[spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774650 ] Additional post-filtering options

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Tue Oct 26 23:53:21 CEST 2004


Feature Requests item #774650, was opened at 2003-07-21 06:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Next Release (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Additional post-filtering options

Initial Comment:
1.  Option to "Permanently Delete" certain spam rather 
than just moving it.

2.  Better than that, the option to do anything with a 
post-filtered message that I can do with an Outlook rule 
filtered message (forward, flag, etc.)

3.  User configurable number of filtering levels - i.e., 
more than two.

4.  A way to view/modify/tweak the database directly 
(maybe this already exists and I don't know it?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2004-10-27 10:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting dupe in:

[ 1054425 ] Additional filtering options
<https://sf.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1054425&group_id=61702>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bänz Ledin (banz)
Date: 2004-01-22 07:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=956857

I have a similar request:

Spam makes it virtually impossible for me to use my mobile 
phone to download my mail (too many messages for low 
bandwith, too small a screen to sort out Spam).

This could be solved by Spam Bayes removing all messages 
that are moved to the _SPAM folder from the mailserver: my 
computer would be always on, Spam messages would go into 
my _SPAM folder and ham would be left on the mail server for 
e.g. 5 days, according to Outlook settings. Therefore when 
accessing the server from outside with the mobile phone I 
would get only the ham from the last 5 days.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=826656

#1 - That had already been suggested by Mr. Meyer when I 
posted to the SpamBayes list (he also suggested that I [re]
post it here)

#2 - Header or subject line modification would work for this (I 
have used that technique successfully with the K9 filter 
(http://kier.net) and Outlook's rules.  Unfortunately K9 does 
not support Outlook/Exchange directly (only through POP3), 
which is why I now use SpamBayes since I needed support for 
multiple simultaneous Exchange and POP3 mailboxes.

#3 - What I mean is more spam score filters.  Since it is 
CRITICAL for me to NEVER lose a &quot;ham&quot; message, I would like 
to have at least three levels of filtering.  For example:

  70% - 100% Immediate Delete (via SpamBayes
  as in #2 or using the AutoArchive method in #1)

  30% - 69% Move to Spam folder with autodelete
  after 3 days

  10%-29% Move to Suspect folder for manual review

I have had such great success in less than a month of using 
SpamBayes (over 99.9%) that I am actually considering how I 
can &quot;trust&quot; it to autodelete.  I have tried many alternatives 
including commercial products and none (with the exception 
of K9, noted above) has come close to SpamBayes.

#4 - Agreed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 08:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

For #1, you can right click the spam folder and set the auto 
archive options to delete messages in that folder after a 
certain time (1 day is smallest amount) or move them to 
another pst file for retraining.

For #2, convince a developer that it is useful. I would think 
either header or subject line modication would be easier and 
then build your rules using outlook.

For #3, Do you mean more than filtering on different ranges 
of the the spam score or trying to do spam/ham and 
work/personal  (etc.) type of thing?

For #4, Looking at the spam clues for a message is filtered 
snapshot of the db. I think viewing would kinda neat, but 
modify/tweak could have some bad results.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702


More information about the Spambayes-bugs mailing list