From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 2 22:52:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 2 22:53:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-24 05:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 10:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note: checked in initial patches to CVS Head. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-30 07:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Yes, you need the _() around "Help". I knew I've forgotten something... My current addin.py and manager.py have many messages gettexted but the code is far from complete so I reverted those to the minimun. Configuring the language in the main options is better, yes. Thanks. Don't check the patches in yet. I'm going to test sb_server very soon to double check if there are problems with the designed framework on other SB programs besides the Outlook addin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm happy to check in what's done so far, if you are. That way it's easy for the other developers (most are using CVS HEAD, I think) to try it out too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The "Help" menu & submenus need addin.py to be converted to use '_()', too, right? (It didn't work before then, but did afterwards). Apart from that, looks great. I would like the option to be in the main options file - otherwise there will be one there and one for Outlook, and there are too many options like that already. Attached are revised patches that do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-28 23:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Sure. I upload "es" and "es_AR". I translated the "Help" menu and submenus and the first tab of the manager dialog window. If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Argentina (Espa?ol-Argentina) you'll see that "Help" is translated as "Ashuda". If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Spain (Espa?ol-Espa?a) you'll see that "Help" is now spelled as "Ayuda" (the y-sh difference was a local pun.) Given that there is no "es_ES" directory yet, Spanish-Spain fallbacks to "es". You can also try to set to, for instance, French-France which will fallback to the embedded english. Besides configuring through "International Settings", you can also set the language in SB's outlook .ini. Do it in General section, language variable like: [General] language: fr_FR Regarding "license" well.. that's a strong word for my code. Do whatever you like with it. Consider it in public domain. ah... unzip the file under the spambayes directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These look good to me. Do you have any translations done/partly done, so I could see how it all goes? BTW, could you confirm that you're fine donating this code to the SpamBayes project, to be licensed under the PSF licence? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Outlook2000.txt patch file modifies config.py to add a "language" user var and modifies manager.py adding calls to the LanguageManager class. The first calls set the language to the default system one. The second call set the language to the one that is configured in the SB config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 05:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 01:04:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 01:04:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1059170, was opened at 2004-11-02 19:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ethan J. Brown (iristyle) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Initial Comment: When installing spambayes-1.0.exe on Windows XP SP2 (clean install) and Outlook 2k3, the installer spawns outlook_addin_register.exe, but that process crashes. All files are copied appropriately to the destination location in c:\program files, and the installer itself completes, but the outlook toolbar registration does not complete. The problem is a crash within msvcrt.dll: " Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. " As you can see, the version of msvcrt.dll that ships with XP SP2 from above is 7.0.2600.2180. To workaround this problem, an older version of msvcrt.dll can be dumped into c:\program files\spambayes\bin, so that the LoadLibrary calls load a compatible version (I don't have my dev tools / dumpbin installed at the moment to take a look at your exports). In my case, I took the only other available version that I had, version 7.0.0.0, from my Windows side-by-side directory: C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.CPlusPlu sRuntime_6595b64144ccf1df_7.0.0.0_x-ww_2726e76a When the compatible msvcrt.dll and msvcirt.dll are copied to the SpamBayes\bin directory, the registration application runs succesfully. You might want to consider shipping the dlls you've compiled against with your installer in the future to avoid this problem (it's only about a 365k commitment to do so). If you need any more details, don't hesitate to ask -- but I assume you guys should have enough here. Thanks -e ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 02:12:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 02:12:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-922063 ] Intermittent sb_filter.py failure with URL pickle Message-ID: Bugs item #922063, was opened at 2004-03-24 10:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=922063&group_id=61702 Category: hammie >Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: Intermittent sb_filter.py failure with URL pickle Initial Comment: Here are the relevant .spambayesrc lines: [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition=True x-pick_apart_urls=True [URLRetriever] x-slurp_urls=True Here is the stack trace: File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0a9/scripts/sb_filter.py", line 239, in ? main() File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0a9/scripts/sb_filter.py", line 231, in main action(msg) File "/usr/home/leob/spambayes-1.0a9/scripts/sb_filter.py", line 163, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 246, in slurpi ng_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 550, in _gener ate_slurp self.setup() File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 609, in setup self.bad_urls = pickle.load(b_file) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/pickle.py", line 982, in load return Unpickler(file).load() File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/pickle.py", line 597, in load dispatch[key](self) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/lib/python2.2/pickle.py", line 667, in load_string raise ValueError, "insecure string pickle" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 14:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For the sake of resolving this, I've changed the code anyway: 1. If an error occurs loading the pickle, then a new one is used - at least the classifier will keep going, and this shouldn't hurt much (it's only a cache). 2. Saving saves to a temp file first, and then replaces the old one. This should be completely (*nix) or reasonably (win32) robust. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-03 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm guessing that something went wrong writing the pickle. (I get an EOFError trying to open the attached pickle). The slurping code really ought to do what the other code does and save a copy and then replace the original once the save succeeds. I'm reluctant to do this at the moment, though, since it seems fairly likely that the slurping code will vanish given that it's only experimental and no-one's spoken up saying that it does them any good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=922063&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 02:36:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 02:36:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-675811 ] Dead buttons left on uninstall Message-ID: Bugs item #675811, was opened at 2003-01-28 12:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Dead buttons left on uninstall Initial Comment: The toolbar buttons are temporary, which causes problems if they are moved. If they are permanent, then we are left with dead buttons if we uninstall the plugin (why would we do this? ;p ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 14:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be really good to have this fixed for 1.1 - we still regularly get people confused by this bug. I'm not sure about the temporary option, as described by Kenny - I do like having our own toolbar (although we have already reduced the size of the buttons). Attached is a patch that simply deletes the toolbar on unregister, launching Outlook if necessary to do so. (It quits when done, which could be only done if Outlook wasn't already running, or in that case could relaunch it - those are minor details). This works for the source, but I haven't tested it with the installer yet. Any thoughts on this method? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-17 04:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I don't think it would be that "expensive" computationally, but it would destroy any customizations done to the toolbar including repositioning. That seems to defeat the purpose of making the toolbar permanent in the first place. As an example, if I delete the SpamBayes toolbar manually and then restart Outlook, the SpamBayes toolbar appears in a second toolbar row all by itself. That wastes a lot of screen real-estate so I immediately drag it over to the end of the main toolbar to make a single row, and it stays there from then on no matter how many times I restart Outlook. If we delete the SpamBayes toolbar every time Outlook is closed, the toolbar would go back to the second row every time I restart. Personally, I think I would rather see us go back to using temporary buttons. The hard part is figuring out how to use them correctly. Here are some thoughts that might at least spark some discussion (I'm not fully aware of all the history on this, so I apologize if any of this has already been found to not work well). (1) Don't create a separate toolbar if it is temporary, because the user won't be able to reposition it to a convenient location (just like above with deleting the permanent one every time). (2) Don't tack the buttons onto the end of the main toolbar because it is too easy to lose them off the edge if people aren't using wide screens and maximized Outlook windows. A good place to put them might be to insert them where Outlook inserts its "Not Junk" button, which is by default between the Delete button and the Reply button. (3) Use shorter text descriptions so that the buttons don't take up as much room. Similar to Outlook's "Not Junk", I've renamed my SpamBayes buttons as "Spam" and "Not Spam". (4) We could possibly save even more room on the toolbar by making the SpamBayes menu a submenu in the Action menu after Outlook's Junk E-mail submenu instead of using a toolbar button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 14:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 How expensive would it be to delete the toolbar every time we close Outlook? That would fix this and also step around the bug that makes the toolbar get recreated all the time. (For me, at least, the toolbar is recreated because of that failure every time I start Outlook, so it would make almost no difference). Just a thought. (This tracker was opened over a year ago - wow!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-14 10:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That's right - I wrote that solution before SpamBayes had it's own toolbar. If you right-click on the toolbar, then choose customize, then select the spambayes toolbar, then choose delete, it goes away and everything else is left alone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-14 05:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 Dead buttons - Less drastic is to customize the toolbar and drag the spambayes buttons off. This avoids loosing all your customizations. I also had to select the spambayes toolbar in the View menu to see the real 0.6 buttons. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-04 00:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Still in the latest version, even with the new toolbar :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-01 12:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For anyone reading this because they have buttons left over after uninstalling, you can get rid of them by resetting the toolbar. (Right click on the toolbar, click customize, then select the standard toolbar, then click reset). Presumably the next release, when we have our own toolbar, will remove this issue and this can be closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 02:41:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 02:41:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-757371 ] Traceback when training on a certain message Message-ID: Bugs item #757371, was opened at 2003-06-20 04:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=757371&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Traceback when training on a certain message Initial Comment: Using current CVS, mboxtrain crashes on the attached Unix mbox file, with the following traceback: Training ham (buggy.mbox): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/db/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ? main() File "/home/db/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main train(h, g, False, force, trainnew) File "/home/db/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 214, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/home/db/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 148, in mbox_train if msg_train(h, msg, is_spam, force): File "/home/db/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 80, in msg_train h.train(msg, is_spam) File "/home/db/spambayes/hammie.py", line 150, in train spambayes.hammiebulk.main() File "./spambayes/classifier.py", line 276, in learn File "./spambayes/classifier.py", line 402, in _add_msg File "./spambayes/storage.py", line 215, in _wordinfoget File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): TypeError: key type must be string What could be wrong? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is either out-of-date (sorry!) or isn't a problem. My suspicion (based on the traceback) is that the problem was actually a bad database or a db problem. Anyway, running sb_mboxtrain.py with the attached mbox works for me with current CVS, so closing. Please reopen if this is incorrect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=757371&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 02:42:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 02:46:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find Message-ID: Bugs item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-08 11:59 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't move items from Advanced Find Initial Comment: I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by spambayes but I just installed it this morning and noticed the following. I did a search for a message using the advanced search tool. It brought up a list of messages matching the search. I tried to drag the message from the search folder to a different folder and got a message "Can't move the items." I can however move the message as long as it isn't in the search window. I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook spambayes plugin. Sorry, I can't seem to find the spambayes version number anywhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 The true cause is probably identified here: http://www.tech- archive.net/Archive/Outlook/microsoft.public.outlook.program_ addins/2004-02/0052.html although that poor source never got a reply. Almost certainly an Outlook 2002 bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, the problem doesn't occur with Outlook 2000 SR1 (as the MS article indicates). Thanks for finding that Tim (I should have thought to look!). Given how vague that is ("a conflict") it seems unlikely that we'd be able to do anything about this. Their workaround is the same as mine, too. So I'll close this - anyone searching in future will find it and these comments anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Here's a pretty useless MS article about the symptom: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 No problem under OL 2003 SP1 + Win XP Pro SP2. Dragging one msg from Advanced Find to a folder works fine, doesn't matter whether SB is or isn't watching the source and/or destination folders; dragging dozens of msgs at the same time also works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I get this problem too, and if I uninstall SpamBayes it goes away, so it presumably is our fault. I'm not sure where to look for the cause of this, though. It occurs even when moving to & from folders that we are not hooking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 02:54:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 02:54:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783915 ] hammiefilter garbles message Message-ID: Bugs item #783915, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783915&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Eldridge (eldie1) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: hammiefilter garbles message Initial Comment: hammiefilter -f garbles the attached message. It drops the original headers, and replaces them with a single X- Spambayes-Classification header. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 14:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The real solution here is to use email 3.0 / Python 2.4, as the message is parsed properly (whatever defects are present). We are still throwing away damaged headers, as they aren't any use to us (mboxutils.get_message()). At some point sb_filter might work like sb_server, but for the moment there are other solutions, and this is deliberate behaviour, so closing as "Won't Fix". Please reopen if this is a problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This happens because there is an error parsing the headers, and so spambayes throws them away and classifies on the body. The best solution, IMO, would be to abstract out the code from sb_server that deals with this same problem, into message.py, and then get hammie.py to use message.py to add the headers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783915&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 02:58:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 02:58:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-09 03:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 >Status: Pending >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is anyone still experiencing this problem with 1.0? If they are, please reset the status of this item to "open", and go through Kenny's most recent questions - particularly, is Background Filtering definitely on and what are the timer values? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slappy (rural_cdn) Date: 2004-02-10 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=971814 I'd like to add, I had this same problem. I have 3 folders in my inbox, each folder representing a pop account. When I selected inbox in the background filtering, along with 'include subfolders' it would never work. I tried also selecting each folder individually within the inbox also, no go. They only way I could get filtering to work was to _not_ select the inbox, _but_ select each folder within. Voila, it works. I've also _not_ selected include subfolders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 07:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Looks like SpamBayes is moving a message to your Spam folder and then the Outlook rules are moving it back out again. See the section of your log quoted below. SpamBayes detects when a message is moved out of the spam folder back to a filtered folder and takes that as an indication that the message was misclassified, so it trains it as a good message. This is the line that has "Training on message '...' - trained as good". The "Moving and spam training message..." line after it then indicates where you clicked Delete as Spam on the message. For some reason, SpamBayes is getting to the message first even with background filtering on. What are your background filtering delay values set to? How many different e-mail accounts do you retreive from? Are any of them accessed over dial-up or other slow links? """ Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam """ Is there any chance that your background filtering is not actually enabled? The log line "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms" should instead say "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" if background filtering is enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-19 06:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 05:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-19 01:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 22:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 14:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-27 05:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-26 05:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-26 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-15 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-12 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:06:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:06:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831864 ] sb_mboxtrain.py: flock vs. lockf Message-ID: Bugs item #831864, was opened at 2003-10-29 08:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831864&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Klein (mklein9) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py: flock vs. lockf Initial Comment: sb_mboxtrain has an inconsistent use of flock and lockf: flock to set the mailbox file lock and lockf to unlock it. This causes on an older Linux system (RH 5.2) a fatal error in the lockf invocation. The difference appears to be that flock can use fcntl if HAVE_FLOCK is undefined. lockf always uses C's flock, which may not be available. % sb_mboxtrain.py -d .hammie.db -g imap- mail/spamNo -s imap-mail/spamYes Training ham (imap-mail/spamNo): Reading as Unix mbox 180Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 317, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 302, in main train(h, g, False, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 230, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 181, in mbox_train fcntl.lockf(f, fcntl.LOCK_UN) IOError: [Errno 16] Device or resource busy % The fix is easy and seems to work fine: change the invocation of lockf to flock in sb_mboxtrain.py. % diff -C2 sb_mboxtrain.py.orig sb_mboxtrain.py *** sb_mboxtrain.py.orig Tue Oct 28 11:05:47 2003 --- sb_mboxtrain.py Tue Oct 28 11:05:57 2003 *************** *** 179,183 **** raise ! fcntl.lockf(f, fcntl.LOCK_UN) f.close() if loud: --- 179,183 ---- raise ! fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_UN) f.close() if loud: % ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Add (rather belatedly) to CVS Head. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831864&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:09:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:09:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-09 03:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe that this is most likely a dupe: [ 824900 ] Spambayes incorrectly trains mail as good Based on the comments below. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is anyone still experiencing this problem with 1.0? If they are, please reset the status of this item to "open", and go through Kenny's most recent questions - particularly, is Background Filtering definitely on and what are the timer values? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slappy (rural_cdn) Date: 2004-02-10 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=971814 I'd like to add, I had this same problem. I have 3 folders in my inbox, each folder representing a pop account. When I selected inbox in the background filtering, along with 'include subfolders' it would never work. I tried also selecting each folder individually within the inbox also, no go. They only way I could get filtering to work was to _not_ select the inbox, _but_ select each folder within. Voila, it works. I've also _not_ selected include subfolders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 07:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Looks like SpamBayes is moving a message to your Spam folder and then the Outlook rules are moving it back out again. See the section of your log quoted below. SpamBayes detects when a message is moved out of the spam folder back to a filtered folder and takes that as an indication that the message was misclassified, so it trains it as a good message. This is the line that has "Training on message '...' - trained as good". The "Moving and spam training message..." line after it then indicates where you clicked Delete as Spam on the message. For some reason, SpamBayes is getting to the message first even with background filtering on. What are your background filtering delay values set to? How many different e-mail accounts do you retreive from? Are any of them accessed over dial-up or other slow links? """ Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam """ Is there any chance that your background filtering is not actually enabled? The log line "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms" should instead say "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" if background filtering is enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-19 06:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 05:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-19 01:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 22:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 14:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-27 05:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-26 05:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-26 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-15 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-12 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:10:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:10:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824900 ] Spambayes incorrectly trains mail as good Message-ID: Bugs item #824900, was opened at 2003-10-17 04:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824900&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Ingenito (gates150) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes incorrectly trains mail as good Initial Comment: Initially I noticed that Spambayes was not moving messages to the Unsure folder or the Junk E-mail folder for certain messages that had high enough percentages. Spambayes would move some, but then would leave emails with a 90% or above score in my folders. It would also leave messages with a score of 15% or higher without moving them to the Unsure folder. Looking at the log, I noticed that these message are being trained as good, even though they have scores of 90% and above. Please look at the log. For example the last few lines of the log: Message 'Refinance Without Perfect Credit' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' - This had a score of 43% and stayed in the original folder. Message 'Quick Cash Loans up to $500 plus free groceries bonus' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' but then two lines later: Training on message 'Quick Cash Loans up to $500 plus free groceries bonus' - trained as good - This message has a score of 55% and stayed in the original folder. Message 'Get your Complimentary Credit Report' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Get your Complimentary Credit Report' - trained as good This had a score of 44% and stayed in the folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this is a dupe of: [ 802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb In any case, if this is still a problem with 1.0, please send us a copy of a log file for a time when this happened, preferably with log verbosity set to 3 or more (SpamBayes Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Best I can do with this one is to upgrade the logging to include the folder names when all this stuff happens - which I have done. So hopefully when people strike it in the next version, I will get a clue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824900&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:25:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:25:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-873036 ] sb_mboxtrain.py deletes mail on cygwin Message-ID: Bugs item #873036, was opened at 2004-01-09 01:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=873036&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py deletes mail on cygwin Initial Comment: [14:29] $ls -l .mail total 13M -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 338k Jan 8 14:22 adp54 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 army -rw-rw-rw- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 dvp -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 elad -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.4M Jan 8 14:22 fast-download -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 i55 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 i76 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 803k Jan 8 14:29 inbox -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.5M Jan 8 14:22 jokes -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 3.2k Jan 8 14:22 misc -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 mlv -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 197k Jan 8 14:22 parents -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 8.8k Jan 8 14:22 perforce -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 5.0M Jan 8 14:22 sent -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 933k Jan 8 14:22 servo -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 341k Jan 8 14:22 spam -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.9k Jan 8 14:22 uni -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 1.3k Jan 8 14:22 uri.nix -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.8k Jan 8 14:22 zoran [14:30] $cp -r .mail .mail.bak [14:30] $cat /tmp/sbt #!/bin/bash sb_mboxtrain.py -g ~/.mail/army -g ~/.mail/dvp -g ~/.mail/elad -g ~/.mail/fast-download -g ~/.mail/i55 -g ~/.mail/i76 -g ~/.mail/jokes -g ~/.mail/misc -g ~/.mail/mlv -g ~/.mail/perforce -g ~/.mail/sent -g ~/.mail/servo -g ~/.mail/uri.nix -g ~/.mail/zoran -s ~/.mail/spam -s /tmp/272.r2 -D ~/.hammiedb [14:30] $/tmp/sbt Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/army): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/dvp): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/elad): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/fast-download): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 16 out of 16 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/i55): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/i76): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/jokes): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/misc): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/mlv): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/perforce): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 3 out of 3 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/sent): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 87 out of 87 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/servo): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/uri.nix): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 1 out of 1 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/zoran): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 1 out of 1 messages Training spam (/home/mikit/.mail/spam): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 25 out of 25 messages Training spam (/tmp/272.r2): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages [14:30] $ls -l .mail total 1.4M -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 338k Jan 8 14:22 adp54 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 army -rw-rw-rw- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 dvp -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 elad -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 fast-download -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 i55 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 i76 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 803k Jan 8 14:29 inbox -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 jokes -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 misc -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 mlv -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 197k Jan 8 14:22 parents -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 perforce -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 sent -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 servo -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 spam -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.9k Jan 8 14:22 uni -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 uri.nix -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 zoran ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Works for me with current CVS. I suspect what was happening was that what was passed were not mbox files. If you pass (eg) a RFC822 message instead (i.e. no From header) then there will be no messages found in the mbox and if "Headers":"include_trained" is True, then an empty mbox will be written out, which is correct. The solution then is to either give it mboxes (or mdirs) or use a different script, that doesn't have this requirement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=873036&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:26:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:26:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-960610 ] URL checking in classifier.py fails (patch included) Message-ID: Bugs item #960610, was opened at 2004-05-26 19:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960610&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: URL checking in classifier.py fails (patch included) Initial Comment: The mistyped URL 'http:///www.pascal-network.org/' (I think) makes classifier.py to crash. I have the experimental URL checking options on. The attached patch cures the problem, although I think it would be better to change the URL parsing regexp. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response, and no patch. If this is still relevant, please set the status back to "open", and provide the additional information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No patch attached! I also can't duplicate a crash with "http:///www.pascal-network.org/" - is it definately that? Which experimental URL options are you using? (There are three). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=960610&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:37:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:37:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1017729 ] sb_filter.py "crashes" -- bad db? Message-ID: Bugs item #1017729, was opened at 2004-08-28 05:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1017729&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Bell (bbell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter.py "crashes" -- bad db? Initial Comment: I was rebuilding by DB from my corpus, and sb_filter.py "crashed" (i.e., gave a backtrace and exited) on a particular message. I tried the same messages, and the behavior is reproducible. I then created a new database, and ran the message through, but that didn't cause a problem. So I ran the last 3 messages through, in order, and it still worked. I'm now rebuilding from scratch again, and I believe I've gotten past the problem point, although I can't guarantee that I'm training on *exactly* the same mail. So perhaps something unusually caused sb_filter.py to corrupt the database in the first run? I'm attaching the db file, since I think that's key here. I can also attach the faulting message upon request. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Unfortunately, there just isn't enough information to tell what happened here. The db appears to work for me. If we had got to this earlier (sorry!) then the clues would really have been in exactly what the traceback said. That and the faulting message would be the best clues in tracking down the cause. If this is still something you'd like investigated (again, sorry about the delay), please attach those if possible (understandable if not), and reset the status to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Bell (bbell) Date: 2004-08-28 05:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18297 SF wouldn't let me attach the DB, so I put it here: http://macroped.com/sbdb.crashes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1017729&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:49:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:49:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1022848 ] sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Message-ID: Bugs item #1022848, was opened at 2004-09-06 14:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py crashes while importing into pickle file Initial Comment: I attempted to convert my spambayes database from db to pickle format. I was able to export from hammie.db (attached) to hammie.csv (attached) ok, but when I tried to import hammie.csv into hammie.dat in pickle format, I got the following messages and traceback: david@arno2:/mnt/disk1/spambayes$ sb_dbexpimp.py -i -p hammie.dat -f hammie.csv Importing file hammie.csv into database hammie.dat Storing database, please be patient. Even moderately sized databases may take a very long time to store. Finished storing database Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 281, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/home/david/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 233, in runImport words = bayes.db.keys() AttributeError: PickledClassifier instance has no attribute 'db' It does produce a hammie.dat (attached) but the error message makes me not trust that it is complete and uncorrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in CVS, thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-06 14:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Ok, the uploaded hammie2.csv file has the exact same problem when you try to import it using the following command: sb_dbexpimp.py -i -p hammie.dat -f hammie2.csv I hope this helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-06 14:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Attempting to upload hammie.db resulted in an error message that said "Invalid filename." Attempting to upload hammie.csv resulted in an error message that said: File Upload: ArtifactFile: File must be > 20 bytes and < 256000 bytes in length So I will attempt to cut down the csv file and see if I can still reproduce the problem, then upload the smaller file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2004-09-06 14:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Ok, my first attempt to attach files to this bug report failed. I'll try again, if sourceforge will let me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1022848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 03:58:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 03:58:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981750 ] 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder Message-ID: Bugs item #981750, was opened at 2004-06-29 17:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981750&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul M. Suchko (suchko) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder Initial Comment: I have a similar problem to 972359 where I keep getting items in POSSIBLE SPAM but when I view the SPAM clues, they show up as 100%. I looked at the source using View Options and as far as I can tell, I do not have the quotes which are shown in 972359. I do have a letter salad as part of the URLs which is NOT showing up as significant tokens in the SPAM clues window but IS showing up as a token. Perhaps the filter is scoring the letter salad when it should be ignoring it (since it is invisible to the user) like the clues window is. (PS: Why are two different scoring algorithms being used?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 15:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The "letter salad" is irrelevant here. (Only the 150 most significant tokens are used in scoring, which is why some tokens aren't used. It's highly likely that random noise like "letter salad" will be insignificant, so will not be used). Two different scoring algorithms are not being used. Mark's comment is regarding getting hold of the source of the message from Outlook - "show spam clues" uses the Outlook item, whereas regular filtering uses the MAPI item. I'm not sure why - probably using MAPI is more correct, but the "show clues" code is older, at a guess. This is a dupe of [ 972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=972359 so closing (but thanks for the report - the additional message helps figure out what is happening). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981750&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:01:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:01:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Message-ID: Bugs item #972359, was opened at 2004-06-14 14:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Initial Comment: (This is a continuation of Bugs item #923921. I am opening a new bug report so that I can upload related files.) About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. - I received a message which was sent to the "unsure" folder. I then ran "show spam clues" on it, which showed that it was 100% SPAM (see attached file). I then manually ran "filter messages..." on the unsure folder and it correctly detected the message as SPAM and moved it to the correct folder. *No* training was done between the time the message arrived and the time that I performed these steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. I wonder whether my one was a wierd fluke (I still have the clues message in my drafts folder...) since it doesn't have the content-type stuff, and these others do. Noting dupe in: [ 981750 ] 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=981750 (That tracker includes another example msg). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-29 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have never seen this before, but did today (as in spambayes-dev message). Attached is the message that it happened with. Let me know if you need anything else (I saved the spam clues message so have that, but the log (ie. contents of the trace window in Pythonwin) are gone now, but I assure you it had nothing odd). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be an error in our 'content-type' magic. If I look at the headers for this message, as shown by Outlook's View->Options, I see: """ Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mx56.dadoihag.us ([64.136.98.56]) by proxy.danz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:39:09 -0700 From: "United Coalition" To: " " Subject: 1 Minute Mortgage Application Here Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:39:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A" Return-Path: SarahAllen@mx56.dadoihag.us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 01:39:10.0757 (UTC) FILETIME=[64083550:01C451B0] ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A-- """ That doesn't look right (to me) for the headers, and I suspect is what is causing the tokenizer to not see all the tokens when filtered, but it *does* see them all for 'spam clues' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:04:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:04:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831365 ] sb_mboxtrain: non-maildir dir with "numeric" subdirs Message-ID: Bugs item #831365, was opened at 2003-10-28 10:58 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831365&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gareth McCaughan (gjm-w) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: sb_mboxtrain: non-maildir dir with "numeric" subdirs Initial Comment: [This is for 1.0a6.] If you have a directory which (1) doesn't contain a "cur" subdirectory and (2) contains at least one subdirectory whose name begins with a digit, and you are careless enough to feed this directory to sb_mboxtrain.py, then the following happens: 1. Because the directory doesn't have a "cur" subdirectory and is therefore not a maildir, it is assumed to be an MH directory. 2. mhdir_train iterates over directory entries whose names begin with a digit. (I'm not sure whether this is what the author *intended* -- surely MH message filenames are *all* digits -- but it's what globbing against "[0-9]*" does.) 3. It finds one of the aforementioned subdirectories. 4. It calls file(<that dir's name>, "rb"), which raises an exception. 5. The exception isn't caught, and we lose. Strictly, this is user error: you aren't supposed to feed sb_mboxtrain the name of a directory that isn't either a maildir or an MH dir. However, it should be handled more robustly. The simplest remedy is probably to wrap the call to file() in "try: ... except IOError: continue", which will just ignore directories. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831365&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:06:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:06:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809848 ] ImportError importing MAPI during installation Message-ID: Bugs item #809848, was opened at 2003-09-21 05:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: ImportError importing MAPI during installation Initial Comment: Hi All, I've having lots of trouble trying to install the plugin. I've read the bug trackers and docs, but am still unsuccessful. The toolbar basically does not show up and seems to fail according to the logs. Here's the info: Downloaded: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-0081.exe OS: WinXP sp1 Outlook 2002 sp2 spambayes1.log: pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1150, in OnConnection File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/manager", line 16, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 14, in ? exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name mapi spambayes2.log: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. Thanks for your help in advance, johnny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is really out-of-date (sorry!). Does this still occur with version 1.0? If so, please attach a new log and reset the status to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Date: 2003-09-26 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=870923 It seems both those logs are generated when I go through the installer. However, I am judging that the installation is unsuccessful as I do not see the toolbar in Outlook 2002. I checked the tools -> Customized -> Toolbars tab and I do not see SpamBayes anywhere installed. I have tried the installer on 2 different WinXP machines and both failed with the same log messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My mistake - I thought that bug was an 'import error' getting MAPI. I was sure there was another tracking this problem though, but now I can't find it - so this bug is it :) I am confused about your last comment: you said SpamBayes failed to install - however, from the looks of these logs it has installed - the "2" log shows the installation going correctly, while the "1" log shows SpamBayes attempting to connect to Outlook as Outlook starts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Date: 2003-09-25 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=870923 I read over bug# 803798 and I don't understand how the bug is the same? It mentioned that the installation went ok in that ID, however I cannot even get spambayes to install let alone do anything with filtering and what not. Please elaborate. thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 19:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a dupe of [ 803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:10:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:10:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] fail to work with early shell32.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-22 10:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: fail to work with early shell32.dll Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I wonder whether this was maybe related to the problem with the Activestate Python pythoncom.dll that we discovered a while back? If so, then this is fixed. If anyone is still having problems with this (8 months later! sorry!), please try 1.0 and set the status back to "open" if this is not fixed (however, as above, I suspect that it is). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stuart Carter (stu_bloke) Date: 2004-03-18 06:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=980433 Thanks wolfram, I did the same and can now start outlook without 1.09 reporting an error. However, it does not like my old configuration data (can't find the designated Inbox/Junk/Suspect folders). But hey! Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfram Kuss (wolfram_kuss) Date: 2004-03-18 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2120 I had the same problem on WinXp, no Outlook (Express) installed. I searched the computer for the dll (pythoncom23.dll) and found two, one in the SpamBayes folder and one in the windows\system32. They were different size and date. I copied the SpamBayes one over the other one after making a backup. The error message no longer appears. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Lilly (rclilly) Date: 2004-03-15 23:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=346237 Has any progress been made on this problem yet? I had the exact same problem on my system: Windows 2000 Pro, SP4; Outlook 2000 SR3. I uninstalled and went back to using 1.0a7/0.81. I would like to upgrade to 1.0a9/0.9 but can't until this issure is resolved. Funny thing though, I installed .9 on my daughter's laptop that has the exact same setup as my desktop and it works just fine. Hmm! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daren Thomas (darenthomas) Date: 2004-03-02 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=987722 I have the same problem after upgrading to 1.09a. Can't downgrade because I can't find the file :( My boss had the same problem with the earlier version (I lost a lot of points selling SpamBayes to him!!!)... I tried anadelonbrin's suggestion: - deleted config files - manually configured config files but that didn't help. Heres the (german) copy of the error message Outlook gives me: Der Prozedureinsprungpunkt "? PyCom_SetAndLogCOMErrorFromPyException@@YAJPBDABU_G UID@@@Z" wurde in der DLL "Pythoncom23.dll" nicht gefunden. which means that the DLL entry point ("?PyCom[...]") could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stuart Carter (stu_bloke) Date: 2004-02-21 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=980433 I have also got this problem on Windows 2003, OL 2003, Python 2.3. Removing 0.9 and re-installing 0.81 worked. Here is the log from my 0.81 startup (0.9 log is identical to that posted below) Cheers! -------------------------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and Settings\carters\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and Settings\carters\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 184 spam and 432 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.2.3790 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ********************************************** **** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 11.5316ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 13:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You can't see the 0.7 version either, just old versions of the source. You should try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release, and see if this fixes it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-19 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 Here's the contents of my logfile: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-19 04:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 I have had the same experience. I deleted all versions, and the data directory. Still no luck. I am also using Win2K, with all updates, and Outlook XP. What happened to version 0.8? I'd like to reinstall it, but I only see 0.7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Darragh (pdarragh) Date: 2004-02-04 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=967576 I am using Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. (Clean install of Windows XP ... i.e. started with FORMAT). I have installed all of the patches for Windows and Office. I am getting the exact same error message. I've compared the spambase1.log file here with the one I have on my system and they are identical (with the execption of the username in the paths). I've ignored the error message and manually configured Spambyaes but without any real luck. Un-installed and re- installed a number of times. Again, no luck. My environment: Windows XP; Office Pro 2003; Corel Office 8; Delphi 5; Java 2 Runtime v1.4.2_03; McAfee 7.1.0; .NET Framework 1.1 Any pointers on getting this to work would be great. Thansk for your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 20:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:14:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:14:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-948930 ] spambayes binary tray dissapeared Message-ID: Bugs item #948930, was opened at 2004-05-06 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948930&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: captbuck (captbuck) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes binary tray dissapeared Initial Comment: I have been trying this product for about a month and it is a very interesting dev. It has worked fine for me and I tried to show a friend of mine how it works on their xp home machine. I first installed the same version I used (spambayes-1.0a9.exe) It seemed to load fine and I right clicked the tray to begin configuring......I am not sure what I did but next thing I knew the tray.... dissapeared.. I tried un installing and reinstalling repeatedly and then down loaded yr latest version but to no avail ...the installer said all okay but the tray has never reappeared... This is used in outlook express on a xp home machine........The traceback log s follows...... Traceback (most recent call last): File "autoconfigure.py", line 791, in ? File "autoconfigure.py", line 742, in offer_to_configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 705, in configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 451, in configure_outlook_express KeyError: 'SMTP Port' Traceback (most recent call last): File "autoconfigure.py", line 791, in ? File "autoconfigure.py", line 742, in offer_to_configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 705, in configure File "autoconfigure.py", line 451, in configure_outlook_express KeyError: 'SMTP Port' I see the error but I am clueless how to resolve it.......... any ideas thankyou , captbuck ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I'm sure I answered something like this way back when. Perhaps it was also asked on spambayes@python.org? Apologies for the delay, anyway). The traceback is for the autoconfigure script, not for the tray icon. The logs for the tray icon end up in the temp folder - c:\documents and settings\{username}\local settings\temp, probably. If this is still an issue with 1.0, please add the appropriate log, and reset the status to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=948930&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:15:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:16:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962911 ] Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Message-ID: Bugs item #962911, was opened at 2004-05-30 09:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Goebel (stgoebel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Initial Comment: After starting Outlook the first click on any SpamBayes toolbar icon (either Delete As Spam or Recover From Spam) decreases the font size of the mail folders in the navigation pane, other fonts sizes are not affected. The font size will be normal after restarting Outlook. I'm using Outlook 2003 on Win XP Pro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in response to this. Does this really happen consistently? It's one of the weirdest reports I've seen - I can't imagine how this could happen. Does it happen with 1.0? Are there problems with any other toolbar buttons? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:18:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:18:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-872051 ] Missing review items when using HTTP Message-ID: Feature Requests item #872051, was opened at 2004-01-07 13:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=872051&group_id=61702 >Category: pop3proxy >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: Missing review items when using HTTP Initial Comment: When [html_ui] rows_per_section: is used to limit the number of rows displayed, the next/previous buttons still move in complete days, resulting in messages being not displayed. If this is not the desired behavior, assign this to me and I'll put a patch together. Brendon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No comments, but no patch... If you'd still like this changed, then a patch would be great . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Date: 2004-01-11 19:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=944315 Ok, I've thought about this a lot, and it seems like the semantics seem wrong. The current option _claims_ to limit the maximum number of lines _per section_ which seems to make life much more difficult than it needs to be. The primary reason for limiting the number of lines is to avoid very slow response times from the server. When you add a limit on the number of lines, you don't also only want to display a single day at a time. A more natural approach would be to display messages for review _either_ per day OR per number of lines. So, if you set the limit to 100 lines, you could page 100 messages at a time. This behavior would also be useful for reviewing a long history of messages that are sparsely populated in manageable groups, but faster than one day at a time. I'll wait a few days in case anybody has any comments before I implement something along these lines. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-08 10:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Brendon, A patch would be ideal. My use case for the current behavior was that displaying either all pending messages or often just a day's worth can be hideously expensive. I'd like to move by rows_per_section chunks through the pending messages, typically in chronological order. You're more than welcome to implement other semantics though. I don't actually use the pop3proxy these days, so my recollections about how it worked/should work may be off-base somewhat. Since you're not a registered developer, I can't assign it back to you. If you have a chance to create a patch though, just attach it and I'll review it for inclusion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 IIRC, Skip added this behaviour (or re-added it, maybe?). I'm not sure what the correct behaviour is, so I'm assigning to him to make the call. (I'm sure that if he does want it changed, he'll be happy for you to create a patch. You can assign it back to me to check it in, if it gets to that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=872051&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:20:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:20:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804075 ] All mail items non-filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #804075, was opened at 2003-09-11 11:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: All mail items non-filterable Initial Comment: >From the list: I started using SpamBayes last week with the .7x version. I just upgraded to .81, but I'm still having a problem I experienced with .7x. Platform: Windows XP Program: Outlook 2000 I started using the plugin on my wife's profile on the machine and it worked great. I then tried to use it in my profile, and the plugin does not work at all. I try to train the SpamBayes and it fails to see any messages. It finishes the training in a split second and ends up saying it has 0 good message and 0 spam. Trying to get the training to see a message, I selected all my folder to train on, and managed to get 1 message to appear as good. I put the folders back to their proper settings, retrained and got the 0 good 0 spam result again... If I try and delete a message as Spam it always says, "No filterable mail items are selected". I don't know what to do. It still works great on my wife's profile though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Axel Foley (axelfoley) Date: 2003-11-19 16:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909220 Found the problem. :) The OE export wizard apparently does its job of exporting but it "forgets" to export ALL the SMTP headers of each mail. If you analyze the imported messages in outlook you will see that every mail exported by OE doesn't have *ANY* SMTP header. This is also documented by MS but still unsolved, check here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx? scid=kb;en-us;175666. :D Anyway I solved my problem; instead of exporting from OE to Outlook I simply inverted the process. I imported from OE's database using Outlook 2003 import wizard and everything was transferred correctly. A suggestion to the developers: you should give a warning to the users when the plugin skips messages, so one knows what the problem could be, instead of guessing. ;) Anyway I have finished training the plugin and it's doing a fine job (at least until now), great piece of software. ;) Keep up the good job... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-11-15 07:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 I'll confirm that my initial entry was dealing with mails that I just imported from Outlook Express. I moved to Outlook 2000 to use Spambayes. Thanks, Rich ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Axel Foley (axelfoley) Date: 2003-11-15 04:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909220 I can confirm that it is a problem with mails exported from outlook express to Outlook using Outlook Express export wizard. Affected mails appear formally correct, but I haven't analysed headers in details. All the other emails are "filtered" correctly. Maybe some headers are missing in the faulty ones and SpamBayes parser skips them. It's easy to reproduce this behaviour if you want to analyse and correct it. Keep us updated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tobias Kothe (mr_useless) Date: 2003-09-24 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873198 Same problem here. I just moved my Mails from outlook express to Outlook. Now the training wont find any mails in the folders. The "Delete as spam" wont work either giving the "no filterable items selected" message. But suprisingly all new messages, those which i did not transfer from "outlook express", work fine. I can delete them as spam without any problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-09-11 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 In response to a question from Mark: Yes, all my emails have the regular envelope icon next to them ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:21:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:21:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 19:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 955934 ] e-mail is not filterable https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=955934&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-01 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 925428 ] No Filterable mail items are selected ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-19 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 None that I know of, unfortunately. This was an oddball, but since it happened with no other (apparent) external cause and was repeatable, I submitted the bug report. AFAIK, this message was received the same as all my others: through POP3 (simple auth) queried every five minutes. Though this is probably not terribly relevant, my setup is: Win2K SP4 Outlook2K SP3 Kaspersky AV 4.5 BlackICE Defender 3.6cbz BOClean 4.11 AdAware Plus 6.181 Cisco 827 Router/DSL Modem 1.5Mbps DSL connection >From what I can tell, Kaspersky AV grabs port 110 traffic directly from the TCP socket and proxies it back to the application level (somehow with the same port number). Since there was no virus associated with this message, I don't think that's relevant either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the props Tony. I can't see a good way around this though, unless we drop the restriction completely, which I think would be bad. Seth - how many other messages have you seen this happen with? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's clueless, but I forgive you <wink>. MAPI isn't how Outlook gets the messages (I suspect you're thinking of IMAP), but a way to communicate with Outlook. The props attachment is basically the information that Outlook stores about that message. The problem is determining whether a message was received, or created by the user (in which case it's not filterable). The current theory is that it needs to have one of two properties, and your message has neither. Mark may need a new theory ;) The "Tony Meyer" stuff coems about because Outlook must have modified it a bit when I dragged it into the inbox (I suppose I did place it on an exchange server). Not enough to change the non-filterable status, but enough to contaminate it a bit. And yes, I'm at Massey University in NZ - the Auckland campus, though, not the Palmerston North (or Wellington) ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-09 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 I don't know the source code, so forgive the following comment if it's clueless. This message was downloaded via POP3, as neither of my ISP's supports MAPI. Since Outlook deals with POP3 and MAPI, I have no idea if it internally changes all messages as MAPI with the POP3 ones having limited properties as they don't exist as copies in remote directories. BTW, what's all the Tony Meyer stuff in the headers of the Seal_Props.txt file? Are you at the University of Massey in NZ? Friends of mine lived there a few years ago, liked it a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-07 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-06 10:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 21:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:21:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:21:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955934 ] e-mail is not filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #955934, was opened at 2004-05-19 01:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955934&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: BC (cormiewg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: e-mail is not filterable Initial Comment: An e-mail from "System Administrator" with an icon of a red curved arrow. When I "Delete as Spam", a message box "No filterable mail items are selected." is presented. If I select this item along wiht others, it is ignored. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 854547 ] message won't filter https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=854547&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Nitabach (mnitabach) Date: 2004-06-08 07:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1056858 I have received another crop of these e-mails over the weekend. They are all automatically-bounced e-mails. If it would be helpful, I can provide the e-mails to whomever is working on this bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Nitabach (mnitabach) Date: 2004-06-05 02:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1056858 I have received several e-mails that cause the same behavior. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955934&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:25:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:25:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-878546 ] Spam causes exception Message-ID: Bugs item #878546, was opened at 2004-01-17 10:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878546&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spam causes exception Initial Comment: The following message triggers an exception (see the headers): Received: from na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx ([200.78.223.14]:43050 "HELO na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx") by ps3.test.onet.pl with SMTP id ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:17:18 +0100 Received: from mail[127.0.0.1] by na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx with ESMTP id 15724901; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:05:26 -0300 Message-ID: <8o5nh9t68c2q842-244@djt4s.n.0.21o> From: "Gary Egan" Reply-To: "Gary Egan" To: dave_78@poczta.onet.pl Subject: Get a Diploma without the hassle! Date: Thu, 15 Jan 04 04:05:26 -0500 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OrigFrom: t021kub@bentcom.net Status: O X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 438, in onRetr . msg.setPayload(messageText) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 231, in setPayload . prs._parsebody(self, fp) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody . raise Errors.BoundaryError( .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA OR GED Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning power more money and th= e respect of all? Call this number: 1-646-304-7539 (24 hours) There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews! Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, GED and Doctorate (PhD) diploma! Receive the benefits and admiration that comes with a diploma! No one is turned down! Call Today 1-646-304-7539 (7 days a week) Confidentiality assured! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The first 1.1 release will solve this problem, as it will be built with Python 2.4, which handles parsing much better. (Or if you run from source, you can solve it immediately by using Python 2.4) For the moment, the X-Spambayes-Exception header is probably as good as it will get. There isn't much point trying to work around all the possible malformations possible (this is what Python 2.4's email package does, so we would be duplicating work). The exception would be if there was a huge flood of a particular type of malformed message, which this doesn't appear to be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kristian Eide (kreide) Date: 2004-01-20 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=954793 I have also received this error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "./sb_server.py", line 438, in onRetr . msg.setPayload(messageText) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 180, in setPayload . prs._parsebody(self, fp) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody . raise Errors.BoundaryError( .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState:
Image Loading...........












------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878546&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:28:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:28:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-878622 ] Progress Indicator Message-ID: Feature Requests item #878622, was opened at 2004-01-17 13:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=878622&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brandan E. Lloyd (brandan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Progress Indicator Initial Comment: When I "Delete As Spam" multiple spam messages it takes a few minutes. While this is understandable, it would be nice to see a progress dialog box like "deleting 1 of 20". To duplicate this just select 20+ spam and press the "Delete as Spam" button. It took me 2 minutes to delete all these. I just wasn't sure if it worked or if Outlook was hung. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-21 13:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 Not to pressure , but I concur that a progress meter would fit well here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=878622&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:31:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:31:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890691 ] Invalid message causes exception from email package Message-ID: Bugs item #890691, was opened at 2004-02-05 08:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890691&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Invalid message causes exception from email package Initial Comment: This report was posted to spambayes-dev by Atom 'Smasher' . I've attached the traceback and the message that causes email.message_from_file() to choke. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Python 2.4/email 3.0 handles this ok. Earlier versions of the email package don't. I think the general consensus is that it doesn't make sense to do any more work trying to handle malformed messages, as we'd be duping the email package people (i.e. Barry/Anthony)'s work. The more well-used scripts handle malformed messages as well as possible. The exception would be if there was a flood of a particular malformation, I suppose (like there was the TypeError one a while back). This doesn't seem to be one of those, so closing. If anyone disagrees, feel free to write some patches and reopen . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890691&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:32:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:32:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962138 ] Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Message-ID: Bugs item #962138, was opened at 2004-05-28 22:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Initial Comment: Running Win2000 SP4 fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. After installing the binary and starting Outlook, I get an error message : "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re- enable this plugin. Error details:Failed to load bayes database. I tried rebooting and restarting Outlook (Spambayes is the only add-in) to no avail. The included spambayeslog1 reports a DBFileExistsError. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 How strange! Can you please try removing that file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Date: 2004-06-01 20:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051799 I have a file called __db.default_bayes_database.db in that directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the file actually exist? It would be called "default_bayes_database.db" and be in your data directory - with Win2K this is something like C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes, IIRC. Either way it's very odd - either bsddb is saying it exists when it doesn't, or the attempt to delete it is silently failing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:48:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:49:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887256 ] Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Message-ID: Bugs item #887256, was opened at 2004-01-30 09:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Siefert (msiefert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Initial Comment: To all the SpamBayes gurus. I recently installed XP and the MS Office suite 2002. Updated the OS and Office with all the latest and greatest patches without problem. Finally I was able to install SpamBayes for Outlook, also without problems and in its latest version 0.81. So I went on to create my POP3 account for my domain. Just like I do for about 20 other clients (They run Office 2000). I try to send an email to an outside domain and now I get the following bounces. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 1/29/2004 1:45 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: recpient@othercompany.com on 1/29/2004 1:45 PM 501 5.7.1 This system is not configured to relay mail from to for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx I contacted my ISP and verified my settings in Outlook which are 100% correct. I use SMTP Auth to authorize any emails I send. The username and password are correct as well. I know this is a long shot, but is anyone aware of any incompatibility / issue with SpamBayes and Outlook 2002 using SMTP Auth? Please let me know.... this is driving me crazy. Martin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No comment from the OP, so Tim is almost certainly right that this has nothing to do with SpamBayes. If this is not the case, please re-open with futher comments. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 14:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 993472 ] Outlook 2000 & SMTP auth problems ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-03-07 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Select "My Outgoing (SMTP) server requires Authentication" and set the username and password here. If you have already done so, delete the information and re-enter it - perhaps there is a typo in the password field. You may also attempt selecting and deselecting the "log into incoming server before sending mail" checkbox to see if this makes a difference on your server. These are MS Outlook issues, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-03-07 06:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Select "My Outgoing (SMTP) server requires Authentication" and set the username and password here. If you have already done so, delete the information and re-enter it - perhaps there is a typo in the password field. You may also attempt selecting and deselecting the "log into incoming server before sending mail" checkbox to see if this makes a difference on your server. These are MS Outlook issues, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-30 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Suggest you uninstall the SpamBayes addin and try again. I expect you'll find it makes no difference. The addin isn't involved in sending email (or even in receiving email -- it just sits there until Outlook tells it an item has been added to one of the folders you told it to watch; the addin plays no part in Outlook's POP3 or SMTP dialogs). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:52:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:52:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019797 ] some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py (backtrace) Message-ID: Bugs item #1019797, was opened at 2004-09-01 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py (backtrace) Initial Comment: I'm running Python 2.3.1 on Linux, processing my mail with procmail. Recently I've been getting spam that crashes sb_filter.py. Failure can be repeated from the command line. Seems to affect only mail that SpamAssassin has tagged as spam. Repeatable for any message that fails. I had this problem starting 2 weeks ago with Source 1.0rc1, upgraded to Source 1.0rc2 and problem persists. Affects ~10% of messages. (note: no option for Source 1.0rc2 in reporting form) Backtrace looks looks like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 253, in main result = mboxutils.as_string(msg, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 170, in as_string parts.append(part.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 298, in _handle_message g.flatten(msg.get_payload(0), unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 200, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: Test message attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I thought that sb_filter handled these ok with 1.0rc2 - is that definately the version you are using? If you are able/willing to use Python 2.4, you will stop having these problems, BTW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 04:51:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 04:53:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-869360 ] Cannot get Toolbar to load. Message-ID: Bugs item #869360, was opened at 2004-01-03 04:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=869360&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chuck Strickland (chuckstr89134) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot get Toolbar to load. Initial Comment: I had a problem a couple of days ago and I have not been able to get Spambayes to work again since then. I am running Windows XP with Office XP (Outlook 2002 SP2). I use the Exchange client in outlook. I was building a temporary profile in outlook to work on one of my people's PST files and I got an error that I didn't pay any attention to when I opened outlook in the temporary profile. When I went back to my regular profile, I noticed that Spambayes was not working. I tried un-installing and re-installing the program several times, even trying a full re-boot after one of the un- installs. I have my antivirus disabled. I have tried the "regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll" command also. I do not get any errors at any time, but when I open outlook the toolbar is not there and I can not get it to appear. I have even tried adding it using the "add button" from: Tools->Options to display the main Options dialog. Select the tab labeled Other, then click on the Advanced button. Click on the COM Add-Ins button. I will attqach all the log files I have, unfortunately, it appears that the uninstall removed the older ones as I can only find the ones from today. The other day I saw a new beta download and I was looking for it today to give it a try but I cannot find it again. I am open to any suggestions. I really would like to get this working again. Thanks for developing such a wonderful product, please be so kind as to help me get it going again. Chuck PS - I also did another un-install and checked the registry after that. I found and deleted several references to Spambayes and then re-loaded it again - no help, same symptoms. I am attaching a zip file with the exported registry enrtries and the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe the 'leftover' registry entry problem has been since fixed. The main problem is very out of date now (sorry!). If this is still relevant, then: 1. Try 1.0 if you are not already. 2. Is it listed in the COM add-ins list? 3. Check to see if Outlook disabled it (Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items). 4. Attach the most recent log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=869360&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:00:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:00:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1053223 ] Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1053223, was opened at 2004-10-25 04:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Initial Comment: I've been running SpamBayes for over a year on Outlook (now XP SP3). I've also had a BlackBerry for three years (have had a 7780 since the summer). Over time, I've noticed ever more Spam hitting my BlackBerry, even though when I get home and check my Outlook Inbox it is not there, but (correctly) in the Spam folder. And recently I've noticed that when I select an email in the "maybe SPAM" folder and click the "Delete as Spam" button, it takes several seconds to move it to the SPAM folder. So I'm guessing SpamBayes has a linear (or worse than linear) time algorithm for updating the spam database. SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0 (July 2004) reports that this training database status: Database has 30326 good and 16916 spam. I assume one solution is for me to delete the databases and retrain. Have you also considered some kind of automatic pruning to keep the databases manageable? Here are the SB DB file sizes: 1,316 default_bayes_customize.ini 42,049,536 default_bayes_database.db 2,506,752 default_message_database.db 3,521 MS Exchange Settings.ini Of course the other possibility is to modify your DB algorithms so their running time is O(LogN) or faster... Thank you! --Ben Slivka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. Well, you do select the messages that end up in the db, even though you don't do anything else. Perhaps adjusting the thresholds might help? Or enabling the [Classifier] x-use_bigrams option? (Open the default_bayes_customize.ini file in the data directory, and add the appropriate lines; to be effective, this does need a retrain). 2. There aren't any other files, so this is rather perplexing. There have been a couple of other reports of slowdowns on the spambayes@python.org list recently, which also are unresolved at the moment. I'll update this once more is figured out. 3. Not much, at the moment :(. Have you seen the material at ? That's mostly what we have on training at the moment, or at least a good (lengthy) summary. Typically the action is to retrain from scratch. We're still looking into it, really. 5. Sorry. I was under the impression that even with the binary you could switch to a pickle, but a glance at the code indicates that I was wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2004-10-26 14:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tony, Thank you for the thorough response. 1) I didn't create the database -- that is happening "under the covers". I assume SpamBayes built up that database all on its own? I'm just an "end user" and I get a lot of email (and, unfortunately, a lot of spam -- ben **at** slivka **dot** com is too easy to figure out, I guess). And there is no obvious way in the user interface for me to shrink or prune the database. 2) I deleted the database files -- it didn't change the classification speed at all -- it's still noticeably slower than it was when I first installed SpamBayes (in 2003). Are their some other files or registry settings I should reset/delete? 3) So you would have to redesign your database schema -- I get that. But what advice to you have for users when the DB gets "too large"? 4) I'm all for you all experimenting with new techniques and training regimines! 5) I installed the Windows binary -- I'm not looking to experiment with other database choices! Thank you! --Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 14:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. ~47000 messages is a very large database. Generally, it seems that the best results can be obtained from quite small (under 1000) databases, which would remove this problem. The wiki has a lot of stuff about training strategies. 2. Classification time shouldn't be particularly related to the db size (training certainly is). I don't know what the system is that sends mail to the BlackBerry, but perhaps adjusting the background filtering options could help with this problem? 3. There has been a little investigation into expiring messages, but the research hasn't shown that it's particularly helpful. One major problem is that SpamBayes relies on bags of tokens being added/removed as a set. This means that if we were to prune the database we would want to remove whole messages, not individual tokens. At the moment we don't store this information, so it would mean a whole new database/table. 4. Alternate training regimes, which keep the database size small, like 'train to exhaustion', are likely to be the best solution for this sort of problem. The 1.1 release of SpamBayes will almost certainly have some sort of support for (more easily) trying out different training regimes with the Outlook plug-in/sb_server. 5. The database is user-selected. By default bsddb is used (I have no idea what the access times for bsddb are meant to be, but I'm google could pull up something). You can, however, use a pickle, MySQL, or Postgres SQL. Any of these might help, depending on your exact requirements. A pickle takes a lot more memory, and will be slow to load/save, but very fast otherwise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:05:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:05:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Message-ID: Bugs item #972359, was opened at 2004-06-14 14:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Initial Comment: (This is a continuation of Bugs item #923921. I am opening a new bug report so that I can upload related files.) About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. - I received a message which was sent to the "unsure" folder. I then ran "show spam clues" on it, which showed that it was 100% SPAM (see attached file). I then manually ran "filter messages..." on the unsure folder and it correctly detected the message as SPAM and moved it to the correct folder. *No* training was done between the time the message arrived and the time that I performed these steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. I wonder whether my one was a wierd fluke (I still have the clues message in my drafts folder...) since it doesn't have the content-type stuff, and these others do. Noting dupe in: [ 981750 ] 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=981750 (That tracker includes another example msg). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-29 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have never seen this before, but did today (as in spambayes-dev message). Attached is the message that it happened with. Let me know if you need anything else (I saved the spam clues message so have that, but the log (ie. contents of the trace window in Pythonwin) are gone now, but I assure you it had nothing odd). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be an error in our 'content-type' magic. If I look at the headers for this message, as shown by Outlook's View->Options, I see: """ Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mx56.dadoihag.us ([64.136.98.56]) by proxy.danz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:39:09 -0700 From: "United Coalition" To: " " Subject: 1 Minute Mortgage Application Here Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:39:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A" Return-Path: SarahAllen@mx56.dadoihag.us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 01:39:10.0757 (UTC) FILETIME=[64083550:01C451B0] ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A-- """ That doesn't look right (to me) for the headers, and I suspect is what is causing the tokenizer to not see all the tokens when filtered, but it *does* see them all for 'spam clues' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:05:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:06:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Possible Spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-27 03:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Possible Spam folder Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is almost certainly the same as: [ 972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure (This tracker is actually older, but that one has more useful hints about the probable cause, so closing this one as the dupe, and tracking in there). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-14 14:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 no problem! see bug # 972359 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-14 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry, my fault - I forgot that sourceforge only allows the original person opening the report and people with developer access to add files to a tracker. Just submit a new report with the log files and a comment pointing back at this bug (i.e. id 923921). And, preferably, another comment here with the id of the new one that you created. (Don't forget to tick the box when uploading the files). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-14 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 ok, i got the files you requested, but i can't find a way to upload them. how do you add a file to an existing bug report? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-08 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Could you attach a copy of the "show spam clues" info as well as a copy of your SpamBayes logfiles immediately following the error? The Troubleshooting Guide has info on how to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-07 04:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Just caught one as it arrived: At 9:31am a message arrived and was put into the possible spam folder. Outlook spam field says 52%. I immediately ran show spam clues, which said that it was 100%. BTW - I am running version v1.0rc1, but this happened in the previous version as well. I am using it with Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-07 04:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Checked again at 9:15am this morning. Checked the latest two messages in the possible spam folder. First message was received at 9:11am and had an 83% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. Second message was received at 9:07am and had a 50% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. No training was performed between the time the messages were recieved and the time I checked them. What additional data would be helpful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 23:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 23:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-07 01:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-27 05:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:06:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:07:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1006769 ] Spams are not moved as requiered!!! Message-ID: Bugs item #1006769, was opened at 2004-08-11 06:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1006769&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cariboune (cariboune) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spams are not moved as requiered!!! Initial Comment: I have configured spambayes to move my emails considered as spam in a directory. In fact, the mail is just copied and not moved : I have the original in my mailbox and a copy in my spambox, both appear as non- read. I have checked my configuration and it's well define : move to folder xxx. All seems to be all right. Moreover, the option "mark spam as read" is checked but the spams stay non-read. What could I do? My configuration : winXp home, Office XP Sp2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What sort of store are these on? (pst file, Exchange, IMAP, hotmail?) Could you attach a copy of your most recent log file? You could try disabling the "save_spam_info" option, and seeing if that makes a difference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1006769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:07:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:07:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019734 ] Send / receive - 100% CPU after 1.0rc2 (June 2004) upgrade Message-ID: Bugs item #1019734, was opened at 2004-09-01 02:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Send / receive - 100% CPU after 1.0rc2 (June 2004) upgrade Initial Comment: Exchange Server environment. I am experiencing 100% CPU utilization while sending and recieving. I also see an Add-in under Ad-in Manager called "Redemption Helper Outlook Extension" which I see has a history of the same issue for other spam filters. Disabling all add-ins resolves the 100% cpu usage. This is repeatable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you just disable the "redemption helper", does that solve the problem? It sounds like a problem with that one, not SpamBayes, from your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:08:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:08:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1006769 ] Spams are copied, not moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1006769, was opened at 2004-08-11 06:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1006769&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cariboune (cariboune) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Spams are copied, not moved Initial Comment: I have configured spambayes to move my emails considered as spam in a directory. In fact, the mail is just copied and not moved : I have the original in my mailbox and a copy in my spambox, both appear as non- read. I have checked my configuration and it's well define : move to folder xxx. All seems to be all right. Moreover, the option "mark spam as read" is checked but the spams stay non-read. What could I do? My configuration : winXp home, Office XP Sp2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What sort of store are these on? (pst file, Exchange, IMAP, hotmail?) Could you attach a copy of your most recent log file? You could try disabling the "save_spam_info" option, and seeing if that makes a difference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1006769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:09:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:09:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Feature Requests item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-08 04:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=931150&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-05 05:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Sorry ignore that. Browser mess up... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-05 05:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 21:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry, but this is too hard to fix before 1.0 - it will mean pulling apart all text attachments, and including them in the body. We can do this post 1.0 though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond@users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 19:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 12:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:10:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:11:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day Where there are the errors, but apparently no symptoms! Odd.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-27 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other problems seem qutie different. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that Richard has done this: the new tracker is: [ 988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 If you could take a look at it Mark, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-10 00:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 I accept your expert view that they are the same. I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I have a couple of new "spam" mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:12:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:12:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966487 ] uncaptured python exception ... object has no attribute 'isC Message-ID: Bugs item #966487, was opened at 2004-06-05 00:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966487&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: uncaptured python exception ... object has no attribute 'isC Initial Comment: hello, CVS of spambayes as well as 1.0rc1 crashes on our mailserver after running for 1 hour up to 1 day. the bug was reported for the 1st time (i think) in January (see http://mail.python. org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/2004-January/001857.html). the version 1.0a7 worked just fine for me (as opposed to Gisli's message). we're running python 2.3 on the mailserver. a snippet of the original message follows: Gisli Ottarsson gisli.ottarsson at mscsoftware.com: I have fetchmail sucking e-mail through a spambayes pop3 proxy. I am using spambayes-1.0a7 and have tried both python 2.2 and 2.3. The computer is running Debian unstable. This is working very well, except about once every 24 hours spambayes quits with this message: error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.BayesProxyListener listening :1110 at 0x83620d4> (exceptions.IOError:[Errno 5] Input/output error [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|100] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|391] [/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler. py|handle_accept|280] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|__init__|341] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|__init__|183] [/usr/bin/sb_server. py|__init__|142]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__. BayesProxy connected 127.0.0.1:42864 at 0x841acac> (exceptions.AttributeError:'_socket.socket' object has no attribute 'isClosed' [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|113] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_write_event|404] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|handle_write|146] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|initiate_send|208] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|refill_buffer|189] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|close|372] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|__getattr__|372]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this happens when the socket is unexpectedly closed (at least that is when I see this sort of traceback). I suspect that the cure here is handling such an event better. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:13:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:13:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800282 ] first mail not filtered after standby Message-ID: Bugs item #800282, was opened at 2003-09-04 19:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: first mail not filtered after standby Initial Comment: When waking up the pc (win2000 hibernate) spambayes/ outlook plugin doesn't filter the inbox. When manually starting the filtering process (SpamBayes Manager -> Filter Now -> Start filtering (Perform all filter actions, restrict to unread mail + mail never previously spam filtered) all spam mails except the first one in the inbox will be filtered and moved to the spam folder. The first one afterwards has a 0% spam score. When moving this mail via "Delete as spam", the same E-Mail gets a 100% spam score! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yikes this is old - sorry! Can anyone confirm that this still happens with 1.0 and background filtering enabled? If so, please set the status back to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Shardlow (jshardlo) Date: 2003-12-01 22:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=83019 I am using Outlook Plugin 0.81. I also see this behaviour when I start Outlook in the morning. I always have a list of SPAMs in the Inbox. The one at the *bottom* of the list always seems to be scored 0% and therefore stay in the Inbox. It correctly identifies every other message! If I leave it running overnight it get 100% of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Date: 2003-09-09 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858841 I checked the behaviour with version 008 of the outlook plugin. The bug, that the first mail isn't filtered, seems not to be present any more. But the plugin doesn't filter the inbox after waking up the PC, so I have to start filtering manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-09-09 00:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 yes - it still happens. if you delete the mail from the spam-folder, and then UNDO the action, the value is updated correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 00:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please see if this happens with the new 008 version? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:13:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:13:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806915 ] Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst fi Message-ID: Bugs item #806915, was opened at 2003-09-16 14:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst fi Initial Comment: i have outlook xp at home with just hotmail as an account. outlook makes you have a pst file regardless if you use it or not. I have the possible spam going to a folder in the hotmail tree. when i hit recover from spam, it transports to the Personal Folder's Inbox, not back to the Hotmail Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 69 spam and 26 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ********************************************** **** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SpamBayes Junk Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.376305ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Moving and spam training message 'Reservation ID 3830285' - Training on message 'Reservation ID 3830285' - trained as spam Current version is 0.81, latest is 0.81. Message 'Extended auto warranties-best coverage and great values' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Re: Losing weight impossible? pge' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Receipt for your Auction Money Request' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'You have received a credit card payment' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Check out hot pics of singles from your area' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 're: Hunter' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message '=(' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Maybe it's Your Resume' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'RED's 4th Annual Halloween Bash - 10.31.2003' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation (#031022-900739)' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation (#031022-900745)' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation (#031022-900748)' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Moving and spam training message 'Broadband low as $3. 05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' - Training on message 'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' - trained as spam Message 'Tonight!!! - Miguel Migs / LTJ Bukem / Proton Radio' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Your Daily Feedback Report' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Fw: Fall Allergies and Exercise Induced Asthma' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'We help change your tomorrow' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Dice JobAlert for Agent Primary' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'comments...' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a dupe of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=786212&group_id=61702&atid=498103, although that bug doesn't specifically mention Hotmail. If possible, could you attempt this operation again, then attach a log of that session to that bug - see the "troubleshooting guide" for details on how to locate the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:17:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:17:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-916271 ] Outlook 2003 = Permanent SpamBayes Toolbar Message-ID: Bugs item #916271, was opened at 2004-03-15 15:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=916271&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Cox (dcox) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 = Permanent SpamBayes Toolbar Initial Comment: I have customized my outlook 2003 toolbar by moving the spam/ham buttons from the SpamBayes toolbar to the main toolbar. I have then closed the SpamBayes toolbar. Whenever Outlook is restarted, the SpamBayes toolbar is back on again. Can I get the wooden stake option to keep it off? :) (BTW - Great job everyone - keep up the good work) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you check the logs, do you get the "recreating toolbar" message each time you startup? I suspect that this is a symptom of that problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=916271&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:18:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:18:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1007285 ] unable to train empty mail Message-ID: Bugs item #1007285, was opened at 2004-08-12 02:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1007285&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik (fjoll) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: unable to train empty mail Initial Comment: I've recently begun to recieve empty emails and spambayes is unable to train these :( they look like this: X-Apparently-To: xxxxx@xxxxx via 206.190.37.64; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:47:47 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [213.214.194.102] Return-Path: Received: from 213.214.194.102 (EHLO smtp2.home.se) (213.214.194.102) by mta442.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:47:47 -0700 Received: from lns-th2-5f-81-56-228-176.adsl.proxad.net not authenticated [81.56.228.176] by smtp2.home.se with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.22.1.8 $ on Novell NetWare; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:23:31 +0200 X-Message-Info: y[1 X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure Subject: unsure X-Spambayes-MailId: 1092232483 ------ Since i get a pretty hefty sum of these, it sure would be nice to be able to filter them. running pop3-proxy rc2 from source on a gnu-system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik (fjoll) Date: 2004-08-12 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=940770 "By "unable to train these" I assume you mean that no matter how many of them you train on, SpamBayes still classifies them as unsure." Exactly, sorry for not making it more clear. And thanks for the tip. i'll try it out and see how it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-08-12 02:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 By "unable to train these" I assume you mean that no matter how many of them you train on, SpamBayes still classifies them as unsure. This is a known issue with extremely short messages, particularly in this case where there is no body at all. The problem is that there are so few clues available for SpamBayes to use in classifying the message. There are a couple of options that IIRC are not enabled by default, but may provide additional clues to help classify these messages. One of them is available from the Advanced Configuration page, but the other must be manually added to the config file so I'll just show both of them that way. In your SpamBayes data directory along with your training databases, you should find a "bayescustomize.ini" file. I run Windows so I'm afraid I don't know what path is used on Linux, but I assume it's somewhere under your HOME directory. In this file, look for a section starting with "[Tokenizer]". If that heading is not present then add it. In that section, add the option settings show below: [Tokenizer] mine_received_headers:True record_header_absence:True The mine_received_headers option adds tokens derived from the Received: headers, and the record_header_absence option adds tokens to indicate when common headers such as From:, To:, or Subject: are missing. I can't guarantee that this will improve your results, but it might. I notice in particular that the message you included has no From: header, and recording the absence of that header could quickly become a strong spam clue since very few legitimate messages will be missing the From: header. Unfortunately, if this doesn't help then there probably isn't much else we can do. SpamBayes can only work with the data that is available in the message, and there just isn't much data here to work with. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1007285&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:20:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:20:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1003686 ] Deletes good email without going to either junk or suspect Message-ID: Bugs item #1003686, was opened at 2004-08-05 13:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1003686&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Hempe (cjhempe) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Deletes good email without going to either junk or suspect Initial Comment: Several emails have been discovered in the deleted items folder after downloading from server. They never make it to either the Junk or Junk Suspects folder. They might be considered ham, but there is no log entry for them to be found. To recover them, I must scan the Deleted items folder, drag them into the Junk Suspects folder, then use the Recover From Spam facility. On the next one I will attach the log, hopefully it will even mention the message classification. I was under the impression that no email messages would be immediately sent to the Deleted Items folder? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't send anything to the Deleted Items folder. This is confirmed by the fact that there is no record of them in the log. It sounds like an Outlook rule is doing this - that would be the place to check. (You could verify this by uninstalling SpamBayes, waiting for such a message, seeing that it is still moved, and then reinstalling. This won't effect your configuration/training data). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hempe (cjhempe) Date: 2004-08-08 07:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=571381 Three files in this attached log were sent straight to the Deleted Items folder. They don't appear to have been even looked at by SpamBayes (no log record). The three entries in the log for the files were from me dragging them to the suspect folder and using the recover from spam facility. The one InDesign and XML is from XML.com. Anything from XML.com seems to go straight to the Deleted Items folder. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1003686&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:23:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:23:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-850886 ] Palm Pilot Sync kills spambayes Message-ID: Bugs item #850886, was opened at 2003-11-29 09:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850886&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Baum (jbaum) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Palm Pilot Sync kills spambayes Initial Comment: I just figured out why my toolbar was disappearing. I have a sprint I500 phone (with a palm PDA). I installed the sync software which includes the chapura conduits. If I attempt to run a sync WITHOUT first starting outlook, the sync hangs or acts funky. I reinstalled spambayes and everything is fine again. Sync's with outlook running also work without trashing spambayes. I checked the COM list in tools->options after the install and noticed no entry there. From your troubleshooting guide, it said there should be an entry. I'm running w2k sp4 with Outlook 2002. (Version 10.0, build 2627) BTW, your program rocks :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This appears to be a report of a solution (non-SpamBayes related), not a problem. If I'm wrong, please reopen. (The missing entry in the COM add-ins list is long resolved). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850886&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:23:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:23:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-913583 ] problems when syncing pocketpc Message-ID: Bugs item #913583, was opened at 2004-03-11 05:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Kludy (tomkludy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: problems when syncing pocketpc Initial Comment: When a new email arrives, it is immediately synced (through activesync) to my pocketpc. If it is spam, spambayes then moves it to the "spam" folder. However activesync doesn't recognize that the email has moved, and doesn't remove it from my pocketpc. The result is that I get no spam on my PC but every spam shows up in the inbox on my pocketpc, and forcing a resync in activesync does not fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this solved by the background filtering function with newer releases? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:26:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:26:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-07 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is in progress, and will be done (with at least one translation - others just require the translation work) for 1.1, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-14 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Work is beginning right now for this. See the recent discussion on spambayes-dev for more information. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 So whats the situation now? I wanted to use SpamBayes as 2nd level antispam protection in my company, but people here dont speak english :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-02 00:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Ok, then. I'm on. Let's go for it. I've already subscribe to spambayes-dev list so expect an introductory message from myself any time soon. The only thing I don't like too much is the word "champion". That implies too much credit to me beforehand when I haven't seen a single line of Spambayes' code. ;-) See you in the dev list. -Hernan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, there are no time requirements other than the ones you impose on yourself. You won't need any stats knowledge for this sort of work. I'm happy to subchampion this (helping out wherever necessary), but I can't really help in any actual translating (apart from Maori, or maybe a little bit of German) and I haven't done any work like this before, which would help. I am very familiar with SpamBayes itself, though. Probably the best move would be for someone to post a list of "things to do" to spambayes-dev and ask for volunteers/help. Creating that "things to do" list would be the first step :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-17 03:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 21:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-09 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-13 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:26:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:26:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1031959 ] Silent mode for installation Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1031959, was opened at 2004-09-22 03:09 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Soulin (soulin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Silent mode for installation Initial Comment: I think ability to create unattended/silent installation could be really great. Define what you want install (Outlook plugin only), where you want to install it, what will be the names of Spam and Suspected spam mail directories etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-14 20:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You're most welcome to do so, of course! If you're willing to, then submitting any created script back to the project as a patch would be gratefully received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 Hi anadelonbrin! The main point is to make SpamBayes useful for organizations. With need of manual install it is almost useless for mass deployment :( I will try to create .msi file if U dont mind ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could do some of this yourself. If you install it once, you'll have the necessary files, which you can copy to the appropriate place with a script. To register the addin, you can get the script to run the outlook_addin_register.exe file, which will do the registration. That should be all you need to do the install. Configuring SpamBayes is a bit trickier. You can easily manually create the configuration file (the *.ini file in the data directory), and it's easy to enter in any of the options except for folders. Folders are difficult because they are not specified by name, but by Outlook's store & entry ids (open up a *.ini file and take a look). Given that you'd have to specify these anyway, I'm not sure what the benefit of doing this outside of the Wizard would be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 05:46:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 05:47:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059262 ] Spambayes Stopped Filtering Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059262, was opened at 2004-11-02 20:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059262&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: mctabish (mctabish1) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes Stopped Filtering Initial Comment: Recently, my SPAMBAYES stopped filtering. I have it installed in Outlook. When I check updates, it reports that the latest is July 04 (which I have.) Below is my INI file [Filter] enabled:True spam_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D39 2D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3AF 46A1F3A50ADC2800000') unsure_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E6420 53657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C446 5736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '00000000 03A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F13566A2C00000') watch_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E642 053657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C44 65736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '0000000 003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F1356682800000')] timer_interval:0.5 timer_start_delay:0.5 [Training] ham_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000473A5C352D32342D30345C4F75746C6F6 F6B2E70737400', '0000000003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB0 25F1356682800000')] spam_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D3 92D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3A F46A1F3A50ADC2800000'), ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D39 2D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3AF 46A1F3A50ADE2800000')] ham_include_sub:True spam_include_sub:True rebuild:False [Filter_Now] folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E642 053657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C44 65736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '0000000 003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F1356682800000')] action_all:True include_sub:False [Filter_Now] action_all:True include_sub:False Any idea as to get spambayes to start working again? Thanks Mc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 10:31:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 10:31:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 16:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by soulin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-11-03 09:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 2anadelonbrin: Ok, what exactly have I do if I want to make translation? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 04:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is in progress, and will be done (with at least one translation - others just require the translation work) for 1.1, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-14 07:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Work is beginning right now for this. See the recent discussion on spambayes-dev for more information. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 07:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 So whats the situation now? I wanted to use SpamBayes as 2nd level antispam protection in my company, but people here dont speak english :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-01 12:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Ok, then. I'm on. Let's go for it. I've already subscribe to spambayes-dev list so expect an introductory message from myself any time soon. The only thing I don't like too much is the word "champion". That implies too much credit to me beforehand when I haven't seen a single line of Spambayes' code. ;-) See you in the dev list. -Hernan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 23:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, there are no time requirements other than the ones you impose on yourself. You won't need any stats knowledge for this sort of work. I'm happy to subchampion this (helping out wherever necessary), but I can't really help in any actual translating (apart from Maori, or maybe a little bit of German) and I haven't done any work like this before, which would help. I am very familiar with SpamBayes itself, though. Probably the best move would be for someone to post a list of "things to do" to spambayes-dev and ask for volunteers/help. Creating that "things to do" list would be the first step :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-16 15:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 03:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 03:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-08 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 07:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 10:45:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 10:46:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962911 ] Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Message-ID: Bugs item #962911, was opened at 2004-05-29 23:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stgoebel You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Goebel (stgoebel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Initial Comment: After starting Outlook the first click on any SpamBayes toolbar icon (either Delete As Spam or Recover From Spam) decreases the font size of the mail folders in the navigation pane, other fonts sizes are not affected. The font size will be normal after restarting Outlook. I'm using Outlook 2003 on Win XP Pro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Stefan Goebel (stgoebel) Date: 2004-11-03 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=130248 I'm using Thunderbird right now, but IIRC it happened all the time as long as I was using SpamBayes (1.0RC1, never used any later version) with Outlook. As mentioned above only the first click resulted in a smaller font size, after that the font size didn't change. Sorry that I can't help you anymore, but as no one else has reported a bug like this I guess it was dependent on some settings of my OS (maybe the theme had something to do with that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 04:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in response to this. Does this really happen consistently? It's one of the weirdest reports I've seen - I can't imagine how this could happen. Does it happen with 1.0? Are there problems with any other toolbar buttons? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 11:25:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 11:26:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 18:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-11-03 11:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 We didn't arrive yet to a point where the infrastructure for translating SB is done but we are getting close. Email me in private hfoffani@gmail.com (my public email address) and I'll give the details. You may subscribe to spambayes developers mailing list too. -Hern?n. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-11-03 10:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 2anadelonbrin: Ok, what exactly have I do if I want to make translation? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 05:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is in progress, and will be done (with at least one translation - others just require the translation work) for 1.1, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-14 09:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Work is beginning right now for this. See the recent discussion on spambayes-dev for more information. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 09:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 So whats the situation now? I wanted to use SpamBayes as 2nd level antispam protection in my company, but people here dont speak english :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-01 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Ok, then. I'm on. Let's go for it. I've already subscribe to spambayes-dev list so expect an introductory message from myself any time soon. The only thing I don't like too much is the word "champion". That implies too much credit to me beforehand when I haven't seen a single line of Spambayes' code. ;-) See you in the dev list. -Hernan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 01:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, there are no time requirements other than the ones you impose on yourself. You won't need any stats knowledge for this sort of work. I'm happy to subchampion this (helping out wherever necessary), but I can't really help in any actual translating (apart from Maori, or maybe a little bit of German) and I haven't done any work like this before, which would help. I am very familiar with SpamBayes itself, though. Probably the best move would be for someone to post a list of "things to do" to spambayes-dev and ask for volunteers/help. Creating that "things to do" list would be the first step :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-16 17:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 11:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-08 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 16:02:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 16:02:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-913583 ] problems when syncing pocketpc Message-ID: Bugs item #913583, was opened at 2004-03-10 16:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tomkludy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Kludy (tomkludy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: problems when syncing pocketpc Initial Comment: When a new email arrives, it is immediately synced (through activesync) to my pocketpc. If it is spam, spambayes then moves it to the "spam" folder. However activesync doesn't recognize that the email has moved, and doesn't remove it from my pocketpc. The result is that I get no spam on my PC but every spam shows up in the inbox on my pocketpc, and forcing a resync in activesync does not fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tom Kludy (tomkludy) Date: 2004-11-03 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=306121 No, it doesn't seem to make a difference ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 04:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this solved by the background filtering function with newer releases? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 19:03:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 19:03:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019797 ] some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py (backtrace) Message-ID: Bugs item #1019797, was opened at 2004-08-31 09:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nkurz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py (backtrace) Initial Comment: I'm running Python 2.3.1 on Linux, processing my mail with procmail. Recently I've been getting spam that crashes sb_filter.py. Failure can be repeated from the command line. Seems to affect only mail that SpamAssassin has tagged as spam. Repeatable for any message that fails. I had this problem starting 2 weeks ago with Source 1.0rc1, upgraded to Source 1.0rc2 and problem persists. Affects ~10% of messages. (note: no option for Source 1.0rc2 in reporting form) Backtrace looks looks like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 253, in main result = mboxutils.as_string(msg, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 170, in as_string parts.append(part.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 298, in _handle_message g.flatten(msg.get_payload(0), unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 200, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: Test message attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-03 11:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 Sorry for the lack of response. After your last comment, I tried a number of things and intended to report back after testing it for a while. Problem seems to be with multipart messages that have been passed through SpamAssassin and tagged as spam. Somehow, the quoting of the multipart messes up SpamBayes. Yes, I'm using 1.0rc2. No, I can't switch currently to Python 2.4. The attached patch seems to work for me, at least I haven't had any apparent problems since applying it a couple months ago. Probably kludgy, though, and I am not a Python programmer. Thanks for your follow up. Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-02 20:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-15 21:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I thought that sb_filter handled these ok with 1.0rc2 - is that definately the version you are using? If you are able/willing to use Python 2.4, you will stop having these problems, BTW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 19:45:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 19:45:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059690 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059690, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark (mingram123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Initial Comment: I'm wondering if anyone has seen this problem and has a fix? I'm using the latest version of Spambayes and outlook2000. I've also heard that the problems exists when using program with OL 2003 as well. If I receive an email with a virus attached and I tell SpamBayes that I want to delete as spam OR if it automatically files it in my Junk Emails folder, Norton Antivirus comes up saying that it has detected a virus. I have reading (preview) panes turned off for all folders. The only way this can happen is if SpamBayes opens the email in the background to search for spam patterns. Is this the case? How do I keep it from opening the virus infected email? tx in advance! Mark marki@athena.dev.unc.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 19:56:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 19:56:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059705 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059705, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059705&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark (mingram123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Initial Comment: I'm wondering if anyone has seen this problem and has a fix? I'm using the latest version of Spambayes and outlook2000. I've also heard that the problems exists when using program with OL 2003 as well. If I receive an email with a virus attached and I tell SpamBayes that I want to delete as spam OR if it automatically files it in my Junk Emails folder, Norton Antivirus comes up saying that it has detected a virus. I have reading (preview) panes turned off for all folders. The only way this can happen is if SpamBayes opens the email in the background to search for spam patterns. Is this the case? How do I keep it from opening the virus infected email? tx in advance! Mark marki@athena.dev.unc.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059705&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 23:07:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 23:07:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059705 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059705, was opened at 2004-11-04 07:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059705&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark (mingram123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Initial Comment: I'm wondering if anyone has seen this problem and has a fix? I'm using the latest version of Spambayes and outlook2000. I've also heard that the problems exists when using program with OL 2003 as well. If I receive an email with a virus attached and I tell SpamBayes that I want to delete as spam OR if it automatically files it in my Junk Emails folder, Norton Antivirus comes up saying that it has detected a virus. I have reading (preview) panes turned off for all folders. The only way this can happen is if SpamBayes opens the email in the background to search for spam patterns. Is this the case? How do I keep it from opening the virus infected email? tx in advance! Mark marki@athena.dev.unc.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 1059690 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059705&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 3 23:08:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 3 23:08:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962911 ] Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Message-ID: Bugs item #962911, was opened at 2004-05-30 09:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Goebel (stgoebel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Mail Folders Font Size Initial Comment: After starting Outlook the first click on any SpamBayes toolbar icon (either Delete As Spam or Recover From Spam) decreases the font size of the mail folders in the navigation pane, other fonts sizes are not affected. The font size will be normal after restarting Outlook. I'm using Outlook 2003 on Win XP Pro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Assuming invalid as per the OP's comment, in that case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stefan Goebel (stgoebel) Date: 2004-11-03 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=130248 I'm using Thunderbird right now, but IIRC it happened all the time as long as I was using SpamBayes (1.0RC1, never used any later version) with Outlook. As mentioned above only the first click resulted in a smaller font size, after that the font size didn't change. Sorry that I can't help you anymore, but as no one else has reported a bug like this I guess it was dependent on some settings of my OS (maybe the theme had something to do with that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in response to this. Does this really happen consistently? It's one of the weirdest reports I've seen - I can't imagine how this could happen. Does it happen with 1.0? Are there problems with any other toolbar buttons? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962911&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 03:45:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 03:46:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1038052 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Message-ID: Bugs item #1038052, was opened at 2004-10-01 09:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lynnt (lynnt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Initial Comment: Hello. I'm having 2 different issues. It appears I'm having the same issues as incident: "[ 939050 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start". On another computer, I installed SpamBayes. I do not get any errors, but it seems that SpamBayes is not running. (Clicking on the SpamBayes button loaded on Outlook does nothing.) It worked fine previously, but I recently changed my mail server from Exchange to CommuniGate Pro. Now I can't get SpamBayes to run on Outlook 2003 or Outlook 2000. I've uninstalled, reinstalled, rebooted inbetween & after. Following are logs. ---------------------------------------------- For the problem crashing, this is the contents log file: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc2 (June 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ------------------------------------------------- For the problem of SpamBayes just not functioning, this is the log file: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ----------------------------------------------- I appreciate any feedback. -lynn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 15:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 With the one where Outlook crashes, if you uninstall SpamBayes and then click on the down arrow next to the help icon on the standard toolbar, does Outlook also crash? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 03:46:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 03:46:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939050 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start Message-ID: Bugs item #939050, was opened at 2004-04-21 16:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939050&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Berto (rwainberg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 crashes upon start Initial Comment: After loading SpamBayes, Outlook 2003 crashes. "Outlook has recovered from a serious error...". Log file: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 15:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you uninstall SpamBayes and then open Outlook and click on the down arrow next to the help icon on the standard toolbar, does Outlook crash? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939050&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 04:15:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 04:16:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1059170, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ethan J. Brown (iristyle) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Initial Comment: When installing spambayes-1.0.exe on Windows XP SP2 (clean install) and Outlook 2k3, the installer spawns outlook_addin_register.exe, but that process crashes. All files are copied appropriately to the destination location in c:\program files, and the installer itself completes, but the outlook toolbar registration does not complete. The problem is a crash within msvcrt.dll: " Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. " As you can see, the version of msvcrt.dll that ships with XP SP2 from above is 7.0.2600.2180. To workaround this problem, an older version of msvcrt.dll can be dumped into c:\program files\spambayes\bin, so that the LoadLibrary calls load a compatible version (I don't have my dev tools / dumpbin installed at the moment to take a look at your exports). In my case, I took the only other available version that I had, version 7.0.0.0, from my Windows side-by-side directory: C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.CPlusPlu sRuntime_6595b64144ccf1df_7.0.0.0_x-ww_2726e76a When the compatible msvcrt.dll and msvcirt.dll are copied to the SpamBayes\bin directory, the registration application runs succesfully. You might want to consider shipping the dlls you've compiled against with your installer in the future to avoid this problem (it's only about a 365k commitment to do so). If you need any more details, don't hesitate to ask -- but I assume you guys should have enough here. Thanks -e ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two of the developers tested this after this report, and it works fine for both of us. >From spambayes-dev: """ 7.0.2600.2180 is the correct version number for the XP SP2 version of msvcrt.dll, so we know it wasn't overwritten by some rogue installer that didn't follow the Microsoft rules. I can't speak to specific changes made for SP2, but this is now a system DLL and Microsoft has guaranteed that the interface will never change. Given the extensiveness of their compatibility testing and the number of users outside of Microsoft that beta tested SP2 before it was released, I suspect they would have discovered it by now if there was a compatibility problem. """ I have to agree - the chances of something in msvcrt.dll changing that we use is minute, especially since it seems to work fine for other SP2 users. Is this definitely reproducable? i.e. did you try several times (including after restarting) with the original msvcrt.dll? If it just happened once, then the 'fix' of replacing the dll was probably not necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 04:29:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 04:29:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019797 ] some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1019797, was opened at 2004-09-01 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Initial Comment: I'm running Python 2.3.1 on Linux, processing my mail with procmail. Recently I've been getting spam that crashes sb_filter.py. Failure can be repeated from the command line. Seems to affect only mail that SpamAssassin has tagged as spam. Repeatable for any message that fails. I had this problem starting 2 weeks ago with Source 1.0rc1, upgraded to Source 1.0rc2 and problem persists. Affects ~10% of messages. (note: no option for Source 1.0rc2 in reporting form) Backtrace looks looks like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 253, in main result = mboxutils.as_string(msg, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 170, in as_string parts.append(part.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 298, in _handle_message g.flatten(msg.get_payload(0), unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 200, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: Test message attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I see that I wasn't correct when I guessed what type of malformation it was - the code handles one that generates a TypeError, but in a different part of the message). The general rule at the moment seems to be that we won't patch for any specific malformations (because we'd just be duplicating the email package folk's work, and eventually people will be able to use email 3.0/Python 2.4), except in cases where there is a flood of a particular type. Since you have a patch that works for you, I'm inclined to leave this unless there are more people bumping into the problem. (Once we start patching for malformed messages, there's really nowhere to stop). If you feel this is a mistake, say so and I (or another developer) can probably be convinced otherwise :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-04 07:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 Sorry for the lack of response. After your last comment, I tried a number of things and intended to report back after testing it for a while. Problem seems to be with multipart messages that have been passed through SpamAssassin and tagged as spam. Somehow, the quoting of the multipart messes up SpamBayes. Yes, I'm using 1.0rc2. No, I can't switch currently to Python 2.4. The attached patch seems to work for me, at least I haven't had any apparent problems since applying it a couple months ago. Probably kludgy, though, and I am not a Python programmer. Thanks for your follow up. Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I thought that sb_filter handled these ok with 1.0rc2 - is that definately the version you are using? If you are able/willing to use Python 2.4, you will stop having these problems, BTW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 04:31:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 04:32:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059262 ] Spambayes Stopped Filtering Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059262, was opened at 2004-11-03 17:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059262&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: mctabish (mctabish1) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes Stopped Filtering Initial Comment: Recently, my SPAMBAYES stopped filtering. I have it installed in Outlook. When I check updates, it reports that the latest is July 04 (which I have.) Below is my INI file [Filter] enabled:True spam_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D39 2D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3AF 46A1F3A50ADC2800000') unsure_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E6420 53657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C446 5736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '00000000 03A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F13566A2C00000') watch_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E642 053657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C44 65736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '0000000 003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F1356682800000')] timer_interval:0.5 timer_start_delay:0.5 [Training] ham_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000473A5C352D32342D30345C4F75746C6F6 F6B2E70737400', '0000000003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB0 25F1356682800000')] spam_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D3 92D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3A F46A1F3A50ADC2800000'), ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D39 2D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3AF 46A1F3A50ADE2800000')] ham_include_sub:True spam_include_sub:True rebuild:False [Filter_Now] folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E642 053657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C44 65736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '0000000 003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F1356682800000')] action_all:True include_sub:False [Filter_Now] action_all:True include_sub:False Any idea as to get spambayes to start working again? Thanks Mc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 By "stopped filtering", do you mean that nothing SpamBayes works anymore? i.e. if you click the "Delete as Spam" button, does that work? Does the SpamBayes drop-down menu and the SpamBayes Manager? Has Outlook disabled the plug-in? Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find your log files. If you could attach those to this tracker, that would help us track down the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 04:34:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 04:34:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059690 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059690, was opened at 2004-11-04 07:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark (mingram123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Initial Comment: I'm wondering if anyone has seen this problem and has a fix? I'm using the latest version of Spambayes and outlook2000. I've also heard that the problems exists when using program with OL 2003 as well. If I receive an email with a virus attached and I tell SpamBayes that I want to delete as spam OR if it automatically files it in my Junk Emails folder, Norton Antivirus comes up saying that it has detected a virus. I have reading (preview) panes turned off for all folders. The only way this can happen is if SpamBayes opens the email in the background to search for spam patterns. Is this the case? How do I keep it from opening the virus infected email? tx in advance! Mark marki@athena.dev.unc.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this perhaps mail arriving on an Exchange/IMAP/Hotmail store and being moved to a "Junk Emails" folder on a local (pst) store? That would explain this, as Norton is unaware of the files on the remote machine, but becomes aware of it once it arrives on the local one. FWIW, SpamBayes doesn't "open" the mail in any way. There's no way that SpamBayes would trigger an email virus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 04:44:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 04:44:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-913583 ] problems when syncing pocketpc Message-ID: Bugs item #913583, was opened at 2004-03-11 05:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Kludy (tomkludy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: problems when syncing pocketpc Initial Comment: When a new email arrives, it is immediately synced (through activesync) to my pocketpc. If it is spam, spambayes then moves it to the "spam" folder. However activesync doesn't recognize that the email has moved, and doesn't remove it from my pocketpc. The result is that I get no spam on my PC but every spam shows up in the inbox on my pocketpc, and forcing a resync in activesync does not fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem here (I think) is that ActiveSync gets hold of the mail before SpamBayes does. Can you set ActiveSync to only sync certain folders? In that case this would be fixed if you could specify moving good mail to another folder (this is an existing feature request, and probably one that will make it into 1.1). If you move messages manually and do a resync, do they move on the pocketpc? If so, then maybe there's something additional we can do when moving messages to fix this. I don't know what, though, so this wouldn't be a quick fix... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Kludy (tomkludy) Date: 2004-11-04 04:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=306121 No, it doesn't seem to make a difference ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this solved by the background filtering function with newer releases? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 04:45:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 04:46:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-913891 ] Outlook crashes on any use of Spambayes buttons Message-ID: Bugs item #913891, was opened at 2004-03-11 17:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913891&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nik R (nikroz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes on any use of Spambayes buttons Initial Comment: If I use any of the SpamBayes add-in buttons such as the "Delete as spam" Outlook shuts down and asks to submit an error report to MS. Interestingly enough when Outlook restarts, the function requested is carried out. e.g if a delete button is pressed, the delete is carried out similarly with the restore. I am using Win XP Home edition version 2002 with Service Pack 1, on a Dell Dimension 4550. Otherwise, I have been using Spambayes for about three weeks and it has been exceptional in its performance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Yikes - apologies for the delay). If this still isn't resolved, did you try the various steps regarding the toolbar in the troubleshooting guide? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nik R (nikroz) Date: 2004-03-11 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995134 Thank you for your suggestion, I did try Outlook's "Detect & repair" but to no avail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-11 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried using Outlook's "Detect and Repair" function? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913891&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 05:54:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 05:54:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019797 ] some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1019797, was opened at 2004-08-31 09:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nkurz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Initial Comment: I'm running Python 2.3.1 on Linux, processing my mail with procmail. Recently I've been getting spam that crashes sb_filter.py. Failure can be repeated from the command line. Seems to affect only mail that SpamAssassin has tagged as spam. Repeatable for any message that fails. I had this problem starting 2 weeks ago with Source 1.0rc1, upgraded to Source 1.0rc2 and problem persists. Affects ~10% of messages. (note: no option for Source 1.0rc2 in reporting form) Backtrace looks looks like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 253, in main result = mboxutils.as_string(msg, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 170, in as_string parts.append(part.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 298, in _handle_message g.flatten(msg.get_payload(0), unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 200, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: Test message attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-03 21:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 I'm fine with keeping it as a local patch if indeed the message is malformed, but I'm not sure if it is. Can you take a look at the spam.test I attached originally and confirm that it is not to spec? To my untrained eye it looks legal. If it's broken due to SpamAssassin, I'll report it as a bug there if the breakage exists in their latest version. Thanks! Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 20:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I see that I wasn't correct when I guessed what type of malformation it was - the code handles one that generates a TypeError, but in a different part of the message). The general rule at the moment seems to be that we won't patch for any specific malformations (because we'd just be duplicating the email package folk's work, and eventually people will be able to use email 3.0/Python 2.4), except in cases where there is a flood of a particular type. Since you have a patch that works for you, I'm inclined to leave this unless there are more people bumping into the problem. (Once we start patching for malformed messages, there's really nowhere to stop). If you feel this is a mistake, say so and I (or another developer) can probably be convinced otherwise :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-03 11:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 Sorry for the lack of response. After your last comment, I tried a number of things and intended to report back after testing it for a while. Problem seems to be with multipart messages that have been passed through SpamAssassin and tagged as spam. Somehow, the quoting of the multipart messes up SpamBayes. Yes, I'm using 1.0rc2. No, I can't switch currently to Python 2.4. The attached patch seems to work for me, at least I haven't had any apparent problems since applying it a couple months ago. Probably kludgy, though, and I am not a Python programmer. Thanks for your follow up. Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-02 20:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-15 21:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I thought that sb_filter handled these ok with 1.0rc2 - is that definately the version you are using? If you are able/willing to use Python 2.4, you will stop having these problems, BTW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 11:54:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 11:54:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Feature Requests item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-07 16:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by yazmon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-11-04 10:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Eesults of Show Spam Clues as requested. ---- 8< ---- Combined Score: 13% (0.13489) Internal ham score (*H*): 0.874286 Internal spam score (*S*): 0.144065 # ham trained on: 18958 # spam trained on: 37851 41 Significant Tokens token spamprob #ham #spam 'cc:no real name:2**0' 0.0293311 5626 339 'cc:2**0' 0.0381075 5530 437 'header:Organization:1' 0.055403 2403 281 'using' 0.0940433 4296 890 "doesn't" 0.109159 1943 475 'character' 0.113282 464 118 'text' 0.117279 989 262 'subject:changed' 0.143036 7 2 'then' 0.156914 4024 1495 'uses' 0.169402 681 277 'set' 0.187562 2322 1070 'supported' 0.194154 275 132 'that' 0.203366 12571 6407 'can' 0.211424 9909 5304 'attached' 0.21534 475 260 'not' 0.244613 10504 6791 'correctly,' 0.279318 114 88 'disk,' 0.286598 100 80 'subject:address' 0.302551 6 5 'this' 0.306877 10789 9537 'message.' 0.309489 236 211 'attachment' 0.309771 104 93 'open' 0.313923 958 875 'display' 0.315122 219 201 'set.' 0.322163 114 108 'service.' 0.602322 119 360 'content,' 0.602752 63 191 'internet' 0.643487 427 1539 'save' 0.648866 355 1310 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.667894 7445 29894 'cc:addr:[snip]' 0.70368 13 62 'cc:addr:mpuk.com' 0.74098 286 1634 'message' 0.765092 3718 24178 'sender:none' 0.809634 4393 37304 'header:Reply-To:1' 0.8163 1664 14764 'header:Received:3' 0.856519 445 5305 'to:addr:[snip]' 0.876623 1298 18415 'original' 0.906061 1096 21108 'to:addr:mpuk.com' 0.906496 1864 36082 'reply-to:addr:yahoo.com' 0.962049 17 866 'message-id:@yahoo.com' 0.98256 5 575 Message Stream Received: from mailrelay.mapleusa.com ([172.25.10.40]) by chapar.mpuk.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 4WA0NCGN; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:30:05 -0000 Received: from 206.81.95.104 (unknown [206.81.95.104]) by mailrelay.mapleusa.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1571243143; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 05:33:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from %RECEIVED.yahoo.com (%RECEIVED.yahoo.com [170.218.147.92]) by %REC_WITH; Thu, 04 Nov 2004 02:30:03 -0800 Message-ID: <%MESSAGEID@yahoo.com> From: "Ward Corbin" Reply-To: "Ward Corbin" To: [snip] Cc: [snip] Subject: my email address has changed Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 02:30:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="45828411876807924" This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set. All Message Tokens 62 unique tokens 'and' 'attached' 'attachment' 'can' 'cc:2**0' 'cc:addr:[snip]' 'cc:addr:mpuk.com' 'cc:no real name:2**0' 'character' 'content,' 'content-type:text/plain' 'correctly,' 'disk,' 'display' "doesn't" 'from:addr:pickyourrate' 'from:addr:yahoo.com' 'from:name:ward corbin' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-ID:1' 'header:Organization:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Reply-To:1' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'internet' 'message' 'message-id:@yahoo.com' 'message.' 'not' 'open' 'original' 'reply-to:addr:pickyourrate' 'reply-to:addr:yahoo.com' 'reply-to:name:ward corbin' 'save' 'sender:none' 'service.' 'set' 'set.' 'subject: ' 'subject:address' 'subject:changed' 'subject:email' 'subject:has' 'supported' 'text' 'that' 'the' 'then' 'this' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:[snip]' 'to:addr:mpuk.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'uses' 'using' 'view' 'viewer' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Sorry ignore that. Browser mess up... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry, but this is too hard to fix before 1.0 - it will mean pulling apart all text attachments, and including them in the body. We can do this post 1.0 though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 08:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Email sent! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 08:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please forward that spam to mhammond@users.sourceforge.net? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Date: 2004-05-04 07:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985659 Spam clues attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 00:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please do a "Show Spam Clues" on one of these messages, and attach the clues here? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 14:23:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 14:23:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059690 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059690, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mingram123 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark (mingram123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Initial Comment: I'm wondering if anyone has seen this problem and has a fix? I'm using the latest version of Spambayes and outlook2000. I've also heard that the problems exists when using program with OL 2003 as well. If I receive an email with a virus attached and I tell SpamBayes that I want to delete as spam OR if it automatically files it in my Junk Emails folder, Norton Antivirus comes up saying that it has detected a virus. I have reading (preview) panes turned off for all folders. The only way this can happen is if SpamBayes opens the email in the background to search for spam patterns. Is this the case? How do I keep it from opening the virus infected email? tx in advance! Mark marki@athena.dev.unc.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark (mingram123) Date: 2004-11-04 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1151941 We have outlook pointing to the Exchange 5.5 server and the junk email folder for the user is also kept in their exchange mailbox. It isn't sorting to a personal folder that is on the local drive. It mostly happens in the morning after a nights worth of emails have come in and then outlook is cranked up and Spambayes starts filtering the mail so it appears to be happening during the filtering process. There isn't anything in the spambayes logfile that indicates a problem. And this is happening on all the machines we have installed it on. I have even made sure that spambays is Not marking the message as read as it moves them to the Junk folder. Seems like the only way that Norton would be triggered (since the mail isn't being moved to a local .pst file) is if the mail is being opened (as far as norton is concerned). wierd... I've talked to another IT person from a different company and it is happening to them also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 22:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this perhaps mail arriving on an Exchange/IMAP/Hotmail store and being moved to a "Junk Emails" folder on a local (pst) store? That would explain this, as Norton is unaware of the files on the remote machine, but becomes aware of it once it arrives on the local one. FWIW, SpamBayes doesn't "open" the mail in any way. There's no way that SpamBayes would trigger an email virus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 14:30:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 14:30:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1060206 ] Taking too much processor time Message-ID: Bugs item #1060206, was opened at 2004-11-04 13:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: shiphen (shiphen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taking too much processor time Initial Comment: ms Outlook (Office 2002) / Win2000 Pro Hi How do I stop Spambayes from taking up too much processor time?! When I am downloading emails, my entire PC becomes so slow that it is more or less unusable! This is a disaster because I need to see my new emails regularly thoughout the day & I get huge amounts of spam! With thanks Ship Shiperton Henethe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 14:32:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 14:32:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1060206 ] Taking too much processor time Message-ID: Bugs item #1060206, was opened at 2004-11-04 13:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shiphen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: shiphen (shiphen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taking too much processor time Initial Comment: ms Outlook (Office 2002) / Win2000 Pro Hi How do I stop Spambayes from taking up too much processor time?! When I am downloading emails, my entire PC becomes so slow that it is more or less unusable! This is a disaster because I need to see my new emails regularly thoughout the day & I get huge amounts of spam! With thanks Ship Shiperton Henethe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2004-11-04 13:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 P.S. I am using the Add-in Binary Version 1.0 - (July 2004)... Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 18:36:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 18:36:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1038052 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Message-ID: Bugs item #1038052, was opened at 2004-09-30 14:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lynnht You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lynnt (lynnt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Initial Comment: Hello. I'm having 2 different issues. It appears I'm having the same issues as incident: "[ 939050 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start". On another computer, I installed SpamBayes. I do not get any errors, but it seems that SpamBayes is not running. (Clicking on the SpamBayes button loaded on Outlook does nothing.) It worked fine previously, but I recently changed my mail server from Exchange to CommuniGate Pro. Now I can't get SpamBayes to run on Outlook 2003 or Outlook 2000. I've uninstalled, reinstalled, rebooted inbetween & after. Following are logs. ---------------------------------------------- For the problem crashing, this is the contents log file: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc2 (June 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ------------------------------------------------- For the problem of SpamBayes just not functioning, this is the log file: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ----------------------------------------------- I appreciate any feedback. -lynn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lynn (lynnht) Date: 2004-11-04 09:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152630 I have uninstalled SpamBayes & Outlook does not crash (at any time or when clicking the down arrow). We are no longer using SpamBayes, so I don't need any additional follow up. thank you -lynn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 With the one where Outlook crashes, if you uninstall SpamBayes and then click on the down arrow next to the help icon on the standard toolbar, does Outlook also crash? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 19:17:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 19:17:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-22 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by joewagner501 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-04 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I have had this same exact issue after using the program for only two days. At first the buttons worked fine but the last two days they are not working. The program is still filtering email but I can't identify items in the junk suspects folder as being junk or not using the buttons. I have taken all the steps to remove the buttons and reinstal them but nothing has worked. I am using XP Pro SP2 and the latest version of SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jwhited (jimmywhited) Date: 2004-08-15 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1104558 I to am having this problem. This seems to be related to, but not an exact duplicate of bug ID 964537. Email filtering seems to be working fine; however, if I click or nothing happnes. I originally had 1.0rc1 so I upgraded to 1.0rc2 hoping this would fix the problem. It didn't. Next I tried deleting the toolbar, per troubleshooting instructions -- right-click on toolbars, Customize, highlight spam-bayes, delete, close outlook, reopen outlook so toolbars would be recreated. This didn't help. Next I tried renaming outcmd.dat so outlook would reset all the toolbars and also tried deleting the toolbar after that, which did not work. The last thing I tried was retraining the DB with the rebuild entire DB option checked. I saw the message writing database, but it never changed after several minutes. I hit the close button and closed the SpamBayes Manager, but the toolbars still did not work. I have the logs prior to retraining the DB and after if you want me to send them (I do not see a place where I can attach them in this followup addition). I can also send the DB file if need be. System Config (I can send a system.nfo file): Windows XP w/SP-1 applied Outlook 2002 SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-24 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 I too am down with SpamBayes because of this. I have completely uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and Outlook, and the "dead" toolbars still exist. I am getting no spam filtering either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-15 15:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 I have the same issue. Tried everything. Uploaded a log to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-03 17:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-01 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-30 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 22:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 22:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 22:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 17:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-26 13:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-24 11:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 21:01:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 21:01:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059690 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059690, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark (mingram123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Initial Comment: I'm wondering if anyone has seen this problem and has a fix? I'm using the latest version of Spambayes and outlook2000. I've also heard that the problems exists when using program with OL 2003 as well. If I receive an email with a virus attached and I tell SpamBayes that I want to delete as spam OR if it automatically files it in my Junk Emails folder, Norton Antivirus comes up saying that it has detected a virus. I have reading (preview) panes turned off for all folders. The only way this can happen is if SpamBayes opens the email in the background to search for spam patterns. Is this the case? How do I keep it from opening the virus infected email? tx in advance! Mark marki@athena.dev.unc.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-11-04 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 In order for SpamBayes to check the message, it has to read the message data from the Exchange Server. Norton AV is probably hooking itself into the communication channel between your PC and the server and checking the message as it is read. NAV has no way to know that SpamBayes is reading the raw data to analyze it, so it assumes that a user is trying to view the message. If this is, in fact, what NAV is doing then unfortunately there is nothing we can do about it. There is no way to analyze the message without reading the data, and there is no way to read the data except through the communication channels that NAV is monitoring. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark (mingram123) Date: 2004-11-04 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1151941 We have outlook pointing to the Exchange 5.5 server and the junk email folder for the user is also kept in their exchange mailbox. It isn't sorting to a personal folder that is on the local drive. It mostly happens in the morning after a nights worth of emails have come in and then outlook is cranked up and Spambayes starts filtering the mail so it appears to be happening during the filtering process. There isn't anything in the spambayes logfile that indicates a problem. And this is happening on all the machines we have installed it on. I have even made sure that spambays is Not marking the message as read as it moves them to the Junk folder. Seems like the only way that Norton would be triggered (since the mail isn't being moved to a local .pst file) is if the mail is being opened (as far as norton is concerned). wierd... I've talked to another IT person from a different company and it is happening to them also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 22:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this perhaps mail arriving on an Exchange/IMAP/Hotmail store and being moved to a "Junk Emails" folder on a local (pst) store? That would explain this, as Norton is unaware of the files on the remote machine, but becomes aware of it once it arrives on the local one. FWIW, SpamBayes doesn't "open" the mail in any way. There's no way that SpamBayes would trigger an email virus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 23:19:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 23:20:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019797 ] some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1019797, was opened at 2004-09-01 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Open Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Initial Comment: I'm running Python 2.3.1 on Linux, processing my mail with procmail. Recently I've been getting spam that crashes sb_filter.py. Failure can be repeated from the command line. Seems to affect only mail that SpamAssassin has tagged as spam. Repeatable for any message that fails. I had this problem starting 2 weeks ago with Source 1.0rc1, upgraded to Source 1.0rc2 and problem persists. Affects ~10% of messages. (note: no option for Source 1.0rc2 in reporting form) Backtrace looks looks like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 253, in main result = mboxutils.as_string(msg, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 170, in as_string parts.append(part.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 298, in _handle_message g.flatten(msg.get_payload(0), unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 200, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: Test message attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-05 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, now I'm even more confused! You're right - the attached message appears to parse fine. However, with Python 2.2.3/2.3.4/2.4b2 and (unpatched) spambayes 1.0 (which didn't change from 1.0rc2) sb_filter filters this fine for me - I can't duplicate that traceback at all. Do you definately get the traceback with unpatched mobxutils with the spam.test attached here? I am on a different OS, but I can't see how that would effect this... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-04 17:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 I'm fine with keeping it as a local patch if indeed the message is malformed, but I'm not sure if it is. Can you take a look at the spam.test I attached originally and confirm that it is not to spec? To my untrained eye it looks legal. If it's broken due to SpamAssassin, I'll report it as a bug there if the breakage exists in their latest version. Thanks! Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I see that I wasn't correct when I guessed what type of malformation it was - the code handles one that generates a TypeError, but in a different part of the message). The general rule at the moment seems to be that we won't patch for any specific malformations (because we'd just be duplicating the email package folk's work, and eventually people will be able to use email 3.0/Python 2.4), except in cases where there is a flood of a particular type. Since you have a patch that works for you, I'm inclined to leave this unless there are more people bumping into the problem. (Once we start patching for malformed messages, there's really nowhere to stop). If you feel this is a mistake, say so and I (or another developer) can probably be convinced otherwise :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-04 07:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 Sorry for the lack of response. After your last comment, I tried a number of things and intended to report back after testing it for a while. Problem seems to be with multipart messages that have been passed through SpamAssassin and tagged as spam. Somehow, the quoting of the multipart messes up SpamBayes. Yes, I'm using 1.0rc2. No, I can't switch currently to Python 2.4. The attached patch seems to work for me, at least I haven't had any apparent problems since applying it a couple months ago. Probably kludgy, though, and I am not a Python programmer. Thanks for your follow up. Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I thought that sb_filter handled these ok with 1.0rc2 - is that definately the version you are using? If you are able/willing to use Python 2.4, you will stop having these problems, BTW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 23:24:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 23:25:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 17:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-05 11:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 joewagner501: have you tried retraining from scratch? Your problem (and jimmywhited) sounds most like a database problem (since filtering is still working). Could you also either post a copy of your most recent log file here or open a new tracker with it attached? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-05 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I have had this same exact issue after using the program for only two days. At first the buttons worked fine but the last two days they are not working. The program is still filtering email but I can't identify items in the junk suspects folder as being junk or not using the buttons. I have taken all the steps to remove the buttons and reinstal them but nothing has worked. I am using XP Pro SP2 and the latest version of SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jwhited (jimmywhited) Date: 2004-08-16 09:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1104558 I to am having this problem. This seems to be related to, but not an exact duplicate of bug ID 964537. Email filtering seems to be working fine; however, if I click or nothing happnes. I originally had 1.0rc1 so I upgraded to 1.0rc2 hoping this would fix the problem. It didn't. Next I tried deleting the toolbar, per troubleshooting instructions -- right-click on toolbars, Customize, highlight spam-bayes, delete, close outlook, reopen outlook so toolbars would be recreated. This didn't help. Next I tried renaming outcmd.dat so outlook would reset all the toolbars and also tried deleting the toolbar after that, which did not work. The last thing I tried was retraining the DB with the rebuild entire DB option checked. I saw the message writing database, but it never changed after several minutes. I hit the close button and closed the SpamBayes Manager, but the toolbars still did not work. I have the logs prior to retraining the DB and after if you want me to send them (I do not see a place where I can attach them in this followup addition). I can also send the DB file if need be. System Config (I can send a system.nfo file): Windows XP w/SP-1 applied Outlook 2002 SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 I too am down with SpamBayes because of this. I have completely uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and Outlook, and the "dead" toolbars still exist. I am getting no spam filtering either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-16 10:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 I have the same issue. Tried everything. Uploaded a log to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-04 12:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-02 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-31 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 17:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-27 08:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-25 05:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 23:25:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 23:25:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1038052 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Message-ID: Bugs item #1038052, was opened at 2004-10-01 09:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: lynnt (lynnt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 crashes upon start/SpamBayes doesn't run Initial Comment: Hello. I'm having 2 different issues. It appears I'm having the same issues as incident: "[ 939050 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start". On another computer, I installed SpamBayes. I do not get any errors, but it seems that SpamBayes is not running. (Clicking on the SpamBayes button loaded on Outlook does nothing.) It worked fine previously, but I recently changed my mail server from Exchange to CommuniGate Pro. Now I can't get SpamBayes to run on Outlook 2003 or Outlook 2000. I've uninstalled, reinstalled, rebooted inbetween & after. Following are logs. ---------------------------------------------- For the problem crashing, this is the contents log file: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fanucchj\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc2 (June 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ------------------------------------------------- For the problem of SpamBayes just not functioning, this is the log file: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ----------------------------------------------- I appreciate any feedback. -lynn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-05 11:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As in the original comment, this is likely to be a dupe, anyway, so closing as such. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lynn (lynnht) Date: 2004-11-05 06:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152630 I have uninstalled SpamBayes & Outlook does not crash (at any time or when clicking the down arrow). We are no longer using SpamBayes, so I don't need any additional follow up. thank you -lynn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 15:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 With the one where Outlook crashes, if you uninstall SpamBayes and then click on the down arrow next to the help icon on the standard toolbar, does Outlook also crash? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1038052&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 4 23:28:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 4 23:35:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799201 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Bugs item #799201, was opened at 2003-09-03 03:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: When I go to the SpamBayes manager it shows that the database has 1066 good and 224 spam. These numbers don't change regardless of how much spam has been processed. I'm not sure SpamBayes is learning from new incomming messages. I'm using SpamBayes .7 upgraded from SpamBayes .6. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-05 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From 799959: I think I've figured out what is going on with 799201 - I have some rules that move spam into a folder. When I installed spambayes I configured it to look for spam in the inbox and this other folder. It appears that spambayes does not update the database counters when messages are moved from this other folder to the spambayes spam folder. The counters are updated when messages are moved from the inbox to the spambayes spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are checkboxes that ask if you want to train on messages moved into the watched ham and spam folders. Do you have these ticked? If you don't, then no training is done unless you do it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 5 01:04:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 5 01:07:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-800487 ] Don't count classified spam as new mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #800487, was opened at 2003-09-05 00:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by turpie You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Russell Leake (leaker) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Don't count classified spam as new mail Initial Comment: I found what "turns me on" and "off" to spam filters is their ability NOT to falsely indicate the arrival of new mail. If a message is classified as spam, it would be nice if SpamBayes would not indicate it as new mail (sounds/tray icon envelope). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Turpie (turpie) Date: 2004-11-05 11:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=374613 What might be a simple solution/work-around would be hto ave SpamBayes play a sound when it classifies a message as ham. I could then disable Outlooks builtin notification feature which plays a sound whenever any message is received even if its junk. You could also do the reverse and play a sound when spam is detected, I'm sure some people would enjoy hearing their spam going through the shredder. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dale W. Freck (dwfreck) Date: 2003-10-07 02:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=881319 Greetings. With respect to FAQ 3.9, it says, "Until someone comes up with a clever solution for all of this...". It looks like someone has: the author of Spammunition, a free bayesian Outlook add-in. Spammunition is similar to SpamBayes (I like SpamBayes better; it's more effective), but Spammunition includes an option to turn off the "new mail" icon if it moves spam out of your Inbox and there are no unread mesages remaining there. Outlook will still play a sound/open a pop-up when something arrives, if you have Outlook configured that way. With Outlook configured to play a sound, and Spammunition configured to turn off the icon when appropriate, you know spam has arrived because you'll hear the sound, but the icon doesn't show up. Spammunition hasn't been updated in quite a while, but the author posted a news item on his web site saying he was trying to make it an open source project, so perhaps you could recruit him... See http://www.upserve.com for information. I've sent him an e-mail referencing this project. Sincerely, Dale Freck ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 08:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. That is an interesting idea. I'll change this back to open and see what Mark thinks of it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Russell Leake (leaker) Date: 2003-09-05 08:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676711 All too clear now. Thank you for your prompt response. An alternative solution would be to create a spambayes icon and update it upon success or filter. An example that I have seen is JunkOut (which uses a Bayesian filter also). Just a suggestion. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 3.9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 5 14:39:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 5 14:39:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-22 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by joewagner501 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-05 07:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I retrained from scratch but that didn't work either. Then I decided to take your information about it being a database issue one step further and went to the folder with the database files and deleted them all. Then I restarted Outlook, set up SpamBayes from scratch and the buttons are working again. You were absolutely correct about the database being the issue but it seems the files need to be deleted before retraining. Thanks for the help. I really appreciate it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 joewagner501: have you tried retraining from scratch? Your problem (and jimmywhited) sounds most like a database problem (since filtering is still working). Could you also either post a copy of your most recent log file here or open a new tracker with it attached? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-04 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I have had this same exact issue after using the program for only two days. At first the buttons worked fine but the last two days they are not working. The program is still filtering email but I can't identify items in the junk suspects folder as being junk or not using the buttons. I have taken all the steps to remove the buttons and reinstal them but nothing has worked. I am using XP Pro SP2 and the latest version of SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jwhited (jimmywhited) Date: 2004-08-15 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1104558 I to am having this problem. This seems to be related to, but not an exact duplicate of bug ID 964537. Email filtering seems to be working fine; however, if I click or nothing happnes. I originally had 1.0rc1 so I upgraded to 1.0rc2 hoping this would fix the problem. It didn't. Next I tried deleting the toolbar, per troubleshooting instructions -- right-click on toolbars, Customize, highlight spam-bayes, delete, close outlook, reopen outlook so toolbars would be recreated. This didn't help. Next I tried renaming outcmd.dat so outlook would reset all the toolbars and also tried deleting the toolbar after that, which did not work. The last thing I tried was retraining the DB with the rebuild entire DB option checked. I saw the message writing database, but it never changed after several minutes. I hit the close button and closed the SpamBayes Manager, but the toolbars still did not work. I have the logs prior to retraining the DB and after if you want me to send them (I do not see a place where I can attach them in this followup addition). I can also send the DB file if need be. System Config (I can send a system.nfo file): Windows XP w/SP-1 applied Outlook 2002 SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-24 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 I too am down with SpamBayes because of this. I have completely uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and Outlook, and the "dead" toolbars still exist. I am getting no spam filtering either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-15 15:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 I have the same issue. Tried everything. Uploaded a log to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-03 17:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-01 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-30 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 22:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 22:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 22:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 17:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-26 13:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-24 11:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 5 18:32:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 5 18:32:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059690 ] Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059690, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mingram123 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 >Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark (mingram123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Plug-in / Norton Antivirus problem Initial Comment: I'm wondering if anyone has seen this problem and has a fix? I'm using the latest version of Spambayes and outlook2000. I've also heard that the problems exists when using program with OL 2003 as well. If I receive an email with a virus attached and I tell SpamBayes that I want to delete as spam OR if it automatically files it in my Junk Emails folder, Norton Antivirus comes up saying that it has detected a virus. I have reading (preview) panes turned off for all folders. The only way this can happen is if SpamBayes opens the email in the background to search for spam patterns. Is this the case? How do I keep it from opening the virus infected email? tx in advance! Mark marki@athena.dev.unc.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark (mingram123) Date: 2004-11-05 12:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1151941 That's what I was thinking. How do other spam filters handle this conundrum? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-11-04 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 In order for SpamBayes to check the message, it has to read the message data from the Exchange Server. Norton AV is probably hooking itself into the communication channel between your PC and the server and checking the message as it is read. NAV has no way to know that SpamBayes is reading the raw data to analyze it, so it assumes that a user is trying to view the message. If this is, in fact, what NAV is doing then unfortunately there is nothing we can do about it. There is no way to analyze the message without reading the data, and there is no way to read the data except through the communication channels that NAV is monitoring. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark (mingram123) Date: 2004-11-04 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1151941 We have outlook pointing to the Exchange 5.5 server and the junk email folder for the user is also kept in their exchange mailbox. It isn't sorting to a personal folder that is on the local drive. It mostly happens in the morning after a nights worth of emails have come in and then outlook is cranked up and Spambayes starts filtering the mail so it appears to be happening during the filtering process. There isn't anything in the spambayes logfile that indicates a problem. And this is happening on all the machines we have installed it on. I have even made sure that spambays is Not marking the message as read as it moves them to the Junk folder. Seems like the only way that Norton would be triggered (since the mail isn't being moved to a local .pst file) is if the mail is being opened (as far as norton is concerned). wierd... I've talked to another IT person from a different company and it is happening to them also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 22:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this perhaps mail arriving on an Exchange/IMAP/Hotmail store and being moved to a "Junk Emails" folder on a local (pst) store? That would explain this, as Norton is unaware of the files on the remote machine, but becomes aware of it once it arrives on the local one. FWIW, SpamBayes doesn't "open" the mail in any way. There's no way that SpamBayes would trigger an email virus. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059690&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 5 19:23:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 5 19:23:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1061119 ] Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1061119, was opened at 2004-11-05 13:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Initial Comment: It would be a good idea (and not terribly difficult) to provide MD5 checksums for the various downloads so users can verify the integrity of their downloaded files. In the best of all possible worlds, there'd also be a way to check that the downloaded file was created by who its purported author, presumably by some sort of digital signature. I don't know if there are standardized ways to do this that are not burdensome, however. (Authenticode might be an option for the Outlook plugin.) If not, I'd recommend just providing MD5 sums. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 8 00:41:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 8 00:41:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 17:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-08 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll look into the issue of having to delete the files manually, thanks. Closing this, as I'm fairly sure that this will also solve 'jimmywhited''s problem, too, and this tracker is getting cluttered with several different problems. If anyone here is still having problems, please open a new tracker with all the revelant info and a copy of your most recent log. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-06 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I retrained from scratch but that didn't work either. Then I decided to take your information about it being a database issue one step further and went to the folder with the database files and deleted them all. Then I restarted Outlook, set up SpamBayes from scratch and the buttons are working again. You were absolutely correct about the database being the issue but it seems the files need to be deleted before retraining. Thanks for the help. I really appreciate it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-05 11:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 joewagner501: have you tried retraining from scratch? Your problem (and jimmywhited) sounds most like a database problem (since filtering is still working). Could you also either post a copy of your most recent log file here or open a new tracker with it attached? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-05 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I have had this same exact issue after using the program for only two days. At first the buttons worked fine but the last two days they are not working. The program is still filtering email but I can't identify items in the junk suspects folder as being junk or not using the buttons. I have taken all the steps to remove the buttons and reinstal them but nothing has worked. I am using XP Pro SP2 and the latest version of SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jwhited (jimmywhited) Date: 2004-08-16 09:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1104558 I to am having this problem. This seems to be related to, but not an exact duplicate of bug ID 964537. Email filtering seems to be working fine; however, if I click or nothing happnes. I originally had 1.0rc1 so I upgraded to 1.0rc2 hoping this would fix the problem. It didn't. Next I tried deleting the toolbar, per troubleshooting instructions -- right-click on toolbars, Customize, highlight spam-bayes, delete, close outlook, reopen outlook so toolbars would be recreated. This didn't help. Next I tried renaming outcmd.dat so outlook would reset all the toolbars and also tried deleting the toolbar after that, which did not work. The last thing I tried was retraining the DB with the rebuild entire DB option checked. I saw the message writing database, but it never changed after several minutes. I hit the close button and closed the SpamBayes Manager, but the toolbars still did not work. I have the logs prior to retraining the DB and after if you want me to send them (I do not see a place where I can attach them in this followup addition). I can also send the DB file if need be. System Config (I can send a system.nfo file): Windows XP w/SP-1 applied Outlook 2002 SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-25 10:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 I too am down with SpamBayes because of this. I have completely uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and Outlook, and the "dead" toolbars still exist. I am getting no spam filtering either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-16 10:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 I have the same issue. Tried everything. Uploaded a log to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-04 12:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-02 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-31 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 17:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-31 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-27 08:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-25 05:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 8 03:31:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 8 03:31:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-22 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jimmywhited You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jwhited (jimmywhited) Date: 2004-11-07 21:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1104558 This did in fact fix my problem as well. I can't find my old log files or else I'd post them. I have been running SpamBayes after doing this "fix" for 2 days now and it appears to be working fine. If the problem resurfaces, I'll post a new tracker and reference this defect ID as well. In any event, here are the steps I took to fix/work-around the problem -- 1. Remove the toolbars from Outlook, then closed outlook. 2. I did a complete uninstall using the SpamBayes uninstall program (not Windows uninstall). 3. Manually deleted the C:\Program Files\SpamBayes folder and left over files. 4. Manually deleted the outcmd.dat file in the profile directories. 5. Manually deleted the SpamBayes folder in the profile directories. 6. Reinstalled SpamBayes 7. Trained using existing Ham and Spam that SpamBayes had filtered out before. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-07 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll look into the issue of having to delete the files manually, thanks. Closing this, as I'm fairly sure that this will also solve 'jimmywhited''s problem, too, and this tracker is getting cluttered with several different problems. If anyone here is still having problems, please open a new tracker with all the revelant info and a copy of your most recent log. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-05 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I retrained from scratch but that didn't work either. Then I decided to take your information about it being a database issue one step further and went to the folder with the database files and deleted them all. Then I restarted Outlook, set up SpamBayes from scratch and the buttons are working again. You were absolutely correct about the database being the issue but it seems the files need to be deleted before retraining. Thanks for the help. I really appreciate it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 17:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 joewagner501: have you tried retraining from scratch? Your problem (and jimmywhited) sounds most like a database problem (since filtering is still working). Could you also either post a copy of your most recent log file here or open a new tracker with it attached? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (joewagner501) Date: 2004-11-04 13:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152649 I have had this same exact issue after using the program for only two days. At first the buttons worked fine but the last two days they are not working. The program is still filtering email but I can't identify items in the junk suspects folder as being junk or not using the buttons. I have taken all the steps to remove the buttons and reinstal them but nothing has worked. I am using XP Pro SP2 and the latest version of SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jwhited (jimmywhited) Date: 2004-08-15 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1104558 I to am having this problem. This seems to be related to, but not an exact duplicate of bug ID 964537. Email filtering seems to be working fine; however, if I click or nothing happnes. I originally had 1.0rc1 so I upgraded to 1.0rc2 hoping this would fix the problem. It didn't. Next I tried deleting the toolbar, per troubleshooting instructions -- right-click on toolbars, Customize, highlight spam-bayes, delete, close outlook, reopen outlook so toolbars would be recreated. This didn't help. Next I tried renaming outcmd.dat so outlook would reset all the toolbars and also tried deleting the toolbar after that, which did not work. The last thing I tried was retraining the DB with the rebuild entire DB option checked. I saw the message writing database, but it never changed after several minutes. I hit the close button and closed the SpamBayes Manager, but the toolbars still did not work. I have the logs prior to retraining the DB and after if you want me to send them (I do not see a place where I can attach them in this followup addition). I can also send the DB file if need be. System Config (I can send a system.nfo file): Windows XP w/SP-1 applied Outlook 2002 SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul (pfbpaul) Date: 2004-05-24 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1048938 I too am down with SpamBayes because of this. I have completely uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and Outlook, and the "dead" toolbars still exist. I am getting no spam filtering either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-15 16:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 I have the same issue. Tried everything. Uploaded a log to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-03 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-01 12:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-31 00:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 23:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 23:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 18:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-26 14:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-24 11:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:09:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:09:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1061119 ] Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1061119, was opened at 2004-11-06 07:23 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Initial Comment: It would be a good idea (and not terribly difficult) to provide MD5 checksums for the various downloads so users can verify the integrity of their downloaded files. In the best of all possible worlds, there'd also be a way to check that the downloaded file was created by who its purported author, presumably by some sort of digital signature. I don't know if there are standardized ways to do this that are not burdensome, however. (Authenticode might be an option for the Outlook plugin.) If not, I'd recommend just providing MD5 sums. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:10:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:10:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-930950 ] upper limit to scanned email size Message-ID: Feature Requests item #930950, was opened at 2004-04-07 21:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: upper limit to scanned email size Initial Comment: hello, SpamBayes is a client-side plugin and so, need to download the email in order to scan it. this can be a pain in case of remote connected seesion... typically, SPAM are small emails. it could be great to be able to setup an upper limit to the size of email SpamBayes try to scan. have a nice day, Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Date: 2004-04-08 23:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=602719 I use the Outlook plugin. YES, the mail has _arrived_... but on the Exchange server not on the client (outlook). as the outlook plugin runs on the client side, in order to tokenize the email to give it a score, it has to read each and every word of the email which is _arrived_ but still lives on the Exchange server, and so download it from the server to the client. on an ethernet connection, there is no problem. but when outlook runs on a laptop connected to the exchange server via a telephone line, it may be a pain. Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-08 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Which SpamBayes application are you using? If it's the Outlook plug-in, then this doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes only finds out about the mail when it has arrived. If it's sb_server, this also doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes is acting as a proxy - it's only processing mail when the mail client is already downloading it - it doesn't result in any extra traffic between the server and your machine. If, however, you're using sb_imapfilter, then this could be relevant. If you are, and really want this feature, then put a note confirming that here, otherwise I'll close this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:13:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:13:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-836642 ] Add " ham" folder to sb_imapfilter.py (and others?) Message-ID: Feature Requests item #836642, was opened at 2003-11-06 06:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=836642&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Greenberg (grnbrg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add "ham" folder to sb_imapfilter.py (and others?) Initial Comment: A "ham" output folder would be useful. ie: Read folder "INBOX", copy spam to INBOX.SPAM, unsure messages to INBOX.Unsure, and ham to INBOX.Ham. This option could be defaulted to whichever folder(s) are marked for classification. This feature will be useful on IMAP servers, as messages are manipulated on the server, rather than filtered through a SpamBayes application. I don't think it would be applicable to the POP3 filter or procmail applications. Why? I will frequently notice and act on an email in my inbox before Spambayes has a chance to classify it, resulting in confused flags. Secondly (and this might be considered a bug in the mail app) if the mail app retrieves the headers for a mail before it is classified it will process it through it's filters, which may then result in a second (classified) copy being re-filtered and moved. Adding an "X-Spambayes-Classification" check to each filter rule is clunky and has given inconsistant results. Addition of a "ham" folder will allow me to monitor for messages that have already been classified. Duplication, deletion and race condition issues disappear with this setup, as it effectively turns SpamBayes from another client accessing the mailbox to a filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-09 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 CVS now has an ham folder option for sb_imapfilter. This might also be of use with Outlook, but that is covered in: [ 1036970 ] Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=836642&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:15:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:15:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1028198 ] Feature request: Classify as ham Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1028198, was opened at 2004-09-15 09:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Classify as ham Initial Comment: When a mail is classified as "not spam", there should be a function to reclassify it as ham (set spam score to 0% and include words in "good words"-list) Now you have to first delete the mail as spam, then recover it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-09 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 796129 ] 'Keep as Good' Button ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:15:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:15:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796129 ] 'Keep as Good' Button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796129, was opened at 2003-08-28 05:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andreas Unterste (aunterste) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: 'Keep as Good' Button Initial Comment: I use my InBox as storage for the good mail (in order to use outlooks rules for further moving and classification). When a message arrives with a relatively high spam score, but below the threshold, I think a button 'Keep as Good' would be useful which trains SpamBayes that this is ham. The only other way to achieve that at the moment is to move the message somewhere and trigger the set of the SpamScore to 0% by moving it back into the InBox. Something right next to the 'Delete as Spam'. Otherwise: TERRIFIC PRODUCT !!!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-09 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1028198 ] Feature request: Classify as ham ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-16 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also the comments in the thread starting here: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev/2004-May/002847.html I'll write a patch for this at some point and we can see how things go, and maybe this can be added to a released version at some point. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 12:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I also missed this button, since it is initially hard to train it for good messages, since a new inbox is normally polluted by spam. It would be more convenient than moving good mail temporarily to a separate Ham folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:16:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:16:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1028198 ] Feature request: Classify as ham Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1028198, was opened at 2004-09-15 09:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Classify as ham Initial Comment: When a mail is classified as "not spam", there should be a function to reclassify it as ham (set spam score to 0% and include words in "good words"-list) Now you have to first delete the mail as spam, then recover it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-09 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 796129 ] 'Keep as Good' Button ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:46:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:46:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-940547 ] imapfilter interface available when using -l switch Message-ID: Feature Requests item #940547, was opened at 2004-04-23 19:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940547&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter interface available when using -l switch Initial Comment: You can't access the web interface (for stats or config changes) if you run imapfilter with the -l command, because it isn't offered. You shouldn't really run another instance, because then both open the databases and you're asking for trouble. You'd have to stop the -l one and then start it up again, which is a pain. So add a new option that controls whether the interface is served when imapfilter is run or not. Running without -c or -t would serve it regardless, of course. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-09 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Despite my comment above, I'd prefer to avoid more options. So the new scheme is that if the -l option is used the web interface is also served. This doesn't really hurt anything (if just -c and/or -t are used, then it doesn't, to save time and avoid complications). This is in CVS now, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 01:56:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 01:57:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-829602 ] Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled Message-ID: Feature Requests item #829602, was opened at 2003-10-25 03:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=829602&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled Initial Comment: I have a primary exchange account for my Outlook 2K. I also monitor a varying number of other mailboxes when folks are gone or I'm working in a project area that has an application outlook mailbox. (e.g. SQL Mail and the outlook mailbox assigned to our Intranet). I have an Outlook profile for my main mailbox as the default and a secondary one for the Intranet mail account. Here is what happens; When someone with global enterprise send capabilities sends that global message, The Outlook plug-in for SpamBayes handles all of them and they appear as only one message in my Inbox or one of the SpamBayes classification folders. Anyone else seen this happen? Also, it appears, but I have not completely confirmed that any inbound mail to the intranet account shows up as above, MY inbox or Spambayes classification folders. So, do we have a bug, a "feature" or do I have a wonky system because it is a developer machine?? bpu_webguy, a.k.a. Hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-09 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay (this probably should have been in bugs and not feature requests?). I'm not clear on what you mean by the problem with sending a global message. Is this message meant to appear in lots of different mailboxes, and it doesn't? If so, is that definitely SpamBayes? It doesn't get involved in delivering (or receiving) mail, so that would be odd. Does the rest of it mean that no matter which Exchange account is being filter messages only end up in one unsure/spam folder? If so, then that's the desired behaviour - every user has only one unsure/spam folder, and here you are one user filtering a number of different folders. If you want all users to have their own unsure/spam folder, then they each need to be running the plug-in, or you need to use some sort of server-side filtering instead. The messages should all "recover from spam" back to the right mailbox, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-10-09 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Going back over my posts, I noticed this. One update: Multiple mailboxes with OL2003 and POP3 servers still hit the same inbox, spam or unsure folders, no matter what the destination account is. One semi work-around is to set an OL rule up to shake and bake the destination folders and move the messages based on the recipient. -hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=829602&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 9 03:38:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 9 03:38:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-870524 ] Make the message-proxy timeout configurable Message-ID: Feature Requests item #870524, was opened at 2004-01-05 10:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=870524&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Make the message-proxy timeout configurable Initial Comment: When the POP3 proxy receives a large message, it collects thirty seconds-worth of body before classifying it, adding the classification headers and proxying it to the client. Some email clients have a shorter timeout than this, and give up waiting for the message. Making the timeout shorter would make the amount of message body available to the classifier much smaller (especially over a modem), so the timeout should be configurable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-09 15:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This seems like a simple enough change, so I've gone ahead and done this. I hope you don't mind Richie! Feel free to reopen if you don't like the way I did it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=870524&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 10 04:12:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 10 04:12:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Multibyte (CJK etc.) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multibyte (CJK etc.) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2004-11-10 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 Estimation for Effect of per_langualge_corpus Option I prepared 4 test sets from 7987 ham and 2364 spam including: ham spam arabic: 1 1 cyrillic: 26 63 greek: 1 0 hebrew: 5 10 ja: 6438 85 ko: 9 29 thai: 1 2 zh: 4 207 other/unknown: 1502 1967 TOTAL: 7987 2364 * Languages/scripts are determined by main charset of each messages. Then I run test by: $ python timtest.py --ham-keep 500 --spam-keep 500 -n 4 with ham/spam cutoffs 0.5 / 0.95. Below is average of 20 tests. x-per_language_corpus: True ham:spam: 6000:6000 fp total: 10 fp %: 0.17 fn total: 253 fn %: 4.23 unsure t: 947 unsure %: 7.90 real cost: $543.15 best cost: $695.66 h mean: 0.88 h sdev: 7.38 s mean: 81.68 s sdev: 31.74 mean diff: 80.80 k: 2.07 x-per_language_corpus: False ham:spam: 6000:6000 fp total: 24 fp %: 0.40 fn total: 81 fn %: 1.36 unsure t: 551 unsure %: 4.60 real cost: $434.45 best cost: $584.04 h mean: 3.00 h sdev: 13.03 s mean: 94.28 s sdev: 19.51 mean diff: 91.27 k: 2.82 x-per_language_corpus increses fp a little and increases fn and unsure more. So x-per_language_corpus feature shall be thrown away (database will be compatible with original again). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2004-10-05 22:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 Update for 1.0-final. - Normalize Unicode'ified texts by Normalization Form KC (NFKC). - HTTP charset is fixed to UTF-8. Option [html_ui] http_charset was removed. - Some bug fixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-12-08 12:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 patch 1.0. Per-language corpus. Ham/spam ratio are different by language of message. This affects performance. NOTE: Format of corpus has been changed. It now contains per-language nham/nspam info and wordinfo. PICKLE_VERSION is 6. New configuration option: [Tokenizer] per_language_corpus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-29 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o hammie.py / sb_filter.py / sb_xmlrpcserver.py: - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidence: header will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-26 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 server patch 1.0a7-0.6 o Dibbler performs HTTP charset conversion (to/from internal UTF-8). o New configuration option: [html_ui] http_charset ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 09:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the sb_dbexpimp.py patch (v1.3). Will look at the rest, shortly - thanks for your patience! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-11 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 05:37:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 05:37:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-31 02:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the discussion below indicates, the chances of SpamBayes causing this problem is minute, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-10-09 02:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Running W2K Pro, I have found that this occurs in OL2000 / Exchange 5.5 at the office, and also at home with OL2000 WG/Inet then later upgraded to OL2003 WG/Inet, that when I have ActiveSync 3.71 running with my WinCE 2002 PDA docked. If I kill the ASync process and get OL to shutdown cleanly, then I don't wind up with the multiple instances. -Hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-17 04:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, I just added a comment without listing my OS; it's Win XP Pro, SP1+. Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-17 04:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Outlook 2k SR3 process remains loaded after closing Outlook. I don't THINK this happened before loading Spambayes 1.0rc1. Otherwise, I think SP is working okay. Cheers! Jim J ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-31 13:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-31 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-31 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-31 10:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-31 07:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 05:34:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 05:37:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1059170, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:04 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ethan J. Brown (iristyle) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Initial Comment: When installing spambayes-1.0.exe on Windows XP SP2 (clean install) and Outlook 2k3, the installer spawns outlook_addin_register.exe, but that process crashes. All files are copied appropriately to the destination location in c:\program files, and the installer itself completes, but the outlook toolbar registration does not complete. The problem is a crash within msvcrt.dll: " Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. " As you can see, the version of msvcrt.dll that ships with XP SP2 from above is 7.0.2600.2180. To workaround this problem, an older version of msvcrt.dll can be dumped into c:\program files\spambayes\bin, so that the LoadLibrary calls load a compatible version (I don't have my dev tools / dumpbin installed at the moment to take a look at your exports). In my case, I took the only other available version that I had, version 7.0.0.0, from my Windows side-by-side directory: C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.CPlusPlu sRuntime_6595b64144ccf1df_7.0.0.0_x-ww_2726e76a When the compatible msvcrt.dll and msvcirt.dll are copied to the SpamBayes\bin directory, the registration application runs succesfully. You might want to consider shipping the dlls you've compiled against with your installer in the future to avoid this problem (it's only about a 365k commitment to do so). If you need any more details, don't hesitate to ask -- but I assume you guys should have enough here. Thanks -e ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two of the developers tested this after this report, and it works fine for both of us. >From spambayes-dev: """ 7.0.2600.2180 is the correct version number for the XP SP2 version of msvcrt.dll, so we know it wasn't overwritten by some rogue installer that didn't follow the Microsoft rules. I can't speak to specific changes made for SP2, but this is now a system DLL and Microsoft has guaranteed that the interface will never change. Given the extensiveness of their compatibility testing and the number of users outside of Microsoft that beta tested SP2 before it was released, I suspect they would have discovered it by now if there was a compatibility problem. """ I have to agree - the chances of something in msvcrt.dll changing that we use is minute, especially since it seems to work fine for other SP2 users. Is this definitely reproducable? i.e. did you try several times (including after restarting) with the original msvcrt.dll? If it just happened once, then the 'fix' of replacing the dll was probably not necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 05:44:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 05:44:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896498 ] Mailbox browse won't open all folders Message-ID: Bugs item #896498, was opened at 2004-02-14 02:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896498&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Haapanen (tomh009) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mailbox browse won't open all folders Initial Comment: When using the SpamBayes Manager 008.1, using the browse button to browse folders, whether for filtering or training, won't open all the connected mailboxes and folders. The browse window will see all the server mailboxes I am connected to, but will not expand most of them (clicking on the "+" will not do anything). Some of them do expand however -- including my own, and some others. Have verified permissions on all the relevant mailboxes -- and all the mailboxes are browsable in Outlook itself. Environment: Outlook 2003 Windows XP SP1 Exchange 5.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry - no-one noticed that you asked how to get to the log files. If this is still relevant, please attach the current logs. The troubleshooting guide (SpamBayes->Help->Troubleshooting Guide) explains where to find them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Haapanen (tomh009) Date: 2004-03-19 05:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=61699 The outlook profile includes the shortcuts (I have about 100), other server mailboxes (5-10) and personal folders (5-10). It's a real pain to redo. Sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: BobT (nickdanger) Date: 2004-03-17 09:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=996607 Just to clarify; I delete the Outlook profile, not the User profile. CTRL PANEL -> MAIL (from here a variable path depending on the version of Outlook installed.) In my environment, I just have to note if and where they have a personal folder. Then delete the Outlook profile, recreate, point to my exchange server, add in the personal folder, and done. Time, about 2 minutes. Maybe I'm missing something, but I can't figure out how it would take 1+ hrs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Haapanen (tomh009) Date: 2004-03-16 15:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=61699 Delete the profile in Outlook? Would really rather not do that, setting it all up again will probably take an hour or two (complex configuration). How do I turn on the log files? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 13:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you let us know if nickdanger's suggestion works? Or, if it doesn't, or you can't do that, attach your log files to this tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: BobT (nickdanger) Date: 2004-03-13 07:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=996607 My solution, delete the Outlook profile and recreate. Had this solve a number of odd problems like this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896498&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 05:45:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 05:45:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1006769 ] Spams are copied, not moved Message-ID: Bugs item #1006769, was opened at 2004-08-11 06:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1006769&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cariboune (cariboune) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spams are copied, not moved Initial Comment: I have configured spambayes to move my emails considered as spam in a directory. In fact, the mail is just copied and not moved : I have the original in my mailbox and a copy in my spambox, both appear as non- read. I have checked my configuration and it's well define : move to folder xxx. All seems to be all right. Moreover, the option "mark spam as read" is checked but the spams stay non-read. What could I do? My configuration : winXp home, Office XP Sp2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What sort of store are these on? (pst file, Exchange, IMAP, hotmail?) Could you attach a copy of your most recent log file? You could try disabling the "save_spam_info" option, and seeing if that makes a difference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1006769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 05:48:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 05:48:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-858640 ] can't initialize spambayes Message-ID: Bugs item #858640, was opened at 2003-12-12 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=858640&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: dong wang (as-dwang) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: can't initialize spambayes Initial Comment: 1. my system: windows XP, with outlook 2002 SP2 2. downloaded the binanry outlook 0.81 3. followed the installation instructions 4. after start outlook for the first time, finished configuration of spambayes 5. now the "delete as spam" and "SpamBayes" toolbars appear 6. if I click the delete as spam button, then windows try to install Access, in a dialogue window named "Microsoft Access 2000 SR-1 Runtime". Then an error window says "Error 1309. Error reading from file: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\ART\PFiles\MSOffice\Office\MSACNV30.EXE. System error 3. Verify that the file exists and that you can access it." If I click "Ignore", then it complains about all the other needed files, such as ACCESS.EXE, SQLPARSER.DLL, etc. My installation of Office has all these required files under "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office10\". How do I make SpamBayes to use the files at this location? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is really old now - sorry that no-one has managed to get to it. This really sounds a lot like a problem specific to that machine. If it's still relevant could you attach the log files (SpamBayes->Help->Troubleshooting Guide explains where they are) when this is tried? And also try 1.0 if you haven't already? Do you have any other problems with Office? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=858640&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 05:50:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 05:50:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-825223 ] Does not mark mail as read Message-ID: Bugs item #825223, was opened at 2003-10-17 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Does not mark mail as read Initial Comment: When using the "Delete As Spam" button on new mail with the "Mark spam as read" feature checked. Does not mark as read. (Outlook addin version 0.81) Otherwise works awesome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 17:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-23 08:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I've seen this training anomaly before with a person who had an Outlook rule that moved a message to one of the watched folders. SpamBayes moved the message to the spam folder before Outlook rules ran. A rule then moved it back to a watched folder, which SpamBayes detected as the user dragging a misclassified message out of the spam folder, and so trained it as good (which generates "Training on message..."). The user then saw that a spam message was in his good folder and clicked Delete as Spam (which generates "Moving and spam training..."). The "Processing n missed spam..." lines would seem to indicate that background filtering is not enabled. Enabling background filtering on the Advanced tab should eliminate the rules contention that is causing the training anomaly. Please report back as to whether or not this also fixes the original "mark as read" problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Something else strange is going on here. Note that the end of the log has: Training on message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - trained as good Moving and spam training message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - Training on message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - trained as spam Somehow, this message ended up being trained as ham, them immediately as spam. I note you have 2 inboxes being watched - is this intentional? It may be and is quite common, but if not may point to a bigger issue. I think we will find some other bug is confusing us, which causes it to look like the read state is not being set (or possibly it is being set before/after some extra move we aren't expecting, etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak) Date: 2003-10-28 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=888770 Mark, this happens because I have preview turned on in Outlook. I can look at the email and see if it's spam without opening it and having Outlook mark it as read. If I open it and it gets marked as read then click on "Delete As Spam" it obviously stays marked as read in the spam folder. I don't know if this would be considered a bug or an enhancement. Also sorry about the duplicate attachements. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log from a session where you try this? See the "troubleshooting guide" for info. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 05:58:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 05:58:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802890 ] Doc/error message bugs: Non-standard db name? Message-ID: Bugs item #802890, was opened at 2003-09-09 14:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802890&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeffrey C. Albro (jalbro) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Doc/error message bugs: Non-standard db name? Initial Comment: Using version spambayes-1.0a5: If you follow the directions in INTEGRATION.txt, and hammie.py -g ~/tmp/newham -s ~/tmp/newspam You get a complaint about using the pickle or DB version (-d or -D). No big deal. .hammiedb is created if you use -d (even though there is no success message to tell you this.) However, the procmail instructions suggest you use hammie.db. This causes hammie to crash in a cryptic fashion. Instead, hammie should complain along the lines of "No such data base file!" In the documentation the name of the DB created in the first place should match the procmail instructions. Thanks for a great product! Please fix the documentaion and make hammie a bit more "talkative" Thanks! -Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 17:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The documentation was fixed some time ago. The error does include a "no such file" message - and adjusting that error to make it clearer and more consistent with pickle/dbm is dealt with in another tracker. So closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeffrey C. Albro (jalbro) Date: 2004-04-03 02:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=10595 In accordance with my ongoing ice cream - carrot experiment, I am attaching a bounty to this bug. Fix it, and I will send the fixer a coupon for a pint of Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream. -Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802890&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 07:27:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 07:27:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 07:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by superba You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-11-10 22:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Spambayes is innocent on my machine. Win XP SP2, OL2K SR3. I uninstalled Spambayes for another reason about 30 days ago. I find OL2K still installed at least 3 or 4 times per day even though I did a normal exit from the program. I searched TechNet for an answer but found none and there probably won't be one, for OL2K is at 2 versions old. HTH. Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-10 20:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the discussion below indicates, the chances of SpamBayes causing this problem is minute, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-10-08 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Running W2K Pro, I have found that this occurs in OL2000 / Exchange 5.5 at the office, and also at home with OL2000 WG/Inet then later upgraded to OL2003 WG/Inet, that when I have ActiveSync 3.71 running with my WinCE 2002 PDA docked. If I kill the ASync process and get OL to shutdown cleanly, then I don't wind up with the multiple instances. -Hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 09:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, I just added a comment without listing my OS; it's Win XP Pro, SP1+. Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Outlook 2k SR3 process remains loaded after closing Outlook. I don't THINK this happened before loading Spambayes 1.0rc1. Otherwise, I think SP is working okay. Cheers! Jim J ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 18:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 17:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 15:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 07:48:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 07:49:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-31 02:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 19:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for the update - much appreciated :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-11-11 19:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Spambayes is innocent on my machine. Win XP SP2, OL2K SR3. I uninstalled Spambayes for another reason about 30 days ago. I find OL2K still installed at least 3 or 4 times per day even though I did a normal exit from the program. I searched TechNet for an answer but found none and there probably won't be one, for OL2K is at 2 versions old. HTH. Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the discussion below indicates, the chances of SpamBayes causing this problem is minute, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-10-09 02:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Running W2K Pro, I have found that this occurs in OL2000 / Exchange 5.5 at the office, and also at home with OL2000 WG/Inet then later upgraded to OL2003 WG/Inet, that when I have ActiveSync 3.71 running with my WinCE 2002 PDA docked. If I kill the ASync process and get OL to shutdown cleanly, then I don't wind up with the multiple instances. -Hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-17 04:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, I just added a comment without listing my OS; it's Win XP Pro, SP1+. Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-17 04:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Outlook 2k SR3 process remains loaded after closing Outlook. I don't THINK this happened before loading Spambayes 1.0rc1. Otherwise, I think SP is working okay. Cheers! Jim J ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-31 13:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-31 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-31 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-31 10:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-31 07:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 15:34:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 15:34:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 09:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-11-11 08:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 One of these days, real soon now, I am going to undergo this exercise with Sysinternals Regmon and Filemon, launching Outlook with Dependency Walker just to see who is doing what. As soon as I get the time..... -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-11 00:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for the update - much appreciated :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-11-11 00:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Spambayes is innocent on my machine. Win XP SP2, OL2K SR3. I uninstalled Spambayes for another reason about 30 days ago. I find OL2K still installed at least 3 or 4 times per day even though I did a normal exit from the program. I searched TechNet for an answer but found none and there probably won't be one, for OL2K is at 2 versions old. HTH. Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-10 22:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the discussion below indicates, the chances of SpamBayes causing this problem is minute, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-10-08 08:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Running W2K Pro, I have found that this occurs in OL2000 / Exchange 5.5 at the office, and also at home with OL2000 WG/Inet then later upgraded to OL2003 WG/Inet, that when I have ActiveSync 3.71 running with my WinCE 2002 PDA docked. If I kill the ASync process and get OL to shutdown cleanly, then I don't wind up with the multiple instances. -Hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 11:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, I just added a comment without listing my OS; it's Win XP Pro, SP1+. Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 11:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Outlook 2k SR3 process remains loaded after closing Outlook. I don't THINK this happened before loading Spambayes 1.0rc1. Otherwise, I think SP is working okay. Cheers! Jim J ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 11 15:44:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 11 15:44:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1043358 ] OL 2K internal filters stop working Message-ID: Bugs item #1043358, was opened at 2004-10-08 16:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: superba (superba) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: OL 2K internal filters stop working Initial Comment: Hi, It's OL 2K with SR3, latest version of SB, Win XP Pro w/SP2+. After loading the released version 1.0 of SB, some if not all of my internal filters stopped working and I could find no way to reactivate them. I use them to file email into different folders based on their subject/and or origin. I searched for a reported bug but found none. BTW, OL 2K remains open sometimes with and without SB installed. Any ideas? Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-11-11 08:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 One problem that I have run into with Spambayes, even with the filtering delay feature is that the OL rules seem to run asynchronously and fire at different times. I also see fewer rules available on Exchange 5.5 than with OL WG, with attendant "out of space on server messages". Sometimes it takes deleting all the rules, shutting down OL entirely, and rebuilding the ruleset. The way that I get around much of the problem is to have spambayes filter the OL rule destination folders also.... -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 22:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't interact with the Outlook rules at all, so it's unlikely that SpamBayes is doing this. If you uninstall SpamBayes, does the problem go away (when you reinstall you won't have lost any configuration/training data). If you go into the Outlook Rules Wizard, are the rules still enabled there? What do you mean by "remains open"? After you quit it, you can still see it in the Task Manager, you mean? This is reasonably common for Outlook, with or without SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 12 02:05:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 12 02:06:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-12 14:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 14:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This MS support article explains how to turn logging on: (Basically Tools->Options->Advanced Options and tick the box). It also explains where the logs are (XP is the same as Win2k). Remember to turn logging off afterwards, otherwise you'll end up with *lots* of logs :) Only the OP and admins can attach logs to any trackers, so you'll have to open a new report and attach it there (and then put a note here). Yes, you might as well raise the SpamBayes log level to 5 for this. Thanks for the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Data Bitz (databitz) Date: 2004-07-23 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=702593 Couldn't find a way of capturing the imap conversation? There is a spambayes log attached to the bug report 995553. Should I run spambayes log with more details? My log verbosity is set to 0 at the moment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Data Bitz (databitz) Date: 2004-07-23 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=702593 I can duplicate this problem. My IMAP server is IBM Lotus Domino. My Outlook 2000 client is running in 'Internet Only Mode'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I can't repro this either. My IMAP server is Courier (not sure of version). I imagine this is a quirk of the particular IMAP servers, and to really debug we would need the IMAP conversation (I believe Outlook can store this) as well as the SpamBayes log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-05-29 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked instead of his Personal Folders inbox. Thanks, Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 i think the key here is the following line in my log: Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 12 02:11:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 12 02:11:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-964537 ] delete as spam doesn't always work Message-ID: Bugs item #964537, was opened at 2004-06-02 08:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=964537&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: teweb (teweb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: delete as spam doesn't always work Initial Comment: ... message also posted to mail list... [Geoff Campbell] > Sometimes (very rarely) when I select an obvious spam message and > "click" on "Delete As Spam", nothing happens. It seems that the > message is "SpamBayes proof"! This happens once every several days, > but I can't see a pattern. Using Outlook 2002 (SP- 1). Would be happy > to send you a representative email. That would be good. There's probably a helpful (to us ) message in your SpamBayes log file whenever this happens. A real problem is that Outlook destroys the exact structure of incoming email, so you may not actually be able to give anyone else an email that reproduces the problem. When "nothing happens" in an otherwise-working SpamBayes, the usual cause is that the email is so badly formed (violates so many standards about how email *should* be constructed) that the SpamBayes email parser gives up trying to make any sense of it. If that's what's happening, you will find helpful (to us) information in your SpamBayes log file. #### I too am seeing this behavior - on about 1% of spam (I get 2 or 3 messages a day that won't delete as spam). I am using Outlook 2002 SP3 on XP Pro SP1, SpamBayes 1.0b1 log file indicates: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 633, in OnClick File "manager.pyc", line 802, in score File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 504, in _worddistanceget File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 261, in _wordinfoget File "shelve.pyc", line 111, in get File "shelve.pyc", line 119, in __getitem__ exceptions.ValueError: could not convert string to int ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-12 14:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry about the long delay. If this is still an issue, would you be able to attach one of the messages that this fails for to this tracker and set the status back to open? That second traceback looks more like there's an issue with the particular message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dennis Foreman (djforeman) Date: 2004-08-25 02:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820852 I have re-buit the DB and re-trained, but delete-as-spam still fails sometimes. Here's my relevant logfile data: Moving and spam training message 'Low rates available in your local area' - Training on message 'Low rates available in your local area' - pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 280, in _invoke_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 620, in OnClick File "out1.pyz/addin", line 151, in TrainAsSpam File "out1.pyz/train", line 46, in train_message File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 894, in GetEmailPackageObject File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 736, in _GetMessageText File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 758, in _GetMessageTextParts File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 439, in GetHTMLFromRTFProperty pywintypes.com_error: (-2147221221, 'OLE error 0x8004011b', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks very much like a database corruption. Can you try training spambayes, ensuring 'rebuild entire database' is selected? Please reset the bug status to 'open' if it doesn't solve it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=964537&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 12 02:14:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 12 02:14:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1043358 ] OL 2K internal filters stop working Message-ID: Bugs item #1043358, was opened at 2004-10-09 10:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: superba (superba) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: OL 2K internal filters stop working Initial Comment: Hi, It's OL 2K with SR3, latest version of SB, Win XP Pro w/SP2+. After loading the released version 1.0 of SB, some if not all of my internal filters stopped working and I could find no way to reactivate them. I use them to file email into different folders based on their subject/and or origin. I searched for a reported bug but found none. BTW, OL 2K remains open sometimes with and without SB installed. Any ideas? Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-12 14:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure if there is a SpamBayes problem here. The idea of the background filtering delay is to force SpamBayes to run after all Outlook rules, because of the irratic nature of the timing of those rules. If SpamBayes isn't running after all Outlook rules with the default values, then they may need to be increased. Since SpamBayes is after the Outlook rules, if mail that has been moved is to be filtered, then the new location will also have to be filtered, yes. No word from the OP, so assuming that this was not SpamBayes related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-11-12 03:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 One problem that I have run into with Spambayes, even with the filtering delay feature is that the OL rules seem to run asynchronously and fire at different times. I also see fewer rules available on Exchange 5.5 than with OL WG, with attendant "out of space on server messages". Sometimes it takes deleting all the rules, shutting down OL entirely, and rebuilding the ruleset. The way that I get around much of the problem is to have spambayes filter the OL rule destination folders also.... -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't interact with the Outlook rules at all, so it's unlikely that SpamBayes is doing this. If you uninstall SpamBayes, does the problem go away (when you reinstall you won't have lost any configuration/training data). If you go into the Outlook Rules Wizard, are the rules still enabled there? What do you mean by "remains open"? After you quit it, you can still see it in the Task Manager, you mean? This is reasonably common for Outlook, with or without SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 12 16:16:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 12 16:16:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1065234 ] certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1065234, was opened at 2004-11-12 09:16 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Hendershot (rhendershot) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Initial Comment: I'd like to be able to pick root folders, like 'Deleted Items' or 'Junk E-mail' as the target to both certain and potential spam. This would allow me to save a lot of time. There would be a higher risk of lost emails, but I find myself pretty much just rubber-stamping the classification as Spambayes has left it. I sort the spam folders by score which helps to quickly determing false-positives, but I can still do that in these other folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 12 17:35:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 12 17:35:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1065234 ] certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1065234, was opened at 2004-11-12 10:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Hendershot (rhendershot) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Initial Comment: I'd like to be able to pick root folders, like 'Deleted Items' or 'Junk E-mail' as the target to both certain and potential spam. This would allow me to save a lot of time. There would be a higher risk of lost emails, but I find myself pretty much just rubber-stamping the classification as Spambayes has left it. I sort the spam folders by score which helps to quickly determing false-positives, but I can still do that in these other folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-11-12 11:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 You should be able to use "Junk E-mail" with no problems. Many of us already do. "Deleted Items", on the other hand, is specifically restricted. The reason for this really has nothing to do with "deleting" the spam without reviewing it. The problem is with the incremental training options, which are enabled by default. One of the functions of incremental training is to train a message as spam if you move it into your spam folder. The way SpamBayes does this is by detecting when a message that was classified as something other than spam is added to the spam folder. Whenever you use the normal Outlook "Delete" command to remove a message from your Inbox, what actually happens is that it is removed from the Inbox but also added to the "Deleted Items" folder. If you were to set the "Deleted Items" folder as your spam folder, SpamBayes would then detect this action as you moving a mis-classified message into the spam folder. As a result, SpamBayes would train every good message that you delete as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 12 23:49:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 12 23:49:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-05 03:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sxross You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seattle (sxross) Date: 2004-11-12 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1158241 this applies also to the SpamBayes manager, so changing settings is impossible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Nov 13 00:29:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Nov 13 00:29:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1065234 ] certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1065234, was opened at 2004-11-12 09:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rhendershot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Hendershot (rhendershot) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Initial Comment: I'd like to be able to pick root folders, like 'Deleted Items' or 'Junk E-mail' as the target to both certain and potential spam. This would allow me to save a lot of time. There would be a higher risk of lost emails, but I find myself pretty much just rubber-stamping the classification as Spambayes has left it. I sort the spam folders by score which helps to quickly determing false-positives, but I can still do that in these other folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richard Hendershot (rhendershot) Date: 2004-11-12 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=615900 I'd find it much more useful to turn off the automatic tracking of move-to-spam to be able to 'real' delete. I was not able to set to Junk E-mail folder, created by outlook 2003 I think, but that was just an examle; not really much more useful than Spambayes's SPAM folder, except if it might help integration with other spam filtering tools. The real issue for me is to be able to point to the Deleted Items folder so that I don't have to constantly empty SPAM. Thanks for the info! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-11-12 10:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 You should be able to use "Junk E-mail" with no problems. Many of us already do. "Deleted Items", on the other hand, is specifically restricted. The reason for this really has nothing to do with "deleting" the spam without reviewing it. The problem is with the incremental training options, which are enabled by default. One of the functions of incremental training is to train a message as spam if you move it into your spam folder. The way SpamBayes does this is by detecting when a message that was classified as something other than spam is added to the spam folder. Whenever you use the normal Outlook "Delete" command to remove a message from your Inbox, what actually happens is that it is removed from the Inbox but also added to the "Deleted Items" folder. If you were to set the "Deleted Items" folder as your spam folder, SpamBayes would then detect this action as you moving a mis-classified message into the spam folder. As a result, SpamBayes would train every good message that you delete as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 15 01:48:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 15 01:48:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1065234 ] certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1065234, was opened at 2004-11-13 04:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Hendershot (rhendershot) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: certain-spam should be moved to deleted items folder Initial Comment: I'd like to be able to pick root folders, like 'Deleted Items' or 'Junk E-mail' as the target to both certain and potential spam. This would allow me to save a lot of time. There would be a higher risk of lost emails, but I find myself pretty much just rubber-stamping the classification as Spambayes has left it. I sort the spam folders by score which helps to quickly determing false-positives, but I can still do that in these other folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-15 13:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FAQs 3.9 and 3.11 might also be of interest: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i-configure-spambayes-to-delete-spam-rather-than-moving-it http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-can-t-i-set-spam-to-be-moved-to-the-deleted-items-folder This is also a dupe of: [ 774650 ] Additional post-filtering options http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=774650&group_id=61702&atid=498106 There's also a request (can't find it right now, but it's there somewhere) for additional filtering levels to be added. As the FAQs say, the easiest way to handle this is just to use the autoarchiving system that Outlook has. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Hendershot (rhendershot) Date: 2004-11-13 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=615900 I'd find it much more useful to turn off the automatic tracking of move-to-spam to be able to 'real' delete. I was not able to set to Junk E-mail folder, created by outlook 2003 I think, but that was just an examle; not really much more useful than Spambayes's SPAM folder, except if it might help integration with other spam filtering tools. The real issue for me is to be able to point to the Deleted Items folder so that I don't have to constantly empty SPAM. Thanks for the info! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-11-13 05:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 You should be able to use "Junk E-mail" with no problems. Many of us already do. "Deleted Items", on the other hand, is specifically restricted. The reason for this really has nothing to do with "deleting" the spam without reviewing it. The problem is with the incremental training options, which are enabled by default. One of the functions of incremental training is to train a message as spam if you move it into your spam folder. The way SpamBayes does this is by detecting when a message that was classified as something other than spam is added to the spam folder. Whenever you use the normal Outlook "Delete" command to remove a message from your Inbox, what actually happens is that it is removed from the Inbox but also added to the "Deleted Items" folder. If you were to set the "Deleted Items" folder as your spam folder, SpamBayes would then detect this action as you moving a mis-classified message into the spam folder. As a result, SpamBayes would train every good message that you delete as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1065234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 16 09:09:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 16 09:09:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1067189 ] exception .BoundaryError Message-ID: Bugs item #1067189, was opened at 2004-11-16 09:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1067189&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: exception .BoundaryError Initial Comment: Attached mail generates exception: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 471, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 247, in setPayload . File "email\Parser.pyc", line 245, in _parsebody .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary It's malformed message, but i think this exception should be catched. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1067189&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 16 22:56:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 16 22:56:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1067658 ] log file for error message. Message-ID: Support Requests item #1067658, was opened at 2004-11-16 15:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: log file for error message. Initial Comment: The following is the latest log file for SB. I've tried installing and uninstalling several times and continue to get "no filterable mail items selected". I am running XPPro, SP1, P4, 512MB Ram, Office 2003, SB ver1.0rc1. Any ideas? Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/SPAM' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' SpamBayes - Dis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 17 01:23:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 17 01:23:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1067658 ] log file for error message. Message-ID: Support Requests item #1067658, was opened at 2004-11-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: log file for error message. Initial Comment: The following is the latest log file for SB. I've tried installing and uninstalling several times and continue to get "no filterable mail items selected". I am running XPPro, SP1, P4, 512MB Ram, Office 2003, SB ver1.0rc1. Any ideas? Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/SPAM' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' SpamBayes - Dis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-17 13:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this happen with all messages, or just one in particular? Not every message can be filtered - it has to be mail that has been received (i.e. not sent items or drafts), and has to be messages (i.e. not calendar items, tasks, etc). Some other items (special Outlook messages like anti-virus warnings etc) are also not filterable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 17 01:27:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 17 01:27:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1067189 ] exception .BoundaryError Message-ID: Bugs item #1067189, was opened at 2004-11-16 21:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1067189&group_id=61702 >Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: exception .BoundaryError Initial Comment: Attached mail generates exception: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 471, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 247, in setPayload . File "email\Parser.pyc", line 245, in _parsebody .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary It's malformed message, but i think this exception should be catched. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-17 13:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The latest version of the Python email library (which SpamBayes uses) handles any malformed message, and much better than we could hope to. There isn't any point in us duplicating their work unless we really have to, so for the moment we won't be adding any code to handle malformed messages unless there is a huge wave of a particular type in the near future. Longer term, those running from source can use Python 2.4 (or just email 3.0) and they will have no more problems with malformed messages. For those using the binary, SpamBayes 1.1a1 will be built with Python 2.4 and so will also handle all of these. We're not sure whether there will be a 1.0.x SpamBayes release built with Python 2.4 or not, but it's possible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1067189&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 17 21:08:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 17 21:08:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1067658 ] log file for error message. Message-ID: Support Requests item #1067658, was opened at 2004-11-16 15:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by synlupri You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: log file for error message. Initial Comment: The following is the latest log file for SB. I've tried installing and uninstalling several times and continue to get "no filterable mail items selected". I am running XPPro, SP1, P4, 512MB Ram, Office 2003, SB ver1.0rc1. Any ideas? Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/SPAM' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' SpamBayes - Dis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Syndi (synlupri) Date: 2004-11-17 14:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1055190 It is for every message that I was attempting training on. However, today I realized a brand new email came into the junk suspects folder and was able to be recovered from SPAM. So this means that only new messages can be filtered? Yikes that's a whole lot of filtering on every message. Usually I make a folder called SPAM and fill it with all the junk mail before I download SB. Then I train the application program on all those as SPAM and all those presently in the inbox as Good. It just will not let me do this. That error message "no filterable mail items selected" comes up every time I highlight a new message and hit the "delete as spam" button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-16 18:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this happen with all messages, or just one in particular? Not every message can be filtered - it has to be mail that has been received (i.e. not sent items or drafts), and has to be messages (i.e. not calendar items, tasks, etc). Some other items (special Outlook messages like anti-virus warnings etc) are also not filterable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 18 06:05:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 18 06:05:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 05:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 19 18:32:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 19 18:32:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1069572 ] Toolbar Problem: trying to install an app Message-ID: Bugs item #1069572, was opened at 2004-11-19 12:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1069572&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ab9 (ab9pgh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbar Problem: trying to install an app Initial Comment: Previously I had no problems with SpamBayes on XP but a work change necessitated a change to a new user account and re-establishing Outlook. I had problems with already installed SpamBayes (1.0a9) so I just removed the program from machine. I installed SB 1.0 (with no training) and everthing seemed to go well. I started Outlook and tried to "Delete as Spam" but my computer started the process to install MS Project??? It does this everytime I try to delete spam or try to configure SB from the toolbar -- it is the wierdest thing. (Note: MS Project is the last software I have installed on my computer -- weeks ago!) SB does filter mail after pressing Delete as Spam, however. I tried all the troubleshooting tips and re-installed the program to no avail. Any help would be appreciated! ab ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1069572&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 22 05:01:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 22 05:01:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 18:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-22 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 22 05:05:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 22 05:05:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1067658 ] log file for error message. Message-ID: Support Requests item #1067658, was opened at 2004-11-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: log file for error message. Initial Comment: The following is the latest log file for SB. I've tried installing and uninstalling several times and continue to get "no filterable mail items selected". I am running XPPro, SP1, P4, 512MB Ram, Office 2003, SB ver1.0rc1. Any ideas? Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/SPAM' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' SpamBayes - Dis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-22 17:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Any (filterable) message can be filtered. This doesn't mean only new mail - the criteria are in my earlier comment. What do you mean a lot of filtering on every message? (I don't understand the comment at all). We do not recommend pretraining spambayes with a lot of mail. See the wiki: http://entrian.com/sbwiki/TrainingIdeas for extensive discussion. That should work, however, as long as the messages are filterable. Did the folder of messages arrive normally in Outlook? If, for example, they were imported from OE, then the import process may have mangled them (a common problem is Outlook stripping all the headers). To be clear - if you click "Delete as spam" or "Recover from spam" on a message that is regularly recieved by Outlook, do you get the error? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Syndi (synlupri) Date: 2004-11-18 09:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1055190 It is for every message that I was attempting training on. However, today I realized a brand new email came into the junk suspects folder and was able to be recovered from SPAM. So this means that only new messages can be filtered? Yikes that's a whole lot of filtering on every message. Usually I make a folder called SPAM and fill it with all the junk mail before I download SB. Then I train the application program on all those as SPAM and all those presently in the inbox as Good. It just will not let me do this. That error message "no filterable mail items selected" comes up every time I highlight a new message and hit the "delete as spam" button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-17 13:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this happen with all messages, or just one in particular? Not every message can be filtered - it has to be mail that has been received (i.e. not sent items or drafts), and has to be messages (i.e. not calendar items, tasks, etc). Some other items (special Outlook messages like anti-virus warnings etc) are also not filterable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 22 23:15:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 22 23:15:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1071319 ] Outlook plug in for IMAP boxes Message-ID: Bugs item #1071319, was opened at 2004-11-22 17:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1071319&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook plug in for IMAP boxes Initial Comment: I know similar problems have been listed, however i dont believe they were addressed, nor do i believe the previous poster was clear. When using the oulook plug in to monitor IMAP boxes in Outlook, a couple undesirable effects occur that have people angry at me. First: If a message is placed in "Junk Suspects" and a user attempts to "Recover from Spam" the message is returned to the local store inbox instead of the IMAP box from which it came. I have read that this occurs because the plug-in cannot actually modify the message to tell where it came from, and thus where to put it if recovered. My suggested workaround is the following: Add an IMAP Recovery option that allows the user to select which folder recovered messages are returned to. Seems simple enough and would result in less "lost messages". Second: As a workaround to the above problem, my users drag messages from the "Suspects" folder back to the Inbox, since hitting the recover button moves those messages to the wrong folder. This is a fine solution if the message has been marked as read, however if the message is marked as unread, then within a few seconds SpamBayes evaluates the message again and moves it to the Suspects folder again. Again, there is a workaround, which is that the messages must be marked as unread before manually dragging them back. The result however, is a marked decrease in usability and simplicity. Of course my suggestion to this is to resolve the underlying issue stated above. I appreciate your time and this wonderful product. Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1071319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 23 01:14:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 23 01:14:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-800671 ] Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Message-ID: Patches item #800671, was opened at 2003-09-05 07:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Initial Comment: Here sb-oe-training.py. It must be put into the windows\ directory of SpamBayes. When launched, it shows a simple GUI which let the user classify each OE mailbox either as Ham or Spam. A simple click on the Train button does the job. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-23 13:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the oe_utils code (with minor modifications) to spambayes/oe_mailbox.py in CVS Head. Will look into the GUI part soon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-06 22:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Romain, Many thanks for the patch! We're in a feature freeze at the moment, while we concentrate on fixing bugs and things like installation, but as soon as we're out of the freeze we'll integrate your code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-09-05 22:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 This new release adds an oe_utils module in spambayes directory. It allows developers to easily get OE registry keys, store path, list of DBX files, convert a DBX file to mbox or train a whole DBX file as ham or spam. We can use this in the Web interface to remove a bit of code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 24 20:59:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 24 20:59:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1072734, was opened at 2004-11-24 11:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook_addin_register.exe crash Initial Comment: Had been using SpamBayes for a year, new HDD, reinstalling system all over again. Trying to install in Outlook 2000, with the new SP3 Office update. outlook_addin_register.exe crashes, the installer reports it's finished. Nothing (buttons, etc) shows up in Outlook. The spambayes.log file is empty (zero bytes). The M$ error reporting system txt file contains this: Event viewer, application error says: Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. I've tried this several times, with same result, also after restarting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Nov 24 23:59:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Nov 24 23:59:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1002273 ] inbox not filtered on startup and excessive startup time Message-ID: Bugs item #1002273, was opened at 2004-08-02 17:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ostroffjh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1002273&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: peter (pmaxwell121) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: inbox not filtered on startup and excessive startup time Initial Comment: If I start Outlook (I have Outlook 2000 on Win2K) with spambayes enabled, it takes a huge amount of time before I can access my inbox, and no message filtering is done. All the unread items remain just as they are and incoming messages aren't filtered either. If I then open spambayes manager, to verify the enabled flag is set (which it is) and then close it, inbox now becomes filtered. If I start Outlook with spambayes disabled, the startup time is fine (this aspect sounds a bit similar to 943702). This behavior did not happen with the previous version, which I think was 1.0b. I've attached two log files, one immediately after startup, and the other immediately after having opened and closed spambayes manager. The two files are merged because there doesn't seem a method to attach more than one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ostroffjh (ostroffjh) Date: 2004-11-24 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165726 I have the same problem, currently with SpamBayes 1.0, but also with 1.0rc2. Outlook takes almost two mintes to start up (before I can actually do anything) but less than twenty seconds with SpamBayes disabled, or "work offline" (but the junk and unsure folders are not synchronized for offline use). I'm running Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) under Windows 2000. 1.0rc2 used to work without this problem. I'm not absolutely certain, but I strongly suspect that the problem started when I was migrated from Exchange Server 2000 to Exchange Server 2003. My log looks very similar to the one posted - with the four unavailable messages and the toolbar error message, so I'll only post it at specific request. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: peter (pmaxwell121) Date: 2004-08-03 13:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1096199 The only folder that's supposed to be watched is "Mailbox - MAXWELL,PETER (A-Americas,ex1)/Inbox". This is on an Exchange server. I don't know why there are four skipping messages (does it try four times?). Outlook can connect to the server because the folder list appears very quickly, and it displays correctly the number of unread items in all the folders. It's strange that spambayes can't access them. This behavior did not occur with the older version, although I have no idea if there have been configuration changes with the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-03 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The logs have a "skipping because temporarily available" message which indicates that SpamBayes can't connect to the folders it's trying to watch. (This would explain the delay (trying and failing to get hold of them), and the failure to filter). What sort of store are these folders in? IMAP, Hotmail, Exchange, local pst? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1002273&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 25 05:24:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 25 05:24:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Multibyte (CJK etc.) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multibyte (CJK etc.) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2004-11-25 13:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 Auto-detect charset of message. Some messages lack (or fake in some spam) charset information. Codes added to detect suitable charset and to convert to unicode. Unicodedata compatibility module for Python < 2.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2004-11-10 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 Estimation for Effect of per_langualge_corpus Option I prepared 4 test sets from 7987 ham and 2364 spam including: ham spam arabic: 1 1 cyrillic: 26 63 greek: 1 0 hebrew: 5 10 ja: 6438 85 ko: 9 29 thai: 1 2 zh: 4 207 other/unknown: 1502 1967 TOTAL: 7987 2364 * Languages/scripts are determined by main charset of each messages. Then I run test by: $ python timtest.py --ham-keep 500 --spam-keep 500 -n 4 with ham/spam cutoffs 0.5 / 0.95. Below is average of 20 tests. x-per_language_corpus: True ham:spam: 6000:6000 fp total: 10 fp %: 0.17 fn total: 253 fn %: 4.23 unsure t: 947 unsure %: 7.90 real cost: $543.15 best cost: $695.66 h mean: 0.88 h sdev: 7.38 s mean: 81.68 s sdev: 31.74 mean diff: 80.80 k: 2.07 x-per_language_corpus: False ham:spam: 6000:6000 fp total: 24 fp %: 0.40 fn total: 81 fn %: 1.36 unsure t: 551 unsure %: 4.60 real cost: $434.45 best cost: $584.04 h mean: 3.00 h sdev: 13.03 s mean: 94.28 s sdev: 19.51 mean diff: 91.27 k: 2.82 x-per_language_corpus increses fp a little and increases fn and unsure more. So x-per_language_corpus feature shall be thrown away (database will be compatible with original again). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2004-10-05 22:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 Update for 1.0-final. - Normalize Unicode'ified texts by Normalization Form KC (NFKC). - HTTP charset is fixed to UTF-8. Option [html_ui] http_charset was removed. - Some bug fixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-12-08 12:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 patch 1.0. Per-language corpus. Ham/spam ratio are different by language of message. This affects performance. NOTE: Format of corpus has been changed. It now contains per-language nham/nspam info and wordinfo. PICKLE_VERSION is 6. New configuration option: [Tokenizer] per_language_corpus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-29 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o hammie.py / sb_filter.py / sb_xmlrpcserver.py: - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidence: header will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-26 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 server patch 1.0a7-0.6 o Dibbler performs HTTP charset conversion (to/from internal UTF-8). o New configuration option: [html_ui] http_charset ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 09:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the sb_dbexpimp.py patch (v1.3). Will look at the rest, shortly - thanks for your patience! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-11 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Nov 25 08:33:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Nov 25 08:33:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1061119 ] Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1061119, was opened at 2004-11-06 07:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Initial Comment: It would be a good idea (and not terribly difficult) to provide MD5 checksums for the various downloads so users can verify the integrity of their downloaded files. In the best of all possible worlds, there'd also be a way to check that the downloaded file was created by who its purported author, presumably by some sort of digital signature. I don't know if there are standardized ways to do this that are not burdensome, however. (Authenticode might be an option for the Outlook plugin.) If not, I'd recommend just providing MD5 sums. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-25 20:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see http://spambayes.org/download.html Is this correct? I've not done this before, so it may not be... there are PGP sigs, sizes, and MD5 checksums for each of the files. I would greatly appreciate feedback about whether this has been done correctly! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 26 03:34:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 26 03:35:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1059262 ] Spambayes Stopped Filtering Message-ID: Support Requests item #1059262, was opened at 2004-11-03 17:46 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059262&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: mctabish (mctabish1) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes Stopped Filtering Initial Comment: Recently, my SPAMBAYES stopped filtering. I have it installed in Outlook. When I check updates, it reports that the latest is July 04 (which I have.) Below is my INI file [Filter] enabled:True spam_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D39 2D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3AF 46A1F3A50ADC2800000') unsure_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E6420 53657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C446 5736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '00000000 03A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F13566A2C00000') watch_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E642 053657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C44 65736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '0000000 003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F1356682800000')] timer_interval:0.5 timer_start_delay:0.5 [Training] ham_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000473A5C352D32342D30345C4F75746C6F6 F6B2E70737400', '0000000003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB0 25F1356682800000')] spam_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D3 92D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3A F46A1F3A50ADC2800000'), ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D 737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0 037D96E000000433A5C4475706C69636174657320382D39 2D30342E70737400', '00000000A69CE8163EA35E44BE3AF 46A1F3A50ADE2800000')] ham_include_sub:True spam_include_sub:True rebuild:False [Filter_Now] folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006 D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA 0037D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E642 053657474696E67735C42727563652E4C41505049455C44 65736B746F705C4F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400', '0000000 003A72CE0AD6FEA4D9BBDBBB025F1356682800000')] action_all:True include_sub:False [Filter_Now] action_all:True include_sub:False Any idea as to get spambayes to start working again? Thanks Mc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-26 15:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response from the OP for some time, and we can't really progress any further without answers to the questions below. If this is still an issue, please provide the answers, and reset the status back to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 By "stopped filtering", do you mean that nothing SpamBayes works anymore? i.e. if you click the "Delete as Spam" button, does that work? Does the SpamBayes drop-down menu and the SpamBayes Manager? Has Outlook disabled the plug-in? Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find your log files. If you could attach those to this tracker, that would help us track down the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1059262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 26 03:37:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 26 03:37:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1059170, was opened at 2004-11-03 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ethan J. Brown (iristyle) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash Initial Comment: When installing spambayes-1.0.exe on Windows XP SP2 (clean install) and Outlook 2k3, the installer spawns outlook_addin_register.exe, but that process crashes. All files are copied appropriately to the destination location in c:\program files, and the installer itself completes, but the outlook toolbar registration does not complete. The problem is a crash within msvcrt.dll: " Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. " As you can see, the version of msvcrt.dll that ships with XP SP2 from above is 7.0.2600.2180. To workaround this problem, an older version of msvcrt.dll can be dumped into c:\program files\spambayes\bin, so that the LoadLibrary calls load a compatible version (I don't have my dev tools / dumpbin installed at the moment to take a look at your exports). In my case, I took the only other available version that I had, version 7.0.0.0, from my Windows side-by-side directory: C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.CPlusPlu sRuntime_6595b64144ccf1df_7.0.0.0_x-ww_2726e76a When the compatible msvcrt.dll and msvcirt.dll are copied to the SpamBayes\bin directory, the registration application runs succesfully. You might want to consider shipping the dlls you've compiled against with your installer in the future to avoid this problem (it's only about a 365k commitment to do so). If you need any more details, don't hesitate to ask -- but I assume you guys should have enough here. Thanks -e ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-26 15:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1072734&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two of the developers tested this after this report, and it works fine for both of us. >From spambayes-dev: """ 7.0.2600.2180 is the correct version number for the XP SP2 version of msvcrt.dll, so we know it wasn't overwritten by some rogue installer that didn't follow the Microsoft rules. I can't speak to specific changes made for SP2, but this is now a system DLL and Microsoft has guaranteed that the interface will never change. Given the extensiveness of their compatibility testing and the number of users outside of Microsoft that beta tested SP2 before it was released, I suspect they would have discovered it by now if there was a compatibility problem. """ I have to agree - the chances of something in msvcrt.dll changing that we use is minute, especially since it seems to work fine for other SP2 users. Is this definitely reproducable? i.e. did you try several times (including after restarting) with the original msvcrt.dll? If it just happened once, then the 'fix' of replacing the dll was probably not necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1059170&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 26 03:40:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 26 03:40:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1072734, was opened at 2004-11-25 08:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook_addin_register.exe crash Initial Comment: Had been using SpamBayes for a year, new HDD, reinstalling system all over again. Trying to install in Outlook 2000, with the new SP3 Office update. outlook_addin_register.exe crashes, the installer reports it's finished. Nothing (buttons, etc) shows up in Outlook. The spambayes.log file is empty (zero bytes). The M$ error reporting system txt file contains this: Event viewer, application error says: Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. I've tried this several times, with same result, also after restarting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-26 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a dupe of [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1059170 Which is strange - our best guess for this is that you have a bad msvcrt.dll. Do you have any other problems with it? The fix suggested in the above tracker might work - it would be worth trying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Nov 26 04:15:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Nov 26 04:15:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1071319 ] Outlook plug in for IMAP boxes Message-ID: Bugs item #1071319, was opened at 2004-11-23 11:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1071319&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Outlook plug in for IMAP boxes Initial Comment: I know similar problems have been listed, however i dont believe they were addressed, nor do i believe the previous poster was clear. When using the oulook plug in to monitor IMAP boxes in Outlook, a couple undesirable effects occur that have people angry at me. First: If a message is placed in "Junk Suspects" and a user attempts to "Recover from Spam" the message is returned to the local store inbox instead of the IMAP box from which it came. I have read that this occurs because the plug-in cannot actually modify the message to tell where it came from, and thus where to put it if recovered. My suggested workaround is the following: Add an IMAP Recovery option that allows the user to select which folder recovered messages are returned to. Seems simple enough and would result in less "lost messages". Second: As a workaround to the above problem, my users drag messages from the "Suspects" folder back to the Inbox, since hitting the recover button moves those messages to the wrong folder. This is a fine solution if the message has been marked as read, however if the message is marked as unread, then within a few seconds SpamBayes evaluates the message again and moves it to the Suspects folder again. Again, there is a workaround, which is that the messages must be marked as unread before manually dragging them back. The result however, is a marked decrease in usability and simplicity. Of course my suggestion to this is to resolve the underlying issue stated above. I appreciate your time and this wonderful product. Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-26 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The first problem is now fixed in CVS, as we record this information elsewhere and so recovering on IMAP should work just like it does everywhere else. However, this change relies on other changes that are too major to go in a bugfix release, so this won't appear until 1.1 (rather than 1.0.2). That'll probably be early next year for a1 and maybe March for a final release. However, a new option would also fail to make it into a bugfix release. The second problem occurs (I believe) because IMAP actually creates a new message when you drag one in - it doesn't actually move the message (you can't move a message with IMAP). So SpamBayes has no way of telling that it's the same message, so treats it as new. Working around this would be very difficult, and since fixing the other problem removes the need, I'll leave this one alone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1071319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Nov 28 07:40:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Nov 28 07:40:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1074481 ] Pornbayes? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1074481, was opened at 2004-11-27 23:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074481&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill (zonebit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pornbayes? Initial Comment: Could Spambayes be used to filter websites for pornography? I am asking because I know how well Spambayes works for email spam and I would like to know if its features could be used in some sort of "Parental Control" internet implementation. Could a website be tokenized and passed to the classifier with the same effect? If the mathematical experts behind Spambayes say "yes" or "maybe", I'd be interested in pursuing it. If not, I'd like to know before I go wasting my time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074481&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 00:00:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 00:00:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1074481 ] Pornbayes? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1074481, was opened at 2004-11-28 19:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074481&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill (zonebit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pornbayes? Initial Comment: Could Spambayes be used to filter websites for pornography? I am asking because I know how well Spambayes works for email spam and I would like to know if its features could be used in some sort of "Parental Control" internet implementation. Could a website be tokenized and passed to the classifier with the same effect? If the mathematical experts behind Spambayes say "yes" or "maybe", I'd be interested in pursuing it. If not, I'd like to know before I go wasting my time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 12:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes. Get hold of the source archive of spambayes and check out the mod_spambayes.py script in the contrib directory. This is a plugin for an existing http proxy, which will perform simple filtering. (If you wanted to really use this properly, you'd probably want to enhance it by making it easier to classify pages, and probably create a new tokenizer subclass aimed towards web pages rather than email. It will work ok as is, though). If you do anything with it, we'd be very interested in receiving any patches back, if you were willing to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074481&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 00:00:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 00:00:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1074481 ] SpamBayes web filtering Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1074481, was opened at 2004-11-28 19:40 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074481&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill (zonebit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: SpamBayes web filtering Initial Comment: Could Spambayes be used to filter websites for pornography? I am asking because I know how well Spambayes works for email spam and I would like to know if its features could be used in some sort of "Parental Control" internet implementation. Could a website be tokenized and passed to the classifier with the same effect? If the mathematical experts behind Spambayes say "yes" or "maybe", I'd be interested in pursuing it. If not, I'd like to know before I go wasting my time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 12:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes. Get hold of the source archive of spambayes and check out the mod_spambayes.py script in the contrib directory. This is a plugin for an existing http proxy, which will perform simple filtering. (If you wanted to really use this properly, you'd probably want to enhance it by making it easier to classify pages, and probably create a new tokenizer subclass aimed towards web pages rather than email. It will work ok as is, though). If you do anything with it, we'd be very interested in receiving any patches back, if you were willing to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074481&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 02:38:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 02:39:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1074948 ] Email subject has to be part of the search Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1074948, was opened at 2004-11-28 17:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074948&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Email subject has to be part of the search Initial Comment: I get all sorts of 0% - 3% spam rated stuff that are basically a big html picture and a lot of random text that spambayes perceives as real text. If you would simply look at the lurid titles of these trashy spams, this wouldn't be happening. I have not read whether you look at the subject or not, but I am guessing that you don't. It is a BIG mistake, and it really limits the usefulness of this tool. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074948&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 03:15:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 03:15:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1074948 ] Email subject has to be part of the search Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1074948, was opened at 2004-11-29 14:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074948&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Email subject has to be part of the search Initial Comment: I get all sorts of 0% - 3% spam rated stuff that are basically a big html picture and a lot of random text that spambayes perceives as real text. If you would simply look at the lurid titles of these trashy spams, this wouldn't be happening. I have not read whether you look at the subject or not, but I am guessing that you don't. It is a BIG mistake, and it really limits the usefulness of this tool. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's always wise to avoid guesses <0.5 wink>. The subject is tokenized. You may wish to read FAQ 4.7 if you're not sure why messages are not being classified correctly: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1074948&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 18:39:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 18:40:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1075410, was opened at 2004-11-29 18:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1075410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: MikeB075 (bergmann075) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail notification if new ham detected Initial Comment: It would be very nice to get a notification (e.g. a sound or a tray icon like in 'normal' Outlook when new mail arrives) - but only if there are new HAM messages. Could Spambayes generate such a notification seperately from outlook (where I switched it off because Outlook can't decide if spam or ham)? Something like 'Alert new HAM messages doing...' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1075410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 19:25:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 19:25:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1072734, was opened at 2004-11-24 11:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jaythompson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook_addin_register.exe crash Initial Comment: Had been using SpamBayes for a year, new HDD, reinstalling system all over again. Trying to install in Outlook 2000, with the new SP3 Office update. outlook_addin_register.exe crashes, the installer reports it's finished. Nothing (buttons, etc) shows up in Outlook. The spambayes.log file is empty (zero bytes). The M$ error reporting system txt file contains this: Event viewer, application error says: Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. I've tried this several times, with same result, also after restarting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-11-29 10:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 I just tried the fix suggested: [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/? group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=d etail&aid=1059170 But got the identical crash. The version number of the replacement msvcrt.dll that I have is 7.0.2600.0 I don't know if I have any other problems with the .dll, I don't know how to check. But generally, my system is running well, with only the typical amount of XP instabilities. I had been experiencing some random Office crashes, which is why Windows suggested I update Office 2000 to the lastest set of patches/service packs. Since these were relatively new updates I thought that might be why I couldn't get it to install. Unless you have some other tricks to share, I guess I'll have to find some other spam manager, which is a drag as SpamBayes had worked well for me for some time. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-25 18:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a dupe of [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1059170 Which is strange - our best guess for this is that you have a bad msvcrt.dll. Do you have any other problems with it? The fix suggested in the above tracker might work - it would be worth trying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 21:12:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 21:12:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1061119 ] Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1061119, was opened at 2004-11-05 13:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessepelton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Initial Comment: It would be a good idea (and not terribly difficult) to provide MD5 checksums for the various downloads so users can verify the integrity of their downloaded files. In the best of all possible worlds, there'd also be a way to check that the downloaded file was created by who its purported author, presumably by some sort of digital signature. I don't know if there are standardized ways to do this that are not burdensome, however. (Authenticode might be an option for the Outlook plugin.) If not, I'd recommend just providing MD5 sums. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Date: 2004-11-29 15:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130248 I checked spambayes-1.0.1.exe. The MD5 sum and file size match my results. The signature also looked OK, but I'm not an expert. The GnuPG documentation warns that "secure usage requires that YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING." Maybe you should post a request for expert opinion on the SpamBayes list. Heaven knows you give enough help to have earned a little assistance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-25 02:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see http://spambayes.org/download.html Is this correct? I've not done this before, so it may not be... there are PGP sigs, sizes, and MD5 checksums for each of the files. I would greatly appreciate feedback about whether this has been done correctly! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 22:45:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 22:45:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1075410, was opened at 2004-11-30 06:39 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1075410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: MikeB075 (bergmann075) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail notification if new ham detected Initial Comment: It would be very nice to get a notification (e.g. a sound or a tray icon like in 'normal' Outlook when new mail arrives) - but only if there are new HAM messages. Could Spambayes generate such a notification seperately from outlook (where I switched it off because Outlook can't decide if spam or ham)? Something like 'Alert new HAM messages doing...' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-30 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=774978&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1075410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Nov 29 22:45:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Nov 29 22:46:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-22 00:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-30 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1075410&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-10-01 03:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Thanks for the input, but the real problem is not being able to clear the icon (I've already got Python code based on an earlier comment that will do that) but rather knowing *when* to clear the icon. The problem is that SpamBayes only knows about a small subset of the Outlook mail folders. A user can configure Outlook rules to move messages to other folders that SpamBayes doesn't know about, so it is difficult for SpamBayes to be certain when there are *no* other unread messages anywhere in Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-30 12:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-05 00:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-05 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-03 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-03 02:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-02 11:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 09:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-14 01:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-27 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 03:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 03:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 01:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 30 00:55:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 30 00:55:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1075666 ] Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #1075666, was opened at 2004-11-29 23:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cilver79 (cilver79) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Initial Comment: Windows XP Pro SP2 Outlook 2003 Exchange Server 2003 Spambayes version 1.0.1 Our network admins at work just upgraded our Exchange server to 2003 and all of our workstations to Office 2003. My SpamBayes configuration came through unscathed and worked just as it has for months. The problem is it only worked that way for a few days. I have three mailboxes that I used SpamBayes to filter. My personal work mailbox, and two common mailboxes. This morning, SpamBayes stopped filtering the common mailboxes. I went into the configuration to make sure all the folders were still selected, but only my personal inbox was checked. In the folder list, I am unable to expand the directories for the common folders. Clicking on the '+' to the left of them does absolutely nothing. I checked the logs and I see this error message a few times... "MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring" I upgraded to Spambayes version 1.0.1 (I was running 1.0b1 prior) as I thought this might be a known issue. No change. Same thing happens. I have permission to access the folders, and they all show up fine in Outlook. I have seen a few other reports about this error, but none have offered a definitive solution and I couldn't find anything for this version of SpamBayes so I am submitting it. Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 30 01:37:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 30 01:37:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1075666 ] Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #1075666, was opened at 2004-11-29 23:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cilver79 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cilver79 (cilver79) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Initial Comment: Windows XP Pro SP2 Outlook 2003 Exchange Server 2003 Spambayes version 1.0.1 Our network admins at work just upgraded our Exchange server to 2003 and all of our workstations to Office 2003. My SpamBayes configuration came through unscathed and worked just as it has for months. The problem is it only worked that way for a few days. I have three mailboxes that I used SpamBayes to filter. My personal work mailbox, and two common mailboxes. This morning, SpamBayes stopped filtering the common mailboxes. I went into the configuration to make sure all the folders were still selected, but only my personal inbox was checked. In the folder list, I am unable to expand the directories for the common folders. Clicking on the '+' to the left of them does absolutely nothing. I checked the logs and I see this error message a few times... "MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring" I upgraded to Spambayes version 1.0.1 (I was running 1.0b1 prior) as I thought this might be a known issue. No change. Same thing happens. I have permission to access the folders, and they all show up fine in Outlook. I have seen a few other reports about this error, but none have offered a definitive solution and I couldn't find anything for this version of SpamBayes so I am submitting it. Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: cilver79 (cilver79) Date: 2004-11-30 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1168573 ** UPDATE ** I was able to remedy this situation by uninstalling SpamBayes, deleting all of the files it leaves behind, and then turfing and recreating the Outlook profile from the Mail control panel. Reinstalled Spambayes, and all of the folders expand as they should again. I don't know if this still would be considered a bug or not, but I'll leave that to you. =) Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 30 02:06:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 30 02:06:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1075666 ] Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #1075666, was opened at 2004-11-29 23:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cilver79 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cilver79 (cilver79) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Initial Comment: Windows XP Pro SP2 Outlook 2003 Exchange Server 2003 Spambayes version 1.0.1 Our network admins at work just upgraded our Exchange server to 2003 and all of our workstations to Office 2003. My SpamBayes configuration came through unscathed and worked just as it has for months. The problem is it only worked that way for a few days. I have three mailboxes that I used SpamBayes to filter. My personal work mailbox, and two common mailboxes. This morning, SpamBayes stopped filtering the common mailboxes. I went into the configuration to make sure all the folders were still selected, but only my personal inbox was checked. In the folder list, I am unable to expand the directories for the common folders. Clicking on the '+' to the left of them does absolutely nothing. I checked the logs and I see this error message a few times... "MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring" I upgraded to Spambayes version 1.0.1 (I was running 1.0b1 prior) as I thought this might be a known issue. No change. Same thing happens. I have permission to access the folders, and they all show up fine in Outlook. I have seen a few other reports about this error, but none have offered a definitive solution and I couldn't find anything for this version of SpamBayes so I am submitting it. Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: cilver79 (cilver79) Date: 2004-11-30 01:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1168573 ** UPDATE ** I was able to remedy this situation by uninstalling SpamBayes, deleting all of the files it leaves behind, and then turfing and recreating the Outlook profile from the Mail control panel. Reinstalled Spambayes, and all of the folders expand as they should again. I don't know if this still would be considered a bug or not, but I'll leave that to you. =) Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilver79 (cilver79) Date: 2004-11-30 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1168573 ** UPDATE ** I was able to remedy this situation by uninstalling SpamBayes, deleting all of the files it leaves behind, and then turfing and recreating the Outlook profile from the Mail control panel. Reinstalled Spambayes, and all of the folders expand as they should again. I don't know if this still would be considered a bug or not, but I'll leave that to you. =) Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 30 02:23:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 30 02:23:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1075666 ] Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #1075666, was opened at 2004-11-30 12:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: cilver79 (cilver79) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to expand folders when selecting mailboxes to filter Initial Comment: Windows XP Pro SP2 Outlook 2003 Exchange Server 2003 Spambayes version 1.0.1 Our network admins at work just upgraded our Exchange server to 2003 and all of our workstations to Office 2003. My SpamBayes configuration came through unscathed and worked just as it has for months. The problem is it only worked that way for a few days. I have three mailboxes that I used SpamBayes to filter. My personal work mailbox, and two common mailboxes. This morning, SpamBayes stopped filtering the common mailboxes. I went into the configuration to make sure all the folders were still selected, but only my personal inbox was checked. In the folder list, I am unable to expand the directories for the common folders. Clicking on the '+' to the left of them does absolutely nothing. I checked the logs and I see this error message a few times... "MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring" I upgraded to Spambayes version 1.0.1 (I was running 1.0b1 prior) as I thought this might be a known issue. No change. Same thing happens. I have permission to access the folders, and they all show up fine in Outlook. I have seen a few other reports about this error, but none have offered a definitive solution and I couldn't find anything for this version of SpamBayes so I am submitting it. Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-30 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I think this was probably a symptom of a problem with the Outlook profile (since we were getting the error straight from Outlook), so closing. Thanks for updating this, though (just before I was about to look into it!) - it helps to have something to suggest if this comes up with anyone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilver79 (cilver79) Date: 2004-11-30 14:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1168573 ** UPDATE ** I was able to remedy this situation by uninstalling SpamBayes, deleting all of the files it leaves behind, and then turfing and recreating the Outlook profile from the Mail control panel. Reinstalled Spambayes, and all of the folders expand as they should again. I don't know if this still would be considered a bug or not, but I'll leave that to you. =) Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: cilver79 (cilver79) Date: 2004-11-30 13:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1168573 ** UPDATE ** I was able to remedy this situation by uninstalling SpamBayes, deleting all of the files it leaves behind, and then turfing and recreating the Outlook profile from the Mail control panel. Reinstalled Spambayes, and all of the folders expand as they should again. I don't know if this still would be considered a bug or not, but I'll leave that to you. =) Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1075666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Nov 30 07:07:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Nov 30 07:07:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1061119 ] Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1061119, was opened at 2004-11-06 07:23 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Initial Comment: It would be a good idea (and not terribly difficult) to provide MD5 checksums for the various downloads so users can verify the integrity of their downloaded files. In the best of all possible worlds, there'd also be a way to check that the downloaded file was created by who its purported author, presumably by some sort of digital signature. I don't know if there are standardized ways to do this that are not burdensome, however. (Authenticode might be an option for the Outlook plugin.) If not, I'd recommend just providing MD5 sums. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-30 19:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 After suggestions from Anthony, the page is a little modified, but I'm willing to believe it's all correct now, so closing. (The instructions for putting out a release include this process now, so future releases should also have all of this done). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Date: 2004-11-30 09:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130248 I checked spambayes-1.0.1.exe. The MD5 sum and file size match my results. The signature also looked OK, but I'm not an expert. The GnuPG documentation warns that "secure usage requires that YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING." Maybe you should post a request for expert opinion on the SpamBayes list. Heaven knows you give enough help to have earned a little assistance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-25 20:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see http://spambayes.org/download.html Is this correct? I've not done this before, so it may not be... there are PGP sigs, sizes, and MD5 checksums for each of the files. I would greatly appreciate feedback about whether this has been done correctly! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702