From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 2 02:09:47 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 2 02:09:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 03:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gcaz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoff (gcaz) Date: 2005-03-01 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1171944 I'm having the same issue. My mail server is up. Seems to me that wither it's a timeout issue (I'm chaining spambayes behind ClamMail) or it's hitting a message it's chocking on. Either way it's totally crashing and creating 100s of MBs of log files. Win2k and Thunderbird using the proxy version 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-08 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 You can duplicate this error by setting remote host to any host without pop3 service (at 110 port) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 15:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I've changed the behaviour for 1.1. If globals:verbose is set to True, then the behaviour is the same. Otherwise each distinct connection error is reported only once per hour. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-07 02:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 I agree, for me looks like connection is established, but later breaks - my email client reports about too long inactivity time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 01:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-06 18:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Why are you trying to check for mail when a network connection is unavailable? If you didn't try to check for new mail, then the error wouldn't occur and the log entry would not be created. I'm relucant to disable the printing of this error when it is a valid error and should be reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-06 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-03 05:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 01:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 00:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 04:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Mar 4 11:12:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Mar 4 11:13:01 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1156557 ] errors overflowing the log file - followup of 1145057 Message-ID: Bugs item #1156557, was opened at 2005-03-04 11:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1156557&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: chrisKJD (hagen62) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: errors overflowing the log file - followup of 1145057 Initial Comment: Using SB 1.0.3 on W2K server I have stumbled immediately afer installation upon errors in the log files that I enclose (shortened for readability). Since the logs files are locked on W2K by SB it is impossible to remove them using other method then closing SB manually and deleting the log. It grows pretty rapidly, like 20 GB in 10 hours on my server, so I have to restart every day including the weekend. Otherwise my system gets stuffed with tousands of spam mails, as SB is quite good at filtering it out :-) I hope the community will find some solution other than downgrading... Regard - Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1156557&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 8 13:53:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 8 13:53:25 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1159005 ] Fails to load under XP Sp2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1159005, was opened at 2005-03-08 12:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fails to load under XP Sp2 Initial Comment: The SpamBayes plugin to Outlook 2002 fails to load repeatably. No error message is displayed, but Outlook Tools>Other>Advanced>COM add-ins shows "Not loaded. A run-time error occurred during the loading of the COM add-in." Log file attached. Same fault occurs with SpamBayes 1.0.3 Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 9 03:08:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 9 03:08:45 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1156557 ] errors overflowing the log file - followup of 1145057 Message-ID: Bugs item #1156557, was opened at 2005-03-04 23:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1156557&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: chrisKJD (hagen62) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: errors overflowing the log file - followup of 1145057 Initial Comment: Using SB 1.0.3 on W2K server I have stumbled immediately afer installation upon errors in the log files that I enclose (shortened for readability). Since the logs files are locked on W2K by SB it is impossible to remove them using other method then closing SB manually and deleting the log. It grows pretty rapidly, like 20 GB in 10 hours on my server, so I have to restart every day including the weekend. Otherwise my system gets stuffed with tousands of spam mails, as SB is quite good at filtering it out :-) I hope the community will find some solution other than downgrading... Regard - Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-09 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This occurs if you are using Python 2.4 (1.0.3 does, 1.0.1 doesn't), the mail server cannot be reached, and the DNS lookup succeeds. A fix has been checked in, so will appear in the next release. Until then, either run from 1.0.3 source with Python 2.3, run from source with 2.2/2.3/2.4 and CVS head, or go back to 1.0.1 until there is a new release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1156557&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 9 03:24:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 9 03:25:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1159005 ] Fails to load under XP Sp2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1159005, was opened at 2005-03-09 01:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fails to load under XP Sp2 Initial Comment: The SpamBayes plugin to Outlook 2002 fails to load repeatably. No error message is displayed, but Outlook Tools>Other>Advanced>COM add-ins shows "Not loaded. A run-time error occurred during the loading of the COM add-in." Log file attached. Same fault occurs with SpamBayes 1.0.3 Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-09 15:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've never seen this error before, and Google doesn't come up with much either. Have you tried uninstalling and then reinstalling? It appears to be failing to load a DLL (mapi.pyd at a guess), so maybe that file is bad for some reason. Is there anything you can think of that is unusual about the system (there isn't normally a problem with XP SP2)? Are you installing with admin privileges? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 9 14:34:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 9 14:34:05 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1159005 ] Fails to load under XP Sp2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1159005, was opened at 2005-03-08 12:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gcusick You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fails to load under XP Sp2 Initial Comment: The SpamBayes plugin to Outlook 2002 fails to load repeatably. No error message is displayed, but Outlook Tools>Other>Advanced>COM add-ins shows "Not loaded. A run-time error occurred during the loading of the COM add-in." Log file attached. Same fault occurs with SpamBayes 1.0.3 Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-09 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 Thanks for the response. Yes, I did have admin privileges when installing. There's and interesting hint in your response, though, since I have had other problems around MAPI. I'll do a bit more work and report back. Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-09 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-09 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've never seen this error before, and Google doesn't come up with much either. Have you tried uninstalling and then reinstalling? It appears to be failing to load a DLL (mapi.pyd at a guess), so maybe that file is bad for some reason. Is there anything you can think of that is unusual about the system (there isn't normally a problem with XP SP2)? Are you installing with admin privileges? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 9 14:48:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 9 14:48:32 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1159005 ] Fails to load under XP Sp2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1159005, was opened at 2005-03-08 12:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gcusick You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fails to load under XP Sp2 Initial Comment: The SpamBayes plugin to Outlook 2002 fails to load repeatably. No error message is displayed, but Outlook Tools>Other>Advanced>COM add-ins shows "Not loaded. A run-time error occurred during the loading of the COM add-in." Log file attached. Same fault occurs with SpamBayes 1.0.3 Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-09 13:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 Resolved. I was installing SpamBayes because I have changed mailer from Eudora to Outlook. I think that the origin of the problem was that Eudora's MAPI had not been uninstalled. Closing all the likel MAPI suspects and explicity uninstalling the Eudora MAPI resulted in SpamBayes installing and starting correctly. Thanks for the help. Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-09 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 Thanks for the response. Yes, I did have admin privileges when installing. There's and interesting hint in your response, though, since I have had other problems around MAPI. I'll do a bit more work and report back. Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-09 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-09 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've never seen this error before, and Google doesn't come up with much either. Have you tried uninstalling and then reinstalling? It appears to be failing to load a DLL (mapi.pyd at a guess), so maybe that file is bad for some reason. Is there anything you can think of that is unusual about the system (there isn't normally a problem with XP SP2)? Are you installing with admin privileges? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Mar 10 01:10:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Mar 10 01:10:14 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1159005 ] Fails to load under XP Sp2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1159005, was opened at 2005-03-09 01:53 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fails to load under XP Sp2 Initial Comment: The SpamBayes plugin to Outlook 2002 fails to load repeatably. No error message is displayed, but Outlook Tools>Other>Advanced>COM add-ins shows "Not loaded. A run-time error occurred during the loading of the COM add-in." Log file attached. Same fault occurs with SpamBayes 1.0.3 Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-10 13:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No worries (you did almost everything yourself anyway!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-10 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 Resolved. I was installing SpamBayes because I have changed mailer from Eudora to Outlook. I think that the origin of the problem was that Eudora's MAPI had not been uninstalled. Closing all the likel MAPI suspects and explicity uninstalling the Eudora MAPI resulted in SpamBayes installing and starting correctly. Thanks for the help. Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-10 02:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 Thanks for the response. Yes, I did have admin privileges when installing. There's and interesting hint in your response, though, since I have had other problems around MAPI. I'll do a bit more work and report back. Thanks Geoff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoff Cusick (gcusick) Date: 2005-03-10 02:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=296463 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-09 15:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've never seen this error before, and Google doesn't come up with much either. Have you tried uninstalling and then reinstalling? It appears to be failing to load a DLL (mapi.pyd at a guess), so maybe that file is bad for some reason. Is there anything you can think of that is unusual about the system (there isn't normally a problem with XP SP2)? Are you installing with admin privileges? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1159005&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 15 13:27:48 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 15 13:27:51 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1163672 ] Need to re-train every day Message-ID: Support Requests item #1163672, was opened at 2005-03-15 13:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: fintan74 (fintan74) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Need to re-train every day Initial Comment: I have a problem for which I have been unable to find a solution in either this forum, the FAQ or the Troubleshooting guide. Hopefully someone here will be able to assist. Spambayes has been monitoring my Outlook mailbox for quite some time and it has always worked like a charm. Upto about two weeks ago. Suddenly I needed to re-train the complete database every day, otherwise it will simply not process messages. Spambayes loads without problems and the toolbar itself works fine. It just does not process anything until I re-train the database. Downloading and installing the latest version has not resolved matters. I have also tried putting the configuration files in a local folder instead of the documents&settings-folder that is synchronised with server during logon and logoff. Hasn't helped either... What I have noticed in the logfile is that it says "NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable" four times in a row. I wonder if this is the reason for the problem, although I have no idea what is triggering that message. The complete log is as follows: --------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 709 spam and 33 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable Saving configuration -> C:\spambayesconfig\MS Exchange Settings.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'fintan/Postvak IN' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'fintan/Junk E-Mail' --------------------- Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 15 17:38:12 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 15 17:38:15 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1163862 ] spambayes *very* slow Message-ID: Bugs item #1163862, was opened at 2005-03-15 17:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes *very* slow Initial Comment: hello, recently i upgraded spambayes 1.0a07 to 1.0.3 and later to cvs version (1.1a0 as of 2005-03-15). unfortunately both 1.0.3 and 1.1a0 versions are very slow (my estimate is 20x). i'm running the sb_server.py script with cPickle database storage. i'm also constantly uploading messages trained as spam/ham via sb_upload.py. currently it's trained on 835 spam and 293 ham messages. when i was running 1.0a07 (on bsddb database storage), mail retrieval was blazingly fast, with both the 1.0.3 (also running on bsddb) and the cvs version a single mail takes about 1-2 secs to be retrieved. i'll be happy to supply any additional data - i just don't know which would be interesting for the developers. thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 15 18:52:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 15 18:52:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1163862 ] spambayes *very* slow Message-ID: Bugs item #1163862, was opened at 2005-03-15 17:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fufsource You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes *very* slow Initial Comment: hello, recently i upgraded spambayes 1.0a07 to 1.0.3 and later to cvs version (1.1a0 as of 2005-03-15). unfortunately both 1.0.3 and 1.1a0 versions are very slow (my estimate is 20x). i'm running the sb_server.py script with cPickle database storage. i'm also constantly uploading messages trained as spam/ham via sb_upload.py. currently it's trained on 835 spam and 293 ham messages. when i was running 1.0a07 (on bsddb database storage), mail retrieval was blazingly fast, with both the 1.0.3 (also running on bsddb) and the cvs version a single mail takes about 1-2 secs to be retrieved. i'll be happy to supply any additional data - i just don't know which would be interesting for the developers. thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-15 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 some additions to the above (sorry for not mentioning them earlier): this is on linux, kernel 2.4.26, python 2.3.5, db-4.1.25-NC, pybsddb3-4.3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 02:48:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 02:48:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1163862 ] spambayes *very* slow Message-ID: Bugs item #1163862, was opened at 2005-03-16 05:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes *very* slow Initial Comment: hello, recently i upgraded spambayes 1.0a07 to 1.0.3 and later to cvs version (1.1a0 as of 2005-03-15). unfortunately both 1.0.3 and 1.1a0 versions are very slow (my estimate is 20x). i'm running the sb_server.py script with cPickle database storage. i'm also constantly uploading messages trained as spam/ham via sb_upload.py. currently it's trained on 835 spam and 293 ham messages. when i was running 1.0a07 (on bsddb database storage), mail retrieval was blazingly fast, with both the 1.0.3 (also running on bsddb) and the cvs version a single mail takes about 1-2 secs to be retrieved. i'll be happy to supply any additional data - i just don't know which would be interesting for the developers. thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you check to see whether this is just the change from bsddb to pickle? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-16 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 some additions to the above (sorry for not mentioning them earlier): this is on linux, kernel 2.4.26, python 2.3.5, db-4.1.25-NC, pybsddb3-4.3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 02:51:57 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 02:51:59 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1152981 ] Internal Rules & Alerts OL2003 don't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1152981, was opened at 2005-02-28 07:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152981&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: superba (superba) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Internal Rules & Alerts OL2003 don't work Initial Comment: HI, I love Spambayes better than about 10 other AS that I've tried. However, there is a problem, which may also occur with other addins. I use Rules and Alerts to move email from my inbox to a large number of folders within OL2003. Rules and Alerts apparently stops working when 1) SB or another email filter is installed, or 2) when a certain number(upper limit) of Rules and Alerts are written. My WAG is that somehow the SB hooks interfere or shut down the internal filtering of OL2003. I reported this same situation with OL2000.... Any ideas? Thanks for a good product. Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (2) would not effect SpamBayes at all, because SpamBayes does not use or create any Outlook rules. There is definitely no problem in general with using both rules and SpamBayes, and never has. The only problem has ever been with which system operates first - which was the reason for the introduction of the background filtering (to ensure that SpamBayes operates last). If you uninstall SpamBayes, do you rules work? If you then install SpamBayes again, do they cease to work? If not, then it's pretty likely that it's not SpamBayes. Have you tried doing a Detect and Repair on Outlook? Do you get a specific error message? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152981&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 03:01:12 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 03:01:14 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1150863 ] Spambayes cuts subject of messages Message-ID: Bugs item #1150863, was opened at 2005-02-24 22:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spambayes cuts subject of messages Initial Comment: I'm using OE so i've set spambayes to add predix to "unsure" and "spam" messages. But, when i search messages (via spambayes search), they have cutten subjects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can anyone else duplicate this? If I try this, it works exactly as expected (with the full subject including the classification present, since 1.0.x doesn't try to remove it). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-28 07:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 It's 1.0.3 version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-26 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What version of spambayes is this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-25 20:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 It happens for any message with added prefix, when i search. I'm attaching example header of message before and after training. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-25 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you give me an example of this? Does it happen with any message, or just some? (If just some, can you see any pattern?) Does it happen just when you search, or in the regular review pages as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 03:03:19 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 03:03:23 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1145237 ] Find by SpambayesID doesn't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1145237, was opened at 2005-02-21 21:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145237&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Find by SpambayesID doesn't work Initial Comment: Spambayes version 1.0.3 . I can find messages by subject, or body, but not by SpambayesID. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Works for me. Are you certain that you're entering a valid ID in the search box? No extra spaces or anything (it should be just numbers, or numbers and a dash and number)? Has the message definitely not expired? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145237&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 03:05:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 03:05:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122512 ] If registry write fails, report to user Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122512, was opened at 2005-02-15 06:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: If registry write fails, report to user Initial Comment: I used SpamBayes for a few weeks at work on Win2000. No problems - I even enabled spam column per instructions. Great program. I used version 1.0.3.exe, but I don't see that on the Group pulldown. Got a new PC at work - now have no write permissions in Program Files (completely locked down). Maybe the Registry is similarly locked down. Here is the log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 483, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 413, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 181, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 32, in _set_string pywintypes.error: (5, 'RegSetValue', 'Access is denied.') Any tips to work-around this issue appreciated ! I miss my SpamBayes filtering ! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 15:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We should certainly report this as an error if we can, so changing to a feature request. If we don't remove this requirement (see other tracker) then we should mention the requirement somewhere, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) Date: 2005-02-16 03:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1219094 I suggest 2 changes: 1) change installer to not claim success if this happens 2) mention write permissions to registry as a requirement Also - add 1.0.3 to SourceForge group list (but this registry issue likely applies to all versions) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) Date: 2005-02-16 03:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1219094 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-15 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It does look like you don't have access to the registry. Unfortunately, there's no way to let Outlook know about the plug-in without putting information in the registry, so unless you can get permission to do that, nothing can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 04:21:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 04:21:28 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1164175 ] Mishandled Mouse-Up in Outlook Plugin Message-ID: Bugs item #1164175, was opened at 2005-03-15 20:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1164175&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rudy Ramsey (ceolmhor) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mishandled Mouse-Up in Outlook Plugin Initial Comment: After SpamBayes has processed my incoming messages, I go to the Outlook folder in which the "maybe" messages are stored, and look them over. Usually, they're all spam, so I click on the first one, and then repeatedly click the "Delete as Spam" button. In this process, I frequently find that a single click behaves like two separate clicks, in a manner I usually associated with a mishandled mouse-up event. I suspect that the mouse-up is sometimes handled as if it were a mouse-down event. This is certainly not a big deal, but I thought I should report it. Thanks to all for a very useful tool. I like this better than any of the commercial spam-killers I've tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1164175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 04:39:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 04:39:15 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1164175 ] Mishandled Mouse-Up in Outlook Plugin Message-ID: Bugs item #1164175, was opened at 2005-03-16 16:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1164175&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rudy Ramsey (ceolmhor) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mishandled Mouse-Up in Outlook Plugin Initial Comment: After SpamBayes has processed my incoming messages, I go to the Outlook folder in which the "maybe" messages are stored, and look them over. Usually, they're all spam, so I click on the first one, and then repeatedly click the "Delete as Spam" button. In this process, I frequently find that a single click behaves like two separate clicks, in a manner I usually associated with a mishandled mouse-up event. I suspect that the mouse-up is sometimes handled as if it were a mouse-down event. This is certainly not a big deal, but I thought I should report it. Thanks to all for a very useful tool. I like this better than any of the commercial spam-killers I've tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this. Are you positive that this is what is happening? IAC, it's Outlook that handles the clicking, not SpamBayes (we just get the event), so if this was occuring, then it would be an Outlook bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1164175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 07:14:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 07:15:03 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1164175 ] Mishandled Mouse-Up in Outlook Plugin Message-ID: Bugs item #1164175, was opened at 2005-03-15 20:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ceolmhor You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1164175&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rudy Ramsey (ceolmhor) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mishandled Mouse-Up in Outlook Plugin Initial Comment: After SpamBayes has processed my incoming messages, I go to the Outlook folder in which the "maybe" messages are stored, and look them over. Usually, they're all spam, so I click on the first one, and then repeatedly click the "Delete as Spam" button. In this process, I frequently find that a single click behaves like two separate clicks, in a manner I usually associated with a mishandled mouse-up event. I suspect that the mouse-up is sometimes handled as if it were a mouse-down event. This is certainly not a big deal, but I thought I should report it. Thanks to all for a very useful tool. I like this better than any of the commercial spam-killers I've tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Rudy Ramsey (ceolmhor) Date: 2005-03-15 23:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=692822 anadelonbrin, I should have mentioned that this occurs only if I use multiple clicks in succession. If I click singly, with a pause between items, SpamBayes behaves normally. I just placed 10 items in this folder and then went through them in several different ways, clicking twice close together, pausing, twice again. It took 7 clicks to delete all 10 items. I tried several other rhythms, all the way to 7 clicks close together. In every case, I deleted all 10 items with 7 clicks. FWIW, I applied the same procedure to the Deleted Items folder, clicking on the normal Outlook button, and the behavior was correct (each click removed exactly one item). I'm not saying it's a SpamBayes bug (as opposed to an Outlook issue), but it seems on first look to occur only in connection with SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-15 20:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this. Are you positive that this is what is happening? IAC, it's Outlook that handles the clicking, not SpamBayes (we just get the event), so if this was occuring, then it would be an Outlook bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1164175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 14:31:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 14:31:50 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1163862 ] spambayes *very* slow Message-ID: Bugs item #1163862, was opened at 2005-03-15 17:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fufsource You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes *very* slow Initial Comment: hello, recently i upgraded spambayes 1.0a07 to 1.0.3 and later to cvs version (1.1a0 as of 2005-03-15). unfortunately both 1.0.3 and 1.1a0 versions are very slow (my estimate is 20x). i'm running the sb_server.py script with cPickle database storage. i'm also constantly uploading messages trained as spam/ham via sb_upload.py. currently it's trained on 835 spam and 293 ham messages. when i was running 1.0a07 (on bsddb database storage), mail retrieval was blazingly fast, with both the 1.0.3 (also running on bsddb) and the cvs version a single mail takes about 1-2 secs to be retrieved. i'll be happy to supply any additional data - i just don't know which would be interesting for the developers. thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-16 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 [i had to downgrade to 1.0.3 because there were some problems in the cvs version (self.gzipCache undefined in spambayes/UserInterface.py, i don't use cache at all).] so 1.0.3 running on bsddb runs fast for me. but when the same code is using pickle version of hammie.db the spambayes.messageinfo.db is constantly being rebuilded causing the cpu usage to be 100% most of the time. i have both the hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db which seem to cause this. shall i upload them? they are 2480916 bytes for hammie.db and 1678535 bytes for messageinfo. [btw: some utility to convert bsddb<=>pickle storage would be great for experimenting] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you check to see whether this is just the change from bsddb to pickle? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-15 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 some additions to the above (sorry for not mentioning them earlier): this is on linux, kernel 2.4.26, python 2.3.5, db-4.1.25-NC, pybsddb3-4.3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 16 23:38:53 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 16 23:38:58 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1163862 ] spambayes *very* slow Message-ID: Bugs item #1163862, was opened at 2005-03-16 05:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes *very* slow Initial Comment: hello, recently i upgraded spambayes 1.0a07 to 1.0.3 and later to cvs version (1.1a0 as of 2005-03-15). unfortunately both 1.0.3 and 1.1a0 versions are very slow (my estimate is 20x). i'm running the sb_server.py script with cPickle database storage. i'm also constantly uploading messages trained as spam/ham via sb_upload.py. currently it's trained on 835 spam and 293 ham messages. when i was running 1.0a07 (on bsddb database storage), mail retrieval was blazingly fast, with both the 1.0.3 (also running on bsddb) and the cvs version a single mail takes about 1-2 secs to be retrieved. i'll be happy to supply any additional data - i just don't know which would be interesting for the developers. thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-17 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed the CVS bug; thanks. sb_dbexpimp.py converts between bsddb and pickle (and csv, and any of the other storage types in spambayes/storage.py). Using a pickle for the message info db will mean that it has to write the whole thing to disk every time it's updated, which includes any time that a message is classified or trained. I'll leave this open and play around with using pickle and see what I can come up with. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-17 02:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 [i had to downgrade to 1.0.3 because there were some problems in the cvs version (self.gzipCache undefined in spambayes/UserInterface.py, i don't use cache at all).] so 1.0.3 running on bsddb runs fast for me. but when the same code is using pickle version of hammie.db the spambayes.messageinfo.db is constantly being rebuilded causing the cpu usage to be 100% most of the time. i have both the hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db which seem to cause this. shall i upload them? they are 2480916 bytes for hammie.db and 1678535 bytes for messageinfo. [btw: some utility to convert bsddb<=>pickle storage would be great for experimenting] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you check to see whether this is just the change from bsddb to pickle? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-16 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 some additions to the above (sorry for not mentioning them earlier): this is on linux, kernel 2.4.26, python 2.3.5, db-4.1.25-NC, pybsddb3-4.3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Mar 18 14:12:31 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Mar 18 14:12:34 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1145237 ] Find by SpambayesID doesn't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1145237, was opened at 2005-02-21 09:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpiw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145237&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Find by SpambayesID doesn't work Initial Comment: Spambayes version 1.0.3 . I can find messages by subject, or body, but not by SpambayesID. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-03-18 14:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 I am certain that i am entering a valid id in the search box. Message isn't expired, file with id name exists in cache directory. And now, when i'm trying to search by subject or anything else, it fails with: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 470, in found_terminator File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 477, in onReview File "spambayes\FileCorpus.pyc", line 221, in load File "gzip.pyc", line 49, in open File "gzip.pyc", line 94, in __init__ IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'C:\Documents and Settings\Janusz Piwowarski\Dane aplikacji\SpamBayes\Proxy\pop3proxy-ham- cache\1110525146-3' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 03:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Works for me. Are you certain that you're entering a valid ID in the search box? No extra spaces or anything (it should be just numbers, or numbers and a dash and number)? Has the message definitely not expired? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145237&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Mar 18 19:27:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Mar 18 19:27:16 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166146 ] Tokenizer fails on bad URL Message-ID: Bugs item #1166146, was opened at 2005-03-18 10:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Tokenizer fails on bad URL Initial Comment: The following line in the body of a message being scored or trained http://) causes spambayes to die. The potentially relevant spambayesrc settings are [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition=True x-pick_apart_urls=True [URLRetriever] x-slurp_urls=True The relevant backtrace is File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 374, in _add_msg for word in Set(wordstream): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 429, in __init__ self._update(iterable) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 383, in _update for element in iterable: File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 762, in _add_slurped slurped_tokens = self._generate_slurp() File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 556, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 663, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Mar 20 00:18:45 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Mar 20 00:18:48 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166698 ] SpamBayes 1.0.3 bug fills HD with log files Message-ID: Bugs item #1166698, was opened at 2005-03-20 00:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166698&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alberto Martinez (albmartin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes 1.0.3 bug fills HD with log files Initial Comment: I recently updated from 1.0.1 to 1.0.3, using the POP3 proxy with The Bat! mail manager in Windows 2K SP4, and from time to time the proxy fails and begins to add to the log file the line "warning: unhandled exception" (the first time it ocurred I was away from the computer and it generated a 600 MB log file until the system partition was full). A log for this situation would look like: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 110 is proxying mail.xxxxx.xxx:110 Listener on port 111 is proxying mail.yyyyy.yyy:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ... I have been using SpamBayes since version 0.9 and I never found this problem until I updated to version 1.0.3. I'll try to revert to version 1.0.1 until this bug is solved, since some programs aren't happy when you haven't any space left in your system partition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166698&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Mar 20 00:19:47 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Mar 20 00:19:50 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166698 ] SpamBayes 1.0.3 bug fills HD with log files Message-ID: Bugs item #1166698, was opened at 2005-03-20 00:18 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by albmartin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166698&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Alberto Martinez (albmartin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes 1.0.3 bug fills HD with log files Initial Comment: I recently updated from 1.0.1 to 1.0.3, using the POP3 proxy with The Bat! mail manager in Windows 2K SP4, and from time to time the proxy fails and begins to add to the log file the line "warning: unhandled exception" (the first time it ocurred I was away from the computer and it generated a 600 MB log file until the system partition was full). A log for this situation would look like: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 110 is proxying mail.xxxxx.xxx:110 Listener on port 111 is proxying mail.yyyyy.yyy:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ... I have been using SpamBayes since version 0.9 and I never found this problem until I updated to version 1.0.3. I'll try to revert to version 1.0.1 until this bug is solved, since some programs aren't happy when you haven't any space left in your system partition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166698&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Mar 20 01:27:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Mar 20 01:27:28 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166698 ] SpamBayes 1.0.3 bug fills HD with log files Message-ID: Bugs item #1166698, was opened at 2005-03-20 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166698&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 7 Submitted By: Alberto Martinez (albmartin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes 1.0.3 bug fills HD with log files Initial Comment: I recently updated from 1.0.1 to 1.0.3, using the POP3 proxy with The Bat! mail manager in Windows 2K SP4, and from time to time the proxy fails and begins to add to the log file the line "warning: unhandled exception" (the first time it ocurred I was away from the computer and it generated a 600 MB log file until the system partition was full). A log for this situation would look like: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 110 is proxying mail.xxxxx.xxx:110 Listener on port 111 is proxying mail.yyyyy.yyy:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ... I have been using SpamBayes since version 0.9 and I never found this problem until I updated to version 1.0.3. I'll try to revert to version 1.0.1 until this bug is solved, since some programs aren't happy when you haven't any space left in your system partition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-20 12:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a problem with using Python 2.4 and SpamBayes. 1.0.3 was built with Python 2.4 so exhibits this problem. It will occur if you try to connect to your mail server and it is not available (and the DNS lookup still succeeds). If you can't avoid such situations, then, yes, revert to 1.0.1, or use the 1.0.3 source with Python 2.2/2.3, or use CVS Head with Python 2.2/2.3/2.4. 1.1 will include a fix for this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166698&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Mar 21 15:20:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Mar 21 15:21:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1167607 ] Multi-Gigabyte log file Outlook Express Message-ID: Bugs item #1167607, was opened at 2005-03-21 09:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1167607&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter M. (pmaggs) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multi-Gigabyte log file Outlook Express Initial Comment: Using Spambayes with Outlook Express. Every so often Spambayes goes crazy and creates a multi- gigbyte log file, bringing my computer to its knees. This happened overnight last night, during a period when only a dozen e-mails came in. It seemed to happen after I turned on "put 'spam' in the "To:" header. I can't send the log file because it was six gigabytes long, and I had to zap it to get my computer working. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1167607&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 22 00:18:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 22 00:18:43 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1167607 ] Multi-Gigabyte log file Outlook Express Message-ID: Bugs item #1167607, was opened at 2005-03-22 02:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1167607&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter M. (pmaggs) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multi-Gigabyte log file Outlook Express Initial Comment: Using Spambayes with Outlook Express. Every so often Spambayes goes crazy and creates a multi- gigbyte log file, bringing my computer to its knees. This happened overnight last night, during a period when only a dozen e-mails came in. It seemed to happen after I turned on "put 'spam' in the "To:" header. I can't send the log file because it was six gigabytes long, and I had to zap it to get my computer working. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-22 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This occurs when using 1.0.x with Python 2.4 (1.0.3 is built with 2.4), and your mail client tries to connect to the mail server but cannot (but DNS still resolves). CVS includes a fix for this, which will be in the next release. For now, either use 1.0.1, the 1.0.3 source with Python 2.2/2.3, or CVS source with Python 2.2./2.3/2.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1167607&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 22 21:11:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 22 21:11:41 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1168625 ] sb_tray.exe uses 100% CPU (1.0.3) Message-ID: Bugs item #1168625, was opened at 2005-03-22 22:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1168625&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray.exe uses 100% CPU (1.0.3) Initial Comment: After a few minutes (?) it suddenly starts using 100% CPU. Worked fine for a long time before this. Don't know how to get more information. WinXP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1168625&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 23 06:49:02 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 23 06:49:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1168625 ] sb_tray.exe uses 100% CPU (1.0.3) Message-ID: Bugs item #1168625, was opened at 2005-03-23 08:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1168625&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray.exe uses 100% CPU (1.0.3) Initial Comment: After a few minutes (?) it suddenly starts using 100% CPU. Worked fine for a long time before this. Don't know how to get more information. WinXP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-23 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This will occur if SpamBayes is used with Python 2.4 (1.0.3 is built with Python 2.4), you mail client tries but fails to connect to the mail server, and the DNS lookup succeeds. The next release will include a fix for this problem. Until then, you can use 1.0.1, use 1.0.3 source with Python 2.2/2.3, or use CVS source with Python 2.2/2.3/2.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1168625&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 23 06:57:02 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 23 06:57:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166146 ] Tokenizer fails on bad URL Message-ID: Bugs item #1166146, was opened at 2005-03-19 07:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 >Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Tokenizer fails on bad URL Initial Comment: The following line in the body of a message being scored or trained http://) causes spambayes to die. The potentially relevant spambayesrc settings are [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition=True x-pick_apart_urls=True [URLRetriever] x-slurp_urls=True The relevant backtrace is File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 374, in _add_msg for word in Set(wordstream): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 429, in __init__ self._update(iterable) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 383, in _update for element in iterable: File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 762, in _add_slurped slurped_tokens = self._generate_slurp() File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 556, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 663, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-23 17:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is with the x-slurp_urls option from the trace, but I can't duplicate this by adding in "http://)" to a message. Do you have a message that triggers this problem that you can attach here for me to test against? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Mar 24 16:15:39 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Mar 24 16:15:41 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1169939 ] Make sb_imapfilter use CRAM MD5 authentication Message-ID: Patches item #1169939, was opened at 2005-03-24 16:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1169939&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexandre Fayolle (afayolle) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Make sb_imapfilter use CRAM MD5 authentication Initial Comment: Hi, I maintain the Debian package for Spambayes, and I received the following message and patch from Kim Minh Kaplan The patch looks ok to me. Is there any chance for the patch to be included in the next release of spamabayes ? ----------------------------8<-------------------------------- Currently sb_imapfilter only use the LOGIN mechanism to authenticate to the IMAP server. This is a security concern for many people as it means clear password is sent across the Internet. The attached patch makes use of CRAM MD5 authentication when available. Regards, Kim Minh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1169939&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Mar 28 17:28:21 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Mar 28 17:28:24 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1171901 ] Plugin loses categories field when moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1171901, was opened at 2005-03-28 10:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin loses categories field when moved Initial Comment: I have a system when I process email through my Rules Wizard. I take much of my email and move a copy to many different archive controlled folders. Each email is processed and a copy made in the appropriate folder and the category is set to "Copy". I have the field "categories" in my Inbox header line and so any email that is marked "Copy" in my Inbox, I can read and delete quickly as I know that a copy exists elsewhere. I installed the most recent Outlook plugin today and my categories went blank. I checked to see if a copy was being moved to the appropriate folders and they do seem to be getting there so the Rules Wizard seems to be working correctly. In addition, the "categories" field in the target folder is set correctly. This implies to me that category information is being lost in the SpamBayes hold and move process. It is quite possible that other information that might be useful is being lost as well. I am using Outlook 2000 Server SP-4 (v5.x), Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (v9.x). I checked for similar problems and was unable to find any. Thanks, Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 03:41:37 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 03:41:40 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1163672 ] Need to re-train every day Message-ID: Support Requests item #1163672, was opened at 2005-03-16 01:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: fintan74 (fintan74) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Need to re-train every day Initial Comment: I have a problem for which I have been unable to find a solution in either this forum, the FAQ or the Troubleshooting guide. Hopefully someone here will be able to assist. Spambayes has been monitoring my Outlook mailbox for quite some time and it has always worked like a charm. Upto about two weeks ago. Suddenly I needed to re-train the complete database every day, otherwise it will simply not process messages. Spambayes loads without problems and the toolbar itself works fine. It just does not process anything until I re-train the database. Downloading and installing the latest version has not resolved matters. I have also tried putting the configuration files in a local folder instead of the documents&settings-folder that is synchronised with server during logon and logoff. Hasn't helped either... What I have noticed in the logfile is that it says "NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable" four times in a row. I wonder if this is the reason for the problem, although I have no idea what is triggering that message. The complete log is as follows: --------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 709 spam and 33 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable Saving configuration -> C:\spambayesconfig\MS Exchange Settings.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'fintan/Postvak IN' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'fintan/Junk E-Mail' --------------------- Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach a log from when it doesn't work? That would help a lot more in figuring out what is wrong. Are all of these folders on an Exchange server? Has anything changed with your Exchange server recently? Do you have any other problems viewing these folders? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 05:52:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 05:52:36 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1169939 ] Make sb_imapfilter use CRAM MD5 authentication Message-ID: Patches item #1169939, was opened at 2005-03-25 03:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1169939&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexandre Fayolle (afayolle) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Make sb_imapfilter use CRAM MD5 authentication Initial Comment: Hi, I maintain the Debian package for Spambayes, and I received the following message and patch from Kim Minh Kaplan The patch looks ok to me. Is there any chance for the patch to be included in the next release of spamabayes ? ----------------------------8<-------------------------------- Currently sb_imapfilter only use the LOGIN mechanism to authenticate to the IMAP server. This is a security concern for many people as it means clear password is sent across the Internet. The attached patch makes use of CRAM MD5 authentication when available. Regards, Kim Minh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 15:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks. Added to sb_imapfilter r1.55 (so will be in 1.1a1). I don't have access to an IMAP server that supports CRAM-MD5 so can't test it, but it looks good to me. If anyone is able to verify that this works (after 1.1a1 is out is fine) that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1169939&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 06:45:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 06:45:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166146 ] Tokenizer fails on bad URL Message-ID: Bugs item #1166146, was opened at 2005-03-18 10:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Tokenizer fails on bad URL Initial Comment: The following line in the body of a message being scored or trained http://) causes spambayes to die. The potentially relevant spambayesrc settings are [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition=True x-pick_apart_urls=True [URLRetriever] x-slurp_urls=True The relevant backtrace is File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 374, in _add_msg for word in Set(wordstream): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 429, in __init__ self._update(iterable) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 383, in _update for element in iterable: File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 762, in _add_slurped slurped_tokens = self._generate_slurp() File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 556, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 663, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-03-28 20:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I've downloaded version 1.0.4 and did the following: % sb_filter.py -d dummy -n % sb_filter.py -d dummy http://) ^D And got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "./sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "./sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 246, in slurping_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 559, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 689, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-22 21:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is with the x-slurp_urls option from the trace, but I can't duplicate this by adding in "http://)" to a message. Do you have a message that triggers this problem that you can attach here for me to test against? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 06:46:31 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 06:46:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166146 ] Tokenizer fails on bad URL Message-ID: Bugs item #1166146, was opened at 2005-03-18 10:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Tokenizer fails on bad URL Initial Comment: The following line in the body of a message being scored or trained http://) causes spambayes to die. The potentially relevant spambayesrc settings are [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition=True x-pick_apart_urls=True [URLRetriever] x-slurp_urls=True The relevant backtrace is File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 374, in _add_msg for word in Set(wordstream): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 429, in __init__ self._update(iterable) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 383, in _update for element in iterable: File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 762, in _add_slurped slurped_tokens = self._generate_slurp() File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 556, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 663, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-03-28 20:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 NB: http://( with the OPENING parenthesis works ok, it's the CLOSING one that causes the error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-03-28 20:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I've downloaded version 1.0.4 and did the following: % sb_filter.py -d dummy -n % sb_filter.py -d dummy http://) ^D And got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "./sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "./sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 246, in slurping_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 559, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 689, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-22 21:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is with the x-slurp_urls option from the trace, but I can't duplicate this by adding in "http://)" to a message. Do you have a message that triggers this problem that you can attach here for me to test against? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 07:29:45 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 07:29:50 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1166146 ] Tokenizer fails on bad URL Message-ID: Bugs item #1166146, was opened at 2005-03-19 07:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Tokenizer fails on bad URL Initial Comment: The following line in the body of a message being scored or trained http://) causes spambayes to die. The potentially relevant spambayesrc settings are [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition=True x-pick_apart_urls=True [URLRetriever] x-slurp_urls=True The relevant backtrace is File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 374, in _add_msg for word in Set(wordstream): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 429, in __init__ self._update(iterable) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/sets.py", line 383, in _update for element in iterable: File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 762, in _add_slurped slurped_tokens = self._generate_slurp() File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 556, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-2/spambayes/classifier.py", line 663, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah - turns out that the -o command line option doesn't work with the slurp options (options change is made too late), so I wasn't actually turning slurping on before, which is why I couldn't duplicate this. I've identified the cause of this (I haven't checked, but http://: and various others should also trigger it), and checked in a fix. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-03-29 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 NB: http://( with the OPENING parenthesis works ok, it's the CLOSING one that causes the error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-03-29 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I've downloaded version 1.0.4 and did the following: % sb_filter.py -d dummy -n % sb_filter.py -d dummy http://) ^D And got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "./sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "./sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 246, in slurping_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 559, in _generate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0.4/scripts/spambayes/classifier.py", line 689, in slurp domain = mo.group(1) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'group' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-23 17:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is with the x-slurp_urls option from the trace, but I can't duplicate this by adding in "http://)" to a message. Do you have a message that triggers this problem that you can attach here for me to test against? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1166146&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 08:59:40 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 08:59:42 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1172348 ] Add option to uninstall all data Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1172348, was opened at 2005-03-29 18:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1172348&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Add option to uninstall all data Initial Comment: It would be good if the uninstaller would offer to uninstall all data, including training and configuration data. (But not do this by default, and warn about it). This shouldn't be too difficult to add to the Inno script. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1172348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 09:00:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 09:00:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1109452 ] Make install for all users an option in installer Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1109452, was opened at 2005-01-26 12:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1109452&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Make install for all users an option in installer Initial Comment: A suggestion on spambayes@python.org from Johan Geertsma is to make installing for all users an option in the Inno installer. This makes sense to me, since it's a reasonably common request and (being off by default) shouldn't confuse people that don't need it. I'll try and get this done for 1.1 (a1, hopefully). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is now checked in and will be in 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1109452&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 09:02:10 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 09:02:13 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1121419 ] Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1121419, was opened at 2005-02-13 06:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Initial Comment: I would like the sb_mboxtrain to be precompiled with the next release. I would like to issue a command like the following in a windows command prompt / dos box. Notice that in windows, I must quote the dbx, not mbox, file name! sb_mboxtrain.exe -g "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21-42DE-BDD4- 882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\ham.dbx" - s "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21- 42DE-BDD4-882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\spam.dbx" Is this possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Since sb_mboxtrain wouldn't help here, and there have been no other requests for it, I'm not including it in the binary (too much bloat). Please reopen if you do have a use case. (For the OP, sb_pop3dnd.py is the best bet, or a custom solution that would really need to be done in Python or built separately). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-13 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could try the sb_pop3dnd script in 1.1 (hopefully arriving soon) or in CVS. It hasn't had the extensive testing that the other scripts have (because it's newer) but allows drag-and-drop training from within mail clients. Perhaps using the SMTP proxy would be easier than the web interface? Otherwise, a new script (or modified mboxtrain) needs to be written that can handle dbx files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) Date: 2005-02-13 16:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=271524 I don't know, that part of my question. If it doesn't work with dbx files I am still up a creek---regardless. I am trying to automate the process. I find its easier to tell people to move spam into a spam folder than to use the web interface. I would like to setup a windows task to train it with all the messages in the spam folder. Something like every hour. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-13 11:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't believe sb_mboxtrain works with dbx files, does it? So including a frozen sb_mboxtrain wouldn't actually do this. What is your use case for this? I'm not convinced that sb_mboxtrain would be widely used enough to make it worth including in the binary. It's not difficult to just install Python, after all, and run from source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 09:05:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 09:06:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1171901 ] Plugin loses categories field when moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1171901, was opened at 2005-03-29 03:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin loses categories field when moved Initial Comment: I have a system when I process email through my Rules Wizard. I take much of my email and move a copy to many different archive controlled folders. Each email is processed and a copy made in the appropriate folder and the category is set to "Copy". I have the field "categories" in my Inbox header line and so any email that is marked "Copy" in my Inbox, I can read and delete quickly as I know that a copy exists elsewhere. I installed the most recent Outlook plugin today and my categories went blank. I checked to see if a copy was being moved to the appropriate folders and they do seem to be getting there so the Rules Wizard seems to be working correctly. In addition, the "categories" field in the target folder is set correctly. This implies to me that category information is being lost in the SpamBayes hold and move process. It is quite possible that other information that might be useful is being lost as well. I am using Outlook 2000 Server SP-4 (v5.x), Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (v9.x). I checked for similar problems and was unable to find any. Thanks, Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 19:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What type of store is this? Hotmail, IMAP, Exchange, local PST file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 09:06:36 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 09:06:39 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932471 ] Spambayes will not install on NT Message-ID: Bugs item #932471, was opened at 2004-04-10 07:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932471&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: jonw (jondavidsmith) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spambayes will not install on NT Initial Comment: Hello, I am trying to install spambayes on an NT system. The install gets to the finish page and then jumps to the welcome to spambayes page--as expected. The toolbar does not appear on outlook and the install is not compleat. I'm running nt4.0 with service pack 6. Using Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.3821 Spambayes 1.0a9 I beleive I have the correct comcat.dll. In that both the good and bad ones are version 5.0, Ican't be sure, but IE is 6.0 2800 and the bad dll comes from IE4.0. This is per this link: spambayes1.log : Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin spambayes2.log: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 477, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 407, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 261, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) The only pyton file that showes up is: pythoncom23.dll in winnt\system32. No "com addins" are shown in outlook tools. Tony Meyer has been helping me, but has run out of ideas. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The OP no londer needs help :( and there's another more recent report dealing with NT, so closing this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jonw (jondavidsmith) Date: 2004-07-16 23:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1017921 After having no luck with spambayes, I ended up buying Junk- out for $20. It is slow, but it does catch the spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932471&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 15:56:43 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 15:56:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1171901 ] Plugin loses categories field when moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1171901, was opened at 2005-03-28 10:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by footloose You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin loses categories field when moved Initial Comment: I have a system when I process email through my Rules Wizard. I take much of my email and move a copy to many different archive controlled folders. Each email is processed and a copy made in the appropriate folder and the category is set to "Copy". I have the field "categories" in my Inbox header line and so any email that is marked "Copy" in my Inbox, I can read and delete quickly as I know that a copy exists elsewhere. I installed the most recent Outlook plugin today and my categories went blank. I checked to see if a copy was being moved to the appropriate folders and they do seem to be getting there so the Rules Wizard seems to be working correctly. In addition, the "categories" field in the target folder is set correctly. This implies to me that category information is being lost in the SpamBayes hold and move process. It is quite possible that other information that might be useful is being lost as well. I am using Outlook 2000 Server SP-4 (v5.x), Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (v9.x). I checked for similar problems and was unable to find any. Thanks, Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Outlook 2000 uses local(?) PSTs. I do not have much mail yet to determine if there is any special pattern but I think I may have noticed something. I have multiple POP accounts being processed through Outlook. 2 from my ISP (Fuse) and 2 from gmail. I have 4 rules that first move items out of my Inbox into 4 sub Inboxes which look like this: | |--- Folders |--- Inbox | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | |--- CareerBuilders |--- More Folders | The categories seem to get wiped out when the mail is returned to one of the sub-folders and not when it is returned to the Inbox. I will watch this and report on it when I am more sure of the pattern. Outlook seems to have no ability to create multiple Inboxes for each account so I have 4 rules like this, one to catch mail for each pop acccount and send it to it's own sub-folder: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to @Fuse Ddddddd move it to the Fuse Ddddddd Folder I have many dozens of rules to catch email designated for archiving target folders which look like this: Apply this rule after the message arrives from CareerBuilder.com assign it to the Copy category and move a copy to the CareerBuilders folder The four pop sub-folder rules are processed first. The combination of 2 rules like this results in one copy being moved to the Inbox sub folder and another copy to it's target folder. Both copies are marked as category "Copy". What was left in my inbox was usually spam but not always. Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 02:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What type of store is this? Hotmail, IMAP, Exchange, local PST file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Mar 29 16:21:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Mar 29 16:21:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1171901 ] Plugin loses categories field when moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1171901, was opened at 2005-03-28 10:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by footloose You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin loses categories field when moved Initial Comment: I have a system when I process email through my Rules Wizard. I take much of my email and move a copy to many different archive controlled folders. Each email is processed and a copy made in the appropriate folder and the category is set to "Copy". I have the field "categories" in my Inbox header line and so any email that is marked "Copy" in my Inbox, I can read and delete quickly as I know that a copy exists elsewhere. I installed the most recent Outlook plugin today and my categories went blank. I checked to see if a copy was being moved to the appropriate folders and they do seem to be getting there so the Rules Wizard seems to be working correctly. In addition, the "categories" field in the target folder is set correctly. This implies to me that category information is being lost in the SpamBayes hold and move process. It is quite possible that other information that might be useful is being lost as well. I am using Outlook 2000 Server SP-4 (v5.x), Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (v9.x). I checked for similar problems and was unable to find any. Thanks, Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 A couple of details which are probably not important but I will mention them. I have multiple PSTs on multiple drives and moves and copies go to several of them. Don't think this should matter. The setup for SpamBayes looks like this with junk going to Spam and junk supects going to Spam Suspects. They are also sub folders to Inbox. |--Base PST | | | |--- A to B Folders | |--- CareerBuilders | |--- D to H Folders | |--- Inbox | | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | | |--- Spam | | |--- Spam Suspects | | | |--- J to Z Folders | |-- More PSTs | | | |--- A to Z Folders | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Outlook 2000 uses local(?) PSTs. I do not have much mail yet to determine if there is any special pattern but I think I may have noticed something. I have multiple POP accounts being processed through Outlook. 2 from my ISP (Fuse) and 2 from gmail. I have 4 rules that first move items out of my Inbox into 4 sub Inboxes which look like this: | |--- Folders |--- Inbox | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | |--- CareerBuilders |--- More Folders | The categories seem to get wiped out when the mail is returned to one of the sub-folders and not when it is returned to the Inbox. I will watch this and report on it when I am more sure of the pattern. Outlook seems to have no ability to create multiple Inboxes for each account so I have 4 rules like this, one to catch mail for each pop acccount and send it to it's own sub-folder: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to @Fuse Ddddddd move it to the Fuse Ddddddd Folder I have many dozens of rules to catch email designated for archiving target folders which look like this: Apply this rule after the message arrives from CareerBuilder.com assign it to the Copy category and move a copy to the CareerBuilders folder The four pop sub-folder rules are processed first. The combination of 2 rules like this results in one copy being moved to the Inbox sub folder and another copy to it's target folder. Both copies are marked as category "Copy". What was left in my inbox was usually spam but not always. Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 02:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What type of store is this? Hotmail, IMAP, Exchange, local PST file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 30 01:27:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 30 01:27:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1171901 ] Plugin loses categories field when moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1171901, was opened at 2005-03-28 10:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by footloose You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin loses categories field when moved Initial Comment: I have a system when I process email through my Rules Wizard. I take much of my email and move a copy to many different archive controlled folders. Each email is processed and a copy made in the appropriate folder and the category is set to "Copy". I have the field "categories" in my Inbox header line and so any email that is marked "Copy" in my Inbox, I can read and delete quickly as I know that a copy exists elsewhere. I installed the most recent Outlook plugin today and my categories went blank. I checked to see if a copy was being moved to the appropriate folders and they do seem to be getting there so the Rules Wizard seems to be working correctly. In addition, the "categories" field in the target folder is set correctly. This implies to me that category information is being lost in the SpamBayes hold and move process. It is quite possible that other information that might be useful is being lost as well. I am using Outlook 2000 Server SP-4 (v5.x), Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (v9.x). I checked for similar problems and was unable to find any. Thanks, Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Please defer for a moment (unitl I get a bit more evidence) on working this problem. I may have found a rule processing pattern that could cause what I am seeing. I am moving some rules around to see if that fixes the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 A couple of details which are probably not important but I will mention them. I have multiple PSTs on multiple drives and moves and copies go to several of them. Don't think this should matter. The setup for SpamBayes looks like this with junk going to Spam and junk supects going to Spam Suspects. They are also sub folders to Inbox. |--Base PST | | | |--- A to B Folders | |--- CareerBuilders | |--- D to H Folders | |--- Inbox | | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | | |--- Spam | | |--- Spam Suspects | | | |--- J to Z Folders | |-- More PSTs | | | |--- A to Z Folders | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Outlook 2000 uses local(?) PSTs. I do not have much mail yet to determine if there is any special pattern but I think I may have noticed something. I have multiple POP accounts being processed through Outlook. 2 from my ISP (Fuse) and 2 from gmail. I have 4 rules that first move items out of my Inbox into 4 sub Inboxes which look like this: | |--- Folders |--- Inbox | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | |--- CareerBuilders |--- More Folders | The categories seem to get wiped out when the mail is returned to one of the sub-folders and not when it is returned to the Inbox. I will watch this and report on it when I am more sure of the pattern. Outlook seems to have no ability to create multiple Inboxes for each account so I have 4 rules like this, one to catch mail for each pop acccount and send it to it's own sub-folder: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to @Fuse Ddddddd move it to the Fuse Ddddddd Folder I have many dozens of rules to catch email designated for archiving target folders which look like this: Apply this rule after the message arrives from CareerBuilder.com assign it to the Copy category and move a copy to the CareerBuilders folder The four pop sub-folder rules are processed first. The combination of 2 rules like this results in one copy being moved to the Inbox sub folder and another copy to it's target folder. Both copies are marked as category "Copy". What was left in my inbox was usually spam but not always. Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 02:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What type of store is this? Hotmail, IMAP, Exchange, local PST file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Mar 30 02:26:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Mar 30 02:26:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-17 09:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kcartwri You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kip Cartwright (kcartwri) Date: 2005-03-29 18:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=192708 I have the same problem on Outlook 2003. No problem with Outlook XP (2002). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fsnyder (fsnyder) Date: 2005-02-25 16:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1227716 This behavior of the Outlook.exe not being stopped properly can be duplicated using the following VBScript code. OPTION EXPLICIT On error Resume Next err.clear Dim oOutlookApp, oOutlookNS Set oOutlookApp = GetObject(,"Outlook.Application") if Err <> 0 then MsgBox "Outlook not currently running." & VbCrLf & "Creating New Outlook Application. I'll kill it when I'm done" set oOutlookApp = CreateObject ("Outlook.Application") else MsgBox "Outlook was running. I'll kill it anyway when I'm done." End If MsgBox oOutlookApp.name & " version# " & oOutlookApp.version MsgBox "Now I'll kill the Outlook.exe process the clean way" oOutlookApp.Quit set oOutlookNS = Nothing set oOutlookApp = Nothing MsgBox "END" Run it and watch the TaskManager for when the Outlook.exe process gets created, and killed (as long as the SpamBayes Add-In is NOT activated in Outlook) This should normally kill the process unless some other add- in or anti-virus code is not allowing Outlook to exit cleanly. Hope this Helps -fsnyder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2005-02-03 12:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 One other source of hanging OL up, with or without Spambayes is ActiveSync for your PDA, celll phone or whatever. AS does tend to work behind your back, a little bit. One of the reasons I love Process Explorer from System Internals... -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gil (spambayes411) Date: 2005-02-02 04:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210353 I've discovered this is not limited to the mailto function. I use a program called SynchPST to keep outlook sychronized between my home computer and my laptop. When SynchPST opens, I see it in the task manager and it opens Outlook as well. After I synch my PST files, I close SynchPST. It closes but Outlook remains in the task manager. If the Spambayes add-in is not loaded, then both SynchPST and Outlook quit as they should. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Kenny :) I don't really know what might be causing this, but I guess you could start by checking to see if the spambayes log gets to the "addin terminating" part. Let me know if I can help at all (though I don't have OL2003 anywhere). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 10:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Yep, I was able to confirm this problem on Outlook 2003. If I activate a mailto link with SpamBayes loaded and enabled, OUTLOOK.EXE will not exit when I close the compose window. If I disable SpamBayes filtering from SpamBayes Manager, OUTLOOK.EXE still doesn't exit. If I completely disable loading of SpamBayes from the COM Add-ins dialog then OUTLOOK.EXE closes properly when I close the compose window. I'll look into this further when I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-23 23:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-21 05:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 21:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Mar 31 14:57:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Mar 31 14:57:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1163672 ] Need to re-train every day Message-ID: Support Requests item #1163672, was opened at 2005-03-15 13:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fintan74 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: fintan74 (fintan74) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Need to re-train every day Initial Comment: I have a problem for which I have been unable to find a solution in either this forum, the FAQ or the Troubleshooting guide. Hopefully someone here will be able to assist. Spambayes has been monitoring my Outlook mailbox for quite some time and it has always worked like a charm. Upto about two weeks ago. Suddenly I needed to re-train the complete database every day, otherwise it will simply not process messages. Spambayes loads without problems and the toolbar itself works fine. It just does not process anything until I re-train the database. Downloading and installing the latest version has not resolved matters. I have also tried putting the configuration files in a local folder instead of the documents&settings-folder that is synchronised with server during logon and logoff. Hasn't helped either... What I have noticed in the logfile is that it says "NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable" four times in a row. I wonder if this is the reason for the problem, although I have no idea what is triggering that message. The complete log is as follows: --------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 709 spam and 33 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable Saving configuration -> C:\spambayesconfig\MS Exchange Settings.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'fintan/Postvak IN' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'fintan/Junk E-Mail' --------------------- Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-03-31 14:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi anadelonbrin, Thank you very much for taking the time to respond to this query. The log doesn't show much more than the above after a full day of not working, but yet manually processing. I have deleted the last 50 or so spam messages from the following log, as they do not seem to add much to this log: --------------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1111 spam and 39 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Moving and spam training message 'Perfector (1+1) machines for sale' - Training on message 'Perfector (1+1) machines for sale' in 'fintan/Postvak IN - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'Re: Encrypted Mail' - Training on message 'Re: Encrypted Mail' in 'fintan/Postvak IN - trained as spam --------------------------------------------- That's all it says... Yes, these folders are on an Exchange server, but to my knowledge nothingw as changed (although I am not the server admin). I have no further problems viewing these folders. As stated earlier, when I retrain Spambayes it works fine for the rest of the day. But overnight (when the machine is turned off) it forgets all it's settings and needs retraining again the next day. To me it looks like the problem is in the folders that Spambayes is skipping during initialising. But I have no idea why it cannot locate the folders, or why it forgets where they are even after the retraining. Thanks again for your time and input. Regards, Fintan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 03:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach a log from when it doesn't work? That would help a lot more in figuring out what is wrong. Are all of these folders on an Exchange server? Has anything changed with your Exchange server recently? Do you have any other problems viewing these folders? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Mar 31 17:58:15 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Mar 31 17:58:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1171901 ] Plugin loses categories field when moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1171901, was opened at 2005-03-28 10:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by footloose You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin loses categories field when moved Initial Comment: I have a system when I process email through my Rules Wizard. I take much of my email and move a copy to many different archive controlled folders. Each email is processed and a copy made in the appropriate folder and the category is set to "Copy". I have the field "categories" in my Inbox header line and so any email that is marked "Copy" in my Inbox, I can read and delete quickly as I know that a copy exists elsewhere. I installed the most recent Outlook plugin today and my categories went blank. I checked to see if a copy was being moved to the appropriate folders and they do seem to be getting there so the Rules Wizard seems to be working correctly. In addition, the "categories" field in the target folder is set correctly. This implies to me that category information is being lost in the SpamBayes hold and move process. It is quite possible that other information that might be useful is being lost as well. I am using Outlook 2000 Server SP-4 (v5.x), Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (v9.x). I checked for similar problems and was unable to find any. Thanks, Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-31 10:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 I rearranged the rules. Turned SpamBayes off and on. Watched results and something I did fixed the problem. I am not clear at all what or why but categories now are being set. So I will close the problem until I see something appear againt that I can document. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Please defer for a moment (unitl I get a bit more evidence) on working this problem. I may have found a rule processing pattern that could cause what I am seeing. I am moving some rules around to see if that fixes the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 A couple of details which are probably not important but I will mention them. I have multiple PSTs on multiple drives and moves and copies go to several of them. Don't think this should matter. The setup for SpamBayes looks like this with junk going to Spam and junk supects going to Spam Suspects. They are also sub folders to Inbox. |--Base PST | | | |--- A to B Folders | |--- CareerBuilders | |--- D to H Folders | |--- Inbox | | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | | |--- Spam | | |--- Spam Suspects | | | |--- J to Z Folders | |-- More PSTs | | | |--- A to Z Folders | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Outlook 2000 uses local(?) PSTs. I do not have much mail yet to determine if there is any special pattern but I think I may have noticed something. I have multiple POP accounts being processed through Outlook. 2 from my ISP (Fuse) and 2 from gmail. I have 4 rules that first move items out of my Inbox into 4 sub Inboxes which look like this: | |--- Folders |--- Inbox | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | |--- CareerBuilders |--- More Folders | The categories seem to get wiped out when the mail is returned to one of the sub-folders and not when it is returned to the Inbox. I will watch this and report on it when I am more sure of the pattern. Outlook seems to have no ability to create multiple Inboxes for each account so I have 4 rules like this, one to catch mail for each pop acccount and send it to it's own sub-folder: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to @Fuse Ddddddd move it to the Fuse Ddddddd Folder I have many dozens of rules to catch email designated for archiving target folders which look like this: Apply this rule after the message arrives from CareerBuilder.com assign it to the Copy category and move a copy to the CareerBuilders folder The four pop sub-folder rules are processed first. The combination of 2 rules like this results in one copy being moved to the Inbox sub folder and another copy to it's target folder. Both copies are marked as category "Copy". What was left in my inbox was usually spam but not always. Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 02:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What type of store is this? Hotmail, IMAP, Exchange, local PST file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Mar 31 17:59:58 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Mar 31 18:00:00 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1171901 ] Plugin loses categories field when moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1171901, was opened at 2005-03-28 10:28 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by footloose You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin loses categories field when moved Initial Comment: I have a system when I process email through my Rules Wizard. I take much of my email and move a copy to many different archive controlled folders. Each email is processed and a copy made in the appropriate folder and the category is set to "Copy". I have the field "categories" in my Inbox header line and so any email that is marked "Copy" in my Inbox, I can read and delete quickly as I know that a copy exists elsewhere. I installed the most recent Outlook plugin today and my categories went blank. I checked to see if a copy was being moved to the appropriate folders and they do seem to be getting there so the Rules Wizard seems to be working correctly. In addition, the "categories" field in the target folder is set correctly. This implies to me that category information is being lost in the SpamBayes hold and move process. It is quite possible that other information that might be useful is being lost as well. I am using Outlook 2000 Server SP-4 (v5.x), Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (v9.x). I checked for similar problems and was unable to find any. Thanks, Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-31 10:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 I rearranged the rules. Turned SpamBayes off and on. Watched results and something I did fixed the problem. I am not clear at all what or why but categories now are being set. So I will close the problem until I see something appear againt that I can document. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Please defer for a moment (unitl I get a bit more evidence) on working this problem. I may have found a rule processing pattern that could cause what I am seeing. I am moving some rules around to see if that fixes the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 A couple of details which are probably not important but I will mention them. I have multiple PSTs on multiple drives and moves and copies go to several of them. Don't think this should matter. The setup for SpamBayes looks like this with junk going to Spam and junk supects going to Spam Suspects. They are also sub folders to Inbox. |--Base PST | | | |--- A to B Folders | |--- CareerBuilders | |--- D to H Folders | |--- Inbox | | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | | |--- Spam | | |--- Spam Suspects | | | |--- J to Z Folders | |-- More PSTs | | | |--- A to Z Folders | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Wolff (footloose) Date: 2005-03-29 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=957768 Outlook 2000 uses local(?) PSTs. I do not have much mail yet to determine if there is any special pattern but I think I may have noticed something. I have multiple POP accounts being processed through Outlook. 2 from my ISP (Fuse) and 2 from gmail. I have 4 rules that first move items out of my Inbox into 4 sub Inboxes which look like this: | |--- Folders |--- Inbox | |--- Fuse Dddddddd | |--- Fuse EeeeWwwww | |--- Gmail Dddddddd | |--- Gmail WwwwwHouse | |--- CareerBuilders |--- More Folders | The categories seem to get wiped out when the mail is returned to one of the sub-folders and not when it is returned to the Inbox. I will watch this and report on it when I am more sure of the pattern. Outlook seems to have no ability to create multiple Inboxes for each account so I have 4 rules like this, one to catch mail for each pop acccount and send it to it's own sub-folder: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to @Fuse Ddddddd move it to the Fuse Ddddddd Folder I have many dozens of rules to catch email designated for archiving target folders which look like this: Apply this rule after the message arrives from CareerBuilder.com assign it to the Copy category and move a copy to the CareerBuilders folder The four pop sub-folder rules are processed first. The combination of 2 rules like this results in one copy being moved to the Inbox sub folder and another copy to it's target folder. Both copies are marked as category "Copy". What was left in my inbox was usually spam but not always. Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 02:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What type of store is this? Hotmail, IMAP, Exchange, local PST file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1171901&group_id=61702