From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 1 16:04:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 1 16:04:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816103 ] Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Message-ID: Bugs item #816103, was opened at 2003-10-01 15:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Initial Comment: Im running Outlook 2003 Beta (11.4920.4920) BETA on Windows XP, and I've installed the latest SpamBayes from the website, and It's not filtering or scoring new emails. The only time it does is when I start up outlook. Im not sure what info you'll need, but feel free to contact me and I'll provide it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 1 16:09:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 1 16:10:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816103 ] Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Message-ID: Bugs item #816103, was opened at 2003-10-01 16:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Initial Comment: Im running Outlook 2003 Beta (11.4920.4920) BETA on Windows XP, and I've installed the latest SpamBayes from the website, and It's not filtering or scoring new emails. The only time it does is when I start up outlook. Im not sure what info you'll need, but feel free to contact me and I'll provide it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-10-01 16:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Please install the outlook 2003 techincal refresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 1 16:27:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 1 16:28:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816103 ] Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Message-ID: Bugs item #816103, was opened at 2003-10-01 15:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sicwan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Initial Comment: Im running Outlook 2003 Beta (11.4920.4920) BETA on Windows XP, and I've installed the latest SpamBayes from the website, and It's not filtering or scoring new emails. The only time it does is when I start up outlook. Im not sure what info you'll need, but feel free to contact me and I'll provide it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Date: 2003-10-01 15:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=554693 Tried to install, but I can't find it back on MS's website ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-10-01 15:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Please install the outlook 2003 techincal refresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 1 16:33:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 1 16:33:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-813151 ] Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Message-ID: Support Requests item #813151, was opened at 2003-09-26 11:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by martoon You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marty Rabens (martoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Initial Comment: Does anyone know of a way to get Outlook to remove specific messages from the server without deleting them from your mail folders? I run the SpamBayes plugin at work, and I'd like to keep all my spam (in case I need to retrain SpamBayes or to experiment with other spam filters), but I'd like to remove all the spam from the server so I don't have to retrieve it over dialup at home. My apologies that this isn't actually a support request for SpamBayes, but it does relate to the Outlook plugin (and I thought other users may have the same question). Thanks, Marty ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marty Rabens (martoon) Date: 2003-10-01 15:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=483884 Thanks for the suggestions, guys. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work for me. I'm running Outlook 2002. I created a new .pst file, created a spam folder in it, and told the SpamBayes plugin to put spam there. I have the "Remove from server when deleted from 'Deleted Items'" option checked. When I retrieve my mail, SpamBayes puts the spam in the folder in the other .pst file, but it still gets left on the server. Maybe this was a bug in Outlook 2000 that's been fixed in Outlook 2002. Oh well. Guess I'll need to start deleting the spam. I just wish Outlook had some kind of "remove the selected items from server" feature. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-26 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Purely by accident, I stumbled into something that works great, at least in Outlook 2000: On my POP3 accounts, I have the "Remove from server when deleted from 'Deleted Items'" Outlook option checked. God only knows exactly what that option truly means, but it turns out it means something surprising: I have separate .pst file into which I store my training ham and training spam. The Outlook addin is configured to move Spam directly into the training spam folder in this other .pst file. And that's all it takes! The spam messages (and only the spam messages) are automatically removed from my POP3 server. I have no idea why this works; I guess Outlook sees that the messages have vanished from the .pst file containing ny Inbox, and erroneously concludes that I must have deleted them from the Deleted Items folder. Whatever the reason, it works for me on Outlook 2K, for 3 unrelated POP3 accounts, and across 3 different OL2K installations on 3 different computers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-26 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 In Outlook, go to file->Data File Management. Use that dialog to create a pst file. Now create a new folder in the pst file (should be attached as "Personal Folders" or something). Set you spam folder to be the new folder. That should do what you want but, I can't test it because I don't use exchange currently. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 1 20:26:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 1 20:26:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Support Requests item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-24 22:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andykn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Knowles (andykn) Date: 2003-10-02 00:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=878540 I have just tried to get all this to work and have managed to get a bit further. I think the readme has been changed to say you need to run the command "net start pop3proxy" If this does not start, look in Event Viewer, Applications for error messages. I searched for any files listed as missing in the error message and copied them into the root of the python23 directory. The service then started (Using the Services section of Manage Computer). I can now open the configuration page and enter my mail servers but Outlook Express will not connect to them, reporting a No. Socket Error. If you get any further than me Id love to hear how! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 01:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 When you ran with "install", did you get something like "Installing service pop3proxy to Python class C:\spambayes_1_0\windows\pop3proxy_ service.Service Service installed"? (your path will be different, obviously). Did you get "Starting service pop3proxy" after running with "start"? If you look in the Services control panel (via the Administrative Tools one), you should see the pop3proxy/spambayes service listed. It should say that it is started. If you run "pop3proxy_service.py debug" you should get the service starting but printing out debugging information into the console. Could you let us know what you get then? It might be that the service has started, but can't use port 8880 for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Date: 2003-09-25 01:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873906 Okay, I installed win32all, but I'm not understanding how to start the service properly. "python pop3proxy_service.py" gives me parameter information, so I tried "python pop3proxy_service.py install" followed by "python pop3proxy_service.py start" from the download directory. However, http://localhost:8880 produced no page. Do I need to run this script from somewhere else, or as some particular user? I feel like I'm being dense, but I don't see any more information in the ReadMe to help me get this set up. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll update the readme to reflect the additional dependancy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-25 00:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You need to install win32all. http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 1 20:32:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 1 20:32:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Support Requests item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-25 10:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-02 12:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To use the service you need to also install the Python win32 extensions. You can get those from . The readme has been corrected so that the next release will also include this information. Apologies for the inconvenience. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Knowles (andykn) Date: 2003-10-02 12:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=878540 I have just tried to get all this to work and have managed to get a bit further. I think the readme has been changed to say you need to run the command "net start pop3proxy" If this does not start, look in Event Viewer, Applications for error messages. I searched for any files listed as missing in the error message and copied them into the root of the python23 directory. The service then started (Using the Services section of Manage Computer). I can now open the configuration page and enter my mail servers but Outlook Express will not connect to them, reporting a No. Socket Error. If you get any further than me Id love to hear how! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 When you ran with "install", did you get something like "Installing service pop3proxy to Python class C:\spambayes_1_0\windows\pop3proxy_ service.Service Service installed"? (your path will be different, obviously). Did you get "Starting service pop3proxy" after running with "start"? If you look in the Services control panel (via the Administrative Tools one), you should see the pop3proxy/spambayes service listed. It should say that it is started. If you run "pop3proxy_service.py debug" you should get the service starting but printing out debugging information into the console. Could you let us know what you get then? It might be that the service has started, but can't use port 8880 for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Date: 2003-09-25 13:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873906 Okay, I installed win32all, but I'm not understanding how to start the service properly. "python pop3proxy_service.py" gives me parameter information, so I tried "python pop3proxy_service.py install" followed by "python pop3proxy_service.py start" from the download directory. However, http://localhost:8880 produced no page. Do I need to run this script from somewhere else, or as some particular user? I feel like I'm being dense, but I don't see any more information in the ReadMe to help me get this set up. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll update the readme to reflect the additional dependancy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-25 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You need to install win32all. http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 1 21:15:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 1 21:15:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-812076 ] Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Message-ID: Support Requests item #812076, was opened at 2003-09-24 22:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andykn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Pop3Proxy won't run: no module 'win32api' Initial Comment: Downloaded 1.0a6 and ran "python setup.py install" without problems. The readme then says: "Now launch pop3proxy, either by running the "pop3proxy_service.py" script (for those using Windows 2000, Windows NT or Windows XP), or the "sb_server.py" script (for everyone else)." I'm running Windows XP, so I did "python pop3proxy_service.py" and got: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 24, in ? import win32api ImportError: No module named win32api I've got Python 2.3. How do I get past this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Knowles (andykn) Date: 2003-10-02 01:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=878540 Thanks for the prompt reply. I Already had the Win32 extensions, thanks. I have now realised that Outlook Express, 'Tools' menu, 'Accounts' option, 'Properties', 'Advanced' tab lists the SMTP port first, above the POP3 port, whereas the Spambayes config page list them in the same order as the 'Servers' tab. POP3 first. It now all works - training commences. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-02 00:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 To use the service you need to also install the Python win32 extensions. You can get those from . The readme has been corrected so that the next release will also include this information. Apologies for the inconvenience. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Knowles (andykn) Date: 2003-10-02 00:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=878540 I have just tried to get all this to work and have managed to get a bit further. I think the readme has been changed to say you need to run the command "net start pop3proxy" If this does not start, look in Event Viewer, Applications for error messages. I searched for any files listed as missing in the error message and copied them into the root of the python23 directory. The service then started (Using the Services section of Manage Computer). I can now open the configuration page and enter my mail servers but Outlook Express will not connect to them, reporting a No. Socket Error. If you get any further than me Id love to hear how! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 01:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 When you ran with "install", did you get something like "Installing service pop3proxy to Python class C:\spambayes_1_0\windows\pop3proxy_ service.Service Service installed"? (your path will be different, obviously). Did you get "Starting service pop3proxy" after running with "start"? If you look in the Services control panel (via the Administrative Tools one), you should see the pop3proxy/spambayes service listed. It should say that it is started. If you run "pop3proxy_service.py debug" you should get the service starting but printing out debugging information into the console. Could you let us know what you get then? It might be that the service has started, but can't use port 8880 for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Swerdlow (swerdlow) Date: 2003-09-25 01:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873906 Okay, I installed win32all, but I'm not understanding how to start the service properly. "python pop3proxy_service.py" gives me parameter information, so I tried "python pop3proxy_service.py install" followed by "python pop3proxy_service.py start" from the download directory. However, http://localhost:8880 produced no page. Do I need to run this script from somewhere else, or as some particular user? I feel like I'm being dense, but I don't see any more information in the ReadMe to help me get this set up. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-25 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'll update the readme to reflect the additional dependancy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-25 00:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 You need to install win32all. http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=812076&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 2 00:40:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 2 00:40:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Message-ID: Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-02 04:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Initial Comment: I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different folders. When the rules are of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives with in the subject move it to the folder and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the inbox. This is very frustrating. If the rule is of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to move it to the folder and a matching message comes in, duplicate messages do not occur. So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with Outlook Rules. I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a (with current hotfixes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-02 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Reported with 0.81 by "Brooks Page" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No word from the user, and I'm fairly certain the timer will fix this anyway ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-31 11:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I would be very interested to know if version 006 works with save_spam_info = True - it very well might. It would be great if you could let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-23 00:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 I installed both versions 4 and 5 of the binary, and set the save_spam_info to False. So far, it seems to have fixed the problem, although I'd like to give it a full day of email to verify (because it doesn't always happen). However: for some reason, the SpamBayes configuration dialog doesn't pop up when I click the spambayes button. This happens on Outlook XP on Windows XP. I'll put a new bug in on this; just thought you should know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 20:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-20 23:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-07 08:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine. I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will look into this when he gets a chance. Stay tuned! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-05 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 Anadelon: Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is Moved to Junk Mail. I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing the problem. (I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?) Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-05 01:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and chair. :) I seem to have overlooked the option to move messages instead of copying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-04 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using release 002 of the plugin. If you haven't already, could you try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-04 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on? If you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off (they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem? In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather than "copy"? (It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have rules of that form, and don't notice this problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-04 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 I am also having this problem. I have not tested it with various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 2 03:42:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 2 03:42:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816400 ] Crash because of bad date Message-ID: Bugs item #816400, was opened at 2003-10-02 07:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816400&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrik Reali (patrik_reali) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Crash because of bad date Initial Comment: My imap filter crashed this morning because of a wrongly formatted date (something common on spam messages): Classifying ...........................*Invalid response to append: ('NO', ['APPEND failed: Bad date in append: 31-Dec-1969 16:00:18 +0100']) The date field in the message is Date: Wed, 31 Dec 69 16:00:18 GMT Thanks for this great piece of software! I've been using it for three months now, and it is fullfilling all my expectations! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816400&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 2 03:44:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 2 03:44:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816400 ] Crash because of bad date Message-ID: Bugs item #816400, was opened at 2003-10-02 07:42 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by patrik_reali You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816400&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter >Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrik Reali (patrik_reali) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Crash because of bad date Initial Comment: My imap filter crashed this morning because of a wrongly formatted date (something common on spam messages): Classifying ...........................*Invalid response to append: ('NO', ['APPEND failed: Bad date in append: 31-Dec-1969 16:00:18 +0100']) The date field in the message is Date: Wed, 31 Dec 69 16:00:18 GMT Thanks for this great piece of software! I've been using it for three months now, and it is fullfilling all my expectations! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816400&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 2 12:58:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 2 12:58:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810902 ] Outlook 2000, Customize Outlook Today no longer works Message-ID: Bugs item #810902, was opened at 2003-09-22 21:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dstapleton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Bremmer (bremchris) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2000, Customize Outlook Today no longer works Initial Comment: After a fresh install on Outlook 2000 sr1 (9.0.0.3812) the "Customize Outlook Today" button no longer works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton) Date: 2003-10-02 13:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864221 This may be a Microsoft problem, not SpamBayes. Check out Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 820575. I had the same problem and this fixed it up. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-23 08:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 I notice same problem with Outlook 2000 sr1 (9.0.0.4527). SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 2 23:01:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 2 23:01:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816400 ] Crash because of bad date Message-ID: Bugs item #816400, was opened at 2003-10-02 19:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816400&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a1-1.0a4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrik Reali (patrik_reali) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Crash because of bad date Initial Comment: My imap filter crashed this morning because of a wrongly formatted date (something common on spam messages): Classifying ...........................*Invalid response to append: ('NO', ['APPEND failed: Bad date in append: 31-Dec-1969 16:00:18 +0100']) The date field in the message is Date: Wed, 31 Dec 69 16:00:18 GMT Thanks for this great piece of software! I've been using it for three months now, and it is fullfilling all my expectations! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-03 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should be fixed (in cvs) now. If appending fails, we now try without the flags (previous problem), without the date (i.e. using the current date), and then without both. This does mean that the message will end up with the current date/time, but I can't see any easy way around that. The fix will appear in the next release (or, if you're using cvs, then it will appear once sf updates anon access). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816400&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 3 01:18:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 3 01:18:07 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810342 ] sb_smtpproxy does not work with smtplib.SMTP.sendmail() Message-ID: Bugs item #810342, was opened at 2003-09-22 12:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810342&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timothy O'Malley (thisistimo) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_smtpproxy does not work with smtplib.SMTP.sendmail() Initial Comment: When sending mail using the standard smtplib in the Python 2.3 distribution, the smtplib client implementation expects to receive a '354' response to the 'DATA' command. To verify, search for '354' (without quotes) in the standard smptlib.py library module. I have attached a patch to sb_smtpproxy.py that fixes this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-03 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810342&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 3 01:24:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 3 01:24:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812020 ] Outlook plugin doesn't get 'installed' Message-ID: Bugs item #812020, was opened at 2003-09-25 08:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812020&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: logistix (logistix) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin doesn't get 'installed' Initial Comment: Running 'setup.py install' doesn't seem to add the outlook plugin to 'site-packages'; it only installed spambayes. The outlook2000 directory itself doesn't have a setup.py file to do it's own install. I ran addin.py from the temporary directory I extracted spambayes to. Afterwards, renaming or deleting this directory fried the plugin. The main toolbar still showed up, but all the submenus disappeared. Although I expected something like this, it wasn't made clear in the readme.txt file. It is not a big deal for me to manually copy the dir to site-packages, but future installers might want to do this automatically (or just document that you need to manually copy the Outlook 2000 files) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-03 17:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've modified the documentation to include a note saying that you need to 'install' the Outlook2000 directory to wherever you want it, and noting that the plug-in will not be happy about moving that directory after installation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812020&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 3 01:35:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 3 01:35:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811759 ] Imap: odd message deletion behavior Message-ID: Bugs item #811759, was opened at 2003-09-25 01:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811759&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter >Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jerm (floydd) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imap: odd message deletion behavior Initial Comment: (actually it's 1.0a6, but it only went to a5 in the dropdown) I'm having an issue where I'll often have repeats in my inbox, where a message will have the "X-Spambayes- MailId:" alone and the other copy will have the whole rating system included after that line, both of these in addition to the (deleted) original. If it's ham it shows as a repeat, if it's spam or unsure i end up with the fully formed headered message in the proper folder, and the (i'm assuming) working message still in the inbox. The original always seems to be deleted. Unfortunately, as with everything, it's not always the case, as it work fine some of the time. The classification works splendidly, thanks for the great software everyone. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-03 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry it's taken so long to get to this. I can't think of what the reason for these might be. If you could run imapfilter with the "-i4" switch, and pass on the stuff it outputs (edit out any personal stuff that you want to), that would be great. The first time that spambayes sees the message, it adds the id header, so that it can keep track of it. When it's classifying, it will add the rest of the headers, but it should delete the id-only message at that point. Something is definately screwy with the deletion code, but I think I'll need the imap trace to figure out where it's going wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jerm (floydd) Date: 2003-09-25 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=873570 additionally, sometimes bessages, when moved to a new folder (unsure for certain, possibly spam as well), they'll show up in the folder as deleted before i ever get to them -- at least i now know WHY nothing was showing up in my folders after sb_imapfilter said it had found stuff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811759&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 3 13:46:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 3 13:46:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809665 ] Installation and automated Update problems Message-ID: Bugs item #809665, was opened at 2003-09-20 08:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by seifertd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809665&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Christoph Obernd?rfer (baloons) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Installation and automated Update problems Initial Comment: Hello forum, there are two issues I want to tell you: First one is a problem with the installation on WindowsXP with OutlookXP. At the end of the installation process, there is the error-message, that the spambayes_addin.dll couldn't be initialized. Then I tried to initialize it manually as plugin into OutlookXP but that did nothing. At last, I copied the file into the MSOutlook Addin-folder and initialized it as Outlook-plugin... voilla Seccond one is the automated update feature. When running it, the following message comes up: There was an error checking for the latest version. Fot specific errors on the error, please see the SpamBayes log. Please check your internet connection, or try again later. In the log, there is the following entry: ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 530, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 145, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 353, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 479, in http_error_302 File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found I have a permanent on connection via a DSL-Router. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Douglas A. Seifert (seifertd) Date: 2003-10-03 17:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=591390 I experience this as well during install on Windows XP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809665&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 3 14:53:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 3 14:54:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-20 17:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by esterhai You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Esterhai (esterhai) Date: 2003-10-03 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=879055 I am having the exact same problem and can't figure out a solution. Does anyone have a solution for us. Restarting the computer or Outlook doesn't solve my problem. I have been trying to make it work for 3 days now. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2003-09-22 09:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP (SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates). Except rebooting does not solve my problem. Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) but not moved. I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but can find no documentation. Can anyone tell me how to do this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-21 13:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 4 06:14:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 4 06:14:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788845 ] imapfilter training fails Message-ID: Bugs item #788845, was opened at 2003-08-14 19:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jcayzac You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter training fails Initial Comment: Using latest CVS, Python 2.2.2, connecting to a Courier IMAP server. Web interface of imapfilter can connect and see the imap folders on the server. When I try training (with messages in the TrainSpam folder) I get the following traceback, I am willing to help anyone debug this: [gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 spambayes/imapfilter.py -v -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, version 0.01 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.SB.TrainSpam *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ? run() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run imap_filter.Train() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 607, in Train num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True) File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train msg.Save() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, command) + args) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, apply (self._command, (name,) + args)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in _command data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in _checkquote if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')): IndexError: string index out of range ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Julien Cayzac (jcayzac) Date: 2003-10-04 12:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=775162 This is not fixed in 1.0a6. The problem is that _checkquote is invoked with a zero-length argument, so arg[0] and arg[-1] both fail. I tried to patch imaplib by inserting the following snippet before that test: if (len(arg)==0): return arg ...then the ouput (with -i 4) is: Password: 08:47.89 > BGIK1 LOGIN deepmind "#######" 08:49.18 < BGIK1 OK LOGIN Ok. 08:49.18 > BGIK2 SELECT 08:49.18 < BGIK2 NO Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to. 08:49.18 NO response: Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to. Invalid response to select : ('NO', ['Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to.']) i.e., you're using select(None) at some point, which is illegal. Hope it helps. Julien. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-02 03:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I think I have fixed this. If you could try out imapfilter in 1.0a5 (due 04 Sept 03) and let me know if it works, that would be great. It should definately move the error into smtpproxy, rather than imaplib, and it should manage to recover from it, as well. It would be good to know that it still acts correctly though. (IMAP is a terrible protocol. The problem here is still the fundamental one that you can't alter a message on the server). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza) Date: 2003-08-25 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=844717 Here is some more using a more verbose debug: [gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 spambayes/imapfilter.py -v - t -i4 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, version 0.01 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham Done. 18:45.14 > FPNB1 LOGIN **** "******" 18:45.19 < FPNB1 OK LOGIN Ok. Training 18:45.19 > FPNB2 SELECT INBOX.SB.TrainHam 18:45.19 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Recent) 18:45.19 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen)] Limited 18:45.19 < * 1 EXISTS 18:45.19 < * 0 RECENT 18:45.19 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1060841558] Ok 18:45.19 < FPNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam 18:45.19 > FPNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED 18:45.19 < * SEARCH 157 18:45.19 < FPNB3 OK SEARCH done. 18:45.19 > FPNB4 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.HEADER 18:45.19 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822.HEADER {2075} 18:45.19 read literal size 2075 18:45.19 < ) 18:45.19 < FPNB4 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.20 > FPNB5 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.PEEK 18:45.20 < FPNB5 NO Error in IMAP command received by server. 18:45.20 NO response: Error in IMAP command received by server. 18:45.20 > FPNB6 UID FETCH 157 RFC822 18:45.20 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822 {5442} 18:45.20 read literal size 5442 18:45.20 < ) 18:45.20 < FPNB6 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.22 > FPNB7 UID FETCH 157 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE) 18:45.22 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "19-Aug-2003 10:07:21 -0600") 18:45.23 < FPNB7 OK FETCH completed. 18:45.24 > FPNB8 APPEND INBOX.SB.TrainHam (\Seen) "19- Aug-2003 10:07:21 -0600" {5476} 18:45.24 < + OK 18:45.24 write literal size 5476 18:45.29 < FPNB8 OK [APPENDUID 1060841558 158] APPEND Ok. 18:45.29 > FPNB9 UID STORE 157 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) 18:45.29 < FPNB9 OK STORE completed. 18:45.29 > FPNB10 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X- Spambayes-MailId 1061320725) 18:45.29 < * SEARCH 18:45.29 < * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted)) 18:45.29 < FPNB10 OK SEARCH done. 18:45.29 > FPNB11 UID SEARCH RECENT 18:45.29 < * SEARCH 18:45.29 < FPNB11 OK SEARCH done. *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ? run() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run imap_filter.Train() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 594, in Train num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False) File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train msg.Save() File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS INTERNALDATE)") File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, command) + args) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in _simple_command return self._command_complete(name, apply (self._command, (name,) + args)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in _command data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg)) File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in _checkquote if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')): IndexError: string index out of range ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-19 10:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have very occasionally seen this too, but whenever I've tried to reproduce it (to fix it) I haven't been able to. Do you get this consistently? If you do, could you run imapfilter with the "-i4" switch and tell me/the list what you get? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 4 14:39:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 4 14:39:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-817813 ] Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #817813, was opened at 2003-10-04 14:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Levison (mlevison) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Initial Comment: Add a spelling checker and reasonable sized dictionary. If more than xx% of the message is misspelled (esp the subject), consider it to be spam. Many emails have gotten past Spam Bayes recently because their spelling is like "bfuqclvfphz". Also consider adding the words from any message not marked as spam to the dictionary - that way it would quickly learn proper names ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 04:07:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 04:07:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818494 ] Crashes when training Message-ID: Bugs item #818494, was opened at 2003-10-06 10:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818494&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kresimir Tonkovic (kresho) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes when training Initial Comment: Training... Trained on 104 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818494&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 07:29:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 07:29:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818552 ] Exchange 2000 IMAP server & imaplib.error: APPEND command er Message-ID: Bugs item #818552, was opened at 2003-10-06 13:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818552&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marcell Lengyel (miketkf) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Exchange 2000 IMAP server & imaplib.error: APPEND command er Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py crashes when a new mail arrives to the server's inbox. The server is: Microsoft Exchange 2000 IMAP4rev1 server version 6.0.6249.0 I'm using spambayes-1.0a6.1.tar.gz The error message is: imaplib.error: APPEND command error: BAD ['Protocol Error: "Specified set of flags is not valid".'] See the attached log for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818552&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 07:51:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 07:51:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-818567 ] Add IDLE support for IMAP Message-ID: Feature Requests item #818567, was opened at 2003-10-06 11:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Wagland (pwagland) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add IDLE support for IMAP Initial Comment: It would be very useful if the imap filter could use the IDLE support of LDAP on the folders that it monitors for new messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=818567&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 12:31:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 12:31:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-800487 ] Don't count classified spam as new mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #800487, was opened at 2003-09-04 10:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dwfreck You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Russell Leake (leaker) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Don't count classified spam as new mail Initial Comment: I found what "turns me on" and "off" to spam filters is their ability NOT to falsely indicate the arrival of new mail. If a message is classified as spam, it would be nice if SpamBayes would not indicate it as new mail (sounds/tray icon envelope). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dale W. Freck (dwfreck) Date: 2003-10-06 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=881319 Greetings. With respect to FAQ 3.9, it says, "Until someone comes up with a clever solution for all of this...". It looks like someone has: the author of Spammunition, a free bayesian Outlook add-in. Spammunition is similar to SpamBayes (I like SpamBayes better; it's more effective), but Spammunition includes an option to turn off the "new mail" icon if it moves spam out of your Inbox and there are no unread mesages remaining there. Outlook will still play a sound/open a pop-up when something arrives, if you have Outlook configured that way. With Outlook configured to play a sound, and Spammunition configured to turn off the icon when appropriate, you know spam has arrived because you'll hear the sound, but the icon doesn't show up. Spammunition hasn't been updated in quite a while, but the author posted a news item on his web site saying he was trying to make it an open source project, so perhaps you could recruit him... See http://www.upserve.com for information. I've sent him an e-mail referencing this project. Sincerely, Dale Freck ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 18:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. That is an interesting idea. I'll change this back to open and see what Mark thinks of it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Russell Leake (leaker) Date: 2003-09-04 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676711 All too clear now. Thank you for your prompt response. An alternative solution would be to create a spambayes icon and update it upon success or filter. An example that I have seen is JunkOut (which uses a Bayesian filter also). Just a suggestion. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 3.9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 16:52:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 16:53:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818871 ] sb_server.py calls undefined variable Message-ID: Bugs item #818871, was opened at 2003-10-06 15:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818871&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bradley Peters (moberley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py calls undefined variable Initial Comment: I was running the pop3proxy_service on Windows 2000. It was working fine, and then stopped working with the following error message. Here is the description from the PythonService error in the Event Viewer: The instance's SvcRun() method failed File "G:\Programs\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32\lib\win32serviceutil.py", line 663, in SvcRun self.SvcDoRun() File "G:\Programs\SBService\windows\pop3proxy_service.py", line 110, in SvcDoRun sb_server.prepare(state=sb_server.state) File "G:\Programs\SBService\scripts\sb_server.py", line 851, in prepare state.prepare() File "G:\Programs\SBService\scripts\sb_server.py", line 679, in prepare self.createWorkers() File "G:\Programs\SBService\scripts\sb_server.py", line 715, in createWorkers self.warning = "%s\nWarning: you have much more %s than %s - " \ exceptions.NameError: global name 'db_status' is not defined ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818871&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 19:44:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 19:44:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818494 ] Crashes when training Message-ID: Bugs item #818494, was opened at 2003-10-06 21:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818494&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kresimir Tonkovic (kresho) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes when training Initial Comment: Training... Trained on 104 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-07 12:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818494&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 19:46:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 19:46:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818494 ] Crashes when training Message-ID: Bugs item #818494, was opened at 2003-10-06 21:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818494&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kresimir Tonkovic (kresho) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Crashes when training Initial Comment: Training... Trained on 104 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-07 12:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The exact problem is that the database is unusable after you do anything in the configuration pages. Simply restarting spambayes after changing any options will fix this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-07 12:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818494&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 19:53:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 19:53:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818871 ] sb_server.py calls undefined variable Message-ID: Bugs item #818871, was opened at 2003-10-07 09:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818871&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bradley Peters (moberley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py calls undefined variable Initial Comment: I was running the pop3proxy_service on Windows 2000. It was working fine, and then stopped working with the following error message. Here is the description from the PythonService error in the Event Viewer: The instance's SvcRun() method failed File "G:\Programs\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32\lib\win32serviceutil.py", line 663, in SvcRun self.SvcDoRun() File "G:\Programs\SBService\windows\pop3proxy_service.py", line 110, in SvcDoRun sb_server.prepare(state=sb_server.state) File "G:\Programs\SBService\scripts\sb_server.py", line 851, in prepare state.prepare() File "G:\Programs\SBService\scripts\sb_server.py", line 679, in prepare self.createWorkers() File "G:\Programs\SBService\scripts\sb_server.py", line 715, in createWorkers self.warning = "%s\nWarning: you have much more %s than %s - " \ exceptions.NameError: global name 'db_status' is not defined ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-07 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps - too much copying from the Outlook plugin. Thanks - fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818871&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 6 20:11:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 6 20:11:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818552 ] Exchange 2000 IMAP server & imaplib.error: APPEND command er Message-ID: Bugs item #818552, was opened at 2003-10-07 00:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818552&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marcell Lengyel (miketkf) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Exchange 2000 IMAP server & imaplib.error: APPEND command er Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py crashes when a new mail arrives to the server's inbox. The server is: Microsoft Exchange 2000 IMAP4rev1 server version 6.0.6249.0 I'm using spambayes-1.0a6.1.tar.gz The error message is: imaplib.error: APPEND command error: BAD ['Protocol Error: "Specified set of flags is not valid".'] See the attached log for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-07 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I presume this is because there was a space in the flag list that wasn't removed. I've checked in a fix for this to cvs, so it should be fixed for the next release. If you were able to check that this does fix it, that would be great. You can just change line 406 (current cvs, 1.0a6 should be similar) from: flags = re.sub(r"\Recent ?|\ ?Recent", "", flags) to flags = re.sub(r"\Recent ?| ?\Recent", "", flags) If you could reopen this if it doesn't fix it, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818552&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 7 02:17:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 7 02:17:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-818552 ] Exchange 2000 IMAP server & imaplib.error: APPEND command er Message-ID: Bugs item #818552, was opened at 2003-10-06 13:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by miketkf You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818552&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marcell Lengyel (miketkf) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Exchange 2000 IMAP server & imaplib.error: APPEND command er Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py crashes when a new mail arrives to the server's inbox. The server is: Microsoft Exchange 2000 IMAP4rev1 server version 6.0.6249.0 I'm using spambayes-1.0a6.1.tar.gz The error message is: imaplib.error: APPEND command error: BAD ['Protocol Error: "Specified set of flags is not valid".'] See the attached log for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcell Lengyel (miketkf) Date: 2003-10-07 08:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=881144 Your fix did work. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-07 02:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I presume this is because there was a space in the flag list that wasn't removed. I've checked in a fix for this to cvs, so it should be fixed for the next release. If you were able to check that this does fix it, that would be great. You can just change line 406 (current cvs, 1.0a6 should be similar) from: flags = re.sub(r"\Recent ?|\ ?Recent", "", flags) to flags = re.sub(r"\Recent ?| ?\Recent", "", flags) If you could reopen this if it doesn't fix it, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=818552&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 7 20:51:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 7 20:52:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-819684 ] Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Message-ID: Bugs item #819684, was opened at 2003-10-08 00:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Initial Comment: When a MIME message is received from the Evolution Mail client the SpamBayes Outlook plugin truncates the message stream after the headers and only tokenizers the headers. Message source looks like this: ... Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ" Organization: Message-Id: <1065568187.23375.8.camel@wookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 07 Oct 2003 16:09:47 -0700 Content-Length: 5759 --=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable message here ... --- Show spam clues indicates the message stream is only the headers. The message appears to get truncated after the Date header. My guess is that this is because Evolution puts two blanks lines after the headers instead of one. Other mail clients I tried only put one blank line after the headers before the first MIME boundary. Surprisingly this really doesn't seem to matter. SpamBayes quickly learned these messages were not spam. SpamBayes rocks! And so does the Outlook plugin! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 7 22:19:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 7 22:19:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-819684 ] Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Message-ID: Bugs item #819684, was opened at 2003-10-08 00:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jazzdevotee You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Initial Comment: When a MIME message is received from the Evolution Mail client the SpamBayes Outlook plugin truncates the message stream after the headers and only tokenizers the headers. Message source looks like this: ... Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ" Organization: Message-Id: <1065568187.23375.8.camel@wookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 07 Oct 2003 16:09:47 -0700 Content-Length: 5759 --=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable message here ... --- Show spam clues indicates the message stream is only the headers. The message appears to get truncated after the Date header. My guess is that this is because Evolution puts two blanks lines after the headers instead of one. Other mail clients I tried only put one blank line after the headers before the first MIME boundary. Surprisingly this really doesn't seem to matter. SpamBayes quickly learned these messages were not spam. SpamBayes rocks! And so does the Outlook plugin! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Date: 2003-10-08 02:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=556412 A little Googling turned up a comment from Tim Peters a year ago: > The Outlook client right now "loses" all > attachments, and even loses the msg body if the msg has been > digitally signed (because it turns out Outlook does Yet > Another Entirely Different Thing for signed msgs, leaving the > two "normal" body properties empty and stuffing the body > *plus* the signature into Yet Another property). So if it's possible to figure out the name of this "Yet Another property", I could probably test and submit a patch (to msgstore.GetEmailPackageObject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 8 17:55:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 8 17:55:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-820285 ] can't connect to pop server Message-ID: Support Requests item #820285, was opened at 2003-10-08 16:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=820285&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marty Mo (itleader) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can't connect to pop server Initial Comment: I am using Mozilla Thunderbird mail client on Win 98 and Win XP. After installing python 2.3 I installed and configured SpamBayes per readme instructions. I changed client to use 'localhost' as proxy. The client connects to SpamBayes Pop3 proxy server OK, and the proxy server displays a message stating that it is proxying. When I try to get mail, I get a message that the connection was refused. Could this be because the proxy server is not able to supply the password when it attempts to connect to the POP server? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=820285&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 9 05:39:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 9 05:40:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810183 ] Outlook crash after watching spam clues Message-ID: Bugs item #810183, was opened at 2003-09-21 17:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rcowham You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crash after watching spam clues Initial Comment: After looking at the spam clues in outlook 2000 (via the spambayes menu in the toolbar), outlook crashes when the window is closed again. Crash Location: 0x32503BD2 (BLNMGRPS.DLL, at prefered load address) Call Stack: BLNMGRPS.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x8d3 OBALLOON.DLL!32a033ca() MSO9.DLL!_MsoFCustomAWDatabases@12() + 0x900 MSO9.DLL!_LDoBalloonTFC@40() + 0x3e 00000005() NTDLL.DLL!_LdrpAccessResourceData@16() + 0x9d msi.dll!InstallFiles() + 0x1dd2 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe riched20.dll!CFontCache::GetCcs() + 0xa6 riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight() + 0xe NTDLL.DLL!_RtlpUnlockAtomTable@4() + 0xd NTDLL.DLL!_RtlLookupAtomInAtomTable@12() + 0x86 URLMON.DLL! CSecurityManager::CSecMgrCache::FindCacheEntry() + 0x33 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion2::Intersect() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!XHDC::PatBlt() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!SelectObject() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CRgnData::Subtract() + 0x63 MSHTML.DLL!CLayout::DrawClientScrollbar() + 0x13c MSHTML.DLL!CDispClipTransform::SetClipRect () + 0x32 MSHTML.DLL!CDispContainer::PreDraw() + 0x217 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Subtract() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawBands() + 0x11e MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::BoundsInside() + 0x1b MSHTML.DLL! CDispDrawContext::IntersectRedrawRegion() + 0x37 MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Intersect() + 0x3f MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0xd0 MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 00000275() MSHTML.DLL! CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder() + 0x8c MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::~CRegion() + 0x19 MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot() + 0x27f OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x162d6 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x160f0 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x15522 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x169a3 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x14d4d OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4f84 OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID() + 0x2ddde OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4e9f OUTLLIB.DLL!RenExitInstance@0() + 0x22d0 OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0() + 0x4ff1 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcA@16() + 0x22 OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x468da OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate() + 0x46871 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x2244 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1fd0 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1f41 OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject() + 0x1e78 USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20() + 0x2f USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4() + 0x22 NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12() + 0x13 USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20() + 0xfc USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20() + 0x18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Cowham (rcowham) Date: 2003-10-09 09:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=883409 I don't know if it's the same thing, but my Outlook has started crashing on me since installing SpamBayes. Outlook just dies from time to time. This happens sometimes when trying for SpamClues, but at other times too. I'm running Outlook 2002 (10.4608.4219) SP-2 on WinXP SP1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-25 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Hm. I just noticed that it doesn't happen every time. It happened the first few times I was trying, so I thought it was reproducible. It's possible that it is actually a problem with some other plugin (I'm also using PGP) or some interference. I'll try to monitor it further. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-25 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Does this happen every single time? Have you ever tried on another machine? As this is the only ever report of this, I suspect that unfortunately we will have to put it down to your specific machine.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 17:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a nil pointer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 9 18:30:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 9 18:30:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-22 00:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-27 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 03:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 03:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 01:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 9 18:33:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 9 18:34:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-22 00:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-27 05:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 03:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 03:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-22 01:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 10 02:39:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 10 02:39:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-821011 ] Show db content Message-ID: Feature Requests item #821011, was opened at 2003-10-10 06:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=821011&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Markus Renschler (mare) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Show db content Initial Comment: It would be great to get access a list of all the tokens stored in the db and their spam probability number. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=821011&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 10 03:12:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 10 03:12:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-817813 ] Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #817813, was opened at 2003-10-04 14:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmvalin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Levison (mlevison) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Initial Comment: Add a spelling checker and reasonable sized dictionary. If more than xx% of the message is misspelled (esp the subject), consider it to be spam. Many emails have gotten past Spam Bayes recently because their spelling is like "bfuqclvfphz". Also consider adding the words from any message not marked as spam to the dictionary - that way it would quickly learn proper names ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2003-10-10 03:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 Actually, this could probably be achieved simply by assigning a spam probability to words that aren't in the database at all (assuming there's enough training data that all real words are in the database). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 10 08:05:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 10 08:06:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 17:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kremp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 10 08:49:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 10 08:49:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-821186 ] Lot's of Server Errors (Code 500) Message-ID: Bugs item #821186, was opened at 2003-10-10 12:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821186&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Florian Metzger (flometzger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Lot's of Server Errors (Code 500) Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes on two different machines - one running Windows2003 Web Edition and the other running Windows 2000. I installed the latest version of Python on both machines (2.3.2). The program basically runs, but whenever I want to train it through the web-admin interface I get Server errors. Did I do something wrong ? Installation seemed pretty simple... Please write any ideas to fm@neodelight.com Now - here's some examples of the errors, I always get: ----------------------------------------------------- Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 388, in onTrain classifier.learn(tokens, isSpam) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 337, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' --------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 258, in onClassify results = self._buildCluesTable(message) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 269, in _buildCluesTable evidence=True) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' ----------------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 336, in onWordquery wordinfo = classifier._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' --------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 462, in onShowclues results = self._buildCluesTable(message, subject) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 269, in _buildCluesTable evidence=True) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' ---------------------------------- Training... Trained on 3 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821186&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 10 12:06:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 10 12:10:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-821186 ] Lot's of Server Errors (Code 500) Message-ID: Bugs item #821186, was opened at 2003-10-10 05:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andylange You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821186&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Florian Metzger (flometzger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Lot's of Server Errors (Code 500) Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes on two different machines - one running Windows2003 Web Edition and the other running Windows 2000. I installed the latest version of Python on both machines (2.3.2). The program basically runs, but whenever I want to train it through the web-admin interface I get Server errors. Did I do something wrong ? Installation seemed pretty simple... Please write any ideas to fm@neodelight.com Now - here's some examples of the errors, I always get: ----------------------------------------------------- Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 388, in onTrain classifier.learn(tokens, isSpam) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 337, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' --------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 258, in onClassify results = self._buildCluesTable(message) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 269, in _buildCluesTable evidence=True) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' ----------------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 336, in onWordquery wordinfo = classifier._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' --------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 462, in onShowclues results = self._buildCluesTable(message, subject) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 269, in _buildCluesTable evidence=True) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' ---------------------------------- Training... Trained on 3 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Lange (andylange) Date: 2003-10-10 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=884085 I was getting the same, but stopping and restarting the service (under Windows XP, at least) fixed it when training on an mbox. It also allowed me to train (via cut and paste into the textbox) a message that had previously generated the same errors. It appears that something is happening to the SpamBayes process which breaks self.dict, and it is then unable to train until it is restared. I haven't figured out a minimal series of actions to get it into this state, but I believe it includes training on proxied messages (confirming what the filter has thought of the various messages) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821186&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 11 11:46:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 11 11:46:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-821808 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to mark X-Spambayes-Trained Message-ID: Bugs item #821808, was opened at 2003-10-11 08:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821808&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alan W. Irwin (airwin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails to mark X-Spambayes-Trained Initial Comment: Symptoms: I have chosen a two-message mbox folder called libtool as an example, but I get the same result with larger folders as well. irwin@starling> sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.spambayes/hammie.dbm -g ~/cdburn0/Mail/libtool Training ham (/home/irwin/cdburn0/Mail/libtool): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages irwin@starling> sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.spambayes/hammie.dbm -g ~/cdburn0/Mail/libtool Training ham (/home/irwin/cdburn0/Mail/libtool): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Note the second time around it still trains 2 messages rather than 0. Also, that folder remains absolutely unchanged by these training efforts with a september date ls -l ~/cdburn0/Mail/libtool -rw------- 1 irwin irwin 4290 Sep 11 15:20 /home/irwin/cdburn0/Mail/libtool and no extra mail header line referring to X-Spambayes-Trained Configuration file: cat ~/.spambayesrc [Headers] include_trained: True [Storage] persistent_storage_file: ~/.spambayes/hammie.dbm persistent_use_database: True The include_trained: True should be redundant (since it is default), but I tried it anyway to force the X-Spambayes-Trained header to be in, but it didn't work. I believe this bug has serious consequences since there is no way to retrain spambayes with the recommended cron tasks using sb_mboxtrain.py since it acts as if the -f option was on all the time. To users unaware of this bug, the database gets slowly distorted by the cumulative repeating of the same data with no correction of previous classification mistakes possible. Of course, one workaround presumably (I haven't tried this yet) is to remove your database in the cron task and start from scratch every time, but this is somewhat wasteful of resources for the huge spam and ham collection of mail folders I have collected. If others here have trouble reproducing this bug, then here are some details about my system: I am running a Debian stable Linux distribution which I have modified by downloading and installing the python 2.3.2 tarball, Python-2.3.2.tgz, from python.org. python Python 2.3.2 (#1, Oct 10 2003, 17:38:20) [GCC 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> I have downloaded and installed spambayes-1.0a6.1.tar.gz from sourceforge.net. If there is any difficulty verifying this bug, I will be happy to supply more details about my system, run more tests, etc., since spam waits for no man, and it is fairly urgent I get it fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821808&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 12 09:51:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 12 09:52:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 01:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by donnieb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 09:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 10:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 02:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 12 18:53:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 12 18:53:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-821186 ] Lot's of Server Errors (Code 500) Message-ID: Bugs item #821186, was opened at 2003-10-11 01:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821186&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Florian Metzger (flometzger) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Lot's of Server Errors (Code 500) Initial Comment: I installed SpamBayes on two different machines - one running Windows2003 Web Edition and the other running Windows 2000. I installed the latest version of Python on both machines (2.3.2). The program basically runs, but whenever I want to train it through the web-admin interface I get Server errors. Did I do something wrong ? Installation seemed pretty simple... Please write any ideas to fm@neodelight.com Now - here's some examples of the errors, I always get: ----------------------------------------------------- Training... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 388, in onTrain classifier.learn(tokens, isSpam) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 211, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 337, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' --------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 258, in onClassify results = self._buildCluesTable(message) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 269, in _buildCluesTable evidence=True) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' ----------------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 336, in onWordquery wordinfo = classifier._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' --------------------- 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 462, in onShowclues results = self._buildCluesTable(message, subject) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 269, in _buildCluesTable evidence=True) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 391, in _getclues record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 250, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 110, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): AttributeError: 'int' object has no attribute 'has_key' ---------------------------------- Training... Trained on 3 messages. Saving... 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 324, in onReview self._doSave() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\UserInterface.py", line 470, in _doSave classifier.store() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 229, in store self._write_state_key() File "C:\spambayes\spambayes\storage.py", line 233, in _write_state_key self.db[self.statekey] = (classifier.PICKLE_VERSION, File "C:\Python23\lib\shelve.py", line 130, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() TypeError: object does not support item assignment ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-13 11:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a known bug with 1.0a6, and has been fixed in CVS, so will be fixed in the nextrelease. What happens is that the database is unusable after you make *any* changes via the web configuration pages. Simply restarting spambayes after making any changes will work around this problem (or you can use 1.0a5 until the next release comes out). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Lange (andylange) Date: 2003-10-11 05:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=884085 I was getting the same, but stopping and restarting the service (under Windows XP, at least) fixed it when training on an mbox. It also allowed me to train (via cut and paste into the textbox) a message that had previously generated the same errors. It appears that something is happening to the SpamBayes process which breaks self.dict, and it is then unable to train until it is restared. I haven't figured out a minimal series of actions to get it into this state, but I believe it includes training on proxied messages (confirming what the filter has thought of the various messages) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821186&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 08:29:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 08:30:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 14:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bchamans You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 14:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 00:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 19:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 11:42:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 11:42:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-822823 ] Outlook plugin suggestion... Message-ID: Feature Requests item #822823, was opened at 2003-10-13 11:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=822823&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wuphon's Reach (wuphonsreach) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin suggestion... Initial Comment: First off... a general background of how I prefer to do filtering as e-mail arrives in my inbox: 1) Filter out newsletters to sub-folders, maybe half a dozen rules that are extremely specific. Outlook moves the message and then stops processing any other rules for the current message. These rules are so specific that it's rare that spam gets through. 2) e-mail sent to a specific account (abuse@, webmaster@) gets shoved into sub-folders (1 for each account) 3) Filter out work e-mail domains. Messages that match this rule get left in my inbox. 4) Filter out people that I know... anyone on this list gets left in the inbox. 5) Move everything else to a "Bulk Mail" folder. (At this point, the messages are 95% sure to be spammy...) What I wish is that for rule #5, I had the option of running SpamBayes on the message... (e.g. SpamBayes would plug into the Rules Wizard as 3 different conditions... ham/notsure/spam). Then I could have 3 rules: 5a) Move everything that SpamBayes says is spam to folder A 5b) Move everything that SpamBayes says is notsure to folder B 5c) Leave messages that SpamBayes says are ham alone. The reason that I'd like to wait to do bayesian until step 5 is that it gives me discrete control over the process... if I find that too much spam gets through my whitelist, I can choose to bayesian earlier in the process. Also, having SpamBayes as part of the rule system, might clean up the problem where SB doesn't notice new messages in the watched folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=822823&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 15:35:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 15:35:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816103 ] Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Message-ID: Bugs item #816103, was opened at 2003-10-01 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by go_jesse You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Initial Comment: Im running Outlook 2003 Beta (11.4920.4920) BETA on Windows XP, and I've installed the latest SpamBayes from the website, and It's not filtering or scoring new emails. The only time it does is when I start up outlook. Im not sure what info you'll need, but feel free to contact me and I'll provide it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jesse Brandeburg (go_jesse) Date: 2003-10-13 12:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631160 I'm running Outlook2003 (11.5608.5606) release version that I upgraded from a spambayes installed OutlookXP (2001) Everything runs fine, I even updated to the latest version of the outlook windows plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Date: 2003-10-01 13:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=554693 Tried to install, but I can't find it back on MS's website ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-10-01 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Please install the outlook 2003 techincal refresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 17:35:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 17:36:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-822823 ] Outlook plugin suggestion... Message-ID: Feature Requests item #822823, was opened at 2003-10-14 04:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=822823&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wuphon's Reach (wuphonsreach) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin suggestion... Initial Comment: First off... a general background of how I prefer to do filtering as e-mail arrives in my inbox: 1) Filter out newsletters to sub-folders, maybe half a dozen rules that are extremely specific. Outlook moves the message and then stops processing any other rules for the current message. These rules are so specific that it's rare that spam gets through. 2) e-mail sent to a specific account (abuse@, webmaster@) gets shoved into sub-folders (1 for each account) 3) Filter out work e-mail domains. Messages that match this rule get left in my inbox. 4) Filter out people that I know... anyone on this list gets left in the inbox. 5) Move everything else to a "Bulk Mail" folder. (At this point, the messages are 95% sure to be spammy...) What I wish is that for rule #5, I had the option of running SpamBayes on the message... (e.g. SpamBayes would plug into the Rules Wizard as 3 different conditions... ham/notsure/spam). Then I could have 3 rules: 5a) Move everything that SpamBayes says is spam to folder A 5b) Move everything that SpamBayes says is notsure to folder B 5c) Leave messages that SpamBayes says are ham alone. The reason that I'd like to wait to do bayesian until step 5 is that it gives me discrete control over the process... if I find that too much spam gets through my whitelist, I can choose to bayesian earlier in the process. Also, having SpamBayes as part of the rule system, might clean up the problem where SB doesn't notice new messages in the watched folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-14 10:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you not do this now? Why don't you just set spambayes to watch only the "Bulk Mail" folder, moving spam to folder A, and unsure to folder B. We all realise that using Outlook's rule system to do spambayes work would have a lot of benefits; unfortunately Microsoft don't expose the necessary hooks to be able to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=822823&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 17:38:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 17:38:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-821011 ] Show db content Message-ID: Feature Requests item #821011, was opened at 2003-10-10 19:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=821011&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Markus Renschler (mare) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Show db content Initial Comment: It would be great to get access a list of all the tokens stored in the db and their spam probability number. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-14 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I realise you're asking for a GUI tool to do this, but in case you don't know about it, there is a script in the source releases (1.0a6, for example) that will do this for you (almost). You want the db_expimp.py script. Simply feed it the location of your database and export to a flat text file. You can then open this file in Excel, or whatever, and see the various tokens. Note that this *doesn't* give you the probability because the database doesn't store the probability - it stores the counts for the number of ham and spam messages that the token has been seen in. You will get this exported. If you want to convert this to a probability, then you can simply plug those numbers in to the formula that calculates the probability (it's in classifier.py in the source release). Excel can do this for you, too :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=821011&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 17:43:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 17:43:05 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-817813 ] Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #817813, was opened at 2003-10-05 07:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Levison (mlevison) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Consider bad spelling a sign of spam Initial Comment: Add a spelling checker and reasonable sized dictionary. If more than xx% of the message is misspelled (esp the subject), consider it to be spam. Many emails have gotten past Spam Bayes recently because their spelling is like "bfuqclvfphz". Also consider adding the words from any message not marked as spam to the dictionary - that way it would quickly learn proper names ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-14 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added both of these to the NEWTRICKS.txt file. Note that a 'word' like 'bfuqclvfphz' is highly unlikely to be used in the calculation of a message score. Any tokens not seen before get a score of 0.5, and any tokens that score between 0.4 and 0.6 don't get used for the calculation. So unless you'd seen that word before, it wouldn't be used. If you *had* seen it, surely it would be spam, and so a good thing? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2003-10-10 20:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 Actually, this could probably be achieved simply by assigning a spam probability to words that aren't in the database at all (assuming there's enough training data that all real words are in the database). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=817813&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 17:51:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 17:51:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-821808 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to mark X-Spambayes-Trained Message-ID: Bugs item #821808, was opened at 2003-10-12 04:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821808&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alan W. Irwin (airwin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails to mark X-Spambayes-Trained Initial Comment: Symptoms: I have chosen a two-message mbox folder called libtool as an example, but I get the same result with larger folders as well. irwin@starling> sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.spambayes/hammie.dbm -g ~/cdburn0/Mail/libtool Training ham (/home/irwin/cdburn0/Mail/libtool): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages irwin@starling> sb_mboxtrain.py -d ~/.spambayes/hammie.dbm -g ~/cdburn0/Mail/libtool Training ham (/home/irwin/cdburn0/Mail/libtool): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 2 out of 2 messages Note the second time around it still trains 2 messages rather than 0. Also, that folder remains absolutely unchanged by these training efforts with a september date ls -l ~/cdburn0/Mail/libtool -rw------- 1 irwin irwin 4290 Sep 11 15:20 /home/irwin/cdburn0/Mail/libtool and no extra mail header line referring to X-Spambayes-Trained Configuration file: cat ~/.spambayesrc [Headers] include_trained: True [Storage] persistent_storage_file: ~/.spambayes/hammie.dbm persistent_use_database: True The include_trained: True should be redundant (since it is default), but I tried it anyway to force the X-Spambayes-Trained header to be in, but it didn't work. I believe this bug has serious consequences since there is no way to retrain spambayes with the recommended cron tasks using sb_mboxtrain.py since it acts as if the -f option was on all the time. To users unaware of this bug, the database gets slowly distorted by the cumulative repeating of the same data with no correction of previous classification mistakes possible. Of course, one workaround presumably (I haven't tried this yet) is to remove your database in the cron task and start from scratch every time, but this is somewhat wasteful of resources for the huge spam and ham collection of mail folders I have collected. If others here have trouble reproducing this bug, then here are some details about my system: I am running a Debian stable Linux distribution which I have modified by downloading and installing the python 2.3.2 tarball, Python-2.3.2.tgz, from python.org. python Python 2.3.2 (#1, Oct 10 2003, 17:38:20) [GCC 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> I have downloaded and installed spambayes-1.0a6.1.tar.gz from sourceforge.net. If there is any difficulty verifying this bug, I will be happy to supply more details about my system, run more tests, etc., since spam waits for no man, and it is fairly urgent I get it fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-14 10:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Skip fixed this in cvs a few days back, which I hadn't realised :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=821808&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 22:10:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 22:11:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-823159 ] Add SpamBayes headers with Outlook plug-in Message-ID: Feature Requests item #823159, was opened at 2003-10-14 15:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=823159&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add SpamBayes headers with Outlook plug-in Initial Comment: [From the list] Could you add a custom line to the mail header when the message is classified as spam? [Mark's response] I see no reason we can't add this as a disabled-by- default option. However, we should do it properly, allowing the headers to be "fully specified" - ie, we should consider adding the complete set of headers the proxy does. Please open a feature request at sourceforge (and I doubt I will find the time in the short term) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=823159&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 13 22:13:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 13 22:13:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-823159 ] Add SpamBayes headers with Outlook plug-in Message-ID: Feature Requests item #823159, was opened at 2003-10-14 15:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=823159&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add SpamBayes headers with Outlook plug-in Initial Comment: [From the list] Could you add a custom line to the mail header when the message is classified as spam? [Mark's response] I see no reason we can't add this as a disabled-by- default option. However, we should do it properly, allowing the headers to be "fully specified" - ie, we should consider adding the complete set of headers the proxy does. Please open a feature request at sourceforge (and I doubt I will find the time in the short term) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-14 15:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark: if you can point me towards an example of how to add a header to an Outlook message, then I'm happy to put together a patch with the rest of the code necessary for this. I'm not really sure about how to add the header, though (change PR_TRANSPORT_HEADERS?), and never have much luck searching for this sort of thing. If pointing me to an example is as much work as just doing it yourself, then never mind, I'll wait and watch when you find time for this :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=823159&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 14 08:29:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 14 08:29:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-822823 ] Outlook plugin suggestion... Message-ID: Feature Requests item #822823, was opened at 2003-10-13 11:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wuphonsreach You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=822823&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Wuphon's Reach (wuphonsreach) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin suggestion... Initial Comment: First off... a general background of how I prefer to do filtering as e-mail arrives in my inbox: 1) Filter out newsletters to sub-folders, maybe half a dozen rules that are extremely specific. Outlook moves the message and then stops processing any other rules for the current message. These rules are so specific that it's rare that spam gets through. 2) e-mail sent to a specific account (abuse@, webmaster@) gets shoved into sub-folders (1 for each account) 3) Filter out work e-mail domains. Messages that match this rule get left in my inbox. 4) Filter out people that I know... anyone on this list gets left in the inbox. 5) Move everything else to a "Bulk Mail" folder. (At this point, the messages are 95% sure to be spammy...) What I wish is that for rule #5, I had the option of running SpamBayes on the message... (e.g. SpamBayes would plug into the Rules Wizard as 3 different conditions... ham/notsure/spam). Then I could have 3 rules: 5a) Move everything that SpamBayes says is spam to folder A 5b) Move everything that SpamBayes says is notsure to folder B 5c) Leave messages that SpamBayes says are ham alone. The reason that I'd like to wait to do bayesian until step 5 is that it gives me discrete control over the process... if I find that too much spam gets through my whitelist, I can choose to bayesian earlier in the process. Also, having SpamBayes as part of the rule system, might clean up the problem where SB doesn't notice new messages in the watched folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Wuphon's Reach (wuphonsreach) Date: 2003-10-14 08:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=725551 Right now, SB works 90% of the time at moving items from my Bulk Folder to the spam folders. (I wasn't sure whether it was a technical reason that you hadn't gone the rule system route or just something on the to-do list. Figured I'd splonk the idea down in writing along with explaining a usage scenario.) For the 10% of the time when SB doesn't notice new inbound e-mail in the folders that it's watching, I've ended up using the "Filter Messages..." dialog to force it. (For the record, I've tried with background processing, without, dancing with wolves in the pale moonlight...) Last week or two, it's been quietly behaving, which makes the whole idea a moot point. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-13 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you not do this now? Why don't you just set spambayes to watch only the "Bulk Mail" folder, moving spam to folder A, and unsure to folder B. We all realise that using Outlook's rule system to do spambayes work would have a lot of benefits; unfortunately Microsoft don't expose the necessary hooks to be able to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=822823&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 14 10:15:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 14 10:16:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows 2000 Message-ID: Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 02:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by david_st You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000 Initial Comment: When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs until the registering dll's section and then stops with an alert. An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is "Unable to register the DLL/OCX. DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201. " I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just repeat the error and Abort would unwind the installation. I never tried Ignore. I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them. Abort worked the second time. I finally tried Ignore, which completes okay. When I ran Outlook, though, the add-in wasn't there. This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron notebook. It has Outlook 2002 SP2. Both are up to date with recent patches. I believe this combination is not known to work, but thought this information might help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Stahl (david_st) Date: 2003-10-14 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886746 I am experiencing the same problem on NT machine, newest SP with Office 2000 SR1 und Spambayes V0081. Internet Explorer is the newest Ver. 6, SP1 Although the Bug seems to be fixed I don't see what the solution is or what I have to do to make it running. Thanks for help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm) Date: 2003-08-08 00:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564609 I believe the problem I am having is related to registry corruption. This is a NT box that was built 4 years ago. It's been patched but when I removed IE and reinstalled it gave a bunch of errors trying to register the DLL's for IE. Thanks for the Help ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-02 02:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 It appears you can fix this by upgrading your Internet Explorer. Please see http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/InstallationProblems.html#comcat_version_screwup for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm) Date: 2003-08-01 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564609 Ok from the logs here is the error I am getting. I still have this problem with the 06 intaller. on NT with Outlook 2000 Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 15, in DllRegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in RegisterClasses File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in RegisterServer File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-31 02:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 For most people, the problem is the MS "Designer" object spontaneously unregistering. The 006 binary attempts to fix this by not requiring the object to be installed at all! This particular error code generally means a Python failure that will be written to a log. Please see the troubleshooting guide and attach the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm) Date: 2003-07-31 01:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564609 I am having this problem on an NT 4 sp6a box with the 06 version. Using Outlook 2000. any clues what is causing this? so far it just seems to be fixing it's self for people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Elmar Bransch (elmar71) Date: 2003-07-28 20:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=832399 After digging in the Mailing List and the bug base I found the interim version posted on 25-07 in this thread. I was very lucky having SpamBayes 002 installed on Win2000 Prof. with Outlook 2000 SR-1. Since upgrading to 003 it had the DLL-Register-0x80040201-problem, still remaining with the binary 005 installer. Finally the interim bug catcher release did the trick for me and installed fine - there has been even no errors in the spambayes1.log on startup so far :-) Thanks! Keep on ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola) Date: 2003-07-28 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=787905 Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and unable to test on my Win 2000 machine. This morning, however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly there. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-25 17:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with "win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-25 17:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-25 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I've put a new interim version at http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe. This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and let me know how it goes. (Note that speficically, it should work even when that dll is not registered/installed) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-25 12:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files% \Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL When I register it manually, I was able to register spambayes_addin.dll I have no idea what is this module for and why spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer () ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-24 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 10, in ? File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ? File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in RegisterInterfaces pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not registered.', None, None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-23 01:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error code generally means the Python code doing the registration failed. Can you please look for a log file to attach - see http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html for info on finding the log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola) Date: 2003-07-22 19:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=787905 Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary installer still has this problem on Win 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola) Date: 2003-07-21 21:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=787905 Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the new version 004 installer. As expected, it fails in the same way it did in the 002 and 003 installers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson) Date: 2003-07-06 20:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=120676 Copy-n-pasted from another bug report: Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet. Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error. Tried source install again and still get error from "addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson) Date: 2003-07-06 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=120676 More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :) --Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error. --Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to Spambayes Outlook plug-in --Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB article. No difference. --Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in case: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;207132 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;249873 The 2nd one mentions this: DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. Return code was: string *Search Winerror.h for string. You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to get this working again. Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, her missing "spam thingy". I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. Just so happened that 003 became available and troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, so I did. Didn't help me.... :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson) Date: 2003-07-04 06:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=120676 Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ SP2 installed. The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-07-02 19:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) And still could not install the Binary version 003. I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 14 17:17:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 14 17:18:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-823722 ] Add-in failed to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #823722, was opened at 2003-10-14 15:17 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bighead (saskaheed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add-in failed to initialize Initial Comment: I received the error message when starting Outlook - could not initialize the Spambayes add-in. I've tried adding the COM add-in in Outlook options - I've also tried uninstalling and reinstalling the Spambayes add-in. I've attached the log - please advise... Windows 2000 sp3 Outlook 2000 sp1 Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 3) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\xxx.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 03:07:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 03:16:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-823929 ] Web-based training hangs on auth-digest timeout Message-ID: Bugs item #823929, was opened at 2003-10-15 07:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823929&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Web-based training hangs on auth-digest timeout Initial Comment: Using auth-digest, log in, go the Review page, wait for the timeout (20 minutes as of 15/10/2003; used to be 1 minute) then hit Train. The browser hangs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823929&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 05:31:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 05:31:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824000 ] Could not watch the specified folders Message-ID: Bugs item #824000, was opened at 2003-10-15 09:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824000&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Farkas Szil?rd (lupus78) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Could not watch the specified folders Initial Comment: Each time I start Outlook 2000 I get an error message: ----- There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin Error details: Could not watch the specified folders ----- Spam filtering dosen't work automaticly (the filter is disabled), however my spams get high Spam score (over the limit i've set for the spams!) If I start the filtering manualy the messages will be filtered well. The log file is attached! Szilard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824000&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 06:37:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 06:37:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824021 ] Simple fix - update HAMMIE.TXT Message-ID: Bugs item #824021, was opened at 2003-10-15 12:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824021&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Simple fix - update HAMMIE.TXT Initial Comment: The file "hammiefilter.py" doesn't exist anymore and should be changed to the appropriate filename. (Any other changes? Perhaps a small review would be good?) /Jens Rantil, student in Sweden ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824021&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 07:09:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 07:09:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824021 ] Simple fix - update HAMMIE.TXT Message-ID: Bugs item #824021, was opened at 2003-10-15 12:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ztyx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824021&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 3 Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Simple fix - update HAMMIE.TXT Initial Comment: The file "hammiefilter.py" doesn't exist anymore and should be changed to the appropriate filename. (Any other changes? Perhaps a small review would be good?) /Jens Rantil, student in Sweden ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jens Rantil (ztyx) Date: 2003-10-15 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=121417 Now that I know more about spambayes I've attached a diff. Note that the file is still incomplete because one should somehow install the spambayes module (before step 2 in HAMMIE.txt). I don't know how to do this in the best way, because I'm not a python programmer... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824021&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 07:39:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 07:39:26 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816103 ] Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Message-ID: Bugs item #816103, was opened at 2003-10-01 20:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cagier You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring Initial Comment: Im running Outlook 2003 Beta (11.4920.4920) BETA on Windows XP, and I've installed the latest SpamBayes from the website, and It's not filtering or scoring new emails. The only time it does is when I start up outlook. Im not sure what info you'll need, but feel free to contact me and I'll provide it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keith Garland (cagier) Date: 2003-10-15 11:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=827817 I have exactly the same problem in W2K. I was told that upgrading to the non-Beta version of Outlook 2003 might help but I haven't done this yet! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jesse Brandeburg (go_jesse) Date: 2003-10-13 19:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=631160 I'm running Outlook2003 (11.5608.5606) release version that I upgraded from a spambayes installed OutlookXP (2001) Everything runs fine, I even updated to the latest version of the outlook windows plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Date: 2003-10-01 20:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=554693 Tried to install, but I can't find it back on MS's website ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-10-01 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 Please install the outlook 2003 techincal refresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 10:34:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 10:34:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-824143 ] Send junk email to SpamCop Message-ID: Feature Requests item #824143, was opened at 2003-10-15 10:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=824143&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Roger Tragin (rtragin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Send junk email to SpamCop Initial Comment: Have an option to send junk email to SpamCop, either automatically (dangerous for any false positives) or manually (menu option, button, right click on "junk" folder to send all email in folder to SpamCop). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=824143&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 15:27:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 15:27:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-824326 ] Does not train on messages in public folders Message-ID: Support Requests item #824326, was opened at 2003-10-15 15:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=824326&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Anthony D\'Agostino (lokeswari) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Does not train on messages in public folders Initial Comment: Hi - When I attempted to train spambayes, I checked off three personal folders and three Public Folders on our Exchange server for spam training. When done, the training database only reports 55 messages (the number in my personal folders). It seems to be ignoring the 263 messages in the public folder that were checked. Log is attached. Versions: Outlook 2002 Exchange 2000 OS: XP Professional SpamBayes Outlook add-in: 0.81 Questions: Should this work? Why doesn't it? Is there another way to train the db on these messages? Can you configure spambayes to filter mail being sent to a public folder? Thank! dad ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=824326&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 15 17:26:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 15 17:27:07 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803227 ] spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #803227, was opened at 2003-09-09 11:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cboelkes You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: spam score shows as 0% even though message is moved as spam Initial Comment: With plug-in 007 and now 008, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't a functionality bug, just a display bug, since the message is moved into the spam folder correctly. Although the incorrect score might cause problems if SpamBayes ever re-filters without re- scoring. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you need more information, Ryan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes) Date: 2003-10-15 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=876739 After watching this problem for a while, I think I have discovered the conditions that cause what we are seeing. Ryan's comment about the first e-mail in the Inbox when SpamBayes processes it, will always result in a 0% score and the message not moved to the Spam folder. This always occurs on my system when that condition is met. Also, for the other situation that I reported, where the message does get moved to the Spam folder, but has a score of 0%, I think I understand better what is happening. These messages were filtered, scored correctly and moved to the Spam folder correctly. However, the next time Outlook is brought up, SpamBayes will change score for the first message in the Spam folder to 0%. Although I haven't run a lot of tests, this also appears to be 100% repeatable. I think both of these symptoms are the result of the same problem. In both cases when you show the Spam clues for the message with a score of 0%, it is scored correctly internally. Just the Spam scoring column in the list view displays 0%. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-30 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I think there's acutally two different things going on here: The problem with the first message scoring incorrectly as 0% and NOT being moved, and also a problem with messages that ARE spam and ARE moved to my spam folder, but still have 0% saved in the Outlook spam field. The first issue seems to happen whenever a spam message is listed first in my inbox view when I start outlook. It is repeatable. THe second issue seems totally random, but is very infrequent (perhaps 1 out of 100 spams get captured correctly but still show 0% as their score). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-29 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 A little further information: this seems to happen only to me when the FIRST message in my inbox is spam. The plug-in saves a 0% score in the spam field, and the messages is not filtered. However, if I manually run spam clues on it, it always scores above 90%. I have a 10-second processing delay set at start, and my mail server is Exchagne 2003 SP3. I connect through native Exchagne RPC, not through IMAP or POP3 or anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes) Date: 2003-09-29 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=876739 I am encountering a similar problem, with a slight difference: About 10% of the messages in the SPAM folder show 0% in the Outlook list view. However, when the SPAM clues are displayed they appear to be scorded correctly...all in the .9+ range. The difference from this reported problem: About 20% of the SPAM messages are left in my Inbox with a 0% score in the Outlook list view. Again, these appear to be scored correctly (.9+ score) when the SPAM clues are examined. I have never encountered this problem with Possible Spam. This problem seems (so far) to occur with messages that are very high scoring (.9+) and has occured on plug-in 0.7, 0.8 and 0.81. I am running XP Pro SP1 with all current critical updates, Office 2000 SP3, and Exchange 5.5 SP4 I currently have specified a 4.0 second delay before starting processing and a 1.0 second delay between processing items. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 From janne.sinkkonen at hut.fi Wed Oct 15 19:19:16 2003 From: janne.sinkkonen at hut.fi (Janne Sinkkonen) Date: Wed Oct 15 19:19:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 1.0a6 & python 2.2.1 eats message ends, recursion depth Message-ID: <200310160219.16337.janne.sinkkonen@hut.fi> Two bugs in 1.0a6 with python 2.2.1: - I have a mail message which I have recurrently feed to sb_filter, and at every round it eats one character from the end of the message. I guess the original was without a trailing newline. (just a guess) - With a large collection in the maildir format (thousands of messages), the python recursion depth is exceeded. Remedied by increasing the recursion depth, surprisingly... Sorry if these have been reported already - I just subscribed and have been too lazy to read the archives, if they exist. -- Janne From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 02:23:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 02:24:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824589 ] sb_server.py doesn't recover after a 'connection timed out' Message-ID: Bugs item #824589, was opened at 2003-10-16 06:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824589&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Rowe (dbg400) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py doesn't recover after a 'connection timed out' Initial Comment: When the pop3 server doesn't respond in time, sb_server.py gets a 'connection timed out' error. After that no more mail can be collected until sb_server.py is stopped and restarted. Is the time out period configurable anywhere, or can this message be trapped? Regards, Martin mrowe@jamaro:~$ sb_server.py SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003), using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop.ntlworld.com:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.ServerLineReader connected at 0x418079ac> (socket.error:(110, 'Connection timed out') [/usr/lib/python2.3/asynchat.py|handle_read|88] [/usr/lib/python2.3/asyncore.py|recv|353]) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 829, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 823, in run start(state=state) File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 763, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 744, in main Dibbler.run(launchBrowser=launchUI) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 689, in run asyncore.loop(map=context._map) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/asyncore.py", line 193, in loop poll_fun(timeout, map) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/asyncore.py", line 108, in poll r, w, e = select.select(r, w, e, timeout) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824589&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 03:32:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 03:33:07 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824626 ] sb_filter eats the last character Message-ID: Bugs item #824626, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824626&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter eats the last character Initial Comment: With python 2.2.1 (not that it would probably make a difference here): I have a one-liner mail message which I have recurrently feed to sb_filter. At every round sb_filter eats one character from the end of the message. The message is attached. Contrary to what I first thought, it seems to have the trailing newline. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824626&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 03:34:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 03:34:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824627 ] Recursion depth Message-ID: Bugs item #824627, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824627&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Recursion depth Initial Comment: with python 2.2.1: With a large collection in the maildir format (thousands of messages), the python recursion depth is exceeded. Remedied by increasing the recursion depth, surprisingly... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824627&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 03:35:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 03:36:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824628 ] sb_dbexpimp.py, sb_filter.py option incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #824628, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824628&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py, sb_filter.py option incompatibility Initial Comment: Look at this: sb_dbexpimp.py --help [...] -d: FN : name of pickled database file to use -D: FN : name of dbm database file to use sb_filter.py --help [...] -d DBFILE use database in DBFILE -D PICKLEFILE use pickle (instead of database) in PICKLEFILE This inconsistency is functional, not only in the documentation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824628&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 03:36:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 03:36:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824629 ] python 2.2 compatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #824629, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824629&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: python 2.2 compatibility Initial Comment: I tried to run spambayes 1.0a6 with python 2.2 and observed the following: - The trick for True and False as written at the beginning of many files does not work. python 2.2 complains of a name error with False, after trapping the name error with True. This works, of course: try: True except NameError: # Maintain compatibility with Python 2.2 True, False = 1, 0 - I needed to add the trick to sb_filter.py and to Options.py, classifier.py, hammie.py, and storage.py to get sb_filter to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824629&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 03:44:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 03:44:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824631 ] Documentation of Options, persistent_storage_file Message-ID: Bugs item #824631, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824631&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Documentation of Options, persistent_storage_file Initial Comment: The documentation in Options.py gives hammie.db as the default without mentioning the trick at the beginning of sb_filter.HammieFilter. This is a bit confusing for a new user. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824631&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 03:49:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 03:50:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824632 ] The option Headers:include_score Message-ID: Bugs item #824632, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: The option Headers:include_score Initial Comment: Headers:include_score does nothing in 1.0a6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 04:23:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 04:23:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and so on) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and so on) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 05:13:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 05:13:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824626 ] sb_filter eats the last character Message-ID: Bugs item #824626, was opened at 2003-10-16 07:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by janne You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824626&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter eats the last character Initial Comment: With python 2.2.1 (not that it would probably make a difference here): I have a one-liner mail message which I have recurrently feed to sb_filter. At every round sb_filter eats one character from the end of the message. The message is attached. Contrary to what I first thought, it seems to have the trailing newline. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Date: 2003-10-16 09:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12313 Ok, this bug could also be in my Knode. Delete if no-one else has observed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824626&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 08:52:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 08:52:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and so on) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and so on) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 11:08:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 11:09:10 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-20 18:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gates150 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Ingenito (gates150) Date: 2003-10-16 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=888404 I am having this same problem also. Rebooting the computer does not fix the problem. I am using Outlook XP, Win XP SP2 and Spambayes .81. I have also set the delay to 4 seconds and this did not help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Esterhai (esterhai) Date: 2003-10-03 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=879055 I am having the exact same problem and can't figure out a solution. Does anyone have a solution for us. Restarting the computer or Outlook doesn't solve my problem. I have been trying to make it work for 3 days now. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2003-09-22 10:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP (SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates). Except rebooting does not solve my problem. Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) but not moved. I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but can find no documentation. Can anyone tell me how to do this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-21 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 12:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 11:21:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 11:21:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824900 ] Spambayes incorrectly trains mail as good Message-ID: Bugs item #824900, was opened at 2003-10-16 11:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824900&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Ingenito (gates150) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes incorrectly trains mail as good Initial Comment: Initially I noticed that Spambayes was not moving messages to the Unsure folder or the Junk E-mail folder for certain messages that had high enough percentages. Spambayes would move some, but then would leave emails with a 90% or above score in my folders. It would also leave messages with a score of 15% or higher without moving them to the Unsure folder. Looking at the log, I noticed that these message are being trained as good, even though they have scores of 90% and above. Please look at the log. For example the last few lines of the log: Message 'Refinance Without Perfect Credit' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' - This had a score of 43% and stayed in the original folder. Message 'Quick Cash Loans up to $500 plus free groceries bonus' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' but then two lines later: Training on message 'Quick Cash Loans up to $500 plus free groceries bonus' - trained as good - This message has a score of 55% and stayed in the original folder. Message 'Get your Complimentary Credit Report' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Get your Complimentary Credit Report' - trained as good This had a score of 44% and stayed in the folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824900&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 14:45:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 14:46:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-825021 ] fix mboxtrain side-effects Message-ID: Patches item #825021, was opened at 2003-10-16 11:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=825021&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Abbas (abbas) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: fix mboxtrain side-effects Initial Comment: I ran into some problems using sb_mboxtrain.py with procmail/Maildir/Courier-IMAP/Outlook, and this patch addresses the difficulties I found. 1) It seems to work a lot better if you make sb_mboxtrain.py preserve the files' modification dates and "unix from" lines. Otherwise Outlook gets confused about what date the message was actually received (because sb_mboxtrain.py is effectively blowing that information away). 2) I had to try to fix the file modification dates using the contents of the messages, after I ran into #1 the hard way. I added a "-F" option to do that. 3) I want to train mail on my inbox as ham, but only if I've had a chance to review it yet. So I added a "-u" switch to make sb_mboxtrain.py ignore unread mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=825021&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 17:34:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 17:34:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824629 ] python 2.2 compatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #824629, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824629&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: python 2.2 compatibility Initial Comment: I tried to run spambayes 1.0a6 with python 2.2 and observed the following: - The trick for True and False as written at the beginning of many files does not work. python 2.2 complains of a name error with False, after trapping the name error with True. This works, of course: try: True except NameError: # Maintain compatibility with Python 2.2 True, False = 1, 0 - I needed to add the trick to sb_filter.py and to Options.py, classifier.py, hammie.py, and storage.py to get sb_filter to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824629&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 17:36:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 17:36:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824628 ] sb_dbexpimp.py, sb_filter.py option incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #824628, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824628&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_dbexpimp.py, sb_filter.py option incompatibility Initial Comment: Look at this: sb_dbexpimp.py --help [...] -d: FN : name of pickled database file to use -D: FN : name of dbm database file to use sb_filter.py --help [...] -d DBFILE use database in DBFILE -D PICKLEFILE use pickle (instead of database) in PICKLEFILE This inconsistency is functional, not only in the documentation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As noted on the spambayes list, this can't be changed for the 1.0 releases, because we have frozen those so that we don't break people's configuration. See also a discussion of this on spambayes-dev a few months back (started by Greg Ward, IIRC). The consensus was, I think, to use "-p filename" for pickles and "-d filename" for dbm. This was before we had other classifier types (ie. SQL), though. Overall, we recommend that users use the config file to set the storage method, not the command line. Leaving open, as this does need to be resolved at some point (for 1.1a1, perhaps). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824628&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 17:46:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 17:46:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824631 ] Documentation of Options, persistent_storage_file Message-ID: Bugs item #824631, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824631&group_id=61702 Category: hammie >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Documentation of Options, persistent_storage_file Initial Comment: The documentation in Options.py gives hammie.db as the default without mentioning the trick at the beginning of sb_filter.HammieFilter. This is a bit confusing for a new user. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 [Why would a new user be reading the source code?] The best fix here would be to get rid of the hackish trick in sb_filter (and also one of the other scripts from memory - mboxtrain, maybe?). This could be done from 1.1.a1, since a lot of other things will be changing then, and people could use 1.0 if they need a stable release. I think the correct fix is to change the default to "~//hammie.db" - this will end up in the Application Data directory for Windows users, which is ok (and most will have been caught earlier anyway, and be moved into application data/spambayes/proxy). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824631&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 17:53:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 17:54:05 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824632 ] The option Headers:include_score Message-ID: Bugs item #824632, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: The option Headers:include_score Initial Comment: Headers:include_score does nothing in 1.0a6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This works for me. Are you sure you have it set right, that spambayes has found your config file, and that you haven't missed the header? It's called X-Spambayes-Spam- Probability by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 17:58:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 17:58:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824632 ] hammie.py adds headers differently to other apps Message-ID: Bugs item #824632, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 Category: hammie >Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: hammie.py adds headers differently to other apps Initial Comment: Headers:include_score does nothing in 1.0a6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Whoops - I should have looked at the category you chose. You mean this for sb_filter, I presume? You're correct, this does not have any effect with sb_filter; the score should be included in the classification header, anyway. It does have an effect if you are using the pop3 proxy or imap filter. hammie.py needs to be updated to use message.py to add headers so that everything is consistent. There are some subtle differences in how things work, though, so this isn't straightforward. Since I also don't use sb_filter, I'm wary of doing this in case I break something (if you want to, feel free to submit a patch). I'm going to reopen this, but change the description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This works for me. Are you sure you have it set right, that spambayes has found your config file, and that you haven't missed the header? It's called X-Spambayes-Spam- Probability by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 18:20:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 18:20:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-823722 ] Add-in failed to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #823722, was opened at 2003-10-14 15:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by saskaheed You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bighead (saskaheed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add-in failed to initialize Initial Comment: I received the error message when starting Outlook - could not initialize the Spambayes add-in. I've tried adding the COM add-in in Outlook options - I've also tried uninstalling and reinstalling the Spambayes add-in. I've attached the log - please advise... Windows 2000 sp3 Outlook 2000 sp1 Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 3) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\xxx.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 16 20:45:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 16 20:45:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-825223 ] Does not mark mail as read Message-ID: Bugs item #825223, was opened at 2003-10-17 00:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Does not mark mail as read Initial Comment: When using the "Delete As Spam" button on new mail with the "Mark spam as read" feature checked. Does not mark as read. (Outlook addin version 0.81) Otherwise works awesome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 17 05:19:20 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 17 05:19:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and so on) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and so on) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 18 12:35:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 18 12:35:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-826035 ] bsddb.error on startup Message-ID: Bugs item #826035, was opened at 2003-10-18 16:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826035&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bsddb.error on startup Initial Comment: I'm getting this error when trying to launch sb_server in the folder used previously with 1.0a5: $ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ? import spambayes.message File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 149, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 114, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 53, in open return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 36, in open_best return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') I don't get an error when creating a new directory and starting sb_server.py from there. I'm running on python 2.2.3 linux with unixODBC-2.2.2. Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826035&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 18 12:52:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 18 12:52:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-826035 ] bsddb.error on startup Message-ID: Bugs item #826035, was opened at 2003-10-18 16:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by spboulet You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826035&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bsddb.error on startup Initial Comment: I'm getting this error when trying to launch sb_server in the folder used previously with 1.0a5: $ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ? import spambayes.message File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 149, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 114, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 53, in open return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 36, in open_best return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') I don't get an error when creating a new directory and starting sb_server.py from there. I'm running on python 2.2.3 linux with unixODBC-2.2.2. Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Date: 2003-10-18 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6988 This can be closed. I see that there was an issue with the db-4.1 support in the version of python that Gentoo linux uses. From the python-2.2.3-r3 changelog: python-2.2.3-r3 (17 Oct 2003) 17 Oct 2003; Alastair Tse python-2.2.3-r3.ebuild, files/python-2.2.3-db4.patch, files/python-2.2.3-gentoo_py_dontcompile.patch, files/python-updater: Add support for db-4.1, fixes for ewarn hanging for python-updater ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826035&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 06:02:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 06:02:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and so on) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and so on) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 06:03:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 06:04:07 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 11:07:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 11:07:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alpatzke You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 01:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 13:31:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 13:33:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ttrentham You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-19 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 01:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 15:43:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 15:43:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-826471 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to add trained header Message-ID: Bugs item #826471, was opened at 2003-10-19 21:43 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826471&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michel Lanners (mlan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails to add trained header Initial Comment: Every run of sb_mboxtrain.py trains on the same messages over and over. Indeed, it fails to add the '..trained..' header to the mail messages. This is with spambayes 1.0a6 on Debian GNU/Linux on a PowerPC platform. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826471&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 17:57:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 17:57:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-826530 ] Setupproblem with multiple pop-accounts Message-ID: Support Requests item #826530, was opened at 2003-10-19 23:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=826530&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Carsten Nitschke (carstennitschke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Setupproblem with multiple pop-accounts Initial Comment: Greetings. I seem to encounter problems when setting up Spambayes on my Linux machine for multiple pop3 accounts. Concerning my setup, I use Python 2.3.2, eMail client is KMail 1.5. 1 on a SuSE 8.2 pro distribution. Setting up spambayes for my commercial isp mailaccount, which uses the default pop3 port 110, works fine. However, when I want to setup spambayes for my GMX account, which uses pop3 port 995, I run into problems. Declaring the GMX pop-server as pop.gmx.net:995 with the proxy mapping to port 995 results in the following output upon start of sb_server.py: Listener on port 995 is proxying pop.gmx.net:995 However, when I ask KMail to fetch mail, it not only "hangs" for around 1 minute, but also tells me that the server immedeately resfused connection or that I could not connect to localhost. Using my commercial isp account on proxy- and popport 110 works fine however. Any clues what I might be doing wrong? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=826530&group_id=61702 From jaxjaguar at hotmail.com Sun Oct 19 18:35:42 2003 From: jaxjaguar at hotmail.com (Nick Negron) Date: Sun Oct 19 18:35:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Feature Request: SMTP Scanning and classification References: Message-ID: Is it possible to tag the mail as ham/spam/unsure while the mail is passing through the SMTP filter? Reason is, I would like to use spambayes to be accepting inbound connections on port 25 and send to port 26 on localhost where I am running exchange listening on port 26. This way I can just set filters on the Outlook clients to put mail in specific directories based on the X-SpamBayes-Classification header. POPFile does this, but I really like having the spam and unsure seperation that spambayes provides. To me it seems that the SMTP feature in spambayes is only used for training when an email addressed to spambayes_spam@localhost or spambayes_ham@localhost is passed through it. From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 21:24:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 21:24:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-826530 ] Setupproblem with multiple pop-accounts Message-ID: Support Requests item #826530, was opened at 2003-10-20 10:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=826530&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Carsten Nitschke (carstennitschke) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Setupproblem with multiple pop-accounts Initial Comment: Greetings. I seem to encounter problems when setting up Spambayes on my Linux machine for multiple pop3 accounts. Concerning my setup, I use Python 2.3.2, eMail client is KMail 1.5. 1 on a SuSE 8.2 pro distribution. Setting up spambayes for my commercial isp mailaccount, which uses the default pop3 port 110, works fine. However, when I want to setup spambayes for my GMX account, which uses pop3 port 995, I run into problems. Declaring the GMX pop-server as pop.gmx.net:995 with the proxy mapping to port 995 results in the following output upon start of sb_server.py: Listener on port 995 is proxying pop.gmx.net:995 However, when I ask KMail to fetch mail, it not only "hangs" for around 1 minute, but also tells me that the server immedeately resfused connection or that I could not connect to localhost. Using my commercial isp account on proxy- and popport 110 works fine however. Any clues what I might be doing wrong? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-20 14:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you're using port 995, you probably want to use SSL. SpamBayes doesn't currently support pop3 proxying over SSL, sorry. There is a feature request open asking for it, so it will no doubt be added at some point - feel free to add your request to that, or to submit a patch to get it doing. The request is #753708 Support POP over SSL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=826530&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 19 21:26:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 19 21:26:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-826471 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to add trained header Message-ID: Bugs item #826471, was opened at 2003-10-20 08:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826471&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michel Lanners (mlan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails to add trained header Initial Comment: Every run of sb_mboxtrain.py trains on the same messages over and over. Indeed, it fails to add the '..trained..' header to the mail messages. This is with spambayes 1.0a6 on Debian GNU/Linux on a PowerPC platform. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-20 14:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826471&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 20 11:32:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 20 11:32:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803227 ] spam score shows as 0% for first unread spam Message-ID: Bugs item #803227, was opened at 2003-09-09 15:30 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rmalayter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: spam score shows as 0% for first unread spam Initial Comment: With plug-in 007 and now 008, some spam messages get automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my spam folder. See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% in outlook: http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif So really, this isn't a functionality bug, just a display bug, since the message is moved into the spam folder correctly. Although the incorrect score might cause problems if SpamBayes ever re-filters without re- scoring. This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can discern no pattern. I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3. Let me know if you need more information, Ryan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes) Date: 2003-10-15 21:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=876739 After watching this problem for a while, I think I have discovered the conditions that cause what we are seeing. Ryan's comment about the first e-mail in the Inbox when SpamBayes processes it, will always result in a 0% score and the message not moved to the Spam folder. This always occurs on my system when that condition is met. Also, for the other situation that I reported, where the message does get moved to the Spam folder, but has a score of 0%, I think I understand better what is happening. These messages were filtered, scored correctly and moved to the Spam folder correctly. However, the next time Outlook is brought up, SpamBayes will change score for the first message in the Spam folder to 0%. Although I haven't run a lot of tests, this also appears to be 100% repeatable. I think both of these symptoms are the result of the same problem. In both cases when you show the Spam clues for the message with a score of 0%, it is scored correctly internally. Just the Spam scoring column in the list view displays 0%. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-30 17:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 I think there's acutally two different things going on here: The problem with the first message scoring incorrectly as 0% and NOT being moved, and also a problem with messages that ARE spam and ARE moved to my spam folder, but still have 0% saved in the Outlook spam field. The first issue seems to happen whenever a spam message is listed first in my inbox view when I start outlook. It is repeatable. THe second issue seems totally random, but is very infrequent (perhaps 1 out of 100 spams get captured correctly but still show 0% as their score). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter) Date: 2003-09-29 16:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=731834 A little further information: this seems to happen only to me when the FIRST message in my inbox is spam. The plug-in saves a 0% score in the spam field, and the messages is not filtered. However, if I manually run spam clues on it, it always scores above 90%. I have a 10-second processing delay set at start, and my mail server is Exchagne 2003 SP3. I connect through native Exchagne RPC, not through IMAP or POP3 or anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes) Date: 2003-09-29 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=876739 I am encountering a similar problem, with a slight difference: About 10% of the messages in the SPAM folder show 0% in the Outlook list view. However, when the SPAM clues are displayed they appear to be scorded correctly...all in the .9+ range. The difference from this reported problem: About 20% of the SPAM messages are left in my Inbox with a 0% score in the Outlook list view. Again, these appear to be scored correctly (.9+ score) when the SPAM clues are examined. I have never encountered this problem with Possible Spam. This problem seems (so far) to occur with messages that are very high scoring (.9+) and has occured on plug-in 0.7, 0.8 and 0.81. I am running XP Pro SP1 with all current critical updates, Office 2000 SP3, and Exchange 5.5 SP4 I currently have specified a 4.0 second delay before starting processing and a 1.0 second delay between processing items. Chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 20 11:59:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 20 12:00:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-826954 ] Database corruption after multiple trainings Message-ID: Bugs item #826954, was opened at 2003-10-20 10:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826954&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jacob Farmer (jpfarmer) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Database corruption after multiple trainings Initial Comment: I've made a few posts about this to the Spambayes mailing list and I'm going to paste those messages for reference. However, in summary: regardless of what data format I use, after several trainings using the -t flag, my database becomes corrupted. I've been able to reproduce this using both a Pickle and Bsddb[3]. Each time, if I remove the DB and retrain from scratch, there isn't a problem. Also, if I just classify, I don't have any corruption problems (that is, if I just train once and after that never train again). The training always completes, and when it moves onto classifying, I get an assertion error. The messages from the mailing list follow. Below the message, I've included a sample sb_imapfilter session transcript. ---------------------------------------- Messages from mailing list: ---------------------------------------- >From "Tony Meyer" Subject RE: [Spambayes] Serious Database Corruption Problems Date Wed, October 15, 2003 6:18 pm To leotune@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx,spambayes@xxxxxx.xxx ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- > I'm having a lot of trouble with what I think is database corruption. > I've included the output I get from the program before, but > from what I've read, an assertion error usually means the database is dead. Yes - what this is saying is that you have a token that has appeared in more spam than you have trained, which is obviously impossible. > As the FAQ suggests, I've tried both Bsddb[3] and Pickle formats, but > after a few trainings, I always get this error. If I delete > my databases and start over, then I'm fine for a few additional trainings, > but the same thing happens. It's very strange that this happens with a pickle. To me, that sounds like this is an imapfilter bug, although not one I've seen reported before. > I'm getting a little frusturated with this. Is there > something I can do to keep this from happening? Do you do all your training with "sb_imapfilter.py -t"? Up until the assertion error, does the training always successfully complete? (i.e. it doesn't crash halfway through?) If you run db_expimp.py on your database to convert it to text ("db_expimp.py -e -d hammie.db -f hammie.txt" if it's a pickle) and open it up, what are the ham and spam counts at the top? (I suspect 0 for both). =Tony Meyer -------------------------------------------------- >From jacob-spambayes-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Subject RE: [Spambayes] Serious Database Corruption Problems Date Wed, October 15, 2003 10:56 pm To spambayes@xxxxxx.xxx ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------- >> I'm getting a little frusturated with this. Is there >> something I can do to keep this from happening? > > Do you do all your training with "sb_imapfilter.py -t"? Up until the > assertion error, does the training always successfully complete? (i.e. > it doesn't crash halfway through?) Yes, I do all of my training that way. The training always completes, and then the program fails during classification. I've included a typical transcript below. Something worth making note of: it seems like, many times during training, it'll report that messages are trained when there are no new messages in that particular folder. > > If you run db_expimp.py on your database to convert it to text > ("db_expimp.py -e -d hammie.db -f hammie.txt" if it's a pickle) and open > it > up, what are the ham and spam counts at the top? (I suspect 0 for both). suslik% more hammie.txt 311,431, I can send you the whole file if it'd be useful. Thanks, Jacob ---------------------------------------- A sample sb_imapfilter transcript: ---------------------------------------- Something worth noting about the following transcript: for the lines that look like these, the contents of those two folders never changed, so I don't understand why they indicated messages were trained. It doesn't do this with the Inbox. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ .................................................... 1 trained. ---------------------------------------- suslik% ./sb_imapfilter.py -l 5 -c -t -v -d hammie.db SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db pickle hammie.db is an existing pickle, with 310 ham and 417 spam Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.-Wanted ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ..................................................................... 0 trained. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ......................................************** 15 trained. Persisting hammie.db as a pickle Training took 35.0596210957 seconds, 16 messages were trained Classifying ................... Classified 0 ham, 0 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 0.656105995178 seconds. Training Training ham folder INBOX.-Wanted ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ..................................................................... 0 trained. Training ham folder INBOX .*............ 1 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.-Spam *.......................................................................... ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ .................................................... 1 trained. Persisting hammie.db as a pickle Training took 29.7854119539 seconds, 2 messages were trained Classifying ..................*.Traceback (most recent call last): File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 824, in ? run() File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 814, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "./sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in Filter evidence=True) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/u/jpfarmer/lib/python2.3/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 245, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=826954&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 20 12:17:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 20 12:19:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tpsenak You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak) Date: 2003-10-20 11:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890856 I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000. When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents the \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from registering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-19 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 01:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 20 12:33:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 20 12:34:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ttrentham You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-20 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19. I uninstalled via Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll know if it's actually filtering correctly. Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition that may not be all that easy to reproduce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak) Date: 2003-10-20 11:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890856 I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000. When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents the \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from registering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-19 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 01:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 20 16:08:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 20 16:08:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827100 ] Not Scoring correctly Message-ID: Bugs item #827100, was opened at 2003-10-20 13:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Blake (zebby58) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Not Scoring correctly Initial Comment: Spambayes is not scoring my messages correctly. I have attached a screenshot of my training configuration. Here is the info it has on a message that was moved to my inbox and should have been recognized as good. Spam Score: 100% (0.996519) word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 4.07836e-005 - - '*S*' 0.993078 - - 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.610067 397 79 'subject:(' 0.669051 3 1 'subject:subject' 0.776799 1 1 'subject:)' 0.822865 2 2 'header:Received:3' 0.834469 72 47 'from:addr:****' 0.908163 0 2 'from:name:****0.908163 0 2 'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)' 0.908163 0 2 'from:addr:aol.com' 0.92464 8 15 'message-id:@aol.com' 0.926397 4 9 Message Stream: Received: from imo-r02.mx.aol.com ([****]) by *****.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 49XK1YSQ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:03:00 - 0400 Received: from *****@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id v.cc.23bf465e (16112) for <***.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DELL.charter.net ****.com [24.216.55.96]) by air-id12.mx.aol.com (v96.8) with ESMTP id MAILINID124-3ef03f92fbdfce; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:39 -0400 From: "***" <**@aol.com> Subject: (no subject) To: ***.com Message-ID: <3F92FBEF.3010602@aol.com> X-Mailer: AOL Communicator (20030728.3 Win) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY=79455383-41-1066597359-5020 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-AOL-IP: 24.216.55.96 



  


 ne
Message Tokens:

24 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:aol.com'
'from:addr:***'
'from:name:***
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@aol.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:('
'subject:)'
'subject:subject'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:***
'to:addr:***.com'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)'




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 16:37:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 16:37:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827122 ] POP server reset after
	message review
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827122, was opened at 2003-10-20 16:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Alexander (salex)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: POP server reset after message review

Initial Comment:
I am using evolution 1.2.2 (from RedHat 9) as my mailer.  I 
recently started using spambayes.  I initially used version 1.0a4.  
Today I upgraded to the version in CVS (from sourceforge).  I use 
POP to read one of my mail accounts.  I keep the "real" copy of 
the mail at home, but grab a copy with "leave on server" set when 
using evolution at work so as to be able to answer certain mail in a 
timely manner.  At home everything works as expected.

At work, after I start sb_server.py, everything works nicely.  
However, if I go to localhost:8880 and review my messages to 
update training, the next time evolution downloads my mail, it will 
download all messages since sb_server.py was started.  Then, I 
will only see new messages until the next time that I do a review.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702

From rmalayter at bai.org  Mon Oct 20 16:47:03 2003
From: rmalayter at bai.org (Ryan Malayter)
Date: Mon Oct 20 16:47:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Feature Request: SMTP Scanning and classification
Message-ID: <792DE28E91F6EA42B4663AE761C41C2A011153AE@cliff.bai.org>

From: Nick Negron
> Is it possible to tag the mail as ham/spam/unsure 
> while the mail is passing through the SMTP filter?

> Reason is, I would like to use spambayes to be 
> accepting inbound connections on port 25 and send 
> to port 26 on localhost where I am running exchange
> listening on port 26. This way I can just set filters 
> on the Outlook clients to put mail in specific directories 
> based on the X-SpamBayes-Classification header.

Check out http://assp.sf.net... It's a bayesian filter for the SMTP
gateway level, with a web-based management interface. It has some cool
features for keeping the spam corpora "fresh" across the organization.
I'm not sure how if it does chi-squared scoring like Spambayes, though.
I don't think their parser is as well developed, but I haven't played
with it in a while.


> POPFile does this...

You mention that PopFile can act as an SMTP proxy... I have been unable
to find this feature anywhere in the PopFile documentation. Is it an
add-on module or something?

Regards,
	Ryan

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 16:58:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 16:58:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827138 ] Can't display
	clues/tokens/source for a trained message
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827138, was opened at 2003-10-20 16:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827138&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: Source code - CVS
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't display clues/tokens/source for a trained message

Initial Comment:
When reviewing untrained messages in the sb_server UI, 
there are options to display the clues, tokens, or 
message source of a message in the list.  After training 
on one of the messages, it is still available in the cache 
and can be listed again by using "Find message" on the 
main UI page.  The same options are presented to 
display clues/tokens/message source, but selecting one 
of these options results in a "500 Server error" with the 
following traceback:

"""
Traceback (most recent call last):

  
File "C:\src\Tools\spambayes\spambayes\spambayes\Dibb
ler.py", line 453, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  
File "C:\src\Tools\spambayes\spambayes\spambayes\Prox
yUI.py", line 597, in onShowclues
    message = state.unknownCorpus.get(key).as_string()

AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no 
attribute 'as_string'
"""

Attached is a patch that demonstrates a possible 
solution to the problem.  The onReview method in 
ProxyUI.py checks each corpus to locate a requested 
message but the onShowclues and onView methods 
assume that the message is in the unknownCorpus, 
which is not the case for a message that has already 
been trained.  The patch uses the same code as 
onReview to locate the requested message in 
onShowclues and onView.

I am running from the CVS trunk (ProxyUI.py rev 1.28) 
on Windows 2000 Server SP4.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827138&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 17:17:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 17:17:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827122 ] POP server reset after
	message review
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827122, was opened at 2003-10-21 09:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Alexander (salex)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: POP server reset after message review

Initial Comment:
I am using evolution 1.2.2 (from RedHat 9) as my mailer.  I 
recently started using spambayes.  I initially used version 1.0a4.  
Today I upgraded to the version in CVS (from sourceforge).  I use 
POP to read one of my mail accounts.  I keep the "real" copy of 
the mail at home, but grab a copy with "leave on server" set when 
using evolution at work so as to be able to answer certain mail in a 
timely manner.  At home everything works as expected.

At work, after I start sb_server.py, everything works nicely.  
However, if I go to localhost:8880 and review my messages to 
update training, the next time evolution downloads my mail, it will 
download all messages since sb_server.py was started.  Then, I 
will only see new messages until the next time that I do a review.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-21 10:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Are you sure that this is related to viewing messages in the 
review page?  Doing anything with the review page doesn't 
touch the POP server *at all* - it works solely with the 
cached versions of the messages.  I can't see how it could be 
possible that it could effect the behaviour of the POP server, 
*or* your mail client (which it doesn't touch either).

If you don't use the review page at all, but start and stop 
sb_server, or check (and receive) mail multiple times between 
starting and stopping it, does that have the same effect?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 19:38:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 19:39:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install
	fail to register spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alpatzke
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: john (justaname)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is 
recieved.

spambayes_addin.dll

unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; 
code 0x00000000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-20 18:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

When I changed the install directory to \Program
Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.

The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to
do with a path statement in the registering utility.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-20 11:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19.  I uninstalled via
Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the
installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it
seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it
any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll
know if it's actually filtering correctly.

Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has
yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on
a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition
that may not be all that easy to reproduce. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak)
Date: 2003-10-20 11:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890856

I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000.  When 
I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.  Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents 
the  \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from 
registering.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-19 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll
with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. 

I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the
same error. The log files are created, but they're empty.
The install wizard doesn't appear.

Latest SpamBayes 008.1
Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches.
Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on
another computer with all of the same versions. I got the
error, picked retry and it succeeded.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-19 10:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1
and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-12 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

I'm having the same problem when trying to install the 
Outlook plugin, version 008.1.  A few more details:

I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 
9.0.0.6627.  I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional 
Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt.

The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it 
starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" 
error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll.  I'm 
using the default installation location (C:\Program 
Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin).  The file in question is 
present in that directory.

The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither 
of these is effective.  All I can do is abort the install.

An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the 
install fails.  This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Date: 2003-09-21 09:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=855408

Version 008.1 gives me the same error.
Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: john (justaname)
Date: 2003-09-17 01:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=868390

Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the 
spambayes outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 21:40:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 21:41:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827239 ] Cannot initialize
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827239, was opened at 2003-10-20 18:40
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot initialize

Initial Comment:
hi there,

my app gets the can't initialize whenever I restart 
Outlook.  I then enable through the toolbars and the 
toolbar works, but no filtering occurs.

Thanks for your help!
Andrew

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 23:46:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 23:46:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-820285 ] can't
	connect to pop server
Message-ID: 

Support Requests item #820285, was opened at 2003-10-09 10:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=820285&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marty Mo (itleader)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: can't connect to pop server

Initial Comment:
I am using Mozilla Thunderbird mail client on Win 98
and Win XP.  After installing python 2.3 I installed
and configured SpamBayes per readme instructions.
I changed client to use 'localhost' as proxy.  The
client connects to SpamBayes Pop3 proxy server OK, and
the proxy server displays a message stating that it is
proxying.  When I try to get mail, I get a message that
the connection was refused.  Could this be because the
proxy server is not able to supply the password when it
attempts to connect to the POP server?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-21 16:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Are you using SSL (i.e. port 995)?  SpamBayes doesn't 
currently support SSL, so that could be the problem.

Otherwise, what happens if you telnet to localhost:110 (or 
whatever port you have it proxying on).  Do you get the 
proxied prompt from the pop server?  can you log on (USER 
and PASS)?

If you put "[globals]\nverbose: True" in your configuration file, 
a log file of the pop3 conversation is written out which might 
be of use here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=820285&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 23:52:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 23:52:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or
	other CJK languages) message support
Message-ID: 

Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 21:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support

Initial Comment:
Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages.

o Unicode'ify text:
  For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends
  that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and
  multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be
  used.  Original tokenizer generates only bogus
meaningless
  text fragments for Japanese messages.

o Concatinate C/J lines.  
  In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding
  often breaks 'words'.

o Bigram of C/J characters.
  In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are
  not separated by character such as whitespace.
  Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require
heuristic
  algorithms using large corpus.
  Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate
  bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of
  hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J).

  N.B.:
  - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) 
    for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for
i-gram,
    where n is size of used character set.  On katakana & 
    hiragana n is approximately 100.  On kanzi it is
approx.
    5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese
    standards).  By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will
    generate very sparse and large database.

  - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by
    tokenizer.  Since most of basic kanzi words are of
1 or 2
    characters.
    Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded.

  - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word'
    but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As
run of
    hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to
    n-gram.

o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'?  A lot of
  punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with
  Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for
  compatibility, some of them are overlapped with
  subject_words_re).  Since many of them are also
  registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K
  character set standards.

Problems:

o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible.

o Only BMP range is supported.  Surrogates are not
recognized.

o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other
East-Asian messages.

o No batch tests.  This only aims at Japanese support.

Configuration:

o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set:
    [Tokenizer]
    replace_nonascii_chars: False



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-21 16:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will 
get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy 
with other stuff at the moment!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Date: 2003-10-19 23:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=529503

fix for Korean message.
Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Date: 2003-10-17 22:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=529503

minor fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Date: 2003-10-17 01:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=529503

> ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and
> multibyte character set both designated to GL,

Not 'designate'.  'Invoke' is correct.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 20 23:59:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 20 23:59:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827138 ] Can't display
	clues/tokens/source for a trained message
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827138, was opened at 2003-10-21 09:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827138&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: Source code - CVS
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't display clues/tokens/source for a trained message

Initial Comment:
When reviewing untrained messages in the sb_server UI, 
there are options to display the clues, tokens, or 
message source of a message in the list.  After training 
on one of the messages, it is still available in the cache 
and can be listed again by using "Find message" on the 
main UI page.  The same options are presented to 
display clues/tokens/message source, but selecting one 
of these options results in a "500 Server error" with the 
following traceback:

"""
Traceback (most recent call last):

  
File "C:\src\Tools\spambayes\spambayes\spambayes\Dibb
ler.py", line 453, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  
File "C:\src\Tools\spambayes\spambayes\spambayes\Prox
yUI.py", line 597, in onShowclues
    message = state.unknownCorpus.get(key).as_string()

AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no 
attribute 'as_string'
"""

Attached is a patch that demonstrates a possible 
solution to the problem.  The onReview method in 
ProxyUI.py checks each corpus to locate a requested 
message but the onShowclues and onView methods 
assume that the message is in the unknownCorpus, 
which is not the case for a message that has already 
been trained.  The patch uses the same code as 
onReview to locate the requested message in 
onShowclues and onView.

I am running from the CVS trunk (ProxyUI.py rev 1.28) 
on Windows 2000 Server SP4.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-21 16:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checking in spambayes/ProxyUI.py;
/cvsroot/spambayes/spambayes/spambayes/ProxyUI.py,v  <--
  ProxyUI.py
new revision: 1.29; previous revision: 1.28
done

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827138&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 21 17:37:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 21 17:37:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827823 ] Register dll fails
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827823, was opened at 2003-10-21 16:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827823&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Greg James (gjames)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Register dll fails

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install 008.1 and it keeps blowing up while 
trying to register spambayes_addin.dll. I've turned off 
my firewall and anti-virus programs (and anything else I 
can think of) but to no avail.

I'm running Outlook 2000 on Windows XP with all current 
patches installed.

Any suggestions?
-Greg

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827823&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 21 23:23:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 21 23:23:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827960 ] Lost Spam folders;
	Corrupted installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827960, was opened at 2003-10-22 12:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Lost Spam folders; Corrupted installation

Initial Comment:
I installed version 8 last week (within Outlook 2002) and 
everything was fine until tonight.  For some reason 
when I clicked on the Junk folder I got a message that 
the folder couldn't be found.  So I (probably wrongly) 
decided to delete the Junk folder (forget its actual 
name) and uninstalled SpamBayes.  I reinstalled it 
thinking the two Spam folders (questionable and actual 
Spam) would be re-created.  During the re-install I was 
given no installation options.  Now I have the program 
installed but filtering is disabled because the two folders 
are missing.  To be save I again uninstalled SpamBayes 
and deleted the SpamBayes Toolbar through 
Outlook/Tools/Customize/Toolbars.
 
What can I do at this point?  I assumed that by 
uninstalling the program I'd also delete any configuration 
files but apparently that is not the case.  Re-installed 
SpamBayes doesn't re-create the required folders and I 
am given no setup options.  I noticed that I also cannot 
use the Configuration Setup button.  If I click on it 
nothing happens.  I really like this program and hope you 
can get me back on the right track.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob A.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-22 13:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Try deleting *.ini from your Application Data\SpamBayes
directory, and restarting Outlook.  This bug has been fixed
in the source code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 21 22:37:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 21 23:23:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827960 ] Lost Spam folders;
	Corrupted installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827960, was opened at 2003-10-22 02:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Lost Spam folders; Corrupted installation

Initial Comment:
I installed version 8 last week (within Outlook 2002) and 
everything was fine until tonight.  For some reason 
when I clicked on the Junk folder I got a message that 
the folder couldn't be found.  So I (probably wrongly) 
decided to delete the Junk folder (forget its actual 
name) and uninstalled SpamBayes.  I reinstalled it 
thinking the two Spam folders (questionable and actual 
Spam) would be re-created.  During the re-install I was 
given no installation options.  Now I have the program 
installed but filtering is disabled because the two folders 
are missing.  To be save I again uninstalled SpamBayes 
and deleted the SpamBayes Toolbar through 
Outlook/Tools/Customize/Toolbars.
 
What can I do at this point?  I assumed that by 
uninstalling the program I'd also delete any configuration 
files but apparently that is not the case.  Re-installed 
SpamBayes doesn't re-create the required folders and I 
am given no setup options.  I noticed that I also cannot 
use the Configuration Setup button.  If I click on it 
nothing happens.  I really like this program and hope you 
can get me back on the right track.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob A.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 22 17:04:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 17:04:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827960 ] Lost Spam folders;
	Corrupted installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827960, was opened at 2003-10-22 02:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cobrabob
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Lost Spam folders; Corrupted installation

Initial Comment:
I installed version 8 last week (within Outlook 2002) and 
everything was fine until tonight.  For some reason 
when I clicked on the Junk folder I got a message that 
the folder couldn't be found.  So I (probably wrongly) 
decided to delete the Junk folder (forget its actual 
name) and uninstalled SpamBayes.  I reinstalled it 
thinking the two Spam folders (questionable and actual 
Spam) would be re-created.  During the re-install I was 
given no installation options.  Now I have the program 
installed but filtering is disabled because the two folders 
are missing.  To be save I again uninstalled SpamBayes 
and deleted the SpamBayes Toolbar through 
Outlook/Tools/Customize/Toolbars.
 
What can I do at this point?  I assumed that by 
uninstalling the program I'd also delete any configuration 
files but apparently that is not the case.  Re-installed 
SpamBayes doesn't re-create the required folders and I 
am given no setup options.  I noticed that I also cannot 
use the Configuration Setup button.  If I click on it 
nothing happens.  I really like this program and hope you 
can get me back on the right track.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob A.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Date: 2003-10-22 21:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892039

Mark, thanks so much for your quick response.  I followed 
your suggestion and THE PROBLEM IS FIXED!  I can't thank 
you enough.

Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-22 03:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Try deleting *.ini from your Application Data\SpamBayes
directory, and restarting Outlook.  This bug has been fixed
in the source code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 22 17:07:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 17:07:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827960 ] Lost Spam folders;
	Corrupted installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827960, was opened at 2003-10-22 02:37
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cobrabob
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Lost Spam folders; Corrupted installation

Initial Comment:
I installed version 8 last week (within Outlook 2002) and 
everything was fine until tonight.  For some reason 
when I clicked on the Junk folder I got a message that 
the folder couldn't be found.  So I (probably wrongly) 
decided to delete the Junk folder (forget its actual 
name) and uninstalled SpamBayes.  I reinstalled it 
thinking the two Spam folders (questionable and actual 
Spam) would be re-created.  During the re-install I was 
given no installation options.  Now I have the program 
installed but filtering is disabled because the two folders 
are missing.  To be save I again uninstalled SpamBayes 
and deleted the SpamBayes Toolbar through 
Outlook/Tools/Customize/Toolbars.
 
What can I do at this point?  I assumed that by 
uninstalling the program I'd also delete any configuration 
files but apparently that is not the case.  Re-installed 
SpamBayes doesn't re-create the required folders and I 
am given no setup options.  I noticed that I also cannot 
use the Configuration Setup button.  If I click on it 
nothing happens.  I really like this program and hope you 
can get me back on the right track.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob A.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Date: 2003-10-22 21:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892039

Mark, thanks so much for your quick response.  I followed 
your suggestion and THE PROBLEM IS FIXED!  I can't thank 
you enough.

Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-22 03:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Try deleting *.ini from your Application Data\SpamBayes
directory, and restarting Outlook.  This bug has been fixed
in the source code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 22 17:08:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 17:08:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827960 ] Lost Spam folders;
	Corrupted installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827960, was opened at 2003-10-22 02:37
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by cobrabob
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Lost Spam folders; Corrupted installation

Initial Comment:
I installed version 8 last week (within Outlook 2002) and 
everything was fine until tonight.  For some reason 
when I clicked on the Junk folder I got a message that 
the folder couldn't be found.  So I (probably wrongly) 
decided to delete the Junk folder (forget its actual 
name) and uninstalled SpamBayes.  I reinstalled it 
thinking the two Spam folders (questionable and actual 
Spam) would be re-created.  During the re-install I was 
given no installation options.  Now I have the program 
installed but filtering is disabled because the two folders 
are missing.  To be save I again uninstalled SpamBayes 
and deleted the SpamBayes Toolbar through 
Outlook/Tools/Customize/Toolbars.
 
What can I do at this point?  I assumed that by 
uninstalling the program I'd also delete any configuration 
files but apparently that is not the case.  Re-installed 
SpamBayes doesn't re-create the required folders and I 
am given no setup options.  I noticed that I also cannot 
use the Configuration Setup button.  If I click on it 
nothing happens.  I really like this program and hope you 
can get me back on the right track.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob A.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Date: 2003-10-22 21:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892039

Mark, thanks so much for your quick response.  I followed 
your suggestion and THE PROBLEM IS FIXED!  I can't thank 
you enough.

Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-22 03:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Try deleting *.ini from your Application Data\SpamBayes
directory, and restarting Outlook.  This bug has been fixed
in the source code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 22 17:10:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 17:10:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827960 ] Lost Spam folders;
	Corrupted installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827960, was opened at 2003-10-22 02:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cobrabob
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Lost Spam folders; Corrupted installation

Initial Comment:
I installed version 8 last week (within Outlook 2002) and 
everything was fine until tonight.  For some reason 
when I clicked on the Junk folder I got a message that 
the folder couldn't be found.  So I (probably wrongly) 
decided to delete the Junk folder (forget its actual 
name) and uninstalled SpamBayes.  I reinstalled it 
thinking the two Spam folders (questionable and actual 
Spam) would be re-created.  During the re-install I was 
given no installation options.  Now I have the program 
installed but filtering is disabled because the two folders 
are missing.  To be save I again uninstalled SpamBayes 
and deleted the SpamBayes Toolbar through 
Outlook/Tools/Customize/Toolbars.
 
What can I do at this point?  I assumed that by 
uninstalling the program I'd also delete any configuration 
files but apparently that is not the case.  Re-installed 
SpamBayes doesn't re-create the required folders and I 
am given no setup options.  I noticed that I also cannot 
use the Configuration Setup button.  If I click on it 
nothing happens.  I really like this program and hope you 
can get me back on the right track.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob A.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Date: 2003-10-22 21:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892039

I changed this item status back to OPEN only so Mark and 
any others can see my note of "thanks" for his quick and 
accurate diagnosis.  :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Date: 2003-10-22 21:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892039

Mark, thanks so much for your quick response.  I followed 
your suggestion and THE PROBLEM IS FIXED!  I can't thank 
you enough.

Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-22 03:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Try deleting *.ini from your Application Data\SpamBayes
directory, and restarting Outlook.  This bug has been fixed
in the source code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 22 18:47:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 18:48:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827960 ] Lost Spam folders;
	Corrupted installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827960, was opened at 2003-10-22 12:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Lost Spam folders; Corrupted installation

Initial Comment:
I installed version 8 last week (within Outlook 2002) and 
everything was fine until tonight.  For some reason 
when I clicked on the Junk folder I got a message that 
the folder couldn't be found.  So I (probably wrongly) 
decided to delete the Junk folder (forget its actual 
name) and uninstalled SpamBayes.  I reinstalled it 
thinking the two Spam folders (questionable and actual 
Spam) would be re-created.  During the re-install I was 
given no installation options.  Now I have the program 
installed but filtering is disabled because the two folders 
are missing.  To be save I again uninstalled SpamBayes 
and deleted the SpamBayes Toolbar through 
Outlook/Tools/Customize/Toolbars.
 
What can I do at this point?  I assumed that by 
uninstalling the program I'd also delete any configuration 
files but apparently that is not the case.  Re-installed 
SpamBayes doesn't re-create the required folders and I 
am given no setup options.  I noticed that I also cannot 
use the Configuration Setup button.  If I click on it 
nothing happens.  I really like this program and hope you 
can get me back on the right track.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.

Bob A.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-23 08:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

No problem :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Date: 2003-10-23 07:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892039

I changed this item status back to OPEN only so Mark and 
any others can see my note of "thanks" for his quick and 
accurate diagnosis.  :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Arthur (cobrabob)
Date: 2003-10-23 07:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892039

Mark, thanks so much for your quick response.  I followed 
your suggestion and THE PROBLEM IS FIXED!  I can't thank 
you enough.

Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-22 13:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Try deleting *.ini from your Application Data\SpamBayes
directory, and restarting Outlook.  This bug has been fixed
in the source code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 22 20:13:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 20:13:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during
	message download
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 04:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by balfbalf
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook hangs during message download

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf)
Date: 2003-10-23 00:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=363795

I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message 
number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail 
then reenable spambayes to get my mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch)
Date: 2003-09-19 18:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311170

I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove 
all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes 
away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to 
specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - 
but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-09-17 21:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it 
appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured.  I 
have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds 
but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be 
successful.

I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been 
cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So 
looking good.

The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages 
that I would have thought were previously caught. That 
needs mor investigation however.

Keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Hood (john_hood)
Date: 2003-09-17 18:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=834988

Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or 
when the spam folder has a lot in it.  Spambayes also hangs 
when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a 
modem.  Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back.  
Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then 
re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix 
the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users.   
Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines.  25 
users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above.  
Users love it.  If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you 
would be gods.

Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" 
and "Timer"  There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, 
can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install 
folder, in the site docs, or here.  Ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch)
Date: 2003-09-15 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311170

I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on 
Outlook 2000 and WIN98.  Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414.

It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while 
(1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa)
Date: 2003-09-15 00:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=410520

I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 
9/12/2003.  Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 
messages.  I turn off SpamBytes and same problem.  I've 
uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem.  Prior to the 
installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine.

Paul
paleroy@pacbell.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-04 23:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". 
I suspect this will fix it.  However, it is very strange,
and still not reported by anyone else I can recall.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-09-04 08:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists.

If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on 
it frequently hanges part way through the downloading.

I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at 
message 31 of xxx.  THis occurs too frequently to be 
coincidental in my opinion.

If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the 
messages.

If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then 
filter them I again have no problems.

HELP HELP HELP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still 
occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails 
can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the 
same email (ie cout of xx of yy)  I have not been able to see 
what actual email causes the problem at this stage.
Running the filter after a download works fine.
The log does not seem to show anything conclusive.
I do have McAfee running - current version.  

I will try disabling it next time I get a hang.  Note, the 
incidence  seems less frequent than originally reported.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 23:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html
seems to blame McAfee.  Is anyone else seeing this bug
running McAfee?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-04 15:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual 
desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it
filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly.
It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not
work correctly on virtual desktops. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 22 20:28:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 20:29:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during
	message download
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook hangs during message download

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-23 10:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can the other people having trouble with this let me know
how the "background processing" option works for them?  The
original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for
him.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf)
Date: 2003-10-23 10:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=363795

I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message 
number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail 
then reenable spambayes to get my mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch)
Date: 2003-09-20 04:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311170

I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove 
all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes 
away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to 
specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - 
but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-09-18 07:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it 
appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured.  I 
have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds 
but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be 
successful.

I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been 
cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So 
looking good.

The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages 
that I would have thought were previously caught. That 
needs mor investigation however.

Keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Hood (john_hood)
Date: 2003-09-18 04:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=834988

Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or 
when the spam folder has a lot in it.  Spambayes also hangs 
when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a 
modem.  Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back.  
Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then 
re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix 
the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users.   
Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines.  25 
users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above.  
Users love it.  If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you 
would be gods.

Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" 
and "Timer"  There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, 
can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install 
folder, in the site docs, or here.  Ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch)
Date: 2003-09-16 07:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311170

I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on 
Outlook 2000 and WIN98.  Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414.

It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while 
(1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa)
Date: 2003-09-15 10:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=410520

I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 
9/12/2003.  Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 
messages.  I turn off SpamBytes and same problem.  I've 
uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem.  Prior to the 
installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine.

Paul
paleroy@pacbell.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-05 09:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". 
I suspect this will fix it.  However, it is very strange,
and still not reported by anyone else I can recall.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-09-04 18:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists.

If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on 
it frequently hanges part way through the downloading.

I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at 
message 31 of xxx.  THis occurs too frequently to be 
coincidental in my opinion.

If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the 
messages.

If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then 
filter them I again have no problems.

HELP HELP HELP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-08-07 19:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still 
occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails 
can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the 
same email (ie cout of xx of yy)  I have not been able to see 
what actual email causes the problem at this stage.
Running the filter after a download works fine.
The log does not seem to show anything conclusive.
I do have McAfee running - current version.  

I will try disabling it next time I get a hang.  Note, the 
incidence  seems less frequent than originally reported.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html
seems to blame McAfee.  Is anyone else seeing this bug
running McAfee?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-05 01:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual 
desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it
filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly.
It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not
work correctly on virtual desktops. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 23 00:27:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 23 00:28:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] pythoncom error
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: pythoncom error

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 23 08:17:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 23 08:17:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on
	Server not filtered when starting
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 13:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmarrett
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting

Initial Comment:
Hi, 

I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an 
Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 
Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client.

I observe that when starting the client, all messages in 
the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the 
Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, 
***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered 
and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show 
spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. 
Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) 
rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly.

If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such 
effect. It seems to be related to the code initially 
examining the Inbox when starting Outlook.

Juergen Kremp




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett)
Date: 2003-10-23 08:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=642463

I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version
0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange
server 5.5.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp)
Date: 2003-10-10 08:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=850764

I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9,
2003). It shows the same effect. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 23 12:37:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 23 12:43:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install
	fail to register spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dregier
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: john (justaname)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is 
recieved.

spambayes_addin.dll

unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; 
code 0x00000000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier)
Date: 2003-10-23 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=326244

I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by
installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I
had already had a failed install on the computer I had to
delete the original default directory and also deleted a
couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in
them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-20 18:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

When I changed the install directory to \Program
Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.

The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to
do with a path statement in the registering utility.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-20 11:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19.  I uninstalled via
Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the
installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it
seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it
any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll
know if it's actually filtering correctly.

Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has
yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on
a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition
that may not be all that easy to reproduce. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak)
Date: 2003-10-20 11:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890856

I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000.  When 
I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.  Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents 
the  \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from 
registering.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-19 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll
with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. 

I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the
same error. The log files are created, but they're empty.
The install wizard doesn't appear.

Latest SpamBayes 008.1
Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches.
Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on
another computer with all of the same versions. I got the
error, picked retry and it succeeded.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-19 10:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1
and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-12 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

I'm having the same problem when trying to install the 
Outlook plugin, version 008.1.  A few more details:

I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 
9.0.0.6627.  I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional 
Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt.

The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it 
starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" 
error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll.  I'm 
using the default installation location (C:\Program 
Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin).  The file in question is 
present in that directory.

The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither 
of these is effective.  All I can do is abort the install.

An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the 
install fails.  This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Date: 2003-09-21 09:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=855408

Version 008.1 gives me the same error.
Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: john (justaname)
Date: 2003-09-17 01:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=868390

Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the 
spambayes outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 23 14:27:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 23 14:28:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-829100 ] cmd mgr exception
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #829100, was opened at 2003-10-23 11:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=829100&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Doug Easton (dougeast)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: cmd mgr exception

Initial Comment:
Had some trouble installing (spambayes_addin.dll 
couldn't be initialized); this problem went away after I 
both exited macafee and killed the processes that 
macafee leaves running (email scan module). However 
the pulldown menu for spambayes (within outlook) does 
work. Log file attached.

Any ideas?

Doug

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=829100&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 23 20:08:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 23 20:09:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install
	fail to register spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 01:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by donnieb
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: john (justaname)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is 
recieved.

spambayes_addin.dll

unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; 
code 0x00000000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-23 20:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on 
the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded.  
It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 
emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier)
Date: 2003-10-23 12:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=326244

I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by
installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I
had already had a failed install on the computer I had to
delete the original default directory and also deleted a
couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in
them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-20 19:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

When I changed the install directory to \Program
Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.

The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to
do with a path statement in the registering utility.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-20 12:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19.  I uninstalled via
Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the
installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it
seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it
any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll
know if it's actually filtering correctly.

Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has
yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on
a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition
that may not be all that easy to reproduce. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak)
Date: 2003-10-20 12:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890856

I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000.  When 
I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.  Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents 
the  \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from 
registering.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-19 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll
with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. 

I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the
same error. The log files are created, but they're empty.
The install wizard doesn't appear.

Latest SpamBayes 008.1
Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches.
Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on
another computer with all of the same versions. I got the
error, picked retry and it succeeded.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-19 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1
and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-12 09:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

I'm having the same problem when trying to install the 
Outlook plugin, version 008.1.  A few more details:

I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 
9.0.0.6627.  I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional 
Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt.

The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it 
starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" 
error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll.  I'm 
using the default installation location (C:\Program 
Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin).  The file in question is 
present in that directory.

The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither 
of these is effective.  All I can do is abort the install.

An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the 
install fails.  This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Date: 2003-09-21 10:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=855408

Version 008.1 gives me the same error.
Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: john (justaname)
Date: 2003-09-17 02:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=868390

Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the 
spambayes outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 24 10:06:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 24 10:06:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-829602 ] Multiple
	Inboxes seem to be mishandled
Message-ID: 

Feature Requests item #829602, was opened at 2003-10-24 09:06
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=829602&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled

Initial Comment:
I have a primary exchange account for my Outlook 2K.  I 
also monitor a varying number of other mailboxes when 
folks are gone or I'm working in a project area that has 
an application outlook mailbox.  (e.g. SQL Mail and the 
outlook mailbox assigned to our Intranet).  I have an 
Outlook profile for my main mailbox as the default and a 
secondary one for the Intranet mail account.

Here is what happens;
When someone with global enterprise send capabilities 
sends that global message, The Outlook plug-in for 
SpamBayes handles all of them and they appear as only 
one message in my Inbox or one of the SpamBayes 
classification folders.  Anyone else seen this happen?

Also, it appears, but I have not completely confirmed 
that any inbound mail to the intranet account shows up 
as above, MY inbox or Spambayes classification folders.

So, do we have a bug, a "feature" or do I have a wonky 
system because it is a developer machine??

bpu_webguy, a.k.a. Hal

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=829602&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 24 12:02:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 24 12:07:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] pythoncom error
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by w_hughes
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: pythoncom error

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-24 16:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering 
messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the 
fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat.  Toolbar 
still does not work.  If there are tests you would like me to 
run to help, please let me know.  w_hughes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 24 20:45:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 24 20:46:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook 2003 install
	fail to register spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 00:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alpatzke
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: john (justaname)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: outlook 2003 install fail to register spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is 
recieved.

spambayes_addin.dll

unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; 
code 0x00000000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-24 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

Has anybody else had the following happen? After several
days of using 8.1 version very successfully, quite suddenly
it quits working? I locked my computer and then came back.
Opened Outlook and clicked 'delete as spam' and nothing
happened. The button clicks but nothing is deleted, nothing
is moved, nothing happens even though the buttons are on the
toolbar. I restarted the computer a few times and nothing. I
even uninstalled Spambayes completely, reinstalled it and
nothing. Anybody have a hint?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-23 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on 
the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded.  
It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 
emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier)
Date: 2003-10-23 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=326244

I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by
installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I
had already had a failed install on the computer I had to
delete the original default directory and also deleted a
couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in
them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-20 18:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

When I changed the install directory to \Program
Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.

The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to
do with a path statement in the registering utility.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-20 11:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19.  I uninstalled via
Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the
installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it
seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it
any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll
know if it's actually filtering correctly.

Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has
yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on
a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition
that may not be all that easy to reproduce. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak)
Date: 2003-10-20 11:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890856

I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000.  When 
I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.  Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents 
the  \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from 
registering.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-19 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll
with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. 

I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the
same error. The log files are created, but they're empty.
The install wizard doesn't appear.

Latest SpamBayes 008.1
Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches.
Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on
another computer with all of the same versions. I got the
error, picked retry and it succeeded.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-19 10:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1
and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-12 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

I'm having the same problem when trying to install the 
Outlook plugin, version 008.1.  A few more details:

I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 
9.0.0.6627.  I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional 
Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt.

The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it 
starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" 
error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll.  I'm 
using the default installation location (C:\Program 
Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin).  The file in question is 
present in that directory.

The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither 
of these is effective.  All I can do is abort the install.

An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the 
install fails.  This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Date: 2003-09-21 09:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=855408

Version 008.1 gives me the same error.
Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: john (justaname)
Date: 2003-09-17 01:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=868390

Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the 
spambayes outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Oct 25 13:43:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Oct 25 13:43:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830190 ] more flexibility in
	header options
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830190, was opened at 2003-10-25 10:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: Source code 1.0a6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jeff deifik (jdeifik)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: more flexibility in header options

Initial Comment:
I am using Eudora 6. It allows me to filter on value of
a header field, but not on the name of the header field.
For example,

X-Spambayes-Classification: ham

I can filter on 'ham', but not
'X-Spambayes-Classification:'
or 'X-Spambayes-Classification: ham'
since they includes the name of the header field.

It would be really nice if I could set 'ham' to be some
more unique name. Similiarily with 'unsure' and 'spam'.

If it is too much trouble to make it user-settable,
perhaps it
could be changed to 'spambayes-ham' or something else
less likely to appear in the header.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Oct 25 14:45:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Oct 25 14:46:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830207 ] Keep file modification
	time
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830207, was opened at 2003-10-25 20:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830207&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: Source code 1.0a6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Keep file modification time

Initial Comment:
This is a very small patch to "sb_mboxtrain.py". I
believe that the comment in the code is the best
description of the patch:
--------
# The e-mail app sylpheed(-claws) sets all their messages
# to 'unread' when the file access/modification time
changes.
# therefor are these lines required for me to get it to
work.
# (are there any other e-mail clients which requires this?)
--------
This patch is against SpamBayes 1.0a6. Send me a reply
if you guys really would like to have a patch against
CVS instead.

Keep up with the good work! Thanks for a great product,
I have received great results these few ours I've been
using SpamBayes!

/Jens Rantil, student in Sweden

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830207&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Oct 25 14:48:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Oct 25 14:48:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830207 ] Keep file modification
	time
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830207, was opened at 2003-10-25 20:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ztyx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830207&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: Source code 1.0a6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Keep file modification time

Initial Comment:
This is a very small patch to "sb_mboxtrain.py". I
believe that the comment in the code is the best
description of the patch:
--------
# The e-mail app sylpheed(-claws) sets all their messages
# to 'unread' when the file access/modification time
changes.
# therefor are these lines required for me to get it to
work.
# (are there any other e-mail clients which requires this?)
--------
This patch is against SpamBayes 1.0a6. Send me a reply
if you guys really would like to have a patch against
CVS instead.

Keep up with the good work! Thanks for a great product,
I have received great results these few ours I've been
using SpamBayes!

/Jens Rantil, student in Sweden

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Date: 2003-10-25 20:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=121417

Made a change in comment...uploading a new diff.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830207&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Oct 25 19:30:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Oct 25 19:31:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830290 ] url detection
Message-ID: 

Patches item #830290, was opened at 2003-10-26 00:30
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Toby Dickenson (htrd)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: url detection

Initial Comment:
Ive been looking into a couple of unsures that generated 
suprisingly few tokens.... My mail reader detects some text 
as links because it begins "www.", but spambayes needed 
the http:// prefix too. Replacing this with a skip token was 
a big loss. 
 
In fixing that, I found that this re had always matched a 
little too much.... It would match urls that start in the 
middle of words. It always generated tokens "xxx" and 
"url:www" for messages that contained "xxxhttp://www". 
That wasnt so bad, but I guess we should avoid 
generating the same tokens for messages that contain 
"xxxwww." 
 
To address this I have also changed the re to require that 
urls must start following a non-alphanumeric character. 
 
Sadly my end result is a much messier re.  
 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830290&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 01:55:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 01:55:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830369 ] classify trouble
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830369, was opened at 2003-10-26 06:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830369&group_id=61702

Category: imapfilter
Group: Source code 1.0a6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bip (bippo312)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: classify trouble

Initial Comment:
I'm using sb_imapfilter.py from 1.0a6 on winXP with 
python2.3, 

It's been working fine for a while, but recently it's been 
giving an assertion error message when I try to classify 
my inbox.  Training seems to work fine.  The only thing I 
did out of the ordinary (I think!) was to erase all the 
emails in my spam training folder (roughly 1000 emails).  
Would this cause the problem?


C:\Program Files\Python23\Scripts>sb_imapfilter.py -c -p
SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1
(September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web 
Interface Alpha2, version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Password: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Python23
\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 824, in ? run()

  File "C:\Program Files\Python23
\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 814, in run   
imap_filter.Filter()

  File "C:\Program Files\Python23
\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 675, in Filter
    self.unsure_folder)

  File "C:\Program Files\Python23
\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in Filter
    evidence=True)

 File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 15
8, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 39
5, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 24
5, in probability
    assert spamcount <= nspam
AssertionError


I stuck in a quick 'print' statement for spamcount and 
nspam, nspam was 1293, spamcount was 1296..  

nspam is probably right, the imap web interface tells me 
that trained spam = 1293 and trained ham = 178

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830369&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 06:33:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 06:34:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830207 ] Keep file modification
	time
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830207, was opened at 2003-10-25 20:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ztyx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830207&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: Source code 1.0a6
>Status: Deleted
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Keep file modification time

Initial Comment:
This is a very small patch to "sb_mboxtrain.py". I
believe that the comment in the code is the best
description of the patch:
--------
# The e-mail app sylpheed(-claws) sets all their messages
# to 'unread' when the file access/modification time
changes.
# therefor are these lines required for me to get it to
work.
# (are there any other e-mail clients which requires this?)
--------
This patch is against SpamBayes 1.0a6. Send me a reply
if you guys really would like to have a patch against
CVS instead.

Keep up with the good work! Thanks for a great product,
I have received great results these few ours I've been
using SpamBayes!

/Jens Rantil, student in Sweden

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Date: 2003-10-26 12:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=121417

Hmm, the patch doesn't work fully...I'll upload a better
when I come up with a solution.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Date: 2003-10-25 20:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=121417

Made a change in comment...uploading a new diff.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830207&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 09:58:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 09:58:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-830515 ] Added a flag to train
	on recent email only
Message-ID: 

Patches item #830515, was opened at 2003-10-26 14:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830515&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Added a flag to train on recent email only

Initial Comment:
Hi,

Sometime ago alots of discussion said that we should
train on recent mail only since the spam change over time.

Since I try to keep all my messages and I want to do a
complete training every day. I added a command line
flag to sb_mboxtrain
-t n_days 

If you provide this flag to sb_mboxtrain I will train
on messages not older
than n_days and trained messages older than n_dayes
will be untrained (if they contain the trained header)

Remi
papaDoc@videotron.ca


P.S. Done on sb_mboxtrain taken from CVS the 2003.10.22 
diff -c3 from_file to_file

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=830515&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 14:24:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 14:24:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] pythoncom error
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by w_hughes
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: pythoncom error

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-26 19:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I 
was running version 6.xx.  I installed the latest version 
avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and 
deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. 
Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the 
toolbar does not work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-24 16:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering 
messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the 
fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat.  Toolbar 
still does not work.  If there are tests you would like me to 
run to help, please let me know.  w_hughes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 18:30:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 18:30:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807217 ] fatal region error
	detected; run recovery
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #807217, was opened at 2003-09-17 01:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
>Priority: 9
Submitted By: Rick Adams (rick_adams)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: fatal region error detected; run recovery

Initial Comment:
I am getting errors like:

bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError: (-
30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database 
recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery')

in the log file. There does not seem to be a recovery 
program to run.

SpamBayes is still mostly working even though 
gnerating this error

a complete logfile is attached

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting another Outlook user saw this in [ 828669 ] pythoncom
error

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-23 17:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Adjusting category, as there are 2 reports in this bug -
Outlook and the proxy

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-09-23 16:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Re-opening.  This is *not* fixed - the underlying problem
is still there, and is very nasty.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Date: 2003-09-23 01:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311771

Removing spambayes.messageinfo.db solved the problem for 
me. Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-22 19:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Presumably, if your (bayes) database is a pickle, then this 
means that the problem is in the messageinfo database.  You 
should be able to just delete that file without any problems, 
as long as you aren't planning to correct training of any 
messages still in the caches.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Date: 2003-09-22 18:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311771

I' started getting these errors, too, after upgrading from a2 
(or 3) to a5 and changing from a pickled db to a dbhash (i.e. 
bsdi) one.  Replacing all the code by a fresh CVS download 
from Friday didn't help.  Exporting the database and 
reimporting it to a pickle unfortunately didn't fix the problem, 
either.

I'm still getting these tracebacks, see below. I don't 
understand the "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py" part in 
the traceback - my hammie.db is a pickled db, and I'm calling 
sb_server with the -D flag

I haven't seen a pattern in which messages trigger this 
behaviour and which do not.  It seems that when after say 
five or ten successfully processed messages, a message 
throws such an exception, any other message throws that 
exception, too. One has to kill and restart the proxy in order 
to make it work again, for another five or ten messages.

-------


X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last):
 .  File "sb_server.py", line 439, in onRetr
 .    msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName())
 .  
File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", 
line 193,
 in setId .    msginfoDB._getState(self)
 .  
File "C:\archiv\cvshome\spambayes\spambayes\message.py", 
line 131,
 in _getState
 .    (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()]
 .  File "c:\python23\lib\shelve.py", line 118, in __getitem__
 .    f = StringIO(self.dict[key])
 .  File "c:\python23\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 86, in 
__getitem__
 .    return self.db[key]
 .DBRunRecoveryError: (-30982, 'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal 
error, run database
 recovery -- fatal region error detected; run recovery')



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807217&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 18:38:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 18:39:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work
	after reset
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 14:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 10:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This appears to be a duplicate of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which mentions the same error that appears in your log.  The
only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the
"Training" tab, and do a complete re-train.  If you could
possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db"
before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it
directly to me, or attach it here.

However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the
toolbars.  The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating
new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we
expect after clobbering outcmd.dat.  Are there any messages
regarding toolbars in subsequent startups?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-27 06:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I 
was running version 6.xx.  I installed the latest version 
avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and 
deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. 
Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the 
toolbar does not work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-25 02:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering 
messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the 
fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat.  Toolbar 
still does not work.  If there are tests you would like me to 
run to help, please let me know.  w_hughes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 18:48:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 18:49:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794381 ] win32com gencache files
	still being generated
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #794381, was opened at 2003-08-25 09:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794381&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: win32com gencache files still being generated

Initial Comment:
As reported on mailing list (Wright, Frankie
[FWright@sccd.ctc.edu])
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\fwright\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\fwright\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9,
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in
_InvokeEx_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1228, in OnStartupComplete
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client", line 302, in WithEvents
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 427,
in EnsureModule
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 236,
in MakeModuleForTypelib
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.makepy", line 259, in
GenerateFromTypeLibSpec
exceptions.IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied:
'C:/Program Files/Spambayes Outlook
Addin\support\gen_py\00062FFF-0000-0000-C000-000000000046x0x9x1.py'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 10:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is fixed in the 0.8 release (I'm sure I closed this
before!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-08 14:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

certainly does generate new files for outlook xp.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794381&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 18:53:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 18:53:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806915 ] Hotmail "Recover From
	Spam" puts email into pst file
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #806915, was opened at 2003-09-16 12:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst file

Initial Comment:
i have outlook xp at home with just hotmail as an 
account. outlook makes you have a pst file regardless if 
you use it or not. I have the possible spam going to a 
folder in the hotmail tree. when i hit recover from spam, it 
transports to the Personal Folder's Inbox, not back to the 
Hotmail Inbox.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 10:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a dupe of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=786212&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
although that bug doesn't specifically mention Hotmail.  If
possible, could you attempt this operation again, then
attach a log of that session to that bug - see the
"troubleshooting guide" for details on how to locate the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:13:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:14:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827239 ] Cannot initialize
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827239, was opened at 2003-10-21 11:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot initialize

Initial Comment:
hi there,

my app gets the can't initialize whenever I restart 
Outlook.  I then enable through the toolbars and the 
toolbar works, but no filtering occurs.

Thanks for your help!
Andrew

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you try re-configuring the "filter" folders via the
SpamBayes manager, or if that fails, reboot?  For some
reason, SpamBayes is having trouble with Outlook trying to
watch the folders you have configured, and Outlook is giving
its generic "I'm kinda screwed up" error.  Re-select *all*
filter folders, and let me know if that solves the problem.
 If not, please reset this status back to "open"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:16:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:16:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824000 ] Could not watch the
	specified folders
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #824000, was opened at 2003-10-15 19:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824000&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Farkas Szil?rd (lupus78)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Could not watch the specified folders

Initial Comment:
Each time I start Outlook 2000 I get an error message:
-----
There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.
Spam filtering has been disabled.  Please re-configure
and re-enable this plugin
Error details: Could not watch the specified folders
-----
Spam filtering dosen't work automaticly (the filter is 
disabled), however my spams get high Spam score (over 
the limit i've set for the spams!)
If I start the filtering manualy the messages will be 
filtered well.

The log file is attached!

Szilard

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a dupe of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702
(well, that is a dupe of this, but I saw that one first :) 
Please follow the instructions there, including re-opening
that bug if you still have the problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824000&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:18:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:19:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-823722 ] Add-in failed to
	initialize
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #823722, was opened at 2003-10-15 07:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Bighead (saskaheed)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add-in failed to initialize

Initial Comment:
I received the error message when starting Outlook - 
could not initialize the Spambayes add-in.  I've tried 
adding the COM add-in in Outlook options - I've also 
tried uninstalling and reinstalling the Spambayes add-in.  
I've attached the log - please advise...

Windows 2000 sp3
Outlook 2000 sp1

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\xxx\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\xxx\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 
(September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes 
Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 3)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in 
CreateWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in 
InitWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in 
YieldReceiveFolders
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder
MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 
0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in 
CreateWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in 
InitWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in 
YieldReceiveFolders
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder
MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 
0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\xxx.ini



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a bug in the config wizard that has been fixed in
source code.  You should be able to configure SpamBayes
"manually" by using the SpamBayes Manager, then filling in
the "Training" and optionally filtering via the "Filtering"
tabs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:23:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:23:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814099 ] Old filters still in
	place - 2 COM servers
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #814099, was opened at 2003-09-29 05:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers

Initial Comment:
While using an older version of SpamBayes (version 0.3) 
the filtering would continually move some good emails to 
my deleted items folder (the folder I selected for SPAM 
emails) no matter how much I trained it.  

I decided to remove this version and start over with the 
current version (0.81).  After the uninstall of version 0.3 
and then the install of version 0.81, the first thing I 
found was that I could no longer move SPAM to the 
deleted items folder since it was not a listed choice.  (I 
hope this can be changed as I much prefer to move 
SPAM there when the program is working well. Otherwise 
it is a several step process to permanently delete 
emails).

However, these same aforementioned emails were still 
being moved to the deleted items folder under version 
0.81.  (Note I have no other rules setup in Outlook and 
when SpamBayes is uninstalled this does not happen).

I have also tried to uninstall and completely remove the 
SpamBayes directories both in C:\Program Files and 
under my Document and Settings profile and in the add-
in sections for Outlook in the registry and then reinstall.  
Still the problem exists. 

I also noticed that while SpamBayes appears to work 
fine other than the above issue, the add-in does not 
appear in the Outlook Com add-ins any longer.  The 
SpamBayes log states :
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Unfortunately, we can not use "Deleted Items" as the
destination for Spam, as this would screw up the way we
train - all good items also moved to this folder would be
assumed to be Spam - almost certainly not what you want.

It should be impossible for 2 plugins to be running at the
same time, as they use identical "Ids".  Further, the log
you attached does not show SpamBayes moving any items.  Can
you find a log where SpamBayes is indicating it is moving
the Spam to "deleted items"?  Are you sure there are no
other installed plugins that could be doing this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:25:39 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:25:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-813078 ] Outlook crashes when
	opening some mails
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #813078, was opened at 2003-09-26 23:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813078&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook crashes when opening some mails

Initial Comment:
After installing SpamBayes, Outlook crashes when 
performing actions on *some* mails. 

Crashes are experienced when
* SpamBayes is filtering mail
* I try to forward, reply, view, show properties, etc

I have the following config:
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 
(September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes 
Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]

Microsoft Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627), Internet mail 
only, Security update.

The problem persists after uninstalling SpamBayes.

Magnus


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have *alot* of problems with the FreePGP plugin, causing
random crashes when opening mail, both with and without
SpamBayes installed.  I'm afraid I am going to have to write
this off as their bug, as I hever never personally seen, nor
seen reported, similar symptoms without FreePGP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm)
Date: 2003-09-27 03:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738321

I forgot to mention that FreePGP was installed on the system 
(including the Outlook plugin). Somehow, SpamBayes must 
have broken the PGP installation. After removing FreePGP and 
reinstalling SpamBayes, Outlook has started to behave again.

Conclusion must be that the SpamBayes installer bungles the 
installation of other Outlook Addins, and does not clean up 
correctly when uninstalling.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=813078&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:28:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:28:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812304 ] Error writing
	spambayes-ini-file
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #812304, was opened at 2003-09-25 19:01
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812304&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 001-007
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Klaus Marion (kmarion)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Error writing spambayes-ini-file

Initial Comment:
I have here a win98 Computer with outlook2000 on it. 
Installation of outlook Add-in worked fine, but after 
ending outlook, the add-in lost all information (Spam-
Folders, non-spam-folder and so on).

In the log I find an error:

Saving configuration -> 
C:\WINDOWS\Anwendungsdaten\SpamBayes\IBM 
AS/400.ini
pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method.

Where come the idea to save the .ini-file at "IBM 
AS/400.ini" ??? Maybe, the slash is the problem.
I have looked in the registry for the value, but found 
nothing.
I made a uninstall, then an new install. The same 
procedure...

I have other stations with the same constellation, which 
worked well.

Help...!

Klaus

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yes, the slash is the problem.  SpamBayes uses the name of
the current Outlook profile in use, which in your case is
"IBM AS/400".  We have fixed this in source code, but for
now you can either rename the profile in Outlook, use the
source-code version, or wait a couple of weeks for the next
release.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812304&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:34:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:34:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812380 ] V0.7 > 0.81 (binary)
	Outlook hangs after upgrade
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #812380, was opened at 2003-09-25 21:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alan Saunders (adsaunders)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: V0.7 > 0.81 (binary) Outlook hangs after upgrade

Initial Comment:
Environment:
Windows 2000 SP4
Outlook 2000 SP3
Upgrading from SpamBayes outlook addin (binary) from 
0.7 to 0.81.
I Stopped Outlook, ran the install, and ran Outlook 
again. Outlook loaded, and went through the 
configuration wizard, then locked solid! Had to kill it with 
the task manager. Rebooted, and tried again with the 
same result (Without the wizard). I then decided to 
investigate the installation. I found that in my 
application data directory, the installation had created a 
new .ini file, differing from the version 0.7 one by a 
single period in the file name.
0.7 = Alan D. Saunders.ini
0.81 = Alan D Saunders.ini
I also noticed that the default_bayes_customize.ini file 
had been created in this directory, and was a duplicate 
of that in the program installation directory.

Another point, the configuration wizard determined that 
I wanted two inboxes monitoring, my own inbox, and 
that of a robot process that I have been developing, 
and which I am keeping an eye on. This does not need 
filtering by SpamBayes, as the robot process handles 
non-conforming messages. There seems to be no option 
in the wizard to turn off the monitoring for this mailbox.

In the event, I renamed the new 'Alan D Saunders.ini' 
to .new, and renamed the old one to match the new 
name (without the added period). On reloading Outlook, 
all was ok with my original configuation for monitoring my 
own mailbox only, but using the new SpamBayes engine.
Although I seem to have a resolution for this problem, I 
am logging this firstly to point out my problems with a 
view to future installations not being problematical, and 
also to offer other users an idea of where to look ( 
assuming that I have actually got a true resolution!).

.. Alan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The reason for the "missing period" is that we now modify
the filename to exclude certain characters that cause
trouble, such as "/" or ":" - this excluded periods (even
though they really should be OK).

The Wizard should have check-boxes that allow you to select
any of the Inboxes that the Wizard found - were you not able
to disable these?  Maybe no checkboxes appeared in the
wizard list?

If possible, it would be great if you could rename the old
one back, and see if you can reproduce the hang.  Then,
before restarting, copy the log and attach it here - that
may give me an idea of what we were doing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:39:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:39:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810902 ] Outlook 2000,
	Customize Outlook Today no longer works
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #810902, was opened at 2003-09-23 10:51
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Bremmer (bremchris)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2000, Customize Outlook Today no longer works

Initial Comment:
After a fresh install on Outlook 2000 sr1 (9.0.0.3812) 
the "Customize Outlook Today" button no longer works.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm happy to blame MS for that :)  Please re-open if you
believe it to not be true.  I will also add an entry on this
to a new "frequently reported bugs" section.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Derek Stapleton (dstapleton)
Date: 2003-10-03 02:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=864221

This may be a Microsoft problem, not SpamBayes.  Check out 
Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 820575.  I had the same 
problem and this fixed it up.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be)
Date: 2003-09-23 21:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=545313

I notice same problem with Outlook 2000 sr1 (9.0.0.4527).
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 
32 bit (Intel)]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810902&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:42:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:42:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811874 ] Check New Version Fails
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #811874, was opened at 2003-09-25 02:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Check New Version Fails

Initial Comment:
In 0081, check new version fails in both Outlook XP and 
2003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This appears to have been a sourceforge site configuration
issue - it should all work now.  Please re-open if it doesnt.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-25 10:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fred Lobmeyer (lobmeyer)
Date: 2003-09-25 07:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=873875

Outlook XP 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 
32 bit (Intel)]
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Spam

HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found
ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest 
version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the 
SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, 
or try again later'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 530, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 145, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 353, in error
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 479, in http_error_302
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default
HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811874&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:44:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:46:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-808663 ] unable to set
	spam_filter_id
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #808663, was opened at 2003-09-19 01:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808663&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeffrey Reniers (jeff_reniers)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: unable to set spam_filter_id

Initial Comment:
Don't ask me how or why, but I accidently moved my 
spam folder to my delete folder, and when I shut down 
Outlook I had it deleted.

When I realized what I did I made a new spam folder and 
attempted to reconfigure spambayes. Unfortunately it 
never seems to 'remember' the new folders.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a very old version, and many of these bugs have been
fixed.  Please try upgrading and see if that helps (you will
still need to re-configure after upgrading, but it should
remember the settings!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808663&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:54:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:55:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803321 ] encrypted email
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #803321, was opened at 2003-09-10 03:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dean Adams (deanadams)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: encrypted email

Initial Comment:
Great job on the Outlook plugin - really appreciate the 
effort.  Just one observation so far.  I receive a number 
of encrypted emails (S/MIME format).  When SpamBayes 
tries to examine the emails, I naturally get a prompt to 
unlock the private key (enter the keystore password).  
By the time I have done this, more emails have arrived 
which seem to be ignored by SpamBayes, and it then 
carries on with emails that are still in the process of 
being downloaded.  Of course I can subsequently go 
back and "Delete As Spam" the missed emails, but it 
would be nice if SpamBayes handled this better.

Any hints on how to configure SpamBayes to deal with 
this better, or is it out of scope in the current version?

For info: I am on Win2K pro with Outlook 2K using 
SpamBayes 0.7

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Upgrade to 0.8, and enable "Background Filtering" - this
will fix it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dean Adams (deanadams)
Date: 2003-09-10 22:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=862750

Update - sorry.  Now that I have upgraded to SpamBayes 
release 0.81 - I have an Advanced tab with the background 
filtering options being presented.  Thanks for the help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dean Adams (deanadams)
Date: 2003-09-10 21:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=862750

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but according to the online 
version of Outlook2000/about.html
I need to:
enable background filtering of messages, via the SpamBayes 
Manager's Advanced tab.
Unfortunately I don't seem to have an Advanced tab - any 
other hints as to how I set background filtering?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-10 07:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Try setting "background processing" - that should catch up
the mails

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803321&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 19:56:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 19:56:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811871 ] Unrecoverable Fatal Error
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #811871, was opened at 2003-09-25 02:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Unrecoverable Fatal Error

Initial Comment:
Version 007 running in Outlook XP had a fatal error. 
Uninstalled 007 and installed 0081. The original 
SPAMbayes ICONs were left in the Outlook toolbar and 
caused no action to happen when selecting them.

Uninstalled 0081, removed SPAMbayes from the toolbar 
and reinstalled 0081, and removed all SPAMbayes 
directories. Now, no entries for SPAMbayes are on the 
toolbar.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

No word from reporter, so not much I can do.  Best guess is
the fatal DB error, which is being tracked elsewhere.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-25 10:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What do you mean "had a fatal error"?  What message did you
see, and where did you see it?

Have you tried the "troubleshooting guide", and reset all
the toolbars?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:03:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:03:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move
	spam messages
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-21 08:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages

Initial Comment:
I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I 
noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but 
it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I 
manually select the messages and click on "Delete as 
spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't 
do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful!
My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts 
and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific 
folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 
up and running, with email control ON.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 12:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is it possible that SpamBayes is configured to leave these
messages "Untouched" in the Filter dialog?  I'm adding some
debug output to SpamBayes to help track this down in future
versions, but the log certainly shows nothing going wrong
when doing the move.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Ingenito (gates150)
Date: 2003-10-17 01:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=888404

I am having this same problem also.  Rebooting the computer 
does not fix the problem.  I am using Outlook XP, Win XP SP2 
and Spambayes .81.  I have also set the delay to 4 seconds 
and this did not help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Esterhai (esterhai)
Date: 2003-10-04 04:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=879055

I am having the exact same problem and can't figure out a 
solution.  Does anyone have a solution for us.  Restarting the 
computer or Outlook doesn't solve my problem.  I have been 
trying to make it work for 3 days now.  Thank you

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton)
Date: 2003-09-23 00:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=871993

I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP 
(SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates).  Except 
rebooting does not solve my problem.

Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) 
but not moved.

I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but 
can find no documentation.  Can anyone tell me how to do 
this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz)
Date: 2003-09-22 04:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=706922

It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird 
one...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr)
Date: 2003-09-22 02:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=553846

I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems 
to work after you restart the mail program for the first time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:05:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:06:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811871 ] Unrecoverable Fatal Error
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #811871, was opened at 2003-09-24 12:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lfresin1
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Unrecoverable Fatal Error

Initial Comment:
Version 007 running in Outlook XP had a fatal error. 
Uninstalled 007 and installed 0081. The original 
SPAMbayes ICONs were left in the Outlook toolbar and 
caused no action to happen when selecting them.

Uninstalled 0081, removed SPAMbayes from the toolbar 
and reinstalled 0081, and removed all SPAMbayes 
directories. Now, no entries for SPAMbayes are on the 
toolbar.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1)
Date: 2003-10-26 20:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838921

Toubleshooting Guide worked. Deleted Outcmd.dat.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 19:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

No word from reporter, so not much I can do.  Best guess is
the fatal DB error, which is being tracked elsewhere.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-24 20:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What do you mean "had a fatal error"?  What message did you
see, and where did you see it?

Have you tried the "troubleshooting guide", and reset all
the toolbars?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:06:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:07:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-811871 ] Unrecoverable Fatal Error
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #811871, was opened at 2003-09-24 12:11
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lfresin1
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 9
Submitted By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Unrecoverable Fatal Error

Initial Comment:
Version 007 running in Outlook XP had a fatal error. 
Uninstalled 007 and installed 0081. The original 
SPAMbayes ICONs were left in the Outlook toolbar and 
caused no action to happen when selecting them.

Uninstalled 0081, removed SPAMbayes from the toolbar 
and reinstalled 0081, and removed all SPAMbayes 
directories. Now, no entries for SPAMbayes are on the 
toolbar.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Larry Fresinski (lfresin1)
Date: 2003-10-26 20:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838921

Toubleshooting Guide worked. Deleted Outcmd.dat.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 19:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

No word from reporter, so not much I can do.  Best guess is
the fatal DB error, which is being tracked elsewhere.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-24 20:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What do you mean "had a fatal error"?  What message did you
see, and where did you see it?

Have you tried the "troubleshooting guide", and reset all
the toolbars?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=811871&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:22:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:22:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-816103 ] Outlook 2003 not
	filtering/scoring
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #816103, was opened at 2003-10-02 06:04
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2003 not filtering/scoring

Initial Comment:
Im running Outlook 2003 Beta (11.4920.4920) BETA on 
Windows XP, and I've installed the latest SpamBayes 
from the website, and It's not filtering or scoring new 
emails. The only time it does is when I start up outlook. 
Im not sure what info you'll need, but feel free to 
contact me and I'll provide it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 12:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm going to put this down to an issue with the beta. 
Please re-open if you have upgraded and still have the problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Keith Garland (cagier)
Date: 2003-10-15 21:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=827817

I have exactly the same problem in W2K.  I was told that 
upgrading to the non-Beta version of Outlook 2003 might help 
but I haven't done this yet!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jesse Brandeburg (go_jesse)
Date: 2003-10-14 05:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=631160

I'm running Outlook2003 (11.5608.5606) release version that I 
upgraded from a spambayes installed OutlookXP (2001)

Everything runs fine, I even updated to the latest version of 
the outlook windows plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Drew Boillot (sicwan)
Date: 2003-10-02 06:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=554693

Tried to install, but I can't find it back on MS's website

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-10-02 06:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Please install the outlook 2003 techincal refresh.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=816103&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:23:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:24:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-825223 ] Does not mark mail as
	read
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #825223, was opened at 2003-10-17 10:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Does not mark mail as read

Initial Comment:
When using the "Delete As Spam" button on new mail with
the "Mark spam as read" feature checked. Does not mark
as read. (Outlook addin version 0.81) Otherwise works
awesome.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 12:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Could you please attach a log from a session where you try
this?  See the "troubleshooting guide" for info.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:25:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:25:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-808489 ] Could not watch the
	specified folders
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #808489, was opened at 2003-09-18 21:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808489&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Barry Thomas (thomcom)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Could not watch the specified folders

Initial Comment:
Win XP SP1, fully patched, Outlook 2000 SP3. AVG7 Anti 
Virus (not running during installs)
Insalled 008.1 trained successfully, turned on delayed 
filtering and got the above message. Then software 
would not filter automatically but allowed manual 
filtering. This is not what I wanted so tried turning off 
delayed filtering - no difference. Uninstalled 008.1, 
rebooted. Installed 007 as I had been using this version 
succesfully on a previous install of WinXp - still could not 
get software to filter. re-installed 008.1 and now on 
opening outlook get following error message
"There was an error initialising Spam plugin. Spam 
filtering has been disabled please reconfigure & reenable 
this plugin. Error Details: Could not watch specified 
folders"
4 logfiles attached.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 12:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

No word from reporter for a month...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-23 17:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Have you had any luck with this?  Did you try and
re-configure SpamBayes since the most recent message you
said you saw?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=808489&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:32:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:32:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not
	filter mail moved by rules from inb
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-09 01:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 001-007
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb

Initial Comment:
Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to 
other folders based on email address of incoming mail. 
Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains 
in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the 
rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in 
the destination folder after the move). All folders
 
inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. 
When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in 
inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 12:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this
problem.  Note that we know we have problems in this
scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make
sure you are using that before you attach the log.

Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem -
that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up
back in the inbox!  Everyone else seems to have the problem
that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders.  Please
correct me if I am wrong.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin)
Date: 2003-09-27 03:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=875205

I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and 
impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not 
moved.  My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 
professional.  I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and 
junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, 
but invariably they end up back in my inbox.  I have turned 
off my Rules, but it is still happening.  BTW, kudos for 
undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a 
great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' 
also).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: bill cann (newsguy)
Date: 2003-09-26 03:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=861868

I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I 
installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re-
establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the 
recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by 
Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. 
When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved 
from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and 
then subsequently being moved from these folders to the 
Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam)
Date: 2003-09-25 23:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=874251

Same thing happened to me as well.
But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in 
the com add-in manager.  I've removed the spambayes 
software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application 
folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook 
and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in.  
Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not 
help.  I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as 
spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic 
filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all.
If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it.
I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp-
2.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot)
Date: 2003-09-15 09:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=32629

I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my
inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as
spam/unsure never works for me. 

I have tried to select background processing. Including or
excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not
help either.

Outlook XP (German version)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems)
Date: 2003-09-12 09:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=864665

I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is 
still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version 
I used, 007).

Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately 
from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each 
of those folders represents a different email account.

I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to 
get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've 
also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it 
seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a 
feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 
folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the 
background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see 
if this works for sure.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-09 13:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version?  If not version 008, can you please try it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:39:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:39:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799201 ] Database not updated
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #799201, was opened at 2003-09-03 01:33
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 8
Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Database not updated

Initial Comment:
When I go to the SpamBayes manager it shows that the 
database has 1066 good and 224 spam.  These numbers 
don't change regardless of how much spam has been 
processed.  I'm not sure SpamBayes is learning from new 
incomming messages.  I'm using

SpamBayes .7 upgraded from SpamBayes .6.
Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2
Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 1

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-16 15:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From 799959:

I think I've figured out what is going on with 799201 - I 
have some rules that move spam into a folder. When I 
installed spambayes I configured it to look for spam in 
the inbox and this other folder. It appears that 
spambayes does not update the database counters 
when messages are moved from this other folder to the 
spambayes spam folder. The counters are updated 
when messages are moved from the inbox to the 
spambayes spam folder. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-06 12:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are checkboxes that ask if you want to train on 
messages moved into the watched ham and spam folders.  Do 
you have these ticked?  If you don't, then no training is done 
unless you do it manually.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799201&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 20:43:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 20:43:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803819 ] Outlook from source
	reverts to old source location
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #803819, was opened at 2003-09-11 01:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803819&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Franz Nisswandt (fln)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook from source reverts to old source location

Initial Comment:
I've been running this excellent add-in for Outlook 2000 
(from source, not the DLL) for a couple of months. I had 
not originally followed the directions :: I had merely 
extracted the source zip to C:\python\spambayes-1.0a5
\Outlook2000 and registered the addin (v1.0a4) by 
running addin.py from that folder.

I downloaded 1.0a5 source and followed the setup 
instructions more thoroughly and letting it install 
spambayes in the c:\python22\lib\site-packages folder, 
etc... I then moved the Outlook2000 folder from the 
extract location to c:\python22\lib\site-
packages\spambayes and unregistered and reregistered 
the addin:

addin.py --unregister 
addin.py 

from that folder. 

At this point, the plugin will no longer load. If I run 
manager.py from a cmd prompt, I get the attached 
output - in which it is referencing (from somewhere in 
the registry or outlook) the old 
c:\python\spambayes1.0a5\Outlook2000 folder where it 
was originally found. I can't seem to make Outlook (or 
python?) look for the new location and new version!

I've checked the registry and used regmon and filemon - 
sure enough, filemon checks both the old 1.0a4 and 
1.0a5 extract folders for the files. I'm running Python 
2.2.3 and the Win32com extensions 1.56.

I've even unregistered, deleted the Application 
Data\Spambayes stuff, reregistered, viewed the newly 
created .ini and .pck files, etc... to no avail.

Thanks,

FLN


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Actually, the new location is almost certainly being used -
but the old location still referenced in the .pyc files that
were created in the original location.

You have struck a bug that we have sinced fixed.  You can
change line 33 of outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py to read:

            rc_mtime = rc_size = None

(rc_size was not previously there), and it should fix it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803819&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 21:40:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 21:40:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797768 ] OUtlook hangs after
	running SpamBayes
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #797768, was opened at 2003-08-30 23:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philippe G Herve (marindeaudouce)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: OUtlook hangs after running SpamBayes

Initial Comment:
I have installed SpamBayes 7.0 on OUtlook 2000 SP3 
running Windows 2000 SP4

Everything works well except that Outlook hangs after 
running for sometimes. (Multiple times per day).  Only 
way out is to kill Outlook.

This repeats and I am now going to learn how to remove 
SpamBayes until the bug is fixed.

I had Outlook hanging 4 times already but can only trace 
one error in all the log files. I am not convinced the error 
I am facing is logged.

The error log I can trace:


Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Addin terminating: 0 COM client and 1 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 13:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We have fixed the bug that appears in this log - we
attempted to get the "default" message store at startup,
which was unnecessary, and if failed caused this error.  I
have no idea why it would hang though.  There is another bug
relating to Outlook hanging, so I will close this one.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe G Herve (marindeaudouce)
Date: 2003-09-09 02:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=112882

I did not get the message box which may be why i do not see 
the error message in the log file.  I have upgraded to 0.8 but 
still had the same problem.

I have uninstalled now V.8.  I am wondering if there could be 
some incompatibilities between Spabayes and Gaim 
(http://gaim.sourceforge.net) was unstable when SPamBayes 
was installed.  

I did run Outlook + Spambayes without GAIM and still had a 
problem.

Good look in solving this one and thank you looking into it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-08 22:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The message in this log file should also appear in a message
box - do you see that?  If you don't, that is likely to be
the problem - for some reason it is invisible, but waiting
for you to dismiss it.

Please try 008 of the addin
(http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html) - it has
changed all the window/dialog code, and is unlikely to have
the exact same problem - if we are lucky, it won't have any
problem :)  Please reopen the bug attaching a new log if you
still have problems.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 21:41:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 21:41:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743384 ] Show Spam Clues Marks
	Message as Read
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #743384, was opened at 2003-05-26 10:07
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743384&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
>Priority: 3
Submitted By: Paul C Coyle (pccoyle)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Show Spam Clues Marks Message as Read

Initial Comment:
After using "Show Spam Clues" on an unread message 
in the Spam folder, the message status changed form 
Read to Unread.
My concern here is that an perhaps an acknowledge 
has been sent to the spammer showing the account as 
active?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-17 10:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I can't fix this, as I don't know how.  Adding the original
as an attachment causes Outlook to mark the original as
"read" - but this read status is not reflected in the
message itself.  I'm out of ideas for this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-26 10:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I can reproduce this, but I am not at all sure I will be
able to do anything about it.  If you are concerned about
auto-responses, then I suggest you customize outlook
accordingly.  Note however that spammers can check account
details in other ways - especially if the body of the HTML
message references anything that is downloaded from a server
(such as an image).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743384&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 21:43:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 21:44:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785637 ] Spam score gets set to 0%
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #785637, was opened at 2003-08-09 07:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam score gets set to 0%

Initial Comment:
Outlook 2000 SP1 (9.0.0.3821)
SpamBayes 0.6

Immediately after processing an unread Spam message 
to the Spam folder, navigate to the folder and run 
SpamBayes Manager. Choose Define Filters then OK (you 
might need to make a subtle change to initate 
a 'dirtycount'.

When the SpamBayes Manager is closed, the spam score 
of the most recent Spam message will probably get set 
to 0%.

The correct score can be restored by Recover from 
Spam and then Delete as Spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 13:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It appears this is the exact same problem as in [ 737619 ]
Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly. 
I'll track this issue there, and am closing this as a dupe -
please reopen if you believe it is not a dupe.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-12 17:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I can confirm this also happens here (with latest CVS as of 
2003-08-11).  I'll post a log the next time it happens - lost 
todays due to a restart of outlook - due to non-functional 
toolbar :-(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Date: 2003-08-12 01:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=840787

Downloaded the James Bond release (007) and can still 
reproduce the problem. Additionally, I'm running Windows 
2000 (SP 4, build 2195). When I get a moment, I'll record the 
process and upload the file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-11 19:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is this still true in the 007 release?  I can't repro as
described.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-11 17:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

This actually happens for me every morning.  the first spam-
message (not 100% sure if it's the first, but at least there's 
(only) one) has score 0% in outlook's spam-field.  
viewing "spam score for current message" shows the correct 
score.  Not a big problem, but a bit annoying.

Think I saw another bug on this issue earlier.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 21:44:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 21:45:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803227 ] spam score shows as 0%
	for first unread spam
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #803227, was opened at 2003-09-10 01:30
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: spam score shows as 0% for first unread spam

Initial Comment:

With plug-in 007 and now 008, some spam messages get 
automatically filtered into my spam folder, but their 
spam scores are not saved correctly with the message. 
These messages show a score of 0% in the Outlook 
column view, even though they had to be scored above 
90% to be automatically moved by SpamBayes into my 
spam folder. 

See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The 
highlighted meessage was automatically put into my 
spam folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" 
on the message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it 
still says 0% in outlook:
http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif

So really, this isn't a functionality bug, just a display 
bug, since the message is moved into the spam folder 
correctly. Although the incorrect score might cause 
problems if SpamBayes ever re-filters without re-
scoring. 

This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I 
can discern no pattern.

I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security 
fixes, on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. 
The mail server is Exchange 2000 SP3.

Let me know if you need more information,

Ryan


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 13:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a dupe of [ 737619 ] Message spam score is displayed
(and filtered) wrongly.  I'll track this there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes)
Date: 2003-10-16 07:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=876739

After watching this problem for a while, I think I have 
discovered the conditions that cause what we are seeing.  
Ryan's comment about the first e-mail in the Inbox when 
SpamBayes processes it, will always result in a 0% score and 
the message not moved to the Spam folder.  This always 
occurs on my system when that condition is met.

Also, for the other situation that I reported, where the 
message does get moved to the Spam folder, but has a score 
of 0%, I think I understand better what is happening.  These 
messages were filtered, scored correctly and moved to the 
Spam folder correctly.  However, the next time Outlook is 
brought up, SpamBayes will change score for the first 
message in the Spam folder to 0%.  Although I haven't run a 
lot of tests, this also appears to be 100% repeatable.

I think both of these symptoms are the result of the same 
problem.  In both cases when you show the Spam clues for 
the message with a score of 0%, it is scored correctly 
internally.  Just the Spam scoring column in the list view 
displays 0%.

Chris

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter)
Date: 2003-10-01 03:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=731834

I think there's acutally two different things going on here: 
The problem with the first message scoring incorrectly as 0% 
and NOT being moved, and also a problem with messages 
that ARE spam and ARE moved to my spam folder, but still 
have 0% saved in the Outlook spam field.

The first issue seems to happen whenever a spam message is 
listed first in my inbox view when I start outlook. It is 
repeatable.

THe second issue seems totally random, but is very 
infrequent (perhaps 1 out of 100 spams get captured 
correctly but still show 0% as their score).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter)
Date: 2003-09-30 02:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=731834

A little further information: this seems to happen only to me 
when the FIRST message in my inbox is spam. The plug-in 
saves a 0% score in the spam field, and the messages is not 
filtered. However, if I manually run spam clues on it, it always 
scores above 90%.

I have a 10-second processing delay set at start, and my 
mail server is Exchagne 2003 SP3. I connect through native 
Exchagne RPC, not through IMAP or POP3 or anything.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Chris Boelkes (cboelkes)
Date: 2003-09-30 02:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=876739

I am encountering a similar problem, with a slight difference:
About 10% of the messages in the SPAM folder show 0% in 
the Outlook list view.  However, when the SPAM clues are 
displayed they appear to be scorded correctly...all in the .9+ 
range.

The difference from this reported problem:
About 20% of the SPAM messages are left in my Inbox with a 
0% score in the Outlook list view.  Again, these appear to be 
scored correctly (.9+ score) when the SPAM clues are 
examined.

I have never encountered this problem with Possible Spam.

This problem seems (so far) to occur with messages that are 
very high scoring (.9+) and has occured on plug-in 0.7, 0.8 
and 0.81.

I am running XP Pro SP1 with all current critical updates, 
Office 2000 SP3, and Exchange 5.5 SP4

I currently have specified a 4.0 second delay before starting 
processing and a 1.0 second delay between processing items.

Chris

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803227&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 21:57:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 21:57:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803297 ] DllRegisterServer import
	error when browsing to DLL via Outl
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #803297, was opened at 2003-09-10 02:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: john schmidt (emojoh)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: DllRegisterServer import error when browsing to DLL via Outl

Initial Comment:
Compaq Evo N800w WinXPpro sp1 1G RAM
After several installs, one uninstall reboot, install...
Outlook Tools Options Other AdvancedOptions Com 
Addins -  Initially had MapPoint.  This was removed.
Add fails to indicate after browsing to 
spambayes_addin.dll 

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\john\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\john\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.8 
(September 8, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes 
Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
*** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter 
incoming mail. ***
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, 
None, 0, -2147467259), None)
Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 14, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 14, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 338, in doimport
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 184, in getmod
  File "out3.pkg/archive.pyc", line 386, in getmod
TypeError: unbound method getmod() must be called 
with DirOwner instance as first argument (got 
ExtInPkgImporter instance instead)
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 
0 unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers 
exist.
___________________________________

Please advise if i need to exercise COM Mgr.
Thank you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 13:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you try running "regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll" from the
directory with the DLL, and send me the log from that?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 21:44:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 21:58:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-737619 ] Message spam score is
	displayed (and filtered) wrongly (0%)
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #737619, was opened at 2003-05-14 20:55
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly (0%)

Initial Comment:
Exchange, Outlook 2000, plugin from CVS around 9th 
April. Occasionally (it seems to be mostly when the plugin 
is doing a "catchup" when I start up in the morning, but I 
don't think it's *always* then) a spam is left in my inbox 
with a score of 0% displayed. Clicking the "show spam 
clues" button shows a correct score of 99.xxx%.

I *think* that the message isn't showing in the log of 
messages being filtered (so why does it get a score at 
all?) but it's hard to be sure I didn't miss the note about 
a message with subject "??????????????????????" in a list 
of 200+ such messages :-)

This has been discussed on the list in the past, but I 
could find no bug specifically about it. If I missed one, I 
apologise - feel free to close this in that case.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter)
Date: 2003-09-10 01:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=731834

I opened a new bug 803227 with my information, since upon 
reflection the circumstances are very different. My messages 
are filtered correctly, only the spam score saved with the 
message is incorrrect.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter)
Date: 2003-09-06 08:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=731834

Along the same lines... 

With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically 
filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not 
saved correctly with the message. These messages show a 
score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they 
had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by 
SpamBayes into my spam folder. 

See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The 
highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam 
folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the 
message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% 
in outlook:
http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif

So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. 
This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can 
discern no pattern.

I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, 
on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail 
server is Exchange 2000 SP3.

Let me know if you have any thoughts,

Regards,

Ryan Malayter


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter)
Date: 2003-09-06 08:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=731834

Along the same lines... 

With plug-in 007, some spam messages get automatically 
filtered into my spam folder, but their spam scores are not 
saved correctly with the message. These messages show a 
score of 0% in the Outlook column view, even though they 
had to be scored above 90% to be automatically moved by 
SpamBayes into my spam folder. 

See this graphic to see what I'm talking about. The 
highlighted meessage was automatically put into my spam 
folder, and when I run a manual "show spam clues" on the 
message, it shows up with a .987 score. But it still says 0% 
in outlook:
http://malayter.com/spamBayesScreen.gif

So really, this isn't s functionality bug, just a display bug. 
This bug seems to happen intermittently and randomly; I can 
discern no pattern.

I am running Outlook 2002 SP2 with all recent security fixes, 
on Windows XP SP1 with all recent security fixes. The mail 
server is Exchange 2000 SP3.

Let me know if you have any thoughts,

Regards,

Ryan Malayter


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is very similar to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=771256&group_id=61702&atid=498103
- except in that bug, there is no score displayed (ie, in
that one, the message appears "completely missed".  It is
alot easier to see how the "no score" behaviour could
happen, but this stumps me!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:07:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:07:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787676 ] in outlook xp,
	hotmail inbox does not filter
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #787676, was opened at 2003-08-13 07:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: in outlook xp, hotmail inbox does not filter

Initial Comment:
i know that this should've been fixed with the latest 
latest outlook plugin used. here's the log.

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 161 spam and 13 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
6.66118ms
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
1.11914ms
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Checked 11 in folder Inbox - 3 new entries found.
Checked 4 in folder Inbox - 0 new entries found.
Checked 41 in folder Junk Mail - 26 new entries found.
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Moving and spam training message 'Ab Girls that Just 
Shut Up & Spread Yoo Yr Ip Cleqt' -  trained as spam
Moving and spam training message 'Hey' -  trained as 
spam
Training on message 'Hey' -  already was trained as spam
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
Current version is 0.7, latest is 0.6.
Message 'RE: Outlook E-Mail' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Message 'Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' had a 
Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training 
message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' -  
trained as ham
Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes-announce" mailing 
list' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'RE: Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'shared fax error' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification 
of 'Yes'
Moving and spam training message 'Take Advantage of 
the Benefits of Your Individualized BankCard Services 
Credit Card  ' -  trained as spam
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 67 messages, finding 41 spam and 
5 unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 14:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Version 008 fixed most of these problems, and all
reports/logs in this bug refer to 007.  I'm closing this -
please re-open if the errors persist in 008 or later.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-08-21 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

ok, after much experimenting, i've found that the hotmail 
inbox filters randomly on recieve. There has been a time 
where i can get it to filter all the time... first time you open 
outlook, all new messages gets filtered when you click on 
inbox.

secondly, bprimack's problem is because you probably dont 
have a local copy of the junk mails synced. i ran thru that 
problem when first training. spambayes will only see msgs 
downloaded already and will not pull any from the server.

on a tangent, i should be filling out another bug report, but if 
HOTMAIL is the only account you have, outlook xp still makes 
you have a personal folder open. when you "Recover from 
Spam" in the maybe folder, it sends the piece of email to the 
personal folder, not back to the hotmail inbox. if i need to do 
another bugreport, i will.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brian Primack (bprimack)
Date: 2003-08-20 20:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=848405

I have the same "not filtering" issue ocurring in my Hotmail 
Inbox of Outlook add-in 007 binary code, but (hotmail's) 
Junk Mail box seems to auto-filter fine.  There's over 50 
unread (mostly spam) emails in my Hotmail Inbox that 
SpamBayes should have processed.  

I'm not running Outlook Exchange, but I am running Outlook 
XP & Windows XP.  Filter Actions = Perform All....; Filter 
Restrictions = (none selected).  Here's my log file (note the 
identical exception errors as Jose's (image57) log file):

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Brian Primack\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Brian Primack\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 247 spam and 63 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. To 
save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to Folder" 
command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Junk Mail'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. To 
save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to Folder" 
command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  SPAM
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 42.0481ms
Message 'QbAos Great_Mortgage_Rates' had a Spam 
classification of 'Unsure'
Processing 1 missed spam in folder 'Junk Mail' took 
1280.21ms
Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

i'm sorry, i should've explained. i am also running an exchange 
connector at the same time. i have it monitoring both 
inboxes, and having all spam/unsure spam moved to a folder 
in exchange. doesn't automatically filter anything in the 
hotmail. but spam in the exchange inbox works, and manually 
doing filtering also works.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It isn't clear from the log what is failing.  There are alot
of exceptions relating to being unable to save the "Spam"
score, but we know we can't do this.  The entry:

Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'

Does imply it is working, and I see no exception relating to
making a copy of the message.  I'd like to clean this up
though, and we probably could save the Spam field *after* we
have moved a message into the nominated folder.  Are you
able to run from source code?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:09:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:09:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803798 ] MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED
	error saving spam score
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #803798, was opened at 2003-09-11 01:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED error saving spam score

Initial Comment:
Although my SpamBayes Outlook plug-in 008.1 seems to 
be working OK (Win2Ksp3, OL XPsp2), I suspect 
something isn't right under the covers - perhaps it's now 
not learning any more.  This is what I often (but not 
always get) for new mails:

Unexpected MAPI error saving the spam score for 

ObjectChangedException: Exception 0x80040109 
(MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE error 0x80040109
Message 'RE: Call 12574 : DAC access 
toodscommscausescrashonserverandDac itself' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'

Actually, perhaps it's the tagging of messages that isn't 
working (which I wouldn't notice, since I haven't set 
anything up to show that).

This seems similar to bug 787676 (at least this error 
message also appears there), but I do not use either 
Exchange or Hotmail, so I cannot detect whether this is 
a different issue or not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 14:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is different to 787676.  Am I correct in assuming that
the filtering of these mail items seems to work fine, but
simply the spam score isn't saved?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:15:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:15:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827100 ] Message stream from AOL
	Communicator appears truncated
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827100, was opened at 2003-10-21 06:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Blake (zebby58)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Message stream from AOL Communicator appears truncated

Initial Comment:
Spambayes is not scoring my messages correctly. I have 
attached a screenshot of my training configuration.

Here is the info it has on a message that was moved to 
my inbox and should have been recognized as good.

Spam Score: 100% (0.996519)


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               4.07836e-005        -      -
'*S*'                               0.993078            -      -
'to:no real name:2**0'              0.610067          397     
79
'subject:('                         0.669051            3      1
'subject:subject'                   0.776799            1      1
'subject:)'                         0.822865            2      2
'header:Received:3'                 0.834469           72     
47
'from:addr:****'               0.908163            0      2
'from:name:****0.908163            0      2
'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)' 
0.908163            0      2
'from:addr:aol.com'                 0.92464             8     15
'message-id:@aol.com'               0.926397            4      
9

Message Stream:


Received: from imo-r02.mx.aol.com ([****]) by
	*****.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange
	Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id 49XK1YSQ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:03:00 -
0400
Received: from *****@aol.com
	by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id 
v.cc.23bf465e (16112)
	for <***.com>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DELL.charter.net ****.com 
[24.216.55.96]) by
	air-id12.mx.aol.com (v96.8) with ESMTP id
	MAILINID124-3ef03f92fbdfce; Sun, 19 Oct 
2003 17:02:23 -0400
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:39 -0400
From: "***" <**@aol.com>
Subject: (no subject)
To: ***.com
Message-ID: <3F92FBEF.3010602@aol.com>
X-Mailer: AOL Communicator (20030728.3 Win)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; 
BOUNDARY=79455383-41-1066597359-5020
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-AOL-IP: 24.216.55.96




  


 






  


 ne
Message Tokens:

24 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:aol.com'
'from:addr:***'
'from:name:***
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@aol.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:('
'subject:)'
'subject:subject'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:***
'to:addr:***.com'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)'




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 14:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It looks like we are not seeing the body of the message,
hence only using clues from the headers.  [ 819684 ] has a
similar problem, but for Evolution MIME.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:16:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:17:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-794992 ] Outlook
	should attempt to save information after move
Message-ID: 

Feature Requests item #794992, was opened at 2003-08-26 09:22
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=794992&group_id=61702

>Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook should attempt to save information after move

Initial Comment:
In some cases, we can't save stuff (spam score, folder
name) back to the original message (eg, IMAP, Hotmail).
 However, we almost certainly *can* save it after we
have moved the message (assuming we do move it).  This
would allow people to see the Spam score for their Spam
and unsure, and would allow "recover from" to restore
to the correct folder.

The restore issue is reported in [ 786212 ] Recover
from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=794992&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:23:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:24:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810183 ] Outlook crash after
	watching spam clues
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #810183, was opened at 2003-09-22 03:05
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Wont Fix
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook crash after watching spam clues

Initial Comment:
After looking at the spam clues in outlook 2000 (via the 
spambayes menu in the toolbar), outlook crashes when 
the window is closed again. 
Crash Location: 0x32503BD2 (BLNMGRPS.DLL, at 
prefered load address)
Call Stack:
 	BLNMGRPS.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x8d3	
 	OBALLOON.DLL!32a033ca() 	
 	MSO9.DLL!_MsoFCustomAWDatabases@12()  + 
0x900	
 	MSO9.DLL!_LDoBalloonTFC@40()  + 0x3e	
 	00000005()	
 	NTDLL.DLL!_LdrpAccessResourceData@16()  + 
0x9d	
 	msi.dll!InstallFiles()  + 0x1dd2	
 	riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight()  + 
0xe	
 	riched20.dll!CFontCache::GetCcs()  + 0xa6	
 	riched20.dll!CMeasurer::AdjustLineHeight()  + 
0xe	
 	NTDLL.DLL!_RtlpUnlockAtomTable@4()  + 0xd	
 	NTDLL.DLL!_RtlLookupAtomInAtomTable@12()  
+ 0x86	
 	URLMON.DLL!
CSecurityManager::CSecMgrCache::FindCacheEntry()  + 
0x33	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CRegion2::Intersect()  + 0x8c	
 	MSHTML.DLL!XHDC::PatBlt()  + 0x3f	
 	MSHTML.DLL!SelectObject()  + 0x19	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CRgnData::Subtract()  + 0x63	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CLayout::DrawClientScrollbar()  + 
0x13c	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CDispClipTransform::SetClipRect
()  + 0x32	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CDispContainer::PreDraw()  + 
0x217	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Subtract()  + 0x3f	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawBands()  + 0x11e	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::BoundsInside()  + 0x1b	
 	MSHTML.DLL!
CDispDrawContext::IntersectRedrawRegion()  + 0x37	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::Intersect()  + 0x3f	
 	MSHTML.DLL!
CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder()  + 0xd0	
 	MSHTML.DLL!
CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder()  + 0x8c	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot()  + 0x27f	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID()  + 0x162d6	
 	00000275()	
 	MSHTML.DLL!
CDispClipNode::DrawUnbufferedBorder()  + 0x8c	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CRegion::~CRegion()  + 0x19	
 	MSHTML.DLL!CDispRoot::DrawRoot()  + 0x27f	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID()  + 0x162d6	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID()  + 0x160f0	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID()  + 0x15522	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID()  + 0x169a3	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID()  + 0x14d4d	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0()  + 0x4f84	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!OlkGetUIlangID()  + 0x2ddde	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0()  + 0x4e9f	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!RenExitInstance@0()  + 0x22d0	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!ExchEntryPoint2@0()  + 0x4ff1	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x1fd0	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x1f41	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x1e78	
 	USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20()  + 0x18	
 	USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20()  + 
0x2f	
 	USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4()  + 0x22	
 	NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12()  + 
0x13	
 	USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20()  + 
0xfc	
 	USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcA@16()  + 0x22	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate()  + 0x468da	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!MAPIMHeapCreate()  + 0x46871	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x2244	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x1fd0	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x1f41	
 	OUTLLIB.DLL!DllGetClassObject()  + 0x1e78	
 	USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20()  + 0x18	
 	USER32.DLL!_DispatchClientMessage@20()  + 
0x2f	
 	USER32.DLL!___fnDWORD@4()  + 0x22	
 	NTDLL.DLL!_KiUserCallbackDispatcher@12()  + 
0x13	
 	USER32.DLL!_DefWindowProcWorker@20()  + 
0xfc	
 	USER32.DLL!_UserCallWinProc@20()  + 0x18	


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 14:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

PGP is known to cause a number of problems and crashes, both
with and without SpamBayes installed - I know from personal
experience.  Sorry, but I am going to blame that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Robert Cowham (rcowham)
Date: 2003-10-09 19:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=883409

I don't know if it's the same thing, but my Outlook has 
started crashing on me since installing SpamBayes. Outlook 
just dies from time to time.

This happens sometimes when trying for SpamClues, but at 
other times too.

I'm running Outlook 2002 (10.4608.4219) SP-2 on WinXP SP1

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr)
Date: 2003-09-25 20:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=553846

Hm. I just noticed that it doesn't happen every time. It 
happened the first few times I was trying, so I thought it was 
reproducible. It's possible that it is actually a problem with 
some other plugin (I'm also using PGP) or some interference. 
I'll try to monitor it further.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-25 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Does this happen every single time?  Have you ever tried on
another machine?  As this is the only ever report of this, I
suspect that unfortunately we will have to put it down to
your specific machine....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr)
Date: 2003-09-22 04:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=553846

Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a 
nil pointer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr)
Date: 2003-09-22 03:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=553846

Uh, I forgot: The crash reason is an attempt to dereference a 
nil pointer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810183&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:29:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:30:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook install fails to
	register dll - Error 0
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 15:55
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: john (justaname)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0

Initial Comment:
While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is 
recieved.

spambayes_addin.dll

unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; 
code 0x00000000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-25 10:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

Has anybody else had the following happen? After several
days of using 8.1 version very successfully, quite suddenly
it quits working? I locked my computer and then came back.
Opened Outlook and clicked 'delete as spam' and nothing
happened. The button clicks but nothing is deleted, nothing
is moved, nothing happens even though the buttons are on the
toolbar. I restarted the computer a few times and nothing. I
even uninstalled Spambayes completely, reinstalled it and
nothing. Anybody have a hint?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-24 10:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on 
the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded.  
It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 
emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier)
Date: 2003-10-24 02:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=326244

I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by
installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I
had already had a failed install on the computer I had to
delete the original default directory and also deleted a
couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in
them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-21 09:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

When I changed the install directory to \Program
Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.

The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to
do with a path statement in the registering utility.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-21 02:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19.  I uninstalled via
Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the
installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it
seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it
any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll
know if it's actually filtering correctly.

Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has
yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on
a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition
that may not be all that easy to reproduce. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak)
Date: 2003-10-21 02:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890856

I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000.  When 
I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes 
(eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without 
problems.  Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents 
the  \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from 
registering.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham)
Date: 2003-10-20 03:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=430640

Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll
with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. 

I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the
same error. The log files are created, but they're empty.
The install wizard doesn't appear.

Latest SpamBayes 008.1
Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches.
Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on
another computer with all of the same versions. I got the
error, picked retry and it succeeded.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke)
Date: 2003-10-20 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=890193

I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1
and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb)
Date: 2003-10-12 23:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=885365

I'm having the same problem when trying to install the 
Outlook plugin, version 008.1.  A few more details:

I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 
9.0.0.6627.  I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional 
Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt.

The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it 
starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" 
error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll.  I'm 
using the default installation location (C:\Program 
Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin).  The file in question is 
present in that directory.

The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither 
of these is effective.  All I can do is abort the install.

An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the 
install fails.  This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Date: 2003-09-22 00:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=855408

Version 008.1 gives me the same error.
Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: john (justaname)
Date: 2003-09-17 16:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=868390

Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the 
spambayes outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:33:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:33:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827823 ] Register dll fails
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827823, was opened at 2003-10-22 07:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827823&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Greg James (gjames)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Register dll fails

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install 008.1 and it keeps blowing up while 
trying to register spambayes_addin.dll. I've turned off 
my firewall and anti-virus programs (and anything else I 
can think of) but to no avail.

I'm running Outlook 2000 on Windows XP with all current 
patches installed.

Any suggestions?
-Greg

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 14:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We are tracking this in [ 807618 ] outlook install fails to
register dll - Error 0.  Please re-open if this isn't the
same bug, attaching a log or further details.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827823&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Oct 26 22:40:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Oct 26 22:40:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801416 ] outlook crash when
	customizing field view.
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #801416, was opened at 2003-09-06 08:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801416&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Josh Reznick (invizabul)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: outlook crash when customizing field view.

Initial Comment:
I'm using Win2k SP3 to run OfficeXP, and connecting to 
an Exchange Server.  After installing the plugin, outlook 
crashes any time I try to add/edit fields in the Customize 
Current View option...  

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 14:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Does this happen for all folders, or just folders managed by
SpamBayes?  What version of the addin are you using?  works
for me here on Outlook 2000

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801416&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 00:13:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 00:13:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-799091 ] Spam not always moved
	(when filtering too ?)
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #799091, was opened at 2003-09-02 21:54
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799091&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: mll (mlmll)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam not always moved (when filtering too ?)

Initial Comment:
Hi,

First, thanks for the great app, very promising. Used to try spammunition, but spambayes is better at tracking spam.

I've set a rule in Outlook to move automatically mail send to a given alias to, say "Inbox2". Inbox2 is a subfolder of "Inbox".

I've told SpamBayes to filter "Inbox" and "Inbox2" and move the spam to the "Spam" folder.

Unfortunately, it seems that, while the spam in "Inbox" is appropriately moved to "Spam", it doesn't always for "inbox2". Maybe spambayes kinda competes with the rules filtering system when the mail comes first to the inbox ?

Thanks for any help. I'll be glad to send any debug info privately.

MLL

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: mll (mlmll)
Date: 2003-09-05 15:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=491129

The answer is : set a timer value in the ini file (see About>Advanced options)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=799091&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 00:15:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 00:15:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809848 ] ImportError importing
	MAPI during installation
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #809848, was opened at 2003-09-21 03:50
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Johnny Leon (jleon22)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: ImportError importing MAPI during installation

Initial Comment:
Hi All,

I've having lots of trouble trying to install the plugin. 
I've read the bug trackers and docs, but am still 
unsuccessful. The toolbar basically does not show up 
and seems to fail according to the logs. Here's the info:

Downloaded: SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-0081.exe
OS: WinXP sp1
Outlook 2002 sp2

spambayes1.log:

pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in 
_InvokeEx_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in 
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in 
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1150, in OnConnection
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 16, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 14, in ?
exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name mapi


spambayes2.log:

Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
Registration complete.

Thanks for your help in advance,
johnny



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22)
Date: 2003-09-26 09:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=870923

It seems both those logs are generated when I go through 
the installer. However, I am judging that the installation is 
unsuccessful as I do not see the toolbar in Outlook 2002.
I checked the tools -> Customized -> Toolbars tab and I do 
not see SpamBayes anywhere installed. I have tried the 
installer on 2 different WinXP machines and both failed with 
the same log messages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-25 10:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

My mistake - I thought that bug was an 'import error'
getting MAPI.  I was sure there was another tracking this
problem though, but now I can't find it - so this bug is it :)

I am confused about your last comment: you said SpamBayes
failed to install - however, from the looks of these logs it
has installed - the "2" log shows the installation going
correctly, while the "1" log shows SpamBayes attempting to
connect to Outlook as Outlook starts.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Johnny Leon (jleon22)
Date: 2003-09-25 09:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=870923

I read over bug# 803798 and I don't understand how the bug 
is the same? It mentioned that the installation went ok in 
that ID, however I cannot even get spambayes to install let 
alone do anything with filtering and what not. Please 
elaborate.

thanks

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-23 17:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a dupe of [ 803798 ] MAPI errors in spambayesX.log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809848&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 03:46:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 03:47:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812380 ] V0.7 > 0.81 (binary)
	Outlook hangs after upgrade
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #812380, was opened at 2003-09-25 11:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by adsaunders
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alan Saunders (adsaunders)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: V0.7 > 0.81 (binary) Outlook hangs after upgrade

Initial Comment:
Environment:
Windows 2000 SP4
Outlook 2000 SP3
Upgrading from SpamBayes outlook addin (binary) from 
0.7 to 0.81.
I Stopped Outlook, ran the install, and ran Outlook 
again. Outlook loaded, and went through the 
configuration wizard, then locked solid! Had to kill it with 
the task manager. Rebooted, and tried again with the 
same result (Without the wizard). I then decided to 
investigate the installation. I found that in my 
application data directory, the installation had created a 
new .ini file, differing from the version 0.7 one by a 
single period in the file name.
0.7 = Alan D. Saunders.ini
0.81 = Alan D Saunders.ini
I also noticed that the default_bayes_customize.ini file 
had been created in this directory, and was a duplicate 
of that in the program installation directory.

Another point, the configuration wizard determined that 
I wanted two inboxes monitoring, my own inbox, and 
that of a robot process that I have been developing, 
and which I am keeping an eye on. This does not need 
filtering by SpamBayes, as the robot process handles 
non-conforming messages. There seems to be no option 
in the wizard to turn off the monitoring for this mailbox.

In the event, I renamed the new 'Alan D Saunders.ini' 
to .new, and renamed the old one to match the new 
name (without the added period). On reloading Outlook, 
all was ok with my original configuation for monitoring my 
own mailbox only, but using the new SpamBayes engine.
Although I seem to have a resolution for this problem, I 
am logging this firstly to point out my problems with a 
view to future installations not being problematical, and 
also to offer other users an idea of where to look ( 
assuming that I have actually got a true resolution!).

.. Alan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Alan Saunders (adsaunders)
Date: 2003-10-27 08:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=802106

Hi,
I tried renaming the files again, and lo and behold, this time 
no hang!! Mind you, a lot of water has gone under the bridge 
since I posted the original report. Not least about half a 
dozen MS security updates to my machine! So .. short of 
uninstalling v 0.81, and reinstaling v.7 and doing it all over 
again (which unfortunately I don't have time to do.) I am 
sorry, but I can help no further.

Regards .. Alan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 00:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The reason for the "missing period" is that we now modify
the filename to exclude certain characters that cause
trouble, such as "/" or ":" - this excluded periods (even
though they really should be OK).

The Wizard should have check-boxes that allow you to select
any of the Inboxes that the Wizard found - were you not able
to disable these?  Maybe no checkboxes appeared in the
wizard list?

If possible, it would be great if you could rename the old
one back, and see if you can reproduce the hang.  Then,
before restarting, copy the log and attach it here - that
may give me an idea of what we were doing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 03:59:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 03:59:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-812380 ] V0.7 > 0.81 (binary)
	Outlook hangs after upgrade
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #812380, was opened at 2003-09-25 21:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alan Saunders (adsaunders)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: V0.7 > 0.81 (binary) Outlook hangs after upgrade

Initial Comment:
Environment:
Windows 2000 SP4
Outlook 2000 SP3
Upgrading from SpamBayes outlook addin (binary) from 
0.7 to 0.81.
I Stopped Outlook, ran the install, and ran Outlook 
again. Outlook loaded, and went through the 
configuration wizard, then locked solid! Had to kill it with 
the task manager. Rebooted, and tried again with the 
same result (Without the wizard). I then decided to 
investigate the installation. I found that in my 
application data directory, the installation had created a 
new .ini file, differing from the version 0.7 one by a 
single period in the file name.
0.7 = Alan D. Saunders.ini
0.81 = Alan D Saunders.ini
I also noticed that the default_bayes_customize.ini file 
had been created in this directory, and was a duplicate 
of that in the program installation directory.

Another point, the configuration wizard determined that 
I wanted two inboxes monitoring, my own inbox, and 
that of a robot process that I have been developing, 
and which I am keeping an eye on. This does not need 
filtering by SpamBayes, as the robot process handles 
non-conforming messages. There seems to be no option 
in the wizard to turn off the monitoring for this mailbox.

In the event, I renamed the new 'Alan D Saunders.ini' 
to .new, and renamed the old one to match the new 
name (without the added period). On reloading Outlook, 
all was ok with my original configuation for monitoring my 
own mailbox only, but using the new SpamBayes engine.
Although I seem to have a resolution for this problem, I 
am logging this firstly to point out my problems with a 
view to future installations not being problematical, and 
also to offer other users an idea of where to look ( 
assuming that I have actually got a true resolution!).

.. Alan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 19:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks for trying!  I'm closing this as there's not much
more I can do either - please reopen or create a new bug
should you see any problems in the future!

Mark.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alan Saunders (adsaunders)
Date: 2003-10-27 19:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=802106

Hi,
I tried renaming the files again, and lo and behold, this time 
no hang!! Mind you, a lot of water has gone under the bridge 
since I posted the original report. Not least about half a 
dozen MS security updates to my machine! So .. short of 
uninstalling v 0.81, and reinstaling v.7 and doing it all over 
again (which unfortunately I don't have time to do.) I am 
sorry, but I can help no further.

Regards .. Alan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 11:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The reason for the "missing period" is that we now modify
the filename to exclude certain characters that cause
trouble, such as "/" or ":" - this excluded periods (even
though they really should be OK).

The Wizard should have check-boxes that allow you to select
any of the Inboxes that the Wizard found - were you not able
to disable these?  Maybe no checkboxes appeared in the
wizard list?

If possible, it would be great if you could rename the old
one back, and see if you can reproduce the hang.  Then,
before restarting, copy the log and attach it here - that
may give me an idea of what we were doing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=812380&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 04:32:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 04:32:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830865 ] No dialog context-help
	button on Win9x
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830865, was opened at 2003-10-27 20:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Source code - CVS
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: No dialog context-help button on Win9x

Initial Comment:
>From spambayes-dev.  At least I *think* it was win9x. 
Tim reports Ctrl+F1 (again, I *think* it was Ctrl) does
work, but this obviously misses the visual cues of the
'?' button.

Interestingly, I can't get Win2k to show a "help" mouse
cursor with any combination of F1 (but Ctrl+Shift+F1
does show help for the focused item)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 09:34:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 09:34:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-823722 ] Add-in failed to
	initialize
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #823722, was opened at 2003-10-14 15:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by saskaheed
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Bighead (saskaheed)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add-in failed to initialize

Initial Comment:
I received the error message when starting Outlook - 
could not initialize the Spambayes add-in.  I've tried 
adding the COM add-in in Outlook options - I've also 
tried uninstalling and reinstalling the Spambayes add-in.  
I've attached the log - please advise...

Windows 2000 sp3
Outlook 2000 sp1

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\xxx\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\xxx\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 
(September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes 
Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 3)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in 
CreateWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in 
InitWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in 
YieldReceiveFolders
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder
MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 
0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in 
CreateWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in 
InitWizardConfig
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in 
YieldReceiveFolders
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder
MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 
0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\xxx.ini



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bighead (saskaheed)
Date: 2003-10-27 08:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=886876

So you're saying it will still work even though on the "General" 
tab of SpamBayes Manager the "Enable SpamBayes" checkbox 
is NOT checked and unavailable (greyed-out)?  Yes, I can 
configure SpamBayes but I didn't think it was working 
because it didn't seem to be enabled...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 18:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a bug in the config wizard that has been fixed in
source code.  You should be able to configure SpamBayes
"manually" by using the SpamBayes Manager, then filling in
the "Training" and optionally filtering via the "Filtering"
tabs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 10:57:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 10:57:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831105 ] SpamBayes resets Outlook
	"Startup in this folder" option
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #831105, was opened at 2003-10-27 10:57
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831105&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeremy Johnson (webmasterj)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes resets Outlook "Startup in this folder" option

Initial Comment:
Summary pretty much says it all.  After installation of 
SpamBayes, Outlook starts up in the INBOX regardless 
of what I select in "Startup in this folder" option!  I even 
uninstalled SpamBayes, but it made no difference.  
Help!  I usually start up in Calendar folder.

webmastergpg@yahoo.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831105&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 11:21:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 11:22:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move
	spam messages
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-20 22:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kenjin2
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages

Initial Comment:
I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I 
noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but 
it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I 
manually select the messages and click on "Delete as 
spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't 
do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful!
My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts 
and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific 
folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 
up and running, with email control ON.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken (kenjin2)
Date: 2003-10-27 16:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=895882

The SB Outlook plug-in (0081) fails to move messages that 
are classified as Spam or Spam-Maybe.

An earlier version of the plug-in worked fine after some 
installation anomalies were resolved.

Also, this plug-in worked when first installed 9-12-03. I'm not 
certain, but the failure seemed to occur when Office update 
to SP3 was applied along with a security rollup from Microsoft.

I'm runing Windows XP/Professional SP1 with Outlook 2000 
SP3.

The log files seem nominal. 

Thanks for your efforts on this projevt.

Ken

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is it possible that SpamBayes is configured to leave these
messages "Untouched" in the Filter dialog?  I'm adding some
debug output to SpamBayes to help track this down in future
versions, but the log certainly shows nothing going wrong
when doing the move.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Ingenito (gates150)
Date: 2003-10-16 15:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=888404

I am having this same problem also.  Rebooting the computer 
does not fix the problem.  I am using Outlook XP, Win XP SP2 
and Spambayes .81.  I have also set the delay to 4 seconds 
and this did not help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Esterhai (esterhai)
Date: 2003-10-03 18:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=879055

I am having the exact same problem and can't figure out a 
solution.  Does anyone have a solution for us.  Restarting the 
computer or Outlook doesn't solve my problem.  I have been 
trying to make it work for 3 days now.  Thank you

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton)
Date: 2003-09-22 14:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=871993

I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP 
(SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates).  Except 
rebooting does not solve my problem.

Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) 
but not moved.

I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but 
can find no documentation.  Can anyone tell me how to do 
this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz)
Date: 2003-09-21 18:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=706922

It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird 
one...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr)
Date: 2003-09-21 16:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=553846

I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems 
to work after you restart the mail program for the first time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 11:24:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 11:24:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831123 ] error initializing
	outlook addin
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #831123, was opened at 2003-10-27 16:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nikolas Beyer (nikbeyer)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: error initializing outlook addin

Initial Comment:
I installed the addin without errors, configured it 
manually and trained it. Next day, starting Outlook gives 
the message above. SpamBayes is then automatically 
disabled and no spam is checked.
After enabling, background filtering doesn't work. Spam 
still remains in inbox. Already checked Bug item 
#823722, but doesn't help.

Hope you can help.
Nik

Software: Win200 Sp4, Outlook 2002, SpamBayes bin 
version 0.8

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 15:34:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 15:34:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831291 ] Loads with error -
	"Could not watch the specified folders"
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #831291, was opened at 2003-10-27 15:34
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831291&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Dunbar (sdunbar)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders"

Initial Comment:
System verbosity set to 10
No old pickle file to migrate
Dumping loaded configuration:
[Experimental]
timer_interval: 1000
timer_only_receive_folders: True
timer_start_delay: 0

[Filter]
enabled: True
filter_now: False
save_spam_info: True
spam_action: Moved
spam_folder_id: 
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045
4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661
1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379
6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6
16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363
6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014
000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2
0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66
696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950
0000097305F0000')
spam_mark_as_read: False
spam_threshold: 90.0
timer_enabled: True
timer_interval: 1.0
timer_only_receive_folders: True
timer_start_delay: 2.0
unsure_action: Moved
unsure_folder_id: 
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045
4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661
1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379
6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6
16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363
6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014
000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2
0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66
696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950
0000097305F0000')
unsure_mark_as_read: False
unsure_threshold: 15.0
watch_folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730
000000001E20000')]
watch_include_sub: True

[Filter_Now]
action_all: True
folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730
000000001E20000')]
include_sub: False
only_unread: False
only_unseen: False

[General]
data_directory: 
delete_as_spam_message_state: Read
field_score_name: Spam
recover_from_spam_message_state: Unread
verbose: 10

[Training]
ham_folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730
000000001E20000')]
ham_include_sub: False
rebuild: True
rescore: True
spam_folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950
0000097305F0000')]
spam_include_sub: False
train_manual_spam: True
train_recovered_spam: True

-- end of configuration --
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\dunbar_s.SYNCHROLOGIC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\dunbar_s.SYNCHROLOGIC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 675 spam and 41 good 
messages
Loaded databases in 3.33199ms
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 
(September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes 
Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.2.3790 ()
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
Checking folder 'Mailbox - Scott Dunbar/Inbox' for 
field 'Spam'
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam 
plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled.  Please 
re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError 
details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1237, in FiltersChanged
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1248, in UpdateFolderHooks
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1273, in _HookFolderEvents
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 539, in GetOutlookItem
  File "C:/Program Files/Spambayes Outlook 
Addin\support\gen_py\00062FFF-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046x0x9x2.py", line 4597, in GetFolderFromID
    ret = self._oleobj_.InvokeTypes(8456, LCID, 1, (9, 0), 
((8, 1), (12, 17)),EntryIDFolder, EntryIDStore)
com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', 
(4096, 'Microsoft Office Outlook', 'The operation failed.', 
None, 0, -2147221241), None)
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1193, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1219, in 
ProcessMissedMessages
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1263, in _GetHookForFolder
KeyError: ('\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10
\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00\x00EMSMDB.DLL\x00
\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x1bU\xfa \xaaf\x11
\xcd\x9b\xc8\x00\xaa\x00/\xc4Z\x0c\x00\x00\x00FS01
\x00/o=Synchrologic, 
Inc./ou=Atlanta/cn=Recipients/cn=Scott.Dunbar\x00
\xd85!\xf3[\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x14\x00\x00
\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00/O=Synchrologic, 
Inc./OU=Atlanta/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FS01
\x00\x00\x00', '\x00\x00\x00\x00`\xb3\x1902\xa2\xd4
\x11\x96\xaf\x00\xb0\xd0 \xf8s\x01\x00A\xb3\x1902\xa2
\xd4\x11\x96\xaf\x00\xb0\xd0 \xf8s\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01
\xe2\x00\x00')
OnFolderSwitch 
OnSelectionChange 
OnActivate 
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\dunbar_s.SYNCHROLOGIC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Dumping configuration to save:
[Experimental]
timer_interval: 1000
timer_only_receive_folders: True
timer_start_delay: 0

[Filter]
enabled: True
filter_now: False
save_spam_info: True
spam_action: Moved
spam_folder_id: 
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045
4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661
1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379
6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6
16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363
6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014
000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2
0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66
696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950
0000097305F0000')
spam_mark_as_read: False
spam_threshold: 90.0
timer_enabled: True
timer_interval: 1.0
timer_only_receive_folders: True
timer_start_delay: 2.0
unsure_action: Moved
unsure_folder_id: 
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045
4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661
1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379
6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6
16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363
6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014
000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2
0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66
696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950
0000097305F0000')
unsure_mark_as_read: False
unsure_threshold: 15.0
watch_folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730
000000001E20000')]
watch_include_sub: True

[Filter_Now]
action_all: True
folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730
000000001E20000')]
include_sub: False
only_unread: False
only_unseen: False

[General]
data_directory: 
delete_as_spam_message_state: Read
field_score_name: Spam
recover_from_spam_message_state: Unread
verbose: 10

[Training]
ham_folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730
000000001E20000')]
ham_include_sub: False
rebuild: True
rescore: True
spam_folder_ids: 
[('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004
54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66
11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537
96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C
616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536
36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001
4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C
20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6
6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3
D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00
B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950
0000097305F0000')]
spam_include_sub: False
train_manual_spam: True
train_recovered_spam: True

-- end of configuration --


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831291&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 16:58:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 16:58:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831365 ] sb_mailbox: non-maildir
	dir with "numeric" subdirs -> crash
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #831365, was opened at 2003-10-27 21:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831365&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gareth McCaughan (gjm-w)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: sb_mailbox: non-maildir dir with "numeric" subdirs -> crash

Initial Comment:
[This is for 1.0a6.]

If you have a directory which (1) doesn't contain a
"cur" subdirectory and (2) contains at least one
subdirectory whose name begins with a digit, and you
are careless enough to feed this directory to
sb_mboxtrain.py, then the following happens:

1. Because the directory doesn't have a "cur"
subdirectory and is therefore not a maildir, it is
assumed to be an MH directory.

2. mhdir_train iterates over directory entries whose
names begin with a digit. (I'm not sure whether this is
what the author *intended* -- surely MH message
filenames are *all* digits -- but it's what globbing
against "[0-9]*" does.)

3. It finds one of the aforementioned subdirectories.

4. It calls file(, "rb"), which raises
an exception.

5. The exception isn't caught, and we lose.

Strictly, this is user error: you aren't supposed to
feed sb_mboxtrain the name of a directory that isn't
either a maildir or an MH dir. However, it should be
handled more robustly. The simplest remedy is probably
to wrap the call to file() in "try: ... except IOError:
continue", which will just ignore directories.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831365&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 17:08:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:08:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-825223 ] Does not mark mail as
	read
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #825223, was opened at 2003-10-17 00:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mejesusfreak
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Does not mark mail as read

Initial Comment:
When using the "Delete As Spam" button on new mail with
the "Mark spam as read" feature checked. Does not mark
as read. (Outlook addin version 0.81) Otherwise works
awesome.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak)
Date: 2003-10-27 22:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=888770

Mark, this happens because I have preview turned on in
Outlook. I can look at the email and see if it's spam
without opening it and having Outlook mark it as read. If I
open it and it gets marked as read then click on "Delete As
Spam" it obviously stays marked as read in the spam folder.
I don't know if this would be considered a bug or an
enhancement. Also sorry about the duplicate attachements.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 01:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Could you please attach a log from a session where you try
this?  See the "troubleshooting guide" for info.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 17:19:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:19:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831388 ] message.py ignores
	header_score_digits setting
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #831388, was opened at 2003-10-27 17:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831388&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: Source code - CVS
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: message.py ignores header_score_digits setting

Initial Comment:
When message.py inserts the X-Spambayes-Spam-
Probability header, it just uses str(prob) to format the 
probability and ignores the header_score_digits config 
option.  Attached one-line patch takes the probability 
formatting statement from hammie.py, which handles 
this correctly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831388&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 17:38:39 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 17:38:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827100 ] Message stream from AOL
	Communicator appears truncated
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827100, was opened at 2003-10-20 13:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zebby58
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Blake (zebby58)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Message stream from AOL Communicator appears truncated

Initial Comment:
Spambayes is not scoring my messages correctly. I have 
attached a screenshot of my training configuration.

Here is the info it has on a message that was moved to 
my inbox and should have been recognized as good.

Spam Score: 100% (0.996519)


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               4.07836e-005        -      -
'*S*'                               0.993078            -      -
'to:no real name:2**0'              0.610067          397     
79
'subject:('                         0.669051            3      1
'subject:subject'                   0.776799            1      1
'subject:)'                         0.822865            2      2
'header:Received:3'                 0.834469           72     
47
'from:addr:****'               0.908163            0      2
'from:name:****0.908163            0      2
'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)' 
0.908163            0      2
'from:addr:aol.com'                 0.92464             8     15
'message-id:@aol.com'               0.926397            4      
9

Message Stream:


Received: from imo-r02.mx.aol.com ([****]) by
	*****.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange
	Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id 49XK1YSQ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:03:00 -
0400
Received: from *****@aol.com
	by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id 
v.cc.23bf465e (16112)
	for <***.com>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DELL.charter.net ****.com 
[24.216.55.96]) by
	air-id12.mx.aol.com (v96.8) with ESMTP id
	MAILINID124-3ef03f92fbdfce; Sun, 19 Oct 
2003 17:02:23 -0400
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:39 -0400
From: "***" <**@aol.com>
Subject: (no subject)
To: ***.com
Message-ID: <3F92FBEF.3010602@aol.com>
X-Mailer: AOL Communicator (20030728.3 Win)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; 
BOUNDARY=79455383-41-1066597359-5020
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-AOL-IP: 24.216.55.96




  


 






  


 ne
Message Tokens:

24 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:aol.com'
'from:addr:***'
'from:name:***
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@aol.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:('
'subject:)'
'subject:subject'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:***
'to:addr:***.com'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)'




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Chris Blake (zebby58)
Date: 2003-10-27 14:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=891021

Even if the Message Stream is truncated, why does 
SpamBayes not change the score to 0% after I move the mail 
to my Inbox?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 19:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It looks like we are not seeing the body of the message,
hence only using clues from the headers.  [ 819684 ] has a
similar problem, but for Evolution MIME.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 18:16:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 18:16:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831428 ] Spelling misstake
Message-ID: 

Patches item #831428, was opened at 2003-10-28 00:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831428&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Spelling misstake

Initial Comment:
This patch fixes just an annoying spelling misstake in
"scripts/README.txt".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831428&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 18:17:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 18:17:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831428 ] Spelling misstake
Message-ID: 

Patches item #831428, was opened at 2003-10-28 00:16
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ztyx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831428&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 2
Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Spelling misstake

Initial Comment:
This patch fixes just an annoying spelling misstake in
"scripts/README.txt".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831428&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 19:42:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 19:42:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831428 ] Spelling misstake
Message-ID: 

Patches item #831428, was opened at 2003-10-28 12:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831428&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 2
Submitted By: Jens Rantil (ztyx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Spelling misstake

Initial Comment:
This patch fixes just an annoying spelling misstake in
"scripts/README.txt".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-28 13:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Fixed, thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831428&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Oct 27 19:48:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Oct 27 19:49:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830190 ] more flexibility in
	header options
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830190, was opened at 2003-10-26 06:43
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: Source code 1.0a6
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jeff deifik (jdeifik)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: more flexibility in header options

Initial Comment:
I am using Eudora 6. It allows me to filter on value of
a header field, but not on the name of the header field.
For example,

X-Spambayes-Classification: ham

I can filter on 'ham', but not
'X-Spambayes-Classification:'
or 'X-Spambayes-Classification: ham'
since they includes the name of the header field.

It would be really nice if I could set 'ham' to be some
more unique name. Similiarily with 'unsure' and 'spam'.

If it is too much trouble to make it user-settable,
perhaps it
could be changed to 'spambayes-ham' or something else
less likely to appear in the header.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-28 13:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You're after the 
options "Headers":"header_ham_string" "header_unsure_string"
and "header_spam_string".  The FAQ has details about setting 
and finding options.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 08:42:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 08:42:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830190 ] more flexibility in
	header options
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830190, was opened at 2003-10-25 10:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jdeifik
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: Source code 1.0a6
>Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jeff deifik (jdeifik)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: more flexibility in header options

Initial Comment:
I am using Eudora 6. It allows me to filter on value of
a header field, but not on the name of the header field.
For example,

X-Spambayes-Classification: ham

I can filter on 'ham', but not
'X-Spambayes-Classification:'
or 'X-Spambayes-Classification: ham'
since they includes the name of the header field.

It would be really nice if I could set 'ham' to be some
more unique name. Similiarily with 'unsure' and 'spam'.

If it is too much trouble to make it user-settable,
perhaps it
could be changed to 'spambayes-ham' or something else
less likely to appear in the header.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: jeff deifik (jdeifik)
Date: 2003-10-28 05:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=725890

When I set BAYESCUSTOMIZE, and I have a config file consisting
of:
[Headers]
header_spam_string = spambayes_spam
header_unsure_string = spambayes_unsure
header_ham_string = spambayes_ham

spambayes does not fully start up.
Rather than printing:
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 25 is proxying
smpt.comcast.net:25
Listener on port 110 is proxying mail.comcast.net:110
User interface url is http://localhost:8880/

It instead prints:
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/

And needless to say, it doesn't work as it is not proxying the
ports.

This is with or without a configuration file being present
in the BAYESCUSTOMIZE path (which I specified as e:/j/mail)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-27 16:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You're after the 
options "Headers":"header_ham_string" "header_unsure_string"
and "header_spam_string".  The FAQ has details about setting 
and finding options.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 11:15:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:15:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827122 ] POP server reset after
	message review
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #827122, was opened at 2003-10-20 16:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by salex
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Alexander (salex)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: POP server reset after message review

Initial Comment:
I am using evolution 1.2.2 (from RedHat 9) as my mailer.  I 
recently started using spambayes.  I initially used version 1.0a4.  
Today I upgraded to the version in CVS (from sourceforge).  I use 
POP to read one of my mail accounts.  I keep the "real" copy of 
the mail at home, but grab a copy with "leave on server" set when 
using evolution at work so as to be able to answer certain mail in a 
timely manner.  At home everything works as expected.

At work, after I start sb_server.py, everything works nicely.  
However, if I go to localhost:8880 and review my messages to 
update training, the next time evolution downloads my mail, it will 
download all messages since sb_server.py was started.  Then, I 
will only see new messages until the next time that I do a review.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Scott Alexander (salex)
Date: 2003-10-28 11:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=255951

Let me suggest that we close this bug report, I'll do a bit more 
investigation to figure out more clearly what is going on and open a new 
report.  Stopping and starting does seem to cause it to go into this 
mode.  It seems like arrival of new mail sometimes causes it to stop.  I'll 
need to take some more time to characterize the problem more closely 
and even to be sure that it is a spambayes bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-20 17:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Are you sure that this is related to viewing messages in the 
review page?  Doing anything with the review page doesn't 
touch the POP server *at all* - it works solely with the 
cached versions of the messages.  I can't see how it could be 
possible that it could effect the behaviour of the POP server, 
*or* your mail client (which it doesn't touch either).

If you don't use the review page at all, but start and stop 
sb_server, or check (and receive) mail multiple times between 
starting and stopping it, does that have the same effect?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 11:32:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 11:33:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831388 ] message.py ignores
	header_score_digits setting
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #831388, was opened at 2003-10-27 17:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831388&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: Source code - CVS
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 1
Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: message.py ignores header_score_digits setting

Initial Comment:
When message.py inserts the X-Spambayes-Spam-
Probability header, it just uses str(prob) to format the 
probability and ignores the header_score_digits config 
option.  Attached one-line patch takes the probability 
formatting statement from hammie.py, which handles 
this correctly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Date: 2003-10-28 11:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=859086

This doesn't deserve the default Medium priority.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831388&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 14:06:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 14:07:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831864 ] sb_mboxtrain.py: flock
	vs. lockf
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #831864, was opened at 2003-10-28 11:06
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831864&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: Source code - CVS
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mike Klein (mklein9)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py: flock vs. lockf

Initial Comment:
sb_mboxtrain has an inconsistent use of flock and lockf: 
flock to set the mailbox file lock and lockf to unlock it.  
This causes on an older Linux system (RH 5.2) a fatal 
error in the lockf invocation.  The difference appears to 
be that flock can use fcntl if HAVE_FLOCK is undefined.  
lockf always uses C's flock, which may not be available.

% sb_mboxtrain.py -d .hammie.db -g imap-
mail/spamNo -s imap-mail/spamYes
Training ham (imap-mail/spamNo):
  Reading as Unix mbox
   180Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 317, in ?
    main()
  File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 302, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew, removetrained)
  File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 230, in train
    mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force)
  File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 181, in 
mbox_train
    fcntl.lockf(f, fcntl.LOCK_UN)
IOError: [Errno 16] Device or resource busy
% 

The fix is easy and seems to work fine: change the 
invocation of lockf to flock in sb_mboxtrain.py.

% diff -C2 sb_mboxtrain.py.orig sb_mboxtrain.py
*** sb_mboxtrain.py.orig        Tue Oct 28 11:05:47 
2003
--- sb_mboxtrain.py     Tue Oct 28 11:05:57 2003
***************
*** 179,183 ****
              raise
  
!     fcntl.lockf(f, fcntl.LOCK_UN)
      f.close()
      if loud:
--- 179,183 ----
              raise
  
!     fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_UN)
      f.close()
      if loud:
% 



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831864&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 16:18:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 16:18:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder
	menu item
Message-ID: 

Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item

Initial Comment:
RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam 
folder, and I have seen this requested several times on 
the lists.  I've come up with an initial patch to implement 
this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown.  It 
works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder 
context menu item, which means it prompts with a 
Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does 
nothing if the spam folder is already empty. 

This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but 
probably needs more wide-spread testing before being 
considered entirely stable.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 16:20:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 17:02:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder
	menu item
Message-ID: 

Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:18
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kpitt
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 3
Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item

Initial Comment:
RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam 
folder, and I have seen this requested several times on 
the lists.  I've come up with an initial patch to implement 
this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown.  It 
works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder 
context menu item, which means it prompts with a 
Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does 
nothing if the spam folder is already empty. 

This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but 
probably needs more wide-spread testing before being 
considered entirely stable.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 17:58:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 17:58:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830190 ] more flexibility in
	header options
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #830190, was opened at 2003-10-26 06:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: Source code 1.0a6
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jeff deifik (jdeifik)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: more flexibility in header options

Initial Comment:
I am using Eudora 6. It allows me to filter on value of
a header field, but not on the name of the header field.
For example,

X-Spambayes-Classification: ham

I can filter on 'ham', but not
'X-Spambayes-Classification:'
or 'X-Spambayes-Classification: ham'
since they includes the name of the header field.

It would be really nice if I could set 'ham' to be some
more unique name. Similiarily with 'unsure' and 'spam'.

If it is too much trouble to make it user-settable,
perhaps it
could be changed to 'spambayes-ham' or something else
less likely to appear in the header.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-29 11:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Sounds to me like spambayes now can't find your original 
configuration file (since you have overridden the default with 
the BAYESCUSTOMIZE envar).  Either set BAYESCUSTOMIZE 
to include the full path to both configuration files, or just put 
the headers options in the configuration file that you were 
using before (that has all the server information).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: jeff deifik (jdeifik)
Date: 2003-10-29 02:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=725890

When I set BAYESCUSTOMIZE, and I have a config file consisting
of:
[Headers]
header_spam_string = spambayes_spam
header_unsure_string = spambayes_unsure
header_ham_string = spambayes_ham

spambayes does not fully start up.
Rather than printing:
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 25 is proxying
smpt.comcast.net:25
Listener on port 110 is proxying mail.comcast.net:110
User interface url is http://localhost:8880/

It instead prints:
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta3, version 0.3 (September 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha3, version 0.03
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/

And needless to say, it doesn't work as it is not proxying the
ports.

This is with or without a configuration file being present
in the BAYESCUSTOMIZE path (which I specified as e:/j/mail)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-28 13:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You're after the 
options "Headers":"header_ham_string" "header_unsure_string"
and "header_spam_string".  The FAQ has details about setting 
and finding options.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830190&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Oct 28 19:28:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Oct 28 19:28:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832070 ] bsddb.error: (22,
	'Invalid argument')
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #832070, was opened at 2003-10-29 00:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: Source code 1.0a6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument')

Initial Comment:
I'm not able to start sb_server any more from its
directory (though it will start from an empty directory):

$ Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ?
    import spambayes.message
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py",
line 149, in ?
    msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py",
line 114, in __init__
    self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 53, in open
    return f(*args)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 36, in open_best
    return f(*args)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 18, in open_dbhash
    return bsddb.hashopen(*args)
bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument')

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 00:42:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 00:42:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832183 ] uninstall leaves turds
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #832183, was opened at 2003-10-29 16:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832183&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: uninstall leaves turds

Initial Comment:
Uninstalling SpamBayes apparently leaves lots of cruft
around.  I suspect the uninstaller is not doing the
DLLUnregisterServer thing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832183&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 00:44:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 00:44:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832185 ] Binary addin doesn't
	appear in Outlook addin list
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #832185, was opened at 2003-10-29 16:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832185&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Binary addin doesn't appear in Outlook addin list

Initial Comment:
Recent binary versions stopped appearing in the
"addins" list that Outlook has buried.  It used to do
this - it may have stopped working as soon as I started
registering in HKLM along with HKCU.
It never worked in the source-code version, and I'm not
sure why.
There are no known problems with it not appearing,
other than user confusion.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832185&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 03:09:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 03:11:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not
	filter mail moved by rules from inb
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 18:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kyramas
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 001-007
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb

Initial Comment:
Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to 
other folders based on email address of incoming mail. 
Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains 
in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the 
rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in 
the destination folder after the move). All folders
 
inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. 
When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in 
inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas)
Date: 2003-10-29 10:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=897174

I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS 
filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not 
move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails 
that are moved by email-rules).
Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly.
I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send 
a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background 
proccessing enabled.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this
problem.  Note that we know we have problems in this
scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make
sure you are using that before you attach the log.

Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem -
that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up
back in the inbox!  Everyone else seems to have the problem
that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders.  Please
correct me if I am wrong.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin)
Date: 2003-09-26 20:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=875205

I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and 
impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not 
moved.  My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 
professional.  I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and 
junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, 
but invariably they end up back in my inbox.  I have turned 
off my Rules, but it is still happening.  BTW, kudos for 
undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a 
great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' 
also).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: bill cann (newsguy)
Date: 2003-09-25 20:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=861868

I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I 
installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re-
establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the 
recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by 
Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. 
When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved 
from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and 
then subsequently being moved from these folders to the 
Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam)
Date: 2003-09-25 16:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=874251

Same thing happened to me as well.
But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in 
the com add-in manager.  I've removed the spambayes 
software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application 
folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook 
and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in.  
Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not 
help.  I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as 
spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic 
filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all.
If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it.
I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp-
2.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot)
Date: 2003-09-15 02:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=32629

I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my
inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as
spam/unsure never works for me. 

I have tried to select background processing. Including or
excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not
help either.

Outlook XP (German version)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems)
Date: 2003-09-12 02:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=864665

I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is 
still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version 
I used, 007).

Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately 
from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each 
of those folders represents a different email account.

I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to 
get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've 
also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it 
seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a 
feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 
folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the 
background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see 
if this works for sure.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-09 06:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version?  If not version 008, can you please try it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 05:19:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 05:21:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-785549 ] Can't enable
	SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager
Message-ID: 

Support Requests item #785549, was opened at 2003-08-08 18:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jomjom
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't enable SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager

Initial Comment:
I've been having problems with SpamBayes that I hope 
you can help me with.
 
It's been working superbly until today. Last night, our 
Exchange server was shut down. I think as a result of 
this, every time I would open Outlook it would crash. A 
dialog came up (I think it was an Outlook dialog) asking 
if I wanted to disable SpamBayes. I said yes, figuring I 
would just re-enable once Outlook was back up. After 
that, Outlook did in fact came back up, but ever since I 
have been unable to re-enable SpamBayes.
 
The symptom is that you go into the add-in manager, 
you click on SpamBayes (ie. there's a check mark), and 
exit the addin manager. If you go back in immediately, 
SpamBayes is UNCHECKED. Damn thing won't stay 
checked. Nothing I have tried allows me to enable 
SpamBayes.
 
I tried uninstalling, and reinstalling the latest version. I 
tried uninstalling, rebooting, and reinstalling. I tried 
uninstalling, removing all registry entries for SpamBayes, 
rebooting, and reinstalling. Nothing seems to work.
 
Have you seen this type of behavior before?
 
Lee Herman


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: moess (jomjom)
Date: 2003-10-29 10:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=897254

I have the same problem. Hoe can I re-enable SpamBayes in 
Outlook?
J. Moess

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Date: 2003-08-08 19:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=840726

Ooops. Just found the documentation regarding this exact 
issue. Sorry to bother you.

What a strange place for the list of diabled COM objects 
(under Help)....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 05:29:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 05:29:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or
	other CJK languages) message support
Message-ID: 

Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support

Initial Comment:
Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages.

o Unicode'ify text:
  For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends
  that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and
  multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be
  used.  Original tokenizer generates only bogus
meaningless
  text fragments for Japanese messages.

o Concatinate C/J lines.  
  In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding
  often breaks 'words'.

o Bigram of C/J characters.
  In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are
  not separated by character such as whitespace.
  Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require
heuristic
  algorithms using large corpus.
  Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate
  bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of
  hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J).

  N.B.:
  - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) 
    for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for
i-gram,
    where n is size of used character set.  On katakana & 
    hiragana n is approximately 100.  On kanzi it is
approx.
    5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese
    standards).  By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will
    generate very sparse and large database.

  - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by
    tokenizer.  Since most of basic kanzi words are of
1 or 2
    characters.
    Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded.

  - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word'
    but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As
run of
    hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to
    n-gram.

o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'?  A lot of
  punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with
  Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for
  compatibility, some of them are overlapped with
  subject_words_re).  Since many of them are also
  registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K
  character set standards.

Problems:

o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible.

o Only BMP range is supported.  Surrogates are not
recognized.

o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other
East-Asian messages.

o No batch tests.  This only aims at Japanese support.

Configuration:

o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set:
    [Tokenizer]
    replace_nonascii_chars: False



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Date: 2003-10-29 19:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=529503

OK. I'll test the code untill addition.

minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-10-21 12:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will 
get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy 
with other stuff at the moment!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Date: 2003-10-19 19:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=529503

fix for Korean message.
Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Date: 2003-10-17 18:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=529503

minor fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi)
Date: 2003-10-16 21:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=529503

> ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and
> multibyte character set both designated to GL,

Not 'designate'.  'Invoke' is correct.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 14:10:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:11:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806915 ] Hotmail "Recover From
	Spam" puts email into pst file
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #806915, was opened at 2003-09-15 19:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by image57
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst file

Initial Comment:
i have outlook xp at home with just hotmail as an 
account. outlook makes you have a pst file regardless if 
you use it or not. I have the possible spam going to a 
folder in the hotmail tree. when i hit recover from spam, it 
transports to the Personal Folder's Inbox, not back to the 
Hotmail Inbox.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-10-29 11:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Administrator\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Administrator\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 69 spam and 26 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 
32 bit (Intel)]
**********************************************
****
The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is 
zero
You must set both intervals before the timer will enable
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  SpamBayes 
Junk
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.376305ms
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' 
- (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 
0, -2147467259), None)
Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating
Moving and spam training message 'Reservation ID 3830285' -  
Training on message 'Reservation ID 3830285' -  trained as 
spam
Current version is 0.81, latest is 0.81.
Message 'Extended auto warranties-best coverage and great 
values' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'
Message 'Re: Losing weight impossible?   pge' had a Spam 
classification of 'Yes'
Message 'Receipt for your Auction Money Request' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'
Message 'You have received a credit card payment' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Check out hot pics of singles from your area' had a 
Spam classification of 'Yes'
Message 're: Hunter' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'
Message '=(' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Maybe it's Your Resume' had a Spam classification of 
'No'
Message 'RED's 4th Annual Halloween Bash - 10.31.2003' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation 
(#031022-900739)' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation 
(#031022-900745)' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation 
(#031022-900748)' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' 
had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL 
dial-up!' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Moving and spam training message 'Broadband low as $3.
05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' -  Training on message 
'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' -  
trained as spam
Message 'Tonight!!! - Miguel Migs / LTJ Bukem / Proton Radio' 
had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' 
had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Your Daily Feedback Report' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'
Message 'Fw: Fall Allergies and Exercise Induced Asthma' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'We help change your tomorrow' had a Spam 
classification of 'Yes'
Message 'Dice JobAlert for Agent Primary' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'
Message 'comments...' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - 
restoring to Inbox
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 
'comments...' -  Training on message 'comments...' -  trained 
as good



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 15:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a dupe of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=786212&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
although that bug doesn't specifically mention Hotmail.  If
possible, could you attempt this operation again, then
attach a log of that session to that bug - see the
"troubleshooting guide" for details on how to locate the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 14:12:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:13:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves
	email back to wrong inbox folder
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 04:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by image57
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

Initial Comment:
Hi

In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" 
from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail 
back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder.

I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook.

One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder 
under Personal Folders.

Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is 
configured only for the imap-Inbox.

Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap.

The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back 
to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the 
Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders.

Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 

Regards



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-10-29 11:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

i think the key here is the following line in my log:

Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - 
restoring to Inbox
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 
'comments...' -  Training on message 'comments...' -  trained 
as good


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-15 22:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Opps.  Think, Tony, think!  I recovered a message that hadn't 
been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume 
that is why.

Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for 
messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam.  (I think 
maybe another tracker has this request).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-15 22:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other 
folders on Exchange.  Never noticed before, since I usually 
only filter the Inbox.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-07 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test
accounts.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 16:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I
thought it did.  However, I am guessing the problem is that
we can't save properties on the IMAP message.  I have just
opened another bug
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which when fixed should also solve this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Date: 2003-08-25 06:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=841583

This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know
how to fix at this stage.  If you follow the "troubleshooting
guide"  - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html.
You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which
generally fixes all toolbar related issues.  If it doesn't,
please reopen this bug giving further details.

We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it
continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the
spambayes-announce list -
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-24 23:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried
this (and set the status back to Open)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Oct 29 14:13:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 14:13:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806915 ] Hotmail "Recover From
	Spam" puts email into pst file
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #806915, was opened at 2003-09-15 19:56
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by image57
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
>Status: Open
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst file

Initial Comment:
i have outlook xp at home with just hotmail as an 
account. outlook makes you have a pst file regardless if 
you use it or not. I have the possible spam going to a 
folder in the hotmail tree. when i hit recover from spam, it 
transports to the Personal Folder's Inbox, not back to the 
Hotmail Inbox.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-10-29 11:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Administrator\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Administrator\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 69 spam and 26 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 
32 bit (Intel)]
**********************************************
****
The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is 
zero
You must set both intervals before the timer will enable
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  SpamBayes 
Junk
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.376305ms
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' 
- (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 
0, -2147467259), None)
Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating
Moving and spam training message 'Reservation ID 3830285' -  
Training on message 'Reservation ID 3830285' -  trained as 
spam
Current version is 0.81, latest is 0.81.
Message 'Extended auto warranties-best coverage and great 
values' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'
Message 'Re: Losing weight impossible?   pge' had a Spam 
classification of 'Yes'
Message 'Receipt for your Auction Money Request' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'
Message 'You have received a credit card payment' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Check out hot pics of singles from your area' had a 
Spam classification of 'Yes'
Message 're: Hunter' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'
Message '=(' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Maybe it's Your Resume' had a Spam classification of 
'No'
Message 'RED's 4th Annual Halloween Bash - 10.31.2003' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation 
(#031022-900739)' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation 
(#031022-900745)' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation 
(#031022-900748)' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' 
had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL 
dial-up!' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Moving and spam training message 'Broadband low as $3.
05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' -  Training on message 
'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' -  
trained as spam
Message 'Tonight!!! - Miguel Migs / LTJ Bukem / Proton Radio' 
had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' 
had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'Your Daily Feedback Report' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'
Message 'Fw: Fall Allergies and Exercise Induced Asthma' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'We help change your tomorrow' had a Spam 
classification of 'Yes'
Message 'Dice JobAlert for Agent Primary' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'
Message 'comments...' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - 
restoring to Inbox
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 
'comments...' -  Training on message 'comments...' -  trained 
as good



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 15:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a dupe of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=786212&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
although that bug doesn't specifically mention Hotmail.  If
possible, could you attempt this operation again, then
attach a log of that session to that bug - see the
"troubleshooting guide" for details on how to locate the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 16:22:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 16:22:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833346 ] Error upon exiting
	Outlook
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833346, was opened at 2003-10-30 16:22
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott (secclest)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Error upon exiting Outlook

Initial Comment:
Every time I exit Outlook I am greeted with

?Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs 
to close.  We are sorry for the inconvenience.?


Error signature:

AppName: outlook.exe	 AppVer: 10.0.4510.0
	 ModName: dccmsp32.dll
ModVer: 10.0.2000.929	 Offset: 00005346

I am running Windows XP Pro/Outlook XP both with the 
latest and greatest patches and updates.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 19:04:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:04:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833433 ] Main web page link is
	broken
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833433, was opened at 2003-10-30 16:04
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833433&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Main web page link is broken

Initial Comment:
On main web page: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/

The link to SF Project page is broken.

It should go to something like: 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/spambayes/

Currently it is going to:
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/sourceforge.net/projects/spambayes/index.html

which fails.





----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833433&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 19:11:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:13:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833434 ] Monitors Inboxes for all
	Mailboxes
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833434, was opened at 2003-10-30 16:11
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Monitors Inboxes for all Mailboxes

Initial Comment:
When using Outlook XP with Exchange and have multiple
mailboxes through a single exchange server.

Spambayes is monitoring the Inboxes for all of the
mailboxes selected.  Would like to be able to select it
so it only monitors one Inbox.  Have tried to select
only my inbox but always scans all the inboxes.

In Outlook Select:
Tools -> Email Accounts
Create a new or modify an existing Exchange account.

Select Change on the Exchange type account

Select More Settings:

Select the Advanced tab in the Microsoft Exchange
Server box

Add additional mailboxes to the account.

Save and close.

Install SpamBayes.  Probably still occurs if Spambayes
was already installed.

SpamBayes will monitor the Inbox for ALL of the
Mailboxes that are in the Exchange account.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 19:18:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:18:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833439 ]
	default_Base_customize.ini is confusing
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833439, was opened at 2003-10-31 11:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833439&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: default_Base_customize.ini is confusing

Initial Comment:
The one in the "program" directory is misleading - it
is never used, but only used as the default for new
users.  It should be renamed.

The comments in this should also be updated, to remove
confusion about what INI file is what (as the user ends
up with a few .INI files in their "data" dir)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833439&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 19:19:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:19:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833439 ]
	default_bayes_customize.ini is confusing
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833439, was opened at 2003-10-31 11:18
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833439&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: default_bayes_customize.ini is confusing

Initial Comment:
The one in the "program" directory is misleading - it
is never used, but only used as the default for new
users.  It should be renamed.

The comments in this should also be updated, to remove
confusion about what INI file is what (as the user ends
up with a few .INI files in their "data" dir)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833439&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 19:25:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:25:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833434 ] Monitors Inboxes for all
	Mailboxes
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833434, was opened at 2003-10-31 11:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Monitors Inboxes for all Mailboxes

Initial Comment:
When using Outlook XP with Exchange and have multiple
mailboxes through a single exchange server.

Spambayes is monitoring the Inboxes for all of the
mailboxes selected.  Would like to be able to select it
so it only monitors one Inbox.  Have tried to select
only my inbox but always scans all the inboxes.

In Outlook Select:
Tools -> Email Accounts
Create a new or modify an existing Exchange account.

Select Change on the Exchange type account

Select More Settings:

Select the Advanced tab in the Microsoft Exchange
Server box

Add additional mailboxes to the account.

Save and close.

Install SpamBayes.  Probably still occurs if Spambayes
was already installed.

SpamBayes will monitor the Inbox for ALL of the
Mailboxes that are in the Exchange account.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-31 11:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The intention is that the initial Wizard would offer to
watch all Inboxes, but there should have been a "check-box"
against each inbox, allowing you to de-select any your don't
want to watch.

Further, in the main SpamBayes Manager dialog's 'Filter'
tab, you can specify what folders to watch.  Clicking on
Browse should allow you to select or unselect folders.

It may be possible that the initial wizard, when selecting
the folders, did not display checkmarks - can you recall if
this was true or not?  If you are willing, I can tell you
how to reset the system so the Wizard pops up next time you
start so you can check.
Are you using Windows XP? (does Outlook XP run on other than
Windows XP?  I'm not sure)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702

From dave at ion.co.uk  Tue Oct 21 08:49:35 2003
From: dave at ion.co.uk (Dave Sedgwick)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:26:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes speed keys
Message-ID: 


Wow, awesome software you guys.

One little request...
When Spambayes is installed on XP home, Outlook 2000, it seems to mess up
the speed keys (or at least the Alt-S speed key).

Normally, when composing an e-mail message one can use Alt-S to send the
message.  Once Spambayes is installed, Alt-S appears to select the 'Send'
button, however not click/execute it.

Any ideas how to fix this?

thanks, D

_______________

Dave Sedgwick, dave@ion.co.uk
IT Consultant


From Knut at klo.no  Tue Oct 21 21:33:24 2003
From: Knut at klo.no (Knut Olav Klo)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:26:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Just wanna tell you that Install failed on Windows
	XP Pro English with Office Pro Norwegian but...
Message-ID: <6107CD721E96AB47AB71759E9625851A0E2752@ns1.klo.no>

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 10838 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031022/7fa0c634/attachment-0001.gif
From markdall at hotmail.com  Thu Oct 23 19:42:43 2003
From: markdall at hotmail.com (Mark Allen)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:26:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Strange error message when trying to install 0.7
	or 0.8.1 for Outlook
Message-ID: 

Access violation at address 0040C516. Write of address 00414000.

 

Has anyone else seen this? I've downloaded the files several times, to no
avail. 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031023/be354fae/attachment.html
From bethgb at rcn.com  Wed Oct 29 10:37:35 2003
From: bethgb at rcn.com (Beth Gold-Bernstein)
Date: Thu Oct 30 19:26:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] SpamBayes Stopped working
Message-ID: <000a01c39e32$93644000$6401a8c0@Bethnotebook>

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5675 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031029/8f5246dc/attachment.jpe
From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 23:47:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 23:47:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work
	after reset
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by w_hughes
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 04:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is the file you requested. However you should know that 
I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to 
retrain the database.  It had no effect. I am going to retrain 
it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This appears to be a duplicate of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which mentions the same error that appears in your log.  The
only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the
"Training" tab, and do a complete re-train.  If you could
possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db"
before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it
directly to me, or attach it here.

However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the
toolbars.  The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating
new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we
expect after clobbering outcmd.dat.  Are there any messages
regarding toolbars in subsequent startups?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-26 19:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I 
was running version 6.xx.  I installed the latest version 
avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and 
deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. 
Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the 
toolbar does not work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-24 16:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering 
messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the 
fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat.  Toolbar 
still does not work.  If there are tests you would like me to 
run to help, please let me know.  w_hughes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 23:52:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 23:52:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work
	after reset
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by w_hughes
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 04:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

For some reason I got an invalid file type error when 
submitting  the db file using its original name so I am trying it 
again zipped.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 04:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is the file you requested. However you should know that 
I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to 
retrain the database.  It had no effect. I am going to retrain 
it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This appears to be a duplicate of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which mentions the same error that appears in your log.  The
only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the
"Training" tab, and do a complete re-train.  If you could
possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db"
before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it
directly to me, or attach it here.

However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the
toolbars.  The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating
new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we
expect after clobbering outcmd.dat.  Are there any messages
regarding toolbars in subsequent startups?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-26 19:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I 
was running version 6.xx.  I installed the latest version 
avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and 
deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. 
Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the 
toolbar does not work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-24 16:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering 
messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the 
fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat.  Toolbar 
still does not work.  If there are tests you would like me to 
run to help, please let me know.  w_hughes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Oct 30 23:59:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Oct 30 23:59:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work
	after reset
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 04:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by w_hughes
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 04:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is 
almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to 
send it to you directly. Please advise.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 04:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

For some reason I got an invalid file type error when 
submitting  the db file using its original name so I am trying it 
again zipped.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 04:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is the file you requested. However you should know that 
I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to 
retrain the database.  It had no effect. I am going to retrain 
it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-26 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This appears to be a duplicate of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which mentions the same error that appears in your log.  The
only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the
"Training" tab, and do a complete re-train.  If you could
possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db"
before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it
directly to me, or attach it here.

However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the
toolbars.  The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating
new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we
expect after clobbering outcmd.dat.  Are there any messages
regarding toolbars in subsequent startups?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-26 19:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I 
was running version 6.xx.  I installed the latest version 
avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and 
deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. 
Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the 
toolbar does not work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-24 16:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering 
messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the 
fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat.  Toolbar 
still does not work.  If there are tests you would like me to 
run to help, please let me know.  w_hughes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 31 00:59:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 31 00:59:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work
	after reset
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-23 14:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset

Initial Comment:
I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your 
instructions about removing it and then I checked the 
log file for an error. See the attached log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-31 16:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 15:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is 
almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to 
send it to you directly. Please advise.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 15:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

For some reason I got an invalid file type error when 
submitting  the db file using its original name so I am trying it 
again zipped.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-31 15:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is the file you requested. However you should know that 
I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to 
retrain the database.  It had no effect. I am going to retrain 
it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-27 10:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This appears to be a duplicate of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which mentions the same error that appears in your log.  The
only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the
"Training" tab, and do a complete re-train.  If you could
possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db"
before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it
directly to me, or attach it here.

However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the
toolbars.  The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating
new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we
expect after clobbering outcmd.dat.  Are there any messages
regarding toolbars in subsequent startups?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-27 06:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I 
was running version 6.xx.  I installed the latest version 
avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and 
deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. 
Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the 
toolbar does not work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes)
Date: 2003-10-25 02:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=892918

Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering 
messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the 
fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat.  Toolbar 
still does not work.  If there are tests you would like me to 
run to help, please let me know.  w_hughes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 31 11:58:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 31 11:58:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833751 ] filter dies after a
	processing a few emails
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833751, was opened at 2003-10-31 11:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833751&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: Source code 1.0a6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob s Youruncle (chumpmeister)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: filter dies after a processing a few emails

Initial Comment:
I'm running Spambayes-1.0a6 on RedHat 9 (with python
2.2.2) using the POP3 proxy. I have upgraded from
v1.0a4. The filter works fine for about the first 15-20
of 100 emails, but seems to die at that point and then
let everything through.

I see the following message at the command prompt where
I started Spambayes.

----
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 440, in onRetr
    msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName())
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py",
line 193, in setId
    msginfoDB._getState(self)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py",
line 131, in _getState
    (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()]
  File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in
__getitem__
    f = StringIO(self.dict[key])
error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315')
----

Spambayes-1.0a4 seemed to work OK, but needed
restarting every now and then.

thanks... 

PS. Non of the email that gets through when the filter
dies, shows up in the review/classify screens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833751&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 31 13:08:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 31 13:09:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during
	message download
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-12 23:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jjarrett
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook hangs during message download

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett)
Date: 2003-10-31 12:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=899118

I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 
2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin 
binary 0.81.

Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes 
just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off 
to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not 
hang.

I don't understand how the Timer would help...

John T. Jarrett
john@logontexas.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-22 19:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can the other people having trouble with this let me know
how the "background processing" option works for them?  The
original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for
him.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf)
Date: 2003-10-22 19:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=363795

I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message 
number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail 
then reenable spambayes to get my mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch)
Date: 2003-09-19 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311170

I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove 
all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes 
away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to 
specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - 
but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-09-17 16:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it 
appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured.  I 
have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds 
but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be 
successful.

I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been 
cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So 
looking good.

The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages 
that I would have thought were previously caught. That 
needs mor investigation however.

Keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Hood (john_hood)
Date: 2003-09-17 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=834988

Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or 
when the spam folder has a lot in it.  Spambayes also hangs 
when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a 
modem.  Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back.  
Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then 
re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix 
the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users.   
Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines.  25 
users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above.  
Users love it.  If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you 
would be gods.

Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" 
and "Timer"  There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, 
can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install 
folder, in the site docs, or here.  Ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch)
Date: 2003-09-15 16:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311170

I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on 
Outlook 2000 and WIN98.  Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414.

It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while 
(1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa)
Date: 2003-09-14 19:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=410520

I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 
9/12/2003.  Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 
messages.  I turn off SpamBytes and same problem.  I've 
uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem.  Prior to the 
installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine.

Paul
paleroy@pacbell.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-04 18:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". 
I suspect this will fix it.  However, it is very strange,
and still not reported by anyone else I can recall.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-09-04 03:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists.

If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on 
it frequently hanges part way through the downloading.

I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at 
message 31 of xxx.  THis occurs too frequently to be 
coincidental in my opinion.

If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the 
messages.

If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then 
filter them I again have no problems.

HELP HELP HELP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-08-07 04:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still 
occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails 
can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the 
same email (ie cout of xx of yy)  I have not been able to see 
what actual email causes the problem at this stage.
Running the filter after a download works fine.
The log does not seem to show anything conclusive.
I do have McAfee running - current version.  

I will try disabling it next time I get a hang.  Note, the 
incidence  seems less frequent than originally reported.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 18:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html
seems to blame McAfee.  Is anyone else seeing this bug
running McAfee?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-04 10:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual 
desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it
filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly.
It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not
work correctly on virtual desktops. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 31 14:51:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 31 14:51:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832070 ] bsddb.error: (22,
	'Invalid argument')
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #832070, was opened at 2003-10-29 00:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by spboulet
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: Source code 1.0a6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument')

Initial Comment:
I'm not able to start sb_server any more from its
directory (though it will start from an empty directory):

$ Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ?
    import spambayes.message
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py",
line 149, in ?
    msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py",
line 114, in __init__
    self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 53, in open
    return f(*args)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 36, in open_best
    return f(*args)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 18, in open_dbhash
    return bsddb.hashopen(*args)
bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument')

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet)
Date: 2003-10-31 19:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6988

This is a wild guess, but I wonder if my problem could be
related to changing my linux headers version to 2.4.21 from
2.4.19, recompiling glibc, but not recompiling python.

Stephen

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 31 15:20:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 31 15:20:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833861 ] invalid configuration
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833861, was opened at 2003-10-31 12:20
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: james pepper (pepperink)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: invalid configuration

Initial Comment:
I am using Outlook 2000, on a new Dell, with XP.

When I first installed version "081" of Spambayes, it 
worked flawlessly, and beautifully, too.

Then it suddenly gave me the error "invalid 
configuration" and "you must configure spam folder." 
When I attempted to run the "configuration manager," 
nothing happened. 

I have tried the suggestions in the troubleshooting page. 
I have uninstalled Spambayes and reinstalled. I installed 
the previous version. I installed Outlook 2003 (don't like 
it much). Uninstalled Outlook 2003 and reinstalled 
Outlook 2000. 

Always with the same result. (Also, the "junk e-mail" 
folder is not created during installation.)

Spambayes is a great program. I hope you can help me 
make it work!

james pepper, California Central Coast
jaypea@earthlink.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Oct 31 19:21:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Oct 31 19:22:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833434 ] Monitors Inboxes for all
	Mailboxes
Message-ID: 

Bugs item #833434, was opened at 2003-10-30 16:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by happycamp
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Outlook 008
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Monitors Inboxes for all Mailboxes

Initial Comment:
When using Outlook XP with Exchange and have multiple
mailboxes through a single exchange server.

Spambayes is monitoring the Inboxes for all of the
mailboxes selected.  Would like to be able to select it
so it only monitors one Inbox.  Have tried to select
only my inbox but always scans all the inboxes.

In Outlook Select:
Tools -> Email Accounts
Create a new or modify an existing Exchange account.

Select Change on the Exchange type account

Select More Settings:

Select the Advanced tab in the Microsoft Exchange
Server box

Add additional mailboxes to the account.

Save and close.

Install SpamBayes.  Probably still occurs if Spambayes
was already installed.

SpamBayes will monitor the Inbox for ALL of the
Mailboxes that are in the Exchange account.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Date: 2003-10-31 16:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=661531

Well after selecting the other users box and then
deselecting it stopped monitoring their inboxes.  Or at
least it appears that it has.

So before it was not showing them as selected but it was
grabbing the email from their inboxes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-10-30 16:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The intention is that the initial Wizard would offer to
watch all Inboxes, but there should have been a "check-box"
against each inbox, allowing you to de-select any your don't
want to watch.

Further, in the main SpamBayes Manager dialog's 'Filter'
tab, you can specify what folders to watch.  Clicking on
Browse should allow you to select or unselect folders.

It may be possible that the initial wizard, when selecting
the folders, did not display checkmarks - can you recall if
this was true or not?  If you are willing, I can tell you
how to reset the system so the Wizard pops up next time you
start so you can check.
Are you using Windows XP? (does Outlook XP run on other than
Windows XP?  I'm not sure)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702