From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 1 14:39:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 1 14:39:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-801751 ] Cannot install the program Message-ID: Support Requests item #801751, was opened at 2003-09-06 14:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by adamscpas You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Erik Thorsen (passage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot install the program Initial Comment: After reading through almost every reported bug on this web site and also looking through the documentation html page I am most confident I can't find the reason for my error in any other way than reporting it here. The problem is as follows... I first tried to install the addin for outlook. I had to cancel because it told me to close all outlook tasks and so forth. Then it adviced me to turn of any antivirus programs running. I felt it would be safest to restart my computer, so I choose the cancel button. After restarting and making sure I am not connected with anything like internet explorer, outlook, outlook express, yahoo, msn or anything else that should cause any problems, I get the following error message: You must close Outlook before spambayes can be installed. Please close all outlook windows (using File->Exit and log off" if available) and click retry, or cancel to exit the installation. If the message persists after closing all outlook windows, you may need to log off from windows and try again. I have tried everything now but I can't seem to get the program ready for installing, even though I have disabled my antivirus program and closed all open windows. As the program is not installed I have no log file or anything else to attach. I am running a windows system, xp pro, with office pro installed on it. If you need any additional information about my system, please do not hesitate to contact me! If anyone can help me with this matter I would appreciate it very much!!! Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adamscpas (adamscpas) Date: 2004-04-01 14:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1011391 I have a similar problem when running the install program. Even though I have closed Outlook, it still insists that my Outlook Mail Delivery Agent is still running and won't go any further. I've rebooted without Outlook in my Start-up menu and checked to see if any apps are running in the background... nothing. Any suggestions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-09 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Are you running ActiveSync, Palm software, or any other software for synchronizing an electronic organizer with Outlook? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-16 23:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 801756 ] Problems installing the addin on win xp pro ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 2 02:45:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 2 02:45:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-928081 ] add in reg fail help Message-ID: Support Requests item #928081, was opened at 2004-04-02 02:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=928081&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: russf2001 (russf2001) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: add in reg fail help Initial Comment: using windows xp pro with office 2003 pro system has roaming profiles with restricted group policies. i log on as admin. adjust permissions on spambayes folder. spam bayes works on this profile than i regsvr32 as instructions state and i get this errot -- c:\program files\spambayes\bin\outlook_addin.dill was loaded, but the dllInstall entry point was not found. This file cannot be registered. help. Can I just add a key if so please detail TIA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=928081&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 2 09:00:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 2 11:02:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802890 ] Doc/error message bugs: Non-standard db name? Message-ID: Bugs item #802890, was opened at 2003-09-09 02:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jalbro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802890&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeffrey C. Albro (jalbro) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Doc/error message bugs: Non-standard db name? Initial Comment: Using version spambayes-1.0a5: If you follow the directions in INTEGRATION.txt, and hammie.py -g ~/tmp/newham -s ~/tmp/newspam You get a complaint about using the pickle or DB version (-d or -D). No big deal. .hammiedb is created if you use -d (even though there is no success message to tell you this.) However, the procmail instructions suggest you use hammie.db. This causes hammie to crash in a cryptic fashion. Instead, hammie should complain along the lines of "No such data base file!" In the documentation the name of the DB created in the first place should match the procmail instructions. Thanks for a great product! Please fix the documentaion and make hammie a bit more "talkative" Thanks! -Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jeffrey C. Albro (jalbro) Date: 2004-04-02 14:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=10595 In accordance with my ongoing ice cream - carrot experiment, I am attaching a bounty to this bug. Fix it, and I will send the fixer a coupon for a pint of Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream. -Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802890&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 2 09:54:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 2 12:03:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-928295 ] Spam Bayes fails to auto-filter Message-ID: Bugs item #928295, was opened at 2004-04-02 09:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=928295&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yinzer (yinzer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam Bayes fails to auto-filter Initial Comment: Hope I'm doing this correctly. I'm trying to report a bug I'm encountering with Spam Bayes. I have "Enable Spam Bayes" selected. I've trained on Ham & Spam. Manually clicking Filter Spam successfully filters spam at a success rate of about 99%. I just can't get Spam Bayes to filter automatically. It used to work wonderfully, but not any more. Any help you can offer is greatly appreciated. Dan Sparvero dan@spdesign.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=928295&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 6 09:53:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 6 17:03:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to Message-ID: Bugs item #923921, was opened at 2004-03-26 10:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by komotso You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: 100% Spam moved only to Initial Comment: About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. I had this problem with 0.8 as well, and was able to get around it by setting the plug-in to filter the "Possible Spam" folder as well (so those messages were basically getting filtered twice). But version 0.9 explicitly won't let me do this. There are no errors in the log, I tried lowering the "possible" range even further, to no avail. The filtering seems to otherwise be functioning correctly. It's only that a small fraction of messages are filtered according to the "possible" action despite having a spam score of 100%. The Spam Clues readout for one such message is attached. Outlook 2003 Windows 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Clay Fenlason (komotso) Date: 2004-04-06 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=995642 [Response to kpitt comment] I haven't set up the spam column in Outlook, so it is only the "Show Spam Clues," yes. However, I didn't do any additional training before checking the clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-26 12:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Does the Spam column in Outlook show the message as 100%, or only when you do "Show spam clues"? Did you train on any other messages between the time that the message was filtered to Possible Spam and when you looked at the spam clues for the message? "Show spam clues" scores the message using the current training data at the time that you select the menu option, which isn't necessarily the same as the training data that was used to score the message when it was first received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=923921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 6 12:25:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 6 17:04:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-930550 ] Error on SpamBayes startup. Message-ID: Bugs item #930550, was opened at 2004-04-06 12:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=930550&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gregory Warnes (warnes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error on SpamBayes startup. Initial Comment: SpamBayes 1.0a9 Windows2000 SP3 Outlook 2000 SP3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=930550&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 6 23:24:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 6 23:24:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-930824 ] WhiteList e-mail addresses and domain names Message-ID: Feature Requests item #930824, was opened at 2004-04-06 20:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930824&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: dkuhn (sentinel411) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: WhiteList e-mail addresses and domain names Initial Comment: Develope a feature to "white list" either a specifc e-mail address or domain where the e-mail is never processed by the spam filter and are never considered spam. E-mail WhiteList: Allow all e-mail from a specific address never considered spam. For example mybrother@myfamilydomain.com Domain WhiteList: Allow all mail from *@myfamilydomain.com never to be considered spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930824&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 6 23:32:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 6 23:32:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-930824 ] WhiteList e-mail addresses and domain names Message-ID: Feature Requests item #930824, was opened at 2004-04-07 15:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930824&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: dkuhn (sentinel411) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: WhiteList e-mail addresses and domain names Initial Comment: Develope a feature to "white list" either a specifc e-mail address or domain where the e-mail is never processed by the spam filter and are never considered spam. E-mail WhiteList: Allow all e-mail from a specific address never considered spam. For example mybrother@myfamilydomain.com Domain WhiteList: Allow all mail from *@myfamilydomain.com never to be considered spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-07 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930824&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 7 05:21:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 7 05:21:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-930950 ] upper limit to scanned email size Message-ID: Feature Requests item #930950, was opened at 2004-04-07 11:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: upper limit to scanned email size Initial Comment: hello, SpamBayes is a client-side plugin and so, need to download the email in order to scan it. this can be a pain in case of remote connected seesion... typically, SPAM are small emails. it could be great to be able to setup an upper limit to the size of email SpamBayes try to scan. have a nice day, Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 7 12:02:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 7 15:02:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-931150 ] Unsuported Character Set spams... Message-ID: Bugs item #931150, was opened at 2004-04-07 16:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yasser Mondallis (yazmon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unsuported Character Set spams... Initial Comment: Ive received a lot of spam that seems to confuse our Exchange\Outlook system that makes something convert the actual content of the email into an attached text file, with the body replaced with 'This message uses a character set that is not supported by the Internet Service. To view the original message content, open the attached message. If the text doesn't display correctly, save the attachment to disk, and then open it using a viewer that can display the original character set.' Only clue is the subject. As the training is being done on the body of the text, the app is getting very confused with these mails. Any chance of making it check the original body? (I know this may or may not be a setup problem here, but it would seem like a good way to get spam to an inbox without detection...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=931150&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 7 18:55:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 7 18:55:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-930950 ] upper limit to scanned email size Message-ID: Feature Requests item #930950, was opened at 2004-04-07 21:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: upper limit to scanned email size Initial Comment: hello, SpamBayes is a client-side plugin and so, need to download the email in order to scan it. this can be a pain in case of remote connected seesion... typically, SPAM are small emails. it could be great to be able to setup an upper limit to the size of email SpamBayes try to scan. have a nice day, Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-08 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Which SpamBayes application are you using? If it's the Outlook plug-in, then this doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes only finds out about the mail when it has arrived. If it's sb_server, this also doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes is acting as a proxy - it's only processing mail when the mail client is already downloading it - it doesn't result in any extra traffic between the server and your machine. If, however, you're using sb_imapfilter, then this could be relevant. If you are, and really want this feature, then put a note confirming that here, otherwise I'll close this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 8 07:46:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 8 07:46:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-930950 ] upper limit to scanned email size Message-ID: Feature Requests item #930950, was opened at 2004-04-07 11:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pbru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: upper limit to scanned email size Initial Comment: hello, SpamBayes is a client-side plugin and so, need to download the email in order to scan it. this can be a pain in case of remote connected seesion... typically, SPAM are small emails. it could be great to be able to setup an upper limit to the size of email SpamBayes try to scan. have a nice day, Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Pierre Bru (pbru) Date: 2004-04-08 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=602719 I use the Outlook plugin. YES, the mail has _arrived_... but on the Exchange server not on the client (outlook). as the outlook plugin runs on the client side, in order to tokenize the email to give it a score, it has to read each and every word of the email which is _arrived_ but still lives on the Exchange server, and so download it from the server to the client. on an ethernet connection, there is no problem. but when outlook runs on a laptop connected to the exchange server via a telephone line, it may be a pain. Pierre. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-08 00:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Which SpamBayes application are you using? If it's the Outlook plug-in, then this doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes only finds out about the mail when it has arrived. If it's sb_server, this also doesn't make sense, because SpamBayes is acting as a proxy - it's only processing mail when the mail client is already downloading it - it doesn't result in any extra traffic between the server and your machine. If, however, you're using sb_imapfilter, then this could be relevant. If you are, and really want this feature, then put a note confirming that here, otherwise I'll close this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=930950&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 8 19:02:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 8 19:02:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932074 ] outlook doesn't start with spambayes and outlook-addin.y Message-ID: Bugs item #932074, was opened at 2004-04-09 01:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932074&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: I*igo Serna (inigoserna) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook doesn't start with spambayes and outlook-addin.y Initial Comment: Outlook does not start if I register spambayes and outlook-addin.py (from pywin32-200, win32com/demos). In fact I've written a simple addin - based in outlook-addin.py from win32com/demos) - and If I register mine, outlook does not start. Error dialog shows: Title: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library Body: Runtime Error! Program [path_to_outlook.exe] Abnormal porgram termination Spambayes log file does not exist. I suppose it's spambayes' fault because my own addin and win32com/demos/outlook-addin.py can coexist peacefully. Is this bug related with #924327 maybe? Windows 2000 Spanish with lastest patches MS Office 2000 SR-1 Spanish with lastest patches python-2.3.2 or 2.3.3 from python.org pywin32-200 from sourceforge.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932074&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 8 19:23:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 8 19:23:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932074 ] outlook doesn't start with spambayes and outlook-addin.y Message-ID: Bugs item #932074, was opened at 2004-04-09 01:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by inigoserna You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932074&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: I*igo Serna (inigoserna) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook doesn't start with spambayes and outlook-addin.y Initial Comment: Outlook does not start if I register spambayes and outlook-addin.py (from pywin32-200, win32com/demos). In fact I've written a simple addin - based in outlook-addin.py from win32com/demos) - and If I register mine, outlook does not start. Error dialog shows: Title: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library Body: Runtime Error! Program [path_to_outlook.exe] Abnormal porgram termination Spambayes log file does not exist. I suppose it's spambayes' fault because my own addin and win32com/demos/outlook-addin.py can coexist peacefully. Is this bug related with #924327 maybe? Windows 2000 Spanish with lastest patches MS Office 2000 SR-1 Spanish with lastest patches python-2.3.2 or 2.3.3 from python.org pywin32-200 from sourceforge.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: I*igo Serna (inigoserna) Date: 2004-04-09 01:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1016614 I have the log now, sorry. It seems there are 2 COM servers and 2 COM clients trying to use MAPI... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932074&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 8 22:01:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 8 22:01:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932149 ] sb_dbexpimp.py fails to import what it exported Message-ID: Bugs item #932149, was opened at 2004-04-08 19:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932149&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py fails to import what it exported Initial Comment: There is a line in a flat file exported using 1.0a9 sb_dbexpimp.py: %D0%C9%CB%D4%CF%C7%D2%C1%CD%CD%D9%2C`2`0` (this is a Russian word in KOI-8 encoding) an attempt to import a file containing this line fails with Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/home/leob/opt/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 268, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 200, in runImport word = uunquote(word) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 116, in uunquote return unicode(urllib.unquote(s), 'utf-8') UnicodeError: UTF-8 decoding error: invalid data This is a regression from 1.0a7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932149&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 8 22:06:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 8 22:06:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932149 ] sb_dbexpimp.py fails to import what it exported Message-ID: Bugs item #932149, was opened at 2004-04-09 14:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932149&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py fails to import what it exported Initial Comment: There is a line in a flat file exported using 1.0a9 sb_dbexpimp.py: %D0%C9%CB%D4%CF%C7%D2%C1%CD%CD%D9%2C`2`0` (this is a Russian word in KOI-8 encoding) an attempt to import a file containing this line fails with Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/home/leob/opt/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 268, in ? runImport(dbFN, useDBM, newDBM, flatFN) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 200, in runImport word = uunquote(word) File "/usr/home/leob/opt/bin/sb_dbexpimp.py", line 116, in uunquote return unicode(urllib.unquote(s), 'utf-8') UnicodeError: UTF-8 decoding error: invalid data This is a regression from 1.0a7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-09 14:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The sb_dbexpimp script has undergone a major change (to use csv as the 'interchange' format) since 1.0a9, and this should have resolved this problem. If you're using Python 2.3, you should be able to simply use the script from cvs; otherwise a new release should be out soon, which will include the revised script. Please reopen if this still occurs with the 1.0b1/CVS sb_dbexpimp.py script. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932149&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 9 15:01:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 9 15:01:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-932463 ] Installs but will not run Inbox Problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #932463, was opened at 2004-04-09 15:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=932463&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rich (richg56) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installs but will not run Inbox Problem Initial Comment: I have a similar problem to [ 861014 ] Install Error http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=861014&group_id=61702&atid=498104 Submitted By: Melissa Phillips - mrphillips Date Submitted: 2003-12-16 09:18 Last Updated By: kpitt - Comment added Date Last Updated: 2004-03-09 16:20 Loading spambayes-1.0a9.exe . 4/9/04 I load it and it turns off filtering automatically. I can get to the manager and under the filtering tab first browse button I get no folder tree the existing information is install;install;install The other 2 browse buttons provide folder trees. My first install I did a lot of training I uninstalled and removed the directory mentioned in the follow-up and restarted then reloaded without training, without all unsure directory. Same problem. Potential conflicts: + Outlook ->Tools->Email accounts->2 accounts forwarded to 1 local pst file in 2003 format (not compatible with 2002 and previous) + Tivoli + McAfee on demain virus scanner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=932463&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 9 15:12:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 9 15:12:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-932471 ] Spambayes will not install on NT Message-ID: Support Requests item #932471, was opened at 2004-04-09 15:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=932471&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: jonw (jondavidsmith) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes will not install on NT Initial Comment: Hello, I am trying to install spambayes on an NT system. The install gets to the finish page and then jumps to the welcome to spambayes page--as expected. The toolbar does not appear on outlook and the install is not compleat. I'm running nt4.0 with service pack 6. Using Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.3821 Spambayes 1.0a9 I beleive I have the correct comcat.dll. In that both the good and bad ones are version 5.0, Ican't be sure, but IE is 6.0 2800 and the bad dll comes from IE4.0. This is per this link: spambayes1.log : Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin spambayes2.log: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 477, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 407, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 261, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) The only pyton file that showes up is: pythoncom23.dll in winnt\system32. No "com addins" are shown in outlook tools. Tony Meyer has been helping me, but has run out of ideas. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=932471&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Apr 11 12:11:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Apr 11 12:11:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-933246 ] Error on startup Message-ID: Bugs item #933246, was opened at 2004-04-11 16:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933246&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: SoonerRick (dcary) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error on startup Initial Comment: I downloaded SpamBayes yesterday and am receiving a popup whenever I open Outlook 2000 or every time I click Inbox. The message says: The Web page could not be found. This error could have been caused by a bad or misspelled URL; following an invalid link; or your network connection and/or transient conditions on the internet. To check the URL, choose the Home Page tab on the Properties dialog. I am running Windows 98SE. Outlook will still operate as far as receiving and sending messages. I tried to uninstall the program and removing all traces of SpamBayes but nothing worked. I still get the error message. I downloaded it again and still the same message. Following is the log file: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 4.10.67766446 ( A ) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] GetNextPage with current 0 IDD_WIZARD_WELCOME GetNextPage with current 5 IDD_WIZARD_TRAINING_IS_IMPORTANT GetNextPage with current 1 IDD_WIZARD_FOLDERS_WATCH GetNextPage with current 2 IDD_WIZARD_FOLDERS_REST Wizard Done! Saving wizard changes Saving configuration -> C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\SpamBayes\Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Junk E-Mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Any suggestions? I don?t want to reformat the hard drive unless that is the only alternative. Dick Cary dcarys@cox.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933246&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Apr 11 21:23:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Apr 11 21:23:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-933473 ] Unnecessary spam folder hook Message-ID: Bugs item #933473, was opened at 2004-04-12 13:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933473&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Unnecessary spam folder hook Initial Comment: [From discussion on spambayes-dev] The spam folder gets hooked for incremental training, even if the train_manual_spam option is False. In the hooked event, it checks for the train_manual_spam option and quits if it's False. I asked: """ Would it not be better to only add the hook if the train_manual_spam option is True? Or is there some other reason that the spam folder has to be hooked? """ Mark replied: """I think you are correct - we could avoid the hook alltogether. However, I'm still reluctant to change this, as it does risk breakage. We can fix it post 1.0. """ Opening this so that I remember that this needs to be done. Attaching a patch that does the job, and I'll run with this in my own day-to-day plug-in so there's some limited testing at least before it gets checked in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933473&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 12 13:47:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 12 13:48:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-933778 ] ****SPAM**** not detected Message-ID: Support Requests item #933778, was opened at 2004-04-12 20:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=933778&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ofer Lapid (ofer_lapid) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: ****SPAM**** not detected Initial Comment: I have trined on several email messages that have ****SPAM**** in their subject line but spambayes does not mark these messages as SPAM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=933778&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 12 14:09:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 12 14:09:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-933791 ] Error after install ActivePython (ActiveState) Message-ID: Bugs item #933791, was opened at 2004-04-12 20:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933791&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ingolf Steinhardt (x-herbert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error after install ActivePython (ActiveState) Initial Comment: Hi, after installing the ActiveState ActivePython Version ActivePython-2.3.2-232-win32-ix86 start Outlook with the Error (translate from German): "Dont find the procedur springpoint ? PyCom_SentAnCOMErrorFromPyException@@YAJPBDABU_ GUID@@@Z in the DLL pythoncom23.dll" The Logfile: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: Die angegebene Prozedur wurde nicht gefunden. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: Die angegebene Prozedur wurde nicht gefunden. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' My System: WinXP SP1 Outlook 2000 SpamBayes 1.09a by x-herbert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933791&group_id=61702 From gdpine at pacbell.net Mon Apr 12 22:54:25 2004 From: gdpine at pacbell.net (Gerald Pine) Date: Mon Apr 12 22:56:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Can't start sb_server.py Message-ID: <1081824864.4743.43.camel@pentium.home.net> I have a problem that appeared when I changed from version 1.0a7 to 1.0a9 under SuSE Linux 9.0 and python 2.3. When I start sb_server.py I get the following result. Can someone decipher the messages and give me a hint as to what I need to do to fix the problem? Thanks. pentium:/usr/lib/python/spambayes-1.0a9 # python scripts/sb_server.py SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 0.4 (February 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "scripts/sb_server.py", line 936, in ? run() File "scripts/sb_server.py", line 924, in run prepare() File "scripts/sb_server.py", line 858, in prepare smtpproxy.SMTPTrainer(state.bayes, state))) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/smtpproxy.py", line 502, in CreateProxies trainer) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/smtpproxy.py", line 245, in __init__ proxyArgs) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/asyncore.py", line 300, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (98, 'Address already in use') -- Gerald D. Pine 1530 4th Street, #26 Sacramento, CA 95814 phone/fax: 916-444-5413 gdpine@pacbell.net From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 13 00:27:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 13 00:27:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-933791 ] Error after install ActivePython (ActiveState) Message-ID: Bugs item #933791, was opened at 2004-04-13 06:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933791&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ingolf Steinhardt (x-herbert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error after install ActivePython (ActiveState) Initial Comment: Hi, after installing the ActiveState ActivePython Version ActivePython-2.3.2-232-win32-ix86 start Outlook with the Error (translate from German): "Dont find the procedur springpoint ? PyCom_SentAnCOMErrorFromPyException@@YAJPBDABU_ GUID@@@Z in the DLL pythoncom23.dll" The Logfile: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: Die angegebene Prozedur wurde nicht gefunden. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: Die angegebene Prozedur wurde nicht gefunden. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' My System: WinXP SP1 Outlook 2000 SpamBayes 1.09a by x-herbert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-13 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a known issue with ActivePython and the latest release of spambayes. Both the next releases of ActivePython and of SpamBayes should fix this problem. In good news, the next release (1.0b1) of SpamBayes may very well make it out today, so you'll be able to grab that and it should fix the problem. Stay tuned to the spambayes- announce list (or the website, or whatever). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933791&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 13 00:30:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 13 00:30:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-933778 ] ****SPAM**** not detected Message-ID: Support Requests item #933778, was opened at 2004-04-13 05:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=933778&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ofer Lapid (ofer_lapid) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: ****SPAM**** not detected Initial Comment: I have trined on several email messages that have ****SPAM**** in their subject line but spambayes does not mark these messages as SPAM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-13 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 "****SPAM****" will result in a single token (something like "Subject:****SPAM****", which may be outweighed by other (hammy) tokens. The only way to explain why a message scores the way it does is to explain the "clues" for the message. This is accessible via the "Show Clues" item in the Outlook plugin, and the "Clues" link on the review page of sb_server. If you aren't able to figure out from the clues why the message scored what it did, please attach it here (and reopen this), or mail the list spambayes@python.org with the clues, and someone will explain it to you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=933778&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 13 09:54:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 13 09:54:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-891990 ] Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Message-ID: Bugs item #891990, was opened at 2004-02-06 19:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by thilok You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Read-Confirmation is sent automatically Initial Comment: For some Spam I have received recently, read- confirmation messages have been sent automatically. I have doublechecked the Email-Configuration in Outlook and it was definitely set to "never send a read confirmation for internet mail". Nevertheless, it did. I only noticed because the confirmations came back due to an unknown adress. All the messages have been classified as Spam by Spambayes and where therefore moved directly to the Junk Mail folder, where they were never opened by me. It looks like the read-confirmation was generated during classification of the mails or while they where moved to the junk folder. But why was the confirmation sent at all, when this function is disabled in Outlook? Im using a popmail account, Outlook 2002, Win XP. It's a bit of horror to know that these things are sent in the background without me knowing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Date: 2004-04-13 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=969651 Looks like it doesn't happen any more with the latest Spambayes release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thilo Kuchenbrod (thilok) Date: 2004-02-06 20:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=969651 The header of the messages have a "Disposition-Notification- To:" field instead of "Return-Receipt-To:" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=891990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 14 16:23:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 14 16:23:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-935183 ] crash on run Message-ID: Bugs item #935183, was opened at 2004-04-14 20:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: crash on run Initial Comment: inital steps went fine.... I am ready to run "sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5" and it dumps a stack trace... SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 913, in ? run() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 903, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 774, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 688, in Filter for msg in self: File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 581, in __iter__ for key in self.keys(): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 599, in keys response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['command not implemented'] I'm not a Python coder so I'm just gonna guess that response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") is what it's puking on?? system info: Server is win 2003, current patches etc... imap and mail server is from here: http://www.lumisoft.ee/lsWWW/ENG/Products/WEB_Mai l/webmail_index_eng.aspx?type=info imap server works with Outlook 2003 not yet tested with other clients. Help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 14 18:42:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 14 18:43:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-935183 ] crash on run Message-ID: Bugs item #935183, was opened at 2004-04-14 20:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by figuerres You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: crash on run Initial Comment: inital steps went fine.... I am ready to run "sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5" and it dumps a stack trace... SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 913, in ? run() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 903, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 774, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 688, in Filter for msg in self: File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 581, in __iter__ for key in self.keys(): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 599, in keys response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['command not implemented'] I'm not a Python coder so I'm just gonna guess that response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") is what it's puking on?? system info: Server is win 2003, current patches etc... imap and mail server is from here: http://www.lumisoft.ee/lsWWW/ENG/Products/WEB_Mai l/webmail_index_eng.aspx?type=info imap server works with Outlook 2003 not yet tested with other clients. Help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-14 22:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 I am trying to determine if this is an imap server bug or a spambayes bug... can anyone help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 15 00:01:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 15 00:02:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-903905 ] IMAP Configuration Error Message-ID: Bugs item #903905, was opened at 2004-02-25 03:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rgerrans You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ron Gerrans (rgerrans) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP Configuration Error Initial Comment: I checked the mail list and saw one other user with this same problem, but no resolution and you asked them to submit a bug report which I couldn't locate. After setting up the configuration page with the proper server and login information if I click on the train folders link I get the following error page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 222, in onTrainingfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 212, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 992, in _quote arg = arg.replace('\', '\\') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' Configuration: * Suse 9.0 * Python 2.3 * SpamBayes 1.0a9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ron Gerrans (rgerrans) Date: 2004-04-15 04:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717883 Had a few minutes to finally take another run at it. Installed v1.0b1 and have basically the same results have tried stopping/starting it again, tried removing the password and using the -P option, but all to no avail. Latest error traceback below, any other thoughts would be appreciated. TIA, -Ron File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 222, in onTrainingfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 223, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 832, in _command_complete raise self.abort('command: %s => %s' % (name, val)) abort: command: LOGIN => socket error: EOF ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-15 23:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe that simply stopping and starting again, with or without -v (which shouldn't effect operation in any way) would fix this. The problems appears to be that the filter didn't try to log in correctly after the configuration options were setup (the password was None). (This assumes that the password was entered, if not, then you have to stop it, and run with -P from the command line). The first problem has been fixed in CVS, so should be fixed in the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Bland (birdra) Date: 2004-03-15 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717251 I was able to access the train folders page after I issued "python -v" from the command line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: James Bland (birdra) Date: 2004-03-15 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=717251 I am also getting the same problem with a Suse configuration. Suse Pro 9.0 Python 2.3 Spambayes 1.0a9 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 172, in onFilterfolders self._login_to_imap() File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 217, in _login_to_imap self.imap.login(username, self.imap_pwd) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 212, in login BaseIMAP.login(self, username, pwd) # superclass login File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 471, in login typ, dat = self._simple_command('LOGIN', user, self._quote(password)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/imaplib.py", line 992, in _quote arg = arg.replace('\', '\\') AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'replace' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=903905&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 15 10:29:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 15 10:30:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-935657 ] Delete as Spam button Message-ID: Bugs item #935657, was opened at 2004-04-15 14:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935657&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (scooterbill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Delete as Spam button Initial Comment: When I use delete as Spam button the Spam is deleted but disappears completely...it doesn't go into Spam folder or Possible Spam folder or Deleted items. SpamBayes appears to be functioning fine but not able to find repository for deleted Spam. Using version 1.0b1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 15 12:52:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 15 12:53:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-935657 ] Delete as Spam button Message-ID: Bugs item #935657, was opened at 2004-04-15 14:29 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by scooterbill You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935657&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (scooterbill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Delete as Spam button Initial Comment: When I use delete as Spam button the Spam is deleted but disappears completely...it doesn't go into Spam folder or Possible Spam folder or Deleted items. SpamBayes appears to be functioning fine but not able to find repository for deleted Spam. Using version 1.0b1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935657&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 16 14:36:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 16 14:36:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-16 18:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Apr 17 04:45:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Apr 17 04:45:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936821 ] sb_mboxtrain.py requires writeaccess to mbox Message-ID: Bugs item #936821, was opened at 2004-04-17 08:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936821&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: PieterB (pieterb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py requires writeaccess to mbox Initial Comment: This is tested with spambayes1.0b1.1, which isn't listed in the Group pulldownbox on sourceforge (yet). At our system we use a spamtrap which catches a lot of spam. I want to use that spammailbox for improving spambayes. When I try to learn from this read-only mbox I get the following traceback: Training spam (/var/mail/spamtrap): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 350, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 341, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 265, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 172, in mbox_train f = file(path, "r+b") IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/mail/spamtrap' It can be fixed by first trying to open the file readonly, and when that fails open the file for 'r+b'. In the method mbox_train from sb_mboxtrain.py, use the following code. # Open and lock the mailbox. Some systems require it be opened for # writes in order to assert an exclusive lock. try: # opening the file read only f = file(path, "rb") fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_EX) except: # opening file fails f = file(path, "r+b") fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_EX) This makes spambayes start learning from the mbox. Unfortuately, spambayes really wants to write to the mailbox and it fails: Training spam (/var/mail/spamtrap): Reading as Unix mbox 3960Problem truncating mbox--nothing written Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 355, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 346, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 270, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 202, in mbox_train os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) IOError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument This can be fixed by setting Headers:include_trained to false, e.g. /usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py -o Headers:include_trained:False - p /home/foobar/var/spambayes.db -s /var/mail/spamtrap I would expect sb_mboxtrain.py not to open files for writing if it's not necessary/requested. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936821&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 19 13:11:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 19 13:11:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-938072 ] Utility to check if two spam are the same Message-ID: Patches item #938072, was opened at 2004-04-19 17:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=938072&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Utility to check if two spam are the same Initial Comment: Hi, This is a file created by Skip sent to me by email. I did some minor modification (i.e. removing some fix path). This file can be used after sb_filter in a procmail mail environment. When a spam is discovered a "check sum" is done on it and the checksum is compared to the list of the check sum of previous spam. If a match is found. The email can be discarded since the mail already exist. I don't know if we should wait for Skip to say if he want or not to include this file ? Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=938072&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 20 12:12:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 20 12:12:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-917832 ] Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Message-ID: Bugs item #917832, was opened at 2004-03-16 22:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gittle (gittle) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Initial Comment: Info: Clean install of Office Professional Enterprise Edition 2003 on XP Pro, with Spambayes v 0.3. Problem: After opening Outlook 2003 I get mail for first two downloads, but thereafter the following ?task message:? ! Task 'Gary - Receiving' reported error (0x8004210A): 'The operation timed out waiting for a response from the receiving (POP) server. If you continue to receive this message, contact your server administrator or ISP.' I worked with MS Tech Support in isolating problem. Once we unchecked Spambayes in COM Addins, the program worked correctly. I did not see a FAQ on this. Your assistance please. Up to this point I?ve had no problem with Spambayes and appreciate the software. Thank you, Gary Weinstein gl.weinstein@cox.net Below are log files, though I don?t know if they will help: #1 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons #2 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook SpamBayes has processed zero messages SpamBayes is being manually disabled - deleting toolbar Addin terminating: 5 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2004-04-20 09:12 Message: Logged In: NO I have the exact same problem, with Outlook 2002 SP3, Windows XP 2002 SP1 and SpamBayes 1.0b1. Outlook loads, and then freezes within a few seconds. If I disable SpamBayes, Outlook runs fine. Here's my logfile contents: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3088 spam and 182 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 20 12:20:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 20 12:21:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-917832 ] Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Message-ID: Bugs item #917832, was opened at 2004-03-17 01:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mls64 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gittle (gittle) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Initial Comment: Info: Clean install of Office Professional Enterprise Edition 2003 on XP Pro, with Spambayes v 0.3. Problem: After opening Outlook 2003 I get mail for first two downloads, but thereafter the following ?task message:? ! Task 'Gary - Receiving' reported error (0x8004210A): 'The operation timed out waiting for a response from the receiving (POP) server. If you continue to receive this message, contact your server administrator or ISP.' I worked with MS Tech Support in isolating problem. Once we unchecked Spambayes in COM Addins, the program worked correctly. I did not see a FAQ on this. Your assistance please. Up to this point I?ve had no problem with Spambayes and appreciate the software. Thank you, Gary Weinstein gl.weinstein@cox.net Below are log files, though I don?t know if they will help: #1 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons #2 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook SpamBayes has processed zero messages SpamBayes is being manually disabled - deleting toolbar Addin terminating: 5 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike (mls64) Date: 2004-04-20 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025291 whoops - I forgot to log in before making my comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2004-04-20 12:12 Message: Logged In: NO I have the exact same problem, with Outlook 2002 SP3, Windows XP 2002 SP1 and SpamBayes 1.0b1. Outlook loads, and then freezes within a few seconds. If I disable SpamBayes, Outlook runs fine. Here's my logfile contents: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3088 spam and 182 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 20 20:47:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 20 20:48:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-938992 ] Allow longer background filtering delays. Message-ID: Bugs item #938992, was opened at 2004-04-20 17:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=938992&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Allow longer background filtering delays. Initial Comment: I use two different anti-spam programs, SpamNet and SpamBayes. They both do well at different types of messages, so the they do very well when used together. I give SpamNet the first crack at it, and then use SpamBayes background filtering with both delays set to 10 seconds. However, SpamNet sometimes hits heavy load on their servers (especially Monday mornings), and it can take it more than 10 seconds per message. This sometimes causes the two anti-spam programs to step on each other a bit and then messages can end up in the wrong folders. I'd like the ability to set the values to whatever I want, or at least up to 60 seconds. (Thanks!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=938992&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 00:20:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 00:20:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939050 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start Message-ID: Bugs item #939050, was opened at 2004-04-20 23:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939050&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Berto (rwainberg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 crashes upon start Initial Comment: After loading SpamBayes, Outlook 2003 crashes. "Outlook has recovered from a serious error...". Log file: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939050&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 01:01:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 01:01:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-917832 ] Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Message-ID: Bugs item #917832, was opened at 2004-03-17 06:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gittle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gittle (gittle) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Initial Comment: Info: Clean install of Office Professional Enterprise Edition 2003 on XP Pro, with Spambayes v 0.3. Problem: After opening Outlook 2003 I get mail for first two downloads, but thereafter the following ?task message:? ! Task 'Gary - Receiving' reported error (0x8004210A): 'The operation timed out waiting for a response from the receiving (POP) server. If you continue to receive this message, contact your server administrator or ISP.' I worked with MS Tech Support in isolating problem. Once we unchecked Spambayes in COM Addins, the program worked correctly. I did not see a FAQ on this. Your assistance please. Up to this point I?ve had no problem with Spambayes and appreciate the software. Thank you, Gary Weinstein gl.weinstein@cox.net Below are log files, though I don?t know if they will help: #1 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons #2 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook SpamBayes has processed zero messages SpamBayes is being manually disabled - deleting toolbar Addin terminating: 5 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Gittle (gittle) Date: 2004-04-21 05:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=999599 Problem is now resolved. After hours of work with MS tech and others, it turns out True Vector (Zone Alaarm) got corrupted during o/s reload. In safe mode, renamed Internet Logs folder, reboot and all ok. thanks anyway. Spambayes for me was not the issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike (mls64) Date: 2004-04-20 16:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025291 whoops - I forgot to log in before making my comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2004-04-20 16:12 Message: Logged In: NO I have the exact same problem, with Outlook 2002 SP3, Windows XP 2002 SP1 and SpamBayes 1.0b1. Outlook loads, and then freezes within a few seconds. If I disable SpamBayes, Outlook runs fine. Here's my logfile contents: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3088 spam and 182 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 01:07:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 01:07:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-917832 ] Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Message-ID: Bugs item #917832, was opened at 2004-03-17 19:34 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gittle (gittle) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 stops receiving mail. Initial Comment: Info: Clean install of Office Professional Enterprise Edition 2003 on XP Pro, with Spambayes v 0.3. Problem: After opening Outlook 2003 I get mail for first two downloads, but thereafter the following ?task message:? ! Task 'Gary - Receiving' reported error (0x8004210A): 'The operation timed out waiting for a response from the receiving (POP) server. If you continue to receive this message, contact your server administrator or ISP.' I worked with MS Tech Support in isolating problem. Once we unchecked Spambayes in COM Addins, the program worked correctly. I did not see a FAQ on this. Your assistance please. Up to this point I?ve had no problem with Spambayes and appreciate the software. Thank you, Gary Weinstein gl.weinstein@cox.net Below are log files, though I don?t know if they will help: #1 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons #2 Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 20 spam and 22 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Gary Weinstein/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Gary Weinstein/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook SpamBayes has processed zero messages SpamBayes is being manually disabled - deleting toolbar Addin terminating: 5 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gittle (gittle) Date: 2004-04-21 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=999599 Problem is now resolved. After hours of work with MS tech and others, it turns out True Vector (Zone Alaarm) got corrupted during o/s reload. In safe mode, renamed Internet Logs folder, reboot and all ok. thanks anyway. Spambayes for me was not the issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike (mls64) Date: 2004-04-21 04:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025291 whoops - I forgot to log in before making my comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2004-04-21 04:12 Message: Logged In: NO I have the exact same problem, with Outlook 2002 SP3, Windows XP 2002 SP1 and SpamBayes 1.0b1. Outlook loads, and then freezes within a few seconds. If I disable SpamBayes, Outlook runs fine. Here's my logfile contents: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\local user\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 3088 spam and 182 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 04:02:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 04:03:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939130 ] HTML problem on Relnotes page Message-ID: Bugs item #939130, was opened at 2004-04-21 18:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939130&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken Robertson (kenrob) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HTML problem on Relnotes page Initial Comment: A very minor matter, but the release notes on the page: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php? release_id=230697 have bad markup somewhere corrupting the display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939130&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 04:59:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 04:59:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939153 ] HTML problem on Relnotes page Message-ID: Bugs item #939153, was opened at 2004-04-21 18:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939153&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken Robertson (kenrob) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HTML problem on Relnotes page Initial Comment: A very minor matter, but the release notes on the page: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php? release_id=230697 have bad markup somewhere corrupting the display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939153&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 07:21:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 07:21:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-935183 ] crash on run Message-ID: Bugs item #935183, was opened at 2004-04-14 20:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by figuerres You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: crash on run Initial Comment: inital steps went fine.... I am ready to run "sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5" and it dumps a stack trace... SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 913, in ? run() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 903, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 774, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 688, in Filter for msg in self: File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 581, in __iter__ for key in self.keys(): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 599, in keys response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['command not implemented'] I'm not a Python coder so I'm just gonna guess that response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") is what it's puking on?? system info: Server is win 2003, current patches etc... imap and mail server is from here: http://www.lumisoft.ee/lsWWW/ENG/Products/WEB_Mai l/webmail_index_eng.aspx?type=info imap server works with Outlook 2003 not yet tested with other clients. Help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-21 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 false alarm..... the imap server I was trying does not have the command. so it's *NOT* a problem with spambayes. case closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-14 22:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 I am trying to determine if this is an imap server bug or a spambayes bug... can anyone help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 07:22:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 07:22:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-935183 ] crash on run Message-ID: Bugs item #935183, was opened at 2004-04-14 20:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by figuerres You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: crash on run Initial Comment: inital steps went fine.... I am ready to run "sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l 5" and it dumps a stack trace... SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 913, in ? run() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 903, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 774, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 688, in Filter for msg in self: File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 581, in __iter__ for key in self.keys(): File "E:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 599, in keys response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 697, in uid typ, dat = self._simple_command(name, command, *args) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "E:\Python23\lib\imaplib.py", line 837, in _command_complete raise self.error('%s command error: %s %s' % (name, typ, data)) imaplib.error: UID command error: BAD ['command not implemented'] I'm not a Python coder so I'm just gonna guess that response = imap.uid("SEARCH", "UNDELETED") is what it's puking on?? system info: Server is win 2003, current patches etc... imap and mail server is from here: http://www.lumisoft.ee/lsWWW/ENG/Products/WEB_Mai l/webmail_index_eng.aspx?type=info imap server works with Outlook 2003 not yet tested with other clients. Help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-21 11:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 false alarm..... the imap server I was trying does not have the command. so it's *NOT* a problem with spambayes. case closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-21 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 false alarm..... the imap server I was trying does not have the command. so it's *NOT* a problem with spambayes. case closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denny Figuerres (figuerres) Date: 2004-04-14 22:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175892 I am trying to determine if this is an imap server bug or a spambayes bug... can anyone help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=935183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 15:30:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 15:34:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-939543 ] Can't define data directory Message-ID: Support Requests item #939543, was opened at 2004-04-21 19:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=939543&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Smothers (oregonsteve) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't define data directory Initial Comment: Greetings- Using 1.0b1 Outlook plugin(just upgraded) and I want to define the location for the data directory. I added this section to the default_bayes_customize.ini file under Documents and Settings\{Username}\Application Data\Spambayes: [General] data_directory: h:\spam\spambayes However, when I log back into Outlook 2002, choose Spambayes Manager-->Advanced>Show Data Folder, it still points to Documents and Settings\{Username} \Application Data\Spambayes I added the entry to the default_bayes_customize.ini file under Program Files\Spambayes with the same results. I added the entry to the {profile name}.ini file under Documents and Settings\{Username}\Application Data\Spambayes and noticed that it still points to the same location and it removes the value for the data_directory entry. Please tell me what I'm doing wrong. Thanx OregonSteve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=939543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 20:55:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 20:55:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-939543 ] Can't define data directory Message-ID: Support Requests item #939543, was opened at 2004-04-22 07:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=939543&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Smothers (oregonsteve) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't define data directory Initial Comment: Greetings- Using 1.0b1 Outlook plugin(just upgraded) and I want to define the location for the data directory. I added this section to the default_bayes_customize.ini file under Documents and Settings\{Username}\Application Data\Spambayes: [General] data_directory: h:\spam\spambayes However, when I log back into Outlook 2002, choose Spambayes Manager-->Advanced>Show Data Folder, it still points to Documents and Settings\{Username} \Application Data\Spambayes I added the entry to the default_bayes_customize.ini file under Program Files\Spambayes with the same results. I added the entry to the {profile name}.ini file under Documents and Settings\{Username}\Application Data\Spambayes and noticed that it still points to the same location and it removes the value for the data_directory entry. Please tell me what I'm doing wrong. Thanx OregonSteve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 12:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Also answered on the list. You need to add this to a file called "default_configuration.ini" in either that directory or the one SpamBayes was installed into. Putting it in the default_bayes_customize.ini file is wrong because: * That file is *only* for customizing the underlying SpamBayes engine (it's exactly like the non-Outlook versions). Nothing Outlook specific goes in there. * The {profile name}.ini or Outlook.ini file that should also be in that directory *is* for Outlook customization, but is loaded *after* any data directory moves. > Please tell me what I'm doing wrong. This is a very common error when trying to do this. If you could suggest some way that the configuration guide could be rewritten to make it clearer what needs to be done, that would be fantastic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=939543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 21:12:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 21:12:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-17 06:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 13:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 21:15:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 21:16:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-17 06:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek. I don't know how that happened, but this got entered into the wrong tracker. Ignore all of that. For *this* problem: we need to see the log file. Please attach it to this tracker. You could also try retraining and seeing if that helps (see recent spambayes mailing list messages with "sloth" in the subject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 13:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 21 21:16:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 21 21:16:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939130 ] HTML problem on Relnotes page Message-ID: Bugs item #939130, was opened at 2004-04-21 20:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939130&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken Robertson (kenrob) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: HTML problem on Relnotes page Initial Comment: A very minor matter, but the release notes on the page: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php? release_id=230697 have bad markup somewhere corrupting the display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 13:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939130&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 22 03:51:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 22 03:52:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-16 18:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bbyrd1 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-04-22 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 Ok here is the log file yop requested ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 01:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek. I don't know how that happened, but this got entered into the wrong tracker. Ignore all of that. For *this* problem: we need to see the log file. Please attach it to this tracker. You could also try retraining and seeing if that helps (see recent spambayes mailing list messages with "sloth" in the subject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 01:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 22 06:57:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 22 06:57:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-939947 ] suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Message-ID: Support Requests item #939947, was opened at 2004-04-22 13:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=939947&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aslak (asphunck) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Initial Comment: A suggestion: Giving a download link to an outlook pst file containing ~100 spam messages for fast training. It would be entirely optional to use it ofcourse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=939947&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 22 07:02:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 22 07:02:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-909218 ] Training Question Message-ID: Support Requests item #909218, was opened at 2004-03-03 19:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by asphunck You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=909218&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Hall (hallktm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training Question Initial Comment: Stupid Question: I get a *lot* of spam - Some of which shows up as questionable. I the ham I get is about 1/4 the questionable items. This leaves an inbalance in training materials - even if I move all ham back to questionable and train on it (a PITA by the way). Is there a suggested workaround, other than directly deleting questionable items and not training on them? *Very* happy with the program btw. Jim Hall ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Aslak (asphunck) Date: 2004-04-22 14:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1026777 So because of your imbalance in training material you supposedly get a biased spam score. E.g. the spam score would be too high. Couldn't you just adjust the triggering levels that marks "questionable" and "sure spam". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=909218&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 22 12:33:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 22 12:33:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-940155 ] Data Folder location Message-ID: Bugs item #940155, was opened at 2004-04-22 16:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940155&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Smothers (oregonsteve) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Data Folder location Initial Comment: Greetings- Even though I created a default_configuration.ini file and defined a specific location for the Data Folder, when I open SpamBayes manager, select the advanced tab and click on the Show Data Folder button, it still brings me to the default location (Documents and Settings\{Username}\Application Data\Spambayes). If I click on the Diagnostics button and then View Log, it does show that it is pointing to the location I specified in my default_configuration.ini file. Thanx OregonSteve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940155&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 22 21:27:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 22 21:28:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936529 ] Spambayes has poor performance Message-ID: Bugs item #936529, was opened at 2004-04-17 06:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes has poor performance Initial Comment: I'm running a 2.4ghz P4 prosessor with 512MB of ram and spambayes is running very slow after i upgrade to office xp sp3. However before it ran just fine. Just a side note i'm running Windows XP PRO SP2 RC1 i'm also running the latest (april) release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-23 13:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The log doesn't have any errors in it, but interesting it does show that there is a fairly small amount of ham and spam trained. I wonder whether this is perhaps due to the problem discussed (by me and Tim Peters) on the list recently. If it is, then the two solutions that spring to mind are (a) retrain from a fresh db, because that fixed the problem for both me and Tim, or (b) wait and see if my further investigation into this yields anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brad Byrd (bbyrd1) Date: 2004-04-22 19:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=561013 Ok here is the log file yop requested ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 13:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek. I don't know how that happened, but this got entered into the wrong tracker. Ignore all of that. For *this* problem: we need to see the log file. Please attach it to this tracker. You could also try retraining and seeing if that helps (see recent spambayes mailing list messages with "sloth" in the subject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 13:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 23 00:17:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 23 00:17:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-940155 ] Data Folder location Message-ID: Bugs item #940155, was opened at 2004-04-23 04:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940155&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Smothers (oregonsteve) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Data Folder location Initial Comment: Greetings- Even though I created a default_configuration.ini file and defined a specific location for the Data Folder, when I open SpamBayes manager, select the advanced tab and click on the Show Data Folder button, it still brings me to the default location (Documents and Settings\{Username}\Application Data\Spambayes). If I click on the Diagnostics button and then View Log, it does show that it is pointing to the location I specified in my default_configuration.ini file. Thanx OregonSteve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-23 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, fixed. Checking in Outlook2000/dialogs/dialog_map.py new revision: 1.38; previous revision: 1.37 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940155&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 23 03:45:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 23 03:45:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-940547 ] imapfilter interface available when using -l switch Message-ID: Feature Requests item #940547, was opened at 2004-04-23 19:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940547&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter interface available when using -l switch Initial Comment: You can't access the web interface (for stats or config changes) if you run imapfilter with the -l command, because it isn't offered. You shouldn't really run another instance, because then both open the databases and you're asking for trouble. You'd have to stop the -l one and then start it up again, which is a pain. So add a new option that controls whether the interface is served when imapfilter is run or not. Running without -c or -t would serve it regardless, of course. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 23 06:53:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 23 06:53:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-940630 ] SMTP proxy doesnt work Message-ID: Bugs item #940630, was opened at 2004-04-23 18:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940630&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: BlackCat (cmelv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SMTP proxy doesnt work Initial Comment: I just changed my local server to send through SpamBayes' SMTP proxy rather than directly to my ISP (extmail.bigpond.com), so that SpamBayes can be sent learning messages. However my ISP wont accept mail from SpamBytes - every attempt fails with the SMTP error: "501 space seperator provided without argument" It doesnt matter what the message is, or what client originally sent it (whether Outlook 2003 or a simple command line SMTP mailer). If SpamBayes is removed from the loop again, it does back to working perfectly. I have a feeling that someone will tell me that the ISP is not implementing some RFC or other correctly, but that won't help - it's Telstra (Australia's main Telco), who are absolutely NOT going to change anything so that it's users can use SpamBayes!! :-( Is there any chance of a workaround - I don't know SMTP/RFCs or Python well enough to have a go at it myself :-( ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940630&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 23 07:18:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 23 07:18:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-940643 ] Add ham_folder option Message-ID: Feature Requests item #940643, was opened at 2004-04-23 07:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940643&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: pcm (michali) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add ham_folder option Initial Comment: It would be nice to have a ham_folder option, especially for the IMAP mode, so that classified ham is moved to that folder. Here are diffs for a simple hack that I did, which "seems" to work for me (made to 1.0b1). sb_imapfilter.py: 683c683 < def Filter(self, classifier, spamfolder, unsurefolder): --- > def Filter(self, classifier, hamfolder, spamfolder, unsurefolder): 699c699 < # we leave ham alone --- > msg.MoveTo(hamfolder) 712a713 > self.ham_folder = IMAPFolder(options["imap", "ham_folder"]) 765c766,767 < # Select the spam folder and unsure folder to make sure they exist --- > # Select the ham, spam, and unsure folders to make sure they exist > imap.SelectFolder(self.ham_folder.name) 773,774c775,776 < subcount = folder.Filter(self.classifier, self.spam_folder, < self.unsure_folder) --- > subcount = folder.Filter(self.classifier, self.ham_folder, > self.spam_folder, self.unsure_folder) Options.py: 1050a1051,1054 > ("ham_folder", "Folder for ham messages", "", > """""", > IMAP_FOLDER, DO_NOT_RESTORE), > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=940643&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Apr 24 21:55:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Apr 24 22:02:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-941596 ] sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Message-ID: Support Requests item #941596, was opened at 2004-04-24 20:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=941596&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe (warehauz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Initial Comment: I've got 1.0b1 installed on a Linux server and got everything configured for IMAP usage, and have trained a few dozen spams & hams. Everything appears to be going well, and when I run "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c" the output looks fine, but the classification isn't fully working - messages aren't moved, and they don't get all the headers added they're supposed to have. Basically, when training (i.e. I manually put a message in the spam_train_folders), it will correctly process the message, and move it to the move_trained_spam_to_folder folder. After manually training I looked up a few words in the database via the web interface to make sure everything is working properly, and it does indeed appear to be. But, when classifying, the output will say for example: Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. The message was actually spam, so that's fine - but it left it in the inbox, and didn't add a classification or score header (I've turned those options on). So while the classification is picking the right option, it's not doing anything with the messages. The message remains in the original folder, regardless of it's classification, and only gets the X-Spambayes-Mailid header. I also noticed a minor problem with the training as well, but since the messages are being moved to the proper folder, and the tokens are being added to the training database properly, I'm not concerned about it. I've set include_trained to True, so it should be adding a header to indicate it's trained on that message - but it doesn't. In fact, when it moves the message to the move_trained_*_to_folder folder, even the X-Spambayes-Mailid is gone. Since it's doing the training fine though, I'm not worried - I just suspect it's related to my bigger classification problems. Is this a known problem? Anything I can do to fix/workaround this? It almost seems to me like it's deleting the wrong message (as I understand it, it's supposed to create a second copy of the message with the new headers, and delete the original). FYI, the IMAP server appears to be Courier-IMAP. Here's some lengthy output from a "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c -v -i4" that found & supposedly classified a spam message, but ended up leaving it in the inbox without the classification headers etc: ====== SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.HAM 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SPAM 0 trained. Training took 0.0049 seconds, 0 messages were trained Classifying .*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.0689 seconds. Loading state from /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db is an existing database, with 29 spam and 21 ham 09:01.22 > DMNB1 LOGIN "USERNAME" "***PASSWORD***" 09:01.22 < DMNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. 09:01.23 > DMNB2 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB3 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB4 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB4 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB5 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB5 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB6 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB6 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB7 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB7 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB8 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB8 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB9 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB9 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB10 SELECT INBOX 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 2 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 1 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB10 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB11 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 71 72 09:01.23 < DMNB11 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB12 UID FETCH 71 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 1 FETCH (UID 71 RFC822.HEADER {2564} 09:01.24 read literal size 2564 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB12 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB13 UID FETCH 72 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 RFC822.HEADER {1968} 09:01.24 read literal size 1968 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB13 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB14 UID FETCH 72 (BODY.PEEK[]) 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 BODY[] {3908} 09:01.24 read literal size 3908 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB14 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB15 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.25 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.25 < DMNB15 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.25 > DMNB16 APPEND INBOX () "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400" {3945} 09:01.25 < + OK 09:01.25 write literal size 3945 09:01.26 < DMNB16 OK [APPENDUID 1082778026 73] APPEND Ok. 09:01.26 > DMNB17 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.26 < DMNB17 OK STORE completed. 09:01.26 > DMNB18 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 09:01.26 < * 2 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent)) 09:01.26 < DMNB18 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.26 > DMNB19 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 72 09:01.26 < DMNB19 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.28 > DMNB20 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.28 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.28 < DMNB20 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.29 > DMNB21 APPEND INBOX.SPAM (\Seen \Deleted) "24-Apr-2004 22:07:20 -0400" {5014} 09:01.29 < + OK 09:01.29 write literal size 5014 09:01.29 < DMNB21 OK [APPENDUID 1082777941 52] APPEND Ok. 09:01.29 > DMNB22 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.30 < DMNB22 OK STORE completed. 09:01.30 > DMNB23 CLOSE 09:01.30 < DMNB23 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.30 > DMNB24 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB24 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB25 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB25 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB26 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB26 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB27 UID SEARCH ALL 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 52 09:01.30 < DMNB27 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB28 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB28 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB29 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 1 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < DMNB29 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB30 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB30 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB31 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < DMNB31 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB32 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB32 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB33 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB33 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB34 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.31 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.31 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.31 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.31 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.31 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.31 < DMNB34 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.31 > DMNB35 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB35 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB36 LOGOUT 09:01.31 < * BYE Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 BYE response: Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 < DMNB36 OK LOGOUT completed ====== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=941596&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Apr 25 01:17:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Apr 25 01:18:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941634 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941634, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to activate the .dll. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Apr 25 01:21:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Apr 25 01:21:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941634 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941634, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to activate the .dll. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Apr 25 01:42:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Apr 25 01:42:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Apr 25 01:44:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Apr 25 01:44:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mrpowell You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Apr 25 22:48:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Apr 25 22:48:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-942069 ] 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Support Requests item #942069, was opened at 2004-04-25 22:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=942069&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows .dll error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to register. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. ------------------------------------------------------- This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ------------------------------------------------------- Paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes\bin D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook ------------------------------------------------------- What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell A+, Net+. MCP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=942069&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 07:44:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 07:44:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-933246 ] Error on startup Message-ID: Bugs item #933246, was opened at 2004-04-12 02:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933246&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: SoonerRick (dcary) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error on startup Initial Comment: I downloaded SpamBayes yesterday and am receiving a popup whenever I open Outlook 2000 or every time I click Inbox. The message says: The Web page could not be found. This error could have been caused by a bad or misspelled URL; following an invalid link; or your network connection and/or transient conditions on the internet. To check the URL, choose the Home Page tab on the Properties dialog. I am running Windows 98SE. Outlook will still operate as far as receiving and sending messages. I tried to uninstall the program and removing all traces of SpamBayes but nothing worked. I still get the error message. I downloaded it again and still the same message. Following is the log file: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.9 (February 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 4.10.67766446 ( A ) using Python 2.3.2+ (#49, Oct 23 2003, 15:50:06) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] GetNextPage with current 0 IDD_WIZARD_WELCOME GetNextPage with current 5 IDD_WIZARD_TRAINING_IS_IMPORTANT GetNextPage with current 1 IDD_WIZARD_FOLDERS_WATCH GetNextPage with current 2 IDD_WIZARD_FOLDERS_REST Wizard Done! Saving wizard changes Saving configuration -> C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\SpamBayes\Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Junk E-Mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Any suggestions? I don?t want to reformat the hard drive unless that is the only alternative. Dick Cary dcarys@cox.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 21:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sorry, but I have no reason to believe this is related to SpamBayes. Also note that you never have to format your hard disk to solve a problem like this - the worst you may have to do is reinstall windows into a different directory, but even that is rare. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933246&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 07:48:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 07:48:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 17:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 21:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is anyone still seeing this bug with the latest versions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Bonzek (cantics) Date: 2003-12-23 23:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=936787 This exact thing started for me when I upgraded to Exchange 2003. Clients are Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002, both running on XP Pro, sp1. I have yet to figure out a fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I struck a very similar issue myself recently, and found a way I could "mis-configure" my profile such that Outlook displayed an error message at startup, then immediately shut down. But I found an almost identical error to this in my log. The new version will be more graceful should it get this error. No messagebox will be shown, and SpamBayes will not be disabled. The log will get a bit of noise. I've also moved some of the initialize code to a "startup complete" event, in the hope that this will actually stop the error happening in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 07:50:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 07:51:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-872412 ] Spam Score 0% Misplaced Into Spam Message-ID: Bugs item #872412, was opened at 2004-01-08 01:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872412&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark ONeill (markoneill) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam Score 0% Misplaced Into Spam Initial Comment: Hello: I'm a novice at reporting bugs on your site, but thought that this report might be useful for improving your WONDERFUL program, SpamBayes, which I'm using in Outlook 2002. I've had very few false positives (less than a dozen out of several thousand messages) but the ones I've had are weird, as in the attached Outlook Message file which shows the Spam Score of 0% for a message placed in the Spam folder. Perhaps there is a bug for a 0% Spam Score that places such a message into the wrong folder. I hope this is helpful. Thank you for developing this TREMENDOUS program! Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 21:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I believe we fixed this bug in the most recent binary versions - please reopen if this is not the case for you! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Muller (danmuller) Date: 2004-02-14 00:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=974747 I have the same problem, with the following setup: Outlook 2002 10.4219.4219 SP-2 Windows XP Professional 5.1.2600 SP-1 Build 2600 Spambayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 0.81 Sep 9, 2003 I have one of the misplaced e-mails that I can forward to any interested person. Contact me at dmuller(a)cyberlogic.com Dan Muller ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=872412&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 07:53:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 07:53:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881575 ] Invalid timer values can be set which screw us Message-ID: Bugs item #881575, was opened at 2004-01-22 05:07 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam Wright (nolithium) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Invalid timer values can be set which screw us Initial Comment: I have checked other bugs and they do not seem to address this specifically. After about three runs of Outlook 2002 on Win XP, Background Filtering is Disabled. Since I filter my incoming to several folders, when I recover an item, all items are returned to my primary Inbox, and I have to manually sort, or re-run my rules. Since I get TONS of spam, this is very time-consuming. My Background filtering Options are set as follows: Enable Background Filtering: True Processing Start Delay: 5.0 Seconds Delay between processing items: 0.25 seconds Only for folder that receive new mail: true The applicable section from my log file: ****************************************** The timer is configured to fire way too often(delay=5.0 milliseconds, interval=0.25 milliseconds) Please adjust your configuration. The timer is NOT enabled... ****************************************** If I re-adjust my setting to the highest (10.0 seconds), restart Outlook, it works fine. I re-set my settings to 5.0 and 0.25, and restart Outlook, and it is fine. When I come to work the next day, Background Filtering once again interprets my settings as milliseconds and is disabled and the above excerpt appears in my log file. I have attached the entire log file for reference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-01-22 06:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The error message is misleading. SpamBayes knows the values are in seconds, but the log message just displays them incorrectly. (I've fixed this in latest CVS for the next release) The reason this fails is because SpamBayes considers an interval of 0.25 seconds to be too small. Actual limits are min 0.4 seconds and max 30 seconds. This is currently only checked at startup. We need better validation of these values to prevent configuring invalid values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Wright (nolithium) Date: 2004-01-22 05:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=956851 I apologize - my submission was not completely accurate - Outlook always boots up with this error unless I set the sliders both at 10.0 seconds before restarting. THEN I can adjust the sliders to the delays I want and everything works fine for that specific Outlook session. The problem occurrs when Outlook is closed and restarted with my preferred settings - the intialization of the timer fails, and I have to set the sliders at 10 seconds, restart, then reset the sliders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 07:55:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 07:58:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-881739 ] fail to work with early shell32.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #881739, was opened at 2004-01-22 08:40 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sean Kelly (mrkelly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: fail to work with early shell32.dll Initial Comment: Outlook Plugin 008.1 installed on two Windows 2000 Pro systems with SP2 using Outlook 2000 SP1. Both connected to the same Exchange 2000 server. One installation works fine. The other generates the following error at Outlook startup: "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart and try again." I have uninstalled and reinstalled several times with the same result. I have searched the bug reports, but can't find the same log error. Log is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stuart Carter (stu_bloke) Date: 2004-03-18 04:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=980433 Thanks wolfram, I did the same and can now start outlook without 1.09 reporting an error. However, it does not like my old configuration data (can't find the designated Inbox/Junk/Suspect folders). But hey! Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfram Kuss (wolfram_kuss) Date: 2004-03-17 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=2120 I had the same problem on WinXp, no Outlook (Express) installed. I searched the computer for the dll (pythoncom23.dll) and found two, one in the SpamBayes folder and one in the windows\system32. They were different size and date. I copied the SpamBayes one over the other one after making a backup. The error message no longer appears. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Lilly (rclilly) Date: 2004-03-15 21:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=346237 Has any progress been made on this problem yet? I had the exact same problem on my system: Windows 2000 Pro, SP4; Outlook 2000 SR3. I uninstalled and went back to using 1.0a7/0.81. I would like to upgrade to 1.0a9/0.9 but can't until this issure is resolved. Funny thing though, I installed .9 on my daughter's laptop that has the exact same setup as my desktop and it works just fine. Hmm! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daren Thomas (darenthomas) Date: 2004-03-01 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=987722 I have the same problem after upgrading to 1.09a. Can't downgrade because I can't find the file :( My boss had the same problem with the earlier version (I lost a lot of points selling SpamBayes to him!!!)... I tried anadelonbrin's suggestion: - deleted config files - manually configured config files but that didn't help. Heres the (german) copy of the error message Outlook gives me: Der Prozedureinsprungpunkt "? PyCom_SetAndLogCOMErrorFromPyException@@YAJPBDABU_G UID@@@Z" wurde in der DLL "Pythoncom23.dll" nicht gefunden. which means that the DLL entry point ("?PyCom[...]") could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stuart Carter (stu_bloke) Date: 2004-02-21 06:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=980433 I have also got this problem on Windows 2003, OL 2003, Python 2.3. Removing 0.9 and re-installing 0.81 worked. Here is the log from my 0.81 startup (0.9 log is identical to that posted below) Cheers! -------------------------------------------------------- Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and Settings\carters\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and Settings\carters\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 184 spam and 432 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.2.3790 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ********************************************** **** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 11.5316ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 11:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You can't see the 0.7 version either, just old versions of the source. You should try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release, and see if this fixes it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-19 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 Here's the contents of my logfile: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1191, in OnConnection File "manager.pyc", line 908, in GetManager File "manager.pyc", line 344, in __init__ File "manager.pyc", line 492, in LocateDataDirectory File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32com\shell\shell.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\universal.pyc", line 173, in dispatch File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 608, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 542, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 1227, in OnStartupComplete exceptions.AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'never_configured' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman) Date: 2004-02-19 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=840726 I have had the same experience. I deleted all versions, and the data directory. Still no luck. I am also using Win2K, with all updates, and Outlook XP. What happened to version 0.8? I'd like to reinstall it, but I only see 0.7. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pat Darragh (pdarragh) Date: 2004-02-04 13:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=967576 I am using Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. (Clean install of Windows XP ... i.e. started with FORMAT). I have installed all of the patches for Windows and Office. I am getting the exact same error message. I've compared the spambase1.log file here with the one I have on my system and they are identical (with the execption of the username in the paths). I've ignored the error message and manually configured Spambyaes but without any real luck. Un-installed and re- installed a number of times. Again, no luck. My environment: Windows XP; Office Pro 2003; Corel Office 8; Delphi 5; Java 2 Runtime v1.4.2_03; McAfee 7.1.0; .NET Framework 1.1 Any pointers on getting this to work would be great. Thansk for your time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-01-27 18:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try renaming/deleting your configuration file and reconfiguring SpamBayes? The FAQ explains where to find it, if you're not sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=881739&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 08:01:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 08:01:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-900703 ] still won't install Message-ID: Bugs item #900703, was opened at 2004-02-20 09:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=900703&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Weiss (chrwei) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: still won't install Initial Comment: NT4 SP6a, Office 2000 SP3, IE 6 SP1 just tried 0.9, 0.8 fails too. I don't actually get an error but heres the logs 0.8's log Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in RegisterClasses File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in RegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) 0.9's log Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 477, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 407, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 261, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) I try to register it manually I get return code 0x80040201 if that means anything to you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 22:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This sounds like the problem in http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/InstallationProblems.html#comcat_version_screwup But either way, this will be fixed in the next release, as win32all-202 has a change that will prevent this happening. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=900703&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 08:03:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 08:03:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-930550 ] Error on SpamBayes startup. Message-ID: Bugs item #930550, was opened at 2004-04-07 02:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=930550&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gregory Warnes (warnes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error on SpamBayes startup. Initial Comment: SpamBayes 1.0a9 Windows2000 SP3 Outlook 2000 SP3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 22:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Dupe of bug [881739] fail to work with early shell32.dll ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=930550&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 08:05:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 08:06:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-917586 ] Show data folder on WinXP CZ fails Message-ID: Bugs item #917586, was opened at 2004-03-17 07:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917586&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tomas Valusek (tvalusek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Show data folder on WinXP CZ fails Initial Comment: I'm using SpamBayes Outlook plugin v 0.9 on WinXP Home Czech Edition with Outlook2002SP2. When I click a "Show data folder" button, the error message shown in attachement appears. I think this is because my Windows username contains czech accented characters, but it's quite common in our area. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 22:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should work fine (as we have already fixed it a few versions ago :) Can you please attach a log from a session then this error is generated - please see the "Troubleshooting Guide" for details on the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=917586&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 08:09:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 08:09:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942262 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #942262, was opened at 2004-04-26 07:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Knight (stevenknight) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Both messages in the attached file cause both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1 to die with the following output: $ sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.hammie.db -s ~/Mail/unsure Training spam (/home/knight/Mail/unsure): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 351, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 342, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 266, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 193, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Message.py", line 107, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 100, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 128, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 154, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 212, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: This is on a pretty vanilla Red Hat 9 system running Python 2.2. If you need any more info, let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 08:44:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 08:44:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942262 ] TypeError: string payload expected: Message-ID: Bugs item #942262, was opened at 2004-04-26 12:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by joiner You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steven Knight (stevenknight) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError: string payload expected: Initial Comment: Both messages in the attached file cause both 1.0a7 and 1.0b1 to die with the following output: $ sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.hammie.db -s ~/Mail/unsure Training spam (/home/knight/Mail/unsure): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 351, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 342, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 266, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 193, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Message.py", line 107, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 100, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 128, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 154, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Generator.py", line 212, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: This is on a pretty vanilla Red Hat 9 system running Python 2.2. If you need any more info, let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leo Heska (joiner) Date: 2004-04-26 12:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029402 I got what appears to be the same error with a different presentation. The below came from SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0b1 (April 2004), running on Windows 2000 Professional: X-Nonspam: None X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 474, in onRetr . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 262, in asTokens . File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 277, in as_string . File "email\Message.pyc", line 130, in as_string . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 102, in flatten . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 130, in _write . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 156, in _dispatch . File "email\Generator.pyc", line 199, in _handle_text .TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942262&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 18:13:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 18:14:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898834 ] Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Message-ID: Bugs item #898834, was opened at 2004-02-17 16:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hakero You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Niesen (nniesen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Initial Comment: Windows 2000 sp4 Outlook 2000 SpamBayes 0.8 and 0.9 (1.0a9) When I click the "More Buttons" arrow to expand the toolbar because not all the buttons are visible, Outlook crashes with a "Program Error OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows." This seems to only occur when the "More Buttons" arrow has the ">>" symbol above it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hakero (hakero) Date: 2004-04-26 22:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029828 I'm having the exact same problem. Always when hitting the 'more buttons' on the spambayes toolbar. I also have the same version of Windows, spambayes, and Outlook.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 21:02:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 21:02:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942734 ] Mail in one folder cannot be moved or deleted Message-ID: Bugs item #942734, was opened at 2004-04-26 20:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Darryl Baker (dpbaker57) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Mail in one folder cannot be moved or deleted Initial Comment: I have one folder I cannot delete, archive, or move data from. This started the second week I was using spambayes. Could they be un-related possibly but since I have been using Outlook for 6 years and Outlook 2000 for almost 4 and this has never happened I am suspicious. I have run the Inbox repair tool on the outlook.pst and nothing changed even after it found something minor to fix. The error popup I get says: The messaging interface has returned an unknown error. If the problem persists restart Outlook. I have several times, rebooted several times, run scanpst.exe several times. Nothing has helped. The only idea I have is Outlook may have crashed while data was being moved. Do you have any ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Apr 26 22:40:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Apr 26 22:40:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-941596 ] sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Message-ID: Support Requests item #941596, was opened at 2004-04-24 20:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by warehauz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=941596&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe (warehauz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Initial Comment: I've got 1.0b1 installed on a Linux server and got everything configured for IMAP usage, and have trained a few dozen spams & hams. Everything appears to be going well, and when I run "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c" the output looks fine, but the classification isn't fully working - messages aren't moved, and they don't get all the headers added they're supposed to have. Basically, when training (i.e. I manually put a message in the spam_train_folders), it will correctly process the message, and move it to the move_trained_spam_to_folder folder. After manually training I looked up a few words in the database via the web interface to make sure everything is working properly, and it does indeed appear to be. But, when classifying, the output will say for example: Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. The message was actually spam, so that's fine - but it left it in the inbox, and didn't add a classification or score header (I've turned those options on). So while the classification is picking the right option, it's not doing anything with the messages. The message remains in the original folder, regardless of it's classification, and only gets the X-Spambayes-Mailid header. I also noticed a minor problem with the training as well, but since the messages are being moved to the proper folder, and the tokens are being added to the training database properly, I'm not concerned about it. I've set include_trained to True, so it should be adding a header to indicate it's trained on that message - but it doesn't. In fact, when it moves the message to the move_trained_*_to_folder folder, even the X-Spambayes-Mailid is gone. Since it's doing the training fine though, I'm not worried - I just suspect it's related to my bigger classification problems. Is this a known problem? Anything I can do to fix/workaround this? It almost seems to me like it's deleting the wrong message (as I understand it, it's supposed to create a second copy of the message with the new headers, and delete the original). FYI, the IMAP server appears to be Courier-IMAP. Here's some lengthy output from a "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c -v -i4" that found & supposedly classified a spam message, but ended up leaving it in the inbox without the classification headers etc: ====== SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.HAM 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SPAM 0 trained. Training took 0.0049 seconds, 0 messages were trained Classifying .*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.0689 seconds. Loading state from /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db is an existing database, with 29 spam and 21 ham 09:01.22 > DMNB1 LOGIN "USERNAME" "***PASSWORD***" 09:01.22 < DMNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. 09:01.23 > DMNB2 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB3 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB4 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB4 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB5 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB5 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB6 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB6 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB7 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB7 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB8 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB8 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB9 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB9 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB10 SELECT INBOX 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 2 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 1 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB10 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB11 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 71 72 09:01.23 < DMNB11 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB12 UID FETCH 71 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 1 FETCH (UID 71 RFC822.HEADER {2564} 09:01.24 read literal size 2564 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB12 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB13 UID FETCH 72 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 RFC822.HEADER {1968} 09:01.24 read literal size 1968 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB13 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB14 UID FETCH 72 (BODY.PEEK[]) 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 BODY[] {3908} 09:01.24 read literal size 3908 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB14 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB15 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.25 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.25 < DMNB15 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.25 > DMNB16 APPEND INBOX () "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400" {3945} 09:01.25 < + OK 09:01.25 write literal size 3945 09:01.26 < DMNB16 OK [APPENDUID 1082778026 73] APPEND Ok. 09:01.26 > DMNB17 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.26 < DMNB17 OK STORE completed. 09:01.26 > DMNB18 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 09:01.26 < * 2 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent)) 09:01.26 < DMNB18 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.26 > DMNB19 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 72 09:01.26 < DMNB19 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.28 > DMNB20 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.28 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.28 < DMNB20 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.29 > DMNB21 APPEND INBOX.SPAM (\Seen \Deleted) "24-Apr-2004 22:07:20 -0400" {5014} 09:01.29 < + OK 09:01.29 write literal size 5014 09:01.29 < DMNB21 OK [APPENDUID 1082777941 52] APPEND Ok. 09:01.29 > DMNB22 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.30 < DMNB22 OK STORE completed. 09:01.30 > DMNB23 CLOSE 09:01.30 < DMNB23 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.30 > DMNB24 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB24 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB25 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB25 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB26 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB26 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB27 UID SEARCH ALL 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 52 09:01.30 < DMNB27 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB28 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB28 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB29 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 1 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < DMNB29 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB30 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB30 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB31 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < DMNB31 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB32 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB32 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB33 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB33 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB34 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.31 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.31 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.31 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.31 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.31 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.31 < DMNB34 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.31 > DMNB35 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB35 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB36 LOGOUT 09:01.31 < * BYE Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 BYE response: Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 < DMNB36 OK LOGOUT completed ====== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Joe (warehauz) Date: 2004-04-26 21:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=914399 Ok, after posing to the mailing list & working with Tony, this one is resolved ... this IMAP server was not properly returning the new messages in the SEARCH command after the APPEND. The workaround is to issue a NOOP before the subsequent SEARCH. Around line 510 of sb_imapfilter.py, after the self._check(response, 'store') line, add: imap.noop() This issue appears to only affect certain IMAP servers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=941596&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 27 09:01:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 27 09:01:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942996 ] Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Message-ID: Bugs item #942996, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fisch (ericfischer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Initial Comment: In Outlook 2003 I have two buttons "Delete AS Spam" both are functional. When right clicking on tool bar I am unable to reset tool bar or remove buttons from this bar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 27 09:02:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 27 09:02:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942996 ] Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Message-ID: Bugs item #942996, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ericfischer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fisch (ericfischer) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Initial Comment: In Outlook 2003 I have two buttons "Delete AS Spam" both are functional. When right clicking on tool bar I am unable to reset tool bar or remove buttons from this bar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 27 09:57:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 27 09:57:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942996 ] Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Message-ID: Bugs item #942996, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ericfischer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fisch (ericfischer) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Initial Comment: In Outlook 2003 I have two buttons "Delete AS Spam" both are functional. When right clicking on tool bar I am unable to reset tool bar or remove buttons from this bar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 27 09:58:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 27 09:58:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-942996 ] Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Message-ID: Bugs item #942996, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ericfischer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fisch (ericfischer) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Duplicate "Delete as spam" button on toolbar. Initial Comment: In Outlook 2003 I have two buttons "Delete AS Spam" both are functional. When right clicking on tool bar I am unable to reset tool bar or remove buttons from this bar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=942996&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 27 11:28:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 27 11:29:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943093 ] Add more buckets than Ham and Spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943093, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943093&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Lambert (ranbato) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add more buckets than Ham and Spam Initial Comment: This is a little out of the scope of Spambayes maybe but I thought I would toss it into the ring. Prior to Spambayes POP Service for NT I was using POPFile and it actually allows you to set up as many buckets as you want. It then classifies incoming mail using bayesian filters into the correct bucket. It is here on sourceforge. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943093&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 27 12:04:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 27 12:04:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Apr 27 20:07:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Apr 27 20:10:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943397 ] Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Message-ID: Bugs item #943397, was opened at 2004-04-27 17:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: MH (montyhines) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot choose more than one Inbox folder to filter Initial Comment: I just installed the latest version of Spambayes on my Windows ME laptop with Outlook 2000. It allows me to to filter ONLY my own Inbox filter. I also monitor other Inbox folders of my employees in the office but it will not let me "check" those boxes to filter. I get a message: " Please select a child folder-- top level folders cannot be used". In the earlier version I was able to filter ALL the other Inboxes! What gives? Please help since it is essential that I keep the entire office spam free. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 09:10:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 09:12:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 15:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 09:11:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 09:12:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 15:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 6 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 09:11:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 09:12:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 15:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 13:36:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 13:36:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943852 ] Incorrect sort order for Score column Message-ID: Bugs item #943852, was opened at 2004-04-28 13:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943852&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 2 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Incorrect sort order for Score column Initial Comment: In the Review Messages page, clicking the Score column header appears to sort by the alphabetical order of the percentage text rather than the numeric value. The scores for ham messages sorted as follows: 1, 10, 11, ..., 19, 2, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943852&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 15:45:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 15:45:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943956 ] Email left unprocessed in Inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #943956, was opened at 2004-04-28 14:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken (kpbass) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Email left unprocessed in Inbox Initial Comment: Intermittently, email appears in the Inbox with no assigned spam value. SpamBayes does not process it at all, unless I pull down th manager and choose "Filter messages/Start filtering. Most of the time, but not invariably, these messages are then identified as spam and moved to the spam folder. Background delay is set at .5 seconds, and no Outlook rule is likely to be involved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943956&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 20:52:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 20:52:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-944109 ] notate_to/subject option valid values should be dynamic Message-ID: Bugs item #944109, was opened at 2004-04-29 12:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=944109&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: notate_to/subject option valid values should be dynamic Initial Comment: The notate_to/notate_subject options are currently hard-coded to accept "ham", "spam" or "unsure" as valid values. This is always the case unless the user has changed the header_ham_string/header_spam_string/header_unsure_string options, in which case the values should be the same as those. This means that you can't use the notate_to/notate_subject option if you have changed those values. This isn't a big deal, because changing those values is almost always unnecessary. Even for Outlook Express users - how many times do they get actual mail that has "spam," in the recipient list? Even the simpler "spam," in the subject (note the comma) should be rare. As such, I don't want to check this in before 1.0, because it might break something. After that, though, there should be code in Options.py that dynmically sets (when it's loaded) the appropriate bits of notate_to/notate_subject to whatever the header_X_strings are. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=944109&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 21:44:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 21:44:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-799149 ] Extend the reach of the Add-In to general e.Mail sorting Message-ID: Feature Requests item #799149, was opened at 2003-09-03 02:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johann Richard (johannrichard) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Extend the reach of the Add-In to general e.Mail sorting Initial Comment: Joh Udell made a fabulous suggestion on InfoWorld recently. http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/08/29/34OPstrategi c_1.html Thanks to the SpamBayes plug-in, my e-mail client does a great job of learning which messages I do or don't want to see. But it should do so much more! My work life is organized around groups and projects that form and evolve in fluid ways. E-mail folders and filters help me manage these activities. I want to be pleasantly surprised by software that notices when message patterns indicate the formation of a group or project, and volunteers to set up folders and filters for me. [...] No breakthrough in artificial intelligence is needed to make this happen. We do the pattern recognition ourselves, quite naturally, as we process our information flows. If software paid more attention to what we attend to, and how, there could be more pleasant surprises. So, my suggestion would be, just to implement this idea. As far as I udnerstood, SpamBayes/Outbreak already monitors when the user moves e.Mail around and marks/unmarks it, depending on where it is moved. Likewise, the Plugin could extend its reach and maintain not only a list fo SPAM but track the information flow, tag messages to belong to certain groups/projects/whatever. I'd be happy to hear what you think of this idea, and if you see a possibility to work towards tis direction. Best regards, Johann ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 943093 ] Add more buckets than Ham and Spam http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=943093&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-03 02:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 You can find quite a bit about this in various spambayes archives. spambayes is inherently a binary (2-way) classifier, and exploits that in ways that don't generalize straightforwardly (if at all) to N-way classification. Give popfile a try. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 21:44:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 21:44:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943093 ] Add more buckets than Ham and Spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943093, was opened at 2004-04-28 03:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943093&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Lambert (ranbato) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add more buckets than Ham and Spam Initial Comment: This is a little out of the scope of Spambayes maybe but I thought I would toss it into the ring. Prior to Spambayes POP Service for NT I was using POPFile and it actually allows you to set up as many buckets as you want. It then classifies incoming mail using bayesian filters into the correct bucket. It is here on sourceforge. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 799149 ] Extend the reach of the Add-In to general e.Mail sorting ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943093&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 21:45:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 21:45:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-28 04:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 13:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 21:48:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 21:48:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-909088 ] remove STLS pop3 capability Message-ID: Patches item #909088, was opened at 2004-03-04 04:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wummel (calvin) >Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: remove STLS pop3 capability Initial Comment: Inserting this under the pipelineRe stuff in sb_server.py makes it possible for me to use our cyrus pop server: tlsRE = r'(?im)^STLS[^\n]*\n' self.response = re.sub(tlsRE, '', self.response) Without it, the connection hangs after this log entry: IMPLEMENTATION Cyrus POP3 server v2.1.15-Invoca-RPM-2.1.15-1 . STLS +OK Begin TLS negotiation now [encryption challenge stuff witout newline...] anyway, thanks for making spambayes :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 13:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't see any problems with this, but check with Richie first. If I don't hear back, I'll check this in once 1.0 is out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 21:54:55 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 21:55:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941596 ] sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Message-ID: Bugs item #941596, was opened at 2004-04-25 13:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by warehauz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941596&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe (warehauz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py not adding headers / moving messages Initial Comment: I've got 1.0b1 installed on a Linux server and got everything configured for IMAP usage, and have trained a few dozen spams & hams. Everything appears to be going well, and when I run "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c" the output looks fine, but the classification isn't fully working - messages aren't moved, and they don't get all the headers added they're supposed to have. Basically, when training (i.e. I manually put a message in the spam_train_folders), it will correctly process the message, and move it to the move_trained_spam_to_folder folder. After manually training I looked up a few words in the database via the web interface to make sure everything is working properly, and it does indeed appear to be. But, when classifying, the output will say for example: Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. The message was actually spam, so that's fine - but it left it in the inbox, and didn't add a classification or score header (I've turned those options on). So while the classification is picking the right option, it's not doing anything with the messages. The message remains in the original folder, regardless of it's classification, and only gets the X-Spambayes-Mailid header. I also noticed a minor problem with the training as well, but since the messages are being moved to the proper folder, and the tokens are being added to the training database properly, I'm not concerned about it. I've set include_trained to True, so it should be adding a header to indicate it's trained on that message - but it doesn't. In fact, when it moves the message to the move_trained_*_to_folder folder, even the X-Spambayes-Mailid is gone. Since it's doing the training fine though, I'm not worried - I just suspect it's related to my bigger classification problems. Is this a known problem? Anything I can do to fix/workaround this? It almost seems to me like it's deleting the wrong message (as I understand it, it's supposed to create a second copy of the message with the new headers, and delete the original). FYI, the IMAP server appears to be Courier-IMAP. Here's some lengthy output from a "sb_imapfilter.py -t -c -v -i4" that found & supposedly classified a spam message, but ended up leaving it in the inbox without the classification headers etc: ====== SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.3 (April 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.HAM 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SPAM 0 trained. Training took 0.0049 seconds, 0 messages were trained Classifying .*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.0689 seconds. Loading state from /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db database /usr/local/spambayes/hammie.db is an existing database, with 29 spam and 21 ham 09:01.22 > DMNB1 LOGIN "USERNAME" "***PASSWORD***" 09:01.22 < DMNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. 09:01.23 > DMNB2 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB3 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB4 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB4 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB5 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB5 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB6 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 09:01.23 < DMNB6 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB7 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB7 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB8 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB8 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB9 CLOSE 09:01.23 < DMNB9 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.23 > DMNB10 SELECT INBOX 09:01.23 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.23 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.23 < * 2 EXISTS 09:01.23 < * 1 RECENT 09:01.23 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.23 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.23 < DMNB10 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.23 > DMNB11 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 09:01.23 < * SEARCH 71 72 09:01.23 < DMNB11 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.23 > DMNB12 UID FETCH 71 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 1 FETCH (UID 71 RFC822.HEADER {2564} 09:01.24 read literal size 2564 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB12 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB13 UID FETCH 72 RFC822.HEADER 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 RFC822.HEADER {1968} 09:01.24 read literal size 1968 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB13 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB14 UID FETCH 72 (BODY.PEEK[]) 09:01.24 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 BODY[] {3908} 09:01.24 read literal size 3908 09:01.24 < ) 09:01.24 < DMNB14 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.24 > DMNB15 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.25 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.25 < DMNB15 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.25 > DMNB16 APPEND INBOX () "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400" {3945} 09:01.25 < + OK 09:01.25 write literal size 3945 09:01.26 < DMNB16 OK [APPENDUID 1082778026 73] APPEND Ok. 09:01.26 > DMNB17 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.26 < DMNB17 OK STORE completed. 09:01.26 > DMNB18 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 09:01.26 < * 2 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent)) 09:01.26 < DMNB18 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.26 > DMNB19 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.26 < * SEARCH 72 09:01.26 < DMNB19 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.28 > DMNB20 UID FETCH 72 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 09:01.28 < * 2 FETCH (UID 72 FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Recent) INTERNALDATE "24-Apr-2004 21:07:27 -0400") 09:01.28 < DMNB20 OK FETCH completed. 09:01.29 > DMNB21 APPEND INBOX.SPAM (\Seen \Deleted) "24-Apr-2004 22:07:20 -0400" {5014} 09:01.29 < + OK 09:01.29 write literal size 5014 09:01.29 < DMNB21 OK [APPENDUID 1082777941 52] APPEND Ok. 09:01.29 > DMNB22 UID STORE 72 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted \Seen) 09:01.30 < DMNB22 OK STORE completed. 09:01.30 > DMNB23 CLOSE 09:01.30 < DMNB23 OK mailbox closed. 09:01.30 > DMNB24 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB24 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB25 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-Spambayes-MailId 1082855341) 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB25 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB26 UID SEARCH RECENT 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 09:01.30 < DMNB26 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB27 UID SEARCH ALL 09:01.30 < * SEARCH 52 09:01.30 < DMNB27 OK SEARCH done. 09:01.30 > DMNB28 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 1 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB28 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB29 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 1 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < DMNB29 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB30 SELECT INBOX.UNSURE 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082778026] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB30 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB31 EXPUNGE 09:01.30 < DMNB31 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.30 > DMNB32 SELECT INBOX.HAM 09:01.30 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.30 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.30 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.30 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.30 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.30 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.30 < DMNB32 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.30 > DMNB33 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB33 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB34 SELECT INBOX.SPAM 09:01.31 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 09:01.31 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 09:01.31 < * 0 EXISTS 09:01.31 < * 0 RECENT 09:01.31 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1082777941] Ok 09:01.31 < * OK [MYRIGHTS "acdilrsw"] ACL 09:01.31 < DMNB34 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok 09:01.31 > DMNB35 EXPUNGE 09:01.31 < DMNB35 OK EXPUNGE completed 09:01.31 > DMNB36 LOGOUT 09:01.31 < * BYE Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 BYE response: Courier-IMAP server shutting down 09:01.31 < DMNB36 OK LOGOUT completed ====== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe (warehauz) Date: 2004-04-27 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=914399 Ok, after posing to the mailing list & working with Tony, this one is resolved ... this IMAP server was not properly returning the new messages in the SEARCH command after the APPEND. The workaround is to issue a NOOP before the subsequent SEARCH. Around line 510 of sb_imapfilter.py, after the self._check(response, 'store') line, add: imap.noop() This issue appears to only affect certain IMAP servers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941596&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Apr 28 21:55:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Apr 28 21:55:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-910954 ] Failed to add the toolbar Message-ID: Support Requests item #910954, was opened at 2004-03-07 03:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=910954&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ran Chermesh (chermesh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Failed to add the toolbar Initial Comment: Hi, I'm running spambayes on a Outlook 2002 version mailer. For some reason, the tooklbar fails to show up and my log includes the following excerpt: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) What's wrong? Ran ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Nothing. The very next line will say that it's recreating it. With recent releases the message has been toned down so that it's more obvious that this is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=910954&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 29 09:46:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 29 09:46:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darklaser You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-28 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 29 14:39:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 29 14:39:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-909088 ] remove STLS pop3 capability Message-ID: Patches item #909088, was opened at 2004-03-03 15:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wummel (calvin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: remove STLS pop3 capability Initial Comment: Inserting this under the pipelineRe stuff in sb_server.py makes it possible for me to use our cyrus pop server: tlsRE = r'(?im)^STLS[^\n]*\n' self.response = re.sub(tlsRE, '', self.response) Without it, the connection hangs after this log entry: IMPLEMENTATION Cyrus POP3 server v2.1.15-Invoca-RPM-2.1.15-1 . STLS +OK Begin TLS negotiation now [encryption challenge stuff witout newline...] anyway, thanks for making spambayes :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-04-29 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Go ahead - it looks fine to me. Possibly the PIPELINING and STLS pieces should be merged, creating a list of unsupported functions. Something like (untested): # There are some features, tested by clients using CAPA, # that we don't support. We strip them from the CAPA # response here, so that the client won't use them. for unsupported in ['PIPELINING', 'STLS']: unsupportedLine = r'(?im)^%s[^\n]*\n' % unsupported self.response = re.sub(unsupportedLine, '', self.response) (there's a test case for PIPELINING in test_sb-server.py, so the edit ought to include extending that test for STLS as well, but I won't lose sleep if it doesn't 8-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 01:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't see any problems with this, but check with Richie first. If I don't hear back, I'll check this in once 1.0 is out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 29 14:49:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 29 14:49:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 12:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-29 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 09:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-28 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 29 15:31:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 29 15:31:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darklaser You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Yes I had stored up spam from the last 8 months incase I came accross a bayesien filter I wanted to train it with, but it all came from this one account. The near 5,000 valid email are all my valid email for this account over the last 5 years. So it should have worked very well I would have thought. Perhaps SpamBayes learns from initial tranning sets differently than from email it processes as it comes in. So perhaps the solution is to remove the past training and just start training from scratch. Yes, I'll wait for a few more false positives, and I'll post them before wiping it out and starting over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-29 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-28 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 29 18:03:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 29 18:03:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-28 04:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-30 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the FAQ says, we realise that some people want whitelisting. However, none of the developers do, and none have any interest in putting in the considerable effort into developing whitelisting capabilities. As such, this simply won't be added until someone comes along with code in hand. The developers aren't refusing to add it in (as long as it is off by default) but there just isn't any incentive for us to add it. Anyone desperate for the functionality always has the options to (a) write code or (b) pay for a product that does have whitelisting (InBoxer, for example). In any case, as Kenny said, 85% false positives is unbelievably poor. You'd be better off not using spambayes at all! The fp rate should be less than 5% - typically around 1% or lower. Something is clearly wrong with your training. I'd still rather have this closed - if I thought that people would actually see it and not open a new request that would be different, but that doesn't happen. If it says open then we have two places (here and the FAQ) where information collects. Whitelisting is brought up so often that a tracker really isn't necessary, IMO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 07:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Yes I had stored up spam from the last 8 months incase I came accross a bayesien filter I wanted to train it with, but it all came from this one account. The near 5,000 valid email are all my valid email for this account over the last 5 years. So it should have worked very well I would have thought. Perhaps SpamBayes learns from initial tranning sets differently than from email it processes as it comes in. So perhaps the solution is to remove the past training and just start training from scratch. Yes, I'll wait for a few more false positives, and I'll post them before wiping it out and starting over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-30 06:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 13:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Apr 29 18:04:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Apr 29 18:04:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-28 04:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-30 10:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Oh, one other thing - is there any reason that you can't just use your mail client (Outlook Express?) 's rules to implement whitelisting yourself? It's certainly the simple solution and works for most people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-30 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the FAQ says, we realise that some people want whitelisting. However, none of the developers do, and none have any interest in putting in the considerable effort into developing whitelisting capabilities. As such, this simply won't be added until someone comes along with code in hand. The developers aren't refusing to add it in (as long as it is off by default) but there just isn't any incentive for us to add it. Anyone desperate for the functionality always has the options to (a) write code or (b) pay for a product that does have whitelisting (InBoxer, for example). In any case, as Kenny said, 85% false positives is unbelievably poor. You'd be better off not using spambayes at all! The fp rate should be less than 5% - typically around 1% or lower. Something is clearly wrong with your training. I'd still rather have this closed - if I thought that people would actually see it and not open a new request that would be different, but that doesn't happen. If it says open then we have two places (here and the FAQ) where information collects. Whitelisting is brought up so often that a tracker really isn't necessary, IMO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 07:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Yes I had stored up spam from the last 8 months incase I came accross a bayesien filter I wanted to train it with, but it all came from this one account. The near 5,000 valid email are all my valid email for this account over the last 5 years. So it should have worked very well I would have thought. Perhaps SpamBayes learns from initial tranning sets differently than from email it processes as it comes in. So perhaps the solution is to remove the past training and just start training from scratch. Yes, I'll wait for a few more false positives, and I'll post them before wiping it out and starting over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-30 06:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 13:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 30 07:25:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 30 07:25:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-945227 ] Training error: _handle_text Message-ID: Bugs item #945227, was opened at 2004-04-30 11:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=945227&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jinn Koriech (djinnii) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Training error: _handle_text Initial Comment: I'm using 1.0a9 compiled on Gentoo. I've traced a training problem down to a particular email. Relevant output of (sb_imapfilter.py -t -v -i6) is as follows. I'll keep the message for a while, so if you need more info I can get it for you. 15:42.87 untagged_responses[FETCH] => [('1 (UID 597 RFC822 {2876}', 'Return-Path: \r\nReceived: from nova ([unix socket])\r\n\tby nova (Cyrus v2.1.15) with LMTP; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:27:04 +0100\r\nX-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2\r\nReceived: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r\n\tby nova.hidden-from.you (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EC3BB442\r\n\tfor ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:27:04 +0100 (BST)\r\nReceived: from localhost\r\n\tby localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.3)\r\n\tfor user@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:27:04 +0100 (BST)\r\nReceived: from MG216122098.user.veloxzone.com.br (MG216122098.user.veloxzone.com.br [200.216.122.98] (may be forged))\r\n\tby hidden-from.you (8.11.7/8.11.7) with SMTP id i3PKNFU01417\r\n\tfor ; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 21:23:20 +0100\r\nDelivered-To: \r\nReceived: from 173.116.16.112 by web517.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:19:10 -0200\r\nMessage-ID: \r\nFrom: "Kurtis Wynn" \r\nTo: user@hidden-from.you\r\nSubject: Complete the online form\r\nDate: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 05:13:10 +0300\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: text/html;\r\n\tboundary="--36286347126953001862"\r\nX-CS-IP: 106.14.250.116\r\n\r\n----36286347126953001862\r\nContent-Type: text/html;\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit\r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\nMo.rtgage R.ates are at Historic Lows!\r\n

\r\nEven if you\'ve recently closed on a property, now is the time\r\nto check your numbers.\r\n

\r\n*Lowest I.nterest R.ates in Years
\r\n*S.AVE $200-$500 per month
\r\n*Bad C.redit is NOT a problem
\r\n*No Out of Pocket Expense
\r\n

\r\nApply Now\r\n

caldwell preemptor deaconess befuddle slain quick bloodshot gnomonic correlate timon atomic editorial future dieldrin dragonfly wednesday piecemeal cereus hansel sanitary bass manchester shipwreck earthquake pile cockle establish exchequer aberrant documentation betroth whipple austria blake elongate sainthood marinate dogging doghouse glacis asocial coset andy sniffly exterminate crystallographer hayden bide cloven osha humanitarian attribute bracken conduct anorthite carlson parlay emasculate upraise kleenex rout ate tout doric crupper hateful concede decorum deputy footwear vengeful elegy armata upstater attorney hayden prudential gerundive hate aggression cemetery amplify decompression tombstone taint blaze zippy mcgowan abrogate pitt pretend scuba fisherman password tum duff apse bleeker sacrilege pornographer sudan bolshevism midwife kettering affiliate diagrammatic soignee plaintive earn chairperson bill congressman discriminant sunlit baptism kleenex scottish juliet math ailanthus charlottesville \r\n
\r\nre.move
\r\n\r\n\r\n----36286347126953001862--\r\n\r\n'), ')'] 15:42.88 > EDGI121 UID FETCH 597 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 15:42.89 < * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100") 15:42.89 matched r'\* (?P\d+) (?P[A-Z-]+)( (?P.*))?' => ('1', 'FETCH', ' (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")', '(FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")') 15:42.89 untagged_responses[FETCH] 0 += ["1 (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")"] 15:42.89 < EDGI121 OK Completed 15:42.89 matched r'(?PEDGI\d+) (?P[A-Z]+) (?P.*)' => ('EDGI121', 'OK', 'Completed') 15:42.89 untagged_responses[FETCH] => ['1 (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 597 INTERNALDATE "25-Apr-2004 21:27:04 +0100")'] *Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 857, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 843, in run imap_filter.Train() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 690, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 601, in Train for msg in self: File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 528, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 577, in __getitem__ msg.Save() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 443, in Save self.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 277, in as_string return self._force_CRLF(email.Message.Message.as_string(self)) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=945227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Apr 30 10:04:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Apr 30 10:04:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-943116 ] White list for domains/email addresses Message-ID: Feature Requests item #943116, was opened at 2004-04-27 09:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by darklaser You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: White list for domains/email addresses Initial Comment: A nice feature would be to have a domain/email address white list where you could specify email addresses which should be marked as ham without regard to content. It would also be nice to be able to say anything from the domain belonging to the company I work for should also be marked as ham regardless of content. Anyway, my 2bits. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-30 07:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Tony, of course there is something wrong with the training, we have already sighted that. That?s why in my last post I indicated I was going to start it over (and not use any initial training). I read and understood what it said in the FAQ. We can close this in another day or so after I've gotten Kenney the info he wants, for him to be able to discover why SpamBayes is providing such poor results. Now the reason I thought this feature request should remain open was because I figured someone else may see it and decide its a good idea, build it and present it to the project leader. Yes, I already have message rules in outlook express to put email from specific individuals into specific folders, but the problem the false positive creates is, I have to drag each email out of outlook express, edit and remove 'spam' from the subject, then put it back in outlook express. Quite time consuming. You are right under those circumstances I would be better off without SpamBayes. In the process of requesting the white list feature (which would fix this the majority of my problem), I learned from Kenney that SpamBayes was not performing as it should (based on my training), therefore I should be able to improve my results after starting over on training. Now on to what I?ve got. I asked a coworker to send me an email. I expected it would be a false positive and it was. To provide some privacy for the company I work for, I replaced the domain and ip info with text enclosed by [] explaining what was there. Now for the data: -------------------------------- Original clues for: spam,quarterly review today? (44) Word Probability Times in ham Times in spam *H* 0.01 - - *S* 1.0 - - to:name:david [mylastname] 0.0 156 0 from:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.02 239 11 received:[ouripaddress] 0.09 7 1 from:addr:brian 0.09 2 0 from:name:brian [coworkerslastname] 0.09 2 0 brian 0.27 10 7 would 0.65 71 258 have 0.65 215 791 you. 0.67 38 155 going 0.71 19 91 time 0.72 73 365 received:[ourgatewayipclassa] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c] 0.74 26 144 received:[ourgatewayipclassa+b+c+d] 0.74 26 144 received:unknown 0.74 26 144 your 0.77 269 1745 like 0.77 56 371 some 0.78 29 199 header:Message-ID:1 0.78 375 2705 subject: 0.79 384 2909 to:2**0 0.8 369 3003 with 0.81 116 948 header:Date:1 0.81 393 3238 header:Return-Path:1 0.81 393 3292 header:To:1 0.81 393 3306 header:From:1 0.81 393 3321 header:Subject:1 0.81 393 3336 header:MIME-Version:1 0.82 344 3047 review 0.85 3 34 to:addr:[ourdomainname] 0.89 193 3248 quarterly 0.91 0 2 subject:review 0.91 0 2 today 0.92 10 244 to:addr:david 0.94 84 2596 done, 0.95 0 4 content-type:multipart/alternative 0.95 53 2211 content-type:text/html 0.96 56 2444 over 0.97 6 350 subject:today 0.98 0 9 spend 0.99 0 42 subject:? 1.0 0 114 -------------------------------- Kenney, let me know if you would like to see any more before I wipe out my training and start over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 15:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Oh, one other thing - is there any reason that you can't just use your mail client (Outlook Express?) 's rules to implement whitelisting yourself? It's certainly the simple solution and works for most people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-29 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As the FAQ says, we realise that some people want whitelisting. However, none of the developers do, and none have any interest in putting in the considerable effort into developing whitelisting capabilities. As such, this simply won't be added until someone comes along with code in hand. The developers aren't refusing to add it in (as long as it is off by default) but there just isn't any incentive for us to add it. Anyone desperate for the functionality always has the options to (a) write code or (b) pay for a product that does have whitelisting (InBoxer, for example). In any case, as Kenny said, 85% false positives is unbelievably poor. You'd be better off not using spambayes at all! The fp rate should be less than 5% - typically around 1% or lower. Something is clearly wrong with your training. I'd still rather have this closed - if I thought that people would actually see it and not open a new request that would be different, but that doesn't happen. If it says open then we have two places (here and the FAQ) where information collects. Whitelisting is brought up so often that a tracker really isn't necessary, IMO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Yes I had stored up spam from the last 8 months incase I came accross a bayesien filter I wanted to train it with, but it all came from this one account. The near 5,000 valid email are all my valid email for this account over the last 5 years. So it should have worked very well I would have thought. Perhaps SpamBayes learns from initial tranning sets differently than from email it processes as it comes in. So perhaps the solution is to remove the past training and just start training from scratch. Yes, I'll wait for a few more false positives, and I'll post them before wiping it out and starting over. David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-04-29 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It's very unusual to hear from someone who is getting accuracy this poor. Could you upload a copy of the spam clues for a false positive message (before training on it)? Seeing why SpamBayes thought the way it did when it first processed the message would help a lot. I notice that you have far more training data than you have messages that have been processed by SpamBayes, so I assume you had a large initial training set. Is it possible that your training data was not representative of the messages that you are currently receiving? Although there is no proven best training strategy, in general SpamBayes seems to perform best if you initially train with only 5 or 10 of each type of message and then train it up on your current message stream instead of training it on lots of outdated messages. You'll also find that SpamBayes is more responsive to training of new messages when you have fewer messages in the training database. With the large number of messages that you have, it will take a *LOT* of training to overcome existing clues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DarkLaser (darklaser) Date: 2004-04-29 06:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1030399 Anadelonbrin, thanks for the url. I had looked for something about white lists, but couldn?t find it. I maintain that a white list would be useful. Perhaps not to some, but very much so for others. I have received maybe 1 or 2 spam claiming to be from someone on the domain for the company I work for in the last year, and never have received any claiming to be from any of my 4 personal domains. However, the current false positive ratio is horrible. Try 85% of my good email is falsely being marked as spam. Look at the number of emails I have trained, with that many trained, I should be getting near perfect results. ------------------------------------------------- Total emails trained: Spam: 9728 Ham: 4939 SpamBayes has processed 546 messages - 4 (1%) good, 538 (99%) spam and 4 (0%) unsure. 29 messages were manually classified as good (23 were false positives). 517 messages were manually classified as spam (0 were false negatives). 2 unsure messages were manually identified as good, and 2 as spam. ------------------------------------------------- Ignoring the unsure messages, out of 27 good emails, 4 were actually marked as good and 23 as spam. That is ridiculous. Perhaps I need to change something in my settings, but the majority of those good emails are from this one domain, so in my case a white list would make a world of difference. If one or two spam a year get through because of a white list, no biggie, I can handle that. That?s a lot easier than having to go manually remove the word 'spam,' from the subject of 85% of my email. I don?t have any experience with python (I?m a perl man myself), otherwise I would look at building a white list to send to the project manager. Anyway, I still think this item should remain on the wish list. Thanks, David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-28 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=943116&group_id=61702