From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 1 04:20:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 1 04:36:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962138 ] Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Message-ID: Bugs item #962138, was opened at 2004-05-28 10:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rafkinnaer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Initial Comment: Running Win2000 SP4 fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. After installing the binary and starting Outlook, I get an error message : "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re- enable this plugin. Error details:Failed to load bayes database. I tried rebooting and restarting Outlook (Spambayes is the only add-in) to no avail. The included spambayeslog1 reports a DBFileExistsError. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Date: 2004-06-01 08:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051799 I have a file called __db.default_bayes_database.db in that directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 23:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the file actually exist? It would be called "default_bayes_database.db" and be in your data directory - with Win2K this is something like C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes, IIRC. Either way it's very odd - either bsddb is saying it exists when it doesn't, or the attempt to delete it is silently failing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 1 05:42:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 1 05:42:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961713 ] server error when trying to change Statistics Options Message-ID: Bugs item #961713, was opened at 2004-05-27 17:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psage You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: server error when trying to change Statistics Options Initial Comment: Attempting to change the Ham cutoff or Spam cutoff statistic options and pressing Save produces the following error on this version and on the previous version of Spambayes proxy for Windows: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: psage (psage) Date: 2004-06-01 09:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051271 The only config file I can locate is the bayescustomize.ini file. Is that what you mean? I doubt that's the issue because this problem has existed since my FIRST install of spambayes proxy, so it couldn't be an old value. Here is the contents of that file: [Headers] notate_subject:spam [pop3proxy] listen_ports:110 remote_servers:pop.myserver.com [smtpproxy] ham_address:ham@localhost listen_ports: remote_servers: spam_address:spam@localhost [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition:True x-pick_apart_urls:True [URLRetriever] x-cache_expiry_days:30 x-only_slurp_base:True x-slurp_urls:True [Categorization] ham_cutoff:0.21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 23:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this, whatever options I try. There is a problem, though, because this AttributeError has been reported by several people. My only explanation is that it's caused by an old value in configuration files, but I don't know which one it would be. Would you mind attaching your config file to this tracker? Cut out or XXX the servers if you like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 1 16:37:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 1 16:37:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-964537 ] delete as spam doesn't always work Message-ID: Bugs item #964537, was opened at 2004-06-01 13:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=964537&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: teweb (teweb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: delete as spam doesn't always work Initial Comment: ... message also posted to mail list... [Geoff Campbell] > Sometimes (very rarely) when I select an obvious spam message and > "click" on "Delete As Spam", nothing happens. It seems that the > message is "SpamBayes proof"! This happens once every several days, > but I can't see a pattern. Using Outlook 2002 (SP- 1). Would be happy > to send you a representative email. That would be good. There's probably a helpful (to us ) message in your SpamBayes log file whenever this happens. A real problem is that Outlook destroys the exact structure of incoming email, so you may not actually be able to give anyone else an email that reproduces the problem. When "nothing happens" in an otherwise-working SpamBayes, the usual cause is that the email is so badly formed (violates so many standards about how email *should* be constructed) that the SpamBayes email parser gives up trying to make any sense of it. If that's what's happening, you will find helpful (to us) information in your SpamBayes log file. #### I too am seeing this behavior - on about 1% of spam (I get 2 or 3 messages a day that won't delete as spam). I am using Outlook 2002 SP3 on XP Pro SP1, SpamBayes 1.0b1 log file indicates: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 633, in OnClick File "manager.pyc", line 802, in score File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 504, in _worddistanceget File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 261, in _wordinfoget File "shelve.pyc", line 111, in get File "shelve.pyc", line 119, in __getitem__ exceptions.ValueError: could not convert string to int ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=964537&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 1 20:23:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 1 20:23:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961713 ] server error when trying to change Statistics Options Message-ID: Bugs item #961713, was opened at 2004-05-28 05:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: server error when trying to change Statistics Options Initial Comment: Attempting to change the Ham cutoff or Spam cutoff statistic options and pressing Save produces the following error on this version and on the previous version of Spambayes proxy for Windows: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-02 12:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, that is the correct file. I wasn't that clear when I talked about an old value - I was meaning that the format for an option changed, and so that would be the problem, and it (more-or-less) was. To duplicate this: set either of the notate_ options to a single value, save the configuration, stop sb_server, then start it again, and try to change the value to more than one value. I've checked in a fix for this, so it'll be fixed in a future release. I'm not sure whether this will be 1.0 or not (it's rather late for that). For the moment, you can simply edit the configuration file by hand, or remove the notate_subject option while you edit using the web interface, and then put it back. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: psage (psage) Date: 2004-06-01 21:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051271 The only config file I can locate is the bayescustomize.ini file. Is that what you mean? I doubt that's the issue because this problem has existed since my FIRST install of spambayes proxy, so it couldn't be an old value. Here is the contents of that file: [Headers] notate_subject:spam [pop3proxy] listen_ports:110 remote_servers:pop.myserver.com [smtpproxy] ham_address:ham@localhost listen_ports: remote_servers: spam_address:spam@localhost [Tokenizer] x-fancy_url_recognition:True x-pick_apart_urls:True [URLRetriever] x-cache_expiry_days:30 x-only_slurp_base:True x-slurp_urls:True [Categorization] ham_cutoff:0.21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this, whatever options I try. There is a problem, though, because this AttributeError has been reported by several people. My only explanation is that it's caused by an old value in configuration files, but I don't know which one it would be. Would you mind attaching your config file to this tracker? Cut out or XXX the servers if you like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961713&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 1 23:13:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 1 23:26:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-962693 ] mozilla/thunderbird/netscape profile dir detection Message-ID: Patches item #962693, was opened at 2004-05-29 21:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=962693&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: alch (alch) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: mozilla/thunderbird/netscape profile dir detection Initial Comment: Hi, Fistly thanks a lot for you excellent project. It serves me as a reference in development of Clamwin Antivirus (clamwin.net). As I started to implement POP3 proxy for virus scanning, obviously I decided to adapt code from spambayes. I was able to improve Mozilla/Thinderbird/Netscape mail client detection and developed a scrip (MozRegistry.py) that parses Mozilla's registry.dat and finds the default profile location. Also there were some minor bugs in autoconfigure.py regarding Outlook Express SMTP port (not always present) and Mozilla's spam folders. I attach a zip farchive with the patch and MozRegistry.py script. It hasn't been thoroughly tested yet, but I thought you may find it useful before the 1.0 release. Regards, Alch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: alch (alch) Date: 2004-06-02 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1004158 Hi, As I am the author of MozRegistry.py I grant you the permission to use it in SpamBayes project as you wish necessary. If that requires transferring the license to PSF then I am happy to do that. Now as we are talking licenses, I have used some of the code (heavily modified) from spambayes in clamwin. These source file in clamwin (outlookaddin.py) are GPL and they also have PSF license included. Is this the right way to use the code form spambayes, or shall the whole file that contains portions of PSF code carry PSF license only? Cheers, Alch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks! I've checked in the fixes, although the the improved Mozilla (etc) stuff. Since MozRegistry.py is GPL'd, I don't think that we can include it with the SpamBayes dist (of course, IANAL). Thanks for the offer, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=962693&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 2 10:18:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jun 2 10:18:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-965048 ] Outlook 2002 crashes Message-ID: Bugs item #965048, was opened at 2004-06-02 09:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=965048&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 crashes Initial Comment: Not sure if this is in the right group or not. My Outlook crashes quite frequently since I installed Spambayes. It does it when I try to send a file from Windows explorer. Right click file on desktop, choose send to mail recipient, fill out info and send, it freezes and I have to end task thru task manager in order to use anything on my pc. Have checked application event and see this error: Hanging application OUTLOOK.EXE, version 10.0.6626.0, hang module hungapp, version 0.0.0.0, hang address 0x00000000. Also: Fault bucket 21955421. Have reinstalled and reformatted hard drive several times, so I don't think its related to my harware or other software. This is my first time reporting a bug, hopefully its done correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=965048&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 2 11:35:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jun 2 11:36:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Message-ID: Bugs item #956834, was opened at 2004-05-19 09:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bcurtis You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hans Otten (haotten) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for a while and when I upgraded to the 0.8 release everything worked fine until I highlighted an email that spambayes had not caught and clicked on the "Delete as Spam" button. Outlook crashed and I had to restart. Then I discovered if I try to access any SpamBayes function Outlook immediatly crashes. I just upgraded to rc1 and the same thing still occurs. Please note that the SpamBayes is still properly removing the spam. I have attached the log file, where I noticed several Eeek statements and the following error : only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-06-02 08:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I couldn't find a log file -- do I have to enable that? If so, how? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log file attached. Could either of you attach the log file? (Don't forget to tick the wee box!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-05-27 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I am also experiencing this problem. 1.0rc1 binary with Outlook 2003 using Exchange. It sorts out spam just fine, but if I click on the SpamBayes drop-down menu button from the toolbar Outlook crashes (every time). Great product otherwise! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 2 12:39:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jun 2 12:40:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #957707, was opened at 2004-05-20 22:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stolkin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Initial Comment: I have configured SpamBayes to run the Outlook Addin 1.0rc1 in background, with start delay of 2 seconds, and delay of either 1 or 0 seconds. (I tried both trying to solve the problem reported here.) When spam email arrives it sometimes, but not always, is filtered and then moved to my spamkeep or spam_maybe folders. Other times I have to manually invoke "filter messages" for something to happen. They have not been filtered, e.g. switching to another folder does not cause them to move. I think that once I have manually filtered in an Outlook session later emails will be filtered automatically. This behavior happened with my older (about 1 year old) SpamBayes. But now I notice the additional bad effect: if I archive a folder (e.g. my spamkeep folder -- I keep it in case I need to retrain) the messages are archived, but they do not *seem* to move until I click on another folder. This behavior is new, and undesirable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Date: 2004-06-02 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=732641 As requested by anadelonbrin I am attaching a log file. Except for the last 5 lines, this was the log file this morning when I noticed that the Outlook Addin was not automatically filtering messages. Then I manually ran "Filter Messages ..." (which did move a few spam messages). After this the log had 5 more lines. Here are those last 5 lines, as output by running diff on the before copy and after copy of the log file. (Formatting was changed when I entered the data, but you can see when each line begins by looking for the > symbol): > Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\A071046\Application Data\SpamBayes\Default Outlook Profile.ini > SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/_home' > SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/Inbox' > SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/InboxMyMisc/spamkeep' > Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\A071046\Application Data\SpamBayes\Default Outlook Profile.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 23:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Steven: could you attach a log file that covers a period with the first problem (the messages not filtering)? The messages not moving until they are deselected sounds similar to another reported problem, but, unfortunately, it's one that we're not sure what the cause of is, yet. huxley75: Any DBRunRecovery error means that the database is hosed, and the only way to fix that is to retrain from scratch. This is extremely rare with the plug-in, and we don't know why it happens in the remaining cases - any chance that Outlook crashed in the middle of training at some point? The timer values can't be zero - fixing the constraints is being dealt with in another tracker, IIRC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anthony Parcero (huxley75) Date: 2004-05-26 07:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=159242 I'm having a similar problem with my Outlook plugin, as well. I'm using Outlook 2K on WinXP and the problem just started cropping up (I've been running previous versions of SpamBayes without a hitch until I upgraded to v1.0b1, when I first noticed the issue). Looking at the SpamBayes log, I found: "Bayes database initialized with 779 spam and 1337 good messages *** - message database has 2095 messages - bayes has 2116 - something is screwey" in the log. I had noticed that SpamBayes wasn't adding new spam to its training database (I had gotten up to over 1000 spam in the Junk E-Mail folder but it never registered above 800 spam). There is also a "Folders/Junk Suspects - pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method." error, "The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable", and a number of similar "'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected;" throughout the log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 3 19:00:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 3 19:00:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966175 ] Odd ham probability in clues Message-ID: Bugs item #966175, was opened at 2004-06-03 23:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Odd ham probability in clues Initial Comment: I'm not sure if this is a bug, but the ham probability looked very odd here: Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 8.7e-005 - - *S* 0.994303 - - visa 0.081789 17 2 security 0.168117 79 24 employment 0.186997 15 5 win 0.268726 72 40 finance 0.281642 49 29 build 0.29694 33 21 skip:r 10 0.309556 197 134 to:addr:mindspring.com 0.312988 243 168 credit 0.334167 113 86 promotional 0.35236 5 4 proto:http 0.606301 483 1130 x-mailer:none 0.620156 358 888 url:index 0.625918 92 234 url:php 0.702356 73 262 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.705877 221 806 url:info 0.746857 26 117 header:Reply-To:1 0.755197 129 605 ,algorithmic 0.844828 0 1 ,directrices 0.844828 0 1 ,sassafras 0.844828 0 1 antwan 0.844828 0 1 car.,* 0.844828 0 1 charge,,$ 0.844828 0 1 check,,) 0.844828 0 1 credit..,& 0.844828 0 1 depoits,,` 0.844828 0 1 english,) 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 from:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 offer,) 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 subject:ferdinand 0.844828 0 1 url:9201 0.844828 0 1 url:alphacardz 0.844828 0 1 ,aniline 0.908163 0 2 message-id:@citiz.net 0.965116 0 6 to:addr:ladonnab 0.973373 0 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 3 19:04:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 3 19:04:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966175 ] Odd ham probability in clues Message-ID: Bugs item #966175, was opened at 2004-06-03 19:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Odd ham probability in clues Initial Comment: I'm not sure if this is a bug, but the ham probability looked very odd here: Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 8.7e-005 - - *S* 0.994303 - - visa 0.081789 17 2 security 0.168117 79 24 employment 0.186997 15 5 win 0.268726 72 40 finance 0.281642 49 29 build 0.29694 33 21 skip:r 10 0.309556 197 134 to:addr:mindspring.com 0.312988 243 168 credit 0.334167 113 86 promotional 0.35236 5 4 proto:http 0.606301 483 1130 x-mailer:none 0.620156 358 888 url:index 0.625918 92 234 url:php 0.702356 73 262 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.705877 221 806 url:info 0.746857 26 117 header:Reply-To:1 0.755197 129 605 ,algorithmic 0.844828 0 1 ,directrices 0.844828 0 1 ,sassafras 0.844828 0 1 antwan 0.844828 0 1 car.,* 0.844828 0 1 charge,,$ 0.844828 0 1 check,,) 0.844828 0 1 credit..,& 0.844828 0 1 depoits,,` 0.844828 0 1 english,) 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 from:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 offer,) 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 subject:ferdinand 0.844828 0 1 url:9201 0.844828 0 1 url:alphacardz 0.844828 0 1 ,aniline 0.908163 0 2 message-id:@citiz.net 0.965116 0 6 to:addr:ladonnab 0.973373 0 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-06-03 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What specifically looks very odd to you? Also reveal how many ham and spam the database was trained on. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 4 08:51:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 4 08:51:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966487 ] uncaptured python exception ... object has no attribute 'isC Message-ID: Bugs item #966487, was opened at 2004-06-04 14:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966487&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: uncaptured python exception ... object has no attribute 'isC Initial Comment: hello, CVS of spambayes as well as 1.0rc1 crashes on our mailserver after running for 1 hour up to 1 day. the bug was reported for the 1st time (i think) in January (see http://mail.python. org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/2004-January/001857.html). the version 1.0a7 worked just fine for me (as opposed to Gisli's message). we're running python 2.3 on the mailserver. a snippet of the original message follows: Gisli Ottarsson gisli.ottarsson at mscsoftware.com: I have fetchmail sucking e-mail through a spambayes pop3 proxy. I am using spambayes-1.0a7 and have tried both python 2.2 and 2.3. The computer is running Debian unstable. This is working very well, except about once every 24 hours spambayes quits with this message: error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.BayesProxyListener listening :1110 at 0x83620d4> (exceptions.IOError:[Errno 5] Input/output error [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|100] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|391] [/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler. py|handle_accept|280] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|__init__|341] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|__init__|183] [/usr/bin/sb_server. py|__init__|142]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__. BayesProxy connected 127.0.0.1:42864 at 0x841acac> (exceptions.AttributeError:'_socket.socket' object has no attribute 'isClosed' [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|113] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_write_event|404] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|handle_write|146] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|initiate_send|208] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|refill_buffer|189] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|close|372] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|__getattr__|372]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 4 10:16:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 4 10:16:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955934 ] e-mail is not filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #955934, was opened at 2004-05-18 09:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mnitabach You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955934&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: BC (cormiewg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: e-mail is not filterable Initial Comment: An e-mail from "System Administrator" with an icon of a red curved arrow. When I "Delete as Spam", a message box "No filterable mail items are selected." is presented. If I select this item along wiht others, it is ignored. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Nitabach (mnitabach) Date: 2004-06-04 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1056858 I have received several e-mails that cause the same behavior. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955934&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 4 12:19:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 4 12:36:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966644 ] imapfilter troubles Message-ID: Bugs item #966644, was opened at 2004-06-04 16:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966644&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter troubles Initial Comment: WinXP, Python 2.3.3 I run the program (classifying), enter my password, wait about a minute and then I get an error message. The emails don't seem to get classified. Classifying worked before for me (with rc1). Here's the output: C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -P SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 643, in __getitem__msg.Save() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 504, in Save self.as_string()) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 472, in as_string return message.SBHeaderMessage.as_string(self, unixfrom) File "c:\progra~1\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 279, in as_string return self._force_CRLF(email.Message.Message.as_string(self, unixfrom)) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966644&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 4 18:00:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 4 18:00:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966837 ] Error message Message-ID: Bugs item #966837, was opened at 2004-06-05 10:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966837&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: oneilonline (oneilonline) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error message Initial Comment: Installation of SpamBayes works good. However, when opening Outlook for the first time, when the setup tutorial occurs, I get this message insted (see attached) Once closing the window, Outlook functions normally. SpamBayes not functining. Naturally, this window opens everytme Outlook is opened cause the setup hasn't completed. I have uninstalled and reinstalled a number of times...no solution. I have installed SpamBayes onto at least 20 PCs, all Office XP or 2003, only this PC has this issue. Any help appreciated! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966837&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 4 20:38:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 4 20:38:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 12:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by edaly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-05 00:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 22:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 20:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jun 5 21:22:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jun 5 21:22:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966644 ] imapfilter troubles Message-ID: Bugs item #966644, was opened at 2004-06-05 04:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966644&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter troubles Initial Comment: WinXP, Python 2.3.3 I run the program (classifying), enter my password, wait about a minute and then I get an error message. The emails don't seem to get classified. Classifying worked before for me (with rc1). Here's the output: C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -P SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 643, in __getitem__msg.Save() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 504, in Save self.as_string()) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 472, in as_string return message.SBHeaderMessage.as_string(self, unixfrom) File "c:\progra~1\python\Lib\site-packages\spambayes\message.py", line 279, in as_string return self._force_CRLF(email.Message.Message.as_string(self, unixfrom)) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-06 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem here is a single message, almost certainly spam, which is malformed. For the moment, the solution is to manually remove that message, and then all should be fine. A fix for this has already been checked in, so once the next release (1.0rc2, most likely) comes out, this will no longer be a problem. Longer term, the email parser that SpamBayes uses has been updated so that just about any malformed mail should be handled correctly. It'll be a couple of months before we start using this, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966644&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 01:54:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 01:54:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-967458 ] Cannot regtister for multiple users Message-ID: Bugs item #967458, was opened at 2004-06-06 05:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=967458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Saunders (mjsbgs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot regtister for multiple users Initial Comment: I tried the instructions for registering the program for a multi-user machine. I enetered the following in the Run box: regsvr32.exe /i:hkey_local_machine "c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\bin\outlook_addin.dll" and got the following message: c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\bin\outlook_addin.dll was loaded but the Dllinstall entry point was not found. This file can not be registered. I am running Outlook 2000 SP-3 under Windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=967458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 01:57:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 01:57:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-967458 ] Cannot regtister for multiple users Message-ID: Bugs item #967458, was opened at 2004-06-06 17:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=967458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Saunders (mjsbgs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot regtister for multiple users Initial Comment: I tried the instructions for registering the program for a multi-user machine. I enetered the following in the Run box: regsvr32.exe /i:hkey_local_machine "c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\bin\outlook_addin.dll" and got the following message: c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\bin\outlook_addin.dll was loaded but the Dllinstall entry point was not found. This file can not be registered. I am running Outlook 2000 SP-3 under Windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-06 17:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please follow the updated instructions that can be found in the online version of the troubleshooting guide. Your local copy has a link (at the top), or use: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=967458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 03:23:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 03:24:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by be037446 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No errors in Opera nor Thunderbird nor anywhere else. I will set only one account to pass through the filter and send another log. Perhaps it's more clear to read then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, it is hard to read with the two accounts (three at the top) intermixed. It definately does see that there are 14/3 messages, and gets the uidl for each. Then the log ends with two "REPR 1" commands (I presume one for each account). The log should then have the REPR responses (the whole body of the message, but the octet count), which it doesn't. I'm not sure why the log stops, though - I can't see how it would stop without some error occuring. Do you get any error in the log? Or any error in Opera? (like a timeout, or something?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-29 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No, as I want to use Opera to be my primary mail client, I don't leave the messages on the server. But I have the same problem with the Mozilla e-mail client which is configured to leave the messages on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 21:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 04:42:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 04:43:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by be037446 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 New log added. This time only one account activated for spamfiltering. The other accounts retrieve their mail directly with no problem. So, even with one account the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No errors in Opera nor Thunderbird nor anywhere else. I will set only one account to pass through the filter and send another log. Perhaps it's more clear to read then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, it is hard to read with the two accounts (three at the top) intermixed. It definately does see that there are 14/3 messages, and gets the uidl for each. Then the log ends with two "REPR 1" commands (I presume one for each account). The log should then have the REPR responses (the whole body of the message, but the octet count), which it doesn't. I'm not sure why the log stops, though - I can't see how it would stop without some error occuring. Do you get any error in the log? Or any error in Opera? (like a timeout, or something?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-29 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No, as I want to use Opera to be my primary mail client, I don't leave the messages on the server. But I have the same problem with the Mozilla e-mail client which is configured to leave the messages on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 21:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 04:52:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 04:52:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by be037446 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 10:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 Sorry guys but it seems I overlooked something. Added another log (found in the command line window) with clearly some errors. I hope this can clearify something. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 New log added. This time only one account activated for spamfiltering. The other accounts retrieve their mail directly with no problem. So, even with one account the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No errors in Opera nor Thunderbird nor anywhere else. I will set only one account to pass through the filter and send another log. Perhaps it's more clear to read then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, it is hard to read with the two accounts (three at the top) intermixed. It definately does see that there are 14/3 messages, and gets the uidl for each. Then the log ends with two "REPR 1" commands (I presume one for each account). The log should then have the REPR responses (the whole body of the message, but the octet count), which it doesn't. I'm not sure why the log stops, though - I can't see how it would stop without some error occuring. Do you get any error in the log? Or any error in Opera? (like a timeout, or something?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-29 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No, as I want to use Opera to be my primary mail client, I don't leave the messages on the server. But I have the same problem with the Mozilla e-mail client which is configured to leave the messages on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 21:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 07:13:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 07:13:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dzenc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 07:32:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 07:32:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dzenc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 07:32:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 07:33:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dzenc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 12:24:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 12:24:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dzenc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 09:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Checked again at 9:15am this morning. Checked the latest two messages in the possible spam folder. First message was received at 9:11am and had an 83% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. Second message was received at 9:07am and had a 50% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. No training was performed between the time the messages were recieved and the time I checked them. What additional data would be helpful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 6 12:37:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 6 12:37:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dzenc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Just caught one as it arrived: At 9:31am a message arrived and was put into the possible spam folder. Outlook spam field says 52%. I immediately ran show spam clues, which said that it was 100%. BTW - I am running version v1.0rc1, but this happened in the previous version as well. I am using it with Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 09:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Checked again at 9:15am this morning. Checked the latest two messages in the possible spam folder. First message was received at 9:11am and had an 83% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. Second message was received at 9:07am and had a 50% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. No training was performed between the time the messages were recieved and the time I checked them. What additional data would be helpful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 7 05:53:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 7 05:53:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-968069 ] SpamBayes causes OL2003 to crash when launched by ActiveSync Message-ID: Bugs item #968069, was opened at 2004-06-07 10:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=968069&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alun (aluncarp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes causes OL2003 to crash when launched by ActiveSync Initial Comment: I am using SpamBayes RC1 but this happened in previous versions. If I plug in my PDA without Outlook running ActiveSync will launch Outlook to perform synchronisation. Outlook then encouters a serious error when opening the add-in spambayes. If I launch Outlook before plugging in my PDA everything is fine, if I disable the spambayes add-in Outlook launches fine from ActiveSync. System details: Windows XP Pro SP1, 768 MB RAM, Outlook 2003 All with latest hot fixes/updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=968069&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 7 09:28:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 7 09:29:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 10:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-07 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Could you attach a copy of the "show spam clues" info as well as a copy of your SpamBayes logfiles immediately following the error? The Troubleshooting Guide has info on how to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Just caught one as it arrived: At 9:31am a message arrived and was put into the possible spam folder. Outlook spam field says 52%. I immediately ran show spam clues, which said that it was 100%. BTW - I am running version v1.0rc1, but this happened in the previous version as well. I am using it with Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 12:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Checked again at 9:15am this morning. Checked the latest two messages in the possible spam folder. First message was received at 9:11am and had an 83% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. Second message was received at 9:07am and had a 50% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. No training was performed between the time the messages were recieved and the time I checked them. What additional data would be helpful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 07:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 07:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 07:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 12:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 7 10:55:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 7 10:55:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Message-ID: Bugs item #956834, was opened at 2004-05-19 12:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by haotten You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hans Otten (haotten) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for a while and when I upgraded to the 0.8 release everything worked fine until I highlighted an email that spambayes had not caught and clicked on the "Delete as Spam" button. Outlook crashed and I had to restart. Then I discovered if I try to access any SpamBayes function Outlook immediatly crashes. I just upgraded to rc1 and the same thing still occurs. Please note that the SpamBayes is still properly removing the spam. I have attached the log file, where I noticed several Eeek statements and the following error : only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hans Otten (haotten) Date: 2004-06-07 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=229205 Here is the attached Log file... Sorry about that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-06-02 11:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I couldn't find a log file -- do I have to enable that? If so, how? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log file attached. Could either of you attach the log file? (Don't forget to tick the wee box!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-05-27 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I am also experiencing this problem. 1.0rc1 binary with Outlook 2003 using Exchange. It sorts out spam just fine, but if I click on the SpamBayes drop-down menu button from the toolbar Outlook crashes (every time). Great product otherwise! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 7 15:22:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 7 15:23:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955934 ] e-mail is not filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #955934, was opened at 2004-05-18 09:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mnitabach You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955934&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: BC (cormiewg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: e-mail is not filterable Initial Comment: An e-mail from "System Administrator" with an icon of a red curved arrow. When I "Delete as Spam", a message box "No filterable mail items are selected." is presented. If I select this item along wiht others, it is ignored. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Nitabach (mnitabach) Date: 2004-06-07 15:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1056858 I have received another crop of these e-mails over the weekend. They are all automatically-bounced e-mails. If it would be helpful, I can provide the e-mails to whomever is working on this bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Nitabach (mnitabach) Date: 2004-06-04 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1056858 I have received several e-mails that cause the same behavior. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955934&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 8 03:25:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 8 03:25:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966175 ] Odd ham probability in clues Message-ID: Bugs item #966175, was opened at 2004-06-03 23:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by psage You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Odd ham probability in clues Initial Comment: I'm not sure if this is a bug, but the ham probability looked very odd here: Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 8.7e-005 - - *S* 0.994303 - - visa 0.081789 17 2 security 0.168117 79 24 employment 0.186997 15 5 win 0.268726 72 40 finance 0.281642 49 29 build 0.29694 33 21 skip:r 10 0.309556 197 134 to:addr:mindspring.com 0.312988 243 168 credit 0.334167 113 86 promotional 0.35236 5 4 proto:http 0.606301 483 1130 x-mailer:none 0.620156 358 888 url:index 0.625918 92 234 url:php 0.702356 73 262 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.705877 221 806 url:info 0.746857 26 117 header:Reply-To:1 0.755197 129 605 ,algorithmic 0.844828 0 1 ,directrices 0.844828 0 1 ,sassafras 0.844828 0 1 antwan 0.844828 0 1 car.,* 0.844828 0 1 charge,,$ 0.844828 0 1 check,,) 0.844828 0 1 credit..,& 0.844828 0 1 depoits,,` 0.844828 0 1 english,) 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 from:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 offer,) 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 subject:ferdinand 0.844828 0 1 url:9201 0.844828 0 1 url:alphacardz 0.844828 0 1 ,aniline 0.908163 0 2 message-id:@citiz.net 0.965116 0 6 to:addr:ladonnab 0.973373 0 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: psage (psage) Date: 2004-06-08 07:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051271 Is 8.7e-005 a reasonable and valid probability for spambayes? If so, nevermind. I haven't seen any probabilities like that in spambayes before. Total emails trained: Spam: 1286 Ham: 795 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-06-03 23:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What specifically looks very odd to you? Also reveal how many ham and spam the database was trained on. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 8 21:37:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 8 21:37:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-969328 ] Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #969328, was opened at 2004-06-08 19:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Initial Comment: Python 2.3.4 Red Hat EL 3.0 WS Update 2 Failure seems messsage dependent. Any Python meister care to suggest what this means ? Tue Jun 8 18:55:00 MDT 2004 Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ...................................****.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 626, in __getitem__ data = _extract_fetch_data(response[1][0]) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 172, in _extract_fetch_data mo = FETCH_RESPONSE_RE.match(response) TypeError: expected string or buffer This failure seems to occur when there are several (5+) messages to classify The next classification then does this :- Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ....................................*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 6.5131 seconds. Which seems to complete the task that the first call barf'd on so this does not seem high priority just messy :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 8 21:52:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 8 21:52:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966175 ] Odd ham probability in clues Message-ID: Bugs item #966175, was opened at 2004-06-03 19:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: psage (psage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Odd ham probability in clues Initial Comment: I'm not sure if this is a bug, but the ham probability looked very odd here: Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 8.7e-005 - - *S* 0.994303 - - visa 0.081789 17 2 security 0.168117 79 24 employment 0.186997 15 5 win 0.268726 72 40 finance 0.281642 49 29 build 0.29694 33 21 skip:r 10 0.309556 197 134 to:addr:mindspring.com 0.312988 243 168 credit 0.334167 113 86 promotional 0.35236 5 4 proto:http 0.606301 483 1130 x-mailer:none 0.620156 358 888 url:index 0.625918 92 234 url:php 0.702356 73 262 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.705877 221 806 url:info 0.746857 26 117 header:Reply-To:1 0.755197 129 605 ,algorithmic 0.844828 0 1 ,directrices 0.844828 0 1 ,sassafras 0.844828 0 1 antwan 0.844828 0 1 car.,* 0.844828 0 1 charge,,$ 0.844828 0 1 check,,) 0.844828 0 1 credit..,& 0.844828 0 1 depoits,,` 0.844828 0 1 english,) 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 from:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 from:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 offer,) 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:goldmail.ru 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:addr:lhhyngfjhew 0.844828 0 1 reply-to:name:antoinette 0.844828 0 1 subject:ferdinand 0.844828 0 1 url:9201 0.844828 0 1 url:alphacardz 0.844828 0 1 ,aniline 0.908163 0 2 message-id:@citiz.net 0.965116 0 6 to:addr:ladonnab 0.973373 0 8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-06-08 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 8.7e-005 is "scientific notation", another way of spelling 0.0000875. It's not uncommon for SpamBayes to compute ham or spam scores as low as 1e-16. They're not really probabilities of "being ham" or "being spam". If you really want to know , 8.7e-5 is the probability that a message with that many tokens would have individual token spamprobs so strongly skewed toward 1.0, if individual token spamprobs are drawn from the unit uniform distribution. There's no clear sense in which that's the probability that a message "is ham", but 8.7e-5 is very strong evidence that the token spamprobs in this msg were *not* drawn from the unit uniform distribution. If you're not sorry you asked yet, there are links on the SpamBayes website to online papers about the underlying mathematics. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: psage (psage) Date: 2004-06-08 03:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051271 Is 8.7e-005 a reasonable and valid probability for spambayes? If so, nevermind. I haven't seen any probabilities like that in spambayes before. Total emails trained: Spam: 1286 Ham: 795 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-06-03 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What specifically looks very odd to you? Also reveal how many ham and spam the database was trained on. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 05:48:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 05:49:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970227 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #970227, was opened at 2004-06-10 09:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --- Mail as received via spambayes pop3 proxy: Return-Path: Received: from 200-32-4-197.prima.net.ar (200-32-4- 197.prima.net.ar [200.32.4.197]) by mx2.jaring.my (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5966DVB056107 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:06:15 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from Christa% RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.com) Message-Id: <200406090606.i5966DVB056107@mx2.jaring.my> From: Cornelia.Gore Reply-To: Christa%RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.comuvehkh Subject: If you need auto warranty..try us hereylcyk To: lyeoh@pop.jaring.my X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:10:53 -0700 Organization: eGroups Message Poster Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="757734383087425135" X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --757734383087425135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" If you drive a car, new or used, check this out our warranty program. Save thousands on repairs, rentals, towing and more. Protect your investment GOTO: rayar.us/index.php?aff=3DD3Sh -copy and paste to your browsers address bar to view site- If over tuba player learn a hard lesson from spider of, then tripod about = hesitates.=20 cough syrup inside impresario, bride from, and fruit cake toward are what made America great!If defined by cowboy know blood clot of grain of sand, then hockey player from minivan hibernates.Where we can non- chalantly a big fan of our cargo bay. --757734383087425135 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 08:49:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 08:49:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970227 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #970227, was opened at 2004-06-10 04:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jepler You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --- Mail as received via spambayes pop3 proxy: Return-Path: Received: from 200-32-4-197.prima.net.ar (200-32-4- 197.prima.net.ar [200.32.4.197]) by mx2.jaring.my (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5966DVB056107 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:06:15 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from Christa% RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.com) Message-Id: <200406090606.i5966DVB056107@mx2.jaring.my> From: Cornelia.Gore Reply-To: Christa%RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.comuvehkh Subject: If you need auto warranty..try us hereylcyk To: lyeoh@pop.jaring.my X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:10:53 -0700 Organization: eGroups Message Poster Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="757734383087425135" X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --757734383087425135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" If you drive a car, new or used, check this out our warranty program. Save thousands on repairs, rentals, towing and more. Protect your investment GOTO: rayar.us/index.php?aff=3DD3Sh -copy and paste to your browsers address bar to view site- If over tuba player learn a hard lesson from spider of, then tripod about = hesitates.=20 cough syrup inside impresario, bride from, and fruit cake toward are what made America great!If defined by cowboy know blood clot of grain of sand, then hockey player from minivan hibernates.Where we can non- chalantly a big fan of our cargo bay. --757734383087425135 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Epler (jepler) Date: 2004-06-10 07:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2772 I got a near-identical traceback from a similar spam. upgrading to spambayes 1.0rc1 didn't fix it, but upgrading to email 2.5.5 did. (Python 2.2.3 here) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 09:14:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 09:14:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970359 ] XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #970359, was opened at 2004-06-10 13:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Bartram (stevebartram) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Initial Comment: First, thank you for SpamBayes. It marks my spam very well indeed. However, when training SpamBayes via the web inteface (which is very nice) it frequently freezes my computer so even ctrl-alt-delete won't work. I've checked the Spambayes mailing lists and haven't seen any other report of this problem. Environment: I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (). I have trained 360 ham and 412 spam. (although the "Check for latest version" reports version "0.6") It's the Windows binary version. Some mail retrieved by Pegasus email and some by a custom perl script. These work without any problems. FireFox 0.8 AVG anti-virus up-to-date and ZoneAlarm correctly configured. SpamBayes trained via web interface, I haven't tried the smtp proxy method. SpamBayes is almost in it's default setup. It is using dbm for storage. Here is my bayescustomize.ini ================ [Headers] header_score_logarithm:True include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True [html_ui] display_score:True [pop3proxy] listen_ports:8110,8111,8112,8113 remote_servers:..... [smtpproxy] use_cached_message:True ================ SpamBayesServer1.log: ================ Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 8225 is proxying 127.0.01:25 Listener on port 8110 is proxying mail.zetnet.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8111 is proxying mail.tesco.net:110 Listener on port 8112 is proxying pop3.connectfree.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8113 is proxying mail.onetel.net.uk:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ ================ Symptoms: Quite frequently (but NOT consistently!) my computer will freeze when training SpamBayes via the web interface. This starts as a page not finishing loading. Sometimes this is the review page, but more often it is a page displaying a specific email. But, as I was writing this email and checking my configuration it did it on the page displaying which storage option was being used. When this happens I can still click a few times. The "back" button in the browser often seems to work. But after a few clicks the system starts to lock up. First all application windows fail to refresh their contents, although their frames redraw. This is rapidly followed by no response at all, even to ctrl-alt-delete. At which point only a hard reset will work. After rebooting SpamBayes may successfully train on the same set of emails. Or, it may freeze again. I usually avoid trying to examine the email that I was trying to view when the last freeze occurred. Instead, I find it in my email client and check it there. These freezes only happen on the spambayes pages. I haven't changed/installed anything else recently. I have tried closing Pegasus and stopping the perl script (which runs periodically) before trying to train. But this didn't prevent the freeze. I also tried IE 6 instead of FireFox, but that froze too. Any help will be greatly appreciated. TIA, Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 09:47:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 09:47:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970374 ] Score column disappears from review page Message-ID: Bugs item #970374, was opened at 2004-06-10 13:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970374&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Bartram (stevebartram) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Score column disappears from review page Initial Comment: I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (). I have trained 360 ham and 412 spam. The score column disappears from the review page if I change any of the options on any of the config pages. Exiting and restarting SpamBayes restores the score. Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970374&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 12:09:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 12:10:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970517 ] Outlook 2000 crashes upon opening Message-ID: Bugs item #970517, was opened at 2004-06-10 11:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970517&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: debi (debiwi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000 crashes upon opening Initial Comment: Following a crash on boss's laptop running Win 2K, every time I try to open his Outlook with SpamBayes installed I get a program error that simply says "OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the program." Only by uninstalling Spambayes have I been able to access Outlook, even after a complete re-install of Windows & MS Office (although it did acknowledge prior office settings of which I used, from his network profile). However, with SpamBayes uninstalled the SpamBayes toolbar is still there and it still crashes with the same Program Error message if I attempt to customize under settings or customize or delete the toolbar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970517&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 12:25:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 12:26:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970517 ] Outlook 2000 crashes upon opening Message-ID: Bugs item #970517, was opened at 2004-06-10 11:09 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by debiwi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970517&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Submitted By: debi (debiwi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000 crashes upon opening Initial Comment: Following a crash on boss's laptop running Win 2K, every time I try to open his Outlook with SpamBayes installed I get a program error that simply says "OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the program." Only by uninstalling Spambayes have I been able to access Outlook, even after a complete re-install of Windows & MS Office (although it did acknowledge prior office settings of which I used, from his network profile). However, with SpamBayes uninstalled the SpamBayes toolbar is still there and it still crashes with the same Program Error message if I attempt to customize under settings or customize or delete the toolbar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970517&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 12:32:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 12:32:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970227 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #970227, was opened at 2004-06-10 09:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lyeoh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --- Mail as received via spambayes pop3 proxy: Return-Path: Received: from 200-32-4-197.prima.net.ar (200-32-4- 197.prima.net.ar [200.32.4.197]) by mx2.jaring.my (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5966DVB056107 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:06:15 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from Christa% RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.com) Message-Id: <200406090606.i5966DVB056107@mx2.jaring.my> From: Cornelia.Gore Reply-To: Christa%RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.comuvehkh Subject: If you need auto warranty..try us hereylcyk To: lyeoh@pop.jaring.my X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:10:53 -0700 Organization: eGroups Message Poster Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="757734383087425135" X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --757734383087425135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" If you drive a car, new or used, check this out our warranty program. Save thousands on repairs, rentals, towing and more. Protect your investment GOTO: rayar.us/index.php?aff=3DD3Sh -copy and paste to your browsers address bar to view site- If over tuba player learn a hard lesson from spider of, then tripod about = hesitates.=20 cough syrup inside impresario, bride from, and fruit cake toward are what made America great!If defined by cowboy know blood clot of grain of sand, then hockey player from minivan hibernates.Where we can non- chalantly a big fan of our cargo bay. --757734383087425135 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-10 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Another one: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Epler (jepler) Date: 2004-06-10 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2772 I got a near-identical traceback from a similar spam. upgrading to spambayes 1.0rc1 didn't fix it, but upgrading to email 2.5.5 did. (Python 2.2.3 here) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 12:53:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 12:53:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970227 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #970227, was opened at 2004-06-10 09:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lyeoh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --- Mail as received via spambayes pop3 proxy: Return-Path: Received: from 200-32-4-197.prima.net.ar (200-32-4- 197.prima.net.ar [200.32.4.197]) by mx2.jaring.my (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5966DVB056107 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:06:15 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from Christa% RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.com) Message-Id: <200406090606.i5966DVB056107@mx2.jaring.my> From: Cornelia.Gore Reply-To: Christa%RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.comuvehkh Subject: If you need auto warranty..try us hereylcyk To: lyeoh@pop.jaring.my X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:10:53 -0700 Organization: eGroups Message Poster Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="757734383087425135" X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --757734383087425135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" If you drive a car, new or used, check this out our warranty program. Save thousands on repairs, rentals, towing and more. Protect your investment GOTO: rayar.us/index.php?aff=3DD3Sh -copy and paste to your browsers address bar to view site- If over tuba player learn a hard lesson from spider of, then tripod about = hesitates.=20 cough syrup inside impresario, bride from, and fruit cake toward are what made America great!If defined by cowboy know blood clot of grain of sand, then hockey player from minivan hibernates.Where we can non- chalantly a big fan of our cargo bay. --757734383087425135 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-10 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Forgot to add: platform = windows 2000 sp4, 512MB RAM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-10 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Another one: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Epler (jepler) Date: 2004-06-10 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2772 I got a near-identical traceback from a similar spam. upgrading to spambayes 1.0rc1 didn't fix it, but upgrading to email 2.5.5 did. (Python 2.2.3 here) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 19:32:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 19:32:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970227 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #970227, was opened at 2004-06-10 21:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --- Mail as received via spambayes pop3 proxy: Return-Path: Received: from 200-32-4-197.prima.net.ar (200-32-4- 197.prima.net.ar [200.32.4.197]) by mx2.jaring.my (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5966DVB056107 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:06:15 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from Christa% RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.com) Message-Id: <200406090606.i5966DVB056107@mx2.jaring.my> From: Cornelia.Gore Reply-To: Christa%RNDLCCHAR514@yahoo.comuvehkh Subject: If you need auto warranty..try us hereylcyk To: lyeoh@pop.jaring.my X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:10:53 -0700 Organization: eGroups Message Poster Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; boundary="757734383087425135" X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 264, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 279, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: --757734383087425135 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" If you drive a car, new or used, check this out our warranty program. Save thousands on repairs, rentals, towing and more. Protect your investment GOTO: rayar.us/index.php?aff=3DD3Sh -copy and paste to your browsers address bar to view site- If over tuba player learn a hard lesson from spider of, then tripod about = hesitates.=20 cough syrup inside impresario, bride from, and fruit cake toward are what made America great!If defined by cowboy know blood clot of grain of sand, then hockey player from minivan hibernates.Where we can non- chalantly a big fan of our cargo bay. --757734383087425135 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 04:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Forgot to add: platform = windows 2000 sp4, 512MB RAM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Another one: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Epler (jepler) Date: 2004-06-11 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2772 I got a near-identical traceback from a similar spam. upgrading to spambayes 1.0rc1 didn't fix it, but upgrading to email 2.5.5 did. (Python 2.2.3 here) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 23:13:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 23:13:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Bugs item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 03:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 23:19:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 23:19:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Bugs item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 15:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My Perl is extremely rusty. Exactly what do you mean by transparent proxying? i.e. what changes do you want from the current proxying? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 23:26:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 23:26:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Bugs item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 03:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lyeoh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 3 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 03:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Transparent proxying will require configuration of Linux iptables or FreeBSD IPFW to redirect desired TCP connections to the proxy. The proxy will then figure out the actual intended destination addr and port as per the code above, make the connections and do stuff - spamfiltering, protocol enforcement. NOTE: if it is possible to tell spambayes to connect to a particular popserver by using the following USER command then the need for a transparent proxy may be less, and one could also more easily chain proxies. e.g. USER user@name:popserver1 If the feature is active that should tell spambayes to connect to popserver1 and send USER user@name The delimiter ":" should be configurable. Not sure what would be best - maybe looking at the wrong RFC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My Perl is extremely rusty. Exactly what do you mean by transparent proxying? i.e. what changes do you want from the current proxying? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 10 23:33:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 10 23:33:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Bugs item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 15:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 15:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not familiar with transparent proxying, so forgive me if these are obvious questions: 1. Can this be done with Windows as well as Linux? There's a minimum of platform specific code in sb_server at the moment, and it's probably good to stay that way. 2. Does this offer any significant benefit over simply reconfiguring the client (either manually as at the moment, or automatically)? Python likes explicit over implicit, and this doesn't seem very explicit. SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing which server to connect to, and has one proxy port for each server instead. (Although the pspam code that's in the source dist does use this method). This was decided a long time back, and is highly unlikely to change now. You'd have to put forth some pretty compelling arguments to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Transparent proxying will require configuration of Linux iptables or FreeBSD IPFW to redirect desired TCP connections to the proxy. The proxy will then figure out the actual intended destination addr and port as per the code above, make the connections and do stuff - spamfiltering, protocol enforcement. NOTE: if it is possible to tell spambayes to connect to a particular popserver by using the following USER command then the need for a transparent proxy may be less, and one could also more easily chain proxies. e.g. USER user@name:popserver1 If the feature is active that should tell spambayes to connect to popserver1 and send USER user@name The delimiter ":" should be configurable. Not sure what would be best - maybe looking at the wrong RFC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My Perl is extremely rusty. Exactly what do you mean by transparent proxying? i.e. what changes do you want from the current proxying? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 11 03:13:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 11 03:14:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Bugs item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 03:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-06-11 07:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 [Tony] > SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing > which server to connect to The main reason for this is that the client can send requests before the USER request. For instance, it can issue a CAPA to ask the server which POP3 extensions it supports. If you don't know which real server to connect to until the USER request, you can't serve the CAPA request (or any others that are made before USER). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 03:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not familiar with transparent proxying, so forgive me if these are obvious questions: 1. Can this be done with Windows as well as Linux? There's a minimum of platform specific code in sb_server at the moment, and it's probably good to stay that way. 2. Does this offer any significant benefit over simply reconfiguring the client (either manually as at the moment, or automatically)? Python likes explicit over implicit, and this doesn't seem very explicit. SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing which server to connect to, and has one proxy port for each server instead. (Although the pspam code that's in the source dist does use this method). This was decided a long time back, and is highly unlikely to change now. You'd have to put forth some pretty compelling arguments to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 03:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Transparent proxying will require configuration of Linux iptables or FreeBSD IPFW to redirect desired TCP connections to the proxy. The proxy will then figure out the actual intended destination addr and port as per the code above, make the connections and do stuff - spamfiltering, protocol enforcement. NOTE: if it is possible to tell spambayes to connect to a particular popserver by using the following USER command then the need for a transparent proxy may be less, and one could also more easily chain proxies. e.g. USER user@name:popserver1 If the feature is active that should tell spambayes to connect to popserver1 and send USER user@name The delimiter ":" should be configurable. Not sure what would be best - maybe looking at the wrong RFC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My Perl is extremely rusty. Exactly what do you mean by transparent proxying? i.e. what changes do you want from the current proxying? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 11 12:10:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 11 12:10:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Bugs item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 03:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lyeoh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 16:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 OK, the support for CAPA, APOP etc is a valid reason to not support the proxy chaining with USER. Back to transparent proxying. With transparent proxying the mail clients can retain their mail settings as it is. What typically happens is the network is set up so that pop3 requests pass through a server (e.g. firewall) and are intercepted by the firewall rules and forwarded to a proxy listening on a local address:port - e.g. 127.0.0.3:10110 or something. The proxy figures out the original intended destination, makes the connections and proxies between the client and the destination. The client thinks it is talking directly to the destination (connection end point = dest IP:port), and in most setups the destination thinks it's talking to the proxy. If the proxy is down, the firewall rules could be changed to pass through the connections. Figuring out the original intended destination can be platform dependent. Apparently earlier versions of Linux were like FreeBSD. Newer versions of Linux require you to use the socket/IP options thing to get it. I'm not sure about Windows. Other issues: is it important for spambayes to distinguish one user-popserver pair from another? Transparent proxying could either complicate that, or the proxy admin will have to train and configure spambayes based on all messages passing through the proxy for all users and servers. It is in theory possible to set things up so that say a hundred different users use the same transparent proxy, but still get to administer and train their own "proxy". This could be done by creating spambayes accounts based on a successful pop3 login (perhaps only if automatic creation is enabled). If there's no spambayes account (either manually/automatically created), then the proxy goes to a "pass through" mode - no filtering or parsing. Alternatively an admin could administer on behalf of all users. Spambayes for the masses. That said, there may be performance and memory issues. Well there'd be another use for those multiGHz 64 bit CPUs eh? BTW spambayes takes 40MB of mem in peak usage on my Win2K machine. Is that shared amongst multiple connections or is that per connection? Fortunately I'm not using WinXP - based on some personal/anecdotal evidence it seems to have a memory handling algorithm that fails more disgracefully than W2K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-06-11 07:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 [Tony] > SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing > which server to connect to The main reason for this is that the client can send requests before the USER request. For instance, it can issue a CAPA to ask the server which POP3 extensions it supports. If you don't know which real server to connect to until the USER request, you can't serve the CAPA request (or any others that are made before USER). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 03:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not familiar with transparent proxying, so forgive me if these are obvious questions: 1. Can this be done with Windows as well as Linux? There's a minimum of platform specific code in sb_server at the moment, and it's probably good to stay that way. 2. Does this offer any significant benefit over simply reconfiguring the client (either manually as at the moment, or automatically)? Python likes explicit over implicit, and this doesn't seem very explicit. SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing which server to connect to, and has one proxy port for each server instead. (Although the pspam code that's in the source dist does use this method). This was decided a long time back, and is highly unlikely to change now. You'd have to put forth some pretty compelling arguments to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 03:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Transparent proxying will require configuration of Linux iptables or FreeBSD IPFW to redirect desired TCP connections to the proxy. The proxy will then figure out the actual intended destination addr and port as per the code above, make the connections and do stuff - spamfiltering, protocol enforcement. NOTE: if it is possible to tell spambayes to connect to a particular popserver by using the following USER command then the need for a transparent proxy may be less, and one could also more easily chain proxies. e.g. USER user@name:popserver1 If the feature is active that should tell spambayes to connect to popserver1 and send USER user@name The delimiter ":" should be configurable. Not sure what would be best - maybe looking at the wrong RFC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My Perl is extremely rusty. Exactly what do you mean by transparent proxying? i.e. what changes do you want from the current proxying? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 11 12:54:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 11 12:54:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-16 15:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gisli You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 9 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gisli Ottarsson (gisli) Date: 2004-06-11 16:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=332630 This problem has been spotted on an up-to-date Debian Unstable system. The system has fetchmail sucking mail through a pop3proxy. Version: spambayes-1.0rc1 I am halting spambayes, removing spambayes.messageinfo.db and restarting. Should I have removed this file when I updated to 1.0rc1 recently? Gisli ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting another Outlook user saw this in [ 828669 ] pythoncom error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 07:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Adjusting category, as there are 2 reports in this bug - Outlook and the proxy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-23 06:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Re-opening. This is *not* fixed - the underlying problem is still there, and is very nasty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Removing spambayes.messageinfo.db solved the problem for me. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 08:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jun 12 07:59:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jun 12 07:59:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-971666 ] imap filter classifying duplicates my emails Message-ID: Support Requests item #971666, was opened at 2004-06-12 13:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=971666&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Netz (kirigoe) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: imap filter classifying duplicates my emails Initial Comment: hi, I've installed 1.0rc1, configured it for IMAP and trained it on about 4000 emails. When I run it with "sb_imapfilter.py -c -v -l 10" it loads the db and starts classifying, but when I look in my email client, it duplicates and triples the emails it classifies, like it's making copies of them in the same folder over and over. I've configured it to filter my INBOX, move spam to a spam folder and move unsure to an unsure folder. It moved one unsure message so it works that far. Any ideas? thanks in advance, Daniel Netz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=971666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 12:34:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 12:34:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-972152 ] Sharing database between computers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #972152, was opened at 2004-06-13 18:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=972152&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Krueger (skrueger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Sharing database between computers Initial Comment: I have an Exchange account and use Outlook on my desktop and my notebook computer to access it. It would be nice if I could easily share the spambayes database between the two computers. Ideally, I could store the database in a central locaton, e.g. an Exchange folder. Another option would be to store the file on a USB memory stick. From the documentation it was not clear to me whether the later is possible, using multiple configuration files. If it is, could you please document it, i.e. provide a sample what entries I have to make in which configuration file in which location? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=972152&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 21:32:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 21:32:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-972152 ] Sharing database between computers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #972152, was opened at 2004-06-14 04:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=972152&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Krueger (skrueger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Sharing database between computers Initial Comment: I have an Exchange account and use Outlook on my desktop and my notebook computer to access it. It would be nice if I could easily share the spambayes database between the two computers. Ideally, I could store the database in a central locaton, e.g. an Exchange folder. Another option would be to store the file on a USB memory stick. From the documentation it was not clear to me whether the later is possible, using multiple configuration files. If it is, could you please document it, i.e. provide a sample what entries I have to make in which configuration file in which location? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-14 13:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.14: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=972152&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 21:35:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 21:35:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-971666 ] imap filter classifying duplicates my emails Message-ID: Support Requests item #971666, was opened at 2004-06-12 23:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=971666&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Netz (kirigoe) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imap filter classifying duplicates my emails Initial Comment: hi, I've installed 1.0rc1, configured it for IMAP and trained it on about 4000 emails. When I run it with "sb_imapfilter.py -c -v -l 10" it loads the db and starts classifying, but when I look in my email client, it duplicates and triples the emails it classifies, like it's making copies of them in the same folder over and over. I've configured it to filter my INBOX, move spam to a spam folder and move unsure to an unsure folder. It moved one unsure message so it works that far. Any ideas? thanks in advance, Daniel Netz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-14 13:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The way the imapfilter (currrently) works does involve duplication of messages. The problem is that IMAP does not allow messages to be modified, and the filter wants to modify them (adding the various spambayes headers). This is typically done twice (once to add the initial SpamBayes header, and once for the classification (etc) headers). In a future release (after 1.0 is out) imapfilter will move to a different id method and make adding the headers optional. However, the original messages should be marked for deletion (i.e. the /Deleted flag is set). What you see depends on your client, though - perhaps it's set up to show you all messages, regardless of the /Deleted flag? You can set imapfilter to purge (i.e. get rid of /Deleted messages) after running, although this effects *all* /Deleted messages, not just the SpamBayes ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=971666&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 22:01:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 22:01:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dzenc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-13 19:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 ok, i got the files you requested, but i can't find a way to upload them. how do you add a file to an existing bug report? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-07 06:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Could you attach a copy of the "show spam clues" info as well as a copy of your SpamBayes logfiles immediately following the error? The Troubleshooting Guide has info on how to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Just caught one as it arrived: At 9:31am a message arrived and was put into the possible spam folder. Outlook spam field says 52%. I immediately ran show spam clues, which said that it was 100%. BTW - I am running version v1.0rc1, but this happened in the previous version as well. I am using it with Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 09:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Checked again at 9:15am this morning. Checked the latest two messages in the possible spam folder. First message was received at 9:11am and had an 83% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. Second message was received at 9:07am and had a 50% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. No training was performed between the time the messages were recieved and the time I checked them. What additional data would be helpful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 22:04:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 22:04:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-27 03:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-14 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry, my fault - I forgot that sourceforge only allows the original person opening the report and people with developer access to add files to a tracker. Just submit a new report with the log files and a comment pointing back at this bug (i.e. id 923921). And, preferably, another comment here with the id of the new one that you created. (Don't forget to tick the box when uploading the files). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-14 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 ok, i got the files you requested, but i can't find a way to upload them. how do you add a file to an existing bug report? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-08 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Could you attach a copy of the "show spam clues" info as well as a copy of your SpamBayes logfiles immediately following the error? The Troubleshooting Guide has info on how to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-07 04:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Just caught one as it arrived: At 9:31am a message arrived and was put into the possible spam folder. Outlook spam field says 52%. I immediately ran show spam clues, which said that it was 100%. BTW - I am running version v1.0rc1, but this happened in the previous version as well. I am using it with Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-07 04:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Checked again at 9:15am this morning. Checked the latest two messages in the possible spam folder. First message was received at 9:11am and had an 83% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. Second message was received at 9:07am and had a 50% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. No training was performed between the time the messages were recieved and the time I checked them. What additional data would be helpful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 23:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 23:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-07 01:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-27 05:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 22:12:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 22:12:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Message-ID: Bugs item #972359, was opened at 2004-06-13 19:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Initial Comment: (This is a continuation of Bugs item #923921. I am opening a new bug report so that I can upload related files.) About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. - I received a message which was sent to the "unsure" folder. I then ran "show spam clues" on it, which showed that it was 100% SPAM (see attached file). I then manually ran "filter messages..." on the unsure folder and it correctly detected the message as SPAM and moved it to the correct folder. *No* training was done between the time the message arrived and the time that I performed these steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 22:13:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 22:13:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 07:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dzenc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-13 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 no problem! see bug # 972359 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-13 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry, my fault - I forgot that sourceforge only allows the original person opening the report and people with developer access to add files to a tracker. Just submit a new report with the log files and a comment pointing back at this bug (i.e. id 923921). And, preferably, another comment here with the id of the new one that you created. (Don't forget to tick the box when uploading the files). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-13 19:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 ok, i got the files you requested, but i can't find a way to upload them. how do you add a file to an existing bug report? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-07 06:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Could you attach a copy of the "show spam clues" info as well as a copy of your SpamBayes logfiles immediately following the error? The Troubleshooting Guide has info on how to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Just caught one as it arrived: At 9:31am a message arrived and was put into the possible spam folder. Outlook spam field says 52%. I immediately ran show spam clues, which said that it was 100%. BTW - I am running version v1.0rc1, but this happened in the previous version as well. I am using it with Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 09:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Checked again at 9:15am this morning. Checked the latest two messages in the possible spam folder. First message was received at 9:11am and had an 83% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. Second message was received at 9:07am and had a 50% score in the outlook spam column. I ran show spam clues on it and it said 100%. No training was performed between the time the messages were recieved and the time I checked them. What additional data would be helpful? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 Ok, I found the spam field in outlook. It shows 56% vs. the show spam clues of 100%. This is strange, because there was no additional training done. I will watch for new mail tomorrow and try to catch this as it happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Date: 2004-06-06 04:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057862 I'm seeing this behavior as well. Show spam clues shows 100% Spam but the log files says that it classified it as 'unsure' and the mail is moved to the possible spam folder. How do I show the "spam column" in outlook? I can't find it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jun 13 23:08:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jun 13 23:08:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972374 ] Outlook 2002 Crashes upon launch Message-ID: Bugs item #972374, was opened at 2004-06-13 22:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972374&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: rhemsher (rhemsher) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 Crashes upon launch Initial Comment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6626) SP3/PII 350 Mhz/384 mb RAM/30 Gb HD/MS W98 (first addtn) w/add-in of MS Personal file back up as well as Plaxo contacts to Outlook 2-3 days after installation of Spam-Bayes, application would crash with statement "Outlook has encountered a problem and will shut down". You could lauch the app in Outlook "safe mode" but not normal launch. Continuos failure to launch. After many hours (12-15) work and help from Dial-a- Tech, it was determined that you are not able to add/remove Outlook after SP2(3) applied.....and only after changing file name "outcmd.dat" to outcmd.old, removing Spam-Bayes from system (add/remove programs) and re-launching does Outlook seem to perform correctly. I'm hesitant...but want to re-install Spam-Bayes! GREAT application as long as performs correctly! Please advise.... Thank You, Ray Hemsher rhemsher@erols.com 610-446-8730 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972374&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 14 05:00:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 14 05:01:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972485 ] Works well - some minor cosmetics would be useful Message-ID: Bugs item #972485, was opened at 2004-06-14 19:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972485&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: KVeil (kveil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Works well - some minor cosmetics would be useful Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000 on Win ME - both fully patched. Afetr trying a number of other filters (including a complex set of self-made Outlook rules), I have been running SpamBayes for 6 weeks and it works VERY well for me. Most important is that I have not "lost" a sngle e-mail into the spam bucket, so no false-positives at all. That is very important to me! 2 suggestions: 1) The SpamBayes toolbar bahaves strangely in Outlook. I can hide it, but it comes back every time I re-start Outlook. Also, moving some of the SpamBayes toolbar icons to my custom toolbar does stange things... 2) How can I get "Cartian Spma" to get automatically deleted? I cannot select the "Deleted Items" folder in the "SpamBayes Manager -> Filtering" screen. Great effort - well done!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972485&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 14 20:22:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 14 20:22:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972485 ] Works well - some minor cosmetics would be useful Message-ID: Bugs item #972485, was opened at 2004-06-14 21:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972485&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: KVeil (kveil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Works well - some minor cosmetics would be useful Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000 on Win ME - both fully patched. Afetr trying a number of other filters (including a complex set of self-made Outlook rules), I have been running SpamBayes for 6 weeks and it works VERY well for me. Most important is that I have not "lost" a sngle e-mail into the spam bucket, so no false-positives at all. That is very important to me! 2 suggestions: 1) The SpamBayes toolbar bahaves strangely in Outlook. I can hide it, but it comes back every time I re-start Outlook. Also, moving some of the SpamBayes toolbar icons to my custom toolbar does stange things... 2) How can I get "Cartian Spma" to get automatically deleted? I cannot select the "Deleted Items" folder in the "SpamBayes Manager -> Filtering" screen. Great effort - well done!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-15 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1) The toolbar is a problematic beast, and always has been. Does your log file contain entries that say something like "recreating the toolbar - this problem is common"? That might explain it. I'm sure the toolbar problems will be addressed at some point. 2) Please see FAQ 3.9: and FAQ 3.11: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972485&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 15 11:34:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 15 15:29:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-14 15:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hpoehrli You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: h p oehrli (hpoehrli) Date: 2004-06-15 16:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1063984 Outlook 2000 on a W2K fully updated Laptop Pentium 2 When closing Outlook which is configured for delete the files of the DELETED folder on the providers memory, no such delete at the providers happen anymore (some months now). The mass of spam-mails and the other DELETED-folders files have to be deleted manually at the provider. No multiple download of read messages occure here! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: h p oehrli (hpoehrli) Date: 2004-06-15 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1063984 Outlook 2000 on a W2K fully updated Laptop Pentium 2 When closing Outlook which is configured for delete the files of the DELETED folder on the providers memory, no such delete at the providers happen anymore (some months now). The mass of spam-mails and the other DELETED-folders files have to be deleted manually at the provider. No multiple download of read messages occure here! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Frantz (kruzty) Date: 2004-01-16 17:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=428020 I have this problem as well. I've found that in the following cases the email will not be removed from the server upon deletion: - categorized as spam - not categorized, trained as spam - suspected spam, trained as spam It will remove it when: - not categorized - suspected spam, not trained - suspected spam, trained as ham The only case I haven't tested is if it is categorized as spam and trained has ham. Basically, it looks like the message is altered when it is considered spam whether or not the "save spam score" is checked. I took a peak at the code, but didn't see anything obvious. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 01:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd still really like a log from a session where this happens ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Trevor Banks (twbanks) Date: 2003-12-03 00:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922526 I'm running the compiled Outlook add-in, and am having the same issue. However, it doesn't always do this. Occasionally it leaves messages so they get downloaded again, other times it deletes them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log for a session where this happens. I'm hoping there is something in there related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-26 19:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 15 12:50:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 15 16:04:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-973376 ] Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Message-ID: Feature Requests item #973376, was opened at 2004-06-15 09:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lance (lancevictor) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Initial Comment: Proposed change in functionality: If SpamBayes automatically detects spam, it moves it to the Spam folder (where I can go to verify that it really was spam). On the other hand if *I* select a message and click "Delete As Spam" I'd like the message to be moved to my deleted folder (ie: a human has already verified that it really is spam and it can safely be deleted completely, not moved to "spam"). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 15 12:52:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 15 16:41:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-973376 ] Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Message-ID: Feature Requests item #973376, was opened at 2004-06-15 09:50 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lancevictor You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open >Priority: 6 Submitted By: Lance (lancevictor) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Initial Comment: Proposed change in functionality: If SpamBayes automatically detects spam, it moves it to the Spam folder (where I can go to verify that it really was spam). On the other hand if *I* select a message and click "Delete As Spam" I'd like the message to be moved to my deleted folder (ie: a human has already verified that it really is spam and it can safely be deleted completely, not moved to "spam"). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 15 11:32:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 15 18:56:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-14 15:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hpoehrli You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: h p oehrli (hpoehrli) Date: 2004-06-15 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1063984 Outlook 2000 on a W2K fully updated Laptop Pentium 2 When closing Outlook which is configured for delete the files of the DELETED folder on the providers memory, no such delete at the providers happen anymore (some months now). The mass of spam-mails and the other DELETED-folders files have to be deleted manually at the provider. No multiple download of read messages occure here! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Frantz (kruzty) Date: 2004-01-16 17:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=428020 I have this problem as well. I've found that in the following cases the email will not be removed from the server upon deletion: - categorized as spam - not categorized, trained as spam - suspected spam, trained as spam It will remove it when: - not categorized - suspected spam, not trained - suspected spam, trained as ham The only case I haven't tested is if it is categorized as spam and trained has ham. Basically, it looks like the message is altered when it is considered spam whether or not the "save spam score" is checked. I took a peak at the code, but didn't see anything obvious. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 01:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd still really like a log from a session where this happens ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Trevor Banks (twbanks) Date: 2003-12-03 00:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922526 I'm running the compiled Outlook add-in, and am having the same issue. However, it doesn't always do this. Occasionally it leaves messages so they get downloaded again, other times it deletes them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log for a session where this happens. I'm hoping there is something in there related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-26 19:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From martin at precisionenergy.com Tue Jun 15 21:05:09 2004 From: martin at precisionenergy.com (Martin Treat) Date: Tue Jun 15 21:05:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Outlook 2002 crash Message-ID: <003e01c4533d$f814a6f0$6501a8c0@martin> I loaded Spambayes lsat week and it worked fine until the next day when I restarted my computer and Outlook would not start except in safe mode. I uninstalled Spambayes and Outlook still will not run except in safe mode. Please help! Martin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20040615/8dca9359/attachment.html From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 16 12:58:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 17 08:58:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 07:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by superba You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 09:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, I just added a comment without listing my OS; it's Win XP Pro, SP1+. Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Outlook 2k SR3 process remains loaded after closing Outlook. I don't THINK this happened before loading Spambayes 1.0rc1. Otherwise, I think SP is working okay. Cheers! Jim J ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 18:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 17:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 15:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 16 12:55:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 17 12:35:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 07:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by superba You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Outlook 2k SR3 process remains loaded after closing Outlook. I don't THINK this happened before loading Spambayes 1.0rc1. Otherwise, I think SP is working okay. Cheers! Jim J ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 18:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 17:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 15:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 18 14:45:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 18 15:02:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-975529 ] Can't train on items in "Deleted Items" folder? Message-ID: Support Requests item #975529, was opened at 2004-06-18 14:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=975529&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam (rumblies) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't train on items in "Deleted Items" folder? Initial Comment: Hello, I've looked through documentation and haven't seen anything about this, apologies if I missed it. I keep about half of my archived mail in the Outlook "Deleted Items" folder (and subfolders). The SpamBayes Manager doesn't let me select those folders to train on. Is this by design? Is it a limitation of Outlook? Is there a workaround? My scoring isn't going to be nearly as good as it could be until I get that fixed, and I'm reluctant to shuffle the organization of my stuff because I've got 7 years of archived mail in other PST files that follow the same pattern. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=975529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 18 08:04:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 21 00:02:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-975296 ] systray - icon Message-ID: Feature Requests item #975296, was opened at 2004-06-18 12:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975296&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Markus Manck (mistbratze) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: systray - icon Initial Comment: If "Mark spam as read" is checked and a spammail is filtered it is marked as read as checked but the "new mail" icon in the systray is displayed nevertheless. it would be nice to be able to deactivate this behaviour. regards markus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975296&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 17 04:03:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 21 00:03:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-974567 ] filtering does not work Message-ID: Bugs item #974567, was opened at 2004-06-17 10:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=974567&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marko Robnik-Sikonja (rmarko) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: filtering does not work Initial Comment: All messages receive correct scores, but none of them is moved anywhere, even if I try to do it manually with Filter messages command. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=974567&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jun 19 14:19:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 21 00:45:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-975933 ] Spambayes needs a White List Message-ID: Feature Requests item #975933, was opened at 2004-06-19 18:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian C (briancu) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes needs a White List Initial Comment: We recently rolled out SpamBayes to approx 100 of our users. The program works great, however it needs a whitelist. Users spend too much time checking their Junk E-Mail and Junk Suspects folders for "good" e-mail. We have also rolled out a program called "Spam Bully" to approx 25 users. This program also uses bayesian filtering. The users like this program better only because it has a whitelist. I have also switched over to this program because of the whitelist. Unfortunately, the program costs $25 per user. The other problem that occurs frequently with Spambayes is that users accidently delete the junk e- mail folder or the junk suspects folder. This freaks out the spambayes program. We have upgraded users to Outlook 2003 (users cannot delete the junk e-mail folder in Outlook 2003) and have routed all e-mail to this folder. I don't know if there is anything you can do about this. The bottom line is that the product is great but is not viable without a whitelist. One false positive is too many for our managers - we never hear the end of it when it happens. Thanks for your product and keep up the good work. Brian. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 21 01:44:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 21 01:44:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-976529 ] Hotkeys for training Message-ID: Support Requests item #976529, was opened at 2004-06-20 22:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=976529&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Baram (mbaram) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Hotkeys for training Initial Comment: Are there hotkeys for Delete and Recover from Spam butons? it would be nice to have that not to press the buttons all the time. Also can I add these antries to right-mouse menu in Outlook? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=976529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 21 11:19:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 21 11:19:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-976802 ] multiple POP server setting causes Python error Message-ID: Bugs item #976802, was opened at 2004-06-21 18:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=976802&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Asaf Bartov (amoose) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: multiple POP server setting causes Python error Initial Comment: Adding a POP server to my setup, using the configuration page of the SpamBayes pop3proxy, I encounter the following error: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' The string I've put in the "Remote Servers" field (the very first one in the config page) was: "pop3.actcom.net.il,benyehuda.org" Help appreciated. Thanks, Asaf Bartov ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=976802&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 22 21:51:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 22 21:51:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-977928 ] wont show in COM Message-ID: Bugs item #977928, was opened at 2004-06-22 20:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael (madkayaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wont show in COM Initial Comment: I can't get Spam Bayes to show in the COM ad-ins section, even though i reinstalled it again. I am running windows XP, with Outlook from Office XP. here is the log file also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 23 14:03:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jun 23 14:05:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-978402 ] Outlook.exe not stopping Message-ID: Bugs item #978402, was opened at 2004-06-23 13:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=978402&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Green (irkgreen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe not stopping Initial Comment: This is a side note on a previous thread. I have noticed several times that Outlook.exe is still running in my task manager even after Outlook is closed. Sometimes several copies! I think this started after i started using SpamBayes, but not positive. However I did notice that when i was troubleshooting a visual basic application that I wrote something odd happened. I create an object of Outlook in my code to gain access to my contacts and at the end of the code I set it to nothing. Well at home i always had a copy outlook that would not close. At work, it always closed. I disabled spambayes at home (not using it at work) and same results, outlook.exe running every time. Finally i uninstalled spambayes and it works fine! I dont like not having spambayes but it is certainly responsible for my app not being able to close outlook. Hopefully this situation will help track down this outlook.exe bug. Because i am pretty sure that spambayes is preventing my app from closing outlook, perhaps the plugin also prevents the user from closing sometimes. email me at irkgreen@hotmail.com to converse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=978402&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 23 19:44:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jun 23 19:44:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-975933 ] Spambayes needs a White List Message-ID: Feature Requests item #975933, was opened at 2004-06-20 06:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian C (briancu) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes needs a White List Initial Comment: We recently rolled out SpamBayes to approx 100 of our users. The program works great, however it needs a whitelist. Users spend too much time checking their Junk E-Mail and Junk Suspects folders for "good" e-mail. We have also rolled out a program called "Spam Bully" to approx 25 users. This program also uses bayesian filtering. The users like this program better only because it has a whitelist. I have also switched over to this program because of the whitelist. Unfortunately, the program costs $25 per user. The other problem that occurs frequently with Spambayes is that users accidently delete the junk e- mail folder or the junk suspects folder. This freaks out the spambayes program. We have upgraded users to Outlook 2003 (users cannot delete the junk e-mail folder in Outlook 2003) and have routed all e-mail to this folder. I don't know if there is anything you can do about this. The bottom line is that the product is great but is not viable without a whitelist. One false positive is too many for our managers - we never hear the end of it when it happens. Thanks for your product and keep up the good work. Brian. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-24 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Regarding the deleting the unsure/spam folder - we're aware of this problem and have solutions in mind. The changes are too large to go in pre 1.0, however, so will appear some time in the future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 23 19:45:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jun 23 19:45:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-974567 ] filtering does not work Message-ID: Bugs item #974567, was opened at 2004-06-17 20:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=974567&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marko Robnik-Sikonja (rmarko) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: filtering does not work Initial Comment: All messages receive correct scores, but none of them is moved anywhere, even if I try to do it manually with Filter messages command. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-24 11:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You have background filtering enabled, but have one of the timer values set to 0. Change this value or disable background filtering and the problem should be fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=974567&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jun 23 19:45:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jun 23 19:45:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-975296 ] systray - icon Message-ID: Feature Requests item #975296, was opened at 2004-06-19 00:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975296&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Markus Manck (mistbratze) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: systray - icon Initial Comment: If "Mark spam as read" is checked and a spammail is filtered it is marked as read as checked but the "new mail" icon in the systray is displayed nevertheless. it would be nice to be able to deactivate this behaviour. regards markus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-24 11:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.8: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975296&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 24 12:19:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 24 13:09:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-977928 ] wont show in COM Message-ID: Bugs item #977928, was opened at 2004-06-22 21:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael (madkayaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wont show in COM Initial Comment: I can't get Spam Bayes to show in the COM ad-ins section, even though i reinstalled it again. I am running windows XP, with Outlook from Office XP. here is the log file also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-24 12:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It looks like you are trying to install SpamBayes from a non- administrator account that does not have access rights to modify the registry. Try installing the software from the Administrator account. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 24 12:01:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 24 13:09:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-975933 ] Spambayes needs a White List Message-ID: Feature Requests item #975933, was opened at 2004-06-19 14:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian C (briancu) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes needs a White List Initial Comment: We recently rolled out SpamBayes to approx 100 of our users. The program works great, however it needs a whitelist. Users spend too much time checking their Junk E-Mail and Junk Suspects folders for "good" e-mail. We have also rolled out a program called "Spam Bully" to approx 25 users. This program also uses bayesian filtering. The users like this program better only because it has a whitelist. I have also switched over to this program because of the whitelist. Unfortunately, the program costs $25 per user. The other problem that occurs frequently with Spambayes is that users accidently delete the junk e- mail folder or the junk suspects folder. This freaks out the spambayes program. We have upgraded users to Outlook 2003 (users cannot delete the junk e-mail folder in Outlook 2003) and have routed all e-mail to this folder. I don't know if there is anything you can do about this. The bottom line is that the product is great but is not viable without a whitelist. One false positive is too many for our managers - we never hear the end of it when it happens. Thanks for your product and keep up the good work. Brian. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-24 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Please see FAQ 6.6 for more info on why SpamBayes does not currently support whitelisting. http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you- add-whitelisting-blacklisting-to-spambayes or http://tinyurl.com/34w5r ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-23 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Regarding the deleting the unsure/spam folder - we're aware of this problem and have solutions in mind. The changes are too large to go in pre 1.0, however, so will appear some time in the future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jun 24 15:05:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jun 24 15:05:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-979183 ] Slow scoring for active mailboxes Message-ID: Support Requests item #979183, was opened at 2004-06-24 14:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=979183&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rith (rpeou) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Slow scoring for active mailboxes Initial Comment: I've installed SpamBayes to work on an Exchange mailbox that is very active at certain times, i.e. the box receives about 3000 emails per hour during parts of the day. At first I thought that SpamBayes was skipping the scoring for large numbers of emails as it's coming into the Inbox (the Spam column in Outlook is blank). But if I wait until there is a slow period (which may be as much as 8-10 hours after an email arrived), the email does eventually get scored and possibly moved. My question is whether this is an expected behavior or is this a bug? Is there any setting that can be changed to score the emails more efficiently and quickly? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=979183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jun 25 10:00:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jun 25 10:01:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-975933 ] Spambayes needs a White List Message-ID: Feature Requests item #975933, was opened at 2004-06-19 14:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian C (briancu) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes needs a White List Initial Comment: We recently rolled out SpamBayes to approx 100 of our users. The program works great, however it needs a whitelist. Users spend too much time checking their Junk E-Mail and Junk Suspects folders for "good" e-mail. We have also rolled out a program called "Spam Bully" to approx 25 users. This program also uses bayesian filtering. The users like this program better only because it has a whitelist. I have also switched over to this program because of the whitelist. Unfortunately, the program costs $25 per user. The other problem that occurs frequently with Spambayes is that users accidently delete the junk e- mail folder or the junk suspects folder. This freaks out the spambayes program. We have upgraded users to Outlook 2003 (users cannot delete the junk e-mail folder in Outlook 2003) and have routed all e-mail to this folder. I don't know if there is anything you can do about this. The bottom line is that the product is great but is not viable without a whitelist. One false positive is too many for our managers - we never hear the end of it when it happens. Thanks for your product and keep up the good work. Brian. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-25 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 [sorry about the duplication, I clicked over from the e-mail notice and forgot to read the existing comments] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-24 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Please see FAQ 6.6 for more info on why SpamBayes does not currently support whitelisting. http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you- add-whitelisting-blacklisting-to-spambayes or http://tinyurl.com/34w5r ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-23 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Regarding the deleting the unsure/spam folder - we're aware of this problem and have solutions in mind. The changes are too large to go in pre 1.0, however, so will appear some time in the future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=975933&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jun 26 20:07:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jun 26 20:07:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham statistics Message-ID: Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-04 08:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by joshwa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam / ham statistics Initial Comment: Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were received per hour / day and how many of these were spam messages. It would be great if it could be presented both as numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The means to print it as a hard copy would be just swell... ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Josh Wand (joshwa) Date: 2004-06-26 20:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=7937 Have a look at the popfile statistics page for good ideas on how to present spam statistics. Totals and percentages for spam, non-spam, false-pos, false-neg, and summary and detail statistics on the corpus itself (which words are likliest to be in spam, ham, etc). Lovely html graphics, too. I'd love to see these features in spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Murilo Pinto (mulpinsf) Date: 2004-05-27 09:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=378491 I'd like to have a tiny button in the Outlook toolbar showing how many spams(red)/ham(blue) SB processed in that session. Hovering the mouse at it would give % in the "pop- up" comment. If clicked, it could open a "page" with more detailed stats, as per hour/day/month/hour of the day/day of the week/accounts/year. Outstanding antispam, btw. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-13 02:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 915260 ] Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The latest CVS plugin actually does include false positives and negatives in the statistics. The definition is this. If a message was classified as Ham and then reclassified by the user as Spam, it is a false negative. If a message was classified as Spam and then reclassified by the user as Ham, it is a false positive. A message that was originally classified as Unsure is never considered a false positive or negative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 04:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 Quick note on the "impossibility" of tracking false pos/neg. Actually, since an incorrectly classified message already has a header inserted, then you would only flag a "false" if that header existed and was changed. This means you'd have to check for the existence of the header before you processed the Delete/Recover buttons, but it can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 00:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that the plug-in has basic stats information (cvs version) now, although it's still only on a per session basis (this will no doubt improve at some point). The web interface (for non-plugin users) also now (cvs head) has basic stats, which are persisted between sessions. Any opinions on which statistics would be best to add? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-11 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down it prints a message like: "SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 unsure" (So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate this message). It's unlikely that a graphical version would ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers like this into Excel and get pretty graphs. The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know that mail is a fp/fn. It could print the number of times the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which aren't exactly fp/fn's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27) Date: 2003-07-11 00:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=302748 I'm just another user but I think this would be a great addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false positives (along with percentage of total), number of false negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of mail received that is spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 01:32:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 01:32:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-966837 ] Error message Message-ID: Bugs item #966837, was opened at 2004-06-05 08:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966837&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: oneilonline (oneilonline) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error message Initial Comment: Installation of SpamBayes works good. However, when opening Outlook for the first time, when the setup tutorial occurs, I get this message insted (see attached) Once closing the window, Outlook functions normally. SpamBayes not functining. Naturally, this window opens everytme Outlook is opened cause the setup hasn't completed. I have uninstalled and reinstalled a number of times...no solution. I have installed SpamBayes onto at least 20 PCs, all Office XP or 2003, only this PC has this issue. Any help appreciated! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 There is no attached file - can you please just update this bug with the exact error text? Please reset the bug status to 'open' when you do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=966837&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 01:35:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 01:35:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-964537 ] delete as spam doesn't always work Message-ID: Bugs item #964537, was opened at 2004-06-02 06:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=964537&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: teweb (teweb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: delete as spam doesn't always work Initial Comment: ... message also posted to mail list... [Geoff Campbell] > Sometimes (very rarely) when I select an obvious spam message and > "click" on "Delete As Spam", nothing happens. It seems that the > message is "SpamBayes proof"! This happens once every several days, > but I can't see a pattern. Using Outlook 2002 (SP- 1). Would be happy > to send you a representative email. That would be good. There's probably a helpful (to us ) message in your SpamBayes log file whenever this happens. A real problem is that Outlook destroys the exact structure of incoming email, so you may not actually be able to give anyone else an email that reproduces the problem. When "nothing happens" in an otherwise-working SpamBayes, the usual cause is that the email is so badly formed (violates so many standards about how email *should* be constructed) that the SpamBayes email parser gives up trying to make any sense of it. If that's what's happening, you will find helpful (to us) information in your SpamBayes log file. #### I too am seeing this behavior - on about 1% of spam (I get 2 or 3 messages a day that won't delete as spam). I am using Outlook 2002 SP3 on XP Pro SP1, SpamBayes 1.0b1 log file indicates: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 633, in OnClick File "manager.pyc", line 802, in score File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 504, in _worddistanceget File "spambayes\storage.pyc", line 261, in _wordinfoget File "shelve.pyc", line 111, in get File "shelve.pyc", line 119, in __getitem__ exceptions.ValueError: could not convert string to int ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 15:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks very much like a database corruption. Can you try training spambayes, ensuring 'rebuild entire database' is selected? Please reset the bug status to 'open' if it doesn't solve it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=964537&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 01:40:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 01:41:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955433 ] Check for new version has glitches Message-ID: Bugs item #955433, was opened at 2004-05-18 06:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955433&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Check for new version has glitches Initial Comment: When in the Outlook Addin I say "Check for new version" I am told that the latest is ... "1.0b1 (April 2004) No later version is available". But I downloaded vesion 1.0rc1 which is newer, dated May 2004. Another symptom of this is that the last line in the log says: Current version is 0.992, latest is 0.991. Clearly it is wierd to have a current version newer than the latest version. Finally, in the sourceforge bug reporting GUI there was no entry to 1.0rc1 in the Group drop down list, so I had to say 1.0b1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I believe this is now fixed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955433&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 02:26:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 02:27:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-977928 ] Installer should detect non-admin install for Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #977928, was opened at 2004-06-23 11:51 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael (madkayaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Installer should detect non-admin install for Outlook Initial Comment: I can't get Spam Bayes to show in the COM ad-ins section, even though i reinstalled it again. I am running windows XP, with Outlook from Office XP. here is the log file also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-25 02:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It looks like you are trying to install SpamBayes from a non- administrator account that does not have access rights to modify the registry. Try installing the software from the Administrator account. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 02:34:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 02:34:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-978402 ] Outlook.exe not stopping Message-ID: Bugs item #978402, was opened at 2004-06-24 04:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=978402&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Green (irkgreen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe not stopping Initial Comment: This is a side note on a previous thread. I have noticed several times that Outlook.exe is still running in my task manager even after Outlook is closed. Sometimes several copies! I think this started after i started using SpamBayes, but not positive. However I did notice that when i was troubleshooting a visual basic application that I wrote something odd happened. I create an object of Outlook in my code to gain access to my contacts and at the end of the code I set it to nothing. Well at home i always had a copy outlook that would not close. At work, it always closed. I disabled spambayes at home (not using it at work) and same results, outlook.exe running every time. Finally i uninstalled spambayes and it works fine! I dont like not having spambayes but it is certainly responsible for my app not being able to close outlook. Hopefully this situation will help track down this outlook.exe bug. Because i am pretty sure that spambayes is preventing my app from closing outlook, perhaps the plugin also prevents the user from closing sometimes. email me at irkgreen@hotmail.com to converse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 16:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Alot more activity in [ 963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated, so closing this as a dupe. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=978402&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 02:35:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 02:35:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-965048 ] Outlook 2002 crashes Message-ID: Bugs item #965048, was opened at 2004-06-03 00:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=965048&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 crashes Initial Comment: Not sure if this is in the right group or not. My Outlook crashes quite frequently since I installed Spambayes. It does it when I try to send a file from Windows explorer. Right click file on desktop, choose send to mail recipient, fill out info and send, it freezes and I have to end task thru task manager in order to use anything on my pc. Have checked application event and see this error: Hanging application OUTLOOK.EXE, version 10.0.6626.0, hang module hungapp, version 0.0.0.0, hang address 0x00000000. Also: Fault bucket 21955421. Have reinstalled and reformatted hard drive several times, so I don't think its related to my harware or other software. This is my first time reporting a bug, hopefully its done correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 16:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please try the most recent version (1.0rc2) - A similar bug was fixed in that version (indirectly - the bug was actually in the packaging tool) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=965048&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 02:41:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 02:41:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972374 ] Outlook 2002 Crashes upon launch Message-ID: Bugs item #972374, was opened at 2004-06-14 13:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972374&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: rhemsher (rhemsher) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 Crashes upon launch Initial Comment: Outlook 2002 (10.6515.6626) SP3/PII 350 Mhz/384 mb RAM/30 Gb HD/MS W98 (first addtn) w/add-in of MS Personal file back up as well as Plaxo contacts to Outlook 2-3 days after installation of Spam-Bayes, application would crash with statement "Outlook has encountered a problem and will shut down". You could lauch the app in Outlook "safe mode" but not normal launch. Continuos failure to launch. After many hours (12-15) work and help from Dial-a- Tech, it was determined that you are not able to add/remove Outlook after SP2(3) applied.....and only after changing file name "outcmd.dat" to outcmd.old, removing Spam-Bayes from system (add/remove programs) and re-launching does Outlook seem to perform correctly. I'm hesitant...but want to re-install Spam-Bayes! GREAT application as long as performs correctly! Please advise.... Thank You, Ray Hemsher rhemsher@erols.com 610-446-8730 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm afraid it is possible that this is not related to spambayes, so I can only suggest you re-install spambayes, and see if the problem happens again. If it does, at least you know how to fix it :) Please let us know if you do this (and please reset the bug status to "open" if you do) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972374&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 02:49:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 02:49:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970359 ] XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #970359, was opened at 2004-06-10 23:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Bartram (stevebartram) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Initial Comment: First, thank you for SpamBayes. It marks my spam very well indeed. However, when training SpamBayes via the web inteface (which is very nice) it frequently freezes my computer so even ctrl-alt-delete won't work. I've checked the Spambayes mailing lists and haven't seen any other report of this problem. Environment: I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (). I have trained 360 ham and 412 spam. (although the "Check for latest version" reports version "0.6") It's the Windows binary version. Some mail retrieved by Pegasus email and some by a custom perl script. These work without any problems. FireFox 0.8 AVG anti-virus up-to-date and ZoneAlarm correctly configured. SpamBayes trained via web interface, I haven't tried the smtp proxy method. SpamBayes is almost in it's default setup. It is using dbm for storage. Here is my bayescustomize.ini ================ [Headers] header_score_logarithm:True include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True [html_ui] display_score:True [pop3proxy] listen_ports:8110,8111,8112,8113 remote_servers:..... [smtpproxy] use_cached_message:True ================ SpamBayesServer1.log: ================ Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 8225 is proxying 127.0.01:25 Listener on port 8110 is proxying mail.zetnet.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8111 is proxying mail.tesco.net:110 Listener on port 8112 is proxying pop3.connectfree.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8113 is proxying mail.onetel.net.uk:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ ================ Symptoms: Quite frequently (but NOT consistently!) my computer will freeze when training SpamBayes via the web interface. This starts as a page not finishing loading. Sometimes this is the review page, but more often it is a page displaying a specific email. But, as I was writing this email and checking my configuration it did it on the page displaying which storage option was being used. When this happens I can still click a few times. The "back" button in the browser often seems to work. But after a few clicks the system starts to lock up. First all application windows fail to refresh their contents, although their frames redraw. This is rapidly followed by no response at all, even to ctrl-alt-delete. At which point only a hard reset will work. After rebooting SpamBayes may successfully train on the same set of emails. Or, it may freeze again. I usually avoid trying to examine the email that I was trying to view when the last freeze occurred. Instead, I find it in my email client and check it there. These freezes only happen on the spambayes pages. I haven't changed/installed anything else recently. I have tried closing Pegasus and stopping the perl script (which runs periodically) before trying to train. But this didn't prevent the freeze. I also tried IE 6 instead of FireFox, but that froze too. Any help will be greatly appreciated. TIA, Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The symptoms sound similar to what happens when windows runs out of GUI resources. If that is indeed true, it maybe your browser rather than spambayes, particularly if you are using other than IE. If you are using IE, then this sounds very strange, and certainly the frist report I have heard. Being able to hang the OS is a bug in the OS even if we *are* being really naughty (which we aren't trying to be ) Another very interesting test would be to run from Python sources - the binary version of the proxy programs are used far less than their source-code versions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 02:56:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 02:56:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898037 ] "Recover from Spam" does't work Message-ID: Bugs item #898037, was opened at 2004-02-17 01:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898037&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gal Haber (g_haber) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Recover from Spam" does't work Initial Comment: "Recover from Spam" does't work. I use Outlook 9.0.0.3821 on Windows 2000. I have multiple mailboxes open and I use SpamBayes not on my main mailbox but on one of my other mailboxes with the junk folders configures to that mailbox. My Outlook mailbox structure: + [main mailbox] + mailbox2 | |---Junk E-Mail |---Junk Suspects |------------ +mailbox3 I configured SpamBayes to work on mailbox2 only. "Recover from Spam" doesn't seem to work. "Delete as Spam" does work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 16:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just tested this (with the inbox being in a different .pst than the filter folders), and it does seem to work. No word from original poster, and no log, so not much we can do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What do you mean by "doesn't seem to work"? Does the message get moved? (if not, it's not working, if it does, it is). If you could attach you log file(s), that would greatly help in tracking down the problem (the Help->Troubleshooting Guide explains where to find them). Is mailbox2 a pst file? (or hotmail, exchange, or imap?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898037&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 02:59:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 02:59:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972485 ] Works well - some minor cosmetics would be useful Message-ID: Bugs item #972485, was opened at 2004-06-14 19:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972485&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: KVeil (kveil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Works well - some minor cosmetics would be useful Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000 on Win ME - both fully patched. Afetr trying a number of other filters (including a complex set of self-made Outlook rules), I have been running SpamBayes for 6 weeks and it works VERY well for me. Most important is that I have not "lost" a sngle e-mail into the spam bucket, so no false-positives at all. That is very important to me! 2 suggestions: 1) The SpamBayes toolbar bahaves strangely in Outlook. I can hide it, but it comes back every time I re-start Outlook. Also, moving some of the SpamBayes toolbar icons to my custom toolbar does stange things... 2) How can I get "Cartian Spma" to get automatically deleted? I cannot select the "Deleted Items" folder in the "SpamBayes Manager -> Filtering" screen. Great effort - well done!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the suggestions - i'm closing this as a duplicate, as both issues already exist (somewhere anyway!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-15 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1) The toolbar is a problematic beast, and always has been. Does your log file contain entries that say something like "recreating the toolbar - this problem is common"? That might explain it. I'm sure the toolbar problems will be addressed at some point. 2) Please see FAQ 3.9: and FAQ 3.11: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972485&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 03:21:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 03:21:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Message-ID: Bugs item #972359, was opened at 2004-06-14 12:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Initial Comment: (This is a continuation of Bugs item #923921. I am opening a new bug report so that I can upload related files.) About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. - I received a message which was sent to the "unsure" folder. I then ran "show spam clues" on it, which showed that it was 100% SPAM (see attached file). I then manually ran "filter messages..." on the unsure folder and it correctly detected the message as SPAM and moved it to the correct folder. *No* training was done between the time the message arrived and the time that I performed these steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be an error in our 'content-type' magic. If I look at the headers for this message, as shown by Outlook's View->Options, I see: """ Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mx56.dadoihag.us ([64.136.98.56]) by proxy.danz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:39:09 -0700 From: "United Coalition" To: " " Subject: 1 Minute Mortgage Application Here Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:39:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A" Return-Path: SarahAllen@mx56.dadoihag.us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 01:39:10.0757 (UTC) FILETIME=[64083550:01C451B0] ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A-- """ That doesn't look right (to me) for the headers, and I suspect is what is causing the tokenizer to not see all the tokens when filtered, but it *does* see them all for 'spam clues' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 03:29:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 03:30:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962138 ] Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Message-ID: Bugs item #962138, was opened at 2004-05-28 20:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error initializing: failed to load bayes database Initial Comment: Running Win2000 SP4 fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. After installing the binary and starting Outlook, I get an error message : "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re- enable this plugin. Error details:Failed to load bayes database. I tried rebooting and restarting Outlook (Spambayes is the only add-in) to no avail. The included spambayeslog1 reports a DBFileExistsError. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 How strange! Can you please try removing that file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raf (rafkinnaer) Date: 2004-06-01 18:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051799 I have a file called __db.default_bayes_database.db in that directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the file actually exist? It would be called "default_bayes_database.db" and be in your data directory - with Win2K this is something like C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes, IIRC. Either way it's very odd - either bsddb is saying it exists when it doesn't, or the attempt to delete it is silently failing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962138&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 19:15:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 19:15:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-977928 ] Installer should detect non-admin install for Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #977928, was opened at 2004-06-22 20:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by madkayaker You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael (madkayaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installer should detect non-admin install for Outlook Initial Comment: I can't get Spam Bayes to show in the COM ad-ins section, even though i reinstalled it again. I am running windows XP, with Outlook from Office XP. here is the log file also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael (madkayaker) Date: 2004-06-28 18:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1068932 ok can do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-24 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It looks like you are trying to install SpamBayes from a non- administrator account that does not have access rights to modify the registry. Try installing the software from the Administrator account. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 21:10:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 21:10:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970517 ] Outlook 2000 crashes upon opening Message-ID: Bugs item #970517, was opened at 2004-06-11 02:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970517&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: debi (debiwi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000 crashes upon opening Initial Comment: Following a crash on boss's laptop running Win 2K, every time I try to open his Outlook with SpamBayes installed I get a program error that simply says "OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the program." Only by uninstalling Spambayes have I been able to access Outlook, even after a complete re-install of Windows & MS Office (although it did acknowledge prior office settings of which I used, from his network profile). However, with SpamBayes uninstalled the SpamBayes toolbar is still there and it still crashes with the same Program Error message if I attempt to customize under settings or customize or delete the toolbar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If you see our "trouble-shooting guide", you can see how to reset all the Outlook toolbars - uninstalling and reinstalling Office may not have done that! http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html If you reset the toolbars, the errors customizing the toolbars once spambayes has been removed should certainly go away. There is a very good chance that after resetting the toolbars, Spambayes will also work correctly. If you have a chance to try that, please let us know, and reset this bug status to "open" when you do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970517&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 21:30:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 21:30:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 04:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 21:32:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 21:32:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-959560 ] access denied Message-ID: Bugs item #959560, was opened at 2004-05-25 02:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959560&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cindyp (cindyp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: access denied Initial Comment: After installing there was an error initializing so I went into Spam Bayes Manager and configured it (including enabling) and went through training, etc. It still does not appear to working. It seems that it is not able to watch my inbox because access is denied. Log is attached. I am running Outlook 2000, Exchange Server w/ Small Business Server 4.5. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 cindyp - are you still able to help us with this bug? If so, could you please reset the bug status to open, and give us a little more information - ie, is there anything special about these mailboxes? For example, are they mailboxes for other people that you have permission to open, but SpamBayes still can't work with it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 09:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What sort of access do you have to that mailbox? Owner? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959560&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 21:43:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 21:43:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955286 ] Unable to enable Spam Bayes Message-ID: Bugs item #955286, was opened at 2004-05-18 00:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955286&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Punkrulz (punkrulz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to enable Spam Bayes Initial Comment: Hey guys, I have introduced my boss to Spam Bayes. I have walked him through the configuration. He went through and tried creating a folder called "Crap", and that wouldn't work. He went through and created the directory on Outlook, and pointed spam bayes to go there. However, he is completely unable to tick the "Enable" box to enable Spam Bayes. It is completely greyed out. Under filtering status he gets an error message, but can't read it completely. Can you guys help? Attached is the log file... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 It looks to me like the top-level folder has been selected to watch for spam. This folder includes the spam folders! The latest version of spambayes should prevent you from selecting that top-level folder, and will probably make this error go away. Punkrulz - can you confirm this is correct (ie, that you did select the top-level "Personal Folders"? Please reset the bug status to "Open" when you add further information ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-18 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log mostly has a lot of stuff from the wizard (it looks like it was run 3 or 4 times?). We really need to know what the status messages above the enable box say. The filter status probably just has the folders being watched (the log seems to indicate that they are all fine), which is why the message doesn't all fit (because there are so many folders). What's in the "training database status" box above that? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955286&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 21:47:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 21:47:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943956 ] Email left unprocessed in Inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #943956, was opened at 2004-04-29 05:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken (kpbass) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Email left unprocessed in Inbox Initial Comment: Intermittently, email appears in the Inbox with no assigned spam value. SpamBayes does not process it at all, unless I pull down th manager and choose "Filter messages/Start filtering. Most of the time, but not invariably, these messages are then identified as spam and moved to the spam folder. Background delay is set at .5 seconds, and no Outlook rule is likely to be involved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 11:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Yes, this is a case of "works by design" - checking only "unread" messages at startup allows us to perform well for large inboxes. In *most* cases, we could get around this by checking only messages that don't have a spam score, ignoring their "unread" status, but that will be a problem first time around (assuming the user has not already scored their inbox), and also for hotmail etc users, where we can not save the "Spam" field at all. I'd be happy to see this added as a "feature request" though, so add something there if you like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-09 13:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can confirm that marking a message as read before SpamBayes sees it can (is?) enough to have it ignore the message. (I typically wait for SpamBayes to do it's thing, but I suppose people might not want to do that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken (kpbass) Date: 2004-05-09 04:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1031376 In Outlook, I am using the preview pane, set to mark messages as read after viewing. It seems that when I highlight a spam message before Spambayes has a chance to process that message, it never gets processed at all. This happens when a large number of spam items a re mixed with ham items. I may not always wait untill all processing is done before I highlight a message and read it inthe preview pane, If I then delete it, the highlight drops to the message below it (which may well be spam) and marks it as read. The accidentally highlighted messages are the ones that never get processed. Perhaps this is a case of "works as designed", and I should be more patient. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 09:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 When you next notice this, can you view the log file, and see if it gets any mention at all? If not, increase the verbosity (via "Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics") to 1, and again check the log once it has happened - this should give you more noise regarding timers etc. Then post the relevent sections of the log here. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 21:56:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 21:56:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-957707 ] Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #957707, was opened at 2004-05-21 08:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail items are NOT always filtered automatically Initial Comment: I have configured SpamBayes to run the Outlook Addin 1.0rc1 in background, with start delay of 2 seconds, and delay of either 1 or 0 seconds. (I tried both trying to solve the problem reported here.) When spam email arrives it sometimes, but not always, is filtered and then moved to my spamkeep or spam_maybe folders. Other times I have to manually invoke "filter messages" for something to happen. They have not been filtered, e.g. switching to another folder does not cause them to move. I think that once I have manually filtered in an Outlook session later emails will be filtered automatically. This behavior happened with my older (about 1 year old) SpamBayes. But now I notice the additional bad effect: if I archive a folder (e.g. my spamkeep folder -- I keep it in case I need to retrain) the messages are archived, but they do not *seem* to move until I click on another folder. This behavior is new, and undesirable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is it possible the messages that are missed are simply being marked as "read" by the preview pane before spambayes gets to it? I'm afraid I have no idea about why the archive function would act strangely - are you sure that is related to SpamBayes - we shouldn't get in the way of Outlook's builtin archive feature at all (and indeed, we don't for most other spambayes users!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steven Tolkin (stolkin) Date: 2004-06-03 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=732641 As requested by anadelonbrin I am attaching a log file. Except for the last 5 lines, this was the log file this morning when I noticed that the Outlook Addin was not automatically filtering messages. Then I manually ran "Filter Messages ..." (which did move a few spam messages). After this the log had 5 more lines. Here are those last 5 lines, as output by running diff on the before copy and after copy of the log file. (Formatting was changed when I entered the data, but you can see when each line begins by looking for the > symbol): > Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\A071046\Application Data\SpamBayes\Default Outlook Profile.ini > SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/_home' > SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/Inbox' > SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - Tolkin, Steve/InboxMyMisc/spamkeep' > Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\A071046\Application Data\SpamBayes\Default Outlook Profile.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 09:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Steven: could you attach a log file that covers a period with the first problem (the messages not filtering)? The messages not moving until they are deselected sounds similar to another reported problem, but, unfortunately, it's one that we're not sure what the cause of is, yet. huxley75: Any DBRunRecovery error means that the database is hosed, and the only way to fix that is to retrain from scratch. This is extremely rare with the plug-in, and we don't know why it happens in the remaining cases - any chance that Outlook crashed in the middle of training at some point? The timer values can't be zero - fixing the constraints is being dealt with in another tracker, IIRC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anthony Parcero (huxley75) Date: 2004-05-26 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=159242 I'm having a similar problem with my Outlook plugin, as well. I'm using Outlook 2K on WinXP and the problem just started cropping up (I've been running previous versions of SpamBayes without a hitch until I upgraded to v1.0b1, when I first noticed the issue). Looking at the SpamBayes log, I found: "Bayes database initialized with 779 spam and 1337 good messages *** - message database has 2095 messages - bayes has 2116 - something is screwey" in the log. I had noticed that SpamBayes wasn't adding new spam to its training database (I had gotten up to over 1000 spam in the Junk E-Mail folder but it never registered above 800 spam). There is also a "Folders/Junk Suspects - pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method." error, "The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable", and a number of similar "'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected;" throughout the log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=957707&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 21:59:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 22:00:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 15:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is this still a problem with the most recent versions? If so, please reset the bug status to "Open". Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 23:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 No, I did not extract c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\. The directory listing [c program files spambayes.txt] of c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\ reflects a totally default install of spambayes-1.0b1.exe with no other programs open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If I make a local hack to simulate this error (and change the error text ;), I see: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ['E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip'] Note there is no source-line shown, and that none of the files reference the .zip file. However, if I replace create a *directory* spambayes.zip, and unzip the contents of the real .zip file into it, here is the exception I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c ... ie, just like in this bug!! mypowell - did you unzip this .zip file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log 5/4/04. I wiill try "running from source" if it will help to put this one to bed. speaking of bed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 17:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Here is something I find strange. From OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log ... File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c Note 2 things: * addin.py and win32com\__init__ do not reference the .zip file. * pythoncom.pyc references the .zip file, and has garbage for the source line. I would expect no source-lines at all. Is almost looks as though the .zip file has been expanded!? I might follow this as a clue... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 16:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-04 03:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-03 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 13:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 22:04:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 22:04:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 23:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please try rc2 - there was a change in our packaging tools that may explain this error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-05-24 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Problem was initially reported against 1.0b1. It is still occuring after installation of 1.0rc1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jun 28 22:49:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jun 28 22:49:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955758 ] Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Message-ID: Bugs item #955758, was opened at 2004-05-18 19:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Initial Comment: I have one mailbox named ':Lastprognose VPL' (Note the colon at the beginning). After adding the Folder I get the message "Spam Bayes configuration broken" ... If I start outlook for the 2nd time, I don't get any error, but I can't access this mailbox. My own mailbox and a second mailbox work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Martin - can you please confirm the colon in the name is not the problem, and also confirm exactly what you mean by "mailbox" - I assume you mean creating a new mailbox on an exchange server. If so, I suspect this may be the same underlying issue as bug 959560 (which is an "access denied" error hitting other mailboxes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 10:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this an Exchange mailbox? If so, what sort of permissions do you have for the mailbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Date: 2004-05-21 19:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=29575 My mistake, the first message is 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' as seen in the log file ... I can access the mailbox after adding it. If I restart outlook, I can't access it any more. spambayes2.log is the log file which has been created during adding the mailbox, spambayes1.log is the one, when I tried to access it the second time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-19 08:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's highly unlikely to be the same, because SpamBayes doesn't use the name at all - it uses Outlook's "entry id" and "store id" (big long numbers that uniquely identify the folder, basically). Certainly I can have a folder called ":Lastprognose VPL" and SpamBayes works fine filtering it (just checked). Could you attach your log file? It should have more information about what is going wrong. It's probably some trouble accessing that folder, for some other reason. The exact error message (nothing in spambayes prints out the word "broken") would help, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 29 01:01:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 29 01:02:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Message-ID: Bugs item #972359, was opened at 2004-06-14 14:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Initial Comment: (This is a continuation of Bugs item #923921. I am opening a new bug report so that I can upload related files.) About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. - I received a message which was sent to the "unsure" folder. I then ran "show spam clues" on it, which showed that it was 100% SPAM (see attached file). I then manually ran "filter messages..." on the unsure folder and it correctly detected the message as SPAM and moved it to the correct folder. *No* training was done between the time the message arrived and the time that I performed these steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-29 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have never seen this before, but did today (as in spambayes-dev message). Attached is the message that it happened with. Let me know if you need anything else (I saved the spam clues message so have that, but the log (ie. contents of the trace window in Pythonwin) are gone now, but I assure you it had nothing odd). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be an error in our 'content-type' magic. If I look at the headers for this message, as shown by Outlook's View->Options, I see: """ Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mx56.dadoihag.us ([64.136.98.56]) by proxy.danz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:39:09 -0700 From: "United Coalition" To: " " Subject: 1 Minute Mortgage Application Here Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:39:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A" Return-Path: SarahAllen@mx56.dadoihag.us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 01:39:10.0757 (UTC) FILETIME=[64083550:01C451B0] ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A-- """ That doesn't look right (to me) for the headers, and I suspect is what is causing the tokenizer to not see all the tokens when filtered, but it *does* see them all for 'spam clues' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 29 01:18:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 29 01:18:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981750 ] 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder Message-ID: Bugs item #981750, was opened at 2004-06-29 01:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981750&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul M. Suchko (suchko) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder Initial Comment: I have a similar problem to 972359 where I keep getting items in POSSIBLE SPAM but when I view the SPAM clues, they show up as 100%. I looked at the source using View Options and as far as I can tell, I do not have the quotes which are shown in 972359. I do have a letter salad as part of the URLs which is NOT showing up as significant tokens in the SPAM clues window but IS showing up as a token. Perhaps the filter is scoring the letter salad when it should be ignoring it (since it is invisible to the user) like the clues window is. (PS: Why are two different scoring algorithms being used?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981750&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 29 01:37:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 29 01:38:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 15:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-06-29 07:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Unfortunately, same behaviour after installation of rc2. I did simply install over previous version, I did not deinstall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 04:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please try rc2 - there was a change in our packaging tools that may explain this error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-05-24 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Problem was initially reported against 1.0b1. It is still occuring after installation of 1.0rc1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 29 09:37:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 29 09:38:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-29 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It would definately be interesting to know if the OP is still having a problem with this. I had forgotten about this bug until I got the tracker e-mail from Mark's update. I took a second look and there is something very interesting in the directory listing file. It contains file listings for folders such as the following that look no different than the real folders that we install: c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zipc:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\bsddbc:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\dialogsc:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\dialogs\resources If the user was running some sort of Windows extension that transparently makes ZIP files look like normal folders, would it possibly result in the behavior we were seeing? I've never tried it myself, but the ZipMagic program (http://www.aladdinsys.com/win/zipmagic/) claims to do something like this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 21:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is this still a problem with the most recent versions? If so, please reset the bug status to "Open". Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 No, I did not extract c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\. The directory listing [c program files spambayes.txt] of c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\ reflects a totally default install of spambayes-1.0b1.exe with no other programs open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 03:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If I make a local hack to simulate this error (and change the error text ;), I see: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ['E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip'] Note there is no source-line shown, and that none of the files reference the .zip file. However, if I replace create a *directory* spambayes.zip, and unzip the contents of the real .zip file into it, here is the exception I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c ... ie, just like in this bug!! mypowell - did you unzip this .zip file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log 5/4/04. I wiill try "running from source" if it will help to put this one to bed. speaking of bed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Here is something I find strange. From OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log ... File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c Note 2 things: * addin.py and win32com\__init__ do not reference the .zip file. * pythoncom.pyc references the .zip file, and has garbage for the source line. I would expect no source-lines at all. Is almost looks as though the .zip file has been expanded!? I might follow this as a clue... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 03:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 02:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 29 10:21:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 29 10:29:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-29 09:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 29 14:57:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 29 14:57:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-982167 ] Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Message-ID: Support Requests item #982167, was opened at 2004-06-29 13:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Shack (peteshack) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Initial Comment: Any help with this is greatly appreciated. I know this may not be the best place to post this: I've got the outlook plugin installed - works great. I'm also trying Andrew Dalkes SpamBayesCuller: http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki/SpamBayesCuller using the same training database. Outlook scores emails more accurately than the culler script. I've checked the scores on identical messages - the culler script scored 0.477 where the plugin scored it 0.999 Any ideas why or where I should start to look? THANKS! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jun 29 20:56:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jun 29 20:56:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-982351 ] SpamBayes doesn't move spam mail when in offline mode Message-ID: Bugs item #982351, was opened at 2004-06-30 02:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=982351&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: fx (efish4) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes doesn't move spam mail when in offline mode Initial Comment: Outlook 2000 w/ SP-3 in corporate mode (Exchange server) SpamBayes 1.0rc2 If outlook is launched in offline mode (OST file for the Exchange Server service), then SpamBayes pops up a MAPI error when trying to move some mail to the spam directory. The MAPI error is: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\n Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040119\r\n \r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\n This message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted. Could it be possible to have SpamBayes working in offline mode ? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=982351&group_id=61702