com\client\dynamic.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ exceptions.AttributeError: .Explorers pythoncom error: Unexpected gateway error Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 177, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 332, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 659, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 593, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1365, in OnStartupComplete File "win32com\client\dynamic.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ exceptions.AttributeError: .Explorers SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook Session: Messages classified: 0 Total: Messages classified: 0 Addin terminating: 0 COM client and 1 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Powernout (powernout) Date: 2008-02-25 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1988242 Originator: NO My Spambayes is also not working the way it's supposed to. Not sure when SP3 was installed, but my symtoms are: In Junk Suspects, I can no longer use the "Delete as Spam" button, nor can I use the "Recover from Spam" button. Although junk mail is still being filtered, I am getting approximately 3 times more Junk Suspects, even email addresses which are safe go into the Junk Suspects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: joefidler (joefidler) Date: 2008-01-15 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1911145 Originator: NO I am seeing same symptoms - plug-in just does not enable under Outlook 2003 with SP3. See 1811774 for details. I have not tested with another version of Outlook/SP so cannot confirm problem is specific to this service pack. Cheers, Joe. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raymondg (raymondg) Date: 2007-11-21 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1942118 Originator: YES I thought the KB article may be relevant as it mentions COM add-ins that are disabled after applying Office 2003 SP3. If that is not the case, OK, but has anyone else reported this problem, and is there a fix? Bug report 1811774 looks like similar problem (also using Outlook 2003 SP3). Spambayes toolbar buttons are there but do not respond at all when clicked. No way to delete spam or recover messages from spam. Can't run Spambayes config manager. Outlook 2K3 Toolbar options for Spambayes are grayed out. Happened immediately after installing Office 2K3 SP3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2007-11-21 05:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Originator: NO Is there any reason to believe MSKB article 938814 is relevant here? I can't see one. Not having an 'explorers' object would cripple things, so ignoring this error isn't really an option, and sadly I skipped 2003 and only have 2007. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raymondg (raymondg) Date: 2007-11-21 05:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1942118 Originator: YES Yes, I followed all of the suggestions on the troubleshooting page. Tried several times for 1.0.4 and 1.1a before posting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2007-11-21 05:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Originator: NO Assigning to Mark. Have you checked the troubleshooting guide? http://spambayes.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/spambayes/trunk/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1835536&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 25 20:41:58 2008 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:41:58 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1811774 ] Outlook plugin doesn't load Message-ID: Bugs item #1811774, was opened at 2007-10-11 19:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by chrisprince You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1811774&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: joefidler (joefidler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook plugin doesn't load Initial Comment: Installed Outlook plugin with Outlook 2003 from the windows binary installer. Outlook is unable to load plugin and disables it upon startup. No error is reported in SpamBayes log (see below) and Outlook only reports that a plug-in was unable to load. As a work around I am using the proxy service and it is working fine. Thanks for your help and a your efforts in general on SpamBayes versions: SpamBayes 1.0.4, then tried 1.1a4 with same results Outlook/Office 2003 - SP3 Windows XP SP2 Hardware - AMD Turion 64 with 1 Gig RAM SpamBayes Log : Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. Registration (in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE) complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris (chrisprince) Date: 2008-02-25 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1134326 Originator: NO I ran into this problem as well. Unlike some of the other issues where spambayes stops working, I tried a first time install to a 2003 SP3 version of outlook. I get the same results as initially represented in this bug. I have nothing additional to add, except that it seems to be specific 2003 SP3. I do not have this problem with 2007, or 2003 before SP3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1811774&group_id=61702