From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 00:09:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 02:09:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication Message-ID: Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 18:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: HTTP Authentication Initial Comment: This patch closes Feature Request #791319. This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is required) : requestAuthentication() getRealm() isValidUser() getCancelMessage() This patch works against current CVS release and does include the remote connections one. The configuration page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP authentication, user name and user password. This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more complicated to implement, particularily in such a simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication and Remote connections management souhld be enough to prevent the vast majority of security issues. The attached zip contains diff and py files. P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote connections one ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-01 06:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Many thanks for the patch - it's now committed as: o Dibbler.py 1.6 o Options.py 1.69 o ProxyUI.py 1.20 o UserInterface.py 1.21 I took the liberty of making some minor changes: Imported the md5 and base64 modules into Dibbler.py (this worries me - how come the code ever worked for you, when those modules were never imported?) Made the code in Dibbler.py generic, and moved the Spambayes-specific code to UserInterface.py (because Dibbler is an application-independent library). Rearranged _HTTPHandler.writeUnauthorizedAccess (and subfunctions) to eliminate duplicate code. Changed from qouble- to single-quoted strings to avoid backslash-quoting of double-quotes (eg. "qop=\auth\" becomes 'qop="auth"') Made several superficial rearrangements to conform to the Python style guide (especially the 80-column rule) and the (very informal!) Spambayes coding standard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 It was much simpler than I originnaly thought. This is not a complete Digest implementation since the patch does not take care of the "opaque" value (this would have meant to keep track of each visitor on the HTTP server). Yet, after having read the RFC, I don't think it is worth the work. Anyway, this patch allows encrypted authentication. I've modified the configuration page so that the user can choose between no authentication, basic (base64) and digest (md5). I've submitted two files : one containing the .py files and the .diff files, and another one which is a context diff with today's CVS code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I was not thinking of major structural changes, but to many code additions, especially new instance members. We'll see that tomorrow :) P.S : concerning CVS, I use it for quite a long time, and I was just afraid to run into conflicts (the way CVS merges code is sometimes... surprising), I hate fixing this kind of issues ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 23:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Dibbler.py doesn't change much (it's only ever had three edits!) so you shouldn't worry about huge conflicts. That said, I've just checked in an edit to it before reading this - you can't expect people not to touch it, but you don't need to because CVS will cope with non-conflicting edits. Unless you're planning on changing it beyond all recognition that is, in which case we really need to discuss it first as you say - the reason it's barely changed is that no-one's ever found a bug in it, and I wouldn't want to jeopardise that. Plus, adding authentication really shouldn't require major restructuring work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-30 23:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I'll take care of this, counting from tomorrow. I expect none of you to play with Dibbler.py during the next days, since at first sight it might requires some important changes to add Digest (MD5) authentication support. Anyway, if I am not able to make it for the freeze, I guess Basic support might still be enough for most users. After all, if it is very easy to catch somebody's HTTP Basic login/password couple by sniffing the network, it is even easier to intercept one's POP3 login informations. I'll try to do it, but think of keeping the authentication Basic. As I said before, it might requires important changes within the web server. I did not dig deep enough in HTTP documentation yet, but as far as I know it might require the Dibbler web server to keep a UID for each HTTP client. I hope I'll be surprised by the ease of implementation. I'll get back to you tomorrow evening to tell you wether important changes are required or not. If they are, maybe it will be a good idea to discuss about them since I don't know what are your plans concerning the Dibbler code. I do not want to mess up the code too much :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 21:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol, please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic authentication. (You should know that we're planning a feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the end of next week. I don't know how long the freeze will last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-30 14:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest authentication support (which, as said in patch description, is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-25 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest sources from CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-24 21:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Romain, Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you to resubmit it as a context diff? Plain diffs are difficult to apply once the source has changed in CVS. You should be able to produce a single-file context diff using this command: cvs diff -c in the top-level spambayes directory. (If you're using WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command line") ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-20 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections one (nor the outlook express one). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 00:12:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 02:12:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication Message-ID: Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 18:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) >Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: HTTP Authentication Initial Comment: This patch closes Feature Request #791319. This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is required) : requestAuthentication() getRealm() isValidUser() getCancelMessage() This patch works against current CVS release and does include the remote connections one. The configuration page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP authentication, user name and user password. This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more complicated to implement, particularily in such a simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication and Remote connections management souhld be enough to prevent the vast majority of security issues. The attached zip contains diff and py files. P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote connections one ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-01 06:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Many thanks for the patch - it's now committed as: o Dibbler.py 1.6 o Options.py 1.69 o ProxyUI.py 1.20 o UserInterface.py 1.21 I took the liberty of making some minor changes: Imported the md5 and base64 modules into Dibbler.py (this worries me - how come the code ever worked for you, when those modules were never imported?) Made the code in Dibbler.py generic, and moved the Spambayes-specific code to UserInterface.py (because Dibbler is an application-independent library). Rearranged _HTTPHandler.writeUnauthorizedAccess (and subfunctions) to eliminate duplicate code. Changed from qouble- to single-quoted strings to avoid backslash-quoting of double-quotes (eg. "qop=\auth\" becomes 'qop="auth"') Made several superficial rearrangements to conform to the Python style guide (especially the 80-column rule) and the (very informal!) Spambayes coding standard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 It was much simpler than I originnaly thought. This is not a complete Digest implementation since the patch does not take care of the "opaque" value (this would have meant to keep track of each visitor on the HTTP server). Yet, after having read the RFC, I don't think it is worth the work. Anyway, this patch allows encrypted authentication. I've modified the configuration page so that the user can choose between no authentication, basic (base64) and digest (md5). I've submitted two files : one containing the .py files and the .diff files, and another one which is a context diff with today's CVS code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I was not thinking of major structural changes, but to many code additions, especially new instance members. We'll see that tomorrow :) P.S : concerning CVS, I use it for quite a long time, and I was just afraid to run into conflicts (the way CVS merges code is sometimes... surprising), I hate fixing this kind of issues ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 23:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Dibbler.py doesn't change much (it's only ever had three edits!) so you shouldn't worry about huge conflicts. That said, I've just checked in an edit to it before reading this - you can't expect people not to touch it, but you don't need to because CVS will cope with non-conflicting edits. Unless you're planning on changing it beyond all recognition that is, in which case we really need to discuss it first as you say - the reason it's barely changed is that no-one's ever found a bug in it, and I wouldn't want to jeopardise that. Plus, adding authentication really shouldn't require major restructuring work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-30 23:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I'll take care of this, counting from tomorrow. I expect none of you to play with Dibbler.py during the next days, since at first sight it might requires some important changes to add Digest (MD5) authentication support. Anyway, if I am not able to make it for the freeze, I guess Basic support might still be enough for most users. After all, if it is very easy to catch somebody's HTTP Basic login/password couple by sniffing the network, it is even easier to intercept one's POP3 login informations. I'll try to do it, but think of keeping the authentication Basic. As I said before, it might requires important changes within the web server. I did not dig deep enough in HTTP documentation yet, but as far as I know it might require the Dibbler web server to keep a UID for each HTTP client. I hope I'll be surprised by the ease of implementation. I'll get back to you tomorrow evening to tell you wether important changes are required or not. If they are, maybe it will be a good idea to discuss about them since I don't know what are your plans concerning the Dibbler code. I do not want to mess up the code too much :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 21:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol, please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic authentication. (You should know that we're planning a feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the end of next week. I don't know how long the freeze will last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-30 14:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest authentication support (which, as said in patch description, is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-25 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest sources from CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-24 21:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Romain, Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you to resubmit it as a context diff? Plain diffs are difficult to apply once the source has changed in CVS. You should be able to produce a single-file context diff using this command: cvs diff -c in the top-level spambayes directory. (If you're using WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command line") ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-20 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections one (nor the outlook express one). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 02:46:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 04:46:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797679 ] Recovered Mails filtered again Message-ID: Bugs item #797679, was opened at 2003-08-30 15:49 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recovered Mails filtered again Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know if this a bug or a design problem, so I posting it here. When I recover a mail from Spam Folder in my opinion it should be marked as good on the database. I have reapperaing mails, which we're marked as spam. But no matter how often I recover them from spam, the next mail from these events will be filtered again. Is this the normail behaviour or a known problem? Thanks Jan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 18:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Are you trying to repeatedly train the exact same mail, or a new, similar one? You can't train the same message multiple times. Each time you train, you should notice the "spam score" shift back towards zero. It may not shift enough to have it considered good, but it should shift. It is does, then it will eventually learn. If it doesn't, then we have a bug - but I will need the log file from a session where you have tried to perform this training. If you do submit the log file, please reset the bug status to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 03:10:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 05:10:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query should show all words starting with certain text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:33 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text Initial Comment: Word query should show all words starting with certain text if the user adds * in the end For example: url:great* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, and should have just squeaked into 1.0a5. It works as described above. The one side-effect is that if a token ends with "*", then you can't search for it alone any more (you'll still get the result, but may also get other words, unless there are lots of them (see below), then you might not). If this becomes a problem, then we'll have to either escape '*' (ugly), or have a separate 'wildcard' search. It didn't look very good when there were too many results - and it could take a long time, and on this machine at least, crash, if there were too many. So there's a hard limit of 10 results that will be displayed, along with the number of results that matched, but aren't displayed. If this bothers you or you want to increase the limit, it's a one line change that should be easy to find. If people ask for it, then this can become an exposed option (again, probably via a special wildcard search). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 04:29:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 06:29:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796996 ] smtp server not started until restart Message-ID: Bugs item #796996, was opened at 2003-08-29 10:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796996&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nicolai Dufva Nielsen (ndufva) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: smtp server not started until restart Initial Comment: Version 1.0a4: First-time config: 1/ Run pop3proxy.py -b 2/ Click "Configuration page" 3/ Enter names and port numbers for smtp and pop3 4/ Click Save Now the pop3 proxy is started and listening, but the smtp proxy isn't. Restart of pop3proxy.py started smtp proxy. Parameters for proxies (if important): pop3 servers: localhost:8110 pop3 ports: 110 smtp servers: localhost:8025 smtp ports: 25 (I am already running pop3 and smtp on port 8110 and 8025, respectively) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 22:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in cvs, thanks. This should make it into the 1.0a5 release, due out any time now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796996&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 04:33:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 06:33:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798469 ] mboxtrain crashes on maildir Message-ID: Bugs item #798469, was opened at 2003-09-01 10:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798469&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oliver Mihatsch (omihatsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mboxtrain crashes on maildir Initial Comment: Using spambayes-1.0a4 I get the following error when calling mboxtrain.py on a maildir. Training spam (/home/oliver/Mail/.spambayes.directory/spam): Reading as Maildir 1062401463.20854.X279:2,S Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ? main() File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 286, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew) File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"), is_spam, force) File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train f = file(tfn, "wb") IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/oliver/Mail/.spambayes.directory/spam/cur/tmp/1062410184.6790_1.zaire' I could fix the problem by changing "tmp" for "../tmp" in line 101 of mboxtrain.ph ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798469&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 04:34:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 06:34:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798469 ] mboxtrain crashes on maildir Message-ID: Bugs item #798469, was opened at 2003-09-01 22:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798469&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Oliver Mihatsch (omihatsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mboxtrain crashes on maildir Initial Comment: Using spambayes-1.0a4 I get the following error when calling mboxtrain.py on a maildir. Training spam (/home/oliver/Mail/.spambayes.directory/spam): Reading as Maildir 1062401463.20854.X279:2,S Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ? main() File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 286, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew) File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"), is_spam, force) File "/home/oliver/software/python/bin/mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train f = file(tfn, "wb") IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/oliver/Mail/.spambayes.directory/spam/cur/tmp/1062410184.6790_1.zaire' I could fix the problem by changing "tmp" for "../tmp" in line 101 of mboxtrain.ph ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 22:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798469&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 05:56:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 07:57:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795414 ] Missing [SpamBayes] button after install Message-ID: Bugs item #795414, was opened at 2003-08-27 01:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 9 Submitted By: Niels Hosbond Petersen (hosbond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Missing [SpamBayes] button after install Initial Comment: After installing the "SpamBayes" button is blank (no visible text) and nothing happens, when I press it. Not having this button prevents me from getting started with SpamBayes Manager etc. I have uninstalled/reinstalled several times without any luck. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 21:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please upgrade to version 007 - this should be fixed there. (Your log shows you have version 6) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 06:15:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 08:15:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747945 ] apparent corruption of Received lines Message-ID: Bugs item #747945, was opened at 2003-06-03 06:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmanfredi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apparent corruption of Received lines Initial Comment: It looks like the message header is corrupted by hammiefilter.py. Here's my evidence: I'm running the 1.0a2 release. I use "mailagent" to filter my mail, which is like procmail (with a much cleaner code base and readable rules) and I've set up the rules like that: ### Begin SPAM filtering section ### { FEED ~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py; RESYNC; REJECT; }; X-Spambayes-Classification: /^spam/ { REJECT SPAM } /^ham/ { REJECT INITIAL } /^unsure/ { REJECT LOST }; # Dispatch to spam/lost, keep going if ham... { VACATION off; BIFF off; REJECT }; { SAVE lost }; { SAVE spam }; ### End of SPAM filtering section ### The "FEED" command pipes the message to the specified scripts and gets the output back as the new message. The RESYNC command reparses the headers, since they might have been changed by the command (and indeed, they are since X-Spambayes-Classification is added!). However, here are the logs I see: ------------------------------ 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: FROM 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: RELAYED hbs43-138.hbs.edu, orb.pobox.com, pop.free.fr, lyon.ram.loc 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: ABOUT Approved 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #68 in mode INITIAL 03/06/03 07:44:39 mailagent[277851]: FED [qm16938] through '~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py' 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: WARNING no by in first Received: line 'from localhost (mail@localhost [127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200' 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: weird Received: line 'from localhost (mail@localhost [127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200' 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: RESYNCED [qm16938] 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: REJECTED [qm16938] in state INITIAL 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #69 in mode INITIAL 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: entering new state SPAM --------------------------------- Look at the WARNING about the absence of "by" in Received. The problem is that no such warning is originally emitted, but it appears during RESYNC when the headers are reparsed after the message went through hammiefilter.py. This indicates a corruption problem, since mailagent uses the same code to reparse the headers during RESYNC as it used originally, and no warning were emitted before FEED was run. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi) Date: 2003-09-01 12:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=13887 Thanks. Indeed, the issue is closed. I wanted to actively confirm it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 03:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Haven't heard back in a fortnight, so assume that this is fixed. Please re-open if this is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi) Date: 2003-08-15 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=13887 Upon looking, it does not seem to happen any longer with the beta4 version. I'll keep monitoring the logs for a few days. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-28 02:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try this with alpha4 and let us know if it still occurs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 09:45:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 11:45:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795414 ] Missing [SpamBayes] button after install Message-ID: Bugs item #795414, was opened at 2003-08-26 17:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hosbond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 9 Submitted By: Niels Hosbond Petersen (hosbond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Missing [SpamBayes] button after install Initial Comment: After installing the "SpamBayes" button is blank (no visible text) and nothing happens, when I press it. Not having this button prevents me from getting started with SpamBayes Manager etc. I have uninstalled/reinstalled several times without any luck. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Niels Hosbond Petersen (hosbond) Date: 2003-09-01 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=851586 I have now upgraded to version 007. Now, I get 2 buttons: "Delete as spam" and "Recover from spam". I still can't see the [Spambayes] button and therefore I can't activate Spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please upgrade to version 007 - this should be fixed there. (Your log shows you have version 6) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 10:21:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 12:21:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797890 ] Assertion errors from classifier for new messages Message-ID: Bugs item #797890, was opened at 2003-08-30 12:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by avitous You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Assertion errors from classifier for new messages Initial Comment: Installed from CVS latest version as of 8/30/03 (1.0a4 wouldn't work for me so reinstalled). Python version is 2. 2.3 on Windows XP with latest pybsddb installed. Trained with recent spam/ham collections (about equal numbers of messages, approx. 400 each), configured proxy. Using Mahogany mail client pointed to pop3proxy (localhost). Each new message retrieved results in an assertion failure: AssertionError Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\apps\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 439, in onRetr evidence=True) File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 451, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 307, in probability assert hamcount <= nham (from console running pop3proxy.py) Also inserted into headers of each message: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in probability() at D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert hamcount <= nham ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) Date: 2003-09-01 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=353986 My original install attempt was with 1.0a4 with default db (dumbdbm) and I had corruption problems. I then downloaded CVS snapshot, noted I needed pybsddb (running Python 2.2.3) so I installed it before installing SpamBayes-cvs and discovering the issue I reported here.. When I reverted to 1. 0a4 I used a fresh install, and it worked since pybsddb was now present. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 16:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Could you please clarify something? You say "adding pybsddb helped", but your initial problem description says "...with latest pybsddb installed." When you were seeing the problems, did you have pybsddb installed or not? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) Date: 2003-08-30 16:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=353986 Just got 1.0a4 working (adding pybsddb helped) and although it has a particular training issue thru smtp proxy it works against the corpuses which caused the error documented here in CVS snapshot version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) Date: 2003-08-30 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=353986 I'd love to help track this down, but I cannot send you my corpuses (private data) and don't have time right now to 'sanitize' it. Perhaps later this weekend I can find the time, but I don't want to give away anybody's emails in the process. I'm training through the web interface, with culled most-recent message data for spam/ham corpuses. No errors show up during this exercise; messages are imported as a single mbox file for each corpus. Subsequently I can query on various words and the responses seem to be reasonable. Error shows up when I subsequently shut down, restart pop3proxy.py (was having problem with smtp proxy not working with 1.0a4 so got used to doing that...), connect with my mail client, and retrieve new messages; every message results in the assertion error. Please let me know what else I can do besides sending private data: what kind of debug logs can be written while exercise this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 13:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 This is a bug that's been cropping up from time to time, but we haven't been able to reproduce it. It sounds from your description that you have a way to reproduce it - just train on your corpuses and it fails straight away...? If that's true, could you attach your corpuses to this bug report? Or if you've private messages in there, would you be willing to send the corpuses to me directly? I'd love to be able to track this one down. If you do send/attach your corpuses, please zip them up to guarantee they don't get mangled by intermediate mail/web servers. How are you training? Through the web, or on the command line? If on the command line, what is the exact command you're using? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 10:35:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 12:35:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query should show all words starting with certain text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-28 20:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fuerte You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text Initial Comment: Word query should show all words starting with certain text if the user adds * in the end For example: url:great* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Date: 2003-09-01 19:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=778595 Thanks! A limit of 100 would have been better, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, and should have just squeaked into 1.0a5. It works as described above. The one side-effect is that if a token ends with "*", then you can't search for it alone any more (you'll still get the result, but may also get other words, unless there are lots of them (see below), then you might not). If this becomes a problem, then we'll have to either escape '*' (ugly), or have a separate 'wildcard' search. It didn't look very good when there were too many results - and it could take a long time, and on this machine at least, crash, if there were too many. So there's a hard limit of 10 results that will be displayed, along with the number of results that matched, but aren't displayed. If this bothers you or you want to increase the limit, it's a one line change that should be easy to find. If people ask for it, then this can become an exposed option (again, probably via a special wildcard search). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 15:11:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 17:12:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797890 ] Assertion errors from classifier for new messages Message-ID: Bugs item #797890, was opened at 2003-08-30 19:37 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) >Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Assertion errors from classifier for new messages Initial Comment: Installed from CVS latest version as of 8/30/03 (1.0a4 wouldn't work for me so reinstalled). Python version is 2. 2.3 on Windows XP with latest pybsddb installed. Trained with recent spam/ham collections (about equal numbers of messages, approx. 400 each), configured proxy. Using Mahogany mail client pointed to pop3proxy (localhost). Each new message retrieved results in an assertion failure: AssertionError Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\apps\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 439, in onRetr evidence=True) File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 451, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 307, in probability assert hamcount <= nham (from console running pop3proxy.py) Also inserted into headers of each message: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in probability() at D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert hamcount <= nham ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-01 21:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Fixed. After training on a message, we now ensure that the classifier's state (nspam, nham) is written to the database. Otherwise, if training goes wrong, you can get a wordinfo whose count is greater than nspam/nham - for instance, when training on a 100-message mailbox file, if the 99th message caused an exception you could get a clue with a ham count of 99 but an nham of 0 (or whatever it was when you started training). This is done for bsddb storage, and isn't needed for pickle storage - SQL-based storage isn't done, because that should probably be transaction-based and I'll leave that for Skip/Tony/A. N. Other SQL-Storage Person. 8-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) Date: 2003-09-01 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=353986 My original install attempt was with 1.0a4 with default db (dumbdbm) and I had corruption problems. I then downloaded CVS snapshot, noted I needed pybsddb (running Python 2.2.3) so I installed it before installing SpamBayes-cvs and discovering the issue I reported here.. When I reverted to 1. 0a4 I used a fresh install, and it worked since pybsddb was now present. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 23:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Could you please clarify something? You say "adding pybsddb helped", but your initial problem description says "...with latest pybsddb installed." When you were seeing the problems, did you have pybsddb installed or not? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) Date: 2003-08-30 23:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=353986 Just got 1.0a4 working (adding pybsddb helped) and although it has a particular training issue thru smtp proxy it works against the corpuses which caused the error documented here in CVS snapshot version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous) Date: 2003-08-30 21:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=353986 I'd love to help track this down, but I cannot send you my corpuses (private data) and don't have time right now to 'sanitize' it. Perhaps later this weekend I can find the time, but I don't want to give away anybody's emails in the process. I'm training through the web interface, with culled most-recent message data for spam/ham corpuses. No errors show up during this exercise; messages are imported as a single mbox file for each corpus. Subsequently I can query on various words and the responses seem to be reasonable. Error shows up when I subsequently shut down, restart pop3proxy.py (was having problem with smtp proxy not working with 1.0a4 so got used to doing that...), connect with my mail client, and retrieve new messages; every message results in the assertion error. Please let me know what else I can do besides sending private data: what kind of debug logs can be written while exercise this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 20:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 This is a bug that's been cropping up from time to time, but we haven't been able to reproduce it. It sounds from your description that you have a way to reproduce it - just train on your corpuses and it fails straight away...? If that's true, could you attach your corpuses to this bug report? Or if you've private messages in there, would you be willing to send the corpuses to me directly? I'd love to be able to track this one down. If you do send/attach your corpuses, please zip them up to guarantee they don't get mangled by intermediate mail/web servers. How are you training? Through the web, or on the command line? If on the command line, what is the exact command you're using? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 17:30:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 19:30:28 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query should show all words starting with certain text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text Initial Comment: Word query should show all words starting with certain text if the user adds * in the end For example: url:great* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To change it to 100, all you have to do is add one zero in UserInterface.py. If lots (more than one ;) of people want more control over this, then I'll change it to an 'advanced' lookup to complement the existing one, and have options like this. 100 takes a long time, and results in a massive html page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Date: 2003-09-02 04:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=778595 Thanks! A limit of 100 would have been better, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, and should have just squeaked into 1.0a5. It works as described above. The one side-effect is that if a token ends with "*", then you can't search for it alone any more (you'll still get the result, but may also get other words, unless there are lots of them (see below), then you might not). If this becomes a problem, then we'll have to either escape '*' (ugly), or have a separate 'wildcard' search. It didn't look very good when there were too many results - and it could take a long time, and on this machine at least, crash, if there were too many. So there's a hard limit of 10 results that will be displayed, along with the number of results that matched, but aren't displayed. If this bothers you or you want to increase the limit, it's a one line change that should be easy to find. If people ask for it, then this can become an exposed option (again, probably via a special wildcard search). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 17:57:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 19:57:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747945 ] apparent corruption of Received lines Message-ID: Bugs item #747945, was opened at 2003-06-03 18:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apparent corruption of Received lines Initial Comment: It looks like the message header is corrupted by hammiefilter.py. Here's my evidence: I'm running the 1.0a2 release. I use "mailagent" to filter my mail, which is like procmail (with a much cleaner code base and readable rules) and I've set up the rules like that: ### Begin SPAM filtering section ### { FEED ~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py; RESYNC; REJECT; }; X-Spambayes-Classification: /^spam/ { REJECT SPAM } /^ham/ { REJECT INITIAL } /^unsure/ { REJECT LOST }; # Dispatch to spam/lost, keep going if ham... { VACATION off; BIFF off; REJECT }; { SAVE lost }; { SAVE spam }; ### End of SPAM filtering section ### The "FEED" command pipes the message to the specified scripts and gets the output back as the new message. The RESYNC command reparses the headers, since they might have been changed by the command (and indeed, they are since X-Spambayes-Classification is added!). However, here are the logs I see: ------------------------------ 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: FROM 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: RELAYED hbs43-138.hbs.edu, orb.pobox.com, pop.free.fr, lyon.ram.loc 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: ABOUT Approved 03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #68 in mode INITIAL 03/06/03 07:44:39 mailagent[277851]: FED [qm16938] through '~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py' 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: WARNING no by in first Received: line 'from localhost (mail@localhost [127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200' 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: weird Received: line 'from localhost (mail@localhost [127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200' 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: RESYNCED [qm16938] 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: REJECTED [qm16938] in state INITIAL 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #69 in mode INITIAL 03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: entering new state SPAM --------------------------------- Look at the WARNING about the absence of "by" in Received. The problem is that no such warning is originally emitted, but it appears during RESYNC when the headers are reparsed after the message went through hammiefilter.py. This indicates a corruption problem, since mailagent uses the same code to reparse the headers during RESYNC as it used originally, and no warning were emitted before FEED was run. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 11:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks - it's good to have clarification. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi) Date: 2003-09-02 00:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=13887 Thanks. Indeed, the issue is closed. I wanted to actively confirm it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Haven't heard back in a fortnight, so assume that this is fixed. Please re-open if this is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi) Date: 2003-08-16 04:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=13887 Upon looking, it does not seem to happen any longer with the beta4 version. I'll keep monitoring the logs for a few days. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-28 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try this with alpha4 and let us know if it still occurs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 18:01:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 20:01:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-798318 ] Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM Message-ID: Support Requests item #798318, was opened at 2003-08-31 20:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM Initial Comment: Hi!. I installed SpamBayes 0.7 on my Windows XP Pro SP1 system late Thursday evening 8/28. Here it is Sunday 8/31, and SB is working very nicely! BUT, it doesn't seem to have learned that RIM / Blackberry Redirector e-mails or non-spam. It pretty regularly puts them in the "maybe spam" folder. I've included the detailed "spam report" on one such message below. Otherwise, SB is working great with my Blackberry -- if it identifies an inbox message as Spam it moves it out of the inbox before the Blackberry Redirector has a chance to send it to my Blackberry! Please let me know if I can provide more information. Thank you! --Ben Slivka Ben [at] Slivka [dot] com Clyde Hill, WA (near Seattle) Spam Score: 0.207205 word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 0.663497 - - '*S*' 0.0779066 - - 'between' 0.0221876 2566 0 'blackberry' 0.0815819 3592 1 'processed' 0.249116 120 0 'move' 0.264701 1577 2 'data' 0.270535 1529 2 'header:Message-Id:1' 0.302488 5573 9 'used' 0.318698 2332 4 'not' 0.37607 14097 32 'reply-to:none' 0.390848 27683 67 'to:addr:ben' 0.60174 18381 105 'header:MIME-Version:1' 0.614831 13414 81 'to:addr:slivka.com' 0.616083 17303 105 'from:no real name:2**0' 0.669564 2714 21 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.687821 12466 104 'header:Return-Path:1' 0.744835 9939 110 'carry' 0.779405 332 5 Message Stream: X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from BlackBerry.NET ([206.51.26.40]) by janus.slivka.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:06:27 -0700 Received: from smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry (smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry [172.16.147.240]) by BlackBerry.NET (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7VN6hvs008489 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:06:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry (etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry [172.16.147.237]) by smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7VMxtAg013832 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200308312302.h7VMxtAg013832@smtprelay01.etp.prod. on.blackberry> From: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net Subject: RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-00600811c6a2 To: ben@slivka.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/mixed; BOUNDARY="- 1824071167-23478-1062370948=:1404" Return-Path: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2003 23:06:28.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[8215A7E0:01C37014] RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe- 00600811c6a2

This message is used to carry data between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry Redirector.

This message is used to carry data between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry Redirector. Message Tokens: 47 unique tokens 'and' 'between' 'blackberry' 'carry' 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'data' 'delete,' 'from:addr:etp' 'from:addr:etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net' 'from:no real name:2**0' 'handheld.' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-Id:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Return-Path:1' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'message' 'message-id:@smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry' 'move' 'not' 'please' 'processed' 'redirector' 'redirector.' 'reply-to:none' 'respond' 'sender:none' 'skip:r 40' 'subject:-' 'subject:00600811c6a2' 'subject:11d1' 'subject:87fe' 'subject:RIM_bca28a80' 'subject:e9c0' 'the' 'this' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:ben' 'to:addr:slivka.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'used' 'will' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-01 20:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It's much simpler for you to keep your training data balanced than it is for me to add entirely new subsystems to the code . Try it! People with balanced training sets don't have problems like this. If I had time to throw at making improvements, I'd be much more interested in finding a better way to deal with unbalanced training data than fiddling with brittle rule-based subsystems (they're always brittle, unless backed by complex learning algorithms to adjust weights based on feedback). It would help if you at least tried setting experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False and reported back on what happened. You don't have to retrain after doing that. Your original complaint should go away then. More interesting is what new problems would arise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2003-08-31 23:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tim_One, I have tons of ham (29,000+) and barely any spam (now up to 189 from 80 when I first trained SpamBayes). Have you considered having some additional filter rules that would allow me to indicate that mail from certain domains and/or with certain reg_exp subject lines was SPAM/NOT- SPAM? I understand this would violate the "pure" Bayesian approach, but might be a simple, practical solution? Thanks! --ben@slivka.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-08-31 21:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Looks like you trained on a great many more ham msgs than spam msgs. If so, try training on an approximately equal number of each. The code was designed, tested, and tuned by people who trained on approximately equal numbers of each, and we don't have yet have a good approach to dealing with wildly unbalanced training sets. You can find your default_bayes_customize.ini file and change the line experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: True to experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False and then these msgs will almost certainly be scored as solid ham. However, you'll probably get a much higher false negative rate (spam erroneously classified as ham) then too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 18:20:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 20:20:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795414 ] Missing [SpamBayes] button after install Message-ID: Bugs item #795414, was opened at 2003-08-27 01:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: Niels Hosbond Petersen (hosbond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Missing [SpamBayes] button after install Initial Comment: After installing the "SpamBayes" button is blank (no visible text) and nothing happens, when I press it. Not having this button prevents me from getting started with SpamBayes Manager etc. I have uninstalled/reinstalled several times without any luck. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-02 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 damn :) OK, I have found this. The fix is in the Python for Windows extensions rather than spambayes. Unfortunately, you must either wait for the next binary release or run from source code (and if you go the latter, you will need win32all-159). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Niels Hosbond Petersen (hosbond) Date: 2003-09-02 01:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=851586 I have now upgraded to version 007. Now, I get 2 buttons: "Delete as spam" and "Recover from spam". I still can't see the [Spambayes] button and therefore I can't activate Spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 21:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please upgrade to version 007 - this should be fixed there. (Your log shows you have version 6) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 18:38:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 20:38:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797316 ] Extra CRLF to smtp server causes garbage error. Message-ID: Bugs item #797316, was opened at 2003-08-30 02:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dudley Fox (grieve) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Extra CRLF to smtp server causes garbage error. Initial Comment: In version 1.0a4 of smtpproxy.py on line 200 it reads self.serverSocket.push(cooked + '\r\n') It should read self.serverSocket.push(cooked) The first line sends an empty command to the smtp server, and causes it to return an error. Different smtp servers and mail clients handle it differently, but Eudora will complain that when it sent the QUIT command an error was returned. Agent will just fail silently. In both cases the message is actually sent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Confirmed that it does fix it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Bah. Forget all that. I was making the change in the wrong place, because I didn't look up the line number in 1.0a4 and there wasn't any context code around the change. I made the change (it's in smtpproxy v1.13) and my smtpproxy still works, so 1.0a5 should work for you. Hopefully this will fix it for everyone. I *think* that the problem was not actually anything to do with the QUIT command. The extra \r\n was sent after the end of the data (which is usually immediately followed by the QUIT), which is handled in a different place, and did have an extra \r\n. The error response just came back after the QUIT was sent. This explains a lot. I'm changing this to pending - if anyone does have this problem with smtpproxy v1.13 or 1.0a5 then please reopen. I'll close it once I've confirmed that it fixes it for the other people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 One other thing: two of the people that have reported this have been using Norton Anti-Virus to scan mail. One suspects that the problem lies with the Norton-spambayes relationship (although I'm not convinced). Are you using Norton? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 14:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Bah. I've had one other person tell me that they experienced this problem and that this fixed it, and one other person tell me that they experience this problem, and that this doesn't fix it (they get the same result as me). I really need to know whether this was the only change made or not. I don't see how it could possibly work! If you could download 1.0a5 (probably out later today) and try it unchanged, and then (if necessary) with this alternation, that would be fantastic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-30 20:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You are correct that there is a problem that Eudora complains about an error after the QUIT command. However, if the '\r\n' is removed, then *no* commands work (at least here). Certainly this is the way that the RFC says that SMTP is meant to work (specifically, that there is a CRLF after each command, including QUIT). Can you confirm for me that removing the '\r\n' means that you can still use smtpproxy? If I remove it here, it hangs forever on the first command sent (ELHO, in this case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 19:05:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 21:05:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788845 ] imapfilter training fails Message-ID: Bugs item #788845, was opened at 2003-08-15 05:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter training fails Initial Comment: Using latest CVS, Python 2.2.2, connecting to a Courier IMAP server. Web interface of imapfilter can connect and see the imap folders on the server. When I try training (with messages in the TrainSpam folder) I get the following traceback, I am willing to help anyone debug this: [gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 spambayes/imapfilter.py -v -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, version 0.01 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SB.TrainSpam *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ? run() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run imap_filter.Train() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 607, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train msg.Save() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, command) + args) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, apply (self._command, (name,) + args)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in _command data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in _checkquote if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')): IndexError: string index out of range ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I think I have fixed this. If you could try out imapfilter in 1.0a5 (due 04 Sept 03) and let me know if it works, that would be great. It should definately move the error into smtpproxy, rather than imaplib, and it should manage to recover from it, as well. It would be good to know that it still acts correctly though. (IMAP is a terrible protocol. The problem here is still the fundamental one that you can't alter a message on the server). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza) Date: 2003-08-25 19:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=844717 Here is some more using a more verbose debug: [gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 spambayes/imapfilter.py -v - t -i4 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, version 0.01 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham Done. 18:45.14 > FPNB1 LOGIN **** "******" 18:45.19 < FPNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. Training 18:45.19 > FPNB2 SELECT INBOX.SB.TrainHam 18:45.19 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 18:45.19 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 18:45.19 < * 1 EXISTS 18:45.19 < * 0 RECENT 18:45.19 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1060841558] Ok 18:45.19 < FPNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam 18:45.19 > FPNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 18:45.19 < * SEARCH 157 18:45.19 < FPNB3 OK SEARCH done. 18:45.19 > FPNB4 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.HEADER 18:45.19 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822.HEADER {2075} 18:45.19 read literal size 2075 18:45.19 < ) 18:45.19 < FPNB4 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.20 > FPNB5 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.PEEK 18:45.20 < FPNB5 NO Error in IMAP command received by server. 18:45.20 NO response: Error in IMAP command received by server. 18:45.20 > FPNB6 UID FETCH 157 RFC822 18:45.20 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822 {5442} 18:45.20 read literal size 5442 18:45.20 < ) 18:45.20 < FPNB6 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.22 > FPNB7 UID FETCH 157 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 18:45.22 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "19-Aug-2003 10:07:21 -0600") 18:45.23 < FPNB7 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.24 > FPNB8 APPEND INBOX.SB.TrainHam (\Seen) "19- Aug-2003 10:07:21 -0600" {5476} 18:45.24 < + OK 18:45.24 write literal size 5476 18:45.29 < FPNB8 OK [APPENDUID 1060841558 158] APPEND Ok. 18:45.29 > FPNB9 UID STORE 157 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 18:45.29 < FPNB9 OK STORE completed. 18:45.29 > FPNB10 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X- Spambayes-MailId 1061320725) 18:45.29 < * SEARCH 18:45.29 < * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted)) 18:45.29 < FPNB10 OK SEARCH done. 18:45.29 > FPNB11 UID SEARCH RECENT 18:45.29 < * SEARCH 18:45.29 < FPNB11 OK SEARCH done. *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ? run() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run imap_filter.Train() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 594, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train msg.Save() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, command) + args) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, apply (self._command, (name,) + args)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in _command data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in _checkquote if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')): IndexError: string index out of range ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-19 20:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have very occasionally seen this too, but whenever I've tried to reproduce it (to fix it) I haven't been able to. Do you get this consistently? If you do, could you run imapfilter with the "-i4" switch and tell me/the list what you get? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 19:21:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 21:21:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts Message-ID: Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-29 18:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kgiordano You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts Initial Comment: I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want the whole company able to poke at my machine. On the config page, you can now allow or disallow connections from remote machines. There are separate settings for POP3 and SMTP. Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted or rejected, will be logged to the console. This applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection. As a bonus... Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages: 1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to accomodate every subject, every line took two lines because "Show clues" would line break on the space. That space is now non-breaking. 2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+), the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S, respectively. 3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they have their own columns. These three changes will be applied if you update ui.html and ui_html.py. The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4. Note: I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In reality, connections are always accepted. The "rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there is way to check the peer address without accepting the connection. TODO: For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba accepts a list of host/netmasks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Date: 2003-09-01 21:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855266 PITA = Pain In The Ass. I agree that a proxy is not a blatant security exposure, but, as I mentioned in my original comment, I don't want the whole company (any any viruses they might have) able to connect to ports on my machine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I agree HTTP auth and IP filtering must be kept together. I was just saying that using different settings was not useful if HTTP auth is here. Anyway I agree with you : proxies are not very annoying when opened. By the way, what does "PITA" mean ? :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-31 19:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Restricting pop3/smtp access should be a different setting to restricting http access. Realistically, there's no reason why you should want to restrict pop3/smtp access, since the proxy is only a proxy (no access to the machine or your mail is provided) - and a firewall is a better way of restricting this if you do want to do it for some reason. Restricting http access, OTOH, is something that you would want to do. I think even if http auth is added, the permitted ip code should stay, so that you can set ips that don't have to jump through the auth stuff (which is a PITA, IMO). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-30 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I'm volunteer to adapt the web interface remote connections management to pop3 and smtp proxies (but if kgiordano wants to do it) code. I was only wondering wether there should be only one settings for the three servers (web, pop3 and smtp) or there should be one setting per server (thus allowing an IP to fetch mails but not to change the administration options). Note that this question becomes quite irrevelant if HTTP authentication is added to the web interface. In this case, only one setting should be enough (and I guess it would suit most users needs). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-30 10:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Concerning the TODO : check my patch #790615 (state : closed) which handles the remote connections problem for the web interface. It allows to define allowed hosts as a list of IPs, as ranges of IPs and so on. It is mainly regex based. See onIncomingConnection() in UserInterface.py from the CVS. I guess you might use this code to achieve the same thing in the proxies, thus having something more flexible than the simple "remote hosts allowed/refused". The code itself is 6 or 8 lines long. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Thanks for the patch, Khouri! A couple of notes: o The "Show clues" line-split is already fixed in CVS. o We now have a more sophisticated connection- management system for the web interface, so that should probably be applied here in place of your fix (as you say in your TODO section). o The reason the radio buttons are not in their own columns in so that they are a consistent width apart. Call me trivial, but I think that's important, partly for the look of the thing and partly because it makes it ergonomically easier to click them with the mouse. The radio buttons should line up fairly well under their headings already - if they're out by a large margin for you, could you tell us the OS and browser you're using, and attach a screenshot? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 1 21:41:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 1 23:41:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796434 ] email package link is defunct Message-ID: Bugs item #796434, was opened at 2003-08-28 15:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796434&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kevin C. (lebleu) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: email package link is defunct Initial Comment: The link for downloading the email package on http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/download.html is useless. According to the messages in the mailing list archive, they have shut down the mimelib.sf.net project due to it being integrated into the main python project. Could someone please tell me where to get an up to date copy of the email package? I'm running Debian stable, which currently only has Python 2.2.1 (w/ email 1.0) as the most recent version. Thanks--Kevin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 15:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed (in cvs, have to get someone else to push it), thanks. The new link is http://www.python.org/sigs/email-sig/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796434&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 05:54:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 07:54:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799091 ] Spam not always moved (when filtering too ?) Message-ID: Bugs item #799091, was opened at 2003-09-02 13:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799091&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mll (mlmll) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam not always moved (when filtering too ?) Initial Comment: Hi, First, thanks for the great app, very promising. Used to try spammunition, but spambayes is better at tracking spam. I've set a rule in Outlook to move automatically mail send to a given alias to, say "Inbox2". Inbox2 is a subfolder of "Inbox". I've told SpamBayes to filter "Inbox" and "Inbox2" and move the spam to the "Spam" folder. Unfortunately, it seems that, while the spam in "Inbox" is appropriately moved to "Spam", it doesn't always for "inbox2". Maybe spambayes kinda competes with the rules filtering system when the mail comes first to the inbox ? Thanks for any help. I'll be glad to send any debug info privately. MLL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799091&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 08:26:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 10:26:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-799149 ] Extend the erach to general e.Mail sorting Message-ID: Feature Requests item #799149, was opened at 2003-09-02 14:26 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johann Richard (johannrichard) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Extend the erach to general e.Mail sorting Initial Comment: Joh Udell made a fabulous suggestion on InfoWorld recently. http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/08/29/34OPstrategi c_1.html Thanks to the SpamBayes plug-in, my e-mail client does a great job of learning which messages I do or don't want to see. But it should do so much more! My work life is organized around groups and projects that form and evolve in fluid ways. E-mail folders and filters help me manage these activities. I want to be pleasantly surprised by software that notices when message patterns indicate the formation of a group or project, and volunteers to set up folders and filters for me. [...] No breakthrough in artificial intelligence is needed to make this happen. We do the pattern recognition ourselves, quite naturally, as we process our information flows. If software paid more attention to what we attend to, and how, there could be more pleasant surprises. So, my suggestion would be, just to implement this idea. As far as I udnerstood, SpamBayes/Outbreak already monitors when the user moves e.Mail around and marks/unmarks it, depending on where it is moved. Likewise, the Plugin could extend its reach and maintain not only a list fo SPAM but track the information flow, tag messages to belong to certain groups/projects/whatever. I'd be happy to hear what you think of this idea, and if you see a possibility to work towards tis direction. Best regards, Johann ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 08:27:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 10:27:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-799149 ] Extend the reach of the Add-In to general e.Mail sorting Message-ID: Feature Requests item #799149, was opened at 2003-09-02 14:26 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by johannrichard You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johann Richard (johannrichard) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Extend the reach of the Add-In to general e.Mail sorting Initial Comment: Joh Udell made a fabulous suggestion on InfoWorld recently. http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/08/29/34OPstrategi c_1.html Thanks to the SpamBayes plug-in, my e-mail client does a great job of learning which messages I do or don't want to see. But it should do so much more! My work life is organized around groups and projects that form and evolve in fluid ways. E-mail folders and filters help me manage these activities. I want to be pleasantly surprised by software that notices when message patterns indicate the formation of a group or project, and volunteers to set up folders and filters for me. [...] No breakthrough in artificial intelligence is needed to make this happen. We do the pattern recognition ourselves, quite naturally, as we process our information flows. If software paid more attention to what we attend to, and how, there could be more pleasant surprises. So, my suggestion would be, just to implement this idea. As far as I udnerstood, SpamBayes/Outbreak already monitors when the user moves e.Mail around and marks/unmarks it, depending on where it is moved. Likewise, the Plugin could extend its reach and maintain not only a list fo SPAM but track the information flow, tag messages to belong to certain groups/projects/whatever. I'd be happy to hear what you think of this idea, and if you see a possibility to work towards tis direction. Best regards, Johann ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 08:52:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 10:52:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-799149 ] Extend the reach of the Add-In to general e.Mail sorting Message-ID: Feature Requests item #799149, was opened at 2003-09-02 10:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johann Richard (johannrichard) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Extend the reach of the Add-In to general e.Mail sorting Initial Comment: Joh Udell made a fabulous suggestion on InfoWorld recently. http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/08/29/34OPstrategi c_1.html Thanks to the SpamBayes plug-in, my e-mail client does a great job of learning which messages I do or don't want to see. But it should do so much more! My work life is organized around groups and projects that form and evolve in fluid ways. E-mail folders and filters help me manage these activities. I want to be pleasantly surprised by software that notices when message patterns indicate the formation of a group or project, and volunteers to set up folders and filters for me. [...] No breakthrough in artificial intelligence is needed to make this happen. We do the pattern recognition ourselves, quite naturally, as we process our information flows. If software paid more attention to what we attend to, and how, there could be more pleasant surprises. So, my suggestion would be, just to implement this idea. As far as I udnerstood, SpamBayes/Outbreak already monitors when the user moves e.Mail around and marks/unmarks it, depending on where it is moved. Likewise, the Plugin could extend its reach and maintain not only a list fo SPAM but track the information flow, tag messages to belong to certain groups/projects/whatever. I'd be happy to hear what you think of this idea, and if you see a possibility to work towards tis direction. Best regards, Johann ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-02 10:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 You can find quite a bit about this in various spambayes archives. spambayes is inherently a binary (2-way) classifier, and exploits that in ways that don't generalize straightforwardly (if at all) to N-way classification. Give popfile a try. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=799149&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 09:34:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 11:34:05 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799201 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Support Requests item #799201, was opened at 2003-09-02 15:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799201&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: When I go to the SpamBayes manager it shows that the database has 1066 good and 224 spam. These numbers don't change regardless of how much spam has been processed. I'm not sure SpamBayes is learning from new incomming messages. I'm using SpamBayes .7 upgraded from SpamBayes .6. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 11:23:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 13:23:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication Message-ID: Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: HTTP Authentication Initial Comment: This patch closes Feature Request #791319. This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is required) : requestAuthentication() getRealm() isValidUser() getCancelMessage() This patch works against current CVS release and does include the remote connections one. The configuration page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP authentication, user name and user password. This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more complicated to implement, particularily in such a simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication and Remote connections management souhld be enough to prevent the vast majority of security issues. The attached zip contains diff and py files. P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote connections one ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-09-02 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 "this worries me - how come the code ever worked for you, when those modules were never imported?" Well, after having coded the patch, I've downloaded a clean copy of the modified files from the CVS. Then, I just took my changes from the old files and put them in the newly downloaded ones. And I just forgot the import statement. BTW, is there a problem with SourceForge CVS ? It took me days to be able to do an update and I just have versions 1.5 of Dibbler.py, 1.68 of Options.py, and so on. Finally, could you tell me what are most important Spambayes coding standards ? :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-01 08:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Many thanks for the patch - it's now committed as: o Dibbler.py 1.6 o Options.py 1.69 o ProxyUI.py 1.20 o UserInterface.py 1.21 I took the liberty of making some minor changes: Imported the md5 and base64 modules into Dibbler.py (this worries me - how come the code ever worked for you, when those modules were never imported?) Made the code in Dibbler.py generic, and moved the Spambayes-specific code to UserInterface.py (because Dibbler is an application-independent library). Rearranged _HTTPHandler.writeUnauthorizedAccess (and subfunctions) to eliminate duplicate code. Changed from qouble- to single-quoted strings to avoid backslash-quoting of double-quotes (eg. "qop=\auth\" becomes 'qop="auth"') Made several superficial rearrangements to conform to the Python style guide (especially the 80-column rule) and the (very informal!) Spambayes coding standard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 16:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 It was much simpler than I originnaly thought. This is not a complete Digest implementation since the patch does not take care of the "opaque" value (this would have meant to keep track of each visitor on the HTTP server). Yet, after having read the RFC, I don't think it is worth the work. Anyway, this patch allows encrypted authentication. I've modified the configuration page so that the user can choose between no authentication, basic (base64) and digest (md5). I've submitted two files : one containing the .py files and the .diff files, and another one which is a context diff with today's CVS code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 02:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I was not thinking of major structural changes, but to many code additions, especially new instance members. We'll see that tomorrow :) P.S : concerning CVS, I use it for quite a long time, and I was just afraid to run into conflicts (the way CVS merges code is sometimes... surprising), I hate fixing this kind of issues ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-31 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Dibbler.py doesn't change much (it's only ever had three edits!) so you shouldn't worry about huge conflicts. That said, I've just checked in an edit to it before reading this - you can't expect people not to touch it, but you don't need to because CVS will cope with non-conflicting edits. Unless you're planning on changing it beyond all recognition that is, in which case we really need to discuss it first as you say - the reason it's barely changed is that no-one's ever found a bug in it, and I wouldn't want to jeopardise that. Plus, adding authentication really shouldn't require major restructuring work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-31 01:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I'll take care of this, counting from tomorrow. I expect none of you to play with Dibbler.py during the next days, since at first sight it might requires some important changes to add Digest (MD5) authentication support. Anyway, if I am not able to make it for the freeze, I guess Basic support might still be enough for most users. After all, if it is very easy to catch somebody's HTTP Basic login/password couple by sniffing the network, it is even easier to intercept one's POP3 login informations. I'll try to do it, but think of keeping the authentication Basic. As I said before, it might requires important changes within the web server. I did not dig deep enough in HTTP documentation yet, but as far as I know it might require the Dibbler web server to keep a UID for each HTTP client. I hope I'll be surprised by the ease of implementation. I'll get back to you tomorrow evening to tell you wether important changes are required or not. If they are, maybe it will be a good idea to discuss about them since I don't know what are your plans concerning the Dibbler code. I do not want to mess up the code too much :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-30 23:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol, please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic authentication. (You should know that we're planning a feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the end of next week. I don't know how long the freeze will last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-30 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest authentication support (which, as said in patch description, is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-25 02:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest sources from CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-24 23:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Romain, Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you to resubmit it as a context diff? Plain diffs are difficult to apply once the source has changed in CVS. You should be able to produce a single-file context diff using this command: cvs diff -c in the top-level spambayes directory. (If you're using WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command line") ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-20 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections one (nor the outlook express one). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 12:09:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 14:09:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787664 ] registration error for spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #787664, was opened at 2003-08-12 21:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jsohrt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Klarner (tklarner) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: registration error for spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: Tried installing v007 on two different machines, one an NT4 w/Outlook 2000, second machine WinXP w/Outlook 2000. Got error message "Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201" for the spambayes_addin.dll file on both machines. No anti-virus software running on either machine. Word not default editor nor running. Was able to install v006 on a third XP machine w/Outlook 2000 with no problems. BTW: have been using v006 at home; great software; keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Sohrt (jsohrt) Date: 2003-09-02 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=857533 I installed this on XP Pro with Outlook XP, worked okay. Tried installing on another XP Pro with Outlook 2000 and got the same error. Norton was disabled (Autoprotect set to Off) I even tried Regsvr32 to manually register the dll and that failed. Maybe I can try V006. Where do I find a copy of the older version? Thanks jSohrt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Kerr (mkerr) Date: 2003-08-28 22:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=854480 spambayes_addin.dll failed to register when installing the app. I selected ignore when prompted to retry/cancel/ignore thinking I could manually register this dll. When I ran regsvr32 it was able to register the dll and spambayes appears to have installed ok ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Kerr (mkerr) Date: 2003-08-28 21:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=854480 I have installed Spambayes on 3 workstations now (XP [1], Windows 2000 Pro [2]. The XP installed without a problem, the two W2K machines both gave me the same error with being unable to register the dll spambayes_addin.dll. All service packs are current and I am an administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius) Date: 2003-08-28 12:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676587 Could it be that you are installing using an account that doesn't have admin-rights on those machines??? (I know, dumb Q, but hey....how else should we be able to give dumb answers!!!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 12:13:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 2 14:13:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-751348 ] Problem registering DLL/OCX Message-ID: Support Requests item #751348, was opened at 2003-06-09 14:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jsohrt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kathy Gauvin (kmgauvin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem registering DLL/OCX Initial Comment: I got the follwoing error: Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed. Abort Retry Ignore Ignore to proceed anyway(not recommended). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Sohrt (jsohrt) Date: 2003-09-02 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=857533 I got the same problem. If anyone can tell me what to do to fix it, would appreciate it. I have XP Pro with Outlook 2000. I turn off ZoneAlarm and Norton Antivirus (autoprotect = off). I'm thinking maybe I need to try the V006 version -- don't know where to download from. Otherwise on my other XP machine, this plugin is awsome! That one is Outlook 2002 (from Office XP). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx) Date: 2003-08-11 15:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842228 just desable your Anti-virus and the instalation works well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Graybill (graystarr) Date: 2003-06-11 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=340885 I get this same error. And I c annot get it to install! Please help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mike dee (miked_187) Date: 2003-06-09 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797254 i had this one too, outlook 2k. had cloudmark spam program installed as an active plugin. had to go to tools|options etc to get to the plugin screen and then uncheck the cloudmark program. exit and close outlook, reinstall went fine. mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 13:41:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 17:12:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-800671 ] Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Message-ID: Patches item #800671, was opened at 2003-09-04 21:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Initial Comment: Here sb-oe-training.py. It must be put into the windows\ directory of SpamBayes. When launched, it shows a simple GUI which let the user classify each OE mailbox either as Ham or Spam. A simple click on the Train button does the job. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 11:25:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 17:14:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP Message-ID: Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-23 15:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbrozius You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP Initial Comment: When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it normally. However, when I log in as a different user on the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, however, I get the same message. Already tried reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the trick. I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius) Date: 2003-09-04 18:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676587 New source-version (alpha 5) doesn't seem to have this problem, so I'll close the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius) Date: 2003-08-28 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676587 I've just retrieved the latest CVS-version (7 minutes ago) and everything seems to work fine, now.... I'll leave it open until I've got a response from you that the incident can be/is closed.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius) Date: 2003-08-26 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676587 No differences in Exchange-configs. I already rules that out by deleting all but a pop3-account from my profile. Still nothing. I've done as you asked and installed the source-code version but it has the same result. Python Trace Collector shows these messages: # This window will display output from any programs that import win32traceutil # win32com servers registered with '--debug' are in this category. Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 1127, in OnConnection self.manager = manager.GetManager(application) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 825, in GetManager _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 377, in __init__ self.message_store = msgstore.MAPIMsgStore(outlook) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 158, in __init__ self._GetMessageStore(None) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 222, in _GetMessageStore mapi.MDB_WRITE | com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, None) ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 1127, in OnConnection self.manager = manager.GetManager(application) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 825, in GetManager _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 377, in __init__ self.message_store = msgstore.MAPIMsgStore(outlook) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 158, in __init__ self._GetMessageStore(None) File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 222, in _GetMessageStore mapi.MDB_WRITE | com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, None) The error also occurs when I use only me exchange-account, with no PST-file used in my profile.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jesper Rasmussen (shamran) Date: 2003-08-26 07:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=852337 The same happens to me ! Have reinstalling ! where should i send my logfile ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 00:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Has your user account successfully configured Outlook? Can you see folders and send messages when logged in as this user? Is there anything else different about this users Outlook config versus the Admins - eg, lack of/extra personal folders or exchange server configs? If you were willing to run the source-code version we could track this further. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius) Date: 2003-08-25 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676587 Dunno what Windows Server 2003 does different than XP does in this. I've installed the program as administrator, where it runs fine (one single e-mail account to exchange- server). Then I logged in as my personal account and it never ran properly. I've tried installing it again using my personal user account (with enterprise admin-rights) over the existing install, but to na avail. It still works under the administrator- account. I've got three e-mail accounts; 2 POP3's and one Exchange. I've already removed one POP3 and the exchange-account, but that doesn't do the trick. I've only got one Outlook- profile, that's set to default and "always use", so that shouldn't be the problem (I hope...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 12:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is there anything "unusual" about this machine? Does it have any kind of special logon to the server? This error is getting the "default message store" for the machine, which is where the primary "Inbox" etc is located. I've never seen an error fetching this before, so I need a few more clues... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 01:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine? Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 10:09:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 17:14:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-04 10:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 08:29:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 17:15:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-800487 ] Don't count classified spam as new mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #800487, was opened at 2003-09-04 09:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Russell Leake (leaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Don't count classified spam as new mail Initial Comment: I found what "turns me on" and "off" to spam filters is their ability NOT to falsely indicate the arrival of new mail. If a message is classified as spam, it would be nice if SpamBayes would not indicate it as new mail (sounds/tray icon envelope). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 05:40:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 17:41:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800392 ] Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Message-ID: Bugs item #800392, was opened at 2003-09-04 11:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by grab_rat You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or a "feature" - it might belong in RFEs. Anyway... When an email gets recognised by the filter as spam, it gets moved to the "known-spam" folder. However the filter does not seem to train on this email as spam. I don't know why the filter doesn't train on emails it moves itself, when it *does* train on email that I move manually. This has two main effects. Firstly, the filter will not "reinforce" itself against words which are almost certainly spam. For instance, the word "girls" is only scored 0 ham, 2 spam, when in fact the word would be very unlikely to come up in my emails but makes a regular appearance in my spam. This means that some words get scored abnormally low. I don't use an "undecided" folder so I don't know how well the filter detects "known-ham" emails, but I would guess it would have a similar problem on scoring ham emails. Secondly, the filter will not detect new words appearing in spams. If an email is detected as spam, all words appearing in it should be trained on, otherwise when spams come in featuring the new words alone, they will not be recognised as such. A classic example here would be the emails selling diet supplements - if I train my filter to see "glucosamine" and "vitamin" as spam, and then I receive a spam featuring those two words and also "echinacea", the filter should learn that "echinacea" is also likely to be connected to spams. When I next get an email selling only echinacea, it'll then be correctly detected as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-04 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 One comment to follow up. I know it's possible to collect a bunch of spam in the "known-spam" folder and then train on it all. However (a) this is inconvenient; (b) if it's known that this needs doing then you may as well do it as soon as the spam is detected; and (c) this will count spams twice if they've made it through the filter and been moved manually by me, instead of being moved automatically by the filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 08:51:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 17:43:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799848 ] Cannot activate Outlook plugin Message-ID: Support Requests item #799848, was opened at 2003-09-03 16:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot activate Outlook plugin Initial Comment: I was using Outlook 2003 (Beta) together with the spam bayes plugin very sucessfully. Today, the toolbar disconnected. I went to the Com-Add In manager and detected that there is no (!) plugin listed in there. After that i tried to add the spam bayes plugin manually to the list. However, the process (selecting the file and pressing ok) finished successfully, but no entry appeared int the plugin list. I tried then to do a new install of the plugin, which didn't change anything. A removal and a new install also didn't fix the issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 2 22:24:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 18:06:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799552 ] High-ascii characters in subject generate exception Message-ID: Bugs item #799552, was opened at 2003-09-03 00:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799552&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Babcock (wssddc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: High-ascii characters in subject generate exception Initial Comment: A spam message with a high-ascii character in the subject line yields a message header line similar to this: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError('ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xb6 in position 15: ordinal not in range(128)) in append() at D:\App\PYTHON~1.3\lib\email\Header.py line 272: ustr = unicode(s, incodec, errors) I've just started using SpamBayes. The very first messages I fed it included spams with characters 0xB6 or 0xCE in the subject line. I assume other high-ascii characters would produce the same error. I'm using Win/2K SpamBayes 1.0a4 pop3proxy Python 2.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799552&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 16:13:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 18:13:52 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-800487 ] Don't count classified spam as new mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #800487, was opened at 2003-09-05 02:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Russell Leake (leaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Don't count classified spam as new mail Initial Comment: I found what "turns me on" and "off" to spam filters is their ability NOT to falsely indicate the arrival of new mail. If a message is classified as spam, it would be nice if SpamBayes would not indicate it as new mail (sounds/tray icon envelope). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 3.9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 16:37:56 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 18:38:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-800487 ] Don't count classified spam as new mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #800487, was opened at 2003-09-04 09:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leaker You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Russell Leake (leaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Don't count classified spam as new mail Initial Comment: I found what "turns me on" and "off" to spam filters is their ability NOT to falsely indicate the arrival of new mail. If a message is classified as spam, it would be nice if SpamBayes would not indicate it as new mail (sounds/tray icon envelope). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Russell Leake (leaker) Date: 2003-09-04 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676711 All too clear now. Thank you for your prompt response. An alternative solution would be to create a spambayes icon and update it upon success or filter. An example that I have seen is JunkOut (which uses a Bayesian filter also). Just a suggestion. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 3.9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 16:41:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 18:41:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799552 ] High-ascii characters in subject generate exception Message-ID: Bugs item #799552, was opened at 2003-09-03 16:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799552&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Babcock (wssddc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: High-ascii characters in subject generate exception Initial Comment: A spam message with a high-ascii character in the subject line yields a message header line similar to this: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError('ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xb6 in position 15: ordinal not in range(128)) in append() at D:\App\PYTHON~1.3\lib\email\Header.py line 272: ustr = unicode(s, incodec, errors) I've just started using SpamBayes. The very first messages I fed it included spams with characters 0xB6 or 0xCE in the subject line. I assume other high-ascii characters would produce the same error. I'm using Win/2K SpamBayes 1.0a4 pop3proxy Python 2.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This has been fixed in 1.0a5; please upgrade. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799552&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 17:47:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 18:49:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-798318 ] Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM Message-ID: Support Requests item #798318, was opened at 2003-08-31 17:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by benslivka You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM Initial Comment: Hi!. I installed SpamBayes 0.7 on my Windows XP Pro SP1 system late Thursday evening 8/28. Here it is Sunday 8/31, and SB is working very nicely! BUT, it doesn't seem to have learned that RIM / Blackberry Redirector e-mails or non-spam. It pretty regularly puts them in the "maybe spam" folder. I've included the detailed "spam report" on one such message below. Otherwise, SB is working great with my Blackberry -- if it identifies an inbox message as Spam it moves it out of the inbox before the Blackberry Redirector has a chance to send it to my Blackberry! Please let me know if I can provide more information. Thank you! --Ben Slivka Ben [at] Slivka [dot] com Clyde Hill, WA (near Seattle) Spam Score: 0.207205 word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 0.663497 - - '*S*' 0.0779066 - - 'between' 0.0221876 2566 0 'blackberry' 0.0815819 3592 1 'processed' 0.249116 120 0 'move' 0.264701 1577 2 'data' 0.270535 1529 2 'header:Message-Id:1' 0.302488 5573 9 'used' 0.318698 2332 4 'not' 0.37607 14097 32 'reply-to:none' 0.390848 27683 67 'to:addr:ben' 0.60174 18381 105 'header:MIME-Version:1' 0.614831 13414 81 'to:addr:slivka.com' 0.616083 17303 105 'from:no real name:2**0' 0.669564 2714 21 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.687821 12466 104 'header:Return-Path:1' 0.744835 9939 110 'carry' 0.779405 332 5 Message Stream: X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from BlackBerry.NET ([206.51.26.40]) by janus.slivka.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:06:27 -0700 Received: from smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry (smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry [172.16.147.240]) by BlackBerry.NET (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7VN6hvs008489 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:06:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry (etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry [172.16.147.237]) by smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7VMxtAg013832 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200308312302.h7VMxtAg013832@smtprelay01.etp.prod. on.blackberry> From: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net Subject: RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-00600811c6a2 To: ben@slivka.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/mixed; BOUNDARY="- 1824071167-23478-1062370948=:1404" Return-Path: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2003 23:06:28.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[8215A7E0:01C37014] RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe- 00600811c6a2

This message is used to carry data between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry Redirector.

This message is used to carry data between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry Redirector. Message Tokens: 47 unique tokens 'and' 'between' 'blackberry' 'carry' 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'data' 'delete,' 'from:addr:etp' 'from:addr:etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net' 'from:no real name:2**0' 'handheld.' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-Id:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Return-Path:1' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'message' 'message-id:@smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry' 'move' 'not' 'please' 'processed' 'redirector' 'redirector.' 'reply-to:none' 'respond' 'sender:none' 'skip:r 40' 'subject:-' 'subject:00600811c6a2' 'subject:11d1' 'subject:87fe' 'subject:RIM_bca28a80' 'subject:e9c0' 'the' 'this' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:ben' 'to:addr:slivka.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'used' 'will' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2003-09-03 16:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tim_One: I set "experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False" and that immediately curred the problem -- the Blackberry e- mails are staying in the inbox and being processed by the Blackberry Redirector. I don't notice any significant increase in spam-as-ham, either! Thank you and keep up the great work! ben@slivka.com www.slivka.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-01 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It's much simpler for you to keep your training data balanced than it is for me to add entirely new subsystems to the code . Try it! People with balanced training sets don't have problems like this. If I had time to throw at making improvements, I'd be much more interested in finding a better way to deal with unbalanced training data than fiddling with brittle rule-based subsystems (they're always brittle, unless backed by complex learning algorithms to adjust weights based on feedback). It would help if you at least tried setting experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False and reported back on what happened. You don't have to retrain after doing that. Your original complaint should go away then. More interesting is what new problems would arise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2003-08-31 20:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tim_One, I have tons of ham (29,000+) and barely any spam (now up to 189 from 80 when I first trained SpamBayes). Have you considered having some additional filter rules that would allow me to indicate that mail from certain domains and/or with certain reg_exp subject lines was SPAM/NOT- SPAM? I understand this would violate the "pure" Bayesian approach, but might be a simple, practical solution? Thanks! --ben@slivka.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-08-31 18:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Looks like you trained on a great many more ham msgs than spam msgs. If so, try training on an approximately equal number of each. The code was designed, tested, and tuned by people who trained on approximately equal numbers of each, and we don't have yet have a good approach to dealing with wildly unbalanced training sets. You can find your default_bayes_customize.ini file and change the line experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: True to experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False and then these msgs will almost certainly be scored as solid ham. However, you'll probably get a much higher false negative rate (spam erroneously classified as ham) then too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 17:04:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:05:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800341 ] part of toolbar missing after reinstall Message-ID: Bugs item #800341, was opened at 2003-09-04 20:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800341&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Edgar K. (edgarbkk) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: part of toolbar missing after reinstall Initial Comment: Outlook plugin in Outlook XP, Windows XP prof newest version from September 2003 after outlook did not start I uninstalled spambayes and tries to install it again. This did not work. After this I uninstalled it again. I also removed all files and folders like "*spambayes*". I also removed all registry entries like "*spambayes*". When I install spambayes again the installation finishes ok. When I open Outlook there is only part of the spambayes toolbar. The part SpamBayes (with arrow down) exists, but nothing happens when I click on it. The part with the yellow smiley face does not exist. I like to reinstall the program because I really like it. What do I have to do? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 09:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Edgar K. (edgarbkk) Date: 2003-09-04 20:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858927 i forgot to mention the logfile shows this: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 20:47:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:08:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798362 ] Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Message-ID: Bugs item #798362, was opened at 2003-09-01 03:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shaunbroadbent You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Initial Comment: Periodically (I'm not sure exactly when it happens), the spambayes toolbar stops functioning (latest cvs). Clicking the buttons has no effect, and I have to delete the toolbar and restart Outlook (to recreate it) to get it working again (simply restarting Outlook doesn't help). When the toolbar is 'bad', I get this in the trace: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) """ My machine crashes fairly regularly . I wonder, although I'm not sure, if this problem occurs when Outlook crashes instead of being closed properly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent) Date: 2003-09-04 02:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=818011 I am seeing the same problem, at various stages I have had part or all of the main toolbar missing. Logs always show the same error "Failed to add the toolbar item 'whatever' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) I have never lost the 'Delete As' button always just the main 'Spambayes' drop down or a single element from the drop down. I will try the patch but I guess as per the last comment, that is not fixing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Not quite. I now have a the "delete as" and "recover from" buttons, but no spambayes button...the trace has: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.TestSuite' - (-2146827864, 'OLE error 0x800a01a8', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-03 06:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please try the attached patch and see if it fixes it? ta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 04:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I get this with the new addin.py: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)""" BTW, my machine hasn't crashed yet, so that theory is gone... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 12:09:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:09:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799959 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Support Requests item #799959, was opened at 2003-09-03 18:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799959&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: I think I've figured out what is going on with 799201 - I have some rules that move spam into a folder. When I installed spambayes I configured it to look for spam in the inbox and this other folder. It appears that spambayes does not update the database counters when messages are moved from this other folder to the spambayes spam folder. The counters are updated when messages are moved from the inbox to the spambayes spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 16:53:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:15:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-05 02:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 >Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 08:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the 1.0a5 release - it is missing at least 2 key files. Please grab either the latest binary, or the source code from CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 00:15:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:30:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798362 ] Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Message-ID: Bugs item #798362, was opened at 2003-09-01 13:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Initial Comment: Periodically (I'm not sure exactly when it happens), the spambayes toolbar stops functioning (latest cvs). Clicking the buttons has no effect, and I have to delete the toolbar and restart Outlook (to recreate it) to get it working again (simply restarting Outlook doesn't help). When the toolbar is 'bad', I get this in the trace: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) """ My machine crashes fairly regularly . I wonder, although I'm not sure, if this problem occurs when Outlook crashes instead of being closed properly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-03 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please try the attached patch and see if it fixes it? ta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 14:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I get this with the new addin.py: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)""" BTW, my machine hasn't crashed yet, so that theory is gone... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 16:43:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:41:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-800487 ] Don't count classified spam as new mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #800487, was opened at 2003-09-05 02:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Russell Leake (leaker) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Don't count classified spam as new mail Initial Comment: I found what "turns me on" and "off" to spam filters is their ability NOT to falsely indicate the arrival of new mail. If a message is classified as spam, it would be nice if SpamBayes would not indicate it as new mail (sounds/tray icon envelope). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. That is an interesting idea. I'll change this back to open and see what Mark thinks of it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Russell Leake (leaker) Date: 2003-09-05 10:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676711 All too clear now. Thank you for your prompt response. An alternative solution would be to create a spambayes icon and update it upon success or filter. An example that I have seen is JunkOut (which uses a Bayesian filter also). Just a suggestion. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 3.9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 17:41:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:42:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-05 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 01:49:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:46:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800282 ] first mail not filtered after standby Message-ID: Bugs item #800282, was opened at 2003-09-04 07:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: first mail not filtered after standby Initial Comment: When waking up the pc (win2000 hibernate) spambayes/ outlook plugin doesn't filter the inbox. When manually starting the filtering process (SpamBayes Manager -> Filter Now -> Start filtering (Perform all filter actions, restrict to unread mail + mail never previously spam filtered) all spam mails except the first one in the inbox will be filtered and moved to the spam folder. The first one afterwards has a 0% spam score. When moving this mail via "Delete as spam", the same E-Mail gets a 100% spam score! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 08:59:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:49:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799848 ] Cannot activate Outlook plugin Message-ID: Support Requests item #799848, was opened at 2003-09-03 16:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dernik You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot activate Outlook plugin Initial Comment: I was using Outlook 2003 (Beta) together with the spam bayes plugin very sucessfully. Today, the toolbar disconnected. I went to the Com-Add In manager and detected that there is no (!) plugin listed in there. After that i tried to add the spam bayes plugin manually to the list. However, the process (selecting the file and pressing ok) finished successfully, but no entry appeared int the plugin list. I tried then to do a new install of the plugin, which didn't change anything. A removal and a new install also didn't fix the issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Date: 2003-09-03 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858264 I tried to register the dll manually: regsvr32 /u spambayes_addin.dll regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll but this failed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 18:25:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 19:57:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798362 ] Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Message-ID: Bugs item #798362, was opened at 2003-09-01 15:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Initial Comment: Periodically (I'm not sure exactly when it happens), the spambayes toolbar stops functioning (latest cvs). Clicking the buttons has no effect, and I have to delete the toolbar and restart Outlook (to recreate it) to get it working again (simply restarting Outlook doesn't help). When the toolbar is 'bad', I get this in the trace: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) """ My machine crashes fairly regularly . I wonder, although I'm not sure, if this problem occurs when Outlook crashes instead of being closed properly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Not quite. I now have a the "delete as" and "recover from" buttons, but no spambayes button...the trace has: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.TestSuite' - (-2146827864, 'OLE error 0x800a01a8', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-03 18:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please try the attached patch and see if it fixes it? ta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I get this with the new addin.py: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)""" BTW, my machine hasn't crashed yet, so that theory is gone... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 04:09:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 20:39:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800341 ] part of toolbar missing after reinstall Message-ID: Bugs item #800341, was opened at 2003-09-04 10:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800341&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Edgar K. (edgarbkk) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: part of toolbar missing after reinstall Initial Comment: Outlook plugin in Outlook XP, Windows XP prof newest version from September 2003 after outlook did not start I uninstalled spambayes and tries to install it again. This did not work. After this I uninstalled it again. I also removed all files and folders like "*spambayes*". I also removed all registry entries like "*spambayes*". When I install spambayes again the installation finishes ok. When I open Outlook there is only part of the spambayes toolbar. The part SpamBayes (with arrow down) exists, but nothing happens when I click on it. The part with the yellow smiley face does not exist. I like to reinstall the program because I really like it. What do I have to do? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 05:36:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 20:44:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800392 ] Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Message-ID: Bugs item #800392, was opened at 2003-09-04 11:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Filtered "known-spam" emails don't get added to database Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or a "feature" - it might belong in RFEs. Anyway... When an email gets recognised by the filter as spam, it gets moved to the "known-spam" folder. However the filter does not seem to train on this email as spam. I don't know why the filter doesn't train on emails it moves itself, when it *does* train on email that I move manually. This has two main effects. Firstly, the filter will not "reinforce" itself against words which are almost certainly spam. For instance, the word "girls" is only scored 0 ham, 2 spam, when in fact the word would be very unlikely to come up in my emails but makes a regular appearance in my spam. This means that some words get scored abnormally low. I don't use an "undecided" folder so I don't know how well the filter detects "known-ham" emails, but I would guess it would have a similar problem on scoring ham emails. Secondly, the filter will not detect new words appearing in spams. If an email is detected as spam, all words appearing in it should be trained on, otherwise when spams come in featuring the new words alone, they will not be recognised as such. A classic example here would be the emails selling diet supplements - if I train my filter to see "glucosamine" and "vitamin" as spam, and then I receive a spam featuring those two words and also "echinacea", the filter should learn that "echinacea" is also likely to be connected to spams. When I next get an email selling only echinacea, it'll then be correctly detected as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800392&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 04:21:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 20:48:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800341 ] part of toolbar missing after reinstall Message-ID: Bugs item #800341, was opened at 2003-09-04 10:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by edgarbkk You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800341&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Edgar K. (edgarbkk) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: part of toolbar missing after reinstall Initial Comment: Outlook plugin in Outlook XP, Windows XP prof newest version from September 2003 after outlook did not start I uninstalled spambayes and tries to install it again. This did not work. After this I uninstalled it again. I also removed all files and folders like "*spambayes*". I also removed all registry entries like "*spambayes*". When I install spambayes again the installation finishes ok. When I open Outlook there is only part of the spambayes toolbar. The part SpamBayes (with arrow down) exists, but nothing happens when I click on it. The part with the yellow smiley face does not exist. I like to reinstall the program because I really like it. What do I have to do? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Edgar K. (edgarbkk) Date: 2003-09-04 10:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858927 i forgot to mention the logfile shows this: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 18:02:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 21:56:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-05 04:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - any idea why this would be? I'll be putting out 1.0a6 tomorrow (if everything goes to plan) so I could fix it for that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the 1.0a5 release - it is missing at least 2 key files. Please grab either the latest binary, or the source code from CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 20:23:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 22:23:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-05 02:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 12:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I presume that the script to build the release simply doesn't know to include .rc and .h files. What is the release process? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - any idea why this would be? I'll be putting out 1.0a6 tomorrow (if everything goes to plan) so I could fix it for that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 08:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the 1.0a5 release - it is missing at least 2 key files. Please grab either the latest binary, or the source code from CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 00:56:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 22:37:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-800023 ] PocoMail support for autoconfigure Message-ID: Patches item #800023, was opened at 2003-09-04 08:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800023&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: PocoMail support for autoconfigure Initial Comment: I've added support for PocoMail (POP3 hosts and filters settings) for Windows. I've also improved the move_to_next_port : if a port was already defined in the bayescustomize.ini file but the proxy was not started, we could end with the same port specified several times in the config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added, thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800023&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 02:56:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 22:57:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lba You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-05 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 21:14:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 23:14:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-05 04:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 15:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 AFAIK (this is what I did for 1.0a4) it's just to use distutils. "setup.py bdist" or something like that, from memory. This means adding a "data_files" list to the setup.py file, I think (you'd probably have a better idea than me). I'll do this if you don't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I presume that the script to build the release simply doesn't know to include .rc and .h files. What is the release process? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - any idea why this would be? I'll be putting out 1.0a6 tomorrow (if everything goes to plan) so I could fix it for that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the 1.0a5 release - it is missing at least 2 key files. Please grab either the latest binary, or the source code from CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 3 14:21:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 4 23:36:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-800023 ] PocoMail support for autoconfigure Message-ID: Patches item #800023, was opened at 2003-09-03 22:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800023&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: PocoMail support for autoconfigure Initial Comment: I've added support for PocoMail (POP3 hosts and filters settings) for Windows. I've also improved the move_to_next_port : if a port was already defined in the bayescustomize.ini file but the proxy was not started, we could end with the same port specified several times in the config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800023&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 23:27:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 01:27:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797679 ] Recovered Mails filtered again Message-ID: Bugs item #797679, was opened at 2003-08-30 07:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jaal2001 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recovered Mails filtered again Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know if this a bug or a design problem, so I posting it here. When I recover a mail from Spam Folder in my opinion it should be marked as good on the database. I have reapperaing mails, which we're marked as spam. But no matter how often I recover them from spam, the next mail from these events will be filtered again. Is this the normail behaviour or a known problem? Thanks Jan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-05 07:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Hi, no, it's not exactly the same mail. The Mail contains the follwoing entries: 2c2 < inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX P-t- P:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask:YYY.YYY.YYY.YYYY --- > inet addr:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM P-t- P:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM Mask:NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN The X and M differs from mail to mail, as the're dynamic IP's. The other parts of the mail are the same. When I do a "recover from spam" with this mail, the score does not shift ti zero. The score goes back from 60% to 59%. The log is attached. Let me know, if you need more information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Are you trying to repeatedly train the exact same mail, or a new, similar one? You can't train the same message multiple times. Each time you train, you should notice the "spam score" shift back towards zero. It may not shift enough to have it considered good, but it should shift. It is does, then it will eventually learn. If it doesn't, then we have a bug - but I will need the log file from a session where you have tried to perform this training. If you do submit the log file, please reset the bug status to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 4 23:53:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 01:54:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799091 ] Spam not always moved (when filtering too ?) Message-ID: Bugs item #799091, was opened at 2003-09-02 13:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mlmll You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799091&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: mll (mlmll) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam not always moved (when filtering too ?) Initial Comment: Hi, First, thanks for the great app, very promising. Used to try spammunition, but spambayes is better at tracking spam. I've set a rule in Outlook to move automatically mail send to a given alias to, say "Inbox2". Inbox2 is a subfolder of "Inbox". I've told SpamBayes to filter "Inbox" and "Inbox2" and move the spam to the "Spam" folder. Unfortunately, it seems that, while the spam in "Inbox" is appropriately moved to "Spam", it doesn't always for "inbox2". Maybe spambayes kinda competes with the rules filtering system when the mail comes first to the inbox ? Thanks for any help. I'll be glad to send any debug info privately. MLL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: mll (mlmll) Date: 2003-09-05 07:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=491129 The answer is : set a timer value in the ini file (see About>Advanced options) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799091&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 01:16:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 03:16:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-04 16:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-05 07:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I've just added instructions on making a source release to README-DEVEL.txt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 03:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 AFAIK (this is what I did for 1.0a4) it's just to use distutils. "setup.py bdist" or something like that, from memory. This means adding a "data_files" list to the setup.py file, I think (you'd probably have a better idea than me). I'll do this if you don't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 02:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I presume that the script to build the release simply doesn't know to include .rc and .h files. What is the release process? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 00:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - any idea why this would be? I'll be putting out 1.0a6 tomorrow (if everything goes to plan) so I could fix it for that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 22:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the 1.0a5 release - it is missing at least 2 key files. Please grab either the latest binary, or the source code from CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 04:57:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 06:57:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-800671 ] Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Message-ID: Patches item #800671, was opened at 2003-09-04 21:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Initial Comment: Here sb-oe-training.py. It must be put into the windows\ directory of SpamBayes. When launched, it shows a simple GUI which let the user classify each OE mailbox either as Ham or Spam. A simple click on the Train button does the job. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-09-05 12:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 This new release adds an oe_utils module in spambayes directory. It allows developers to easily get OE registry keys, store path, list of DBX files, convert a DBX file to mbox or train a whole DBX file as ham or spam. We can use this in the Web interface to remove a bit of code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 05:19:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 07:20:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743122 ] Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks Message-ID: Bugs item #743122, was opened at 2003-05-25 22:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks Initial Comment: Just installed SpamBayes and I think it breaks the auto-complete popup list for email addresses used in the To field in Outlook. The popup still appears but only with the first letter of each email address - the rest of the email address doesn't appear. I've uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes several times to confirm this problem. I'm running Outlook 2002 (SP2) on Windows 2000 (SP3). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 21:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Works for me on my outlook xp test machine ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Actually, I will leave this open, as it hasn't actually been confirmed by anyone. I *think* it is fixed, simply as MFC is no longer used. If anyone can confirm it that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is now fixed in cvs (at least according to the check in messages), and so will be fixed in the next binary release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Villalovos (happycamp) Date: 2003-08-21 08:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=661531 This happens for me also. Windows XP (w/ Service Pack 1) and Outlook 2002 from Office XP (w/Service Pack 2). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerhard (neugi) Date: 2003-08-18 20:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=846779 i've the same problem. running winXp SP1 and Outlook 2k SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Garrett Brucker (gbrucker) Date: 2003-08-13 22:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=843726 I'm running Outlook 2002/XP on Windows XP Pro and had this same problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kim Friis (kim_friis) Date: 2003-08-11 19:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=89418 Im running Outlook 2002 on Windows XP and I do NOT see the bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sean True (seantrue) Date: 2003-06-17 11:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=114311 Fixing this bug will require a complete rewrite to remove all MFC based dialogs from SpamBayes. We're about 80% of the way there on SpamAtBay, and it's _not_ fun. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-06-17 10:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Apparently this problem only happens *after* a SpamBayes dialog has been shown, but works fine until then. Can someone else confirm this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Worger (worger) Date: 2003-06-02 19:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=751487 I am running the same - W2K SP3 & OL2K and get the same problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan Evatt (spidawebs) Date: 2003-06-02 06:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=48654 I am also getting this problem. Have installed the app on Outlook XP (2002) SP2 over Win XP SP1. If I start up Outlook the problem only seems to occur AFTER I actually run the spambayes configuration routine. If I do not access that then the problem does not (so far - limited testing) seem to occur. Jonathan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 08:46:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 10:46:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801133 ] Header.py barfs on non-Western code Message-ID: Bugs item #801133, was opened at 2003-09-05 14:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801133&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robb Aley Allan (robballan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Header.py barfs on non-Western code Initial Comment: I'm getting repeated failures of 1.0a4's pop3proxy to parse spam from non-European/Western sources, esp. Korean spam: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError('ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc7 in position 0: ordinal not in range(128)) in append() at /sw/src/root-python23-2.3b2-3/sw/lib/python2.3/email/ Header.py line 272: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801133&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 12:39:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 14:39:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801133 ] Header.py barfs on non-Western code Message-ID: Bugs item #801133, was opened at 2003-09-05 14:46 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801133&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robb Aley Allan (robballan) >Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Header.py barfs on non-Western code Initial Comment: I'm getting repeated failures of 1.0a4's pop3proxy to parse spam from non-European/Western sources, esp. Korean spam: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError('ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc7 in position 0: ordinal not in range(128)) in append() at /sw/src/root-python23-2.3b2-3/sw/lib/python2.3/email/ Header.py line 272: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-05 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Fixed in 1.0a5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801133&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 16:08:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 18:08:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-04 10:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alastair You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Date: 2003-09-05 16:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28845 Confirm that the latest version from CVS fixes this problem. However there is another problem which happens when you click on the "start training" button: Outlook2000 $ python manager.py Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\arankine\Application Data\ SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\arankine\Application Dat a\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 137 spam and 460 good messages Exception in thread Thread-1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Lib\threading.py", line 436, in __bootstrap self.run() File "C:\Python23\Lib\threading.py", line 416, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\dialogs\async_processor.py", line 222, in thread_target self.func( self.window.manager, self.window.config, progress) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\train.py", line 148, in trainer classifier_data.InitNew() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 258, in InitNew self.bayes = self.db_manager.new_bayes() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 169, in new_bayes return self.open_bayes() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 197, in open_bayes return bayes_storage.DBDictClassifier(fname) NameError: global name 'bayes_storage' is not defined Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\arankine\Application Data\Spam Bayes\MS Exchange Settings.ini Outlook2000 $ Can raise a new bug report for this if needed - just let me know. New manager app looks fantastic - Keep up the good work guys! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-05 01:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I've just added instructions on making a source release to README-DEVEL.txt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 21:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 AFAIK (this is what I did for 1.0a4) it's just to use distutils. "setup.py bdist" or something like that, from memory. This means adding a "data_files" list to the setup.py file, I think (you'd probably have a better idea than me). I'll do this if you don't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 20:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I presume that the script to build the release simply doesn't know to include .rc and .h files. What is the release process? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 18:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - any idea why this would be? I'll be putting out 1.0a6 tomorrow (if everything goes to plan) so I could fix it for that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the 1.0a5 release - it is missing at least 2 key files. Please grab either the latest binary, or the source code from CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 16:09:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 18:09:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-737619 ] Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly Message-ID: Bugs item #737619, was opened at 2003-05-14 10:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Moore (pmoore) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly Initial Comment: Exchange, Outlook 2000, plugin from CVS around 9th April. Occasionally (it seems to be mostly when the plugin is doing a "catchup" when I start up in the morning, but I don't think it's *always* then) a spam is left in my inbox with a score of 0% displayed. Clicking the "show spam clues" button shows a correct score of 99.xxx%. I *think* that the message isn't showing in the log of messages being filtered (so why does it get a score at all?) but it's hard to be sure I didn't miss the note about a message with subject "??????????????????????" in a list of 200+ such messages :-) This has been discussed on the list in the past, but I could find no bug specifically about it. If I missed one, I apologise - feel free to close this in that case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-05 22:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Along the same lines... With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts, Regards, Ryan Malayter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-20 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is very similar to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=771256&group_id=61702&atid=498103 - except in that bug, there is no score displayed (ie, in that one, the message appears "completely missed". It is alot easier to see how the "no score" behaviour could happen, but this stumps me! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 16:09:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 18:10:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-737619 ] Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly Message-ID: Bugs item #737619, was opened at 2003-05-14 10:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Moore (pmoore) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly Initial Comment: Exchange, Outlook 2000, plugin from CVS around 9th April. Occasionally (it seems to be mostly when the plugin is doing a "catchup" when I start up in the morning, but I don't think it's *always* then) a spam is left in my inbox with a score of 0% displayed. Clicking the "show spam clues" button shows a correct score of 99.xxx%. I *think* that the message isn't showing in the log of messages being filtered (so why does it get a score at all?) but it's hard to be sure I didn't miss the note about a message with subject "??????????????????????" in a list of 200+ such messages :-) This has been discussed on the list in the past, but I could find no bug specifically about it. If I missed one, I apologise - feel free to close this in that case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-05 22:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Along the same lines... With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts, Regards, Ryan Malayter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-05 22:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Along the same lines... With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts, Regards, Ryan Malayter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-20 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is very similar to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=771256&group_id=61702&atid=498103 - except in that bug, there is no score displayed (ie, in that one, the message appears "completely missed". It is alot easier to see how the "no score" behaviour could happen, but this stumps me! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 16:39:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 18:39:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801416 ] outlook crash when customizing field view. Message-ID: Bugs item #801416, was opened at 2003-09-05 22:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801416&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Josh Reznick (invizabul) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook crash when customizing field view. Initial Comment: I'm using Win2k SP3 to run OfficeXP, and connecting to an Exchange Server. After installing the plugin, outlook crashes any time I try to add/edit fields in the Customize Current View option... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801416&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 20:50:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 22:50:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799201 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Support Requests item #799201, was opened at 2003-09-03 03:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799201&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: When I go to the SpamBayes manager it shows that the database has 1066 good and 224 spam. These numbers don't change regardless of how much spam has been processed. I'm not sure SpamBayes is learning from new incomming messages. I'm using SpamBayes .7 upgraded from SpamBayes .6. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are checkboxes that ask if you want to train on messages moved into the watched ham and spam folders. Do you have these ticked? If you don't, then no training is done unless you do it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 20:53:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 22:53:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796836 ] Show message tokens Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796836, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Show message tokens Initial Comment: "Show spam clues" does not show all of them. Perhaps the list should be just paged. The Outlook add-in already does this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To clarify (I've done this on the list already, but for anyone else reading this): The "slow clues" on the web interface shows all of the clues that were used in scoring the message. This does not mean all *tokens*. Tokens that have a probability of 0.4 to 0.6 are not used in scoring (by default), and only 150 (by default) are used in total. What I think I'll do (for 1.1a1) is add a new option: "show tokens", which shows all the tokens. I'll also update the 'show clues' list to show not just the word and probability, but also the number of (trained) ham & spam messages it has appeared in, a al the Outlook plug-in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 20:54:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 22:55:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query should show all words starting with certain text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text Initial Comment: Word query should show all words starting with certain text if the user adds * in the end For example: url:great* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For 1.1a1, it would be good to have a separate "advanced find" query available (and revert the old one). This would allow you to specify the maximum number of words found, and also allow regex searches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To change it to 100, all you have to do is add one zero in UserInterface.py. If lots (more than one ;) of people want more control over this, then I'll change it to an 'advanced' lookup to complement the existing one, and have options like this. 100 takes a long time, and results in a massive html page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Date: 2003-09-02 04:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=778595 Thanks! A limit of 100 would have been better, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, and should have just squeaked into 1.0a5. It works as described above. The one side-effect is that if a token ends with "*", then you can't search for it alone any more (you'll still get the result, but may also get other words, unless there are lots of them (see below), then you might not). If this becomes a problem, then we'll have to either escape '*' (ugly), or have a separate 'wildcard' search. It didn't look very good when there were too many results - and it could take a long time, and on this machine at least, crash, if there were too many. So there's a hard limit of 10 results that will be displayed, along with the number of results that matched, but aren't displayed. If this bothers you or you want to increase the limit, it's a one line change that should be easy to find. If people ask for it, then this can become an exposed option (again, probably via a special wildcard search). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:00:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:00:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796239 ] database viewer / reporter Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796239, was opened at 2003-08-28 08:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796239&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: database viewer / reporter Initial Comment: For debugging purposes, as well as for curiousity's sake, I'd like to see a way to view the training database. Maybe you can already do this, but I'm unfamiliar with python and I can't really figure it out. Perhaps editing it might even be an option, deleting "incorrect" entires that cause problems, although things could certainly get heiry if that feature were generally available. Then again, this might be a bad idea, because it could give a spammer a clue as to what to avoid. But isn't that the whole point of an adaptive filter like SpamBayes? If spammers start using "innocent" words, they stop being innocent after a short while, or am I wrong? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You can use the dbexpimp.py script to convert the database to a flat text file, and then view it in any program that you like (Excel, for example). You can also convert it back, so this does allow editing, although you are right that that can be a risky sort of thing to do unless you are careful. Your statement about the "innocent" words is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796239&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:00:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:00:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-791246 ] IMAP: keep new messages unread Message-ID: Bugs item #791246, was opened at 2003-08-20 02:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791246&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrik Reali (patrik_reali) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: IMAP: keep new messages unread Initial Comment: With the IMAP processor, incoming mesasges are copied and read. It would be practical to keep (or reset) the processed messages to the "not read" status. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791246&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:01:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:01:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-791246 ] IMAP: keep new messages unread Message-ID: Bugs item #791246, was opened at 2003-08-20 02:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791246&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrik Reali (patrik_reali) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP: keep new messages unread Initial Comment: With the IMAP processor, incoming mesasges are copied and read. It would be practical to keep (or reset) the processed messages to the "not read" status. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If the IMAP server supports the parameter "RFC822.PEEK" with the FETCH command, then this will already be the case. imapfilter should be using "BODY.PEEK" instead, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791246&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:09:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:09:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797064 ] Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange Message-ID: Bugs item #797064, was opened at 2003-08-29 13:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange Initial Comment: If a message's clues are viewed when on the Exchange server, and compared to the same message moved to a pst file, the clues are not the same. It appears (I haven't examined closely yet; can do on request) that on Exchange the html part of the message is used, and in the pst, it isnt'. Probably related to this is the problem that moving a message back and forwards between Exchange and a pst file (showing clues each time) results in an ever- increasing number of tokens. It doesn't appear to be the PR_SEARCH_KEY changing: >>> key1 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6 \xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'" >>> key2 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6 \xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'" >>> key1 == key2 True Next thing to try? :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 15:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are we going to be able to get identical token streams? Attached are two 'show clues' messages, for the same message, on a pst and on Exchange. 26 clues for one, and 28 for the other. This is a plain text message. The extra two clues arise because Exchange html'ises the plain text message and so the words in the subject also appear in the body. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-31 17:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The underlying bug seems to be https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=798029&group_id=61702&atid=498103 - however, as it looks like we will be almost "hand-crafting" the HTML of the message, I will leave this open, as we may still end up with bugs if the html we generate isn't identical (token-wise) to the MS one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-30 21:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The dump_props are attached. If I just move the messages about, doing 'show clues', then no training takes place. I think my original comment was wrong - trying now, I get the same number of tokens no matter how many times I move (although the exchange count and pst count are different). Anyway, the log (at verbose=1) doesn't show anything apart from the "already trained as ham" message. If I train a message I get not that much more. pst first: """ Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' - trained as spam Saving bayes database with 4637 spam and 410 good messages -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db Saved databases in 896.138ms """ and moving it back to Exchange: """ Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' - trained as good Saving bayes database with 4636 spam and 411 good messages -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db Saved databases in 850.026ms """ Does this help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:13:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:13:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800555 ] 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Message-ID: Bugs item #800555, was opened at 2003-09-05 04:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.0a5 release missing key outlook files. Initial Comment: Environment: spambayes-1.0a5 (source) Python 2.3 win32all-155 Symptom: Spambayes Manager will not load from either the Outlook toolbar, or from "python manager.py" on the command line. Stack trace is as follows: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return func(*args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 219, in OnClick self.handler(*self.args) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 48, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 34, in LoadDialogs if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: exceptions.UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rc_size' referenced before assignment Attempted fix: Add assignment for rc_size within dialogs\__init__.py: except OSError: rc_mtime = None rc_size = None ### Added if rc_mtime!=mtime or rc_size!=size: Still doesn't seem to work though :( Outlook2000 $ python manager.py [... snip ...] messagesTraceback (most recent call last): File "manager.py", line 863, in ? sys.exit(main(verbose)) File "manager.py", line 843, in main ShowManager(mgr) File "manager.py", line 833, in ShowManager mgr.ShowManager() File "manager.py", line 790, in ShowManager dialogs.ShowDialog(0, self, self.config, "IDD_MANAGER") File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 49, in ShowDialog manager.dialog_parser = LoadDialogs() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py", line 42, in LoadDialogs mod = __import__(mod_name) ImportError: No module named dialogs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 15:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in MANIFEST.in v1.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alastair Rankine (alastair) Date: 2003-09-06 10:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28845 Confirm that the latest version from CVS fixes this problem. However there is another problem which happens when you click on the "start training" button: Outlook2000 $ python manager.py Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\arankine\Application Data\ SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\arankine\Application Dat a\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 137 spam and 460 good messages Exception in thread Thread-1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Lib\threading.py", line 436, in __bootstrap self.run() File "C:\Python23\Lib\threading.py", line 416, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\dialogs\async_processor.py", line 222, in thread_target self.func( self.window.manager, self.window.config, progress) File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\train.py", line 148, in trainer classifier_data.InitNew() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 258, in InitNew self.bayes = self.db_manager.new_bayes() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 169, in new_bayes return self.open_bayes() File "c:\Program Files\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 197, in open_bayes return bayes_storage.DBDictClassifier(fname) NameError: global name 'bayes_storage' is not defined Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\arankine\Application Data\Spam Bayes\MS Exchange Settings.ini Outlook2000 $ Can raise a new bug report for this if needed - just let me know. New manager app looks fantastic - Keep up the good work guys! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-05 19:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I've just added instructions on making a source release to README-DEVEL.txt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 15:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 AFAIK (this is what I did for 1.0a4) it's just to use distutils. "setup.py bdist" or something like that, from memory. This means adding a "data_files" list to the setup.py file, I think (you'd probably have a better idea than me). I'll do this if you don't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I presume that the script to build the release simply doesn't know to include .rc and .h files. What is the release process? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-05 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - any idea why this would be? I'll be putting out 1.0a6 tomorrow (if everything goes to plan) so I could fix it for that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is an issue with the 1.0a5 release - it is missing at least 2 key files. Please grab either the latest binary, or the source code from CVS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800555&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:15:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:15:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795145 ] pop3proxy review page dies with mixed gzip/non messages Message-ID: Bugs item #795145, was opened at 2003-08-26 18:26 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795145&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: pop3proxy review page dies with mixed gzip/non messages Initial Comment: If the Advanced Options are set to store the message cache gzipped, then having un-gzipped messages in the cache kills the review page (traceback below). This happens if you have outstanding messages cached and not trained, and you go into the Advanced Configuration, and enable gzip compression of the cache. Basically, if the option is set, the Review Messages page assumes the cache is only gzipped messages, and then dies trying to display the first non-gzipped message. Looks like the best fix for this is for the Review Messages page to check whether each message is compressed before attempting to process it, rather than assuming that if the option is set True, then all messages are compressed, or if the option is set to False, that no messages are compressed. (In other words, the option should only control saving, not loading). 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 392, in onReview message = spambayes.mboxutils.get_message (cachedMessage.getSubstance()) File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 349, in getSubstance return self.hdrtxt + self.payload File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 292, in __getattr__ self.load() File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 316, in load self.setSubstance(fp.read()) File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 217, in read self._read(readsize) File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 260, in _read self._read_gzip_header() File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 161, in _read_gzip_header raise IOError, 'Not a gzipped file' IOError: Not a gzipped file ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795145&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:16:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:20:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796984 ] Sudden error after functioning normally Message-ID: Bugs item #796984, was opened at 2003-08-29 09:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796984&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rene Goldsweer (floortje) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Sudden error after functioning normally Initial Comment: After using Spambayes 1.04 with Python 2.3 succesfully, all of the sudden the message header in my emails are showing this error: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in probability() at ? ? ? ? C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert ? ? ? ? hamcount <= nham I'm using WindowsXP SP1 with Pocomail 3.01. I use pop3proxy of which I use the default settings, I've only put in my pop3 adresses and the smtp address. Greetz, Floortje. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 15:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your database has become corrupt. The only option is to retrain from scratch. While you're doing this, you should also upgrade to 1.0a5, which fixes a number of bugs, including a possible cause of this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796984&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 5 21:49:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 5 23:49:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798029 ] Outlook missing HTML in all pst mail Message-ID: Bugs item #798029, was opened at 2003-08-31 17:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798029&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook missing HTML in all pst mail Initial Comment: Discovered via [ 797064 ] Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange I am confused how this *ever* worked for me, but I am sure it did. Particularly, MSKB Q268440 "INFO: MAPI Is Not Suitable for HTML Messages" tells me it never should have worked. That KB tells us PR_BODY_HTML is useless everywhere. It is for me, but people with Exchange Server report it *does* work in the server mailbox, but not in the .pst mailbox (and moving the *same* message between stores seems to magically transform this property - see 797064). "Spam Clues" never shows HTML tokens. I instrumented the test suite, and got the following result: Checked 4975 items, 0 non-filterable items found of these items, 0 had no headers, 179 had no text body and 4840 had no HTML I wonder what the 130 that *do* have the HTML are? *sigh* Either way, a google search looks like I need to process the "compressed RTF" property (which means a new win32all method, and a dumb RTF parser) *sigh**2* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 15:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I'm not missing that many: Checked 4223 items, 0 non-filterable items found of these items, 0 had no headers, 11 had no text body and 75 had no HTML 27 of these are on Exchange, the rest in a .pst. This is with the latest win32all's and cvs. The 11 with no text body are correct - these messages are all multi-part with no text part (they tend to be virus messages). If I look at the ones without html in Outlook, Outlook thinks that they are plain text. They (I looked at 6 or so) have a content-type of multipart, but the source doesn't seem (OL makes it hard to tell) to have a boundary, or an html part. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798029&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 6 04:22:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 6 06:22:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-800671 ] Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Message-ID: Patches item #800671, was opened at 2003-09-04 19:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Windows GUI for easy Outlook Express mailboxes training Initial Comment: Here sb-oe-training.py. It must be put into the windows\ directory of SpamBayes. When launched, it shows a simple GUI which let the user classify each OE mailbox either as Ham or Spam. A simple click on the Train button does the job. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-06 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Romain, Many thanks for the patch! We're in a feature freeze at the moment, while we concentrate on fixing bugs and things like installation, but as soon as we're out of the freeze we'll integrate your code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-09-05 10:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 This new release adds an oe_utils module in spambayes directory. It allows developers to easily get OE registry keys, store path, list of DBX files, convert a DBX file to mbox or train a whole DBX file as ham or spam. We can use this in the Web interface to remove a bit of code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=800671&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 6 10:18:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 6 12:18:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-704188 ] non-interactive hammie Message-ID: Patches item #704188, was opened at 2003-03-15 17:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by htrd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=704188&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: non-interactive hammie Initial Comment: When hammie is training, it displays a message counter to stdout when processing every message in the mailbox. I have recently updated the training phase of my procmail integration to run under cron, and this verbose output is unwelcome. This attached patch causes hammie to only update the counter for every message if stdout is a tty. If it is not (such as when run under cron) it only displays the final total at the end of processing a mailbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Date: 2003-09-06 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=46460 hammie.py has been removed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=704188&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 6 10:33:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 6 12:33:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-801699 ] migration from hammie to sb_* scripts Message-ID: Patches item #801699, was opened at 2003-09-06 17:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=801699&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: migration from hammie to sb_* scripts Initial Comment: Ive been updating my training scripts (for kmail integration) to use the new sb_* scripts. I needed a couple of changes to sb_mboxtrain.py to make it a full replacement for how I was previously using hammie.py: 1. sb_mboxtrain.py writes a X-Spambayes-Trained header. I am currently not using this, I always perform a full retrain. Unfortunately rewriting files in maildir folders interferes with kmail's cache of message status, with the result that recently read messages are marked unread again. This is certainly a kmail bug, but a workaround in spambayes seems reasonable. I added a switch to sb_mboxtrain to inhibit rewriting mailboxes with the X-Spambayes-Trained headers. 2. I run my retrain script from cron. sb_mboxtrain displays the name or number of the mail message as it processes them, which makes for an inappropriately large cron output. The -q switch is a little too quiet - I would still like to see the count of messages trained in each mailbox at the end of training. I changed sb_mboxtrain to inhibit this status update if not isatty(stdout) One patch attached including both changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=801699&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 6 13:31:56 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 6 15:32:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-801751 ] Cannot install the program Message-ID: Support Requests item #801751, was opened at 2003-09-06 21:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Erik Thorsen (passage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot install the program Initial Comment: After reading through almost every reported bug on this web site and also looking through the documentation html page I am most confident I can't find the reason for my error in any other way than reporting it here. The problem is as follows... I first tried to install the addin for outlook. I had to cancel because it told me to close all outlook tasks and so forth. Then it adviced me to turn of any antivirus programs running. I felt it would be safest to restart my computer, so I choose the cancel button. After restarting and making sure I am not connected with anything like internet explorer, outlook, outlook express, yahoo, msn or anything else that should cause any problems, I get the following error message: You must close Outlook before spambayes can be installed. Please close all outlook windows (using File->Exit and log off" if available) and click retry, or cancel to exit the installation. If the message persists after closing all outlook windows, you may need to log off from windows and try again. I have tried everything now but I can't seem to get the program ready for installing, even though I have disabled my antivirus program and closed all open windows. As the program is not installed I have no log file or anything else to attach. I am running a windows system, xp pro, with office pro installed on it. If you need any additional information about my system, please do not hesitate to contact me! If anyone can help me with this matter I would appreciate it very much!!! Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 6 13:44:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 6 15:44:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-801756 ] Problems installing the addin on win xp pro Message-ID: Support Requests item #801756, was opened at 2003-09-06 21:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801756&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Erik Thorsen (passage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problems installing the addin on win xp pro Initial Comment: I have tried to look for support on the bug section and also on the documentation page. However, without any luck. Now I am looking for the answer by reporting it here. The case is as follows: I started the installing and was prompted to close all outlook windows and also any word windows. Then I received a message to turn off my antivirus protection ( so I did, turning off NAV2002) I then came to the bright idea to cancel further installing and restart my comp. This to make sure I had no "hidden" open windows. After restarting the computer I get the following error message when trying to install: You must close Outlook before Spambyes can be installed. Please close all Outlook windows ( Using file-> Exit and log off" if available) and click retry to continue or cancel to exit the installation. If the message persists after closing all outlook windows, you may need to log off from windows, and try again. I hope anyone can help me with solving the problem!! Thank you ps: I am not including any log files as I have not been able to install the program yet. I am using a win xp comp with office pro installed. Using NAV2002 antivirus If you need further info, please contact me! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801756&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 04:45:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 7 06:45:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801952 ] Imapfilter appending headers Message-ID: Bugs item #801952, was opened at 2003-09-07 05:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nolar nolar (nolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Imapfilter appending headers Initial Comment: Just upgraded to spambayes 1.0a5 from a4, and now whenever I run imapfilter -c (to classify), spambayes just keeps appending X-Spambayes headers to each email: .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 .... This never used to happen before. Also, when I run the imapfilter training mode (imapfilter -t) on an existing database, it does a complete retraining instead of just training the new mail as it did in a4. I haven't changed anything from the a4->a5 transition, except change the spambayes symbolic link to --> spambayes-1.0a5/. Here's my .ini file: [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True [Storage] messageinfo_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.messagei nfo.db persistent_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.db [imap] password:xxxxx server:xxxxx.com username:nolar ham_train_folders:INBOX.Accounts,INBOX.Sent-Mail spam_folder:INBOX.SPAM-NEWSPAM spam_train_folders:INBOX.SPAM unsure_folder:INBOX Is this a bug, or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 18:03:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 7 20:03:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798362 ] Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Message-ID: Bugs item #798362, was opened at 2003-09-01 13:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Initial Comment: Periodically (I'm not sure exactly when it happens), the spambayes toolbar stops functioning (latest cvs). Clicking the buttons has no effect, and I have to delete the toolbar and restart Outlook (to recreate it) to get it working again (simply restarting Outlook doesn't help). When the toolbar is 'bad', I get this in the trace: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) """ My machine crashes fairly regularly . I wonder, although I'm not sure, if this problem occurs when Outlook crashes instead of being closed properly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Python should know that when I type "break" I really mean "continue" :) Attaching a new patch, and I have actually *seen* this one work. (This problem is happening *alot* on Outlook XP, but I am yet to see it on 2k) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent) Date: 2003-09-04 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=818011 I am seeing the same problem, at various stages I have had part or all of the main toolbar missing. Logs always show the same error "Failed to add the toolbar item 'whatever' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) I have never lost the 'Delete As' button always just the main 'Spambayes' drop down or a single element from the drop down. I will try the patch but I guess as per the last comment, that is not fixing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 10:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Not quite. I now have a the "delete as" and "recover from" buttons, but no spambayes button...the trace has: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.TestSuite' - (-2146827864, 'OLE error 0x800a01a8', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-03 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please try the attached patch and see if it fixes it? ta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 14:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I get this with the new addin.py: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)""" BTW, my machine hasn't crashed yet, so that theory is gone... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 18:14:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 7 20:14:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798362 ] Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Message-ID: Bugs item #798362, was opened at 2003-09-01 13:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated Initial Comment: Periodically (I'm not sure exactly when it happens), the spambayes toolbar stops functioning (latest cvs). Clicking the buttons has no effect, and I have to delete the toolbar and restart Outlook (to recreate it) to get it working again (simply restarting Outlook doesn't help). When the toolbar is 'bad', I get this in the trace: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) """ My machine crashes fairly regularly . I wonder, although I'm not sure, if this problem occurs when Outlook crashes instead of being closed properly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 10:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Tony says it works too :) Checking in addin.py; new revision: 1.109; previous revision: 1.108 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Python should know that when I type "break" I really mean "continue" :) Attaching a new patch, and I have actually *seen* this one work. (This problem is happening *alot* on Outlook XP, but I am yet to see it on 2k) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent) Date: 2003-09-04 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=818011 I am seeing the same problem, at various stages I have had part or all of the main toolbar missing. Logs always show the same error "Failed to add the toolbar item 'whatever' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) I have never lost the 'Delete As' button always just the main 'Spambayes' drop down or a single element from the drop down. I will try the patch but I guess as per the last comment, that is not fixing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 10:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Not quite. I now have a the "delete as" and "recover from" buttons, but no spambayes button...the trace has: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.TestSuite' - (-2146827864, 'OLE error 0x800a01a8', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-03 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please try the attached patch and see if it fixes it? ta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 14:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I get this with the new addin.py: """ FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand. TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 894, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=temporary) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 451, in __getattr__ return self._ApplyTypes_(*args) File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__. py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_. InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args)) , user, resultCLSID) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)""" BTW, my machine hasn't crashed yet, so that theory is gone... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 20:37:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 7 22:38:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Message-ID: Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-02 04:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Initial Comment: I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different folders. When the rules are of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives with in the subject move it to the folder and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the inbox. This is very frustrating. If the rule is of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to move it to the folder and a matching message comes in, duplicate messages do not occur. So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with Outlook Rules. I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a (with current hotfixes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No word from the user, and I'm fairly certain the timer will fix this anyway ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-31 11:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I would be very interested to know if version 006 works with save_spam_info = True - it very well might. It would be great if you could let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-23 00:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 I installed both versions 4 and 5 of the binary, and set the save_spam_info to False. So far, it seems to have fixed the problem, although I'd like to give it a full day of email to verify (because it doesn't always happen). However: for some reason, the SpamBayes configuration dialog doesn't pop up when I click the spambayes button. This happens on Outlook XP on Windows XP. I'll put a new bug in on this; just thought you should know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 20:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-20 23:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-07 08:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine. I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will look into this when he gets a chance. Stay tuned! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-05 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 Anadelon: Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is Moved to Junk Mail. I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing the problem. (I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?) Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-05 01:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and chair. :) I seem to have overlooked the option to move messages instead of copying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-04 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using release 002 of the plugin. If you haven't already, could you try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-04 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on? If you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off (they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem? In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather than "copy"? (It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have rules of that form, and don't notice this problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-04 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 I am also having this problem. I have not tested it with various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 20:39:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 7 22:39:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-755738 ] Toolbar items aren't created. Message-ID: Bugs item #755738, was opened at 2003-06-17 16:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=755738&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbar items aren't created. Initial Comment: I have been using spambayes for some months. The latest cvs-version fails with the following traceback: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in _invokeex_ return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return apply(func, args) File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O utlook2000\addin.py", line 609, in OnSelectionChange self.SetupUI() File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O utlook2000\addin.py", line 500, in SetupUI Tag = "SpamBayesCommand.Manager") File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O utlook2000\addin.py", line 564, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=False) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 451, in __getattr__ return apply(self._ApplyTypes_, args) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(apply (self._oleobj_.InvokeTypes, (dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args), user, resultCLSID) pywintypes.com_error: (-2147352567, 'Det oppstod et unntak.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Message 'Kunder med utest?ende hos Stocknet.' had a Spam classification of 'No' The traceback is repeated each time a message is selected. I tried the the cvs-version ca a week ago as well with the same result. I unregistered the plugin before installing it, and also tried this multiple times. The new toolbar doen not seem to work. When clicking the "Anti-Spam"-button nothing happens. When selecting the spam-folder, the "Delete as spam"-button does not change to "recover-from-spam", the latter does not show up at all. OS: win XP home outllook 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 12:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 And even more changes since my last comment. Please reopen if you still have this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-08 21:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a fix that will still attempt to create all toolbar items, even if a previous one fails. This may means that at least *some* of our toolbar items work. I'm afraid I am a little stumped here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-07-03 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 the "new" traceback is: pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_ return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_ return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, None, None) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in _invokeex_ return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_ return apply(func, args) File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\Outlook 2000\addin.py", line 674, in OnSelectionChange self.SetupUI() File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\Outlook 2000\addin.py", line 548, in SetupUI Tag = "SpamBayesCommand.Manager") File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\Outlook 2000\addin.py", line 623, in _AddControl item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, Temporary=False) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 451, in __getattr__ return apply(self._ApplyTypes_, args) File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site- packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_ return self._get_good_object_(apply (self._oleobj_.InvokeTypes, (dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args), user, resultCLSID) pywintypes.com_error: (-2147352567, 'Det oppstod et unntak.', (0, None, 'Medlemmet ble ikke funnet.', None, 0, - 2147467259), None) translation of the last messages: oppstod et unntak.: An exception occured Medlemmet ble ikke funnet: The memeber was not found ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-07-02 21:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 I see the same _behaviour_. I'll repost a (new) traceback the next time this problem occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-02 21:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Are you sure this is current CVS? I see: File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O utlook2000\addin.py", line 609, in OnSelectionChange self.SetupUI() File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O utlook2000\addin.py", line 500, in SetupUI Tag = "SpamBayesCommand.Manager") And these are both out by a fair way. Current CVS is rev ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-07-02 17:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 yes. it seems to happen each morning when I start outllok after having shut down my pc. you tipped me to delete \Documents and Settings\{username} \Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat this solves the problem, but it reappears after a while (reboot, new day, shutdown?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-02 09:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Does this still happen? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=755738&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 20:45:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 7 22:45:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 21:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-25 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 20:46:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 7 22:47:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795851 ] Cannot change folder where to move spam Message-ID: Bugs item #795851, was opened at 2003-08-27 17:44 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot change folder where to move spam Initial Comment: Hello, i am using Spambayes with Outlook 2000 and Windows XP prof. and i am just configuring the filter rules, that Certain spam will be moved to a folder and it works so far. Now i want to change this folder, but when i open the button "BROWSE", there will be displayed no folders and i can not even remove the folder i've specified before. I've reinstalled SpamBayes, but afterwards this settings were like before. Also, i've looked into the registry, but i did not find an entry for that configuration. Does somebody know where Spambayes saves it's configuration or how to chose another folder for certain spam? Thank you in advance. Horst ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-27 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 See docs/troubleshooting.html - the log file is in the "temp" directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg) Date: 2003-08-27 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=853131 I am using version 007. What do you mean with reopen this bug and see the "troubleshooting guide" ? I cannot find any log-file in the programm or user folder. grettz Horst Geisler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-27 18:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This should be fixed in version 007 of the plugin - please try that version. If you are using 007, please reopen this bug, and see the "troubleshooting guide" and attach the log file ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 22:52:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 00:52:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797679 ] Recovered Mails filtered again Message-ID: Bugs item #797679, was opened at 2003-08-30 15:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recovered Mails filtered again Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know if this a bug or a design problem, so I posting it here. When I recover a mail from Spam Folder in my opinion it should be marked as good on the database. I have reapperaing mails, which we're marked as spam. But no matter how often I recover them from spam, the next mail from these events will be filtered again. Is this the normail behaviour or a known problem? Thanks Jan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach the "clues" for one of these messages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-05 15:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Hi, no, it's not exactly the same mail. The Mail contains the follwoing entries: 2c2 < inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX P-t- P:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask:YYY.YYY.YYY.YYYY --- > inet addr:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM P-t- P:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM Mask:NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN The X and M differs from mail to mail, as the're dynamic IP's. The other parts of the mail are the same. When I do a "recover from spam" with this mail, the score does not shift ti zero. The score goes back from 60% to 59%. The log is attached. Let me know, if you need more information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 18:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Are you trying to repeatedly train the exact same mail, or a new, similar one? You can't train the same message multiple times. Each time you train, you should notice the "spam score" shift back towards zero. It may not shift enough to have it considered good, but it should shift. It is does, then it will eventually learn. If it doesn't, then we have a bug - but I will need the log file from a session where you have tried to perform this training. If you do submit the log file, please reset the bug status to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 22:53:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 00:53:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798029 ] Outlook missing HTML in all pst mail Message-ID: Bugs item #798029, was opened at 2003-08-31 15:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798029&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 6 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook missing HTML in all pst mail Initial Comment: Discovered via [ 797064 ] Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange I am confused how this *ever* worked for me, but I am sure it did. Particularly, MSKB Q268440 "INFO: MAPI Is Not Suitable for HTML Messages" tells me it never should have worked. That KB tells us PR_BODY_HTML is useless everywhere. It is for me, but people with Exchange Server report it *does* work in the server mailbox, but not in the .pst mailbox (and moving the *same* message between stores seems to magically transform this property - see 797064). "Spam Clues" never shows HTML tokens. I instrumented the test suite, and got the following result: Checked 4975 items, 0 non-filterable items found of these items, 0 had no headers, 179 had no text body and 4840 had no HTML I wonder what the 130 that *do* have the HTML are? *sigh* Either way, a google search looks like I need to process the "compressed RTF" property (which means a new win32all method, and a dumb RTF parser) *sigh**2* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm *sure* I previously added comments and closed this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 13:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I'm not missing that many: Checked 4223 items, 0 non-filterable items found of these items, 0 had no headers, 11 had no text body and 75 had no HTML 27 of these are on Exchange, the rest in a .pst. This is with the latest win32all's and cvs. The 11 with no text body are correct - these messages are all multi-part with no text part (they tend to be virus messages). If I look at the ones without html in Outlook, Outlook thinks that they are plain text. They (I looked at 6 or so) have a content-type of multipart, but the source doesn't seem (OL makes it hard to tell) to have a boundary, or an html part. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798029&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 22:54:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 00:54:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789394 ] SpamBayes Manager Filtering Config Message-ID: Bugs item #789394, was opened at 2003-08-16 04:07 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789394&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Vincent (hired_goon) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes Manager Filtering Config Initial Comment: While defining my filters for where to put spam / good mail etc. I clicked on a bad folder and hit OK before I noticed (wish I could tell you what folder that was...) For "Possible Spam" I then had the folder "IPM_SUBTREE" listed in the "Moved to folder:" box. Clicking on "Browse" again presented me with a blank folder list (no possible selections). Clicking around that window triggered a "Selected 0 folders" message to appear at the bottom of the dialog, but I could not change this setting. Changing to "Copied to folder" did not help. Uninstalling and reinstalling did not help. I fixed my issue by closing Outlook and making sure all OUTLOOK.EXE processes were closed, locating the INI file and removing everything on the same line after the "unsure_folder_id:" field, restarting Outlook and then reconfiguring the Possible Spam Folder. This was on a Windows 2000 SP4 workstation with Outlook 2000 SP3 and all other patches installed. -hg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 10:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't make this happen - can you try and reproduce it for me? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789394&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 22:55:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 00:55:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794381 ] win32com gencache files still being generated Message-ID: Bugs item #794381, was opened at 2003-08-25 09:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794381&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: win32com gencache files still being generated Initial Comment: As reported on mailing list (Wright, Frankie [FWright@sccd.ctc.edu]) Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fwright\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\fwright\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1228, in OnStartupComplete File "out1.pyz/win32com.client", line 302, in WithEvents File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 427, in EnsureModule File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 236, in MakeModuleForTypelib File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.makepy", line 259, in GenerateFromTypeLibSpec exceptions.IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'C:/Program Files/Spambayes Outlook Addin\support\gen_py\00062FFF-0000-0000-C000-000000000046x0x9x1.py' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 certainly does generate new files for outlook xp. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794381&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 22:58:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 00:58:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786516 ] Need initial training database Message-ID: Bugs item #786516, was opened at 2003-08-11 19:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786516&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Need initial training database Initial Comment: We should try and provide a database seeded with some spam, do some training on ham already in the inbox, and enable filtering by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Another one I am sure I closed! New wizard etc means this wont happen for a while :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786516&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 7 23:06:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 01:06:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761318 ] Moved mail is unfiltered Message-ID: Bugs item #761318, was opened at 2003-06-27 03:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761318&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Welsh (markw_x) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Moved mail is unfiltered Initial Comment: When I use Outlook's rules wizard to move my emails to a different folder, they aren't filtered by the add-in. Both the inbox, where the message arrives for a second before the rule is used, and the destination folder, where the message is moved by the rule, are listed as folders that should be filtered by the add-in. The spam that arrives is given a spam score but not filtered accordingly. This is an excerpt from the log for a piece of spam that was given a rating of 100%: Message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' - trained as good Training on message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' - trained as spam It was trained as spam because I clicked the "Delete as Spam" button, not because of the filtering. I have Outlook 2002 SP-2. I'm using the latest binary of the add-in (SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-002.exe). The spam filtering works fine for all other mail that's left in the inbox and not moved by a rule. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I don't think I can fix this. The "background filtering" in the new versions should fix it though. Problem is that I can't tell if it was you who moved it (implying a train) or the Outlook rule moved it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ted schwind (schwit) Date: 2003-08-27 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=852250 Same problem here with v0.7 and Outlook 2003b2 refresh. Even if Spambayes is filtering the folder where mail is moved to. Messages are scored at 100%, but not moved to the spam folder. Filtering does work on those messages not touched by rules. One other item, Spambayes will not let me move spam to the deleted items folder. It's not one of the folders that is selectable when defining filters. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dylan Ginsburg (dginsburg) Date: 2003-07-11 05:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820134 I have the same problem. I was able to get the filtering to work by only watching the sub-folder to which I move certain emails. When I watch both the master and sub-folder the filtering doesn't work (though the spam % is correct). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Welsh (markw_x) Date: 2003-07-02 11:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=809756 I just got the latest binary (SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup- 003.exe) and the bug still exists. I set SpamBayes to mark all spam as read. Although the spam doesn't get moved to the spam directory, it does get marked as read automatically. Unfortunately, it's still trained as good until I delete it manually. I thought maybe that observation would help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761318&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 00:31:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 02:31:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797679 ] Recovered Mails filtered again Message-ID: Bugs item #797679, was opened at 2003-08-30 07:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jaal2001 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recovered Mails filtered again Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know if this a bug or a design problem, so I posting it here. When I recover a mail from Spam Folder in my opinion it should be marked as good on the database. I have reapperaing mails, which we're marked as spam. But no matter how often I recover them from spam, the next mail from these events will be filtered again. Is this the normail behaviour or a known problem? Thanks Jan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-08 08:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Hi, here is the "clues" log from today morning. Sorry for the XXX, but for security reasons I have to blank some things. But I've tried to change so little as possible. Jan Spam Score: 0.512408 word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 0.276798 - - '*S*' 0.301613 - - 'skip:a 10' 0.180202 726 27 'ppp0' 0.198911 4 0 'header:Message-Id:1' 0.22653 324 16 'inet' 0.243728 21 1 'subject:New_Home_IP' 0.271305 18 1 '1,3d0' 0.284601 2 0 'x-mailer:none' 0.321254 932 75 'skip:e 20' 0.369228 21 2 'reply-to:none' 0.380298 1063 111 'to:2**0' 0.625257 545 155 'header:Date:1' 0.63781 583 175 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.643686 448 138 'header:From:1' 0.648059 583 183 'protocol' 0.749747 5 3 'to:addr:jan.albrecht' 0.86241 116 125 'header:Received:3' 0.869959 77 89 'to:addr:XXX.de' 0.891541 116 164 Message Stream: Received: from mx2.XXX.de ([XX.XX.XX.XX]) by mx2.XXX.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version XXX) id SPB4HM05; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 04:59:55 +0200 Received: from XXX.XXX.XX.XXX by mx2.XXX.de (InterScan E- Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 08 Sep 2003 04:59:55 +0200 Received: (from root@localhost) by tower.center.bluecove (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id h88303h17065 for jan.albrecht@XXX.de; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:00:04 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:00:04 +0200 From: root Message-Id: <200309080300.h88303h17065@tower.center.bluecove> To: jan.albrecht@XXX.de Subject: New_Home_IP 1,3d0 < ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol < inet addr:XXX.XXX.XX.XXX P-t-P:XXX.X.XX.XX Mask:255.255.255.255 < Message Tokens: 29 unique tokens '1,3d0' 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'from:addr:root' 'from:addr:tower.center.bluecove' 'from:name:root' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:Message-Id:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'inet' 'link' 'message-id:@tower.center.bluecove' 'ppp0' 'protocol' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 'skip:a 10' 'skip:e 20' 'skip:m 20' 'skip:p 10' 'subject:New_Home_IP' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:XXX.de' 'to:addr:jan.albrecht' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach the "clues" for one of these messages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-05 07:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Hi, no, it's not exactly the same mail. The Mail contains the follwoing entries: 2c2 < inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX P-t- P:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask:YYY.YYY.YYY.YYYY --- > inet addr:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM P-t- P:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM Mask:NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN The X and M differs from mail to mail, as the're dynamic IP's. The other parts of the mail are the same. When I do a "recover from spam" with this mail, the score does not shift ti zero. The score goes back from 60% to 59%. The log is attached. Let me know, if you need more information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Are you trying to repeatedly train the exact same mail, or a new, similar one? You can't train the same message multiple times. Each time you train, you should notice the "spam score" shift back towards zero. It may not shift enough to have it considered good, but it should shift. It is does, then it will eventually learn. If it doesn't, then we have a bug - but I will need the log file from a session where you have tried to perform this training. If you do submit the log file, please reset the bug status to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 03:20:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 05:20:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 03:31:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 05:31:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802347 ] multiline options saved incorrectly Message-ID: Bugs item #802347, was opened at 2003-09-08 11:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802347&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: multiline options saved incorrectly Initial Comment: When saving options from the IMAP user interface (localhost:8880), options that consist of multiple lines are not saved correctlry. Instead of subsequent lines being indented, they are left aligned. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802347&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:24:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:24:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802426 ] Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Message-ID: Bugs item #802426, was opened at 2003-09-08 12:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason (jason_melton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Initial Comment: help -> spambayes manager dialog. If click on 'training' tab, it stays on that tab. Selecting another tab does not change away from the training page contents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:28:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:28:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786956 ] unable to activate toolbar buttons Message-ID: Bugs item #786956, was opened at 2003-08-12 05:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: unable to activate toolbar buttons Initial Comment: After installing (sb-007.exe) on my Win XP Pro Danish SP1, Office XP SBE Danish SP1 i'm unable to use any buttons at the toolbar. Nothing just happens. Also tried installing source version with same result. logfile attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Closed, as per user comment. Hopefully version 8 is better with toolbars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David (dtopping) Date: 2003-08-23 03:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850209 I solved this problem: I removed the buttons from Outlook, deleted all data from the SpamBayes application data directory AND program files directory (WITHOUT uninstalling), then re-installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David (dtopping) Date: 2003-08-23 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850209 I've experienced the same problem. I'm running Windows XP Pro English SP1, and I can't active the latest SpamBayes plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen) Date: 2003-08-14 06:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=511191 Didn't help - still gets same error. The buttons are on their own toolbar (spambayes), but doesn't work. Also there is nothing listed under Tools/Options/Advanced/COM-setting - and there should be what ? new log attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-14 04:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 Try this: Enable the SpamBayes toolbar: View>Toolbars>SpamBayes Customize main toolbar, drag old SpamBayes buttons off. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:35:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:35:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793329 ] toobar missing afer install of new version Message-ID: Bugs item #793329, was opened at 2003-08-23 02:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793329&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ren Hoek (cavehoark) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: toobar missing afer install of new version Initial Comment: Environment: Windows XP, Professional, SP1 Outlook 2002 (10.2627.3501) SP-1 win32all-157 I installed version 007 over the top of 006. I have previously used 005 and 006 with success. The toolbar did not appear. I then tried uninstalling, and made sure to remove any files I found related to SpamBayes in: C:\Documents and Settings\{user}\Application Data\SpamBayes, then I reinstalled. Still no toolbar. The first log file after the latest install contains a pythoncom error related to universal dispatcher (see attachment). For security reasons, I recently changed to manual start for a few windows services I thought I were not needed. Could one of these be trouble? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a commonly reported bug. We have recently released Version 008 of the addin, which has a number of changes to the toolbar designed to make it more reliable. Initial indications are that they do work much better, so please try upgrading to the latest version. If you still have problems, please re-open this bug, attaching your log file - see the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You can also keep up with the latest version by subscribing to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793329&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:38:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:38:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798085 ] object has no attribute 'register' Message-ID: Bugs item #798085, was opened at 2003-08-31 21:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798085&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roger Booth (rogbot) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: object has no attribute 'register' Initial Comment: I got this result when I tried to install the Outlook plugin on Windows 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please try version 008 of the addin (see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - we recently removed a dependency that I think is likely to have contributed to registration problems. If you still have problems, please attach a log file from the new version, and reopen this bug. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798085&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:38:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:39:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787664 ] registration error for spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #787664, was opened at 2003-08-13 07:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Klarner (tklarner) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: registration error for spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: Tried installing v007 on two different machines, one an NT4 w/Outlook 2000, second machine WinXP w/Outlook 2000. Got error message "Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201" for the spambayes_addin.dll file on both machines. No anti-virus software running on either machine. Word not default editor nor running. Was able to install v006 on a third XP machine w/Outlook 2000 with no problems. BTW: have been using v006 at home; great software; keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please try version 008 of the addin (see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - we recently removed a dependency that I think is likely to have contributed to registration problems. If you still have problems, please attach a log file from the new version, and reopen this bug. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Sohrt (jsohrt) Date: 2003-09-03 04:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=857533 I installed this on XP Pro with Outlook XP, worked okay. Tried installing on another XP Pro with Outlook 2000 and got the same error. Norton was disabled (Autoprotect set to Off) I even tried Regsvr32 to manually register the dll and that failed. Maybe I can try V006. Where do I find a copy of the older version? Thanks jSohrt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Kerr (mkerr) Date: 2003-08-29 08:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=854480 spambayes_addin.dll failed to register when installing the app. I selected ignore when prompted to retry/cancel/ignore thinking I could manually register this dll. When I ran regsvr32 it was able to register the dll and spambayes appears to have installed ok ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Kerr (mkerr) Date: 2003-08-29 07:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=854480 I have installed Spambayes on 3 workstations now (XP [1], Windows 2000 Pro [2]. The XP installed without a problem, the two W2K machines both gave me the same error with being unable to register the dll spambayes_addin.dll. All service packs are current and I am an administrator ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius) Date: 2003-08-28 22:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676587 Could it be that you are installing using an account that doesn't have admin-rights on those machines??? (I know, dumb Q, but hey....how else should we be able to give dumb answers!!!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:39:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:40:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error 0x0000000 during install Message-ID: Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 14:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install Initial Comment: Reported twice. Both times XP as the OS, once with Outlook XP SP2, other not specified. NFI :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 For anyone tracking this: Please try version 008 of the addin (see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - we recently removed a dependency that I think is likely to have contributed to registration problems. If you still have problems, please attach a log file from the new version (but I will keep this bug open as the main tracker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro) Date: 2003-08-14 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842937 Hi Buzz, it helped, but first at the second attempt. The first try failed and showed the return code 0x80040201. Now I will see how it works and start with configuring. Regards Werner. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-08-13 23:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 wernerpro, Per my comment below I had same issue. I got around it by running "regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll" from the directory in which spambayes_addin.dll resides. I did this while the error message was on the screen then chose ignore to continue with the install. Hope this helps, Buzz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro) Date: 2003-08-13 19:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842937 I can't install SpamBayes, even when I kill all unnecessary processes. Now only the following processes activ: smss, csrss, winlogon, services, lsass, svchost (3 times) spoolsv, taskmgr, regsvc, mstask, winmgmt and explorer. Are there any ideas what I can do, to come over registration error 0x0000000? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Warburton (warb) Date: 2003-08-13 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=83150 I encountered this problem. I think it was an backgroud office in my startup folder. Kill some QZ... something process and install completed. sorry I did not make a note of the process name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99) Date: 2003-08-07 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=839327 I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 One user saw this traceback: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 16, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook ImportError: No module named _winreg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-08-07 03:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched. I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic functionality and still had error. Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory worked. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a) Date: 2003-08-06 23:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838924 Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the same problem. Closed ALL Windows apps and killed unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe (Photoworks uploader). Afterwards the install ran clean. If I can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post an update. (Word is *not* my default email editor) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 >From one of the reporters: I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to get it to install. It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was running (even though no windows were open). I think this happens when Word is the default e-mail editor. MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure WinWord is down. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:40:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:40:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800282 ] first mail not filtered after standby Message-ID: Bugs item #800282, was opened at 2003-09-04 17:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: first mail not filtered after standby Initial Comment: When waking up the pc (win2000 hibernate) spambayes/ outlook plugin doesn't filter the inbox. When manually starting the filtering process (SpamBayes Manager -> Filter Now -> Start filtering (Perform all filter actions, restrict to unread mail + mail never previously spam filtered) all spam mails except the first one in the inbox will be filtered and moved to the spam folder. The first one afterwards has a 0% spam score. When moving this mail via "Delete as spam", the same E-Mail gets a 100% spam score! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please see if this happens with the new 008 version? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:43:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:43:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797768 ] OUtlook hangs after running SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #797768, was opened at 2003-08-30 23:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philippe G Herve (marindeaudouce) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: OUtlook hangs after running SpamBayes Initial Comment: I have installed SpamBayes 7.0 on OUtlook 2000 SP3 running Windows 2000 SP4 Everything works well except that Outlook hangs after running for sometimes. (Multiple times per day). Only way out is to kill Outlook. This repeats and I am now going to learn how to remove SpamBayes until the bug is fixed. I had Outlook hanging 4 times already but can only trace one error in all the log files. I am not convinced the error I am facing is logged. The error log I can trace: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, None) ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, None) SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook Addin terminating: 0 COM client and 1 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The message in this log file should also appear in a message box - do you see that? If you don't, that is likely to be the problem - for some reason it is invisible, but waiting for you to dismiss it. Please try 008 of the addin (http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - it has changed all the window/dialog code, and is unlikely to have the exact same problem - if we are lucky, it won't have any problem :) Please reopen the bug attaching a new log if you still have problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:45:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:45:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-767871 ] "file exists" error upgrading binary Message-ID: Bugs item #767871, was opened at 2003-07-09 02:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joseph Beaulieu (jbc123) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: "file exists" error upgrading binary Initial Comment: Uninstalled version 2, installed version 3. When I fired up Outlook2000, this log file was generated. ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nFailed to load bayes database' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/manager", line 419, in LoadBayes File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in open_best File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in open_dbhash File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists') Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\jbeauli\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Either bayes database or message database is missing - creating new Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in open_best File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in open_dbhash File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists') ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in open_best File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in open_dbhash File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No word from reporter, and no other reports ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-09 10:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Try deleting whatever files are in your data directory (SpamBayes will recreate them). Note that you'll lose your configuration and training, but this might be the case already (you could try simply moving them and then moving them back instead). The FAQ explains where to find these files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 06:54:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 08:54:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800282 ] first mail not filtered after standby Message-ID: Bugs item #800282, was opened at 2003-09-04 09:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: first mail not filtered after standby Initial Comment: When waking up the pc (win2000 hibernate) spambayes/ outlook plugin doesn't filter the inbox. When manually starting the filtering process (SpamBayes Manager -> Filter Now -> Start filtering (Perform all filter actions, restrict to unread mail + mail never previously spam filtered) all spam mails except the first one in the inbox will be filtered and moved to the spam folder. The first one afterwards has a 0% spam score. When moving this mail via "Delete as spam", the same E-Mail gets a 100% spam score! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-09-08 14:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 yes - it still happens. if you delete the mail from the spam-folder, and then UNDO the action, the value is updated correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please see if this happens with the new 008 version? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 07:09:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 09:09:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 19:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 >Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 08:47:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 10:48:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801952 ] Imapfilter appending headers Message-ID: Bugs item #801952, was opened at 2003-09-07 12:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sjoerd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nolar nolar (nolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Imapfilter appending headers Initial Comment: Just upgraded to spambayes 1.0a5 from a4, and now whenever I run imapfilter -c (to classify), spambayes just keeps appending X-Spambayes headers to each email: .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 .... This never used to happen before. Also, when I run the imapfilter training mode (imapfilter -t) on an existing database, it does a complete retraining instead of just training the new mail as it did in a4. I haven't changed anything from the a4->a5 transition, except change the spambayes symbolic link to --> spambayes-1.0a5/. Here's my .ini file: [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True [Storage] messageinfo_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.messagei nfo.db persistent_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.db [imap] password:xxxxx server:xxxxx.com username:nolar ham_train_folders:INBOX.Accounts,INBOX.Sent-Mail spam_folder:INBOX.SPAM-NEWSPAM spam_train_folders:INBOX.SPAM unsure_folder:INBOX Is this a bug, or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 16:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 I think I may have fixed this with version 1.36 of spambayes/message.py. Can you check? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 09:00:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 11:00:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802530 ] Unable to review messages this morning Message-ID: Bugs item #802530, was opened at 2003-09-08 11:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denis Pelletier (dpellet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to review messages this morning Initial Comment: I used spambayes (Alpha release 4) for a couple of weeks and everything was working perfectly. This morning I tried to use the Review messages page and I'm getting the following error message: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 402, in onReview messageInfo = self._makeMessageInfo(message) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 502, in _makeMessageInfo messageInfo.bodySummary = self._trimHeader(text, 200) File "./spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 195, in _trimHeader sections = email.Header.decode_header(field) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py", line 67, in decode_header if not ecre.search(header): RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded The last time I reviewed the cached messages was 24 hours ago and I received about twenty messages since then. Upgrading to Alpha release 5 does not solve the problem. I'm using Spambayes under Mandrake Linux 9.1. Denis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 09:23:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 11:23:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 10:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 09:25:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 11:25:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802545 ] crash when loggin off imapfilter UI Message-ID: Bugs item #802545, was opened at 2003-09-08 17:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: crash when loggin off imapfilter UI Initial Comment: When the imap option expunge is set to True and you try to save and logoff from the UI (sb_imapfilter.py -b), you get a crash (see below). I can imagine multiple solutions: - put a try/except around the call to self.expunge in logout() - check whether a folder has been selected before calling expunge Here is the trace: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/ufs/sjoerd/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/ufs/sjoerd/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 160, in onSave self.imap.logout() File "/ufs/sjoerd/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 216, in logout self.expunge() File "/ufs/sjoerd/src/python/Lib/imaplib.py", line 402, in expunge typ, dat = self._simple_command(name) File "/ufs/sjoerd/src/python/Lib/imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "/ufs/sjoerd/src/python/Lib/imaplib.py", line 759, in _command raise self.error( error: command EXPUNGE illegal in state NONAUTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 10:37:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 12:37:36 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797768 ] OUtlook hangs after running SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #797768, was opened at 2003-08-30 08:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marindeaudouce You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philippe G Herve (marindeaudouce) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: OUtlook hangs after running SpamBayes Initial Comment: I have installed SpamBayes 7.0 on OUtlook 2000 SP3 running Windows 2000 SP4 Everything works well except that Outlook hangs after running for sometimes. (Multiple times per day). Only way out is to kill Outlook. This repeats and I am now going to learn how to remove SpamBayes until the bug is fixed. I had Outlook hanging 4 times already but can only trace one error in all the log files. I am not convinced the error I am facing is logged. The error log I can trace: Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, None) ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__ File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, None) SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook Addin terminating: 0 COM client and 1 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Philippe G Herve (marindeaudouce) Date: 2003-09-08 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112882 I did not get the message box which may be why i do not see the error message in the log file. I have upgraded to 0.8 but still had the same problem. I have uninstalled now V.8. I am wondering if there could be some incompatibilities between Spabayes and Gaim (http://gaim.sourceforge.net) was unstable when SPamBayes was installed. I did run Outlook + Spambayes without GAIM and still had a problem. Good look in solving this one and thank you looking into it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 07:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The message in this log file should also appear in a message box - do you see that? If you don't, that is likely to be the problem - for some reason it is invisible, but waiting for you to dismiss it. Please try 008 of the addin (http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - it has changed all the window/dialog code, and is unlikely to have the exact same problem - if we are lucky, it won't have any problem :) Please reopen the bug attaching a new log if you still have problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 11:22:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 13:23:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error 0x0000000 during install Message-ID: Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 00:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by buzz4209 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install Initial Comment: Reported twice. Both times XP as the OS, once with Outlook XP SP2, other not specified. NFI :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-09-08 13:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 008 fixes issue for me. It was reproduceable for all previous versions. ( i was reproducing by uninstall, de-register dll, reinstall) Thanks! Buzz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 For anyone tracking this: Please try version 008 of the addin (see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - we recently removed a dependency that I think is likely to have contributed to registration problems. If you still have problems, please attach a log file from the new version (but I will keep this bug open as the main tracker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro) Date: 2003-08-14 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842937 Hi Buzz, it helped, but first at the second attempt. The first try failed and showed the return code 0x80040201. Now I will see how it works and start with configuring. Regards Werner. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-08-13 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 wernerpro, Per my comment below I had same issue. I got around it by running "regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll" from the directory in which spambayes_addin.dll resides. I did this while the error message was on the screen then chose ignore to continue with the install. Hope this helps, Buzz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro) Date: 2003-08-13 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842937 I can't install SpamBayes, even when I kill all unnecessary processes. Now only the following processes activ: smss, csrss, winlogon, services, lsass, svchost (3 times) spoolsv, taskmgr, regsvc, mstask, winmgmt and explorer. Are there any ideas what I can do, to come over registration error 0x0000000? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Warburton (warb) Date: 2003-08-12 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=83150 I encountered this problem. I think it was an backgroud office in my startup folder. Kill some QZ... something process and install completed. sorry I did not make a note of the process name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99) Date: 2003-08-07 09:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=839327 I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 One user saw this traceback: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 16, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook ImportError: No module named _winreg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-08-06 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched. I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic functionality and still had error. Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory worked. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a) Date: 2003-08-06 09:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838924 Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the same problem. Closed ALL Windows apps and killed unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe (Photoworks uploader). Afterwards the install ran clean. If I can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post an update. (Word is *not* my default email editor) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 05:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 >From one of the reporters: I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to get it to install. It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was running (even though no windows were open). I think this happens when Word is the default e-mail editor. MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure WinWord is down. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 00:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 12:49:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 14:49:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802655 ] import/export of probability databases Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802655, was opened at 2003-09-08 13:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Prescott (rprescott) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: import/export of probability databases Initial Comment: It would be nice to have the capability to import and export probability databases. This would allow you to be able to synchronize your work email filter and home, for instance. Taken one step further, automagic periodic updates could be made between one's clients using public key crypto, digital signature, and hash for automatic authentication and synchronization of database transmissions... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 13:51:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 15:51:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802655 ] import/export of probability databases Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802655, was opened at 2003-09-08 14:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Prescott (rprescott) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: import/export of probability databases Initial Comment: It would be nice to have the capability to import and export probability databases. This would allow you to be able to synchronize your work email filter and home, for instance. Taken one step further, automagic periodic updates could be made between one's clients using public key crypto, digital signature, and hash for automatic authentication and synchronization of database transmissions... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 15:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You can export/import already... http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#can-i-share-move-my-training-data-from-one-computer-to-another Sorry, no automagic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 14:00:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 16:01:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801952 ] Imapfilter appending headers Message-ID: Bugs item #801952, was opened at 2003-09-07 05:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nolar You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nolar nolar (nolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Imapfilter appending headers Initial Comment: Just upgraded to spambayes 1.0a5 from a4, and now whenever I run imapfilter -c (to classify), spambayes just keeps appending X-Spambayes headers to each email: .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 .... This never used to happen before. Also, when I run the imapfilter training mode (imapfilter -t) on an existing database, it does a complete retraining instead of just training the new mail as it did in a4. I haven't changed anything from the a4->a5 transition, except change the spambayes symbolic link to --> spambayes-1.0a5/. Here's my .ini file: [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True [Storage] messageinfo_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.messagei nfo.db persistent_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.db [imap] password:xxxxx server:xxxxx.com username:nolar ham_train_folders:INBOX.Accounts,INBOX.Sent-Mail spam_folder:INBOX.SPAM-NEWSPAM spam_train_folders:INBOX.SPAM unsure_folder:INBOX Is this a bug, or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-08 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 I'd check it out, except sourceforge's anonymous CVS access is way behind....only version 1.35 is available to me right now. Can you email it to me (remove spam: nolar@users.sourceforge.SPAMnet) , or attach below, so I can test? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 09:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 I think I may have fixed this with version 1.36 of spambayes/message.py. Can you check? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 14:11:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 16:11:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802426 ] Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Message-ID: Bugs item #802426, was opened at 2003-09-08 08:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason (jason_melton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Initial Comment: help -> spambayes manager dialog. If click on 'training' tab, it stays on that tab. Selecting another tab does not change away from the training page contents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 I can't reproduce it running from source. Can you attach a log file please. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 14:18:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 16:19:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801952 ] Imapfilter appending headers Message-ID: Bugs item #801952, was opened at 2003-09-07 12:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sjoerd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nolar nolar (nolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Imapfilter appending headers Initial Comment: Just upgraded to spambayes 1.0a5 from a4, and now whenever I run imapfilter -c (to classify), spambayes just keeps appending X-Spambayes headers to each email: .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 .... This never used to happen before. Also, when I run the imapfilter training mode (imapfilter -t) on an existing database, it does a complete retraining instead of just training the new mail as it did in a4. I haven't changed anything from the a4->a5 transition, except change the spambayes symbolic link to --> spambayes-1.0a5/. Here's my .ini file: [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True [Storage] messageinfo_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.messagei nfo.db persistent_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.db [imap] password:xxxxx server:xxxxx.com username:nolar ham_train_folders:INBOX.Accounts,INBOX.Sent-Mail spam_folder:INBOX.SPAM-NEWSPAM spam_train_folders:INBOX.SPAM unsure_folder:INBOX Is this a bug, or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 22:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 Sent the change off-line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-08 22:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 I'd check it out, except sourceforge's anonymous CVS access is way behind....only version 1.35 is available to me right now. Can you email it to me (remove spam: nolar@users.sourceforge.SPAMnet) , or attach below, so I can test? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 16:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 I think I may have fixed this with version 1.36 of spambayes/message.py. Can you check? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 15:04:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 17:04:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801952 ] Imapfilter appending headers Message-ID: Bugs item #801952, was opened at 2003-09-07 05:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nolar You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nolar nolar (nolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Imapfilter appending headers Initial Comment: Just upgraded to spambayes 1.0a5 from a4, and now whenever I run imapfilter -c (to classify), spambayes just keeps appending X-Spambayes headers to each email: .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 .... This never used to happen before. Also, when I run the imapfilter training mode (imapfilter -t) on an existing database, it does a complete retraining instead of just training the new mail as it did in a4. I haven't changed anything from the a4->a5 transition, except change the spambayes symbolic link to --> spambayes-1.0a5/. Here's my .ini file: [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True [Storage] messageinfo_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.messagei nfo.db persistent_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.db [imap] password:xxxxx server:xxxxx.com username:nolar ham_train_folders:INBOX.Accounts,INBOX.Sent-Mail spam_folder:INBOX.SPAM-NEWSPAM spam_train_folders:INBOX.SPAM unsure_folder:INBOX Is this a bug, or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-08 16:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 sjoerd: Can you attach below? SF doesn't seems to reject email to my sf account for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 Sent the change off-line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-08 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 I'd check it out, except sourceforge's anonymous CVS access is way behind....only version 1.35 is available to me right now. Can you email it to me (remove spam: nolar@users.sourceforge.SPAMnet) , or attach below, so I can test? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 09:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 I think I may have fixed this with version 1.36 of spambayes/message.py. Can you check? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 15:23:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 17:23:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802756 ] delete spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802756, was opened at 2003-09-08 23:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802756&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: kleinerChemiker (kleinerchemiker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: delete spam Initial Comment: you can move spam ore leve it where it is but i would like to delete it. move to delete folder isnt possible, so i would like to have the posibility to delete it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802756&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 15:27:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 17:27:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802756 ] delete spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802756, was opened at 2003-09-08 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802756&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: kleinerChemiker (kleinerchemiker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: delete spam Initial Comment: you can move spam ore leve it where it is but i would like to delete it. move to delete folder isnt possible, so i would like to have the posibility to delete it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Please see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i-configure-spambayes-to-delete-spam-rather-than-moving-it in the FAQ. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802756&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 15:37:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 17:37:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801952 ] Imapfilter appending headers Message-ID: Bugs item #801952, was opened at 2003-09-07 05:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nolar You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nolar nolar (nolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Imapfilter appending headers Initial Comment: Just upgraded to spambayes 1.0a5 from a4, and now whenever I run imapfilter -c (to classify), spambayes just keeps appending X-Spambayes headers to each email: .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 .... This never used to happen before. Also, when I run the imapfilter training mode (imapfilter -t) on an existing database, it does a complete retraining instead of just training the new mail as it did in a4. I haven't changed anything from the a4->a5 transition, except change the spambayes symbolic link to --> spambayes-1.0a5/. Here's my .ini file: [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True [Storage] messageinfo_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.messagei nfo.db persistent_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.db [imap] password:xxxxx server:xxxxx.com username:nolar ham_train_folders:INBOX.Accounts,INBOX.Sent-Mail spam_folder:INBOX.SPAM-NEWSPAM spam_train_folders:INBOX.SPAM unsure_folder:INBOX Is this a bug, or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-08 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 sjoerd: Just got the patch. YES, it fixes the problem :) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-08 16:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 sjoerd: Can you attach below? SF doesn't seems to reject email to my sf account for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 Sent the change off-line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-08 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 I'd check it out, except sourceforge's anonymous CVS access is way behind....only version 1.35 is available to me right now. Can you email it to me (remove spam: nolar@users.sourceforge.SPAMnet) , or attach below, so I can test? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-08 09:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 I think I may have fixed this with version 1.36 of spambayes/message.py. Can you check? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 15:37:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 17:37:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 15:41:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 17:41:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-08 17:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 17:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 15:59:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 17:59:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error 0x0000000 during install Message-ID: Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 14:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install Initial Comment: Reported twice. Both times XP as the OS, once with Outlook XP SP2, other not specified. NFI :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 07:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 woohoo - thanks for getting back! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-09-09 03:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 008 fixes issue for me. It was reproduceable for all previous versions. ( i was reproducing by uninstall, de-register dll, reinstall) Thanks! Buzz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 For anyone tracking this: Please try version 008 of the addin (see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - we recently removed a dependency that I think is likely to have contributed to registration problems. If you still have problems, please attach a log file from the new version (but I will keep this bug open as the main tracker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro) Date: 2003-08-14 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842937 Hi Buzz, it helped, but first at the second attempt. The first try failed and showed the return code 0x80040201. Now I will see how it works and start with configuring. Regards Werner. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-08-13 23:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 wernerpro, Per my comment below I had same issue. I got around it by running "regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll" from the directory in which spambayes_addin.dll resides. I did this while the error message was on the screen then chose ignore to continue with the install. Hope this helps, Buzz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro) Date: 2003-08-13 19:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842937 I can't install SpamBayes, even when I kill all unnecessary processes. Now only the following processes activ: smss, csrss, winlogon, services, lsass, svchost (3 times) spoolsv, taskmgr, regsvc, mstask, winmgmt and explorer. Are there any ideas what I can do, to come over registration error 0x0000000? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dan Warburton (warb) Date: 2003-08-13 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=83150 I encountered this problem. I think it was an backgroud office in my startup folder. Kill some QZ... something process and install completed. sorry I did not make a note of the process name. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99) Date: 2003-08-07 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=839327 I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 09:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 One user saw this traceback: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 16, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook ImportError: No module named _winreg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209) Date: 2003-08-07 03:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436678 I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched. I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic functionality and still had error. Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory worked. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a) Date: 2003-08-06 23:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838924 Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the same problem. Closed ALL Windows apps and killed unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe (Photoworks uploader). Afterwards the install ran clean. If I can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post an update. (Word is *not* my default email editor) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 >From one of the reporters: I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to get it to install. It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was running (even though no windows were open). I think this happens when Word is the default e-mail editor. MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure WinWord is down. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 16:42:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 18:42:28 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802426 ] Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Message-ID: Bugs item #802426, was opened at 2003-09-08 22:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason (jason_melton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Initial Comment: help -> spambayes manager dialog. If click on 'training' tab, it stays on that tab. Selecting another tab does not change away from the training page contents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro in either source or binary - however, it has also been reported on the mailing list :( As Adam said, please attach the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 06:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 I can't reproduce it running from source. Can you attach a log file please. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 17:34:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 19:34:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802426 ] Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Message-ID: Bugs item #802426, was opened at 2003-09-08 22:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason (jason_melton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Initial Comment: help -> spambayes manager dialog. If click on 'training' tab, it stays on that tab. Selecting another tab does not change away from the training page contents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 09:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 >From the mailing list: Invalid option timer_start_delay in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Invalid option timer_interval in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1173 spam and 6378 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.8 (September 8, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox - Spam Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 221, in OnInitDialog File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 258, in LoadAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 36, in Init File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 320, in UpdateControl_FromValue File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange Settings.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro in either source or binary - however, it has also been reported on the mailing list :( As Adam said, please attach the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 06:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 I can't reproduce it running from source. Can you attach a log file please. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 18:24:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 8 20:24:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802426 ] Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Message-ID: Bugs item #802426, was opened at 2003-09-08 08:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason (jason_melton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Initial Comment: help -> spambayes manager dialog. If click on 'training' tab, it stays on that tab. Selecting another tab does not change away from the training page contents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Ok, to reproduce. Create a new test folder. Set the spam folder to the new folder. Delete the folder and empty the trash. The problem is that the FolderID processor (and the folder selection dialog) except a "None" value return instead of an exception. I fixed it like this............................. Index: Outlook2000/msgstore.py =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/msgstore.py,v retrieving revision 1.75 diff -u -r1.75 msgstore.py --- Outlook2000/msgstore.py 7 Sep 2003 23:43:21 -0000 1.75 +++ Outlook2000/msgstore.py 9 Sep 2003 00:19:55 -0000 @@ -334,7 +334,8 @@ return MAPIMsgStoreFolder(self, folder_id, props[1][1], table.GetRowCount(0)) except pythoncom.com_error, details: - raise MsgStoreExceptionFromCOMException(details) + print MsgStoreExceptionFromCOMException(details) + return None def GetMessage(self, message_id): # Return a single message given either the ID, or an Outlook --------------------------------------------------------- But this may not be the best way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 19:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 >From the mailing list: Invalid option timer_start_delay in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Invalid option timer_interval in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1173 spam and 6378 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.8 (September 8, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox - Spam Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 221, in OnInitDialog File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 258, in LoadAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 36, in Init File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 320, in UpdateControl_FromValue File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange Settings.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 18:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro in either source or binary - however, it has also been reported on the mailing list :( As Adam said, please attach the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 I can't reproduce it running from source. Can you attach a log file please. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 20:28:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 02:30:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802890 ] Doc/error message bugs: Non-standard db name? Message-ID: Bugs item #802890, was opened at 2003-09-09 02:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802890&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeffrey C. Albro (jalbro) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Doc/error message bugs: Non-standard db name? Initial Comment: Using version spambayes-1.0a5: If you follow the directions in INTEGRATION.txt, and hammie.py -g ~/tmp/newham -s ~/tmp/newspam You get a complaint about using the pickle or DB version (-d or -D). No big deal. .hammiedb is created if you use -d (even though there is no success message to tell you this.) However, the procmail instructions suggest you use hammie.db. This causes hammie to crash in a cryptic fashion. Instead, hammie should complain along the lines of "No such data base file!" In the documentation the name of the DB created in the first place should match the procmail instructions. Thanks for a great product! Please fix the documentaion and make hammie a bit more "talkative" Thanks! -Jeff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802890&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 18:45:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 02:43:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801952 ] Imapfilter appending headers Message-ID: Bugs item #801952, was opened at 2003-09-07 22:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: nolar nolar (nolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Imapfilter appending headers Initial Comment: Just upgraded to spambayes 1.0a5 from a4, and now whenever I run imapfilter -c (to classify), spambayes just keeps appending X-Spambayes headers to each email: .... Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 X-Spambayes-Classification: ham X-Spambayes-Spam-Probability: 1.53260861224e-07 X-Spambayes-MailId: 1062930343 .... This never used to happen before. Also, when I run the imapfilter training mode (imapfilter -t) on an existing database, it does a complete retraining instead of just training the new mail as it did in a4. I haven't changed anything from the a4->a5 transition, except change the spambayes symbolic link to --> spambayes-1.0a5/. Here's my .ini file: [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True [Storage] messageinfo_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.messagei nfo.db persistent_storage_file:/var/spambayes/main.db [imap] password:xxxxx server:xxxxx.com username:nolar ham_train_folders:INBOX.Accounts,INBOX.Sent-Mail spam_folder:INBOX.SPAM-NEWSPAM spam_train_folders:INBOX.SPAM unsure_folder:INBOX Is this a bug, or am I missing something? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Sjoerd! (This may effect pop3proxy users as well, but in more subtle ways. :( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-09 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 sjoerd: Just got the patch. YES, it fixes the problem :) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-09 09:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 sjoerd: Can you attach below? SF doesn't seems to reject email to my sf account for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-09 08:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 Sent the change off-line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: nolar nolar (nolar) Date: 2003-09-09 08:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856270 I'd check it out, except sourceforge's anonymous CVS access is way behind....only version 1.35 is available to me right now. Can you email it to me (remove spam: nolar@users.sourceforge.SPAMnet) , or attach below, so I can test? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-09 02:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 I think I may have fixed this with version 1.36 of spambayes/message.py. Can you check? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801952&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 19:46:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 02:43:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802426 ] Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Message-ID: Bugs item #802426, was opened at 2003-09-09 00:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason (jason_melton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Initial Comment: help -> spambayes manager dialog. If click on 'training' tab, it stays on that tab. Selecting another tab does not change away from the training page contents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Also from the list: Hmmm... After playing around a while, I realized that I couldn't make any changes to the Training tab dialog items. I then used the configuration wizard to set training "I haven't prepared" and went to then end of that wizard. I'm now able to use the training tab as designed and the problem disappeared. Must be something in my configuration weirded out the program. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 12:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Ok, to reproduce. Create a new test folder. Set the spam folder to the new folder. Delete the folder and empty the trash. The problem is that the FolderID processor (and the folder selection dialog) except a "None" value return instead of an exception. I fixed it like this............................. Index: Outlook2000/msgstore.py =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/msgstore.py,v retrieving revision 1.75 diff -u -r1.75 msgstore.py --- Outlook2000/msgstore.py 7 Sep 2003 23:43:21 -0000 1.75 +++ Outlook2000/msgstore.py 9 Sep 2003 00:19:55 -0000 @@ -334,7 +334,8 @@ return MAPIMsgStoreFolder(self, folder_id, props[1][1], table.GetRowCount(0)) except pythoncom.com_error, details: - raise MsgStoreExceptionFromCOMException(details) + print MsgStoreExceptionFromCOMException(details) + return None def GetMessage(self, message_id): # Return a single message given either the ID, or an Outlook --------------------------------------------------------- But this may not be the best way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 >From the mailing list: Invalid option timer_start_delay in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Invalid option timer_interval in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1173 spam and 6378 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.8 (September 8, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox - Spam Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 221, in OnInitDialog File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 258, in LoadAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 36, in Init File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 320, in UpdateControl_FromValue File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange Settings.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro in either source or binary - however, it has also been reported on the mailing list :( As Adam said, please attach the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 08:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 I can't reproduce it running from source. Can you attach a log file please. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 21:42:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 02:46:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-802914 ] cannot train spambayes manager Message-ID: Support Requests item #802914, was opened at 2003-09-08 23:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=802914&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas D. Zweifel (tdz200) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: cannot train spambayes manager Initial Comment: i successfully installed spambayes for outlook, and created the suggested 2 folders ('spam' and 'possible spam'), but when i go to the spambayes manager and browse for the new spam folder, i cannot find it. (for the ham folder i use my inbox, which i did find.) help! thomas p.s. also, there is no troubleshooter feature in my spambayes. fyi. t ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=802914&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 21:39:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 02:52:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802426 ] Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Message-ID: Bugs item #802426, was opened at 2003-09-08 22:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason (jason_melton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dialog box broken - Outlook 0.8 Initial Comment: help -> spambayes manager dialog. If click on 'training' tab, it stays on that tab. Selecting another tab does not change away from the training page contents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 and released :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 11:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Also from the list: Hmmm... After playing around a while, I realized that I couldn't make any changes to the Training tab dialog items. I then used the configuration wizard to set training "I haven't prepared" and went to then end of that wizard. I'm now able to use the training tab as designed and the problem disappeared. Must be something in my configuration weirded out the program. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Ok, to reproduce. Create a new test folder. Set the spam folder to the new folder. Delete the folder and empty the trash. The problem is that the FolderID processor (and the folder selection dialog) except a "None" value return instead of an exception. I fixed it like this............................. Index: Outlook2000/msgstore.py =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/msgstore.py,v retrieving revision 1.75 diff -u -r1.75 msgstore.py --- Outlook2000/msgstore.py 7 Sep 2003 23:43:21 -0000 1.75 +++ Outlook2000/msgstore.py 9 Sep 2003 00:19:55 -0000 @@ -334,7 +334,8 @@ return MAPIMsgStoreFolder(self, folder_id, props[1][1], table.GetRowCount(0)) except pythoncom.com_error, details: - raise MsgStoreExceptionFromCOMException(details) + print MsgStoreExceptionFromCOMException(details) + return None def GetMessage(self, message_id): # Return a single message given either the ID, or an Outlook --------------------------------------------------------- But this may not be the best way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 09:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 >From the mailing list: Invalid option timer_start_delay in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Invalid option timer_interval in section Experimental in file C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_customize.ini Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 1173 spam and 6378 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.8 (September 8, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox - Spam Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 221, in OnInitDialog File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 258, in LoadAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 36, in Init File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 320, in UpdateControl_FromValue File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 295, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 172, in OnNotify File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 176, in switchToPage File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 270, in SaveAllControls File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 39, in Done File "out1.pyz/dialogs.opt_processors", line 167, in UpdateValue_FromControl KeyError: '' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\DBetting\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange Settings.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro in either source or binary - however, it has also been reported on the mailing list :( As Adam said, please attach the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 06:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 I can't reproduce it running from source. Can you attach a log file please. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802426&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 21:40:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 02:55:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-09 01:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 8 18:40:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 02:58:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802655 ] import/export of probability databases Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802655, was opened at 2003-09-09 06:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Prescott (rprescott) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: import/export of probability databases Initial Comment: It would be nice to have the capability to import and export probability databases. This would allow you to be able to synchronize your work email filter and home, for instance. Taken one step further, automagic periodic updates could be made between one's clients using public key crypto, digital signature, and hash for automatic authentication and synchronization of database transmissions... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 12:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The FAQ only talks about copying the databases across, not importing and exporting. To do this, use the dbExpImp.py script in the 1.0a5 (source) release. This can convert your database to a plain text file (and back). You could use this to merge two databases. Re: the automagic - would this really be worth the effort needed to implement it? both databases should be able to learn independently, and fairly quickly, without having to resort to this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You can export/import already... http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#can-i-share-move-my-training-data-from-one-computer-to-another Sorry, no automagic. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802655&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 01:08:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 03:09:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-801699 ] migration from hammie to sb_* scripts Message-ID: Patches item #801699, was opened at 2003-09-07 04:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=801699&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: migration from hammie to sb_* scripts Initial Comment: Ive been updating my training scripts (for kmail integration) to use the new sb_* scripts. I needed a couple of changes to sb_mboxtrain.py to make it a full replacement for how I was previously using hammie.py: 1. sb_mboxtrain.py writes a X-Spambayes-Trained header. I am currently not using this, I always perform a full retrain. Unfortunately rewriting files in maildir folders interferes with kmail's cache of message status, with the result that recently read messages are marked unread again. This is certainly a kmail bug, but a workaround in spambayes seems reasonable. I added a switch to sb_mboxtrain to inhibit rewriting mailboxes with the X-Spambayes-Trained headers. 2. I run my retrain script from cron. sb_mboxtrain displays the name or number of the mail message as it processes them, which makes for an inappropriately large cron output. The -q switch is a little too quiet - I would still like to see the count of messages trained in each mailbox at the end of training. I changed sb_mboxtrain to inhibit this status update if not isatty(stdout) One patch attached including both changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've checked in a version for #1. Instead of making it a switch I made it an option ("Headers":"include_trained"), as this is more consistent with the other headers. I don't know enough about how mboxtrain is used to put the second one in. Skip or someone like that should make that call. BTW, all the old hammie.py script did was call the spambayes/hammiebulk.py script. That's still there, so you could call it directly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=801699&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 01:10:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 03:10:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800282 ] first mail not filtered after standby Message-ID: Bugs item #800282, was opened at 2003-09-04 07:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by terminator212 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: first mail not filtered after standby Initial Comment: When waking up the pc (win2000 hibernate) spambayes/ outlook plugin doesn't filter the inbox. When manually starting the filtering process (SpamBayes Manager -> Filter Now -> Start filtering (Perform all filter actions, restrict to unread mail + mail never previously spam filtered) all spam mails except the first one in the inbox will be filtered and moved to the spam folder. The first one afterwards has a 0% spam score. When moving this mail via "Delete as spam", the same E-Mail gets a 100% spam score! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Date: 2003-09-09 07:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858841 I checked the behaviour with version 008 of the outlook plugin. The bug, that the first mail isn't filtered, seems not to be present any more. But the plugin doesn't filter the inbox after waking up the PC, so I have to start filtering manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-09-08 12:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 yes - it still happens. if you delete the mail from the spam-folder, and then UNDO the action, the value is updated correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 12:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please see if this happens with the new 008 version? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 01:53:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 03:53:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802347 ] multiline options saved incorrectly Message-ID: Bugs item #802347, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802347&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: multiline options saved incorrectly Initial Comment: When saving options from the IMAP user interface (localhost:8880), options that consist of multiple lines are not saved correctlry. Instead of subsequent lines being indented, they are left aligned. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 19:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What multi-line options are there? I've checked in a fix for this; could you see if it fixes it for you? (I can't check it because I can't find an option that I can make multi-line). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802347&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 02:08:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 04:08:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802545 ] crash when loggin off imapfilter UI Message-ID: Bugs item #802545, was opened at 2003-09-09 03:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802545&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: crash when loggin off imapfilter UI Initial Comment: When the imap option expunge is set to True and you try to save and logoff from the UI (sb_imapfilter.py -b), you get a crash (see below). I can imagine multiple solutions: - put a try/except around the call to self.expunge in logout() - check whether a folder has been selected before calling expunge Here is the trace: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/ufs/sjoerd/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/ufs/sjoerd/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/ImapUI.py", line 160, in onSave self.imap.logout() File "/ufs/sjoerd/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 216, in logout self.expunge() File "/ufs/sjoerd/src/python/Lib/imaplib.py", line 402, in expunge typ, dat = self._simple_command(name) File "/ufs/sjoerd/src/python/Lib/imaplib.py", line 1000, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, self._command(name, *args)) File "/ufs/sjoerd/src/python/Lib/imaplib.py", line 759, in _command raise self.error( error: command EXPUNGE illegal in state NONAUTH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed, thanks. It should really have gone through and SELECTed each folder that the filter works with, and then expunged (this is what is does now). Plus it also needs to make sure that it was logged in in the first place, or do nothing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802545&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 02:36:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 04:36:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-753708 ] Support POP over SSL Message-ID: Feature Requests item #753708, was opened at 2003-06-13 15:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=753708&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: rick gregory (rickg17) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support POP over SSL Initial Comment: Enable POPproxy to proxy a connection to a POP3 server over SSL, supporting either port 110 or 995. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 20:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two more requests on the list, 6 Sept from "theta sigma" (Mark) and 1 Sept from Ryan Booker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=753708&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 07:37:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 09:38:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802530 ] Unable to review messages this morning Message-ID: Bugs item #802530, was opened at 2003-09-08 11:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dpellet You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denis Pelletier (dpellet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to review messages this morning Initial Comment: I used spambayes (Alpha release 4) for a couple of weeks and everything was working perfectly. This morning I tried to use the Review messages page and I'm getting the following error message: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 402, in onReview messageInfo = self._makeMessageInfo(message) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 502, in _makeMessageInfo messageInfo.bodySummary = self._trimHeader(text, 200) File "./spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 195, in _trimHeader sections = email.Header.decode_header(field) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py", line 67, in decode_header if not ecre.search(header): RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded The last time I reviewed the cached messages was 24 hours ago and I received about twenty messages since then. Upgrading to Alpha release 5 does not solve the problem. I'm using Spambayes under Mandrake Linux 9.1. Denis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Denis Pelletier (dpellet) Date: 2003-09-09 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861858 This morning, I was able to review/train on today's email. After doing that, I got again the same error (RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded) when trying to review what are now yesterday's email. So I guess that spambayes is chocking on an email. Does anyone want to have a look at my database? Denis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 08:09:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 10:09:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803174 ] broken link on Welcome & About pages Message-ID: Bugs item #803174, was opened at 2003-09-09 10:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803174&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Trevor Metzger (trevorm_xcg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken link on Welcome & About pages Initial Comment: I have noticed a little documentation error in versions 0.8 and 0.81. On the "Welcome" page there is the following text/link: Outlook does not allow us to automatically add the spam score to your Outlook folder views - but you can do it manually by following these instructions . This link is broken (it tries looking on E: drive?). A link to the same info is broken on the Welcome page: If you want to add the Spam field to your Outlook views, follow these instructions . I knew my way around from the previous version but this could confuse a newer user. Thanks again, keep up the good work! -Trevor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803174&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 08:09:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 10:10:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802347 ] multiline options saved incorrectly Message-ID: Bugs item #802347, was opened at 2003-09-08 11:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sjoerd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802347&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: multiline options saved incorrectly Initial Comment: When saving options from the IMAP user interface (localhost:8880), options that consist of multiple lines are not saved correctlry. Instead of subsequent lines being indented, they are left aligned. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sjoerd Mullender (sjoerd) Date: 2003-09-09 16:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=43607 Options that consists of white-space-separated values, such as safe_headers or address_headers can be split over multiple lines, as long as the continuation lines are indented. The fix works, so closing this report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-09 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What multi-line options are there? I've checked in a fix for this; could you see if it fixes it for you? (I can't check it because I can't find an option that I can make multi-line). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802347&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 09:30:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 11:30:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803227 ] spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #803227, was opened at 2003-09-09 15:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Initial Comment: With plug-in 007 and now 008, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't a functionality bug, just a display bug, since the message is moved into the spam folder correctly. Although the incorrect score might cause problems if SpamBayes ever re-filters without re- scoring. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you need more information, Ryan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 09:32:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 11:32:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-737619 ] Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly Message-ID: Bugs item #737619, was opened at 2003-05-14 10:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Moore (pmoore) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly Initial Comment: Exchange, Outlook 2000, plugin from CVS around 9th April. Occasionally (it seems to be mostly when the plugin is doing a "catchup" when I start up in the morning, but I don't think it's *always* then) a spam is left in my inbox with a score of 0% displayed. Clicking the "show spam clues" button shows a correct score of 99.xxx%. I *think* that the message isn't showing in the log of messages being filtered (so why does it get a score at all?) but it's hard to be sure I didn't miss the note about a message with subject "??????????????????????" in a list of 200+ such messages :-) This has been discussed on the list in the past, but I could find no bug specifically about it. If I missed one, I apologise - feel free to close this in that case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-09 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I opened a new bug 803227 with my information, since upon reflection the circumstances are very different. My messages are filtered correctly, only the spam score saved with the message is incorrrect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-05 22:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Along the same lines... With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts, Regards, Ryan Malayter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-05 22:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Along the same lines... With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts, Regards, Ryan Malayter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-20 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is very similar to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=771256&group_id=61702&atid=498103 - except in that bug, there is no score displayed (ie, in that one, the message appears "completely missed". It is alot easier to see how the "no score" behaviour could happen, but this stumps me! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 10:53:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 12:53:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803297 ] Addin not Message-ID: Bugs item #803297, was opened at 2003-09-09 11:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803297&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john schmidt (emojoh) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Addin not Initial Comment: Compaq Evo N800w WinXPpro sp1 1G RAM After several installs, one uninstall reboot, install... Outlook Tools Options Other AdvancedOptions Com Addins - Initially had MapPoint. This was removed. Add fails to indicate after browsing to spambayes_addin.dll Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\john\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\john\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.8 (September 8, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 14, in DllRegisterServer File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 14, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 338, in doimport File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 184, in getmod File "out3.pkg/archive.pyc", line 386, in getmod TypeError: unbound method getmod() must be called with DirOwner instance as first argument (got ExtInPkgImporter instance instead) SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 unsure Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ___________________________________ Please advise if i need to exercise COM Mgr. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803297&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 11:27:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 13:27:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803321 ] encrypted email Message-ID: Bugs item #803321, was opened at 2003-09-09 17:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Adams (deanadams) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: encrypted email Initial Comment: Great job on the Outlook plugin - really appreciate the effort. Just one observation so far. I receive a number of encrypted emails (S/MIME format). When SpamBayes tries to examine the emails, I naturally get a prompt to unlock the private key (enter the keystore password). By the time I have done this, more emails have arrived which seem to be ignored by SpamBayes, and it then carries on with emails that are still in the process of being downloaded. Of course I can subsequently go back and "Delete As Spam" the missed emails, but it would be nice if SpamBayes handled this better. Any hints on how to configure SpamBayes to deal with this better, or is it out of scope in the current version? For info: I am on Win2K pro with Outlook 2K using SpamBayes 0.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 15:45:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 17:45:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803321 ] encrypted email Message-ID: Bugs item #803321, was opened at 2003-09-10 03:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Adams (deanadams) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: encrypted email Initial Comment: Great job on the Outlook plugin - really appreciate the effort. Just one observation so far. I receive a number of encrypted emails (S/MIME format). When SpamBayes tries to examine the emails, I naturally get a prompt to unlock the private key (enter the keystore password). By the time I have done this, more emails have arrived which seem to be ignored by SpamBayes, and it then carries on with emails that are still in the process of being downloaded. Of course I can subsequently go back and "Delete As Spam" the missed emails, but it would be nice if SpamBayes handled this better. Any hints on how to configure SpamBayes to deal with this better, or is it out of scope in the current version? For info: I am on Win2K pro with Outlook 2K using SpamBayes 0.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-10 07:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Try setting "background processing" - that should catch up the mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 17:24:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 19:25:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803174 ] broken link on Welcome & About pages Message-ID: Bugs item #803174, was opened at 2003-09-10 00:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803174&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Trevor Metzger (trevorm_xcg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken link on Welcome & About pages Initial Comment: I have noticed a little documentation error in versions 0.8 and 0.81. On the "Welcome" page there is the following text/link: Outlook does not allow us to automatically add the spam score to your Outlook folder views - but you can do it manually by following these instructions . This link is broken (it tries looking on E: drive?). A link to the same info is broken on the Welcome page: If you want to add the Spam field to your Outlook views, follow these instructions . I knew my way around from the previous version but this could confuse a newer user. Thanks again, keep up the good work! -Trevor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-10 09:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Damn Mozilla :( Thanks, I'll fix this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803174&group_id=61702 From T.A.Meyer at massey.ac.nz Mon Sep 1 12:23:02 2003 From: T.A.Meyer at massey.ac.nz (Meyer, Tony) Date: Tue Sep 9 19:26:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messages frommailing list as SPAM despite multiple (20+) recoveries fromspam folder Message-ID: <1ED4ECF91CDED24C8D012BCF2B034F130308C67B@its-xchg4.massey.ac.nz> > It's not a big issue, but I've noticed that my m-w.com "word > of the day" is consistently flagged by Spambayes as spam [...] > Here is an example of the mailing list messages that keep > getting mislabeled as spam. Would you also be able to send a copy of the tokens (with scores/count) that this message produces? You can do this via the "Show Clues" command in the Outlook plug-in, or via the web interface, or with the "debug" header in hammiefilter. (It would also be great to know which application you are using). It's the clues that provide the clues ;), not the message itself. =Tony Meyer From brian at brightrock.com Tue Sep 2 09:49:50 2003 From: brian at brightrock.com (Brian Schwarz) Date: Tue Sep 9 19:26:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messages frommailing list as SPAM despite multiple (20+) recoveries fromspam folder References: <1ED4ECF91CDED24C8D012BCF2B034F130308C67B@its-xchg4.massey.ac.nz> Message-ID: <000a01c37169$da6baba0$1fd2f10a@amr.corp.intel.com> Meyer, Tony wrote: >> It's not a big issue, but I've noticed that my m-w.com "word >> of the day" is consistently flagged by Spambayes as spam > [...] >> Here is an example of the mailing list messages that keep >> getting mislabeled as spam. > > Would you also be able to send a copy of the tokens (with > scores/count) that this message produces? You can do this via the > "Show Clues" command in the Outlook plug-in, or via the web > interface, or with the "debug" header in hammiefilter. (It would > also be great to know which application you are using). > > It's the clues that provide the clues ;), not the message itself. > > =Tony Meyer Sorry, I should have thought of that. I'm not really that surprised that the message gets flagged as spam initially - I'm just surprised that after a couple of weeks of "teaching" that this mailing list message hasn't been "whitelisted." Spam Score: 0.833733 word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 0.0566883 - - '*S*' 0.724154 - - 'url:mydomain' 0.00493094 17079 0 'url:' 0.0484636 16429 2 'include' 0.0493323 1554 0 'during' 0.0614506 1214 0 'url:1' 0.0647733 1143 0 'which' 0.0908595 766 0 'url:com' 0.135831 17291 7 'version' 0.135846 456 0 'where' 0.148409 403 0 'has' 0.166979 17312 9 'about' 0.177514 17824 10 'did' 0.181311 299 0 'reply-to:no real name:2**0' 0.183654 17096 10 'skip:c 10' 0.192864 17673 11 'text' 0.210474 234 0 'word' 0.21747 221 0 'proto:http' 0.22321 17313 13 'that' 0.246672 18646 16 'enter' 0.250835 1298 1 'url:htm' 0.251559 168 0 'media' 0.261618 155 0 'written' 0.302567 111 0 'none' 0.317238 98 0 'url:w' 0.318426 97 0 'url:brian' 0.319623 96 0 'skip:" 10' 0.322246 2479 3 'this' 0.326907 18770 24 'words' 0.330811 87 0 'english' 0.341435 79 0 'often' 0.344198 77 0 'text:' 0.358715 67 0 'browser' 0.366442 62 0 'term' 0.369627 60 0 'email,' 0.37124 59 0 'for' 0.371932 19209 30 'html' 0.372868 58 0 'usually' 0.372868 58 0 'header:Reply-To:1' 0.374258 17122 27 'incorporated' 0.374509 57 0 'the' 0.376997 19421 31 'subject:the' 0.37984 671 1 'know?' 0.384672 51 0 'paste' 0.384672 51 0 'subscribe' 0.388183 49 0 'you' 0.398736 18854 33 'web' 0.60086 1227 5 'subject:: ' 0.603351 2456 10 'have' 0.617628 3010 13 'new' 0.638145 1678 8 'skip:g 10' 0.639491 176 1 'cannot' 0.643938 171 1 'url:gif' 0.646921 374 2 'short' 0.661413 152 1 'unsubscribe' 0.669058 144 1 'turn' 0.686922 126 1 'most' 0.691433 459 3 'please' 0.700634 1728 11 'are' 0.709184 1810 12 'header:Return-Path:1' 0.727515 5327 38 '2003' 0.738932 1147 9 'seem' 0.740766 77 1 'edition' 0.752809 67 1 'click' 0.756326 1891 16 'copy' 0.777908 263 3 'from' 0.780108 2070 20 'morning.' 0.780731 45 1 'as:' 0.787369 40 1 'url:images' 0.787369 40 1 'your' 0.788588 2674 27 'around' 0.79206 235 3 'format' 0.800167 125 2 'example' 0.805531 118 2 'read' 0.806202 208 3 'address' 0.806736 207 3 '©' 0.812228 22 1 'sense' 0.818067 102 2 'email' 0.82774 562 8 'seen' 0.834296 82 2 'beauty' 0.841756 2 1 'comes' 0.848605 65 2 'heard' 0.848605 65 2 'our' 0.856201 1199 20 'following' 0.866762 451 9 'url:html' 0.867593 101 3 'url:www' 0.869709 494 10 'more' 0.870263 942 18 "it's" 0.877004 351 8 'url:http' 0.881513 28 2 'url:info' 0.888028 21 2 'is:' 0.889179 114 4 'here' 0.912533 684 21 '_____' 0.925437 135 7 'from:no real name:2**0' 0.9562 92 10 'header:Received:7' 0.961498 100 12 'header:Message-Id:1' 0.96387 74 11 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.965475 310 29 Message Stream: X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from fmsmsx331.amr.corp.mydomain.com ([132.233.42.135]) by fmsmsx407.amr.corp.mydomain.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 22:02:07 -0700 Received: from fmsmsxvs043.fm.mydomain.com ([132.233.42.129]) by fmsmsx331.amr.corp.mydomain.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 22:02:07 -0700 Received: from petasus.fm.mydomain.com ([10.1.192.37]) by fmsmsxvs043.fm.mydomain.com (NAVGW 2.5.2.11) with SMTP id M2003083122020618594 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 22:02:06 -0700 Received: from hermes.fm.mydomain.com (hermes.fm.mydomain.com [10.1.193.8]) by petasus.fm.mydomain.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/d: inner.mc, v 1.35 2003/05/22 21:18:01 rfjohns1 Exp $) with ESMTP id h814sPO23806 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 04:54:25 GMT Received: from blast1.myfree.com (blast1.myfree.com [64.132.70.201]) by hermes.fm.mydomain.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/d: outer.mc, v 1.66 2003/05/22 21:17:36 rfjohns1 Exp $) with SMTP id h814uocw014412 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 04:57:08 GMT Received: from oahu.startsampling.com ([64.85.80.196]) by blast1.myfree.com with SMTP (Lyris ListManager WIN32 version 6.1b); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:24:04 -0500 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by oahu.startsampling.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h7QKKn412432; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:20:49 -0700 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 23:30:00 -0500 Message-Id: From: word@m-w.com To: BRIAN.W.SCHWARZ@mydomain.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: doxology: M-W's Word of the Day List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: word@m-w.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Return-Path: bounce-mw-20182749@blast1.myfree.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Sep 2003 05:02:07.0576 (UTC) FILETIME=[316D1580:01C37046] Merriam Webster - Word of the Day
< /td>
Where in the media have you seen or heard mentions of the new Collegiate Dictionary?
In newspapers or magazines
Most of this media
None of this media
On television
On the radio
 

 
The Word of the Day for Sep 01 is:

doxology \dahk-SAH-luh-jee\ noun

: a usually short hymn of praise to God

Example sentence:
During the worship service, the congregation sang a joyous doxology that reflected the beauty and warmth of the glorious sunny morning.

Did you know?
"Doxology" passed into English from the Medieval Latin "doxologia," which in turn comes from the Greek term "doxa," meaning "opinion" or "glory," and the suffix "-logia," which refers to oral or written expression. It's logical enough, therefore, that "doxology" has referred to an oral expression of praise and glorification since it first appeared in English around 1645. The word ultimately derives from the Greek verb "dokein," meaning "to seem" or "to seem good." Two cousins of "doxology" via "dokein" are "dogma" and "paradox"; more distant relatives include "decent" and "synecdoche." The Gloria in Excelsis and the Gloria Patri are two of the best-known and most often sung doxologies in contemporary Christianity.

*Indicates the sense illustrated in the example sentence.

 

You Are Subscribed As: BRIAN.W.SCHWARZ@mydomain.com

Subscribe to Word of the Day via the Web: click here
Unsubscribe to Word of the Day via the Web: click here
To change the email format from html to text: click here

Questions about your subscription? click here

© 2003 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated

*mf mwh 090103 BRIAN.W.SCHWARZ@mydomain.com mf*

Enter our "funplex" of new words from the Eleventh Edition of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate® Dictionary! click here

If you cannot read this email, please copy and paste the following address into your web browser to subscribe to the text version of the Merriam-Webster Word of the Day: http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/changeofaddress.iphtml Where in the media have you seen or heard mentions of the new Collegiate Dictionary? In newspapers or magazines Most of this media None of this media On television On the radio The Word of the Day for Sep 01 is: doxology \dahk-SAH-luh-jee\ noun : a usually short hymn of praise to God Example sentence: During the worship service, the congregation sang a joyous doxology that reflected the beauty and warmth of the glorious sunny morning. Did you know? "Doxology" passed into English from the Medieval Latin "doxologia," which in turn comes from the Greek term "doxa," meaning "opinion" or "glory," and the suffix "-logia," which refers to oral or written expression. It's logical enough, therefore, that "doxology" has referred to an oral expression of praise and glorification since it first appeared in English around 1645. The word ultimately derives from the Greek verb "dokein," meaning "to seem" or "to seem good." Two cousins of "doxology" via "dokein" are "dogma" and "paradox"; more distant relatives include "decent" and "synecdoche." The Gloria in Excelsis and the Gloria Patri are two of the best-known and most often sung doxologies in contemporary Christianity. *Indicates the sense illustrated in the example sentence. _____ You Are Subscribed As: BRIAN.W.SCHWARZ@mydomain.com _____ Subscribe to Word of the Day via the Web: click here Unsubscribe to Word of the Day via the Web: click here To change the email format from html to text: click here Questions about your subscription? click here ? 2003 by Merriam-Webster , Incorporated *mf mwh 090103 BRIAN.W.SCHWARZ@mydomain.com mf* _____ Enter our "funplex" of new words from the Eleventh Edition of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate? Dictionary! click here _____ If you cannot read this email, please copy and paste the following address into your web browser to subscribe to the text version of the Merriam-Webster Word of the Day: http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/changeofaddress.iphtml Message Tokens: 273 unique tokens '"-logia,"' '"decent"' '"dogma"' '"dokein"' '"dokein,"' '"doxa,"' '"doxologia,"' '"doxology"' '"funplex"' '"glory,"' '"opinion"' '"paradox";' '"to' '?' '*indicates' '*mf' '090103' '1645.' '2003' '_____' 'about' 'address' 'and' 'appeared' 'are' 'around' 'as:' 'beauty' 'best-known' 'browser' 'cannot' 'cc:none' 'change' 'click' 'collegiate' 'collegiate?' 'comes' 'congregation' 'contemporary' 'content-type:text/plain' 'copy' 'cousins' 'day' 'day:' 'derives' 'dictionary!' 'dictionary?' 'did' 'distant' 'doxologies' 'doxology' 'during' 'edition' 'eleventh' 'email' 'email addr:mydomain.com' 'email name:brian.w.schwarz' 'email,' 'english' 'enough,' 'enter' 'example' 'excelsis' 'expression' 'expression.' 'first' 'following' 'for' 'format' 'from' 'from:addr:m-w.com' 'from:addr:word' 'from:no real name:2**0' 'gloria' 'glorious' 'god' 'good."' 'greek' 'has' 'have' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-Id:1' 'header:Received:7' 'header:Reply-To:1' 'header:Return-Path:1' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'heard' 'here' 'html' 'hymn' 'illustrated' 'include' 'incorporated' 'into' 'is:' "it's" 'joyous' 'know?' 'latin' 'logical' 'magazines' 'meaning' 'media' 'medieval' 'mentions' 'merriam' 'message-id:@blast1.myfree.com' 'mf*' 'more' 'morning.' 'most' 'mwh' 'new' 'newspapers' 'none' 'noun' 'often' 'oral' 'our' 'passed' 'paste' 'patri' 'please' 'praise' 'proto:http' 'questions' 'radio' 'read' 'referred' 'refers' 'reflected' 'relatives' 'reply-to:addr:m-w.com' 'reply-to:addr:word' 'reply-to:no real name:2**0' 's.iphtml>' 'sang' 'seem' 'seem"' 'seen' 'sender:none' 'sense' 'sentence.' 'sentence:' 'sep' 'service,' 'short' 'since' 'skip:" 10' 'skip:\\ 10' 'skip:c 10' 'skip:g 10' 'skip:m 10' 'skip:s 10' 'subject: ' "subject:'" 'subject:-' 'subject:: ' 'subject:Day' 'subject:Word' 'subject:doxology' 'subject:the' 'subscribe' 'subscribed' 'suffix' 'sung' 'sunny' 'television' 'term' 'text' 'text:' 'that' 'the' 'therefore,' 'this' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:brian.w.schwarz' 'to:addr:mydomain.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'turn' 'two' 'ultimately' 'unsubscribe' 'url:' 'url:1' 'url:2121' 'url:2121_r1c3' 'url:2121_r2c3' 'url:2121_r3c2' 'url:2121_r3c3' 'url:2121i' 'url:book' 'url:brian' 'url:c10' 'url:changeofaddres' 'url:changeofaddress' 'url:com' 'url:d' 'url:diction' 'url:doxolo01' 'url:email' 'url:email_open' 'url:faq' 'url:game' 'url:gif' 'url:htm' 'url:html' 'url:http' 'url:http%3a%2f%2fwww%2efranklin%2ecom%2festore%2fdetails%2easp%3fid%3dscd%2 d1870%26nettrackerid%3dmw%2dword%2dof%2dday%26referral%5fcode%3dcramw2io' 'url:http%3a%2f%2fwww%2efranklin%2ecom%2festore%2fdetails%2easp%3fid%3dscd%2 d1870%26nettrackerid%3dmw%2dword%2dof%2dday%26referral%5fcode%3dcramw2ioi' 'url:http%3a%2f%2fwww%2emerriam%2dwebster%2ecom%2fgame%2f' 'url:http%3a%2f%2fwww%2emerriam%2dwebster%2ecom%2fgame%2fi' 'url:http%3a%2f%2fwww%2emerriam%2dwebstercollegiate%2ecom%2finfo%2feleventh% 2ehtm' 'url:http%3a%2f%2fwww%2emerriam%2dwebstercollegiate%2ecom%2finfo%2feleventh% 2ehtmi' 'url:image' 'url:images' 'url:info' 'url:mydomain' 'url:iphtml' 'url:item' 'url:m-w' 'url:merriam-webster' 'url:merriam-webstercollegiate' 'url:merriam-websterunabridged' 'url:new_words' 'url:pixel' 'url:poll_report' 'url:r1c3' 'url:r2c3' 'url:r3c2' 'url:r3c3' 'url:redirector' 'url:register' 'url:schwarz' 'url:sm' 'url:sound' 'url:startsampling' 'url:url' 'url:w' 'url:wav' 'url:webster_haveasay_wide' 'url:webster_sound2' 'url:webster_wotdemail_mwon' 'url:webster_wotdemail_nav' 'url:webster_wotdemail_unab' 'url:webster_wotdemail_wc' 'url:webster_wotdemail_wg' 'url:wod' 'url:wod_underlink_filler' 'url:wordcentral' 'url:wotdemail_head' 'url:wotdemail_pic' 'url:www' 'usually' 'verb' 'version' 'via' 'warmth' 'web' 'web:' 'webster' 'where' 'which' 'word' 'words' 'worship' 'written' 'x-mailer:none' 'you' 'your' From rmalayter at bai.org Fri Sep 5 18:26:26 2003 From: rmalayter at bai.org (Ryan Malayter) Date: Tue Sep 9 19:26:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] some messages aren't scored correctly Message-ID: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2AF3D3F0@cliff.bai.org> With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be moved into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you have any thoughts. Regards, Ryan Malayter Sr. Network & Database Administrator Bank Administration Institute Chicago, Illinois, USA PGP Key: http://www.malayter.com/pgp-public.txt ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. -Sir Winston Churchill From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 9 17:40:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 9 19:40:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803501 ] pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Message-ID: Bugs item #803501, was opened at 2003-09-09 16:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris DeSalvo (phixus) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Initial Comment: I just downloaded the 1.0a5 spambayes package, unpacked it, ran setup.py install; and then did the following: [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python -V Python 2.3 [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python pop3proxy.py - b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 819, in ? run() File "pop3proxy.py", line 800, in run prepare(state=state) File "pop3proxy.py", line 736, in prepare state.createWorkers() File "pop3proxy.py", line 617, in createWorkers self.bayes = storage.open_storage(filename, self.useDB) File "/Users/chris/Desktop/spambayes-1.0a5/spambayes/ storage.py", line 652, in open_storage print >> sys.stderr, """\ UnboundLocalError: local variable 'sys' referenced before assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 From tim.one at comcast.net Tue Sep 9 22:47:36 2003 From: tim.one at comcast.net (Tim Peters) Date: Tue Sep 9 21:47:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messagesfrommailing list as SPAM despite multiple (20+) recoveriesfromspam folder In-Reply-To: <000a01c37169$da6baba0$1fd2f10a@amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: [Brian Schwarz] >>> It's not a big issue, but I've noticed that my m-w.com "word >>> of the day" is consistently flagged by Spambayes as spam [...] >>> Here is an example of the mailing list messages that keep >>> getting mislabeled as spam. [Tony Meyer] >> Would you also be able to send a copy of the tokens (with >> scores/count) that this message produces? You can do this via the >> "Show Clues" command in the Outlook plug-in, or via the web >> interface, or with the "debug" header in hammiefilter. (It would >> also be great to know which application you are using). >> >> It's the clues that provide the clues ;), not the message itself. [Brian] > Sorry, I should have thought of that. I'm not really that surprised > that the message gets flagged as spam initially - I'm just surprised > that after a couple of weeks of "teaching" that this mailing list > message hasn't been "whitelisted." > > Spam Score: 0.833733 > > > word spamprob #ham #spam > '*H*' 0.0566883 - - > '*S*' 0.724154 - - > 'url:mydomain' 0.00493094 17079 0 Yikes! From this line I deduce you trained on about 378 *times* more ham messages than spam messages. spambayes works best if you train on an approximately equal number of each. Continuing to train on even more ham than spam probably isn't going to help you at all. So try balancing your training data (i.e., train on much less ham) and see what happens. If you don't want to try that, find your default_bayes_customize.ini file, and change the line experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: True to experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False That should help your specific problem a lot, but may increase the false negative rate too (may give hammier scores to genuine spam messages). If you try it, let us know what happens. Nobody developing this code had such extreme training-set imbalance, and we really don't know what to do about it. Nothing we've tried so far works well for everyone in its presence (apart from users finding a way to balance their training data themselves). From sourceforge at rodland.no Wed Sep 10 09:51:08 2003 From: sourceforge at rodland.no (Fredrik Rodland) Date: Wed Sep 10 02:52:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] some messages aren't scored correctly In-Reply-To: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2AF3D3F0@cliff.bai.org> Message-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: spambayes-bugs-bounces@python.org > [mailto:spambayes-bugs-bounces@python.org]On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter > Sent: 6. september 2003 00:26 > To: spambayes-bugs@python.org > Subject: [spambayes-bugs] some messages aren't scored correctly > > > With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my > spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the > message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, > even though they had to be scored above 90% to be moved into my spam > folder. I think this is the same problem as mentioned in bug #785637 see: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=785637&group_id=617 02&atid=498103 F -- Fredrik Rodland Technical Architect, Stocknet, Oslo, Norway Stocknet: http://www.stocknet.com phone: +47 23 28 40 17 Private: http://rodland.no phone: +47 99 21 98 17 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 00:52:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 02:52:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cvdw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-10 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 yes i understand that by i want it to be simple and thus i turn off automatic train when i move it to that folder. is there any work around that i can use? cliff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 21:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 01:18:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 03:18:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-09 09:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-10 19:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Move it into a spam folder and use Outlook's autoarchive facility to delete the mail (or move it to deleted items) after 1 day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-10 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 yes i understand that by i want it to be simple and thus i turn off automatic train when i move it to that folder. is there any work around that i can use? cliff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 05:51:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 07:51:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803321 ] encrypted email Message-ID: Bugs item #803321, was opened at 2003-09-09 17:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by deanadams You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Adams (deanadams) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: encrypted email Initial Comment: Great job on the Outlook plugin - really appreciate the effort. Just one observation so far. I receive a number of encrypted emails (S/MIME format). When SpamBayes tries to examine the emails, I naturally get a prompt to unlock the private key (enter the keystore password). By the time I have done this, more emails have arrived which seem to be ignored by SpamBayes, and it then carries on with emails that are still in the process of being downloaded. Of course I can subsequently go back and "Delete As Spam" the missed emails, but it would be nice if SpamBayes handled this better. Any hints on how to configure SpamBayes to deal with this better, or is it out of scope in the current version? For info: I am on Win2K pro with Outlook 2K using SpamBayes 0.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dean Adams (deanadams) Date: 2003-09-10 11:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862750 Sorry if this is a dumb question, but according to the online version of Outlook2000/about.html I need to: enable background filtering of messages, via the SpamBayes Manager's Advanced tab. Unfortunately I don't seem to have an Advanced tab - any other hints as to how I set background filtering? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Try setting "background processing" - that should catch up the mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 06:11:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 08:11:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803321 ] encrypted email Message-ID: Bugs item #803321, was opened at 2003-09-09 17:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by deanadams You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Adams (deanadams) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: encrypted email Initial Comment: Great job on the Outlook plugin - really appreciate the effort. Just one observation so far. I receive a number of encrypted emails (S/MIME format). When SpamBayes tries to examine the emails, I naturally get a prompt to unlock the private key (enter the keystore password). By the time I have done this, more emails have arrived which seem to be ignored by SpamBayes, and it then carries on with emails that are still in the process of being downloaded. Of course I can subsequently go back and "Delete As Spam" the missed emails, but it would be nice if SpamBayes handled this better. Any hints on how to configure SpamBayes to deal with this better, or is it out of scope in the current version? For info: I am on Win2K pro with Outlook 2K using SpamBayes 0.7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dean Adams (deanadams) Date: 2003-09-10 12:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862750 Update - sorry. Now that I have upgraded to SpamBayes release 0.81 - I have an Advanced tab with the background filtering options being presented. Thanks for the help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dean Adams (deanadams) Date: 2003-09-10 11:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862750 Sorry if this is a dumb question, but according to the online version of Outlook2000/about.html I need to: enable background filtering of messages, via the SpamBayes Manager's Advanced tab. Unfortunately I don't seem to have an Advanced tab - any other hints as to how I set background filtering? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Try setting "background processing" - that should catch up the mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 08:28:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 10:28:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803771 ] Outlook synchronization fails Message-ID: Bugs item #803771, was opened at 2003-09-10 14:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook synchronization fails Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2002 SP2 on Windows XP SP1 on Compaq Evo. With SpamBayes plugin installed, Outlook will not sync online with offline content: the "time remaining" value on the task grows continuously and apparently without limit. Problem can be avoided by deinstalling the plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 09:14:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 11:14:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log Message-ID: Bugs item #803798, was opened at 2003-09-10 15:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI errors in spambayesX.log Initial Comment: Although my SpamBayes Outlook plug-in 008.1 seems to be working OK (Win2Ksp3, OL XPsp2), I suspect something isn't right under the covers - perhaps it's now not learning any more. This is what I often (but not always get) for new mails: Unexpected MAPI error saving the spam score for ObjectChangedException: Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE error 0x80040109 Message 'RE: Call 12574 : DAC access toodscommscausescrashonserverandDac itself' had a Spam classification of 'No' Actually, perhaps it's the tagging of messages that isn't working (which I wouldn't notice, since I haven't set anything up to show that). This seems similar to bug 787676 (at least this error message also appears there), but I do not use either Exchange or Hotmail, so I cannot detect whether this is a different issue or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 09:59:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 11:59:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803819 ] Outlook from source reverts to old source location Message-ID: Bugs item #803819, was opened at 2003-09-10 10:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803819&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Franz Nisswandt (fln) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook from source reverts to old source location Initial Comment: I've been running this excellent add-in for Outlook 2000 (from source, not the DLL) for a couple of months. I had not originally followed the directions :: I had merely extracted the source zip to C:\python\spambayes-1.0a5 \Outlook2000 and registered the addin (v1.0a4) by running addin.py from that folder. I downloaded 1.0a5 source and followed the setup instructions more thoroughly and letting it install spambayes in the c:\python22\lib\site-packages folder, etc... I then moved the Outlook2000 folder from the extract location to c:\python22\lib\site- packages\spambayes and unregistered and reregistered the addin: addin.py --unregister addin.py from that folder. At this point, the plugin will no longer load. If I run manager.py from a cmd prompt, I get the attached output - in which it is referencing (from somewhere in the registry or outlook) the old c:\python\spambayes1.0a5\Outlook2000 folder where it was originally found. I can't seem to make Outlook (or python?) look for the new location and new version! I've checked the registry and used regmon and filemon - sure enough, filemon checks both the old 1.0a4 and 1.0a5 extract folders for the files. I'm running Python 2.2.3 and the Win32com extensions 1.56. I've even unregistered, deleted the Application Data\Spambayes stuff, reregistered, viewed the newly created .ini and .pck files, etc... to no avail. Thanks, FLN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803819&group_id=61702 From rmalayter at bai.org Wed Sep 10 13:29:28 2003 From: rmalayter at bai.org (Ryan Malayter) Date: Wed Sep 10 13:29:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] some messages aren't scored correctly Message-ID: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2AF3D3FC@cliff.bai.org> From: Fredrik Rodland [mailto:sourceforge@rodland.no] > I think this is the same problem as mentioned in bug #785637 I don't think so, since I'm not opening SpamBayes manager at all. It happens all by itself as messages come in. From rmalayter at bai.org Wed Sep 10 14:03:44 2003 From: rmalayter at bai.org (Ryan Malayter) Date: Wed Sep 10 14:03:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messages frommailing list as SPAM Message-ID: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2AF3D3FD@cliff.bai.org> From: Tim Peters [mailto:tim.one@comcast.net] > Yikes! From this line I deduce you trained > on about 378 *times* more ham messages than > spam messages. Wait a minute... I have trained on 6774 ham and 2771 spam. Here's what I get when I show spam clues for a message: word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 5.4734e-014 - - '*S*' 1 - - I something screwy here? I'm running 0.800.1 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 12:04:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 14:04:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-803901 ] spambayes-1.0a5 DB_RUNRECOVERY when training Message-ID: Support Requests item #803901, was opened at 2003-09-10 14:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=803901&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yom Gritzko (somecallmetim) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes-1.0a5 DB_RUNRECOVERY when training Initial Comment: I installed spambayes-1.0a5 into a directory on my Windows XP box. I copied the hammie.db and the bayescustomize.ini from myspambayes-1.0a4 directory into the spambayes-1.0a5 directory. I fired up spambayes and was able to successfully train using some received messages. I went into the configuration page then to the advanced I said yes to adding the probability score to the header and saved the configuration. Sometime later...I'm not sure when, when I tried to train I get the following error: Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 309, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 552, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 560, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\classifier.py", line 276, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\classifier.py", line 411, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 257, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "D:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "D:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 90, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') I went back into the advanced configuration and clicked on the restore button and I get this: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 703, in onRestoredefaults self.reReadOptions() File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 510, in reReadOptions state.bayes.store() File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 201, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "D:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "D:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 90, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') How does one recover the database? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=803901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 12:14:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 14:14:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-803901 ] spambayes-1.0a5 DB_RUNRECOVERY when training Message-ID: Support Requests item #803901, was opened at 2003-09-10 14:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by somecallmetim You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=803901&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yom Gritzko (somecallmetim) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes-1.0a5 DB_RUNRECOVERY when training Initial Comment: I installed spambayes-1.0a5 into a directory on my Windows XP box. I copied the hammie.db and the bayescustomize.ini from myspambayes-1.0a4 directory into the spambayes-1.0a5 directory. I fired up spambayes and was able to successfully train using some received messages. I went into the configuration page then to the advanced I said yes to adding the probability score to the header and saved the configuration. Sometime later...I'm not sure when, when I tried to train I get the following error: Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 309, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 552, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 560, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\classifier.py", line 276, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\classifier.py", line 411, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 257, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "D:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "D:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 90, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') I went back into the advanced configuration and clicked on the restore button and I get this: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 703, in onRestoredefaults self.reReadOptions() File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 510, in reReadOptions state.bayes.store() File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 201, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "D:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "D:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 90, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') How does one recover the database? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yom Gritzko (somecallmetim) Date: 2003-09-10 14:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=685368 I recopied the hammie db from the 1.0a4 and this time also copied the spambayes.messageinfo file over the ones in the 1. 0a5 directory, restarted spambayes and was able to train some messages once. What files need to be copied when upgrading from 1.0a4 to 1.0a5 if one doesn't want to lose the accumulated training? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=803901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 15:09:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 17:10:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803501 ] pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Message-ID: Bugs item #803501, was opened at 2003-09-09 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris DeSalvo (phixus) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Initial Comment: I just downloaded the 1.0a5 spambayes package, unpacked it, ran setup.py install; and then did the following: [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python -V Python 2.3 [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python pop3proxy.py - b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 819, in ? run() File "pop3proxy.py", line 800, in run prepare(state=state) File "pop3proxy.py", line 736, in prepare state.createWorkers() File "pop3proxy.py", line 617, in createWorkers self.bayes = storage.open_storage(filename, self.useDB) File "/Users/chris/Desktop/spambayes-1.0a5/spambayes/ storage.py", line 652, in open_storage print >> sys.stderr, """\ UnboundLocalError: local variable 'sys' referenced before assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-10 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 The crash is fixed in CVS, storage.py 1.32. You'll still get an error message, but that should make it clear what to do next. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 15:12:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 17:23:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803501 ] pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Message-ID: Bugs item #803501, was opened at 2003-09-09 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris DeSalvo (phixus) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Initial Comment: I just downloaded the 1.0a5 spambayes package, unpacked it, ran setup.py install; and then did the following: [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python -V Python 2.3 [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python pop3proxy.py - b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 819, in ? run() File "pop3proxy.py", line 800, in run prepare(state=state) File "pop3proxy.py", line 736, in prepare state.createWorkers() File "pop3proxy.py", line 617, in createWorkers self.bayes = storage.open_storage(filename, self.useDB) File "/Users/chris/Desktop/spambayes-1.0a5/spambayes/ storage.py", line 652, in open_storage print >> sys.stderr, """\ UnboundLocalError: local variable 'sys' referenced before assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-10 21:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Sorry, I should have said: You can fix your installation by remove the line "import sys" from around line 656 of storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-10 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 The crash is fixed in CVS, storage.py 1.32. You'll still get an error message, but that should make it clear what to do next. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 17:38:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 10 19:38:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804075 ] All mail items non-filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #804075, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:38 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: All mail items non-filterable Initial Comment: >From the list: I started using SpamBayes last week with the .7x version. I just upgraded to .81, but I'm still having a problem I experienced with .7x. Platform: Windows XP Program: Outlook 2000 I started using the plugin on my wife's profile on the machine and it worked great. I then tried to use it in my profile, and the plugin does not work at all. I try to train the SpamBayes and it fails to see any messages. It finishes the training in a split second and ends up saying it has 0 good message and 0 spam. Trying to get the training to see a message, I selected all my folder to train on, and managed to get 1 message to appear as good. I put the folders back to their proper settings, retrained and got the 0 good 0 spam result again... If I try and delete a message as Spam it always says, "No filterable mail items are selected". I don't know what to do. It still works great on my wife's profile though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 From tim.one at comcast.net Wed Sep 10 23:51:24 2003 From: tim.one at comcast.net (Tim Peters) Date: Wed Sep 10 22:51:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messages frommailing list as SPAM In-Reply-To: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2AF3D3FD@cliff.bai.org> Message-ID: [Tim Peters] >> Yikes! From this line I deduce you trained >> on about 378 *times* more ham messages than >> spam messages. [Ryan Malayter] > Wait a minute... I have trained on 6774 ham and 2771 spam. Here's > what I get when I show spam clues for a message: > > word spamprob #ham #spam > '*H*' 5.4734e-014 - - > '*S*' 1 - - > > I something screwy here? I'm running 0.800.1 Umm ... there's nothing in the lines you show there from which I can make any guess about how many ham or spam you trained on. Brian showed more information than that, in particular he showed a line for a word that had appeared in ham but in no spam. From *that* I can deduce the ratio of ham/spam trained on, although how to do so is far from obvious. From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 10 23:07:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 01:07:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804075 ] All mail items non-filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #804075, was opened at 2003-09-10 19:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by awhig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: All mail items non-filterable Initial Comment: >From the list: I started using SpamBayes last week with the .7x version. I just upgraded to .81, but I'm still having a problem I experienced with .7x. Platform: Windows XP Program: Outlook 2000 I started using the plugin on my wife's profile on the machine and it worked great. I then tried to use it in my profile, and the plugin does not work at all. I try to train the SpamBayes and it fails to see any messages. It finishes the training in a split second and ends up saying it has 0 good message and 0 spam. Trying to get the training to see a message, I selected all my folder to train on, and managed to get 1 message to appear as good. I put the folders back to their proper settings, retrained and got the 0 good 0 spam result again... If I try and delete a message as Spam it always says, "No filterable mail items are selected". I don't know what to do. It still works great on my wife's profile though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-09-11 01:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 In response to a question from Mark: Yes, all my emails have the regular envelope icon next to them ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 01:54:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 03:54:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804227 ] Moving the message failed during synchronisation Message-ID: Bugs item #804227, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Moving the message failed during synchronisation Initial Comment: I am using Outlook with Exchange. I was working in "offline mode". During synchronisation with the server, I regularly get an error from SB : "Moving the message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR) : OLE error 0x80040119 It is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity This message will not be reported again until SB is restarted" I see as well that some of the messages in my inbox have "synchronisation error". I assume that this is caused by SB updating the offline messages during the synchronisation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 03:18:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 05:18:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803771 ] Outlook synchronization fails Message-ID: Bugs item #803771, was opened at 2003-09-10 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by martin2305 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook synchronization fails Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2002 SP2 on Windows XP SP1 on Compaq Evo. With SpamBayes plugin installed, Outlook will not sync online with offline content: the "time remaining" value on the task grows continuously and apparently without limit. Problem can be avoided by deinstalling the plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Date: 2003-09-11 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862657 I confirm this behaviour, which applied at release 0.7, still occurs at 0.81. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 03:56:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 05:57:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir Message-ID: Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-09 13:33 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702 Category: hammie >Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 8 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir Initial Comment: If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message, mboxtrain.py dies with Traceback (most recent call last): File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ? main() File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main train(h, g, False, force, trainnew) File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"), is_spam, force) File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train f = file(tfn, "wb") IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com What's with /cur/tmp/ ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-09 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry, I missed that maildir_train would then try to pick it up as a file. In any case, the v1.10 fix should still work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-07-09 14:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 And, worse yet, this "workaround" does not work for obvious reasons: Traceback (most recent call last): File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ? main() File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main train(h, g, False, force, trainnew) File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"), is_spam, force) File "./mboxtrain.py", line 118, in maildir_train os.rename(tfn, cfn) OSError: [Errno} 21] Is a directory ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-09 14:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, I see. This was introduced in v1.6. Fixed in v1.10. You should be able to get this version of mboxtrain and drop it into the a4 release. (note that sf pserver cvs is crappy at the moment, so it might take a while for v1.10 to be visible). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-07-09 14:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 The temporary directory is Maildir/tmp, not Maildir/cur/tmp. The observed behavior is a regression wrt v1.0a2; creating a new directory is a hacky workaround. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-09 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 /cur/tmp/ is where a temporary copy of the message is stored until it is renamed to the /cur/ name. If you create the /cur/tmp/ directory, this should work. I suppose mboxtrain should check that this directory exists, and create it if it doesn't (like pop3proxy does for it's directories). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 03:56:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 05:57:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784296 ] imapfilter broken with Python 2.3 Message-ID: Bugs item #784296, was opened at 2003-08-07 03:27 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784296&group_id=61702 Category: None >Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sebastian Kaliszewski (sebaska) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: imapfilter broken with Python 2.3 Initial Comment: imapfilter.py does not work properly with newly released Python 2.3 The problem is in fact bug/stupidity in 2.3's imaplib, but since it's released and workaround is simple, it would be nicwe if workaround were in fact implemented in spambayes. The solution is to change line 231 of imapfilter.py from: response = self.select(folder, False) into: response = self.select(folder, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-07 09:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for this. Fixed in cvs, imapfilter.py v1.50 Even in Python 2.2 the correct parameter to pass was None, it was just that the way the test was written False would also pass. So my bug, really. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784296&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 03:56:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 05:57:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792652 ] SMTP proxy not starting Message-ID: Bugs item #792652, was opened at 2003-08-22 03:55 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792652&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy >Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wade Ford (cwford) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SMTP proxy not starting Initial Comment: Just installed 1.0a4 on win2k. When I run the pop3proxy.py from the command line everything works fine. If I install as service and run as "net start pop3proxy" the pop proxy starts and works as expected. However the smtp proxy doesn't start. Neither my mail client (Eudora) nor telnet to the proper port produces a response. Not being a python programmer, I am a little lost as to how to debug. Since everything is fine from the command line, my guess is that since it is running as a service it is somehow losing the correct directory and is unable to load the smtpproxy.py file. Help would be appreciated. ===== bayescustomize.ini below ====== [Headers] include_evidence:False include_score:True include_thermostat:True [html_ui] display_to:True [pop3proxy] add_mailid_to:header listen_ports:1110,1111 remote_servers:mail.dallas.net,postoffice.dallas.agency.c om [smtpproxy] ham_address:ham@localhost listen_ports:2500 remote_servers:postoffice.dallas.agency.com spam_address:spam@localhost ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-23 10:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This was recently fixed in cvs, and so will be fixed for the next release. The problem was much simpler than you speculated; the service code simply wasn't starting smtpproxy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792652&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 03:56:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 05:57:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797200 ] UnicodeError(ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range(128) Message-ID: Bugs item #797200, was opened at 2003-08-29 20:32 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797200&group_id=61702 Category: hammie >Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gisli Ottarsson (gisli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: UnicodeError(ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range(128) Initial Comment: I received a message which generated an exception during classification. The message header contains the following: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)) in append() at /usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 272: ustr = unicode(s, incodec, errors) I have attached the message. Please do not be confuesed by the upstream spam filtering provided by my company. This filtering is very conservative and I am trying to supplement it with SpamBayes. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-30 15:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797200&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 03:56:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 06:00:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796984 ] Sudden error after functioning normally Message-ID: Bugs item #796984, was opened at 2003-08-29 07:38 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796984&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy >Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rene Goldsweer (floortje) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Sudden error after functioning normally Initial Comment: After using Spambayes 1.04 with Python 2.3 succesfully, all of the sudden the message header in my emails are showing this error: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in probability() at ? ? ? ? C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert ? ? ? ? hamcount <= nham I'm using WindowsXP SP1 with Pocomail 3.01. I use pop3proxy of which I use the default settings, I've only put in my pop3 adresses and the smtp address. Greetz, Floortje. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 13:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your database has become corrupt. The only option is to retrain from scratch. While you're doing this, you should also upgrade to 1.0a5, which fixes a number of bugs, including a possible cause of this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796984&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 04:02:56 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 06:02:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804227 ] Moving the message failed during synchronisation Message-ID: Bugs item #804227, was opened at 2003-09-11 17:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Moving the message failed during synchronisation Initial Comment: I am using Outlook with Exchange. I was working in "offline mode". During synchronisation with the server, I regularly get an error from SB : "Moving the message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR) : OLE error 0x80040119 It is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity This message will not be reported again until SB is restarted" I see as well that some of the messages in my inbox have "synchronisation error". I assume that this is caused by SB updating the offline messages during the synchronisation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-11 20:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 04:11:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 06:11:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804227 ] Moving the message failed during synchronisation Message-ID: Bugs item #804227, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Moving the message failed during synchronisation Initial Comment: I am using Outlook with Exchange. I was working in "offline mode". During synchronisation with the server, I regularly get an error from SB : "Moving the message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR) : OLE error 0x80040119 It is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity This message will not be reported again until SB is restarted" I see as well that some of the messages in my inbox have "synchronisation error". I assume that this is caused by SB updating the offline messages during the synchronisation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-11 12:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 log attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-11 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 06:37:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 08:38:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804364 ] Outlook hangs when receiving messages Message-ID: Bugs item #804364, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs when receiving messages Initial Comment: Using Windows 98, Outlook 2000 SP3, Pentium II-350, 128MB RAM, Spambayes Outlook Addin 0.81. Outlook rules move messages from the Inbox to three folders. Spambayes is configured to watch three folders. Approximately 80% of the time when an email comes in to be filtered, Outlook hangs and the only way to clear it is to End Task. I have tried both enabling and disabling the filter timer but have the same results. Disabling Spambayes eliminates the problem. I have attached a log file. The first portion of the file is the log immediately after Outlook hanging and being shut down. This portion of the log doesn't show the email that was coming in to be filtered. The second portion of the file is the log after I have restarted Outlook. This portion does show the email that was coming in when Outlook hung. When working, Spambayes is properly identifying up to 97 percent of the spam I receive over three accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 09:20:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 11:20:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804513 ] New mail icon Message-ID: Bugs item #804513, was opened at 2003-09-11 10:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804513&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Newby (bnewby17) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: New mail icon Initial Comment: When new spam arrives the new mail icon still appears in the system tray even when the addin parameters are set up to mark spam as read. The new mail sound still plays also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804513&group_id=61702 From rmalayter at bai.org Thu Sep 11 12:37:01 2003 From: rmalayter at bai.org (Ryan Malayter) Date: Thu Sep 11 12:37:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messages frommailing list as SPAM Message-ID: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2A01115181@cliff.bai.org> From: Tim Peters [mailto:tim.one@comcast.net] > Umm ... there's nothing in the lines you show > there from which I can make any guess about how > many ham or spam you trained on. Brian showed > more information than that, in particular he > showed a line for a word that had appeared in > ham but in no spam. From *that* I can deduce > the ratio of ham/spam trained on, although > how to do so is far from obvious. What exactly are '*H*' and '*S*' then? I thought they represented the ratio of incoming ham to spam... From tim.one at comcast.net Thu Sep 11 13:46:11 2003 From: tim.one at comcast.net (Tim Peters) Date: Thu Sep 11 12:46:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messages frommailing list as SPAM In-Reply-To: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2A01115181@cliff.bai.org> Message-ID: [Ryan Malayter] > What exactly are '*H*' and '*S*' then? I thought they represented the > ratio of incoming ham to spam... spambayes creates two scores internally, one for ham (*H*), the other for spam (*S*). The final score spambayes delivers is a combination of those two: final score = (1 + *S* - *H*) / 2 *S* and *H* both range from 0 to 1 inclusive. The combined score is basically *S*-*H*, linearly rescaled so that it too always lies 0 through 1. The number of ham, number of spam, and ratio of ham/spam trained on can't be deduced from them, and both typically differ between any pair of messages you look at. From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 11:03:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 13:03:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804578 ] Wrong folder referenced Message-ID: Support Requests item #804578, was opened at 2003-09-11 10:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804578&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Wrong folder referenced Initial Comment: When I first ran Spambayes (pop3proxy service in windows) I did it in the folder I downloaded it into. I have since moved it to another folder but the headers added to my email show an error that references the original folder. Where is that folder referenced? I can't find it to change it. The current location is C:\Program Files\spambayes\ Old location was C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\ Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 437, in onRetr . evidence=True). File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob. File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 460, in _getclues. File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 310, in probability.AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804578&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 11:16:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 13:16:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804578 ] Wrong folder referenced Message-ID: Support Requests item #804578, was opened at 2003-09-11 10:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jasonsf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804578&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Wrong folder referenced Initial Comment: When I first ran Spambayes (pop3proxy service in windows) I did it in the folder I downloaded it into. I have since moved it to another folder but the headers added to my email show an error that references the original folder. Where is that folder referenced? I can't find it to change it. The current location is C:\Program Files\spambayes\ Old location was C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\ Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 437, in onRetr . evidence=True). File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob. File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 460, in _getclues. File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 310, in probability.AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf) Date: 2003-09-11 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=728935 OK, I fixed the first problem by deleting all the .pyc files that had been compiled before I moved the directory. Now I'm getting the following error in the headers: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 437, in onRetr . evidence=True) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob. clues = self._getclues(wordstream) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 460, in _getclues. prob = self.probability(record) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 310, in probability. assert spamcount <= nspam.AssertionError What might cause this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804578&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 15:39:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 17:39:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804742 ] Auto Filter Message-ID: Support Requests item #804742, was opened at 2003-09-11 16:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Auto Filter Initial Comment: My newly installed version does not automatically filter new mail as it arrives. If I click 'filter messages' then 'start filtering' it seems to do a great job of moving only my spam, but it does nothing until I click this. Is this suppose to happen? Is there a setting I don't know about? Thanks, -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 17:08:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 19:08:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 08:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by informsystems You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 16:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 20:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 18:56:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 20:56:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804513 ] New mail icon Message-ID: Bugs item #804513, was opened at 2003-09-12 03:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804513&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Newby (bnewby17) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: New mail icon Initial Comment: When new spam arrives the new mail icon still appears in the system tray even when the addin parameters are set up to mark spam as read. The new mail sound still plays also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-12 12:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.9: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804513&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 18:58:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 20:58:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804578 ] Wrong folder referenced Message-ID: Support Requests item #804578, was opened at 2003-09-12 05:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804578&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Wrong folder referenced Initial Comment: When I first ran Spambayes (pop3proxy service in windows) I did it in the folder I downloaded it into. I have since moved it to another folder but the headers added to my email show an error that references the original folder. Where is that folder referenced? I can't find it to change it. The current location is C:\Program Files\spambayes\ Old location was C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\ Error: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 437, in onRetr . evidence=True). File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob. File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 460, in _getclues. File "C:\Documents and Settings\this user\My Documents\downloads\spam\spambayes-1.0a5 \spambayes\classifier.py", line 310, in probability.AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-12 12:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your database is corrupted. You'll need to retrain from scratch. 1.0a5 should have fixed the main cause of corruption, so hopefully this was just a result from the moving of the files. If your database becomes corrupted again (with 1.0a5) please open a bug with details about how you operate (that you use the service, how you train, and so on). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf) Date: 2003-09-12 05:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=728935 OK, I fixed the first problem by deleting all the .pyc files that had been compiled before I moved the directory. Now I'm getting the following error in the headers: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 437, in onRetr . evidence=True) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob. clues = self._getclues(wordstream) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 460, in _getclues. prob = self.probability(record) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 310, in probability. assert spamcount <= nspam.AssertionError What might cause this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804578&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 11 19:34:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 11 21:34:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804812 ] won't classify all new mail from a pop server that has old m Message-ID: Bugs item #804812, was opened at 2003-09-11 21:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804812&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: B0nzo (b0nzo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: won't classify all new mail from a pop server that has old m Initial Comment: I am running: spambayes-1.0a5 (getting mail from two different pop servers) RedHat 9 Kmail After properly shutting down SpamBayes, Kmail and then my machine, the next morning SpamBayes does not classify the first few e-mails from one of the 3 pop servers that I use. After, much investigation, I discovered that Kmail places several files in "/home/myusername/.kde/share/apps/kmail" (myusername is a munge of the actual user name). These files are called (after SpamBayes installation) mungeduser@localhost:port#_that_email_client_points_to, there is one of these files for each pop server or in the case of one of the pop servers that I have two accounts on there are two of these files each pointing to the same server and port but with a different user name, reflecting my user names on the pop server. The purpose of these files is to keep track of what you want to download later and what is to be kept on the server. This is reflected by two commands: downloadLater= seenUidList= In my case there are perhaps 80 e-mails that I have chosen to keep on one of the servers, so after seenUidList= there are a series of numbers separated by commas. I don't think that it is a coincidence that this is the server from which e-mails are not being classified all of the time. (the problem occurs only the first one or two times that I get my e-mail after starting SpamBayes and kmail in the morning. As an experiment I moved these files to another directory and recreated them, leaving the command in Kmail to leave the e-mail on the server. By recreating the files I had emptied them so that Kmail was not aware of what was on the server. I did this twice, the first time Kmail/SpamBayes proceeded to download the mail from the server but hung after the first few e-mails were downloaded. The messages that appeared in the terminal were: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``the first time that I've been on my windows machine in many months so I '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``ZXJlIENhdGFsb2cgTWFuYWdlci4gIFJlc3VsdGVkIGluIGN1c3RvbWVycyBnZXR0aW5nIG5ldyBj'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``AAAAABYHAAAAAAAAPAoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABH'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 110, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before first header error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.ServerLineReader connected at 0x83580a4> (exceptions.ValueError:unpack list of wrong size [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|99] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|396] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|handle_read|130] [pop3proxy.py|found_terminator|146] [pop3proxy.py|onServerLine|214] [pop3proxy.py|onResponse|276] [pop3proxy.py|onTransaction|377] [pop3proxy.py|onRetr|509]) Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``Y8bX2Dke4pk7Zj8uT5gOhPUe1UEuGhVomj3e2MDH1qbWHe5fnferSRvuBO5Cvesq7s7nDMkWVbnA'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``Lh1rfy3X88xAnKiqUy/dKACBFbtRHB1V7UZc4Rm4qoOhLoDBn6pfOWZnUzY5PKviPNvr/9BRe6Pb'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``alt="Careers"> '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, I stopped both SpamBayes and Kmail. I Restarted SpamBayes and Kmail and tried the experiment again. It hung again but this time I decided to let it go, after a few minutes it continued to download the emails but did not add any classifications to the rest of the e-mails. (It did add classifications to the first few e-mails.) p3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 110, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before first header Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``we can't afford to be. "Is your ISP blocking us? Is their ISP blocking us?'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``
    '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``sjtVETUus2U8AsHqb18zVUHyhCPhHxY6Is53zU6VeEcHGSsdTQOf+lo4VnpvlpAIwqBxUfFRqpXx'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``eGcDwMGQdb8BztWiF1zgSOf0wGup9IO/POFQv+mwteufEB7WyBPvMcazTvGuP27jYOf4szX+'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``) Breathing Problems?'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``else'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``............................................................'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``//-->'' After this last experiment, I left Kmail and SpamBayes running and all e-mails that arrived subsequent to the experiment were classified. While I might be willing to remove the mail from the server in order to derive the benefits of SpamBayes, I would really rather not. I think that SpamBayes ought to be capable of dealing with mail left on a pop server. For folks like me who retrieve their mail using more than one machine this is essential. When I am on the road I want to read my mail, but when I get back home I want to be able to download that same mail to my home machine. Lanny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804812&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 12 02:41:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 12 04:41:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804927 ] assert hamcount <= nham Message-ID: Bugs item #804927, was opened at 2003-09-12 10:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804927&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: assert hamcount <= nham Initial Comment: Even when using 1.0a5, and after a Win2K power failure while POP3PROXY was running, then POP3PROXY starts without any warning but all received emails generate a trace back: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Python23\Scripts\pop3proxy.py", line 437, in onRetr . evidence=True) . File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob . clues = self._getclues(wordstream) . File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 460, in _getclues . prob = self.probability(record) . File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 307, in probability . assert hamcount <= nham .AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804927&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 12 10:45:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 12 10:45:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804812 ] won't classify all new mail from a pop server that has old m Message-ID: Bugs item #804812, was opened at 2003-09-11 21:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by b0nzo You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804812&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: B0nzo (b0nzo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: won't classify all new mail from a pop server that has old m Initial Comment: I am running: spambayes-1.0a5 (getting mail from two different pop servers) RedHat 9 Kmail After properly shutting down SpamBayes, Kmail and then my machine, the next morning SpamBayes does not classify the first few e-mails from one of the 3 pop servers that I use. After, much investigation, I discovered that Kmail places several files in "/home/myusername/.kde/share/apps/kmail" (myusername is a munge of the actual user name). These files are called (after SpamBayes installation) mungeduser@localhost:port#_that_email_client_points_to, there is one of these files for each pop server or in the case of one of the pop servers that I have two accounts on there are two of these files each pointing to the same server and port but with a different user name, reflecting my user names on the pop server. The purpose of these files is to keep track of what you want to download later and what is to be kept on the server. This is reflected by two commands: downloadLater= seenUidList= In my case there are perhaps 80 e-mails that I have chosen to keep on one of the servers, so after seenUidList= there are a series of numbers separated by commas. I don't think that it is a coincidence that this is the server from which e-mails are not being classified all of the time. (the problem occurs only the first one or two times that I get my e-mail after starting SpamBayes and kmail in the morning. As an experiment I moved these files to another directory and recreated them, leaving the command in Kmail to leave the e-mail on the server. By recreating the files I had emptied them so that Kmail was not aware of what was on the server. I did this twice, the first time Kmail/SpamBayes proceeded to download the mail from the server but hung after the first few e-mails were downloaded. The messages that appeared in the terminal were: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``the first time that I've been on my windows machine in many months so I '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``ZXJlIENhdGFsb2cgTWFuYWdlci4gIFJlc3VsdGVkIGluIGN1c3RvbWVycyBnZXR0aW5nIG5ldyBj'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``AAAAABYHAAAAAAAAPAoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABH'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 110, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before first header error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.ServerLineReader connected at 0x83580a4> (exceptions.ValueError:unpack list of wrong size [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|99] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|396] [/usr/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|handle_read|130] [pop3proxy.py|found_terminator|146] [pop3proxy.py|onServerLine|214] [pop3proxy.py|onResponse|276] [pop3proxy.py|onTransaction|377] [pop3proxy.py|onRetr|509]) Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``Y8bX2Dke4pk7Zj8uT5gOhPUe1UEuGhVomj3e2MDH1qbWHe5fnferSRvuBO5Cvesq7s7nDMkWVbnA'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``Lh1rfy3X88xAnKiqUy/dKACBFbtRHB1V7UZc4Rm4qoOhLoDBn6pfOWZnUzY5PKviPNvr/9BRe6Pb'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``alt="Careers"> '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, I stopped both SpamBayes and Kmail. I Restarted SpamBayes and Kmail and tried the experiment again. It hung again but this time I decided to let it go, after a few minutes it continued to download the emails but did not add any classifications to the rest of the e-mails. (It did add classifications to the first few e-mails.) p3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 110, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before first header Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``we can't afford to be. "Is your ISP blocking us? Is their ISP blocking us?'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``
      '' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``sjtVETUus2U8AsHqb18zVUHyhCPhHxY6Is53zU6VeEcHGSsdTQOf+lo4VnpvlpAIwqBxUfFRqpXx'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``eGcDwMGQdb8BztWiF1zgSOf0wGup9IO/POFQv+mwteufEB7WyBPvMcazTvGuP27jYOf4szX+'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``) Breathing Problems?'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``else'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``............................................................'' Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 433, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "spambayes/message.py", line 177, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Parser.py", line 128, in _parseheaders raise Errors.HeaderParseError( HeaderParseError: Not a header, not a continuation: ``//-->'' After this last experiment, I left Kmail and SpamBayes running and all e-mails that arrived subsequent to the experiment were classified. While I might be willing to remove the mail from the server in order to derive the benefits of SpamBayes, I would really rather not. I think that SpamBayes ought to be capable of dealing with mail left on a pop server. For folks like me who retrieve their mail using more than one machine this is essential. When I am on the road I want to read my mail, but when I get back home I want to be able to download that same mail to my home machine. Lanny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: B0nzo (b0nzo) Date: 2003-09-12 10:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=843405 I removed all the mail from the server and tried again this morning. 23 e-mails arrived this morning, 4 were not classified. Is there a way to turn logging on for SpamBayes so that I can see what is happening? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804812&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 12 11:03:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 12 11:03:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799848 ] Cannot activate Outlook plugin Message-ID: Support Requests item #799848, was opened at 2003-09-03 16:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dernik You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot activate Outlook plugin Initial Comment: I was using Outlook 2003 (Beta) together with the spam bayes plugin very sucessfully. Today, the toolbar disconnected. I went to the Com-Add In manager and detected that there is no (!) plugin listed in there. After that i tried to add the spam bayes plugin manually to the list. However, the process (selecting the file and pressing ok) finished successfully, but no entry appeared int the plugin list. I tried then to do a new install of the plugin, which didn't change anything. A removal and a new install also didn't fix the issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Date: 2003-09-12 17:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858264 Solved. The Pugin was deactivated by Outlook. I found at Help -> About a place where the plugin can be reactivated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Date: 2003-09-03 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858264 I tried to register the dll manually: regsvr32 /u spambayes_addin.dll regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll but this failed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 12 11:06:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 12 11:06:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799848 ] Cannot activate Outlook plugin Message-ID: Support Requests item #799848, was opened at 2003-09-03 16:51 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by dernik You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot activate Outlook plugin Initial Comment: I was using Outlook 2003 (Beta) together with the spam bayes plugin very sucessfully. Today, the toolbar disconnected. I went to the Com-Add In manager and detected that there is no (!) plugin listed in there. After that i tried to add the spam bayes plugin manually to the list. However, the process (selecting the file and pressing ok) finished successfully, but no entry appeared int the plugin list. I tried then to do a new install of the plugin, which didn't change anything. A removal and a new install also didn't fix the issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Date: 2003-09-12 17:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858264 Solved. The Pugin was deactivated by Outlook. I found at Help -> About a place where the plugin can be reactivated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dominique Marcus Roller (dernik) Date: 2003-09-03 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858264 I tried to register the dll manually: regsvr32 /u spambayes_addin.dll regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll but this failed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 12 17:29:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 12 17:29:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-805351 ] If cc: address is not qualified, proxy fails to send message Message-ID: Bugs item #805351, was opened at 2003-09-12 14:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805351&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Todd Lawson (willie_the_wimp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: If cc: address is not qualified, proxy fails to send message Initial Comment: I use 1.05a as a pop3proxy on the same machine as the email client. If I fail to qualify my cc: addresses with a domain, the server fails to forward the message and I get the error message shown below. If I add a domain to the address, the message is sent correctly. This problem occurs if the unqualified address is in the cc or bcc field, but not if it is in the to: field. My email client is "THe Bat" v1.61. I use pop3 and smtp for email transfers. Let me know if you need more detail. This is easily reproducible. Thanks! Todd I:\spambayes>pop3proxy.py -b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 25 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:25 SMTP Listener on port 25000 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:25 Listener on port 110 is proxying XXX.com:110 Listener on port 11100 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.ValueError:substring not found [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|read|69] [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|handle_read_event|387] [C:\Python23\lib\asynchat.py|handle_read|136] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|found_terminator|229] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onTransaction|322] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onRcptTo|336] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|splitTo|316] [C:\Python23\lib\string.py|index|145]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.ValueError:substring not found [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|read|69] [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|handle_read_event|387] [C:\Python23\lib\asynchat.py|handle_read|136] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|found_terminator|229] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onTransaction|322] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onRcptTo|336] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|splitTo|316] [C:\Python23\lib\string.py|index|145]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805351&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 12 23:02:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 12 23:02:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 02:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-12 20:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 06:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 12 23:54:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 12 23:54:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804927 ] assert hamcount <= nham Message-ID: Bugs item #804927, was opened at 2003-09-12 20:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804927&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: assert hamcount <= nham Initial Comment: Even when using 1.0a5, and after a Win2K power failure while POP3PROXY was running, then POP3PROXY starts without any warning but all received emails generate a trace back: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Python23\Scripts\pop3proxy.py", line 437, in onRetr . evidence=True) . File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 223, in chi2_spamprob . clues = self._getclues(wordstream) . File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 460, in _getclues . prob = self.probability(record) . File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 307, in probability . assert hamcount <= nham .AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-13 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your database is corrupted and you need to retrain from scratch. This *shouldn't* happen unless you were training at the time of the power failure, but that might not necessarily be the case. You might find that using a pickle (see the FAQ) instead of a dbm is more reliable if this sort of thing happens often. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804927&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 13 00:04:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 13 00:04:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-805351 ] If cc: address is not qualified, proxy fails to send message Message-ID: Bugs item #805351, was opened at 2003-09-13 09:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805351&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Todd Lawson (willie_the_wimp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: If cc: address is not qualified, proxy fails to send message Initial Comment: I use 1.05a as a pop3proxy on the same machine as the email client. If I fail to qualify my cc: addresses with a domain, the server fails to forward the message and I get the error message shown below. If I add a domain to the address, the message is sent correctly. This problem occurs if the unqualified address is in the cc or bcc field, but not if it is in the to: field. My email client is "THe Bat" v1.61. I use pop3 and smtp for email transfers. Let me know if you need more detail. This is easily reproducible. Thanks! Todd I:\spambayes>pop3proxy.py -b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 25 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:25 SMTP Listener on port 25000 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:25 Listener on port 110 is proxying XXX.com:110 Listener on port 11100 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.ValueError:substring not found [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|read|69] [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|handle_read_event|387] [C:\Python23\lib\asynchat.py|handle_read|136] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|found_terminator|229] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onTransaction|322] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onRcptTo|336] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|splitTo|316] [C:\Python23\lib\string.py|index|145]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.ValueError:substring not found [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|read|69] [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|handle_read_event|387] [C:\Python23\lib\asynchat.py|handle_read|136] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|found_terminator|229] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onTransaction|322] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onRcptTo|336] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|splitTo|316] [C:\Python23\lib\string.py|index|145]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-13 16:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks. Fixed in sb_smtpproxy v1.2 (so this will be in the fixed in the 1.0a6 release). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805351&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 13 01:18:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 13 01:18:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query should show all words starting with certain text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text Initial Comment: Word query should show all words starting with certain text if the user adds * in the end For example: url:great* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-13 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, but not yet checked in (in anyone else was thinking of doing it). I'll check it in once the 1.0 branch is ready so that it doesn't contaminate that. It can do wildcard seaches with both ? and *, and also a general regex search. It also provides the option to ignore case or not, and alter the maximum number of returned results. There's an option that controls whether you see this box or the simple search one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For 1.1a1, it would be good to have a separate "advanced find" query available (and revert the old one). This would allow you to specify the maximum number of words found, and also allow regex searches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To change it to 100, all you have to do is add one zero in UserInterface.py. If lots (more than one ;) of people want more control over this, then I'll change it to an 'advanced' lookup to complement the existing one, and have options like this. 100 takes a long time, and results in a massive html page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Date: 2003-09-02 04:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=778595 Thanks! A limit of 100 would have been better, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, and should have just squeaked into 1.0a5. It works as described above. The one side-effect is that if a token ends with "*", then you can't search for it alone any more (you'll still get the result, but may also get other words, unless there are lots of them (see below), then you might not). If this becomes a problem, then we'll have to either escape '*' (ugly), or have a separate 'wildcard' search. It didn't look very good when there were too many results - and it could take a long time, and on this machine at least, crash, if there were too many. So there's a hard limit of 10 results that will be displayed, along with the number of results that matched, but aren't displayed. If this bothers you or you want to increase the limit, it's a one line change that should be easy to find. If people ask for it, then this can become an exposed option (again, probably via a special wildcard search). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 13 04:15:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 13 04:15:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796836 ] Show message tokens Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796836, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Show message tokens Initial Comment: "Show spam clues" does not show all of them. Perhaps the list should be just paged. The Outlook add-in already does this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-13 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just in case anyone else is thinking of implementing this: I've finished writing this all up. There's now a button to show clues and one to show tokens. Both of them show the word, the prob, and the ham and spam count. The clues button shows both the current prob & clues and the original ones, if they are available. I'll check this in once the 1.0 branch is created. It'll appear in the first 1.1 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To clarify (I've done this on the list already, but for anyone else reading this): The "slow clues" on the web interface shows all of the clues that were used in scoring the message. This does not mean all *tokens*. Tokens that have a probability of 0.4 to 0.6 are not used in scoring (by default), and only 150 (by default) are used in total. What I think I'll do (for 1.1a1) is add a new option: "show tokens", which shows all the tokens. I'll also update the 'show clues' list to show not just the word and probability, but also the number of (trained) ham & spam messages it has appeared in, a al the Outlook plug-in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 13 23:40:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 13 23:40:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-805852 ] need python-dev package on Debian Message-ID: Bugs item #805852, was opened at 2003-09-13 22:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805852&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Elliott Finley (brianfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: need python-dev package on Debian Initial Comment: When installing on a Debian system, one may encounter an error such as: finley@mantis:~/src/spambayes-1.0a5% ./setup.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./setup.py", line 10, in ? from distutils.core import setup ImportError: No module named distutils.core This can be remedied with an "apt-get install python-dev". Might be a nice thing to add to the README.txt. Cheers, -Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805852&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 14 19:14:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 14 19:14:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806238 ] urllib2 fails in Outlook new-version chk Message-ID: Bugs item #806238, was opened at 2003-09-14 19:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806238&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: urllib2 fails in Outlook new-version chk Initial Comment: Maybe a Python bug! Don't know. Using the addin from CVS, and right now on Win98SE. Python 2.3. Here's a one-liner showing the same problem the addin sees: >>> import urllib2 >>> urllib2.urlopen ("http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg") Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 136, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 333, in open '_open', req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 849, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTP, req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 843, in do_open return self.parent.error('http', req, fp, code, msg, hdrs) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 353, in error result = self._call_chain(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 479, in http_error_302 return self.parent.open(new) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 333, in open '_open', req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 849, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTP, req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 843, in do_open return self.parent.error('http', req, fp, code, msg, hdrs) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 359, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 419, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found Strangely, there's no problem if I use urllib instead: >>> import urllib >>> urllib.urlopen ("http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg") > >>> _.read() '# This file is generated from spambayes/Version.py - do not edit\n[SpamBayes]\nDate:July 2003\nFull Description:%(Description)s, version ... Etc -- it gets the whole file fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806238&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 14 19:38:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 14 19:38:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806238 ] urllib2 fails in Outlook new-version chk Message-ID: Bugs item #806238, was opened at 2003-09-14 19:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806238&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: urllib2 fails in Outlook new-version chk Initial Comment: Maybe a Python bug! Don't know. Using the addin from CVS, and right now on Win98SE. Python 2.3. Here's a one-liner showing the same problem the addin sees: >>> import urllib2 >>> urllib2.urlopen ("http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg") Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 136, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 333, in open '_open', req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 849, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTP, req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 843, in do_open return self.parent.error('http', req, fp, code, msg, hdrs) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 353, in error result = self._call_chain(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 479, in http_error_302 return self.parent.open(new) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 333, in open '_open', req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 849, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTP, req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 843, in do_open return self.parent.error('http', req, fp, code, msg, hdrs) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 359, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 419, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found Strangely, there's no problem if I use urllib instead: >>> import urllib >>> urllib.urlopen ("http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg") > >>> _.read() '# This file is generated from spambayes/Version.py - do not edit\n[SpamBayes]\nDate:July 2003\nFull Description:%(Description)s, version ... Etc -- it gets the whole file fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-14 19:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 When I paste "http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg" into my browser the page forwards to "http://spambayes.sourceforge.net//download/Version.cfg" which also causes the error with urlib2. however, "http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/download/Version.cfg" does not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806238&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 14 19:47:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 14 19:47:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806238 ] urllib2 fails in Outlook new-version chk Message-ID: Bugs item #806238, was opened at 2003-09-14 19:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806238&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: urllib2 fails in Outlook new-version chk Initial Comment: Maybe a Python bug! Don't know. Using the addin from CVS, and right now on Win98SE. Python 2.3. Here's a one-liner showing the same problem the addin sees: >>> import urllib2 >>> urllib2.urlopen ("http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg") Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in ? File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 136, in urlopen return _opener.open(url, data) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 333, in open '_open', req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 849, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTP, req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 843, in do_open return self.parent.error('http', req, fp, code, msg, hdrs) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 353, in error result = self._call_chain(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 479, in http_error_302 return self.parent.open(new) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 333, in open '_open', req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 849, in http_open return self.do_open(httplib.HTTP, req) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 843, in do_open return self.parent.error('http', req, fp, code, msg, hdrs) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 359, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 313, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\urllib2.py", line 419, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found Strangely, there's no problem if I use urllib instead: >>> import urllib >>> urllib.urlopen ("http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg") > >>> _.read() '# This file is generated from spambayes/Version.py - do not edit\n[SpamBayes]\nDate:July 2003\nFull Description:%(Description)s, version ... Etc -- it gets the whole file fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-14 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I switched spambayes/Version.py, rev 1.21, to use a SourceForge URL for now. Works for me ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-14 19:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 When I paste "http://www.spambayes.org/download/Version.cfg" into my browser the page forwards to "http://spambayes.sourceforge.net//download/Version.cfg" which also causes the error with urlib2. however, "http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/download/Version.cfg" does not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806238&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 14 19:49:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 14 19:49:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by whynot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-15 01:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-12 01:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 05:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 14 20:01:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 14 20:01:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-12 21:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leroypa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 02:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 14 20:11:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 14 20:11:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806249 ] Outlook Hangs with currrent version Message-ID: Bugs item #806249, was opened at 2003-09-14 17:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Hangs with currrent version Initial Comment: I installed the v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. I have uninstalled SpamBytes and problem has been resolved. By the way, the uninstall did not remove the SpamBaytes buttons from the Outlook menu bar. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SR-1 Thanks, Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 04:13:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 04:13:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804227 ] Confusing error message when "suspect" folder is unusable Message-ID: Bugs item #804227, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Confusing error message when "suspect" folder is unusable Initial Comment: I am using Outlook with Exchange. I was working in "offline mode". During synchronisation with the server, I regularly get an error from SB : "Moving the message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR) : OLE error 0x80040119 It is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity This message will not be reported again until SB is restarted" I see as well that some of the messages in my inbox have "synchronisation error". I assume that this is caused by SB updating the offline messages during the synchronisation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 I believe that this message is displayed because my "suspect" folder was setup to be available only when online. When I work offline, when SB attempts to move a message to the suspect folder, it obviously cannot move it. Obviously, SB cannot move the message. Could you however attempt to have a user-friendlier message : it would help, at a minimum, to display the name of the source and target folders... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-11 12:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 log attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-11 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 08:35:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 08:35:28 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 09:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 12:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-13 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 08:37:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 08:37:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 09:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 The last sentance under part 1) below should read "So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2003." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 12:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-13 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 09:16:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 09:16:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 19:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-15 23:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My problem is more with missing ham, and I fear that missing a single ham could make the difference. Our low false-positive rate is a feature we should keep :) It all gets back to the test framework. As Tim is fond of saying, intuition is a poor guide here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 22:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 The last sentance under part 1) below should read "So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2003." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 22:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-13 13:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 10:52:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 10:52:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804227 ] Confusing error message when "suspect" folder is unusable Message-ID: Bugs item #804227, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 3 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Confusing error message when "suspect" folder is unusable Initial Comment: I am using Outlook with Exchange. I was working in "offline mode". During synchronisation with the server, I regularly get an error from SB : "Moving the message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR) : OLE error 0x80040119 It is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity This message will not be reported again until SB is restarted" I see as well that some of the messages in my inbox have "synchronisation error". I assume that this is caused by SB updating the offline messages during the synchronisation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 what I meant by "suspect" folder is the folder where SB moves unsure emails. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 I believe that this message is displayed because my "suspect" folder was setup to be available only when online. When I work offline, when SB attempts to move a message to the suspect folder, it obviously cannot move it. Obviously, SB cannot move the message. Could you however attempt to have a user-friendlier message : it would help, at a minimum, to display the name of the source and target folders... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-11 12:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 log attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-11 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 11:03:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 11:03:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804742 ] Auto Filter Message-ID: Support Requests item #804742, was opened at 2003-09-11 23:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Auto Filter Initial Comment: My newly installed version does not automatically filter new mail as it arrives. If I click 'filter messages' then 'start filtering' it seems to do a great job of moving only my spam, but it does nothing until I click this. Is this suppose to happen? Is there a setting I don't know about? Thanks, -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 17:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 You can configure SB to automatically handle incoming emails, and filter them. In "SpamBayes manager...", do you see a mark in "enable SB" ? What is the status of your filter ("filter status" in SB manager) ? You can use the "filtering" tab in "SB manager" to configure the behaviour of the automatic filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 11:13:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 11:13:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804742 ] Auto Filter Message-ID: Support Requests item #804742, was opened at 2003-09-11 16:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jimmoney You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Auto Filter Initial Comment: My newly installed version does not automatically filter new mail as it arrives. If I click 'filter messages' then 'start filtering' it seems to do a great job of moving only my spam, but it does nothing until I click this. Is this suppose to happen? Is there a setting I don't know about? Thanks, -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Date: 2003-09-15 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864628 I have it checked to enable SB. In filtering, I have them both set to move to folders, (Spam, and Spam (unsure) 85-15 respectively. If I manually go to Filter Messages, and Filter now, it works great and filters them. I just want it to filter the messages as soon as they hit my inbox. Should I reinstall? Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 You can configure SB to automatically handle incoming emails, and filter them. In "SpamBayes manager...", do you see a mark in "enable SB" ? What is the status of your filter ("filter status" in SB manager) ? You can use the "filtering" tab in "SB manager" to configure the behaviour of the automatic filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 11:26:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 11:26:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804742 ] Auto Filter Message-ID: Support Requests item #804742, was opened at 2003-09-11 23:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Auto Filter Initial Comment: My newly installed version does not automatically filter new mail as it arrives. If I click 'filter messages' then 'start filtering' it seems to do a great job of moving only my spam, but it does nothing until I click this. Is this suppose to happen? Is there a setting I don't know about? Thanks, -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 is SB configured to watch your inbox ? the setting of folders to permanently watch and folder to filter are two distinct settings. if SB apparently does not notice and act upon new mails in your inboxes, there is an option that you might want to try : the "background filtering" configurable in the "advanced" tab. I am using that option, just to ensure I do not miss emails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Date: 2003-09-15 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864628 I have it checked to enable SB. In filtering, I have them both set to move to folders, (Spam, and Spam (unsure) 85-15 respectively. If I manually go to Filter Messages, and Filter now, it works great and filters them. I just want it to filter the messages as soon as they hit my inbox. Should I reinstall? Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 17:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 You can configure SB to automatically handle incoming emails, and filter them. In "SpamBayes manager...", do you see a mark in "enable SB" ? What is the status of your filter ("filter status" in SB manager) ? You can use the "filtering" tab in "SB manager" to configure the behaviour of the automatic filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 11:33:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 11:34:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-802914 ] cannot train spambayes manager Message-ID: Support Requests item #802914, was opened at 2003-09-09 05:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=802914&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas D. Zweifel (tdz200) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: cannot train spambayes manager Initial Comment: i successfully installed spambayes for outlook, and created the suggested 2 folders ('spam' and 'possible spam'), but when i go to the spambayes manager and browse for the new spam folder, i cannot find it. (for the ham folder i use my inbox, which i did find.) help! thomas p.s. also, there is no troubleshooter feature in my spambayes. fyi. t ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 17:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 as a workaround, you want perhaps to create destination folders from SB manager : when browsing, there is a "new folder" button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=802914&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 12:24:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 12:24:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792255 ] Problems installing as windows service... Message-ID: Bugs item #792255, was opened at 2003-08-20 19:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rdrose You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gordon Hartley (ghartley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problems installing as windows service... Initial Comment: Not sure whether this is just a result of my environment, or whether its useful for others as well. Environment : Windows (XP Prof.) + Cygwin + Python 2.3 + win32all-155.exe Tried: [NOTEBOOK] /cygdrive/c/programs/spambayes- 1.0a4/windows$ python pop3proxy_service.py install Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 38, in ? os.chdir(sb_dir) OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '' # --- Resolved by moving the file up a directory and commenting out the following lines near the top of the file (pop3proxy_service.py) : sb_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(this_filename)) sys.path.insert(0, sb_dir) # and change directory here, so pop3proxy uses the default # config file etc os.chdir(sb_dir) # --- Then successfully installed service, tried to start it, and got the following in the event log: Python could not import the service's module File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4 \pop3proxy_service_modified.py", line 45, in ? import pop3proxy File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4\pop3proxy.py", line 96, in ? import spambayes.message File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\message.py", line 137, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\message.py", line 113, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 59, in open return f(*args) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 41, in open_best return f(*args) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) File "c:\python\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 162, in hashopen d.open(file, db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) # --- Resolved by the following: chmod a+w *.db # --- Not sure if the permissions problem is a result of having cygwin installed, but thought I'd mention it in case its a general windows issue, or is useful to someone else... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Rose (rdrose) Date: 2003-09-15 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=195064 I've had a similar problem with Win XP Pro + Py 2.3 from the windows shell. Based on the comments in the code, it seems that the code expects the program name (__file__) to be fully qualified. Based on my very small troubleshooting effort, it seems that __file__ only contains the program name with no path attached -- thus the error File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 38, in ? os.chdir(sb_dir) OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '' because sb_dir is empty when the author was expecting it to contain the path to pop3proxy_service.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-21 08:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 You should try to run SpamBayes through Windows shell and not Cygwin. And installed and run the SpamBayes service on several computers with no problem (Windows XP, Python 2.3, win32all-155). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 12:34:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 12:34:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806632 ] sb_server failure when saving config Message-ID: Bugs item #806632, was opened at 2003-09-15 11:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server failure when saving config Initial Comment: I just got this from sb_server when punching the "Save" button on the config page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 687, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 520, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_server.py", line 727, in _recreateState state.bayes.store() AttributeError: State instance has no attribute 'bayes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 12:50:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 12:50:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-805351 ] If cc: address is not qualified, proxy fails to send message Message-ID: Bugs item #805351, was opened at 2003-09-12 14:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by willie_the_wimp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805351&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Todd Lawson (willie_the_wimp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: If cc: address is not qualified, proxy fails to send message Initial Comment: I use 1.05a as a pop3proxy on the same machine as the email client. If I fail to qualify my cc: addresses with a domain, the server fails to forward the message and I get the error message shown below. If I add a domain to the address, the message is sent correctly. This problem occurs if the unqualified address is in the cc or bcc field, but not if it is in the to: field. My email client is "THe Bat" v1.61. I use pop3 and smtp for email transfers. Let me know if you need more detail. This is easily reproducible. Thanks! Todd I:\spambayes>pop3proxy.py -b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 25 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:25 SMTP Listener on port 25000 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:25 Listener on port 110 is proxying XXX.com:110 Listener on port 11100 is proxying XXX.XXX.com:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.ValueError:substring not found [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|read|69] [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|handle_read_event|387] [C:\Python23\lib\asynchat.py|handle_read|136] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|found_terminator|229] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onTransaction|322] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onRcptTo|336] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|splitTo|316] [C:\Python23\lib\string.py|index|145]) error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.ValueError:substring not found [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|read|69] [C:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py|handle_read_event|387] [C:\Python23\lib\asynchat.py|handle_read|136] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|found_terminator|229] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onTransaction|322] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|onRcptTo|336] [I:\spambayes-1.0a5\smtpproxy.py|splitTo|316] [C:\Python23\lib\string.py|index|145]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Todd Lawson (willie_the_wimp) Date: 2003-09-15 09:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=865357 THanks for the info. I found a new case where it croaks as well: if I use an address of the form "foo " in the to: field, it fails to forward. I don't know if this was fixed as well, but FYI. Todd ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-12 21:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks. Fixed in sb_smtpproxy v1.2 (so this will be in the fixed in the 1.0a6 release). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=805351&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 13:08:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 13:08:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804742 ] Auto Filter Message-ID: Support Requests item #804742, was opened at 2003-09-11 17:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Auto Filter Initial Comment: My newly installed version does not automatically filter new mail as it arrives. If I click 'filter messages' then 'start filtering' it seems to do a great job of moving only my spam, but it does nothing until I click this. Is this suppose to happen? Is there a setting I don't know about? Thanks, -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-15 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 If your using outlook 2003, make sure you have installed the techincal refresh for outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 is SB configured to watch your inbox ? the setting of folders to permanently watch and folder to filter are two distinct settings. if SB apparently does not notice and act upon new mails in your inboxes, there is an option that you might want to try : the "background filtering" configurable in the "advanced" tab. I am using that option, just to ensure I do not miss emails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Date: 2003-09-15 11:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864628 I have it checked to enable SB. In filtering, I have them both set to move to folders, (Spam, and Spam (unsure) 85-15 respectively. If I manually go to Filter Messages, and Filter now, it works great and filters them. I just want it to filter the messages as soon as they hit my inbox. Should I reinstall? Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 11:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 You can configure SB to automatically handle incoming emails, and filter them. In "SpamBayes manager...", do you see a mark in "enable SB" ? What is the status of your filter ("filter status" in SB manager) ? You can use the "filtering" tab in "SB manager" to configure the behaviour of the automatic filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 14:35:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 14:35:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804742 ] Auto Filter Message-ID: Support Requests item #804742, was opened at 2003-09-11 16:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jimmoney You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Auto Filter Initial Comment: My newly installed version does not automatically filter new mail as it arrives. If I click 'filter messages' then 'start filtering' it seems to do a great job of moving only my spam, but it does nothing until I click this. Is this suppose to happen? Is there a setting I don't know about? Thanks, -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Date: 2003-09-15 13:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864628 I am using Outlook 2000. Just so you know, after your last response, I did a reinstall and now it filters fine automatically. Great tool! Thanks. -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-15 12:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 If your using outlook 2003, make sure you have installed the techincal refresh for outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 10:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 is SB configured to watch your inbox ? the setting of folders to permanently watch and folder to filter are two distinct settings. if SB apparently does not notice and act upon new mails in your inboxes, there is an option that you might want to try : the "background filtering" configurable in the "advanced" tab. I am using that option, just to ensure I do not miss emails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Date: 2003-09-15 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864628 I have it checked to enable SB. In filtering, I have them both set to move to folders, (Spam, and Spam (unsure) 85-15 respectively. If I manually go to Filter Messages, and Filter now, it works great and filters them. I just want it to filter the messages as soon as they hit my inbox. Should I reinstall? Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 You can configure SB to automatically handle incoming emails, and filter them. In "SpamBayes manager...", do you see a mark in "enable SB" ? What is the status of your filter ("filter status" in SB manager) ? You can use the "filtering" tab in "SB manager" to configure the behaviour of the automatic filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 15:14:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 15:14:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-804742 ] Auto Filter Message-ID: Support Requests item #804742, was opened at 2003-09-11 17:39 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Auto Filter Initial Comment: My newly installed version does not automatically filter new mail as it arrives. If I click 'filter messages' then 'start filtering' it seems to do a great job of moving only my spam, but it does nothing until I click this. Is this suppose to happen? Is there a setting I don't know about? Thanks, -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Date: 2003-09-15 14:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864628 I am using Outlook 2000. Just so you know, after your last response, I did a reinstall and now it filters fine automatically. Great tool! Thanks. -jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-15 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 If your using outlook 2003, make sure you have installed the techincal refresh for outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 is SB configured to watch your inbox ? the setting of folders to permanently watch and folder to filter are two distinct settings. if SB apparently does not notice and act upon new mails in your inboxes, there is an option that you might want to try : the "background filtering" configurable in the "advanced" tab. I am using that option, just to ensure I do not miss emails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Mitte (jimmoney) Date: 2003-09-15 11:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864628 I have it checked to enable SB. In filtering, I have them both set to move to folders, (Spam, and Spam (unsure) 85-15 respectively. If I manually go to Filter Messages, and Filter now, it works great and filters them. I just want it to filter the messages as soon as they hit my inbox. Should I reinstall? Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 11:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 You can configure SB to automatically handle incoming emails, and filter them. In "SpamBayes manager...", do you see a mark in "enable SB" ? What is the status of your filter ("filter status" in SB manager) ? You can use the "filtering" tab in "SB manager" to configure the behaviour of the automatic filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=804742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 17:58:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 17:58:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-12 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mchurch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 16:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 19:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 03:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 04:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 18:32:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 18:32:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806632 ] sb_server failure when saving config Message-ID: Bugs item #806632, was opened at 2003-09-16 04:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server failure when saving config Initial Comment: I just got this from sb_server when punching the "Save" button on the config page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 687, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 520, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_server.py", line 727, in _recreateState state.bayes.store() AttributeError: State instance has no attribute 'bayes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 10:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hi Skip - this should have been fixed in sb_server.py v1.4 - are you using up-to-date cvs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 21:56:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 21:56:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Another problem with this is that these require either the user keeping spam around, or storing a *lot* more data. Ryan's scheme below is really two separate things - one is aging out old data, which has been discussed a few times, and then randomly selecting from what's left. I tend to agree with Mark. I think this might end up like the experimental_ham_spam_imbalance and confuse people. Why doesn't x get a ham score, they ask? Because it was randomly chosen to not get included in your training data, we answer. The more I think about it, the more I think that (unless someone comes up with a new, better, experimental_ham_spam_imbalance option), the best option is simply to warn users if they reach a certain level of imbalance, so that their attention is drawn to the problem. If I find the time, I might play around with setting up a test script to train, then retrain on balanced data and see how that goes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-16 01:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My problem is more with missing ham, and I fear that missing a single ham could make the difference. Our low false-positive rate is a feature we should keep :) It all gets back to the test framework. As Tim is fond of saying, intuition is a poor guide here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-16 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 The last sentance under part 1) below should read "So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2003." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-16 00:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-13 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 22:07:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 22:12:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792255 ] Problems installing as windows service... Message-ID: Bugs item #792255, was opened at 2003-08-21 12:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gordon Hartley (ghartley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problems installing as windows service... Initial Comment: Not sure whether this is just a result of my environment, or whether its useful for others as well. Environment : Windows (XP Prof.) + Cygwin + Python 2.3 + win32all-155.exe Tried: [NOTEBOOK] /cygdrive/c/programs/spambayes- 1.0a4/windows$ python pop3proxy_service.py install Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 38, in ? os.chdir(sb_dir) OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '' # --- Resolved by moving the file up a directory and commenting out the following lines near the top of the file (pop3proxy_service.py) : sb_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(this_filename)) sys.path.insert(0, sb_dir) # and change directory here, so pop3proxy uses the default # config file etc os.chdir(sb_dir) # --- Then successfully installed service, tried to start it, and got the following in the event log: Python could not import the service's module File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4 \pop3proxy_service_modified.py", line 45, in ? import pop3proxy File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4\pop3proxy.py", line 96, in ? import spambayes.message File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\message.py", line 137, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\message.py", line 113, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 59, in open return f(*args) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 41, in open_best return f(*args) File "c:\python\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) File "c:\python\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 162, in hashopen d.open(file, db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) # --- Resolved by the following: chmod a+w *.db # --- Not sure if the permissions problem is a result of having cygwin installed, but thought I'd mention it in case its a general windows issue, or is useful to someone else... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 14:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The current code for pop3proxy_service checks to see if the path is fully qualified or not and if it isn't changes it so it is. How recent is the code you are using? If it is up-to-date CVS, please reopen. Re: the permissions business - if this becomes a common question then we can add it to the FAQ, but it should be reasonably obvious that the programs need write access to the database. I would have thought that whatever tool you used to create the database would have set that by default - I imagine this is something to do with running through cygwin rather than just a plain old windows shell. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Rose (rdrose) Date: 2003-09-16 04:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=195064 I've had a similar problem with Win XP Pro + Py 2.3 from the windows shell. Based on the comments in the code, it seems that the code expects the program name (__file__) to be fully qualified. Based on my very small troubleshooting effort, it seems that __file__ only contains the program name with no path attached -- thus the error File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 38, in ? os.chdir(sb_dir) OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: '' because sb_dir is empty when the author was expecting it to contain the path to pop3proxy_service.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-22 01:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 You should try to run SpamBayes through Windows shell and not Cygwin. And installed and run the SpamBayes service on several computers with no problem (Windows XP, Python 2.3, win32all-155). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 22:35:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 22:35:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 05:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-15 22:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Yup, I agree it's fraught with dangers. Note that we'd also need to remember which msgs were explicitly trained as mistakes or unsures, to help prevent them from getting mistreated again. For example, I have a few strange friends I hear from maybe twice a year, and the stuff they send is so bizarre I have to keep several years' worth of their msgs in my ham training set (and, yes, I do think it's ham ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-15 21:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Another problem with this is that these require either the user keeping spam around, or storing a *lot* more data. Ryan's scheme below is really two separate things - one is aging out old data, which has been discussed a few times, and then randomly selecting from what's left. I tend to agree with Mark. I think this might end up like the experimental_ham_spam_imbalance and confuse people. Why doesn't x get a ham score, they ask? Because it was randomly chosen to not get included in your training data, we answer. The more I think about it, the more I think that (unless someone comes up with a new, better, experimental_ham_spam_imbalance option), the best option is simply to warn users if they reach a certain level of imbalance, so that their attention is drawn to the problem. If I find the time, I might play around with setting up a test script to train, then retrain on balanced data and see how that goes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-15 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My problem is more with missing ham, and I fear that missing a single ham could make the difference. Our low false-positive rate is a feature we should keep :) It all gets back to the test framework. As Tim is fond of saying, intuition is a poor guide here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 08:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 The last sentance under part 1) below should read "So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2003." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 08:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-12 23:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 09:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 15 22:56:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 15 22:57:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806915 ] Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst file Message-ID: Bugs item #806915, was opened at 2003-09-15 19:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst file Initial Comment: i have outlook xp at home with just hotmail as an account. outlook makes you have a pst file regardless if you use it or not. I have the possible spam going to a folder in the hotmail tree. when i hit recover from spam, it transports to the Personal Folder's Inbox, not back to the Hotmail Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 00:43:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 00:43:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795145 ] pop3proxy review page dies with mixed gzip/non messages Message-ID: Bugs item #795145, was opened at 2003-08-26 18:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795145&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: pop3proxy review page dies with mixed gzip/non messages Initial Comment: If the Advanced Options are set to store the message cache gzipped, then having un-gzipped messages in the cache kills the review page (traceback below). This happens if you have outstanding messages cached and not trained, and you go into the Advanced Configuration, and enable gzip compression of the cache. Basically, if the option is set, the Review Messages page assumes the cache is only gzipped messages, and then dies trying to display the first non-gzipped message. Looks like the best fix for this is for the Review Messages page to check whether each message is compressed before attempting to process it, rather than assuming that if the option is set True, then all messages are compressed, or if the option is set to False, that no messages are compressed. (In other words, the option should only control saving, not loading). 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 392, in onReview message = spambayes.mboxutils.get_message (cachedMessage.getSubstance()) File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 349, in getSubstance return self.hdrtxt + self.payload File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 292, in __getattr__ self.load() File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 316, in load self.setSubstance(fp.read()) File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 217, in read self._read(readsize) File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 260, in _read self._read_gzip_header() File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 161, in _read_gzip_header raise IOError, 'Not a gzipped file' IOError: Not a gzipped file ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 16:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in cvs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795145&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 00:54:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 00:54:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-695632 ] MySQL Digest Causes Spambayes to Crash Message-ID: Bugs item #695632, was opened at 2003-03-02 05:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=695632&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Scott (rich1) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: MySQL Digest Causes Spambayes to Crash Initial Comment: The main mysql e-mail list (digest version) and the mysql bugs e-mail list (digest version) always cause Spambayes to crash. It appears that the error occurs in Generator.py. Here is the output: Training ham (/home/richard/Mail/inbox): Reading as MH mailbox /home/richard/Mail/inbox/2 /home/richard/Mail/inbox/5 /home/richard/Mail/inbox/6 /home/richard/Mail/inbox/724 /home/richard/Mail/inbox/29 /home/richard/Mail/inbox/751 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/richard/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 278, in ? main() File "/home/richard/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 265, in main train(h, g, False, force) File "/home/richard/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 207, in train mhdir_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/home/richard/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 190, in mhdir_train f.write(msg.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Message.py", line 107, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 100, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 128, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 154, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 243, in _handle_multipart g.flatten(part, unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 100, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 128, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 154, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Generator.py", line 212, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 16:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No further comment (since March), so presumably Tim is correct and it has been resolved. Please reopen if this is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4) Date: 2003-03-19 06:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=645698 I believe this problem has been resolved for pop3proxy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chuck Bearden (cfbearden) Date: 2003-03-19 04:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=499555 I am experiencing the same problem with the axkit digest and also with the monthly log files for a LISTSERV list that I run. Perhaps it's the presence of so many From: To: Subject: Received: etc. lines within one email message. I can fix this problem for myself by inserting a procmail recipe for the digests before the spambayes recipes, but I'm not sure how well that approach will scale to the 100+ folks I'd like to deploy this for. Also, it could cause problems for POP proxy users, since I don't see how they can prevent their digest traffic from being considered by by the spambayes filters on the proxy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=695632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:02:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:03:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775977 ] pop3proxy reports an exception in shelve.py Message-ID: Bugs item #775977, was opened at 2003-07-23 11:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775977&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gary Herron (herron) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy reports an exception in shelve.py Initial Comment: Using pop3proxy from spambayes-1.0a4 with Python 2.3b1 on Linux, the attached email comes throught pop3proxy with the following exception reported in the headers: X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.EOFError() in __getitem__() at /usr/local/lib/python2.3/shelve.py line 119: value = Unpickler(f).load() ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response, so closing. Please reopen if you experience this again, answering the questions above. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-19 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This *looks* more like a database problem than a problem with this one email. Does it definately only occur with this email? Does it still occur if you use a fresh database? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775977&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:03:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:21:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776874 ] Exception when saving options from pop3proxy Message-ID: Bugs item #776874, was opened at 2003-07-24 22:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Exception when saving options from pop3proxy Initial Comment: Since I upgraded from spambayes 1.0a2 to 1.0a4 recently, I have been unable to change options from the pop3proxy web interface. When I hit the same button on the Configure page I get the following exception: ----------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 398, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 525, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 484, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 693, in _recreateState state.createWorkers() File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 595, in createWorkers self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 147, in __init__ self.load() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 155, in load self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 59 , in open return f(*args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 23 , in open_gdbm return gdbm.open(*args) error: (11, 'Resource temporarily unavailable') ------------------------- The line numbers pop3proxy.py may be high by two or three because I added some print statements trying to debug this. The print statements show that the file that it is attempting to open is hammie.db, the classfier database. I am running pop3proxy on RedHat 8.0. as my user. The file permissions show that hammie.db is writable by me, etc. I explicity configured spambayes to use the gdbm database instead of the default - is that part of the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed. We now correctly close (and save) the database before trying to reopen it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2003-07-25 08:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 Workaround: I downloaded, compiled, and installed the bsddb3 module so that I could use the db3hash storage type. After switching my storage type to db3hash this problem went away. This might indicate a problem with gdbm. I won't use it any more if I can avoid it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy) Date: 2003-07-24 23:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=171902 I checked and it turns out that when I set dbm_type:best that it naturally chooses gdbm anyway - I apparently don't have bsddb3 or bsddb available to me as storage types. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:22:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:22:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783915 ] hammiefilter garbles message Message-ID: Bugs item #783915, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783915&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Eldridge (eldie1) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: hammiefilter garbles message Initial Comment: hammiefilter -f garbles the attached message. It drops the original headers, and replaces them with a single X- Spambayes-Classification header. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This happens because there is an error parsing the headers, and so spambayes throws them away and classifies on the body. The best solution, IMO, would be to abstract out the code from sb_server that deals with this same problem, into message.py, and then get hammie.py to use message.py to add the headers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783915&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:24:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:25:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788051 ] database corruption (bsddb) Message-ID: Bugs item #788051, was opened at 2003-08-14 01:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: database corruption (bsddb) Initial Comment: when the pop3proxy.py is run for some longish time (2 hours) the database file (DBM) gets corrupted and each mail then contains: X-Spambayes-Exception: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30989, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery')) in __getitem__() at /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py line 86: return self.db[key] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the last comment by the OP, this sounds like it is a bug with bsddb that is fixed in db-4.1.25, so I'm closing this. Reopen if that's not right. (What to do with the messageinfo db still needs to be resolved, but that's a separate issue). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2003-08-19 04:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Just a point of reference. I use bsddb with Berkeley DB 3.3.11 on Mac OS X via the hammie and hammiefilter programs with no problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2003-08-18 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 i did some experimenting with various bsddb3 versions: - with db-3.3.11 the python segfaults and core is dumped - with db-3.2.9 the database is corrupted - with db-4.1.25 everything works as it should (no db corruption) hth, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-15 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We still don't know what causes this, but as a workaround you can delete your spambayes.messageinfo.db file - that file doesn't (yet) do anything important for pop3proxy, and it's that file that's becoming corrupt. A new one will be created, which may eventually become corrupt as well - again, just delete it. You'll need to stop pop3proxy while you delete it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource) Date: 2003-08-14 04:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=698198 the operating system is RH 7.2 with those versions of the Berkeley DB: db1-1.85-7 db2-2.4.14-7 db3-3.2.9-4 sorry i didn't include this in right away with the bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-08-14 03:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Which operating system, and which version of Sleepycat's Berkeley code (spambayes shouldn't be able to corrupt a Berkeley DB, so the problem is probably specific to the bsddb version in use)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:26:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:26:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803501 ] pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Message-ID: Bugs item #803501, was opened at 2003-09-10 11:40 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris DeSalvo (phixus) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy v1.0a5 throws exceptions on launch Initial Comment: I just downloaded the 1.0a5 spambayes package, unpacked it, ran setup.py install; and then did the following: [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python -V Python 2.3 [cjdmac:~/spambayes-1.0a5] chris% python pop3proxy.py - b SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy.py", line 819, in ? run() File "pop3proxy.py", line 800, in run prepare(state=state) File "pop3proxy.py", line 736, in prepare state.createWorkers() File "pop3proxy.py", line 617, in createWorkers self.bayes = storage.open_storage(filename, self.useDB) File "/Users/chris/Desktop/spambayes-1.0a5/spambayes/ storage.py", line 652, in open_storage print >> sys.stderr, """\ UnboundLocalError: local variable 'sys' referenced before assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-11 09:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Sorry, I should have said: You can fix your installation by remove the line "import sys" from around line 656 of storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-11 09:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 The crash is fixed in CVS, storage.py 1.32. You'll still get an error message, but that should make it clear what to do next. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803501&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:29:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:29:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-09 09:37 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-10 19:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Move it into a spam folder and use Outlook's autoarchive facility to delete the mail (or move it to deleted items) after 1 day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-10 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 yes i understand that by i want it to be simple and thus i turn off automatic train when i move it to that folder. is there any work around that i can use? cliff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:32:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:32:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803174 ] broken link on Welcome & About pages Message-ID: Bugs item #803174, was opened at 2003-09-10 02:09 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803174&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Trevor Metzger (trevorm_xcg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: broken link on Welcome & About pages Initial Comment: I have noticed a little documentation error in versions 0.8 and 0.81. On the "Welcome" page there is the following text/link: Outlook does not allow us to automatically add the spam score to your Outlook folder views - but you can do it manually by following these instructions . This link is broken (it tries looking on E: drive?). A link to the same info is broken on the Welcome page: If you want to add the Spam field to your Outlook views, follow these instructions . I knew my way around from the previous version but this could confuse a newer user. Thanks again, keep up the good work! -Trevor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-10 11:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Damn Mozilla :( Thanks, I'll fix this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803174&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:43:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:43:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:45:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:45:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:47:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:47:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799959 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Support Requests item #799959, was opened at 2003-09-04 06:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799959&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: I think I've figured out what is going on with 799201 - I have some rules that move spam into a folder. When I installed spambayes I configured it to look for spam in the inbox and this other folder. It appears that spambayes does not update the database counters when messages are moved from this other folder to the spambayes spam folder. The counters are updated when messages are moved from the inbox to the spambayes spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Moved comment to the original tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:48:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:48:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-799201 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Support Requests item #799201, was opened at 2003-09-03 03:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799201&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: When I go to the SpamBayes manager it shows that the database has 1066 good and 224 spam. These numbers don't change regardless of how much spam has been processed. I'm not sure SpamBayes is learning from new incomming messages. I'm using SpamBayes .7 upgraded from SpamBayes .6. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From 799959: I think I've figured out what is going on with 799201 - I have some rules that move spam into a folder. When I installed spambayes I configured it to look for spam in the inbox and this other folder. It appears that spambayes does not update the database counters when messages are moved from this other folder to the spambayes spam folder. The counters are updated when messages are moved from the inbox to the spambayes spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are checkboxes that ask if you want to train on messages moved into the watched ham and spam folders. Do you have these ticked? If you don't, then no training is done unless you do it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=799201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:48:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:48:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799201 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Bugs item #799201, was opened at 2003-09-03 03:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: When I go to the SpamBayes manager it shows that the database has 1066 good and 224 spam. These numbers don't change regardless of how much spam has been processed. I'm not sure SpamBayes is learning from new incomming messages. I'm using SpamBayes .7 upgraded from SpamBayes .6. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From 799959: I think I've figured out what is going on with 799201 - I have some rules that move spam into a folder. When I installed spambayes I configured it to look for spam in the inbox and this other folder. It appears that spambayes does not update the database counters when messages are moved from this other folder to the spambayes spam folder. The counters are updated when messages are moved from the inbox to the spambayes spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are checkboxes that ask if you want to train on messages moved into the watched ham and spam folders. Do you have these ticked? If you don't, then no training is done unless you do it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:49:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:49:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799201 ] Database not updated Message-ID: Bugs item #799201, was opened at 2003-09-03 03:33 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Database not updated Initial Comment: When I go to the SpamBayes manager it shows that the database has 1066 good and 224 spam. These numbers don't change regardless of how much spam has been processed. I'm not sure SpamBayes is learning from new incomming messages. I'm using SpamBayes .7 upgraded from SpamBayes .6. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From 799959: I think I've figured out what is going on with 799201 - I have some rules that move spam into a folder. When I installed spambayes I configured it to look for spam in the inbox and this other folder. It appears that spambayes does not update the database counters when messages are moved from this other folder to the spambayes spam folder. The counters are updated when messages are moved from the inbox to the spambayes spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are checkboxes that ask if you want to train on messages moved into the watched ham and spam folders. Do you have these ticked? If you don't, then no training is done unless you do it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:54:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:54:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-803901 ] spambayes-1.0a5 DB_RUNRECOVERY when training Message-ID: Support Requests item #803901, was opened at 2003-09-11 06:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=803901&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Yom Gritzko (somecallmetim) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes-1.0a5 DB_RUNRECOVERY when training Initial Comment: I installed spambayes-1.0a5 into a directory on my Windows XP box. I copied the hammie.db and the bayescustomize.ini from myspambayes-1.0a4 directory into the spambayes-1.0a5 directory. I fired up spambayes and was able to successfully train using some received messages. I went into the configuration page then to the advanced I said yes to adding the probability score to the header and saved the configuration. Sometime later...I'm not sure when, when I tried to train I get the following error: Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 309, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 201, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", line 143, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 136, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 552, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 560, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\classifier.py", line 276, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\classifier.py", line 411, in _add_msg self._wordinfoset(word, record) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 257, in _wordinfoset self.db[word] = record.__getstate__() File "D:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "D:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 90, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') I went back into the advanced configuration and clicked on the restore button and I get this: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 703, in onRestoredefaults self.reReadOptions() File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 510, in reReadOptions state.bayes.store() File "D:\Utils\spambayes\spambayes-1. 0a5\spambayes\storage.py", line 201, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "D:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() File "D:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 90, in __setitem__ self.db[key] = value DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') How does one recover the database? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You *should* only have to copy the hammie.db file to keep your training. If you want to keep your configuration settings, you also need to copy over the bayescustomize.ini file. Ideally you should copy the messageinfo.db file as well, but it shouldn't matter if this gets deleted (for pop3proxy; it does for other apps). It sounds like something happened that corrupted the database but it's not clear what. It shouldn't be related to the option change, or the messageinfo file not being there. As to how to recover the database: there are tools from berkeley that apparently let you do this, but I haven't seen reports of any successful attempts. The best bet is to either go back to a known good copy (as you did), or retrain from scratch. Please let us know if the database corruption happens again, especially if you can reproduce it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yom Gritzko (somecallmetim) Date: 2003-09-11 06:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=685368 I recopied the hammie db from the 1.0a4 and this time also copied the spambayes.messageinfo file over the ones in the 1. 0a5 directory, restarted spambayes and was able to train some messages once. What files need to be copied when upgrading from 1.0a4 to 1.0a5 if one doesn't want to lose the accumulated training? Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=803901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 01:56:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 01:56:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-783846 ] Generalize! Message-ID: Feature Requests item #783846, was opened at 2003-08-06 12:31 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nicolas Kruchten (simnick66) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Generalize! Initial Comment: I think that the spambayes engine (which works great btw) could be generalized to classify way more than just spam, it could completely replace rule-based filtering. As i understand it (correct me if i'm wrong!) there is nothing spam-specific about this software, it could be used to classify any message into any folder, while retaining its spam-filtering abilities. the way this would work would be to specify a default folder (the inbox) and then a set of other folders (ie spam, folder1, folder2, folder3) and when a message comes in, it could be shuttled to the appropriate folder if the threshold for that folder's bayesian rating is crossed. if multiple thresholds are crossed, it could then go into an unsure folder, or the values could be compared to see where it should go. each folder could have independently set thresholds... is there an easy way to hack the current outlook plugin to do this for testing purposes? (ie to install multiple versions and spoof them into comparing different folders or... ?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nicolas Kruchten (simnick66) Date: 2003-08-21 09:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838551 ok, i'll try it, thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-19 20:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You can now try Skip's n-way.py script in the contrib directory in cvs, which does the cascade of n spambayes classifiers as Tim describes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-08-06 12:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 The spambayes engine doesn't really know anything about "ham" and "spam", it starts for each user as a blank slate and knows only what they teach it. So in that sense it could be more general, although the tokenization strategies were specifically designed for, and tuned on, the ham-vs- spam task. A higher hurdle is that spambayes is "deeply" a binary (two- way) classifier. Classic Bayesian classifiers are N-way, but spambayes threw away that part of the math, replacing it with a two-way classifier based on very different theory. I know at least one person tried to do N-way classification by training N distinct spambayes classifiers, and running them in sequence. That was quite a while ago, and I don't know how happy they were with the results. In any case, trying to hack the Outlook plugin will have you crawling on your belly for a month . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 10:01:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 10:02:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806632 ] sb_server failure when saving config Message-ID: Bugs item #806632, was opened at 2003-09-15 11:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server failure when saving config Initial Comment: I just got this from sb_server when punching the "Save" button on the config page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 687, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 520, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_server.py", line 727, in _recreateState state.bayes.store() AttributeError: State instance has no attribute 'bayes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2003-09-16 09:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Yup: % cat CVS/Entries /.cvsignore/1.1/Sun Jul 27 07:51:39 2003// /README.txt/1.1/Sun Jul 27 07:41:09 2003// ... /sb_notesfilter.py/1.2/Wed Sep 10 14:00:35 2003// /sb_server.py/1.4/Mon Sep 15 16:26:09 2003// /sb_smtpproxy.py/1.2/Mon Sep 15 16:26:09 2003// D ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-15 17:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hi Skip - this should have been fixed in sb_server.py v1.4 - are you using up-to-date cvs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 11:40:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 11:40:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807201 ] Error checking for new version Message-ID: Bugs item #807201, was opened at 2003-09-16 08:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807201&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken Erickson (hobie346) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error checking for new version Initial Comment: When attempting to use the "check for new version" button, I get the error message: There was an error checking for latest version. For specific details on the error, please see SpamBayes log. Please check your Internet connection, or try again later. I haven't had a problem with using the "check for later version" option until I upgraded to 0.8. As for check my Internet connection, I'm not sure what this message means as I'm able to connect to the Internet and send this report. I did check the log file: HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found I've attached the log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 11:41:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 11:41:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 09:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-16 15:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I guess my reaction would be: disk space is extraordinarlity cheap, and spam messages are generally small. My folder of 2900 spams takes up only 11.8 MB of space on my Exchange server. I don't think storing "extra" data is a big issue in the single- user model. In fact, I think an auto-rotating trainig corpus-of- copies like the scheme used by ASSP (see assp.sf.net) is a good idea. It help age things properly, and keeps a balanced training set, and lets you empty out your "main" mailbox. Of course, there is the problem of making SpamBayes training sets and databases too large to be "portable". This is an large issue with the Outlook plug-in, since many companies using Windows roaming profiles so users can log-in to any machine. I also remember similar issues with the NFS/AFS roaming-user system we had in college for the enginerring workstations, so I'm sure Linux/FreeBSD/UNIX sites could have roaming-user problems, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-16 02:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Yup, I agree it's fraught with dangers. Note that we'd also need to remember which msgs were explicitly trained as mistakes or unsures, to help prevent them from getting mistreated again. For example, I have a few strange friends I hear from maybe twice a year, and the stuff they send is so bizarre I have to keep several years' worth of their msgs in my ham training set (and, yes, I do think it's ham ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Another problem with this is that these require either the user keeping spam around, or storing a *lot* more data. Ryan's scheme below is really two separate things - one is aging out old data, which has been discussed a few times, and then randomly selecting from what's left. I tend to agree with Mark. I think this might end up like the experimental_ham_spam_imbalance and confuse people. Why doesn't x get a ham score, they ask? Because it was randomly chosen to not get included in your training data, we answer. The more I think about it, the more I think that (unless someone comes up with a new, better, experimental_ham_spam_imbalance option), the best option is simply to warn users if they reach a certain level of imbalance, so that their attention is drawn to the problem. If I find the time, I might play around with setting up a test script to train, then retrain on balanced data and see how that goes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-15 13:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My problem is more with missing ham, and I fear that missing a single ham could make the difference. Our low false-positive rate is a feature we should keep :) It all gets back to the test framework. As Tim is fond of saying, intuition is a poor guide here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 The last sentance under part 1) below should read "So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2003." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 12:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-13 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 11:59:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 11:59:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-16 15:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 12:04:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 12:04:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-751127 ] WinXP MemoryError at installation Message-ID: Bugs item #751127, was opened at 2003-06-08 22:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by utter11 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=751127&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Williams (lamwilli) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: WinXP MemoryError at installation Initial Comment: I attempted to install the Spambayes Outlook AddIn from: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-002.exe to my WinXP machine. Relevent configuration info follows: OS Name Microsoft Windows XP Professional Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 Build 2600 Application name Outlook Version 9.0 Build 3821 AKA MS Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.3821) The entire contents of the log file was: ---------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in DllRegisterServer File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", line 405, in RegisterClasses MemoryError ---------------------------------------------------- The error message at installation time was: ---------------------------------------------------- The instruction at "0x77f51ed3" referenced memory at "0xfffffff8". The memory could not be "read" ---------------------------------------------------- See attached... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Utter (utter11) Date: 2003-09-16 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=867922 I'm receiving the same error in version 0.8 every time a new message arrives and SpamBayes moves it to the Spam folder. I'm on Win2KPro with Outlook 2000 SR-1, on a Dell with plenty of memory and CPU. The instruction at "0x01561a10" referenced memory at "0x00000008". The memory could not be "read". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-01 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please try the new 0.3 binary version ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-06-17 00:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Do you get the same error after a reboot? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=751127&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 12:16:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 12:16:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-807234 ] Active Sync Problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #807234, was opened at 2003-09-16 09:16 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathaniel Gildersleeve (natgild) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Active Sync Problem Initial Comment: I am using the Outlook 2002 addin version .08 on a machine with Windows XP. After installing Spambayes, I am unable to sync my Ipaq Pocket PC using Activesync Version 3.7 and Windows Mobile 2003 on the Ipaq. My computer will no longer connect to the Ipaq. I recall I had a similar problem with Outlook Spam Filter Version 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 12:16:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 12:16:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803771 ] Outlook synchronization fails Message-ID: Bugs item #803771, was opened at 2003-09-10 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by martin2305 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook synchronization fails Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2002 SP2 on Windows XP SP1 on Compaq Evo. With SpamBayes plugin installed, Outlook will not sync online with offline content: the "time remaining" value on the task grows continuously and apparently without limit. Problem can be avoided by deinstalling the plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Date: 2003-09-16 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862657 It gets worse. On attempting to enable a sync by deinstalling plugin v0.81, I find that Outlook STILL won't sync. Informed opinion discounts the possibility that this might be merely a performance issue - I've had the "time remaining" up to 35 minutes before I gave up, so am assuming it's truly a functionality problem. I'm reduced to asking Microsoft consultants whether they have any clues, which I find a bit of a disappointment. How soon can this issue get allocated to someone, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Date: 2003-09-11 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862657 I confirm this behaviour, which applied at release 0.7, still occurs at 0.81. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 12:17:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 12:18:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807201 ] Error checking for new version Message-ID: Bugs item #807201, was opened at 2003-09-16 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807201&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken Erickson (hobie346) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error checking for new version Initial Comment: When attempting to use the "check for new version" button, I get the error message: There was an error checking for latest version. For specific details on the error, please see SpamBayes log. Please check your Internet connection, or try again later. I haven't had a problem with using the "check for later version" option until I upgraded to 0.8. As for check my Internet connection, I'm not sure what this message means as I'm able to connect to the Internet and send this report. I did check the log file: HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found I've attached the log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-16 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Thanks for the report. This has been fixed in the source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807201&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 17:23:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 17:23:52 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-802341 ] Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Message-ID: Feature Requests item #802341, was opened at 2003-09-08 09:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Auto-balancing of ham & spam numbers Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org """ What about adding a feature to the plug-in that would could the number of messages in each training folder, then use a random subsample of each folder (spam or ham) as necessary to create a balanced training corpus? """ This seems like a reasonable idea (as an option), and might work better than the experimental imbalance adjustment, which has caused various people difficulties (because they are *very* imbalanced). What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-16 21:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 As I mentioned on the main spambayes user mailing list, I am going to create a script (in VBA I guess) that will troll through your folders and create the desired representative subset of messages (as copies) automatically. We'll see how it makes the filter perform after training, and if people like the feature. I have to figure out how to automatically strip attachments from the copies... anyone know how to do that in Outlook VBA without destroying the headers? Does anybody have a better idea of how to test this feature? -ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-16 15:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I guess my reaction would be: disk space is extraordinarlity cheap, and spam messages are generally small. My folder of 2900 spams takes up only 11.8 MB of space on my Exchange server. I don't think storing "extra" data is a big issue in the single- user model. In fact, I think an auto-rotating trainig corpus-of- copies like the scheme used by ASSP (see assp.sf.net) is a good idea. It help age things properly, and keeps a balanced training set, and lets you empty out your "main" mailbox. Of course, there is the problem of making SpamBayes training sets and databases too large to be "portable". This is an large issue with the Outlook plug-in, since many companies using Windows roaming profiles so users can log-in to any machine. I also remember similar issues with the NFS/AFS roaming-user system we had in college for the enginerring workstations, so I'm sure Linux/FreeBSD/UNIX sites could have roaming-user problems, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-16 02:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Yup, I agree it's fraught with dangers. Note that we'd also need to remember which msgs were explicitly trained as mistakes or unsures, to help prevent them from getting mistreated again. For example, I have a few strange friends I hear from maybe twice a year, and the stuff they send is so bizarre I have to keep several years' worth of their msgs in my ham training set (and, yes, I do think it's ham ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Another problem with this is that these require either the user keeping spam around, or storing a *lot* more data. Ryan's scheme below is really two separate things - one is aging out old data, which has been discussed a few times, and then randomly selecting from what's left. I tend to agree with Mark. I think this might end up like the experimental_ham_spam_imbalance and confuse people. Why doesn't x get a ham score, they ask? Because it was randomly chosen to not get included in your training data, we answer. The more I think about it, the more I think that (unless someone comes up with a new, better, experimental_ham_spam_imbalance option), the best option is simply to warn users if they reach a certain level of imbalance, so that their attention is drawn to the problem. If I find the time, I might play around with setting up a test script to train, then retrain on balanced data and see how that goes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-15 13:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My problem is more with missing ham, and I fear that missing a single ham could make the difference. Our low false-positive rate is a feature we should keep :) It all gets back to the test framework. As Tim is fond of saying, intuition is a poor guide here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 The last sentance under part 1) below should read "So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2003." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-15 12:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 Since I initially came up with this possible feature on the mailing list, let me add my two cents. I don't think throwing out any "super-spam" is the right approach, since there might be some useful "almost-spam" information in there. A spam might score 100% because it contains 'viagra' and 'lowest' and 'price', fine, and we already know about those tokens. But the same "super- spammy" message might contian a new domain name, or a new word like "silagra"; basically any other information that is useful in the training database. That said, I think a good algorithm might be based on dates, to make sure the sampling is representative. I suggest looking at the received date of the oldest message in each corpus, and choosing the most recent of these dates. Then we can count all messages from each corpus that are newer than this date, and finally, take a random subsample of the messages from the corpus which has "more" new messages. The subsampling can be done on the fly by using an RNG, you might get an error of a few messages in each direction, but it won't affect the statistics materially and will be easier to implement than keeping track of a bunch of message-ids. An example of my proposal: 1) Spam corpus: 1342, oldest is dated 5/13/2003; Ham corpus: 6203, oldest is dated 6/19/2002. So we choose our cutoff date to be 5/13/2002. 2) We already know there are 1342 messages in the spam corpus newer than this date. We also count up 2987 messages in the ham corpus newer than this date. So we want to choose 1342/2987=46.324% of the messages from the ham corpus newer than 5/13/2003. 3) We tokenize and traing on the whole spam corups. Then we start through the ham corpus, skipping all messages older than 5/13/2003. If we come across a message newer than that, we choose a random number between 0 and 1. If the random number is less than 0.46324, we train wiht the message. At most we should be off by a few dozen messages from the desired 1342 trained ham. This method gives us a balanced training set, with representative spam and ham messages from the same time- frame. What do you think? Regards, -Ryan- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2003-09-13 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 I don't know if it is a generally good idea or not, but I forward everything that scores as 1.00 spam directly to /dev/null (this way there is no way to train on it). This effectively implements the idea "do not train on VERY spammy spam". Works for me; about 80% of all messages (or 90% of all spam) is immediately thrown away, and the ham/spam numbers do not get skewed. 3 months, and not a single non-spam mass mailing in my spam box (in "unsure" in the worst case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This isn't Outlook specific, so you can have it back :) The big problem I see is *what* ones to choose? Skipping spam may be possible, but skipping a single ham to train on could be a huge problem. Maybe we could train on all spam, then score all spam, then re-train using only the least spammy spam - but I think the answer to http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#why-don-t-you-implement-cool-tokenizer-trick-x may be relevant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=802341&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 20:02:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 20:02:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cvdw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-17 00:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 this is still not very good solation. the autoachive feature is very crap! i want to be able to make it easy again. i only want this program becasue outlooks spam features are hard to use. pelase help me. cliff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-10 07:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Move it into a spam folder and use Outlook's autoarchive facility to delete the mail (or move it to deleted items) after 1 day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-10 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 yes i understand that by i want it to be simple and thus i turn off automatic train when i move it to that folder. is there any work around that i can use? cliff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 21:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 16 20:06:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 16 20:06:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806632 ] sb_server failure when saving config Message-ID: Bugs item #806632, was opened at 2003-09-16 04:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server failure when saving config Initial Comment: I just got this from sb_server when punching the "Save" button on the config page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 687, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 520, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_server.py", line 727, in _recreateState state.bayes.store() AttributeError: State instance has no attribute 'bayes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-17 12:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, what about 1.5? 1.4 fixed the problem when there was a bayes.state attribute but it got deleted before store/close. 1.5 should take care of the case where there isn't a bayes.state attribute (there always should be for pop3proxy users, but maybe not upload users). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2003-09-17 02:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Yup: % cat CVS/Entries /.cvsignore/1.1/Sun Jul 27 07:51:39 2003// /README.txt/1.1/Sun Jul 27 07:41:09 2003// ... /sb_notesfilter.py/1.2/Wed Sep 10 14:00:35 2003// /sb_server.py/1.4/Mon Sep 15 16:26:09 2003// /sb_smtpproxy.py/1.2/Mon Sep 15 16:26:09 2003// D ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 10:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hi Skip - this should have been fixed in sb_server.py v1.4 - are you using up-to-date cvs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 01:55:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 01:55:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 05:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 02:01:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 02:02:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 05:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by justaname You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 06:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 02:11:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 02:11:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807620 ] New mail icon in system tray Message-ID: Bugs item #807620, was opened at 2003-09-17 06:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807620&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: no name (vongrepa) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: New mail icon in system tray Initial Comment: Hi. When using the outlook plugin ver 0.81 i can set it up to mark mail filtered at spam as read. But when doing this the program does not remove the new mail icon from system tray. As a result I still have to go into outlook to check for new mail.. Thus I still use time on spam that is found and filtered. That apart: This spamfilter is great. Except the registration mail from sourceforge.et :-) nothing has been filtered wrong. Keep up the good work! When new mail icon is gone this is a 100% great product. Regards vonGrepa ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807620&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 02:45:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 02:46:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807620 ] New mail icon in system tray Message-ID: Bugs item #807620, was opened at 2003-09-17 18:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807620&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: no name (vongrepa) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: New mail icon in system tray Initial Comment: Hi. When using the outlook plugin ver 0.81 i can set it up to mark mail filtered at spam as read. But when doing this the program does not remove the new mail icon from system tray. As a result I still have to go into outlook to check for new mail.. Thus I still use time on spam that is found and filtered. That apart: This spamfilter is great. Except the registration mail from sourceforge.et :-) nothing has been filtered wrong. Keep up the good work! When new mail icon is gone this is a 100% great product. Regards vonGrepa ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-17 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.9 and also feature request 774978 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807620&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 03:45:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 03:46:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804227 ] Confusing error message when "unsure" folder is unusable Message-ID: Bugs item #804227, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:54 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 1 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Confusing error message when "unsure" folder is unusable Initial Comment: I am using Outlook with Exchange. I was working in "offline mode". During synchronisation with the server, I regularly get an error from SB : "Moving the message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR) : OLE error 0x80040119 It is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity This message will not be reported again until SB is restarted" I see as well that some of the messages in my inbox have "synchronisation error". I assume that this is caused by SB updating the offline messages during the synchronisation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 what I meant by "suspect" folder is the folder where SB moves unsure emails. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 I believe that this message is displayed because my "suspect" folder was setup to be available only when online. When I work offline, when SB attempts to move a message to the suspect folder, it obviously cannot move it. Obviously, SB cannot move the message. Could you however attempt to have a user-friendlier message : it would help, at a minimum, to display the name of the source and target folders... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-11 12:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 log attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-11 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 06:02:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 06:02:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803771 ] Outlook synchronization fails Message-ID: Bugs item #803771, was opened at 2003-09-10 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by martin2305 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 1 Submitted By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook synchronization fails Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2002 SP2 on Windows XP SP1 on Compaq Evo. With SpamBayes plugin installed, Outlook will not sync online with offline content: the "time remaining" value on the task grows continuously and apparently without limit. Problem can be avoided by deinstalling the plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Date: 2003-09-17 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862657 OK, I seem to have got to the bottom of this - it was a performance problem after all. Microsoft advise: "if this product actually scans the mailbox and changes the items, this may alert Outlook that the items have changed, which would practically force a full sync rather than an incremental one, as each item would need re-synching." I have now archived about half my mailbox, and find that synchronization works eventually. Following syncs, where only a few items have been scored for spam, work fine, as there is no additional material to sync other than what's been received anyway. You might care to incorporate this issue into the Outlook Troubleshooting guide. I assume it's best left to admins to mark this "closed". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Date: 2003-09-16 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862657 It gets worse. On attempting to enable a sync by deinstalling plugin v0.81, I find that Outlook STILL won't sync. Informed opinion discounts the possibility that this might be merely a performance issue - I've had the "time remaining" up to 35 minutes before I gave up, so am assuming it's truly a functionality problem. I'm reduced to asking Microsoft consultants whether they have any clues, which I find a bit of a disappointment. How soon can this issue get allocated to someone, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Taylor (martin2305) Date: 2003-09-11 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=862657 I confirm this behaviour, which applied at release 0.7, still occurs at 0.81. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803771&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 10:43:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 10:44:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806632 ] sb_server failure when saving config Message-ID: Bugs item #806632, was opened at 2003-09-15 11:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server failure when saving config Initial Comment: I just got this from sb_server when punching the "Save" button on the config page: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 687, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 520, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/Users/skip/local/bin/sb_server.py", line 727, in _recreateState state.bayes.store() AttributeError: State instance has no attribute 'bayes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2003-09-17 09:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 yup - works for me ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, what about 1.5? 1.4 fixed the problem when there was a bayes.state attribute but it got deleted before store/close. 1.5 should take care of the case where there isn't a bayes.state attribute (there always should be for pop3proxy users, but maybe not upload users). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2003-09-16 09:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 Yup: % cat CVS/Entries /.cvsignore/1.1/Sun Jul 27 07:51:39 2003// /README.txt/1.1/Sun Jul 27 07:41:09 2003// ... /sb_notesfilter.py/1.2/Wed Sep 10 14:00:35 2003// /sb_server.py/1.4/Mon Sep 15 16:26:09 2003// /sb_smtpproxy.py/1.2/Mon Sep 15 16:26:09 2003// D ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-15 17:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hi Skip - this should have been fixed in sb_server.py v1.4 - are you using up-to-date cvs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 12:35:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 12:35:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-807993 ] Check for new version fails Message-ID: Support Requests item #807993, was opened at 2003-09-17 16:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807993&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Beckley (gorka34) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Check for new version fails Initial Comment: SpamBayes Outlook Addin .081. Clicking Check for New Version fails with error message: --------------------------- SpamBayes --------------------------- There was an error checking for the latest version For specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log Please check your internet connection, or try again later --------------------------- OK --------------------------- I don't have any problems connecting to the internet. The log file is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807993&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 14:31:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 14:32:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 04:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by john_hood You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 18:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 21:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-15 00:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 23:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 08:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 23:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 17:59:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 18:00:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lba You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-18 07:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-18 04:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-16 07:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-15 10:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-05 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 19:01:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 19:01:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807993 ] Check for new version fails Message-ID: Bugs item #807993, was opened at 2003-09-18 04:35 Message generated for change (Attachment added) made by gorka34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807993&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Beckley (gorka34) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Check for new version fails Initial Comment: SpamBayes Outlook Addin .081. Clicking Check for New Version fails with error message: --------------------------- SpamBayes --------------------------- There was an error checking for the latest version For specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log Please check your internet connection, or try again later --------------------------- OK --------------------------- I don't have any problems connecting to the internet. The log file is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807993&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 19:02:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 19:02:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807993 ] Check for new version fails Message-ID: Bugs item #807993, was opened at 2003-09-18 04:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807993&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Beckley (gorka34) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Check for new version fails Initial Comment: SpamBayes Outlook Addin .081. Clicking Check for New Version fails with error message: --------------------------- SpamBayes --------------------------- There was an error checking for the latest version For specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log Please check your internet connection, or try again later --------------------------- OK --------------------------- I don't have any problems connecting to the internet. The log file is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-18 11:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807993&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 17 19:03:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 17 19:03:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807993 ] Check for new version fails Message-ID: Bugs item #807993, was opened at 2003-09-18 04:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807993&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dean Beckley (gorka34) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Check for new version fails Initial Comment: SpamBayes Outlook Addin .081. Clicking Check for New Version fails with error message: --------------------------- SpamBayes --------------------------- There was an error checking for the latest version For specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log Please check your internet connection, or try again later --------------------------- OK --------------------------- I don't have any problems connecting to the internet. The log file is attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-18 11:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807993&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 18 07:02:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 18 07:02:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804364 ] Outlook hangs when receiving messages Message-ID: Bugs item #804364, was opened at 2003-09-11 09:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dstapleton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs when receiving messages Initial Comment: Using Windows 98, Outlook 2000 SP3, Pentium II-350, 128MB RAM, Spambayes Outlook Addin 0.81. Outlook rules move messages from the Inbox to three folders. Spambayes is configured to watch three folders. Approximately 80% of the time when an email comes in to be filtered, Outlook hangs and the only way to clear it is to End Task. I have tried both enabling and disabling the filter timer but have the same results. Disabling Spambayes eliminates the problem. I have attached a log file. The first portion of the file is the log immediately after Outlook hanging and being shut down. This portion of the log doesn't show the email that was coming in to be filtered. The second portion of the file is the log after I have restarted Outlook. This portion does show the email that was coming in when Outlook hung. When working, Spambayes is properly identifying up to 97 percent of the spam I receive over three accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Date: 2003-09-18 08:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864221 Update: The problem seems to be linked to checking multiple email accounts with Outlook. When checking only one account, everything works fine. When checking two or more, thinkgs go downhill from there. I have uninstalled and hope for a new version soon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804364&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 18 07:19:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 18 07:19:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-808489 ] Could not watch the specified folders Message-ID: Bugs item #808489, was opened at 2003-09-18 21:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808489&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry Thomas (thomcom) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Could not watch the specified folders Initial Comment: Win XP SP1, fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. AVG7 Anti Virus (not running during installs) Insalled 008.1 trained successfully, turned on delayed filtering and got the above message. Then software would not filter automatically but allowed manual filtering. This is not what I wanted so tried turning off delayed filtering - no difference. Uninstalled 008.1, rebooted. Installed 007 as I had been using this version succesfully on a previous install of WinXp - still could not get software to filter. re-installed 008.1 and now on opening outlook get following error message "There was an error initialising Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled please reconfigure & reenable this plugin. Error Details: Could not watch specified folders" 4 logfiles attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808489&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 18 10:13:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 18 10:13:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-808575 ] Read status doesn't change for identified SPAM Message-ID: Bugs item #808575, was opened at 2003-09-18 08:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808575&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Stallsworth (jbravo_dude) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Read status doesn't change for identified SPAM Initial Comment: In Outlook 2002, if you tell Spambayes to change the status of messages to "read" after moving, it does so within Outlook. The message notification in the taskbar however does not recognize the change. You still get the icon indicating you have new mail when in fact its just the spam that has technically been "unread". Thanks, JB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 18 11:46:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 18 11:46:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-808663 ] unable to set spam_filter_id Message-ID: Bugs item #808663, was opened at 2003-09-18 15:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808663&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeffrey Reniers (jeff_reniers) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: unable to set spam_filter_id Initial Comment: Don't ask me how or why, but I accidently moved my spam folder to my delete folder, and when I shut down Outlook I had it deleted. When I realized what I did I made a new spam folder and attempted to reconfigure spambayes. Unfortunately it never seems to 'remember' the new folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808663&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 18 17:48:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 18 17:48:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-808575 ] Read status doesn't change for identified SPAM Message-ID: Bugs item #808575, was opened at 2003-09-19 02:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808575&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Stallsworth (jbravo_dude) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Read status doesn't change for identified SPAM Initial Comment: In Outlook 2002, if you tell Spambayes to change the status of messages to "read" after moving, it does so within Outlook. The message notification in the taskbar however does not recognize the change. You still get the icon indicating you have new mail when in fact its just the spam that has technically been "unread". Thanks, JB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-19 09:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.9: And also feature request [ 774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808575&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 18 20:12:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 18 20:12:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-809008 ] safe start/stop and exlusive execution on windows Message-ID: Patches item #809008, was opened at 2003-09-19 10:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=809008&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: safe start/stop and exlusive execution on windows Initial Comment: As per spambayes-dev. This patch has a few main parts: * sb_server's state management refactored slightly - State class grows init, close and prepare methods. Global functions call these. * sb_server has mutex enabled on Windows, and called from State.prepare(). State.close() cleans it up. * pop3proxy_tray changed to check this exception, but also to check the mutex as a reliable "are we running anywhere" indicator. Also changed radically to never believe its "self.started" variable. It no longer gets confused when the world changes underneath it. * pop3proxy_service checks AlreadyRunningException reports an appropriate event ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=809008&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 19 10:39:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 19 10:39:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-809291 ] Database corruption Message-ID: Support Requests item #809291, was opened at 2003-09-19 10:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=809291&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database corruption Initial Comment: I was getting this message: X-Spambayes-Exception: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery')) in __getitem__() at E:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py line 86: return self.db[key] Now I'm getting this: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\pop3proxy.py", line 456, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\spambayes\message.py", line 129, in _getState . if self.db: . File "E:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 101, in __len__ . return len(self.dict) .ValueError: __len__() should return >= 0 I looked around but I couldn't find anything about how to do a database recovery. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=809291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 19 11:42:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 19 11:42:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809321 ] spambayes_addin.dll fails to register Message-ID: Bugs item #809321, was opened at 2003-09-19 09:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809321&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Rowe (jrowe88) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spambayes_addin.dll fails to register Initial Comment: On installing 8.1 i get a message saying that spambayes_addin.dll failed to register. Regsvr32 from the directory doesn't work either. Windows XP, SP1. Outlook 2000, SR3 Version 007 works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809321&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 19 14:02:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 19 14:02:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-12 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mchurch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-19 13:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-17 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 13:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 16:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 19:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 03:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 04:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 19 19:48:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 19 19:48:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query should show all words starting with certain text Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text Initial Comment: Word query should show all words starting with certain text if the user adds * in the end For example: url:great* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-20 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is now in cvs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-13 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, but not yet checked in (in anyone else was thinking of doing it). I'll check it in once the 1.0 branch is ready so that it doesn't contaminate that. It can do wildcard seaches with both ? and *, and also a general regex search. It also provides the option to ignore case or not, and alter the maximum number of returned results. There's an option that controls whether you see this box or the simple search one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For 1.1a1, it would be good to have a separate "advanced find" query available (and revert the old one). This would allow you to specify the maximum number of words found, and also allow regex searches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To change it to 100, all you have to do is add one zero in UserInterface.py. If lots (more than one ;) of people want more control over this, then I'll change it to an 'advanced' lookup to complement the existing one, and have options like this. 100 takes a long time, and results in a massive html page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Date: 2003-09-02 04:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=778595 Thanks! A limit of 100 would have been better, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-01 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is done, and should have just squeaked into 1.0a5. It works as described above. The one side-effect is that if a token ends with "*", then you can't search for it alone any more (you'll still get the result, but may also get other words, unless there are lots of them (see below), then you might not). If this becomes a problem, then we'll have to either escape '*' (ugly), or have a separate 'wildcard' search. It didn't look very good when there were too many results - and it could take a long time, and on this machine at least, crash, if there were too many. So there's a hard limit of 10 results that will be displayed, along with the number of results that matched, but aren't displayed. If this bothers you or you want to increase the limit, it's a one line change that should be easy to find. If people ask for it, then this can become an exposed option (again, probably via a special wildcard search). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 19 19:48:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 19 19:48:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796836 ] Show message tokens Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796836, was opened at 2003-08-29 05:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Show message tokens Initial Comment: "Show spam clues" does not show all of them. Perhaps the list should be just paged. The Outlook add-in already does this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-20 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is now in cvs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-13 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just in case anyone else is thinking of implementing this: I've finished writing this all up. There's now a button to show clues and one to show tokens. Both of them show the word, the prob, and the ham and spam count. The clues button shows both the current prob & clues and the original ones, if they are available. I'll check this in once the 1.0 branch is created. It'll appear in the first 1.1 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To clarify (I've done this on the list already, but for anyone else reading this): The "slow clues" on the web interface shows all of the clues that were used in scoring the message. This does not mean all *tokens*. Tokens that have a probability of 0.4 to 0.6 are not used in scoring (by default), and only 150 (by default) are used in total. What I think I'll do (for 1.1a1) is add a new option: "show tokens", which shows all the tokens. I'll also update the 'show clues' list to show not just the word and probability, but also the number of (trained) ham & spam messages it has appeared in, a al the Outlook plug-in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 20 04:07:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 20 04:07:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809665 ] Installation and automated Update problems Message-ID: Bugs item #809665, was opened at 2003-09-20 08:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809665&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Christoph Obernd?rfer (baloons) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Installation and automated Update problems Initial Comment: Hello forum, there are two issues I want to tell you: First one is a problem with the installation on WindowsXP with OutlookXP. At the end of the installation process, there is the error-message, that the spambayes_addin.dll couldn't be initialized. Then I tried to initialize it manually as plugin into OutlookXP but that did nothing. At last, I copied the file into the MSOutlook Addin-folder and initialized it as Outlook-plugin... voilla Seccond one is the automated update feature. When running it, the following message comes up: There was an error checking for the latest version. Fot specific errors on the error, please see the SpamBayes log. Please check your internet connection, or try again later. In the log, there is the following entry: ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 530, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 145, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 353, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 479, in http_error_302 File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found I have a permanent on connection via a DSL-Router. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809665&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 20 10:30:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 20 10:30:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809769 ] TypeError when training 1.0a6 Message-ID: Bugs item #809769, was opened at 2003-09-20 09:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError when training 1.0a6 Initial Comment: This is a newly set up 1.0a6 running as a service on WinXP. No settings have been imported from 1.0a5, nor has the database. Upon training from the cache, I receive a typeerror: Training... Trained on 7 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 20 12:01:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 20 12:02:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809795 ] scripts directory missing in src tar ball Message-ID: Bugs item #809795, was opened at 2003-09-20 18:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809795&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andreas Stern (astern) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: scripts directory missing in src tar ball Initial Comment: [astern@asyl spambayes]$ wget --passive-ftp http://cesnet.dl. sourceforge.net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz --17:59:54-- http://cesnet.dl.sourceforge. net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz => `spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz' Resolving cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net... done. Connecting to cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net[195.113.161.88]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 429,059 [application/x-gzip] 100% [====================================================== ======================================================= ==>] 429,059 481.06K/s ETA 00:00 17:59:55 (481.06 KB/s) - `spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz' saved [429059/429059] [astern@asyl spambayes]$ tar tzf spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz | grep scripts [astern@asyl spambayes]$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809795&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 20 12:14:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 20 12:14:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809802 ] error: file 'scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py' does not exist Message-ID: Bugs item #809802, was opened at 2003-09-20 18:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809802&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andreas Stern (astern) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: error: file 'scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py' does not exist Initial Comment: [astern@asyl spambayes]$ python setup.py -v build running build running build_py creating build creating build/lib creating build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Corpus.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/CostCounter.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Dibbler.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/FileCorpus.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Histogram.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/ImapUI.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Options.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/OptionsClass.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/ProxyUI.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/PyMeldLite.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/ServerUI.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/TestDriver.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Tester.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/UserInterface.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Version.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/__init__.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/cdb.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/cdb_classifier.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/chi2.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/classifier.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/compatheapq.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/compatsets.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/dbmstorage.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/hammie.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/hammiebulk.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/mboxutils.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/message.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/msgs.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/oe_mailbox.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/optimize.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/smtpproxy.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/storage.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/tokenizer.py -> build/lib/spambayes creating build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/__init__.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/classify_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/config_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/helmet_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/message_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/query_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/scanning__init__.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/status_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/train_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/ui_html.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/ui_psp.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources running build_scripts creating build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_client.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_dbexpimp.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_filter.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_mailsort.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_mboxtrain.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_notesfilter.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_pop3dnd.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_server.py -> build/scripts-2.2 error: file 'scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py' does not exist [astern@asyl spambayes]$ cp /usr/local/src/spam/spambayes-1. 0a5/smtpproxy.py scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py [astern@asyl spambayes]$ python setup.py -v build . . . copying and adjusting scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_unheader.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_upload.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_xmlrpcserver.py -> build/scripts-2. 2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_chkopts.py -> build/scripts-2.2 [astern@asyl spambayes]$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809802&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 20 13:50:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 20 13:50:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809848 ] Failed installation of add-in .08 version Message-ID: Bugs item #809848, was opened at 2003-09-20 17:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Failed installation of add-in .08 version Initial Comment: Hi All, I've having lots of trouble trying to install the plugin. I've read the bug trackers and docs, but am still unsuccessful. The toolbar basically does not show up and seems to fail according to the logs. Here's the info: Downloaded: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-0081.exe OS: WinXP sp1 Outlook 2002 sp2 spambayes1.log: pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1150, in OnConnection File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/manager", line 16, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 14, in ? exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name mapi spambayes2.log: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. Thanks for your help in advance, johnny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 20 18:49:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 20 18:49:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-21 00:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 00:20:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 00:20:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809795 ] scripts directory missing in src tar ball Message-ID: Bugs item #809795, was opened at 2003-09-21 04:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809795&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andreas Stern (astern) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: scripts directory missing in src tar ball Initial Comment: [astern@asyl spambayes]$ wget --passive-ftp http://cesnet.dl. sourceforge.net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz --17:59:54-- http://cesnet.dl.sourceforge. net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz => `spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz' Resolving cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net... done. Connecting to cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net[195.113.161.88]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 429,059 [application/x-gzip] 100% [====================================================== ======================================================= ==>] 429,059 481.06K/s ETA 00:00 17:59:55 (481.06 KB/s) - `spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz' saved [429059/429059] [astern@asyl spambayes]$ tar tzf spambayes-1.0a6.tar.gz | grep scripts [astern@asyl spambayes]$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-21 16:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eek! Sorry - I completely missed this. I've uploaded 1.0a6.1, which has the directory. I've no idea why the zip has it, since the manifest was missing the scripts directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809795&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 00:24:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 00:24:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809802 ] error: file 'scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py' does not exist Message-ID: Bugs item #809802, was opened at 2003-09-21 04:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809802&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andreas Stern (astern) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: error: file 'scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py' does not exist Initial Comment: [astern@asyl spambayes]$ python setup.py -v build running build running build_py creating build creating build/lib creating build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Corpus.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/CostCounter.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Dibbler.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/FileCorpus.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Histogram.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/ImapUI.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Options.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/OptionsClass.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/ProxyUI.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/PyMeldLite.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/ServerUI.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/TestDriver.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Tester.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/UserInterface.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/Version.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/__init__.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/cdb.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/cdb_classifier.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/chi2.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/classifier.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/compatheapq.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/compatsets.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/dbmstorage.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/hammie.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/hammiebulk.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/mboxutils.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/message.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/msgs.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/oe_mailbox.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/optimize.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/smtpproxy.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/storage.py -> build/lib/spambayes copying spambayes/tokenizer.py -> build/lib/spambayes creating build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/__init__.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/classify_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/config_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/helmet_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/message_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/query_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/scanning__init__.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/status_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/train_gif.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/ui_html.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources copying spambayes/resources/ui_psp.py -> build/lib/spambayes/resources running build_scripts creating build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_client.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_dbexpimp.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_filter.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_mailsort.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_mboxtrain.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_notesfilter.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_pop3dnd.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_server.py -> build/scripts-2.2 error: file 'scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py' does not exist [astern@asyl spambayes]$ cp /usr/local/src/spam/spambayes-1. 0a5/smtpproxy.py scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py [astern@asyl spambayes]$ python setup.py -v build . . . copying and adjusting scripts/sb_smtpproxy.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_unheader.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_upload.py -> build/scripts-2.2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_xmlrpcserver.py -> build/scripts-2. 2 copying and adjusting scripts/sb_chkopts.py -> build/scripts-2.2 [astern@asyl spambayes]$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-21 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is from cvs, I assume (sb_smtpproxy was only removed yesterday). Fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809802&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 05:48:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 05:48:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810067 ] problem with 1.06a web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #810067, was opened at 2003-09-21 09:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Bedford (billbedford) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: problem with 1.06a web interface Initial Comment: When using the web review page, hitting the train button results in this error message 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 10:49:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 10:49:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 07:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jaal2001 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 08:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 12:50:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 12:50:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-21 00:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pgrawehr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 18:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 13:05:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 13:05:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810183 ] Outlook crash after watching spam clues Message-ID: Bugs item #810183, was opened at 2003-09-21 19:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crash after watching spam clues Initial Comment: After looking at the spam clues in outlook 2000 (via the spambayes menu in the toolbar), outlook crashes when the window is closed again. Crash Location: 0x32503BD2 (BLNMGRPS.DLL, at prefered load address) Call Stack: BLNMGRPS.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x8d3 OBALLOON.DLL!32a033ca() MSO9.DLL!_MsoFCustomAWDatabases@12() + 0x900 MSO9.DLL!_LDoBalloonTFC@40() + 0x3e 00000005() NTDLL.DLL!_LdrpAccessResourceData@16() + 0x9d msi.dll!InstallFiles() + 0x1dd2 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe riched20.dll!CFontCache::GetCcs() + 0xa6 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe NTDLL.DLL!_RtlpUnlockAtomTable@4() + 0xd NTDLL.DLL!_RtlLookupAtomInAtomTable@12() + 0x86 URLMON.DLL! CSecurityManager::CSecMgrCache::FindCacheEntry() + 0x33 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion2::Intersect() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!XHDC::PatBlt() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!SelectObject() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CRgnData::Subtract() + 0x63 MSHTML.DLL!CLayout::DrawClientScrollbar() + 0x13c MSHTML.DLL!CDispClipTransform::SetClipRect () + 0x32 MSHTML.DLL!CDispContainer::PreDraw() + 0x217 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Subtract() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawBands() + 0x11e MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::BoundsInside() + 0x1b MSHTML.DLL! CDispDrawContext::IntersectRedrawRegion() + 0x37 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Intersect() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0xd0 MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 00000275() MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::~CRegion() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x160f0 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x15522 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x169a3 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x14d4d OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4f84 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x2ddde OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4e9f OUTLLIB.DLL!RenExitInstance@0() + 0x22d0 OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4ff1 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcA@16() + 0x22 OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x468da OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x46871 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x2244 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 13:06:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 13:06:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810183 ] Outlook crash after watching spam clues Message-ID: Bugs item #810183, was opened at 2003-09-21 19:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pgrawehr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crash after watching spam clues Initial Comment: After looking at the spam clues in outlook 2000 (via the spambayes menu in the toolbar), outlook crashes when the window is closed again. Crash Location: 0x32503BD2 (BLNMGRPS.DLL, at prefered load address) Call Stack: BLNMGRPS.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x8d3 OBALLOON.DLL!32a033ca() MSO9.DLL!_MsoFCustomAWDatabases@12() + 0x900 MSO9.DLL!_LDoBalloonTFC@40() + 0x3e 00000005() NTDLL.DLL!_LdrpAccessResourceData@16() + 0x9d msi.dll!InstallFiles() + 0x1dd2 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe riched20.dll!CFontCache::GetCcs() + 0xa6 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe NTDLL.DLL!_RtlpUnlockAtomTable@4() + 0xd NTDLL.DLL!_RtlLookupAtomInAtomTable@12() + 0x86 URLMON.DLL! CSecurityManager::CSecMgrCache::FindCacheEntry() + 0x33 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion2::Intersect() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!XHDC::PatBlt() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!SelectObject() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CRgnData::Subtract() + 0x63 MSHTML.DLL!CLayout::DrawClientScrollbar() + 0x13c MSHTML.DLL!CDispClipTransform::SetClipRect () + 0x32 MSHTML.DLL!CDispContainer::PreDraw() + 0x217 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Subtract() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawBands() + 0x11e MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::BoundsInside() + 0x1b MSHTML.DLL! CDispDrawContext::IntersectRedrawRegion() + 0x37 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Intersect() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0xd0 MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 00000275() MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::~CRegion() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x160f0 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x15522 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x169a3 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x14d4d OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4f84 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x2ddde OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4e9f OUTLLIB.DLL!RenExitInstance@0() + 0x22d0 OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4ff1 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcA@16() + 0x22 OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x468da OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x46871 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x2244 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 14:00:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 14:00:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810183 ] Outlook crash after watching spam clues Message-ID: Bugs item #810183, was opened at 2003-09-21 19:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pgrawehr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crash after watching spam clues Initial Comment: After looking at the spam clues in outlook 2000 (via the spambayes menu in the toolbar), outlook crashes when the window is closed again. Crash Location: 0x32503BD2 (BLNMGRPS.DLL, at prefered load address) Call Stack: BLNMGRPS.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x8d3 OBALLOON.DLL!32a033ca() MSO9.DLL!_MsoFCustomAWDatabases@12() + 0x900 MSO9.DLL!_LDoBalloonTFC@40() + 0x3e 00000005() NTDLL.DLL!_LdrpAccessResourceData@16() + 0x9d msi.dll!InstallFiles() + 0x1dd2 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe riched20.dll!CFontCache::GetCcs() + 0xa6 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe NTDLL.DLL!_RtlpUnlockAtomTable@4() + 0xd NTDLL.DLL!_RtlLookupAtomInAtomTable@12() + 0x86 URLMON.DLL! CSecurityManager::CSecMgrCache::FindCacheEntry() + 0x33 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion2::Intersect() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!XHDC::PatBlt() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!SelectObject() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CRgnData::Subtract() + 0x63 MSHTML.DLL!CLayout::DrawClientScrollbar() + 0x13c MSHTML.DLL!CDispClipTransform::SetClipRect () + 0x32 MSHTML.DLL!CDispContainer::PreDraw() + 0x217 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Subtract() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawBands() + 0x11e MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::BoundsInside() + 0x1b MSHTML.DLL! CDispDrawContext::IntersectRedrawRegion() + 0x37 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Intersect() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0xd0 MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 00000275() MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::~CRegion() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x160f0 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x15522 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x169a3 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x14d4d OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4f84 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x2ddde OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4e9f OUTLLIB.DLL!RenExitInstance@0() + 0x22d0 OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4ff1 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcA@16() + 0x22 OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x468da OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x46871 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x2244 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 14:07:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 14:07:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-810206 ] Filter on attachment names Message-ID: Feature Requests item #810206, was opened at 2003-09-21 20:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=810206&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Filter on attachment names Initial Comment: It would be helpful if the filter checked the names of attachments to incoming mails. I receive lots of messages which consist of nothing than an attachment which is either a worm file or a file called "replaced infected file.txt", which is an informational message from my mail server that the true attachment (or even the contents of the message, if it was a harmful html mail) was removed. Such mails could safely be classified as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=810206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 14:10:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 14:10:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-21 00:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shultz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-21 20:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 18:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 20:50:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 20:50:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810342 ] sb_smtpproxy does not work with smtplib.SMTP.sendmail() Message-ID: Bugs item #810342, was opened at 2003-09-21 19:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810342&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timothy O'Malley (thisistimo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_smtpproxy does not work with smtplib.SMTP.sendmail() Initial Comment: When sending mail using the standard smtplib in the Python 2.3 distribution, the smtplib client implementation expects to receive a '354' response to the 'DATA' command. To verify, search for '354' (without quotes) in the standard smptlib.py library module. I have attached a patch to sb_smtpproxy.py that fixes this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810342&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 20:56:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 20:57:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810344 ] On Mac OS X, should use 'dbm' instead of gdbm or bsddb Message-ID: Bugs item #810344, was opened at 2003-09-21 19:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810344&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timothy O'Malley (thisistimo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: On Mac OS X, should use 'dbm' instead of gdbm or bsddb Initial Comment: The Mac OS X download for Python 2.3 does not have the gdbm, bsddb, or bsddb3 modules. It does, however, have a 'dbm' module. The dbmstorage.py file should be updated to fallback to the dbm module if there are no gdbm, bsddb, or bsddb3 modules as a way to support Mac OS X. There is patch attached to fix this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810344&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 21 21:18:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 21 21:18:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-810349 ] Mac OS X , Entourage integration Message-ID: Patches item #810349, was opened at 2003-09-21 20:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=810349&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timothy O'Malley (thisistimo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Mac OS X , Entourage integration Initial Comment: Attached is two Apple Scripts and a Python program to enable integration with Entourage on Mac OS X. There is a README file to explain the installation. This is pretty rough around the edges (documentation, error catching, installation), but the core functionality is all there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=810349&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 04:07:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 04:07:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-16 17:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by strobl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 05:19:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 05:20:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-17 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) >Assigned to: M.-A. Lemburg (lemburg) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 20:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 05:25:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 05:25:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809769 ] TypeError when training 1.0a6 Message-ID: Bugs item #809769, was opened at 2003-09-21 02:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TypeError when training 1.0a6 Initial Comment: This is a newly set up 1.0a6 running as a service on WinXP. No settings have been imported from 1.0a5, nor has the database. Upon training from the cache, I receive a typeerror: Training... Trained on 7 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you *have* a database? If you set the verbose option to true and run in a console window, do you get the message about "using ... database with x messages" (or the "using new database"? What happens if you use a pickle instead of dbm? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 05:26:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 05:26:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-16 17:59 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lemburg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 05:26:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 05:26:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810067 ] problem with 1.06a web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #810067, was opened at 2003-09-21 21:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Bedford (billbedford) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: problem with 1.06a web interface Initial Comment: When using the web review page, hitting the train button results in this error message 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of 809769: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 05:34:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 05:34:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809769 ] TypeError when training 1.0a6 Message-ID: Bugs item #809769, was opened at 2003-09-21 02:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: TypeError when training 1.0a6 Initial Comment: This is a newly set up 1.0a6 running as a service on WinXP. No settings have been imported from 1.0a5, nor has the database. Upon training from the cache, I receive a typeerror: Training... Trained on 7 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Argh. Forget that, I can duplicate this. If you delete the newly created databases (they will most likely be in c:\documents and settings\[username]\application data\spambayes\proxy) then everything should work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you *have* a database? If you set the verbose option to true and run in a console window, do you get the message about "using ... database with x messages" (or the "using new database"? What happens if you use a pickle instead of dbm? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 05:39:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 05:39:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809769 ] TypeError when training 1.0a6 Message-ID: Bugs item #809769, was opened at 2003-09-21 02:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: TypeError when training 1.0a6 Initial Comment: This is a newly set up 1.0a6 running as a service on WinXP. No settings have been imported from 1.0a5, nor has the database. Upon training from the cache, I receive a typeerror: Training... Trained on 7 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In fact, you should be able to fix this by simply stopping sb_server (or the service), and then starting it again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Argh. Forget that, I can duplicate this. If you delete the newly created databases (they will most likely be in c:\documents and settings\[username]\application data\spambayes\proxy) then everything should work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you *have* a database? If you set the verbose option to true and run in a console window, do you get the message about "using ... database with x messages" (or the "using new database"? What happens if you use a pickle instead of dbm? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 10:36:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 10:36:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-20 18:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wrongbutton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2003-09-22 10:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP (SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates). Except rebooting does not solve my problem. Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) but not moved. I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but can find no documentation. Can anyone tell me how to do this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-21 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 12:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 11:15:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 11:15:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-809291 ] Database corruption Message-ID: Support Requests item #809291, was opened at 2003-09-19 10:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kgiordano You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=809291&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database corruption Initial Comment: I was getting this message: X-Spambayes-Exception: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery')) in __getitem__() at E:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py line 86: return self.db[key] Now I'm getting this: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\pop3proxy.py", line 456, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\spambayes\message.py", line 129, in _getState . if self.db: . File "E:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 101, in __len__ . return len(self.dict) .ValueError: __len__() should return >= 0 I looked around but I couldn't find anything about how to do a database recovery. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Date: 2003-09-22 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855266 Deleting spambayes.messageinfo.db and the contents of the pop3proxy-*-cache folders seems to have cleared this up. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=809291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 11:19:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 11:19:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-16 17:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by strobl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Removing spambayes.messageinfo.db solved the problem for me. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 11:47:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 12:00:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-21 00:49 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by shultz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2003-09-22 16:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP (SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates). Except rebooting does not solve my problem. Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) but not moved. I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but can find no documentation. Can anyone tell me how to do this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-21 20:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 18:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 18:06:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 18:06:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810847 ] problem while saving configuration on 1.0a6 web page Message-ID: Bugs item #810847, was opened at 2003-09-23 00:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810847&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alain Bonnefoy (alainbo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: problem while saving configuration on 1.0a6 web page Initial Comment: Hi, When I click save on the configuration page I get the following error mesage: Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 687, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 513, in reReadOptions state.bayes.store() File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "c:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment --------------- I don't really understand why files are executed in D: what does the install command do? I though it copy the files in c:\python23\Scripts! Any idea about the error? Thanks, Alain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810847&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 22 20:51:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 22 20:51:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810902 ] Outlook 2000, Customize Outlook Today no longer works Message-ID: Bugs item #810902, was opened at 2003-09-22 17:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Bremmer (bremchris) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000, Customize Outlook Today no longer works Initial Comment: After a fresh install on Outlook 2000 sr1 (9.0.0.3812) the "Customize Outlook Today" button no longer works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 00:03:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 00:03:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-809291 ] Database corruption Message-ID: Support Requests item #809291, was opened at 2003-09-20 02:39 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=809291&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Database corruption Initial Comment: I was getting this message: X-Spambayes-Exception: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery')) in __getitem__() at E:\Python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py line 86: return self.db[key] Now I'm getting this: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\pop3proxy.py", line 456, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a5\spambayes\message.py", line 129, in _getState . if self.db: . File "E:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 101, in __len__ . return len(self.dict) .ValueError: __len__() should return >= 0 I looked around but I couldn't find anything about how to do a database recovery. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Date: 2003-09-23 03:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855266 Deleting spambayes.messageinfo.db and the contents of the pop3proxy-*-cache folders seems to have cleared this up. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=809291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 00:14:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 00:14:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-17 03:59 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-23 03:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Removing spambayes.messageinfo.db solved the problem for me. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 20:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 00:21:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 00:21:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810847 ] problem while saving configuration on 1.0a6 web page Message-ID: Bugs item #810847, was opened at 2003-09-23 10:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810847&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alain Bonnefoy (alainbo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: problem while saving configuration on 1.0a6 web page Initial Comment: Hi, When I click save on the configuration page I get the following error mesage: Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 687, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 513, in reReadOptions state.bayes.store() File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "D:\Downloads\antiSpam\spambayes-1.0a6 \spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "c:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment --------------- I don't really understand why files are executed in D: what does the install command do? I though it copy the files in c:\python23\Scripts! Any idea about the error? Thanks, Alain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-23 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of 810067. Simply stopping sb_server.py and then starting it again solves the problem for me. I'm working on checking in a correct fix for the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810847&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 00:54:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 00:54:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810983 ] socket.bind: permission denied Message-ID: Bugs item #810983, was opened at 2003-09-23 06:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810983&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alain Bonnefoy (alainbo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: socket.bind: permission denied Initial Comment: Hi, I'm running XPPro and spambayes1.0a6. Yesterday I had some problems while saving configuration through the web interface. Today, I cannot run sb_server anymore, I get the following message: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_server.py", line 829, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_server.py", line 822, in run prepare(state=state) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_server.py", line 756, in prepare state)) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_smtpproxy.py", line 513, in CreateProxies trainer) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_smtpproxy.py", line 253, in __init__ proxyArgs) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 267, in __init __ self.bind(port) File "c:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py", line 300, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (10013, 'Permission denied') any idea? Thanks, Alain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810983&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 02:59:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 02:59:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-16 15:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-23 06:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Re-opening. This is *not* fixed - the underlying problem is still there, and is very nasty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Removing spambayes.messageinfo.db solved the problem for me. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 08:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 03:15:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 03:16:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809848 ] Failed installation of add-in .08 version Message-ID: Bugs item #809848, was opened at 2003-09-21 03:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Failed installation of add-in .08 version Initial Comment: Hi All, I've having lots of trouble trying to install the plugin. I've read the bug trackers and docs, but am still unsuccessful. The toolbar basically does not show up and seems to fail according to the logs. Here's the info: Downloaded: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-0081.exe OS: WinXP sp1 Outlook 2002 sp2 spambayes1.log: pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1150, in OnConnection File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/manager", line 16, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 14, in ? exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name mapi spambayes2.log: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. Thanks for your help in advance, johnny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 17:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a dupe of [ 803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 03:17:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 03:17:07 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809321 ] spambayes_addin.dll fails to register Message-ID: Bugs item #809321, was opened at 2003-09-20 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809321&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Rowe (jrowe88) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spambayes_addin.dll fails to register Initial Comment: On installing 8.1 i get a message saying that spambayes_addin.dll failed to register. Regsvr32 from the directory doesn't work either. Windows XP, SP1. Outlook 2000, SR3 Version 007 works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is probably a dupe of [ 803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log If it isn't, could you please re-open and attach a log? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809321&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 03:21:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 03:21:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery Message-ID: Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-17 01:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery Initial Comment: I am getting errors like: bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (- 30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery program to run. SpamBayes is still mostly working even though gnerating this error a complete logfile is attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Adjusting category, as there are 2 reports in this bug - Outlook and the proxy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-09-23 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Re-opening. This is *not* fixed - the underlying problem is still there, and is very nasty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-23 01:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 Removing spambayes.messageinfo.db solved the problem for me. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 19:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this means that the problem is in the messageinfo database. You should be able to just delete that file without any problems, as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any messages still in the caches. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Date: 2003-09-22 18:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311771 I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 (or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. bsdi) one. Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download from Friday didn't help. Exporting the database and reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, either. I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling sb_server with the -D flag I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this behaviour and which do not. It seems that when after say five or ten successfully processed messages, a message throws such an exception, any other message throws that exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order to make it work again, for another five or ten messages. ------- X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr . msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 193, in setId . msginfoDB._getState(self) . File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", line 131, in _getState . (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] . File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__ . f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) . File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in __getitem__ . return self.db[key] .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 03:45:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 03:45:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-808489 ] Could not watch the specified folders Message-ID: Bugs item #808489, was opened at 2003-09-18 21:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808489&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Barry Thomas (thomcom) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Could not watch the specified folders Initial Comment: Win XP SP1, fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. AVG7 Anti Virus (not running during installs) Insalled 008.1 trained successfully, turned on delayed filtering and got the above message. Then software would not filter automatically but allowed manual filtering. This is not what I wanted so tried turning off delayed filtering - no difference. Uninstalled 008.1, rebooted. Installed 007 as I had been using this version succesfully on a previous install of WinXp - still could not get software to filter. re-installed 008.1 and now on opening outlook get following error message "There was an error initialising Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled please reconfigure & reenable this plugin. Error Details: Could not watch specified folders" 4 logfiles attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Have you had any luck with this? Did you try and re-configure SpamBayes since the most recent message you said you saw? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808489&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 07:09:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 07:09:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810902 ] Outlook 2000, Customize Outlook Today no longer works Message-ID: Bugs item #810902, was opened at 2003-09-23 02:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Bremmer (bremchris) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000, Customize Outlook Today no longer works Initial Comment: After a fresh install on Outlook 2000 sr1 (9.0.0.3812) the "Customize Outlook Today" button no longer works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-23 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 I notice same problem with Outlook 2000 sr1 (9.0.0.4527). SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 09:10:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 09:10:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810067 ] problem with 1.06a web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #810067, was opened at 2003-09-21 11:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by syvere You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Bedford (billbedford) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: problem with 1.06a web interface Initial Comment: When using the web review page, hitting the train button results in this error message 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Syver Enstad (syvere) Date: 2003-09-23 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=428736 This seems to be same problem that I reported on the spambayes list. The problem seems to occur after changing and saving options and then trying to train or classify. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of 809769: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 19:11:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 19:12:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810067 ] problem with 1.06a web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #810067, was opened at 2003-09-21 21:48 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Bedford (billbedford) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: problem with 1.06a web interface Initial Comment: When using the web review page, hitting the train button results in this error message 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/ lib/python2.3/shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-24 11:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, this is the same problem, but it's still a duplicate. Please do not reopen this - use 809769 to track it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Syver Enstad (syvere) Date: 2003-09-24 01:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=428736 This seems to be same problem that I reported on the spambayes list. The problem seems to occur after changing and saving options and then trying to train or classify. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of 809769: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810067&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 19:42:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 19:42:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804075 ] All mail items non-filterable Message-ID: Bugs item #804075, was opened at 2003-09-11 01:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mr_useless You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: All mail items non-filterable Initial Comment: >From the list: I started using SpamBayes last week with the .7x version. I just upgraded to .81, but I'm still having a problem I experienced with .7x. Platform: Windows XP Program: Outlook 2000 I started using the plugin on my wife's profile on the machine and it worked great. I then tried to use it in my profile, and the plugin does not work at all. I try to train the SpamBayes and it fails to see any messages. It finishes the training in a split second and ends up saying it has 0 good message and 0 spam. Trying to get the training to see a message, I selected all my folder to train on, and managed to get 1 message to appear as good. I put the folders back to their proper settings, retrained and got the 0 good 0 spam result again... If I try and delete a message as Spam it always says, "No filterable mail items are selected". I don't know what to do. It still works great on my wife's profile though... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tobias Kothe (mr_useless) Date: 2003-09-24 01:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873198 Same problem here. I just moved my Mails from outlook express to Outlook. Now the training wont find any mails in the folders. The "Delete as spam" wont work either giving the "no filterable items selected" message. But suprisingly all new messages, those which i did not transfer from "outlook express", work fine. I can delete them as spam without any problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Cook (awhig) Date: 2003-09-11 07:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863989 In response to a question from Mark: Yes, all my emails have the regular envelope icon next to them ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804075&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 23 23:56:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 23 23:56:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809769 ] TypeError when training 1.0a6 Message-ID: Bugs item #809769, was opened at 2003-09-21 02:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: TypeError when training 1.0a6 Initial Comment: This is a newly set up 1.0a6 running as a service on WinXP. No settings have been imported from 1.0a5, nor has the database. Upon training from the cache, I receive a typeerror: Training... Trained on 7 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-24 15:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok. As mentioned elsewhere, the problem arises any time the options (or advanced options) are saved. What as happening is that the database was closed and then reopened, but the ui kept trying to use the old instance of the db (which was closed). This is now fixed in cvs, so will be in 1.1b1. For the moment, simply restarting sb_server after changing the options works. A nicer solution would just be to use a pickle instead of a dbm - pickles aren't effected by this problem, AFAIK. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In fact, you should be able to fix this by simply stopping sb_server (or the service), and then starting it again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Argh. Forget that, I can duplicate this. If you delete the newly created databases (they will most likely be in c:\documents and settings\[username]\application data\spambayes\proxy) then everything should work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-22 21:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you *have* a database? If you set the verbose option to true and run in a console window, do you get the message about "using ... database with x messages" (or the "using new database"? What happens if you use a pickle instead of dbm? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809769&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 08:28:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 08:28:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811725 ] 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Message-ID: Bugs item #811725, was opened at 2003-09-24 07:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Initial Comment: 1.06a on a WinXP, Python 2.3, new installation running as service. Tried with service started and service stopped. which_database shows my storage as a 'None'. On further reflection, this is to be expected, as the database I actually see is called 'message_info_database.db'. It seems that which_database uses the persistant_storage_file property, where spambayes uses messageinfo_storage_file. >From bayescustomize.ini: messageinfo_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db Output of running which_database: C:\Program Files\spambayes\utilities>which_database.py Pickle is available. Dumbdbm is available. Dbhash is available. Bsddb[3] is available. Your storage C:\Documents and Settings\[User]\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy \statistics_database.db is a: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 09:35:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 09:35:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811759 ] Imap: intermediate messages not getting deleted Message-ID: Bugs item #811759, was opened at 2003-09-24 09:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811759&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jerm (floydd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imap: intermediate messages not getting deleted Initial Comment: (actually it's 1.0a6, but it only went to a5 in the dropdown) I'm having an issue where I'll often have repeats in my inbox, where a message will have the "X-Spambayes- MailId:" alone and the other copy will have the whole rating system included after that line, both of these in addition to the (deleted) original. If it's ham it shows as a repeat, if it's spam or unsure i end up with the fully formed headered message in the proper folder, and the (i'm assuming) working message still in the inbox. The original always seems to be deleted. Unfortunately, as with everything, it's not always the case, as it work fine some of the time. The classification works splendidly, thanks for the great software everyone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811759&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 10:59:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 10:59:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811759 ] Imap: odd message deletion behavior Message-ID: Bugs item #811759, was opened at 2003-09-24 09:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by floydd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811759&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jerm (floydd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: Imap: odd message deletion behavior Initial Comment: (actually it's 1.0a6, but it only went to a5 in the dropdown) I'm having an issue where I'll often have repeats in my inbox, where a message will have the "X-Spambayes- MailId:" alone and the other copy will have the whole rating system included after that line, both of these in addition to the (deleted) original. If it's ham it shows as a repeat, if it's spam or unsure i end up with the fully formed headered message in the proper folder, and the (i'm assuming) working message still in the inbox. The original always seems to be deleted. Unfortunately, as with everything, it's not always the case, as it work fine some of the time. The classification works splendidly, thanks for the great software everyone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jerm (floydd) Date: 2003-09-24 10:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873570 additionally, sometimes bessages, when moved to a new folder (unsure for certain, possibly spam as well), they'll show up in the folder as deleted before i ever get to them -- at least i now know WHY nothing was showing up in my folders after sb_imapfilter said it had found stuff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811759&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 12:11:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 12:11:28 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811871 ] Unrecoverable Fatal Error Message-ID: Bugs item #811871, was opened at 2003-09-24 12:11 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unrecoverable Fatal Error Initial Comment: Version 007 running in Outlook XP had a fatal error. Uninstalled 007 and installed 0081. The original SPAMbayes ICONs were left in the Outlook toolbar and caused no action to happen when selecting them. Uninstalled 0081, removed SPAMbayes from the toolbar and reinstalled 0081, and removed all SPAMbayes directories. Now, no entries for SPAMbayes are on the toolbar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 12:13:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 12:13:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811874 ] Check New Version Fails Message-ID: Bugs item #811874, was opened at 2003-09-24 12:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Check New Version Fails Initial Comment: In 0081, check new version fails in both Outlook XP and 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 12:14:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 12:15:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811871 ] Unrecoverable Fatal Error Message-ID: Bugs item #811871, was opened at 2003-09-24 12:11 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lfresin1 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 9 Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unrecoverable Fatal Error Initial Comment: Version 007 running in Outlook XP had a fatal error. Uninstalled 007 and installed 0081. The original SPAMbayes ICONs were left in the Outlook toolbar and caused no action to happen when selecting them. Uninstalled 0081, removed SPAMbayes from the toolbar and reinstalled 0081, and removed all SPAMbayes directories. Now, no entries for SPAMbayes are on the toolbar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 12:15:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 12:15:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811874 ] Check New Version Fails Message-ID: Bugs item #811874, was opened at 2003-09-24 12:13 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lfresin1 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Check New Version Fails Initial Comment: In 0081, check new version fails in both Outlook XP and 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 16:41:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 16:44:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812020 ] Outlook plugin doesn't get 'installed' Message-ID: Bugs item #812020, was opened at 2003-09-24 15:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812020&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: logistix (logistix) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin doesn't get 'installed' Initial Comment: Running 'setup.py install' doesn't seem to add the outlook plugin to 'site-packages'; it only installed spambayes. The outlook2000 directory itself doesn't have a setup.py file to do it's own install. I ran addin.py from the temporary directory I extracted spambayes to. Afterwards, renaming or deleting this directory fried the plugin. The main toolbar still showed up, but all the submenus disappeared. Although I expected something like this, it wasn't made clear in the readme.txt file. It is not a big deal for me to manually copy the dir to site-packages, but future installers might want to do this automatically (or just document that you need to manually copy the Outlook 2000 files) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812020&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 17:06:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 17:24:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811874 ] Check New Version Fails Message-ID: Bugs item #811874, was opened at 2003-09-24 11:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lobmeyer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Check New Version Fails Initial Comment: In 0081, check new version fails in both Outlook XP and 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred Lobmeyer (lobmeyer) Date: 2003-09-24 16:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873875 Outlook XP 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Spam HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 530, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 145, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 353, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 479, in http_error_302 File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 18:01:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 18:02:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Bugs item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-24 18:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 19:18:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 19:19:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809848 ] Failed installation of add-in .08 version Message-ID: Bugs item #809848, was opened at 2003-09-20 17:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jleon22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Open Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Failed installation of add-in .08 version Initial Comment: Hi All, I've having lots of trouble trying to install the plugin. I've read the bug trackers and docs, but am still unsuccessful. The toolbar basically does not show up and seems to fail according to the logs. Here's the info: Downloaded: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-0081.exe OS: WinXP sp1 Outlook 2002 sp2 spambayes1.log: pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1150, in OnConnection File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/manager", line 16, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 14, in ? exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name mapi spambayes2.log: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. Thanks for your help in advance, johnny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Date: 2003-09-24 23:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=870923 I read over bug# 803798 and I don't understand how the bug is the same? It mentioned that the installation went ok in that ID, however I cannot even get spambayes to install let alone do anything with filtering and what not. Please elaborate. thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 07:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a dupe of [ 803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:01:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:01:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Bugs item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-24 18:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-24 20:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You need to install win32all. http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:11:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:11:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-809008 ] safe start/stop and exlusive execution on windows Message-ID: Patches item #809008, was opened at 2003-09-19 10:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=809008&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: safe start/stop and exlusive execution on windows Initial Comment: As per spambayes-dev. This patch has a few main parts: * sb_server's state management refactored slightly - State class grows init, close and prepare methods. Global functions call these. * sb_server has mutex enabled on Windows, and called from State.prepare(). State.close() cleans it up. * pop3proxy_tray changed to check this exception, but also to check the mutex as a reliable "are we running anywhere" indicator. Also changed radically to never believe its "self.started" variable. It no longer gets confused when the world changes underneath it. * pop3proxy_service checks AlreadyRunningException reports an appropriate event ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Checking in scripts/sb_server.py; new revision: 1.9; previous revision: 1.8 Checking in windows/pop3proxy_tray.py; new revision: 1.15; previous revision: 1.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=809008&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:25:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:25:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809848 ] ImportError importing MAPI Message-ID: Bugs item #809848, was opened at 2003-09-21 03:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: ImportError importing MAPI Initial Comment: Hi All, I've having lots of trouble trying to install the plugin. I've read the bug trackers and docs, but am still unsuccessful. The toolbar basically does not show up and seems to fail according to the logs. Here's the info: Downloaded: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-0081.exe OS: WinXP sp1 Outlook 2002 sp2 spambayes1.log: pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1150, in OnConnection File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/manager", line 16, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 14, in ? exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name mapi spambayes2.log: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. Thanks for your help in advance, johnny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 10:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My mistake - I thought that bug was an 'import error' getting MAPI. I was sure there was another tracking this problem though, but now I can't find it - so this bug is it :) I am confused about your last comment: you said SpamBayes failed to install - however, from the looks of these logs it has installed - the "2" log shows the installation going correctly, while the "1" log shows SpamBayes attempting to connect to Outlook as Outlook starts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Date: 2003-09-25 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=870923 I read over bug# 803798 and I don't understand how the bug is the same? It mentioned that the installation went ok in that ID, however I cannot even get spambayes to install let alone do anything with filtering and what not. Please elaborate. thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 17:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a dupe of [ 803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:27:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:27:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811871 ] Unrecoverable Fatal Error Message-ID: Bugs item #811871, was opened at 2003-09-25 02:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Unrecoverable Fatal Error Initial Comment: Version 007 running in Outlook XP had a fatal error. Uninstalled 007 and installed 0081. The original SPAMbayes ICONs were left in the Outlook toolbar and caused no action to happen when selecting them. Uninstalled 0081, removed SPAMbayes from the toolbar and reinstalled 0081, and removed all SPAMbayes directories. Now, no entries for SPAMbayes are on the toolbar. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 10:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What do you mean "had a fatal error"? What message did you see, and where did you see it? Have you tried the "troubleshooting guide", and reset all the toolbars? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:30:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:31:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810183 ] Outlook crash after watching spam clues Message-ID: Bugs item #810183, was opened at 2003-09-22 03:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crash after watching spam clues Initial Comment: After looking at the spam clues in outlook 2000 (via the spambayes menu in the toolbar), outlook crashes when the window is closed again. Crash Location: 0x32503BD2 (BLNMGRPS.DLL, at prefered load address) Call Stack: BLNMGRPS.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x8d3 OBALLOON.DLL!32a033ca() MSO9.DLL!_MsoFCustomAWDatabases@12() + 0x900 MSO9.DLL!_LDoBalloonTFC@40() + 0x3e 00000005() NTDLL.DLL!_LdrpAccessResourceData@16() + 0x9d msi.dll!InstallFiles() + 0x1dd2 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe riched20.dll!CFontCache::GetCcs() + 0xa6 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe NTDLL.DLL!_RtlpUnlockAtomTable@4() + 0xd NTDLL.DLL!_RtlLookupAtomInAtomTable@12() + 0x86 URLMON.DLL! CSecurityManager::CSecMgrCache::FindCacheEntry() + 0x33 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion2::Intersect() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!XHDC::PatBlt() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!SelectObject() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CRgnData::Subtract() + 0x63 MSHTML.DLL!CLayout::DrawClientScrollbar() + 0x13c MSHTML.DLL!CDispClipTransform::SetClipRect () + 0x32 MSHTML.DLL!CDispContainer::PreDraw() + 0x217 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Subtract() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawBands() + 0x11e MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::BoundsInside() + 0x1b MSHTML.DLL! CDispDrawContext::IntersectRedrawRegion() + 0x37 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Intersect() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0xd0 MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 00000275() MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::~CRegion() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x160f0 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x15522 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x169a3 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x14d4d OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4f84 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x2ddde OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4e9f OUTLLIB.DLL!RenExitInstance@0() + 0x22d0 OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4ff1 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcA@16() + 0x22 OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x468da OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x46871 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x2244 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 10:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Does this happen every single time? Have you ever tried on another machine? As this is the only ever report of this, I suspect that unfortunately we will have to put it down to your specific machine.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-22 04:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-22 03:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:48:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:48:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811874 ] Check New Version Fails Message-ID: Bugs item #811874, was opened at 2003-09-25 04:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Check New Version Fails Initial Comment: In 0081, check new version fails in both Outlook XP and 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred Lobmeyer (lobmeyer) Date: 2003-09-25 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873875 Outlook XP 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Spam HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 530, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 145, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 353, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 479, in http_error_302 File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:49:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:49:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Bugs item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-25 10:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll update the readme to reflect the additional dependancy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-25 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You need to install win32all. http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 20:59:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 20:59:35 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811725 ] 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Message-ID: Bugs item #811725, was opened at 2003-09-25 00:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Initial Comment: 1.06a on a WinXP, Python 2.3, new installation running as service. Tried with service started and service stopped. which_database shows my storage as a 'None'. On further reflection, this is to be expected, as the database I actually see is called 'message_info_database.db'. It seems that which_database uses the persistant_storage_file property, where spambayes uses messageinfo_storage_file. >From bayescustomize.ini: messageinfo_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db Output of running which_database: C:\Program Files\spambayes\utilities>which_database.py Pickle is available. Dumbdbm is available. Dbhash is available. Bsddb[3] is available. Your storage C:\Documents and Settings\[User]\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy \statistics_database.db is a: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 12:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes uses *two* databases. One, the message_info_database.db, keeps track of which messages it has already seen/trained. The other, statistics_database.db, keeps track of statistics - basically how many times each word (token) has been seen in ham and spam. None should mean that the file is unreadable or doesn't exist. Is this the case? I'll update which_database to print out a nicer message in this case. It works fine for me. What version of Python are you using? What should the answer be? (i.e. are you using the default, which would be dbhash or bsddb[3], or have you changed to a pickle). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 21:48:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 21:48:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Bugs item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-24 18:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by swerdlow You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Date: 2003-09-24 21:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873906 Okay, I installed win32all, but I'm not understanding how to start the service properly. "python pop3proxy_service.py" gives me parameter information, so I tried "python pop3proxy_service.py install" followed by "python pop3proxy_service.py start" from the download directory. However, http://localhost:8880 produced no page. Do I need to run this script from somewhere else, or as some particular user? I feel like I'm being dense, but I don't see any more information in the ReadMe to help me get this set up. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-24 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll update the readme to reflect the additional dependancy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-24 20:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You need to install win32all. http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 21:55:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 21:55:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Support Requests item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-25 10:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 When you ran with "install", did you get something like "Installing service pop3proxy to Python class C:\spambayes_1_0\windows\pop3proxy_ service.Service Service installed"? (your path will be different, obviously). Did you get "Starting service pop3proxy" after running with "start"? If you look in the Services control panel (via the Administrative Tools one), you should see the pop3proxy/spambayes service listed. It should say that it is started. If you run "pop3proxy_service.py debug" you should get the service starting but printing out debugging information into the console. Could you let us know what you get then? It might be that the service has started, but can't use port 8880 for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Date: 2003-09-25 13:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873906 Okay, I installed win32all, but I'm not understanding how to start the service properly. "python pop3proxy_service.py" gives me parameter information, so I tried "python pop3proxy_service.py install" followed by "python pop3proxy_service.py start" from the download directory. However, http://localhost:8880 produced no page. Do I need to run this script from somewhere else, or as some particular user? I feel like I'm being dense, but I don't see any more information in the ReadMe to help me get this set up. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll update the readme to reflect the additional dependancy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-25 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You need to install win32all. http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Sep 24 22:14:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Sep 24 22:14:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811725 ] 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Message-ID: Bugs item #811725, was opened at 2003-09-24 07:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbehrens You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Initial Comment: 1.06a on a WinXP, Python 2.3, new installation running as service. Tried with service started and service stopped. which_database shows my storage as a 'None'. On further reflection, this is to be expected, as the database I actually see is called 'message_info_database.db'. It seems that which_database uses the persistant_storage_file property, where spambayes uses messageinfo_storage_file. >From bayescustomize.ini: messageinfo_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db Output of running which_database: C:\Program Files\spambayes\utilities>which_database.py Pickle is available. Dumbdbm is available. Dbhash is available. Bsddb[3] is available. Your storage C:\Documents and Settings\[User]\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy \statistics_database.db is a: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Date: 2003-09-24 21:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=748552 >> None should mean that the file is unreadable or doesn't exist. Is this the case? >> Yes, that is the case. There is a message_info_database.db , but no statistics_database.db . Should statistics_database.db be created? Or is that an optional item with a default of "off"? > I'll update which_database to print out a nicer message in this case. which_database only checks one of the two files, then. It looks for whatever "persistent_storage_file" is set to ; it does not check "messageinfo_storage_file". > What version of Python are you using? 2.3 > What should the answer be? I am using the default, which turns out to be a dbhash. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-24 19:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes uses *two* databases. One, the message_info_database.db, keeps track of which messages it has already seen/trained. The other, statistics_database.db, keeps track of statistics - basically how many times each word (token) has been seen in ham and spam. None should mean that the file is unreadable or doesn't exist. Is this the case? I'll update which_database to print out a nicer message in this case. It works fine for me. What version of Python are you using? What should the answer be? (i.e. are you using the default, which would be dbhash or bsddb[3], or have you changed to a pickle). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 25 05:01:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 25 05:01:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812304 ] Error writing spambayes-ini-file Message-ID: Bugs item #812304, was opened at 2003-09-25 09:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812304&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Klaus Marion (kmarion) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error writing spambayes-ini-file Initial Comment: I have here a win98 Computer with outlook2000 on it. Installation of outlook Add-in worked fine, but after ending outlook, the add-in lost all information (Spam- Folders, non-spam-folder and so on). In the log I find an error: Saving configuration -> C:\WINDOWS\Anwendungsdaten\SpamBayes\IBM AS/400.ini pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Where come the idea to save the .ini-file at "IBM AS/400.ini" ??? Maybe, the slash is the problem. I have looked in the registry for the value, but found nothing. I made a uninstall, then an new install. The same procedure... I have other stations with the same constellation, which worked well. Help...! Klaus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812304&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 25 06:20:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 25 06:20:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810183 ] Outlook crash after watching spam clues Message-ID: Bugs item #810183, was opened at 2003-09-21 19:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pgrawehr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crash after watching spam clues Initial Comment: After looking at the spam clues in outlook 2000 (via the spambayes menu in the toolbar), outlook crashes when the window is closed again. Crash Location: 0x32503BD2 (BLNMGRPS.DLL, at prefered load address) Call Stack: BLNMGRPS.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x8d3 OBALLOON.DLL!32a033ca() MSO9.DLL!_MsoFCustomAWDatabases@12() + 0x900 MSO9.DLL!_LDoBalloonTFC@40() + 0x3e 00000005() NTDLL.DLL!_LdrpAccessResourceData@16() + 0x9d msi.dll!InstallFiles() + 0x1dd2 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe riched20.dll!CFontCache::GetCcs() + 0xa6 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe NTDLL.DLL!_RtlpUnlockAtomTable@4() + 0xd NTDLL.DLL!_RtlLookupAtomInAtomTable@12() + 0x86 URLMON.DLL! CSecurityManager::CSecMgrCache::FindCacheEntry() + 0x33 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion2::Intersect() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!XHDC::PatBlt() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!SelectObject() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CRgnData::Subtract() + 0x63 MSHTML.DLL!CLayout::DrawClientScrollbar() + 0x13c MSHTML.DLL!CDispClipTransform::SetClipRect () + 0x32 MSHTML.DLL!CDispContainer::PreDraw() + 0x217 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Subtract() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawBands() + 0x11e MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::BoundsInside() + 0x1b MSHTML.DLL! CDispDrawContext::IntersectRedrawRegion() + 0x37 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Intersect() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0xd0 MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 00000275() MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::~CRegion() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x160f0 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x15522 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x169a3 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x14d4d OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4f84 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x2ddde OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4e9f OUTLLIB.DLL!RenExitInstance@0() + 0x22d0 OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4ff1 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcA@16() + 0x22 OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x468da OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x46871 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x2244 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-25 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Hm. I just noticed that it doesn't happen every time. It happened the first few times I was trying, so I thought it was reproducible. It's possible that it is actually a problem with some other plugin (I'm also using PGP) or some interference. I'll try to monitor it further. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 02:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Does this happen every single time? Have you ever tried on another machine? As this is the only ever report of this, I suspect that unfortunately we will have to put it down to your specific machine.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 25 07:18:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 25 07:18:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812380 ] V0.7 > 0.81 (binary) Outlook hangs after upgrade Message-ID: Bugs item #812380, was opened at 2003-09-25 11:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alan Saunders (adsaunders) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: V0.7 > 0.81 (binary) Outlook hangs after upgrade Initial Comment: Environment: Windows 2000 SP4 Outlook 2000 SP3 Upgrading from SpamBayes outlook addin (binary) from 0.7 to 0.81. I Stopped Outlook, ran the install, and ran Outlook again. Outlook loaded, and went through the configuration wizard, then locked solid! Had to kill it with the task manager. Rebooted, and tried again with the same result (Without the wizard). I then decided to investigate the installation. I found that in my application data directory, the installation had created a new .ini file, differing from the version 0.7 one by a single period in the file name. 0.7 = Alan D. Saunders.ini 0.81 = Alan D Saunders.ini I also noticed that the default_bayes_customize.ini file had been created in this directory, and was a duplicate of that in the program installation directory. Another point, the configuration wizard determined that I wanted two inboxes monitoring, my own inbox, and that of a robot process that I have been developing, and which I am keeping an eye on. This does not need filtering by SpamBayes, as the robot process handles non-conforming messages. There seems to be no option in the wizard to turn off the monitoring for this mailbox. In the event, I renamed the new 'Alan D Saunders.ini' to .new, and renamed the old one to match the new name (without the added period). On reloading Outlook, all was ok with my original configuation for monitoring my own mailbox only, but using the new SpamBayes engine. Although I seem to have a resolution for this problem, I am logging this firstly to point out my problems with a view to future installations not being problematical, and also to offer other users an idea of where to look ( assuming that I have actually got a true resolution!). .. Alan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 25 07:58:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 25 07:58:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811725 ] 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Message-ID: Bugs item #811725, was opened at 2003-09-24 07:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbehrens You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Initial Comment: 1.06a on a WinXP, Python 2.3, new installation running as service. Tried with service started and service stopped. which_database shows my storage as a 'None'. On further reflection, this is to be expected, as the database I actually see is called 'message_info_database.db'. It seems that which_database uses the persistant_storage_file property, where spambayes uses messageinfo_storage_file. >From bayescustomize.ini: messageinfo_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db Output of running which_database: C:\Program Files\spambayes\utilities>which_database.py Pickle is available. Dumbdbm is available. Dbhash is available. Bsddb[3] is available. Your storage C:\Documents and Settings\[User]\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy \statistics_database.db is a: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Date: 2003-09-25 06:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=748552 Okay, getting closer, and morphing the bug report: In the configuration screen, I see both databases defined as residing under 'LocalService'. And that's where they are, sure enough. So, the option readout method fails? There is a bayescustomize.ini under 'LocalService' as well as the local user's directory. which_database attempts to find the database under the local user's directory, and that's why it fails. Got to love Windows quirks ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Date: 2003-09-24 21:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=748552 >> None should mean that the file is unreadable or doesn't exist. Is this the case? >> Yes, that is the case. There is a message_info_database.db , but no statistics_database.db . Should statistics_database.db be created? Or is that an optional item with a default of "off"? > I'll update which_database to print out a nicer message in this case. which_database only checks one of the two files, then. It looks for whatever "persistent_storage_file" is set to ; it does not check "messageinfo_storage_file". > What version of Python are you using? 2.3 > What should the answer be? I am using the default, which turns out to be a dbhash. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-24 19:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes uses *two* databases. One, the message_info_database.db, keeps track of which messages it has already seen/trained. The other, statistics_database.db, keeps track of statistics - basically how many times each word (token) has been seen in ham and spam. None should mean that the file is unreadable or doesn't exist. Is this the case? I'll update which_database to print out a nicer message in this case. It works fine for me. What version of Python are you using? What should the answer be? (i.e. are you using the default, which would be dbhash or bsddb[3], or have you changed to a pickle). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 25 09:42:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 25 09:43:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 18:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by odedagam You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-15 02:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-12 02:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 25 13:08:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 25 13:09:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 10:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by newsguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 12:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 18:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 18:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Sep 25 19:32:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Sep 25 19:32:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809848 ] Installation error Message-ID: Bugs item #809848, was opened at 2003-09-20 17:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jleon22 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open >Resolution: None >Priority: 6 Submitted By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Installation error Initial Comment: Hi All, I've having lots of trouble trying to install the plugin. I've read the bug trackers and docs, but am still unsuccessful. The toolbar basically does not show up and seems to fail according to the logs. Here's the info: Downloaded: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-0081.exe OS: WinXP sp1 Outlook 2002 sp2 spambayes1.log: pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in _InvokeEx_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in _invokeex_ File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1150, in OnConnection File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/manager", line 16, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 14, in ? exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name mapi spambayes2.log: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. Thanks for your help in advance, johnny ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Date: 2003-09-25 23:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=870923 It seems both those logs are generated when I go through the installer. However, I am judging that the installation is unsuccessful as I do not see the toolbar in Outlook 2002. I checked the tools -> Customized -> Toolbars tab and I do not see SpamBayes anywhere installed. I have tried the installer on 2 different WinXP machines and both failed with the same log messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 00:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 My mistake - I thought that bug was an 'import error' getting MAPI. I was sure there was another tracking this problem though, but now I can't find it - so this bug is it :) I am confused about your last comment: you said SpamBayes failed to install - however, from the looks of these logs it has installed - the "2" log shows the installation going correctly, while the "1" log shows SpamBayes attempting to connect to Outlook as Outlook starts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22) Date: 2003-09-24 23:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=870923 I read over bug# 803798 and I don't understand how the bug is the same? It mentioned that the installation went ok in that ID, however I cannot even get spambayes to install let alone do anything with filtering and what not. Please elaborate. thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-23 07:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a dupe of [ 803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 02:01:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 02:01:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812903 ] pop3proxy stops presenting messages for review Message-ID: Bugs item #812903, was opened at 2003-09-26 16:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812903&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Jones (richard) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: pop3proxy stops presenting messages for review Initial Comment: I've found that pop3proxy sometimes stops presenting messages for review. Stopping and starting the proxy will cause it to remember those messages and present them for review. Yes, I'll update to the latest release now, just in case this has been fixed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 05:00:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 05:01:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812959 ] Needs address whitelist Message-ID: Bugs item #812959, was opened at 2003-09-26 09:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nick Tatham (nicktatham) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Needs address whitelist Initial Comment: I am running Spambayes Outlook plugin 0.81. I have been running Spambayes outlook plugin for several months. I get some emails that look like spam but aren't, but they get missfilled as possible spam and sometimes as definite spam. I think that a useful addition would be a whitelist by email address that would allow me to flag these as "don't bother checking this stuff". Then Spambayes would be perfect. Unless this can be done with Outlook filters? I can't fiigure how though. Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 09:58:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 09:58:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-813078 ] Outlook crashes when opening some mails Message-ID: Bugs item #813078, was opened at 2003-09-26 15:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813078&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when opening some mails Initial Comment: After installing SpamBayes, Outlook crashes when performing actions on *some* mails. Crashes are experienced when * SpamBayes is filtering mail * I try to forward, reply, view, show properties, etc I have the following config: SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627), Internet mail only, Security update. The problem persists after uninstalling SpamBayes. Magnus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813078&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 12:28:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 12:28:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-813151 ] Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Message-ID: Support Requests item #813151, was opened at 2003-09-26 11:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marty Rabens (martoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Initial Comment: Does anyone know of a way to get Outlook to remove specific messages from the server without deleting them from your mail folders? I run the SpamBayes plugin at work, and I'd like to keep all my spam (in case I need to retrain SpamBayes or to experiment with other spam filters), but I'd like to remove all the spam from the server so I don't have to retrieve it over dialup at home. My apologies that this isn't actually a support request for SpamBayes, but it does relate to the Outlook plugin (and I thought other users may have the same question). Thanks, Marty ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 13:03:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 13:03:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-813078 ] Outlook crashes when opening some mails Message-ID: Bugs item #813078, was opened at 2003-09-26 15:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by magnusholm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813078&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when opening some mails Initial Comment: After installing SpamBayes, Outlook crashes when performing actions on *some* mails. Crashes are experienced when * SpamBayes is filtering mail * I try to forward, reply, view, show properties, etc I have the following config: SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627), Internet mail only, Security update. The problem persists after uninstalling SpamBayes. Magnus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2003-09-26 19:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 I forgot to mention that FreePGP was installed on the system (including the Outlook plugin). Somehow, SpamBayes must have broken the PGP installation. After removing FreePGP and reinstalling SpamBayes, Outlook has started to behave again. Conclusion must be that the SpamBayes installer bungles the installation of other Outlook Addins, and does not clean up correctly when uninstalling. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813078&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 13:07:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 13:07:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 12:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by grab_rat You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 13:28:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 13:28:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 10:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by colforbin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 12:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 12:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 18:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 18:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 22:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 13:31:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 13:31:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-813151 ] Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Message-ID: Support Requests item #813151, was opened at 2003-09-26 12:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marty Rabens (martoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Initial Comment: Does anyone know of a way to get Outlook to remove specific messages from the server without deleting them from your mail folders? I run the SpamBayes plugin at work, and I'd like to keep all my spam (in case I need to retrain SpamBayes or to experiment with other spam filters), but I'd like to remove all the spam from the server so I don't have to retrieve it over dialup at home. My apologies that this isn't actually a support request for SpamBayes, but it does relate to the Outlook plugin (and I thought other users may have the same question). Thanks, Marty ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-26 13:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 In Outlook, go to file->Data File Management. Use that dialog to create a pst file. Now create a new folder in the pst file (should be attached as "Personal Folders" or something). Set you spam folder to be the new folder. That should do what you want but, I can't test it because I don't use exchange currently. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 13:38:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 13:38:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-813151 ] Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Message-ID: Support Requests item #813151, was opened at 2003-09-26 12:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marty Rabens (martoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Initial Comment: Does anyone know of a way to get Outlook to remove specific messages from the server without deleting them from your mail folders? I run the SpamBayes plugin at work, and I'd like to keep all my spam (in case I need to retrain SpamBayes or to experiment with other spam filters), but I'd like to remove all the spam from the server so I don't have to retrieve it over dialup at home. My apologies that this isn't actually a support request for SpamBayes, but it does relate to the Outlook plugin (and I thought other users may have the same question). Thanks, Marty ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-26 13:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Purely by accident, I stumbled into something that works great, at least in Outlook 2000: On my POP3 accounts, I have the "Remove from server when deleted from 'Deleted Items'" Outlook option checked. God only knows exactly what that option truly means, but it turns out it means something surprising: I have separate .pst file into which I store my training ham and training spam. The Outlook addin is configured to move Spam directly into the training spam folder in this other .pst file. And that's all it takes! The spam messages (and only the spam messages) are automatically removed from my POP3 server. I have no idea why this works; I guess Outlook sees that the messages have vanished from the .pst file containing ny Inbox, and erroneously concludes that I must have deleted them from the Deleted Items folder. Whatever the reason, it works for me on Outlook 2K, for 3 unrelated POP3 accounts, and across 3 different OL2K installations on 3 different computers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-26 13:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 In Outlook, go to file->Data File Management. Use that dialog to create a pst file. Now create a new folder in the pst file (should be attached as "Personal Folders" or something). Set you spam folder to be the new folder. That should do what you want but, I can't test it because I don't use exchange currently. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 15:20:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 15:20:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-813231 ] Delete as Spam marks as read Message-ID: Feature Requests item #813231, was opened at 2003-09-26 14:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=813231&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Delete as Spam marks as read Initial Comment: Could there be an option for marking messages as read when the "Delete as Spam" - or the "Remove from Spam" button for that matter - is pressed? For instance, I currently have my spam moved to a different folder and I like to know when I get new mail (even spam) so, eventually, I can have a very quick look the displayed headers and determine if its spam or ham. If I use the button, I've already reviewed the header. I see that an option for marking moved messages as read is already there - how about just splitting that up for messages that are automatically moved, and for messages that are manually moved using the button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=813231&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Sep 26 21:37:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Sep 26 21:37:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cvdw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-27 01:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 Can someone send me a copy of version 002 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-17 00:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 this is still not very good solation. the autoachive feature is very crap! i want to be able to make it easy again. i only want this program becasue outlooks spam features are hard to use. pelase help me. cliff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-10 07:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Move it into a spam folder and use Outlook's autoarchive facility to delete the mail (or move it to deleted items) after 1 day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-10 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 yes i understand that by i want it to be simple and thus i turn off automatic train when i move it to that folder. is there any work around that i can use? cliff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 21:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 08:44:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 08:44:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-813231 ] Delete as Spam marks as read Message-ID: Feature Requests item #813231, was opened at 2003-09-26 21:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=813231&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Delete as Spam marks as read Initial Comment: Could there be an option for marking messages as read when the "Delete as Spam" - or the "Remove from Spam" button for that matter - is pressed? For instance, I currently have my spam moved to a different folder and I like to know when I get new mail (even spam) so, eventually, I can have a very quick look the displayed headers and determine if its spam or ham. If I use the button, I've already reviewed the header. I see that an option for marking moved messages as read is already there - how about just splitting that up for messages that are automatically moved, and for messages that are manually moved using the button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-09-27 14:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 This is allready implemented, and has been for a while. In the latest version (0.81) of the outlook add-in, you find these options under the Training-tab. In the lower part of the window - change the "Clicking recover from spam should"- and "Clicking delete as Spam should"-options. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=813231&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 11:43:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 11:43:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-813600 ] Cant update db after review Message-ID: Support Requests item #813600, was opened at 2003-09-27 11:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813600&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cant update db after review Initial Comment: I get this after hitting the train button: Training... Trained on 414 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813600&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 14:01:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 14:02:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-813658 ] missing spambayes.message in 1.0a6? Message-ID: Bugs item #813658, was opened at 2003-09-27 18:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813658&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robb Aley Allan (robballan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: missing spambayes.message in 1.0a6? Initial Comment: bash-2.05a$ pwd /Users/rallan/Applications/spambayes-1.0a6 bash-2.05a$ python2.2 ./scripts/sb_server.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./scripts/sb_server.py", line 100, in ? import spambayes.message ImportError: No module named spambayes.message bash-2.05a$ find . -name spambayes.message bash-2.05a$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 16:44:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 16:44:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812959 ] Needs address whitelist Message-ID: Bugs item #812959, was opened at 2003-09-26 11:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kretz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nick Tatham (nicktatham) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Needs address whitelist Initial Comment: I am running Spambayes Outlook plugin 0.81. I have been running Spambayes outlook plugin for several months. I get some emails that look like spam but aren't, but they get missfilled as possible spam and sometimes as definite spam. I think that a useful addition would be a whitelist by email address that would allow me to flag these as "don't bother checking this stuff". Then Spambayes would be perfect. Unless this can be done with Outlook filters? I can't fiigure how though. Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Kretz (kretz) Date: 2003-09-27 22:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875785 A good candidate to use as a "white list" would be the address book in Outlook, i.e. "Contacts". /M ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 22:59:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 23:00:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-09 09:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-28 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What exactly is wrong with the using autoarchive? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-27 13:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 Can someone send me a copy of version 002 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-17 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 this is still not very good solation. the autoachive feature is very crap! i want to be able to make it easy again. i only want this program becasue outlooks spam features are hard to use. pelase help me. cliff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-10 19:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Move it into a spam folder and use Outlook's autoarchive facility to delete the mail (or move it to deleted items) after 1 day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-10 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 yes i understand that by i want it to be simple and thus i turn off automatic train when i move it to that folder. is there any work around that i can use? cliff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-09 09:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 23:02:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 23:02:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-813600 ] Cant update db after review Message-ID: Support Requests item #813600, was opened at 2003-09-28 03:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813600&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cant update db after review Initial Comment: I get this after hitting the train button: Training... Trained on 414 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a6\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-28 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a known bug with 1.0a6, and has been fixed in cvs. You should be able to get around this by simply restarting spambayes after every time you use the web interface to change options. Please re-open if this is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813600&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 23:03:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 23:03:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-813231 ] Delete as Spam marks as read Message-ID: Feature Requests item #813231, was opened at 2003-09-27 07:20 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=813231&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Delete as Spam marks as read Initial Comment: Could there be an option for marking messages as read when the "Delete as Spam" - or the "Remove from Spam" button for that matter - is pressed? For instance, I currently have my spam moved to a different folder and I like to know when I get new mail (even spam) so, eventually, I can have a very quick look the displayed headers and determine if its spam or ham. If I use the button, I've already reviewed the header. I see that an option for marking moved messages as read is already there - how about just splitting that up for messages that are automatically moved, and for messages that are manually moved using the button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-09-28 00:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 This is allready implemented, and has been for a while. In the latest version (0.81) of the outlook add-in, you find these options under the Training-tab. In the lower part of the window - change the "Clicking recover from spam should"- and "Clicking delete as Spam should"-options. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=813231&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 23:05:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 23:06:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-813658 ] missing spambayes.message in 1.0a6? Message-ID: Bugs item #813658, was opened at 2003-09-28 06:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813658&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robb Aley Allan (robballan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: missing spambayes.message in 1.0a6? Initial Comment: bash-2.05a$ pwd /Users/rallan/Applications/spambayes-1.0a6 bash-2.05a$ python2.2 ./scripts/sb_server.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./scripts/sb_server.py", line 100, in ? import spambayes.message ImportError: No module named spambayes.message bash-2.05a$ find . -name spambayes.message bash-2.05a$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-28 15:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 message.py is definately in both the 1.0a6 zip and tar.gz. It looks like you haven't got spambayes on your pythonpath. You need to either run "setup.py install", or set your pythonpath to include the spambayes directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Sep 27 23:09:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Sep 27 23:09:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812959 ] Needs address whitelist Message-ID: Bugs item #812959, was opened at 2003-09-26 21:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nick Tatham (nicktatham) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Needs address whitelist Initial Comment: I am running Spambayes Outlook plugin 0.81. I have been running Spambayes outlook plugin for several months. I get some emails that look like spam but aren't, but they get missfilled as possible spam and sometimes as definite spam. I think that a useful addition would be a whitelist by email address that would allow me to flag these as "don't bother checking this stuff". Then Spambayes would be perfect. Unless this can be done with Outlook filters? I can't fiigure how though. Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-28 15:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: There has also been extensive discussion about whitelisting on the spambayes mailing lists. If you google for "spambayes whitelisting site:mail.python.org" you'll find lots. And yes, you can use the Outlook filters to do this. Simply use spambayes' background filtering mode, which means that it will only filter *after* outlook is finished applying rules. Then set up Outlook rules to move all the mail you want whitelisted to a folder that spambayes doesn't watch (Inbox.Whitelist, for example). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Kretz (kretz) Date: 2003-09-28 08:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875785 A good candidate to use as a "white list" would be the address book in Outlook, i.e. "Contacts". /M ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 28 02:03:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 28 02:03:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802766 ] Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #802766, was opened at 2003-09-08 21:37 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cvdw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Deleted >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Cliff (cvdw) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder Initial Comment: Can't set Deleted item's as the spam folder i am using win xp outlook xp spambayes 0.7 i was able to do this with version two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-28 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What exactly is wrong with the using autoarchive? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-27 01:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 Can someone send me a copy of version 002 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-17 00:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 this is still not very good solation. the autoachive feature is very crap! i want to be able to make it easy again. i only want this program becasue outlooks spam features are hard to use. pelase help me. cliff ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-10 07:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Move it into a spam folder and use Outlook's autoarchive facility to delete the mail (or move it to deleted items) after 1 day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cliff (cvdw) Date: 2003-09-10 06:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861353 yes i understand that by i want it to be simple and thus i turn off automatic train when i move it to that folder. is there any work around that i can use? cliff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-08 21:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 This is by design. When you delete your normal email, it would be trained as spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802766&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Sep 28 15:25:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Sep 28 15:25:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814099 ] Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Message-ID: Bugs item #814099, was opened at 2003-09-28 13:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Initial Comment: While using an older version of SpamBayes (version 0.3) the filtering would continually move some good emails to my deleted items folder (the folder I selected for SPAM emails) no matter how much I trained it. I decided to remove this version and start over with the current version (0.81). After the uninstall of version 0.3 and then the install of version 0.81, the first thing I found was that I could no longer move SPAM to the deleted items folder since it was not a listed choice. (I hope this can be changed as I much prefer to move SPAM there when the program is working well. Otherwise it is a several step process to permanently delete emails). However, these same aforementioned emails were still being moved to the deleted items folder under version 0.81. (Note I have no other rules setup in Outlook and when SpamBayes is uninstalled this does not happen). I have also tried to uninstall and completely remove the SpamBayes directories both in C:\Program Files and under my Document and Settings profile and in the add- in sections for Outlook in the registry and then reinstall. Still the problem exists. I also noticed that while SpamBayes appears to work fine other than the above issue, the add-in does not appear in the Outlook Com add-ins any longer. The SpamBayes log states : Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 From simonm at planet.eon.net Mon Sep 15 21:49:22 2003 From: simonm at planet.eon.net (Simon MacKintosh) Date: Sun Sep 28 22:39:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Installing under Windows XP Pro Message-ID: Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/bmp Size: 346006 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20030915/22d0112d/attachment-0001.bin From RGehres at mathematica-mpr.com Mon Sep 22 16:21:45 2003 From: RGehres at mathematica-mpr.com (Ryan Gehres) Date: Sun Sep 28 22:39:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Folders Message-ID: <897E2332A97AD311AEBB00508B116D5410C96398@mpr1> We recently had two users delete one of the folders that the spam goes into in Outlook on W2k machines and the software went haywire. The fields for selecting the folders were empty. Sorry I can't give more information. From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 29 04:12:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 29 04:12:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814322 ] AttributeError: hdrtxt Message-ID: Bugs item #814322, was opened at 2003-09-29 10:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814322&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: AttributeError: hdrtxt Initial Comment: The sb_server.py interface (i.e. pop3proy) yells a tracebay at me, see below. I believe this occurs every time my Anti Virus software (NAI) deletes an infected message behind pop3proxies back. Restarting the proxy is necessary to get rid of the traceback and cures the problem. Environment: WinXP, python23, sb cvs, about a week old (SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03) 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.p y", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI. py", line 395, in onReview message = spambayes.mboxutils.get_message (cachedMessage.getSubstance()) File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Corpus.p y", line 349, in getSubstance return self.hdrtxt + self.payload File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Corpus.p y", line 296, in __getattr__ raise AttributeError, attributeName AttributeError: hdrtxt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814322&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 29 12:13:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 29 12:13:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803227 ] spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #803227, was opened at 2003-09-09 11:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cboelkes You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Initial Comment: With plug-in 007 and now 008, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't a functionality bug, just a display bug, since the message is moved into the spam folder correctly. Although the incorrect score might cause problems if SpamBayes ever re-filters without re- scoring. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you need more information, Ryan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes) Date: 2003-09-29 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=876739 I am encountering a similar problem, with a slight difference: About 10% of the messages in the SPAM folder show 0% in the Outlook list view. However, when the SPAM clues are displayed they appear to be scorded correctly...all in the .9+ range. The difference from this reported problem: About 20% of the SPAM messages are left in my Inbox with a 0% score in the Outlook list view. Again, these appear to be scored correctly (.9+ score) when the SPAM clues are examined. I have never encountered this problem with Possible Spam. This problem seems (so far) to occur with messages that are very high scoring (.9+) and has occured on plug-in 0.7, 0.8 and 0.81. I am running XP Pro SP1 with all current critical updates, Office 2000 SP3, and Exchange 5.5 SP4 I currently have specified a 4.0 second delay before starting processing and a 1.0 second delay between processing items. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 29 12:32:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 29 12:32:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803227 ] spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #803227, was opened at 2003-09-09 15:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Initial Comment: With plug-in 007 and now 008, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't a functionality bug, just a display bug, since the message is moved into the spam folder correctly. Although the incorrect score might cause problems if SpamBayes ever re-filters without re- scoring. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you need more information, Ryan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-29 16:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 A little further information: this seems to happen only to me when the FIRST message in my inbox is spam. The plug-in saves a 0% score in the spam field, and the messages is not filtered. However, if I manually run spam clues on it, it always scores above 90%. I have a 10-second processing delay set at start, and my mail server is Exchagne 2003 SP3. I connect through native Exchagne RPC, not through IMAP or POP3 or anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes) Date: 2003-09-29 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=876739 I am encountering a similar problem, with a slight difference: About 10% of the messages in the SPAM folder show 0% in the Outlook list view. However, when the SPAM clues are displayed they appear to be scorded correctly...all in the .9+ range. The difference from this reported problem: About 20% of the SPAM messages are left in my Inbox with a 0% score in the Outlook list view. Again, these appear to be scored correctly (.9+ score) when the SPAM clues are examined. I have never encountered this problem with Possible Spam. This problem seems (so far) to occur with messages that are very high scoring (.9+) and has occured on plug-in 0.7, 0.8 and 0.81. I am running XP Pro SP1 with all current critical updates, Office 2000 SP3, and Exchange 5.5 SP4 I currently have specified a 4.0 second delay before starting processing and a 1.0 second delay between processing items. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 29 20:20:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 29 20:20:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814322 ] AttributeError: hdrtxt Message-ID: Bugs item #814322, was opened at 2003-09-29 20:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814322&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: AttributeError: hdrtxt Initial Comment: The sb_server.py interface (i.e. pop3proy) yells a tracebay at me, see below. I believe this occurs every time my Anti Virus software (NAI) deletes an infected message behind pop3proxies back. Restarting the proxy is necessary to get rid of the traceback and cures the problem. Environment: WinXP, python23, sb cvs, about a week old (SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03) 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.p y", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI. py", line 395, in onReview message = spambayes.mboxutils.get_message (cachedMessage.getSubstance()) File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Corpus.p y", line 349, in getSubstance return self.hdrtxt + self.payload File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Corpus.p y", line 296, in __getattr__ raise AttributeError, attributeName AttributeError: hdrtxt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can confirm that this would be the result if the file becomes inaccessible without spambayes knowing. I'll check in a fix to display a "can't find message" error, or something like that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814322&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 29 22:25:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 29 22:25:52 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814859 ] Outlook2K Message-ID: Bugs item #814859, was opened at 2003-09-30 02:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814859&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Charles Moore (n30lp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook2K Initial Comment: since installing spambytes, O2K hangs w W2K OS & IE6.0+. After closing via task mgr and re-opening spam goes to correct file and everything is happy again. Platform is IBM T23 Thinkpad and notebook is enabled to go into turnoff monitor=10 min turnoff hd=60 min standby = never hibrenate=never advise what details needed like dr watson, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Sep 29 23:17:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Sep 29 23:17:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814322 ] AttributeError: hdrtxt Message-ID: Bugs item #814322, was opened at 2003-09-29 20:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814322&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: AttributeError: hdrtxt Initial Comment: The sb_server.py interface (i.e. pop3proy) yells a tracebay at me, see below. I believe this occurs every time my Anti Virus software (NAI) deletes an infected message behind pop3proxies back. Restarting the proxy is necessary to get rid of the traceback and cures the problem. Environment: WinXP, python23, sb cvs, about a week old (SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta2, version 0.2 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03) 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.p y", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI. py", line 395, in onReview message = spambayes.mboxutils.get_message (cachedMessage.getSubstance()) File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Corpus.p y", line 349, in getSubstance return self.hdrtxt + self.payload File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\Corpus.p y", line 296, in __getattr__ raise AttributeError, attributeName AttributeError: hdrtxt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I've fixed this in cvs now. If the file can't be loaded, then it isn't presented in the review list. Note that if the message is in the memory cache, then it will still be presented, but it can still be used (until it gets flushed out of the memory cache). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can confirm that this would be the result if the file becomes inaccessible without spambayes knowing. I'll check in a fix to display a "can't find message" error, or something like that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814322&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 00:19:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 00:19:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham statistics Message-ID: Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-05 00:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam / ham statistics Initial Comment: Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were received per hour / day and how many of these were spam messages. It would be great if it could be presented both as numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The means to print it as a hard copy would be just swell... ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that the plug-in has basic stats information (cvs version) now, although it's still only on a per session basis (this will no doubt improve at some point). The web interface (for non-plugin users) also now (cvs head) has basic stats, which are persisted between sessions. Any opinions on which statistics would be best to add? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-11 16:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down it prints a message like: "SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 unsure" (So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate this message). It's unlikely that a graphical version would ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers like this into Excel and get pretty graphs. The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know that mail is a fp/fn. It could print the number of times the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which aren't exactly fp/fn's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27) Date: 2003-07-11 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=302748 I'm just another user but I think this would be a great addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false positives (along with percentage of total), number of false negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of mail received that is spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 00:22:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 00:22:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810983 ] socket.bind: permission denied Message-ID: Bugs item #810983, was opened at 2003-09-23 16:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810983&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alain Bonnefoy (alainbo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: socket.bind: permission denied Initial Comment: Hi, I'm running XPPro and spambayes1.0a6. Yesterday I had some problems while saving configuration through the web interface. Today, I cannot run sb_server anymore, I get the following message: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_server.py", line 829, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_server.py", line 822, in run prepare(state=state) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_server.py", line 756, in prepare state)) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_smtpproxy.py", line 513, in CreateProxies trainer) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_smtpproxy.py", line 253, in __init__ proxyArgs) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 267, in __init __ self.bind(port) File "c:\Python23\lib\asyncore.py", line 300, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (10013, 'Permission denied') any idea? Thanks, Alain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Usually permission is either denied because you don't have sufficient privileges (unlikely on XP), or because the port is already in use. Do you maybe have sb_server already running (maybe the service?), or have something else using the ports you have specified? Try renaming your config file to start up fresh. If you still get the denied error, then it's the web interface that can't be bound - try running "sb_server.py -u 8881" (or some other port that you know is free). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810983&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 00:26:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 00:26:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802530 ] Unable to review messages this morning Message-ID: Bugs item #802530, was opened at 2003-09-09 03:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 >Category: pop3proxy >Group: Source code 1.0a5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denis Pelletier (dpellet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to review messages this morning Initial Comment: I used spambayes (Alpha release 4) for a couple of weeks and everything was working perfectly. This morning I tried to use the Review messages page and I'm getting the following error message: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 402, in onReview messageInfo = self._makeMessageInfo(message) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 502, in _makeMessageInfo messageInfo.bodySummary = self._trimHeader(text, 200) File "./spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 195, in _trimHeader sections = email.Header.decode_header(field) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py", line 67, in decode_header if not ecre.search(header): RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded The last time I reviewed the cached messages was 24 hours ago and I received about twenty messages since then. Upgrading to Alpha release 5 does not solve the problem. I'm using Spambayes under Mandrake Linux 9.1. Denis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you were able to track down the particular email that it's choking on, that would be great. If (in your config file), you set [globals]verbose to True, then you'll get the ids printed out as they are loaded, so it will probably stop right before/after the problem one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denis Pelletier (dpellet) Date: 2003-09-10 01:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861858 This morning, I was able to review/train on today's email. After doing that, I got again the same error (RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded) when trying to review what are now yesterday's email. So I guess that spambayes is chocking on an email. Does anyone want to have a look at my database? Denis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 00:41:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 00:41:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811725 ] 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Message-ID: Bugs item #811725, was opened at 2003-09-25 00:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 1.06a - which_database fails on Win32 Initial Comment: 1.06a on a WinXP, Python 2.3, new installation running as service. Tried with service started and service stopped. which_database shows my storage as a 'None'. On further reflection, this is to be expected, as the database I actually see is called 'message_info_database.db'. It seems that which_database uses the persistant_storage_file property, where spambayes uses messageinfo_storage_file. >From bayescustomize.ini: messageinfo_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\message_info_database.db persistent_storage_file: C:\Documents and Settings\DawnWolf\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\statistics_database.db Output of running which_database: C:\Program Files\spambayes\utilities>which_database.py Pickle is available. Dumbdbm is available. Dbhash is available. Bsddb[3] is available. Your storage C:\Documents and Settings\[User]\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy \statistics_database.db is a: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There should definately be two databases, unless you haven't done any training (in that case I think the message info one gets created but the stats one doesnt). You are correct when you say that it doesn't look at the message info db at all. It will be the same as the stats db unless the stats one is a pickle. The whole message info db thing hasn't really been finalised yet, unfortunately (this is only alpha software ;) I think I see the problem here - when running as a service, windows says that the correct place to put data is under 'LocalService'. However, if you run as a user instead (like running which_database.py), windows says that the user directory is the place to be. I'm not sure that anything can be done about this - which_database is only a little diagnostic tool, in any case. You could set the BAYESCUSTOMIZE environment variable to the full path to the localservice .ini, which would solve the problem. Otherwise which_database has to be running as a service as well, to get the new location. I'll close this, but if you're not satisfied, please reopen :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Date: 2003-09-25 23:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=748552 Okay, getting closer, and morphing the bug report: In the configuration screen, I see both databases defined as residing under 'LocalService'. And that's where they are, sure enough. So, the option readout method fails? There is a bayescustomize.ini under 'LocalService' as well as the local user's directory. which_database attempts to find the database under the local user's directory, and that's why it fails. Got to love Windows quirks ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Shawn Behrens (sbehrens) Date: 2003-09-25 14:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=748552 >> None should mean that the file is unreadable or doesn't exist. Is this the case? >> Yes, that is the case. There is a message_info_database.db , but no statistics_database.db . Should statistics_database.db be created? Or is that an optional item with a default of "off"? > I'll update which_database to print out a nicer message in this case. which_database only checks one of the two files, then. It looks for whatever "persistent_storage_file" is set to ; it does not check "messageinfo_storage_file". > What version of Python are you using? 2.3 > What should the answer be? I am using the default, which turns out to be a dbhash. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 12:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes uses *two* databases. One, the message_info_database.db, keeps track of which messages it has already seen/trained. The other, statistics_database.db, keeps track of statistics - basically how many times each word (token) has been seen in ham and spam. None should mean that the file is unreadable or doesn't exist. Is this the case? I'll update which_database to print out a nicer message in this case. It works fine for me. What version of Python are you using? What should the answer be? (i.e. are you using the default, which would be dbhash or bsddb[3], or have you changed to a pickle). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811725&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 00:47:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 00:47:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796298 ] Outlook plugin: 0.7 Check for new version doesn't use proxy Message-ID: Bugs item #796298, was opened at 2003-08-28 09:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Clark (clach04) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin: 0.7 Check for new version doesn't use proxy Initial Comment: Very low priority, the "Check for new version" option fails after a few seconds. I'm behind a http proxy (IE is configured for proxy access so the plugin could lookup IE's proxy settings and use that). Fragment of spambayes.log: Error checking the latest version Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open URLError: ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open URLError: SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook Bayes database is not dirty - not writing SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 unsure Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I started looking into this, but if anyone else would rather do it... >From what I have been able to tell, autoconfigure scripts are in javascript. But not just any javascript - there are some 'helper' functions predefined, but not for regular javascript. So, either we write those ourselves (or steal them from someone), and then parse the javascript, or we do it some other way. I think that the best solution might be to do the work at the server end (if sf lets us do this). We could open a page like "http://spambayes.org/latest_version.html? my_version=008", and it could display a "You are using version %s, the latest is 008.1" message. We already go to the browser for help, so that's not so bad - and it could have a link to the latest version, if there is a newer one. Of course it's not as elegant as the current method, and it's only for those people with autoconfigure scripts...What do you think, Mark? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Clark (clach04) Date: 2003-08-29 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=379468 My PC has some imposed login scripts that set the proxy method to autodetect so you where spot on there. I usually manually specify the proxy (I'd just rebooted to ensure a "clean" bug report). I just set it manually and re-tried and the log now complains about getting an authentication error. Log attached at end. For MS products I usually don't have to provide authentication information as the machine is logged into a domain server (i.e. my current OS user is DOMAINNAME\username) for non MS products I usually have to feed it the id/pw, e.g. Mozzilla, lynx, wget, my own python scripts, etc. I've not figured out what makes MS apps "special" in not needing to manually specify the auth. info). Error checking the latest version Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 407: Proxy Authentication Required ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 407: Proxy Authentication Required ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-28 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 We do try and use the IE proxy configuration, but currently can't use the "auto configuration" option - we need to have the proxy explicitly specified. How is your IE proxy configured? If configured for auto, then Tony Meyer is looking at that too, but we aren't even sure yet if it is practical. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 09:41:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 09:42:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815116 ] Incorrect link in welcome.html Message-ID: Bugs item #815116, was opened at 2003-09-30 13:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815116&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Incorrect link in welcome.html Initial Comment: (I'm using the latest 0.81 Outlook install) In the "welcome.html" file which is (optionally) run on installing SpamBayes, there is a line with a link saying "Outlook does not allow us to automatically add the spam score to your Outlook folder views - but you can do it manually by following these instructions." The link points to an address "file:///e:/src/spambayes/Outlook2000/about.html#Field" which isn't a whole lot of use! I suspect this should be pointing to the "about.html" file located in the main SpamBayes install directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 12:06:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 12:06:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815205 ] unsigned macro dialog raised Message-ID: Bugs item #815205, was opened at 2003-09-30 05:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815205&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Barth (wbarth1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: unsigned macro dialog raised Initial Comment: unlike 0.7 version 0.81 raises the unsigned macro dialog requiring the user to " enable macros" to proceed after starting Outlook (Outlook 2000 sp3). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815205&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 12:21:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 12:21:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-815233 ] Empty Spam folder button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #815233, was opened at 2003-09-30 05:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=815233&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Barth (wbarth1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam folder button Initial Comment: Unsophisticated users end up deleting spam folder. I've added a "empty spam" button on the toolbar but it should be part of the product. See below: (loop may look inefficient but necessary to sync object with macro vars) Sub emptyspam() Set myOlApp = CreateObject("Outlook.Application") Set myNamespace = myOlApp.GetNamespace("MAPI") Set objFolders = myNamespace.Folders() Set objPF = objFolders.Item("Personal Folders") Set objSpamFolder = objPF.Folders.Item("SPAM") Set SpamItems = objSpamFolder.Items mycount = SpamItems.Count Do Set SpamItems = objSpamFolder.Items If SpamItems.Count > 0 Then SpamItems.Remove (1) Else: Exit Do End If Loop MsgBox (mycount & " Spam messages deleted") End Sub The "trash can" makes a nice icon for this macro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=815233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 12:24:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 12:24:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815238 ] New Mail systray icon not cleared Message-ID: Bugs item #815238, was opened at 2003-09-30 11:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815238&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: New Mail systray icon not cleared Initial Comment: When spam is moved from the inbox to the spam folder and the "mark message as read" option is checked for that filtering action, the new mail icon in the system tray is not removed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815238&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 13:39:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 13:39:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803227 ] spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #803227, was opened at 2003-09-09 15:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Initial Comment: With plug-in 007 and now 008, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't a functionality bug, just a display bug, since the message is moved into the spam folder correctly. Although the incorrect score might cause problems if SpamBayes ever re-filters without re- scoring. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you need more information, Ryan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-30 17:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I think there's acutally two different things going on here: The problem with the first message scoring incorrectly as 0% and NOT being moved, and also a problem with messages that ARE spam and ARE moved to my spam folder, but still have 0% saved in the Outlook spam field. The first issue seems to happen whenever a spam message is listed first in my inbox view when I start outlook. It is repeatable. THe second issue seems totally random, but is very infrequent (perhaps 1 out of 100 spams get captured correctly but still show 0% as their score). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-29 16:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 A little further information: this seems to happen only to me when the FIRST message in my inbox is spam. The plug-in saves a 0% score in the spam field, and the messages is not filtered. However, if I manually run spam clues on it, it always scores above 90%. I have a 10-second processing delay set at start, and my mail server is Exchagne 2003 SP3. I connect through native Exchagne RPC, not through IMAP or POP3 or anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes) Date: 2003-09-29 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=876739 I am encountering a similar problem, with a slight difference: About 10% of the messages in the SPAM folder show 0% in the Outlook list view. However, when the SPAM clues are displayed they appear to be scorded correctly...all in the .9+ range. The difference from this reported problem: About 20% of the SPAM messages are left in my Inbox with a 0% score in the Outlook list view. Again, these appear to be scored correctly (.9+ score) when the SPAM clues are examined. I have never encountered this problem with Possible Spam. This problem seems (so far) to occur with messages that are very high scoring (.9+) and has occured on plug-in 0.7, 0.8 and 0.81. I am running XP Pro SP1 with all current critical updates, Office 2000 SP3, and Exchange 5.5 SP4 I currently have specified a 4.0 second delay before starting processing and a 1.0 second delay between processing items. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 19:10:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 19:10:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815116 ] Incorrect link in welcome.html Message-ID: Bugs item #815116, was opened at 2003-10-01 01:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815116&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Incorrect link in welcome.html Initial Comment: (I'm using the latest 0.81 Outlook install) In the "welcome.html" file which is (optionally) run on installing SpamBayes, there is a line with a link saying "Outlook does not allow us to automatically add the spam score to your Outlook folder views - but you can do it manually by following these instructions." The link points to an address "file:///e:/src/spambayes/Outlook2000/about.html#Field" which isn't a whole lot of use! I suspect this should be pointing to the "about.html" file located in the main SpamBayes install directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-01 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815116&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 19:11:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 19:11:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815238 ] New Mail systray icon not cleared Message-ID: Bugs item #815238, was opened at 2003-10-01 04:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815238&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: New Mail systray icon not cleared Initial Comment: When spam is moved from the inbox to the spam folder and the "mark message as read" option is checked for that filtering action, the new mail icon in the system tray is not removed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-01 11:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.9: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815238&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Sep 30 21:48:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Sep 30 21:48:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815238 ] New Mail systray icon not cleared Message-ID: Bugs item #815238, was opened at 2003-09-30 11:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by clubstew You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815238&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: New Mail systray icon not cleared Initial Comment: When spam is moved from the inbox to the spam folder and the "mark message as read" option is checked for that filtering action, the new mail icon in the system tray is not removed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Heath Stewart (clubstew) Date: 2003-09-30 20:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=585482 The MailItem coclass exposes an UnRead property that is read/write. I did check the source and did not find anywhere where this property is set, only read. I do see where you use SetReadState on the MAPI item. Have you tried using the UnRead property, or is it not accessible in a particular context? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 18:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 3.9: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815238&group_id=61702