From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 4 03:08:48 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:08:48 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1366408 ] Fatal Error in Outlook 2003 after installation of .NET 1.1 Message-ID: Bugs item #1366408, was opened at 2005-11-25 10:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cmfn_mx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1366408&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Henrik Weber (hweber) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fatal Error in Outlook 2003 after installation of .NET 1.1 Initial Comment: On a relatively fresh installation of Windows XP SP 2 with Outlook 2003 I installed the Spambayes Outlook plugin, version 1.0.4. Copied the databases from an old computer. Everything worked fine. Then I installed the .NET 1.1 runtime and .NET SP 1. Since then Outlook produces an error message for the plugin (Want to send a report to Microsoft?) and will only start when Spambayes is deactivated. As soon as I reactivate the plugin, Outlook will crash again. Deinstalled .NET, didn't help. Couldn't even reinstall it afterwards. Went back to the system restore point before the installation of .NET, didn't help either, but could reinstall .NET again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: CesarF (cmfn_mx) Date: 2005-12-03 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1396303 Hi, I think I've good news for you. I've same problem and I found a similar reference to DEP with AMD that also fixed ours. You just have to manually add OUTLOOK to DEP (Data Execution Prevention) list. How? Just follow this steps: My Computer | Properties | Advanced | Performance | Settings | Data Execution Prevention (After SP1, it is turned ON for all programs and services) Add | Surf to c:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office11 \OUTLOOK.EXE | Open | Ok | Ok ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1366408&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 4 18:07:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 09:07:22 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1348816 ] spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Message-ID: Support Requests item #1348816, was opened at 2005-11-05 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darrinm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Initial Comment: SpamBayes stopped working and clicking the SpamBayes button in Outlook doesn't do anything. I need to know how to get it working again. Environment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6735) SP3 Windows XP Pro - 5.1(Build 2600.XPSP-SP2.gdr.050301-1519: Service Pack 2) Problem description: As stated above, SpanBayes has become inoperative. I tried to upgrade to version 1.0.4 to see if that would "kick-start: it, but that did nothing. PC had been running v 1.0, SpamBayes was trained and working, then suddenly it stopped filtering mail. Clicking the SpamBayes button on Outlook does nothing. I downloaded and installed 1.0.4 - no change. (After installation, starting Outlook took no special action -- as it did when I originally installed 1.0 earlier. I then uninstalled SpamBayes. The button still showed in Outlook [???]. I reinstalled 1.0.4 and still no difference. What I'm looking for from you: Is there a recommended way to uninstall SpanBayes? Should I even try? How do I get SpamBayes to function again? Can I do this without losing the knowledge of training? (Are there specific files to save?} Thanks in advance. -- Marvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-04 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 I'm seeing the same problem on a similar configuration (but with Outlook 2003) which I first noticed after I installed Visual Studio 2005. At the same time another Outlook plugin, Newsgator, also stopped functioning. The two failures are somewhat different though. In the case of Newsgator, the plugin doesn't appear at all (on the toolbar). Spambayes appears on the toolbar but clicking on the "SpamBayes" button doesn't drop down the menu and clicking on the "Spam" button does nothing. I've verified that SpamBayes is not simply disabled by Outlook (at least it isn't listed in the "About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items" dialog) and that a simple setup.py install doesn't fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-21 23:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in. Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The recommended way to uninstall SpamBayes is via the Add/Remove Programs Control Panel. This will not remove your training/configuration files. If you want to back up your training data, the FAQ outlines the files that you need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:14:52 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:14:52 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1366408 ] Fatal Error in Outlook 2003 after installation of .NET 1.1 Message-ID: Bugs item #1366408, was opened at 2005-11-25 17:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hweber You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1366408&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Henrik Weber (hweber) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fatal Error in Outlook 2003 after installation of .NET 1.1 Initial Comment: On a relatively fresh installation of Windows XP SP 2 with Outlook 2003 I installed the Spambayes Outlook plugin, version 1.0.4. Copied the databases from an old computer. Everything worked fine. Then I installed the .NET 1.1 runtime and .NET SP 1. Since then Outlook produces an error message for the plugin (Want to send a report to Microsoft?) and will only start when Spambayes is deactivated. As soon as I reactivate the plugin, Outlook will crash again. Deinstalled .NET, didn't help. Couldn't even reinstall it afterwards. Went back to the system restore point before the installation of .NET, didn't help either, but could reinstall .NET again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Henrik Weber (hweber) Date: 2005-12-05 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=121229 Yes, that worked. Thank you! I can live with that for the time being. However, DEP is supposed to be a security feature. It would be nice if the SpamBayes plugin played together with it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: CesarF (cmfn_mx) Date: 2005-12-04 03:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1396303 Hi, I think I've good news for you. I've same problem and I found a similar reference to DEP with AMD that also fixed ours. You just have to manually add OUTLOOK to DEP (Data Execution Prevention) list. How? Just follow this steps: My Computer | Properties | Advanced | Performance | Settings | Data Execution Prevention (After SP1, it is turned ON for all programs and services) Add | Surf to c:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office11 \OUTLOOK.EXE | Open | Ok | Ok ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1366408&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:35:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:35:35 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1366408 ] Fatal Error in Outlook 2003 after installation of .NET 1.1 Message-ID: Bugs item #1366408, was opened at 2005-11-26 05:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1366408&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Henrik Weber (hweber) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fatal Error in Outlook 2003 after installation of .NET 1.1 Initial Comment: On a relatively fresh installation of Windows XP SP 2 with Outlook 2003 I installed the Spambayes Outlook plugin, version 1.0.4. Copied the databases from an old computer. Everything worked fine. Then I installed the .NET 1.1 runtime and .NET SP 1. Since then Outlook produces an error message for the plugin (Want to send a report to Microsoft?) and will only start when Spambayes is deactivated. As soon as I reactivate the plugin, Outlook will crash again. Deinstalled .NET, didn't help. Couldn't even reinstall it afterwards. Went back to the system restore point before the installation of .NET, didn't help either, but could reinstall .NET again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is almost certainly not a problem with SpamBayes, but with DEP itself, with Outlook, with pywin32, or with Python. Hopefully a future version of one of those will solve the problem. Dupe of: [ 988095 ] Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=988095&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Henrik Weber (hweber) Date: 2005-12-05 21:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=121229 Yes, that worked. Thank you! I can live with that for the time being. However, DEP is supposed to be a security feature. It would be nice if the SpamBayes plugin played together with it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: CesarF (cmfn_mx) Date: 2005-12-04 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1396303 Hi, I think I've good news for you. I've same problem and I found a similar reference to DEP with AMD that also fixed ours. You just have to manually add OUTLOOK to DEP (Data Execution Prevention) list. How? Just follow this steps: My Computer | Properties | Advanced | Performance | Settings | Data Execution Prevention (After SP1, it is turned ON for all programs and services) Add | Surf to c:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office11 \OUTLOOK.EXE | Open | Ok | Ok ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1366408&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:39:51 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:39:51 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day Message-ID: Bugs item #1000192, was opened at 2004-07-30 04:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1000192&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Lambert (ranbato) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Weird Userfield errors in log every day Initial Comment: This has no visible effect on Spambayes, but it is odd. See the attached log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=961019&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1000192&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:39:58 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:39:58 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe (no effect) in: [ 1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1000192&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day Where there are the errors, but apparently no symptoms! Odd.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-27 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other problems seem qutie different. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that Richard has done this: the new tracker is: [ 988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 If you could take a look at it Mark, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-10 00:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 I accept your expert view that they are the same. I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I have a couple of new "spam" mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:42:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:42:17 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1345248 ] identified spam is duplicated in spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1345248, was opened at 2005-11-02 09:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1345248&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dana (danadickson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: identified spam is duplicated in spam folder Initial Comment: Emails that are identified as spam are duplicated when they are moved to the spam folder. Despite repeated reinstallations and re training the problem remains. The log is as follows: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DicksoAD\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DicksoAD\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 172 spam and 136 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.4 (March 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS got (((920846594, '\x02\x00\x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00 \x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07\x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'),), ((920846594, '\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00\x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07 \x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00'),)) Folder 'Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS got (((920846594, '\x02\x00\x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00 \x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07\x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'),), ((920846594, '\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00\x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07 \x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00'),)) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Spam/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Message 'Very popular dating site.' in 'Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 361, in _TimerFunc File "addin.pyc", line 123, in HaveSeenMessage File "msgstore.pyc", line 1099, in GetField File "msgstore.pyc", line 975, in _EnsureObject msgstore.MsgStoreExceptionC:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.modules\msgstore.py: 126: FutureWarning: %u/%o/%x/%X of negative int will return a signed string in Python 2.4 and up : MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\DicksoAD\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS got (((920846594, '\x02\x00\x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00 \x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07\x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'),), ((920846594, '\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00\x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07 \x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00'),)) Folder 'Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS got (((920846594, '\x02\x00\x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00 \x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07\x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00'),), ((920846594, '\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x0c\x00\x00\x00\x04\x00Spam)\x03\x02\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\xc0\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00F\x07 \x00\x00\x81\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 \x00'),)) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Spam/Spam' Message 'Do you have extended warranty coverage on your Vehicle? ' in 'Dickson, Dana A./IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Unable to determine source folder for message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration: Email Verification' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration: Email Verification' - Training on message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration: Email Verification' in 'Spam/Spam - trained as good Unable to determine source folder for message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration: Email Verification' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration: Email Verification' - Training on message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration: Email Verification' in 'Spam/Spam - already was trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you mean they appear twice in the spam folder, or they appear in the spam folder and also in the original location? This is probably a dupe of: [ 961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=961019&group_id=61702&atid=498103 (although symptoms vary a lot, I'm sure it must be the same problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1345248&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:43:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:43:07 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook >Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe (duplicate messages) in: [ 1345248 ] identified spam is duplicated in spam folder http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1345248&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe (no effect) in: [ 1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1000192&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day Where there are the errors, but apparently no symptoms! Odd.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-27 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other problems seem qutie different. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that Richard has done this: the new tracker is: [ 988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 If you could take a look at it Mark, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-10 00:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 I accept your expert view that they are the same. I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I have a couple of new "spam" mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:43:53 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:43:53 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1225798 ] SpamBayes causes Outlook.exe failure when changing folders Message-ID: Bugs item #1225798, was opened at 2005-06-23 08:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225798&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mrbene (mrbene) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes causes Outlook.exe failure when changing folders Initial Comment: Spambayes toolbar on same row as Standard toolbar and window width is only wide enough for 1 of 3 SpamBayes buttons. Folder List is displayed, Outlook Bar is hidden. When switching between Inbox (SpamBayes Toolbar shows "Delete as Spam" and ">>") and Junk Suspects (SpamBayes Toolbar shows "Recover from Spam" and ">>") repeatedly, Outlook.exe will eventually fail. But the buttons have to be different - if they are the same, then it won't fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you the suggestions in the troubleshooting guide for fixing toolbar problems? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1225798&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:45:55 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:45:55 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-17 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 9 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't fixed the underlying problem (that we know of), but since the default is now ZODB, I figure we can close this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-08-17 02:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noting dupe in 1009077 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gisli Ottarsson (gisli) Date: 2004-06-12 04:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=332630 This problem has been spotted on an up-to-date Debian Unstable system. The system has fetchmail sucking mail through a pop3proxy. Version: spambayes-1.0rc1 I am halting spambayes, removing spambayes.messageinfo.db and restarting. Should I have removed this file when I updated to 1.0rc1 recently? Gisli ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting another Outlook user saw this in [ 828669 ] pythoncom error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Adjusting category, as there are 2 reports in this bug - Outlook and the proxy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-23 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Re-opening. This is *not* fixed - the underlying problem is still there, and is very nasty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-23 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Removing spambayes.messageinfo.db solved the problem for me. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 20:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:47:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:47:29 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988095 ] DEP / NX causes Outlook to crash Message-ID: Bugs item #988095, was opened at 2004-07-10 05:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook >Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mlarma (mlarma) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: DEP / NX causes Outlook to crash Initial Comment: When enabling the NX function underneath WinXP with SP2 RC2 (32 bit edition, not 64 bit windows), I was unable to start Outlook with the SpamBayes plug-in. After disabling and only disabling NX (remove /noexecute from boot.ini), it worked. Funny thing is that the owner of the company I work for developed a Bayesian spam filter as well and it had the same issue with the NX. Not sure what the problem is, but the NX feature would be nice to turn on. Does anyone know if NX can be disabled at the application level so that the other processes were protected with NX? Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 A lot of people are hitting this these days, so changing the summary in the hope that people will notice this bug and not submit new ones (it's already in the FAQ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2005-08-10 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Just had a report that Pythonwin also fails with this turned on. This makes it less likely the problem is simply py2exe. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2005-07-23 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 another possibility is that py2exe is the culprit. It isn't obvious to me that is *is* the problem, but it certainly is possible. It would be interesting to know if the source version of SpamBayes has the same problem. When I get back to Aus, I will try and reproduce this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Quinn (paulquinn) Date: 2004-07-21 03:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=815032 This is a problem with NX protection...this is how I got it to work: There are ways to disable NX at application level: a) Through the UI... i) "Control Panel" > "System" ii) Click on the "Advanced" tab iii) Under "Performance" section, click "Settings" iv) Click on the "Data Execution Prevention" tab v) Click "Add" and select the appication you want to disable NX for b) Registry... Under "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\AppCompatFlags\Layers" (there are equivalent HKEY_CURRENT_USER keys), create a new string key, its name being the full path to the executable file you want to disable NX for, the value being "DisableNXShowUI" ...you'll notice that in the UI, only executable files can be added. This means that I had to select the "Outlook.exe" file to get Spambayes to work again. I tried adding the spambayes_addin.dll and the python23.dll paths to the registry as a workaround, but this didn't work... Also, if you are using Outlook 2003, you may need to re-enable the plug-in by deleting its resilliency key (the COM Add-in Manager won't remember the re-enable setting no matter how many times you try): http://groups.google.co.uk/groups? hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=uZ%24FJzyFEHA.3984% 40TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl FYI, the same techniques work with Inboxer etc. I'm guessing, as tim_one said, it's to do with the Python libraries. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-10 05:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 You'll really have to ask about NX gimmicks on an Athlon list. SpamBayes is written entirely in the Python programming language, and that never, ever tries to execute code from a data region (I'm very familiar with Python's implementation) My only guess is that Outlook itself, or MAPI, try to do this when interfacing with extensions. Or Mark Hammond is playing disgusting games (the only kind he knows, really ) in the win32all Python extensions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:49:32 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:49:32 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1163862 ] Using pickle as storage is slow Message-ID: Bugs item #1163862, was opened at 2005-03-16 05:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: Using pickle as storage is slow Initial Comment: hello, recently i upgraded spambayes 1.0a07 to 1.0.3 and later to cvs version (1.1a0 as of 2005-03-15). unfortunately both 1.0.3 and 1.1a0 versions are very slow (my estimate is 20x). i'm running the sb_server.py script with cPickle database storage. i'm also constantly uploading messages trained as spam/ham via sb_upload.py. currently it's trained on 835 spam and 293 ham messages. when i was running 1.0a07 (on bsddb database storage), mail retrieval was blazingly fast, with both the 1.0.3 (also running on bsddb) and the cvs version a single mail takes about 1-2 secs to be retrieved. i'll be happy to supply any additional data - i just don't know which would be interesting for the developers. thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-17 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed the CVS bug; thanks. sb_dbexpimp.py converts between bsddb and pickle (and csv, and any of the other storage types in spambayes/storage.py). Using a pickle for the message info db will mean that it has to write the whole thing to disk every time it's updated, which includes any time that a message is classified or trained. I'll leave this open and play around with using pickle and see what I can come up with. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-17 02:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 [i had to downgrade to 1.0.3 because there were some problems in the cvs version (self.gzipCache undefined in spambayes/UserInterface.py, i don't use cache at all).] so 1.0.3 running on bsddb runs fast for me. but when the same code is using pickle version of hammie.db the spambayes.messageinfo.db is constantly being rebuilded causing the cpu usage to be 100% most of the time. i have both the hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db which seem to cause this. shall i upload them? they are 2480916 bytes for hammie.db and 1678535 bytes for messageinfo. [btw: some utility to convert bsddb<=>pickle storage would be great for experimenting] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-03-16 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you check to see whether this is just the change from bsddb to pickle? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-03-16 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 some additions to the above (sorry for not mentioning them earlier): this is on linux, kernel 2.4.26, python 2.3.5, db-4.1.25-NC, pybsddb3-4.3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1163862&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:52:44 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:52:44 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1124409 ] Remove admin registry write requirements for install Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1124409, was opened at 2005-02-17 13:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1124409&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Remove admin registry write requirements for install Initial Comment: Installing the plug-in currently requires write-access to parts of the registry that a 'regular' user does not have. We can probably register in other places to work around this, which would be good. I'll try to get this done for 1.1 (probably a2, but maybe a1). --- Tips from Ryan Malayter: The add-in itself appears to be registered with outlook in the USER portion of the registry: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins\SpamBayes.Out lookAddin However, the SpamBayes.OutlookAddin ProgID appears to be registered in a protected part of the registry: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AppID\{3556EDEE-FC91-4cf2-A0E4-7489747BAB10} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{3556EDEE-FC91-4cf2-A0E4-7489747BAB10} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Instead, I would think you could put similar entries into the corresponding parts of the user's registry hive: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\AppID HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\CLSID HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Of course, the spambayes program files and DLLs themselves would have to go into the %USERPROFILE%\Application Data directory, which is the only place a "standard user" can write on the machine. --- In addition to these changes, I suppose that when doing a "for all users" registration, we should do what we currently do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apparently this isn't possible, see: [ 784283 ] cannot install SpamBayes without elevated privileges http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=784283&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1124409&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:52:47 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:52:47 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-784283 ] cannot install SpamBayes without elevated privileges Message-ID: Feature Requests item #784283, was opened at 2003-08-07 04:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew (andrewz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: cannot install SpamBayes without elevated privileges Initial Comment: Under an administrated Windows Domain it is important that some users not have the ability to install their own software or modify their registry. And yet it is important that These same users, running Outlook & Exchange, have Spam filtering capability like SpamBayes. It is not currently possible to install SpamBayes for a user from the Administrator account, it is also not possible to install SpamBayes from a locked down account. it would be great to have this feature in an upcoming version. thanks, AndrewZ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The documentation explains how to register for all users, and the 1.1 installer offers to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew (andrewz) Date: 2003-08-11 05:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=588328 You certainly don't want non-admin users installing anything or making registry changes, agreed. But it would be nice to allow the admin to install for a user or class of users. Or have a separate util which enables for a user after SpamBayes is installed. Nero does this with a separate util called 'Burn Rights'. Thanks, Andrew ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-10 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 A non-admin user can't get far at all here - such users can't register COM objects in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, so is pretty much screwed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 11:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I agree, it would be great to have in the next version. Any takers? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:54:16 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:54:16 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-25 02:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook >Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1199978 ] Requires Owner on Public Folder to Score Spam http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1199978&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-13 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 Sorry but it does also happen with background filtering off. I get the same error:- File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) I have administrator rights and am trying to remove items from a variety of Public folders (Sales, Support, Facsimiles) into a Public Spam folder HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-13 09:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 jduydye: dsbowskill's comment of 3-12 says that this does not occur with background filtering off. Did you try that? Did you have the same experience? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-12 18:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I am still getting the original problem - see my entry 2004-03- 02 even with 1.0b1. I've reverted back to 0.81 which is the latest version when things work. HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 zanthony's bug is not the same as this. It is, however, the same as: [ 943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Happily, this has just been fixed & closed, so this should be resolved in the next release (1.0rc2 or 1.0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zanthony (zanthony) Date: 2004-05-12 01:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004452 The problem doesn't seem to be fixed with 1.0b1 for me, assuming, that is, that the problem I am experieicing is the same one documented here. I am unable to mark both my personal Inbox and another account's Inbox (for which I have full rights) to be monitored at the same time. Both are available in my Folder List simulataneously. This worked in .0081 but hasn't since. In the last version I was simply unable to close the Manager dialog with the other account's Inbox selected also, now I get an error stating 'Please select a child-folder - top-level folders can't be used' and am unable to even select it. Can this bug be re-opened, or should this be opened as a separate issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-02 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:54:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:54:25 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1199978 ] Requires Owner on Public Folder to Score Spam Message-ID: Bugs item #1199978, was opened at 2005-05-12 04:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1199978&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Karl Vollmer (vollmerk) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Requires Owner on Public Folder to Score Spam Initial Comment: In an attempt to make it easier to train Spam Bayes for all of our customers we created a Public Folder in exchange that contained a large number of known Spam. What we would like to be able to do is when installing Spam Bayes for a new user simply point it at this Public Folder to train for "Bad Messages" unfortuantly we ran into a problem. If the user has read only rights to the Public Folder when you point the Spam Bayes configuration agent at it, it appears to process the messages but then comes back with a "0 Spam Messages Found" If you set the user at a owner on the folder and try again it works perfectly. Unfortuantly setting every single one of our users as a "Owner" really isn't an option (we don't want them deleting messagesf from it etc). It would be nice if Spam Bayes didn't require owner of the folder in order to score spam messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 903440 ] Fail to filter public folder http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=903440&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-05-12 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In general, I wouldn't recommend this approach for a number of reasons. The first is that it's really best to only train on mail that you receive - there are clues (addresses, received headers, etc) that will not be correct for each user, and the idea is to train on spam unique to each user. Secondly, this is likely to lead to an imbalanced database (more spam than ham) unless you can be sure that the users will train on similar amounts of ham to start with (and imbalanced databases are a bad idea). Thirdly, generally a small database is usually better than a large one, and this may lead to a large database. See http://entrian.com/sbwiki/TrainingIdeas for more information. If you do decide to do this anyway, it would probably be easier to simply train a database on this mail and give the database files to each user to start with rather than getting them to do the training in Outlook. As for the problem, the owner privileges are required to score messages because the spam field is modified/created. If you turn off writing the spam field (not really a good idea) as described in the configuration guide, this may work. If you train without rescoring the messages, does that work? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1199978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:56:43 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:56:43 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1120780 ] no training with public folder postings or mails Message-ID: Bugs item #1120780, was opened at 2005-02-12 03:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120780&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: marty K (martinkoeb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: no training with public folder postings or mails Initial Comment: hi, I have full admin rights on the public folder,but the minute I focus on a mail in the folder,the 'delete as spam' button disappears. further when I start training with spam in a public folder (hr,jobs) in this case,I get :Checked 0 in folder HR - 0 new entries found. spambayes version:1.0.3 outlook 2003 Sp1 here's the log: ###################### Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 16 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Martin Koeb/Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Office Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - Martin Koeb/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'HR' took 24.4768ms Checked 377 in folder iit list - 371 new entries found. Checked 0 in folder HR - 0 new entries found. Checked 0 in folder jobs - 0 new entries found. Checked 0 in folder Junk E-mail - 0 new entries found. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 371 good messages Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_START Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_START Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_START ########################### also:does anyone know:what's the difference between postings and mails in pub folders as far as spambayes goes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 903440 ] Fail to filter public folder http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=903440&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120780&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:56:49 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:56:49 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-25 02:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Actually, that one was not exactly a dupe - it wanted the owner privileges requirement removed, but close enough (if we fix one, I imagine we'll fix the other). Actual dupe here: [ 1120780 ] no training with public folder postings or mails http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1120780&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1199978 ] Requires Owner on Public Folder to Score Spam http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1199978&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-13 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 Sorry but it does also happen with background filtering off. I get the same error:- File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) I have administrator rights and am trying to remove items from a variety of Public folders (Sales, Support, Facsimiles) into a Public Spam folder HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-13 09:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 jduydye: dsbowskill's comment of 3-12 says that this does not occur with background filtering off. Did you try that? Did you have the same experience? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-05-12 18:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I am still getting the original problem - see my entry 2004-03- 02 even with 1.0b1. I've reverted back to 0.81 which is the latest version when things work. HTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-12 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 zanthony's bug is not the same as this. It is, however, the same as: [ 943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Happily, this has just been fixed & closed, so this should be resolved in the next release (1.0rc2 or 1.0). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zanthony (zanthony) Date: 2004-05-12 01:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004452 The problem doesn't seem to be fixed with 1.0b1 for me, assuming, that is, that the problem I am experieicing is the same one documented here. I am unable to mark both my personal Inbox and another account's Inbox (for which I have full rights) to be monitored at the same time. Both are available in my Folder List simulataneously. This worked in .0081 but hasn't since. In the last version I was simply unable to close the Manager dialog with the other account's Inbox selected also, now I get an error stating 'Please select a child-folder - top-level folders can't be used' and am unable to even select it. Can this bug be re-opened, or should this be opened as a separate issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in the 1.0b1 release (it has better error handing when fetching the full folder name). If not, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. This means my comment is most likely invalid. Back to Mark for the clever figuring out bit :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Back on 1.a09 ... and further fiddling reveals that this problem only seems to occur when background filtering is turned on. This actually happens in v0081 as well, just never had background filter switched on before it seems. Here's the log file for 1.a09 with background filtering OFF: (with various privacy snips!) ---Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3360 spam and 3622 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning// Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - /Spam' Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 3.73427ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Online' took 144.868ms --- And here's the logfile with background filtering ON. --- SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - /Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Spam filtering is disabled - ignoring new message pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 280, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 383, in OnItemAdd File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 496, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 455, in __getattr__ File "win32com\client\__init__.pyc", line 446, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221233, 'OLE error 0x8004010f', None, None) --- Result! :) Seems to work ok, but not with background filtering. Remember I have 'Editor' priv of the public folder (I can delete the items from it) I am *moving* the spam from the public folder and into a sub- folder on my on mailbox. DSB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-12 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: this is presumably a result of SB now trying to create the spam field for all the folders, yes? Could it fail more gracefully here? (I'd write a patch, but I'm not very familiar with this bit of the code). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Forgot to mention ... I am moving the spam OUT of the public folder and into one of my mailbox sub-folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DSB (dsbowskill) Date: 2004-03-12 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995952 Exactly the same problem, though I went back to 0081 in order to fix it. 0081 works, 1.0a9 doesn't. Nothing to do with our exchange server, so this isn't the problem (at least for me). I do get this error in the logfile, which doesn't stop the addin working for 0081, but it does seem to for 1.0a9. (I don't have admin over the public folder I'm filtering, but I am 'Editor' priv. --- Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/News//Planning//Online' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Judy Dye (judydye) Date: 2004-03-02 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=988571 I have the same problem but it has only occurred since upgrading from Exchange 5.5 to 2003 - perhaps this is causing the problem? Trace SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re- configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1395, in _HookFolderEvents File "addin.pyc", line 277, in Init File "msgstore.pyc", line 629, in IsReceiveFolder com_error: (-2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Facsimiles', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'sales', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Support', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Hope this helps........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys) Date: 2004-03-02 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840787 I've recently encountered this problem as well. However in my case, I want SpamBayes to move detected spam to the public folder for use by our IT staff. Once the network folder is identified and the "Could not watch the specified folders" message appears, the only way I've been able to clear the error is to retrain SpamBayes through the training wizard which allows me to specify a local folder towards the end of the wizard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 09:59:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:59:38 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1060206 ] Taking too much processor time Message-ID: Bugs item #1060206, was opened at 2004-11-05 02:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: shiphen (shiphen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taking too much processor time Initial Comment: ms Outlook (Office 2002) / Win2000 Pro Hi How do I stop Spambayes from taking up too much processor time?! When I am downloading emails, my entire PC becomes so slow that it is more or less unusable! This is a disaster because I need to see my new emails regularly thoughout the day & I get huge amounts of spam! With thanks Ship Shiperton Henethe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-24 13:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 How many ham/spam have you trained on? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2005-06-24 01:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 The trouble is that if I delete all the training and start again, then I will lose all the hard-won intelligence! (i.e. that it is now quite good at distinguishing spam from non-spam!) Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Leftley (dleftley) Date: 2004-12-22 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891846 Has Spambayes always run slowly for you, or has it recently slowed down? I ask because I find my copy fairly often gets into this state, which I think is because the database gets slightly corrupted. If so, you should find that if you delete all your training data and retrain from scratch it will run at an acceptable speed again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2004-11-05 02:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 P.S. I am using the Add-in Binary Version 1.0 - (July 2004)... Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:02:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:02:07 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1221946 ] Duplicates created with activesync Message-ID: Bugs item #1221946, was opened at 2005-06-17 02:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kyle Prawel (kprawel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Duplicates created with activesync Initial Comment: When I sync my iPaq with Oulook2003, while Spambayes plugin is turned on, duplicates are created. These email duplicates are stripped of thier "from" data which causes outlook to crash when you look at one. I have turned the plugin off and been able to sync and delete the duplicates with no problems. I love Spambayes on my other machines; hope you'll be able to make it work with Activesync. Machine: Win XP /sp2 Oulook 2003 Activesync 3.8 IPaq running Mobile 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 User reports fixed. Dupe of: [ 968069 ] SpamBayes causes OL2003 to crash when launched by ActiveSync http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=968069&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kyle Prawel (kprawel) Date: 2005-08-16 02:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1297932 I have changed the delay time to 1.5 and .5 between items... It seems to work now. Hmmm.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kyle Prawel (kprawel) Date: 2005-06-24 03:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1297932 This happens in both back-ground filtering, and non- background filtering methods. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-06-23 20:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does changing the background filtering values have any effect? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1221946&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:02:12 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:02:12 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-968069 ] SpamBayes causes OL2003 to crash when launched by ActiveSync Message-ID: Bugs item #968069, was opened at 2004-06-07 21:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=968069&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook >Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alun (aluncarp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes causes OL2003 to crash when launched by ActiveSync Initial Comment: I am using SpamBayes RC1 but this happened in previous versions. If I plug in my PDA without Outlook running ActiveSync will launch Outlook to perform synchronisation. Outlook then encouters a serious error when opening the add-in spambayes. If I launch Outlook before plugging in my PDA everything is fine, if I disable the spambayes add-in Outlook launches fine from ActiveSync. System details: Windows XP Pro SP1, 768 MB RAM, Outlook 2003 All with latest hot fixes/updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the fix in: [ 1221946 ] Dublicates created with activesync http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1221946&group_id=61702&atid=498103 work for you? (Changing processing times) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2005-02-04 07:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 I have had no problem with Active Sync 3.5 to 3.8 with my CE 3.0 2002 device and OL2000 then OL2003 in workgroup mode. OL does remain open if ActiveSync is resident, and ususally closes if it is not. -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=968069&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:07:58 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:07:58 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1181131 ] sb_filter fails with AttributeError on FreeBSD Message-ID: Bugs item #1181131, was opened at 2005-04-12 11:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1181131&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: hammie Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dmitry Karasik (int32) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter fails with AttributeError on FreeBSD Initial Comment: sb_filter.py fails with the error. the file 'sample_mail' is a simple message, but the error is the same on every message i've tested spambayes on: $ sb_filter.py < sample_mail Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'spamprob' zsh: 87791 exit 1 sb_filter.py < aa $ uname -a 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As leobru notes (thanks!), this is a dupe of 1106457, which has been fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-08-05 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 See 1106457 for the solution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dmitry Karasik (int32) Date: 2005-04-14 18:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=72076 sb_filter.py does print the help, and the database file does exist - the condition appeared after the upgrading from the older spambayes version. cannot confirm whether training or new database creation works, because I rolled it back, but if you suspect an impoper setup, the condition can be reproduced by installing spambayes on freebsd from ports collection. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-12 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Odd. Does sb_filter.py work apart from classifying? (e.g. to train, to create a new database, to print the help). Do the other scripts work as expected? Does a database file exist? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1181131&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:09:28 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:09:28 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:20 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes at python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-17 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 As I mentioned on the main spambayes user mailing list, I am going to create a script (in VBA I guess) that will troll through your folders and create the desired representative subset of messages (as copies) automatically. We'll see how it makes the filter perform after training, and if people like the feature. I have to figure out how to automatically strip attachments from the copies... anyone know how to do that in Outlook VBA without destroying the headers? Does anybody have a better idea of how to test this feature? -ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-17 03:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I guess my reaction would be: disk space is extraordinarlity cheap, and spam messages are generally small. My folder of 2900 spams takes up only 11.8 MB of space on my Exchange server. I don't think storing "extra" data is a big issue in the single- user model. In fact, I think an auto-rotating trainig corpus-of- copies like the scheme used by ASSP (see assp.sf.net) is a good idea. It help age things properly, and keeps a balanced training set, and lets you empty out your "main" mailbox. Of course, there is the problem of making SpamBayes training sets and databases too large to be "portable". This is an large issue with the Outlook plug-in, since many companies using Windows roaming profiles so users can log-in to any machine. I also remember similar issues with the NFS/AFS roaming-user system we had in college for the enginerring workstations, so I'm sure Linux/FreeBSD/UNIX sites could have roaming-user problems, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-16 14:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Yup, I agree it's fraught with dangers. Note that we'd also need to remember which msgs were explicitly trained as mistakes or unsures, to help prevent them from getting mistreated again. For example, I have a few strange friends I hear from maybe twice a year, and the stuff they send is so bizarre I have to keep several years' worth of their msgs in my ham training set (and, yes, I do think it's ham <wink>). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Another problem with this is that these require either the user keeping spam around, or storing a *lot* more data. Ryan's scheme below is really two separate things - one is aging out old data, which has been discussed a few times, and then randomly selecting from what's left. I tend to agree with Mark. I think this might end up like the experimental_ham_spam_imbalance and confuse people. Why doesn't x get a ham score, they ask? Because it was randomly chosen to not get included in your training data, we answer. The more I think about it, the more I think that (unless someone comes up with a new, better, experimental_ham_spam_imbalance option), the best option is simply to warn users if they reach a certain level of imbalance, so that their attention is drawn to the problem. If I find the time, I might play around with setting up a test script to train, then retrain on balanced data and see how that goes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-16 01:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My problem is more with missing ham, and I fear that missing a single ham could make the difference. Our low false-positive rate is a feature we should keep :) It all gets back to the test framework. As Tim is fond of saying, intuition is a poor guide here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-16 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 The last sentance under part 1) below should read "So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2003." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-16 00:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-13 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant <wink> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:10:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:10:01 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-859339 ] Add sqlite support for the storage.py Message-ID: Feature Requests item #859339, was opened at 2003-12-13 17:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vladimir Ulogov (vulogov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Add sqlite support for the storage.py Initial Comment: In addition to the BerkleyDB, I'd like to use sqlite as well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a feature request, not a patch, so changing type. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that you can use mysql or postgresql. Are either of those good enough? If not, then you could maybe write your own SQLiteClassifier class, based on the other SQL ones in storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:11:28 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:11:28 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-859339 ] Add sqlite storage option Message-ID: Feature Requests item #859339, was opened at 2003-12-13 17:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vladimir Ulogov (vulogov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Add sqlite storage option Initial Comment: In addition to the BerkleyDB, I'd like to use sqlite as well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note also that there have been a few people on the mailing list that have mentioned intending to do this. You could try seeing if any have, and if they'd be willing to contribute the code either to you or back to the project. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a feature request, not a patch, so changing type. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that you can use mysql or postgresql. Are either of those good enough? If not, then you could maybe write your own SQLiteClassifier class, based on the other SQL ones in storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:12:06 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:12:06 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1362959 ] Rules executed after checking Message-ID: Support Requests item #1362959, was opened at 2005-11-22 06:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1362959&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: NaturalSelector (naturalselector) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Rules executed after checking Initial Comment: I have many rules configured for moving e-mail into specified folders. These rules fail to move e-mail when the e-mail gets marked as spam or suspect. The ideal situation would be for spambayes to allow rules to run, and THEN mark the messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-23 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if it is SpamBayes that is moving these and not something else (like Outlook's built-in spam filtering). Every message that SpamBayes processes gets an entry in the log file (SpamBayes->SpamBayes Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics->View Log). Next time a message is moved before it ought to be, see if there is an entry in the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: NaturalSelector (naturalselector) Date: 2005-11-23 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1384790 The filter status says "Watching 'Inbox'", and background filtering is (and has been) enabled. Outlook rules are applied instantly (under half a second) on messages not considered spam. I even changed the rule to delete permanently messages that matched it, and those messages were still moved to junk mail (that is why I believe spambayes runs first). If I then run the same rule on the junk e-mail folder (manually), the messages are moved or deleted. I am certain the rule works, and is capable of completing within the spambayes processing delay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-22 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It is the case with Outlook 2003. Are you filtering only the Inbox? Does it take longer than 10 seconds after mail arrives for Outlook to process the rules? Is the "background filtering" enabled? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: NaturalSelector (naturalselector) Date: 2005-11-22 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1384790 With Outlook 2003 this is not the case. I have set the timing values to 10 seconds and the rules do not execute until after items are tagged and moved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-22 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This *is* the way that the plug-in works. Perhaps you need to adjust the timing values in the Advanced tab of the SpamBayes Manager? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1362959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:14:09 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:14:09 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Feature Requests item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-08 04:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is really therefore the same as: [ 922840 ] Score multipart/alternative separately http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=922840&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-11-04 23:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Eesults of Show Spam Clues as requested. ---- 8< ---- Combined Score: 13% (0.13489) Internal ham score (*H*): 0.874286 Internal spam score (*S*): 0.144065 # ham trained on: 18958 # spam trained on: 37851 41 Significant Tokens token spamprob #ham #spam 'cc:no real name:2**0' 0.0293311 5626 339 'cc:2**0' 0.0381075 5530 437 'header:Organization:1' 0.055403 2403 281 'using' 0.0940433 4296 890 "doesn't" 0.109159 1943 475 'character' 0.113282 464 118 'text' 0.117279 989 262 'subject:changed' 0.143036 7 2 'then' 0.156914 4024 1495 'uses' 0.169402 681 277 'set' 0.187562 2322 1070 'supported' 0.194154 275 132 'that' 0.203366 12571 6407 'can' 0.211424 9909 5304 'attached' 0.21534 475 260 'not' 0.244613 10504 6791 'correctly,' 0.279318 114 88 'disk,' 0.286598 100 80 'subject:address' 0.302551 6 5 'this' 0.306877 10789 9537 'message.' 0.309489 236 211 'attachment' 0.309771 104 93 'open' 0.313923 958 875 'display' 0.315122 219 201 'set.' 0.322163 114 108 'service.' 0.602322 119 360 'content,' 0.602752 63 191 'internet' 0.643487 427 1539 'save' 0.648866 355 1310 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.667894 7445 29894 'cc:addr:[snip]' 0.70368 13 62 'cc:addr:mpuk.com' 0.74098 286 1634 'message' 0.765092 3718 24178 'sender:none' 0.809634 4393 37304 'header:Reply-To:1' 0.8163 1664 14764 'header:Received:3' 0.856519 445 5305 'to:addr:[snip]' 0.876623 1298 18415 'original' 0.906061 1096 21108 'to:addr:mpuk.com' 0.906496 1864 36082 'reply-to:addr:yahoo.com' 0.962049 17 866 'message-id:@yahoo.com' 0.98256 5 575 Message Stream Received: from mailrelay.mapleusa.com ([172.25.10.40]) by chapar.mpuk.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 4WA0NCGN; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:30:05 -0000 Received: from 206.81.95.104 (unknown [206.81.95.104]) by mailrelay.mapleusa.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1571243143; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 05:33:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from %RECEIVED.yahoo.com (%RECEIVED.yahoo.com [170.218.147.92]) by %REC_WITH; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 02:30:03 -0800 Message-ID: <%MESSAGEID at yahoo.com> From: "Ward Corbin" Reply-To: "Ward Corbin" To: [snip] Cc: [snip] Subject: my email address has changed Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 02:30:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="45828411876807924" This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set. All Message Tokens 62 unique tokens 'and' 'attached' 'attachment' 'can' 'cc:2**0' 'cc:addr:[snip]' 'cc:addr:mpuk.com' 'cc:no real name:2**0' 'character' 'content,' 'content-type:text/plain' 'correctly,' 'disk,' 'display' "doesn't" 'from:addr:pickyourrate' 'from:addr:yahoo.com' 'from:name:ward corbin' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-ID:1' 'header:Organization:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Reply-To:1' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'internet' 'message' 'message-id:@yahoo.com' 'message.' 'not' 'open' 'original' 'reply-to:addr:pickyourrate' 'reply-to:addr:yahoo.com' 'reply-to:name:ward corbin' 'save' 'sender:none' 'service.' 'set' 'set.' 'subject: ' 'subject:address' 'subject:changed' 'subject:email' 'subject:has' 'supported' 'text' 'that' 'the' 'then' 'this' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:[snip]' 'to:addr:mpuk.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'uses' 'using' 'view' 'viewer' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-05 05:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Sorry ignore that. Browser mess up... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-05 05:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 21:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry, but this is too hard to fix before 1.0 - it will mean pulling apart all text attachments, and including them in the body. We can do this post 1.0 though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond at users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 19:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 12:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:14:16 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:14:16 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-922840 ] Score multipart/alternative separately Message-ID: Feature Requests item #922840, was opened at 2004-03-25 12:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=922840&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Score multipart/alternative separately Initial Comment: The amount of spam with multipart/alternative content where the plain text is a piece of prose or such, and the HTML is a UCE, is growing. My proposal is: - compute separate scores as if the text/plain part was empty, and as if the text/html part was empty - to compute the final score, use min(plain_hamscore, html_hamscore) and max(plain_spamscore, html_spamscore) because any disparity is by itself a spam indicator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=931150&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2004-05-04 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 A 75 Kb long spam message has been observed that scored an exact 0.50 because of that technique. The text/plain part was an enormous list of space-separated random words that happened to include enough "hammy" words in my database to saturate the default 150 word cutoff before the "spammy" ones would have started to prevail. Unless measures are taken, the spammers will learn the trick quickly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=922840&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:15:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:15:50 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-818567 ] Add IDLE support for IMAP Message-ID: Feature Requests item #818567, was opened at 2003-10-07 00:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Wagland (pwagland) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add IDLE support for IMAP Initial Comment: It would be very useful if the imap filter could use the IDLE support of LDAP on the folders that it monitors for new messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure what this feature is; could you elaborate or point to a link? (If it's a non-standard IMAP feature, then the chances of implementing it is low - the IMAP filter is complicated enough trying to support all the standard ways that IMAP can work). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:17:14 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:17:14 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1348816 ] spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Message-ID: Support Requests item #1348816, was opened at 2005-11-05 17:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Initial Comment: SpamBayes stopped working and clicking the SpamBayes button in Outlook doesn't do anything. I need to know how to get it working again. Environment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6735) SP3 Windows XP Pro - 5.1(Build 2600.XPSP-SP2.gdr.050301-1519: Service Pack 2) Problem description: As stated above, SpanBayes has become inoperative. I tried to upgrade to version 1.0.4 to see if that would "kick-start: it, but that did nothing. PC had been running v 1.0, SpamBayes was trained and working, then suddenly it stopped filtering mail. Clicking the SpamBayes button on Outlook does nothing. I downloaded and installed 1.0.4 - no change. (After installation, starting Outlook took no special action -- as it did when I originally installed 1.0 earlier. I then uninstalled SpamBayes. The button still showed in Outlook [???]. I reinstalled 1.0.4 and still no difference. What I'm looking for from you: Is there a recommended way to uninstall SpanBayes? Should I even try? How do I get SpamBayes to function again? Can I do this without losing the knowledge of training? (Are there specific files to save?} Thanks in advance. -- Marvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't suppose DEP is now enabled? That usually causes Outlook to crash, but I suppose it could maybe disable SB... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-05 06:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 I'm seeing the same problem on a similar configuration (but with Outlook 2003) which I first noticed after I installed Visual Studio 2005. At the same time another Outlook plugin, Newsgator, also stopped functioning. The two failures are somewhat different though. In the case of Newsgator, the plugin doesn't appear at all (on the toolbar). Spambayes appears on the toolbar but clicking on the "SpamBayes" button doesn't drop down the menu and clicking on the "Spam" button does nothing. I've verified that SpamBayes is not simply disabled by Outlook (at least it isn't listed in the "About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items" dialog) and that a simple setup.py install doesn't fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-22 12:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in. Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The recommended way to uninstall SpamBayes is via the Add/Remove Programs Control Panel. This will not remove your training/configuration files. If you want to back up your training data, the FAQ outlines the files that you need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:19:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:19:04 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1012384 ] want "are you sure?" dialog on Recover from Spam button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1012384, was opened at 2004-08-20 06:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1012384&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Albert Davidson Chou (alchou) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: want "are you sure?" dialog on Recover from Spam button Initial Comment: It would be very nice to have a preference to specify that I want an "are you sure?" dialog to be presented when I click the "Recover from Spam" button. Yesterday I mistakenly recovered 15 suspected spam messages back into my huge inbox and had to go manually hunting for them in my inbox to get rid of them again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This strikes me as something that would be very annoying, to have to click twice to do a recover. Since no-one else has requested this in all the time I've been involved, I'm going to close this. (If any developer actually does like the idea, please reopen. If anyone else wants it, please submit a patch to be considered ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1012384&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:20:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:20:46 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1076595 ] Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1076595, was opened at 2004-12-01 22:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patric (likit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Initial Comment: Hi, I have plan to build an messagefilter for our companys exchange-server for spam-classified. I use spambayers on clientside but i will have it on serverside so the webaccess will process and filter spam/ham to right folder. I think that the dll/.net-class shuld have (3) functions like classifieMessage, processAsSpam, processAsHam Best regards Patric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response in a long time, so closing. I don't believe py2exe can create dll's currently, so it would be a lot of work to do this. There are many simple ways to do this at the moment, e.g. with XML RPC as below, which should suffice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Python is *extremely* easy to learn, especially if you already know another language. The existing scripts probably have all the functions you need, anyway, so you'd just have to pick the ones you want and then write the appropriate py2exe script to create the dll. Have you considered just running sb_xmlrpcserver.py and then just sending messages to/from that? It would certainly be simple, and has the advantage of using existing scripts and keeping the SpamBayes state separate and alive across filtering sessions (for speed). The sb_bnfilter/sb_bnserver scripts (sb_bnserver is also implemented in C) do this sort of thing, but without the XML RPC, but are *nix only. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patric (likit) Date: 2004-12-02 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=671964 My big problem to build the dll in python is that I can't the python-language that I must learn me before I start... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 11:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This thing about this is that SpamBayes is open-source, so it's really trivial to just get the source and use it to build what you want. The code is all well documented and should be simple to understand - but the people on spambayes-dev would probably be willing to help out anyway. You probably want to start with the tokenizer.py and classifier.py modules. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:23:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:23:56 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1336405 ] Add-In breaks MAPI control Message-ID: Support Requests item #1336405, was opened at 2005-10-25 02:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1336405&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: omegadcuk (omegadcuk) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add-In breaks MAPI control Initial Comment: This bug is fixed when spambayes is removed from the machine and re-appears when re-installed. I am running Windows XP SP1, Outlook 2003 SP1 (11.6359.6360) I have a small .NET program to send mail via MAPI which works perfectly, however when spambayes is enabled it sends the email once and after that it fails with 'Unspecified failure has occurred'. I noticed that the 'Outlook.exe' has not been closed whereas it is closed properly when spambayes is removed. It would seem that spambayes/outlook is somehow not freeing all the references to the objects it has allocated when it is called with CreateObject ("Application.Outlook") and the MAPI control's Send method (with email dialog) is activated. It has created a spambayes log file but it's identical to the log file created when opening outlook normally so i don't think its any use? I can provide a short listing of the code being used for VB6 if anyone is interested in trouble shooting this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Almost certainly a dupe of: [ 1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1103976&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1336405&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:24:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:24:18 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-18 04:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook >Group: 1.1.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 1336405 ] Add-In breaks MAPI control http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1336405&group_id=61702&atid=498104 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Palio (nytetears) Date: 2005-10-28 08:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1369127 I had this problem on my computer and tried removing various different program to fix it. Nothing worked. I have found it is not related to any program outside of outlook. It is an outlook problem. It seems that the spam filter in outlook is causing it to hang. Once I turned off the spam filter that came with outlook I never had the program hang once. I could not tell you why it does this or a fix for it beyond turning the option off but that is the cause of outlook remaining open in the task manager. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kip Cartwright (kcartwri) Date: 2005-03-30 12:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=192708 I have the same problem on Outlook 2003. No problem with Outlook XP (2002). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fsnyder (fsnyder) Date: 2005-02-26 11:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1227716 This behavior of the Outlook.exe not being stopped properly can be duplicated using the following VBScript code. OPTION EXPLICIT On error Resume Next err.clear Dim oOutlookApp, oOutlookNS Set oOutlookApp = GetObject(,"Outlook.Application") if Err <> 0 then MsgBox "Outlook not currently running." & VbCrLf & "Creating New Outlook Application. I'll kill it when I'm done" set oOutlookApp = CreateObject ("Outlook.Application") else MsgBox "Outlook was running. I'll kill it anyway when I'm done." End If MsgBox oOutlookApp.name & " version# " & oOutlookApp.version MsgBox "Now I'll kill the Outlook.exe process the clean way" oOutlookApp.Quit set oOutlookNS = Nothing set oOutlookApp = Nothing MsgBox "END" Run it and watch the TaskManager for when the Outlook.exe process gets created, and killed (as long as the SpamBayes Add-In is NOT activated in Outlook) This should normally kill the process unless some other add- in or anti-virus code is not allowing Outlook to exit cleanly. Hope this Helps -fsnyder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2005-02-04 07:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 One other source of hanging OL up, with or without Spambayes is ActiveSync for your PDA, celll phone or whatever. AS does tend to work behind your back, a little bit. One of the reasons I love Process Explorer from System Internals... -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gil (spambayes411) Date: 2005-02-02 23:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210353 I've discovered this is not limited to the mailto function. I use a program called SynchPST to keep outlook sychronized between my home computer and my laptop. When SynchPST opens, I see it in the task manager and it opens Outlook as well. After I synch my PST files, I close SynchPST. It closes but Outlook remains in the task manager. If the Spambayes add-in is not loaded, then both SynchPST and Outlook quit as they should. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Kenny :) I don't really know what might be causing this, but I guess you could start by checking to see if the spambayes log gets to the "addin terminating" part. Let me know if I can help at all (though I don't have OL2003 anywhere). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-25 05:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Yep, I was able to confirm this problem on Outlook 2003. If I activate a mailto link with SpamBayes loaded and enabled, OUTLOOK.EXE will not exit when I close the compose window. If I disable SpamBayes filtering from SpamBayes Manager, OUTLOOK.EXE still doesn't exit. If I completely disable loading of SpamBayes from the COM Add-ins dialog then OUTLOOK.EXE closes properly when I close the compose window. I'll look into this further when I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 18:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-22 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah at blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:26:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:26:08 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1322222 ] Training & Modified Message-ID: Support Requests item #1322222, was opened at 2005-10-10 22:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1322222&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: WDW (wdwpower) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training & Modified Initial Comment: Hi, I'm using SpamBayes 1.1a1 for a while now. Why is the "training" updating the "modified date" in the emails. The result is later archiving! TIA Willy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm assuming the Outlook plug-in here. Please specify. Are you rescoring when training? The score is stored with the message, so that will do this. You can turn this off (note that displaying the spam score will no longer work) as described in the troubleshooting guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1322222&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:28:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:28:04 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824589 ] sb_server.py doesn't recover after a 'connection timed out' Message-ID: Bugs item #824589, was opened at 2003-10-16 19:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824589&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pop3proxy >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Rowe (dbg400) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py doesn't recover after a 'connection timed out' Initial Comment: When the pop3 server doesn't respond in time, sb_server.py gets a 'connection timed out' error. After that no more mail can be collected until sb_server.py is stopped and restarted. Is the time out period configurable anywhere, or can this message be trapped? Regards, Martin mrowe at jamaro:~$ sb_server.py SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop.ntlworld.com:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.ServerLineReader connected at 0x418079ac> (socket.error:(110, 'Connection timed out') [/usr/lib/python2.3/asynchat.py|handle_read|88] [/usr/lib/python2.3/asyncore.py|recv|353]) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 829, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 823, in run start(state=state) File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 763, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 744, in main Dibbler.run(launchBrowser=launchUI) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 689, in run asyncore.loop(map=context._map) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/asyncore.py", line 193, in loop poll_fun(timeout, map) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/asyncore.py", line 108, in poll r, w, e = select.select(r, w, e, timeout) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See: [ 1235058 ] Email timeout http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1235058&group_id=61702&atid=498104 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824589&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:28:09 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:28:09 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1235058 ] Email timeout Message-ID: Support Requests item #1235058, was opened at 2005-07-09 13:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1235058&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: laschmove (laschmove) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Email timeout Initial Comment: Outlook and OE timeout when downloading email. To work around it I have to bypass Spambayes to download email, then enable Spambayes again after I've downloaded them. But when I logout of PC and login again I have to repeat the process. Only happens with POP3 not SMTP. Spambayes will work fine for 3-4 months then this starts happening for about a week or so then it starts working fine again. These errors appear in error log, can you guys help? error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (socket.error: (10035, 'The socket operation could not complete without blocking') [asynchat.pyc|handle_read|88] [asyncore.pyc|recv|356]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (socket.error: (10035, 'The socket operation could not complete without blocking') [asynchat.pyc|handle_read|88] [asyncore.pyc|recv|356]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (socket.error: (10035, 'The socket operation could not complete without blocking') [asynchat.pyc|handle_read|88] [asyncore.pyc|recv|356]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 824589 ] sb_server.py doesn't recover after a 'connection timed out' http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=824589&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2005-07-26 14:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: laschmove (laschmove) Date: 2005-07-12 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1309782 Using version 1.0.4, file size doesn't matter. I don't even think it's reaching the POP server so the file size makes no difference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-07-11 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 When it happens, is there a really large email on the server? What version of SpamBayes is this? There's a configurable timeout in 1.1 (but you shouldn't use 1.1a1's sb_server), which might help with this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1235058&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:30:32 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:30:32 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Message-ID: Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Initial Comment: In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to remove that copy when the mail is deleted from the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem to be working with mail that has been checked by SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the same thing with mail that has not been checked by SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as expected. It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is because of the addition of the spam score to the local copy? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1275205 ] Delete Mails on server (again) http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1275205&group_id=61702&atid=498104 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mzmo (mzmo) Date: 2005-09-09 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1341551 [ 1284927 ] Leave a copy on server + SpamBayes = many duplicates Not a duplicate, this may be related behaviour, but no-one else is complaining about the email being downloaded multiple times. Fixing the Delete from server problem will probably not fix the multiple download problem, since Delete from server *does* seem to be working in my case. It's the mail I *want* left on the server that remains there - so no problem. Problem is that the wanted mail, left on the server, is repeatedly downloaded. Why is this a dupe? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-09-09 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1284927 ] Leave a copy on server + SpamBayes = many duplicates https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1284927&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-08-29 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1275261 ] Delete Mails on server (again) https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1275261&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-05-09 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1196814 ] Doesn't Delete Mails on Server https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1196814&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 842182 ] email not deleted from server http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=842182&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 859333 ] Outlook will not remove read messages from server ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Date: 2003-12-13 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=930199 I just submitted another bug message with this same thing, sorry didn't see this one before submitting. I have email set to delete after 5 days, outlook never removes ANY mail from the server, ever. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-31 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, the save_spam_info option now appears to be doing what it is meant to do, but it hasn't solved the "delete from server" problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-30 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 Ah, OK. I didn't know about that website. I've now got v0.6 installed. I'll report back when I've seen some spam (shouldn't be too long). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-30 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you running the plugin from source? (and in particular, the 1.0a4 release?) If you are: this doesn't include the most recent changes to the Outlook plugin. The only way to get them is to get hold of the cvs source or the binary installer from Mark's website. (Although there have been a great number of improvements to the Outlook plugin since 1.0a4, there hasn't been much changed elsewhere, so it's not really worth releasing a 1.0a5 since most Outlook people use the binary or CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-30 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still working as it did before; I would have thought that this would stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't deleting from the server. On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog still says version 0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-29 17:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving the spam score with each message. Can you try this version and see if the behaviour changes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 22:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 01:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:30:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:30:38 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1275205 ] Delete Mails on server (again) Message-ID: Support Requests item #1275205, was opened at 2005-08-29 05:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1275205&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: janbro (janbro) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Delete Mails on server (again) Initial Comment: I want to delete mails on the server, which I've deleted locally (Outlook2000). See Bug Report under: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=773364&group_id=61702&atid=498103 because of that I placed the save_spam_info:False line into my configuration, according to the docu, but it doesn't help. my Configuration/ Version SpamBayes 1.1a1 (April 2005) Outlook2000 Problem, with this version, Mails are still not deleted on the server. It is definately a spambayes problem. If I turn SB of, and delete mails, they are deleted on the server, as expected. So far I had to delete them manually which is really annoying with 40+ spam mails a day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=773364&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1275205&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 10:31:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:31:18 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1298170 ] move everything from inbox to spam Message-ID: Support Requests item #1298170, was opened at 2005-09-22 09:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1298170&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kar Yeow (karyeow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: move everything from inbox to spam Initial Comment: I use the outlook plugin. everything install ok. I use the 'delete as spam' button to delete 15 spam mails to the spam folder. I then run filter on inbox thinking that it pick up the remaining spam. It simple move every single mail to the spam folder! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you train on any ham? If not, then all SpamBayes knows is spam, and so everything will look like it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1298170&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 13:33:12 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:33:12 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-818567 ] Add IDLE support for IMAP Message-ID: Feature Requests item #818567, was opened at 2003-10-06 13:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pwagland You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Wagland (pwagland) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add IDLE support for IMAP Initial Comment: It would be very useful if the imap filter could use the IDLE support of LDAP on the folders that it monitors for new messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul Wagland (pwagland) Date: 2005-12-05 13:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=19812 http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc/rfc2177.txt The IDLE command is fairly standard amongst IMAP servers, although there are varying degrees of support. Cyrus and Exchange both have very good support for it, as do courier, binc, and dovecot. However, with the last three it also requires a bit of OS support for decent efficiency since they do not use their own internal database. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 10:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure what this feature is; could you elaborate or point to a link? (If it's a non-standard IMAP feature, then the chances of implementing it is low - the IMAP filter is complicated enough trying to support all the standard ways that IMAP can work). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 16:04:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:04:50 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-859339 ] Add sqlite storage option Message-ID: Feature Requests item #859339, was opened at 2003-12-12 23:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vladimir Ulogov (vulogov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add sqlite storage option Initial Comment: In addition to the BerkleyDB, I'd like to use sqlite as well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-12-05 10:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I actually had a mostly working SQLite storage class back when SQLite 2.x was current, but the performance was so abysmal that I didn't go any further with it. I never got around to digging it out and testing it with the 3.x version of SQLite, which is supposed to have better performance. SQLite generally performs pretty well for reads and for writes that are batched together in a transaction. Unfortunately, the current SpamBayes database access includes a fairly large number of writes (especially when training, although it also tracks statistics on every message received), and the writes are generally committed after each change rather than batched until the end of a large operation. This mode of access is pretty much the worst case scenario for SQLite performance. If anyone is interested in doing any more work with this, I'll see if I can locate my old code and post it as a patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 04:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note also that there have been a few people on the mailing list that have mentioned intending to do this. You could try seeing if any have, and if they'd be willing to contribute the code either to you or back to the project. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 21:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a feature request, not a patch, so changing type. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 03:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that you can use mysql or postgresql. Are either of those good enough? If not, then you could maybe write your own SQLiteClassifier class, based on the other SQL ones in storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 5 22:29:32 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:29:32 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-859339 ] Add sqlite storage option Message-ID: Feature Requests item #859339, was opened at 2003-12-13 17:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vladimir Ulogov (vulogov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add sqlite storage option Initial Comment: In addition to the BerkleyDB, I'd like to use sqlite as well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-06 10:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If anyone is, two things to consider would be: 1. Looking at the way the DBClassifier works and copying some ideas from there. IIRC it caches non-hapax tokens and so tries to minimise actually accessing the db. 2. Using sqlite for the token database (hammie.db) and something else for the messageinfo database. The messageinfo db gets written a lot more often (once per message train/classify). pickle also does poorly here at the moment, and dbm is the one that gave us all the trouble, so I'm not sure what to suggest, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-12-06 04:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I actually had a mostly working SQLite storage class back when SQLite 2.x was current, but the performance was so abysmal that I didn't go any further with it. I never got around to digging it out and testing it with the 3.x version of SQLite, which is supposed to have better performance. SQLite generally performs pretty well for reads and for writes that are batched together in a transaction. Unfortunately, the current SpamBayes database access includes a fairly large number of writes (especially when training, although it also tracks statistics on every message received), and the writes are generally committed after each change rather than batched until the end of a large operation. This mode of access is pretty much the worst case scenario for SQLite performance. If anyone is interested in doing any more work with this, I'll see if I can locate my old code and post it as a patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note also that there have been a few people on the mailing list that have mentioned intending to do this. You could try seeing if any have, and if they'd be willing to contribute the code either to you or back to the project. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a feature request, not a patch, so changing type. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that you can use mysql or postgresql. Are either of those good enough? If not, then you could maybe write your own SQLiteClassifier class, based on the other SQL ones in storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 6 08:34:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:34:08 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1348816 ] spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Message-ID: Support Requests item #1348816, was opened at 2005-11-05 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darrinm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Initial Comment: SpamBayes stopped working and clicking the SpamBayes button in Outlook doesn't do anything. I need to know how to get it working again. Environment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6735) SP3 Windows XP Pro - 5.1(Build 2600.XPSP-SP2.gdr.050301-1519: Service Pack 2) Problem description: As stated above, SpanBayes has become inoperative. I tried to upgrade to version 1.0.4 to see if that would "kick-start: it, but that did nothing. PC had been running v 1.0, SpamBayes was trained and working, then suddenly it stopped filtering mail. Clicking the SpamBayes button on Outlook does nothing. I downloaded and installed 1.0.4 - no change. (After installation, starting Outlook took no special action -- as it did when I originally installed 1.0 earlier. I then uninstalled SpamBayes. The button still showed in Outlook [???]. I reinstalled 1.0.4 and still no difference. What I'm looking for from you: Is there a recommended way to uninstall SpanBayes? Should I even try? How do I get SpamBayes to function again? Can I do this without losing the knowledge of training? (Are there specific files to save?} Thanks in advance. -- Marvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-06 07:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 My system DEP config is set to OptIn so and I doubt Outlook opts in but just in case I disabled DEP and gave it a try. The Spambayes plugin is still non-functional, even though its toolbar is present (menus do not drop down). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 09:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't suppose DEP is now enabled? That usually causes Outlook to crash, but I suppose it could maybe disable SB... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-04 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 I'm seeing the same problem on a similar configuration (but with Outlook 2003) which I first noticed after I installed Visual Studio 2005. At the same time another Outlook plugin, Newsgator, also stopped functioning. The two failures are somewhat different though. In the case of Newsgator, the plugin doesn't appear at all (on the toolbar). Spambayes appears on the toolbar but clicking on the "SpamBayes" button doesn't drop down the menu and clicking on the "Spam" button does nothing. I've verified that SpamBayes is not simply disabled by Outlook (at least it isn't listed in the "About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items" dialog) and that a simple setup.py install doesn't fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-21 23:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in. Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The recommended way to uninstall SpamBayes is via the Add/Remove Programs Control Panel. This will not remove your training/configuration files. If you want to back up your training data, the FAQ outlines the files that you need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 6 16:30:16 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:30:16 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1348816 ] spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Message-ID: Support Requests item #1348816, was opened at 2005-11-04 22:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marvinlevin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Initial Comment: SpamBayes stopped working and clicking the SpamBayes button in Outlook doesn't do anything. I need to know how to get it working again. Environment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6735) SP3 Windows XP Pro - 5.1(Build 2600.XPSP-SP2.gdr.050301-1519: Service Pack 2) Problem description: As stated above, SpanBayes has become inoperative. I tried to upgrade to version 1.0.4 to see if that would "kick-start: it, but that did nothing. PC had been running v 1.0, SpamBayes was trained and working, then suddenly it stopped filtering mail. Clicking the SpamBayes button on Outlook does nothing. I downloaded and installed 1.0.4 - no change. (After installation, starting Outlook took no special action -- as it did when I originally installed 1.0 earlier. I then uninstalled SpamBayes. The button still showed in Outlook [???]. I reinstalled 1.0.4 and still no difference. What I'm looking for from you: Is there a recommended way to uninstall SpanBayes? Should I even try? How do I get SpamBayes to function again? Can I do this without losing the knowledge of training? (Are there specific files to save?} Thanks in advance. -- Marvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Date: 2005-12-06 09:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1373596 What darrinm is seeing is similar to my original problem - after going through the "normal" methods to uninstall SpamBayes and to clear the Outlook add-in, the SpamBayes toolbar still was present but menus did not drop down. Subsequent attempts to re-install didn't help. FYI - In my case, this was all on a client's system and they decided not to bother and to just use the built-in filtering in Outlook 2003. So I never actually resolved the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-06 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 My system DEP config is set to OptIn so and I doubt Outlook opts in but just in case I disabled DEP and gave it a try. The Spambayes plugin is still non-functional, even though its toolbar is present (menus do not drop down). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 03:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't suppose DEP is now enabled? That usually causes Outlook to crash, but I suppose it could maybe disable SB... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-04 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 I'm seeing the same problem on a similar configuration (but with Outlook 2003) which I first noticed after I installed Visual Studio 2005. At the same time another Outlook plugin, Newsgator, also stopped functioning. The two failures are somewhat different though. In the case of Newsgator, the plugin doesn't appear at all (on the toolbar). Spambayes appears on the toolbar but clicking on the "SpamBayes" button doesn't drop down the menu and clicking on the "Spam" button does nothing. I've verified that SpamBayes is not simply disabled by Outlook (at least it isn't listed in the "About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items" dialog) and that a simple setup.py install doesn't fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-21 17:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in. Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The recommended way to uninstall SpamBayes is via the Add/Remove Programs Control Panel. This will not remove your training/configuration files. If you want to back up your training data, the FAQ outlines the files that you need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 6 21:42:26 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:42:26 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1348816 ] spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Message-ID: Support Requests item #1348816, was opened at 2005-11-05 17:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Initial Comment: SpamBayes stopped working and clicking the SpamBayes button in Outlook doesn't do anything. I need to know how to get it working again. Environment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6735) SP3 Windows XP Pro - 5.1(Build 2600.XPSP-SP2.gdr.050301-1519: Service Pack 2) Problem description: As stated above, SpanBayes has become inoperative. I tried to upgrade to version 1.0.4 to see if that would "kick-start: it, but that did nothing. PC had been running v 1.0, SpamBayes was trained and working, then suddenly it stopped filtering mail. Clicking the SpamBayes button on Outlook does nothing. I downloaded and installed 1.0.4 - no change. (After installation, starting Outlook took no special action -- as it did when I originally installed 1.0 earlier. I then uninstalled SpamBayes. The button still showed in Outlook [???]. I reinstalled 1.0.4 and still no difference. What I'm looking for from you: Is there a recommended way to uninstall SpanBayes? Should I even try? How do I get SpamBayes to function again? Can I do this without losing the knowledge of training? (Are there specific files to save?} Thanks in advance. -- Marvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-07 09:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The toolbar not being removed on uninstall is a known issue, see: http://spambayes.org/faq.html#how-do-i-uninstall-the-plug-in The OP says that he reinstalled SpamBayes, so this would not be the issue here. Unfortunately, I'm a little out of ideas (you could try posting on spambayes at python.org, as there are a few people there who don't monitor the trackers). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Date: 2005-12-07 04:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1373596 What darrinm is seeing is similar to my original problem - after going through the "normal" methods to uninstall SpamBayes and to clear the Outlook add-in, the SpamBayes toolbar still was present but menus did not drop down. Subsequent attempts to re-install didn't help. FYI - In my case, this was all on a client's system and they decided not to bother and to just use the built-in filtering in Outlook 2003. So I never actually resolved the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-06 20:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 My system DEP config is set to OptIn so and I doubt Outlook opts in but just in case I disabled DEP and gave it a try. The Spambayes plugin is still non-functional, even though its toolbar is present (menus do not drop down). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 22:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't suppose DEP is now enabled? That usually causes Outlook to crash, but I suppose it could maybe disable SB... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-05 06:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 I'm seeing the same problem on a similar configuration (but with Outlook 2003) which I first noticed after I installed Visual Studio 2005. At the same time another Outlook plugin, Newsgator, also stopped functioning. The two failures are somewhat different though. In the case of Newsgator, the plugin doesn't appear at all (on the toolbar). Spambayes appears on the toolbar but clicking on the "SpamBayes" button doesn't drop down the menu and clicking on the "Spam" button does nothing. I've verified that SpamBayes is not simply disabled by Outlook (at least it isn't listed in the "About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items" dialog) and that a simple setup.py install doesn't fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-22 12:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in. Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The recommended way to uninstall SpamBayes is via the Add/Remove Programs Control Panel. This will not remove your training/configuration files. If you want to back up your training data, the FAQ outlines the files that you need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 7 20:27:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:27:17 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-04 22:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cybrarian1st You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-12 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 7 20:46:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:46:27 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-04 22:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cybrarian1st You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Ok. Even the latest alpha version does not seem to work. As with others with this problem, spambayes works from data ALREADY entered into the database. If you click on the toolbar to access ANY functions (to add spam or delete spam etc), Outlook immediately crashes. So, what is the solution? Any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-12 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 8 03:36:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:36:18 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-05 16:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-08 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if DEP is enabled (note that Microsoft considers Outlook and "essential" program) and if it is, disable it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 08:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Ok. Even the latest alpha version does not seem to work. As with others with this problem, spambayes works from data ALREADY entered into the database. If you click on the toolbar to access ANY functions (to add spam or delete spam etc), Outlook immediately crashes. So, what is the solution? Any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-13 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 8 16:14:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:14:22 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1356535 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1356535, was opened at 2005-11-14 21:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by davidsrsb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1356535&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: davidsrsb (davidsrsb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: Version 1.1a1 O/S WindowsME database type dbm client Pegasus mail hammie.db 1.18MB 8/11/05 spambayes.messageinfo.db 136KB, 14/11/05 After a couple of months filtering stopped a few days ago and I get messages like this: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 564, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 452, in addSBHeaders . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 401, in RememberClassification . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg . File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') old server This looks similar to Bugs item #1225489 I don't remember any crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: davidsrsb (davidsrsb) Date: 2005-12-08 23:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1132656 Deleting and starting again worked for just two weeks Definitely no crashes or multiple accesses I have python 2.4.2 in c:\python24 I see some python 2.2.2 and 2.3.4 in OpenOffice trees I see two copies of _bsddb.pyd, with the spambayes copy the same file size as the 2.4.2 but much older. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-22 07:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your database is dead, and you need to retrain from scratch. We're moving away from bsddb, so this won't be an issue in future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1356535&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 8 20:01:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:01:35 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-04 22:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cybrarian1st You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Sorry. DEP?? What is that and how do I disable it? If I disable it, what other functions do I effect? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-07 21:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if DEP is enabled (note that Microsoft considers Outlook and "essential" program) and if it is, disable it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Ok. Even the latest alpha version does not seem to work. As with others with this problem, spambayes works from data ALREADY entered into the database. If you click on the toolbar to access ANY functions (to add spam or delete spam etc), Outlook immediately crashes. So, what is the solution? Any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-12 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 8 23:04:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:04:56 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1356535 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1356535, was opened at 2005-11-15 02:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1356535&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: davidsrsb (davidsrsb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: Version 1.1a1 O/S WindowsME database type dbm client Pegasus mail hammie.db 1.18MB 8/11/05 spambayes.messageinfo.db 136KB, 14/11/05 After a couple of months filtering stopped a few days ago and I get messages like this: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 564, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 452, in addSBHeaders . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 401, in RememberClassification . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 377, in modified . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 181, in store_msg . File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ . File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 218, in __setitem__ .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') old server This looks similar to Bugs item #1225489 I don't remember any crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-09 11:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Don't use 1.1a1 with sb_server, use 1.0.4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: davidsrsb (davidsrsb) Date: 2005-12-09 04:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1132656 Deleting and starting again worked for just two weeks Definitely no crashes or multiple accesses I have python 2.4.2 in c:\python24 I see some python 2.2.2 and 2.3.4 in OpenOffice trees I see two copies of _bsddb.pyd, with the spambayes copy the same file size as the 2.4.2 but much older. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-22 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your database is dead, and you need to retrain from scratch. We're moving away from bsddb, so this won't be an issue in future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1356535&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 8 23:08:54 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:08:54 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-05 16:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-09 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875352 If you disable it, everything will probably work better <0.5 wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-09 08:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Sorry. DEP?? What is that and how do I disable it? If I disable it, what other functions do I effect? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-08 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if DEP is enabled (note that Microsoft considers Outlook and "essential" program) and if it is, disable it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 08:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Ok. Even the latest alpha version does not seem to work. As with others with this problem, spambayes works from data ALREADY entered into the database. If you click on the toolbar to access ANY functions (to add spam or delete spam etc), Outlook immediately crashes. So, what is the solution? Any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-13 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 8 23:43:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:43:35 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1376706 ] MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND Message-ID: Bugs item #1376706, was opened at 2005-12-08 23:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1376706&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: svopex (svopex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND Initial Comment: I reinstall office from 2000CZ to XP(2002)CZ. SpamBayes now write error - NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f And enable button is disabled. Petr Svoboda ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1376706&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 9 01:01:57 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:01:57 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1376706 ] MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND Message-ID: Support Requests item #1376706, was opened at 2005-12-09 11:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1376706&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None >Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: svopex (svopex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND Initial Comment: I reinstall office from 2000CZ to XP(2002)CZ. SpamBayes now write error - NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f And enable button is disabled. Petr Svoboda ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-09 13:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You need to reconfigure SpamBayes (during the upgrade folders were changed). Choose "SpamBayes Manager" from the SpamBayes menu, go to the Filtering tab, and re-select the folders you want filtered, the unsure folder, and the spam folder. The enable button will then be enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1376706&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 9 08:44:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:44:29 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1348816 ] spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Message-ID: Support Requests item #1348816, was opened at 2005-11-05 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darrinm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes stopped working - cannot fix Initial Comment: SpamBayes stopped working and clicking the SpamBayes button in Outlook doesn't do anything. I need to know how to get it working again. Environment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6735) SP3 Windows XP Pro - 5.1(Build 2600.XPSP-SP2.gdr.050301-1519: Service Pack 2) Problem description: As stated above, SpanBayes has become inoperative. I tried to upgrade to version 1.0.4 to see if that would "kick-start: it, but that did nothing. PC had been running v 1.0, SpamBayes was trained and working, then suddenly it stopped filtering mail. Clicking the SpamBayes button on Outlook does nothing. I downloaded and installed 1.0.4 - no change. (After installation, starting Outlook took no special action -- as it did when I originally installed 1.0 earlier. I then uninstalled SpamBayes. The button still showed in Outlook [???]. I reinstalled 1.0.4 and still no difference. What I'm looking for from you: Is there a recommended way to uninstall SpanBayes? Should I even try? How do I get SpamBayes to function again? Can I do this without losing the knowledge of training? (Are there specific files to save?} Thanks in advance. -- Marvin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-09 07:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 Ultimately I solved the problem by reinstalling SpamBayes from via the installer package (as opposed to installing from source). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-06 20:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The toolbar not being removed on uninstall is a known issue, see: http://spambayes.org/faq.html#how-do-i-uninstall-the-plug-in The OP says that he reinstalled SpamBayes, so this would not be the issue here. Unfortunately, I'm a little out of ideas (you could try posting on spambayes at python.org, as there are a few people there who don't monitor the trackers). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marvin Levin (marvinlevin) Date: 2005-12-06 15:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1373596 What darrinm is seeing is similar to my original problem - after going through the "normal" methods to uninstall SpamBayes and to clear the Outlook add-in, the SpamBayes toolbar still was present but menus did not drop down. Subsequent attempts to re-install didn't help. FYI - In my case, this was all on a client's system and they decided not to bother and to just use the built-in filtering in Outlook 2003. So I never actually resolved the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-06 07:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 My system DEP config is set to OptIn so and I doubt Outlook opts in but just in case I disabled DEP and gave it a try. The Spambayes plugin is still non-functional, even though its toolbar is present (menus do not drop down). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 09:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't suppose DEP is now enabled? That usually causes Outlook to crash, but I suppose it could maybe disable SB... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Darrin Massena (darrinm) Date: 2005-12-04 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152884 I'm seeing the same problem on a similar configuration (but with Outlook 2003) which I first noticed after I installed Visual Studio 2005. At the same time another Outlook plugin, Newsgator, also stopped functioning. The two failures are somewhat different though. In the case of Newsgator, the plugin doesn't appear at all (on the toolbar). Spambayes appears on the toolbar but clicking on the "SpamBayes" button doesn't drop down the menu and clicking on the "Spam" button does nothing. I've verified that SpamBayes is not simply disabled by Outlook (at least it isn't listed in the "About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items" dialog) and that a simple setup.py install doesn't fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-21 23:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if Outlook has disabled the plug-in. Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The recommended way to uninstall SpamBayes is via the Add/Remove Programs Control Panel. This will not remove your training/configuration files. If you want to back up your training data, the FAQ outlines the files that you need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1348816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 9 16:50:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:50:46 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-04 22:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cybrarian1st You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-09 10:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Nope. That did not work. And when you say "disable" do you mean follow their directions and "optout" of DEP for SpamBayes only? If so, I did that by chosing NOT to run DEP for only the executables in the program files/spambayes/bin folder - which are: outlook_addin_register.exe and outlook_dump_props.exe But "optingout" of DEP for these two files still does not effect the problem as first described. And I cannot find any way to "disable" DEP completely for the whole computer - if that is what you meant. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-08 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875352 If you disable it, everything will probably work better <0.5 wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Sorry. DEP?? What is that and how do I disable it? If I disable it, what other functions do I effect? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-07 21:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if DEP is enabled (note that Microsoft considers Outlook and "essential" program) and if it is, disable it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Ok. Even the latest alpha version does not seem to work. As with others with this problem, spambayes works from data ALREADY entered into the database. If you click on the toolbar to access ANY functions (to add spam or delete spam etc), Outlook immediately crashes. So, what is the solution? Any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-12 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 11 09:51:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:51:07 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-05 16:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-11 21:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried doing a "Detect and Repair" on Outlook? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-10 04:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Nope. That did not work. And when you say "disable" do you mean follow their directions and "optout" of DEP for SpamBayes only? If so, I did that by chosing NOT to run DEP for only the executables in the program files/spambayes/bin folder - which are: outlook_addin_register.exe and outlook_dump_props.exe But "optingout" of DEP for these two files still does not effect the problem as first described. And I cannot find any way to "disable" DEP completely for the whole computer - if that is what you meant. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-09 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875352 If you disable it, everything will probably work better <0.5 wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-09 08:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Sorry. DEP?? What is that and how do I disable it? If I disable it, what other functions do I effect? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-08 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if DEP is enabled (note that Microsoft considers Outlook and "essential" program) and if it is, disable it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 08:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Ok. Even the latest alpha version does not seem to work. As with others with this problem, spambayes works from data ALREADY entered into the database. If you click on the toolbar to access ANY functions (to add spam or delete spam etc), Outlook immediately crashes. So, what is the solution? Any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-13 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 12 20:28:51 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:28:51 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-04 22:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cybrarian1st You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-12 14:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Nope. No help with the "detect and repair" option either. I even tried completely unloading SpamBayes first and deleting all files in the Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\SpamBayes directory, THEN running the detect and repair. No joy. This all started when I upgraded from Office 2000 to 2003 (sp2). I read another post here that said they had the same trouble. Is there something wrong with the upgrade?? I upgraded WITHOUT first unloading SpamBayes. Does Outlook not play nice with add-ins during an upgrade? Also, I read someplace here that someone had success in fixing the mess when they completely uninstalled Outlook 2003 and re-installed it. Then they reinstalled SpamBayes. Is this the only answer?? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-11 03:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried doing a "Detect and Repair" on Outlook? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-09 10:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Nope. That did not work. And when you say "disable" do you mean follow their directions and "optout" of DEP for SpamBayes only? If so, I did that by chosing NOT to run DEP for only the executables in the program files/spambayes/bin folder - which are: outlook_addin_register.exe and outlook_dump_props.exe But "optingout" of DEP for these two files still does not effect the problem as first described. And I cannot find any way to "disable" DEP completely for the whole computer - if that is what you meant. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-08 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/875352 If you disable it, everything will probably work better <0.5 wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-08 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Sorry. DEP?? What is that and how do I disable it? If I disable it, what other functions do I effect? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-07 21:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Check to see if DEP is enabled (note that Microsoft considers Outlook and "essential" program) and if it is, disable it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 Ok. Even the latest alpha version does not seem to work. As with others with this problem, spambayes works from data ALREADY entered into the database. If you click on the toolbar to access ANY functions (to add spam or delete spam etc), Outlook immediately crashes. So, what is the solution? Any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: p-51 (cybrarian1st) Date: 2005-12-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1399625 I have had this happen as well. Nothing I have tried has fixed the problem. I am going to try the 1.1a1 version to see if it has any effect. Is there a problem in Outlook 2003?? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-12 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 13 02:18:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:18:42 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1379155 ] 1.1a1 and zodb does not learn Message-ID: Bugs item #1379155, was opened at 2005-12-13 09:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1379155&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: davidsrsb (davidsrsb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.1a1 and zodb does not learn Initial Comment: 1.1a1 on WinME with python 2.4.2 After repeated corruption of bsddb databases I tried zodb. Before use I deleted all .db files for a fresh start. After classifying mail I see that the new hammie.db database has not been updated and another file called hammie.db.tmp has been. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1379155&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 14 09:45:24 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:45:24 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] Incorrect "No filterable mail items are selected" error Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 06:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hoagie572 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Incorrect "No filterable mail items are selected" error Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: hoagie (hoagie572) Date: 2005-12-14 08:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1350579 I have a lot of trouble with this too. I have tried addinng the outlook administrator mail box to my monitored folders as all that ever gets into there is spam to departed collegues. Everthing in there is from system administrator to whoever at our.address with the original subject. SpamBayes refuses to look at any of it. These are obviously "special items" as they open differently in outlook, but the subject lines usually contain obvious spam pointers. It would be nice if the filter could be told to handle special messages in certain folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-09-09 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe (including example message) in: [ 1284021 ] No filterable mail items selected. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1284021&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 955934 ] e-mail is not filterable https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=955934&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-01 04:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 925428 ] No Filterable mail items are selected ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-19 04:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 None that I know of, unfortunately. This was an oddball, but since it happened with no other (apparent) external cause and was repeatable, I submitted the bug report. AFAIK, this message was received the same as all my others: through POP3 (simple auth) queried every five minutes. Though this is probably not terribly relevant, my setup is: Win2K SP4 Outlook2K SP3 Kaspersky AV 4.5 BlackICE Defender 3.6cbz BOClean 4.11 AdAware Plus 6.181 Cisco 827 Router/DSL Modem 1.5Mbps DSL connection >From what I can tell, Kaspersky AV grabs port 110 traffic directly from the TCP socket and proxies it back to the application level (somehow with the same port number). Since there was no virus associated with this message, I don't think that's relevant either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 03:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the props Tony. I can't see a good way around this though, unless we drop the restriction completely, which I think would be bad. Seth - how many other messages have you seen this happen with? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 01:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's clueless, but I forgive you <wink>. MAPI isn't how Outlook gets the messages (I suspect you're thinking of IMAP), but a way to communicate with Outlook. The props attachment is basically the information that Outlook stores about that message. The problem is determining whether a message was received, or created by the user (in which case it's not filterable). The current theory is that it needs to have one of two properties, and your message has neither. Mark may need a new theory ;) The "Tony Meyer" stuff coems about because Outlook must have modified it a bit when I dragged it into the inbox (I suppose I did place it on an exchange server). Not enough to change the non-filterable status, but enough to contaminate it a bit. And yes, I'm at Massey University in NZ - the Auckland campus, though, not the Palmerston North (or Wellington) ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-09 01:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 I don't know the source code, so forgive the following comment if it's clueless. This message was downloaded via POP3, as neither of my ISP's supports MAPI. Since Outlook deals with POP3 and MAPI, I have no idea if it internally changes all messages as MAPI with the POP3 ones having limited properties as they don't exist as copies in remote directories. BTW, what's all the Tony Meyer stuff in the headers of the Seal_Props.txt file? Are you at the University of Massey in NZ? Friends of mine lived there a few years ago, liked it a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 01:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-06 20:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 06:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 14 19:56:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:56:56 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1380672 ] thunderbird extension Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1380672, was opened at 2005-12-14 13:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1380672&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mitchell Deoudes (meeotch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: thunderbird extension Initial Comment: Any chance of getting an extension to hook the thunderbird "Junk/NotJunk" button up to the appropriate functions in spambayes? Seems like this would be pretty valuable in terms of helping both projects to spread. spambayes is much, much better than thunderbird's junk filter - but one-click classifying of junk while you read your mail is really ideal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1380672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 15 09:51:33 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:51:33 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1380672 ] thunderbird extension Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1380672, was opened at 2005-12-15 07:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1380672&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mitchell Deoudes (meeotch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: thunderbird extension Initial Comment: Any chance of getting an extension to hook the thunderbird "Junk/NotJunk" button up to the appropriate functions in spambayes? Seems like this would be pretty valuable in terms of helping both projects to spread. spambayes is much, much better than thunderbird's junk filter - but one-click classifying of junk while you read your mail is really ideal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-15 21:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498106&func=detail&aid=793478 Essentially, this is really something to be done from within Thunderbird (potentially, they could make a plug-in interface for spam filtering, so that any filter could be used). None of the current SpamBayes developers are likely to work on this, so you're better off asking them (see the other tracker for a link to a bugzilla ticket about this). We are willing to help, if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1380672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 15 09:52:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:52:04 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #793478, was opened at 2003-08-23 08:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Urberg (tim273) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin for Mozilla Mail Initial Comment: Create a plugin for Mozilla Mail/Mozilla Thunderbird that is similar to the Outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-15 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1380672 ] thunderbird extension http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1380672&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-04 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noted dupe in [ 895290 ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt Gerrans (mattgerrans) Date: 2004-09-23 07:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=481624 One additional thing the Outlook plugin does is add a Spam percentage column to your folder view, allowing you to sort a folder by likelihood of being spam. This makes training new spam (and ham) a lot easier, in contrast with Thunderbirds binary spam or not icon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Date: 2004-02-12 12:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=570853 The Mozilla/Thunderbird community is interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed here. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-26 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The plugin provides a toolbar with three buttons: "delete as spam" moves the currently selected message to the spam folder and does the appropriate training (this is not visible in the spam folder). "recover from spam" does the opposite, basically. The third button opens up a dialog that lets the user configure the plugin, train, and filter one or more folders. Once setup, the plug-in also filters all incoming mail in the folders it is set to watch. Let me know if you need any more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-26 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Can somebody describe me exactly what does the Outlook plugin do ? I'm volunteer to create a Mozilla Mail plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 15 19:51:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:51:34 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1178463 ] Bad file descriptior (http handler) Message-ID: Bugs item #1178463, was opened at 2005-04-07 11:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nochternus You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1178463&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Bad file descriptior (http handler) Initial Comment: hello, the following is raised by sb_server.py: error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (socket.error:(9, 'Bad file descriptor') [/usr/lib/pytho n2.4/asynchat.py|initiate_send|219] [/usr/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|send|332] [/usr/lib/python2.4/socket.py|_dummy|144]) thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nochternus (nochternus) Date: 2005-12-15 18:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1405834 i get this also when running sb_server.py and trying to access the web administration. I get asked my login userid and password about 4-5 times per page and this error shows up every time(scrolling on console) I have to enter my login. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2005-04-15 09:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 the error occures with spambayes CVS (as of 2005-04-04) running on python 2.4.1. on linux. unfortunately i don't know what leads for reproduction of the error. thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-04-07 23:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What causes this to happen? What version of spambayes is this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1178463&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 16 18:15:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:15:35 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1382574 ] Problem selecting folder in training SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1382574, was opened at 2005-12-16 11:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1382574&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Glenn F (glenn_f) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem selecting folder in training SpamBayes Initial Comment: I am looking forward to SpamBayes helping me, but I'm having problems getting going. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) and Microsoft XP I just loaded SpamBayes 1.0.4 My problem is when I try to select folders to train SpamBayes. Specifically, I click on "Browse" for "Select Folders with known good messages" or for "Select folders with Spam messages. Then I select a folder, like my "InBox", but the box stays gray instead of white and does not show the folder I picked with the Browse. I then hit "Train" but it says that I must select at least one folder (which I tried to do with Browse). I then clicked the "Enable SpamBayes" box and repeated the steps above, but again the folder box stayed gray and would not show the folder I tried to pick with Browse. Help! Thanks in advance, - Glenn F ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1382574&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 16 21:09:36 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:09:36 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1382574 ] Problem selecting folder in training SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1382574, was opened at 2005-12-16 11:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by glenn_f You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1382574&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Glenn F (glenn_f) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem selecting folder in training SpamBayes Initial Comment: I am looking forward to SpamBayes helping me, but I'm having problems getting going. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) and Microsoft XP I just loaded SpamBayes 1.0.4 My problem is when I try to select folders to train SpamBayes. Specifically, I click on "Browse" for "Select Folders with known good messages" or for "Select folders with Spam messages. Then I select a folder, like my "InBox", but the box stays gray instead of white and does not show the folder I picked with the Browse. I then hit "Train" but it says that I must select at least one folder (which I tried to do with Browse). I then clicked the "Enable SpamBayes" box and repeated the steps above, but again the folder box stayed gray and would not show the folder I tried to pick with Browse. Help! Thanks in advance, - Glenn F ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Glenn F (glenn_f) Date: 2005-12-16 14:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1406573 Nevermind. I figure it out. I need to check the little box next to the folder I want, in Browse. Duh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1382574&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 17 18:05:58 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:05:58 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 03:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lyeoh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=970859&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2005-12-17 17:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 OK I just downloaded the spambayes 1.0.4 source and modified it to support transparent proxying for my FreeBSD machine. I've attached a "demo" patch. Please note that I don't know python and this is my first (or 2nd?) go at writing python, so the patch is probably far from "best practices". For FreeBSD you can use getsockname() for getting the original destination address:port for connections that are "fwd"ed by ipfw. That's what I have done. For Linux you can't do that, you need to getsockopt clientsock, SOL_IP, SO_ORIGINAL_DST. I have not added support for this in the patch. Some real python programmer should do it ;). My demo patch forces the destination port to be 110. This is because I'm using tcp port 7000 for test purposes. In the demo config below if the pop3 client tries to connect to serverA:7000 they will get transparently connected to spambayes on tcp/5000 which then connects to serverA:110 If the client tries to connect to serverA:110 that firewall rule won't match, so they will connect straight to serverA:110 (unless there are other firewall rules). Commandline: sb_transserver.py -T bayescustomize.ini [pop3proxy] listen_ports: 5000 remote_servers: 127.0.0.1 allow_remote_connections:192.168.1.* Freebsd config: Add something like following line to /etc/rc.firewall ${fwcmd} add fwd 127.0.0.1,5000 tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any 7000 keep-state Issues: Privacy and security. One should probably turn off caching and web configuration support. I'm not sure how to do that. I have not really tested multiple concurrent users, so performance, reliability and stability is not proven, nor is data integrity confirmed. A different command line opt other than -T may be desirable. Notes: I used a pretrained hammie.db and it seems to work. With this, the clients can be on windows and the spambayes server on FreeBSD, and all one needs is to configure the client mail filters to use the "X-Spambayes-Classification" headers. This should also work on other *BSD. But I have not tested it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 01:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I suspect that this is something that will only get added if lots of people ask for it or if someone supplies a patch. In any case, this is certainly a feature request and not a bug, so I'm changing the type. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 16:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 OK, the support for CAPA, APOP etc is a valid reason to not support the proxy chaining with USER. Back to transparent proxying. With transparent proxying the mail clients can retain their mail settings as it is. What typically happens is the network is set up so that pop3 requests pass through a server (e.g. firewall) and are intercepted by the firewall rules and forwarded to a proxy listening on a local address:port - e.g. 127.0.0.3:10110 or something. The proxy figures out the original intended destination, makes the connections and proxies between the client and the destination. The client thinks it is talking directly to the destination (connection end point = dest IP:port), and in most setups the destination thinks it's talking to the proxy. If the proxy is down, the firewall rules could be changed to pass through the connections. Figuring out the original intended destination can be platform dependent. Apparently earlier versions of Linux were like FreeBSD. Newer versions of Linux require you to use the socket/IP options thing to get it. I'm not sure about Windows. Other issues: is it important for spambayes to distinguish one user-popserver pair from another? Transparent proxying could either complicate that, or the proxy admin will have to train and configure spambayes based on all messages passing through the proxy for all users and servers. It is in theory possible to set things up so that say a hundred different users use the same transparent proxy, but still get to administer and train their own "proxy". This could be done by creating spambayes accounts based on a successful pop3 login (perhaps only if automatic creation is enabled). If there's no spambayes account (either manually/automatically created), then the proxy goes to a "pass through" mode - no filtering or parsing. Alternatively an admin could administer on behalf of all users. Spambayes for the masses. That said, there may be performance and memory issues. Well there'd be another use for those multiGHz 64 bit CPUs eh? BTW spambayes takes 40MB of mem in peak usage on my Win2K machine. Is that shared amongst multiple connections or is that per connection? Fortunately I'm not using WinXP - based on some personal/anecdotal evidence it seems to have a memory handling algorithm that fails more disgracefully than W2K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-06-11 07:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 [Tony] > SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing > which server to connect to The main reason for this is that the client can send requests before the USER request. For instance, it can issue a CAPA to ask the server which POP3 extensions it supports. If you don't know which real server to connect to until the USER request, you can't serve the CAPA request (or any others that are made before USER). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 03:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not familiar with transparent proxying, so forgive me if these are obvious questions: 1. Can this be done with Windows as well as Linux? There's a minimum of platform specific code in sb_server at the moment, and it's probably good to stay that way. 2. Does this offer any significant benefit over simply reconfiguring the client (either manually as at the moment, or automatically)? Python likes explicit over implicit, and this doesn't seem very explicit. SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing which server to connect to, and has one proxy port for each server instead. (Although the pspam code that's in the source dist does use this method). This was decided a long time back, and is highly unlikely to change now. You'd have to put forth some pretty compelling arguments to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 03:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Transparent proxying will require configuration of Linux iptables or FreeBSD IPFW to redirect desired TCP connections to the proxy. The proxy will then figure out the actual intended destination addr and port as per the code above, make the connections and do stuff - spamfiltering, protocol enforcement. NOTE: if it is possible to tell spambayes to connect to a particular popserver by using the following USER command then the need for a transparent proxy may be less, and one could also more easily chain proxies. e.g. USER user at name:popserver1 If the feature is active that should tell spambayes to connect to popserver1 and send USER user at name The delimiter ":" should be configurable. Not sure what would be best - maybe looking at the wrong RFC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My Perl is extremely rusty. Exactly what do you mean by transparent proxying? i.e. what changes do you want from the current proxying? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 17 20:02:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 11:02:42 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1383801 ] trustedIPs wildcard to regex broken Message-ID: Bugs item #1383801, was opened at 2005-12-17 19:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1383801&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: trustedIPs wildcard to regex broken Initial Comment: Wildcard does not work properly: trustedIPs = trustedIPs.replace('.', '\.').replace ('*', '([01]?\d\d?|2[04]\d|25[0-5])') * will not match 2[1-3]\d Not sure if there are other bugs in that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1383801&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 17 20:11:39 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 11:11:39 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1383810 ] Don't buffer STDOUT and STDERR Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1383810, was opened at 2005-12-17 19:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1383810&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Don't buffer STDOUT and STDERR Initial Comment: It is desirable to allow sb_server STDOUT/STDERR to be unbuffered so that sb_server STDOUT and STDERR appears in syslog in a timely manner e.g. sb_server.py | logger -t spambayes 2>&1 & I am currently adding -u e.g. #!/usr/local/bin/python -u Otherwise nothing shows up in syslog until the buffer is flushed which is not on a per line basis. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1383810&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 19 10:06:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:06:17 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1385006 ] SB works only after new training Message-ID: Bugs item #1385006, was opened at 2005-12-19 10:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1385006&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.1.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SB works only after new training Initial Comment: Every time I start outlook spambayes doen't work. Only if I train spambayes again, spams will be filtert again. regards Werner. Outlook 2000 SP3 (9.0.0.6627) all MS saty patches are installed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1385006&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 19 14:56:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:56:23 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1382574 ] Problem selecting folder in training SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1382574, was opened at 2005-12-16 12:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hdegrego You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1382574&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Glenn F (glenn_f) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem selecting folder in training SpamBayes Initial Comment: I am looking forward to SpamBayes helping me, but I'm having problems getting going. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) and Microsoft XP I just loaded SpamBayes 1.0.4 My problem is when I try to select folders to train SpamBayes. Specifically, I click on "Browse" for "Select Folders with known good messages" or for "Select folders with Spam messages. Then I select a folder, like my "InBox", but the box stays gray instead of white and does not show the folder I picked with the Browse. I then hit "Train" but it says that I must select at least one folder (which I tried to do with Browse). I then clicked the "Enable SpamBayes" box and repeated the steps above, but again the folder box stayed gray and would not show the folder I tried to pick with Browse. Help! Thanks in advance, - Glenn F ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hank (hdegrego) Date: 2005-12-19 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1408344 I am having a similar (not the same) problem as Glenn. I am running the 1.0.4 source version with Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) on XP. When I want to choose a folder for training (good or spam), I get odd behavior in the "Select folder(s)" dialog. "Personal Folders" is shown, but I cannot drill- down for any of my folders below it. That is, the "+" does not expand "Personal Folders." So I am unable to help train SpamBayes. Note that I also tried to manually run train.py from the command line, but that looks to be disabled now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Glenn F (glenn_f) Date: 2005-12-16 15:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1406573 Nevermind. I figure it out. I need to check the little box next to the folder I want, in Browse. Duh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1382574&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 22 02:55:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:55:42 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-07 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by aikiaboy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 2 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aikiaboy (aikiaboy) Date: 2005-12-21 19:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1252668 It's probably not a good idea to use RECENT to check for messages because race conditions are possible with other IMAP clients, e.g. thunderbird and sb_imapfilter.py. According to the IMAP RFC: If multiple connections have the same mailbox selected simultaneously, it is undefined which of these connections will see newly-arrives messages with \Recent set and which will see it without \Recent set. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-25 11:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 Following up after a few weeks of the latest version: I'm still getting occasional failures---probably some peculiarity of the Cyrus IMAP server I'm using. The failures are about once every day or two with about 8-10 hours of continual running "sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -l 10". This is acceptable, and is a huge improvement over the state when I submitted this bug, where sb_imapfilter would crash several times per hour, but it would be nice if it were possible to fix it completely. Definitely a low-priority item, though, since it only affects the usability of the IMAP filter slightly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-13 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have been testing this for over a week with very few problems. I have gone from several failures per hour to less than one failure per day on average. sjoerd's fix (rev. 1.40) seems to have made a lot of difference. Things are currently stable enough for me to be happy downgrading the severity of the bug. It's not quite perfectly fixed, but it's good enough for me to use regularly on my production system. I'll leave it up to Tony to decide whether this is sufficient to declare the bug closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-04 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 Revision 1.40 (by sjoerd) to manage illegal values in the Message-Id, seems to fix this. I am currently testing and will report back on whether this really solves the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-09-30 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have increased the range in line 548 to 10000 or even 100000, and it doesn't solve the problem. I even inserted an increasing time.sleep(): for i in xrange(11): .... time.sleep(1 << i) and I still get crashes, so just increasing the number of noops or waiting longer doesn't seem to solve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-29 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Apologies for not getting to this yesterday) Could you try making a change to your copy of sb_imapfitler.py for me? Line 548 is " for i in xrange(100):". Could you try increasing the 100 to 10000 and seeing if that solves the problem? (It may run for a long time before it finally quits, if it doesn't fix it - but it's just no-op'ing, so it doesn't hurt). I suspect it is related to a timeout sort of problem - maybe the server is slow and so it's taking a long time to register that the new message is there. I guessed that 100 no-ops would be enough, but perhaps it isn't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in getting to this (I've been overseas). This code is quite significantly changed (for the better, in theory) than the 1.0 sb_imapfilter, so hasn't been as widely tested. Your server isn't giving up the EXISTS response that's expected or in the expected way, so something's falling apart. I'll try and find time to have a proper look at this tomorrow. Note that you ought to be able to fall back to the 1.0 imapfilter if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 22 02:57:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:57:30 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1182743 ] 1.1a1: imapfilter can't find saved message Message-ID: Bugs item #1182743, was opened at 2005-04-14 01:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by aikiaboy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1182743&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: imapfilter Group: 1.1.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: 1.1a1: imapfilter can't find saved message Initial Comment: C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -P SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 1.1a1 (April 2005). Enter password for : Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1203, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1185, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1007, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 910, in Filter msg.Save() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 663, in Save raise BadIMAPResponseError("Cannot find saved message", "") __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. It managed to get through classifying 9 spam before giving this error. Running a 'classify' again gave the same error. It eventually classified all of my in-box correctly (after running it like 10 times). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aikiaboy (aikiaboy) Date: 2005-12-21 19:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1252668 see bug [1023797] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2005-05-17 02:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 Update: and then I reverted to my older version of the database again and classified again, and I didn't get the DB_RUNRECOVERY error. So the 'older' database wasn't corrupted... it was only corrupted after classifying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2005-05-17 02:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 On two consecutive 'classify's (within about a minute of each other), I got the above error, and then I got this second error (the same as in the closed bug report 1190119) Since a few days ago I have been using a backed up version of my database from before 1.1a1. SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 1.1a1 (April 2005). Enter password for : Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1203, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1185, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1007, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 895, in Filter msg.addSBHeaders(prob, clues) File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 45 2, in addSBHeaders self.RememberClassification(disposition) File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 40 1, in RememberClassification self.modified() File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 37 7, in modified self.message_info_db.store_msg(self) File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 18 1, in store_msg self.db[msg.getDBKey()] = attributes File "C:\Program Files\Python\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 218, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run databas e recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') It seems like the 'classify' operation corrupted the database... (the messageinfo one?) Or my database was already corrupt but it wasn't detected during the first 'classify' operation? I can import/export my hammie.db file without errors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1182743&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 22 02:58:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:58:01 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1182743 ] 1.1a1: imapfilter can't find saved message Message-ID: Bugs item #1182743, was opened at 2005-04-14 01:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by aikiaboy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1182743&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: imapfilter Group: 1.1.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: 1.1a1: imapfilter can't find saved message Initial Comment: C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -P SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 1.1a1 (April 2005). Enter password for : Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1203, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1185, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1007, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 910, in Filter msg.Save() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 663, in Save raise BadIMAPResponseError("Cannot find saved message", "") __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. It managed to get through classifying 9 spam before giving this error. Running a 'classify' again gave the same error. It eventually classified all of my in-box correctly (after running it like 10 times). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aikiaboy (aikiaboy) Date: 2005-12-21 19:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1252668 see bug [1023797] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aikiaboy (aikiaboy) Date: 2005-12-21 19:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1252668 see bug [1023797] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2005-05-17 02:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 Update: and then I reverted to my older version of the database again and classified again, and I didn't get the DB_RUNRECOVERY error. So the 'older' database wasn't corrupted... it was only corrupted after classifying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2005-05-17 02:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 On two consecutive 'classify's (within about a minute of each other), I got the above error, and then I got this second error (the same as in the closed bug report 1190119) Since a few days ago I have been using a backed up version of my database from before 1.1a1. SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 1.1a1 (April 2005). Enter password for : Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1203, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1185, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1007, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 895, in Filter msg.addSBHeaders(prob, clues) File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 45 2, in addSBHeaders self.RememberClassification(disposition) File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 40 1, in RememberClassification self.modified() File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 37 7, in modified self.message_info_db.store_msg(self) File "c:\program files\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 18 1, in store_msg self.db[msg.getDBKey()] = attributes File "C:\Program Files\Python\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 218, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (-30978, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run databas e recovery -- PANIC: Invalid argument') It seems like the 'classify' operation corrupted the database... (the messageinfo one?) Or my database was already corrupt but it wasn't detected during the first 'classify' operation? I can import/export my hammie.db file without errors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1182743&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 22 03:14:48 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:14:48 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1387699 ] train_on_filter=True needs the db to be opened read/write Message-ID: Bugs item #1387699, was opened at 2005-12-21 20:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1387699&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: hammie Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aikiaboy (aikiaboy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: train_on_filter=True needs the db to be opened read/write Initial Comment: train_on_filter=True needs the db to be opened read/write for classification eg. ======================== [globals] dbm_type=db3hash verbose=True [Headers] include_score=True [html_ui] display_adv_find=True [Storage] persistent_use_database=dbm persistent_storage_file=./hammie.db [Hammie] train_on_filter=True ========================= $ sb_filter.py asdf fdsa Loading state from /u/k/a/kantor/.spambayes/./hammie.db database /u/k/a/kantor/.spambayes/./hammie.db is an existing database, with 2273 spam and 711 ham Traceback (most recent call last): File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/spambayes/lib/python2.4/site- packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 120, in filter File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/spambayes/lib/python2.4/site- packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 162, in train File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/spambayes/lib/python2.4/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/spambayes/lib/python2.4/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 384, in _add_msg File "/u/k/a/kantor/bin/spambayes/lib/python2.4/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 304, in _wordinfoset File "/s/python- 2.4.1/sun4x_58/lib/python2.4/shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "../spambayes//lib/python2.4/site- packages/bsddb3/__init__.py", line 218, in __setitem__ bsddb._db.DBAccessError: (13, 'Permission denied -- put: attempt to modify a read-only tree') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1387699&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 22 03:23:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:23:50 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1387709 ] dbm_type=db3hash is assumed to be dbhash when db exists Message-ID: Bugs item #1387709, was opened at 2005-12-21 20:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1387709&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: hammie Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aikiaboy (aikiaboy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: dbm_type=db3hash is assumed to be dbhash when db exists Initial Comment: On SunOs (or any non-windows arch) The option dbm_type=db3hash is assumed to be dbm_type=dbhash when db exists. So bsddb is used instead of bsddb3 and things break when bsddb doesn't exist. settings file: =================== [globals] dbm_type=db3hash verbose=True [Headers] include_score=True [html_ui] display_adv_find=True [Storage] persistent_use_database=dbm persistent_storage_file=./hammie.db ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1387709&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 23 04:10:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:10:01 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1388546 ] Can't get SB (Windows) to work with IMAP server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1388546, was opened at 2005-12-22 19:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1388546&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Bullock (bullock) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't get SB (Windows) to work with IMAP server Initial Comment: I loved SpamBayes when I had an POP3 server. Now that I'm using an IMAP email server, I'm trying to get it to work with that. The setup seemed to work OK, but the filtering gives an error message and aborts. I've just installed Python 2.4 and SpamBayes 1.0.4 on my Windows XP system with Outlook Express 6. The "Configuration", "Configure folders to filter" and "Configure folders to train" steps went fine, and SpamBayes correctly identified the available IMAP folders. But I can't seem to get the actual filtering to work. Here's the command line and error response: C:\Python24\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.6 (January 2005) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 947, in ? run() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 933, in run imap_filter.Train() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 766, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 686, in Train for msg in self: File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 613, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 662, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 545, in Save response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "(UNDELETED HEADER %s \"%s\")" % \ File "C:\Python24\lib\imaplib.py", line 725, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "C:\Python24\lib\imaplib.py", line 1028, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "C:\Python24\lib\imaplib.py", line 865, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['UID invalid arguments'] Any help most appreciated. Regards. Greg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1388546&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 24 06:31:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:31:23 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1388546 ] Can't get SB (Windows) to work with IMAP server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1388546, was opened at 2005-12-22 19:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bullock You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1388546&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Bullock (bullock) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't get SB (Windows) to work with IMAP server Initial Comment: I loved SpamBayes when I had an POP3 server. Now that I'm using an IMAP email server, I'm trying to get it to work with that. The setup seemed to work OK, but the filtering gives an error message and aborts. I've just installed Python 2.4 and SpamBayes 1.0.4 on my Windows XP system with Outlook Express 6. The "Configuration", "Configure folders to filter" and "Configure folders to train" steps went fine, and SpamBayes correctly identified the available IMAP folders. But I can't seem to get the actual filtering to work. Here's the command line and error response: C:\Python24\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.6 (January 2005) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 947, in ? run() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 933, in run imap_filter.Train() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 766, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 686, in Train for msg in self: File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 613, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 662, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 545, in Save response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "(UNDELETED HEADER %s \"%s\")" % \ File "C:\Python24\lib\imaplib.py", line 725, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "C:\Python24\lib\imaplib.py", line 1028, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "C:\Python24\lib\imaplib.py", line 865, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['UID invalid arguments'] Any help most appreciated. Regards. Greg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Greg Bullock (bullock) Date: 2005-12-23 21:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1131257 I just switched to SpamBayes 1.1a1 and tried again. I get a different error message now, but I'm still just as stumped as before about how to solve this or even how to look into the error. Here's the command line and new error message (this time with some debugging information): C:\Python24\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -i 4 -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 1.1a1 (April 2005). 22:51.52 > CBHD1 LOGIN "*********@******.com" "********" 22:51.57 < CBHD1 OK LOGIN completed 22:51.57 > CBHD2 SELECT Chisato 22:51.63 < * 0 EXISTS 22:51.82 < * 0 RECENT 22:51.82 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 0] UIDs valid 22:51.82 < * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) 22:51.82 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)] 22:51.82 < CBHD2 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 22:51.82 > CBHD3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 22:51.88 < CBHD3 OK UID completed 22:51.88 > CBHD4 SELECT Personal 22:51.95 < * 85 EXISTS 22:52.13 < * 0 RECENT 22:52.13 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 0] UIDs valid 22:52.13 < * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft) 22:52.13 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)] 22:52.13 < CBHD4 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 22:52.13 > CBHD5 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 22:52.18 < * SEARCH 131 133 143 146 147 148 158 161 162 166 170 171 172 174 17 7 178 179 180 186 190 191 192 194 198 199 206 211 212 214 215 216 220 224 228 23 2 237 238 242 265 266 267 273 278 279 287 289 290 294 295 296 298 299 300 310 32 3 324 325 326 328 330 335 336 337 338 340 341 342 343 344 345 347 348 349 350 35 1 352 353 354 356 357 358 359 361 22:52.33 < CBHD5 OK UID completed 22:52.33 > CBHD6 UID FETCH 131 RFC822.HEADER 22:52.53 < * 2 FETCH (RFC822.HEADER {935} 22:52.54 read literal size 935 22:52.54 < UID 131) 22:52.54 < CBHD6 OK UID completed Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1203, in ? run() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1181, in run imap_filter.Train() File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 945, in Train num_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, is_spam) File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 829, in Train for msg in self: File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 740, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 772, in __getitem__ data = self.imap_server.extract_fetch_data(response_data) File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 399, in extract_fetch_data msg_data = self._extract_fetch_data(msg) File "C:\Python24\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 372, in _extract_fetch_data raise BadIMAPResponseError("FETCH response", response) __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'FETCH response' failed to give an OK response. (' UID 131)',) Thanks. Greg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1388546&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 27 21:02:49 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:02:49 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-753708 ] Support POP over SSL Message-ID: Feature Requests item #753708, was opened at 2003-06-13 03:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by theomurpse You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=753708&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: rick gregory (rickg17) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support POP over SSL Initial Comment: Enable POPproxy to proxy a connection to a POP3 server over SSL, supporting either port 110 or 995. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kyle (theomurpse) Date: 2005-12-27 20:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1026720 I'd like to add a request for this as well. I haven't been able to use SpamBayes (much to my chagrin) since my University changed their off-campus login procedures to require SSL in August. I would really like to use SpamBayes again. I will be tied to this email address for about three more years, and I'd hate to have to put up with spam until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-11-15 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that there is limited support for POP over SSL in 1.1a1 (see the release notes for details). I am working on more complete support (using another library) which hopefully will make it in soon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-17 01:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is probably of interest/use here: <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=791706&group_id=5470&atid=305470> [ 791706 ] POP3 over SSL support for poplib ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 08:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two more requests on the list, 6 Sept from "theta sigma" (Mark) and 1 Sept from Ryan Booker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=753708&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 30 03:20:20 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:20:20 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1393312 ] DEP causes SpamBayes to fail Message-ID: Bugs item #1393312, was opened at 2005-12-30 02:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1393312&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Gewirtz (davidgewirtz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DEP causes SpamBayes to fail Initial Comment: SpamBayes seems to fail when Windows DEP (Data Execution Protection) is turned on for all programs. Not necessarily a bug, but definitely a case of one security measure interfering with another. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1393312&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 30 03:56:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:56:59 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1393312 ] DEP causes SpamBayes to fail Message-ID: Bugs item #1393312, was opened at 2005-12-30 15:20 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1393312&group_id=61702_______________________________________________ Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Gewirtz (davidgewirtz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DEP causes SpamBayes to fail Initial Comment: SpamBayes seems to fail when Windows DEP (Data Execution Protection) is turned on for all programs. Not necessarily a bug, but definitely a case of one security measure interfering with another. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-30 15:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 988095 ] DEP / NX causes Outlook to crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=988095&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1393312&group_id=61702_______________________________________________ From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 31 05:46:57 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:46:57 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1394143 ] pop3proxy_tray fails when windows is starting Message-ID: Patches item #1394143, was opened at 2005-12-31 15:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1394143&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: pop3proxy_tray fails when windows is starting Initial Comment: >From a mail to SpamBayes, we had the traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 556, in ? File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 552, in main File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 188, in __init__ pywintypes.error: (1460, 'Shell_NotifyIcon', 'This operation returned because the timeout period expired.') This lead me to: http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ui/browse_frm/thread/537fc374abbd74be which implies it is probably a problem when XP is starting up. I am guessing that XP does startup slightly differently to 2000, hence it will never be seen there. I haven't tested this patch (but have tested a similar one to the pywin32 demo this was based on). To test, I suggest you simply kill explorer.exe, then try and start the taskbar app. You should find it currently fails to start. You should find that with this patch it does start, and the icon is correctly created when explorer restarts. I've assigned to Tony in the hope he is in a position to test - if not, please assign to someone else :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1394143&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 31 06:23:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:23:13 -0800 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1394143 ] pop3proxy_tray fails when windows is starting Message-ID: Patches item #1394143, was opened at 2005-12-31 17:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1394143&group_id=61702 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: pop3proxy_tray fails when windows is starting Initial Comment: >From a mail to SpamBayes, we had the traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 556, in ? File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 552, in main File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 188, in __init__ pywintypes.error: (1460, 'Shell_NotifyIcon', 'This operation returned because the timeout period expired.') This lead me to: http://groups.google.com.au/group/microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ui/browse_frm/thread/537fc374abbd74be which implies it is probably a problem when XP is starting up. I am guessing that XP does startup slightly differently to 2000, hence it will never be seen there. I haven't tested this patch (but have tested a similar one to the pywin32 demo this was based on). To test, I suggest you simply kill explorer.exe, then try and start the taskbar app. You should find it currently fails to start. You should find that with this patch it does start, and the icon is correctly created when explorer restarts. I've assigned to Tony in the hope he is in a position to test - if not, please assign to someone else :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-31 18:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks :) I was pretty stumped when I read the log (but hadn't had time to search around yet). I'll test this and check it in shortly. Just about everything is ready for a 1.1a2 release, so hopefully I'll get to that soon, too :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1394143&group_id=61702