From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 2 15:40:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 2 15:40:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-18 14:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by callowjg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-02 08:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 2 18:47:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 2 18:47:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019621 ] POP3 client hangs - HEADER_SIZE_FUDGE_FACTOR too big Message-ID: Bugs item #1019621, was opened at 2004-08-31 12:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019621&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Erik Reeh (erikreeh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: POP3 client hangs - HEADER_SIZE_FUDGE_FACTOR too big Initial Comment: My POP3 client (POPcon) hangs because the 'pop3proxy' returns too big a message length. The constant 'HEADER_SIZE_FUDGE_FACTOR' is set to 512 in ?sb_server.py?. The proxy-server adds this size to all message sizes. The message size, however, only increases with approx. 90 bytes. My POP3 client (POPcon) waits to read a message about the size supplied until it times-out. Message retrieval becomes very slow. By changing the 'HEADER_SIZE_FUDGE_FACTOR' to the appropriate number (in casu 90) the problem disappears. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-09-02 16:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 That fudge factor has to accommodate a potentially large X- Spambayes-Evidence header, so just reducing the value isn't workable. We may need to make it an advanced option, though that's pretty horrible. Maybe we should pad the message to fit the claimed size? That's horrible too. Does anyone have any brilliant ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019621&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 6 04:31:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 6 04:31:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1022848 ] sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Message-ID: Bugs item #1022848, was opened at 2004-09-05 19:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Initial Comment: I attempted to convert my spambayes database from db to pickle format. I was able to export from hammie.db (attached) to hammie.csv (attached) ok, but when I tried to import hammie.csv into hammie.dat in pickle format, I got the following messages and traceback: david@arno2:/mnt/disk1/spambayes$ sb_dbexpimp.py -i -p hammie.dat -f hammie.csv Importing file hammie.csv into database hammie.dat Storing database, please be patient. Even moderately sized databases may take a very long time to store. Finished storing database Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 281, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 233, in runImport words = bayes.db.keys() AttributeError: PickledClassifier instance has no attribute 'db' It does produce a hammie.dat (attached) but the error message makes me not trust that it is complete and uncorrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 6 04:35:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 6 04:36:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1022848 ] sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Message-ID: Bugs item #1022848, was opened at 2004-09-05 19:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by davidhandy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Initial Comment: I attempted to convert my spambayes database from db to pickle format. I was able to export from hammie.db (attached) to hammie.csv (attached) ok, but when I tried to import hammie.csv into hammie.dat in pickle format, I got the following messages and traceback: david@arno2:/mnt/disk1/spambayes$ sb_dbexpimp.py -i -p hammie.dat -f hammie.csv Importing file hammie.csv into database hammie.dat Storing database, please be patient. Even moderately sized databases may take a very long time to store. Finished storing database Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 281, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 233, in runImport words = bayes.db.keys() AttributeError: PickledClassifier instance has no attribute 'db' It does produce a hammie.dat (attached) but the error message makes me not trust that it is complete and uncorrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-05 19:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Ok, my first attempt to attach files to this bug report failed. I'll try again, if sourceforge will let me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 6 04:42:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 6 04:42:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1022848 ] sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Message-ID: Bugs item #1022848, was opened at 2004-09-05 19:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by davidhandy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Initial Comment: I attempted to convert my spambayes database from db to pickle format. I was able to export from hammie.db (attached) to hammie.csv (attached) ok, but when I tried to import hammie.csv into hammie.dat in pickle format, I got the following messages and traceback: david@arno2:/mnt/disk1/spambayes$ sb_dbexpimp.py -i -p hammie.dat -f hammie.csv Importing file hammie.csv into database hammie.dat Storing database, please be patient. Even moderately sized databases may take a very long time to store. Finished storing database Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 281, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 233, in runImport words = bayes.db.keys() AttributeError: PickledClassifier instance has no attribute 'db' It does produce a hammie.dat (attached) but the error message makes me not trust that it is complete and uncorrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-05 19:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Attempting to upload hammie.db resulted in an error message that said "Invalid filename." Attempting to upload hammie.csv resulted in an error message that said: File Upload: ArtifactFile: File must be > 20 bytes and < 256000 bytes in length So I will attempt to cut down the csv file and see if I can still reproduce the problem, then upload the smaller file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-05 19:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Ok, my first attempt to attach files to this bug report failed. I'll try again, if sourceforge will let me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 6 04:47:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 6 04:47:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1022848 ] sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Message-ID: Bugs item #1022848, was opened at 2004-09-05 19:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by davidhandy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Initial Comment: I attempted to convert my spambayes database from db to pickle format. I was able to export from hammie.db (attached) to hammie.csv (attached) ok, but when I tried to import hammie.csv into hammie.dat in pickle format, I got the following messages and traceback: david@arno2:/mnt/disk1/spambayes$ sb_dbexpimp.py -i -p hammie.dat -f hammie.csv Importing file hammie.csv into database hammie.dat Storing database, please be patient. Even moderately sized databases may take a very long time to store. Finished storing database Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 281, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 233, in runImport words = bayes.db.keys() AttributeError: PickledClassifier instance has no attribute 'db' It does produce a hammie.dat (attached) but the error message makes me not trust that it is complete and uncorrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-05 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Ok, the uploaded hammie2.csv file has the exact same problem when you try to import it using the following command: sb_dbexpimp.py -i -p hammie.dat -f hammie2.csv I hope this helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-05 19:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Attempting to upload hammie.db resulted in an error message that said "Invalid filename." Attempting to upload hammie.csv resulted in an error message that said: File Upload: ArtifactFile: File must be > 20 bytes and < 256000 bytes in length So I will attempt to cut down the csv file and see if I can still reproduce the problem, then upload the smaller file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-05 19:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Ok, my first attempt to attach files to this bug report failed. I'll try again, if sourceforge will let me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 6 22:04:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 6 22:04:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023274 ] sb_server.py -u problem Message-ID: Bugs item #1023274, was opened at 2004-09-06 16:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py -u problem Initial Comment: The sb_server.py's -u option (set the port for the web interface) doesn't seem to work, though I know it used to. 1.0b1 and 1.0rc1 both use the default port instead of the specified port. It would also be nice if the port could be set in the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 6 22:10:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 6 22:10:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023274 ] sb_server.py -u problem Message-ID: Bugs item #1023274, was opened at 2004-09-06 16:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fdrake You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py -u problem Initial Comment: The sb_server.py's -u option (set the port for the web interface) doesn't seem to work, though I know it used to. 1.0b1 and 1.0rc1 both use the default port instead of the specified port. It would also be nice if the port could be set in the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2004-09-06 16:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 Ah, from reading the source I see the html_ui port setting; that solves my immediate problem, since it works. The -u option should still be made to work, or be removed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 7 16:50:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 7 16:50:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023727 ] Parsing fails on multipart message with no defined boundary Message-ID: Bugs item #1023727, was opened at 2004-09-07 10:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023727&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Parsing fails on multipart message with no defined boundary Initial Comment: Parsing fails on multipart message with no defined boundary. These messages go straight thru as HAM. They also cause hanging if I select to import an email folder to train with just these 2 messages in Configuration page. X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 471, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 247, in setPayload . File "email\Parser.pyc", line 245, in _parsebody .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary I have included 2 spam email messages in 1 file that cause this. Thanks... SpamBayes is GREAT!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023727&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 7 18:18:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 7 18:18:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-07 11:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 7 19:50:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 7 19:50:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023848 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023848, was opened at 2004-09-07 12:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023848&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 7 19:52:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 7 19:52:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023848 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023848, was opened at 2004-09-07 12:50 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by jmgilligan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023848&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 8 17:07:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 8 17:08:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 18:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-08 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 14 12:12:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 14 12:12:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-958015 ] German language Message-ID: Feature Requests item #958015, was opened at 2004-05-21 13:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by soulin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: German language Initial Comment: Hello is there any plan to translate user interface to german language? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-14 10:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I would volunteer to translate it into czech and slovak... What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 06:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Other than the documentation, the text is mostly in either the ui.html file (for sb_server/sb_imapfilter), or in the various dialog definition files (for the Outlook plug-in). Working out exactly how the technical side of things would work is the contribution that the existing developers would make. Anyway, let us know when you decide if you're interested or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Date: 2004-05-24 06:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046743 Hello at the moment I?ll test SpamBayes. If I take a decission to use it permanently I can spend time of translation. But the question is how? Where can I find the literals and text to translate? Is there a tecnical solution that SpamBayes provide other languages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 01:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Translation efforts have been mentioned a little recently. Basically the status is that the existing developers are quite happy to assist with any work necessary to facilitate translation, but don't have the time/skills to actually do the translation work. What this means is that if anyone steps up to translate the ui into language x, then it'll happen. Otherwise it won't. If you're interested in providing a German one, please let us know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 14 13:13:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 14 13:13:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-958015 ] German language Message-ID: Feature Requests item #958015, was opened at 2004-05-21 15:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by horseman-sf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: German language Initial Comment: Hello is there any plan to translate user interface to german language? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Date: 2004-09-14 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046743 Hello OK, I'll spend time to translate. Therefor I need informations where are the literals to translate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-14 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I would volunteer to translate it into czech and slovak... What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 08:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Other than the documentation, the text is mostly in either the ui.html file (for sb_server/sb_imapfilter), or in the various dialog definition files (for the Outlook plug-in). Working out exactly how the technical side of things would work is the contribution that the existing developers would make. Anyway, let us know when you decide if you're interested or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Date: 2004-05-24 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046743 Hello at the moment I?ll test SpamBayes. If I take a decission to use it permanently I can spend time of translation. But the question is how? Where can I find the literals and text to translate? Is there a tecnical solution that SpamBayes provide other languages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 03:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Translation efforts have been mentioned a little recently. Basically the status is that the existing developers are quite happy to assist with any work necessary to facilitate translation, but don't have the time/skills to actually do the translation work. What this means is that if anyone steps up to translate the ui into language x, then it'll happen. Otherwise it won't. If you're interested in providing a German one, please let us know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 14 22:57:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 14 22:57:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028193 ] Feature request: Train on ham or spam separately Message-ID: Bugs item #1028193, was opened at 2004-09-14 22:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028193&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Train on ham or spam separately Initial Comment: SpamBayes should be able to train on ham or spam separately. If you go to the train-menu and only select ham folders, the content in the folders should be added to the "good words"-list, and vica versa for the spam list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028193&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 14 23:00:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 14 23:00:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028194 ] Feature request: Training on root folders Message-ID: Bugs item #1028194, was opened at 2004-09-14 23:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Training on root folders Initial Comment: SpamBayes should support training on root folders. This is especially useful when you have PSTs consisting only of ham (or spam for that sake) with lots of folders on the root level. (Friends.pst, Colleagues.pst, Spam.pst) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 14 23:02:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 14 23:02:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028198 ] Feature request: Classify as ham Message-ID: Bugs item #1028198, was opened at 2004-09-14 23:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Classify as ham Initial Comment: When a mail is classified as "not spam", there should be a function to reclassify it as ham (set spam score to 0% and include words in "good words"-list) Now you have to first delete the mail as spam, then recover it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 04:57:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 04:58:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1007472 ] Spambayes slow with XP SP2? Message-ID: Bugs item #1007472, was opened at 2004-08-12 06:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1007472&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes slow with XP SP2? Initial Comment: I'm not sure if my perception is correct on this but it seems like spambayes may be slower after SP2 is installed. I had been noticing that it was taking a long time for spambayes to move recently received spam into the Junk E-mail folder. I had installed spambayes and SP2 on another computer and the user of that computer also noticed that it seemed slower. It still works and I don't have any hard evidence that the slowness was caused by SP2. We are using spambayes in conjunction with Outlook. Note: I also submitted 799201. That submission is bogus. It was my fault. I didn't understand how spambayes worked. 799201 can be ignored. Thanks for your work on Spambayes - It's awesome! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 14:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It doesn't appear that there is a SpamBayes problem here - or if there is, it's that sometimes Outlook is slow to refresh, which is not related to SP2 (it sometimes happens here, and I'm using SP1). So closing. Please reopen with a comment explaining the exact SpamBayes problem, if I'm wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: PeteH (phoare) Date: 2004-08-20 19:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1082158 Well in response to cmfinley, I can categorically state that on my setup it is SP2 and it is the firewall. Running Spambayes rc2 since it was released. No problems up until the moment I installed SP2. As soon as SP2 installed, problems. Since then, I've conducted multiple tests and it is absolutely clear that (again on my setup) if I disable the firewall, or allow Outlook as a firewall exception, or open the particular port that the firewall is blocking from my Exchange server to Outlook, then Spambayes (or Outlook) is fine. If I don't do one of those three, then Spambayes/Outlook as the refresh problem. For the record, Windows XP SP2, Outlook 2003 SP1, Spambayes 1.0rc2 and Exchange 2000. OK, not the same setup as cmfinley and I could well believe that there is a difference between the way that Outlook connects with Exchange 2000 vs Exchange 5.5. I don't get a problem clicking on the "Delete as Spam" button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Date: 2004-08-20 05:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840099 After looking at this further I don't believe it is that spambayes is slow to move message. I believe the problem is that Outlook is slow to update the contents of the folder. In my case it doesn't appear to be a problem with the firewall. There aren't any dropped packets between my exchange server and my system. I've also noticed that it is sometimes slow to refresh when using the delete as spam button. If I remember right, this slow to refresh after "Delete as Spam" was a problem before I installed SP2. I'm not sure when the problem started - perhaps with rc2? Note: I have Windows XP SP2, Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6626) SP3 and Outlook connects to and Exchage 5.5 server information store. I have three mailboxes open at the same time. My system is 2.5 GHz with 768 MB RAM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: worm eater (wormeater) Date: 2004-08-19 04:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1105099 That sounds right phoare... too bad it isn't as simple as opening a single port on the firewall. It's odd that Exchange seems to be able to update Outlook fine when new email comes in, but has problems when SB is moving files around. Here's my solution: I added an exception for Outlook, but changed the scope of the exception to just allow connections from the IP address of the server that has Exchange on it. This seems to be a fairly safe work-around that does not involve changing the default behavior of Exchange. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: PeteH (phoare) Date: 2004-08-19 00:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1082158 OK, more on this. The problem is the Windows XP/SP2 firewall. Assuming that everyone who's meeting this is running against Microsoft Exchange, then the problem appears to be that the firewall is blocking (dropping) connections sent from Exchange to Outlook via a UDP port. I'm guessing that somehow Exchange signals to Outlook that it needs to refresh/redisplay via that port. If you enable the SP2 firewall logging and look at the log file, you'll see the dropped connections from your Exchange server to your machine on a UDP port > 1024. Unfortunately, the port that is used is dynamically assigned by default. I believe if you search MS Knowledge Base you'll find some registry settings to force the connection to a specific port. So unless I'm missing something (quite possible) the only options are to force the connection to a specific port and define that port as an exception within the SP2 firewall or to add Outlook itself as an exception to the firewall. Certainly the latter restores the timely update of Outlook once Spambayes has done it bit. You may wish to consider the security implications of adding (the whole of) Outlook as an exception to the firewall... Maybe there's a way of SpamBayes itself forcing a refresh? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: PeteH (phoare) Date: 2004-08-18 21:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1082158 Just following up on my earlier comment - and to agree with wormeater... It would appear that Spambayes is performing as normal BUT not it/Outlook is not updating the display. If I get an obvious spam message in, wait a few seconds and then double-click to open it, it says the item can't be found - because it has in fact been moved. BTW I did try the obvious thing of reinstalling SpamBayes after having installed SP2 but that didn't make it better. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: worm eater (wormeater) Date: 2004-08-17 08:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1105099 I've been having the same problems since installing SP2 about a week ago. It seems to be classifying the mail but for some reason it's not updating. I say this because you can always speed up the process by opening messages or switching to another mailbox. You may have many spam emails in the Inbox, but as soon as you view any other mailbox, and go back, they will all disappear. The same thing happens if you open an email in the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: PeteH (phoare) Date: 2004-08-17 02:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1082158 No, it's not your perception... I can confirm this. Everything was fine before SP2 - Spambayes would display the %age Spam likelihood after less than five seconds of emails appearing in my Inbox, but now it's a good minute before the %age appears. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1007472&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 04:58:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 04:58:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1013391 ] Upgrading 1.0rc1 -> rc2 generates DB_RUNRECOVERY error Message-ID: Bugs item #1013391, was opened at 2004-08-22 01:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1013391&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 1 Submitted By: Will Watts (willw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Upgrading 1.0rc1 -> rc2 generates DB_RUNRECOVERY error Initial Comment: I recently upgraded from rc1 to rc2, and rapidly got a DB_RUNRECOVERY problem. The upgraded software classified a few messages - maybe a dozen or so - before the database corrupted and every message failed. I had backed up my SpamBayes C:\Documents and Settings\[user]\Application Data\SpamBayes before installing rc2, so I was able to revert to backup. However, the same thing happened again, fairly rapidly. At a third attempt, the database corrupted at once, without working at all. At this point, I reverted to rc1, which seems to be working fine... as it had been for many months prior to installing rc2. http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-keeps-getting-corrupted suggests you guys are keen for evidence to help nail this problem. If this is still the case, I have a setup where apparently I can corrupt the database to order; so perhaps I can be of help to you, if you want me to run diagnostics or whatever. Info: I am running from the installable Windows package, using the POP3Proxy with an email client called The Bat!. The OS is Win2K SP4. I am running the Norton Internet Security, including the aggressive virus checking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Will Watts (willw) Date: 2004-08-25 07:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=70647 My error - the database *is* corrupt. :-( Pls ignore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1013391&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 04:59:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 04:59:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023274 ] sb_server.py -u problem Message-ID: Bugs item #1023274, was opened at 2004-09-07 08:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py -u problem Initial Comment: The sb_server.py's -u option (set the port for the web interface) doesn't seem to work, though I know it used to. 1.0b1 and 1.0rc1 both use the default port instead of the specified port. It would also be nice if the port could be set in the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2004-09-07 08:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 Ah, from reading the source I see the html_ui port setting; that solves my immediate problem, since it works. The -u option should still be made to work, or be removed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:01:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:01:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1012384 ] want "are you sure?" dialog on Recover from Spam button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1012384, was opened at 2004-08-20 06:29 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1012384&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Albert Davidson Chou (alchou) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: want "are you sure?" dialog on Recover from Spam button Initial Comment: It would be very nice to have a preference to specify that I want an "are you sure?" dialog to be presented when I click the "Recover from Spam" button. Yesterday I mistakenly recovered 15 suspected spam messages back into my huge inbox and had to go manually hunting for them in my inbox to get rid of them again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1012384&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:02:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:02:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1014527 ] exception in Generator.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1014527, was opened at 2004-08-24 05:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1014527&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harvey Chapman (sr105) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: exception in Generator.py Initial Comment: This is also in 1.0rc2. I've attached the errant e-mail with traceback included. I get a lot of these messages and everyone seems to crash. The rest of my spam gets categorized with no exceptions. X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.00 X-Spambayes-Exception: File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 153, in as_string return msg.as_string(unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please try 1.0rc2, as this error should be fixed. Reopen if that is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1014527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:05:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:05:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1016605 ] Training db error... help Message-ID: Support Requests item #1016605, was opened at 2004-08-26 20:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1016605&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris (chrisb28) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training db error... help Initial Comment: I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc2 (June 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (Service Pack 1). I have trained 8366 ham and 44006 spam. The problem I am having is [I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc2 (June 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (Service Pack 1). I have trained 8366 ham and 44006 spam. The problem I am having is [When training I get the following problem. 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 391, in onReview File "spambayes\Corpus.pyc", line 214, in takeMessage File "spambayes\FileCorpus.pyc", line 140, in addMessage File "spambayes\Corpus.pyc", line 134, in addMessage File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 588, in onAddMessage File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 596, in train File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 273, in learn File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 384, in _add_msg File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 281, in _wordinfoset File "shelve.pyc", line 130, in __setitem__ File "bsddb\__init__.pyc", line 120, in __setitem__ DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 5.3: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1016605&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:06:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:06:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-07 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-09 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-13 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:08:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:08:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-07 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-09 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-13 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:08:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:08:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-958015 ] German language Message-ID: Feature Requests item #958015, was opened at 2004-05-22 01:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: German language Initial Comment: Hello is there any plan to translate user interface to german language? Thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are two identical trackers here, so I'm arbitrarily choosing to close one, which is this one. Please refer to: [ 986079 ] Multilanguage However, the best thing would be to start a spambayes-dev discussion about this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Date: 2004-09-14 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046743 Hello OK, I'll spend time to translate. Therefor I need informations where are the literals to translate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-14 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I would volunteer to translate it into czech and slovak... What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-24 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Other than the documentation, the text is mostly in either the ui.html file (for sb_server/sb_imapfilter), or in the various dialog definition files (for the Outlook plug-in). Working out exactly how the technical side of things would work is the contribution that the existing developers would make. Anyway, let us know when you decide if you're interested or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas (horseman-sf) Date: 2004-05-24 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1046743 Hello at the moment I?ll test SpamBayes. If I take a decission to use it permanently I can spend time of translation. But the question is how? Where can I find the literals and text to translate? Is there a tecnical solution that SpamBayes provide other languages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-23 13:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Translation efforts have been mentioned a little recently. Basically the status is that the existing developers are quite happy to assist with any work necessary to facilitate translation, but don't have the time/skills to actually do the translation work. What this means is that if anyone steps up to translate the ui into language x, then it'll happen. Otherwise it won't. If you're interested in providing a German one, please let us know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=958015&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:10:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:10:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-19 08:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is not limited to SP2, or to Outlook 2003. I very occasionally see this with Outlook 2002 and XP SP1. I believe it's when the Exchange server is particularly busy, although I couldn't say for sure. It's hard to know what SpamBayes can do about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-03 01:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:11:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:11:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028194 ] Feature request: Training on root folders Message-ID: Bugs item #1028194, was opened at 2004-09-15 09:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Training on root folders Initial Comment: SpamBayes should support training on root folders. This is especially useful when you have PSTs consisting only of ham (or spam for that sake) with lots of folders on the root level. (Friends.pst, Colleagues.pst, Spam.pst) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two things: 1. Is it really that hard to just tick the boxes? 2. We recommend training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:11:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:11:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028193 ] Feature request: Train on ham or spam separately Message-ID: Bugs item #1028193, was opened at 2004-09-15 08:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028193&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Train on ham or spam separately Initial Comment: SpamBayes should be able to train on ham or spam separately. If you go to the train-menu and only select ham folders, the content in the folders should be added to the "good words"-list, and vica versa for the spam list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028193&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:12:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:12:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028193 ] Feature request: Train on ham or spam separately Message-ID: Bugs item #1028193, was opened at 2004-09-15 08:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028193&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Train on ham or spam separately Initial Comment: SpamBayes should be able to train on ham or spam separately. If you go to the train-menu and only select ham folders, the content in the folders should be added to the "good words"-list, and vica versa for the spam list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (To clarify, this will actually be in the first 1.1 release). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028193&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:14:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:14:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023727 ] Parsing fails on multipart message with no defined boundary Message-ID: Bugs item #1023727, was opened at 2004-09-08 02:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023727&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Parsing fails on multipart message with no defined boundary Initial Comment: Parsing fails on multipart message with no defined boundary. These messages go straight thru as HAM. They also cause hanging if I select to import an email folder to train with just these 2 messages in Configuration page. X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 471, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 247, in setPayload . File "email\Parser.pyc", line 245, in _parsebody .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary I have included 2 spam email messages in 1 file that cause this. Thanks... SpamBayes is GREAT!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Future versions (probably the first 1.1 binary, and the source for anyone using Python 2.4 or above) of SpamBayes will handle any malformed message reasonably well. Until then, there isn't much point in coding for specific errors, unless they are extremely common. What you could you is add a rule to your client that moves messages with the X-SpamBayes-Exception header to the unsure folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023727&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:15:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:15:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019797 ] some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py (backtrace) Message-ID: Bugs item #1019797, was opened at 2004-09-01 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py (backtrace) Initial Comment: I'm running Python 2.3.1 on Linux, processing my mail with procmail. Recently I've been getting spam that crashes sb_filter.py. Failure can be repeated from the command line. Seems to affect only mail that SpamAssassin has tagged as spam. Repeatable for any message that fails. I had this problem starting 2 weeks ago with Source 1.0rc1, upgraded to Source 1.0rc2 and problem persists. Affects ~10% of messages. (note: no option for Source 1.0rc2 in reporting form) Backtrace looks looks like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 253, in main result = mboxutils.as_string(msg, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 170, in as_string parts.append(part.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 298, in _handle_message g.flatten(msg.get_payload(0), unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 200, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: Test message attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I thought that sb_filter handled these ok with 1.0rc2 - is that definately the version you are using? If you are able/willing to use Python 2.4, you will stop having these problems, BTW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 05:16:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 05:16:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019734 ] Send / receive - 100% CPU after 1.0rc2 (June 2004) upgrade Message-ID: Bugs item #1019734, was opened at 2004-09-01 02:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Send / receive - 100% CPU after 1.0rc2 (June 2004) upgrade Initial Comment: Exchange Server environment. I am experiencing 100% CPU utilization while sending and recieving. I also see an Add-in under Ad-in Manager called "Redemption Helper Outlook Extension" which I see has a history of the same issue for other spam filters. Disabling all add-ins resolves the 100% cpu usage. This is repeatable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you just disable the "redemption helper", does that solve the problem? It sounds like a problem with that one, not SpamBayes, from your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 11:16:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 11:17:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 16:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by soulin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 03:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 03:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-08 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 07:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 16 17:55:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 16 17:55:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 18:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-16 17:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 11:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-08 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 19 02:33:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 19 02:33:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1030515 ] dealing with *much* more spam than ham Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1030515, was opened at 2004-09-19 00:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1030515&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: ajki (ajki) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: dealing with *much* more spam than ham Initial Comment: "Warning: you have much more spam than ham - SpamBayes works best with approximately even numbers of ham and spam." That's a warning msg from Spambayes (and I'm getting poorer results in the last weeks). My Spam/Ham-ration is quite normal, I guess: about 75:25 for the last two years. I think Spambayes should cope with reality and do not assume a false 50:50 percent ratio. Best, Andreas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1030515&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 19 16:37:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 19 16:37:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1030707 ] BoundaryError exception not caught Message-ID: Bugs item #1030707, was opened at 2004-09-19 10:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1030707&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rusty Hacksaw (rhacksaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: BoundaryError exception not caught Initial Comment: I'm getting about 4 of these a day, the parser seems to be choking on what I'm guessing to be a malformed MIME 'thingy'. This is from outlook express, so I'm not sure if Return-path: Envelope-to: 1001051858@mail.golden.net Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:22 -0400 Received: from exprod6mx69.postini.com ([12.158.36.53] helo=psmtp.com) by mail3.int.golden.net with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1C92Bu-000MGD-00 for 1001051858@mail.golden.net; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:22 -0400 Received: from source ([199.166.210.22]) by exprod6mx69.postini.com ([12.158.35.251]) with SMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:18 EDT Received: from baidcd02632.bai.ne.jp ([220.208.38.50]) by mail3.int.golden.net with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1C92Bp-000M7e-00; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:18 -0400 Received: from calcine.mail.tekmailer.com by 199.166.210.24; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:54:28 -0600 To: From: scarlet pyle Reply-To: Subject: We don't turn down people in need of a better life. R Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:54:28 -0500 Message-ID: <570769343708.u8MYCXS77003@balinese.mail.tekmailer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 X-original-rcpt: @ X-pstn-levels: (S: 0.00000/22.88805 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:100.0000 C:51.8443 ) X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 471, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 247, in setPayload . File "email\Parser.pyc", line 245, in _parsebody .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary ----5099608214661800 PARMACIA.BIZ

Hi Gmgraham,

Tips to Help in Managing Chronic Pain. Write yourself a contract: Pledge to yourself that you are committed to managing your pain

We are one of the largest online pharmaceutical ordering services, providing medical consultations and prescription processing.

When you need them fast: _ V.a.lium ( X@NAX ) S:o:ma ) Pnte/r/min - v1agr@ ^ At`|v@n

Plus: Pr0z@`c, P@x'il, Busp@.r, A`d|pex, I0n.am|n, M3ridi'a, X3.nica|, Ambi:3n, S0'naTa, Fl3xe'ril, Ce|3b'rex, Fi'0ric3t, Tram@`do|, U|`tr@m, L3v|tr`a, Pr0p`3cia, A.cyc|0vir

We ship to almost every country in the World . www.PARMACIA.BIZ.

Best regards,

scarlet pyle

PARMACIA.BIZ ----5099608214661800-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1030707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 20 03:34:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 20 03:34:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1030515 ] dealing with *much* more spam than ham Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1030515, was opened at 2004-09-19 12:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1030515&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: ajki (ajki) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: dealing with *much* more spam than ham Initial Comment: "Warning: you have much more spam than ham - SpamBayes works best with approximately even numbers of ham and spam." That's a warning msg from Spambayes (and I'm getting poorer results in the last weeks). My Spam/Ham-ration is quite normal, I guess: about 75:25 for the last two years. I think Spambayes should cope with reality and do not assume a false 50:50 percent ratio. Best, Andreas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-20 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. If you are getting satisfactory results, then you obviously don't need to take notice of the warning. 2. There's a large difference between the ratio of ham::spam received and the ratio trained. Different training techniques (see the wiki for details) result in quite different ratios. 3. It's unlikely there is a "normal" ratio. Some people get much more ham than spam (those who receive several high volume mailing lists, for example, or those who receive very little mail at all, and whose address is hardly used). Others, like you, get much more spam than ham. Some, actually do get about 50:50. SpamBayes needs to be able to cope with all of these. 4. If you can suggest improvements to the math that will help this, then please do! This is open-source, and that's what it's all about. I'm closing this, as this is a recognised issue to be worked on for 1.1 in several places, and we don't really need another open tracker about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1030515&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 20 03:38:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 20 03:39:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1030707 ] BoundaryError exception not caught Message-ID: Bugs item #1030707, was opened at 2004-09-20 02:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1030707&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rusty Hacksaw (rhacksaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: BoundaryError exception not caught Initial Comment: I'm getting about 4 of these a day, the parser seems to be choking on what I'm guessing to be a malformed MIME 'thingy'. This is from outlook express, so I'm not sure if Return-path: Envelope-to: 1001051858@mail.golden.net Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:22 -0400 Received: from exprod6mx69.postini.com ([12.158.36.53] helo=psmtp.com) by mail3.int.golden.net with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1C92Bu-000MGD-00 for 1001051858@mail.golden.net; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:22 -0400 Received: from source ([199.166.210.22]) by exprod6mx69.postini.com ([12.158.35.251]) with SMTP; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:18 EDT Received: from baidcd02632.bai.ne.jp ([220.208.38.50]) by mail3.int.golden.net with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1C92Bp-000M7e-00; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 09:57:18 -0400 Received: from calcine.mail.tekmailer.com by 199.166.210.24; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:54:28 -0600 To: From: scarlet pyle Reply-To: Subject: We don't turn down people in need of a better life. R Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:54:28 -0500 Message-ID: <570769343708.u8MYCXS77003@balinese.mail.tekmailer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 X-original-rcpt: @ X-pstn-levels: (S: 0.00000/22.88805 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:100.0000 C:51.8443 ) X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 471, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 247, in setPayload . File "email\Parser.pyc", line 245, in _parsebody .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary ----5099608214661800 PARMACIA.BIZ

Hi Gmgraham,

Tips to Help in Managing Chronic Pain. Write yourself a contract: Pledge to yourself that you are committed to managing your pain

We are one of the largest online pharmaceutical ordering services, providing medical consultations and prescription processing.

When you need them fast: _ V.a.lium ( X@NAX ) S:o:ma ) Pnte/r/min - v1agr@ ^ At`|v@n

Plus: Pr0z@`c, P@x'il, Busp@.r, A`d|pex, I0n.am|n, M3ridi'a, X3.nica|, Ambi:3n, S0'naTa, Fl3xe'ril, Ce|3b'rex, Fi'0ric3t, Tram@`do|, U|`tr@m, L3v|tr`a, Pr0p`3cia, A.cyc|0vir

We ship to almost every country in the World . www.PARMACIA.BIZ.

Best regards,

scarlet pyle

PARMACIA.BIZ ----5099608214661800-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-20 13:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We manage a certain number of malformations, but not all. Unless one in particular is really common, it's not worth specifically coding for it, for a number of reasons. So what we do is continue on, and add the exception header to that message. Users of basically any program but Outlook Express can set up their mail client to consider messages with an exception header as unsure (they're almost certainly spam). OE is very limited though. We could let SpamBayes add in an "Exception," notation to the subject/recipient list, like the ham/spam/unsure notation, if that would be of use. In the long term, if you run from source and use Python 2.4 you won't have this problem because the email library is much improved and handles all this for us. If you use the binaries, then at some point in the future (probably before the end of the year) they will be built with Python 2.4, and so also handle any of these problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1030707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 21 17:03:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 21 17:04:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-973376 ] Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Message-ID: Feature Requests item #973376, was opened at 2004-06-15 16:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by soulin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 6 Submitted By: Lance (lancevictor) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Initial Comment: Proposed change in functionality: If SpamBayes automatically detects spam, it moves it to the Spam folder (where I can go to verify that it really was spam). On the other hand if *I* select a message and click "Delete As Spam" I'd like the message to be moved to my deleted folder (ie: a human has already verified that it really is spam and it can safely be deleted completely, not moved to "spam"). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-21 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I must agree, in fact I actually wanted to post same thread :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 21 17:04:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 21 17:04:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-939947 ] suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Message-ID: Feature Requests item #939947, was opened at 2004-04-22 10:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by soulin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=939947&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aslak (asphunck) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Initial Comment: A suggestion: Giving a download link to an outlook pst file containing ~100 spam messages for fast training. It would be entirely optional to use it ofcourse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-21 15:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 Yep... I was missing this kind of pre-set filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=939947&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 21 17:09:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 21 17:09:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1031959 ] Silent mode Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1031959, was opened at 2004-09-21 15:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Soulin (soulin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Silent mode Initial Comment: I think ability to create unattended/silent installation could be really great. Define what you want install (Outlook plugin only), where you want to install it, what will be the names of Spam and Suspected spam mail directories etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 22 05:01:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 22 05:01:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-939947 ] suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Message-ID: Feature Requests item #939947, was opened at 2004-04-22 22:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=939947&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aslak (asphunck) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Initial Comment: A suggestion: Giving a download link to an outlook pst file containing ~100 spam messages for fast training. It would be entirely optional to use it ofcourse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-22 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are two main problems with this: * SpamBayes works by gathering an understanding of what spam looks like *and* what ham looks like. So you'd really also need a collection of ham, as well as spam. There are a lot of privacy issues with that, among other problems. * The strength of SpamBayes (and similar filters) is that it builds up an individual understanding of what mail you want to see and what mail you don't want to see. This would negate that strength. (It would also make it simple for a spammer to download the central corpus and remove all words that score highly). Given that it takes about 20 messages to effectively train SpamBayes, I don't see any potential gain here, and lots of potential loss. Of course, there's nothing stopping anyone putting a pst with spam in it online if they wanted to. (If you want spam collections, there are lots online, although not in pst format, AFAIK). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-22 03:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 Yep... I was missing this kind of pre-set filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=939947&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 22 08:41:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 22 08:41:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032383 ] Feature Request: Extend maximum wait time for filter timer Message-ID: Bugs item #1032383, was opened at 2004-09-22 08:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032383&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature Request: Extend maximum wait time for filter timer Initial Comment: Today the maximum filter processing start delay is ten seconds. This is too short. I want to be able to increase it to 30 or 60 seconds. It is ok for me that the slider goes from 0 to 10 seconds, but SpamBayes should accept higher values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032383&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 22 17:43:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 22 17:43:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032744 ] Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #1032744, was opened at 2004-09-22 15:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Initial Comment: I recently switched to Outlook 2003 SP1 and re-run the SpamBayes configuration wizard. Everything works fine, but I noticed that Spambayes has stopped marking spam messages as read, although the option is set. To be more specific: messages are marked as not read in the folder list (i.e. folder name is set bold and number of unread mails is shown), but the message appears as read inside of the folder. This applies to messages filtered automatically in the Inbox. On the other hand, "Junk suspects" stay unread on both accounts even when classified manually as spam via "Delete as Spam". I searched the help files, FAQs and bug messages and have found nothing so far. Has anyone got a solution for this weird behavior ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 22 21:08:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 22 21:08:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032867 ] be able to classify sender address as good/bad Message-ID: Bugs item #1032867, was opened at 2004-09-22 12:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032867&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Albert Davidson Chou (al_chou) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: be able to classify sender address as good/bad Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to specify that a particular sender's address is always spam or always non-spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032867&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 22 21:19:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 22 21:19:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #793478, was opened at 2003-08-22 13:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mattgerrans You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Urberg (tim273) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin for Mozilla Mail Initial Comment: Create a plugin for Mozilla Mail/Mozilla Thunderbird that is similar to the Outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt Gerrans (mattgerrans) Date: 2004-09-22 12:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=481624 One additional thing the Outlook plugin does is add a Spam percentage column to your folder view, allowing you to sort a folder by likelihood of being spam. This makes training new spam (and ham) a lot easier, in contrast with Thunderbirds binary spam or not icon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Date: 2004-02-11 15:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=570853 The Mozilla/Thunderbird community is interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed here. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-25 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The plugin provides a toolbar with three buttons: "delete as spam" moves the currently selected message to the spam folder and does the appropriate training (this is not visible in the spam folder). "recover from spam" does the opposite, basically. The third button opens up a dialog that lets the user configure the plugin, train, and filter one or more folders. Once setup, the plug-in also filters all incoming mail in the folders it is set to watch. Let me know if you need any more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-25 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Can somebody describe me exactly what does the Outlook plugin do ? I'm volunteer to create a Mozilla Mail plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 22 21:20:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 22 21:20:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032867 ] be able to classify sender address as good/bad Message-ID: Bugs item #1032867, was opened at 2004-09-22 15:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032867&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Albert Davidson Chou (al_chou) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: be able to classify sender address as good/bad Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to specify that a particular sender's address is always spam or always non-spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-22 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This is refered to as whitelisting and blacklisting. It is covered by FAQ 6.6: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-add-whitelisting-blacklisting-to-spambayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032867&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 24 04:27:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 24 04:27:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1033776 ] Cannot Enable COM Addin Message-ID: Bugs item #1033776, was opened at 2004-09-24 02:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Shubert (tshubert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot Enable COM Addin Initial Comment: In Outlook 2002, the SPAMBAYES COM Addin is listed by everytime I check the box to enable it and close the window and go back in to see its status it is unchecked again. I have uninstalled and reinstalled Spambayes removing the folder each time, I have done a DETECT and REPAIR on Outlook I have swept for spyware, etc., and I have had no success in getting it working. It was working at one point prior. Are there compatibility issues with Act 6? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 24 18:29:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 24 18:29:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1033776 ] Cannot Enable COM Addin Message-ID: Bugs item #1033776, was opened at 2004-09-23 20:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by adeger You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Shubert (tshubert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot Enable COM Addin Initial Comment: In Outlook 2002, the SPAMBAYES COM Addin is listed by everytime I check the box to enable it and close the window and go back in to see its status it is unchecked again. I have uninstalled and reinstalled Spambayes removing the folder each time, I have done a DETECT and REPAIR on Outlook I have swept for spyware, etc., and I have had no success in getting it working. It was working at one point prior. Are there compatibility issues with Act 6? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: adeger (adeger) Date: 2004-09-24 10:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1127793 I think this started for me after applying the latest non-SP2 security fixes for the JPEG vulnerability and one other that I can't remember (sorry!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 27 04:59:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 27 04:59:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1033776 ] Cannot Enable COM Addin Message-ID: Bugs item #1033776, was opened at 2004-09-24 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Shubert (tshubert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot Enable COM Addin Initial Comment: In Outlook 2002, the SPAMBAYES COM Addin is listed by everytime I check the box to enable it and close the window and go back in to see its status it is unchecked again. I have uninstalled and reinstalled Spambayes removing the folder each time, I have done a DETECT and REPAIR on Outlook I have swept for spyware, etc., and I have had no success in getting it working. It was working at one point prior. Are there compatibility issues with Act 6? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you check to see if Outlook has disabled it? Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. (Why there are two places for disabling items, I do not know.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: adeger (adeger) Date: 2004-09-25 04:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1127793 I think this started for me after applying the latest non-SP2 security fixes for the JPEG vulnerability and one other that I can't remember (sorry!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 27 09:24:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 27 09:24:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-08 04:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in getting to this (I've been overseas). This code is quite significantly changed (for the better, in theory) than the 1.0 sb_imapfilter, so hasn't been as widely tested. Your server isn't giving up the EXISTS response that's expected or in the expected way, so something's falling apart. I'll try and find time to have a proper look at this tomorrow. Note that you ought to be able to fall back to the 1.0 imapfilter if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 27 17:08:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 27 18:02:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1035533 ] That fixed it Message-ID: Bugs item #1035533, was opened at 2004-09-27 09:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1035533&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: adeger (adeger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: That fixed it Initial Comment: Enabling under the "hidden" Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items worked! Don't ask me either why this functionality would be under two completely different controls. Thanks, ard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1035533&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 27 18:39:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 27 18:40:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1035533 ] That fixed it Message-ID: Bugs item #1035533, was opened at 2004-09-27 11:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1035533&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: adeger (adeger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: That fixed it Initial Comment: Enabling under the "hidden" Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items worked! Don't ask me either why this functionality would be under two completely different controls. Thanks, ard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-27 12:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 What original bug number does this apply too? Could you copy this comment to the original bug, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1035533&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 04:48:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 04:48:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1033776 ] Cannot Enable COM Addin Message-ID: Bugs item #1033776, was opened at 2004-09-24 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Shubert (tshubert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot Enable COM Addin Initial Comment: In Outlook 2002, the SPAMBAYES COM Addin is listed by everytime I check the box to enable it and close the window and go back in to see its status it is unchecked again. I have uninstalled and reinstalled Spambayes removing the folder each time, I have done a DETECT and REPAIR on Outlook I have swept for spyware, etc., and I have had no success in getting it working. It was working at one point prior. Are there compatibility issues with Act 6? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-28 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As indicated in: My suggestion worked for adeger. Tom, if it does not work for you, please set the status back to open, with an explanatory comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you check to see if Outlook has disabled it? Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. (Why there are two places for disabling items, I do not know.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: adeger (adeger) Date: 2004-09-25 04:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1127793 I think this started for me after applying the latest non-SP2 security fixes for the JPEG vulnerability and one other that I can't remember (sorry!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1033776&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 04:49:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 04:49:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1035533 ] That fixed it Message-ID: Bugs item #1035533, was opened at 2004-09-28 03:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1035533&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: adeger (adeger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: That fixed it Initial Comment: Enabling under the "hidden" Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items worked! Don't ask me either why this functionality would be under two completely different controls. Thanks, ard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-28 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The original was (I made the suggestion yesterday, so remembered): [ 1033776 ] Cannot Enable COM Addin https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1033776&group_id=61702&atid=498103 I've closed it with a comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 04:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 What original bug number does this apply too? Could you copy this comment to the original bug, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1035533&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 14:32:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 14:32:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036135 ] detect faxes as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #1036135, was opened at 2004-09-28 14:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: zimcad (zimcad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: detect faxes as spam Initial Comment: the outlook plugin detects incoming faxes in outlook as suspected spam. Combined Score: 29% (0.288208) Internal ham score (*H*): 0.85227 Internal spam score (*S*): 0.428687 # ham trained on: 327 # spam trained on: 573 3 Significant Tokens token spamprob #ham #spam 'from:none' 0.0180723 12 0 'x-mailer:none' 0.665707 120 419 'to:none' 0.721932 12 55 Message Stream Seiten: 1 Seiten: 1 Die Mitteilung hat folgenden Anhang: All Message Tokens 8 unique tokens 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'from:none' 'message-id:invalid' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 'to:none' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 23:00:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 23:00:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036551 ] FlashWindowEx not in User32.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #1036551, was opened at 2004-09-28 14:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036551&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Hall (hallktm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: FlashWindowEx not in User32.dll Initial Comment: Windows NT4 system with latest fixes from MS. Spambayes 10rC2. Error message popup: "The procedure entry point FlashWindowEx could not be locaed in the dynamic link library USER32.dll." outlook_addin_register.exe.log reads: "Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036551&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 23:01:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 23:01:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036135 ] detect faxes as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #1036135, was opened at 2004-09-28 08:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: zimcad (zimcad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: detect faxes as spam Initial Comment: the outlook plugin detects incoming faxes in outlook as suspected spam. Combined Score: 29% (0.288208) Internal ham score (*H*): 0.85227 Internal spam score (*S*): 0.428687 # ham trained on: 327 # spam trained on: 573 3 Significant Tokens token spamprob #ham #spam 'from:none' 0.0180723 12 0 'x-mailer:none' 0.665707 120 419 'to:none' 0.721932 12 55 Message Stream Seiten: 1 Seiten: 1 Die Mitteilung hat folgenden Anhang: All Message Tokens 8 unique tokens 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'from:none' 'message-id:invalid' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 'to:none' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The following tokens look like they would probably be pretty consistent for incoming faxes, and the fact that none of them appear in the "significant tokens" list seems to indicate that you haven't trained any incoming fax messages. 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'message-id:invalid' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 29% isn't that high a score, and I don't think it would take much training to drive that into the good message range. I don't have the ability to receive faxes in my Inbox, so I've never tried training one. Is SpamBayes preventing you from training on these? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 23:17:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 23:17:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036551 ] FlashWindowEx not in User32.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #1036551, was opened at 2004-09-28 17:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036551&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Hall (hallktm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: FlashWindowEx not in User32.dll Initial Comment: Windows NT4 system with latest fixes from MS. Spambayes 10rC2. Error message popup: "The procedure entry point FlashWindowEx could not be locaed in the dynamic link library USER32.dll." outlook_addin_register.exe.log reads: "Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Duplicate of [ 983539 ]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036551&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 23:18:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 23:19:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-01 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noting dupe in [ 1036551 ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-15 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It seems that the problem is not a *call* to FlashWindowEx, but rather simply that FlashWindowEx appears in the import table of the win32gui.pyd DLL file and the import cannot be resolved on NT4. This is an issue in the pywin32 extensions, and appears to have been introduced in build 202. Revision 1.42 of win32gui.i added the PyFlashWindowEx function that generates the offending import. I'm assigning this to Mark to see if he can find a way to implement the FlashWindow function without generating a static import reference to the FlashWindowEx function (maybe LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress after an OS version check?). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: pbarbour (pbarbour) Date: 2004-07-09 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1080518 likely due a call to the FlashWindowEx() function which is not supported in NT4. This error occured on my NT4 workstation also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 23:56:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 23:56:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036601 ] typo on advanced config web page Message-ID: Bugs item #1036601, was opened at 2004-09-28 21:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036601&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: typo on advanced config web page Initial Comment: I hope this comes under pop3proxy. This applies to 1.0, but that's not on the group drop-down box above. On the web page that appears for setting advanced config options, in the 'Storage Options' section, there appears this line: '... messages (note this does not effect the copy of the message that you have in your mail client).' It should be 'affect'. This seems to be the file 'Options.py', but as this is the first time I've even looked at the code, thought I'd just raise it here. Maybe I should register as a developer and change it myself? :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036601&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 28 23:58:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 28 23:58:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036601 ] typo on advanced config web page Message-ID: Bugs item #1036601, was opened at 2004-09-28 21:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by andyholtmacc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036601&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 3 Submitted By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: typo on advanced config web page Initial Comment: I hope this comes under pop3proxy. This applies to 1.0, but that's not on the group drop-down box above. On the web page that appears for setting advanced config options, in the 'Storage Options' section, there appears this line: '... messages (note this does not effect the copy of the message that you have in your mail client).' It should be 'affect'. This seems to be the file 'Options.py', but as this is the first time I've even looked at the code, thought I'd just raise it here. Maybe I should register as a developer and change it myself? :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036601&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 29 01:46:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 29 01:46:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036601 ] typo on advanced config web page Message-ID: Bugs item #1036601, was opened at 2004-09-29 09:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036601&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy >Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: typo on advanced config web page Initial Comment: I hope this comes under pop3proxy. This applies to 1.0, but that's not on the group drop-down box above. On the web page that appears for setting advanced config options, in the 'Storage Options' section, there appears this line: '... messages (note this does not effect the copy of the message that you have in your mail client).' It should be 'affect'. This seems to be the file 'Options.py', but as this is the first time I've even looked at the code, thought I'd just raise it here. Maybe I should register as a developer and change it myself? :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-29 11:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I've added the 1.0 groups now). Thanks, fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036601&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 29 08:26:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 29 08:26:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-940643 ] Add ham_folder option Message-ID: Feature Requests item #940643, was opened at 2004-04-23 23:18 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940643&group_id=61702 >Category: imapfilter Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: pcm (michali) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Add ham_folder option Initial Comment: It would be nice to have a ham_folder option, especially for the IMAP mode, so that classified ham is moved to that folder. Here are diffs for a simple hack that I did, which "seems" to work for me (made to 1.0b1). sb_imapfilter.py: 683c683 < def Filter(self, classifier, spamfolder, unsurefolder): --- > def Filter(self, classifier, hamfolder, spamfolder, unsurefolder): 699c699 < # we leave ham alone --- > msg.MoveTo(hamfolder) 712a713 > self.ham_folder = IMAPFolder(options["imap", "ham_folder"]) 765c766,767 < # Select the spam folder and unsure folder to make sure they exist --- > # Select the ham, spam, and unsure folders to make sure they exist > imap.SelectFolder(self.ham_folder.name) 773,774c775,776 < subcount = folder.Filter(self.classifier, self.spam_folder, < self.unsure_folder) --- > subcount = folder.Filter(self.classifier, self.ham_folder, > self.spam_folder, self.unsure_folder) Options.py: 1050a1051,1054 > ("ham_folder", "Folder for ham messages", "", > """""", > IMAP_FOLDER, DO_NOT_RESTORE), > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940643&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 29 10:31:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 29 10:31:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 10:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 29 14:30:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 29 14:30:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036970 ] Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036970, was opened at 2004-09-29 08:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to move ham messages from wherever SpamBayes finds them to a user-specified folder. There are at least two scenarios where this would be useful: - When Exchange is configured to filter messages, it puts what it considers to be certain/possible junk in Junk/Junk candidates folders. Since its filtering isn't as good as SpamBayes (when well-trained), it's helpful to have SpamBayes filter the Junk folders and put real spam elsewhere. Without the ability to move ham, though, any ham remains in the Junk folders. - Guaranteeing the order of processing of Outlook rules and SpamBayes filtering. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-September/014781.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 02:39:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 02:39:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 12:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by balfbalf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-30 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-04 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-05 00:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 22:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 20:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 03:11:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 03:11:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 20:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you get an error message from spambayes when you try to, or is the folder simply not in the list to choose? Could you please try this again (to get the log entries) then attach you most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where they are) to this tracker, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 03:43:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 03:43:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-969328 ] TypeError checking fetch response in sb_imapfilter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #969328, was opened at 2004-06-09 13:37 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: TypeError checking fetch response in sb_imapfilter.py Initial Comment: Python 2.3.4 Red Hat EL 3.0 WS Update 2 Failure seems messsage dependent. Any Python meister care to suggest what this means ? Tue Jun 8 18:55:00 MDT 2004 Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ...................................****.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 626, in __getitem__ data = _extract_fetch_data(response[1][0]) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 172, in _extract_fetch_data mo = FETCH_RESPONSE_RE.match(response) TypeError: expected string or buffer This failure seems to occur when there are several (5+) messages to classify The next classification then does this :- Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ....................................*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 6.5131 seconds. Which seems to complete the task that the first call barf'd on so this does not seem high priority just messy :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Date: 2004-07-15 09:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=37202 The message that I included and causes the training failure is not unique. And unlike the initital classification problem does not 'go away' on subsequent calls. I'm currently having to delete about one third of the messages assigned to the Spam folder becasue they generate this failure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Date: 2004-07-15 09:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=37202 I have not been able to reproduce the exact failure as shown above I moved up to RC 2 which might make a difference. However here is a training problem (in RC 2) that seems to have a similar flavor in that it seems msg specific. I have attached two files. The first 'crap.res' contains the result of running :- sb_imapfilter.py -i4 -t -v -e y On a Spam folder containing a single message that was moved there following an 'unsure' classification. The message itself is included in a second attached file 'crap.msg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you could generate this problem again, but using also having '-i4' on the command line, that would be great. That will spit out a copy of the IMAP conversation, and let me figure out what it is that FETCH is returning that is causing the trouble. Note that the conversation will include your username and password, so please edit those out before you attach it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 03:44:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 03:44:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903905 ] IMAP Configuration Error Message-ID: Bugs item #903905, was opened at 2004-02-25 16:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ron Gerrans (rgerrans) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP Configuration Error Initial Comment: I checked the mail list and saw one other user with this same problem, but no resolution and you asked them to submit a bug report which I couldn't locate. After setting up the configuration page with the proper server and login information if I click on the train folders link I get the following error page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 222, in onTrainingfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 212, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 992, in _quote arg = arg.replace('\', '\\') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' Configuration: * Suse 9.0 * Python 2.3 * SpamBayes 1.0a9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ron Gerrans (rgerrans) Date: 2004-04-15 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717883 Had a few minutes to finally take another run at it. Installed v1.0b1 and have basically the same results have tried stopping/starting it again, tried removing the password and using the -P option, but all to no avail. Latest error traceback below, any other thoughts would be appreciated. TIA, -Ron File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 222, in onTrainingfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 223, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 832, in _command_complete raise self.abort('command: %s => %s' % (name, val)) abort: command: LOGIN => socket error: EOF ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe that simply stopping and starting again, with or without -v (which shouldn't effect operation in any way) would fix this. The problems appears to be that the filter didn't try to log in correctly after the configuration options were setup (the password was None). (This assumes that the password was entered, if not, then you have to stop it, and run with -P from the command line). The first problem has been fixed in CVS, so should be fixed in the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Bland (birdra) Date: 2004-03-16 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717251 I was able to access the train folders page after I issued "python -v" from the command line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Bland (birdra) Date: 2004-03-16 06:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717251 I am also getting the same problem with a Suse configuration. Suse Pro 9.0 Python 2.3 Spambayes 1.0a9 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 172, in onFilterfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 212, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 992, in _quote arg = arg.replace('\', '\\') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 03:57:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 03:57:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903905 ] IMAP Configuration Error Message-ID: Bugs item #903905, was opened at 2004-02-25 16:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ron Gerrans (rgerrans) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP Configuration Error Initial Comment: I checked the mail list and saw one other user with this same problem, but no resolution and you asked them to submit a bug report which I couldn't locate. After setting up the configuration page with the proper server and login information if I click on the train folders link I get the following error page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 222, in onTrainingfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 212, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 992, in _quote arg = arg.replace('\', '\\') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' Configuration: * Suse 9.0 * Python 2.3 * SpamBayes 1.0a9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 13:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure why, but this was not in fact fixed, so the problem is still present in 1.0. I have fixed it now, however, so it'll be in 1.1, and should be backported for 1.0.1. Until then, simply restarting the script after entering in the server/username details works. rgerrans: I didn't notice this comment because the tracker was still closed. The given traceback is due to something other than this problem (problems connecting to the server, perhaps?). If you still need this resolved, please open a new tracker for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ron Gerrans (rgerrans) Date: 2004-04-15 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717883 Had a few minutes to finally take another run at it. Installed v1.0b1 and have basically the same results have tried stopping/starting it again, tried removing the password and using the -P option, but all to no avail. Latest error traceback below, any other thoughts would be appreciated. TIA, -Ron File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 222, in onTrainingfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 223, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 832, in _command_complete raise self.abort('command: %s => %s' % (name, val)) abort: command: LOGIN => socket error: EOF ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe that simply stopping and starting again, with or without -v (which shouldn't effect operation in any way) would fix this. The problems appears to be that the filter didn't try to log in correctly after the configuration options were setup (the password was None). (This assumes that the password was entered, if not, then you have to stop it, and run with -P from the command line). The first problem has been fixed in CVS, so should be fixed in the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Bland (birdra) Date: 2004-03-16 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717251 I was able to access the train folders page after I issued "python -v" from the command line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Bland (birdra) Date: 2004-03-16 06:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717251 I am also getting the same problem with a Suse configuration. Suse Pro 9.0 Python 2.3 Spambayes 1.0a9 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 172, in onFilterfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 212, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 992, in _quote arg = arg.replace('\', '\\') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 04:49:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 04:49:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941596 ] sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Message-ID: Bugs item #941596, was opened at 2004-04-25 13:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941596&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe (warehauz) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Initial Comment: I've got 1.0b1 installed on a Linux server and got everything configured for IMAP usage, and have trained a few dozen spams & hams. Everything appears to be going well, and when I run "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c" the output looks fine, but the classification isn't fully working - messages aren't moved, and they don't get all the headers added they're supposed to have. Basically, when training (i.e. I manually put a message in the spam_train_folders), it will correctly process the message, and move it to the move_trained_spam_to_folder folder. After manually training I looked up a few words in the database via the web interface to make sure everything is working properly, and it does indeed appear to be. But, when classifying, the output will say for example: Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. The message was actually spam, so that's fine - but it left it in the inbox, and didn't add a classification or score header (I've turned those options on). So while the classification is picking the right option, it's not doing anything with the messages. The message remains in the original folder, regardless of it's classification, and only gets the X-Spambayes-Mailid header. I also noticed a minor problem with the training as well, but since the messages are being moved to the proper folder, and the tokens are being added to the training database properly, I'm not concerned about it. I've set include_trained to True, so it should be adding a header to indicate it's trained on that message - but it doesn't. In fact, when it moves the message to the move_trained_*_to_folder folder, even the X-Spambayes-Mailid is gone. Since it's doing the training fine though, I'm not worried - I just suspect it's related to my bigger classification problems. Is this a known problem? Anything I can do to fix/workaround this? It almost seems to me like it's deleting the wrong message (as I understand it, it's supposed to create a second copy of the message with the new headers, and delete the original). FYI, the IMAP server appears to be Courier-IMAP. Here's some lengthy output from a "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c -v -i4" that found & supposedly classified a spam message, but ended up leaving it in the inbox without the classification headers etc: ====== SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.HAM 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SPAM 0 trained. Training took 0.0049 seconds, 0 messages were trained Classifying .*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.0689 seconds. Loading state from /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db is an existing database, with 29 spam and 21 ham 09:01.22 > DMNB1 LOGIN "USERNAME" "***PASSWORD***" 09:01.22 < DMNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. 09:01.23 > DMNB2 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB3 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB4 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB4 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB5 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB5 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB6 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB6 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB7 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB7 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB8 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB8 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB9 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB9 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB10 SELECT INBOX 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 2 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 1 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB10 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB11 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 71 72 09:01.23 < DMNB11 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB12 UID FETCH 71 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 1 FETCH (UID 71 RFC822.HEADER {2564} 09:01.24 read literal size 2564 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB12 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB13 UID FETCH 72 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 RFC822.HEADER {1968} 09:01.24 read literal size 1968 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB13 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB14 UID FETCH 72 (BODY.PEEK[]) 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 BODY[] {3908} 09:01.24 read literal size 3908 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB14 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB15 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.25 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.25 < DMNB15 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.25 > DMNB16 APPEND INBOX () "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400" {3945} 09:01.25 < + OK 09:01.25 write literal size 3945 09:01.26 < DMNB16 OK [APPENDUID 1082778026 73] APPEND Ok. 09:01.26 > DMNB17 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.26 < DMNB17 OK STORE completed. 09:01.26 > DMNB18 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 09:01.26 < * 2 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent)) 09:01.26 < DMNB18 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.26 > DMNB19 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 72 09:01.26 < DMNB19 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.28 > DMNB20 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.28 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.28 < DMNB20 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.29 > DMNB21 APPEND INBOX.SPAM (\Seen \Deleted) "24-Apr-2004 22:07:20 -0400" {5014} 09:01.29 < + OK 09:01.29 write literal size 5014 09:01.29 < DMNB21 OK [APPENDUID 1082777941 52] APPEND Ok. 09:01.29 > DMNB22 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.30 < DMNB22 OK STORE completed. 09:01.30 > DMNB23 CLOSE 09:01.30 < DMNB23 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.30 > DMNB24 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB24 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB25 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB25 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB26 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB26 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB27 UID SEARCH ALL 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 52 09:01.30 < DMNB27 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB28 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB28 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB29 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 1 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < DMNB29 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB30 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB30 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB31 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < DMNB31 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB32 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB32 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB33 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB33 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB34 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.31 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.31 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.31 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.31 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.31 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.31 < DMNB34 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.31 > DMNB35 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB35 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB36 LOGOUT 09:01.31 < * BYE Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 BYE response: Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 < DMNB36 OK LOGOUT completed ====== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is in CVS Head now, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've checked in the noop() fix. Ideally, the code should enter a loop waiting for the server to hand out the new "EXISTS" response (since one no-op might not be enough). I'll work this up after 1.0 is released - for the moment this should be a reasonable stopgap. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (warehauz) Date: 2004-04-27 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=914399 Ok, after posing to the mailing list & working with Tony, this one is resolved ... this IMAP server was not properly returning the new messages in the SEARCH command after the APPEND. The workaround is to issue a NOOP before the subsequent SEARCH. Around line 510 of sb_imapfilter.py, after the self._check(response, 'store') line, add: imap.noop() This issue appears to only affect certain IMAP servers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941596&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 04:52:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 04:52:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-969328 ] TypeError checking fetch response in sb_imapfilter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #969328, was opened at 2004-06-09 13:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: TypeError checking fetch response in sb_imapfilter.py Initial Comment: Python 2.3.4 Red Hat EL 3.0 WS Update 2 Failure seems messsage dependent. Any Python meister care to suggest what this means ? Tue Jun 8 18:55:00 MDT 2004 Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ...................................****.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 626, in __getitem__ data = _extract_fetch_data(response[1][0]) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 172, in _extract_fetch_data mo = FETCH_RESPONSE_RE.match(response) TypeError: expected string or buffer This failure seems to occur when there are several (5+) messages to classify The next classification then does this :- Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ....................................*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 6.5131 seconds. Which seems to complete the task that the first call barf'd on so this does not seem high priority just messy :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry that no-one's got to this before now (I've been away for a while). I presume that the first problem was fixed between 1.0rc1 and 1.0rc2. The second one is a bad database (possibly because of all the problems earlier). Removing the messageinfo and hammie.db databases will fix it (and remove you training data). If that reoccurs, then a new bug report would be appropriate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Date: 2004-07-15 09:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=37202 The message that I included and causes the training failure is not unique. And unlike the initital classification problem does not 'go away' on subsequent calls. I'm currently having to delete about one third of the messages assigned to the Spam folder becasue they generate this failure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Date: 2004-07-15 09:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=37202 I have not been able to reproduce the exact failure as shown above I moved up to RC 2 which might make a difference. However here is a training problem (in RC 2) that seems to have a similar flavor in that it seems msg specific. I have attached two files. The first 'crap.res' contains the result of running :- sb_imapfilter.py -i4 -t -v -e y On a Spam folder containing a single message that was moved there following an 'unsure' classification. The message itself is included in a second attached file 'crap.msg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you could generate this problem again, but using also having '-i4' on the command line, that would be great. That will spit out a copy of the IMAP conversation, and let me figure out what it is that FETCH is returning that is causing the trouble. Note that the conversation will include your username and password, so please edit those out before you attach it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 05:12:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 05:12:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-08 04:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 15:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Apologies for not getting to this yesterday) Could you try making a change to your copy of sb_imapfitler.py for me? Line 548 is " for i in xrange(100):". Could you try increasing the 100 to 10000 and seeing if that solves the problem? (It may run for a long time before it finally quits, if it doesn't fix it - but it's just no-op'ing, so it doesn't hurt). I suspect it is related to a timeout sort of problem - maybe the server is slow and so it's taking a long time to register that the new message is there. I guessed that 100 no-ops would be enough, but perhaps it isn't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in getting to this (I've been overseas). This code is quite significantly changed (for the better, in theory) than the 1.0 sb_imapfilter, so hasn't been as widely tested. Your server isn't giving up the EXISTS response that's expected or in the expected way, so something's falling apart. I'll try and find time to have a proper look at this tomorrow. Note that you ought to be able to fall back to the 1.0 imapfilter if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 06:13:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 06:14:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find Message-ID: Bugs item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-07 19:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't move items from Advanced Find Initial Comment: I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by spambayes but I just installed it this morning and noticed the following. I did a search for a message using the advanced search tool. It brought up a list of messages matching the search. I tried to drag the message from the search folder to a different folder and got a message "Can't move the items." I can however move the message as long as it isn't in the search window. I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook spambayes plugin. Sorry, I can't seem to find the spambayes version number anywhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 00:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 No problem under OL 2003 SP1 + Win XP Pro SP2. Dragging one msg from Advanced Find to a folder works fine, doesn't matter whether SB is or isn't watching the source and/or destination folders; dragging dozens of msgs at the same time also works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 23:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I get this problem too, and if I uninstall SpamBayes it goes away, so it presumably is our fault. I'm not sure where to look for the cause of this, though. It occurs even when moving to & from folders that we are not hooking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 06:33:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 06:33:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find Message-ID: Bugs item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-07 19:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't move items from Advanced Find Initial Comment: I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by spambayes but I just installed it this morning and noticed the following. I did a search for a message using the advanced search tool. It brought up a list of messages matching the search. I tried to drag the message from the search folder to a different folder and got a message "Can't move the items." I can however move the message as long as it isn't in the search window. I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook spambayes plugin. Sorry, I can't seem to find the spambayes version number anywhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 00:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Here's a pretty useless MS article about the symptom: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 00:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 No problem under OL 2003 SP1 + Win XP Pro SP2. Dragging one msg from Advanced Find to a folder works fine, doesn't matter whether SB is or isn't watching the source and/or destination folders; dragging dozens of msgs at the same time also works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 23:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I get this problem too, and if I uninstall SpamBayes it goes away, so it presumably is our fault. I'm not sure where to look for the cause of this, though. It occurs even when moving to & from folders that we are not hooking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 06:37:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 06:37:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find Message-ID: Bugs item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-08 11:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Can't move items from Advanced Find Initial Comment: I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by spambayes but I just installed it this morning and noticed the following. I did a search for a message using the advanced search tool. It brought up a list of messages matching the search. I tried to drag the message from the search folder to a different folder and got a message "Can't move the items." I can however move the message as long as it isn't in the search window. I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook spambayes plugin. Sorry, I can't seem to find the spambayes version number anywhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, the problem doesn't occur with Outlook 2000 SR1 (as the MS article indicates). Thanks for finding that Tim (I should have thought to look!). Given how vague that is ("a conflict") it seems unlikely that we'd be able to do anything about this. Their workaround is the same as mine, too. So I'll close this - anyone searching in future will find it and these comments anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Here's a pretty useless MS article about the symptom: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 No problem under OL 2003 SP1 + Win XP Pro SP2. Dragging one msg from Advanced Find to a folder works fine, doesn't matter whether SB is or isn't watching the source and/or destination folders; dragging dozens of msgs at the same time also works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I get this problem too, and if I uninstall SpamBayes it goes away, so it presumably is our fault. I'm not sure where to look for the cause of this, though. It occurs even when moving to & from folders that we are not hooking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 06:37:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 06:38:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find Message-ID: Bugs item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-07 19:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: None >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't move items from Advanced Find Initial Comment: I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by spambayes but I just installed it this morning and noticed the following. I did a search for a message using the advanced search tool. It brought up a list of messages matching the search. I tried to drag the message from the search folder to a different folder and got a message "Can't move the items." I can however move the message as long as it isn't in the search window. I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook spambayes plugin. Sorry, I can't seem to find the spambayes version number anywhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 The true cause is probably identified here: http://www.tech- archive.net/Archive/Outlook/microsoft.public.outlook.program_ addins/2004-02/0052.html although that poor source never got a reply. Almost certainly an Outlook 2002 bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, the problem doesn't occur with Outlook 2000 SR1 (as the MS article indicates). Thanks for finding that Tim (I should have thought to look!). Given how vague that is ("a conflict") it seems unlikely that we'd be able to do anything about this. Their workaround is the same as mine, too. So I'll close this - anyone searching in future will find it and these comments anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 00:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Here's a pretty useless MS article about the symptom: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 00:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 No problem under OL 2003 SP1 + Win XP Pro SP2. Dragging one msg from Advanced Find to a folder works fine, doesn't matter whether SB is or isn't watching the source and/or destination folders; dragging dozens of msgs at the same time also works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 23:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I get this problem too, and if I uninstall SpamBayes it goes away, so it presumably is our fault. I'm not sure where to look for the cause of this, though. It occurs even when moving to & from folders that we are not hooking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 07:01:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 07:02:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-940643 ] Add ham_folder option Message-ID: Feature Requests item #940643, was opened at 2004-04-23 23:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940643&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: pcm (michali) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Add ham_folder option Initial Comment: It would be nice to have a ham_folder option, especially for the IMAP mode, so that classified ham is moved to that folder. Here are diffs for a simple hack that I did, which "seems" to work for me (made to 1.0b1). sb_imapfilter.py: 683c683 < def Filter(self, classifier, spamfolder, unsurefolder): --- > def Filter(self, classifier, hamfolder, spamfolder, unsurefolder): 699c699 < # we leave ham alone --- > msg.MoveTo(hamfolder) 712a713 > self.ham_folder = IMAPFolder(options["imap", "ham_folder"]) 765c766,767 < # Select the spam folder and unsure folder to make sure they exist --- > # Select the ham, spam, and unsure folders to make sure they exist > imap.SelectFolder(self.ham_folder.name) 773,774c775,776 < subcount = folder.Filter(self.classifier, self.spam_folder, < self.unsure_folder) --- > subcount = folder.Filter(self.classifier, self.ham_folder, > self.spam_folder, self.unsure_folder) Options.py: 1050a1051,1054 > ("ham_folder", "Folder for ham messages", "", > """""", > IMAP_FOLDER, DO_NOT_RESTORE), > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added (roughly based on this patch) to CVS Head (i.e. for 1.1). Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940643&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 11:01:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 11:02:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 10:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eggidd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-09-30 11:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 No, I don't get an error message from spambayes, the folder is in the list but it is not possible to open the subfolders. How do I get the log file? I did not find the log file in the program-folder of spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 03:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you get an error message from spambayes when you try to, or is the folder simply not in the list to choose? Could you please try this again (to get the log entries) then attach you most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where they are) to this tracker, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 17:41:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 17:41:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-07 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmgilligan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-09-30 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have increased the range in line 548 to 10000 or even 100000, and it doesn't solve the problem. I even inserted an increasing time.sleep(): for i in xrange(11): .... time.sleep(1 << i) and I still get crashes, so just increasing the number of noops or waiting longer doesn't seem to solve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-29 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Apologies for not getting to this yesterday) Could you try making a change to your copy of sb_imapfitler.py for me? Line 548 is " for i in xrange(100):". Could you try increasing the 100 to 10000 and seeing if that solves the problem? (It may run for a long time before it finally quits, if it doesn't fix it - but it's just no-op'ing, so it doesn't hurt). I suspect it is related to a timeout sort of problem - maybe the server is slow and so it's taking a long time to register that the new message is there. I guessed that 100 no-ops would be enough, but perhaps it isn't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in getting to this (I've been overseas). This code is quite significantly changed (for the better, in theory) than the 1.0 sb_imapfilter, so hasn't been as widely tested. Your server isn't giving up the EXISTS response that's expected or in the expected way, so something's falling apart. I'll try and find time to have a proper look at this tomorrow. Note that you ought to be able to fall back to the 1.0 imapfilter if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 23:25:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 30 23:25:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1038052 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Message-ID: Bugs item #1038052, was opened at 2004-09-30 14:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lynnt (lynnt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Initial Comment: Hello. I'm having 2 different issues. It appears I'm having the same issues as incident: "[ 939050 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start". On another computer, I installed SpamBayes. I do not get any errors, but it seems that SpamBayes is not running. (Clicking on the SpamBayes button loaded on Outlook does nothing.) It worked fine previously, but I recently changed my mail server from Exchange to CommuniGate Pro. Now I can't get SpamBayes to run on Outlook 2003 or Outlook 2000. I've uninstalled, reinstalled, rebooted inbetween & after. Following are logs. ---------------------------------------------- For the problem crashing, this is the contents log file: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc2 (June 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ------------------------------------------------- For the problem of SpamBayes just not functioning, this is the log file: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ----------------------------------------------- I appreciate any feedback. -lynn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 30 17:26:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 1 00:04:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 08:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-30 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Thanks for the input, but the real problem is not being able to clear the icon (I've already got Python code based on an earlier comment that will do that) but rather knowing *when* to clear the icon. The problem is that SpamBayes only knows about a small subset of the Outlook mail folders. A user can configure Outlook rules to move messages to other folders that SpamBayes doesn't know about, so it is difficult for SpamBayes to be certain when there are *no* other unread messages anywhere in Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-29 20:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-04 08:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-04 20:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 08:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 17:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 18:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 13:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 11:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 11:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702