[spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797679 ] Recovered Mails filtered
again
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Jan 21 04:44:00 CET 2005
Bugs item #797679, was opened at 2003-08-30 17:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702
Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recovered Mails filtered again
Initial Comment:
Hi,
I don't know if this a bug or a design problem, so I
posting it here.
When I recover a mail from Spam Folder in my opinion it
should be marked as good on the database.
I have reapperaing mails, which we're marked as spam.
But no matter how often I recover them from spam, the
next mail from these events will be filtered again.
Is this the normail behaviour or a known problem?
Thanks
Jan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2005-01-21 16:44
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=552329
Yikes - this is very out of date.
This looks like a training imbalance problem (though it's so
old it doesn't have the counts).
If there is still a problem, please set the status back to
'open'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Date: 2003-09-08 18:31
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=855408
Hi,
here is the "clues" log from today morning.
Sorry for the XXX, but for security reasons I have to blank
some things. But I've tried to change so little as possible.
Jan
Spam Score: 0.512408
word spamprob #ham #spam
'*H*' 0.276798 - -
'*S*' 0.301613 - -
'skip:a 10' 0.180202 726 27
'ppp0' 0.198911 4 0
'header:Message-Id:1' 0.22653 324 16
'inet' 0.243728 21 1
'subject:New_Home_IP' 0.271305 18 1
'1,3d0' 0.284601 2 0
'x-mailer:none' 0.321254 932 75
'skip:e 20' 0.369228 21 2
'reply-to:none' 0.380298 1063 111
'to:2**0' 0.625257 545 155
'header:Date:1' 0.63781 583 175
'to:no real name:2**0' 0.643686 448 138
'header:From:1' 0.648059 583 183
'protocol' 0.749747 5 3
'to:addr:jan.albrecht' 0.86241 116 125
'header:Received:3' 0.869959 77 89
'to:addr:XXX.de' 0.891541 116 164
Message Stream:
Received: from mx2.XXX.de ([XX.XX.XX.XX]) by mx2.XXX.de
with
SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version XXX)
id SPB4HM05; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 04:59:55 +0200
Received: from XXX.XXX.XX.XXX by mx2.XXX.de (InterScan E-
Mail
VirusWall NT); Mon, 08 Sep 2003 04:59:55 +0200
Received: (from root at localhost)
by tower.center.bluecove (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux
8.11.1-0.5) id
h88303h17065
for jan.albrecht at XXX.de; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:00:04
+0200
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:00:04 +0200
From: root <root at tower.center.bluecove>
Message-Id:
<200309080300.h88303h17065 at tower.center.bluecove>
To: jan.albrecht at XXX.de
Subject: New_Home_IP
1,3d0
< ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
< inet addr:XXX.XXX.XX.XXX P-t-P:XXX.X.XX.XX
Mask:255.255.255.255
<
Message Tokens:
29 unique tokens
'1,3d0'
'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:root'
'from:addr:tower.center.bluecove'
'from:name:root'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:Message-Id:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'inet'
'link'
'message-id:@tower.center.bluecove'
'ppp0'
'protocol'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'skip:a 10'
'skip:e 20'
'skip:m 20'
'skip:p 10'
'subject:New_Home_IP'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:XXX.de'
'to:addr:jan.albrecht'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-08 16:52
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=14198
Can you please attach the "clues" for one of these messages?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Date: 2003-09-05 17:27
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=855408
Hi,
no, it's not exactly the same mail.
The Mail contains the follwoing entries:
2c2
< inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX P-t-
P:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask:YYY.YYY.YYY.YYYY
---
> inet addr:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM P-t-
P:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM Mask:NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN
The X and M differs from mail to mail, as the're dynamic IP's.
The other parts of the mail are the same.
When I do a "recover from spam" with this mail, the score
does not shift ti zero. The score goes back from 60% to 59%.
The log is attached. Let me know, if you need more
information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-01 20:46
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=14198
Are you trying to repeatedly train the exact same mail, or a
new, similar one? You can't train the same message multiple
times.
Each time you train, you should notice the "spam score"
shift back towards zero. It may not shift enough to have it
considered good, but it should shift. It is does, then it
will eventually learn. If it doesn't, then we have a bug -
but I will need the log file from a session where you have
tried to perform this training. If you do submit the log
file, please reset the bug status to "open"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702
More information about the Spambayes-bugs
mailing list