From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 3 03:13:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:13:25 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-759917 ] Pickle vs. DB: inconsistent behaviour when database missing Message-ID: Bugs item #759917, was opened at 2003-06-24 11:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=759917&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Ward (gward) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: Pickle vs. DB: inconsistent behaviour when database missing Initial Comment: hammie.py behaves inconsistently when the database file is missing, depending on whether it was run with -D (pickle) or -d (DBM). In particular, -D scores the message at 0.5, and -d crashes with a traceback. Example (neither spambayes.db or spambayes.pkl exist): $ hammie.py -f -D -p spambayes.pkl < $msg | grep "^X-Spambayes" X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.50 $ hammie.py -f -d -p spambayes.db < $msg | grep "^X-Spambayes" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/hammie.py", line 6, in ? spambayes.hammiebulk.main() File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/hammiebulk.py", line 180, in main h = hammie.open(pck, usedb, mode) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/hammie.py", line 260, in open b = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename, mode) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/storage.py", line 147, in __init__ self.load() File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/storage.py", line 155, in load self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 59, in open return f(*args) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 41, in open_best return f(*args) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 12, in open_db3hash return bsddb3.hashopen(*args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/bsddb3/__init__.py", line 160, in hashopen d.open(file, _db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) bsddb3._db.DBNoSuchFileError: (2, 'No such file or directory') Arguably, both behaviours are wrong: hammie.py should terminate with a clear, simple, "No such file or directory" error message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2005-06-02 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 (finally) fixes in sb_filter.py 1.18. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-08-03 06:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Yes, sb_filter.py opens the database in read mode because you will presumably be modifying the database (training) with some other tool. This avoids two problems: 1. corruption w/ multiple writers and no locking 2. having to work out some sort of locking scheme and figuring out what to do when one of the locking programs (say, sb_server.py) wants to keep the file locked for writing for long periods of time. The only time sb_filter.py opens the database with a different mode is when you explicitly ask it to create a new database with the -n flag. In that case it doesn't score any messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-02 23:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is very old, and should probably be resolved one way or the other. Right now, just about all the spambayes scripts do the pickle behaviour above, i.e. if there is no database it opens a new one without error. This seems somewhat nicer than having to explicitly create one if it doesn't exist, although I don't use sb_filter. The reason that sb_filter is different in this respect is that it specifies 'r' as the mode, rather than the default 'c'. I'm sure there is a reason for this, so I don't want to change it - I figure Skip will probably know why it is, so assigning to him. Skip: if you think that the 'r' mode is right, then I'll create a patch to catch the DBNoSuchFileError and print out a nicer "Use an existing database, fool", error. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=759917&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 3 03:13:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:13:59 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-759917 ] Pickle vs. DB: inconsistent behaviour when database missing Message-ID: Bugs item #759917, was opened at 2003-06-24 11:26 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=759917&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: hammie Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Ward (gward) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: Pickle vs. DB: inconsistent behaviour when database missing Initial Comment: hammie.py behaves inconsistently when the database file is missing, depending on whether it was run with -D (pickle) or -d (DBM). In particular, -D scores the message at 0.5, and -d crashes with a traceback. Example (neither spambayes.db or spambayes.pkl exist): $ hammie.py -f -D -p spambayes.pkl < $msg | grep "^X-Spambayes" X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.50 $ hammie.py -f -d -p spambayes.db < $msg | grep "^X-Spambayes" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/hammie.py", line 6, in ? spambayes.hammiebulk.main() File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/hammiebulk.py", line 180, in main h = hammie.open(pck, usedb, mode) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/hammie.py", line 260, in open b = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename, mode) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/storage.py", line 147, in __init__ self.load() File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/storage.py", line 155, in load self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 59, in open return f(*args) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 41, in open_best return f(*args) File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 12, in open_db3hash return bsddb3.hashopen(*args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/bsddb3/__init__.py", line 160, in hashopen d.open(file, _db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) bsddb3._db.DBNoSuchFileError: (2, 'No such file or directory') Arguably, both behaviours are wrong: hammie.py should terminate with a clear, simple, "No such file or directory" error message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2005-06-02 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 (finally) fixes in sb_filter.py 1.18. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-08-03 06:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Yes, sb_filter.py opens the database in read mode because you will presumably be modifying the database (training) with some other tool. This avoids two problems: 1. corruption w/ multiple writers and no locking 2. having to work out some sort of locking scheme and figuring out what to do when one of the locking programs (say, sb_server.py) wants to keep the file locked for writing for long periods of time. The only time sb_filter.py opens the database with a different mode is when you explicitly ask it to create a new database with the -n flag. In that case it doesn't score any messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-02 23:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is very old, and should probably be resolved one way or the other. Right now, just about all the spambayes scripts do the pickle behaviour above, i.e. if there is no database it opens a new one without error. This seems somewhat nicer than having to explicitly create one if it doesn't exist, although I don't use sb_filter. The reason that sb_filter is different in this respect is that it specifies 'r' as the mode, rather than the default 'c'. I'm sure there is a reason for this, so I don't want to change it - I figure Skip will probably know why it is, so assigning to him. Skip: if you think that the 'r' mode is right, then I'll create a patch to catch the DBNoSuchFileError and print out a nicer "Use an existing database, fool", error. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=759917&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 3 14:11:36 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 05:11:36 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1214205 ] corrupt database when# spams > #hams Message-ID: Bugs item #1214205, was opened at 2005-06-03 14:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214205&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: JohanC (jclaes) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: corrupt database when# spams > #hams Initial Comment: After running SpamBayes 1.1a1 (on Windows XP) for a few weeks without any problems, I suddenly get a database error. Deleting the database and restarting leads to the same error again, after a while at least. The problem seems to be that there are more spam-mails in my database than hams. I can consistently reproduce the following: - delete the database - start SpamBayes - select any mail to be classified as spam (so only classifying one message in an empty database, the contents of the mail to be classified isn't important) - I get the following error-message Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 470, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 559, in onTrain File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 409, in RememberTrained File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214205&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 3 21:57:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 12:57:46 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1214494 ] Toolbar buttons won't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1214494, was opened at 2005-06-03 14:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214494&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jtfgoblue (jtfancher) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbar buttons won't work Initial Comment: My SpamBayes sorts some incoming messages into suspected and junk, but the toolbal buttons won't work for me on others I want to assign. Please help....here is the log file: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214494&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jun 4 03:19:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:19:23 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1214205 ] corrupt database when# spams > #hams Message-ID: Bugs item #1214205, was opened at 2005-06-04 00:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214205&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: JohanC (jclaes) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: corrupt database when# spams > #hams Initial Comment: After running SpamBayes 1.1a1 (on Windows XP) for a few weeks without any problems, I suddenly get a database error. Deleting the database and restarting leads to the same error again, after a while at least. The problem seems to be that there are more spam-mails in my database than hams. I can consistently reproduce the following: - delete the database - start SpamBayes - select any mail to be classified as spam (so only classifying one message in an empty database, the contents of the mail to be classified isn't important) - I get the following error-message Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 470, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 559, in onTrain File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 409, in RememberTrained File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-04 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm 99% certain that this is a dupe of the existing report with message database problems with sb_server and 1.1a1. In that case this is already fixed in CVS. It'd be wise to not use 1.1a1 with sb_server. Hopefully I'll find time to get a 1.1a2 out soon, or you can use source from CVS or 1.0.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214205&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jun 4 03:51:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:51:59 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1214494 ] Toolbar buttons won't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1214494, was opened at 2005-06-04 07:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214494&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jtfgoblue (jtfancher) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbar buttons won't work Initial Comment: My SpamBayes sorts some incoming messages into suspected and junk, but the toolbal buttons won't work for me on others I want to assign. Please help....here is the log file: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-04 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log file attached. Did you forget to tick the box? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1214494&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 9 20:36:12 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:36:12 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1217704 ] Not all spam marked as read with mark as read checked Message-ID: Bugs item #1217704, was opened at 2005-06-09 18:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1217704&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bryn Moslow (rhomboid) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Not all spam marked as read with mark as read checked Initial Comment: I've got a few users using the Outlook plugin 1.0.4 on Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360 SP1) with Exchange 2003 SP1 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Around the time the Server 2003 SP1 patch was installed, messages moved into their Certain Spam folder (Inbox\Junk E-mail in all cases) sometimes are not marked as read even though the "Mark spam as read" box is checked. It's a few messages here and there, not all. I'm not referring to the message count next to the folder name, this is actually when you go into the folder and look at the message list pane. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1217704&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 10 01:15:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:15:27 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1217866 ] inert Spambayes using Outlook Message-ID: Support Requests item #1217866, was opened at 2005-06-09 23:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1217866&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: john prokopek (jprok) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: inert Spambayes using Outlook Initial Comment: I had installed spambayes with outlook 2003 a while ago and it worked great. Then I did who know what it stopped working. I would click on the 'delete spambayes' toolbar icon but nothing would happen. I clicked on the 'spambayes' icon for options but nothing happened. I uninstalled and reinstalled a number of times with no luck. I just downloaded and installed version 1.1a1 and still no luck. I would love to get this working again. Thanks, I appreciate your help john ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1217866&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 10 14:38:19 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:38:19 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1218181 ] spam gets through, totally unmarked Message-ID: Bugs item #1218181, was opened at 2005-06-10 08:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spam gets through, totally unmarked Initial Comment: I set the spambayes as a local POP3 server, so all my mail goes through it. I was working fine, and was catching 95% of the spam after i trained it. I set it up so it was marking the header as spam, ham or unsure, so i can sort my mail withing my mail client (outlook express). I send all messages marked "spam" to the deleted folder. But then like three days ago i started getting some of the spam without ANY marks in the header, and now i get like 10-15% of the spam right into my inbox. Does anybody know how to fix that? thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 13 05:34:55 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:34:55 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-744558 ] Add "Delete As Spam" button to Outlook inspector w Message-ID: Feature Requests item #744558, was opened at 2003-05-27 16:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by herbm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=744558&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Raabe (mraabe) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add "Delete As Spam" button to Outlook inspector w Initial Comment: The "Delete As Spam" button that the addin adds to the toolbar in Outlook's main explorer window should also be added to the toolbar in each email inspector window as well. I.e., when you double-click on an email and are viewing it in its own window, you should have the option right there to delete it as spam, instead of having to return to the explorer window to do so. It's of lesser importance, but it may make sense to add the "Anti-Spam" dropdown button to the inspector window as well. I tried adding the buttons myself, which caused me to discover bug #744550 (where Outlook's Tools/Customize dialog is broken). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Herb Martin (herbm) Date: 2005-06-12 22:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529071 Good feature -- please add when convenient ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: arkitekt1 (arkitekt1) Date: 2004-10-07 14:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1135013 I believe this would be a valuable added feature - especially for those of us using Outlook add-ons such as Neo Email Organizer (http://www.caelo.com/a/rl.php3?i=A963D) - this is a great program but I end up losing the benefit of SpamBayes because when I double click the messages to open them the Delete As Spam button isn't available ... I have to go back to Outlook and find the email and designate it as spam. NEO itself does have some spam type features that help - I can drag the email to a folder designated as spam (junk email folder that I set with SpamBayes) and it ignores that folder. But it would be even better to have the Delete As Spam feature built right into each email interface. I don't know how difficult this would be, but it would be a great addition in functionality for people like myself using an add-on interface. Thanks for your consideration ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=744558&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 13 05:42:58 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:42:58 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1218181 ] spam gets through, totally unmarked Message-ID: Bugs item #1218181, was opened at 2005-06-11 00:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spam gets through, totally unmarked Initial Comment: I set the spambayes as a local POP3 server, so all my mail goes through it. I was working fine, and was catching 95% of the spam after i trained it. I set it up so it was marking the header as spam, ham or unsure, so i can sort my mail withing my mail client (outlook express). I send all messages marked "spam" to the deleted folder. But then like three days ago i started getting some of the spam without ANY marks in the header, and now i get like 10-15% of the spam right into my inbox. Does anybody know how to fix that? thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-13 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Take a look at the headers for the mail. Is there a "X-Spambayes-Exception" header? If so, what does it say? What do the log files say? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 13 05:43:49 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:43:49 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1217866 ] inert Spambayes using Outlook Message-ID: Support Requests item #1217866, was opened at 2005-06-10 11:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1217866&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: jprok (jprok) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: inert Spambayes using Outlook Initial Comment: I had installed spambayes with outlook 2003 a while ago and it worked great. Then I did who know what it stopped working. I would click on the 'delete spambayes' toolbar icon but nothing would happen. I clicked on the 'spambayes' icon for options but nothing happened. I uninstalled and reinstalled a number of times with no luck. I just downloaded and installed version 1.1a1 and still no luck. I would love to get this working again. Thanks, I appreciate your help john ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-13 15:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in (Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items). If not, then please attach a copy of your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the logs). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1217866&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 13 05:44:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:44:18 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1217704 ] Not all spam marked as read with mark as read checked Message-ID: Bugs item #1217704, was opened at 2005-06-10 06:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1217704&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bryn Moslow (rhomboid) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Not all spam marked as read with mark as read checked Initial Comment: I've got a few users using the Outlook plugin 1.0.4 on Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360 SP1) with Exchange 2003 SP1 on Windows Server 2003 SP1. Around the time the Server 2003 SP1 patch was installed, messages moved into their Certain Spam folder (Inbox\Junk E-mail in all cases) sometimes are not marked as read even though the "Mark spam as read" box is checked. It's a few messages here and there, not all. I'm not referring to the message count next to the folder name, this is actually when you go into the folder and look at the message list pane. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-13 15:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach a log file for a period when this occured? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1217704&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 13 10:53:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:53:23 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1219553 ] Background Filtering does not start Message-ID: Bugs item #1219553, was opened at 2005-06-13 08:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1219553&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ngzj (ngzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Background Filtering does not start Initial Comment: After starting Outlook, SpamBayes does not start automatic filtering. I always (!) have to click "filter messages" in Menu. It seems (as logfile says below) that SpamBayes can not Access the Incoming Folder for a short time after starting Outlook, so that filteriing does not start. But setting the start delay to five seconds also not fixes the problem. ----------------------------------- Log File ------------------------------- System verbosity set to 4 No old pickle file to migrate Dumping loaded configuration: [Experimental] timer_interval: 1000 timer_only_receive_folders: True timer_start_delay: 0 [Filter] enabled: True filter_now: False save_spam_info: True spam_action: Moved spam_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 0454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20 AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C485 83234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F636 E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '000000008 D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA0100B8DC48 81655E6848BB8CBF82058DB4CB0000003BF6A40000') spam_mark_as_read: False spam_threshold: 85.0 timer_enabled: True timer_interval: 0.5 timer_only_receive_folders: False timer_start_delay: 5.0 unsure_action: Moved unsure_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 0454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20 AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C485 83130002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F636 E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '000000008 D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01002A32460 07B0AC345A11FAF121B1BAC4800000062F2120000') unsure_mark_as_read: False unsure_threshold: 15.0 watch_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583130002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01009D0A38 DA0C72D511A87200D0B75B457B000000E856440000')] watch_include_sub: False [Filter_Now] action_all: True folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01009D0A38 DA0C72D511A87200D0B75B457B000000E856440000')] include_sub: True only_unread: False only_unseen: False [General] data_directory: delete_as_spam_message_state: None field_score_name: Spam recover_from_spam_message_state: None verbose: 4 [Training] ham_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583130002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01002A3246 007B0AC345A11FAF121B1BAC4800000062F2100000'), ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 06D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80 100AA0037D96E000000473A5C4E6F656769735C6E677 A6A5C4F75746C6F6F6B5C506F7374666163682041726 36869762E70737400', '000000005E17B2567A750845938 94140F7D2E84F82800000')] ham_include_sub: True rebuild: True rescore: True spam_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA0100B8DC4 881655E6848BB8CBF82058DB4CB0000003BF6A40000' ), ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 0454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20 AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C485 83234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F636 E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '000000008 D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01002A32460 07B0AC345A11FAF121B1BAC4800000062F2120000')] spam_include_sub: False train_manual_spam: True train_recovered_spam: True -- end of configuration -- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\ngzj.000 \Anwendungsdaten\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database .db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\ngzj.000 \Anwendungsdaten\SpamBayes\default_message_datab ase.db' Bayes database initialized with 1228 spam and 753 good messages Loaded databases in 5.70128ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable Folder 'Postfach - xxxxx J?rgen, (BD5- NOEGIS)/Spambayes/Spam' already has field 'Spam' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Postfach - xxxxx J?rgen, (BD5- NOEGIS)/Spambayes/Spam' Folder 'Postfach - xxxxx J?rgen, (BD5- NOEGIS)/Spambayes/Unsure' already has field 'Spam' Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Posteingang', as it is not available OnFolderSwitch OnSelectionChange ----------------------- End of Log ---------------------- sincerely, Juergen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1219553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 14 20:22:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:22:13 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1220635 ] slow down the computer Message-ID: Bugs item #1220635, was opened at 2005-06-14 11:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220635&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: duykhang (sowku) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: slow down the computer Initial Comment: i have lot of spam. and i love the software, it filters and works well. filtered all my spam, but it's so slow that i have to wait atleast 30 min to download 1000>1500 spams. can't use my computer.. winxp sp1 & latest SB. thanks.. you guys created something amazing... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220635&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 14 20:43:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:43:27 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1220651 ] slow down the computer Message-ID: Bugs item #1220651, was opened at 2005-06-14 11:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220651&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: duykhang (sowku) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: slow down the computer Initial Comment: i have lot of spam. and i love the software, it filters and works well. filtered all my spam, but it's so slow that i have to wait atleast 30 min to download 1000>1500 spams. can't use my computer.. winxp sp1 & latest SB. thanks.. you guys created something amazing... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 15 17:28:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 08:28:46 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1221309 ] Feature Request: Filter only e-mail with internet headers Message-ID: Bugs item #1221309, was opened at 2005-06-15 11:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221309&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.1.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason St.Amand (starconboy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature Request: Filter only e-mail with internet headers Initial Comment: If you use Outlook with an Exchange server, all e-mails internal and external are filtered. Due to the nature of spammers, after a while internal e-mails will start becomming rated as "unsure" and get put into the "Junk Suspects" folder. I see nothing wrong with this functionallity, it works as it should. But internal company e-mails, sometimes important ones, end up where people do not allways look. To correct this, I would like a feature so that only e- mails that have internet headers are filtered. This would remove all internal e-mails from being filtered accidentially into the wrong folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221309&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 16 01:34:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:34:35 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1221309 ] Feature Request: Filter only e-mail with internet headers Message-ID: Bugs item #1221309, was opened at 2005-06-16 03:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221309&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.1.x >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason St.Amand (starconboy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature Request: Filter only e-mail with internet headers Initial Comment: If you use Outlook with an Exchange server, all e-mails internal and external are filtered. Due to the nature of spammers, after a while internal e-mails will start becomming rated as "unsure" and get put into the "Junk Suspects" folder. I see nothing wrong with this functionallity, it works as it should. But internal company e-mails, sometimes important ones, end up where people do not allways look. To correct this, I would like a feature so that only e- mails that have internet headers are filtered. This would remove all internal e-mails from being filtered accidentially into the wrong folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-16 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1.1 simluates more headers for exchange-only messages, which should mostly resolve this. You could try 1.1a1 and see if that helps (ideally retraining), or wait for 1.1 final. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221309&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 16 16:13:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:13:03 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1221946 ] Dublicates created with activesync Message-ID: Bugs item #1221946, was opened at 2005-06-16 14:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kyle Prawel (kprawel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dublicates created with activesync Initial Comment: When I sync my iPaq with Oulook2003, while Spambayes plugin is turned on, duplicates are created. These email duplicates are stripped of thier "from" data which causes outlook to crash when you look at one. I have turned the plugin off and been able to sync and delete the duplicates with no problems. I love Spambayes on my other machines; hope you'll be able to make it work with Activesync. Machine: Win XP /sp2 Oulook 2003 Activesync 3.8 IPaq running Mobile 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 16 18:38:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:38:30 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1222045 ] lost spam Message-ID: Bugs item #1222045, was opened at 2005-06-16 11:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1222045&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon H. Peterson (jonhp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lost spam Initial Comment: If the "certain spam" folder gets deleted (don't know how this happend on my system), then spam bayes appears to just delete the spam w/o comment. seems like there should be a wizard that appears that helps you reconfigure spambayes and/or create a new folder for spam to reside in. i guess, at a minimum, there should be a dialog box warning that spam is going in the bit-bucket if it is not reconfigured through the manager. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1222045&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 17 00:18:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:18:30 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1218181 ] spam gets through, totally unmarked Message-ID: Bugs item #1218181, was opened at 2005-06-10 05:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spam gets through, totally unmarked Initial Comment: I set the spambayes as a local POP3 server, so all my mail goes through it. I was working fine, and was catching 95% of the spam after i trained it. I set it up so it was marking the header as spam, ham or unsure, so i can sort my mail withing my mail client (outlook express). I send all messages marked "spam" to the deleted folder. But then like three days ago i started getting some of the spam without ANY marks in the header, and now i get like 10-15% of the spam right into my inbox. Does anybody know how to fix that? thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-06-16 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I have observed a new technique used by spammers: they inundate a (personal/virtual) server with dozens of idle SMTP connections - usually from different source IPs using zombies - where each forks a new smtpd process until no more connections can be made due to the limit on number of processes by one user, then they send their spam through one of the connections. Now, if procmail is used for filtering, a fork to call spambayes will fail, and therefore the rescued original text will be delivered to the mailbox based on the default rule. You may be better off setting a rule to put unmarked messages to the unsure box. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-12 20:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Take a look at the headers for the mail. Is there a "X-Spambayes-Exception" header? If so, what does it say? What do the log files say? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 20 07:22:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:22:22 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1222045 ] lost spam Message-ID: Bugs item #1222045, was opened at 2005-06-17 04:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1222045&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon H. Peterson (jonhp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lost spam Initial Comment: If the "certain spam" folder gets deleted (don't know how this happend on my system), then spam bayes appears to just delete the spam w/o comment. seems like there should be a wizard that appears that helps you reconfigure spambayes and/or create a new folder for spam to reside in. i guess, at a minimum, there should be a dialog box warning that spam is going in the bit-bucket if it is not reconfigured through the manager. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-20 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If the spam folder is moved to the deleted items folder, then spambayes will continue to move mail to it. If it is actually deleted, then spambayes will cease to be able to move spam (it *can't* delete mail). If you re-run the SpamBayes wizard and choose not to do any training, that would recreate the folders, I think (but haven't checked). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1222045&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 20 07:22:52 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:22:52 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1218181 ] spam gets through, totally unmarked Message-ID: Bugs item #1218181, was opened at 2005-06-11 00:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spam gets through, totally unmarked Initial Comment: I set the spambayes as a local POP3 server, so all my mail goes through it. I was working fine, and was catching 95% of the spam after i trained it. I set it up so it was marking the header as spam, ham or unsure, so i can sort my mail withing my mail client (outlook express). I send all messages marked "spam" to the deleted folder. But then like three days ago i started getting some of the spam without ANY marks in the header, and now i get like 10-15% of the spam right into my inbox. Does anybody know how to fix that? thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-06-17 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I have observed a new technique used by spammers: they inundate a (personal/virtual) server with dozens of idle SMTP connections - usually from different source IPs using zombies - where each forks a new smtpd process until no more connections can be made due to the limit on number of processes by one user, then they send their spam through one of the connections. Now, if procmail is used for filtering, a fork to call spambayes will fail, and therefore the rescued original text will be delivered to the mailbox based on the default rule. You may be better off setting a rule to put unmarked messages to the unsure box. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-13 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Take a look at the headers for the mail. Is there a "X-Spambayes-Exception" header? If so, what does it say? What do the log files say? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1218181&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 20 16:22:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 07:22:08 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1163672 ] Need to re-train every day Message-ID: Support Requests item #1163672, was opened at 2005-03-15 13:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fintan74 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: fintan74 (fintan74) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Need to re-train every day Initial Comment: I have a problem for which I have been unable to find a solution in either this forum, the FAQ or the Troubleshooting guide. Hopefully someone here will be able to assist. Spambayes has been monitoring my Outlook mailbox for quite some time and it has always worked like a charm. Upto about two weeks ago. Suddenly I needed to re-train the complete database every day, otherwise it will simply not process messages. Spambayes loads without problems and the toolbar itself works fine. It just does not process anything until I re-train the database. Downloading and installing the latest version has not resolved matters. I have also tried putting the configuration files in a local folder instead of the documents&settings-folder that is synchronised with server during logon and logoff. Hasn't helped either... What I have noticed in the logfile is that it says "NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable" four times in a row. I wonder if this is the reason for the problem, although I have no idea what is triggering that message. The complete log is as follows: --------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 709 spam and 33 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable Saving configuration -> C:\spambayesconfig\MS Exchange Settings.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'fintan/Postvak IN' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'fintan/Junk E-Mail' --------------------- Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-06-20 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi Tony, It's been a while since I heard from you. Don't want to push, but do you have any further ideas to help resolve this matter? Thanks, Fintan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-27 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That is the correct file - it's name is based on the Outlook profile name, which if there is only one profile is usually called Outlook.ini or MS Exchange Server.ini. I'll look into this more tomorrow - particularly what might cause it to start working as you describe. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-04-22 10:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi Tony, Thanks again for your time. I downloaded the file, unpacked it and tried running it. Unfortunately there is no such thing as an outlook.ini file on our system. What I do have in my spambayes-folder is an 'MS Exchange Server.ini' file, which I assume is the same file you are looking for. Our IT-guy confirms this is also the name of the file that holds my Outlook-settings. Running the executable on this ini-file does nothing in the DOS-shell however: no errors, but also no output. There is no logfile in the spambayes-folder or the bin-drectory of your executable. Am I looking in the wrong place, or could this different .ini-file be the reason for the problems in the first place? An additional bit of information: I found yesterday and today that Spambayes suddenly starts working if I first 'delete as spam' a message, then open the Spambayes Manager window and simply close it again. After a while the program suddenly jumps to life and starts classifying mail. Upon restart of the computer it is dormant again (it loads fine though) and I need to repeat the above steps to get it working. It's getting stranger by the day, but at least it's doing something... Look forward to hearing back from you... Regards, Fintan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-22 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, there's a test binary at: If you expand it, then open a command window and go into the dist\bin directory, then do "debug_folder_list.exe C:\spambayesconfig\Outlook.ini" it should print out a list of the folders. (I'm taking a stab at where the Outlook.ini file is, since it's not the default config layout. Replace with the location of the actual file). If you could try this with Outlook closed, and with Outlook open, and see if it generates the same error, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-21 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ack - sorry. I got caught up with other work. I'll send you a binary tomorrow (22/4). Thanks for trying 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-04-12 09:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi Tony, Thanks for your below reply and my apologies for not getting back to you sooner. Unfortunately I am not familiar enough with Exchange servers to give you any feedback on the mapi-issue. If you would be so kind as to e-mail me the binary you mention, that would be great. I believe you have my e-mail address, otherwise I'll be happy to mail it to you. I've tried installing the testversion you mention. It still gives the same message in the logfile: 'skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable'. It almost seems like Spambayes is starting up before Outlook has finished loading, or something... The interesting thing is that the new testversion does give an additional errormessage: 'Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM'. It also does not seem to complete the loop of saving the configuration and activating the Spambayes watch. I've copied the complete logfile below. Perhaps this helps also. Thanks again for your time. Hopefully we'll be able to make some progress with your binary-file. Regards, Fintan ---------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1337 spam and 50 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Version 1.1a1 (April 2005) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] Log created Tue Apr 12 09:30:47 2005 NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-06 08:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If I could figure out whether it's mapi.MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED or mapi.MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND and whether it happens just when Outlook is opening or not that would help. I have a little script that will tell me this, hopefully (it'll be more information, anyway, if you're able to run it. There are two options: (1) If you have Python (http://www.python.org/download) installed and a copy of the spambayes source, then I can just attach the script here (it's only 10 lines). (2) I can wrap it up as a binary, so you don't need anything, and send this to you. It ends up being about 3Mb, though, because it grabs a whole heap of stuff. (Although if I just sent the executable, which is small, it might work if it was run in the bin directory in the spambayes installation). Does either of those sound ok? I've looked for information about these errors, and tried things here, but I can't think of any other way forward at the moment. (You could try 1.1a1 - a test version is at http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/spambayes-1.1a1rc1.exe - but I doubt it will be any different). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-03-31 14:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi anadelonbrin, Thank you very much for taking the time to respond to this query. The log doesn't show much more than the above after a full day of not working, but yet manually processing. I have deleted the last 50 or so spam messages from the following log, as they do not seem to add much to this log: --------------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1111 spam and 39 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Moving and spam training message 'Perfector (1+1) machines for sale' - Training on message 'Perfector (1+1) machines for sale' in 'fintan/Postvak IN - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'Re: Encrypted Mail' - Training on message 'Re: Encrypted Mail' in 'fintan/Postvak IN - trained as spam --------------------------------------------- That's all it says... Yes, these folders are on an Exchange server, but to my knowledge nothingw as changed (although I am not the server admin). I have no further problems viewing these folders. As stated earlier, when I retrain Spambayes it works fine for the rest of the day. But overnight (when the machine is turned off) it forgets all it's settings and needs retraining again the next day. To me it looks like the problem is in the folders that Spambayes is skipping during initialising. But I have no idea why it cannot locate the folders, or why it forgets where they are even after the retraining. Thanks again for your time and input. Regards, Fintan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 03:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach a log from when it doesn't work? That would help a lot more in figuring out what is wrong. Are all of these folders on an Exchange server? Has anything changed with your Exchange server recently? Do you have any other problems viewing these folders? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 08:51:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:51:29 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224637 ] Broken database? Part 1 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224637, was opened at 2005-06-20 23:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224637&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Broken database? Part 1 Initial Comment: I was reading through the advanced options in the spambayes proxy interface (because I use outlook express) and I decided to change my database type to "pickle" from "dbm" because pickle is recoomended for training large numbers of messages, and I have a high volume of spam everyday. When I selected the "pickle" radio button and hit "save advanced options", this screen followed: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 470, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 793, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 729, in reReadOptions File "sb_server.pyc", line 891, in _recreateState File "sb_server.pyc", line 906, in prepare File "sb_server.pyc", line 738, in prepare File "sb_server.pyc", line 786, in createWorkers File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 710, in open_storage File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 91, in __init__ File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 114, in load EOFError And then spambayes would not work until I went to the config INI file, and manually changed the database value back to "dbm". I am running Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) and SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224637&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 09:02:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:02:25 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224645 ] broken database? part 2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224645, was opened at 2005-06-21 00:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken database? part 2 Initial Comment: Today I was checking my email, and I noticed that two obviously SPAM mesages had not been classified by spambayes, so I looked at the message sources, and they both had this (as a header?): X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 499, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 263, in setId . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 119, in _getState . File "shelve.pyc", line 118, in __getitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 116, in __getitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Does this mean I need to delete my database and start from scratch? Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 09:09:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:09:11 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224637 ] Broken database? Part 1 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224637, was opened at 2005-06-20 23:51 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by darkfoon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224637&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None >Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Broken database? Part 1 Initial Comment: I was reading through the advanced options in the spambayes proxy interface (because I use outlook express) and I decided to change my database type to "pickle" from "dbm" because pickle is recoomended for training large numbers of messages, and I have a high volume of spam everyday. When I selected the "pickle" radio button and hit "save advanced options", this screen followed: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 470, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 793, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 729, in reReadOptions File "sb_server.pyc", line 891, in _recreateState File "sb_server.pyc", line 906, in prepare File "sb_server.pyc", line 738, in prepare File "sb_server.pyc", line 786, in createWorkers File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 710, in open_storage File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 91, in __init__ File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 114, in load EOFError And then spambayes would not work until I went to the config INI file, and manually changed the database value back to "dbm". I am running Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) and SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224637&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 09:10:51 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:10:51 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224645 ] broken database? part 2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224645, was opened at 2005-06-21 00:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by darkfoon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken database? part 2 Initial Comment: Today I was checking my email, and I noticed that two obviously SPAM mesages had not been classified by spambayes, so I looked at the message sources, and they both had this (as a header?): X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 499, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 263, in setId . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 119, in _getState . File "shelve.pyc", line 118, in __getitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 116, in __getitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Does this mean I need to delete my database and start from scratch? Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 09:12:26 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:12:26 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224645 ] broken database? part 2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224645, was opened at 2005-06-21 00:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by darkfoon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None >Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken database? part 2 Initial Comment: Today I was checking my email, and I noticed that two obviously SPAM mesages had not been classified by spambayes, so I looked at the message sources, and they both had this (as a header?): X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 499, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 263, in setId . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 119, in _getState . File "shelve.pyc", line 118, in __getitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 116, in __getitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Does this mean I need to delete my database and start from scratch? Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 09:31:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:31:34 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224637 ] Broken database? Part 1 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224637, was opened at 2005-06-21 18:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224637&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Broken database? Part 1 Initial Comment: I was reading through the advanced options in the spambayes proxy interface (because I use outlook express) and I decided to change my database type to "pickle" from "dbm" because pickle is recoomended for training large numbers of messages, and I have a high volume of spam everyday. When I selected the "pickle" radio button and hit "save advanced options", this screen followed: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 470, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 793, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 729, in reReadOptions File "sb_server.pyc", line 891, in _recreateState File "sb_server.pyc", line 906, in prepare File "sb_server.pyc", line 738, in prepare File "sb_server.pyc", line 786, in createWorkers File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 710, in open_storage File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 91, in __init__ File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 114, in load EOFError And then spambayes would not work until I went to the config INI file, and manually changed the database value back to "dbm". I am running Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) and SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-21 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You have to either rename or delete the old database - it doesn't get automatically converted. Handling this situtation better is covered in another tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224637&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 10:17:21 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:17:21 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224645 ] broken database? part 2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224645, was opened at 2005-06-21 19:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken database? part 2 Initial Comment: Today I was checking my email, and I noticed that two obviously SPAM mesages had not been classified by spambayes, so I looked at the message sources, and they both had this (as a header?): X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 499, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 263, in setId . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 119, in _getState . File "shelve.pyc", line 118, in __getitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 116, in __getitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Does this mean I need to delete my database and start from scratch? Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-21 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, that is what it means. The FAQ has more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 21:47:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:47:42 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224645 ] broken database? part 2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224645, was opened at 2005-06-21 00:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darkfoon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: 1.0.4 Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken database? part 2 Initial Comment: Today I was checking my email, and I noticed that two obviously SPAM mesages had not been classified by spambayes, so I looked at the message sources, and they both had this (as a header?): X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 499, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 263, in setId . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 119, in _getState . File "shelve.pyc", line 118, in __getitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 116, in __getitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Does this mean I need to delete my database and start from scratch? Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Date: 2005-06-21 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1300301 thank you for your help. I apologzie for posting it in here, I couldn't find the FAQs on the website (that's a little embarassing to admit, but it's the truth) The same goes for my other problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-21 01:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, that is what it means. The FAQ has more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 21 23:50:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:50:35 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224645 ] broken database? part 2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224645, was opened at 2005-06-21 00:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darkfoon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: 1.0.4 Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken database? part 2 Initial Comment: Today I was checking my email, and I noticed that two obviously SPAM mesages had not been classified by spambayes, so I looked at the message sources, and they both had this (as a header?): X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 499, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 263, in setId . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 119, in _getState . File "shelve.pyc", line 118, in __getitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 116, in __getitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Does this mean I need to delete my database and start from scratch? Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Date: 2005-06-21 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1300301 For what it's worth, I was using the experimental bi-grams option. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Date: 2005-06-21 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1300301 thank you for your help. I apologzie for posting it in here, I couldn't find the FAQs on the website (that's a little embarassing to admit, but it's the truth) The same goes for my other problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-21 01:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, that is what it means. The FAQ has more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 22 00:31:32 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:31:32 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1224645 ] broken database? part 2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1224645, was opened at 2005-06-21 19:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: 1.0.4 Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken database? part 2 Initial Comment: Today I was checking my email, and I noticed that two obviously SPAM mesages had not been classified by spambayes, so I looked at the message sources, and they both had this (as a header?): X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 499, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 263, in setId . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 119, in _getState . File "shelve.pyc", line 118, in __getitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 116, in __getitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') Does this mean I need to delete my database and start from scratch? Windows ME (4.90.3000 build 3000) SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-22 10:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No need to apologise :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Date: 2005-06-22 09:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1300301 For what it's worth, I was using the experimental bi-grams option. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkFoon (darkfoon) Date: 2005-06-22 07:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1300301 thank you for your help. I apologzie for posting it in here, I couldn't find the FAQs on the website (that's a little embarassing to admit, but it's the truth) The same goes for my other problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-21 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, that is what it means. The FAQ has more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1224645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 22 14:17:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 05:17:17 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1225489 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1225489, was opened at 2005-06-22 08:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: I get this exception, and lots of spam gets through. How can i fix the problem? X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 564, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 452, in addSBHeaders . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 401, in RememberClassification . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg . File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 22 22:32:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:32:04 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1225798 ] SpamBayes causes Outlook.exe failure when changing folders Message-ID: Bugs item #1225798, was opened at 2005-06-22 16:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225798&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mrbene (mrbene) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes causes Outlook.exe failure when changing folders Initial Comment: Spambayes toolbar on same row as Standard toolbar and window width is only wide enough for 1 of 3 SpamBayes buttons. Folder List is displayed, Outlook Bar is hidden. When switching between Inbox (SpamBayes Toolbar shows "Delete as Spam" and ">>") and Junk Suspects (SpamBayes Toolbar shows "Recover from Spam" and ">>") repeatedly, Outlook.exe will eventually fail. But the buttons have to be different - if they are the same, then it won't fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225798&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 01:48:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:48:56 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1225489 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1225489, was opened at 2005-06-23 00:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: I get this exception, and lots of spam gets through. How can i fix the problem? X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 564, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 452, in addSBHeaders . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 401, in RememberClassification . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg . File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your messageinfo database is dead. You'll neeed to delete it. It's called spambayes.messageinfo.db and is in your data directory (the configuration page has the full path). Something like C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes on WinXP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:07:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:07:04 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1060206 ] Taking too much processor time Message-ID: Bugs item #1060206, was opened at 2004-11-05 02:30 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: shiphen (shiphen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taking too much processor time Initial Comment: ms Outlook (Office 2002) / Win2000 Pro Hi How do I stop Spambayes from taking up too much processor time?! When I am downloading emails, my entire PC becomes so slow that it is more or less unusable! This is a disaster because I need to see my new emails regularly thoughout the day & I get huge amounts of spam! With thanks Ship Shiperton Henethe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Leftley (dleftley) Date: 2004-12-22 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891846 Has Spambayes always run slowly for you, or has it recently slowed down? I ask because I find my copy fairly often gets into this state, which I think is because the database gets slightly corrupted. If so, you should find that if you delete all your training data and retrain from scratch it will run at an acceptable speed again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2004-11-05 02:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 P.S. I am using the Add-in Binary Version 1.0 - (July 2004)... Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:07:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:07:42 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1163862 ] spambayes *very* slow Message-ID: Bugs item #1163862, was opened at 2005-03-16 05:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: spambayes *very* slow Initial Comment: hello, recently i upgraded spambayes 1.0a07 to 1.0.3 and later to cvs version (1.1a0 as of 2005-03-15). unfortunately both 1.0.3 and 1.1a0 versions are very slow (my estimate is 20x). i'm running the sb_server.py script with cPickle database storage. i'm also constantly uploading messages trained as spam/ham via sb_upload.py. currently it's trained on 835 spam and 293 ham messages. when i was running 1.0a07 (on bsddb database storage), mail retrieval was blazingly fast, with both the 1.0.3 (also running on bsddb) and the cvs version a single mail takes about 1-2 secs to be retrieved. i'll be happy to supply any additional data - i just don't know which would be interesting for the developers. thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-17 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed the CVS bug; thanks. sb_dbexpimp.py converts between bsddb and pickle (and csv, and any of the other storage types in spambayes/storage.py). Using a pickle for the message info db will mean that it has to write the whole thing to disk every time it's updated, which includes any time that a message is classified or trained. I'll leave this open and play around with using pickle and see what I can come up with. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-17 02:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 [i had to downgrade to 1.0.3 because there were some problems in the cvs version (self.gzipCache undefined in spambayes/UserInterface.py, i don't use cache at all).] so 1.0.3 running on bsddb runs fast for me. but when the same code is using pickle version of hammie.db the spambayes.messageinfo.db is constantly being rebuilded causing the cpu usage to be 100% most of the time. i have both the hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db which seem to cause this. shall i upload them? they are 2480916 bytes for hammie.db and 1678535 bytes for messageinfo. [btw: some utility to convert bsddb<=>pickle storage would be great for experimenting] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you check to see whether this is just the change from bsddb to pickle? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-16 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 some additions to the above (sorry for not mentioning them earlier): this is on linux, kernel 2.4.26, python 2.3.5, db-4.1.25-NC, pybsddb3-4.3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:09:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:09:03 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1220651 ] slow down the computer Message-ID: Bugs item #1220651, was opened at 2005-06-15 06:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220651&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: duykhang (sowku) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: slow down the computer Initial Comment: i have lot of spam. and i love the software, it filters and works well. filtered all my spam, but it's so slow that i have to wait atleast 30 min to download 1000>1500 spams. can't use my computer.. winxp sp1 & latest SB. thanks.. you guys created something amazing... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 1220635 ] slow down the computer ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:10:19 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:10:19 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1220635 ] slow down the computer Message-ID: Bugs item #1220635, was opened at 2005-06-15 06:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220635&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: duykhang (sowku) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: slow down the computer Initial Comment: i have lot of spam. and i love the software, it filters and works well. filtered all my spam, but it's so slow that i have to wait atleast 30 min to download 1000>1500 spams. can't use my computer.. winxp sp1 & latest SB. thanks.. you guys created something amazing... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 How many ham/spam have you trained on? What version of SpamBayes is this? Is this sb_server (the POP3 proxy) or the Outlook plug-in? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1220635&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:11:26 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:11:26 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1221946 ] Dublicates created with activesync Message-ID: Bugs item #1221946, was opened at 2005-06-17 02:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kyle Prawel (kprawel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dublicates created with activesync Initial Comment: When I sync my iPaq with Oulook2003, while Spambayes plugin is turned on, duplicates are created. These email duplicates are stripped of thier "from" data which causes outlook to crash when you look at one. I have turned the plugin off and been able to sync and delete the duplicates with no problems. I love Spambayes on my other machines; hope you'll be able to make it work with Activesync. Machine: Win XP /sp2 Oulook 2003 Activesync 3.8 IPaq running Mobile 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does changing the background filtering values have any effect? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:17:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:17:07 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-911734 ] Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Message-ID: Bugs item #911734, was opened at 2004-03-08 16:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Randy (rdemars) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Initial Comment: I updates to the latest Outlook addin and have a problem now that I didn?t have with the previous version. When I connect to the Exchange server, Outlook appears to lock up for some time. I get multiple dialog boxes that say that outlook is requesting data from the exchange server. After about 2 minutes, my inbox finally appears, but none of the messages are scored. If I tell Spambayes to filter my inbox, it will then work. The attached log file indicates my folders were not available. I would guess it is some kind of communication timeout. My Outlook configuration is all the same as it was before I upgraded Spambayes, and it worked fine then. Here are my particulars: Windows XP ? all the latest service packs and patches Outlook 2002 SP2 Exchange server 5.5 Gateway 450X laptop Connected to Exchange server over VPN via WIFI and cable modem 2M up/128k down I wouldn?t think the problem was with Spambayes, except that the last version worked fine. It hasn?t worked correctly since I upgraded. I checked to make sure everything is enables, including Spambayes, and the COM addin and about Outlook 2002 stuff you talk about in the troubleshooting guide. Everything is enabled. Seems like some kind of communication issue. I haven?t been back to the office to connect to Exchange directly so I don?t know if the problem will exist when I am connected with 100M Ethernet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1219553 ] Background Filtering does not start http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1219553&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be exchange timing out. Once you select 'cancel' from the connection dialog, you will always then get that error for that session. But assuming you *don't* ever press cancel - I can see that exchange may timeout, but that outlook itself would re-try, or in someway handle it more elegantly (eg, popping a dialog asking you if you want to retry). However, SpamBayes isn't that smart - it just gets the error and gives up. Post 1.0, I can see that we could possibly fix this - I think people may be seeing the same base thing in a few exchange server related issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list (I asked him to try turning off background filtering, since I couldn't think of anything else that changed with 0.9, unless it's the spam field creation): """No luck. I turned off the background filtering option and the problem still exists. I get the Outlook requester saying it is requesting data from the Exchange server when I start outlook, and also as I switch from tab to tab on the Manager dialog box. If I cancel this, I get a Spambayes message reporting I have a configuration error telling me that my unsure folder is invalid. When I run the wizard to try to fix it, I can browse, but it only sees my Outlook data file (the one that resides on my hard drive) but none of my server-based folders (inbox, etc) It definitely seems like a communication issue somewhere. I don't know what could be different about my configuration, except that we use Exchange 5.5, which is old and temperamental.""" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:17:14 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:17:14 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1219553 ] Background Filtering does not start Message-ID: Bugs item #1219553, was opened at 2005-06-13 20:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1219553&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: ngzj (ngzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Background Filtering does not start Initial Comment: After starting Outlook, SpamBayes does not start automatic filtering. I always (!) have to click "filter messages" in Menu. It seems (as logfile says below) that SpamBayes can not Access the Incoming Folder for a short time after starting Outlook, so that filteriing does not start. But setting the start delay to five seconds also not fixes the problem. ----------------------------------- Log File ------------------------------- System verbosity set to 4 No old pickle file to migrate Dumping loaded configuration: [Experimental] timer_interval: 1000 timer_only_receive_folders: True timer_start_delay: 0 [Filter] enabled: True filter_now: False save_spam_info: True spam_action: Moved spam_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 0454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20 AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C485 83234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F636 E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '000000008 D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA0100B8DC48 81655E6848BB8CBF82058DB4CB0000003BF6A40000') spam_mark_as_read: False spam_threshold: 85.0 timer_enabled: True timer_interval: 0.5 timer_only_receive_folders: False timer_start_delay: 5.0 unsure_action: Moved unsure_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 0454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20 AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C485 83130002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F636 E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '000000008 D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01002A32460 07B0AC345A11FAF121B1BAC4800000062F2120000') unsure_mark_as_read: False unsure_threshold: 15.0 watch_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583130002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01009D0A38 DA0C72D511A87200D0B75B457B000000E856440000')] watch_include_sub: False [Filter_Now] action_all: True folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01009D0A38 DA0C72D511A87200D0B75B457B000000E856440000')] include_sub: True only_unread: False only_unseen: False [General] data_directory: delete_as_spam_message_state: None field_score_name: Spam recover_from_spam_message_state: None verbose: 4 [Training] ham_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583130002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01002A3246 007B0AC345A11FAF121B1BAC4800000062F2100000'), ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 06D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80 100AA0037D96E000000473A5C4E6F656769735C6E677 A6A5C4F75746C6F6F6B5C506F7374666163682041726 36869762E70737400', '000000005E17B2567A750845938 94140F7D2E84F82800000')] ham_include_sub: True rebuild: True rescore: True spam_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200 00454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA2 0AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C48 583234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F63 6E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '00000000 8D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA0100B8DC4 881655E6848BB8CBF82058DB4CB0000003BF6A40000' ), ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000 0454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20 AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C0000004E54504C485 83234002F6F3D584E4F454C2F6F753D58504C482F636 E3D4E4F454749532F636E3D4E475A4A00', '000000008 D1DABB8536DD611AA3A00D0B712FCEA01002A32460 07B0AC345A11FAF121B1BAC4800000062F2120000')] spam_include_sub: False train_manual_spam: True train_recovered_spam: True -- end of configuration -- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\ngzj.000 \Anwendungsdaten\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database .db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\ngzj.000 \Anwendungsdaten\SpamBayes\default_message_datab ase.db' Bayes database initialized with 1228 spam and 753 good messages Loaded databases in 5.70128ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable Folder 'Postfach - xxxxx J?rgen, (BD5- NOEGIS)/Spambayes/Spam' already has field 'Spam' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Postfach - xxxxx J?rgen, (BD5- NOEGIS)/Spambayes/Spam' Folder 'Postfach - xxxxx J?rgen, (BD5- NOEGIS)/Spambayes/Unsure' already has field 'Spam' Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Posteingang', as it is not available OnFolderSwitch OnSelectionChange ----------------------- End of Log ---------------------- sincerely, Juergen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Duplicate of [ 911734 ] Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=911734 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1219553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:17:20 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:17:20 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-911734 ] Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Message-ID: Bugs item #911734, was opened at 2004-03-08 16:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Randy (rdemars) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Initial Comment: I updates to the latest Outlook addin and have a problem now that I didn?t have with the previous version. When I connect to the Exchange server, Outlook appears to lock up for some time. I get multiple dialog boxes that say that outlook is requesting data from the exchange server. After about 2 minutes, my inbox finally appears, but none of the messages are scored. If I tell Spambayes to filter my inbox, it will then work. The attached log file indicates my folders were not available. I would guess it is some kind of communication timeout. My Outlook configuration is all the same as it was before I upgraded Spambayes, and it worked fine then. Here are my particulars: Windows XP ? all the latest service packs and patches Outlook 2002 SP2 Exchange server 5.5 Gateway 450X laptop Connected to Exchange server over VPN via WIFI and cable modem 2M up/128k down I wouldn?t think the problem was with Spambayes, except that the last version worked fine. It hasn?t worked correctly since I upgraded. I checked to make sure everything is enables, including Spambayes, and the COM addin and about Outlook 2002 stuff you talk about in the troubleshooting guide. Everything is enabled. Seems like some kind of communication issue. I haven?t been back to the office to connect to Exchange directly so I don?t know if the problem will exist when I am connected with 100M Ethernet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1219553 ] Background Filtering does not start http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1219553&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be exchange timing out. Once you select 'cancel' from the connection dialog, you will always then get that error for that session. But assuming you *don't* ever press cancel - I can see that exchange may timeout, but that outlook itself would re-try, or in someway handle it more elegantly (eg, popping a dialog asking you if you want to retry). However, SpamBayes isn't that smart - it just gets the error and gives up. Post 1.0, I can see that we could possibly fix this - I think people may be seeing the same base thing in a few exchange server related issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list (I asked him to try turning off background filtering, since I couldn't think of anything else that changed with 0.9, unless it's the spam field creation): """No luck. I turned off the background filtering option and the problem still exists. I get the Outlook requester saying it is requesting data from the Exchange server when I start outlook, and also as I switch from tab to tab on the Manager dialog box. If I cancel this, I get a Spambayes message reporting I have a configuration error telling me that my unsure folder is invalid. When I run the wizard to try to fix it, I can browse, but it only sees my Outlook data file (the one that resides on my hard drive) but none of my server-based folders (inbox, etc) It definitely seems like a communication issue somewhere. I don't know what could be different about my configuration, except that we use Exchange 5.5, which is old and temperamental.""" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:23:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:23:18 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1192148 ] Outlook 2000 crashes 1179651 Message-ID: Support Requests item #1192148, was opened at 2005-04-29 14:50 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1192148&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marc Erickson (marcerickson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2000 crashes 1179651 Initial Comment: This is an addendum to report 1179651. Using the multiple user installation procedure doesn't help. The Oulook is Outlook 2000. According to the Microsoft Error Report, the file responsible for crashing outlook.exe is OUTLLIB.DLL. Renaming it and reinstalling Office 2000 overtop of the existing Office 2000 installation so that a fresh copy of OUTLLIB.DLL is installed doesn't work. Microsoft Error Reporting appcompat.txt attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-05-11 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Didn't know that you'd tried the Office un/re-install. That doesn't leave me with many ideas, unless it is something that gets left behind. Here's hoping the log has something! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marc Erickson (marcerickson) Date: 2005-05-11 18:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=477851 OK - will try to get a log for you. I've already uninstalled and reinstalled Office with Add/Remove Programs and updated it. They don't have anything special in their Office installation - the only customizing is setting up the two email accounts. Removing and reinstalling Office with Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then updating it is at least an hour - probably closer to two hours. As you probably know, removing Office with Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel leaves all sorts of crap behind - as with many Windows programs. Removing Office completely means a long session of manual file and folder deletion and hand Registry editing. Microsoft publishes a tool that automates this - but it doesn't run on Windows XP, only earlier Windows versions. I'll try to write a batch file to help me out - but I'm not a programmer so that's a tedious process for me. Thanks for your help - will get back to you when I have a log file - or not - to send. Marc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-05-11 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I understand that remote troubleshooting is difficult - the problem is that a COM add-in should not be able to crash Outlook, unless it's doing something undocumented. Since it is, it's very difficult to figure out what the cause might be. I suspect that you'll find that either the log doesn't get created or that an empty log is created. Neither really helps much in figuring out what is happening. (OTOH, if there is something in there, then that would say a lot). Doing the uninstall removes everything that doing the install adds. It doesn't do anything else. Doing an install then an uninstall ought to leave the registry unchanged. I'm not suggesting reformatting the HD, or reinstalling Windows. I wonder if maybe removing Office/Outlook completely, then reinstalling it (the Repair doesn't really seem to help very often) might do it. If their Office install is highly customised that's a very time-consuming process, though. (Or if they have many Outlook accounts that will need to be re-setup). My thought was more along the lines that perhaps this isn't a problem we'll be able to solve, and maybe a filter other than SpamBayes might be an idea (unless all Outlook add-in filters have this problem, in which case it's almost certainly Outlook). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marc Erickson (marcerickson) Date: 2005-05-11 17:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=477851 Does anything get written to the SpamBayes logs? Don't know other than SB reported the correct string when the multiple user install was used - will try a Remote Assistance session to gather the log. You have to understand that Ken and Sandy (the users I'm trying to install this for) live 80 km away from me. It's not quite a trivial problem for me to go out there and troubleshoot. If you uninstall SpamBayes, does Outlook work correctly? Yes. What version of SpamBayes is this? Version 1.0. Re: your comment, "Doing an uninstall ought to remove all registry entries. It might be worth uninstalling before doing the install for all users, but it should work either way." You are correct in that all Registry entries relating to SpamBayes are removed - that is the entries with SpamBayes in the name of the Registry key. But what about Registry entries relating to COM and other plugin objects? Am I really going to have to format his harddrive and reinstall because of an installation error? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-05-11 16:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does anything get written to the SpamBayes logs? If you uninstall SpamBayes, does Outlook work correctly? What version of SpamBayes is this? You could try 1.0 or 1.1a1 to see if that makes any difference (possibly different versions of pywin32 might make a difference). It really sounds like an Outlook problem, though, since SB ought to just work with Outlook 2000 and multiple users, and shouldn't be able to crash Outlook itself. I'm out of ideas after that, sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1192148&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:26:14 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:26:14 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-911734 ] Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Message-ID: Bugs item #911734, was opened at 2004-03-08 16:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Randy (rdemars) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available Initial Comment: I updates to the latest Outlook addin and have a problem now that I didn?t have with the previous version. When I connect to the Exchange server, Outlook appears to lock up for some time. I get multiple dialog boxes that say that outlook is requesting data from the exchange server. After about 2 minutes, my inbox finally appears, but none of the messages are scored. If I tell Spambayes to filter my inbox, it will then work. The attached log file indicates my folders were not available. I would guess it is some kind of communication timeout. My Outlook configuration is all the same as it was before I upgraded Spambayes, and it worked fine then. Here are my particulars: Windows XP ? all the latest service packs and patches Outlook 2002 SP2 Exchange server 5.5 Gateway 450X laptop Connected to Exchange server over VPN via WIFI and cable modem 2M up/128k down I wouldn?t think the problem was with Spambayes, except that the last version worked fine. It hasn?t worked correctly since I upgraded. I checked to make sure everything is enables, including Spambayes, and the COM addin and about Outlook 2002 stuff you talk about in the troubleshooting guide. Everything is enabled. Seems like some kind of communication issue. I haven?t been back to the office to connect to Exchange directly so I don?t know if the problem will exist when I am connected with 100M Ethernet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I suspect that [ 1163672 ] Need to re-train every day http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1163672&group_id=61702&atid=498104 is also related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1219553 ] Background Filtering does not start http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1219553&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be exchange timing out. Once you select 'cancel' from the connection dialog, you will always then get that error for that session. But assuming you *don't* ever press cancel - I can see that exchange may timeout, but that outlook itself would re-try, or in someway handle it more elegantly (eg, popping a dialog asking you if you want to retry). However, SpamBayes isn't that smart - it just gets the error and gives up. Post 1.0, I can see that we could possibly fix this - I think people may be seeing the same base thing in a few exchange server related issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list (I asked him to try turning off background filtering, since I couldn't think of anything else that changed with 0.9, unless it's the spam field creation): """No luck. I turned off the background filtering option and the problem still exists. I get the Outlook requester saying it is requesting data from the Exchange server when I start outlook, and also as I switch from tab to tab on the Manager dialog box. If I cancel this, I get a Spambayes message reporting I have a configuration error telling me that my unsure folder is invalid. When I run the wizard to try to fix it, I can browse, but it only sees my Outlook data file (the one that resides on my hard drive) but none of my server-based folders (inbox, etc) It definitely seems like a communication issue somewhere. I don't know what could be different about my configuration, except that we use Exchange 5.5, which is old and temperamental.""" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=911734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 10:27:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:27:18 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1163672 ] Need to re-train every day Message-ID: Support Requests item #1163672, was opened at 2005-03-16 01:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: fintan74 (fintan74) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Need to re-train every day Initial Comment: I have a problem for which I have been unable to find a solution in either this forum, the FAQ or the Troubleshooting guide. Hopefully someone here will be able to assist. Spambayes has been monitoring my Outlook mailbox for quite some time and it has always worked like a charm. Upto about two weeks ago. Suddenly I needed to re-train the complete database every day, otherwise it will simply not process messages. Spambayes loads without problems and the toolbar itself works fine. It just does not process anything until I re-train the database. Downloading and installing the latest version has not resolved matters. I have also tried putting the configuration files in a local folder instead of the documents&settings-folder that is synchronised with server during logon and logoff. Hasn't helped either... What I have noticed in the logfile is that it says "NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable" four times in a row. I wonder if this is the reason for the problem, although I have no idea what is triggering that message. The complete log is as follows: --------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 709 spam and 33 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable Saving configuration -> C:\spambayesconfig\MS Exchange Settings.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'fintan/Postvak IN' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'fintan/Junk E-Mail' --------------------- Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry - I've been flat out with other stuff and not really managing to keep up with SpamBayes work. I think this is the same as [ 911734 ] Addin never checks if unavailable folders become available http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=911734 I think probably what has to be done is that we have to try these folders that have been skipped later on. I'll try and find time to build a binary that does this tomorrow. Please email me or add a comment here if you don't see anything in the next couple of days to remind me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-06-21 02:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi Tony, It's been a while since I heard from you. Don't want to push, but do you have any further ideas to help resolve this matter? Thanks, Fintan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-27 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That is the correct file - it's name is based on the Outlook profile name, which if there is only one profile is usually called Outlook.ini or MS Exchange Server.ini. I'll look into this more tomorrow - particularly what might cause it to start working as you describe. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-04-22 20:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi Tony, Thanks again for your time. I downloaded the file, unpacked it and tried running it. Unfortunately there is no such thing as an outlook.ini file on our system. What I do have in my spambayes-folder is an 'MS Exchange Server.ini' file, which I assume is the same file you are looking for. Our IT-guy confirms this is also the name of the file that holds my Outlook-settings. Running the executable on this ini-file does nothing in the DOS-shell however: no errors, but also no output. There is no logfile in the spambayes-folder or the bin-drectory of your executable. Am I looking in the wrong place, or could this different .ini-file be the reason for the problems in the first place? An additional bit of information: I found yesterday and today that Spambayes suddenly starts working if I first 'delete as spam' a message, then open the Spambayes Manager window and simply close it again. After a while the program suddenly jumps to life and starts classifying mail. Upon restart of the computer it is dormant again (it loads fine though) and I need to repeat the above steps to get it working. It's getting stranger by the day, but at least it's doing something... Look forward to hearing back from you... Regards, Fintan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-22 18:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, there's a test binary at: If you expand it, then open a command window and go into the dist\bin directory, then do "debug_folder_list.exe C:\spambayesconfig\Outlook.ini" it should print out a list of the folders. (I'm taking a stab at where the Outlook.ini file is, since it's not the default config layout. Replace with the location of the actual file). If you could try this with Outlook closed, and with Outlook open, and see if it generates the same error, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-21 19:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ack - sorry. I got caught up with other work. I'll send you a binary tomorrow (22/4). Thanks for trying 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-04-12 19:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi Tony, Thanks for your below reply and my apologies for not getting back to you sooner. Unfortunately I am not familiar enough with Exchange servers to give you any feedback on the mapi-issue. If you would be so kind as to e-mail me the binary you mention, that would be great. I believe you have my e-mail address, otherwise I'll be happy to mail it to you. I've tried installing the testversion you mention. It still gives the same message in the logfile: 'skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable'. It almost seems like Spambayes is starting up before Outlook has finished loading, or something... The interesting thing is that the new testversion does give an additional errormessage: 'Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM'. It also does not seem to complete the loop of saving the configuration and activating the Spambayes watch. I've copied the complete logfile below. Perhaps this helps also. Thanks again for your time. Hopefully we'll be able to make some progress with your binary-file. Regards, Fintan ---------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1337 spam and 50 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Version 1.1a1 (April 2005) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] Log created Tue Apr 12 09:30:47 2005 NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_ACTION_HAM ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-06 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If I could figure out whether it's mapi.MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED or mapi.MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND and whether it happens just when Outlook is opening or not that would help. I have a little script that will tell me this, hopefully (it'll be more information, anyway, if you're able to run it. There are two options: (1) If you have Python (http://www.python.org/download) installed and a copy of the spambayes source, then I can just attach the script here (it's only 10 lines). (2) I can wrap it up as a binary, so you don't need anything, and send this to you. It ends up being about 3Mb, though, because it grabs a whole heap of stuff. (Although if I just sent the executable, which is small, it might work if it was run in the bin directory in the spambayes installation). Does either of those sound ok? I've looked for information about these errors, and tried things here, but I can't think of any other way forward at the moment. (You could try 1.1a1 - a test version is at http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/spambayes-1.1a1rc1.exe - but I doubt it will be any different). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fintan74 (fintan74) Date: 2005-04-01 00:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1239541 Hi anadelonbrin, Thank you very much for taking the time to respond to this query. The log doesn't show much more than the above after a full day of not working, but yet manually processing. I have deleted the last 50 or so spam messages from the following log, as they do not seem to add much to this log: --------------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\spambayesconfig\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1111 spam and 39 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable NOTE: Skipping folder for this session - temporarily unavailable FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Moving and spam training message 'Perfector (1+1) machines for sale' - Training on message 'Perfector (1+1) machines for sale' in 'fintan/Postvak IN - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'Re: Encrypted Mail' - Training on message 'Re: Encrypted Mail' in 'fintan/Postvak IN - trained as spam --------------------------------------------- That's all it says... Yes, these folders are on an Exchange server, but to my knowledge nothingw as changed (although I am not the server admin). I have no further problems viewing these folders. As stated earlier, when I retrain Spambayes it works fine for the rest of the day. But overnight (when the machine is turned off) it forgets all it's settings and needs retraining again the next day. To me it looks like the problem is in the folders that Spambayes is skipping during initialising. But I have no idea why it cannot locate the folders, or why it forgets where they are even after the retraining. Thanks again for your time and input. Regards, Fintan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-29 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach a log from when it doesn't work? That would help a lot more in figuring out what is wrong. Are all of these folders on an Exchange server? Has anything changed with your Exchange server recently? Do you have any other problems viewing these folders? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1163672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 15:23:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:23:25 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1060206 ] Taking too much processor time Message-ID: Bugs item #1060206, was opened at 2004-11-04 13:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shiphen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: shiphen (shiphen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taking too much processor time Initial Comment: ms Outlook (Office 2002) / Win2000 Pro Hi How do I stop Spambayes from taking up too much processor time?! When I am downloading emails, my entire PC becomes so slow that it is more or less unusable! This is a disaster because I need to see my new emails regularly thoughout the day & I get huge amounts of spam! With thanks Ship Shiperton Henethe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2005-06-23 13:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 The trouble is that if I delete all the training and start again, then I will lose all the hard-won intelligence! (i.e. that it is now quite good at distinguishing spam from non-spam!) Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Leftley (dleftley) Date: 2004-12-21 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891846 Has Spambayes always run slowly for you, or has it recently slowed down? I ask because I find my copy fairly often gets into this state, which I think is because the database gets slightly corrupted. If so, you should find that if you delete all your training data and retrain from scratch it will run at an acceptable speed again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2004-11-04 13:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 P.S. I am using the Add-in Binary Version 1.0 - (July 2004)... Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 17:49:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:49:17 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1225489 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1225489, was opened at 2005-06-22 08:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by olegkikin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: I get this exception, and lots of spam gets through. How can i fix the problem? X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 564, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 452, in addSBHeaders . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 401, in RememberClassification . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg . File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: oleg (olegkikin) Date: 2005-06-23 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1294399 Why is my messageinfo database is dead? How do i prevent this from happening in the future? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-22 19:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your messageinfo database is dead. You'll neeed to delete it. It's called spambayes.messageinfo.db and is in your data directory (the configuration page has the full path). Something like C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes on WinXP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 23 17:59:54 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:59:54 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1221946 ] Dublicates created with activesync Message-ID: Bugs item #1221946, was opened at 2005-06-16 14:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kprawel You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kyle Prawel (kprawel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dublicates created with activesync Initial Comment: When I sync my iPaq with Oulook2003, while Spambayes plugin is turned on, duplicates are created. These email duplicates are stripped of thier "from" data which causes outlook to crash when you look at one. I have turned the plugin off and been able to sync and delete the duplicates with no problems. I love Spambayes on my other machines; hope you'll be able to make it work with Activesync. Machine: Win XP /sp2 Oulook 2003 Activesync 3.8 IPaq running Mobile 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kyle Prawel (kprawel) Date: 2005-06-23 15:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1297932 This happens in both back-ground filtering, and non- background filtering methods. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 08:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does changing the background filtering values have any effect? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 24 03:25:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:25:04 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1225489 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1225489, was opened at 2005-06-23 00:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: oleg (olegkikin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: I get this exception, and lots of spam gets through. How can i fix the problem? X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 564, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 452, in addSBHeaders . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 401, in RememberClassification . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg . File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-24 13:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What version of spambayes are you using? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: oleg (olegkikin) Date: 2005-06-24 03:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1294399 Why is my messageinfo database is dead? How do i prevent this from happening in the future? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your messageinfo database is dead. You'll neeed to delete it. It's called spambayes.messageinfo.db and is in your data directory (the configuration page has the full path). Something like C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes on WinXP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225489&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 24 03:25:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:25:50 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1060206 ] Taking too much processor time Message-ID: Bugs item #1060206, was opened at 2004-11-05 02:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: shiphen (shiphen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taking too much processor time Initial Comment: ms Outlook (Office 2002) / Win2000 Pro Hi How do I stop Spambayes from taking up too much processor time?! When I am downloading emails, my entire PC becomes so slow that it is more or less unusable! This is a disaster because I need to see my new emails regularly thoughout the day & I get huge amounts of spam! With thanks Ship Shiperton Henethe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-24 13:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 How many ham/spam have you trained on? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2005-06-24 01:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 The trouble is that if I delete all the training and start again, then I will lose all the hard-won intelligence! (i.e. that it is now quite good at distinguishing spam from non-spam!) Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Leftley (dleftley) Date: 2004-12-22 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891846 Has Spambayes always run slowly for you, or has it recently slowed down? I ask because I find my copy fairly often gets into this state, which I think is because the database gets slightly corrupted. If so, you should find that if you delete all your training data and retrain from scratch it will run at an acceptable speed again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2004-11-05 02:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 P.S. I am using the Add-in Binary Version 1.0 - (July 2004)... Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 24 07:42:54 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:42:54 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-930950 ] upper limit to scanned email size Message-ID: Feature Requests item #930950, was opened at 2004-04-07 14:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by altufaltu_sf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: upper limit to scanned email size Initial Comment: hello, SpamBayes is a client-side plugin and so, need to download the email in order to scan it. this can be a pain in case of remote connected seesion... typically, SPAM are small emails. it could be great to be able to setup an upper limit to the size of email SpamBayes try to scan. have a nice day, Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Altu (altufaltu_sf) Date: 2005-06-24 11:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1119883 Hi, I agree with Pierre. I'm using Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2003 server. When connecte dthrough dial-up, Outlook gets smart and downloads only headers of new messages. However, Spambayes tries to scan full messages and ends-up downloading full messages. Outlook kind of hangs during this. It will be good to have Spambayes not scan messages greater than a configurable size limit. Does it scan attachments too? or is it possible to scan only message body excluding attachments? Most of the big messages are because of big attachments and it seems that Spambayes makes Outlook download everything. Please see to it. Thanks, Altu Faltu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Date: 2004-04-08 17:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=602719 I use the Outlook plugin. YES, the mail has _arrived_... but on the Exchange server not on the client (outlook). as the outlook plugin runs on the client side, in order to tokenize the email to give it a score, it has to read each and every word of the email which is _arrived_ but still lives on the Exchange server, and so download it from the server to the client. on an ethernet connection, there is no problem. but when outlook runs on a laptop connected to the exchange server via a telephone line, it may be a pain. Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-08 04:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Which SpamBayes application are you using? If it's the Outlook plug-in, then this doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes only finds out about the mail when it has arrived. If it's sb_server, this also doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes is acting as a proxy - it's only processing mail when the mail client is already downloading it - it doesn't result in any extra traffic between the server and your machine. If, however, you're using sb_imapfilter, then this could be relevant. If you are, and really want this feature, then put a note confirming that here, otherwise I'll close this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 24 18:35:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:35:11 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1227117 ] Spambayes still filters after uninstall Message-ID: Bugs item #1227117, was opened at 2005-06-24 11:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1227117&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jerrod (shomankj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes still filters after uninstall Initial Comment: I'm using outlook 2003. Spambayes still continues to filter email (all good) to my spam suspects and spam folders. I have uninstalled, reinstalled, and then uninstalled again (just in case) spambayes. I have turned off outlook spam filtering, and verified no spambayes plugins are loaded, yet it still continues to filter the email. How can I make this stop? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1227117&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jun 25 01:49:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:49:01 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1227117 ] Spambayes still filters after uninstall Message-ID: Bugs item #1227117, was opened at 2005-06-25 04:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1227117&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jerrod (shomankj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes still filters after uninstall Initial Comment: I'm using outlook 2003. Spambayes still continues to filter email (all good) to my spam suspects and spam folders. I have uninstalled, reinstalled, and then uninstalled again (just in case) spambayes. I have turned off outlook spam filtering, and verified no spambayes plugins are loaded, yet it still continues to filter the email. How can I make this stop? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-25 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you ever installed from source? Are log files (see the troubleshooting guide) being created? If not, then the most likely explanation is that something else is doing this filtering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1227117&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 28 20:09:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:09:23 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1229214 ] Spam Bayes doesn't work anymore... Message-ID: Support Requests item #1229214, was opened at 2005-06-28 14:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1229214&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eduardo Cattan (ecattan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam Bayes doesn't work anymore... Initial Comment: Dear Sirs: I have been a happy user of Spambayes for a VERY LONG Time. I uses it from Outlook, office XP, Windows XP. This morning, some advise appears too quickly in my screen, and SpamBayes does not work anymore. I have tried to desinstall / install it some times, but nothing happens. Currently, I got The SpamBayes toolbar, but only the title appears. Also, I have tried to install it manually from Tools/ Options/Other/Advanced Options/COM Complements, CHECKING spambayes or adding it manually, but the "check" vanished. may you help me? Best Regards, Eduardo Cattan Computer Engineer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1229214&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 29 03:46:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:46:23 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1206277 ] managing spam folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1206277, was opened at 2005-05-22 08:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1206277&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon H. Peterson (jonhp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: managing spam folder Initial Comment: hi, i have read a bunch from the sourceforge/spambayes pages and if this is a duplicate, then i appologize up front for not finding it. i think users, me included, need some help in managing the space consumed by spambayes spam folder. it would appear from what i have read, that keeping some spam is helpful for retraining purposes. but from my experience training is best when the ham/spam training sets are about balanced -- since i keep ham in lots of folders, it is very hard to get the right set of folders with a good cross section of candidates selected for the ham part to balance the spam folder contents (this could lead to another discussion of making training easier for the user...later perhaps). and it is possible for a ham to get lost in the spam folder (although i quite checking some time ago as it has never been a productive exercise). so there must be some balance between all spam since the beginning of time and an empty spam folder. to begin with i don't know if the messages should be deleted by age or by spam rating or some other criteria. one also has to consider what the "right" amount of spam for training should be (and I have no idea as an end user). i do think they should go to the deleted folder and not to the bit bucket . i am thinking that some high water mark (number of messages to be left in the spam folder) along with one or more user selecteable criteria would make an automatic spam folder management scheme. if you are tempted to write a response which describes a process i could follow, wouldn't it be better to codify that response as a new management feature of spambayes for all to take advantage of? Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-29 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 1206298 ] managing spam folder http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1206298&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1206277&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 29 03:48:21 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:48:21 -0700 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1229214 ] Spam Bayes doesn't work anymore... Message-ID: Support Requests item #1229214, was opened at 2005-06-29 06:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1229214&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eduardo Cattan (ecattan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam Bayes doesn't work anymore... Initial Comment: Dear Sirs: I have been a happy user of Spambayes for a VERY LONG Time. I uses it from Outlook, office XP, Windows XP. This morning, some advise appears too quickly in my screen, and SpamBayes does not work anymore. I have tried to desinstall / install it some times, but nothing happens. Currently, I got The SpamBayes toolbar, but only the title appears. Also, I have tried to install it manually from Tools/ Options/Other/Advanced Options/COM Complements, CHECKING spambayes or adding it manually, but the "check" vanished. may you help me? Best Regards, Eduardo Cattan Computer Engineer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-29 13:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in: Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1229214&group_id=61702