From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 1 05:27:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 1 05:27:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-868742 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails on cygwin Message-ID: Bugs item #868742, was opened at 2004-01-01 12:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=868742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails on cygwin Initial Comment: Trying to run sb_mboxtrain.py on cygwin fails. The cause of the problem is line 165 which has seek(0), this does not work on cygwin. I've commented this like and looks like it's working. A patch would be: if sys.platform != cygwin: outf.seek(0) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=868742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 1 20:10:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 1 20:11:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-868648 ] Document restriction against training on Sent Items folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #868648, was opened at 2004-01-01 09:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=868648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Document restriction against training on Sent Items folder Initial Comment: Bob Coe on spambayes@python.org. > If you think training on the "sent" folder is a bad > idea, say so in the installation instructions; but don't > incorporate another unexpected restriction. It seems that he's asking for the restriction to be lifted and changed into a suggestion in the documentation instead. Lifting the restriction seems unlikely to have any effect, apart from maybe confusing people if they try to manually train on messages in it (since they'll get the "No filterable items" message). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-01-02 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I agree that this is a request for doc change, as we wont lift the restriction (mainly for the reason Tony mentioned). All we need now is somewhere to put these docs (about.html isn't right, and there is currently no better place) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=868648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 2 10:54:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 2 10:54:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-869360 ] Cannot get Toolbar to load. Message-ID: Bugs item #869360, was opened at 2004-01-02 07:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=869360&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chuck Strickland (chuckstr89134) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot get Toolbar to load. Initial Comment: I had a problem a couple of days ago and I have not been able to get Spambayes to work again since then. I am running Windows XP with Office XP (Outlook 2002 SP2). I use the Exchange client in outlook. I was building a temporary profile in outlook to work on one of my people's PST files and I got an error that I didn't pay any attention to when I opened outlook in the temporary profile. When I went back to my regular profile, I noticed that Spambayes was not working. I tried un-installing and re-installing the program several times, even trying a full re-boot after one of the un- installs. I have my antivirus disabled. I have tried the "regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll" command also. I do not get any errors at any time, but when I open outlook the toolbar is not there and I can not get it to appear. I have even tried adding it using the "add button" from: Tools->Options to display the main Options dialog. Select the tab labeled Other, then click on the Advanced button. Click on the COM Add-Ins button. I will attqach all the log files I have, unfortunately, it appears that the uninstall removed the older ones as I can only find the ones from today. The other day I saw a new beta download and I was looking for it today to give it a try but I cannot find it again. I am open to any suggestions. I really would like to get this working again. Thanks for developing such a wonderful product, please be so kind as to help me get it going again. Chuck PS - I also did another un-install and checked the registry after that. I found and deleted several references to Spambayes and then re-loaded it again - no help, same symptoms. I am attaching a zip file with the exported registry enrtries and the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=869360&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jan 3 05:50:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jan 3 05:52:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 07:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by martijnstegeman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Stegeman (martijnstegeman) Date: 2004-01-03 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=942696 Registering failed initially, also running regsvr32 manually. But running this command from the installation directory would work immediately (from cmd.exe). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonas Bergman (jonasbe) Date: 2003-12-05 17:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=924735 I have seen this error on three different computers. I also tried to register the file manually with regsvr32. Failed. Checked the dependencies, but all were correct. Then I killed a few processes, ICQ, MSN, Panda Anti-virus and a few more (all in the tray): then I registered manually once more and it worked. On all of the computers I tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-25 02:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 Has anybody else had the following happen? After several days of using 8.1 version very successfully, quite suddenly it quits working? I locked my computer and then came back. Opened Outlook and clicked 'delete as spam' and nothing happened. The button clicks but nothing is deleted, nothing is moved, nothing happens even though the buttons are on the toolbar. I restarted the computer a few times and nothing. I even uninstalled Spambayes completely, reinstalled it and nothing. Anybody have a hint? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-24 02:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded. It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier) Date: 2003-10-23 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=326244 I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I had already had a failed install on the computer I had to delete the original default directory and also deleted a couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-21 01:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to do with a path statement in the registering utility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-20 18:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19. I uninstalled via Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll know if it's actually filtering correctly. Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition that may not be all that easy to reproduce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak) Date: 2003-10-20 18:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890856 I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000. When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents the \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from registering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-19 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 15:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 08:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jan 3 12:41:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jan 3 12:41:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-04 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tagrobicki You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2004-01-03 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 Another quick note on this one. It happened again after 24- 36 hours of continuous operation filtering messages. After it happened, I acknowledged the error and then ran a bulk filter on approximately 500 messages that had accumulated. SpamBayes continued to operate fine as did Outlook without the exit. I then let Outloook continue running without exiting, and SpamBayes continued to do filtering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2003-12-29 23:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 In response to the various questions: (1) It does tend to happen after the system has been up for many hours to possibly many days (2) I do not have PGP installed, (3) I was doing normal filtering but of a "spam" account we have on our mail server which receives 1000-2000 messages, the purpose is to catch false positives from the mail server (4) The mail server is not MS Exchange, I did look at MSDN before reporting this and didn't see anything that applied to my situation (5) Outlook appears to continue working, in fact, it continues downloading the remaining spam messages but it doesn't do any SpamBayes filtering until I exit and re-enter at which point is filters out spam messages. I have not looked at the message preceeding the error, but I will the next time it comes up. I do have Norton ISS installed, but its spam filter is disabled. I also have a few Outlook filtering rules to move specific messages into some folders. However, the dialog clearly says that it is SpamBayes that is having issue possibly due to underlying Outlook problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-29 19:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have previously seen tracebacks similar to the one posted when filtering single incoming messages. IIRC, this was when I used the PGP plugin, but it had nothing to do with SpamBayes - Outlook itself was also screwed, and almost all Outlook operations would also fail, with Outlook displaying a dialog saying it too was out of memory. This happened after only 24 hours or so of uptime when PGP was enabled, and has never once happened when disabled. tagrobicki - is the error in the log you posted a result of doing a "bulk score" of a folder, or simply after normal filtering of (many) new incoming messages? If the latter, did Outlook itself also appear to be dead after you saw this message? If so, do you have any other addins loaded? If you do have the PGP plugin installed, please close this bug as "wont fix" (only as there is a 'can't fix' :) I'm reluctant to say that this is a simple memory leak in SpamBayes, else I would expect far more users to see it. My outlook shows no evidence of leaks after many many hours and messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-29 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you using Exchange? Microsoft's support stuff has info saying that this can be something that Exchange can do (if I read it right). (It also said that this happened with copying messages with a lot of attachments, but only with NT4, so I presume that isn't relevant here). Are you able to find the 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' message and see if there's anything unusual about it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2003-12-29 08:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 I have uploaded a log file (minus some "Message" lines to get it below size restrictions on uploads). The error appears at the bottom. I've added it here just so you don't have to download the file. Message 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. Message 'weekend entertainment' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 23:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Me too (I routinely filter thousands more msgs than that). It's more likely a specific single message that's causing a problem. OTOH, we're simply moving a message (according to the error msg), and it's hard to imagine how that could provoke an out-of-memory response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sure I followed this up earlier, but it seems to have got lost :( I've seen SpamBayes successfully score far more messages than that without an error. Could you please attach a log for the session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jan 4 16:05:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jan 4 16:05:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-870524 ] Make the message-proxy timeout configurable Message-ID: Feature Requests item #870524, was opened at 2004-01-04 21:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=870524&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Make the message-proxy timeout configurable Initial Comment: When the POP3 proxy receives a large message, it collects thirty seconds-worth of body before classifying it, adding the classification headers and proxying it to the client. Some email clients have a shorter timeout than this, and give up waiting for the message. Making the timeout shorter would make the amount of message body available to the classifier much smaller (especially over a modem), so the timeout should be configurable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=870524&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 5 04:58:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 5 05:03:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-870799 ] imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Message-ID: Bugs item #870799, was opened at 2004-01-05 09:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Mann (feint) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Initial Comment: It looks like it is going off the end of the list of the UIDs it brings back from the IMAP server: c:\tmp> c:\Python23\python.exe sb_imapfilter.py -c -v -i4 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db...Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 41 spam and 16 ham Done. 46:52.00 > GPAB1 LOGIN xxxx "xxxxxx" 46:52.18 < GPAB1 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 IDLE NAMESPACE MAILBOX-REFERRALS SCAN SORT THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND] User xxxx authenticated Classifying 46:52.18 > GPAB2 SELECT Spam 46:52.31 < * 56 EXISTS 46:52.31 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1073247595] UID validity status 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDNEXT 83] Predicted next UID 46:52.31 < * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.32 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.32 < GPAB2 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.32 > GPAB3 SELECT Junk 46:52.44 < * 1 EXISTS 46:52.44 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.44 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1067418428] UID validity status 46:52.45 < * OK [UIDNEXT 2] Predicted next UID 46:52.45 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.45 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.45 < * OK [UNSEEN 1] first unseen message in /home/xxxx/Junk 46:52.45 < GPAB3 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.45 > GPAB4 SELECT INBOX 46:53.60 < * 127 EXISTS 46:53.60 < * NO Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 NO response: Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 < * 0 RECENT 46:53.60 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1066476660] UID validity status 46:53.61 < * OK [UIDNEXT 558] Predicted next UID 46:53.61 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:53.61 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:53.61 < * OK [UNSEEN 125] first unseen message in /var/spool/mail/xxxx 46:53.61 < GPAB4 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:53.61 > GPAB5 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 46:53.74 < * SEARCH 180 190 233 245 251 260 264 270 283 288 299 316 322 332 355 363 397 399 402 403 404 405 406 409 410 412 414 416 421 422 424 425 432 434 439 440 441 442 445 446 447 448 451 452 454 455 456 457 458 460 462 463 464 465 466 467 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 483 484 485 486 487 489 492 494 495 497 498 499 501 502 503 505 506 507 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 547 549 551 553 554 555 556 557 46:53.74 < GPAB5 OK UID SEARCH completed 46:53.74 > GPAB6 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.HEADER 46:53.91 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822.HEADER {1110} 46:53.91 read literal size 1110 46:53.91 < ) 46:53.91 < GPAB6 OK UID FETCH completed 46:53.91 > GPAB7 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.PEEK 46:54.02 < GPAB7 BAD Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 BAD response: Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 > GPAB8 UID FETCH 180 RFC822 46:54.52 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822 {4644} 46:54.52 read literal size 4644 46:54.52 < ) 46:54.52 < GPAB8 OK UID FETCH completed * 46:54.52 > GPAB9 UID FETCH 180 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:54.63 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 FLAGS (\Seen NonJunk) INTERNALDATE " 2-Dec-2003 12:20:04 +0100") 46:54.63 < GPAB9 OK UID FETCH completed 46:54.64 > GPAB10 APPEND INBOX (\Seen NonJunk) " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:54.74 < + Ready for argument 46:54.74 write literal size 4679 46:55.06 < * 128 EXISTS 46:55.06 < * 1 RECENT 46:55.06 < GPAB10 NO APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.06 NO response: APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.07 > GPAB11 APPEND INBOX " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:55.23 < + Ready for argument 46:55.23 write literal size 4679 46:55.42 < * 129 EXISTS 46:55.42 < * 2 RECENT 46:55.42 < GPAB11 OK APPEND completed 46:55.42 > GPAB12 UID STORE 180 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 46:55.52 < GPAB12 OK UID STORE completed 46:55.52 > GPAB13 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1073296013) 46:55.63 < * SEARCH 558 559 46:55.63 < GPAB13 OK UID SEARCH completed . 46:55.65 > GPAB14 UID FETCH "558 559" (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:55.75 < GPAB14 BAD Bogus sequence in UID FETCH 46:55.75 BAD response: Bogus sequence in UID FETCH Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 815, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 608, in Filter msg.Save() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 395, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['Bogus sequence in UID FETCH'] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 5 17:27:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 5 17:27:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-871265 ] Mark spam as read not working Message-ID: Support Requests item #871265, was opened at 2004-01-05 17:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=871265&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Troy (mx32nv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mark spam as read not working Initial Comment: I've installed the Outlook Add-in (version .81 September 9th, 2003) and everything has been working well so far except for when SpamBayes recognizes an e-mail as SPAM and moves it to the appropriate folder even though I have checked the "mark spam as read" option I still have the envelope tray icon in my taskbar. If I right click on the folder the spam went into and choose "Mark All as Read" it goes away. I'm using Outlook 2003 ( all updates as of 01-02-2004) I would assume the envelope icon should dissappear if SpamBayes is truly marking it as "read". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=871265&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 5 17:36:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 5 17:36:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-871265 ] Mark spam as read not working Message-ID: Support Requests item #871265, was opened at 2004-01-05 17:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=871265&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Troy (mx32nv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mark spam as read not working Initial Comment: I've installed the Outlook Add-in (version .81 September 9th, 2003) and everything has been working well so far except for when SpamBayes recognizes an e-mail as SPAM and moves it to the appropriate folder even though I have checked the "mark spam as read" option I still have the envelope tray icon in my taskbar. If I right click on the folder the spam went into and choose "Mark All as Read" it goes away. I'm using Outlook 2003 ( all updates as of 01-02-2004) I would assume the envelope icon should dissappear if SpamBayes is truly marking it as "read". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-05 17:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Unfortunately the icon cannot be controlled. "Mark spam as read" only controls the unread state of the message as it appears in your spam folder. See FAQ #3.8. http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i-get- rid-of-the-envelope-tray-icon-for-spam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=871265&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 5 17:36:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 5 17:37:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-871265 ] Mark spam as read not working Message-ID: Support Requests item #871265, was opened at 2004-01-06 11:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=871265&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Troy (mx32nv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mark spam as read not working Initial Comment: I've installed the Outlook Add-in (version .81 September 9th, 2003) and everything has been working well so far except for when SpamBayes recognizes an e-mail as SPAM and moves it to the appropriate folder even though I have checked the "mark spam as read" option I still have the envelope tray icon in my taskbar. If I right click on the folder the spam went into and choose "Mark All as Read" it goes away. I'm using Outlook 2003 ( all updates as of 01-02-2004) I would assume the envelope icon should dissappear if SpamBayes is truly marking it as "read". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-06 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.8: RFE 774978 is also relevant: As is, perhaps, patch 858925: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-06 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Unfortunately the icon cannot be controlled. "Mark spam as read" only controls the unread state of the message as it appears in your spam folder. See FAQ #3.8. http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i-get- rid-of-the-envelope-tray-icon-for-spam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=871265&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 5 18:30:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 5 18:30:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855445 ] Outlook shuts down Message-ID: Bugs item #855445, was opened at 2003-12-06 13:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook shuts down Initial Comment: I have XP Pro with all the updates installed and SP1 ronning Outlook 2000 9.0.0.2711 and Spambayes 08.1 and Norton 2003 Installation went well. Outlook opens and check for messages. If there are messages, Outlook automatically shuts down without downloading them. I have to use Outlook express to get my mail. Prior to installing SB I could send & receive mail without problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-05 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 This has been suggested as a resolution for Outlook continuing to run after exit. It pertains to having Outlook Backup Folders installed. Please see if Outlook.exe is listed under processes after closing Outlook. If it is, try the following: ---------------------------------------------------------- On the Tools menu, click Options, and then click the Other tab. Click the Advanced Options button, and then click COM Add- Ins. Click to uncheck Outlook Backup Add-in. Click OK until the Options dialog boxes are all closed, then exit Outlook, and restart your computer. Start Outlook, send a message to yourself, and then exit Outlook. Wait 30 seconds to allow the MAPI Spooler to finish its operation, and check in the Close Program list to see if Outlook is still running ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-30 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have sporadic problems with Outlook as well. After closing Outlook, check your task manager for running processes to see if Outlook is still running. If it is, select the process (Outlook.exe) and end task. I will look into how to resolve this Outlook related issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Schkerke (talonius) Date: 2003-12-22 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=206805 Windows XP Professional SP1 (fully patched), Microsoft Outlook 2003 (fully patched through Office Update), Norton Antivirus Client 2003 Corporate Edition. After a fresh reboot I can load Outlook and SpamBayes and everything works wonderfully. If I shut Outlook down it will no longer load successfully. It only comes up, displays the first message, and then shuts itself back off. My log file looks like this (I do not see a way for me to attach files to this bug): Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 2197 spam and 7158 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.34334ms Error finding the MAPI folders for a folder switch event Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1071, in OnFolderSwitch File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010a (MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED): OLE error 0x8004010a Thank you! Brian Schkerke ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 6 13:55:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 6 13:55:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-25 18:30 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) >Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 6 18:56:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 6 18:56:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872044 ] HTTP review page date problems Message-ID: Bugs item #872044, was opened at 2004-01-06 15:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872044&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HTTP review page date problems Initial Comment: I've occasionally complained (or at least alluded to) a problem when training sb_server using the web interface. The problem has the symptom of getting more than one days defects listed in the review page, mixed with finding no messages to review and similar strange date related problems. The reason I classified the problem as strange was that I've not seen any other reports of this type of problem... So, I finally borrowed 10 minutes to learn python and dig into the problem: In _buildReviewKeys in ProxyUI.py, the array returned by state.unknownCorpus.keys() is not sorted in any particular order. This leads to allKeys[-1] returning unpredictable starting dates instead of the latest date. It also violates the assumptions required to use bisect() on the keys. I solve my problem by adding an "allKeys.sort()" after getting the keys. I assume that the keys are expected to be in order? (Hence I'm not convinced I've understood the real problem, let alone solved the problem!) This also probably explains why I can't (usually) use any of the query functionality on the home page? It often returned the "message may have been deleted" message. The things I am doing that may qualify as "not typical": 1) I'm running from CVS. 2) I'm running on Linux. 3) I expire messages in the cache after a VERY long time. 4) I almost never "forget" any messages AND only train on unsures/mistakes and none extreme correctly classified stuff. Hence I have over a months worth of web pages available for review. I've attached the diff of my hacked version of ProxyUI.py with debug stuff and the sort inserted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872044&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 6 18:58:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 6 18:59:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872044 ] HTTP review page date problems Message-ID: Bugs item #872044, was opened at 2004-01-06 15:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by brendonw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872044&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: HTTP review page date problems Initial Comment: I've occasionally complained (or at least alluded to) a problem when training sb_server using the web interface. The problem has the symptom of getting more than one days defects listed in the review page, mixed with finding no messages to review and similar strange date related problems. The reason I classified the problem as strange was that I've not seen any other reports of this type of problem... So, I finally borrowed 10 minutes to learn python and dig into the problem: In _buildReviewKeys in ProxyUI.py, the array returned by state.unknownCorpus.keys() is not sorted in any particular order. This leads to allKeys[-1] returning unpredictable starting dates instead of the latest date. It also violates the assumptions required to use bisect() on the keys. I solve my problem by adding an "allKeys.sort()" after getting the keys. I assume that the keys are expected to be in order? (Hence I'm not convinced I've understood the real problem, let alone solved the problem!) This also probably explains why I can't (usually) use any of the query functionality on the home page? It often returned the "message may have been deleted" message. The things I am doing that may qualify as "not typical": 1) I'm running from CVS. 2) I'm running on Linux. 3) I expire messages in the cache after a VERY long time. 4) I almost never "forget" any messages AND only train on unsures/mistakes and none extreme correctly classified stuff. Hence I have over a months worth of web pages available for review. I've attached the diff of my hacked version of ProxyUI.py with debug stuff and the sort inserted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872044&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 6 19:19:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 6 19:19:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872051 ] Missing review items when using HTTP Message-ID: Bugs item #872051, was opened at 2004-01-06 16:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Missing review items when using HTTP Initial Comment: When [html_ui] rows_per_section: is used to limit the number of rows displayed, the next/previous buttons still move in complete days, resulting in messages being not displayed. If this is not the desired behavior, assign this to me and I'll put a patch together. Brendon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 6 20:04:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 6 20:05:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-25 19:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-06 20:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It sounds like a good idea, but (of course) will need testing: the special-case tokenizing of URLs is the single biggest win the project ever got, so we can't afford any chance of screwing it up. I *expect* this change will be a net win, though. We can make the regexp prettier after we know whether it's a good idea . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 01:02:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 01:02:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872044 ] HTTP review page date problems Message-ID: Bugs item #872044, was opened at 2004-01-07 12:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872044&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: HTTP review page date problems Initial Comment: I've occasionally complained (or at least alluded to) a problem when training sb_server using the web interface. The problem has the symptom of getting more than one days defects listed in the review page, mixed with finding no messages to review and similar strange date related problems. The reason I classified the problem as strange was that I've not seen any other reports of this type of problem... So, I finally borrowed 10 minutes to learn python and dig into the problem: In _buildReviewKeys in ProxyUI.py, the array returned by state.unknownCorpus.keys() is not sorted in any particular order. This leads to allKeys[-1] returning unpredictable starting dates instead of the latest date. It also violates the assumptions required to use bisect() on the keys. I solve my problem by adding an "allKeys.sort()" after getting the keys. I assume that the keys are expected to be in order? (Hence I'm not convinced I've understood the real problem, let alone solved the problem!) This also probably explains why I can't (usually) use any of the query functionality on the home page? It often returned the "message may have been deleted" message. The things I am doing that may qualify as "not typical": 1) I'm running from CVS. 2) I'm running on Linux. 3) I expire messages in the cache after a VERY long time. 4) I almost never "forget" any messages AND only train on unsures/mistakes and none extreme correctly classified stuff. Hence I have over a months worth of web pages available for review. I've attached the diff of my hacked version of ProxyUI.py with debug stuff and the sort inserted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this is my fault. I made various changes to the sorting with what was once the 1.1a1 line so that you can now sort a page by column. I believe I introduced this then. I've checked in the one line fix, thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872044&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 01:08:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 01:09:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872051 ] Missing review items when using HTTP Message-ID: Bugs item #872051, was opened at 2004-01-07 13:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) >Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: Missing review items when using HTTP Initial Comment: When [html_ui] rows_per_section: is used to limit the number of rows displayed, the next/previous buttons still move in complete days, resulting in messages being not displayed. If this is not the desired behavior, assign this to me and I'll put a patch together. Brendon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 IIRC, Skip added this behaviour (or re-added it, maybe?). I'm not sure what the correct behaviour is, so I'm assigning to him to make the call. (I'm sure that if he does want it changed, he'll be happy for you to create a patch. You can assign it back to me to check it in, if it gets to that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 04:05:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 04:05:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-872233 ] Unable to filter or view spam score Message-ID: Support Requests item #872233, was opened at 2004-01-07 01:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: OvErboRed (overbored) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter or view spam score Initial Comment: I just installed SpamBayes on Outlook 2003. I followed the Wizard and trained it, which seemed to go smoothly. However, it's not doing anything with my new incoming mail. I also am unable to see the spam scores on any new mail. Or maybe it's not even there. All I know is I followed the instructions for the "Spam" field exactly, and all I see are empty values for that field. What's going on? If it helps at all, I think I chose to install SpamBayes to C: \Program Files\SpamBayes instead of C:\Program Files\SpamBayes Outlook Addin, but it ended up in the latter directory anyway. Also, I can't find any *.log file in the program directory or in the Data Folder. Thanks in advance for any hints. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 04:09:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 04:10:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-872233 ] Unable to filter or view spam score Message-ID: Support Requests item #872233, was opened at 2004-01-07 22:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: OvErboRed (overbored) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter or view spam score Initial Comment: I just installed SpamBayes on Outlook 2003. I followed the Wizard and trained it, which seemed to go smoothly. However, it's not doing anything with my new incoming mail. I also am unable to see the spam scores on any new mail. Or maybe it's not even there. All I know is I followed the instructions for the "Spam" field exactly, and all I see are empty values for that field. What's going on? If it helps at all, I think I chose to install SpamBayes to C: \Program Files\SpamBayes instead of C:\Program Files\SpamBayes Outlook Addin, but it ended up in the latter directory anyway. Also, I can't find any *.log file in the program directory or in the Data Folder. Thanks in advance for any hints. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 22:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log files are in your temp directory (probably c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp). Did you definately choose to install into a different directory and that didn't happen? If so, then it would be worth opening a separate bug about that. It's presumably installed and working if the wizard was done. What happens if you do "show spam clues" on a message? If you go into the spambayes Manager, what does the status panel say? Is the "enable spambayes" box ticked? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 08:08:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 08:08:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872358 ] Outlook Express learn mode Message-ID: Bugs item #872358, was opened at 2004-01-07 08:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872358&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Srivaths Srinivasan (vatman) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Express learn mode Initial Comment: I recd the following error when I tried to get Spambayes to read my Outlook Epress folder of "ham" mail. srivaths 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File ?spambayes\Dibbler.pyc?, line 457, in found_terminator File ?spambayes\UserInterface.pyc?, line 479, in onTrain File ?spambayes\UserInterface.pyc?, line 521, in _convertToMbox File ?spambayes\oe_mailbox.pyc?, line 465, in convertToMbox NameError: global name ?strftime? is not defined ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872358&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 09:07:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 09:07:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872412 ] Spam Score 0% Misplaced Into Spam Message-ID: Bugs item #872412, was opened at 2004-01-07 08:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872412&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark ONeill (markoneill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam Score 0% Misplaced Into Spam Initial Comment: Hello: I'm a novice at reporting bugs on your site, but thought that this report might be useful for improving your WONDERFUL program, SpamBayes, which I'm using in Outlook 2002. I've had very few false positives (less than a dozen out of several thousand messages) but the ones I've had are weird, as in the attached Outlook Message file which shows the Spam Score of 0% for a message placed in the Spam folder. Perhaps there is a bug for a 0% Spam Score that places such a message into the wrong folder. I hope this is helpful. Thank you for developing this TREMENDOUS program! Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872412&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 09:37:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 09:37:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-872233 ] Unable to filter or view spam score Message-ID: Support Requests item #872233, was opened at 2004-01-07 04:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: OvErboRed (overbored) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter or view spam score Initial Comment: I just installed SpamBayes on Outlook 2003. I followed the Wizard and trained it, which seemed to go smoothly. However, it's not doing anything with my new incoming mail. I also am unable to see the spam scores on any new mail. Or maybe it's not even there. All I know is I followed the instructions for the "Spam" field exactly, and all I see are empty values for that field. What's going on? If it helps at all, I think I chose to install SpamBayes to C: \Program Files\SpamBayes instead of C:\Program Files\SpamBayes Outlook Addin, but it ended up in the latter directory anyway. Also, I can't find any *.log file in the program directory or in the Data Folder. Thanks in advance for any hints. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-07 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The Troubleshooting Guide has a complete description of how to locate the logfiles if you haven't found them from Tony's comment. Go to SpamBayes/Help/Troubleshooting Guide or look of the file troubleshooting.html under your installation directory. Select the "All other problems" link at the top, and just below that location you should see a "Check the log file" section. A blank Spam field usually indicates that SpamBayes has not processed the message. The logfiles should tell us more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 04:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log files are in your temp directory (probably c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp). Did you definately choose to install into a different directory and that didn't happen? If so, then it would be worth opening a separate bug about that. It's presumably installed and working if the wizard was done. What happens if you do "show spam clues" on a message? If you go into the spambayes Manager, what does the status panel say? Is the "enable spambayes" box ticked? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 14:06:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 14:06:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Oulook "cannot open custom form" error dialog Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-07 13:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Oulook "cannot open custom form" error dialog Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 16:06:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 16:06:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872051 ] Missing review items when using HTTP Message-ID: Bugs item #872051, was opened at 2004-01-06 18:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: Missing review items when using HTTP Initial Comment: When [html_ui] rows_per_section: is used to limit the number of rows displayed, the next/previous buttons still move in complete days, resulting in messages being not displayed. If this is not the desired behavior, assign this to me and I'll put a patch together. Brendon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Brendon, A patch would be ideal. My use case for the current behavior was that displaying either all pending messages or often just a day's worth can be hideously expensive. I'd like to move by rows_per_section chunks through the pending messages, typically in chronological order. You're more than welcome to implement other semantics though. I don't actually use the pop3proxy these days, so my recollections about how it worked/should work may be off-base somewhat. Since you're not a registered developer, I can't assign it back to you. If you have a chance to create a patch though, just attach it and I'll review it for inclusion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 00:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 IIRC, Skip added this behaviour (or re-added it, maybe?). I'm not sure what the correct behaviour is, so I'm assigning to him to make the call. (I'm sure that if he does want it changed, he'll be happy for you to create a patch. You can assign it back to me to check it in, if it gets to that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 16:47:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 16:47:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872358 ] Outlook Express learn mode Message-ID: Bugs item #872358, was opened at 2004-01-08 02:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872358&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Srivaths Srinivasan (vatman) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Express learn mode Initial Comment: I recd the following error when I tried to get Spambayes to read my Outlook Epress folder of "ham" mail. srivaths 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File ?spambayes\Dibbler.pyc?, line 457, in found_terminator File ?spambayes\UserInterface.pyc?, line 479, in onTrain File ?spambayes\UserInterface.pyc?, line 521, in _convertToMbox File ?spambayes\oe_mailbox.pyc?, line 465, in convertToMbox NameError: global name ?strftime? is not defined ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-08 10:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872358&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 17:30:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 17:30:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-25 18:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 *sigh* stinkin' SF. It accepted the modified diff I uploaded, but lost my comments. Oh well, after a little tweak for the x- pick_apart_url code, it worked fine. The number of tokens containing 'skip:w' dropped from 380 to 126 in my normal database. I'm making a 10x10 timcv run right now. Details at 11. Slightly fancier diff attached (and I deleted the other two) which controls using a Tokenizer:x-fancy_url_recognition switch just to make it easier to test. I anticipate deleting that option if/when the change is accepted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-06 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It sounds like a good idea, but (of course) will need testing: the special-case tokenizing of URLs is the single biggest win the project ever got, so we can't afford any chance of screwing it up. I *expect* this change will be a net win, though. We can make the regexp prettier after we know whether it's a good idea . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 17:33:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 17:34:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-25 18:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Tests are finished. I saw *no change* at all. Maybe the option hasn't been properly initialized from the ini file at the time the tokenizer module is loaded? I'll fiddle some more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 *sigh* stinkin' SF. It accepted the modified diff I uploaded, but lost my comments. Oh well, after a little tweak for the x- pick_apart_url code, it worked fine. The number of tokens containing 'skip:w' dropped from 380 to 126 in my normal database. I'm making a 10x10 timcv run right now. Details at 11. Slightly fancier diff attached (and I deleted the other two) which controls using a Tokenizer:x-fancy_url_recognition switch just to make it easier to test. I anticipate deleting that option if/when the change is accepted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-06 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It sounds like a good idea, but (of course) will need testing: the special-case tokenizing of URLs is the single biggest win the project ever got, so we can't afford any chance of screwing it up. I *expect* this change will be a net win, though. We can make the regexp prettier after we know whether it's a good idea . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 17:43:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 17:43:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-25 18:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Deferring consideration of the url re until inside URLStripper.__init__ didn't change anything. My conclusion is that this change has no effect other than to slightly reduce the number of skip: tokens. Toby, did it have a positive effect on SB performance for you? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Tests are finished. I saw *no change* at all. Maybe the option hasn't been properly initialized from the ini file at the time the tokenizer module is loaded? I'll fiddle some more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 *sigh* stinkin' SF. It accepted the modified diff I uploaded, but lost my comments. Oh well, after a little tweak for the x- pick_apart_url code, it worked fine. The number of tokens containing 'skip:w' dropped from 380 to 126 in my normal database. I'm making a 10x10 timcv run right now. Details at 11. Slightly fancier diff attached (and I deleted the other two) which controls using a Tokenizer:x-fancy_url_recognition switch just to make it easier to test. I anticipate deleting that option if/when the change is accepted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-06 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It sounds like a good idea, but (of course) will need testing: the special-case tokenizing of URLs is the single biggest win the project ever got, so we can't afford any chance of screwing it up. I *expect* this change will be a net win, though. We can make the regexp prettier after we know whether it's a good idea . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 18:14:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 18:14:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-817813 ] Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #817813, was opened at 2003-10-05 07:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Levison (mlevison) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Initial Comment: Add a spelling checker and reasonable sized dictionary. If more than xx% of the message is misspelled (esp the subject), consider it to be spam. Many emails have gotten past Spam Bayes recently because their spelling is like "bfuqclvfphz". Also consider adding the words from any message not marked as spam to the dictionary - that way it would quickly learn proper names ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-08 12:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I ran some tests generating a token that had the percentage of words in the message that were in a dictionary. Results are at: We'll see what people think of that :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-14 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added both of these to the NEWTRICKS.txt file. Note that a 'word' like 'bfuqclvfphz' is highly unlikely to be used in the calculation of a message score. Any tokens not seen before get a score of 0.5, and any tokens that score between 0.4 and 0.6 don't get used for the calculation. So unless you'd seen that word before, it wouldn't be used. If you *had* seen it, surely it would be spam, and so a good thing? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2003-10-10 20:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 Actually, this could probably be achieved simply by assigning a spam probability to words that aren't in the database at all (assuming there's enough training data that all real words are in the database). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 18:35:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 18:35:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-872233 ] Unable to filter or view spam score Message-ID: Support Requests item #872233, was opened at 2004-01-07 01:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by overbored You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Priority: 2 Submitted By: OvErboRed (overbored) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter or view spam score Initial Comment: I just installed SpamBayes on Outlook 2003. I followed the Wizard and trained it, which seemed to go smoothly. However, it's not doing anything with my new incoming mail. I also am unable to see the spam scores on any new mail. Or maybe it's not even there. All I know is I followed the instructions for the "Spam" field exactly, and all I see are empty values for that field. What's going on? If it helps at all, I think I chose to install SpamBayes to C: \Program Files\SpamBayes instead of C:\Program Files\SpamBayes Outlook Addin, but it ended up in the latter directory anyway. Also, I can't find any *.log file in the program directory or in the Data Folder. Thanks in advance for any hints. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: OvErboRed (overbored) Date: 2004-01-07 15:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=691024 Sorry, as it turns out, all that was needed was a reboot, apparently. I can see the spam scores now, and SpamBayes is filtering. And I found the log files. I just had a few more quick questions: - How do I train SpamBayes to treat something as non-spam? (It's labelling some of my own messages as spam.) - Does clicking on "Delete As Spam" more than once on a message have any effect? - How does POPFile compare to SpamBayes as an anti-spam utility? Will SpamBayes ever become more generalized like POPFile? Anyway thanks for being so responsive about my trouble earlier. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-07 06:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The Troubleshooting Guide has a complete description of how to locate the logfiles if you haven't found them from Tony's comment. Go to SpamBayes/Help/Troubleshooting Guide or look of the file troubleshooting.html under your installation directory. Select the "All other problems" link at the top, and just below that location you should see a "Check the log file" section. A blank Spam field usually indicates that SpamBayes has not processed the message. The logfiles should tell us more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log files are in your temp directory (probably c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp). Did you definately choose to install into a different directory and that didn't happen? If so, then it would be worth opening a separate bug about that. It's presumably installed and working if the wizard was done. What happens if you do "show spam clues" on a message? If you go into the spambayes Manager, what does the status panel say? Is the "enable spambayes" box ticked? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 18:47:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 18:47:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-872233 ] Unable to filter or view spam score Message-ID: Support Requests item #872233, was opened at 2004-01-07 22:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 2 Submitted By: OvErboRed (overbored) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter or view spam score Initial Comment: I just installed SpamBayes on Outlook 2003. I followed the Wizard and trained it, which seemed to go smoothly. However, it's not doing anything with my new incoming mail. I also am unable to see the spam scores on any new mail. Or maybe it's not even there. All I know is I followed the instructions for the "Spam" field exactly, and all I see are empty values for that field. What's going on? If it helps at all, I think I chose to install SpamBayes to C: \Program Files\SpamBayes instead of C:\Program Files\SpamBayes Outlook Addin, but it ended up in the latter directory anyway. Also, I can't find any *.log file in the program directory or in the Data Folder. Thanks in advance for any hints. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-08 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. Find the message and click the "Recover from spam" button. Alternatively, enable the 'incremental training' option, and drag it to a 'good' folder (like the inbox). Or put examples of such messages in a folder and train on all the messages in that folder. 2. No. Each message will only be trained once, no matter how many times you click it (if you copy the message, you can 'double train', but only then). 3. No idea about POPFile vs SpamBayes, sorry. It's unlikely that spambayes would be generalised to be n-way, because it's really not designed that way (and it makes everything much more complicated, too!). There is a script in the source distribution (contrib/nway.py IIRC) that demonstrates how spambayes can be used to do nway classification, though (it wouldn't be as efficient about it as POPFile, though). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: OvErboRed (overbored) Date: 2004-01-08 12:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=691024 Sorry, as it turns out, all that was needed was a reboot, apparently. I can see the spam scores now, and SpamBayes is filtering. And I found the log files. I just had a few more quick questions: - How do I train SpamBayes to treat something as non-spam? (It's labelling some of my own messages as spam.) - Does clicking on "Delete As Spam" more than once on a message have any effect? - How does POPFile compare to SpamBayes as an anti-spam utility? Will SpamBayes ever become more generalized like POPFile? Anyway thanks for being so responsive about my trouble earlier. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-08 03:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The Troubleshooting Guide has a complete description of how to locate the logfiles if you haven't found them from Tony's comment. Go to SpamBayes/Help/Troubleshooting Guide or look of the file troubleshooting.html under your installation directory. Select the "All other problems" link at the top, and just below that location you should see a "Check the log file" section. A blank Spam field usually indicates that SpamBayes has not processed the message. The logfiles should tell us more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 22:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log files are in your temp directory (probably c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp). Did you definately choose to install into a different directory and that didn't happen? If so, then it would be worth opening a separate bug about that. It's presumably installed and working if the wizard was done. What happens if you do "show spam clues" on a message? If you go into the spambayes Manager, what does the status panel say? Is the "enable spambayes" box ticked? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 18:54:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 18:54:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-805852 ] need python-dev package on Debian Message-ID: Bugs item #805852, was opened at 2003-09-14 15:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805852&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a5 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Elliott Finley (brianfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: need python-dev package on Debian Initial Comment: When installing on a Debian system, one may encounter an error such as: finley@mantis:~/src/spambayes-1.0a5% ./setup.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./setup.py", line 10, in ? from distutils.core import setup ImportError: No module named distutils.core This can be remedied with an "apt-get install python-dev". Might be a nice thing to add to the README.txt. Cheers, -Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-08 12:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Done, thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805852&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 7 22:59:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 7 22:59:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-872233 ] Unable to filter or view spam score Message-ID: Support Requests item #872233, was opened at 2004-01-07 01:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by overbored You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 2 Submitted By: OvErboRed (overbored) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter or view spam score Initial Comment: I just installed SpamBayes on Outlook 2003. I followed the Wizard and trained it, which seemed to go smoothly. However, it's not doing anything with my new incoming mail. I also am unable to see the spam scores on any new mail. Or maybe it's not even there. All I know is I followed the instructions for the "Spam" field exactly, and all I see are empty values for that field. What's going on? If it helps at all, I think I chose to install SpamBayes to C: \Program Files\SpamBayes instead of C:\Program Files\SpamBayes Outlook Addin, but it ended up in the latter directory anyway. Also, I can't find any *.log file in the program directory or in the Data Folder. Thanks in advance for any hints. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: OvErboRed (overbored) Date: 2004-01-07 19:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=691024 Actually, what I meant by #2 was: is it possible to have SpamNet lower its suspicion of messages that I wrote (and CC'd to myself) down from 85%? Currently, the only way for "Unmark As Spam" button to appear is if the message is >90% and filtered into the Junk E-mail folder. Should I just drag the message into Junk E-mail and unmark it from there? Does dragging items into that folder have the same effect as using the "Delete As Spam" button? Thanks again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 15:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. Find the message and click the "Recover from spam" button. Alternatively, enable the 'incremental training' option, and drag it to a 'good' folder (like the inbox). Or put examples of such messages in a folder and train on all the messages in that folder. 2. No. Each message will only be trained once, no matter how many times you click it (if you copy the message, you can 'double train', but only then). 3. No idea about POPFile vs SpamBayes, sorry. It's unlikely that spambayes would be generalised to be n-way, because it's really not designed that way (and it makes everything much more complicated, too!). There is a script in the source distribution (contrib/nway.py IIRC) that demonstrates how spambayes can be used to do nway classification, though (it wouldn't be as efficient about it as POPFile, though). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: OvErboRed (overbored) Date: 2004-01-07 15:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=691024 Sorry, as it turns out, all that was needed was a reboot, apparently. I can see the spam scores now, and SpamBayes is filtering. And I found the log files. I just had a few more quick questions: - How do I train SpamBayes to treat something as non-spam? (It's labelling some of my own messages as spam.) - Does clicking on "Delete As Spam" more than once on a message have any effect? - How does POPFile compare to SpamBayes as an anti-spam utility? Will SpamBayes ever become more generalized like POPFile? Anyway thanks for being so responsive about my trouble earlier. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-07 06:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The Troubleshooting Guide has a complete description of how to locate the logfiles if you haven't found them from Tony's comment. Go to SpamBayes/Help/Troubleshooting Guide or look of the file troubleshooting.html under your installation directory. Select the "All other problems" link at the top, and just below that location you should see a "Check the log file" section. A blank Spam field usually indicates that SpamBayes has not processed the message. The logfiles should tell us more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log files are in your temp directory (probably c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp). Did you definately choose to install into a different directory and that didn't happen? If so, then it would be worth opening a separate bug about that. It's presumably installed and working if the wizard was done. What happens if you do "show spam clues" on a message? If you go into the spambayes Manager, what does the status panel say? Is the "enable spambayes" box ticked? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 8 06:35:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 8 06:35:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-26 00:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by htrd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Date: 2004-01-08 11:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=46460 I created this after getting a run of spams where the body was only a single url which were all incorrectly classified. There were no spam clue tokens in the header, and only the one skip token in the body. This patch fixed the classification of those messages. Ive not run the full tests to prove that it doesnt have some other bad effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 22:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Deferring consideration of the url re until inside URLStripper.__init__ didn't change anything. My conclusion is that this change has no effect other than to slightly reduce the number of skip: tokens. Toby, did it have a positive effect on SB performance for you? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Tests are finished. I saw *no change* at all. Maybe the option hasn't been properly initialized from the ini file at the time the tokenizer module is loaded? I'll fiddle some more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 *sigh* stinkin' SF. It accepted the modified diff I uploaded, but lost my comments. Oh well, after a little tweak for the x- pick_apart_url code, it worked fine. The number of tokens containing 'skip:w' dropped from 380 to 126 in my normal database. I'm making a 10x10 timcv run right now. Details at 11. Slightly fancier diff attached (and I deleted the other two) which controls using a Tokenizer:x-fancy_url_recognition switch just to make it easier to test. I anticipate deleting that option if/when the change is accepted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-07 01:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It sounds like a good idea, but (of course) will need testing: the special-case tokenizing of URLs is the single biggest win the project ever got, so we can't afford any chance of screwing it up. I *expect* this change will be a net win, though. We can make the regexp prettier after we know whether it's a good idea . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 8 07:33:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 8 07:33:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-873036 ] sb_mboxtrain.py deletes mail on cygwin Message-ID: Bugs item #873036, was opened at 2004-01-08 14:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=873036&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py deletes mail on cygwin Initial Comment: [14:29] $ls -l .mail total 13M -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 338k Jan 8 14:22 adp54 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 army -rw-rw-rw- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 dvp -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 elad -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.4M Jan 8 14:22 fast-download -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 i55 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 i76 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 803k Jan 8 14:29 inbox -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.5M Jan 8 14:22 jokes -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 3.2k Jan 8 14:22 misc -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:22 mlv -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 197k Jan 8 14:22 parents -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 8.8k Jan 8 14:22 perforce -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 5.0M Jan 8 14:22 sent -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 933k Jan 8 14:22 servo -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 341k Jan 8 14:22 spam -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.9k Jan 8 14:22 uni -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 1.3k Jan 8 14:22 uri.nix -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.8k Jan 8 14:22 zoran [14:30] $cp -r .mail .mail.bak [14:30] $cat /tmp/sbt #!/bin/bash sb_mboxtrain.py -g ~/.mail/army -g ~/.mail/dvp -g ~/.mail/elad -g ~/.mail/fast-download -g ~/.mail/i55 -g ~/.mail/i76 -g ~/.mail/jokes -g ~/.mail/misc -g ~/.mail/mlv -g ~/.mail/perforce -g ~/.mail/sent -g ~/.mail/servo -g ~/.mail/uri.nix -g ~/.mail/zoran -s ~/.mail/spam -s /tmp/272.r2 -D ~/.hammiedb [14:30] $/tmp/sbt Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/army): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/dvp): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/elad): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/fast-download): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 16 out of 16 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/i55): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/i76): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/jokes): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/misc): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/mlv): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/perforce): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 3 out of 3 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/sent): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 87 out of 87 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/servo): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/uri.nix): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 1 out of 1 messages Training ham (/home/mikit/.mail/zoran): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 1 out of 1 messages Training spam (/home/mikit/.mail/spam): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 25 out of 25 messages Training spam (/tmp/272.r2): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages [14:30] $ls -l .mail total 1.4M -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 338k Jan 8 14:22 adp54 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 army -rw-rw-rw- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 dvp -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 elad -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 fast-download -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 i55 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 i76 -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 803k Jan 8 14:29 inbox -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 jokes -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 misc -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 mlv -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 197k Jan 8 14:22 parents -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 perforce -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 sent -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 servo -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 spam -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 2.9k Jan 8 14:22 uni -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 uri.nix -rw------- 1 mikit Domain U 0 Jan 8 14:30 zoran ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=873036&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 8 09:09:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 8 09:09:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-872233 ] Unable to filter or view spam score Message-ID: Support Requests item #872233, was opened at 2004-01-07 04:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 2 Submitted By: OvErboRed (overbored) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter or view spam score Initial Comment: I just installed SpamBayes on Outlook 2003. I followed the Wizard and trained it, which seemed to go smoothly. However, it's not doing anything with my new incoming mail. I also am unable to see the spam scores on any new mail. Or maybe it's not even there. All I know is I followed the instructions for the "Spam" field exactly, and all I see are empty values for that field. What's going on? If it helps at all, I think I chose to install SpamBayes to C: \Program Files\SpamBayes instead of C:\Program Files\SpamBayes Outlook Addin, but it ended up in the latter directory anyway. Also, I can't find any *.log file in the program directory or in the Data Folder. Thanks in advance for any hints. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-08 09:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 SpamNet is a commercial product that is related to SpamBayes only so far as they are both spam filters, so I'll assume that was a typo. In SpamBayes, messages that score greater than the Possible Spam threshold and less than the Certain Spam threshold should be moved to your "Unsure" folder. In the unsure folder, you should see both the "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" buttons so you should be able to train it as a good message from there. You can adjust the threshold scores from the Filtering tab in SpamBayes Manager. By default, dragging a message from a non-spam folder to the spam folder is equivalent to using "Delete as Spam". This behavior is controlled by the Incremental Training options on the Training tab, and can be disabled from there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: OvErboRed (overbored) Date: 2004-01-07 22:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=691024 Actually, what I meant by #2 was: is it possible to have SpamNet lower its suspicion of messages that I wrote (and CC'd to myself) down from 85%? Currently, the only way for "Unmark As Spam" button to appear is if the message is >90% and filtered into the Junk E-mail folder. Should I just drag the message into Junk E-mail and unmark it from there? Does dragging items into that folder have the same effect as using the "Delete As Spam" button? Thanks again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 18:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. Find the message and click the "Recover from spam" button. Alternatively, enable the 'incremental training' option, and drag it to a 'good' folder (like the inbox). Or put examples of such messages in a folder and train on all the messages in that folder. 2. No. Each message will only be trained once, no matter how many times you click it (if you copy the message, you can 'double train', but only then). 3. No idea about POPFile vs SpamBayes, sorry. It's unlikely that spambayes would be generalised to be n-way, because it's really not designed that way (and it makes everything much more complicated, too!). There is a script in the source distribution (contrib/nway.py IIRC) that demonstrates how spambayes can be used to do nway classification, though (it wouldn't be as efficient about it as POPFile, though). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: OvErboRed (overbored) Date: 2004-01-07 18:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=691024 Sorry, as it turns out, all that was needed was a reboot, apparently. I can see the spam scores now, and SpamBayes is filtering. And I found the log files. I just had a few more quick questions: - How do I train SpamBayes to treat something as non-spam? (It's labelling some of my own messages as spam.) - Does clicking on "Delete As Spam" more than once on a message have any effect? - How does POPFile compare to SpamBayes as an anti-spam utility? Will SpamBayes ever become more generalized like POPFile? Anyway thanks for being so responsive about my trouble earlier. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-07 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The Troubleshooting Guide has a complete description of how to locate the logfiles if you haven't found them from Tony's comment. Go to SpamBayes/Help/Troubleshooting Guide or look of the file troubleshooting.html under your installation directory. Select the "All other problems" link at the top, and just below that location you should see a "Check the log file" section. A blank Spam field usually indicates that SpamBayes has not processed the message. The logfiles should tell us more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-07 04:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log files are in your temp directory (probably c:\documents and settings\[username]\local settings\temp). Did you definately choose to install into a different directory and that didn't happen? If so, then it would be worth opening a separate bug about that. It's presumably installed and working if the wizard was done. What happens if you do "show spam clues" on a message? If you go into the spambayes Manager, what does the status panel say? Is the "enable spambayes" box ticked? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=872233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 9 06:26:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 9 06:27:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 13:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-23 08:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 08:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 9 08:41:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 9 08:41:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841819 ] 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Message-ID: Bugs item #841819, was opened at 2003-11-14 00:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by falted You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Initial Comment: Actually version is 1.0a7 Windows 2000, with Pegasus e-mail software, using the pop3proxy. Updated from 1.0a7, and it worked for a few days. Now any attempt to train using the web interface yields the same error (see below). Restarting the service did not help. Database corrupted? 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 310, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 580, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 588, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 346, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 279, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 120, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Francesc Alted (falted) Date: 2004-01-09 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=249033 The same problem happens to me with Linux and python 2.3.3. I've tried to recover the database, as the message errors suggest, but I've found no way to do that because I don't know what bsddb version the hammie.db file is. A try with $ db3_recover hammie usage: db_recover [-cVv] [-h home] [-t[[CC]YY]MMDDhhmm[.SS]] does nothing. It seems like if hammie.db is not a berkeley db. Anyway, I hope the bug could be found soon, because I find the software lovely!. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-15 16:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We don't know what causes this - you might find it comes back, or you might not. I don't think it's specific to 1.0a6, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Date: 2003-11-14 21:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=908752 I blew away the databases, stopped and restarted the pop3 service and trained again on stored spam. (Pegasus can create a unix mailbox for me). The problem seems to go away. Perhaps the database was corrupt because of 1.0a6 bug, and the upgrade requires a fresh start with new database? -Marek ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 9 11:03:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 9 11:03:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841819 ] 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Message-ID: Bugs item #841819, was opened at 2003-11-13 23:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Initial Comment: Actually version is 1.0a7 Windows 2000, with Pegasus e-mail software, using the pop3proxy. Updated from 1.0a7, and it worked for a few days. Now any attempt to train using the web interface yields the same error (see below). Restarting the service did not help. Database corrupted? 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 310, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 580, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 588, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 346, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 279, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 120, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-01-09 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We're still investigating this, but I'm afraid we still don't have a resolution. There's no known way of recovering the database, because (we think) the SleepyCat tools don't work with the backward-compatibility mode we use with bsddb. All you can do this time is retrain from scratch. You can prevent this error from happening in the future by using a pickle rather than a database (Configuration / Advanced / Storage options / Use database for storage: No). This will make startup and training slower, but may make classifying faster and will guarantee that you don't get this error again (or at least not for the main database - you could possibly get it for spambayes.messageinfo.db but you can harmlessly delete that one). I think you need to shut down SpamBayes and manually delete your database file (probably called hammie.db) before (or after?) changing the "Use database" option. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Francesc Alted (falted) Date: 2004-01-09 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=249033 The same problem happens to me with Linux and python 2.3.3. I've tried to recover the database, as the message errors suggest, but I've found no way to do that because I don't know what bsddb version the hammie.db file is. A try with $ db3_recover hammie usage: db_recover [-cVv] [-h home] [-t[[CC]YY]MMDDhhmm[.SS]] does nothing. It seems like if hammie.db is not a berkeley db. Anyway, I hope the bug could be found soon, because I find the software lovely!. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-15 15:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We don't know what causes this - you might find it comes back, or you might not. I don't think it's specific to 1.0a6, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Date: 2003-11-14 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=908752 I blew away the databases, stopped and restarted the pop3 service and trained again on stored spam. (Pegasus can create a unix mailbox for me). The problem seems to go away. Perhaps the database was corrupt because of 1.0a6 bug, and the upgrade requires a fresh start with new database? -Marek ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 9 18:04:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 9 18:04:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Oulook "cannot open custom form" error dialog Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-07 14:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Oulook "cannot open custom form" error dialog Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Verify that your Macro Security Level is set at Medium or Low. Setting it at high will cause this to occur. - Tools - Macro - Security ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 9 19:31:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 9 19:31:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 00:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Are you using SMTP and POP3 or are you connecting to an exchange server? When connecting to an exchange server (and, this COULD affect SMTP / POP3 as well - I have to confirm this) the RPC Binding Order dramatically affects the time it takes the Outlook client to process messages. The string in the reg key HKLM/Software/Microsoft/Exchange/RPC_Binding_Order comes, by default, as follows: ncalrpc,ncacn_ip_tcp,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns _spp All that is requitred for a standard TCP/IP connection is ncacn_ip_tcp RPC, SPX, NP (named pipes), netbios, and vns_spp (banyan vines) are rarely used. Outlook can take up to a minute attempting to establish communication using each individual protocol. Lets say that your server to server environment requires RPC. Outlook must first establish a TCP/IP connection before using RPC. So RPC will fail, then TCP/IP will establish, followed by SPX, NP, netbios, and vns_spp. Then it must go through the order again, establishing RPC, attempting to restablic TCP/IP, followed again by the rest. This can make it appear that the system is indeed hung. Modifying the binding order to reflect the required services, in the order they are used, reduces the time to perform tasks. If you want details, contact me and I will send them "offline" I will also determine if the RPC Binding order is used in the Internet Mail Only mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Date: 2003-12-06 13:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=925460 My XP pro does too except that it shut down completely as soon as it detect a message to DL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-12-02 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I tried leroypa's suggestion yesterday and Outlook has not yet hung again after receiving hundreds of messages and filtering them to dozens of folders through half a dozen email accounts. McAfee Virus Scan is running and I haven't seen a problem since I turned Spam Bayes back on yesterday. Again, all I did was tell Spam Bayes to ONLY filter the Inbox. I assume since Outlook puts the emails into the Inbox and then applies the Rules moving them to other folders, having Spam Bayes filter them in the Inbox then filter them again in sub-folders was somehow creating the problem. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-12-01 14:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I to have been having this problem (see previous posts). Like Basil, I to am running McAfee Virus Scan, but what I did was to filter only the 'Inbox' and not it's sub-folders as well as turning on 'background filtering'. Don't need to filter Inbox sub-folders as Outlook rules is setup to move messages I know I want to these folders. I also find that Spambytes does run slow and it does look like at times it is 'running into' Outlook processing. Thanks, PL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Basil Hussain (basil_hussain) Date: 2003-12-01 04:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=918906 I have been experiencing the same problem with Outlook hanging during download of messages. I tried setting SpamBayes to use background filtering, but that didn't help. I think it is definitely something to do with having McAfee VirusScan installed. I have VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 installed. I uninstalled the E-mail Scan feature (which integrates with Outlook) and all has been working well. This was with Outlook 2000 SP-3 9.0.0.6627. PGP Freeware 7.0.3 (with Outlook plug-in) is also installed, but seems to co- exist fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-10-31 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin binary 0.81. Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not hang. I don't understand how the Timer would help... John T. Jarrett john@logontexas.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-22 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can the other people having trouble with this let me know how the "background processing" option works for them? The original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2003-10-22 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail then reenable spambayes to get my mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-19 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-17 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 17:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 20:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 04:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 05:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 19:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 9 19:44:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 9 19:44:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 00:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 This ONLY affects clients connecting to an exchange server ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Are you using SMTP and POP3 or are you connecting to an exchange server? When connecting to an exchange server (and, this COULD affect SMTP / POP3 as well - I have to confirm this) the RPC Binding Order dramatically affects the time it takes the Outlook client to process messages. The string in the reg key HKLM/Software/Microsoft/Exchange/RPC_Binding_Order comes, by default, as follows: ncalrpc,ncacn_ip_tcp,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns _spp All that is requitred for a standard TCP/IP connection is ncacn_ip_tcp RPC, SPX, NP (named pipes), netbios, and vns_spp (banyan vines) are rarely used. Outlook can take up to a minute attempting to establish communication using each individual protocol. Lets say that your server to server environment requires RPC. Outlook must first establish a TCP/IP connection before using RPC. So RPC will fail, then TCP/IP will establish, followed by SPX, NP, netbios, and vns_spp. Then it must go through the order again, establishing RPC, attempting to restablic TCP/IP, followed again by the rest. This can make it appear that the system is indeed hung. Modifying the binding order to reflect the required services, in the order they are used, reduces the time to perform tasks. If you want details, contact me and I will send them "offline" I will also determine if the RPC Binding order is used in the Internet Mail Only mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Date: 2003-12-06 13:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=925460 My XP pro does too except that it shut down completely as soon as it detect a message to DL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-12-02 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I tried leroypa's suggestion yesterday and Outlook has not yet hung again after receiving hundreds of messages and filtering them to dozens of folders through half a dozen email accounts. McAfee Virus Scan is running and I haven't seen a problem since I turned Spam Bayes back on yesterday. Again, all I did was tell Spam Bayes to ONLY filter the Inbox. I assume since Outlook puts the emails into the Inbox and then applies the Rules moving them to other folders, having Spam Bayes filter them in the Inbox then filter them again in sub-folders was somehow creating the problem. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-12-01 14:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I to have been having this problem (see previous posts). Like Basil, I to am running McAfee Virus Scan, but what I did was to filter only the 'Inbox' and not it's sub-folders as well as turning on 'background filtering'. Don't need to filter Inbox sub-folders as Outlook rules is setup to move messages I know I want to these folders. I also find that Spambytes does run slow and it does look like at times it is 'running into' Outlook processing. Thanks, PL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Basil Hussain (basil_hussain) Date: 2003-12-01 04:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=918906 I have been experiencing the same problem with Outlook hanging during download of messages. I tried setting SpamBayes to use background filtering, but that didn't help. I think it is definitely something to do with having McAfee VirusScan installed. I have VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 installed. I uninstalled the E-mail Scan feature (which integrates with Outlook) and all has been working well. This was with Outlook 2000 SP-3 9.0.0.6627. PGP Freeware 7.0.3 (with Outlook plug-in) is also installed, but seems to co- exist fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-10-31 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin binary 0.81. Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not hang. I don't understand how the Timer would help... John T. Jarrett john@logontexas.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-22 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can the other people having trouble with this let me know how the "background processing" option works for them? The original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2003-10-22 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail then reenable spambayes to get my mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-19 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-17 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 17:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 20:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 04:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 05:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 19:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jan 10 20:16:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jan 10 20:16:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-841819 ] 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Message-ID: Bugs item #841819, was opened at 2003-11-14 12:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 500 Server error: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error Initial Comment: Actually version is 1.0a7 Windows 2000, with Pegasus e-mail software, using the pop3proxy. Updated from 1.0a7, and it worked for a few days. Now any attempt to train using the web interface yields the same error (see below). Restarting the service did not help. Database corrupted? 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 310, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 580, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 588, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 346, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\storage.py", line 279, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "C:\Program Files\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 120, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-11 14:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you're using 1.0a7 or later, then the messageinfo db will use the same storage type as the main (bayes) database, so it should also be immune from this problem if you switch to using a pickle. To confirm, you do have to delete the database files before you change the option, at the moment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-01-10 05:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We're still investigating this, but I'm afraid we still don't have a resolution. There's no known way of recovering the database, because (we think) the SleepyCat tools don't work with the backward-compatibility mode we use with bsddb. All you can do this time is retrain from scratch. You can prevent this error from happening in the future by using a pickle rather than a database (Configuration / Advanced / Storage options / Use database for storage: No). This will make startup and training slower, but may make classifying faster and will guarantee that you don't get this error again (or at least not for the main database - you could possibly get it for spambayes.messageinfo.db but you can harmlessly delete that one). I think you need to shut down SpamBayes and manually delete your database file (probably called hammie.db) before (or after?) changing the "Use database" option. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Francesc Alted (falted) Date: 2004-01-10 02:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=249033 The same problem happens to me with Linux and python 2.3.3. I've tried to recover the database, as the message errors suggest, but I've found no way to do that because I don't know what bsddb version the hammie.db file is. A try with $ db3_recover hammie usage: db_recover [-cVv] [-h home] [-t[[CC]YY]MMDDhhmm[.SS]] does nothing. It seems like if hammie.db is not a berkeley db. Anyway, I hope the bug could be found soon, because I find the software lovely!. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-11-16 04:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We don't know what causes this - you might find it comes back, or you might not. I don't think it's specific to 1.0a6, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marek Zielinski (marekz) Date: 2003-11-15 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=908752 I blew away the databases, stopped and restarted the pop3 service and trained again on stored spam. (Pegasus can create a unix mailbox for me). The problem seems to go away. Perhaps the database was corrupt because of 1.0a6 bug, and the upgrade requires a fresh start with new database? -Marek ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=841819&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jan 11 01:12:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jan 11 01:12:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872051 ] Missing review items when using HTTP Message-ID: Bugs item #872051, was opened at 2004-01-06 16:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brendonw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: Missing review items when using HTTP Initial Comment: When [html_ui] rows_per_section: is used to limit the number of rows displayed, the next/previous buttons still move in complete days, resulting in messages being not displayed. If this is not the desired behavior, assign this to me and I'll put a patch together. Brendon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Date: 2004-01-10 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=944315 Ok, I've thought about this a lot, and it seems like the semantics seem wrong. The current option _claims_ to limit the maximum number of lines _per section_ which seems to make life much more difficult than it needs to be. The primary reason for limiting the number of lines is to avoid very slow response times from the server. When you add a limit on the number of lines, you don't also only want to display a single day at a time. A more natural approach would be to display messages for review _either_ per day OR per number of lines. So, if you set the limit to 100 lines, you could page 100 messages at a time. This behavior would also be useful for reviewing a long history of messages that are sparsely populated in manageable groups, but faster than one day at a time. I'll wait a few days in case anybody has any comments before I implement something along these lines. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Brendon, A patch would be ideal. My use case for the current behavior was that displaying either all pending messages or often just a day's worth can be hideously expensive. I'd like to move by rows_per_section chunks through the pending messages, typically in chronological order. You're more than welcome to implement other semantics though. I don't actually use the pop3proxy these days, so my recollections about how it worked/should work may be off-base somewhat. Since you're not a registered developer, I can't assign it back to you. If you have a chance to create a patch though, just attach it and I'll review it for inclusion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-06 22:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 IIRC, Skip added this behaviour (or re-added it, maybe?). I'm not sure what the correct behaviour is, so I'm assigning to him to make the call. (I'm sure that if he does want it changed, he'll be happy for you to create a patch. You can assign it back to me to check it in, if it gets to that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872051&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jan 11 01:27:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jan 11 01:27:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-874784 ] Error in onReview code Message-ID: Bugs item #874784, was opened at 2004-01-10 22:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=874784&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error in onReview code Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know how significant this error is, since everything seems to work even though the code is wrong! In ProxyUI.py in the def of 'onReview', there is the following code: if params.get('go') != 'refresh': to presumably miss this block unless we are doing a refresh. The problem is that this is ALWAYS true because the value of the param 'go' is 'Refresh', not 'refresh' I assume that this is an unintended, and harmless oversight? Brendon. P.S. I'll make a patch if one is needed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=874784&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 12 14:04:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 12 14:04:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Oulook Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-07 13:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ben_dillon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Oulook Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-12 13:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 I gave that a try and continued to see the problem. It had been set at Medium to begin with. Someone here suggested that this might be linked to my use of folder sharing. Does this provide any additional insight? Thanks! Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 17:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Verify that your Macro Security Level is set at Medium or Low. Setting it at high will cause this to occur. - Tools - Macro - Security ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 12 17:25:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 12 17:26:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-874784 ] Error in onReview code Message-ID: Bugs item #874784, was opened at 2004-01-11 19:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=874784&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brendon Whateley (brendonw) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Error in onReview code Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know how significant this error is, since everything seems to work even though the code is wrong! In ProxyUI.py in the def of 'onReview', there is the following code: if params.get('go') != 'refresh': to presumably miss this block unless we are doing a refresh. The problem is that this is ALWAYS true because the value of the param 'go' is 'Refresh', not 'refresh' I assume that this is an unintended, and harmless oversight? Brendon. P.S. I'll make a patch if one is needed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-13 11:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not really significant, but you're right, it's an error nonetheless. Fixed, thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=874784&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 12 18:14:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 12 18:14:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796129 ] 'Keep as Good' Button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796129, was opened at 2003-08-27 19:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sdx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andreas Unterste (aunterste) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 'Keep as Good' Button Initial Comment: I use my InBox as storage for the good mail (in order to use outlooks rules for further moving and classification). When a message arrives with a relatively high spam score, but below the threshold, I think a button 'Keep as Good' would be useful which trains SpamBayes that this is ham. The only other way to achieve that at the moment is to move the message somewhere and trigger the set of the SpamScore to 0% by moving it back into the InBox. Something right next to the 'Delete as Spam'. Otherwise: TERRIFIC PRODUCT !!!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 00:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I also missed this button, since it is initially hard to train it for good messages, since a new inbox is normally polluted by spam. It would be more convenient than moving good mail temporarily to a separate Ham folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 12 18:21:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 12 18:21:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-875748 ] Outlook: Score/filter read messages as well Message-ID: Feature Requests item #875748, was opened at 2004-01-13 00:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=875748&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook: Score/filter read messages as well Initial Comment: If you use more than one email client to read your exchange server inbox, for instance Outlook Web Access, messages don't get filtered until you use the client with spambayes installed/configured again. This means ofcourse that the spam piles up. You might also, by mistake or by curiosity open an item that is spam, which means that it is marked as read, and not scanned by spambayes the next time the client with spambayes is executed. This means that you will have to manually scan your inbox, or move the emails to the specified junk folder. I would like to have an option for the plugin that lets the background filtering process all unscored mail, even if it is read already, and take proper action. However, since this might not be desirable for a new installation with limited training or by an inexperienced user, I suggest that this option should be off by default. //Oscar ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=875748&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 12 18:24:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 12 18:24:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-875748 ] Outlook: Score/filter read messages as well Message-ID: Feature Requests item #875748, was opened at 2004-01-13 00:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by sdx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=875748&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook: Score/filter read messages as well Initial Comment: If you use more than one email client to read your exchange server inbox, for instance Outlook Web Access, messages don't get filtered until you use the client with spambayes installed/configured again. This means ofcourse that the spam piles up. You might also, by mistake or by curiosity open an item that is spam, which means that it is marked as read, and not scanned by spambayes the next time the client with spambayes is executed. This means that you will have to manually scan your inbox, or move the emails to the specified junk folder. I would like to have an option for the plugin that lets the background filtering process all unscored mail, even if it is read already, and take proper action. However, since this might not be desirable for a new installation with limited training or by an inexperienced user, I suggest that this option should be off by default. //Oscar ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=875748&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 13 13:51:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 13 13:52:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 19:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 13 14:00:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 13 14:00:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 19:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sdx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 13 18:21:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 13 18:21:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876483 ] SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #876483, was opened at 2004-01-13 18:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: After upgrading to Outlook 2003 SpamBayes no longer works. Attempted to follow the Troubleshooting Guide ToolBar steps (to no avail). See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 14 03:00:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 14 03:00:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876483 ] SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #876483, was opened at 2004-01-13 15:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by esargent You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: After upgrading to Outlook 2003 SpamBayes no longer works. Attempted to follow the Troubleshooting Guide ToolBar steps (to no avail). See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2004-01-14 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I've upgraded from Outlook 2000 to 2003 on several PCs, including beta versions of Outlook 2003 and never had a problem. I was using WinXP in both cases. David, can you try reinstalling SpamBayes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 14 09:19:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 14 09:19:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876483 ] SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #876483, was opened at 2004-01-13 18:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dgriffinpcs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: After upgrading to Outlook 2003 SpamBayes no longer works. Attempted to follow the Troubleshooting Guide ToolBar steps (to no avail). See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Date: 2004-01-14 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=950307 Uninstal and reinstall was the first thing I tried. Then I followed the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2004-01-14 03:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I've upgraded from Outlook 2000 to 2003 on several PCs, including beta versions of Outlook 2003 and never had a problem. I was using WinXP in both cases. David, can you try reinstalling SpamBayes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 14 16:22:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 14 16:24:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833346 ] winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #833346, was opened at 2003-10-30 21:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dpdhamm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (secclest) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Initial Comment: Every time I exit Outlook I am greeted with ?Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.? Error signature: AppName: outlook.exe AppVer: 10.0.4510.0 ModName: dccmsp32.dll ModVer: 10.0.2000.929 Offset: 00005346 I am running Windows XP Pro/Outlook XP both with the latest and greatest patches and updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2004-01-14 21:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 i was told by outlook and winfax folks that I need to completely uninstall ( they directed me to uninstallers on symantec and office websites) and remove all items for these programs from the registry, temp files, all folders,etc ( i did this with a microsoft technician..so best to call them) and then first install outlook and then winfax..the winfax tech said he was using the two programs without any difficulty. right now I have not reinstalled winfax..I am using Office 2003 alone to see if any error occur and after about 5 days there are none (the outlook error on exiting had been occurring 85- 100% of time).....I will rinstall winfax in the next day or so and see what happens and then will post...dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 dccmsp32.dll is certainly a winfax DLL. I'm afraid I have no solution, but updating the summary accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2003-12-17 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 I have had this same problem and an told it is related to WINFAX integration with Outlook 2003 (never occurred before I upgraded to Outlook 2003;worked without problems in Outlook XP). Can disable dccmsp32.dll or stop Winfax but are ther any better solutions? Thanks. dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your spambayes log files? The troubleshooting guide has information about how to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 15 08:45:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 15 08:45:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-877558 ] one-click filter button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #877558, was opened at 2004-01-15 08:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877558&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Keith Royster (kroyster) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: one-click filter button Initial Comment: I am using the binary spambayes outlook plugin (v0.81). Frequently with my IMAP accounts, spambayes does not automatically begin processing new mail (usually when there is a large amount of new mail). In these instances, I have to manually kick of the analysis process by going to the toolbar and clicking SpamBayes > Filter > Start Filtering > (wait for it to finish) > Close. I would love to see a button added to the toolbar that does all of this automatically (using default or preset settings) with just one click without further interaction required by me. Thanks for considering this! BTW - I did try customizing the toolbar to create my own button, but my changes to the spambayes toolbar aren't "sticky". I draged the 'filter' menu out to the toolbar and changed it into a button, but each time I would restart outlook my changes were gone. So a secondary request here might be to make the spambayes toolbar "sticky" to customizations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877558&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 15 17:03:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 15 17:03:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-877836 ] anyone working on a .deb package for spambayes Message-ID: Feature Requests item #877836, was opened at 2004-01-15 17:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877836&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Robibaro (perlchild) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: anyone working on a .deb package for spambayes Initial Comment: I'm kinda interested in the idea at the moment, but I'm wondering if there is a volunteer for binary packages on systems besides windows. I'm just installing imap_filter right now. Is there a special reason why imap_filter is a filter and not a true proxy, for that matter? -- Curious ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877836&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 15 18:05:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 15 18:05:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-877836 ] anyone working on a .deb package for spambayes Message-ID: Feature Requests item #877836, was opened at 2004-01-16 11:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877836&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Robibaro (perlchild) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: anyone working on a .deb package for spambayes Initial Comment: I'm kinda interested in the idea at the moment, but I'm wondering if there is a volunteer for binary packages on systems besides windows. I'm just installing imap_filter right now. Is there a special reason why imap_filter is a filter and not a true proxy, for that matter? -- Curious ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-16 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm sure no-one would have a problem with it if someone volunteered to put together a non-windows package. I think there are two reasons why windows is getting one first - because the users tend to need more help, and because the majority of the developers that are interested in putting out a package are windows users. imapfilter is a filter and not a proxy because that's what was requested at the time it was created. I do think it makes more sense in many ways, too, since imap is designed to leave mail on the server, and pop isn't. It makes it easier to access mail from multiple locations and still have it filtered, without having multiple instances of spambayes installed. It also avoids any problems with syncronising mail and having local copies that differ from the server ones. For that matter, it also saves a lot of work for clients that don't store local copies, and always retrieve from the server. All that said, it wouldn't be overly difficult to create an imap proxy (based on sb_server), if you wanted to do it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877836&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 16 12:53:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 16 12:54:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-14 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kruzty You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Frantz (kruzty) Date: 2004-01-16 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=428020 I have this problem as well. I've found that in the following cases the email will not be removed from the server upon deletion: - categorized as spam - not categorized, trained as spam - suspected spam, trained as spam It will remove it when: - not categorized - suspected spam, not trained - suspected spam, trained as ham The only case I haven't tested is if it is categorized as spam and trained has ham. Basically, it looks like the message is altered when it is considered spam whether or not the "save spam score" is checked. I took a peak at the code, but didn't see anything obvious. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-02 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd still really like a log from a session where this happens ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Trevor Banks (twbanks) Date: 2003-12-02 19:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922526 I'm running the compiled Outlook add-in, and am having the same issue. However, it doesn't always do this. Occasionally it leaves messages so they get downloaded again, other times it deletes them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log for a session where this happens. I'm hoping there is something in there related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-26 14:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 16 13:16:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 16 13:16:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-877836 ] anyone working on a .deb package for spambayes Message-ID: Feature Requests item #877836, was opened at 2004-01-15 17:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by perlchild You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877836&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Robibaro (perlchild) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: anyone working on a .deb package for spambayes Initial Comment: I'm kinda interested in the idea at the moment, but I'm wondering if there is a volunteer for binary packages on systems besides windows. I'm just installing imap_filter right now. Is there a special reason why imap_filter is a filter and not a true proxy, for that matter? -- Curious ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eric Robibaro (perlchild) Date: 2004-01-16 13:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=203248 Ok well write me down for the debian package, I'll try to look into the rules file this weekend. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-15 18:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm sure no-one would have a problem with it if someone volunteered to put together a non-windows package. I think there are two reasons why windows is getting one first - because the users tend to need more help, and because the majority of the developers that are interested in putting out a package are windows users. imapfilter is a filter and not a proxy because that's what was requested at the time it was created. I do think it makes more sense in many ways, too, since imap is designed to leave mail on the server, and pop isn't. It makes it easier to access mail from multiple locations and still have it filtered, without having multiple instances of spambayes installed. It also avoids any problems with syncronising mail and having local copies that differ from the server ones. For that matter, it also saves a lot of work for clients that don't store local copies, and always retrieve from the server. All that said, it wouldn't be overly difficult to create an imap proxy (based on sb_server), if you wanted to do it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=877836&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 16 16:46:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 16 16:46:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-878546 ] Spam causes exception Message-ID: Bugs item #878546, was opened at 2004-01-16 22:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878546&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam causes exception Initial Comment: The following message triggers an exception (see the headers): Received: from na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx ([200.78.223.14]:43050 "HELO na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx") by ps3.test.onet.pl with SMTP id ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:17:18 +0100 Received: from mail[127.0.0.1] by na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx with ESMTP id 15724901; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:05:26 -0300 Message-ID: <8o5nh9t68c2q842-244@djt4s.n.0.21o> From: "Gary Egan" Reply-To: "Gary Egan" To: dave_78@poczta.onet.pl Subject: Get a Diploma without the hassle! Date: Thu, 15 Jan 04 04:05:26 -0500 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OrigFrom: t021kub@bentcom.net Status: O X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 438, in onRetr . msg.setPayload(messageText) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 231, in setPayload . prs._parsebody(self, fp) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody . raise Errors.BoundaryError( .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA OR GED Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning power more money and th= e respect of all? Call this number: 1-646-304-7539 (24 hours) There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews! Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, GED and Doctorate (PhD) diploma! Receive the benefits and admiration that comes with a diploma! No one is turned down! Call Today 1-646-304-7539 (7 days a week) Confidentiality assured! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878546&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 16 19:00:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 16 19:00:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-878622 ] Progress Indicator Message-ID: Bugs item #878622, was opened at 2004-01-16 17:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878622&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brandan E. Lloyd (brandan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Progress Indicator Initial Comment: When I "Delete As Spam" multiple spam messages it takes a few minutes. While this is understandable, it would be nice to see a progress dialog box like "deleting 1 of 20". To duplicate this just select 20+ spam and press the "Delete as Spam" button. It took me 2 minutes to delete all these. I just wasn't sure if it worked or if Outlook was hung. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878622&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 19 06:25:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 19 06:25:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-878546 ] Spam causes exception Message-ID: Bugs item #878546, was opened at 2004-01-16 22:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kreide You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878546&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam causes exception Initial Comment: The following message triggers an exception (see the headers): Received: from na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx ([200.78.223.14]:43050 "HELO na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx") by ps3.test.onet.pl with SMTP id ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:17:18 +0100 Received: from mail[127.0.0.1] by na-200-78-223-14.na.avantel.net.mx with ESMTP id 15724901; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:05:26 -0300 Message-ID: <8o5nh9t68c2q842-244@djt4s.n.0.21o> From: "Gary Egan" Reply-To: "Gary Egan" To: dave_78@poczta.onet.pl Subject: Get a Diploma without the hassle! Date: Thu, 15 Jan 04 04:05:26 -0500 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OrigFrom: t021kub@bentcom.net Status: O X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 438, in onRetr . msg.setPayload(messageText) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 231, in setPayload . prs._parsebody(self, fp) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody . raise Errors.BoundaryError( .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA OR GED Do you want a prosperous future, increased earning power more money and th= e respect of all? Call this number: 1-646-304-7539 (24 hours) There are no required tests, classes, books, or interviews! Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, GED and Doctorate (PhD) diploma! Receive the benefits and admiration that comes with a diploma! No one is turned down! Call Today 1-646-304-7539 (7 days a week) Confidentiality assured! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kristian Eide (kreide) Date: 2004-01-19 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=954793 I have also received this error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "./sb_server.py", line 438, in onRetr . msg.setPayload(messageText) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 180, in setPayload . prs._parsebody(self, fp) . File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody . raise Errors.BoundaryError( .BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState:
Image Loading...........












------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878546&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 19 22:46:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 19 22:47:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833346 ] winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #833346, was opened at 2003-10-31 08:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (secclest) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Initial Comment: Every time I exit Outlook I am greeted with ?Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.? Error signature: AppName: outlook.exe AppVer: 10.0.4510.0 ModName: dccmsp32.dll ModVer: 10.0.2000.929 Offset: 00005346 I am running Windows XP Pro/Outlook XP both with the latest and greatest patches and updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-01-20 14:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm not sure if these are our specific issue, but: http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/faxprod.nsf/docid/2001110911391704 has information about a bug in WinFax 10.02 relating to Office XP, and information how to obtain an upgrade, or work around it. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;221201 has information about a bug in WinFax 9.02 relating to Office XP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2004-01-15 08:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 i was told by outlook and winfax folks that I need to completely uninstall ( they directed me to uninstallers on symantec and office websites) and remove all items for these programs from the registry, temp files, all folders,etc ( i did this with a microsoft technician..so best to call them) and then first install outlook and then winfax..the winfax tech said he was using the two programs without any difficulty. right now I have not reinstalled winfax..I am using Office 2003 alone to see if any error occur and after about 5 days there are none (the outlook error on exiting had been occurring 85- 100% of time).....I will rinstall winfax in the next day or so and see what happens and then will post...dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 22:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 dccmsp32.dll is certainly a winfax DLL. I'm afraid I have no solution, but updating the summary accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2003-12-17 21:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 I have had this same problem and an told it is related to WINFAX integration with Outlook 2003 (never occurred before I upgraded to Outlook 2003;worked without problems in Outlook XP). Can disable dccmsp32.dll or stop Winfax but are ther any better solutions? Thanks. dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 12:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your spambayes log files? The troubleshooting guide has information about how to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 20 19:43:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 20 19:44:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 10:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mlytton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-20 16:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 I am running Outlook 2000. When I start Outlook (OL), if I have received spam since I last used OL, it always leaves one spam in my inbox. I have preview pane enabled, so this looks like the same defect, just a different OL version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 11:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 20 19:45:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 20 19:46:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-878622 ] Progress Indicator Message-ID: Bugs item #878622, was opened at 2004-01-16 16:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mlytton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878622&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brandan E. Lloyd (brandan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Progress Indicator Initial Comment: When I "Delete As Spam" multiple spam messages it takes a few minutes. While this is understandable, it would be nice to see a progress dialog box like "deleting 1 of 20". To duplicate this just select 20+ spam and press the "Delete as Spam" button. It took me 2 minutes to delete all these. I just wasn't sure if it worked or if Outlook was hung. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-20 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 Not to pressure , but I concur that a progress meter would fit well here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=878622&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 20 20:07:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 20 20:07:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881009 ] Exiting Outlook loses spam score Message-ID: Bugs item #881009, was opened at 2004-01-20 17:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881009&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Exiting Outlook loses spam score Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000. I was trying to write an Outlook VBA subroutine to delete items in the Spam folder based on the spam score of the messages in the folder. However, while debugging I discovered that the messages that SpamBayes had filtered and moved into the Spam folder did not have a spam score. In VBA terms, this meant the "UserProperties collection" had no members. However, if I exit outlook without moving/training with the affected messages, then when I come back the messages have a spam score of zero. In VBA terms, the "UserProperties collection" now has one item, a Percent field named Spam. The value of this UserProperty is zero however. If I run the "Spam clues..." option on this mail it is nonzero and normally spam-qualified (over the default 90% setting which I have retained). Speculating, SpamBayes acts as if the spam score is volatile and managed completely by SpamBayes based on Outlook events, until Outlook exit when the score is saved? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881009&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 20 21:37:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 20 21:37:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881009 ] Exiting Outlook loses spam score Message-ID: Bugs item #881009, was opened at 2004-01-21 12:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881009&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Exiting Outlook loses spam score Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000. I was trying to write an Outlook VBA subroutine to delete items in the Spam folder based on the spam score of the messages in the folder. However, while debugging I discovered that the messages that SpamBayes had filtered and moved into the Spam folder did not have a spam score. In VBA terms, this meant the "UserProperties collection" had no members. However, if I exit outlook without moving/training with the affected messages, then when I come back the messages have a spam score of zero. In VBA terms, the "UserProperties collection" now has one item, a Percent field named Spam. The value of this UserProperty is zero however. If I run the "Spam clues..." option on this mail it is nonzero and normally spam-qualified (over the default 90% setting which I have retained). Speculating, SpamBayes acts as if the spam score is volatile and managed completely by SpamBayes based on Outlook events, until Outlook exit when the score is saved? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-01-21 13:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm afraid this is not a bug. We intentionally do not set the Spam score via "UserProperties". We *do* touch the UserProperties collection for a single message per folder when we startup, as this allows the "Spam" score to show in the Outlook UI. This is probably what you saw. However, as each message is scored, we do not touch UserProperties, but instead set everything directly via MAPI. To be honest, I'm not sure how to get the spam value using the Outlook object model. It is easy via CDO - you just use the Fields collection on the object. I would be very surprised if Outlook can't get at this field somehow. Try and find information on how to get at any "raw" MAPI field, and you should be right. If you get stuck, drop me an email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881009&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 20 21:39:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 20 21:39:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881009 ] Exiting Outlook loses spam score Message-ID: Bugs item #881009, was opened at 2004-01-21 12:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881009&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Exiting Outlook loses spam score Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000. I was trying to write an Outlook VBA subroutine to delete items in the Spam folder based on the spam score of the messages in the folder. However, while debugging I discovered that the messages that SpamBayes had filtered and moved into the Spam folder did not have a spam score. In VBA terms, this meant the "UserProperties collection" had no members. However, if I exit outlook without moving/training with the affected messages, then when I come back the messages have a spam score of zero. In VBA terms, the "UserProperties collection" now has one item, a Percent field named Spam. The value of this UserProperty is zero however. If I run the "Spam clues..." option on this mail it is nonzero and normally spam-qualified (over the default 90% setting which I have retained). Speculating, SpamBayes acts as if the spam score is volatile and managed completely by SpamBayes based on Outlook events, until Outlook exit when the score is saved? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-01-21 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Actually, to be clear, you did raise 2 issues. One is that you can't get at the field via VBA, which is what I addressed. The other is that in some cases, exiting Outlook can reset a spam field to zero - this is a bug that has since been fixed, so the next version will not do this (but the next version will have the same VBA issues) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-01-21 13:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm afraid this is not a bug. We intentionally do not set the Spam score via "UserProperties". We *do* touch the UserProperties collection for a single message per folder when we startup, as this allows the "Spam" score to show in the Outlook UI. This is probably what you saw. However, as each message is scored, we do not touch UserProperties, but instead set everything directly via MAPI. To be honest, I'm not sure how to get the spam value using the Outlook object model. It is easy via CDO - you just use the Fields collection on the object. I would be very surprised if Outlook can't get at this field somehow. Try and find information on how to get at any "raw" MAPI field, and you should be right. If you get stuck, drop me an email. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881009&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 20 21:44:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 20 21:45:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-881056 ] Train via sb_xmlrpcserver Message-ID: Patches item #881056, was opened at 2004-01-20 20:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=881056&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Epler (jepler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Train via sb_xmlrpcserver Initial Comment: requested on the mailing list recently. Virtually untested (no traceback is good, and my hammie database was updated). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=881056&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 20 21:59:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 20 21:59:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881061 ] too many connects to pop server Message-ID: Bugs item #881061, was opened at 2004-01-20 20:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881061&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Fischer (mfischer2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: too many connects to pop server Initial Comment: I am using the source code 1.0a7 pop3proxy. Win XP service with Eudora. I regular send spams back to the filter "spambayes_spam@localhost" for retraining. After sending several, the pop server tells me that I "have too many recent connections" or a similar error. I believe this is a bug, because the mail should be going to localhost only, it should not be going back to the main mail server, which I believe is the origin of the error message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881061&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 09:59:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 09:59:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881427 ] sb_mboxtrain.py requires -d or -D Message-ID: Bugs item #881427, was opened at 2004-01-21 09:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881427&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mitchell Surface (msurface) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py requires -d or -D Initial Comment: In the README.txt, the section concerning sb_mboxtrain.py doesn't mention the -d or -D switch, but the script requires it. The script should probably get it config from .spambayesrc but currently doesn't. I'm not sure if we want to fix the program or the docs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881427&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 13:07:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 13:07:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881575 ] Background Filtering disabled Message-ID: Bugs item #881575, was opened at 2004-01-21 12:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam Wright (nolithium) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Background Filtering disabled Initial Comment: I have checked other bugs and they do not seem to address this specifically. After about three runs of Outlook 2002 on Win XP, Background Filtering is Disabled. Since I filter my incoming to several folders, when I recover an item, all items are returned to my primary Inbox, and I have to manually sort, or re-run my rules. Since I get TONS of spam, this is very time-consuming. My Background filtering Options are set as follows: Enable Background Filtering: True Processing Start Delay: 5.0 Seconds Delay between processing items: 0.25 seconds Only for folder that receive new mail: true The applicable section from my log file: ****************************************** The timer is configured to fire way too often(delay=5.0 milliseconds, interval=0.25 milliseconds) Please adjust your configuration. The timer is NOT enabled... ****************************************** If I re-adjust my setting to the highest (10.0 seconds), restart Outlook, it works fine. I re-set my settings to 5.0 and 0.25, and restart Outlook, and it is fine. When I come to work the next day, Background Filtering once again interprets my settings as milliseconds and is disabled and the above excerpt appears in my log file. I have attached the entire log file for reference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 13:09:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 13:09:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774650 ] Additional post-filtering options Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774650, was opened at 2003-07-20 18:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by banz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Additional post-filtering options Initial Comment: 1. Option to "Permanently Delete" certain spam rather than just moving it. 2. Better than that, the option to do anything with a post-filtered message that I can do with an Outlook rule filtered message (forward, flag, etc.) 3. User configurable number of filtering levels - i.e., more than two. 4. A way to view/modify/tweak the database directly (maybe this already exists and I don't know it?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: B?nz Ledin (banz) Date: 2004-01-21 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=956857 I have a similar request: Spam makes it virtually impossible for me to use my mobile phone to download my mail (too many messages for low bandwith, too small a screen to sort out Spam). This could be solved by Spam Bayes removing all messages that are moved to the _SPAM folder from the mailserver: my computer would be always on, Spam messages would go into my _SPAM folder and ham would be left on the mail server for e.g. 5 days, according to Outlook settings. Therefore when accessing the server from outside with the mobile phone I would get only the ham from the last 5 days. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc) Date: 2003-07-20 22:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=826656 #1 - That had already been suggested by Mr. Meyer when I posted to the SpamBayes list (he also suggested that I [re] post it here) #2 - Header or subject line modification would work for this (I have used that technique successfully with the K9 filter (http://kier.net) and Outlook's rules. Unfortunately K9 does not support Outlook/Exchange directly (only through POP3), which is why I now use SpamBayes since I needed support for multiple simultaneous Exchange and POP3 mailboxes. #3 - What I mean is more spam score filters. Since it is CRITICAL for me to NEVER lose a "ham" message, I would like to have at least three levels of filtering. For example: 70% - 100% Immediate Delete (via SpamBayes as in #2 or using the AutoArchive method in #1) 30% - 69% Move to Spam folder with autodelete after 3 days 10%-29% Move to Suspect folder for manual review I have had such great success in less than a month of using SpamBayes (over 99.9%) that I am actually considering how I can "trust" it to autodelete. I have tried many alternatives including commercial products and none (with the exception of K9, noted above) has come close to SpamBayes. #4 - Agreed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-07-20 20:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 For #1, you can right click the spam folder and set the auto archive options to delete messages in that folder after a certain time (1 day is smallest amount) or move them to another pst file for retraining. For #2, convince a developer that it is useful. I would think either header or subject line modication would be easier and then build your rules using outlook. For #3, Do you mean more than filtering on different ranges of the the spam score or trying to do spam/ham and work/personal (etc.) type of thing? For #4, Looking at the spam clues for a message is filtered snapshot of the db. I think viewing would kinda neat, but modify/tweak could have some bad results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 13:18:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 13:19:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881575 ] Background Filtering disabled Message-ID: Bugs item #881575, was opened at 2004-01-21 12:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nolithium You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam Wright (nolithium) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Background Filtering disabled Initial Comment: I have checked other bugs and they do not seem to address this specifically. After about three runs of Outlook 2002 on Win XP, Background Filtering is Disabled. Since I filter my incoming to several folders, when I recover an item, all items are returned to my primary Inbox, and I have to manually sort, or re-run my rules. Since I get TONS of spam, this is very time-consuming. My Background filtering Options are set as follows: Enable Background Filtering: True Processing Start Delay: 5.0 Seconds Delay between processing items: 0.25 seconds Only for folder that receive new mail: true The applicable section from my log file: ****************************************** The timer is configured to fire way too often(delay=5.0 milliseconds, interval=0.25 milliseconds) Please adjust your configuration. The timer is NOT enabled... ****************************************** If I re-adjust my setting to the highest (10.0 seconds), restart Outlook, it works fine. I re-set my settings to 5.0 and 0.25, and restart Outlook, and it is fine. When I come to work the next day, Background Filtering once again interprets my settings as milliseconds and is disabled and the above excerpt appears in my log file. I have attached the entire log file for reference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Wright (nolithium) Date: 2004-01-21 12:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=956851 I apologize - my submission was not completely accurate - Outlook always boots up with this error unless I set the sliders both at 10.0 seconds before restarting. THEN I can adjust the sliders to the delays I want and everything works fine for that specific Outlook session. The problem occurrs when Outlook is closed and restarted with my preferred settings - the intialization of the timer fails, and I have to set the sliders at 10 seconds, restart, then reset the sliders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 14:45:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 14:45:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881575 ] Background Filtering disabled Message-ID: Bugs item #881575, was opened at 2004-01-21 13:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam Wright (nolithium) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Background Filtering disabled Initial Comment: I have checked other bugs and they do not seem to address this specifically. After about three runs of Outlook 2002 on Win XP, Background Filtering is Disabled. Since I filter my incoming to several folders, when I recover an item, all items are returned to my primary Inbox, and I have to manually sort, or re-run my rules. Since I get TONS of spam, this is very time-consuming. My Background filtering Options are set as follows: Enable Background Filtering: True Processing Start Delay: 5.0 Seconds Delay between processing items: 0.25 seconds Only for folder that receive new mail: true The applicable section from my log file: ****************************************** The timer is configured to fire way too often(delay=5.0 milliseconds, interval=0.25 milliseconds) Please adjust your configuration. The timer is NOT enabled... ****************************************** If I re-adjust my setting to the highest (10.0 seconds), restart Outlook, it works fine. I re-set my settings to 5.0 and 0.25, and restart Outlook, and it is fine. When I come to work the next day, Background Filtering once again interprets my settings as milliseconds and is disabled and the above excerpt appears in my log file. I have attached the entire log file for reference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-21 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The error message is misleading. SpamBayes knows the values are in seconds, but the log message just displays them incorrectly. (I've fixed this in latest CVS for the next release) The reason this fails is because SpamBayes considers an interval of 0.25 seconds to be too small. Actual limits are min 0.4 seconds and max 30 seconds. This is currently only checked at startup. We need better validation of these values to prevent configuring invalid values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Wright (nolithium) Date: 2004-01-21 13:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=956851 I apologize - my submission was not completely accurate - Outlook always boots up with this error unless I set the sliders both at 10.0 seconds before restarting. THEN I can adjust the sliders to the delays I want and everything works fine for that specific Outlook session. The problem occurrs when Outlook is closed and restarted with my preferred settings - the intialization of the timer fails, and I have to set the sliders at 10 seconds, restart, then reset the sliders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 14:50:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 14:59:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-16 22:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nschindler You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nate S. (nschindler) Date: 2004-01-21 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810618 I have the same issue under NT4SP6a/Office2k Pro SP3/SpamBayes 8.1. NOTHING I've done helps, and I've tried a lot - All patches for Office/Windows were applied (windows/office update), ran regsrv32 from the command line (tried "/i:hkey_local_machine" as well), tried manually adding the dll as a COM Add-In, tried patching the computer in question with registry setitngs from a machine where the dll registered correctly, re-installed IE6SP1, etc. The spambayes install log reports: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in RegisterClasses File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in RegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Stegeman (martijnstegeman) Date: 2004-01-03 02:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=942696 Registering failed initially, also running regsvr32 manually. But running this command from the installation directory would work immediately (from cmd.exe). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonas Bergman (jonasbe) Date: 2003-12-05 08:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=924735 I have seen this error on three different computers. I also tried to register the file manually with regsvr32. Failed. Checked the dependencies, but all were correct. Then I killed a few processes, ICQ, MSN, Panda Anti-virus and a few more (all in the tray): then I registered manually once more and it worked. On all of the computers I tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-24 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 Has anybody else had the following happen? After several days of using 8.1 version very successfully, quite suddenly it quits working? I locked my computer and then came back. Opened Outlook and clicked 'delete as spam' and nothing happened. The button clicks but nothing is deleted, nothing is moved, nothing happens even though the buttons are on the toolbar. I restarted the computer a few times and nothing. I even uninstalled Spambayes completely, reinstalled it and nothing. Anybody have a hint? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-23 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded. It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier) Date: 2003-10-23 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=326244 I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I had already had a failed install on the computer I had to delete the original default directory and also deleted a couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-20 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to do with a path statement in the registering utility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-20 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19. I uninstalled via Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll know if it's actually filtering correctly. Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition that may not be all that easy to reproduce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak) Date: 2003-10-20 09:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890856 I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000. When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents the \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from registering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-19 10:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 08:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 06:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 07:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-16 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 16:40:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 16:41:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] error initializing the SpamBayes addin Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-21 16:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing the SpamBayes addin Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 17:11:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 17:11:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881754 ] Message Filtering not working and unable to "Delete as Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #881754, was opened at 2004-01-21 17:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881754&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timothy Shih (tshihsensicast) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message Filtering not working and unable to "Delete as Spam" Initial Comment: I am not sure how this occurred, SpamBayes was working fine for me until recently. However, currently SpamBayes no longer filters messages and when I hit the delete as spam button it generates the following error in the log file : pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 275, in _Invoke_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 280, in _invoke_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 588, in OnClick File "out1.pyz/addin", line 987, in GetSelectedMessages File "out1.pyz/win32com.client", line 451, in __getattr__ File "out1.pyz/win32com.client", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ pywintypes.com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Outlook', 'The operation failed.', None, 0, -2147467259), None) I have attempted deleting the application data and uninstalling, then reinstalling SpamBayes to no effect. I have also attempted to register the dll via the command-line, also to no effect. This is on windows XP w/ Outlook 2002 Sp-1, SpamBayes v0.81. I have attached the relevant log file to this report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881754&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 17:19:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 17:23:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852387 ] Spambayes stops working Message-ID: Support Requests item #852387, was opened at 2003-12-01 18:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by balfson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes stops working Initial Comment: I do not know what happened, but Spambayes was working great, then stopped! I tried uninstall and redownloading and reinstall, but it made no difference. Even after uninstall and before the reinstall, the "Delete as Spam" Icon and the "Spambayes" drop down box were there, but clicking on "Delete as Spam" did nothing, and there was no drop down on the spambayes key. I used to get a drop down box re: the manager. What happened? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Alfson (balfson) Date: 2004-01-21 16:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820772 I have just experienced the same phenomenon with the latest version of Spambayes running with Outlook 2002 SP2 on Win2K SP3. I tried a similar fix, even going so far as to uninstall from Add/Remove Programs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-03 16:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 POPFile is another 'bayesian' spam filter - it also does n-way classification. There's a link on the spambayes website to lots of related packages, including popfile - http://popfile.sf.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Date: 2003-12-03 10:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921777 Sorry for my ignarance, but what si PopFile and where do I get it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nick (jaxjaguar) Date: 2003-12-02 00:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892819 I was running the service and it stopped working on me a few last weekend. It had some strange coding errors and was not allowing complete email downloads. Since I am not a coder and did not know how to de-bug, I installed PopFile. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 22:33:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 22:34:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Oulook Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-07 14:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Oulook Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-21 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-12 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 I gave that a try and continued to see the problem. It had been set at Medium to begin with. Someone here suggested that this might be linked to my use of folder sharing. Does this provide any additional insight? Thanks! Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Verify that your Macro Security Level is set at Medium or Low. Setting it at high will cause this to occur. - Tools - Macro - Security ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 21 22:51:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 21 22:51:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Oulook Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-07 14:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Oulook Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-21 22:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-21 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-12 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 I gave that a try and continued to see the problem. It had been set at Medium to begin with. Someone here suggested that this might be linked to my use of folder sharing. Does this provide any additional insight? Thanks! Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Verify that your Macro Security Level is set at Medium or Low. Setting it at high will cause this to occur. - Tools - Macro - Security ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 22 13:07:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 22 13:08:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Oulook Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-07 13:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ben_dillon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Oulook Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-22 12:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 Outlook Version 9.0.0.2711 The exact error message is: "The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead. The error occurs when I am receiving email (presumably when SpamBayes is examining the message, but I can't tell you that for sure). I'm not sure what add-ins might be installed. Is there an easy way to check this? The programs that I can think of that may have put add-ins on there are: - ACT! - Sony Clie' - Compaq iPAQ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-21 21:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-21 21:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-12 13:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 I gave that a try and continued to see the problem. It had been set at Medium to begin with. Someone here suggested that this might be linked to my use of folder sharing. Does this provide any additional insight? Thanks! Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 17:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Verify that your Macro Security Level is set at Medium or Low. Setting it at high will cause this to occur. - Tools - Macro - Security ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 22 18:50:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 22 18:51:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Oulook Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-07 14:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Oulook Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-22 18:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 To see add-ins, goto Tools, Options, Other, Advanced Options, Com Add-ins. After doing a search of the MS Knowledge base, it is suggested that you 1) perform a repair of MS Office 2) Ensure that the latest Office updates have been applied 3) Install the Customizable Alerts for additional information concerning "difficult-to-troubleshoot alerts or error messages": (http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/alerts.aspx) Please view the following Knowledge base articles pertinant to this error message. The use of a PIM is addressed, but specifically a Palm Device in the first KB article. - OL2000: Error Message "The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead.": http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;223481&Product=out - OL2000: Custom Form Produces Error Message and Does Not Load : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;251415&Product=out ------------------------------------------- Developers, this is from MS KB article 287525: -OL2000: You Cannot Access a Custom Form If You Use the Outlook Object Model "This problem occurs because of how Outlook 2000 accesses the property on a custom form. The following is an example of how Outlook 2000 accesses the EntryID property on a custom form: dim objOOM as object dim objDrafts as object dim objForm as object ' Touch all forms in the Drafts (id = 16) folder set objOOM = CreateObejct("Outlook.Application") set objDrafts = objOOM.GetNamespace ("MAPI").GetDefaultFolder(16) for each objForm in objDrafts.Items MsgBox objForm.Subject & " " & objForm.Entryid next objForm RESOLUTION To resolve this problem, obtain the latest service pack for Microsoft Office 2000. For additional information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 276367 OFF2000: How to Obtain the Latest Office 2000 Service Pack The English version of this fix has the file attributes (or later) that are listed in the following table. The dates and times for these files are listed in coordinated universal time (UTC). When you view the file information, it is converted to local time. To find the difference between UTC and local time, use the Time Zone tab in the Date and Time tool in Control Panel. Date Time Version Size File name --------------------------------------------------------- - 26-Jan-01 7:03:59 9.0.0.4924 5,324,850 Outllib.dll 26-Jan-01 7:05:20 9.0.0.4924 1,675,315 Outllibr.dll WORKAROUND To work around this problem, access a custom form through Collaboration Data Objects (CDO) instead of the Outlook object model. STATUS Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed at the beginning of this article. This problem was first corrected in Microsoft Office 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP-3). " Ultimately, the fix is to ensure the latest patches are applied to outlook. The links to do so follow: US: http://office.microsoft.com/officeupdate/default.aspx? CTT=98 Outside the US: http://office.microsoft.com/home/default.aspx? CTT=6&Origin=EC010272491033 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-22 13:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 Outlook Version 9.0.0.2711 The exact error message is: "The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead. The error occurs when I am receiving email (presumably when SpamBayes is examining the message, but I can't tell you that for sure). I'm not sure what add-ins might be installed. Is there an easy way to check this? The programs that I can think of that may have put add-ins on there are: - ACT! - Sony Clie' - Compaq iPAQ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-21 22:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-21 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-12 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 I gave that a try and continued to see the problem. It had been set at Medium to begin with. Someone here suggested that this might be linked to my use of folder sharing. Does this provide any additional insight? Thanks! Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Verify that your Macro Security Level is set at Medium or Low. Setting it at high will cause this to occur. - Tools - Macro - Security ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 22 23:49:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 22 23:49:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-882703 ] White space as token? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #882703, was opened at 2004-01-22 20:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=882703&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Not Really (sillyknight) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White space as token? Initial Comment: Amazing! I love it! Awesome! I was looking for a regexp plugin for Outlook "rules wizard" and ran across this - great! So, the suggestion: One of the rules that really worked for me in Outlook was detecting white space (OK, 5 spaces in a row) in the subject line. Lots of spam has a bunch of white space and then some gibberish to try and fool recognizers. Thanks again, Bob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=882703&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 23 06:59:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 23 06:59:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-882913 ] White/Black List Message-ID: Feature Requests item #882913, was opened at 2004-01-23 11:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=882913&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Cresswell (estechco) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: White/Black List Initial Comment: A nice feature I have seen on other tools - notably SpamAssassin - is a configurable White (and possibly Black) list so that you can always include (or exclude) specific email addresses or domains from filtering. Alternatively, it would be nice if I could leave alone anyone who is known to my address book for instance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=882913&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 23 09:10:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 23 09:11:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-882913 ] White/Black List Message-ID: Feature Requests item #882913, was opened at 2004-01-23 06:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=882913&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Cresswell (estechco) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: White/Black List Initial Comment: A nice feature I have seen on other tools - notably SpamAssassin - is a configurable White (and possibly Black) list so that you can always include (or exclude) specific email addresses or domains from filtering. Alternatively, it would be nice if I could leave alone anyone who is known to my address book for instance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-23 09:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 See FAQ 6.6: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you- add-whitelisting-blacklisting-to-spambayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=882913&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jan 25 22:57:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jan 25 22:58:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884539 ] Error with multipart messages Message-ID: Bugs item #884539, was opened at 2004-01-26 03:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884539&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Error with multipart messages Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Actually it's probably a malformed multipart email (evil spammers!) but it makes spambayes stop scanning... (and I can't tell which email is causing this among the 400+ spams I have :( ) This is the second or third time I've run into this... The other times I've just manually erased the obvious spam emails in my inbox and things work fine ('till the next multipart error...) Maybe spambayes can give a warning message that there's a misbehaving email and continue scanning the remaining emails? (so I can manually erase that annoying email) C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 815, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 590, in Filter for msg in self: File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 533, in __getite m__ msg.get_substance() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 364, in get_subs tance new_msg = email.Parser.Parser().parsestr(data ["RFC822"]) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in parse self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody raise Errors.BoundaryError( email.Errors.BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jan 25 23:17:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jan 25 23:17:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884545 ] off-by-one ? Message-ID: Bugs item #884545, was opened at 2004-01-26 04:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: off-by-one ? Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Whenever I train spambayes, I always (later, when classifying) get the error that I have more spam than total mails. I normally just do sb_dbexport -e -D hammie.db -f out.txt In out.txt, the top line will say that there are 202 ham and 3342 spam... searching through the file I find the line header%3ATo%3A1`170`3343` (this is the only line in the db where the # spams is larger than the total # of spams) I correct this line, and re-import the database. It now works fine. Every time I train spambayes this 'header- to' line will always be one higher than the total # of spams. (If I train twice, the number of spams for header-to will be 2 larger than the max # of spams... etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 26 16:45:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 26 16:45:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884539 ] Error with multipart messages Message-ID: Bugs item #884539, was opened at 2004-01-26 16:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884539&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Error with multipart messages Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Actually it's probably a malformed multipart email (evil spammers!) but it makes spambayes stop scanning... (and I can't tell which email is causing this among the 400+ spams I have :( ) This is the second or third time I've run into this... The other times I've just manually erased the obvious spam emails in my inbox and things work fine ('till the next multipart error...) Maybe spambayes can give a warning message that there's a misbehaving email and continue scanning the remaining emails? (so I can manually erase that annoying email) C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 815, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 590, in Filter for msg in self: File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 533, in __getite m__ msg.get_substance() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 364, in get_subs tance new_msg = email.Parser.Parser().parsestr(data ["RFC822"]) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in parse self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody raise Errors.BoundaryError( email.Errors.BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 26 16:47:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 26 16:47:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884539 ] Error with multipart messages Message-ID: Bugs item #884539, was opened at 2004-01-26 16:57 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884539&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Error with multipart messages Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Actually it's probably a malformed multipart email (evil spammers!) but it makes spambayes stop scanning... (and I can't tell which email is causing this among the 400+ spams I have :( ) This is the second or third time I've run into this... The other times I've just manually erased the obvious spam emails in my inbox and things work fine ('till the next multipart error...) Maybe spambayes can give a warning message that there's a misbehaving email and continue scanning the remaining emails? (so I can manually erase that annoying email) C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 815, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 590, in Filter for msg in self: File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 533, in __getite m__ msg.get_substance() File "C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 364, in get_subs tance new_msg = email.Parser.Parser().parsestr(data ["RFC822"]) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in parse self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline) File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python\lib\email\Parser.py", line 245, in _parsebody raise Errors.BoundaryError( email.Errors.BoundaryError: multipart message with no defined boundary C:\Program Files\Python\Scripts> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 02:47:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 02:48:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] error initializing the SpamBayes addin Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-22 10:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing the SpamBayes addin Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 20:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 02:55:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 02:55:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881427 ] sb_mboxtrain.py requires -d or -D Message-ID: Bugs item #881427, was opened at 2004-01-22 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881427&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mitchell Surface (msurface) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py requires -d or -D Initial Comment: In the README.txt, the section concerning sb_mboxtrain.py doesn't mention the -d or -D switch, but the script requires it. The script should probably get it config from .spambayesrc but currently doesn't. I'm not sure if we want to fix the program or the docs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 20:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks. I've checked in a fix so that if the option isn't specified on the command line it's read from the configuration script, as with the other spambayes scripts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881427&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 02:59:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 02:59:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881061 ] too many connects to pop server Message-ID: Bugs item #881061, was opened at 2004-01-21 15:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881061&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Fischer (mfischer2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: too many connects to pop server Initial Comment: I am using the source code 1.0a7 pop3proxy. Win XP service with Eudora. I regular send spams back to the filter "spambayes_spam@localhost" for retraining. After sending several, the pop server tells me that I "have too many recent connections" or a similar error. I believe this is a bug, because the mail should be going to localhost only, it should not be going back to the main mail server, which I believe is the origin of the error message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 20:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is it definately the *pop* server that you are getting this message from? Sending mail doesn't involve the pop server at all (it uses smtp), but if you have Eudora set to check for mail when sending (which is quite common), then it might also be checking for mail each time you send mail to be trained. I'm not sure how to get around this. Locally, you can probably tell Eudora to just send the message and not check for new mail, or you could queue the message to be sent and do a bunch at once. I can't think of anything that the smtpproxy could do to avoid this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881061&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 03:02:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 03:02:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876483 ] SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #876483, was opened at 2004-01-14 12:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: After upgrading to Outlook 2003 SpamBayes no longer works. Attempted to follow the Troubleshooting Guide ToolBar steps (to no avail). See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 21:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try moving aside/deleting your configuration file and seeing if that helps? I've seen cases before where (I think) Outlook 2003 has used different ids for the stores and so the folders haven't been valid anymore. That might be the case here, although the log error isn't one that I recall seeing before. Worth a try, though. (The FAQ explains where to find the config file if you're not sure). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Date: 2004-01-15 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=950307 Uninstal and reinstall was the first thing I tried. Then I followed the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2004-01-14 21:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I've upgraded from Outlook 2000 to 2003 on several PCs, including beta versions of Outlook 2003 and never had a problem. I was using WinXP in both cases. David, can you try reinstalling SpamBayes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 03:06:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 03:06:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872358 ] Outlook Express learn mode Message-ID: Bugs item #872358, was opened at 2004-01-08 02:08 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872358&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Srivaths Srinivasan (vatman) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Express learn mode Initial Comment: I recd the following error when I tried to get Spambayes to read my Outlook Epress folder of "ham" mail. srivaths 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File ?spambayes\Dibbler.pyc?, line 457, in found_terminator File ?spambayes\UserInterface.pyc?, line 479, in onTrain File ?spambayes\UserInterface.pyc?, line 521, in _convertToMbox File ?spambayes\oe_mailbox.pyc?, line 465, in convertToMbox NameError: global name ?strftime? is not defined ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-08 10:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872358&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 03:38:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 03:38:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-870799 ] imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Message-ID: Bugs item #870799, was opened at 2004-01-05 22:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Mann (feint) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Initial Comment: It looks like it is going off the end of the list of the UIDs it brings back from the IMAP server: c:\tmp> c:\Python23\python.exe sb_imapfilter.py -c -v -i4 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db...Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 41 spam and 16 ham Done. 46:52.00 > GPAB1 LOGIN xxxx "xxxxxx" 46:52.18 < GPAB1 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 IDLE NAMESPACE MAILBOX-REFERRALS SCAN SORT THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND] User xxxx authenticated Classifying 46:52.18 > GPAB2 SELECT Spam 46:52.31 < * 56 EXISTS 46:52.31 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1073247595] UID validity status 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDNEXT 83] Predicted next UID 46:52.31 < * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.32 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.32 < GPAB2 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.32 > GPAB3 SELECT Junk 46:52.44 < * 1 EXISTS 46:52.44 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.44 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1067418428] UID validity status 46:52.45 < * OK [UIDNEXT 2] Predicted next UID 46:52.45 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.45 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.45 < * OK [UNSEEN 1] first unseen message in /home/xxxx/Junk 46:52.45 < GPAB3 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.45 > GPAB4 SELECT INBOX 46:53.60 < * 127 EXISTS 46:53.60 < * NO Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 NO response: Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 < * 0 RECENT 46:53.60 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1066476660] UID validity status 46:53.61 < * OK [UIDNEXT 558] Predicted next UID 46:53.61 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:53.61 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:53.61 < * OK [UNSEEN 125] first unseen message in /var/spool/mail/xxxx 46:53.61 < GPAB4 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:53.61 > GPAB5 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 46:53.74 < * SEARCH 180 190 233 245 251 260 264 270 283 288 299 316 322 332 355 363 397 399 402 403 404 405 406 409 410 412 414 416 421 422 424 425 432 434 439 440 441 442 445 446 447 448 451 452 454 455 456 457 458 460 462 463 464 465 466 467 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 483 484 485 486 487 489 492 494 495 497 498 499 501 502 503 505 506 507 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 547 549 551 553 554 555 556 557 46:53.74 < GPAB5 OK UID SEARCH completed 46:53.74 > GPAB6 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.HEADER 46:53.91 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822.HEADER {1110} 46:53.91 read literal size 1110 46:53.91 < ) 46:53.91 < GPAB6 OK UID FETCH completed 46:53.91 > GPAB7 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.PEEK 46:54.02 < GPAB7 BAD Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 BAD response: Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 > GPAB8 UID FETCH 180 RFC822 46:54.52 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822 {4644} 46:54.52 read literal size 4644 46:54.52 < ) 46:54.52 < GPAB8 OK UID FETCH completed * 46:54.52 > GPAB9 UID FETCH 180 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:54.63 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 FLAGS (\Seen NonJunk) INTERNALDATE " 2-Dec-2003 12:20:04 +0100") 46:54.63 < GPAB9 OK UID FETCH completed 46:54.64 > GPAB10 APPEND INBOX (\Seen NonJunk) " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:54.74 < + Ready for argument 46:54.74 write literal size 4679 46:55.06 < * 128 EXISTS 46:55.06 < * 1 RECENT 46:55.06 < GPAB10 NO APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.06 NO response: APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.07 > GPAB11 APPEND INBOX " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:55.23 < + Ready for argument 46:55.23 write literal size 4679 46:55.42 < * 129 EXISTS 46:55.42 < * 2 RECENT 46:55.42 < GPAB11 OK APPEND completed 46:55.42 > GPAB12 UID STORE 180 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 46:55.52 < GPAB12 OK UID STORE completed 46:55.52 > GPAB13 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1073296013) 46:55.63 < * SEARCH 558 559 46:55.63 < GPAB13 OK UID SEARCH completed . 46:55.65 > GPAB14 UID FETCH "558 559" (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:55.75 < GPAB14 BAD Bogus sequence in UID FETCH 46:55.75 BAD response: Bogus sequence in UID FETCH Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 815, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 608, in Filter msg.Save() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 395, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['Bogus sequence in UID FETCH'] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 21:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What's going wrong is that imapfilter is finding two 'undeleted' messages with the same spambayes id, which is very bad. What's more, messages 558 and 559 didn't exist when it did the first listing of undeleted messages, which means that they were both written then. I *think* that what is happening is that although the first append fails (because of the "nonjunk" flag, which is some weird thing that imap server is doing), it still creates the message, which is very bad. The only fix I can think of is to check if more than one message is returned, and if it is, try and delete all but the last one. I've checked this in, so it should be there in the next release. You could either try that, or get sb_imapfilter.py from CVS and try that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 03:41:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 03:41:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-851785 ] Pop3proxy stores Ham/Spam/Unsure subject line in message cac Message-ID: Bugs item #851785, was opened at 2003-12-01 12:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=851785&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Howells (markhowells) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Pop3proxy stores Ham/Spam/Unsure subject line in message cac Initial Comment: The Ham/Spam/Unsure label added by the classifier to the subject line is stored in the message cache. When these cached messages are used as training data, the token subject:unsure (or spam/ham) becomes very spammy/hammy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 21:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The correct behaviour here, I think, would be to strip this info from the subject/to line when training from the cache, if the appropriate options are set. I'll try and get around to doing this before the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=851785&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 09:33:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 09:33:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-870799 ] imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Message-ID: Bugs item #870799, was opened at 2004-01-05 09:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by feint You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Mann (feint) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Initial Comment: It looks like it is going off the end of the list of the UIDs it brings back from the IMAP server: c:\tmp> c:\Python23\python.exe sb_imapfilter.py -c -v -i4 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db...Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 41 spam and 16 ham Done. 46:52.00 > GPAB1 LOGIN xxxx "xxxxxx" 46:52.18 < GPAB1 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 IDLE NAMESPACE MAILBOX-REFERRALS SCAN SORT THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND] User xxxx authenticated Classifying 46:52.18 > GPAB2 SELECT Spam 46:52.31 < * 56 EXISTS 46:52.31 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1073247595] UID validity status 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDNEXT 83] Predicted next UID 46:52.31 < * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.32 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.32 < GPAB2 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.32 > GPAB3 SELECT Junk 46:52.44 < * 1 EXISTS 46:52.44 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.44 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1067418428] UID validity status 46:52.45 < * OK [UIDNEXT 2] Predicted next UID 46:52.45 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.45 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.45 < * OK [UNSEEN 1] first unseen message in /home/xxxx/Junk 46:52.45 < GPAB3 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.45 > GPAB4 SELECT INBOX 46:53.60 < * 127 EXISTS 46:53.60 < * NO Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 NO response: Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 < * 0 RECENT 46:53.60 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1066476660] UID validity status 46:53.61 < * OK [UIDNEXT 558] Predicted next UID 46:53.61 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:53.61 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:53.61 < * OK [UNSEEN 125] first unseen message in /var/spool/mail/xxxx 46:53.61 < GPAB4 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:53.61 > GPAB5 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 46:53.74 < * SEARCH 180 190 233 245 251 260 264 270 283 288 299 316 322 332 355 363 397 399 402 403 404 405 406 409 410 412 414 416 421 422 424 425 432 434 439 440 441 442 445 446 447 448 451 452 454 455 456 457 458 460 462 463 464 465 466 467 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 483 484 485 486 487 489 492 494 495 497 498 499 501 502 503 505 506 507 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 547 549 551 553 554 555 556 557 46:53.74 < GPAB5 OK UID SEARCH completed 46:53.74 > GPAB6 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.HEADER 46:53.91 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822.HEADER {1110} 46:53.91 read literal size 1110 46:53.91 < ) 46:53.91 < GPAB6 OK UID FETCH completed 46:53.91 > GPAB7 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.PEEK 46:54.02 < GPAB7 BAD Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 BAD response: Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 > GPAB8 UID FETCH 180 RFC822 46:54.52 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822 {4644} 46:54.52 read literal size 4644 46:54.52 < ) 46:54.52 < GPAB8 OK UID FETCH completed * 46:54.52 > GPAB9 UID FETCH 180 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:54.63 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 FLAGS (\Seen NonJunk) INTERNALDATE " 2-Dec-2003 12:20:04 +0100") 46:54.63 < GPAB9 OK UID FETCH completed 46:54.64 > GPAB10 APPEND INBOX (\Seen NonJunk) " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:54.74 < + Ready for argument 46:54.74 write literal size 4679 46:55.06 < * 128 EXISTS 46:55.06 < * 1 RECENT 46:55.06 < GPAB10 NO APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.06 NO response: APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.07 > GPAB11 APPEND INBOX " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:55.23 < + Ready for argument 46:55.23 write literal size 4679 46:55.42 < * 129 EXISTS 46:55.42 < * 2 RECENT 46:55.42 < GPAB11 OK APPEND completed 46:55.42 > GPAB12 UID STORE 180 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 46:55.52 < GPAB12 OK UID STORE completed 46:55.52 > GPAB13 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1073296013) 46:55.63 < * SEARCH 558 559 46:55.63 < GPAB13 OK UID SEARCH completed . 46:55.65 > GPAB14 UID FETCH "558 559" (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:55.75 < GPAB14 BAD Bogus sequence in UID FETCH 46:55.75 BAD response: Bogus sequence in UID FETCH Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 815, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 608, in Filter msg.Save() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 395, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['Bogus sequence in UID FETCH'] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David Mann (feint) Date: 2004-01-27 14:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=64372 FYI I fixed the problem (on my local machine) with the following 1 liner (diff - ignore the part about the change of location of python executable): 1c1 < #!/usr/bin/env python --- > #!c:\Python23\python.exe 358a359,361 > > > 436a440,441 > new_id=new_id.split(' ')[0] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 08:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What's going wrong is that imapfilter is finding two 'undeleted' messages with the same spambayes id, which is very bad. What's more, messages 558 and 559 didn't exist when it did the first listing of undeleted messages, which means that they were both written then. I *think* that what is happening is that although the first append fails (because of the "nonjunk" flag, which is some weird thing that imap server is doing), it still creates the message, which is very bad. The only fix I can think of is to check if more than one message is returned, and if it is, try and delete all but the last one. I've checked this in, so it should be there in the next release. You could either try that, or get sb_imapfilter.py from CVS and try that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 11:10:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 11:10:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876483 ] SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #876483, was opened at 2004-01-13 18:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dgriffinpcs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: After upgrading to Outlook 2003 SpamBayes no longer works. Attempted to follow the Troubleshooting Guide ToolBar steps (to no avail). See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Date: 2004-01-27 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=950307 Nice call. That fixed the problem. I am :-) to get SpamBayes back! Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try moving aside/deleting your configuration file and seeing if that helps? I've seen cases before where (I think) Outlook 2003 has used different ids for the stores and so the folders haven't been valid anymore. That might be the case here, although the log error isn't one that I recall seeing before. Worth a try, though. (The FAQ explains where to find the config file if you're not sure). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Date: 2004-01-14 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=950307 Uninstal and reinstall was the first thing I tried. Then I followed the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2004-01-14 03:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I've upgraded from Outlook 2000 to 2003 on several PCs, including beta versions of Outlook 2003 and never had a problem. I was using WinXP in both cases. David, can you try reinstalling SpamBayes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 11:11:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 11:28:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876483 ] SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #876483, was opened at 2004-01-13 18:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by dgriffinpcs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes addin will not load in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: After upgrading to Outlook 2003 SpamBayes no longer works. Attempted to follow the Troubleshooting Guide ToolBar steps (to no avail). See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Date: 2004-01-27 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=950307 Nice call. That fixed the problem. I am :-) to get SpamBayes back! Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try moving aside/deleting your configuration file and seeing if that helps? I've seen cases before where (I think) Outlook 2003 has used different ids for the stores and so the folders haven't been valid anymore. That might be the case here, although the log error isn't one that I recall seeing before. Worth a try, though. (The FAQ explains where to find the config file if you're not sure). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Griffin (dgriffinpcs) Date: 2004-01-14 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=950307 Uninstal and reinstall was the first thing I tried. Then I followed the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2004-01-14 03:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I've upgraded from Outlook 2000 to 2003 on several PCs, including beta versions of Outlook 2003 and never had a problem. I was using WinXP in both cases. David, can you try reinstalling SpamBayes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876483&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 27 18:40:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 27 18:40:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-870799 ] imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Message-ID: Bugs item #870799, was opened at 2004-01-05 22:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Mann (feint) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imap trying to fetch invalid message UID Initial Comment: It looks like it is going off the end of the list of the UIDs it brings back from the IMAP server: c:\tmp> c:\Python23\python.exe sb_imapfilter.py -c -v -i4 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db...Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 41 spam and 16 ham Done. 46:52.00 > GPAB1 LOGIN xxxx "xxxxxx" 46:52.18 < GPAB1 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4REV1 IDLE NAMESPACE MAILBOX-REFERRALS SCAN SORT THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND] User xxxx authenticated Classifying 46:52.18 > GPAB2 SELECT Spam 46:52.31 < * 56 EXISTS 46:52.31 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1073247595] UID validity status 46:52.31 < * OK [UIDNEXT 83] Predicted next UID 46:52.31 < * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.32 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.32 < GPAB2 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.32 > GPAB3 SELECT Junk 46:52.44 < * 1 EXISTS 46:52.44 < * 0 RECENT 46:52.44 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1067418428] UID validity status 46:52.45 < * OK [UIDNEXT 2] Predicted next UID 46:52.45 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:52.45 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:52.45 < * OK [UNSEEN 1] first unseen message in /home/xxxx/Junk 46:52.45 < GPAB3 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:52.45 > GPAB4 SELECT INBOX 46:53.60 < * 127 EXISTS 46:53.60 < * NO Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 NO response: Trying to get mailbox lock from process 14487 46:53.60 < * 0 RECENT 46:53.60 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1066476660] UID validity status 46:53.61 < * OK [UIDNEXT 558] Predicted next UID 46:53.61 < * FLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen) 46:53.61 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (Junk NonJunk $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label4 $Label5 \* \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Draft \Seen)] Permanent flags 46:53.61 < * OK [UNSEEN 125] first unseen message in /var/spool/mail/xxxx 46:53.61 < GPAB4 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 46:53.61 > GPAB5 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 46:53.74 < * SEARCH 180 190 233 245 251 260 264 270 283 288 299 316 322 332 355 363 397 399 402 403 404 405 406 409 410 412 414 416 421 422 424 425 432 434 439 440 441 442 445 446 447 448 451 452 454 455 456 457 458 460 462 463 464 465 466 467 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 483 484 485 486 487 489 492 494 495 497 498 499 501 502 503 505 506 507 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 547 549 551 553 554 555 556 557 46:53.74 < GPAB5 OK UID SEARCH completed 46:53.74 > GPAB6 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.HEADER 46:53.91 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822.HEADER {1110} 46:53.91 read literal size 1110 46:53.91 < ) 46:53.91 < GPAB6 OK UID FETCH completed 46:53.91 > GPAB7 UID FETCH 180 RFC822.PEEK 46:54.02 < GPAB7 BAD Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 BAD response: Bogus attribute list in UID FETCH 46:54.02 > GPAB8 UID FETCH 180 RFC822 46:54.52 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 RFC822 {4644} 46:54.52 read literal size 4644 46:54.52 < ) 46:54.52 < GPAB8 OK UID FETCH completed * 46:54.52 > GPAB9 UID FETCH 180 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:54.63 < * 1 FETCH (UID 180 FLAGS (\Seen NonJunk) INTERNALDATE " 2-Dec-2003 12:20:04 +0100") 46:54.63 < GPAB9 OK UID FETCH completed 46:54.64 > GPAB10 APPEND INBOX (\Seen NonJunk) " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:54.74 < + Ready for argument 46:54.74 write literal size 4679 46:55.06 < * 128 EXISTS 46:55.06 < * 1 RECENT 46:55.06 < GPAB10 NO APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.06 NO response: APPEND failed: Unknown flag: NonJunk 46:55.07 > GPAB11 APPEND INBOX " 2-Dec-2003 12:36:21 +0100" {4679} 46:55.23 < + Ready for argument 46:55.23 write literal size 4679 46:55.42 < * 129 EXISTS 46:55.42 < * 2 RECENT 46:55.42 < GPAB11 OK APPEND completed 46:55.42 > GPAB12 UID STORE 180 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 46:55.52 < GPAB12 OK UID STORE completed 46:55.52 > GPAB13 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1073296013) 46:55.63 < * SEARCH 558 559 46:55.63 < GPAB13 OK UID SEARCH completed . 46:55.65 > GPAB14 UID FETCH "558 559" (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 46:55.75 < GPAB14 BAD Bogus sequence in UID FETCH 46:55.75 BAD response: Bogus sequence in UID FETCH Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 815, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 608, in Filter msg.Save() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 395, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "c:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['Bogus sequence in UID FETCH'] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-28 12:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, I considered that, as it was the simple fix, but then you're left with two undeleted messages in the inbox which are duplicates of each other, both having the same spambayes id. (Or at least, I assume so, if I had deduced the problem correctly). Good to hear that things are working for you, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Mann (feint) Date: 2004-01-28 03:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=64372 FYI I fixed the problem (on my local machine) with the following 1 liner (diff - ignore the part about the change of location of python executable): 1c1 < #!/usr/bin/env python --- > #!c:\Python23\python.exe 358a359,361 > > > 436a440,441 > new_id=new_id.split(' ')[0] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 21:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What's going wrong is that imapfilter is finding two 'undeleted' messages with the same spambayes id, which is very bad. What's more, messages 558 and 559 didn't exist when it did the first listing of undeleted messages, which means that they were both written then. I *think* that what is happening is that although the first append fails (because of the "nonjunk" flag, which is some weird thing that imap server is doing), it still creates the message, which is very bad. The only fix I can think of is to check if more than one message is returned, and if it is, try and delete all but the last one. I've checked this in, so it should be there in the next release. You could either try that, or get sb_imapfilter.py from CVS and try that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=870799&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 01:45:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 01:46:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886025 ] sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Message-ID: Bugs item #886025, was opened at 2004-01-28 01:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Initial Comment: When the pop3 proxy is configured to support two different POP servers at different ports via the web interface, it works just fine. Stopping the server and restarting causes only the first proxy port to be opened; sb_server.py does not listed on the second port at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 06:08:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 06:08:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886133 ] "500 Server error" on win32/XP Message-ID: Bugs item #886133, was opened at 2004-01-28 11:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: "500 Server error" on win32/XP Initial Comment: first, thanks for this nice piece of software ;) Unfortunaly, running "sb_imapfilter.py -b" 1.0a7 on win2k (german) produces the following output on the browser if I try to train _or_ to configure the IMAP folders: --- cut --- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 175, in onFilterfolders folderBox = self._buildFolderBox("imap", opt, available_folders) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 271, in _buildFolderBox folderRow.folderName = folder File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 738, in __setattr__ self._replaceNodeContent(node, value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 654, in _replaceNodeContent node.children = self._nodeListFromSource(value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 640, in _nodeListFromSource tree = _generateTree(""+value+"") File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 574, in _generateTree g.feed(source) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 499, in feed self._parser.Parse(data) ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line 1, column 15 --- cut --- Config looks like that: --- cut --- [Storage] ham_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\ham_cache messageinfo_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db spam_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\spam_cache unknown_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\unknown_cache [globals] verbose:True [imap] server:10.0.0.1 password:xxxxxxx username:puls@xxx.com --- cut --- I reran the script "sb_imapfilter.py -b -i 5 -v 2>error.log" --- cut --- Loading state from C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db database C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham 58:20.82 > DMME1 LOGIN "puls@xxx.yyy" "xxxxxx" 58:20.88 < DMME1 OK LOGIN completed 58:20.88 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME1', 'OK', 'LOGIN completed') 58:20.88 > DMME2 LIST "" * 58:21.31 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX" 58:21.31 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX"') 58:21.31 untagged_responses[LIST] 0 += ["() "/" "INBOX""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX/junk" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"') 58:21.32 untagged_responses[LIST] 1 += ["() "/" "INBOX/junk""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "business" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "business"', '() "/" "business"') [... lines deleted ...] 58:21.38 < DMME2 OK LIST completed 58:21.38 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME2', 'OK', 'LIST completed') 58:21.38 untagged_responses[LIST] => ['() "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "business"', ] [... line cutted ...] 58:27.33 > DMME3 LOGOUT 58:27.33 < * BYE logging out 58:27.33 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('BYE', ' logging out', 'logging out') 58:27.33 untagged_responses[BYE] 0 += ["logging out"] 58:27.33 BYE response: logging out 58:27.33 < DMME3 OK LOGOUT completed 58:27.33 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME3', 'OK', 'LOGOUT completed') --- cut --- My assumption (without digging deeper) so far is that the parser might struggle with the fact that I have an imap server running that has the feature "folders in folders" enabled. This results in folders like "INBOX/junk", but this is just a first guess. If you find out anything or need further information please let me know! Best regards Roman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 06:14:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 06:15:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886133 ] "500 Server error" on win32/XP Message-ID: Bugs item #886133, was opened at 2004-01-28 11:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ropuls You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: "500 Server error" on win32/XP Initial Comment: first, thanks for this nice piece of software ;) Unfortunaly, running "sb_imapfilter.py -b" 1.0a7 on win2k (german) produces the following output on the browser if I try to train _or_ to configure the IMAP folders: --- cut --- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 175, in onFilterfolders folderBox = self._buildFolderBox("imap", opt, available_folders) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 271, in _buildFolderBox folderRow.folderName = folder File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 738, in __setattr__ self._replaceNodeContent(node, value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 654, in _replaceNodeContent node.children = self._nodeListFromSource(value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 640, in _nodeListFromSource tree = _generateTree(""+value+"") File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 574, in _generateTree g.feed(source) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 499, in feed self._parser.Parse(data) ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line 1, column 15 --- cut --- Config looks like that: --- cut --- [Storage] ham_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\ham_cache messageinfo_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db spam_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\spam_cache unknown_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\unknown_cache [globals] verbose:True [imap] server:10.0.0.1 password:xxxxxxx username:puls@xxx.com --- cut --- I reran the script "sb_imapfilter.py -b -i 5 -v 2>error.log" --- cut --- Loading state from C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db database C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham 58:20.82 > DMME1 LOGIN "puls@xxx.yyy" "xxxxxx" 58:20.88 < DMME1 OK LOGIN completed 58:20.88 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME1', 'OK', 'LOGIN completed') 58:20.88 > DMME2 LIST "" * 58:21.31 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX" 58:21.31 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX"') 58:21.31 untagged_responses[LIST] 0 += ["() "/" "INBOX""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX/junk" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"') 58:21.32 untagged_responses[LIST] 1 += ["() "/" "INBOX/junk""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "business" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "business"', '() "/" "business"') [... lines deleted ...] 58:21.38 < DMME2 OK LIST completed 58:21.38 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME2', 'OK', 'LIST completed') 58:21.38 untagged_responses[LIST] => ['() "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "business"', ] [... line cutted ...] 58:27.33 > DMME3 LOGOUT 58:27.33 < * BYE logging out 58:27.33 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('BYE', ' logging out', 'logging out') 58:27.33 untagged_responses[BYE] 0 += ["logging out"] 58:27.33 BYE response: logging out 58:27.33 < DMME3 OK LOGOUT completed 58:27.33 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME3', 'OK', 'LOGOUT completed') --- cut --- My assumption (without digging deeper) so far is that the parser might struggle with the fact that I have an imap server running that has the feature "folders in folders" enabled. This results in folders like "INBOX/junk", but this is just a first guess. If you find out anything or need further information please let me know! Best regards Roman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Date: 2004-01-28 11:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=962136 BTW: C:\Python23\Scripts>..\python -V Python 2.3.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 18:39:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 18:39:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886133 ] ExpatError in IMAP folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #886133, was opened at 2004-01-29 00:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: ExpatError in IMAP folder list Initial Comment: first, thanks for this nice piece of software ;) Unfortunaly, running "sb_imapfilter.py -b" 1.0a7 on win2k (german) produces the following output on the browser if I try to train _or_ to configure the IMAP folders: --- cut --- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 175, in onFilterfolders folderBox = self._buildFolderBox("imap", opt, available_folders) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 271, in _buildFolderBox folderRow.folderName = folder File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 738, in __setattr__ self._replaceNodeContent(node, value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 654, in _replaceNodeContent node.children = self._nodeListFromSource(value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 640, in _nodeListFromSource tree = _generateTree(""+value+"") File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 574, in _generateTree g.feed(source) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 499, in feed self._parser.Parse(data) ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line 1, column 15 --- cut --- Config looks like that: --- cut --- [Storage] ham_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\ham_cache messageinfo_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db spam_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\spam_cache unknown_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\unknown_cache [globals] verbose:True [imap] server:10.0.0.1 password:xxxxxxx username:puls@xxx.com --- cut --- I reran the script "sb_imapfilter.py -b -i 5 -v 2>error.log" --- cut --- Loading state from C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db database C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham 58:20.82 > DMME1 LOGIN "puls@xxx.yyy" "xxxxxx" 58:20.88 < DMME1 OK LOGIN completed 58:20.88 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME1', 'OK', 'LOGIN completed') 58:20.88 > DMME2 LIST "" * 58:21.31 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX" 58:21.31 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX"') 58:21.31 untagged_responses[LIST] 0 += ["() "/" "INBOX""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX/junk" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"') 58:21.32 untagged_responses[LIST] 1 += ["() "/" "INBOX/junk""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "business" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "business"', '() "/" "business"') [... lines deleted ...] 58:21.38 < DMME2 OK LIST completed 58:21.38 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME2', 'OK', 'LIST completed') 58:21.38 untagged_responses[LIST] => ['() "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "business"', ] [... line cutted ...] 58:27.33 > DMME3 LOGOUT 58:27.33 < * BYE logging out 58:27.33 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('BYE', ' logging out', 'logging out') 58:27.33 untagged_responses[BYE] 0 += ["logging out"] 58:27.33 BYE response: logging out 58:27.33 < DMME3 OK LOGOUT completed 58:27.33 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME3', 'OK', 'LOGOUT completed') --- cut --- My assumption (without digging deeper) so far is that the parser might struggle with the fact that I have an imap server running that has the feature "folders in folders" enabled. This results in folders like "INBOX/junk", but this is just a first guess. If you find out anything or need further information please let me know! Best regards Roman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 12:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's most likely that this is caused by a folder name having &, < or > in it. If that's the case, then this has been fixed in cvs and will therefore be fixed in the next release (due very soon). If that's not the case, please reopen. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Date: 2004-01-29 00:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=962136 BTW: C:\Python23\Scripts>..\python -V Python 2.3.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 19:41:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 19:42:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886025 ] sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Message-ID: Bugs item #886025, was opened at 2004-01-28 19:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Initial Comment: When the pop3 proxy is configured to support two different POP servers at different ports via the web interface, it works just fine. Stopping the server and restarting causes only the first proxy port to be opened; sb_server.py does not listed on the second port at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What OS is this? Are you just starting/stopping sb_server from the command line? I tried this here (WinXP) and it worked fine from the command line and from the tray app. Does your config file end up with both servers listed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 19:46:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 19:46:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884545 ] off-by-one ? Message-ID: Bugs item #884545, was opened at 2004-01-26 17:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: off-by-one ? Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Whenever I train spambayes, I always (later, when classifying) get the error that I have more spam than total mails. I normally just do sb_dbexport -e -D hammie.db -f out.txt In out.txt, the top line will say that there are 202 ham and 3342 spam... searching through the file I find the line header%3ATo%3A1`170`3343` (this is the only line in the db where the # spams is larger than the total # of spams) I correct this line, and re-import the database. It now works fine. Every time I train spambayes this 'header- to' line will always be one higher than the total # of spams. (If I train twice, the number of spams for header-to will be 2 larger than the max # of spams... etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. That's quite an imbalance - you'd probably get better results with more even numbers of ham and spam. What are you using to train spambayes? just imapfilter? Could you attach the output from running imapfilter with the - i4 switch? (blank out the username/password stuff). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 20:22:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 20:23:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886025 ] sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Message-ID: Bugs item #886025, was opened at 2004-01-28 01:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fdrake You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Initial Comment: When the pop3 proxy is configured to support two different POP servers at different ports via the web interface, it works just fine. Stopping the server and restarting causes only the first proxy port to be opened; sb_server.py does not listed on the second port at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2004-01-28 20:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 Operating system: RedHat Linux 9 Yes, I was just starting from the command line, and stopping using the shutdown button in the web interface. The configuration file lists both ports and both servers, but... I can't reproduce this now. ;-( I remember seeing only one of the proxy ports listed in the UI when I saw this. I've tried with a fresh configuration in an empty directory (allow the proxy to create the config, of course), and don't see the problem occur. I guess we can chalk this one up to operator error; sorry for wasting your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-28 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What OS is this? Are you just starting/stopping sb_server from the command line? I tried this here (WinXP) and it worked fine from the command line and from the tray app. Does your config file end up with both servers listed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 28 20:56:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 28 20:56:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886025 ] sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Message-ID: Bugs item #886025, was opened at 2004-01-28 19:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server.py: restarting only starts one proxy port Initial Comment: When the pop3 proxy is configured to support two different POP servers at different ports via the web interface, it works just fine. Stopping the server and restarting causes only the first proxy port to be opened; sb_server.py does not listed on the second port at all. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 14:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You will be when you get the bill . Don't worry about it, glad all is ok. If you do notice it again, please reopen! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2004-01-29 14:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 Operating system: RedHat Linux 9 Yes, I was just starting from the command line, and stopping using the shutdown button in the web interface. The configuration file lists both ports and both servers, but... I can't reproduce this now. ;-( I remember seeing only one of the proxy ports listed in the UI when I saw this. I've tried with a fresh configuration in an empty directory (allow the proxy to create the config, of course), and don't see the problem occur. I guess we can chalk this one up to operator error; sorry for wasting your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What OS is this? Are you just starting/stopping sb_server from the command line? I tried this here (WinXP) and it worked fine from the command line and from the tray app. Does your config file end up with both servers listed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886025&group_id=61702 From ehume at pshrink.com Thu Jan 29 00:54:06 2004 From: ehume at pshrink.com (Edward Hume) Date: Thu Jan 29 00:54:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 'Virus found' messages fron AVG stops SpamBayes filtering in Outlook Message-ID: <001301c3e62c$500525d0$0200a8c0@Dad> I am using AVG antivirus and SpamBayes with Outlook 2002 SP2. When AVG finds a virus it produces a popup window that must be dismissed. When this occurs, SpamBayes stops processing mail in the inbox. This is annoying during times of virus-induced spam (as now). During the blockage I can tell SpamBayes to delete mail as spam and recover mail from spam. If I turn Outlook off and back on again, SpamBayes will process the mail in the inbox. As a workaround I will try setting AVG not to display a virus warning. But it is not a good workaround. Ed Hume From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 04:35:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 04:35:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886825 ] No log file is created Message-ID: Bugs item #886825, was opened at 2004-01-29 09:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886825&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: No log file is created Initial Comment: Env. is Windows 2000 Pro with Outlook 2000. Under folder "C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes" I don't see any log files. I see these 4 files: default_bayes_customize.ini default_bayes_database.db default_message_database.db MS Exchange Settings.ini And as already listed in a different bug, SpamBayes does not appear in the COM add-in list. However, the filter seems to work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886825&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 06:44:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 06:44:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886133 ] ExpatError in IMAP folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #886133, was opened at 2004-01-28 11:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ropuls You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: ExpatError in IMAP folder list Initial Comment: first, thanks for this nice piece of software ;) Unfortunaly, running "sb_imapfilter.py -b" 1.0a7 on win2k (german) produces the following output on the browser if I try to train _or_ to configure the IMAP folders: --- cut --- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 175, in onFilterfolders folderBox = self._buildFolderBox("imap", opt, available_folders) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 271, in _buildFolderBox folderRow.folderName = folder File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 738, in __setattr__ self._replaceNodeContent(node, value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 654, in _replaceNodeContent node.children = self._nodeListFromSource(value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 640, in _nodeListFromSource tree = _generateTree(""+value+"") File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 574, in _generateTree g.feed(source) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 499, in feed self._parser.Parse(data) ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line 1, column 15 --- cut --- Config looks like that: --- cut --- [Storage] ham_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\ham_cache messageinfo_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db spam_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\spam_cache unknown_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\unknown_cache [globals] verbose:True [imap] server:10.0.0.1 password:xxxxxxx username:puls@xxx.com --- cut --- I reran the script "sb_imapfilter.py -b -i 5 -v 2>error.log" --- cut --- Loading state from C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db database C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham 58:20.82 > DMME1 LOGIN "puls@xxx.yyy" "xxxxxx" 58:20.88 < DMME1 OK LOGIN completed 58:20.88 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME1', 'OK', 'LOGIN completed') 58:20.88 > DMME2 LIST "" * 58:21.31 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX" 58:21.31 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX"') 58:21.31 untagged_responses[LIST] 0 += ["() "/" "INBOX""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX/junk" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"') 58:21.32 untagged_responses[LIST] 1 += ["() "/" "INBOX/junk""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "business" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "business"', '() "/" "business"') [... lines deleted ...] 58:21.38 < DMME2 OK LIST completed 58:21.38 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME2', 'OK', 'LIST completed') 58:21.38 untagged_responses[LIST] => ['() "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "business"', ] [... line cutted ...] 58:27.33 > DMME3 LOGOUT 58:27.33 < * BYE logging out 58:27.33 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('BYE', ' logging out', 'logging out') 58:27.33 untagged_responses[BYE] 0 += ["logging out"] 58:27.33 BYE response: logging out 58:27.33 < DMME3 OK LOGOUT completed 58:27.33 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME3', 'OK', 'LOGOUT completed') --- cut --- My assumption (without digging deeper) so far is that the parser might struggle with the fact that I have an imap server running that has the feature "folders in folders" enabled. This results in folders like "INBOX/junk", but this is just a first guess. If you find out anything or need further information please let me know! Best regards Roman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Date: 2004-01-29 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=962136 right, some of the foldernames contained german umlauts like ?,?,?. Due to transcoding, a foldername like "Entw?rfe" (drafts) became "Entw&APw-rfe" and therefore contained one of the "illegal" chars. Thanks for your answer! Regards Roman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-28 23:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's most likely that this is caused by a folder name having &, < or > in it. If that's the case, then this has been fixed in cvs and will therefore be fixed in the next release (due very soon). If that's not the case, please reopen. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Date: 2004-01-28 11:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=962136 BTW: C:\Python23\Scripts>..\python -V Python 2.3.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 06:46:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 06:46:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886133 ] ExpatError in IMAP folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #886133, was opened at 2004-01-28 11:08 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ropuls You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: ExpatError in IMAP folder list Initial Comment: first, thanks for this nice piece of software ;) Unfortunaly, running "sb_imapfilter.py -b" 1.0a7 on win2k (german) produces the following output on the browser if I try to train _or_ to configure the IMAP folders: --- cut --- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 175, in onFilterfolders folderBox = self._buildFolderBox("imap", opt, available_folders) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\ImapUI.py", line 271, in _buildFolderBox folderRow.folderName = folder File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 738, in __setattr__ self._replaceNodeContent(node, value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 654, in _replaceNodeContent node.children = self._nodeListFromSource(value) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 640, in _nodeListFromSource tree = _generateTree(""+value+"") File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 574, in _generateTree g.feed(source) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\PyMeldLite.py", line 499, in feed self._parser.Parse(data) ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line 1, column 15 --- cut --- Config looks like that: --- cut --- [Storage] ham_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\ham_cache messageinfo_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db spam_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\spam_cache unknown_cache:C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\unknown_cache [globals] verbose:True [imap] server:10.0.0.1 password:xxxxxxx username:puls@xxx.com --- cut --- I reran the script "sb_imapfilter.py -b -i 5 -v 2>error.log" --- cut --- Loading state from C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db database C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham 58:20.82 > DMME1 LOGIN "puls@xxx.yyy" "xxxxxx" 58:20.88 < DMME1 OK LOGIN completed 58:20.88 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME1', 'OK', 'LOGIN completed') 58:20.88 > DMME2 LIST "" * 58:21.31 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX" 58:21.31 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX"') 58:21.31 untagged_responses[LIST] 0 += ["() "/" "INBOX""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "INBOX/junk" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"') 58:21.32 untagged_responses[LIST] 1 += ["() "/" "INBOX/junk""] 58:21.32 < * LIST () "/" "business" 58:21.32 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('LIST', ' () "/" "business"', '() "/" "business"') [... lines deleted ...] 58:21.38 < DMME2 OK LIST completed 58:21.38 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME2', 'OK', 'LIST completed') 58:21.38 untagged_responses[LIST] => ['() "/" "INBOX"', '() "/" "INBOX/junk"', '() "/" "business"', ] [... line cutted ...] 58:27.33 > DMME3 LOGOUT 58:27.33 < * BYE logging out 58:27.33 matched r'\* (?P[A-Z-]+)( (? P.*))?' => ('BYE', ' logging out', 'logging out') 58:27.33 untagged_responses[BYE] 0 += ["logging out"] 58:27.33 BYE response: logging out 58:27.33 < DMME3 OK LOGOUT completed 58:27.33 matched r'(?PDMME\d+) (? P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('DMME3', 'OK', 'LOGOUT completed') --- cut --- My assumption (without digging deeper) so far is that the parser might struggle with the fact that I have an imap server running that has the feature "folders in folders" enabled. This results in folders like "INBOX/junk", but this is just a first guess. If you find out anything or need further information please let me know! Best regards Roman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Date: 2004-01-29 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=962136 right, some of the foldernames contained german umlauts like ?,?,?. Due to transcoding, a foldername like "Entw?rfe" (drafts) became "Entw&APw-rfe" and therefore contained one of the "illegal" chars. Thanks for your answer! Regards Roman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-28 23:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's most likely that this is caused by a folder name having &, < or > in it. If that's the case, then this has been fixed in cvs and will therefore be fixed in the next release (due very soon). If that's not the case, please reopen. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Date: 2004-01-28 11:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=962136 BTW: C:\Python23\Scripts>..\python -V Python 2.3.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886133&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 06:50:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 06:50:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-886903 ] Add button to show raw mail message Message-ID: Feature Requests item #886903, was opened at 2004-01-29 11:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add button to show raw mail message Initial Comment: This is regarding the Outlook plug-in. In a competing product, Spammunition (also free), there is a button called 'show analysis', which shows the statistics, like SpamBayes' 'show spam clues for current message'. However, Spammunition's feature is better because: a) It does not create a new mail message that has to be manually discarded b) It opens a pop up window with the three sections: - the mail headers - the raw message - the Bayesian statistics I think the SB should adopt this method. But hey, this is a great piece of software. Amir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 07:18:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 07:19:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886924 ] email.Errors.BoundaryError on training Message-ID: Bugs item #886924, was opened at 2004-01-29 12:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886924&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: email.Errors.BoundaryError on training Initial Comment: Training (running "sb_imapfilter.py -t -v -i4") produces the following output: --- cut --- Loading state from C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db database C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 142 ham 48:49.92 > CHAD1 LOGIN "puls@xxx.yy" "****" 48:49.99 < CHAD1 OK LOGIN completed 48:50.00 > CHAD2 SELECT INBOX 48:50.00 < * FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen \Answered \Draft \Flagged) 48:50.00 < * 431 EXISTS 48:50.00 < * 0 RECENT 48:50.00 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1043230528] UID validity 48:50.00 < * OK [UIDNEXT 3075] Predicted next UID 48:50.00 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Deleted \Seen \Answered \Draft \Flagged $MDNSent)] Permanent flags 48:50.00 < CHAD2 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 48:50.01 > CHAD3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 48:50.01 < * SEARCH 879 884 890 896 907 908 909 910 911 912 915 916 917 918 919 921 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 947 949 952 954 956 957 960 962 963 964 965 966 968 973 974 979 981 982 983 992 993 1014 1019 1034 1037 1051 1052 1054 1055 1059 1063 1064 1069 1083 1085 1087 1091 1092 1093 1100 1101 1103 1105 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1119 1129 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1138 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1152 1153 1157 1159 1161 1174 1181 1182 1188 1192 1194 1305 1307 1331 1335 1337 1338 1342 1348 1353 1354 1366 1369 1371 1374 1381 1382 1383 1462 1464 1465 1470 1471 1473 1474 1487 1490 1491 1493 1497 1519 1521 1529 1531 1542 1543 1550 1558 1559 1560 1561 1563 1564 1574 1575 1577 1581 1585 1591 1592 1594 1595 1596 1600 1615 1616 1617 1622 1625 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1641 1657 1663 1664 1667 1671 1682 1687 1692 1694 1706 1729 1730 1737 1738 1740 1742 1743 1751 1766 1767 1773 1774 1828 1830 1845 1847 1848 1851 1857 1858 1864 1889 1892 1893 1894 1904 1915 1920 1921 1922 1933 1934 1936 1941 1942 1947 1954 1962 1974 1978 1985 1986 1990 1991 1993 2030 2036 2048 2071 2072 2074 2079 2235 2240 2241 2242 2250 2352 2353 2354 2376 2378 2393 2394 2397 2400 2421 2422 2423 2431 2432 2501 2507 2508 2547 2579 2594 2666 2712 2715 2721 2749 2850 2851 2862 2863 2867 2869 2870 2871 2872 2882 2885 2886 2890 2903 2905 2907 2908 2909 2910 2911 2912 2913 2914 2915 2916 2917 2918 2919 2920 2921 2922 2923 2924 2925 2926 2927 2928 2929 2930 2931 2932 2933 2934 2935 2936 2937 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944 2945 2946 2947 2948 2949 2950 2951 2952 2953 2954 2955 2956 2957 2958 2959 2960 2961 2962 2963 2964 2965 2966 2967 2968 2969 2970 2971 2972 2973 2974 2975 2976 2977 2978 2979 2980 2981 2982 2983 2984 2985 2986 2987 2988 2989 2990 2991 2992 2993 2994 2995 2996 2997 2998 2999 3000 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006 3007 3008 3009 3010 3011 3012 3013 3014 3015 3016 3017 3018 3019 3020 3021 3022 3023 3024 3025 3026 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3038 3039 3040 3041 3042 3043 3044 3045 3046 3047 3049 3052 3053 3063 3064 48:50.01 < CHAD3 OK UID SEARCH completed in 0.00 s 48:50.01 > CHAD4 UID FETCH 879 RFC822.HEADER 48:50.02 < * 1 FETCH (UID 879 RFC822.HEADER {1691} 48:50.02 read literal size 1691 48:50.02 < ) 48:50.02 < CHAD4 OK UID FETCH completed 48:50.02 > CHAD5 UID FETCH 879 RFC822.PEEK 48:50.02 < CHAD5 BAD UID FETCH Invalid request format 48:50.02 BAD response: UID FETCH Invalid request format 48:50.03 > CHAD6 UID FETCH 879 RFC822 48:50.03 < * 1 FETCH (UID 879 RFC822 {69120} 48:50.03 read literal size 69120 48:50.05 < ) 48:50.05 < CHAD6 OK UID FETCH completed Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 633, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 533, in __getitem__ msg.get_substance() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 364, in get_substance new_msg = email.Parser.Parser().parsestr(data ["RFC822"]) File "C:\Python23\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly) File "C:\Python23\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in parse self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline) File "C:\Python23\lib\email\Parser.py", line 205, in _parsebody raise Errors.BoundaryError( email.Errors.BoundaryError: No terminating boundary and no trailing empty line --- cut --- I'd fetch the email manually with telnet and I cannot clearly see wether or not the format is okay. If necessary, I can forward it to a personal account to make tests with it. Anyhow, I assume that even if the email is not truly compliant to RFC822, the software should not abort at this point but skip the email or just use working parts of it, right? regards, roman PS: config as decribed in #886133 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 09:19:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 09:19:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886825 ] No log file is created Message-ID: Bugs item #886825, was opened at 2004-01-29 04:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886825&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: No log file is created Initial Comment: Env. is Windows 2000 Pro with Outlook 2000. Under folder "C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes" I don't see any log files. I see these 4 files: default_bayes_customize.ini default_bayes_database.db default_message_database.db MS Exchange Settings.ini And as already listed in a different bug, SpamBayes does not appear in the COM add-in list. However, the filter seems to work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-29 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This is not the correct location to look for the log files. Log files are located in "\Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp". The Troubleshooting Guide describes this (SpamBayes / Help / Troubleshooting Guide). Please check the correct directory and report back whether or not the log files are there. I'm assuming that you are running from the binary plugin. Just in case you are not, please note that log files are not created when running directly from source code. When running from source, all log output is sent to the trace collector where it can be monitored in real time from the Pythonwin IDE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886825&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 11:22:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 11:23:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887078 ] Install Fails Message-ID: Bugs item #887078, was opened at 2004-01-29 11:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887078&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Gold (drewwebmail) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install Fails Initial Comment: When attempting to install SpamBayes .81 with Outlook 2003 in XP, I get the error "spambayes_addin.dll - unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed". I have attempted to install this numerous times now and always get the same error message. I have disabled both Norton Antivirus and Norton Internet Security during the install without success. I have also tried the manual solution posted earlier - I copied the spambayes_addin.dll file to the Plugin folder for Office but when i try to initialize the addin from within Outlook, it does not recognize it is there. I had it successfully installed earler and ran into a problem with outlook that took 3 hours of MSFT support to resolve. Once the problem was fixed, I tried to reinstall SpamBayes and now it won't install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887078&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 14:32:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 14:32:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887202 ] DLL does not register Message-ID: Bugs item #887202, was opened at 2004-01-29 14:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Elly Kaufman (ellythek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: DLL does not register Initial Comment: My spambayes stopped working this afternoon. The com object (DLL) does not show up. I tried reinstalling and registering (regsvr32) with no luck. I can't even get the configuration wizard to work. When uninstalling registry entries must still exist because after the uninstall and install same values appear in the training tab. I went through all the trouble shooting tips and checked the FAQ. Can't seem to figure it out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 15:56:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 16:54:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887256 ] Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Message-ID: Bugs item #887256, was opened at 2004-01-29 20:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Siefert (msiefert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Initial Comment: To all the SpamBayes gurus. I recently installed XP and the MS Office suite 2002. Updated the OS and Office with all the latest and greatest patches without problem. Finally I was able to install SpamBayes for Outlook, also without problems and in its latest version 0.81. So I went on to create my POP3 account for my domain. Just like I do for about 20 other clients (They run Office 2000). I try to send an email to an outside domain and now I get the following bounces. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 1/29/2004 1:45 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: recpient@othercompany.com on 1/29/2004 1:45 PM 501 5.7.1 This system is not configured to relay mail from to for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx I contacted my ISP and verified my settings in Outlook which are 100% correct. I use SMTP Auth to authorize any emails I send. The username and password are correct as well. I know this is a long shot, but is anyone aware of any incompatibility / issue with SpamBayes and Outlook 2002 using SMTP Auth? Please let me know.... this is driving me crazy. Martin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 16:37:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 17:00:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887202 ] DLL does not register Message-ID: Bugs item #887202, was opened at 2004-01-29 14:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Elly Kaufman (ellythek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: DLL does not register Initial Comment: My spambayes stopped working this afternoon. The com object (DLL) does not show up. I tried reinstalling and registering (regsvr32) with no luck. I can't even get the configuration wizard to work. When uninstalling registry entries must still exist because after the uninstall and install same values appear in the training tab. I went through all the trouble shooting tips and checked the FAQ. Can't seem to figure it out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-29 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It is a known issue with the 0.81 version that the plugin will not show up in Outlook's COM Add-Ins dialog. If Outlook has detected a problem with the plugin then you may find it under Help / About Microsoft Outlook / Disabled Items. The uninstall does not remove the data files from your Application Data directory under Documents and Settings. This is to avoid deleting all of your training data in case you want to reinstall. If you want to force SpamBayes to configure from scratch then delete all the files under Application Data\SpamBayes. The Configuration Wizard presents a simplified view of configuration, but does not configure anything that can't be reconfigured manually through the SpamBayes Manager dialog. Before starting over from scratch, you might try going to the Filtering tab and reselecting your Spam and Unsure folders using the Browse buttons. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 17:18:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 17:19:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887256 ] Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Message-ID: Bugs item #887256, was opened at 2004-01-29 15:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Siefert (msiefert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Initial Comment: To all the SpamBayes gurus. I recently installed XP and the MS Office suite 2002. Updated the OS and Office with all the latest and greatest patches without problem. Finally I was able to install SpamBayes for Outlook, also without problems and in its latest version 0.81. So I went on to create my POP3 account for my domain. Just like I do for about 20 other clients (They run Office 2000). I try to send an email to an outside domain and now I get the following bounces. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 1/29/2004 1:45 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: recpient@othercompany.com on 1/29/2004 1:45 PM 501 5.7.1 This system is not configured to relay mail from to for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx I contacted my ISP and verified my settings in Outlook which are 100% correct. I use SMTP Auth to authorize any emails I send. The username and password are correct as well. I know this is a long shot, but is anyone aware of any incompatibility / issue with SpamBayes and Outlook 2002 using SMTP Auth? Please let me know.... this is driving me crazy. Martin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-29 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Suggest you uninstall the SpamBayes addin and try again. I expect you'll find it makes no difference. The addin isn't involved in sending email (or even in receiving email -- it just sits there until Outlook tells it an item has been added to one of the folders you told it to watch; the addin plays no part in Outlook's POP3 or SMTP dialogs). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 20:26:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 20:26:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886924 ] email.Errors.BoundaryError on training Message-ID: Bugs item #886924, was opened at 2004-01-30 01:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886924&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roman Puls (ropuls) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: email.Errors.BoundaryError on training Initial Comment: Training (running "sb_imapfilter.py -t -v -i4") produces the following output: --- cut --- Loading state from C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db database C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator.PROUTE\Anwendungsdaten\S pamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 142 ham 48:49.92 > CHAD1 LOGIN "puls@xxx.yy" "****" 48:49.99 < CHAD1 OK LOGIN completed 48:50.00 > CHAD2 SELECT INBOX 48:50.00 < * FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen \Answered \Draft \Flagged) 48:50.00 < * 431 EXISTS 48:50.00 < * 0 RECENT 48:50.00 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1043230528] UID validity 48:50.00 < * OK [UIDNEXT 3075] Predicted next UID 48:50.00 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Deleted \Seen \Answered \Draft \Flagged $MDNSent)] Permanent flags 48:50.00 < CHAD2 OK [READ-WRITE] SELECT completed 48:50.01 > CHAD3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 48:50.01 < * SEARCH 879 884 890 896 907 908 909 910 911 912 915 916 917 918 919 921 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 947 949 952 954 956 957 960 962 963 964 965 966 968 973 974 979 981 982 983 992 993 1014 1019 1034 1037 1051 1052 1054 1055 1059 1063 1064 1069 1083 1085 1087 1091 1092 1093 1100 1101 1103 1105 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1119 1129 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1138 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1152 1153 1157 1159 1161 1174 1181 1182 1188 1192 1194 1305 1307 1331 1335 1337 1338 1342 1348 1353 1354 1366 1369 1371 1374 1381 1382 1383 1462 1464 1465 1470 1471 1473 1474 1487 1490 1491 1493 1497 1519 1521 1529 1531 1542 1543 1550 1558 1559 1560 1561 1563 1564 1574 1575 1577 1581 1585 1591 1592 1594 1595 1596 1600 1615 1616 1617 1622 1625 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1641 1657 1663 1664 1667 1671 1682 1687 1692 1694 1706 1729 1730 1737 1738 1740 1742 1743 1751 1766 1767 1773 1774 1828 1830 1845 1847 1848 1851 1857 1858 1864 1889 1892 1893 1894 1904 1915 1920 1921 1922 1933 1934 1936 1941 1942 1947 1954 1962 1974 1978 1985 1986 1990 1991 1993 2030 2036 2048 2071 2072 2074 2079 2235 2240 2241 2242 2250 2352 2353 2354 2376 2378 2393 2394 2397 2400 2421 2422 2423 2431 2432 2501 2507 2508 2547 2579 2594 2666 2712 2715 2721 2749 2850 2851 2862 2863 2867 2869 2870 2871 2872 2882 2885 2886 2890 2903 2905 2907 2908 2909 2910 2911 2912 2913 2914 2915 2916 2917 2918 2919 2920 2921 2922 2923 2924 2925 2926 2927 2928 2929 2930 2931 2932 2933 2934 2935 2936 2937 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944 2945 2946 2947 2948 2949 2950 2951 2952 2953 2954 2955 2956 2957 2958 2959 2960 2961 2962 2963 2964 2965 2966 2967 2968 2969 2970 2971 2972 2973 2974 2975 2976 2977 2978 2979 2980 2981 2982 2983 2984 2985 2986 2987 2988 2989 2990 2991 2992 2993 2994 2995 2996 2997 2998 2999 3000 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006 3007 3008 3009 3010 3011 3012 3013 3014 3015 3016 3017 3018 3019 3020 3021 3022 3023 3024 3025 3026 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3038 3039 3040 3041 3042 3043 3044 3045 3046 3047 3049 3052 3053 3063 3064 48:50.01 < CHAD3 OK UID SEARCH completed in 0.00 s 48:50.01 > CHAD4 UID FETCH 879 RFC822.HEADER 48:50.02 < * 1 FETCH (UID 879 RFC822.HEADER {1691} 48:50.02 read literal size 1691 48:50.02 < ) 48:50.02 < CHAD4 OK UID FETCH completed 48:50.02 > CHAD5 UID FETCH 879 RFC822.PEEK 48:50.02 < CHAD5 BAD UID FETCH Invalid request format 48:50.02 BAD response: UID FETCH Invalid request format 48:50.03 > CHAD6 UID FETCH 879 RFC822 48:50.03 < * 1 FETCH (UID 879 RFC822 {69120} 48:50.03 read literal size 69120 48:50.05 < ) 48:50.05 < CHAD6 OK UID FETCH completed Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 633, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 533, in __getitem__ msg.get_substance() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 364, in get_substance new_msg = email.Parser.Parser().parsestr(data ["RFC822"]) File "C:\Python23\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly) File "C:\Python23\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in parse self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline) File "C:\Python23\lib\email\Parser.py", line 205, in _parsebody raise Errors.BoundaryError( email.Errors.BoundaryError: No terminating boundary and no trailing empty line --- cut --- I'd fetch the email manually with telnet and I cannot clearly see wether or not the format is okay. If necessary, I can forward it to a personal account to make tests with it. Anyhow, I assume that even if the email is not truly compliant to RFC822, the software should not abort at this point but skip the email or just use working parts of it, right? regards, roman PS: config as decribed in #886133 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-30 14:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 23:53:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 23:53:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887453 ] Crash when training on messages Message-ID: Bugs item #887453, was opened at 2004-01-29 23:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crash when training on messages Initial Comment: I've been running into the following error for a day or two now on different messages. While I haven't narrowed it down to a particular message yet, the modules and line numbers appear to be the same each time. Stopping and restarting spambayes several times seems to get the offending message to get out of the way somehow.. Will try to narrow it down a bit more over the weekend if it doesn't ring a familiar bell by then.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 23:56:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 23:56:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 12:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brown2611 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-23 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 07:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 23:57:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 23:57:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 12:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brown2611 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-23 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 07:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 29 23:57:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 29 23:57:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 12:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brown2611 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-23 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 07:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 00:00:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 00:00:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 12:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brown2611 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-23 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 07:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 00:00:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 00:00:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887453 ] Crash when training on messages Message-ID: Bugs item #887453, was opened at 2004-01-30 17:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crash when training on messages Initial Comment: I've been running into the following error for a day or two now on different messages. While I haven't narrowed it down to a particular message yet, the modules and line numbers appear to be the same each time. Stopping and restarting spambayes several times seems to get the offending message to get out of the way somehow.. Will try to narrow it down a bit more over the weekend if it doesn't ring a familiar bell by then.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-30 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't recall seeing this before, but it looks like it's either a problem with a particular token, or that something is wrong with the database. You could try examining which key is giving problems. If you add "print word" before line 259 of storage.py, that will print out the tokens looked up, and the last one before the crash will be the problem one (if it's always the same, otherwise that's probably not the problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 00:00:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 00:01:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 13:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brown2611 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 Is this related to report #793830? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-20 19:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 I am running Outlook 2000. When I start Outlook (OL), if I have received spam since I last used OL, it always leaves one spam in my inbox. I have preview pane enabled, so this looks like the same defect, just a different OL version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 14:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 02:27:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 02:27:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 19:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sdx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 06:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 Is this related to report #793830? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-21 01:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 I am running Outlook 2000. When I start Outlook (OL), if I have received spam since I last used OL, it always leaves one spam in my inbox. I have preview pane enabled, so this looks like the same defect, just a different OL version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 02:27:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 02:27:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 19:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sdx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 06:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 Is this related to report #793830? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-21 01:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 I am running Outlook 2000. When I start Outlook (OL), if I have received spam since I last used OL, it always leaves one spam in my inbox. I have preview pane enabled, so this looks like the same defect, just a different OL version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 02:28:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 02:28:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 19:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sdx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 06:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 Is this related to report #793830? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-21 01:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 I am running Outlook 2000. When I start Outlook (OL), if I have received spam since I last used OL, it always leaves one spam in my inbox. I have preview pane enabled, so this looks like the same defect, just a different OL version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 02:29:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 02:29:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-13 19:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sdx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 (There seems to be a bug in sourceforge.net regarding that it claims that one must log-in, but one is already logged in and the comment is posted anyway) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 06:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 Is this related to report #793830? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-21 01:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 I am running Outlook 2000. When I start Outlook (OL), if I have received spam since I last used OL, it always leaves one spam in my inbox. I have preview pane enabled, so this looks like the same defect, just a different OL version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-13 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 09:16:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 09:16:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887453 ] Crash when training on messages Message-ID: Bugs item #887453, was opened at 2004-01-29 23:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fsolensky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crash when training on messages Initial Comment: I've been running into the following error for a day or two now on different messages. While I haven't narrowed it down to a particular message yet, the modules and line numbers appear to be the same each time. Stopping and restarting spambayes several times seems to get the offending message to get out of the way somehow.. Will try to narrow it down a bit more over the weekend if it doesn't ring a familiar bell by then.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Date: 2004-01-30 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=205922 Here's the last one displayed and a stack trace that went to that window. The web interface shows the same trace as before. --------------------------------- wordinfoget: word= subject:Korean Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/spambayes-1.0a7/scripts/sb_server.py", line 442, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 260, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-30 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't recall seeing this before, but it looks like it's either a problem with a particular token, or that something is wrong with the database. You could try examining which key is giving problems. If you add "print word" before line 259 of storage.py, that will print out the tokens looked up, and the last one before the crash will be the problem one (if it's always the same, otherwise that's probably not the problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 10:14:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 10:14:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887202 ] DLL does not register Message-ID: Bugs item #887202, was opened at 2004-01-29 14:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ellythek You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Elly Kaufman (ellythek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: DLL does not register Initial Comment: My spambayes stopped working this afternoon. The com object (DLL) does not show up. I tried reinstalling and registering (regsvr32) with no luck. I can't even get the configuration wizard to work. When uninstalling registry entries must still exist because after the uninstall and install same values appear in the training tab. I went through all the trouble shooting tips and checked the FAQ. Can't seem to figure it out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Elly Kaufman (ellythek) Date: 2004-01-30 10:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963406 Based upon the email received on a solution, I uninstalled spambayes, deleted the spambayes folder in the application data directory, cleaned up all other files I could find and removed the junk folders and toolbar from outlook. I then reinstalled from the beginning and everyhting works now. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-29 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It is a known issue with the 0.81 version that the plugin will not show up in Outlook's COM Add-Ins dialog. If Outlook has detected a problem with the plugin then you may find it under Help / About Microsoft Outlook / Disabled Items. The uninstall does not remove the data files from your Application Data directory under Documents and Settings. This is to avoid deleting all of your training data in case you want to reinstall. If you want to force SpamBayes to configure from scratch then delete all the files under Application Data\SpamBayes. The Configuration Wizard presents a simplified view of configuration, but does not configure anything that can't be reconfigured manually through the SpamBayes Manager dialog. Before starting over from scratch, you might try going to the Filtering tab and reselecting your Spam and Unsure folders using the Browse buttons. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 19:18:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 19:18:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887453 ] Crash when training on messages Message-ID: Bugs item #887453, was opened at 2004-01-29 23:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fsolensky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crash when training on messages Initial Comment: I've been running into the following error for a day or two now on different messages. While I haven't narrowed it down to a particular message yet, the modules and line numbers appear to be the same each time. Stopping and restarting spambayes several times seems to get the offending message to get out of the way somehow.. Will try to narrow it down a bit more over the weekend if it doesn't ring a familiar bell by then.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Date: 2004-01-30 19:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=205922 Update: it doesn't appear to be limited to a particular word. I've been marking all messages as 'defer' and admitting a few at a time to see exactly when the crashes occur. The last word displayed has been different each time ("dithered", "ux-50,", "url:draft-ietf-avt-uncomp-video-05"). I'm not sure, but I think that the message that triggers the error may disappear once I've restarted the daemon as well.. If it's the db, are there any tools to look for errors? Or do I have to reinstall and retrain? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Date: 2004-01-30 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=205922 Here's the last one displayed and a stack trace that went to that window. The web interface shows the same trace as before. --------------------------------- wordinfoget: word= subject:Korean Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/spambayes-1.0a7/scripts/sb_server.py", line 442, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 260, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-30 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't recall seeing this before, but it looks like it's either a problem with a particular token, or that something is wrong with the database. You could try examining which key is giving problems. If you add "print word" before line 259 of storage.py, that will print out the tokens looked up, and the last one before the crash will be the problem one (if it's always the same, otherwise that's probably not the problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 30 21:44:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 30 21:44:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-887984 ] Remove "Save and Shutdown" button when running as service Message-ID: Feature Requests item #887984, was opened at 2004-01-31 15:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=887984&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Remove "Save and Shutdown" button when running as service Initial Comment: Robert Neuschul on spambayes@python.org: """ I have a /small/ query/comment about the web UI and functionality when it's used in conjunction with the pop3proxy_service.py on a Windows Server: there's a "Save & Shutdown" button on most pages. If one does use it then the service stops. This button therefore seems to me to be doing something slightly illogical in this context - in most instances when running as a service one does NOT want to shutdown after saving any changes or after training etc - that's the whole point of running as a service. This button seems to be of more use when SpamBayes is working in pure application mode - perhaps on a workstation or personal PC - rather than as a service on a server. """ This makes sense to me. Robert makes various suggestions, but it seems to me that the most sensible option is to simply remove the button if we are running as a service (all the saving is done elsewhere, anyway, so it's really just doing a shutdown). Of course, we need to therefore detect that we are running as a service, which I'm pretty sure we don't have any way of doing at the moment. Something that would be good to fix at some point, anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=887984&group_id=61702 From gisli.ottarsson at mscsoftware.com Tue Jan 6 04:49:40 2004 From: gisli.ottarsson at mscsoftware.com (Gisli Ottarsson) Date: Sat Feb 7 20:23:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] uncaptured python exception ... object has no attribute 'isClosed' Message-ID: <1073382339.13629.53.camel@mjolnir> I have fetchmail sucking e-mail through a spambayes pop3 proxy. I am using spambayes-1.0a7 and have tried both python 2.2 and 2.3. The computer is running Debian unstable. This is working very well, except about once every 24 hours spambayes quits with this message: error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.BayesProxyListener listening :1110 at 0x83620d4> (exceptions.IOError:[Errno 5] Input/output error [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|100] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|391] [/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|280] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|__init__|341] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|__init__|183] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|__init__|142]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.BayesProxy connected 127.0.0.1:42864 at 0x841acac> (exceptions.AttributeError:'_socket.socket' object has no attribute 'isClosed' [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|113] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_write_event|404] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|handle_write|146] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|initiate_send|208] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|refill_buffer|189] [/usr/bin/sb_server.py|close|372] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|__getattr__|372]) Unfortunately I am not smart enough to decypher this. I believe I understand the situation with fetchmail doing "TOP x 99999999" and the need for fetchall. I think I am correctly instructing fetchmail to fetchall. Is there a way in which I can be sure whether the fetchall option has kicked in? Furthermore, note that I am using the default nokeep behavior in fetchmail, whereby messages are deleted from the server. When spambayes is running, this seems to work as expected. Apart from the once-a-day-or-so failure rate, I have not seen any pattern. I have wondered whether the failures might be related to one of the following reasons: 1) The remote pop3 server is periodically unreachable, often for several minutes. Could this cause spambayes to fail? 2) It is not clear to me what happens if fetchmail has a polling interval which is too short. Could it be that fetchmail is kicking off a new session *before* the previous session has completed? Thanks for any clues. Gisli