From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 1 05:27:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 1 05:27:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-888501 ] Inconsistent Options for utility programs Message-ID: Bugs item #888501, was opened at 2004-02-01 10:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=888501&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inconsistent Options for utility programs Initial Comment: There's some inconsistency between utility programs. To run sb_mboxtrain.py with a BSD db called hammie.db I have to run: `sb_mboxtrain.py ... -d hammie.db` But to run sb_dbexpimp.py with a BSD db called hammie.db I have to run: `sb_dbexpimp.py ... -D hammie.db` It would be a neat enhancement if all the utility scripts had consistent command line options. (I'm running Spambayes on SuSE Linux 8.2.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=888501&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 2 00:11:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 2 00:11:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802655 ] import/export of probability databases Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802655, was opened at 2003-09-09 06:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Prescott (rprescott) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: import/export of probability databases Initial Comment: It would be nice to have the capability to import and export probability databases. This would allow you to be able to synchronize your work email filter and home, for instance. Taken one step further, automagic periodic updates could be made between one's clients using public key crypto, digital signature, and hash for automatic authentication and synchronization of database transmissions... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-02 18:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No answer, can't be wanted all that much. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 12:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The FAQ only talks about copying the databases across, not importing and exporting. To do this, use the dbExpImp.py script in the 1.0a5 (source) release. This can convert your database to a plain text file (and back). You could use this to merge two databases. Re: the automagic - would this really be worth the effort needed to implement it? both databases should be able to learn independently, and fairly quickly, without having to resort to this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You can export/import already... http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#can-i-share-move-my-training-data-from-one-computer-to-another Sorry, no automagic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 2 00:30:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 2 00:30:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-888501 ] Inconsistent Options for utility programs Message-ID: Bugs item #888501, was opened at 2004-02-01 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=888501&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inconsistent Options for utility programs Initial Comment: There's some inconsistency between utility programs. To run sb_mboxtrain.py with a BSD db called hammie.db I have to run: `sb_mboxtrain.py ... -d hammie.db` But to run sb_dbexpimp.py with a BSD db called hammie.db I have to run: `sb_dbexpimp.py ... -D hammie.db` It would be a neat enhancement if all the utility scripts had consistent command line options. (I'm running Spambayes on SuSE Linux 8.2.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-02 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 824628 ] sb_dbexpimp.py, sb_filter.py option incompatibility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=888501&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 2 00:30:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 2 00:30:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884545 ] off-by-one ? Message-ID: Bugs item #884545, was opened at 2004-01-26 04:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bippo312 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: off-by-one ? Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Whenever I train spambayes, I always (later, when classifying) get the error that I have more spam than total mails. I normally just do sb_dbexport -e -D hammie.db -f out.txt In out.txt, the top line will say that there are 202 ham and 3342 spam... searching through the file I find the line header%3ATo%3A1`170`3343` (this is the only line in the db where the # spams is larger than the total # of spams) I correct this line, and re-import the database. It now works fine. Every time I train spambayes this 'header- to' line will always be one higher than the total # of spams. (If I train twice, the number of spams for header-to will be 2 larger than the max # of spams... etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2004-02-02 05:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 The 200 hams have accumulated over 2 years, the 3000+ spams are from the last 4 months :) Yes, I am only using imapfilter. I emptied my spam folder except for 1 untrained spam before training. (I originally had 3590 spams, but WinXP only allows 9999 lines of scrollback, when about 30k lines were needed... and appending '>> out.txt' didn't do anything useful) Just before training: Nothing new in ham folder, 1 new spam in spam folder. During training: See file. Originally I had 3590 spam. The total # of spam recorded in my database was 3590 and I had set the # of spam in the header-to entry to 3590 as well. After the training: The total # of spam in the database was still 3590 (should have been 3591??) and the # of header-to spam was listed as 3591... (correct, I think) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 00:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. That's quite an imbalance - you'd probably get better results with more even numbers of ham and spam. What are you using to train spambayes? just imapfilter? Could you attach the output from running imapfilter with the - i4 switch? (blank out the username/password stuff). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 2 11:03:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 2 11:03:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-889150 ] Hide Toolbar Button Text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #889150, was opened at 2004-02-02 11:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=889150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe D'Andrea (jdandrea) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide Toolbar Button Text Initial Comment: To help conserve space, offer an option to hide toolbar button text from view (e.g., Recover from Spam). In conjunction, ensure each button has an identifying image (e.g., SpamBayes). Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=889150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 2 17:08:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 2 17:09:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-889150 ] Hide Toolbar Button Text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #889150, was opened at 2004-02-03 05:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=889150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe D'Andrea (jdandrea) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide Toolbar Button Text Initial Comment: To help conserve space, offer an option to hide toolbar button text from view (e.g., Recover from Spam). In conjunction, ensure each button has an identifying image (e.g., SpamBayes). Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-03 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook lets you do this with any buttons on the toolbar, except those that drop down a menu (IIRC). The Outlook Help explains how, but basically you open up the configure dialog, click the button, right click on it, and change away. Not the most intuative way of doing things, but not our decision! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=889150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 2 21:09:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 2 21:09:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-889150 ] Hide Toolbar Button Text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #889150, was opened at 2004-02-02 11:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jdandrea You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=889150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe D'Andrea (jdandrea) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide Toolbar Button Text Initial Comment: To help conserve space, offer an option to hide toolbar button text from view (e.g., Recover from Spam). In conjunction, ensure each button has an identifying image (e.g., SpamBayes). Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Joe D'Andrea (jdandrea) Date: 2004-02-02 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=420680 Arrrgh, and to think I had looked for that in Outlook. My bad then. Thank you for the reality check! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-02 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook lets you do this with any buttons on the toolbar, except those that drop down a menu (IIRC). The Outlook Help explains how, but basically you open up the configure dialog, click the button, right click on it, and change away. Not the most intuative way of doing things, but not our decision! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=889150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 3 21:02:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 3 21:03:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] error initializing the SpamBayes addin Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-21 13:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pdarragh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing the SpamBayes addin Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Darragh (pdarragh) Date: 2004-02-03 18:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=967576 I am using Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. (Clean install of Windows XP ... i.e. started with FORMAT). I have installed all of the patches for Windows and Office. I am getting the exact same error message. I've compared the spambase1.log file here with the one I have on my system and they are identical (with the execption of the username in the paths). I've ignored the error message and manually configured Spambyaes but without any real luck. Un-installed and re- installed a number of times. Again, no luck. My environment: Windows XP; Office Pro 2003; Corel Office 8; Delphi 5; Java 2 Runtime v1.4.2_03; McAfee 7.1.0; .NET Framework 1.1 Any pointers on getting this to work would be great. Thansk for your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-26 23:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 4 11:17:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 4 11:17:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890531 ] Changed attachments PR_RECORD_KEY Message-ID: Bugs item #890531, was opened at 2004-02-04 17:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890531&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wilfried Pohl (wilfried_pohl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Changed attachments PR_RECORD_KEY Initial Comment: The add-in changes the PR_RECORD_KEY propertiy of the attachments. That confuses other add-ins. Also the add-in sets all MAPI properties of an email (to an unchanged value) and not only adding the userproperties Spam/PT_DOUBLE SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID/PT_BINARY SpamBayesOriginalFolderID/PT_BINARY That causes a of lot unnecessary traffic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890531&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 4 11:20:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 4 11:38:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-886825 ] No log file is created Message-ID: Bugs item #886825, was opened at 2004-01-29 09:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by amirkatz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886825&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: No log file is created Initial Comment: Env. is Windows 2000 Pro with Outlook 2000. Under folder "C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\SpamBayes" I don't see any log files. I see these 4 files: default_bayes_customize.ini default_bayes_database.db default_message_database.db MS Exchange Settings.ini And as already listed in a different bug, SpamBayes does not appear in the COM add-in list. However, the filter seems to work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-29 14:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This is not the correct location to look for the log files. Log files are located in "\Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp". The Troubleshooting Guide describes this (SpamBayes / Help / Troubleshooting Guide). Please check the correct directory and report back whether or not the log files are there. I'm assuming that you are running from the binary plugin. Just in case you are not, please note that log files are not created when running directly from source code. When running from source, all log output is sent to the trace collector where it can be monitored in real time from the Pythonwin IDE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=886825&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 4 13:58:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 4 13:58:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890645 ] imapfilter: "ValueError: year out of range" Message-ID: Bugs item #890645, was opened at 2004-02-04 13:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Webb Scales (webbnh) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter: "ValueError: year out of range" Initial Comment: I'm running on a Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.0A system, using Python 2.3.3, talking to a Cyrus IMAP4 v1.5.19 server. I've got the following options set: [Tokenizer] mine_received_headers:True replace_nonascii_chars:True summarize_email_prefixes:True summarize_email_suffixes:True I got the traceback below after about 5.5 hours of continuous training. (I've been waiting a long time for this filter, so I've got a corpus of 5K spam messages and another gigabyte or so of ham.... ;-) My spam corpus includes a number of messages with "bad" dates -- I presume it's one of these which is triggering the problem -- but I would hope that the filter could cope with that. (That is, since I have examples of real messages with this "feature", it's likely that the classifier will have to cope with them in the future! :-) Thanks, Webb ------------ /usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 646, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 401, in Save msg_time = self.extractTime() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 332, in extractTime return Time2Internaldate(time.mktime(parsed_date)) ValueError: year out of range ------- Examples from some "bad" mail headers: Date: Mon, 06 May 0102 10:51:16 -0100 Date: Sat, 08 Jun 0102 19:44:54 -0700 Date: 16 Mar 80 8:16:44 AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 4 14:08:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 4 14:08:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890645 ] imapfilter: Message-ID: Bugs item #890645, was opened at 2004-02-04 13:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by webbnh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Webb Scales (webbnh) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: imapfilter: Initial Comment: I'm running on a Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.0A system, using Python 2.3.3, talking to a Cyrus IMAP4 v1.5.19 server. I've got the following options set: [Tokenizer] mine_received_headers:True replace_nonascii_chars:True summarize_email_prefixes:True summarize_email_suffixes:True I got the traceback below after about 5.5 hours of continuous training. (I've been waiting a long time for this filter, so I've got a corpus of 5K spam messages and another gigabyte or so of ham.... ;-) My spam corpus includes a number of messages with "bad" dates -- I presume it's one of these which is triggering the problem -- but I would hope that the filter could cope with that. (That is, since I have examples of real messages with this "feature", it's likely that the classifier will have to cope with them in the future! :-) Thanks, Webb ------------ /usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 646, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 401, in Save msg_time = self.extractTime() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 332, in extractTime return Time2Internaldate(time.mktime(parsed_date)) ValueError: year out of range ------- Examples from some "bad" mail headers: Date: Mon, 06 May 0102 10:51:16 -0100 Date: Sat, 08 Jun 0102 19:44:54 -0700 Date: 16 Mar 80 8:16:44 AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Webb Scales (webbnh) Date: 2004-02-04 14:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=968108 Here's a mail message which causes the problem. ----8<---- Return-Path: Received: from mailhub2.tay.cpqcorp.net by sears.zko.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-0127PM) id GAA0000008712; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:16:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by mailhub2.tay.cpqcorp.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/PS1.14) with ESMTP id g46AGk85162132 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:16:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net [161.114.8.205]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBDE10AD for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 03:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Yahoo.com (unknown [194.185.98.4]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA8585BC for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 05:16:19 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: Message-ID: <003b57d68b1b57a4b7ca73be7@bsjogq> To: !!!!!!!!!@Quotes.compaq.com Subject: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. Date: Mon, 06 May 0102 10:51:16 -0100 MiME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 Importance: Normal Lowest Life Insurance Quotes
Get a FREE Life Insurance quote from top companies nationwide!
Do you have the best policy that will provide for your family's future?

Compare your coverage, without the hassle!

How does your monthly premium stack up against these
rates from the nation's top insurance companies?

? 0,000 0,000 ,000,000
Age Male Female Male Female Male Female
30
40
50 7
60 4 9 1


You can't predict the future, but you can prepare for it.
Get the best rates and Save up to 70%!

It's fast, easy, and best of all... FREE. Fill out the simple form, and you'll have
quotes from the nation's top insurance companies. Choose the one you like
and request a free application. You'll be done in less than a minute!

CLICK HERE NOW AND SAVE!


? Copyright 2002 Life Insurance Quotes of America. All rights reserved.
Please know that we do not want to send you information regarding our special offers if you do not wish to receive it. If you would no longer like us to contact you or feel that you have received this email in error, please click here to unsubscribe.
7836CpQj9-810yl13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 4 14:54:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 4 14:54:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890691 ] Invalid message causes exception from email package Message-ID: Bugs item #890691, was opened at 2004-02-04 19:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890691&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Invalid message causes exception from email package Initial Comment: This report was posted to spambayes-dev by Atom 'Smasher' . I've attached the traceback and the message that causes email.message_from_file() to choke. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890691&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 4 15:22:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 4 15:22:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890645 ] imapfilter: Message-ID: Bugs item #890645, was opened at 2004-02-04 13:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Webb Scales (webbnh) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter: Initial Comment: I'm running on a Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.0A system, using Python 2.3.3, talking to a Cyrus IMAP4 v1.5.19 server. I've got the following options set: [Tokenizer] mine_received_headers:True replace_nonascii_chars:True summarize_email_prefixes:True summarize_email_suffixes:True I got the traceback below after about 5.5 hours of continuous training. (I've been waiting a long time for this filter, so I've got a corpus of 5K spam messages and another gigabyte or so of ham.... ;-) My spam corpus includes a number of messages with "bad" dates -- I presume it's one of these which is triggering the problem -- but I would hope that the filter could cope with that. (That is, since I have examples of real messages with this "feature", it's likely that the classifier will have to cope with them in the future! :-) Thanks, Webb ------------ /usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 646, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 401, in Save msg_time = self.extractTime() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 332, in extractTime return Time2Internaldate(time.mktime(parsed_date)) ValueError: year out of range ------- Examples from some "bad" mail headers: Date: Mon, 06 May 0102 10:51:16 -0100 Date: Sat, 08 Jun 0102 19:44:54 -0700 Date: 16 Mar 80 8:16:44 AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-02-04 15:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Just noting that the system works best if you train on an approximately equal # of ham and spam. So if you have 5K spam, train on about 5K ham too. For most email mixes, that should be more than enough training to get excellent results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Webb Scales (webbnh) Date: 2004-02-04 14:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=968108 Here's a mail message which causes the problem. ----8<---- Return-Path: Received: from mailhub2.tay.cpqcorp.net by sears.zko.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-0127PM) id GAA0000008712; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:16:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by mailhub2.tay.cpqcorp.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/PS1.14) with ESMTP id g46AGk85162132 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:16:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net [161.114.8.205]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBDE10AD for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 03:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Yahoo.com (unknown [194.185.98.4]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA8585BC for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 05:16:19 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: Message-ID: <003b57d68b1b57a4b7ca73be7@bsjogq> To: !!!!!!!!!@Quotes.compaq.com Subject: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. Date: Mon, 06 May 0102 10:51:16 -0100 MiME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 Importance: Normal Lowest Life Insurance Quotes

Get a FREE Life Insurance quote from top companies nationwide!
Do you have the best policy that will provide for your family's future?

Compare your coverage, without the hassle!

How does your monthly premium stack up against these
rates from the nation's top insurance companies?

? 0,000 0,000 ,000,000
Age Male Female Male Female Male Female
30
40
50 7
60 4 9 1


You can't predict the future, but you can prepare for it.
Get the best rates and Save up to 70%!

It's fast, easy, and best of all... FREE. Fill out the simple form, and you'll have
quotes from the nation's top insurance companies. Choose the one you like
and request a free application. You'll be done in less than a minute!

CLICK HERE NOW AND SAVE!


? Copyright 2002 Life Insurance Quotes of America. All rights reserved.
Please know that we do not want to send you information regarding our special offers if you do not wish to receive it. If you would no longer like us to contact you or feel that you have received this email in error, please click here to unsubscribe.
7836CpQj9-810yl13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 5 03:10:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 5 03:10:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-890645 ] imapfilter: Message-ID: Bugs item #890645, was opened at 2004-02-05 07:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Webb Scales (webbnh) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter: Initial Comment: I'm running on a Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.0A system, using Python 2.3.3, talking to a Cyrus IMAP4 v1.5.19 server. I've got the following options set: [Tokenizer] mine_received_headers:True replace_nonascii_chars:True summarize_email_prefixes:True summarize_email_suffixes:True I got the traceback below after about 5.5 hours of continuous training. (I've been waiting a long time for this filter, so I've got a corpus of 5K spam messages and another gigabyte or so of ham.... ;-) My spam corpus includes a number of messages with "bad" dates -- I presume it's one of these which is triggering the problem -- but I would hope that the filter could cope with that. (That is, since I have examples of real messages with this "feature", it's likely that the classifier will have to cope with them in the future! :-) Thanks, Webb ------------ /usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t -p SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Train() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 646, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 558, in Train for msg in self: File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 485, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 534, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 401, in Save msg_time = self.extractTime() File "/usr/procmailrcs/scales/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 332, in extractTime return Time2Internaldate(time.mktime(parsed_date)) ValueError: year out of range ------- Examples from some "bad" mail headers: Date: Mon, 06 May 0102 10:51:16 -0100 Date: Sat, 08 Jun 0102 19:44:54 -0700 Date: 16 Mar 80 8:16:44 AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't know why you're getting mail from ~1800 years ago, but maybe you have odd friends . Anyway, this is fixed now, and will squeak into the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-02-05 09:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Just noting that the system works best if you train on an approximately equal # of ham and spam. So if you have 5K spam, train on about 5K ham too. For most email mixes, that should be more than enough training to get excellent results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Webb Scales (webbnh) Date: 2004-02-05 08:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=968108 Here's a mail message which causes the problem. ----8<---- Return-Path: Received: from mailhub2.tay.cpqcorp.net by sears.zko.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.10.5/07Nov97-0127PM) id GAA0000008712; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:16:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Received: from mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net [16.47.132.152]) by mailhub2.tay.cpqcorp.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/PS1.14) with ESMTP id g46AGk85162132 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:16:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (ztxmail01.nz-cce.cpqcorp.net [161.114.8.205]) by mailrelay01.cac.cpqcorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBDE10AD for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 03:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Yahoo.com (unknown [194.185.98.4]) by ztxmail01.ztx.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA8585BC for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 05:16:19 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: Message-ID: <003b57d68b1b57a4b7ca73be7@bsjogq> To: !!!!!!!!!@Quotes.compaq.com Subject: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. Date: Mon, 06 May 0102 10:51:16 -0100 MiME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 Importance: Normal Lowest Life Insurance Quotes

Get a FREE Life Insurance quote from top companies nationwide!
Do you have the best policy that will provide for your family's future?

Compare your coverage, without the hassle!

How does your monthly premium stack up against these
rates from the nation's top insurance companies?

? 0,000 0,000 ,000,000
Age Male Female Male Female Male Female
30
40
50 7
60 4 9 1


You can't predict the future, but you can prepare for it.
Get the best rates and Save up to 70%!

It's fast, easy, and best of all... FREE. Fill out the simple form, and you'll have
quotes from the nation's top insurance companies. Choose the one you like
and request a free application. You'll be done in less than a minute!

CLICK HERE NOW AND SAVE!


? Copyright 2002 Life Insurance Quotes of America. All rights reserved.
Please know that we do not want to send you information regarding our special offers if you do not wish to receive it. If you would no longer like us to contact you or feel that you have received this email in error, please click here to unsubscribe.
7836CpQj9-810yl13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=890645&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 5 03:11:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 5 03:12:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824628 ] sb_dbexpimp.py, sb_filter.py option incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #824628, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824628&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py, sb_filter.py option incompatibility Initial Comment: Look at this: sb_dbexpimp.py --help [...] -d: FN : name of pickled database file to use -D: FN : name of dbm database file to use sb_filter.py --help [...] -d DBFILE use database in DBFILE -D PICKLEFILE use pickle (instead of database) in PICKLEFILE This inconsistency is functional, not only in the documentation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed (we dumped the freeze :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As noted on the spambayes list, this can't be changed for the 1.0 releases, because we have frozen those so that we don't break people's configuration. See also a discussion of this on spambayes-dev a few months back (started by Greg Ward, IIRC). The consensus was, I think, to use "-p filename" for pickles and "-d filename" for dbm. This was before we had other classifier types (ie. SQL), though. Overall, we recommend that users use the config file to set the storage method, not the command line. Leaving open, as this does need to be resolved at some point (for 1.1a1, perhaps). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824628&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 5 03:43:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 5 03:43:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-861656 ] Missing file for patch Message-ID: Patches item #861656, was opened at 2003-12-18 02:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=861656&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Missing file for patch Initial Comment: The patch was missing for the submitted patch # 857937. Since I'm not able to attach it to the above patch I'm creating a new submitted patch. Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There's nothing here, but the patch is now closed anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=861656&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 5 03:44:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 5 03:44:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-857595 ] Same argument on the command line Message-ID: Patches item #857595, was opened at 2003-12-11 03:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857595&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Same argument on the command line Initial Comment: Hi, This is two patchs. Most of the script use -D for pickle but sb_imapfilter.py did not. So now it uses the same command argument to specify a pickle. Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, although not quite the same way, and using -p and -d. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857595&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 5 03:44:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 5 03:44:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-857597 ] On command line use -D for pickle Message-ID: Patches item #857597, was opened at 2003-12-11 03:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857597&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: On command line use -D for pickle Initial Comment: Hi, This is two patchs. Most of the script use -D for pickle but sb_dbexpimp.py did not. So now it uses the same command argument to specify a pickle. Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, although not quite in the same way, using -p and -d. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857597&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 5 03:45:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 5 03:45:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-859339 ] Add sqlite support for the dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Patches item #859339, was opened at 2003-12-13 17:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=859339&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vladimir Ulogov (vulogov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add sqlite support for the dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In addition to the BerkleyDB, I'd like to use sqlite as well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that you can use mysql or postgresql. Are either of those good enough? If not, then you could maybe write your own SQLiteClassifier class, based on the other SQL ones in storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=859339&group_id=61702 From bruce at artsalliance.co.uk Fri Feb 6 05:58:20 2004 From: bruce at artsalliance.co.uk (Bruce Leigh) Date: Fri Feb 6 06:03:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] parse error - undefined boundary - in sb_imapfilter.py Message-ID: <0AA408F4E902C84C8F6BE093CCE9D7A808D3F2@server1.artsalliance.co.uk> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: problem.zip Type: application/octet-stream Size: 120 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20040206/976f3ba4/problem.obj From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 6 13:22:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 6 13:22:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-891990 ] Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #891990, was opened at 2004-02-06 19:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Initial Comment: For some Spam I have received recently, read- confirmation messages have been sent automatically. I have doublechecked the Email-Configuration in Outlook and it was definitely set to "never send a read confirmation for internet mail". Nevertheless, it did. I only noticed because the confirmations came back due to an unknown adress. All the messages have been classified as Spam by Spambayes and where therefore moved directly to the Junk Mail folder, where they were never opened by me. It looks like the read-confirmation was generated during classification of the mails or while they where moved to the junk folder. But why was the confirmation sent at all, when this function is disabled in Outlook? Im using a popmail account, Outlook 2002, Win XP. It's a bit of horror to know that these things are sent in the background without me knowing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 6 14:28:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 6 14:28:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-891990 ] Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #891990, was opened at 2004-02-06 19:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by thilok You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Initial Comment: For some Spam I have received recently, read- confirmation messages have been sent automatically. I have doublechecked the Email-Configuration in Outlook and it was definitely set to "never send a read confirmation for internet mail". Nevertheless, it did. I only noticed because the confirmations came back due to an unknown adress. All the messages have been classified as Spam by Spambayes and where therefore moved directly to the Junk Mail folder, where they were never opened by me. It looks like the read-confirmation was generated during classification of the mails or while they where moved to the junk folder. But why was the confirmation sent at all, when this function is disabled in Outlook? Im using a popmail account, Outlook 2002, Win XP. It's a bit of horror to know that these things are sent in the background without me knowing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Date: 2004-02-06 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=969651 The header of the messages have a "Disposition-Notification- To:" field instead of "Return-Receipt-To:" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 7 17:51:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 7 17:51:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-892634 ] Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Message-ID: Bugs item #892634, was opened at 2004-02-07 16:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Stanley (dbstanley) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Initial Comment: Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) Windows XP Pro, all updates installed SpamBayes Outlook plugin v0.81 The SpamBayes plugin seems to score and automatically filter only messages in one PST file, if multiple PST files are used with Outlook. My main PST files ("Personal Folders") has only the standard folders (Inbox, Outbox, Sent Items, Junk E-Mail, Junk Suspects, Drafts, Deleted Items). I have another PST file (okay, actually I have 3 more) with several folders. I have Outlook rules set up to move messages into a few of these folders "after they arrive." I have set up SpamBayes to filter 3 of these folders (in the 2nd PST), as well as the Inbox folder in the main PST file. Although messages that end up in my Inbox folder are being scored and automatically filtered, messages in the second PST files are not. The "Spam" field shows nothing (blank) for messages in filtered folders in the second PST file. However, the "Show Spam clues for current message" option shows high scores (100% in some cases) for Spam messages in these folders. If I force filter-these messages using the "Filter Messages..." option, the Spam messages are filtered and moved to the Junk E- mail folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 7 20:21:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 7 20:21:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-892634 ] Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Message-ID: Bugs item #892634, was opened at 2004-02-08 11:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Stanley (dbstanley) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Initial Comment: Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) Windows XP Pro, all updates installed SpamBayes Outlook plugin v0.81 The SpamBayes plugin seems to score and automatically filter only messages in one PST file, if multiple PST files are used with Outlook. My main PST files ("Personal Folders") has only the standard folders (Inbox, Outbox, Sent Items, Junk E-Mail, Junk Suspects, Drafts, Deleted Items). I have another PST file (okay, actually I have 3 more) with several folders. I have Outlook rules set up to move messages into a few of these folders "after they arrive." I have set up SpamBayes to filter 3 of these folders (in the 2nd PST), as well as the Inbox folder in the main PST file. Although messages that end up in my Inbox folder are being scored and automatically filtered, messages in the second PST files are not. The "Spam" field shows nothing (blank) for messages in filtered folders in the second PST file. However, the "Show Spam clues for current message" option shows high scores (100% in some cases) for Spam messages in these folders. If I force filter-these messages using the "Filter Messages..." option, the Spam messages are filtered and moved to the Junk E- mail folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-08 14:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please attach a log file that covers a period where mail arrives in a folder that should be filtered, but isn't? The plug-in will find the latest log for you via the "Diagnostics" button on the Advanced tab of the Manager, or the FAQ and troubleshooting guide explain where to find it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 From mhammond at keypoint.com.au Sat Feb 7 20:41:39 2004 From: mhammond at keypoint.com.au (Mark Hammond) Date: Sat Feb 7 20:41:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] test2 Message-ID: <001001c3ede4$b2738f30$0200a8c0@eden> From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 8 16:02:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 8 16:02:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-893036 ] Installed but quits after 1 cycle Message-ID: Support Requests item #893036, was opened at 2004-02-08 16:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=893036&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: allen hutton (ahutton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installed but quits after 1 cycle Initial Comment: I use Goldmine contact manager which takes in email via pop3. I got spambayes all configured and can get a group of messages into the Goldmine program with Ham in the subject line. all this is fine but then when I retreive mail again all the pop3 activity on my XP pro unit is stopped. I get no server found for email thru Spambayes and thru my other setups. Logging off does not help but a full reboot does. I can again start spambayes retreive a few messages and then all email gets hung. If no mail is present it does not lock when I retrive an email "Subject : ham,[Norton AntiSpam] test" its Ok as soon as I've retrieved an email and go back to check it sits and sits "connected to localhost" and times out without retreiving.. after a few minutes it gives up. at this point outlook will not work either. it seems liek a port is in limbo!!! it also will not send email at this point either ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=893036&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 9 07:34:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 9 07:34:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-893357 ] Invalid window handle on recieve folder Message-ID: Bugs item #893357, was opened at 2004-02-09 13:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=893357&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rastislav Wartiak (felcer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Invalid window handle on recieve folder Initial Comment: In localized version of MS Exchange (Czech) are folder names renamed, including Inbox folder and contain national characters. This might cause this error. *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 310, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.processors", line 76, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 322, in OnClicked File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010a (MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED): OLE error 0x8004010a ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=893357&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 9 09:31:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 9 09:32:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 12:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brown2611 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-02-09 09:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I believe this is the same as bug #876281. As far as I can tell, having only started looking at Python and the SpamBayes Windows code yesterday, here is why this happens: 1. When SB starts, it (eventually) invokes BayesManager.EnsureOutlookFieldsForFolder() for each folder. This method finds the first MalItem in the specified folder and looks for the "Spam" UserProperty attached to that MailItem. If the MailItem does not have the "Spam" UserProperty, SB adds the UserProperty to the MailItem, causing the MailItem to have a Spam score of 0. 2. In trying to process missed messages, SB invokes MAPIMsgStoreFolder.GetNewUnscoredMessageGenerator(), which excludes any MailItem that already has the "Spam" UserProperty from processing. Voila. The item most recently received in a folder while SB was not running is automatically assigned a score of 0 and not filtered. Apparently, there isn't a clean way to detect if a folder has a particular user defined field. So, the only way to check for the presence of the user defined field in the folder is to check the items in the folder. SB (correctly) assumes that adding the UserProperty to the first MailItem will force the creation of the user defined field in the folder. However, this is not a benign act. Possible solutions: * Don't force the creation of the user defined field until SB has an actual score to store. However, I fear there may be a great number of places in the code that assume the Spam field already exists. For example, GetNewUnscoredMessageGenerator() certainly makes this assumption. The error resulting from the lack of the Spam field could be trapped, but I don't know the code well enough to find all the places where the absence of the field might be a problem. Nonetheless, this seems to be the correct solution to me. * EnsureOutlookFieldsForFolder() could check more than just the first MailItem in the folder. However, this doesn't avoid the problem if every message in the folder is a missed message. * If SB is going to force the creation of the Spam field, go ahead and filter the message. Aside from not being terribly clean, its not clear to me that enough of the code has been initialized by this point to filter a message. * If SB is going to force the creation of the Spam field, initialize it to a value that is easily detected as unscored, for example -1. However, I'm not confident that the code doesn't depend on 0 <= Spam <= 100. In addition, I don't know how many places in the code would have to be changed to recognize this value. * Change the minimum score to 0.0001, or the like, and detect a score of 0 as an unscored message. Kludgey and one would still have to find all of the places where something with a ham-like score (or any score) is excluded from further filtering (e.g., addin.ProcessMessage()). * Since OutlookAddin.ProcessMissedMessages() only _seems_ effectively to be invoked at startup, it could be modified to always process the first MailItem if the item is unread and has a score of exactly zero. Again, kludgey, but at least the kludge is confined to a single place. On the other hand, it looks to me like SB has already hooked into the folders it is watching at this point. if SB is filtering in the background, I suspect that any mail received before the "processing start delay" expires would bump the improperly flagged message out of the first position. Hmmm. * One could treat anything with a score of 0 as an unscored message, but it isn't really desirable to rescore all of those messages, since the majority of them have presumably already been filtered correctly. Any feedback from someone who actually knows the code? ---Jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-29 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-23 07:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 07:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 9 12:25:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 9 12:26:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 11:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rural_cdn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slappy (rural_cdn) Date: 2004-02-09 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=971814 I'd like to add, I had this same problem. I have 3 folders in my inbox, each folder representing a pop account. When I selected inbox in the background filtering, along with 'include subfolders' it would never work. I tried also selecting each folder individually within the inbox also, no go. They only way I could get filtering to work was to _not_ select the inbox, _but_ select each folder within. Voila, it works. I've also _not_ selected include subfolders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 13:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Looks like SpamBayes is moving a message to your Spam folder and then the Outlook rules are moving it back out again. See the section of your log quoted below. SpamBayes detects when a message is moved out of the spam folder back to a filtered folder and takes that as an indication that the message was misclassified, so it trains it as a good message. This is the line that has "Training on message '...' - trained as good". The "Moving and spam training message..." line after it then indicates where you clicked Delete as Spam on the message. For some reason, SpamBayes is getting to the message first even with background filtering on. What are your background filtering delay values set to? How many different e-mail accounts do you retreive from? Are any of them accessed over dial-up or other slow links? """ Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam """ Is there any chance that your background filtering is not actually enabled? The log line "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms" should instead say "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" if background filtering is enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 12:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 07:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 04:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 03:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 20:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 09:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 23:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 9 13:07:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 9 13:07:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-891990 ] Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #891990, was opened at 2004-02-06 19:22 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by thilok You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Initial Comment: For some Spam I have received recently, read- confirmation messages have been sent automatically. I have doublechecked the Email-Configuration in Outlook and it was definitely set to "never send a read confirmation for internet mail". Nevertheless, it did. I only noticed because the confirmations came back due to an unknown adress. All the messages have been classified as Spam by Spambayes and where therefore moved directly to the Junk Mail folder, where they were never opened by me. It looks like the read-confirmation was generated during classification of the mails or while they where moved to the junk folder. But why was the confirmation sent at all, when this function is disabled in Outlook? Im using a popmail account, Outlook 2002, Win XP. It's a bit of horror to know that these things are sent in the background without me knowing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Date: 2004-02-06 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=969651 The header of the messages have a "Disposition-Notification- To:" field instead of "Return-Receipt-To:" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 10 06:29:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 10 13:32:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 18:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rural_cdn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slappy (rural_cdn) Date: 2004-02-09 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=971814 I'd like to add, I had this same problem. I have 3 folders in my inbox, each folder representing a pop account. When I selected inbox in the background filtering, along with 'include subfolders' it would never work. I tried also selecting each folder individually within the inbox also, no go. They only way I could get filtering to work was to _not_ select the inbox, _but_ select each folder within. Voila, it works. I've also _not_ selected include subfolders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Looks like SpamBayes is moving a message to your Spam folder and then the Outlook rules are moving it back out again. See the section of your log quoted below. SpamBayes detects when a message is moved out of the spam folder back to a filtered folder and takes that as an indication that the message was misclassified, so it trains it as a good message. This is the line that has "Training on message '...' - trained as good". The "Moving and spam training message..." line after it then indicates where you clicked Delete as Spam on the message. For some reason, SpamBayes is getting to the message first even with background filtering on. What are your background filtering delay values set to? How many different e-mail accounts do you retreive from? Are any of them accessed over dial-up or other slow links? """ Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam """ Is there any chance that your background filtering is not actually enabled? The log line "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms" should instead say "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" if background filtering is enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 19:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 10:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-15 02:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-12 02:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 10 06:28:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 10 15:32:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 18:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rural_cdn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slappy (rural_cdn) Date: 2004-02-09 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=971814 I'd like to add, I had this same problem. I have 3 folders in my inbox, each folder representing a pop account. When I selected inbox in the background filtering, along with 'include subfolders' it would never work. I tried also selecting each folder individually within the inbox also, no go. They only way I could get filtering to work was to _not_ select the inbox, _but_ select each folder within. Voila, it works. I've also _not_ selected include subfolders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Looks like SpamBayes is moving a message to your Spam folder and then the Outlook rules are moving it back out again. See the section of your log quoted below. SpamBayes detects when a message is moved out of the spam folder back to a filtered folder and takes that as an indication that the message was misclassified, so it trains it as a good message. This is the line that has "Training on message '...' - trained as good". The "Moving and spam training message..." line after it then indicates where you clicked Delete as Spam on the message. For some reason, SpamBayes is getting to the message first even with background filtering on. What are your background filtering delay values set to? How many different e-mail accounts do you retreive from? Are any of them accessed over dial-up or other slow links? """ Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam """ Is there any chance that your background filtering is not actually enabled? The log line "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms" should instead say "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" if background filtering is enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 19:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 10:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-15 02:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-12 02:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 10 10:31:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 10 15:33:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by chrwei You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Weiss (chrwei) Date: 2004-02-10 09:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=42466 I have the old 0x8004201 regsvr32 error that's supposed to be fixed with 8.1 but isn't. I tried the shorter path too. Office 2000 SP3, NT4 SP6a, IE6 SP1 works fine on Win2k with the same Office version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nate S. (nschindler) Date: 2004-01-21 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810618 I have the same issue under NT4SP6a/Office2k Pro SP3/SpamBayes 8.1. NOTHING I've done helps, and I've tried a lot - All patches for Office/Windows were applied (windows/office update), ran regsrv32 from the command line (tried "/i:hkey_local_machine" as well), tried manually adding the dll as a COM Add-In, tried patching the computer in question with registry setitngs from a machine where the dll registered correctly, re-installed IE6SP1, etc. The spambayes install log reports: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in RegisterClasses File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in RegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Stegeman (martijnstegeman) Date: 2004-01-03 04:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=942696 Registering failed initially, also running regsvr32 manually. But running this command from the installation directory would work immediately (from cmd.exe). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonas Bergman (jonasbe) Date: 2003-12-05 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=924735 I have seen this error on three different computers. I also tried to register the file manually with regsvr32. Failed. Checked the dependencies, but all were correct. Then I killed a few processes, ICQ, MSN, Panda Anti-virus and a few more (all in the tray): then I registered manually once more and it worked. On all of the computers I tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-24 19:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 Has anybody else had the following happen? After several days of using 8.1 version very successfully, quite suddenly it quits working? I locked my computer and then came back. Opened Outlook and clicked 'delete as spam' and nothing happened. The button clicks but nothing is deleted, nothing is moved, nothing happens even though the buttons are on the toolbar. I restarted the computer a few times and nothing. I even uninstalled Spambayes completely, reinstalled it and nothing. Anybody have a hint? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-23 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded. It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier) Date: 2003-10-23 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=326244 I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I had already had a failed install on the computer I had to delete the original default directory and also deleted a couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-20 18:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to do with a path statement in the registering utility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-20 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19. I uninstalled via Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll know if it's actually filtering correctly. Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition that may not be all that easy to reproduce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak) Date: 2003-10-20 11:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890856 I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000. When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents the \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from registering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-19 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 01:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 10 15:34:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 10 15:34:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-894657 ] Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Message-ID: Support Requests item #894657, was opened at 2004-02-10 15:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Initial Comment: Hi, I tried to simply install the addin on my WinXP pro system with Outlook 2003. The plugin did not register in the "com addin" section and there was no toolbar functionality. I followed the troubleshooting guide and disabled all NAV functions. No errors were reported at any time. The only thing slightly different about my setup is that my outlook .pst file is located in my "My Documents" directory - Please help!, Thanks , JT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 10 06:28:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 10 15:34:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 18:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rural_cdn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Slappy (rural_cdn) Date: 2004-02-09 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=971814 I'd like to add, I had this same problem. I have 3 folders in my inbox, each folder representing a pop account. When I selected inbox in the background filtering, along with 'include subfolders' it would never work. I tried also selecting each folder individually within the inbox also, no go. They only way I could get filtering to work was to _not_ select the inbox, _but_ select each folder within. Voila, it works. I've also _not_ selected include subfolders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Looks like SpamBayes is moving a message to your Spam folder and then the Outlook rules are moving it back out again. See the section of your log quoted below. SpamBayes detects when a message is moved out of the spam folder back to a filtered folder and takes that as an indication that the message was misclassified, so it trains it as a good message. This is the line that has "Training on message '...' - trained as good". The "Moving and spam training message..." line after it then indicates where you clicked Delete as Spam on the message. For some reason, SpamBayes is getting to the message first even with background filtering on. What are your background filtering delay values set to? How many different e-mail accounts do you retreive from? Are any of them accessed over dial-up or other slow links? """ Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam """ Is there any chance that your background filtering is not actually enabled? The log line "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms" should instead say "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" if background filtering is enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 19:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 10:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-15 02:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-12 02:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 10 15:54:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 10 15:55:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-894657 ] Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Message-ID: Support Requests item #894657, was opened at 2004-02-10 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Initial Comment: Hi, I tried to simply install the addin on my WinXP pro system with Outlook 2003. The plugin did not register in the "com addin" section and there was no toolbar functionality. I followed the troubleshooting guide and disabled all NAV functions. No errors were reported at any time. The only thing slightly different about my setup is that my outlook .pst file is located in my "My Documents" directory - Please help!, Thanks , JT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-10 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 What version of SpamBayes did you try to install? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 10 16:11:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 10 16:11:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-894657 ] Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Message-ID: Support Requests item #894657, was opened at 2004-02-10 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jtb3 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) >Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Initial Comment: Hi, I tried to simply install the addin on my WinXP pro system with Outlook 2003. The plugin did not register in the "com addin" section and there was no toolbar functionality. I followed the troubleshooting guide and disabled all NAV functions. No errors were reported at any time. The only thing slightly different about my setup is that my outlook .pst file is located in my "My Documents" directory - Please help!, Thanks , JT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Date: 2004-02-10 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=972663 I installed the latest release - Version 008.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-10 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 What version of SpamBayes did you try to install? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 11 18:21:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 11 20:36:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #793478, was opened at 2003-08-22 16:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ikester You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Urberg (tim273) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin for Mozilla Mail Initial Comment: Create a plugin for Mozilla Mail/Mozilla Thunderbird that is similar to the Outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Date: 2004-02-11 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=570853 The Mozilla/Thunderbird community is interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed here. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-25 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The plugin provides a toolbar with three buttons: "delete as spam" moves the currently selected message to the spam folder and does the appropriate training (this is not visible in the spam folder). "recover from spam" does the opposite, basically. The third button opens up a dialog that lets the user configure the plugin, train, and filter one or more folders. Once setup, the plug-in also filters all incoming mail in the folders it is set to watch. Let me know if you need any more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-25 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Can somebody describe me exactly what does the Outlook plugin do ? I'm volunteer to create a Mozilla Mail plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 11 18:29:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 11 22:31:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-895290 ] Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Message-ID: Feature Requests item #895290, was opened at 2004-02-11 18:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Initial Comment: Some users of Mozilla Thunderbird are very interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed below in [ 793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail although there may be a complelling reason for not doing so that I'm not currently aware of. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. I see that the Outlook plugin and the pop3proxy are managed as different applications. Perhaps this could be handled in a similar fashion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 12 05:31:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 12 05:32:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-895606 ] 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Message-ID: Bugs item #895606, was opened at 2004-02-12 11:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Initial Comment: After I upgraded to 1.0a9 the pop3 proxy raises the following error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 445, in onRetr. try: . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/message.py", line 400, in addSBHeaders. if disposition in options ["Headers", "notate_to"]: .TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand The error is raised on all messages. I have set the "notate to" option in the configuration panel to "spam". The proxy is running on a Red Hat Linux release 9 box. Could you please explain me hot to downgrade to 1.0a7? It was working rather well. I tried to to launch the install script again but it didn't do anything as it skipped all files. Do I have to manually delete 1.0a9 files and then reinstall 1.0a7? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 12 15:57:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 12 15:57:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-895606 ] 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Message-ID: Bugs item #895606, was opened at 2004-02-12 10:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dougielawson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Initial Comment: After I upgraded to 1.0a9 the pop3 proxy raises the following error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 445, in onRetr. try: . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/message.py", line 400, in addSBHeaders. if disposition in options ["Headers", "notate_to"]: .TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand The error is raised on all messages. I have set the "notate to" option in the configuration panel to "spam". The proxy is running on a Red Hat Linux release 9 box. Could you please explain me hot to downgrade to 1.0a7? It was working rather well. I tried to to launch the install script again but it didn't do anything as it skipped all files. Do I have to manually delete 1.0a9 files and then reinstall 1.0a7? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Date: 2004-02-12 20:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965369 Have you tried deleting your bayescustomize.ini and re-creating it using the config options? Or edit bayescustomize.ini and check that the [Headers] stanza is syntactically correct? Mine has: [Headers] notate_subject:unsure spam header_score_digits:3 include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True notate_to:spam When I set the notate option from the web interface. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 12 16:17:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 12 16:19:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-895606 ] 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Message-ID: Bugs item #895606, was opened at 2004-02-12 05:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Initial Comment: After I upgraded to 1.0a9 the pop3 proxy raises the following error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 445, in onRetr. try: . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/message.py", line 400, in addSBHeaders. if disposition in options ["Headers", "notate_to"]: .TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand The error is raised on all messages. I have set the "notate to" option in the configuration panel to "spam". The proxy is running on a Red Hat Linux release 9 box. Could you please explain me hot to downgrade to 1.0a7? It was working rather well. I tried to to launch the install script again but it didn't do anything as it skipped all files. Do I have to manually delete 1.0a9 files and then reinstall 1.0a7? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-12 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Dougie, have you run the proxy and downloaded messages using the configuration you specified (and using the 1.0a9 release)? If so, could you report whether or not it worked correctly? It appears that this is a bug in the code. If the "notate_to" or "notate_subject" options are set to a list of dispositions such as "unsure spam" then the code works correctly because it expects a tuple. However, in the case of a single disposition such as "spam" the option value is actually a string. The line of code that causes the exception does not take this into account. The same error should occur if "notate_subject" is set to a single disposition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Date: 2004-02-12 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965369 Have you tried deleting your bayescustomize.ini and re-creating it using the config options? Or edit bayescustomize.ini and check that the [Headers] stanza is syntactically correct? Mine has: [Headers] notate_subject:unsure spam header_score_digits:3 include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True notate_to:spam When I set the notate option from the web interface. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 12 16:34:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 12 16:38:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-895606 ] 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Message-ID: Bugs item #895606, was opened at 2004-02-12 05:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Initial Comment: After I upgraded to 1.0a9 the pop3 proxy raises the following error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 445, in onRetr. try: . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/message.py", line 400, in addSBHeaders. if disposition in options ["Headers", "notate_to"]: .TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand The error is raised on all messages. I have set the "notate to" option in the configuration panel to "spam". The proxy is running on a Red Hat Linux release 9 box. Could you please explain me hot to downgrade to 1.0a7? It was working rather well. I tried to to launch the install script again but it didn't do anything as it skipped all files. Do I have to manually delete 1.0a9 files and then reinstall 1.0a7? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-12 16:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 P.S. Note that this is a Python 2.2 compatibility bug. This works OK in Python 2.3 where the "in" operator can search for a substring inside the target string and not just a single character. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-12 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Dougie, have you run the proxy and downloaded messages using the configuration you specified (and using the 1.0a9 release)? If so, could you report whether or not it worked correctly? It appears that this is a bug in the code. If the "notate_to" or "notate_subject" options are set to a list of dispositions such as "unsure spam" then the code works correctly because it expects a tuple. However, in the case of a single disposition such as "spam" the option value is actually a string. The line of code that causes the exception does not take this into account. The same error should occur if "notate_subject" is set to a single disposition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Date: 2004-02-12 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965369 Have you triedni and re-creating it using the config options? Or edit bayescustomize.ini and check that the [Headers] stanza is syntactically correct? Mine has: [Headers] notate_subject:unsure spam header_score_digits:3 include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True notate_to:spam When I set the notate option from the web interface. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 12 16:40:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 12 16:41:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-895606 ] 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Message-ID: Bugs item #895606, was opened at 2004-02-12 23:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: 1.0a9 proxy raises an X-Spambayes-Exception Initial Comment: After I upgraded to 1.0a9 the pop3 proxy raises the following error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 445, in onRetr. try: . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/message.py", line 400, in addSBHeaders. if disposition in options ["Headers", "notate_to"]: .TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand The error is raised on all messages. I have set the "notate to" option in the configuration panel to "spam". The proxy is running on a Red Hat Linux release 9 box. Could you please explain me hot to downgrade to 1.0a7? It was working rather well. I tried to to launch the install script again but it didn't do anything as it skipped all files. Do I have to manually delete 1.0a9 files and then reinstall 1.0a7? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-13 10:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This fails because it's Python 2.2 which doesn't allow 'string in string'. In Python 2.3, '"spam" in "spam"' is True, and '"unsure" in "spam"' is False, which works fine. Fixed in message.py 1.47 (And yes, to revert to 1.0a7, delete the spambayes folder in your Python Lib/site-packages folder, and all the sb_*.py scripts in your Python Scripts folder.) Alternatively, just grab message.py 1.47 from CVS and drop it in, and that'll fix it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-13 10:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 P.S. Note that this is a Python 2.2 compatibility bug. This works OK in Python 2.3 where the "in" operator can search for a substring inside the target string and not just a single character. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-13 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Dougie, have you run the proxy and downloaded messages using the configuration you specified (and using the 1.0a9 release)? If so, could you report whether or not it worked correctly? It appears that this is a bug in the code. If the "notate_to" or "notate_subject" options are set to a list of dispositions such as "unsure spam" then the code works correctly because it expects a tuple. However, in the case of a single disposition such as "spam" the option value is actually a string. The line of code that causes the exception does not take this into account. The same error should occur if "notate_subject" is set to a single disposition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Date: 2004-02-13 09:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965369 Have you tried deleting your bayescustomize.ini and re-creating it using the config options? Or edit bayescustomize.ini and check that the [Headers] stanza is syntactically correct? Mine has: [Headers] notate_subject:unsure spam header_score_digits:3 include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True notate_to:spam When I set the notate option from the web interface. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=895606&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 13 04:20:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 13 04:21:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 10:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 13 08:23:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 13 08:24:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872412 ] Spam Score 0% Misplaced Into Spam Message-ID: Bugs item #872412, was opened at 2004-01-07 09:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by danmuller You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872412&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark ONeill (markoneill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam Score 0% Misplaced Into Spam Initial Comment: Hello: I'm a novice at reporting bugs on your site, but thought that this report might be useful for improving your WONDERFUL program, SpamBayes, which I'm using in Outlook 2002. I've had very few false positives (less than a dozen out of several thousand messages) but the ones I've had are weird, as in the attached Outlook Message file which shows the Spam Score of 0% for a message placed in the Spam folder. Perhaps there is a bug for a 0% Spam Score that places such a message into the wrong folder. I hope this is helpful. Thank you for developing this TREMENDOUS program! Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Muller (danmuller) Date: 2004-02-13 08:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=974747 I have the same problem, with the following setup: Outlook 2002 10.4219.4219 SP-2 Windows XP Professional 5.1.2600 SP-1 Build 2600 Spambayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.81 Sep 9, 2003 I have one of the misplaced e-mails that I can forward to any interested person. Contact me at dmuller(a)cyberlogic.com Dan Muller ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872412&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 13 08:34:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 13 08:35:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896498 ] Mailbox browse won't open all folders Message-ID: Bugs item #896498, was opened at 2004-02-13 13:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896498&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Haapanen (tomh009) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mailbox browse won't open all folders Initial Comment: When using the SpamBayes Manager 008.1, using the browse button to browse folders, whether for filtering or training, won't open all the connected mailboxes and folders. The browse window will see all the server mailboxes I am connected to, but will not expand most of them (clicking on the "+" will not do anything). Some of them do expand however -- including my own, and some others. Have verified permissions on all the relevant mailboxes -- and all the mailboxes are browsable in Outlook itself. Environment: Outlook 2003 Windows XP SP1 Exchange 5.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896498&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 14 13:04:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 14 13:05:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Message-ID: Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-01 14:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sc_sixx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Initial Comment: I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different folders. When the rules are of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives with in the subject move it to the folder and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the inbox. This is very frustrating. If the rule is of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to move it to the folder and a matching message comes in, duplicate messages do not occur. So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with Outlook Rules. I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a (with current hotfixes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Len Fowler (sc_sixx) Date: 2004-02-14 13:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=975615 I'm running SpamBayes Outlook Addin version 0.81 I am also running into the multiple mail items left in my inbox problem. I usually receive 1 email from a mailing list and it ends up showing in Outlook 2 or 3 times. All have the same to: address and all are received at the same time. I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling the plugin, which resolves the issue for a day or so. I've also tried re-training several times but the problem still keeps showing back up. BTW, I have no Outlook rules set up. Please help... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-02 00:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Reported with 0.81 by "Brooks Page" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-07 22:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No word from the user, and I'm fairly certain the timer will fix this anyway ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-30 21:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I would be very interested to know if version 006 works with save_spam_info = True - it very well might. It would be great if you could let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-22 10:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 I installed both versions 4 and 5 of the binary, and set the save_spam_info to False. So far, it seems to have fixed the problem, although I'd like to give it a full day of email to verify (because it doesn't always happen). However: for some reason, the SpamBayes configuration dialog doesn't pop up when I click the spambayes button. This happens on Outlook XP on Windows XP. I'll put a new bug in on this; just thought you should know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 06:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-20 09:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-06 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine. I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will look into this when he gets a chance. Stay tuned! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-04 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 Anadelon: Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is Moved to Junk Mail. I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing the problem. (I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?) Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-04 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and chair. :) I seem to have overlooked the option to move messages instead of copying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-03 23:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using release 002 of the plugin. If you haven't already, could you try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-03 23:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on? If you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off (they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem? In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather than "copy"? (It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have rules of that form, and don't notice this problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-03 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 I am also having this problem. I have not tested it with various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 14 20:34:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 14 20:35:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-675811 ] Dead buttons left on uninstall Message-ID: Bugs item #675811, was opened at 2003-01-28 12:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Dead buttons left on uninstall Initial Comment: The toolbar buttons are temporary, which causes problems if they are moved. If they are permanent, then we are left with dead buttons if we uninstall the plugin (why would we do this? ;p ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 14:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 How expensive would it be to delete the toolbar every time we close Outlook? That would fix this and also step around the bug that makes the toolbar get recreated all the time. (For me, at least, the toolbar is recreated because of that failure every time I start Outlook, so it would make almost no difference). Just a thought. (This tracker was opened over a year ago - wow!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-14 10:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That's right - I wrote that solution before SpamBayes had it's own toolbar. If you right-click on the toolbar, then choose customize, then select the spambayes toolbar, then choose delete, it goes away and everything else is left alone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-14 05:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 Dead buttons - Less drastic is to customize the toolbar and drag the spambayes buttons off. This avoids loosing all your customizations. I also had to select the spambayes toolbar in the View menu to see the real 0.6 buttons. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-04 00:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Still in the latest version, even with the new toolbar :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-01 12:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For anyone reading this because they have buttons left over after uninstalling, you can get rid of them by resetting the toolbar. (Right click on the toolbar, click customize, then select the standard toolbar, then click reset). Presumably the next release, when we have our own toolbar, will remove this issue and this can be closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 14 21:19:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 14 21:20:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 14 23:14:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 14 23:15:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 15 13:00:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 15 13:01:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-897549 ] Multiple Emails left in Inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #897549, was opened at 2004-02-15 13:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Len Fowler (sc_sixx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Multiple Emails left in Inbox Initial Comment: I see that this has been reported before but I didn't see a fix for it.. I seem to have a recurring problem with the SpamBayes Outlook Plugin (ver. 0.81) where it will created multiple copies of the same message. I've uninstalled/reinstalled a couple of times and this has resolved the problem for short periods of time but it always comes back to haunt me. I've also retrained it (with rebuild entire db on and off), changed the filter settings, etc. Nothing seems to fix it permanently. I have no Outlook rules set up and the filters are set to move the messages, not copy. The only other thing I've noticed is that these multiple messages only seem to appear on mail that are from mailing lists or forum thread update notifications. I'm attaching all relevant log and ini files that I think are related to SpamBayes Any help is greatly appreciated SC_Sixx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 15 19:21:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 15 19:23:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-737967 ] Malformed messages break pop3proxy (et al) Message-ID: Bugs item #737967, was opened at 2003-05-15 11:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737967&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Malformed messages break pop3proxy (et al) Initial Comment: Those applications using message.py (pop3proxy, imapfilter, maybe others at some point) die if a message fails to parse through the email package. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-16 13:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 7 months later, this is finally done for sb_imapfilter.py. I believe that sb_filter already handles this since it just uses mboxutils.get_message, so I think this is fixed enough to close. Reopen if not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-07-03 07:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 This is now fixed for pop3proxy. When the email package barfs on a message, the proxy recovers and adds an X-Spambayes-Exception header to the message, giving details of the exception. No classification headers are added. I won't close the bug report because it's only fixed for the POP3 proxy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-05-15 11:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Moving from "Bugs item #737642": I'm using pop3proxy (from cvs 2003.05.13) and sometime I'm not able to retreive my mail from one my pop account I'm getting the following error: error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.ServerLineReader c onnected at 0x138d160> (email.Errors.HeaderParseError:Not a header, not a contin uation: ``charset="iso-8859-1"'' [C:\Devtools\Python\PYTHON~1.2\lib\asyncore.py| poll|99] [C:\Devtools\Python\PYTHON~1.2 \lib\asyncore.py|handle_read_event|396] [ C:\Devtools\Python\PYTHON~1.2 \lib\asynchat.py|handle_read|130] [C:\Devtools\SPAM BA~1\SPAMBA~1.13\POP3PR~1.PY|found_terminator|146] [C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~ 1.13\POP3PR~1.PY|onServerLine|214] [C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.13\POP3PR~1.PY |onResponse|288] [C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.13 \POP3PR~1.PY|onTransaction|389 ] [C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.13 \POP3PR~1.PY|onRetr|436] [C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~ 1\SPAMBA~1.13\spambayes\message.py|setPayload|168] [C:\Devtools\Python\PYTHON~1. 2\lib\email\Parser.py|_parsebody|228] [C:\Devtools\Python\PYTHON~1.2\lib\email\P arser.py|parsestr|75] [C:\Devtools\Python\PYTHON~1.2\lib\email\Parser.py|parse|6 2] [C:\Devtools\Python\PYTHON~1.2 \lib\email\Parser.py|_parseheaders|128]) I retrieve the mail directly without using pop3proxy and tested each message with the classify options on the web interface and there was not problem. Remi papaDoc@videotron.ca ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-05-15 11:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I suspect this was behind this (really old closed) bug as well: [ 650496 ] hammie.py discards headers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-05-15 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Comment from the list) As others have said, hammie eats the headers if there is a message parsing failure. This is fairly easy to cause with a malformed MIME section. I mentioned this on list a couple times a few months ago (including a message which causes it to happen), and the general reaction at the time was that Barry should fix the non-strict MIME parser in the email package, rather than making the error handling in spambayes itself more robust. This hasn't been a high-priority task, given that it's really only idiots like me who hand-craft MIME messages (with the occasional error) who are sending malformed messages to trigger the problem. - Alex ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737967&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 04:01:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 04:02:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 10:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by maxferrario You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 10:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 > Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? > If so, which version? Yes, version 1.0a7 >What sort of database are you using? > pickle? bsddb? gdbm? dbm is set in the advancedconfig page: i do not see neither bsddd nor gdbm. >If you swap to a different >one, does the problem still occur? I tried to change to pickle and got ================ 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 793, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 711, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 833, in _recreateState state.close() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 667, in close state.bayes.store() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 225, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') =================== I had to manually change the bayescustomize.ini file (removing the 'pickle' line) to have it started again. >What happens if you move your dbs > aside and use fresh ones? > Does the error reoccur immediately, > after a while, or not at all? I will try this later PS the changes in Stats.pm are working perfectly. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 05:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 04:20:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 04:21:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible Message-ID: Bugs item #897895, was opened at 2004-02-16 10:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897895&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: training via SMTP is not possible Initial Comment: The training via SMTP is not working anymore in 1.0a9 (it was in my previous 1.0a7 installation). If I send an email to the SMTP port I get almost always a "connection closed" error on my MUA (Eudora). Sorry I cannot tell exactly when this error occurs, I can only say that I got this problem many times, but a few mails were accepted! After I try to train spambayes via SMTP, and get an error, my emails contain an X-Spambayes-Exception header ==================== X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 451, in onRetr. evidence=True) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob. clues = self._getclues (wordstream) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues. tup = self._worddistanceget(word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 504, in _worddistanceget. record = self._wordinfoget (word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget. r = self.db.get(word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get . if self.dict.has_key(key): .error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ==================== and if I stop the POP3 proxy via command line i get ==================== # /etc/rc.d/init.d/spambayes_pop3 stop Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 451, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 504, in _worddistanceget record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ==================== Please note that I am using 1.09a + message.py and Stats.py from CVS. My system is a RedHat 9.0 box, python 2.2 PS I can train spambayes on the same message that gave the previous error using the web interface at "Train on a message, mbox file or dbx file" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897895&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 04:29:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 04:31:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible Message-ID: Bugs item #897895, was opened at 2004-02-16 10:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by maxferrario You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897895&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: training via SMTP is not possible Initial Comment: The training via SMTP is not working anymore in 1.0a9 (it was in my previous 1.0a7 installation). If I send an email to the SMTP port I get almost always a "connection closed" error on my MUA (Eudora). Sorry I cannot tell exactly when this error occurs, I can only say that I got this problem many times, but a few mails were accepted! After I try to train spambayes via SMTP, and get an error, my emails contain an X-Spambayes-Exception header ==================== X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 451, in onRetr. evidence=True) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob. clues = self._getclues (wordstream) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues. tup = self._worddistanceget(word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 504, in _worddistanceget. record = self._wordinfoget (word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget. r = self.db.get(word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get . if self.dict.has_key(key): .error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ==================== and if I stop the POP3 proxy via command line i get ==================== # /etc/rc.d/init.d/spambayes_pop3 stop Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 451, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 504, in _worddistanceget record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ==================== Please note that I am using 1.09a + message.py and Stats.py from CVS. My system is a RedHat 9.0 box, python 2.2 PS I can train spambayes on the same message that gave the previous error using the web interface at "Train on a message, mbox file or dbx file" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 10:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 PS - additional infos from bugreport page I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 0.4 (February 2004) (source), with version 2.2.2 (#1, Feb 24 2003, 19:13:11) [GCC 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-4)] of Python; my operating system is posix. I have trained 84 ham and 159 spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897895&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 09:26:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 09:27:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898037 ] "Recover from Spam" does't work Message-ID: Bugs item #898037, was opened at 2004-02-16 16:26 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898037&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gal Haber (g_haber) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Recover from Spam" does't work Initial Comment: "Recover from Spam" does't work. I use Outlook 9.0.0.3821 on Windows 2000. I have multiple mailboxes open and I use SpamBayes not on my main mailbox but on one of my other mailboxes with the junk folders configures to that mailbox. My Outlook mailbox structure: + [main mailbox] + mailbox2 | |---Junk E-Mail |---Junk Suspects |------------ +mailbox3 I configured SpamBayes to work on mailbox2 only. "Recover from Spam" doesn't seem to work. "Delete as Spam" does work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898037&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 10:06:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 10:08:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-675811 ] Dead buttons left on uninstall Message-ID: Bugs item #675811, was opened at 2003-01-27 18:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Dead buttons left on uninstall Initial Comment: The toolbar buttons are temporary, which causes problems if they are moved. If they are permanent, then we are left with dead buttons if we uninstall the plugin (why would we do this? ;p ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-16 10:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I don't think it would be that "expensive" computationally, but it would destroy any customizations done to the toolbar including repositioning. That seems to defeat the purpose of making the toolbar permanent in the first place. As an example, if I delete the SpamBayes toolbar manually and then restart Outlook, the SpamBayes toolbar appears in a second toolbar row all by itself. That wastes a lot of screen real-estate so I immediately drag it over to the end of the main toolbar to make a single row, and it stays there from then on no matter how many times I restart Outlook. If we delete the SpamBayes toolbar every time Outlook is closed, the toolbar would go back to the second row every time I restart. Personally, I think I would rather see us go back to using temporary buttons. The hard part is figuring out how to use them correctly. Here are some thoughts that might at least spark some discussion (I'm not fully aware of all the history on this, so I apologize if any of this has already been found to not work well). (1) Don't create a separate toolbar if it is temporary, because the user won't be able to reposition it to a convenient location (just like above with deleting the permanent one every time). (2) Don't tack the buttons onto the end of the main toolbar because it is too easy to lose them off the edge if people aren't using wide screens and maximized Outlook windows. A good place to put them might be to insert them where Outlook inserts its "Not Junk" button, which is by default between the Delete button and the Reply button. (3) Use shorter text descriptions so that the buttons don't take up as much room. Similar to Outlook's "Not Junk", I've renamed my SpamBayes buttons as "Spam" and "Not Spam". (4) We could possibly save even more room on the toolbar by making the SpamBayes menu a submenu in the Action menu after Outlook's Junk E-mail submenu instead of using a toolbar button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-14 20:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 How expensive would it be to delete the toolbar every time we close Outlook? That would fix this and also step around the bug that makes the toolbar get recreated all the time. (For me, at least, the toolbar is recreated because of that failure every time I start Outlook, so it would make almost no difference). Just a thought. (This tracker was opened over a year ago - wow!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-13 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That's right - I wrote that solution before SpamBayes had it's own toolbar. If you right-click on the toolbar, then choose customize, then select the spambayes toolbar, then choose delete, it goes away and everything else is left alone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-13 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 Dead buttons - Less drastic is to customize the toolbar and drag the spambayes buttons off. This avoids loosing all your customizations. I also had to select the spambayes toolbar in the View menu to see the real 0.6 buttons. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-03 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Still in the latest version, even with the new toolbar :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-06-30 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For anyone reading this because they have buttons left over after uninstalling, you can get rid of them by resetting the toolbar. (Right click on the toolbar, click customize, then select the standard toolbar, then click reset). Presumably the next release, when we have our own toolbar, will remove this issue and this can be closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 18:53:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 18:54:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you have it set to dbm (and haven't manually specified which type of dbm in the config file - it's not exposed via the web interface), then it'll be whatever it thinks is best for your platform, probably bsddb or gdbm. The whichdb.py file in the contrib directory should be able to figure out which one it is. Sorry, I should have been more explicit about using a pickle. At the moment changing is a bit of a headache if you've got an existing database. Basically you have to change the option, convert the db (or start from fresh), and then start it up again. This will be fixed at some point. I'll leave this for now (lots of 'real' work to do anyway!) until I hear back about using fresh db's. I'm reasonably confident that this is a case of the db being corrupt for some reason, or an existing db not being opened correctly (there were changes in the way that the db type is determined for opening), so a fresh db would fix all of that (although it's not ideal). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 22:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 > Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? > If so, which version? Yes, version 1.0a7 >What sort of database are you using? > pickle? bsddb? gdbm? dbm is set in the advancedconfig page: i do not see neither bsddd nor gdbm. >If you swap to a different >one, does the problem still occur? I tried to change to pickle and got ================ 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 793, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 711, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 833, in _recreateState state.close() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 667, in close state.bayes.store() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 225, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') =================== I had to manually change the bayescustomize.ini file (removing the 'pickle' line) to have it started again. >What happens if you move your dbs > aside and use fresh ones? > Does the error reoccur immediately, > after a while, or not at all? I will try this later PS the changes in Stats.pm are working perfectly. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 18:55:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 18:56:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898037 ] "Recover from Spam" does't work Message-ID: Bugs item #898037, was opened at 2004-02-17 03:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898037&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gal Haber (g_haber) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Recover from Spam" does't work Initial Comment: "Recover from Spam" does't work. I use Outlook 9.0.0.3821 on Windows 2000. I have multiple mailboxes open and I use SpamBayes not on my main mailbox but on one of my other mailboxes with the junk folders configures to that mailbox. My Outlook mailbox structure: + [main mailbox] + mailbox2 | |---Junk E-Mail |---Junk Suspects |------------ +mailbox3 I configured SpamBayes to work on mailbox2 only. "Recover from Spam" doesn't seem to work. "Delete as Spam" does work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 12:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What do you mean by "doesn't seem to work"? Does the message get moved? (if not, it's not working, if it does, it is). If you could attach you log file(s), that would greatly help in tracking down the problem (the Help->Troubleshooting Guide explains where to find them). Is mailbox2 a pst file? (or hotmail, exchange, or imap?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898037&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 21:57:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 21:58:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887453 ] Crash when training on messages Message-ID: Bugs item #887453, was opened at 2004-01-30 17:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crash when training on messages Initial Comment: I've been running into the following error for a day or two now on different messages. While I haven't narrowed it down to a particular message yet, the modules and line numbers appear to be the same each time. Stopping and restarting spambayes several times seems to get the offending message to get out of the way somehow.. Will try to narrow it down a bit more over the weekend if it doesn't ring a familiar bell by then.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Weird. You can use db_dbexpimp.py to convert the db to text, but I doubt that will turn up anything of use (unless it fails, in which case the db must be screwed). You can also use it to convert between various db formats - maybe whichever db this is using isn't good on your machine? Switching to a pickle would solve this, although then you're using a pickle... Which sort of dbm is it using? bsddb? gdbm? (whichdb.py in the contrib directory should answer that). Maybe trying another one would help? (The option to do this isn't exposed via the web interface, IIRC, so you'll have to edit the config file manually). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Date: 2004-01-31 13:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=205922 Update: it doesn't appear to be limited to a particular word. I've been marking all messages as 'defer' and admitting a few at a time to see exactly when the crashes occur. The last word displayed has been different each time ("dithered", "ux-50,", "url:draft-ietf-avt-uncomp-video-05"). I'm not sure, but I think that the message that triggers the error may disappear once I've restarted the daemon as well.. If it's the db, are there any tools to look for errors? Or do I have to reinstall and retrain? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Solensky (fsolensky) Date: 2004-01-31 03:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=205922 Here's the last one displayed and a stack trace that went to that window. The web interface shows the same trace as before. --------------------------------- wordinfoget: word= subject:Korean Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/spambayes-1.0a7/scripts/sb_server.py", line 442, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 260, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-30 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't recall seeing this before, but it looks like it's either a problem with a particular token, or that something is wrong with the database. You could try examining which key is giving problems. If you add "print word" before line 259 of storage.py, that will print out the tokens looked up, and the last one before the crash will be the problem one (if it's always the same, otherwise that's probably not the problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887453&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 21:58:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:03:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884545 ] off-by-one ? Message-ID: Bugs item #884545, was opened at 2004-01-26 17:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: off-by-one ? Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Whenever I train spambayes, I always (later, when classifying) get the error that I have more spam than total mails. I normally just do sb_dbexport -e -D hammie.db -f out.txt In out.txt, the top line will say that there are 202 ham and 3342 spam... searching through the file I find the line header%3ATo%3A1`170`3343` (this is the only line in the db where the # spams is larger than the total # of spams) I correct this line, and re-import the database. It now works fine. Every time I train spambayes this 'header- to' line will always be one higher than the total # of spams. (If I train twice, the number of spams for header-to will be 2 larger than the max # of spams... etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 15:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I still can't figure what could be causing this :( Could you try the 1.0a9 (0.9) source release, and see if the problem has been fixed? (a number of imapfilter bugs has, and it's possible that this was a side effect of one of those). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2004-02-02 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 The 200 hams have accumulated over 2 years, the 3000+ spams are from the last 4 months :) Yes, I am only using imapfilter. I emptied my spam folder except for 1 untrained spam before training. (I originally had 3590 spams, but WinXP only allows 9999 lines of scrollback, when about 30k lines were needed... and appending '>> out.txt' didn't do anything useful) Just before training: Nothing new in ham folder, 1 new spam in spam folder. During training: See file. Originally I had 3590 spam. The total # of spam recorded in my database was 3590 and I had set the # of spam in the header-to entry to 3590 as well. After the training: The total # of spam in the database was still 3590 (should have been 3591??) and the # of header-to spam was listed as 3591... (correct, I think) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. That's quite an imbalance - you'd probably get better results with more even numbers of ham and spam. What are you using to train spambayes? just imapfilter? Could you attach the output from running imapfilter with the - i4 switch? (blank out the username/password stuff). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:03:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:04:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible Message-ID: Bugs item #897895, was opened at 2004-02-16 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897895&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: training via SMTP is not possible Initial Comment: The training via SMTP is not working anymore in 1.0a9 (it was in my previous 1.0a7 installation). If I send an email to the SMTP port I get almost always a "connection closed" error on my MUA (Eudora). Sorry I cannot tell exactly when this error occurs, I can only say that I got this problem many times, but a few mails were accepted! After I try to train spambayes via SMTP, and get an error, my emails contain an X-Spambayes-Exception header ==================== X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 451, in onRetr. evidence=True) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob. clues = self._getclues (wordstream) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues. tup = self._worddistanceget(word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 504, in _worddistanceget. record = self._wordinfoget (word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget. r = self.db.get(word) . File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get . if self.dict.has_key(key): .error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ==================== and if I stop the POP3 proxy via command line i get ==================== # /etc/rc.d/init.d/spambayes_pop3 stop Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 451, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 504, in _worddistanceget record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ==================== Please note that I am using 1.09a + message.py and Stats.py from CVS. My system is a RedHat 9.0 box, python 2.2 PS I can train spambayes on the same message that gave the previous error using the web interface at "Train on a message, mbox file or dbx file" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Whatever's going wrong, it's the same thing in both reports, so tracking in the original one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 22:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 PS - additional infos from bugreport page I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 0.4 (February 2004) (source), with version 2.2.2 (#1, Feb 24 2003, 19:13:11) [GCC 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-4)] of Python; my operating system is posix. I have trained 84 ham and 159 spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897895&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:03:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:05:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you have it set to dbm (and haven't manually specified which type of dbm in the config file - it's not exposed via the web interface), then it'll be whatever it thinks is best for your platform, probably bsddb or gdbm. The whichdb.py file in the contrib directory should be able to figure out which one it is. Sorry, I should have been more explicit about using a pickle. At the moment changing is a bit of a headache if you've got an existing database. Basically you have to change the option, convert the db (or start from fresh), and then start it up again. This will be fixed at some point. I'll leave this for now (lots of 'real' work to do anyway!) until I hear back about using fresh db's. I'm reasonably confident that this is a case of the db being corrupt for some reason, or an existing db not being opened correctly (there were changes in the way that the db type is determined for opening), so a fresh db would fix all of that (although it's not ideal). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 22:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 > Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? > If so, which version? Yes, version 1.0a7 >What sort of database are you using? > pickle? bsddb? gdbm? dbm is set in the advancedconfig page: i do not see neither bsddd nor gdbm. >If you swap to a different >one, does the problem still occur? I tried to change to pickle and got ================ 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 793, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 711, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 833, in _recreateState state.close() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 667, in close state.bayes.store() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 225, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') =================== I had to manually change the bayescustomize.ini file (removing the 'pickle' line) to have it started again. >What happens if you move your dbs > aside and use fresh ones? > Does the error reoccur immediately, > after a while, or not at all? I will try this later PS the changes in Stats.pm are working perfectly. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:07:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:09:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In the other bug report (the SMTP proxy one), you noted that you could train a problem message with the "train message/dbx/mbox" form on the front page of the web interface. Can you also do this with ones that don't work via the review page? (It's very strange). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you have it set to dbm (and haven't manually specified which type of dbm in the config file - it's not exposed via the web interface), then it'll be whatever it thinks is best for your platform, probably bsddb or gdbm. The whichdb.py file in the contrib directory should be able to figure out which one it is. Sorry, I should have been more explicit about using a pickle. At the moment changing is a bit of a headache if you've got an existing database. Basically you have to change the option, convert the db (or start from fresh), and then start it up again. This will be fixed at some point. I'll leave this for now (lots of 'real' work to do anyway!) until I hear back about using fresh db's. I'm reasonably confident that this is a case of the db being corrupt for some reason, or an existing db not being opened correctly (there were changes in the way that the db type is determined for opening), so a fresh db would fix all of that (although it's not ideal). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 22:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 > Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? > If so, which version? Yes, version 1.0a7 >What sort of database are you using? > pickle? bsddb? gdbm? dbm is set in the advancedconfig page: i do not see neither bsddd nor gdbm. >If you swap to a different >one, does the problem still occur? I tried to change to pickle and got ================ 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 793, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 711, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 833, in _recreateState state.close() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 667, in close state.bayes.store() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 225, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') =================== I had to manually change the bayescustomize.ini file (removing the 'pickle' line) to have it started again. >What happens if you move your dbs > aside and use fresh ones? > Does the error reoccur immediately, > after a while, or not at all? I will try this later PS the changes in Stats.pm are working perfectly. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:11:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:12:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832185 ] Binary addin doesn't appear in Outlook addin list Message-ID: Bugs item #832185, was opened at 2003-10-29 18:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832185&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Binary addin doesn't appear in Outlook addin list Initial Comment: Recent binary versions stopped appearing in the "addins" list that Outlook has buried. It used to do this - it may have stopped working as soon as I started registering in HKLM along with HKCU. It never worked in the source-code version, and I'm not sure why. There are no known problems with it not appearing, other than user confusion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in 1.0a9 (0.9) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832185&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:14:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:16:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800392 ] Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Message-ID: Bugs item #800392, was opened at 2003-09-04 23:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or a "feature" - it might belong in RFEs. Anyway... When an email gets recognised by the filter as spam, it gets moved to the "known-spam" folder. However the filter does not seem to train on this email as spam. I don't know why the filter doesn't train on emails it moves itself, when it *does* train on email that I move manually. This has two main effects. Firstly, the filter will not "reinforce" itself against words which are almost certainly spam. For instance, the word "girls" is only scored 0 ham, 2 spam, when in fact the word would be very unlikely to come up in my emails but makes a regular appearance in my spam. This means that some words get scored abnormally low. I don't use an "undecided" folder so I don't know how well the filter detects "known-ham" emails, but I would guess it would have a similar problem on scoring ham emails. Secondly, the filter will not detect new words appearing in spams. If an email is detected as spam, all words appearing in it should be trained on, otherwise when spams come in featuring the new words alone, they will not be recognised as such. A classic example here would be the emails selling diet supplements - if I train my filter to see "glucosamine" and "vitamin" as spam, and then I receive a spam featuring those two words and also "echinacea", the filter should learn that "echinacea" is also likely to be connected to spams. When I next get an email selling only echinacea, it'll then be correctly detected as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The main reason for this is that this (along with training all non-spam, which presumably is also wanted) would mean that the "train on everything" regime was being used. Testing has shown that this is not a particularly effective technique to use. Training only on mistakes (false positives, false negatives, unsures) appears to be a much more effective technique (despite what common sense might indicate). As such, this is the technique that the interface makes most simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-04 23:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 One comment to follow up. I know it's possible to collect a bunch of spam in the "known-spam" folder and then train on it all. However (a) this is inconvenient; (b) if it's known that this needs doing then you may as well do it as soon as the spam is detected; and (c) this will count spams twice if they've made it through the filter and been moved manually by me, instead of being moved automatically by the filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:17:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:19:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-737619 ] Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly (0%) Message-ID: Bugs item #737619, was opened at 2003-05-14 22:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Moore (pmoore) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly (0%) Initial Comment: Exchange, Outlook 2000, plugin from CVS around 9th April. Occasionally (it seems to be mostly when the plugin is doing a "catchup" when I start up in the morning, but I don't think it's *always* then) a spam is left in my inbox with a score of 0% displayed. Clicking the "show spam clues" button shows a correct score of 99.xxx%. I *think* that the message isn't showing in the log of messages being filtered (so why does it get a score at all?) but it's hard to be sure I didn't miss the note about a message with subject "??????????????????????" in a list of 200+ such messages :-) This has been discussed on the list in the past, but I could find no bug specifically about it. If I missed one, I apologise - feel free to close this in that case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe Mark thinks that this is fixed with 1.0a9 (0.9) as a result of better handling of the spam field. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-10 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I opened a new bug 803227 with my information, since upon reflection the circumstances are very different. My messages are filtered correctly, only the spam score saved with the message is incorrrect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-06 10:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Along the same lines... With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts, Regards, Ryan Malayter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-06 10:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Along the same lines... With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts, Regards, Ryan Malayter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 11:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is very similar to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=771256&group_id=61702&atid=498103 - except in that bug, there is no score displayed (ie, in that one, the message appears "completely missed". It is alot easier to see how the "no score" behaviour could happen, but this stumps me! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:22:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:25:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 17:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should be fixed with the 1.0a9 (0.9) installer. Please give that a go and reopen if you still get the error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Weiss (chrwei) Date: 2004-02-11 04:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=42466 I have the old 0x8004201 regsvr32 error that's supposed to be fixed with 8.1 but isn't. I tried the shorter path too. Office 2000 SP3, NT4 SP6a, IE6 SP1 works fine on Win2k with the same Office version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nate S. (nschindler) Date: 2004-01-22 08:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810618 I have the same issue under NT4SP6a/Office2k Pro SP3/SpamBayes 8.1. NOTHING I've done helps, and I've tried a lot - All patches for Office/Windows were applied (windows/office update), ran regsrv32 from the command line (tried "/i:hkey_local_machine" as well), tried manually adding the dll as a COM Add-In, tried patching the computer in question with registry setitngs from a machine where the dll registered correctly, re-installed IE6SP1, etc. The spambayes install log reports: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in RegisterClasses File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in RegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Stegeman (martijnstegeman) Date: 2004-01-03 23:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=942696 Registering failed initially, also running regsvr32 manually. But running this command from the installation directory would work immediately (from cmd.exe). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonas Bergman (jonasbe) Date: 2003-12-06 05:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=924735 I have seen this error on three different computers. I also tried to register the file manually with regsvr32. Failed. Checked the dependencies, but all were correct. Then I killed a few processes, ICQ, MSN, Panda Anti-virus and a few more (all in the tray): then I registered manually once more and it worked. On all of the computers I tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-25 13:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 Has anybody else had the following happen? After several days of using 8.1 version very successfully, quite suddenly it quits working? I locked my computer and then came back. Opened Outlook and clicked 'delete as spam' and nothing happened. The button clicks but nothing is deleted, nothing is moved, nothing happens even though the buttons are on the toolbar. I restarted the computer a few times and nothing. I even uninstalled Spambayes completely, reinstalled it and nothing. Anybody have a hint? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-24 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded. It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier) Date: 2003-10-24 05:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=326244 I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I had already had a failed install on the computer I had to delete the original default directory and also deleted a couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-21 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to do with a path statement in the registering utility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-21 05:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19. I uninstalled via Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll know if it's actually filtering correctly. Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition that may not be all that easy to reproduce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak) Date: 2003-10-21 05:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890856 I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000. When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents the \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from registering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-20 06:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-20 04:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-13 02:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-22 02:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 18:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:26:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:27:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832183 ] uninstall leaves turds Message-ID: Bugs item #832183, was opened at 2003-10-29 18:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: uninstall leaves turds Initial Comment: Uninstalling SpamBayes apparently leaves lots of cruft around. I suspect the uninstaller is not doing the DLLUnregisterServer thing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should be fixed in 1.0a9 (0.9). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 23:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 *sigh* - recent testing shows inno+py2exe does not leave uninstall turds in the registry - but *does* leave all files used by the .dll hanging around - presumably as inno is attempting to remove them as "regsvr32 -u ..." is still running. Dropping priority as a few files around is less harmfull than the regsitry referencing COM objects that no longer exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:27:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:29:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833861 ] invalid configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #833861, was opened at 2003-11-01 09:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: james pepper (pepperink) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: invalid configuration Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000, on a new Dell, with XP. When I first installed version "081" of Spambayes, it worked flawlessly, and beautifully, too. Then it suddenly gave me the error "invalid configuration" and "you must configure spam folder." When I attempted to run the "configuration manager," nothing happened. I have tried the suggestions in the troubleshooting page. I have uninstalled Spambayes and reinstalled. I installed the previous version. I installed Outlook 2003 (don't like it much). Uninstalled Outlook 2003 and reinstalled Outlook 2000. Always with the same result. (Also, the "junk e-mail" folder is not created during installation.) Spambayes is a great program. I hope you can help me make it work! james pepper, California Central Coast jaypea@earthlink.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Haven't heard back, so assume this is fixed by the previous comment. Please re-open if this is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please see http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html (sorry about the URL) and look for "Resetting SpamBayes Configuration". If you delete the INI file there, you should find SpamBayes config wizard will start correctly. This will not lose your training database ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Sims (ssims) Date: 2003-12-13 08:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=929150 You can set the various directories by clicking on the "Filtering" Tab in SpamBayes Manager and then clicking on the various Browse buttons and set the directory. Be sure that the directory exists, if it doesn't create it in Windows Explorer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:39:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:40:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Message-ID: Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Initial Comment: In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to remove that copy when the mail is deleted from the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem to be working with mail that has been checked by SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the same thing with mail that has not been checked by SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as expected. It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is because of the addition of the spam score to the local copy? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 859333 ] Outlook will not remove read messages from server ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Date: 2003-12-13 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=930199 I just submitted another bug message with this same thing, sorry didn't see this one before submitting. I have email set to delete after 5 days, outlook never removes ANY mail from the server, ever. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-31 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, the save_spam_info option now appears to be doing what it is meant to do, but it hasn't solved the "delete from server" problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-30 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 Ah, OK. I didn't know about that website. I've now got v0.6 installed. I'll report back when I've seen some spam (shouldn't be too long). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-30 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you running the plugin from source? (and in particular, the 1.0a4 release?) If you are: this doesn't include the most recent changes to the Outlook plugin. The only way to get them is to get hold of the cvs source or the binary installer from Mark's website. (Although there have been a great number of improvements to the Outlook plugin since 1.0a4, there hasn't been much changed elsewhere, so it's not really worth releasing a 1.0a5 since most Outlook people use the binary or CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-30 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still working as it did before; I would have thought that this would stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't deleting from the server. On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog still says version 0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-29 17:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving the spam score with each message. Can you try this version and see if the behaviour changes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 22:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 01:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:39:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:40:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-859333 ] Outlook will not remove read messages from server Message-ID: Bugs item #859333, was opened at 2003-12-13 17:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook will not remove read messages from server Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes on outlook 2000 the advanced properties of 'Remove message from server when deleted from deleted items' no longer works. Now all the emails are saved on the server regardless of the fact that I have deleted them from the deleted items folder. This means all the spam that spambayes saves me from seeing in my inbox, still takes up space on my mail server. I must leave a copy on the server, I have it set to delete all emails 5 days after download regardless of them being saved. I must do this because I read my email from different locations. Some emails need to be saved on different machines. The emails are not getting deleted after this 5 day period either, outlook never, ever removes items from the server, this really needs to be looked into and fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-30 12:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Are you using personal folders and connecting to an exchange server? If the messages are copied to personal folders (.pst) then the "remove from server" command won't work. Perhaps you can create an autoArchive event to remove messages after 5 days to resolve this. Take a look at Outlook Help, searching for "delete copies" without the quotes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:39:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:40:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-859333 ] Outlook will not remove read messages from server Message-ID: Bugs item #859333, was opened at 2003-12-13 17:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook will not remove read messages from server Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes on outlook 2000 the advanced properties of 'Remove message from server when deleted from deleted items' no longer works. Now all the emails are saved on the server regardless of the fact that I have deleted them from the deleted items folder. This means all the spam that spambayes saves me from seeing in my inbox, still takes up space on my mail server. I must leave a copy on the server, I have it set to delete all emails 5 days after download regardless of them being saved. I must do this because I read my email from different locations. Some emails need to be saved on different machines. The emails are not getting deleted after this 5 day period either, outlook never, ever removes items from the server, this really needs to be looked into and fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-30 12:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Are you using personal folders and connecting to an exchange server? If the messages are copied to personal folders (.pst) then the "remove from server" command won't work. Perhaps you can create an autoArchive event to remove messages after 5 days to resolve this. Take a look at Outlook Help, searching for "delete copies" without the quotes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:42:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:43:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872549 ] Cannot open the custom form Message-ID: Bugs item #872549, was opened at 2004-01-08 08:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Cannot open the custom form Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes recently and I now intermittently receive the error dialog "Outlook cannot open the custom form...". Has anyone seen this before. It's an annoyance. Thanks, Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Haven't heard back, so assuming that installing the latest updates fixed the problem. Please re-open if this is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-23 12:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 To see add-ins, goto Tools, Options, Other, Advanced Options, Com Add-ins. After doing a search of the MS Knowledge base, it is suggested that you 1) perform a repair of MS Office 2) Ensure that the latest Office updates have been applied 3) Install the Customizable Alerts for additional information concerning "difficult-to-troubleshoot alerts or error messages": (http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/alerts.aspx) Please view the following Knowledge base articles pertinant to this error message. The use of a PIM is addressed, but specifically a Palm Device in the first KB article. - OL2000: Error Message "The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead.": http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;223481&Product=out - OL2000: Custom Form Produces Error Message and Does Not Load : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;251415&Product=out ------------------------------------------- Developers, this is from MS KB article 287525: -OL2000: You Cannot Access a Custom Form If You Use the Outlook Object Model "This problem occurs because of how Outlook 2000 accesses the property on a custom form. The following is an example of how Outlook 2000 accesses the EntryID property on a custom form: dim objOOM as object dim objDrafts as object dim objForm as object ' Touch all forms in the Drafts (id = 16) folder set objOOM = CreateObejct("Outlook.Application") set objDrafts = objOOM.GetNamespace ("MAPI").GetDefaultFolder(16) for each objForm in objDrafts.Items MsgBox objForm.Subject & " " & objForm.Entryid next objForm RESOLUTION To resolve this problem, obtain the latest service pack for Microsoft Office 2000. For additional information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 276367 OFF2000: How to Obtain the Latest Office 2000 Service Pack The English version of this fix has the file attributes (or later) that are listed in the following table. The dates and times for these files are listed in coordinated universal time (UTC). When you view the file information, it is converted to local time. To find the difference between UTC and local time, use the Time Zone tab in the Date and Time tool in Control Panel. Date Time Version Size File name --------------------------------------------------------- - 26-Jan-01 7:03:59 9.0.0.4924 5,324,850 Outllib.dll 26-Jan-01 7:05:20 9.0.0.4924 1,675,315 Outllibr.dll WORKAROUND To work around this problem, access a custom form through Collaboration Data Objects (CDO) instead of the Outlook object model. STATUS Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the Microsoft products that are listed at the beginning of this article. This problem was first corrected in Microsoft Office 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP-3). " Ultimately, the fix is to ensure the latest patches are applied to outlook. The links to do so follow: US: http://office.microsoft.com/officeupdate/default.aspx? CTT=98 Outside the US: http://office.microsoft.com/home/default.aspx? CTT=6&Origin=EC010272491033 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-23 07:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 Outlook Version 9.0.0.2711 The exact error message is: "The custom form could not be opened. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead. The error occurs when I am receiving email (presumably when SpamBayes is examining the message, but I can't tell you that for sure). I'm not sure what add-ins might be installed. Is there an easy way to check this? The programs that I can think of that may have put add-ins on there are: - ACT! - Sony Clie' - Compaq iPAQ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-22 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-22 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Would you please provide: 1) The version of Outlook you are using (help, about) 2) The exact wording of the error message you receive 3) When the error occurs (Opening Outlook, replying to message, creating new message, on send/recieve, on shutdown, etc... 4) any additional Outlook Com Add-ins you may have installed Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ben Dillon (ben_dillon) Date: 2004-01-13 08:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=945881 I gave that a try and continued to see the problem. It had been set at Medium to begin with. Someone here suggested that this might be linked to my use of folder sharing. Does this provide any additional insight? Thanks! Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-10 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Verify that your Macro Security Level is set at Medium or Low. Setting it at high will cause this to occur. - Tools - Macro - Security ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:45:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:46:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-876281 ] If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Message-ID: Bugs item #876281, was opened at 2004-01-14 07:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: If first item in in inbox = spam & preview pane = true == 0% Initial Comment: It seems like if the preview pane is opened on outlook startup on the inbox, and the newest item in the inbox is a spam message and thus gets displayed in the preview pane, spambays scores the message as 0%, and doesn't move it either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I believe the message is a reminder that you need to be logged in, not a statement that you aren't logged in. I agree that it is confusing). I believe Mark thinks this is fixed in 1.0a9 (0.9). Please re- open if that is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 20:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 (There seems to be a bug in sourceforge.net regarding that it claims that one must log-in, but one is already logged in and the comment is posted anyway) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 20:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-30 20:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 Yes, it seems to be the same problem. One thing I noticed though is that this occurs on every folder that is scanned for incoming mail. For instance, if I have the inbox and a folder called "A", and have some rules set up to move some mail to A, the first mail in both the Inbox and folder "A" always get 0% spam core, according to the Spam percentage column that I have added in the inbox and "A" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 Is this related to report #793830? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Lytton (mlytton) Date: 2004-01-21 13:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=810438 I am running Outlook 2000. When I start Outlook (OL), if I have received spam since I last used OL, it always leaves one spam in my inbox. I have preview pane enabled, so this looks like the same defect, just a different OL version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oscar Olsson (sdx) Date: 2004-01-14 08:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=170398 I am using MS outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 - if that matters. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=876281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:49:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:51:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887078 ] Install Fails Message-ID: Bugs item #887078, was opened at 2004-01-30 05:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887078&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Gold (drewwebmail) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install Fails Initial Comment: When attempting to install SpamBayes .81 with Outlook 2003 in XP, I get the error "spambayes_addin.dll - unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed". I have attempted to install this numerous times now and always get the same error message. I have disabled both Norton Antivirus and Norton Internet Security during the install without success. I have also tried the manual solution posted earlier - I copied the spambayes_addin.dll file to the Plugin folder for Office but when i try to initialize the addin from within Outlook, it does not recognize it is there. I had it successfully installed earler and ran into a problem with outlook that took 3 hours of MSFT support to resolve. Once the problem was fixed, I tried to reinstall SpamBayes and now it won't install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release? I suspect that this will fix the problem. If it doesn't, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887078&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:50:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:51:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887202 ] DLL does not register Message-ID: Bugs item #887202, was opened at 2004-01-30 08:32 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Elly Kaufman (ellythek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: DLL does not register Initial Comment: My spambayes stopped working this afternoon. The com object (DLL) does not show up. I tried reinstalling and registering (regsvr32) with no luck. I can't even get the configuration wizard to work. When uninstalling registry entries must still exist because after the uninstall and install same values appear in the training tab. I went through all the trouble shooting tips and checked the FAQ. Can't seem to figure it out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Elly Kaufman (ellythek) Date: 2004-01-31 04:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963406 Based upon the email received on a solution, I uninstalled spambayes, deleted the spambayes folder in the application data directory, cleaned up all other files I could find and removed the junk folders and toolbar from outlook. I then reinstalled from the beginning and everyhting works now. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-30 10:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It is a known issue with the 0.81 version that the plugin will not show up in Outlook's COM Add-Ins dialog. If Outlook has detected a problem with the plugin then you may find it under Help / About Microsoft Outlook / Disabled Items. The uninstall does not remove the data files from your Application Data directory under Documents and Settings. This is to avoid deleting all of your training data in case you want to reinstall. If you want to force SpamBayes to configure from scratch then delete all the files under Application Data\SpamBayes. The Configuration Wizard presents a simplified view of configuration, but does not configure anything that can't be reconfigured manually through the SpamBayes Manager dialog. Before starting over from scratch, you might try going to the Filtering tab and reselecting your Spam and Unsure folders using the Browse buttons. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887202&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 22:57:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 22:58:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-894657 ] Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Message-ID: Support Requests item #894657, was opened at 2004-02-11 09:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Initial Comment: Hi, I tried to simply install the addin on my WinXP pro system with Outlook 2003. The plugin did not register in the "com addin" section and there was no toolbar functionality. I followed the troubleshooting guide and disabled all NAV functions. No errors were reported at any time. The only thing slightly different about my setup is that my outlook .pst file is located in my "My Documents" directory - Please help!, Thanks , JT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try the new 1.0a9 (0.9) release? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Date: 2004-02-11 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=972663 I installed the latest release - Version 008.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-11 09:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 What version of SpamBayes did you try to install? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:08:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:10:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-856078 ] Process "posts" as well as messages? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #856078, was opened at 2003-12-08 19:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=856078&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott Marquardt (rasqual) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Process "posts" as well as messages? Initial Comment: In Outlook, it would be darned nice if Spambayes would process posts as well as email. My particular interest is in processing RSS feeds in intravnews, an excellent outlook RSS plugin. Being able to categorize material in the feeds would be a huge help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=856078&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:10:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:12:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-849847 ] Outlook Addin Build doen't work Message-ID: Support Requests item #849847, was opened at 2003-11-27 09:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=849847&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Petrus Wang (petruswang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Addin Build doen't work Initial Comment: Hi, I can't get my own build of SpamBayes Outlook addin to work. When registering the DLL I get: * (trace) RC: -1 from spambayes_addin * DllRegisterServer in spambayes_addin.dll failed. Return code was: 0x80040201 spambayes1.log: ----- Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 10, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/addin", line 85, in ? File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 507, in EnsureModule File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 279, in MakeModuleForTypelib File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.makepy", line 273, in GenerateFromTypeLibSpec File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 537, in AddModuleToCache File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 616, in _GetModule File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook ImportError: No module named win32com.gen_py.00062FFF-0000-0000-C000- 000000000046x0x9x1 ----- The binary version works fine. The folder "00062FFF-0000-0000-C000- 000000000046x0x9x1" is created in support\gen_py\. I have also tried to copy the same folder from PythonLib (didn't help) and I have tried to register my own spambayes_addin.dll (built directly from source) in the installation folder of the binary version (after unreg. the original dll). Same error. Any suggestions? My system: * WinXP Pro SP1 * Outlook 2002 SP2 * Python 2.3.2 * SpamBayes Outlook addin binary 0081 * SpamBayes source 1.0a7 * Updated McMillan Installer, 5.0b4+ Regards/Petrus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe the version of Installer isn't up-to-date enough? There was a version on Mark's website that was needed at one point. In any case, the build process now uses py2exe (in the windows directory in the source), so you'd be better off trying with that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=849847&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:11:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:12:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-848313 ] Scores, but doesnt move Message-ID: Support Requests item #848313, was opened at 2003-11-25 03:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=848313&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores, but doesnt move Initial Comment: Hello, I have noticed that sometimes SpamBayes will score, and mark the message as read, but fails to move it to the spam folder. This uesally happens after the weekend when i havn't checked this account. I've Increased the deley in wich SpamBayes starts to scan messages, but that still didn't help. I didn't have this problem untill my boss tried to uninstall SpamBayes because he didn't know what it was. (In the process, he some how corrupted my settings file and i had to start over) If anyone has and suggestions, or a fix for this. Please let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this still happen with 1.0a9 (0.9)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=848313&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:12:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:14:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-843586 ] Spambayes irreparable after accid. deletion Junk folder; Message-ID: Support Requests item #843586, was opened at 2003-11-17 22:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=843586&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marc Goossens (mgoossens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes irreparable after accid. deletion Junk folder; Initial Comment: Outlook Junk folder configured for SapBayes was accidentally deleted. Now, when trying to "delete as spam", outlook plug-in reports: "Invalid Configuration - You must configure the spam folder". Also filtering no longer works. But Configuration wizard does not start from Spambayes Manager: nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The config wizard bug is fixed in 1.0a9 (0.9). To configure the spam folder, choose it from the Filtering tab. This is FAQ 3.13: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=843586&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:14:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:15:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-841147 ] install problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #841147, was opened at 2003-11-13 16:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=841147&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert betz (bbxrider) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: install problem Initial Comment: this is for win2k, outlook2k tried to run the .exe option but windows didn't recognize it, so -installed python 2.3.2 -installed the win32all extensions, -ran the 'setup.py install', lots of copy messages, looked good, ended with, copying build\scripts-2.3\pop3proxy_tray.py -> C:\Program Files\pythonInstaller\Scripts - ran addin.py, got this output # This window will display output from any programs that import win32traceutil # win32com servers registered with '--debug' are in this category. Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. but.... no spambays tool bar in my outlook2k and its not listed in the outlook addin area any ideas what might be missing? i would really like to have this running, i'm drowning in spam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=841147&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:15:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:16:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-820285 ] can't connect to pop server Message-ID: Support Requests item #820285, was opened at 2003-10-09 10:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=820285&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marty Mo (itleader) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can't connect to pop server Initial Comment: I am using Mozilla Thunderbird mail client on Win 98 and Win XP. After installing python 2.3 I installed and configured SpamBayes per readme instructions. I changed client to use 'localhost' as proxy. The client connects to SpamBayes Pop3 proxy server OK, and the proxy server displays a message stating that it is proxying. When I try to get mail, I get a message that the connection was refused. Could this be because the proxy server is not able to supply the password when it attempts to connect to the POP server? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response in a long time. Please re-open if this is still a problem, along with the answers to the questions below. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you using SSL (i.e. port 995)? SpamBayes doesn't currently support SSL, so that could be the problem. Otherwise, what happens if you telnet to localhost:110 (or whatever port you have it proxying on). Do you get the proxied prompt from the pop server? can you log on (USER and PASS)? If you put "[globals]\nverbose: True" in your configuration file, a log file of the pop3 conversation is written out which might be of use here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=820285&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:16:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:18:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-802914 ] cannot train spambayes manager Message-ID: Support Requests item #802914, was opened at 2003-09-09 15:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=802914&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas D. Zweifel (tdz200) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: cannot train spambayes manager Initial Comment: i successfully installed spambayes for outlook, and created the suggested 2 folders ('spam' and 'possible spam'), but when i go to the spambayes manager and browse for the new spam folder, i cannot find it. (for the ham folder i use my inbox, which i did find.) help! thomas p.s. also, there is no troubleshooter feature in my spambayes. fyi. t ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The trouble-shooting guide is available from the Help submenu of the SpamBayes drop-down menu. If the folders are not listed, this might be a bug - the log file would help here. You could also try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release. Closing since this is quite out of date (sorry!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-16 03:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 as a workaround, you want perhaps to create destination folders from SB manager : when browsing, there is a "new folder" button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=802914&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:18:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:19:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-801751 ] Cannot install the program Message-ID: Support Requests item #801751, was opened at 2003-09-07 07:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Erik Thorsen (passage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot install the program Initial Comment: After reading through almost every reported bug on this web site and also looking through the documentation html page I am most confident I can't find the reason for my error in any other way than reporting it here. The problem is as follows... I first tried to install the addin for outlook. I had to cancel because it told me to close all outlook tasks and so forth. Then it adviced me to turn of any antivirus programs running. I felt it would be safest to restart my computer, so I choose the cancel button. After restarting and making sure I am not connected with anything like internet explorer, outlook, outlook express, yahoo, msn or anything else that should cause any problems, I get the following error message: You must close Outlook before spambayes can be installed. Please close all outlook windows (using File->Exit and log off" if available) and click retry, or cancel to exit the installation. If the message persists after closing all outlook windows, you may need to log off from windows and try again. I have tried everything now but I can't seem to get the program ready for installing, even though I have disabled my antivirus program and closed all open windows. As the program is not installed I have no log file or anything else to attach. I am running a windows system, xp pro, with office pro installed on it. If you need any additional information about my system, please do not hesitate to contact me! If anyone can help me with this matter I would appreciate it very much!!! Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 801756 ] Problems installing the addin on win xp pro ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:18:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:19:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-801756 ] Problems installing the addin on win xp pro Message-ID: Support Requests item #801756, was opened at 2003-09-07 07:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801756&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Erik Thorsen (passage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problems installing the addin on win xp pro Initial Comment: I have tried to look for support on the bug section and also on the documentation page. However, without any luck. Now I am looking for the answer by reporting it here. The case is as follows: I started the installing and was prompted to close all outlook windows and also any word windows. Then I received a message to turn off my antivirus protection ( so I did, turning off NAV2002) I then came to the bright idea to cancel further installing and restart my comp. This to make sure I had no "hidden" open windows. After restarting the computer I get the following error message when trying to install: You must close Outlook before Spambyes can be installed. Please close all Outlook windows ( Using file-> Exit and log off" if available) and click retry to continue or cancel to exit the installation. If the message persists after closing all outlook windows, you may need to log off from windows, and try again. I hope anyone can help me with solving the problem!! Thank you ps: I am not including any log files as I have not been able to install the program yet. I am using a win xp comp with office pro installed. Using NAV2002 antivirus If you need further info, please contact me! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 801751 ] Cannot install the program ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801756&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:19:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:20:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-785549 ] Can't enable SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager Message-ID: Support Requests item #785549, was opened at 2003-08-09 06:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't enable SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager Initial Comment: I've been having problems with SpamBayes that I hope you can help me with. It's been working superbly until today. Last night, our Exchange server was shut down. I think as a result of this, every time I would open Outlook it would crash. A dialog came up (I think it was an Outlook dialog) asking if I wanted to disable SpamBayes. I said yes, figuring I would just re-enable once Outlook was back up. After that, Outlook did in fact came back up, but ever since I have been unable to re-enable SpamBayes. The symptom is that you go into the add-in manager, you click on SpamBayes (ie. there's a check mark), and exit the addin manager. If you go back in immediately, SpamBayes is UNCHECKED. Damn thing won't stay checked. Nothing I have tried allows me to enable SpamBayes. I tried uninstalling, and reinstalling the latest version. I tried uninstalling, rebooting, and reinstalling. I tried uninstalling, removing all registry entries for SpamBayes, rebooting, and reinstalling. Nothing seems to work. Have you seen this type of behavior before? Lee Herman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In the Help menu, choose "About Microsoft Outlook". Click "Disabled Items". It's probably listed there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: moess (jomjom) Date: 2003-10-29 23:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897254 I have the same problem. Hoe can I re-enable SpamBayes in Outlook? J. Moess ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2003-08-09 07:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 Ooops. Just found the documentation regarding this exact issue. Sorry to bother you. What a strange place for the list of diabled COM objects (under Help).... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:21:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:22:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-756965 ] I sent in the OCX/DLL problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #756965, was opened at 2003-06-19 13:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=756965&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kathy Gauvin (kmgauvin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I sent in the OCX/DLL problem Initial Comment: Still having the same problem. I went to Tools, Options, Other, Advanced Options, and then looked at the Comm Add-ins, and there was nothing there. The Add-In Manager had nothing checked, Custom forms had nothing. I looked on every page and had nothing checked. What do I do to make the Spambayes install work? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 751348 ] Problem registering DLL/OCX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=756965&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:21:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:22:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-751348 ] Problem registering DLL/OCX Message-ID: Support Requests item #751348, was opened at 2003-06-10 02:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kathy Gauvin (kmgauvin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem registering DLL/OCX Initial Comment: I got the follwoing error: Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed. Abort Retry Ignore Ignore to proceed anyway(not recommended). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 756965 ] I sent in the OCX/DLL problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Coote (timcoote) Date: 2003-11-18 22:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=574600 I get this with no anti virus s/w on the machine: xp pro sp1, ol 2002 sp2 + salesforce.com add-in clearly this is a bit of a blocker ;-) also, the rollback doesn't work: it doesn't rollback the creation of the install directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Sohrt (jsohrt) Date: 2003-09-03 06:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=857533 I got the same problem. If anyone can tell me what to do to fix it, would appreciate it. I have XP Pro with Outlook 2000. I turn off ZoneAlarm and Norton Antivirus (autoprotect = off). I'm thinking maybe I need to try the V006 version -- don't know where to download from. Otherwise on my other XP machine, this plugin is awsome! That one is Outlook 2002 (from Office XP). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx) Date: 2003-08-12 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842228 just desable your Anti-virus and the instalation works well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Graybill (graystarr) Date: 2003-06-12 04:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=340885 I get this same error. And I c annot get it to install! Please help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mike dee (miked_187) Date: 2003-06-10 02:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797254 i had this one too, outlook 2k. had cloudmark spam program installed as an active plugin. had to go to tools|options etc to get to the plugin screen and then uncheck the cloudmark program. exit and close outlook, reinstall went fine. mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:23:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:24:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-751348 ] Problem registering DLL/OCX Message-ID: Support Requests item #751348, was opened at 2003-06-10 02:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kathy Gauvin (kmgauvin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem registering DLL/OCX Initial Comment: I got the follwoing error: Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed. Abort Retry Ignore Ignore to proceed anyway(not recommended). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These problems may be fixed with the 1.0a9 (0.9) release (see http://spambayes.org/windows.html). Leaving open since it's got various tips and might be read by people about to leave a bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 756965 ] I sent in the OCX/DLL problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Coote (timcoote) Date: 2003-11-18 22:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=574600 I get this with no anti virus s/w on the machine: xp pro sp1, ol 2002 sp2 + salesforce.com add-in clearly this is a bit of a blocker ;-) also, the rollback doesn't work: it doesn't rollback the creation of the install directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Sohrt (jsohrt) Date: 2003-09-03 06:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=857533 I got the same problem. If anyone can tell me what to do to fix it, would appreciate it. I have XP Pro with Outlook 2000. I turn off ZoneAlarm and Norton Antivirus (autoprotect = off). I'm thinking maybe I need to try the V006 version -- don't know where to download from. Otherwise on my other XP machine, this plugin is awsome! That one is Outlook 2002 (from Office XP). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx) Date: 2003-08-12 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842228 just desable your Anti-virus and the instalation works well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Graybill (graystarr) Date: 2003-06-12 04:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=340885 I get this same error. And I c annot get it to install! Please help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mike dee (miked_187) Date: 2003-06-10 02:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797254 i had this one too, outlook 2k. had cloudmark spam program installed as an active plugin. had to go to tools|options etc to get to the plugin screen and then uncheck the cloudmark program. exit and close outlook, reinstall went fine. mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:24:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:25:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-742258 ] Shutdown/restart Message-ID: Support Requests item #742258, was opened at 2003-05-23 23:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=742258&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Ring (mikering) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Shutdown/restart Initial Comment: Whenever I logoff and restart Outlook, SpamBayes doesn't filter messages on startup. I have to retrain it and then filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is way out of date now. Please submit a new report, or reopen, if there is still a problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-05-26 21:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 According to the log the databases are not being saved - in fact there isn't even the "exiting outlook" message. Are you exiting Outlook normally? (i.e. it's not being forced to quit or crashing?) Are you exiting Outlook and then logging off, or getting Windows to exit Outlook after a log off command? In any case, the next alpha release (later this week, hopefully) will fix this as training is saved after each operation. (Alpha2 should still work, however). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=742258&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:27:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:29:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-697970 ] pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Message-ID: Patches item #697970, was opened at 2003-03-06 02:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) >Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Initial Comment: pop3proxy doesn't accept the hostname:portno notation for the -l (i.e. uiPort) flag. I did'nt like everybody on our LAN being able to read my mail using a webbrowser, so I wrote the attached path, this allows -l localhost:8880 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Richie - do you still think that this is worth including, even with all the other security stuff that's there now? If the patch does work (does it?), then it certainly seems very simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-06 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Richie, thanks for the hint, I didn't know about the new html_ui_allow_remote_connections option, because I didn't read through docs and sources again after doing a new checkout. Using the Option parsing helper functions was simply done by looking for symmetry. Tim: assuming that localhost is resolved locally to 127.0.0.1, AFIK only local processes using the loopback interface can bind to the port, when somesthing listens on localhost:. That's exactly what I need, when everything (mail client, browser, pop3proxy) runs on the very same machine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4) Date: 2003-03-06 04:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=645698 You bring up a very good point, Wolfgang. Your patch plugs one hole, but someone can still access your mail via http://:8880 (or whatever port you happen to be listening on). This is a problem, and I think the solution is to implement http auth... We can't just reject connections that don't originate from localhost, because someone really might want to use another computer to access the pop3proxy ui. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-03-06 03:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Unless I'm misunderstanding something, this is exactly what the html_ui_allow_remote_connections setting is for...? Thanks for the patch anyway - there's nothing wrong with being able to specify the address that way whether html_ui_allow_remote_connections solves your problem or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-06 02:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 ahem. Make that ".. this allows -u localhost:8880", of course ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-06 02:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Forgot the checkmark, as usual. arrggg. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:31:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:32:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-26 12:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that this change is in the source now, controlled by the x-fancy_url_recognition option. (In CVS, or in 1.0a9). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Date: 2004-01-09 00:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=46460 I created this after getting a run of spams where the body was only a single url which were all incorrectly classified. There were no spam clue tokens in the header, and only the one skip token in the body. This patch fixed the classification of those messages. Ive not run the full tests to prove that it doesnt have some other bad effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-08 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Deferring consideration of the url re until inside URLStripper.__init__ didn't change anything. My conclusion is that this change has no effect other than to slightly reduce the number of skip: tokens. Toby, did it have a positive effect on SB performance for you? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-08 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Tests are finished. I saw *no change* at all. Maybe the option hasn't been properly initialized from the ini file at the time the tokenizer module is loaded? I'll fiddle some more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-08 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 *sigh* stinkin' SF. It accepted the modified diff I uploaded, but lost my comments. Oh well, after a little tweak for the x- pick_apart_url code, it worked fine. The number of tokens containing 'skip:w' dropped from 380 to 126 in my normal database. I'm making a 10x10 timcv run right now. Details at 11. Slightly fancier diff attached (and I deleted the other two) which controls using a Tokenizer:x-fancy_url_recognition switch just to make it easier to test. I anticipate deleting that option if/when the change is accepted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-07 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It sounds like a good idea, but (of course) will need testing: the special-case tokenizing of URLs is the single biggest win the project ever got, so we can't afford any chance of screwing it up. I *expect* this change will be a net win, though. We can make the regexp prettier after we know whether it's a good idea . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:43:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:44:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-848311 ] sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Message-ID: Patches item #848311, was opened at 2003-11-25 03:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py obeys launch_browser Initial Comment: Here's a patch to make sb_imapfilter.py obey the html_ui::launch_browser option. This script's -b flag is overloaded both with starting the web server and with launching a browser. I want to start the server but not launch the browser (since I already have Mozilla running). With this patch -b starts the web server, but the browser is launched on the basis of the bayescustomize.ini file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added in sb_imapfilter.py v1.27. (The final version isn't like any of these, but is better than them all ). If you run "sb_imapfilter.py" then it'll start the interface, and launch a browser if you have the option set to True. If you run "sb_imapfilter.py -b", then it'll start the interface, and launch a browser, whatever the option is set to. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a bug from older versions of the code that didn't do this (my fault, no doubt :). What about this patch? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2003-11-25 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 My problem was that without the -b option, sb_imapfilter.py exits with the following message: You need to specify both a server and a username. Your patch doesn't change that. So it seems that the -b or launchUI variable is overloaded. I can't suss out what the original intent was, but I think the script should have /some/ behavior where it starts the webserver and no browser. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 15:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I prefer the attached patch, which more closely resembles the way sb_server.py works. At the moment you can already launch the server without the browser - just do "sb_imapfilter.py". My patch makes *that* command observe the config value, and the "-b" switch has the same behaviour as sb_server - it forces the option to True. (So it's a shortcut for -o:html_ui:launch_browser:True or however that new-fangled method works). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=848311&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 16 23:47:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 16 23:48:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-886903 ] Improve "Show Clues" window Message-ID: Feature Requests item #886903, was opened at 2004-01-30 00:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Improve "Show Clues" window Initial Comment: This is regarding the Outlook plug-in. In a competing product, Spammunition (also free), there is a button called 'show analysis', which shows the statistics, like SpamBayes' 'show spam clues for current message'. However, Spammunition's feature is better because: a) It does not create a new mail message that has to be manually discarded b) It opens a pop up window with the three sections: - the mail headers - the raw message - the Bayesian statistics I think the SB should adopt this method. But hey, this is a great piece of software. Amir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Changing the summary to reflect what this is actually after). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 03:11:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 03:12:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898541 ] IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Message-ID: Bugs item #898541, was opened at 2004-02-17 08:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jens Vonderheide (vdh) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2003 on an IMAP account, when I select multiple messages and then click "Delete as Spam", only the first message gets deleted. It seems to be connected with the download status of these messages, as all messages are deleted if they have been downloaded (mark message for download, process marked headers). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 11:06:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 12:40:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898834 ] Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Message-ID: Bugs item #898834, was opened at 2004-02-17 10:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Niesen (nniesen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Initial Comment: Windows 2000 sp4 Outlook 2000 SpamBayes 0.8 and 0.9 (1.0a9) When I click the "More Buttons" arrow to expand the toolbar because not all the buttons are visible, Outlook crashes with a "Program Error OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows." This seems to only occur when the "More Buttons" arrow has the ">>" symbol above it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 11:42:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 13:21:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-894657 ] Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Message-ID: Support Requests item #894657, was opened at 2004-02-10 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jtb3 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Initial Comment: Hi, I tried to simply install the addin on my WinXP pro system with Outlook 2003. The plugin did not register in the "com addin" section and there was no toolbar functionality. I followed the troubleshooting guide and disabled all NAV functions. No errors were reported at any time. The only thing slightly different about my setup is that my outlook .pst file is located in my "My Documents" directory - Please help!, Thanks , JT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Date: 2004-02-17 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=972663 Thanks! All now seems fine. I installed the new version (1.0a9) and the installation and initial configuration/training wizzard ran perfectly! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-16 22:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try the new 1.0a9 (0.9) release? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Date: 2004-02-10 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=972663 I installed the latest release - Version 008.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-10 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 What version of SpamBayes did you try to install? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 13:03:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 13:21:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898934 ] Bug 807618 still happens in 1.0a9 Message-ID: Bugs item #898934, was opened at 2004-02-17 10:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898934&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nate S. (nschindler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Bug 807618 still happens in 1.0a9 Initial Comment: Still having the same issue with dll registration in 1.0a9. The installer doesn't complain, but the COM Add-In fails to load. If "regsvr32 outlook_addin.dll" is run from the SpamBayes directory, it reports failure. This bug seems specific to NT4. I've never had a problem with Win2k. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898934&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 15:35:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 15:36:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-894657 ] Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Message-ID: Support Requests item #894657, was opened at 2004-02-10 15:34 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 Addin Installation Failure Initial Comment: Hi, I tried to simply install the addin on my WinXP pro system with Outlook 2003. The plugin did not register in the "com addin" section and there was no toolbar functionality. I followed the troubleshooting guide and disabled all NAV functions. No errors were reported at any time. The only thing slightly different about my setup is that my outlook .pst file is located in my "My Documents" directory - Please help!, Thanks , JT ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Date: 2004-02-17 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=972663 Thanks! All now seems fine. I installed the new version (1.0a9) and the installation and initial configuration/training wizzard ran perfectly! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-16 22:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try the new 1.0a9 (0.9) release? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James T. Brown III (jtb3) Date: 2004-02-10 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=972663 I installed the latest release - Version 008.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-02-10 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 What version of SpamBayes did you try to install? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=894657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 16:51:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 16:53:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-697970 ] pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Message-ID: Patches item #697970, was opened at 2003-03-05 13:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Initial Comment: pop3proxy doesn't accept the hostname:portno notation for the -l (i.e. uiPort) flag. I did'nt like everybody on our LAN being able to read my mail using a webbrowser, so I wrote the attached path, this allows -l localhost:8880 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-02-17 21:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 It's worth including if it still works against the current code. I'll give it a look as soon as I can. I think I've had a brief look before and the code had changed under it, but I could be thinking of something else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 04:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Richie - do you still think that this is worth including, even with all the other security stuff that's there now? If the patch does work (does it?), then it certainly seems very simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-05 17:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Richie, thanks for the hint, I didn't know about the new html_ui_allow_remote_connections option, because I didn't read through docs and sources again after doing a new checkout. Using the Option parsing helper functions was simply done by looking for symmetry. Tim: assuming that localhost is resolved locally to 127.0.0.1, AFIK only local processes using the loopback interface can bind to the port, when somesthing listens on localhost:. That's exactly what I need, when everything (mail client, browser, pop3proxy) runs on the very same machine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4) Date: 2003-03-05 15:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=645698 You bring up a very good point, Wolfgang. Your patch plugs one hole, but someone can still access your mail via http://:8880 (or whatever port you happen to be listening on). This is a problem, and I think the solution is to implement http auth... We can't just reject connections that don't originate from localhost, because someone really might want to use another computer to access the pop3proxy ui. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-03-05 14:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Unless I'm misunderstanding something, this is exactly what the html_ui_allow_remote_connections setting is for...? Thanks for the patch anyway - there's nothing wrong with being able to specify the address that way whether html_ui_allow_remote_connections solves your problem or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-05 13:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 ahem. Make that ".. this allows -u localhost:8880", of course ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-05 13:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Forgot the checkmark, as usual. arrggg. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 15:40:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 16:58:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899060 ] SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Message-ID: Bugs item #899060, was opened at 2004-02-17 13:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gregory Engel (gpeangel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Initial Comment: Upgraded from 081 to 1.0a9. Restart of Outlook 2000 resulted in a "could not initialize" addin error message with a suggestion to restart Outlook. Restarting Outlook did not help. Uninstalling 081 and 1.0a9, reinstalling 1.0a9 did not help. Note: pst file is located on a shared network drive. I was able to upgrade a different box (Outlook 2000, 081 > 1.0a9 upgrade) successfully which has a local pst file. Log file: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1409, in OnDisconnection exceptions.AttributeError: OutlookAddin instance has no attribute 'explorers_events' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 18:09:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 18:11:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-899172 ] Help->About dialog, not html Message-ID: Feature Requests item #899172, was opened at 2004-02-18 12:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=899172&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Help->About dialog, not html Initial Comment: Amir Katz and David Walker have both requested (on the spambayes@python list) that selecting Help->About SpamBayes bring up a dialog box (presumably containing the version, license information, and whatever else seems appropriate), rather than a html page. This doesn't seem like it would be that difficult, and it would be more consistent with other applications. I'd write a patch, but I'm no good with the dialogs, and don't have whatever it is that you guys are using to design them (VC?). (The existing about.html page could be renamed "Introduction" or something like that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=899172&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 18:10:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 18:11:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-899172 ] Help->About dialog, not html Message-ID: Feature Requests item #899172, was opened at 2004-02-18 12:09 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=899172&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open >Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Help->About dialog, not html Initial Comment: Amir Katz and David Walker have both requested (on the spambayes@python list) that selecting Help->About SpamBayes bring up a dialog box (presumably containing the version, license information, and whatever else seems appropriate), rather than a html page. This doesn't seem like it would be that difficult, and it would be more consistent with other applications. I'd write a patch, but I'm no good with the dialogs, and don't have whatever it is that you guys are using to design them (VC?). (The existing about.html page could be renamed "Introduction" or something like that). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=899172&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 17 20:44:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 17 20:45:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899260 ] UnicodeEncodeError while training Message-ID: Bugs item #899260, was opened at 2004-02-17 20:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899260&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: UnicodeEncodeError while training Initial Comment: While training the database I got a traceback caused by a UnicodeEncodeError (see attached log file). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899260&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 10:18:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 10:19:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] error initializing the SpamBayes addin Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-21 16:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lee_herman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing the SpamBayes addin Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-18 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 I have had the same experience. I deleted all versions, and the data directory. Still no luck. I am also using Win2K, with all updates, and Outlook XP. What happened to version 0.8? I'd like to reinstall it, but I only see 0.7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Darragh (pdarragh) Date: 2004-02-03 21:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=967576 I am using Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. (Clean install of Windows XP ... i.e. started with FORMAT). I have installed all of the patches for Windows and Office. I am getting the exact same error message. I've compared the spambase1.log file here with the one I have on my system and they are identical (with the execption of the username in the paths). I've ignored the error message and manually configured Spambyaes but without any real luck. Un-installed and re- installed a number of times. Again, no luck. My environment: Windows XP; Office Pro 2003; Corel Office 8; Delphi 5; Java 2 Runtime v1.4.2_03; McAfee 7.1.0; .NET Framework 1.1 Any pointers on getting this to work would be great. Thansk for your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 02:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 11:07:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 11:08:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] error initializing the SpamBayes addin Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-21 16:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lee_herman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing the SpamBayes addin Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-18 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 Here's the contents of my logfile: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-18 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 I have had the same experience. I deleted all versions, and the data directory. Still no luck. I am also using Win2K, with all updates, and Outlook XP. What happened to version 0.8? I'd like to reinstall it, but I only see 0.7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Darragh (pdarragh) Date: 2004-02-03 21:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=967576 I am using Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. (Clean install of Windows XP ... i.e. started with FORMAT). I have installed all of the patches for Windows and Office. I am getting the exact same error message. I've compared the spambase1.log file here with the one I have on my system and they are identical (with the execption of the username in the paths). I've ignored the error message and manually configured Spambyaes but without any real luck. Un-installed and re- installed a number of times. Again, no luck. My environment: Windows XP; Office Pro 2003; Corel Office 8; Delphi 5; Java 2 Runtime v1.4.2_03; McAfee 7.1.0; .NET Framework 1.1 Any pointers on getting this to work would be great. Thansk for your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 02:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 11:41:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 11:43:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 10:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by maxferrario You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-18 17:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 I started yesterday a new proxy on the same machine (using a differerent configuration) and it ran for a whole day without problems, both in web training and SMTP training. I am using pickle as database type. When enough mail are collected I will try to use the new db files on the 'production' installation, and let you know the results. BTW, which is the procedure to convert the db file from one format to another (pickle <=> dbm)? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 04:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In the other bug report (the SMTP proxy one), you noted that you could train a problem message with the "train message/dbx/mbox" form on the front page of the web interface. Can you also do this with ones that don't work via the review page? (It's very strange). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 04:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 00:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you have it set to dbm (and haven't manually specified which type of dbm in the config file - it's not exposed via the web interface), then it'll be whatever it thinks is best for your platform, probably bsddb or gdbm. The whichdb.py file in the contrib directory should be able to figure out which one it is. Sorry, I should have been more explicit about using a pickle. At the moment changing is a bit of a headache if you've got an existing database. Basically you have to change the option, convert the db (or start from fresh), and then start it up again. This will be fixed at some point. I'll leave this for now (lots of 'real' work to do anyway!) until I hear back about using fresh db's. I'm reasonably confident that this is a case of the db being corrupt for some reason, or an existing db not being opened correctly (there were changes in the way that the db type is determined for opening), so a fresh db would fix all of that (although it's not ideal). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 10:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 > Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? > If so, which version? Yes, version 1.0a7 >What sort of database are you using? > pickle? bsddb? gdbm? dbm is set in the advancedconfig page: i do not see neither bsddd nor gdbm. >If you swap to a different >one, does the problem still occur? I tried to change to pickle and got ================ 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 793, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 711, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 833, in _recreateState state.close() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 667, in close state.bayes.store() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 225, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') =================== I had to manually change the bayescustomize.ini file (removing the 'pickle' line) to have it started again. >What happens if you move your dbs > aside and use fresh ones? > Does the error reoccur immediately, > after a while, or not at all? I will try this later PS the changes in Stats.pm are working perfectly. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 05:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 14:16:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 14:17:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899815 ] Outlook plugin fails to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #899815, was opened at 2004-02-18 12:16 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899815&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Jewell (jewellgm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin fails to initialize Initial Comment: The 0.9 plugin fails to initialize in Outlook 2002 on my WinXP SP1 machine. Versions 0.8 and 0.81 did not exhibit this problem. Attached is the generated log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899815&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 14:51:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 14:52:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-18 13:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 19:04:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 19:06:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] error initializing the SpamBayes addin Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-22 10:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing the SpamBayes addin Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 13:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You can't see the 0.7 version either, just old versions of the source. You should try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release, and see if this fixes it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-19 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 Here's the contents of my logfile: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-19 04:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 I have had the same experience. I deleted all versions, and the data directory. Still no luck. I am also using Win2K, with all updates, and Outlook XP. What happened to version 0.8? I'd like to reinstall it, but I only see 0.7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Darragh (pdarragh) Date: 2004-02-04 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=967576 I am using Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. (Clean install of Windows XP ... i.e. started with FORMAT). I have installed all of the patches for Windows and Office. I am getting the exact same error message. I've compared the spambase1.log file here with the one I have on my system and they are identical (with the execption of the username in the paths). I've ignored the error message and manually configured Spambyaes but without any real luck. Un-installed and re- installed a number of times. Again, no luck. My environment: Windows XP; Office Pro 2003; Corel Office 8; Delphi 5; Java 2 Runtime v1.4.2_03; McAfee 7.1.0; .NET Framework 1.1 Any pointers on getting this to work would be great. Thansk for your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 20:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 20:17:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 20:19:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy >Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 14:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Cool - thanks for keeping us informed. You can use the sb_dbexpimp.py script in the source dist to convert between pickle & dbm. Running it without any arguments gives example usage. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-19 05:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 I started yesterday a new proxy on the same machine (using a differerent configuration) and it ran for a whole day without problems, both in web training and SMTP training. I am using pickle as database type. When enough mail are collected I will try to use the new db files on the 'production' installation, and let you know the results. BTW, which is the procedure to convert the db file from one format to another (pickle <=> dbm)? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In the other bug report (the SMTP proxy one), you noted that you could train a problem message with the "train message/dbx/mbox" form on the front page of the web interface. Can you also do this with ones that don't work via the review page? (It's very strange). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you have it set to dbm (and haven't manually specified which type of dbm in the config file - it's not exposed via the web interface), then it'll be whatever it thinks is best for your platform, probably bsddb or gdbm. The whichdb.py file in the contrib directory should be able to figure out which one it is. Sorry, I should have been more explicit about using a pickle. At the moment changing is a bit of a headache if you've got an existing database. Basically you have to change the option, convert the db (or start from fresh), and then start it up again. This will be fixed at some point. I'll leave this for now (lots of 'real' work to do anyway!) until I hear back about using fresh db's. I'm reasonably confident that this is a case of the db being corrupt for some reason, or an existing db not being opened correctly (there were changes in the way that the db type is determined for opening), so a fresh db would fix all of that (although it's not ideal). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 22:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 > Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? > If so, which version? Yes, version 1.0a7 >What sort of database are you using? > pickle? bsddb? gdbm? dbm is set in the advancedconfig page: i do not see neither bsddd nor gdbm. >If you swap to a different >one, does the problem still occur? I tried to change to pickle and got ================ 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 793, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 711, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 833, in _recreateState state.close() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 667, in close state.bayes.store() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 225, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') =================== I had to manually change the bayescustomize.ini file (removing the 'pickle' line) to have it started again. >What happens if you move your dbs > aside and use fresh ones? > Does the error reoccur immediately, > after a while, or not at all? I will try this later PS the changes in Stats.pm are working perfectly. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 20:18:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 20:20:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899815 ] Outlook plugin fails to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #899815, was opened at 2004-02-19 08:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899815&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Jewell (jewellgm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin fails to initialize Initial Comment: The 0.9 plugin fails to initialize in Outlook 2002 on my WinXP SP1 machine. Versions 0.8 and 0.81 did not exhibit this problem. Attached is the generated log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 899060 ] SpamBayes could not be initialized Error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899815&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 18 20:18:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 18 20:20:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899060 ] SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Message-ID: Bugs item #899060, was opened at 2004-02-18 09:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gregory Engel (gpeangel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Initial Comment: Upgraded from 081 to 1.0a9. Restart of Outlook 2000 resulted in a "could not initialize" addin error message with a suggestion to restart Outlook. Restarting Outlook did not help. Uninstalling 081 and 1.0a9, reinstalling 1.0a9 did not help. Note: pst file is located on a shared network drive. I was able to upgrade a different box (Outlook 2000, 081 > 1.0a9 upgrade) successfully which has a local pst file. Log file: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1409, in OnDisconnection exceptions.AttributeError: OutlookAddin instance has no attribute 'explorers_events' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 899815 ] Outlook plugin fails to initialize ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 19 07:36:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 19 07:37:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-900252 ] Assertion Error in Classifier Message-ID: Support Requests item #900252, was opened at 2004-02-19 12:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=900252&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Assertion Error in Classifier Initial Comment: Spambayes suddenly stops classifying. Traceback shows the following error: System is Rh 9, Evolution and running spambayes 1.0a9 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/spambayes-1.0a6/scripts/sb_server.py", line 442, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 308, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError I am not a python coder but I can certainly go in and make any recommended changes. Any ideas. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=900252&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 19 17:18:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 19 17:19:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-900703 ] still won't install Message-ID: Bugs item #900703, was opened at 2004-02-19 16:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=900703&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Weiss (chrwei) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: still won't install Initial Comment: NT4 SP6a, Office 2000 SP3, IE 6 SP1 just tried 0.9, 0.8 fails too. I don't actually get an error but heres the logs 0.8's log Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in RegisterClasses File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in RegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) 0.9's log Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 477, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 407, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 261, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) I try to register it manually I get return code 0x80040201 if that means anything to you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=900703&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 19 17:38:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 19 17:40:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899060 ] SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Message-ID: Bugs item #899060, was opened at 2004-02-18 09:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gregory Engel (gpeangel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes could not be initialized Error Initial Comment: Upgraded from 081 to 1.0a9. Restart of Outlook 2000 resulted in a "could not initialize" addin error message with a suggestion to restart Outlook. Restarting Outlook did not help. Uninstalling 081 and 1.0a9, reinstalling 1.0a9 did not help. Note: pst file is located on a shared network drive. I was able to upgrade a different box (Outlook 2000, 081 > 1.0a9 upgrade) successfully which has a local pst file. Log file: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: A device attached to the system is not functioning. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1409, in OnDisconnection exceptions.AttributeError: OutlookAddin instance has no attribute 'explorers_events' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-20 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There was a report that looked like it was the same thing on the list, and I've just had an email from Gregory Warnes with the same problem - SR-1, Windows 2000 Pro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 899815 ] Outlook plugin fails to initialize ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899060&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 19 22:07:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 19 22:09:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-807234 ] Active Sync Problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #807234, was opened at 2003-09-17 02:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alecclews You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathaniel Gildersleeve (natgild) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Active Sync Problem Initial Comment: I am using the Outlook 2002 addin version .08 on a machine with Windows XP. After installing Spambayes, I am unable to sync my Ipaq Pocket PC using Activesync Version 3.7 and Windows Mobile 2003 on the Ipaq. My computer will no longer connect to the Ipaq. I recall I had a similar problem with Outlook Spam Filter Version 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alec Clews (alecclews) Date: 2004-02-20 14:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=202472 After upgrading to Outlook 2003 Spambayes and Activesync now seem to work together nicely ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alec Clews (alecclews) Date: 2003-12-25 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=202472 I have a similiar problem. Spambayes 0.8.1, activesync 3.7.1, Windows XP SP1 and Outlook 2002 SP-2. I installed Spambayes and had it working. I then installed Activesync and spampayes has just died. Spambayes produces no long files :-(. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 20 14:29:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 20 14:31:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] error initializing the SpamBayes addin Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-21 21:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stu_bloke You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing the SpamBayes addin Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stuart Carter (stu_bloke) Date: 2004-02-20 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=980433 I have also got this problem on Windows 2003, OL 2003, Python 2.3. Removing 0.9 and re-installing 0.81 worked. Here is the log from my 0.81 startup (0.9 log is identical to that posted below) Cheers! -------------------------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and Settings\carters\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and Settings\carters\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 184 spam and 432 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.2.3790 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ********************************************** **** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 11.5316ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 00:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You can't see the 0.7 version either, just old versions of the source. You should try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release, and see if this fixes it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-18 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 Here's the contents of my logfile: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-18 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 I have had the same experience. I deleted all versions, and the data directory. Still no luck. I am also using Win2K, with all updates, and Outlook XP. What happened to version 0.8? I'd like to reinstall it, but I only see 0.7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Darragh (pdarragh) Date: 2004-02-04 02:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=967576 I am using Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. (Clean install of Windows XP ... i.e. started with FORMAT). I have installed all of the patches for Windows and Office. I am getting the exact same error message. I've compared the spambase1.log file here with the one I have on my system and they are identical (with the execption of the username in the paths). I've ignored the error message and manually configured Spambyaes but without any real luck. Un-installed and re- installed a number of times. Again, no luck. My environment: Windows XP; Office Pro 2003; Corel Office 8; Delphi 5; Java 2 Runtime v1.4.2_03; McAfee 7.1.0; .NET Framework 1.1 Any pointers on getting this to work would be great. Thansk for your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 07:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 21 12:13:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 21 12:15:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884545 ] off-by-one ? Message-ID: Bugs item #884545, was opened at 2004-01-26 04:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bippo312 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: off-by-one ? Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Whenever I train spambayes, I always (later, when classifying) get the error that I have more spam than total mails. I normally just do sb_dbexport -e -D hammie.db -f out.txt In out.txt, the top line will say that there are 202 ham and 3342 spam... searching through the file I find the line header%3ATo%3A1`170`3343` (this is the only line in the db where the # spams is larger than the total # of spams) I correct this line, and re-import the database. It now works fine. Every time I train spambayes this 'header- to' line will always be one higher than the total # of spams. (If I train twice, the number of spams for header-to will be 2 larger than the max # of spams... etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2004-02-21 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 Seems like it's fixed in 1.0a9, Thanks :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 02:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I still can't figure what could be causing this :( Could you try the 1.0a9 (0.9) source release, and see if the problem has been fixed? (a number of imapfilter bugs has, and it's possible that this was a side effect of one of those). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2004-02-02 05:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 The 200 hams have accumulated over 2 years, the 3000+ spams are from the last 4 months :) Yes, I am only using imapfilter. I emptied my spam folder except for 1 untrained spam before training. (I originally had 3590 spams, but WinXP only allows 9999 lines of scrollback, when about 30k lines were needed... and appending '>> out.txt' didn't do anything useful) Just before training: Nothing new in ham folder, 1 new spam in spam folder. During training: See file. Originally I had 3590 spam. The total # of spam recorded in my database was 3590 and I had set the # of spam in the header-to entry to 3590 as well. After the training: The total # of spam in the database was still 3590 (should have been 3591??) and the # of header-to spam was listed as 3591... (correct, I think) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 00:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. That's quite an imbalance - you'd probably get better results with more even numbers of ham and spam. What are you using to train spambayes? just imapfilter? Could you attach the output from running imapfilter with the - i4 switch? (blank out the username/password stuff). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 21 18:12:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 21 18:14:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-901920 ] sb_dbexpimp.py barfs on 0xA3 char Message-ID: Bugs item #901920, was opened at 2004-02-21 23:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=901920&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py barfs on 0xA3 char Initial Comment: I've got a problem where I can't export my hammie.db and re-import it with sb_dbexpimp.py. The script barfs with "UnicodeDecodeError". jerry:/etc/spambayes # ~/sb_dbexpimp.py -i -d new.db -f hammie.db.export Importing database new.db using file hammie.db.export Debug: current word: subject%3A%20%A3 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/root/broke.py", line 271, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/root/broke.py", line 203, in runImport word = uunquote(word) File "/root/broke.py", line 116, in uunquote return unicode(urllib.unquote(s), 'utf-8') UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xa3 in position 9: unexpected code byte jerry:/etc/spambayes # I added this code to get the debugging output: def uunquote(s): try: return unicode(urllib.unquote(s), 'utf-8') except UnicodeDecodeError, e: print "Debug: current word: %s\n" % s raise jerry:/etc/spambayes # python -V Python 2.3.3 0xA3 is a GBP currency symbol. The web interface handles it OK. I get these results for a word query on "subject: ?" Statistics for 'subject: ?' Number of spam messages: 0. Number of ham messages: 2. Probability that a message containing this word is spam: 0.091837. If you need a copy of the exported (100K) file just ask. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=901920&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 21 18:33:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 21 18:35:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-901920 ] sb_dbexpimp.py barfs on 0xA3 char Message-ID: Bugs item #901920, was opened at 2004-02-21 23:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dougielawson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=901920&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py barfs on 0xA3 char Initial Comment: I've got a problem where I can't export my hammie.db and re-import it with sb_dbexpimp.py. The script barfs with "UnicodeDecodeError". jerry:/etc/spambayes # ~/sb_dbexpimp.py -i -d new.db -f hammie.db.export Importing database new.db using file hammie.db.export Debug: current word: subject%3A%20%A3 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/root/broke.py", line 271, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/root/broke.py", line 203, in runImport word = uunquote(word) File "/root/broke.py", line 116, in uunquote return unicode(urllib.unquote(s), 'utf-8') UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xa3 in position 9: unexpected code byte jerry:/etc/spambayes # I added this code to get the debugging output: def uunquote(s): try: return unicode(urllib.unquote(s), 'utf-8') except UnicodeDecodeError, e: print "Debug: current word: %s\n" % s raise jerry:/etc/spambayes # python -V Python 2.3.3 0xA3 is a GBP currency symbol. The web interface handles it OK. I get these results for a word query on "subject: ?" Statistics for 'subject: ?' Number of spam messages: 0. Number of ham messages: 2. Probability that a message containing this word is spam: 0.091837. If you need a copy of the exported (100K) file just ask. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dougie Lawson (dougielawson) Date: 2004-02-21 23:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965369 I've checked through the whole export file and it barfs on all these records. subject%3A%20%A3`2`0` subject%3A%20%A8`0`1` subject%3A%20%B5%C4%CD%CB%D0%C5`0`1` subject%3A%20%E9`0`1` subject%3A%25%20%D0%CE`0`1` subject%3A%2C%C0%B4%D7%D4%20`0`1` subject%3A%A385.99`2`0` subject%3A%B5%C4%CD%CB%D0%C5`0`1` subject%3A%C0%20%40%20`0`1` subject%3A%C0%B4%D7%D4`0`1` subject%3A%CE%C0`0`1` subject%3A%CF%B5%CD%B3%CD%CB%D0%C5`0`1` subject%3A%D0%CESC0%DCNT`0`1` subject%3A%DC`0`1` subject%3A%E9`0`1` subject%3A%E9nlarger`0`1` subject%3A%ED`0`4` subject%3AV%CE%C0GR%C0`0`1` subject%3Ap%E9nis`0`1` subject%3Av%EDagra`0`4` ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=901920&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 21 20:46:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 21 20:48:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-884545 ] off-by-one ? Message-ID: Bugs item #884545, was opened at 2004-01-26 17:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: off-by-one ? Initial Comment: WinXP, python 2.3.3 Whenever I train spambayes, I always (later, when classifying) get the error that I have more spam than total mails. I normally just do sb_dbexport -e -D hammie.db -f out.txt In out.txt, the top line will say that there are 202 ham and 3342 spam... searching through the file I find the line header%3ATo%3A1`170`3343` (this is the only line in the db where the # spams is larger than the total # of spams) I correct this line, and re-import the database. It now works fine. Every time I train spambayes this 'header- to' line will always be one higher than the total # of spams. (If I train twice, the number of spams for header-to will be 2 larger than the max # of spams... etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-22 14:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fantastic :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2004-02-22 06:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 Seems like it's fixed in 1.0a9, Thanks :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 15:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I still can't figure what could be causing this :( Could you try the 1.0a9 (0.9) source release, and see if the problem has been fixed? (a number of imapfilter bugs has, and it's possible that this was a side effect of one of those). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bip (bippo312) Date: 2004-02-02 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895052 The 200 hams have accumulated over 2 years, the 3000+ spams are from the last 4 months :) Yes, I am only using imapfilter. I emptied my spam folder except for 1 untrained spam before training. (I originally had 3590 spams, but WinXP only allows 9999 lines of scrollback, when about 30k lines were needed... and appending '>> out.txt' didn't do anything useful) Just before training: Nothing new in ham folder, 1 new spam in spam folder. During training: See file. Originally I had 3590 spam. The total # of spam recorded in my database was 3590 and I had set the # of spam in the header-to entry to 3590 as well. After the training: The total # of spam in the database was still 3590 (should have been 3591??) and the # of header-to spam was listed as 3591... (correct, I think) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-29 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. That's quite an imbalance - you'd probably get better results with more even numbers of ham and spam. What are you using to train spambayes? just imapfilter? Could you attach the output from running imapfilter with the - i4 switch? (blank out the username/password stuff). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=884545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 23 12:27:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 23 12:29:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection Message-ID: Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-25 18:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: url detection Initial Comment: Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was a big loss. In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a little too much.... It would match urls that start in the middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and "url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid generating the same tokens for messages that contain "xxxwww." To address this I have also changed the re to require that urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. Sadly my end result is a much messier re. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-02-23 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 I guess I should at least mark this request accepted. I'll leave it open for the time being until we decide to remove the "x-"perimental prefix from the option. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-16 22:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that this change is in the source now, controlled by the x-fancy_url_recognition option. (In CVS, or in 1.0a9). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Date: 2004-01-08 05:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=46460 I created this after getting a run of spams where the body was only a single url which were all incorrectly classified. There were no spam clue tokens in the header, and only the one skip token in the body. This patch fixed the classification of those messages. Ive not run the full tests to prove that it doesnt have some other bad effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Deferring consideration of the url re until inside URLStripper.__init__ didn't change anything. My conclusion is that this change has no effect other than to slightly reduce the number of skip: tokens. Toby, did it have a positive effect on SB performance for you? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Tests are finished. I saw *no change* at all. Maybe the option hasn't been properly initialized from the ini file at the time the tokenizer module is loaded? I'll fiddle some more. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2004-01-07 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 *sigh* stinkin' SF. It accepted the modified diff I uploaded, but lost my comments. Oh well, after a little tweak for the x- pick_apart_url code, it worked fine. The number of tokens containing 'skip:w' dropped from 380 to 126 in my normal database. I'm making a 10x10 timcv run right now. Details at 11. Slightly fancier diff attached (and I deleted the other two) which controls using a Tokenizer:x-fancy_url_recognition switch just to make it easier to test. I anticipate deleting that option if/when the change is accepted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-06 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It sounds like a good idea, but (of course) will need testing: the special-case tokenizing of URLs is the single biggest win the project ever got, so we can't afford any chance of screwing it up. I *expect* this change will be a net win, though. We can make the regexp prettier after we know whether it's a good idea . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 23 18:57:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 23 18:59:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903097 ] Mailbox browser won't add folders Message-ID: Bugs item #903097, was opened at 2004-02-23 17:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903097&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miguel Le?n (esmiguel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mailbox browser won't add folders Initial Comment: Mailbox browse won't add other folders When using the SpamBayes Manager 0.9, using the browse button to browse folders, whether for filtering, won't add the connected mailboxes and folders. The browse window will see all the server mailboxes I am connected to, but will not add (the ok button don't do anything). Only my own. Have verified permissions on all the relevant mailboxes -- and all the mailboxes are browsable in Outlook itself. Environment: Outlook 2002 Windows 2000 Pro Exchange 5.5 Spambayes Outllok Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903097&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 24 08:45:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 24 08:47:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903440 ] Fail to filter public folder Message-ID: Bugs item #903440, was opened at 2004-02-24 14:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rasmus Aaen (raaen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Fail to filter public folder Initial Comment: If I mark a public folder ("Dns") for filtering, the Outlook addin stops working with the errormessage "Could not watch the specified folders". If my Inbox is the only folder filtered there are no problems. Filtering a public folder used to work in v. 0.81 I noticed that the folder does not have a "Spam" field, but manually creating it does not help. I have "Owner" rights on the public folder. After the error has occurred, the "Select folders" window is empty (see attached image). I have tried uninstalling/installing and deleting settings and database files. Logfile: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Rasmus\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Rasmus Aaen/Inbox' ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1304, in FiltersChanged File "addin.pyc", line 1330, in UpdateFolderHooks File "addin.pyc", line 1358, in _HookFolderEvents File "msgstore.pyc", line 501, in GetFQName File "msgstore.pyc", line 547, in GetParent File "msgstore.pyc", line 527, in _FolderFromMAPIFolder com_error: (-2147467259, 'Unspecified error', None, None) Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Inbox', as it is not available Skipping processing of missed messages in folder 'Dns', as it is not available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 24 16:40:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 24 16:42:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-697970 ] pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Message-ID: Patches item #697970, was opened at 2003-03-05 13:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Initial Comment: pop3proxy doesn't accept the hostname:portno notation for the -l (i.e. uiPort) flag. I did'nt like everybody on our LAN being able to read my mail using a webbrowser, so I wrote the attached path, this allows -l localhost:8880 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-02-24 21:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 The code has changed beyond all recognition, so the patch is no longer meaningful. The UI port comes from options["html_ui", "port"], which is of type PORT - that would need to change to something that allowed an optional server component. Everything that used that option (quite a few things) would need to allow for the new format. Given html_ui_allow_remote_connections and our support for http-auth, I don't think it's worth the time and the potential introduction of bugs to add this feature. Tony, I'll pass this back to you for the final say. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-02-17 21:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 It's worth including if it still works against the current code. I'll give it a look as soon as I can. I think I've had a brief look before and the code had changed under it, but I could be thinking of something else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 04:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Richie - do you still think that this is worth including, even with all the other security stuff that's there now? If the patch does work (does it?), then it certainly seems very simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-05 17:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Richie, thanks for the hint, I didn't know about the new html_ui_allow_remote_connections option, because I didn't read through docs and sources again after doing a new checkout. Using the Option parsing helper functions was simply done by looking for symmetry. Tim: assuming that localhost is resolved locally to 127.0.0.1, AFIK only local processes using the loopback interface can bind to the port, when somesthing listens on localhost:. That's exactly what I need, when everything (mail client, browser, pop3proxy) runs on the very same machine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4) Date: 2003-03-05 15:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=645698 You bring up a very good point, Wolfgang. Your patch plugs one hole, but someone can still access your mail via http://:8880 (or whatever port you happen to be listening on). This is a problem, and I think the solution is to implement http auth... We can't just reject connections that don't originate from localhost, because someone really might want to use another computer to access the pop3proxy ui. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-03-05 14:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Unless I'm misunderstanding something, this is exactly what the html_ui_allow_remote_connections setting is for...? Thanks for the patch anyway - there's nothing wrong with being able to specify the address that way whether html_ui_allow_remote_connections solves your problem or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-05 13:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 ahem. Make that ".. this allows -u localhost:8880", of course ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-05 13:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Forgot the checkmark, as usual. arrggg. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 24 20:45:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 24 20:47:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-697970 ] pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Message-ID: Patches item #697970, was opened at 2003-03-06 02:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: pop3proxy didn't use addressAndPort for uiPort Initial Comment: pop3proxy doesn't accept the hostname:portno notation for the -l (i.e. uiPort) flag. I did'nt like everybody on our LAN being able to read my mail using a webbrowser, so I wrote the attached path, this allows -l localhost:8880 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-25 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sounds fine to me; leaving it closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-02-25 10:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 The code has changed beyond all recognition, so the patch is no longer meaningful. The UI port comes from options["html_ui", "port"], which is of type PORT - that would need to change to something that allowed an optional server component. Everything that used that option (quite a few things) would need to allow for the new format. Given html_ui_allow_remote_connections and our support for http-auth, I don't think it's worth the time and the potential introduction of bugs to add this feature. Tony, I'll pass this back to you for the final say. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-02-18 10:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 It's worth including if it still works against the current code. I'll give it a look as soon as I can. I think I've had a brief look before and the code had changed under it, but I could be thinking of something else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Richie - do you still think that this is worth including, even with all the other security stuff that's there now? If the patch does work (does it?), then it certainly seems very simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-06 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Richie, thanks for the hint, I didn't know about the new html_ui_allow_remote_connections option, because I didn't read through docs and sources again after doing a new checkout. Using the Option parsing helper functions was simply done by looking for symmetry. Tim: assuming that localhost is resolved locally to 127.0.0.1, AFIK only local processes using the loopback interface can bind to the port, when somesthing listens on localhost:. That's exactly what I need, when everything (mail client, browser, pop3proxy) runs on the very same machine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4) Date: 2003-03-06 04:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=645698 You bring up a very good point, Wolfgang. Your patch plugs one hole, but someone can still access your mail via http://:8880 (or whatever port you happen to be listening on). This is a problem, and I think the solution is to implement http auth... We can't just reject connections that don't originate from localhost, because someone really might want to use another computer to access the pop3proxy ui. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-03-06 03:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Unless I'm misunderstanding something, this is exactly what the html_ui_allow_remote_connections setting is for...? Thanks for the patch anyway - there's nothing wrong with being able to specify the address that way whether html_ui_allow_remote_connections solves your problem or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-06 02:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 ahem. Make that ".. this allows -u localhost:8880", of course ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-03-06 02:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Forgot the checkmark, as usual. arrggg. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=697970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 24 22:38:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 24 22:40:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903905 ] IMAP Configuration Error Message-ID: Bugs item #903905, was opened at 2004-02-25 03:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ron Gerrans (rgerrans) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP Configuration Error Initial Comment: I checked the mail list and saw one other user with this same problem, but no resolution and you asked them to submit a bug report which I couldn't locate. After setting up the configuration page with the proper server and login information if I click on the train folders link I get the following error page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 222, in onTrainingfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 212, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 992, in _quote arg = arg.replace('\', '\\') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' Configuration: * Suse 9.0 * Python 2.3 * SpamBayes 1.0a9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 25 09:11:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 25 09:13:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-904247 ] Permission denied revisited Message-ID: Bugs item #904247, was opened at 2004-02-25 14:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904247&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lee Robb (lrobb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Permission denied revisited Initial Comment: I was successfully running a previous version of spambayes pop3proxy as a service, but decided to upgrade using spambayes-1.0a9.exe. I uninstalled python, deleted all of the references to spambayes that I could find, disabled the service, rebooted, and then ran the setup program. sb_server is giving me the old permission denied error: C:\PROGRA~1\SPAMBA~1\bin>sb_server -u 7777 -b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 0.4 (February 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 1028 is SMTP Listener on port 1029 is proxying Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_server.py", line 936, in ? File "sb_server.py", line 924, in run File "sb_server.py", line 858, in prepare File "spambayes\smtpproxy.pyc", line 502, in CreateProxies File "spambayes\smtpproxy.pyc", line 245, in __init__ File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 271, in __init__ File "asyncore.pyc", line 300, in bind File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (10013, 'Permission denied') I have tried numerous ports but they all fail with this error. I tried installing from the source again, but that fails too (same error). xp/pro, outlook express ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904247&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 25 15:33:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 25 15:36:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-904526 ] Large number of emails not automatically filtered Message-ID: Bugs item #904526, was opened at 2004-02-25 15:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aaron Rosenfeld (aragorn18) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Large number of emails not automatically filtered Initial Comment: Using Outlook XP, if more than about 6-7 e-mails come in at once, the messages are not automatically filtered and I have to choose Filter Messages from the SpamBayes menu. Background processing does not seem to do anything either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 26 09:25:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 26 09:30:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-904247 ] Permission denied revisited Message-ID: Bugs item #904247, was opened at 2004-02-25 14:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lrobb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904247&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lee Robb (lrobb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Permission denied revisited Initial Comment: I was successfully running a previous version of spambayes pop3proxy as a service, but decided to upgrade using spambayes-1.0a9.exe. I uninstalled python, deleted all of the references to spambayes that I could find, disabled the service, rebooted, and then ran the setup program. sb_server is giving me the old permission denied error: C:\PROGRA~1\SPAMBA~1\bin>sb_server -u 7777 -b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 0.4 (February 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 1028 is SMTP Listener on port 1029 is proxying Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_server.py", line 936, in ? File "sb_server.py", line 924, in run File "sb_server.py", line 858, in prepare File "spambayes\smtpproxy.pyc", line 502, in CreateProxies File "spambayes\smtpproxy.pyc", line 245, in __init__ File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 271, in __init__ File "asyncore.pyc", line 300, in bind File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (10013, 'Permission denied') I have tried numerous ports but they all fail with this error. I tried installing from the source again, but that fails too (same error). xp/pro, outlook express ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Lee Robb (lrobb) Date: 2004-02-26 14:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2169 Fix: Deleted the "C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes" folder, reinstalled from source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=904247&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 27 01:19:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 27 01:21:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-905648 ] Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Message-ID: Feature Requests item #905648, was opened at 2004-02-26 22:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Initial Comment: It would be great if there was an option to "Whitelist" mail from e-mail addresses attached to Outlook Contacts and/or Address Book. Before using SpamBayes, I was using PopFile with an Outlook plugin and this feature was very helpful - except for a few annoyances (the whitelist was not dynamic - you had to load the list from contacts periodically because it was a static list). This could even be extended to allow right-click -- > "Add Sender to WhiteList" functionality. The messages from whitelist members could still be scanned, ... if they looked like spam, they could go into Possible - just not directly into SPAM. SpamBayes is GREAT - this would make it that much better. Great Work ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 27 01:25:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 27 01:27:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-905648 ] Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Message-ID: Feature Requests item #905648, was opened at 2004-02-27 19:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Initial Comment: It would be great if there was an option to "Whitelist" mail from e-mail addresses attached to Outlook Contacts and/or Address Book. Before using SpamBayes, I was using PopFile with an Outlook plugin and this feature was very helpful - except for a few annoyances (the whitelist was not dynamic - you had to load the list from contacts periodically because it was a static list). This could even be extended to allow right-click -- > "Add Sender to WhiteList" functionality. The messages from whitelist members could still be scanned, ... if they looked like spam, they could go into Possible - just not directly into SPAM. SpamBayes is GREAT - this would make it that much better. Great Work ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-27 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Basically, you should just turn on background filtering, and do any whitelisting via Outlook's pretty good rules system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 27 01:40:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 27 01:42:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-905648 ] Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Message-ID: Feature Requests item #905648, was opened at 2004-02-26 22:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kitchenboy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Initial Comment: It would be great if there was an option to "Whitelist" mail from e-mail addresses attached to Outlook Contacts and/or Address Book. Before using SpamBayes, I was using PopFile with an Outlook plugin and this feature was very helpful - except for a few annoyances (the whitelist was not dynamic - you had to load the list from contacts periodically because it was a static list). This could even be extended to allow right-click -- > "Add Sender to WhiteList" functionality. The messages from whitelist members could still be scanned, ... if they looked like spam, they could go into Possible - just not directly into SPAM. SpamBayes is GREAT - this would make it that much better. Great Work ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Date: 2004-02-26 22:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985524 If I specify the rule as "If Sender is in Contacts, then Stop processing more rules" will this stop it from being moved into the SPAM or possible folder? Or do I need to have the filter on the SPAM / possible folder to move the message back to the Inbox? I don't want to move it to another folder if at all possible... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-26 22:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Basically, you should just turn on background filtering, and do any whitelisting via Outlook's pretty good rules system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 28 03:03:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 28 03:04:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-20 18:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wrongbutton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2004-02-28 03:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I found that my problem was resolved by upgrading to SpamBayes version 0.9. I have Outlook XP (SP2) running on Win XP Pro (SP1). SpamBayes was not moving most of the messages that were significantly flagged as spam. As per the 0.9 instructions, I uninstalled SpamBayes and then reinstalled the new version. Rather than continuing to use my existing database, I chose to retrain based on about 6 months of previously categorized email. It took almost an hour, but the results were highly worthwhile as all my messages are now being appropriately filtered. In conclusion: SpamBayes version 0.9 solved my problem. I hope it works for you too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Finkel (lsp85) Date: 2003-12-20 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935221 upgraded Outlook (MS Office) from 2000 to 2003, on a Win2k 5.00.2195 SP4 OS computer. I am using version .81 of SpamBayes SpanBayes worked fantastic on Outlook 2000, however it is not working very good at all on 2003. I retrained, deleted and retrained. No good. I disabled the Outlook junk e-mail option, still not good. I am getting scores of 100, 97 etc... but the e-mails will not forward to the suspected spam folders, they stay in the in box. I know my settings are correct. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken (kenjin2) Date: 2003-10-27 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895882 The SB Outlook plug-in (0081) fails to move messages that are classified as Spam or Spam-Maybe. An earlier version of the plug-in worked fine after some installation anomalies were resolved. Also, this plug-in worked when first installed 9-12-03. I'm not certain, but the failure seemed to occur when Office update to SP3 was applied along with a security rollup from Microsoft. I'm runing Windows XP/Professional SP1 with Outlook 2000 SP3. The log files seem nominal. Thanks for your efforts on this projevt. Ken ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 20:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is it possible that SpamBayes is configured to leave these messages "Untouched" in the Filter dialog? I'm adding some debug output to SpamBayes to help track this down in future versions, but the log certainly shows nothing going wrong when doing the move. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Ingenito (gates150) Date: 2003-10-16 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=888404 I am having this same problem also. Rebooting the computer does not fix the problem. I am using Outlook XP, Win XP SP2 and Spambayes .81. I have also set the delay to 4 seconds and this did not help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Esterhai (esterhai) Date: 2003-10-03 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=879055 I am having the exact same problem and can't figure out a solution. Does anyone have a solution for us. Restarting the computer or Outlook doesn't solve my problem. I have been trying to make it work for 3 days now. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2003-09-22 10:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP (SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates). Except rebooting does not solve my problem. Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) but not moved. I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but can find no documentation. Can anyone tell me how to do this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-21 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 12:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 28 13:14:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 28 13:14:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-906546 ] Installation Rough Spots Message-ID: Bugs item #906546, was opened at 2004-02-28 12:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906546&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon H. Peterson (jonhp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Installation Rough Spots Initial Comment: This applies to the Outlook Plugin installer: (my system: win2k, office2k) 1) It isn't clear whether the user needs to do an uninstall before doing an upgrade or reinstall. Or does the installer take care of this -- didn't appear like it did so I did an unistall of 0.8 before installing 0.9. Was that required? 2) The installer doesn't seem to know where it is installed if there is a prior install. It appears to assume C:\Program Files\... This is not always the case. 3) The registry does not appear to be cleaned up after an uninstall. Attached file has the entires I found after uninstall of 0.8 and install of 0.9. Not sure if they all apply, but didn't want to miss one either. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906546&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 28 14:46:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 28 14:46:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-906581 ] Assertion failed in search subject Message-ID: Bugs item #906581, was opened at 2004-02-28 20:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906581&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marel Baczynski (imbaczek) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Assertion failed in search subject Initial Comment: http://localhost:8880/review?subject=on&max_results=20&find=spam Searching... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 469, in onReview File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 591, in _contains AssertionError It is a clean install as a proxy, fed with some megabytes of old spam/ham mboxes and some recent messages. WinXP Pro SP1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906581&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 28 23:12:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 28 23:12:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-906546 ] Installation Rough Spots Message-ID: Bugs item #906546, was opened at 2004-02-29 07:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906546&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon H. Peterson (jonhp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Installation Rough Spots Initial Comment: This applies to the Outlook Plugin installer: (my system: win2k, office2k) 1) It isn't clear whether the user needs to do an uninstall before doing an upgrade or reinstall. Or does the installer take care of this -- didn't appear like it did so I did an unistall of 0.8 before installing 0.9. Was that required? 2) The installer doesn't seem to know where it is installed if there is a prior install. It appears to assume C:\Program Files\... This is not always the case. 3) The registry does not appear to be cleaned up after an uninstall. Attached file has the entires I found after uninstall of 0.8 and install of 0.9. Not sure if they all apply, but didn't want to miss one either. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-29 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1) The release notes clearly say that you should uninstall first. I suspect the problem may be that people don't manage to figure out where the release notes are - maybe we need to link to these more prominently? IAC, this is only a 0.8-0.9 issue, since usually the software can just be installed over the old version. 2) I suspect this is just a 0.8-0.9 issue. The software name changed from "SpamBayes Outlook plugin" to "SpamBayes" (to accomodate the non-Outlook stuff), which causes this sort of problem. 3) This is a known (and fixed in 0.9) bug with 0.8. Please re- open if you notice that the 0.9 uninstall is not clean. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906546&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 28 23:19:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 28 23:19:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-905648 ] Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Message-ID: Feature Requests item #905648, was opened at 2004-02-27 19:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Initial Comment: It would be great if there was an option to "Whitelist" mail from e-mail addresses attached to Outlook Contacts and/or Address Book. Before using SpamBayes, I was using PopFile with an Outlook plugin and this feature was very helpful - except for a few annoyances (the whitelist was not dynamic - you had to load the list from contacts periodically because it was a static list). This could even be extended to allow right-click -- > "Add Sender to WhiteList" functionality. The messages from whitelist members could still be scanned, ... if they looked like spam, they could go into Possible - just not directly into SPAM. SpamBayes is GREAT - this would make it that much better. Great Work ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-29 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No. Unforunately it's not possible to implement SpamBayes' filtering using the Outlook Rules system, so SpamBayes works independantly of it, and so the "Stop processing" won't have any effect. I would recommend that the best solution would be to create a new folder, and move either all 'whitelisted' mail to it, or everything *except* 'whitelisted' mail to it. Ensure that 'background filtering' is enabled (Advanced tab) and get SpamBayes to filter *only* the folder that doesn't include the 'whitelisted' mail. You'll now have an inbox with mail SpamBayes thinks is ham, and an inbox with mail that your 'whitelist' thinks is ham, and SpamBayes hasn't touched. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Date: 2004-02-27 19:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985524 If I specify the rule as "If Sender is in Contacts, then Stop processing more rules" will this stop it from being moved into the SPAM or possible folder? Or do I need to have the filter on the SPAM / possible folder to move the message back to the Inbox? I don't want to move it to another folder if at all possible... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-27 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Basically, you should just turn on background filtering, and do any whitelisting via Outlook's pretty good rules system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 28 23:49:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 28 23:49:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-906546 ] Installation Rough Spots Message-ID: Bugs item #906546, was opened at 2004-02-28 12:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jonhp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906546&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon H. Peterson (jonhp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Installation Rough Spots Initial Comment: This applies to the Outlook Plugin installer: (my system: win2k, office2k) 1) It isn't clear whether the user needs to do an uninstall before doing an upgrade or reinstall. Or does the installer take care of this -- didn't appear like it did so I did an unistall of 0.8 before installing 0.9. Was that required? 2) The installer doesn't seem to know where it is installed if there is a prior install. It appears to assume C:\Program Files\... This is not always the case. 3) The registry does not appear to be cleaned up after an uninstall. Attached file has the entires I found after uninstall of 0.8 and install of 0.9. Not sure if they all apply, but didn't want to miss one either. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jon H. Peterson (jonhp) Date: 2004-02-28 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=986592 1) Right -- couldn't find the release notes before doing the upgrade....I did, now, it is subtle. 2) OK 3) I included because FAQ 3.14 kinda gives those directions. Will recheck when 0.9 is uninstalled. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-28 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1) The release notes clearly say that you should uninstall first. I suspect the problem may be that people don't manage to figure out where the release notes are - maybe we need to link to these more prominently? IAC, this is only a 0.8-0.9 issue, since usually the software can just be installed over the old version. 2) I suspect this is just a 0.8-0.9 issue. The software name changed from "SpamBayes Outlook plugin" to "SpamBayes" (to accomodate the non-Outlook stuff), which causes this sort of problem. 3) This is a known (and fixed in 0.9) bug with 0.8. Please re- open if you notice that the 0.9 uninstall is not clean. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=906546&group_id=61702