From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 04:40:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 04:40:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 05:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by basil_hussain You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Basil Hussain (basil_hussain) Date: 2003-12-01 09:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=918906 I have been experiencing the same problem with Outlook hanging during download of messages. I tried setting SpamBayes to use background filtering, but that didn't help. I think it is definitely something to do with having McAfee VirusScan installed. I have VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 installed. I uninstalled the E-mail Scan feature (which integrates with Outlook) and all has been working well. This was with Outlook 2000 SP-3 9.0.0.6627. PGP Freeware 7.0.3 (with Outlook plug-in) is also installed, but seems to co- exist fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-10-31 18:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin binary 0.81. Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not hang. I don't understand how the Timer would help... John T. Jarrett john@logontexas.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-23 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can the other people having trouble with this let me know how the "background processing" option works for them? The original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2003-10-23 01:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail then reenable spambayes to get my mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-19 19:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-17 22:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 22:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-15 01:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 00:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 09:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 10:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 00:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 04:54:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 04:54:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-800282 ] first mail not filtered after standby Message-ID: Bugs item #800282, was opened at 2003-09-04 07:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jshardlo You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: first mail not filtered after standby Initial Comment: When waking up the pc (win2000 hibernate) spambayes/ outlook plugin doesn't filter the inbox. When manually starting the filtering process (SpamBayes Manager -> Filter Now -> Start filtering (Perform all filter actions, restrict to unread mail + mail never previously spam filtered) all spam mails except the first one in the inbox will be filtered and moved to the spam folder. The first one afterwards has a 0% spam score. When moving this mail via "Delete as spam", the same E-Mail gets a 100% spam score! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Shardlow (jshardlo) Date: 2003-12-01 09:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=83019 I am using Outlook Plugin 0.81. I also see this behaviour when I start Outlook in the morning. I always have a list of SPAMs in the Inbox. The one at the *bottom* of the list always seems to be scored 0% and therefore stay in the Inbox. It correctly identifies every other message! If I leave it running overnight it get 100% of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephan Sickert (terminator212) Date: 2003-09-09 07:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=858841 I checked the behaviour with version 008 of the outlook plugin. The bug, that the first mail isn't filtered, seems not to be present any more. But the plugin doesn't filter the inbox after waking up the PC, so I have to start filtering manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr) Date: 2003-09-08 12:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=724871 yes - it still happens. if you delete the mail from the spam-folder, and then UNDO the action, the value is updated correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 12:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please see if this happens with the new 008 version? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=800282&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 08:41:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 08:41:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827239 ] Cannot initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #827239, was opened at 2003-10-21 01:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ponbrabant You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot initialize Initial Comment: hi there, my app gets the can't initialize whenever I restart Outlook. I then enable through the toolbars and the toolbar works, but no filtering occurs. Thanks for your help! Andrew ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: S ten Thije (ponbrabant) Date: 2003-12-01 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921368 I had a a similar problem using SpamBayes in Outlook 2000 SP3 on an Exchange 2000 server. In offline mode it worked, online it didn't, so I figured it had to do with somthing on the server. As it turned out it had to do with having two mailbox accounts enabled at the same time, my own and one of a collegue. SpamBayes couldn't choose between the two. After I manually choose to only monitor my own mailbox SpamBayes could initialise. Kind regards, Stan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Date: 2003-11-05 21:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891212 I tried your suggestions, thanks, but It didn't work. Interestingly enough, it does work if I'm working in Offline mode of Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 00:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you try re-configuring the "filter" folders via the SpamBayes manager, or if that fails, reboot? For some reason, SpamBayes is having trouble with Outlook trying to watch the folders you have configured, and Outlook is giving its generic "I'm kinda screwed up" error. Re-select *all* filter folders, and let me know if that solves the problem. If not, please reset this status back to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 10:39:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 10:40:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-852137 ] sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Message-ID: Bugs item #852137, was opened at 2003-12-01 15:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Initial Comment: When I classify through sb_imapfilter.py, I am getting an AssertionError. Any ideas? I am using spambayes from CVS; courier IMAP; python 2.2.2; and a just-deleted database. See below for commands, and further below for database dumps. [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is a new database Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.Ham ************** 14 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.Spam ******************************************** 44 trained. Persisting hammie.db state in database Training took 2.87554502487 seconds, 58 messages were trained [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -c SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 44 spam and 10 ham Loading database hammie.db... Done. Classifying *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 821, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 676, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 595, in Filter evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 11:52:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 11:52:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852175 ] Missing "Recover from Spam" button Message-ID: Support Requests item #852175, was opened at 2003-12-01 11:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852175&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dennis Grinberg (skipole) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Missing "Recover from Spam" button Initial Comment: I am current running version .81 of the plug-in on Outlook 2003 on Windows XP Pro. For the last couple of months, the ?Recover from Spam? button has been missing most of the time. Sometimes it appears, I recover some mail, change folders and it is gone when I get back to the Possible Spam folder. For the last several weeks it hasn?t been appearing at all. I deleted the toolbar, wiped out outcmd.dat and tried some other ideas but nothing helped. The contents of the log file, after deleting the toolbar and outcmd.dat follows: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dgrinberg\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dgrinberg\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 4036 spam and 170 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Spam Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 83.0346ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 14:34:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 14:35:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-12 21:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leroypa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-12-01 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I to have been having this problem (see previous posts). Like Basil, I to am running McAfee Virus Scan, but what I did was to filter only the 'Inbox' and not it's sub-folders as well as turning on 'background filtering'. Don't need to filter Inbox sub-folders as Outlook rules is setup to move messages I know I want to these folders. I also find that Spambytes does run slow and it does look like at times it is 'running into' Outlook processing. Thanks, PL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Basil Hussain (basil_hussain) Date: 2003-12-01 01:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=918906 I have been experiencing the same problem with Outlook hanging during download of messages. I tried setting SpamBayes to use background filtering, but that didn't help. I think it is definitely something to do with having McAfee VirusScan installed. I have VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 installed. I uninstalled the E-mail Scan feature (which integrates with Outlook) and all has been working well. This was with Outlook 2000 SP-3 9.0.0.6627. PGP Freeware 7.0.3 (with Outlook plug-in) is also installed, but seems to co- exist fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-10-31 10:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin binary 0.81. Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not hang. I don't understand how the Timer would help... John T. Jarrett john@logontexas.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-22 17:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can the other people having trouble with this let me know how the "background processing" option works for them? The original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2003-10-22 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail then reenable spambayes to get my mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-19 11:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-17 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 11:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 14:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 02:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 08:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 18:32:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 18:32:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852175 ] Missing "Recover from Spam" button Message-ID: Support Requests item #852175, was opened at 2003-12-02 05:52 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852175&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dennis Grinberg (skipole) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Missing "Recover from Spam" button Initial Comment: I am current running version .81 of the plug-in on Outlook 2003 on Windows XP Pro. For the last couple of months, the ?Recover from Spam? button has been missing most of the time. Sometimes it appears, I recover some mail, change folders and it is gone when I get back to the Possible Spam folder. For the last several weeks it hasn?t been appearing at all. I deleted the toolbar, wiped out outcmd.dat and tried some other ideas but nothing helped. The contents of the log file, after deleting the toolbar and outcmd.dat follows: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dgrinberg\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dgrinberg\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 4036 spam and 170 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Spam Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 83.0346ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-02 12:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you sure it simply isn't being hidden by Outlook since the full toolbar doesn't fit on the screen? If the toolbar doesn't fit, Outlook removes as many of the buttons as necessary and places them in a little drop-down menu (looks like a little down arrow) at the end of the toolbar. Typically this is where the 'missing' buttons can be found. You can avoid the problem by moving the toolbar to somewhere it will always have enough space. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 18:34:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 18:34:52 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-852137 ] sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Message-ID: Bugs item #852137, was opened at 2003-12-02 04:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Initial Comment: When I classify through sb_imapfilter.py, I am getting an AssertionError. Any ideas? I am using spambayes from CVS; courier IMAP; python 2.2.2; and a just-deleted database. See below for commands, and further below for database dumps. [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is a new database Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.Ham ************** 14 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.Spam ******************************************** 44 trained. Persisting hammie.db state in database Training took 2.87554502487 seconds, 58 messages were trained [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -c SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 44 spam and 10 ham Loading database hammie.db... Done. Classifying *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 821, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 676, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 595, in Filter evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-02 12:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As per Tim Stone's message on spambayes@python.org: Removing the messageinfo db and not the stats db is the *cause*of this problem. imapfilter relies on the messageinfo db to tell it which messages it should train on and which it has already processed. By deleting that, but not your stats (hammie) db, you're in for all sorts of trouble. You need to delete both if you want to start afresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 1 19:04:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 1 19:04:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852387 ] Spambayes stops working Message-ID: Support Requests item #852387, was opened at 2003-12-02 00:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes stops working Initial Comment: I do not know what happened, but Spambayes was working great, then stopped! I tried uninstall and redownloading and reinstall, but it made no difference. Even after uninstall and before the reinstall, the "Delete as Spam" Icon and the "Spambayes" drop down box were there, but clicking on "Delete as Spam" did nothing, and there was no drop down on the spambayes key. I used to get a drop down box re: the manager. What happened? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 01:45:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 01:46:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852387 ] Spambayes stops working Message-ID: Support Requests item #852387, was opened at 2003-12-01 16:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jaxjaguar You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes stops working Initial Comment: I do not know what happened, but Spambayes was working great, then stopped! I tried uninstall and redownloading and reinstall, but it made no difference. Even after uninstall and before the reinstall, the "Delete as Spam" Icon and the "Spambayes" drop down box were there, but clicking on "Delete as Spam" did nothing, and there was no drop down on the spambayes key. I used to get a drop down box re: the manager. What happened? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nick (jaxjaguar) Date: 2003-12-01 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892819 I was running the service and it stopped working on me a few last weekend. It had some strange coding errors and was not allowing complete email downloads. Since I am not a coder and did not know how to de-bug, I installed PopFile. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 08:27:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 08:27:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-852598 ] Date and Toolbar changes Message-ID: Bugs item #852598, was opened at 2003-12-02 07:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852598&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Haymo Henry (haymohenry) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Date and Toolbar changes Initial Comment: Bug report: 1) After installing SpamBayes, the "Customize Outlook Today" button in the "Outlook Today" does not work any more. 2) It confuses dates/reminders set in the Calendar on the "Outlook Today" window. The calendar itself is stable. After a day, the dates show zup correctly again. Best regards from Costa Rica, Haymo Log file (so far): Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 22 spam and 784 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-Mail Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852598&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 11:56:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 11:56:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852175 ] Missing "Recover from Spam" button Message-ID: Support Requests item #852175, was opened at 2003-12-01 11:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by skipole You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852175&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dennis Grinberg (skipole) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Missing "Recover from Spam" button Initial Comment: I am current running version .81 of the plug-in on Outlook 2003 on Windows XP Pro. For the last couple of months, the ?Recover from Spam? button has been missing most of the time. Sometimes it appears, I recover some mail, change folders and it is gone when I get back to the Possible Spam folder. For the last several weeks it hasn?t been appearing at all. I deleted the toolbar, wiped out outcmd.dat and tried some other ideas but nothing helped. The contents of the log file, after deleting the toolbar and outcmd.dat follows: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dgrinberg\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dgrinberg\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 4036 spam and 170 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Spam Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 83.0346ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Dennis Grinberg (skipole) Date: 2003-12-02 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921507 I am sure that the problem is not due to lack of space for the toolbar. That was the first thing I checked. Thank you for suggesting it though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-01 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you sure it simply isn't being hidden by Outlook since the full toolbar doesn't fit on the screen? If the toolbar doesn't fit, Outlook removes as many of the buttons as necessary and places them in a little drop-down menu (looks like a little down arrow) at the end of the toolbar. Typically this is where the 'missing' buttons can be found. You can avoid the problem by moving the toolbar to somewhere it will always have enough space. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852175&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 14:24:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 14:24:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-852137 ] sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Message-ID: Bugs item #852137, was opened at 2003-12-01 15:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tonylownds You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Initial Comment: When I classify through sb_imapfilter.py, I am getting an AssertionError. Any ideas? I am using spambayes from CVS; courier IMAP; python 2.2.2; and a just-deleted database. See below for commands, and further below for database dumps. [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is a new database Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.Ham ************** 14 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.Spam ******************************************** 44 trained. Persisting hammie.db state in database Training took 2.87554502487 seconds, 58 messages were trained [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -c SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 44 spam and 10 ham Loading database hammie.db... Done. Classifying *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 821, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 676, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 595, in Filter evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Date: 2003-12-02 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=24100 I think this should be re-opened. Please look at the command below, included in the original report, carefully: [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db That command removes hammie.db as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-01 23:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As per Tim Stone's message on spambayes@python.org: Removing the messageinfo db and not the stats db is the *cause*of this problem. imapfilter relies on the messageinfo db to tell it which messages it should train on and which it has already processed. By deleting that, but not your stats (hammie) db, you're in for all sorts of trouble. You need to delete both if you want to start afresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 15:00:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 15:01:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-12 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jjarrett You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-12-02 14:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I tried leroypa's suggestion yesterday and Outlook has not yet hung again after receiving hundreds of messages and filtering them to dozens of folders through half a dozen email accounts. McAfee Virus Scan is running and I haven't seen a problem since I turned Spam Bayes back on yesterday. Again, all I did was tell Spam Bayes to ONLY filter the Inbox. I assume since Outlook puts the emails into the Inbox and then applies the Rules moving them to other folders, having Spam Bayes filter them in the Inbox then filter them again in sub-folders was somehow creating the problem. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-12-01 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I to have been having this problem (see previous posts). Like Basil, I to am running McAfee Virus Scan, but what I did was to filter only the 'Inbox' and not it's sub-folders as well as turning on 'background filtering'. Don't need to filter Inbox sub-folders as Outlook rules is setup to move messages I know I want to these folders. I also find that Spambytes does run slow and it does look like at times it is 'running into' Outlook processing. Thanks, PL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Basil Hussain (basil_hussain) Date: 2003-12-01 03:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=918906 I have been experiencing the same problem with Outlook hanging during download of messages. I tried setting SpamBayes to use background filtering, but that didn't help. I think it is definitely something to do with having McAfee VirusScan installed. I have VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 installed. I uninstalled the E-mail Scan feature (which integrates with Outlook) and all has been working well. This was with Outlook 2000 SP-3 9.0.0.6627. PGP Freeware 7.0.3 (with Outlook plug-in) is also installed, but seems to co- exist fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-10-31 12:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin binary 0.81. Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not hang. I don't understand how the Timer would help... John T. Jarrett john@logontexas.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-22 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can the other people having trouble with this let me know how the "background processing" option works for them? The original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2003-10-22 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail then reenable spambayes to get my mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-19 13:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-17 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 13:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 16:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 19:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 03:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 04:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 19:59:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 19:59:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-14 08:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by twbanks You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Trevor Banks (twbanks) Date: 2003-12-02 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922526 I'm running the compiled Outlook add-in, and am having the same issue. However, it doesn't always do this. Occasionally it leaves messages so they get downloaded again, other times it deletes them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 05:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log for a session where this happens. I'm hoping there is something in there related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-26 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 20:13:34 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 20:13:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-15 02:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd still really like a log from a session where this happens ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Trevor Banks (twbanks) Date: 2003-12-03 11:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922526 I'm running the compiled Outlook add-in, and am having the same issue. However, it doesn't always do this. Occasionally it leaves messages so they get downloaded again, other times it deletes them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-27 23:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log for a session where this happens. I'm hoping there is something in there related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-27 06:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 2 20:57:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 20:57:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-852137 ] sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Message-ID: Bugs item #852137, was opened at 2003-12-02 04:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Initial Comment: When I classify through sb_imapfilter.py, I am getting an AssertionError. Any ideas? I am using spambayes from CVS; courier IMAP; python 2.2.2; and a just-deleted database. See below for commands, and further below for database dumps. [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is a new database Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.Ham ************** 14 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.Spam ******************************************** 44 trained. Persisting hammie.db state in database Training took 2.87554502487 seconds, 58 messages were trained [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -c SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 44 spam and 10 ham Loading database hammie.db... Done. Classifying *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 821, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 676, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 595, in Filter evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-03 14:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry, I missed that (was that in the mailing list post, too? I must have missed it twice). So there's something wrong then with it reporting that it trained on 58 messages, but having the db only have 54. If you use the web interface and look at the "stats" page, how many messages does it report there? (That goes off the messageinfo db rather than hammie.db). If you use the move_trained_[sp|h]am_to_folder options, do all the messages get moved? I'm not sure whether the problem here is that it's not actually training all those messages, or that something is going wrong saving the increased count to the hammie.db. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Date: 2003-12-03 08:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=24100 I think this should be re-opened. Please look at the command below, included in the original report, carefully: [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db That command removes hammie.db as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-02 12:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As per Tim Stone's message on spambayes@python.org: Removing the messageinfo db and not the stats db is the *cause*of this problem. imapfilter relies on the messageinfo db to tell it which messages it should train on and which it has already processed. By deleting that, but not your stats (hammie) db, you're in for all sorts of trouble. You need to delete both if you want to start afresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:22:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:22:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-849004 ] Spambayes stops filtering in Outlook after losing connection Message-ID: Bugs item #849004, was opened at 2003-11-26 01:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849004&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lou Franco (loumf) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes stops filtering in Outlook after losing connection Initial Comment: - Background (nothing to do with Spambayes): I connect to Outlook remotely over a VPN and the connection is a little spotty. When it is dropped, the VPN autoredials and Outlook recovers. During this time outlook is usually frozen and sometimes it can take a long time (and sometimes the redialer gives up and I need to manually redial). - SpamBayes Problem: After Outlook reconnects, messages are no longer filtered as they come in the inbox. If I restart Outlook, everything is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log from a session where this happens? Without a log, I won't be able to make any progress at all. Please re-open the bug when you do this - thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=849004&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:26:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:26:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 17:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:27:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:27:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-848622 ] There was an error initializing the Spam plugin Message-ID: Bugs item #848622, was opened at 2003-11-25 09:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=848622&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe Patterson (josepatterson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: There was an error initializing the Spam plugin Initial Comment: 'Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin Error details: Could not watch the specified folders' I am running XP with SP1. Outlook 2002. When I installed spambayes and started outlook, it complained that the plugin could not be initialized, and suggested I re-install it. I configured it by hand (the tool bar was there), and now I get the "can't watch" error. If I run the filter by hand, it works, but I have to re- enable the plug-in every time I start outlook. It also does not auto-filter messages when they arrive. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Dupe of [ 843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=848622&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:30:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:30:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-835435 ] UnicodeEncodeError (non-English Language) Message-ID: Bugs item #835435, was opened at 2003-11-04 13:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Armand Suarez (armandeus) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: UnicodeEncodeError (non-English Language) Initial Comment: The problem: cannot analyze existing Japanese- language mail to build a database of good messages using the manager. I am using SB version 0.81 with Outlook 2003 (Japanese) in WinXP Pro (Japanese). SB installs and works properly, filtering English-language spam that arrives (which is the vast majority of spam). However, when I use the manager to analyze existing messages to build the database, the manager stops at "writing the database." The log says: "UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 26-35: ordinal not in range (128)." The log file is attached (contains some Japanese characters, file in ANSI). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The Python bug is at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=846133&group_id=5470, and a fix has been checked into the 2.3 and 2.4 trees. Binaries made my mhammond before 2.3.3 is released will have this fix though (and 2.3.3 is due out within a week or so), so I will close this as fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-07 09:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the report. A work around should be to create a "data_directory" in your config file - see the configuration guide for details. The problem appears to be a bug in Python - os.utime does not accept Unicode strings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=835435&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:35:17 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:35:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Message-ID: Bugs item #831123, was opened at 2003-10-28 03:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 9 Submitted By: Nikolas Beyer (nikbeyer) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: error initializing outlook addin Initial Comment: I installed the addin without errors, configured it manually and trained it. Next day, starting Outlook gives the message above. SpamBayes is then automatically disabled and no spam is checked. After enabling, background filtering doesn't work. Spam still remains in inbox. Already checked Bug item #823722, but doesn't help. Hope you can help. Nik Software: Win200 Sp4, Outlook 2002, SpamBayes bin version 0.8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Dupe of [ 843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes (Yes, I know this was opened first, but I saw the other one first :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831123&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:47:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:48:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 17:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:48:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:48:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" Message-ID: Bugs item #831291, was opened at 2003-10-28 07:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831291&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott Dunbar (sdunbar) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" Initial Comment: System verbosity set to 10 No old pickle file to migrate Dumping loaded configuration: [Experimental] timer_interval: 1000 timer_only_receive_folders: True timer_start_delay: 0 [Filter] enabled: True filter_now: False save_spam_info: True spam_action: Moved spam_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045 4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661 1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379 6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6 16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363 6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014 000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2 0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66 696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950 0000097305F0000') spam_mark_as_read: False spam_threshold: 90.0 timer_enabled: True timer_interval: 1.0 timer_only_receive_folders: True timer_start_delay: 2.0 unsure_action: Moved unsure_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045 4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661 1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379 6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6 16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363 6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014 000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2 0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66 696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950 0000097305F0000') unsure_mark_as_read: False unsure_threshold: 15.0 watch_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730 000000001E20000')] watch_include_sub: True [Filter_Now] action_all: True folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730 000000001E20000')] include_sub: False only_unread: False only_unseen: False [General] data_directory: delete_as_spam_message_state: Read field_score_name: Spam recover_from_spam_message_state: Unread verbose: 10 [Training] ham_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730 000000001E20000')] ham_include_sub: False rebuild: True rescore: True spam_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950 0000097305F0000')] spam_include_sub: False train_manual_spam: True train_recovered_spam: True -- end of configuration -- Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dunbar_s.SYNCHROLOGIC\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dunbar_s.SYNCHROLOGIC\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 675 spam and 41 good messages Loaded databases in 3.33199ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.2.3790 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] Checking folder 'Mailbox - Scott Dunbar/Inbox' for field 'Spam' SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError details:\r\nCould not watch the specified folders' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1237, in FiltersChanged File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1248, in UpdateFolderHooks File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1273, in _HookFolderEvents File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 539, in GetOutlookItem File "C:/Program Files/Spambayes Outlook Addin\support\gen_py\00062FFF-0000-0000-C000- 000000000046x0x9x2.py", line 4597, in GetFolderFromID ret = self._oleobj_.InvokeTypes(8456, LCID, 1, (9, 0), ((8, 1), (12, 17)),EntryIDFolder, EntryIDStore) com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Office Outlook', 'The operation failed.', None, 0, -2147221241), None) Error processing missed messages! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1193, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1219, in ProcessMissedMessages File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1263, in _GetHookForFolder KeyError: ('\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10 \x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00\x00EMSMDB.DLL\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x1bU\xfa \xaaf\x11 \xcd\x9b\xc8\x00\xaa\x00/\xc4Z\x0c\x00\x00\x00FS01 \x00/o=Synchrologic, Inc./ou=Atlanta/cn=Recipients/cn=Scott.Dunbar\x00 \xd85!\xf3[\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x14\x00\x00 \x00\x00\x00\x00\x00/O=Synchrologic, Inc./OU=Atlanta/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=FS01 \x00\x00\x00', '\x00\x00\x00\x00`\xb3\x1902\xa2\xd4 \x11\x96\xaf\x00\xb0\xd0 \xf8s\x01\x00A\xb3\x1902\xa2 \xd4\x11\x96\xaf\x00\xb0\xd0 \xf8s\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01 \xe2\x00\x00') OnFolderSwitch OnSelectionChange OnActivate Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\dunbar_s.SYNCHROLOGIC\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Dumping configuration to save: [Experimental] timer_interval: 1000 timer_only_receive_folders: True timer_start_delay: 0 [Filter] enabled: True filter_now: False save_spam_info: True spam_action: Moved spam_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045 4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661 1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379 6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6 16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363 6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014 000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2 0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66 696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950 0000097305F0000') spam_mark_as_read: False spam_threshold: 90.0 timer_enabled: True timer_interval: 1.0 timer_only_receive_folders: True timer_start_delay: 2.0 unsure_action: Moved unsure_folder_id: ('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C2000045 4D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA661 1CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D5379 6E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C6 16E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D5363 6F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B0000000100000014 000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C2 0496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E66 696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950 0000097305F0000') unsure_mark_as_read: False unsure_threshold: 15.0 watch_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730 000000001E20000')] watch_include_sub: True [Filter_Now] action_all: True folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730 000000001E20000')] include_sub: False only_unread: False only_unseen: False [General] data_directory: delete_as_spam_message_state: Read field_score_name: Spam recover_from_spam_message_state: Unread verbose: 10 [Training] ham_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F873010041B3193032A2D41196AF00B0D020F8730 000000001E20000')] ham_include_sub: False rebuild: True rescore: True spam_folder_ids: [('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200004 54D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA66 11CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C00000046533031002F6F3D537 96E6368726F6C6F6769632C20496E632E2F6F753D41746C 616E74612F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D536 36F74742E44756E62617200D83521F35B000000010000001 4000000000000002F4F3D53796E6368726F6C6F6769632C 20496E632E2F4F553D41746C616E74612F636E3D436F6E6 6696775726174696F6E2F636E3D536572766572732F636E3 D46533031000000', '0000000060B3193032A2D41196AF00 B0D020F8730100EB0104FB281A6A4FAD86AE2A2B19FE950 0000097305F0000')] spam_include_sub: False train_manual_spam: True train_recovered_spam: True -- end of configuration -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Dupe of [ 843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 01:51:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 01:51:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827239 ] Cannot initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #827239, was opened at 2003-10-21 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot initialize Initial Comment: hi there, my app gets the can't initialize whenever I restart Outlook. I then enable through the toolbars and the toolbar works, but no filtering occurs. Thanks for your help! Andrew ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Another dupe of [ 843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: S ten Thije (ponbrabant) Date: 2003-12-02 00:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921368 I had a a similar problem using SpamBayes in Outlook 2000 SP3 on an Exchange 2000 server. In offline mode it worked, online it didn't, so I figured it had to do with somthing on the server. As it turned out it had to do with having two mailbox accounts enabled at the same time, my own and one of a collegue. SpamBayes couldn't choose between the two. After I manually choose to only monitor my own mailbox SpamBayes could initialise. Kind regards, Stan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Date: 2003-11-06 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891212 I tried your suggestions, thanks, but It didn't work. Interestingly enough, it does work if I'm working in Offline mode of Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 11:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you try re-configuring the "filter" folders via the SpamBayes manager, or if that fails, reboot? For some reason, SpamBayes is having trouble with Outlook trying to watch the folders you have configured, and Outlook is giving its generic "I'm kinda screwed up" error. Re-select *all* filter folders, and let me know if that solves the problem. If not, please reset this status back to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 02:03:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 02:03:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827239 ] Cannot initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #827239, was opened at 2003-10-21 11:40 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Cannot initialize Initial Comment: hi there, my app gets the can't initialize whenever I restart Outlook. I then enable through the toolbars and the toolbar works, but no filtering occurs. Thanks for your help! Andrew ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Another dupe of [ 843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: S ten Thije (ponbrabant) Date: 2003-12-02 00:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921368 I had a a similar problem using SpamBayes in Outlook 2000 SP3 on an Exchange 2000 server. In offline mode it worked, online it didn't, so I figured it had to do with somthing on the server. As it turned out it had to do with having two mailbox accounts enabled at the same time, my own and one of a collegue. SpamBayes couldn't choose between the two. After I manually choose to only monitor my own mailbox SpamBayes could initialise. Kind regards, Stan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Appel (andrewappel) Date: 2003-11-06 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891212 I tried your suggestions, thanks, but It didn't work. Interestingly enough, it does work if I'm working in Offline mode of Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 11:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you try re-configuring the "filter" folders via the SpamBayes manager, or if that fails, reboot? For some reason, SpamBayes is having trouble with Outlook trying to watch the folders you have configured, and Outlook is giving its generic "I'm kinda screwed up" error. Re-select *all* filter folders, and let me know if that solves the problem. If not, please reset this status back to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827239&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 02:06:25 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 02:06:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-823722 ] Add-in failed to initialize Message-ID: Bugs item #823722, was opened at 2003-10-15 07:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bighead (saskaheed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add-in failed to initialize Initial Comment: I received the error message when starting Outlook - could not initialize the Spambayes add-in. I've tried adding the COM add-in in Outlook options - I've also tried uninstalling and reinstalling the Spambayes add-in. I've attached the log - please advise... Windows 2000 sp3 Outlook 2000 sp1 Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 3) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\xxx\Application Data\SpamBayes\xxx.ini ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If you configure the watch folders, the "enable" button should become able to be checked. Please re-open is that isn't the case, and attach a new log (as the log you attached only references the config wizard bug) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bighead (saskaheed) Date: 2003-10-28 01:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886876 So you're saying it will still work even though on the "General" tab of SpamBayes Manager the "Enable SpamBayes" checkbox is NOT checked and unavailable (greyed-out)? Yes, I can configure SpamBayes but I didn't think it was working because it didn't seem to be enabled... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a bug in the config wizard that has been fixed in source code. You should be able to configure SpamBayes "manually" by using the SpamBayes Manager, then filling in the "Training" and optionally filtering via the "Filtering" tabs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=823722&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 02:10:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 02:11:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-829100 ] cmd mgr exception Message-ID: Bugs item #829100, was opened at 2003-10-24 04:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=829100&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Doug Easton (dougeast) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: cmd mgr exception Initial Comment: Had some trouble installing (spambayes_addin.dll couldn't be initialized); this problem went away after I both exited macafee and killed the processes that macafee leaves running (email scan module). However the pulldown menu for spambayes (within outlook) does work. Log file attached. Any ideas? Doug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 18:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The exception in the log file is quite common. It isn't clear from this report what isn't working for you, if the toolbar is working for you. There are some known issues with MacAfee. Please re-open the bug when you add these details - thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=829100&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 02:30:55 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 02:31:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-852598 ] Date and Toolbar changes Message-ID: Bugs item #852598, was opened at 2003-12-03 00:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852598&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Haymo Henry (haymohenry) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Date and Toolbar changes Initial Comment: Bug report: 1) After installing SpamBayes, the "Customize Outlook Today" button in the "Outlook Today" does not work any more. 2) It confuses dates/reminders set in the Calendar on the "Outlook Today" window. The calendar itself is stable. After a day, the dates show zup correctly again. Best regards from Costa Rica, Haymo Log file (so far): Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 22 spam and 784 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-Mail Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/apps/outlook/bugs.html#customize-outlook-today-stops-working ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852598&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 02:44:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 02:44:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839648 ] SpamBayes/Rules conflict Message-ID: Bugs item #839648, was opened at 2003-11-11 11:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tyson Vanek (tvanek) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes/Rules conflict Initial Comment: This is an interesting problem to which I've found a solution, but I'll explain. I have Outlook 2002 checking 4 email accounts. Inside my "Inbox" folder, I have a folder for each of these email accounts. I then have a rule created for each email account that moves messages from the Inbox to the appropriate folder based on which account received the message, a setup I believe to be fairly common among people using Outlook to check multiple accounts. I installed SpamBayes (the Outlook 0081 plug-in) today and went into configuring it. Because I have many rules that move messages all over the place into different folders, I configured SpamBayes' email filtering to watch the "Inbox" folder and marked the "Include Subfolders" checkbox, assuming this would monitor every single piece of email that Outlook retrieves. Then I bounced a known spam message to one of my email accounts. Even with the delayed filtering in place, the offending spam was not moved to the appropriate spam folder. Checking the "Spam Clues" on the offending message revealed a 100% match for spam. Considering I had SpamBayes configured to move spam 90% or higher to the spam folder, it baffled me that this email hadn't been moved. Then I took a look at the log files and figured out what was taking place. When the email originally landed in the "Inbox", SpamBayes properly identifie it as SPAM and attempted to move it to the spam folder. However, my Outlook rule for moving messages received through that account to the sub-folder inbox was pulling the email OUT of the spam folder and placing it in the designated pseudo-inbox folder. As a result of this action, SpamBayes also thought I was retrieving this email from the spam folder, so it also logged an entry that it learned that this email was NOT SPAM and would fail to score future duplicate emails properly. How did I get around all this? Simple. I went back to the filtering options of the plug-in and unchecked the "Inbox" folder. Instead, I opened it up and checked every single folder that exists inside of the "Inbox", but not the "Inbox" itself - and I also kept the "all sub- folders" option checked. This means SpamBayes now only scans the message when it arrives in one of my folders after Outlook rules process it, and everything is working correctly. I hope this makes sense to the developers. I'm sure this is the same scenario being reported by many of your users that utilize rules for managing multiple email accounts. They simply need to ignore the "Inbox" and filter everything else so that SpamBayes doesn't trap the spam until it lands in the rule-specified folder and Outlook doesn't "steal" it from the spam folder. If you need any clarification on this, please let me know. Other than this minor configuration glitch, I LOVE the plug-in so far! Great work - keep it up! Thanks, Tyson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 18:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 It would be great if the original reporter could confirm that the timer does fix this (but I would be very surprised if it doesn't). I'm starting to thing we should make "background processing" the default! Please reopen the bug of the timer doesn't fix it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Outlook doesn't expose the necessary 'hooks' to be able to do that, unfortunately (it would make many things easier). Using the 'background filtering' option should also solve this problem, I think. Leaving open in case Mark wants to read this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 20:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 A suggestion on solving the "Rules Wizard" conflict: How about if you turn "filter with SpamBayes" into a Rule which can then be enabled through the Rules Wizard, which would allow people to do either pre- or post- filter rule processing depending on their individual need or preference. Since Outlook processes the rules in a known, configurable order, this should solve the problems reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 03:08:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 03:08:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839831 ] Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Message-ID: Bugs item #839831, was opened at 2003-11-11 21:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Initial Comment: I just tried installing the SpamBayes Outlook plugin. It seemed fine immediately after installation (I installed with "have not prepared" option, and did no initial training). I already had a PGP plugin installed, and the McAfee VirusScan plugin. Have used these for a year or more (about three months on this computer), with no problems whatsoever. I now tried to delete a couple of hundred emails from a folder (not Inbox) by block-selecting them and using shift-delete. An Outlook dialog came up saying it failed to load plugin pgpExch.dll. I clicked OK. The same dialog immediately came up, now specifying the HawkEx.dll (which is McAfee VirusScan's DLL). I clicked OK again. Same dialog came up with pgpExch.dll again. This was an infinite loop. The dialog is modal, so I can't get anywhere else in Outlook or close it. I tried Ctrl-Alt-Del as well as right-clicking the taskbar, to get the TaskManager up. It did come up this first time, but its display was incomplete. I managed to get Outlook displayed in the Applications tab (all other tabs were empty) and tried to kill it there, but nothing happened. I tried to shutdown; it seemed to work but hung somewhere in the shutdown process with an empty blue screen. After a hard reboot, I tried this again, and got the exact same error in Outlook. It starts up OK, but fails on this delete operation. But this time Task Manager did not come up at all, and shutdown did not even start working. This has the markings of an infinite loop. Since none of the other components have ever given me any trouble, the SpamBayes plugin seems like the obvious culprit, although it is also possible that its presence somehow triggers an infinite loop (or similarly manifested problem) in the other add-ins. The "Frequently Reported Bug List" mentions the PGP freeware plugin, but I am using a commercial one (from pgp.com) ... not that that makes it any more trustworthy, but it's a different add-in and has never given me any problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm not sure what we can do about this. "background processing" may make a difference. I'd be happy to chat with the PGP developers about this, but see nothing to imply SpamBayes is doing anything it shouldn't. Please reopen if you feel this to be wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Date: 2003-11-11 21:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=130612 I just tried disabling the PGP add-in, restarting Outlook, and doing the same operation (permanently deleting a couple of hundred mails in one go). The problem did not come up. I enabled the PGP add-in again, and did the same kind of operation, and the problem did come up. So yes, it does seem to occur only with the PGP add-in active. It also seems to occur only with spambayes installed, since I have been doing big deletes like this (I get a lot of automated mail from CVS commits) for months, with no problems, with PGP add-in active. That seems worth looking into. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 04:56:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 04:56:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839831 ] Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Message-ID: Bugs item #839831, was opened at 2003-11-11 10:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gthb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook locks up and disables TaskManager and reboot Initial Comment: I just tried installing the SpamBayes Outlook plugin. It seemed fine immediately after installation (I installed with "have not prepared" option, and did no initial training). I already had a PGP plugin installed, and the McAfee VirusScan plugin. Have used these for a year or more (about three months on this computer), with no problems whatsoever. I now tried to delete a couple of hundred emails from a folder (not Inbox) by block-selecting them and using shift-delete. An Outlook dialog came up saying it failed to load plugin pgpExch.dll. I clicked OK. The same dialog immediately came up, now specifying the HawkEx.dll (which is McAfee VirusScan's DLL). I clicked OK again. Same dialog came up with pgpExch.dll again. This was an infinite loop. The dialog is modal, so I can't get anywhere else in Outlook or close it. I tried Ctrl-Alt-Del as well as right-clicking the taskbar, to get the TaskManager up. It did come up this first time, but its display was incomplete. I managed to get Outlook displayed in the Applications tab (all other tabs were empty) and tried to kill it there, but nothing happened. I tried to shutdown; it seemed to work but hung somewhere in the shutdown process with an empty blue screen. After a hard reboot, I tried this again, and got the exact same error in Outlook. It starts up OK, but fails on this delete operation. But this time Task Manager did not come up at all, and shutdown did not even start working. This has the markings of an infinite loop. Since none of the other components have ever given me any trouble, the SpamBayes plugin seems like the obvious culprit, although it is also possible that its presence somehow triggers an infinite loop (or similarly manifested problem) in the other add-ins. The "Frequently Reported Bug List" mentions the PGP freeware plugin, but I am using a commercial one (from pgp.com) ... not that that makes it any more trustworthy, but it's a different add-in and has never given me any problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Date: 2003-12-03 09:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=130612 Just as a comment for those who chance upon this bug when they end up scratching their heads with the same problem ... - I was wrong, I wasn't using a different PGP add-in --- it is the commercially-licensed version of the freeware add-in. Both are from pgp.com. - This happens already when I block-select many (on the order of a hundred) mails, before pressing Delete or anything. - The loop is not infinite. If I hold down Enter for a little while, it gets out of it. The dialogs might be coming up one for each selected mail -- in any case, they apparently come up a finite number of times after all. That makes this a lot less severe than I thought it was -- as long as people know that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 08:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm not sure what we can do about this. "background processing" may make a difference. I'd be happy to chat with the PGP developers about this, but see nothing to imply SpamBayes is doing anything it shouldn't. Please reopen if you feel this to be wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gunnlaugur Thor Briem (gthb) Date: 2003-11-11 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=130612 I just tried disabling the PGP add-in, restarting Outlook, and doing the same operation (permanently deleting a couple of hundred mails in one go). The problem did not come up. I enabled the PGP add-in again, and did the same kind of operation, and the problem did come up. So yes, it does seem to occur only with the PGP add-in active. It also seems to occur only with spambayes installed, since I have been doing big deletes like this (I get a lot of automated mail from CVS commits) for months, with no problems, with PGP add-in active. That seems worth looking into. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839831&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 05:20:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 05:20:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833434 ] Monitors Inboxes for all Mailboxes Message-ID: Bugs item #833434, was opened at 2003-10-31 11:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Villalovos (happycamp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Monitors Inboxes for all Mailboxes Initial Comment: When using Outlook XP with Exchange and have multiple mailboxes through a single exchange server. Spambayes is monitoring the Inboxes for all of the mailboxes selected. Would like to be able to select it so it only monitors one Inbox. Have tried to select only my inbox but always scans all the inboxes. In Outlook Select: Tools -> Email Accounts Create a new or modify an existing Exchange account. Select Change on the Exchange type account Select More Settings: Select the Advanced tab in the Microsoft Exchange Server box Add additional mailboxes to the account. Save and close. Install SpamBayes. Probably still occurs if Spambayes was already installed. SpamBayes will monitor the Inbox for ALL of the Mailboxes that are in the Exchange account. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 21:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No one else has reported this, so unless you can repro it some way, I will have to chalk it up to the price of eggs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Villalovos (happycamp) Date: 2003-11-01 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=661531 Well after selecting the other users box and then deselecting it stopped monitoring their inboxes. Or at least it appears that it has. So before it was not showing them as selected but it was grabbing the email from their inboxes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-31 11:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The intention is that the initial Wizard would offer to watch all Inboxes, but there should have been a "check-box" against each inbox, allowing you to de-select any your don't want to watch. Further, in the main SpamBayes Manager dialog's 'Filter' tab, you can specify what folders to watch. Clicking on Browse should allow you to select or unselect folders. It may be possible that the initial wizard, when selecting the folders, did not display checkmarks - can you recall if this was true or not? If you are willing, I can tell you how to reset the system so the Wizard pops up next time you start so you can check. Are you using Windows XP? (does Outlook XP run on other than Windows XP? I'm not sure) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833434&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 11:51:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 11:51:52 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852387 ] Spambayes stops working Message-ID: Support Requests item #852387, was opened at 2003-12-02 00:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mossesq You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes stops working Initial Comment: I do not know what happened, but Spambayes was working great, then stopped! I tried uninstall and redownloading and reinstall, but it made no difference. Even after uninstall and before the reinstall, the "Delete as Spam" Icon and the "Spambayes" drop down box were there, but clicking on "Delete as Spam" did nothing, and there was no drop down on the spambayes key. I used to get a drop down box re: the manager. What happened? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Date: 2003-12-03 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921777 Sorry for my ignarance, but what si PopFile and where do I get it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nick (jaxjaguar) Date: 2003-12-02 06:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892819 I was running the service and it stopped working on me a few last weekend. It had some strange coding errors and was not allowing complete email downloads. Since I am not a coder and did not know how to de-bug, I installed PopFile. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 17:28:19 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 17:31:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852387 ] Spambayes stops working Message-ID: Support Requests item #852387, was opened at 2003-12-02 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes stops working Initial Comment: I do not know what happened, but Spambayes was working great, then stopped! I tried uninstall and redownloading and reinstall, but it made no difference. Even after uninstall and before the reinstall, the "Delete as Spam" Icon and the "Spambayes" drop down box were there, but clicking on "Delete as Spam" did nothing, and there was no drop down on the spambayes key. I used to get a drop down box re: the manager. What happened? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 POPFile is another 'bayesian' spam filter - it also does n-way classification. There's a link on the spambayes website to lots of related packages, including popfile - http://popfile.sf.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Date: 2003-12-04 05:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921777 Sorry for my ignarance, but what si PopFile and where do I get it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nick (jaxjaguar) Date: 2003-12-02 19:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892819 I was running the service and it stopped working on me a few last weekend. It had some strange coding errors and was not allowing complete email downloads. Since I am not a coder and did not know how to de-bug, I installed PopFile. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 18:47:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 18:47:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-853697 ] Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Message-ID: Bugs item #853697, was opened at 2003-12-03 23:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Initial Comment: Hi there I'm using Outlook 2002 with Win2000, all the latest service packs, etc installed. I have a 990MB .pst Outlook file. I installed Spambayes and followed the instructions only to find after i clicked "finish" on the Wizard Spambayes began to move all my messages into the suspect folder. THIS IS REALLY BAD! (and non obvious that it was going to do this). It is really bad because a 990MB outlook file takes a long time to move all the messages, and secondly Outlook is very unstable and crashed midway though the process! This corrupted my Outlook file rendering it useless, luckily the Inbox Repair Tool *seemed* to fix it. After my mail was working again, i tried Spambayes again, luckily because it was now installed it did not try to move the remaining messages although because of the crash Spambayes did not know which folder the messages came from (ARGGG). Anyway things seemed to be working now for new messages until i ran Training on Spambayes, where i selected the bulk of my message folders as "good", again after training for 30 minutes it crashed Outlook and again corrupted the .pst file... Basically the bugs are: a) do not automatically move the messages from the inbox/selected folders (warn the user incase they have 990MB .pst file!) b) dont let training crash, perhaps limit the size of the training, or make sure when you look at messages it's read only. c) remember which folder the files came from (even after a crash) And finally one feature request: 1) assume that messages from people in my address book are not spam Thank you for destroying my day and almost my life. My Inbox is important to me, BE CAREFUL WITH IT! Jed PS i have no log file that was generated ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 19:03:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 19:03:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-853697 ] Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Message-ID: Bugs item #853697, was opened at 2003-12-04 12:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Initial Comment: Hi there I'm using Outlook 2002 with Win2000, all the latest service packs, etc installed. I have a 990MB .pst Outlook file. I installed Spambayes and followed the instructions only to find after i clicked "finish" on the Wizard Spambayes began to move all my messages into the suspect folder. THIS IS REALLY BAD! (and non obvious that it was going to do this). It is really bad because a 990MB outlook file takes a long time to move all the messages, and secondly Outlook is very unstable and crashed midway though the process! This corrupted my Outlook file rendering it useless, luckily the Inbox Repair Tool *seemed* to fix it. After my mail was working again, i tried Spambayes again, luckily because it was now installed it did not try to move the remaining messages although because of the crash Spambayes did not know which folder the messages came from (ARGGG). Anyway things seemed to be working now for new messages until i ran Training on Spambayes, where i selected the bulk of my message folders as "good", again after training for 30 minutes it crashed Outlook and again corrupted the .pst file... Basically the bugs are: a) do not automatically move the messages from the inbox/selected folders (warn the user incase they have 990MB .pst file!) b) dont let training crash, perhaps limit the size of the training, or make sure when you look at messages it's read only. c) remember which folder the files came from (even after a crash) And finally one feature request: 1) assume that messages from people in my address book are not spam Thank you for destroying my day and almost my life. My Inbox is important to me, BE CAREFUL WITH IT! Jed PS i have no log file that was generated ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm sorry that you had such trouble, but: 1. SpamBayes is *alpha* software, with everything that goes with that. Bugs (a): Did you read the options that you selected? I'm pretty sure that you selected the one that said you want to train as you go, which clearly says that it will begin by moving all your mail to an unsure folder so that you can sort it out. This doesn't have to happen, it's just the option that you chose (and also the default). Bugs (b): we do everything we can to avoid crashes, fairly obviously. If you believe that SpamBayes is crashing Outlook, then opening a bug report about that would be the correct behaviour, with *lots* of details (Outlook version, OS version, etc). Bugs (c): The plug-in tries to save the original location of messages as much as it can. It's certainly not designed to work with crashes, and a crash generally means that you're out of luck, with any program. The next version (IIRC) has some improvement to the location-saving code, so that might help. Feature request: please see the FAQ re: whitelisting. Overall, I regret that you had this trouble, but melodrama doesn't really help solve anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 20:10:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 20:11:05 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-853697 ] Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Message-ID: Bugs item #853697, was opened at 2003-12-03 23:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jedbytegeist You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Initial Comment: Hi there I'm using Outlook 2002 with Win2000, all the latest service packs, etc installed. I have a 990MB .pst Outlook file. I installed Spambayes and followed the instructions only to find after i clicked "finish" on the Wizard Spambayes began to move all my messages into the suspect folder. THIS IS REALLY BAD! (and non obvious that it was going to do this). It is really bad because a 990MB outlook file takes a long time to move all the messages, and secondly Outlook is very unstable and crashed midway though the process! This corrupted my Outlook file rendering it useless, luckily the Inbox Repair Tool *seemed* to fix it. After my mail was working again, i tried Spambayes again, luckily because it was now installed it did not try to move the remaining messages although because of the crash Spambayes did not know which folder the messages came from (ARGGG). Anyway things seemed to be working now for new messages until i ran Training on Spambayes, where i selected the bulk of my message folders as "good", again after training for 30 minutes it crashed Outlook and again corrupted the .pst file... Basically the bugs are: a) do not automatically move the messages from the inbox/selected folders (warn the user incase they have 990MB .pst file!) b) dont let training crash, perhaps limit the size of the training, or make sure when you look at messages it's read only. c) remember which folder the files came from (even after a crash) And finally one feature request: 1) assume that messages from people in my address book are not spam Thank you for destroying my day and almost my life. My Inbox is important to me, BE CAREFUL WITH IT! Jed PS i have no log file that was generated ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Date: 2003-12-04 01:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922693 Hi there, Thanks you kindly for your reply. I understand the Spambayes is alpha software but that's more the reason to be overly careful rather than possibly careless. Some additional comments below a) yes i did, and i did find it said that it would move all files in the Welcome Readme towards the bottom (unfortunately i was reading this as it was moving messages). Basically a single confirm MessageBox would have saved me. Thus if there is anything to be gained from this, please think about adding something like Messagebox "Confirm message move" "In order to train Spambayes your messages will be moved to the unsure folder, please see help file for more info" (or similar). b) Actually i dont really blame Spambayes for the Outlook crash, i think Outlook is crashing Outlook :) i.e. it is a very unstable program with BIG .pst files, if i go into Outlook and try to move 500 emails i will likely get a crash. All that i ask of Spambayes is to program assuming that a crash can occur at anytime and hence for information not to be lost so easily when there is an Outlook crash. c) again see above. thanks for the note on the next version. Re: whitelist - thanks Thanks again for your reply, if you take anything by my melodrama please take that Inboxs are important to people and doing big changes to them should be done with care and user acknowledgement. Assume users are dumb :) Otherwise in short Spambayes does look like a great program. Keep up the good work. Jed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 00:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm sorry that you had such trouble, but: 1. SpamBayes is *alpha* software, with everything that goes with that. Bugs (a): Did you read the options that you selected? I'm pretty sure that you selected the one that said you want to train as you go, which clearly says that it will begin by moving all your mail to an unsure folder so that you can sort it out. This doesn't have to happen, it's just the option that you chose (and also the default). Bugs (b): we do everything we can to avoid crashes, fairly obviously. If you believe that SpamBayes is crashing Outlook, then opening a bug report about that would be the correct behaviour, with *lots* of details (Outlook version, OS version, etc). Bugs (c): The plug-in tries to save the original location of messages as much as it can. It's certainly not designed to work with crashes, and a crash generally means that you're out of luck, with any program. The next version (IIRC) has some improvement to the location-saving code, so that might help. Feature request: please see the FAQ re: whitelisting. Overall, I regret that you had this trouble, but melodrama doesn't really help solve anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 3 20:25:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 3 20:26:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-853697 ] Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Message-ID: Bugs item #853697, was opened at 2003-12-04 12:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Initial Comment: Hi there I'm using Outlook 2002 with Win2000, all the latest service packs, etc installed. I have a 990MB .pst Outlook file. I installed Spambayes and followed the instructions only to find after i clicked "finish" on the Wizard Spambayes began to move all my messages into the suspect folder. THIS IS REALLY BAD! (and non obvious that it was going to do this). It is really bad because a 990MB outlook file takes a long time to move all the messages, and secondly Outlook is very unstable and crashed midway though the process! This corrupted my Outlook file rendering it useless, luckily the Inbox Repair Tool *seemed* to fix it. After my mail was working again, i tried Spambayes again, luckily because it was now installed it did not try to move the remaining messages although because of the crash Spambayes did not know which folder the messages came from (ARGGG). Anyway things seemed to be working now for new messages until i ran Training on Spambayes, where i selected the bulk of my message folders as "good", again after training for 30 minutes it crashed Outlook and again corrupted the .pst file... Basically the bugs are: a) do not automatically move the messages from the inbox/selected folders (warn the user incase they have 990MB .pst file!) b) dont let training crash, perhaps limit the size of the training, or make sure when you look at messages it's read only. c) remember which folder the files came from (even after a crash) And finally one feature request: 1) assume that messages from people in my address book are not spam Thank you for destroying my day and almost my life. My Inbox is important to me, BE CAREFUL WITH IT! Jed PS i have no log file that was generated ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 14:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The software is careful not careless - the point about alpha software is that the *users* need to be extremely careful about using it - and any alpha software should never be used on something you don't have a backup of. This isn't spambayes specific, it's alpha software specific. a) It's not just in the welcome document, it's in the wizard. You select "I haven't prepared for spambayes", then next, then "I want to continue without training and let spambayes learn as it goes". Right under that option it says that the messages will be moved. It's in a dialog box, right there where you chose that option. We can't pop up a confirm dialog for everything that you just explicitly chose. Users need to *read* the stuff that they are selecting if they care about what might happen. b) You might consider having multiple smaller pst files if the larger ones are giving you trouble. In terms of spambayes, the plug-in really does try hard to manage in the case of the crash - it has greatly improved from the older version, which were not nearly so good. There are limits, though, when programs unexpectedly quit. I realise that mail is important to people, but the there's no way that "destroying...my life" isn't melodrama. Really if the mail is that important, and Outlook that unstable, then a good backup strategy is more important than the behaviour of any plug-in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Date: 2003-12-04 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922693 Hi there, Thanks you kindly for your reply. I understand the Spambayes is alpha software but that's more the reason to be overly careful rather than possibly careless. Some additional comments below a) yes i did, and i did find it said that it would move all files in the Welcome Readme towards the bottom (unfortunately i was reading this as it was moving messages). Basically a single confirm MessageBox would have saved me. Thus if there is anything to be gained from this, please think about adding something like Messagebox "Confirm message move" "In order to train Spambayes your messages will be moved to the unsure folder, please see help file for more info" (or similar). b) Actually i dont really blame Spambayes for the Outlook crash, i think Outlook is crashing Outlook :) i.e. it is a very unstable program with BIG .pst files, if i go into Outlook and try to move 500 emails i will likely get a crash. All that i ask of Spambayes is to program assuming that a crash can occur at anytime and hence for information not to be lost so easily when there is an Outlook crash. c) again see above. thanks for the note on the next version. Re: whitelist - thanks Thanks again for your reply, if you take anything by my melodrama please take that Inboxs are important to people and doing big changes to them should be done with care and user acknowledgement. Assume users are dumb :) Otherwise in short Spambayes does look like a great program. Keep up the good work. Jed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm sorry that you had such trouble, but: 1. SpamBayes is *alpha* software, with everything that goes with that. Bugs (a): Did you read the options that you selected? I'm pretty sure that you selected the one that said you want to train as you go, which clearly says that it will begin by moving all your mail to an unsure folder so that you can sort it out. This doesn't have to happen, it's just the option that you chose (and also the default). Bugs (b): we do everything we can to avoid crashes, fairly obviously. If you believe that SpamBayes is crashing Outlook, then opening a bug report about that would be the correct behaviour, with *lots* of details (Outlook version, OS version, etc). Bugs (c): The plug-in tries to save the original location of messages as much as it can. It's certainly not designed to work with crashes, and a crash generally means that you're out of luck, with any program. The next version (IIRC) has some improvement to the location-saving code, so that might help. Feature request: please see the FAQ re: whitelisting. Overall, I regret that you had this trouble, but melodrama doesn't really help solve anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 4 04:20:02 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 4 04:20:18 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-853697 ] Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Message-ID: Bugs item #853697, was opened at 2003-12-04 10:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Devastating critical bug, destroys .pst file Initial Comment: Hi there I'm using Outlook 2002 with Win2000, all the latest service packs, etc installed. I have a 990MB .pst Outlook file. I installed Spambayes and followed the instructions only to find after i clicked "finish" on the Wizard Spambayes began to move all my messages into the suspect folder. THIS IS REALLY BAD! (and non obvious that it was going to do this). It is really bad because a 990MB outlook file takes a long time to move all the messages, and secondly Outlook is very unstable and crashed midway though the process! This corrupted my Outlook file rendering it useless, luckily the Inbox Repair Tool *seemed* to fix it. After my mail was working again, i tried Spambayes again, luckily because it was now installed it did not try to move the remaining messages although because of the crash Spambayes did not know which folder the messages came from (ARGGG). Anyway things seemed to be working now for new messages until i ran Training on Spambayes, where i selected the bulk of my message folders as "good", again after training for 30 minutes it crashed Outlook and again corrupted the .pst file... Basically the bugs are: a) do not automatically move the messages from the inbox/selected folders (warn the user incase they have 990MB .pst file!) b) dont let training crash, perhaps limit the size of the training, or make sure when you look at messages it's read only. c) remember which folder the files came from (even after a crash) And finally one feature request: 1) assume that messages from people in my address book are not spam Thank you for destroying my day and almost my life. My Inbox is important to me, BE CAREFUL WITH IT! Jed PS i have no log file that was generated ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-04 20:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Actually, SpamBayes doesn't move your *existing* mail during the config process. The wizard is (trying to) warn you that *new* mail will be filtered to "unsure". The training process never moves mail - if you select "score after filtering", no mail is moved. Note that *all* invocations of SpamBayes will create a log, therefore a log will have been created for your session. It may have been overwritten since then, but without a log, without any idea what you mean about all your mail being moved, and without a single other similar report, I'm not sure what I can do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 12:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The software is careful not careless - the point about alpha software is that the *users* need to be extremely careful about using it - and any alpha software should never be used on something you don't have a backup of. This isn't spambayes specific, it's alpha software specific. a) It's not just in the welcome document, it's in the wizard. You select "I haven't prepared for spambayes", then next, then "I want to continue without training and let spambayes learn as it goes". Right under that option it says that the messages will be moved. It's in a dialog box, right there where you chose that option. We can't pop up a confirm dialog for everything that you just explicitly chose. Users need to *read* the stuff that they are selecting if they care about what might happen. b) You might consider having multiple smaller pst files if the larger ones are giving you trouble. In terms of spambayes, the plug-in really does try hard to manage in the case of the crash - it has greatly improved from the older version, which were not nearly so good. There are limits, though, when programs unexpectedly quit. I realise that mail is important to people, but the there's no way that "destroying...my life" isn't melodrama. Really if the mail is that important, and Outlook that unstable, then a good backup strategy is more important than the behaviour of any plug-in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jed Fisher (jedbytegeist) Date: 2003-12-04 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922693 Hi there, Thanks you kindly for your reply. I understand the Spambayes is alpha software but that's more the reason to be overly careful rather than possibly careless. Some additional comments below a) yes i did, and i did find it said that it would move all files in the Welcome Readme towards the bottom (unfortunately i was reading this as it was moving messages). Basically a single confirm MessageBox would have saved me. Thus if there is anything to be gained from this, please think about adding something like Messagebox "Confirm message move" "In order to train Spambayes your messages will be moved to the unsure folder, please see help file for more info" (or similar). b) Actually i dont really blame Spambayes for the Outlook crash, i think Outlook is crashing Outlook :) i.e. it is a very unstable program with BIG .pst files, if i go into Outlook and try to move 500 emails i will likely get a crash. All that i ask of Spambayes is to program assuming that a crash can occur at anytime and hence for information not to be lost so easily when there is an Outlook crash. c) again see above. thanks for the note on the next version. Re: whitelist - thanks Thanks again for your reply, if you take anything by my melodrama please take that Inboxs are important to people and doing big changes to them should be done with care and user acknowledgement. Assume users are dumb :) Otherwise in short Spambayes does look like a great program. Keep up the good work. Jed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 11:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm sorry that you had such trouble, but: 1. SpamBayes is *alpha* software, with everything that goes with that. Bugs (a): Did you read the options that you selected? I'm pretty sure that you selected the one that said you want to train as you go, which clearly says that it will begin by moving all your mail to an unsure folder so that you can sort it out. This doesn't have to happen, it's just the option that you chose (and also the default). Bugs (b): we do everything we can to avoid crashes, fairly obviously. If you believe that SpamBayes is crashing Outlook, then opening a bug report about that would be the correct behaviour, with *lots* of details (Outlook version, OS version, etc). Bugs (c): The plug-in tries to save the original location of messages as much as it can. It's certainly not designed to work with crashes, and a crash generally means that you're out of luck, with any program. The next version (IIRC) has some improvement to the location-saving code, so that might help. Feature request: please see the FAQ re: whitelisting. Overall, I regret that you had this trouble, but melodrama doesn't really help solve anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=853697&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 4 21:23:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 4 21:24:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832070 ] bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Message-ID: Bugs item #832070, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brucedog You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Initial Comment: I'm not able to start sb_server any more from its directory (though it will start from an empty directory): $ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ? import spambayes.message File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 149, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 114, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 53, in open return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 36, in open_best return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bruce Zollars (brucedog) Date: 2003-12-04 18:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=924285 I have had this problem on Win98 as well, although the error now occurs on line 20 of dbmstorage.py. (The updated code may have two inserted lines?) The docstring for open_dbhash reads """Open a bsddb hash. Don't use this on Windows, unless Python 2.3 or greater is used, in which case bsddb3 is actually named bsddb.""" I am on Windows, and using Python 2.2, so I should be using the immediately preceding function, open_db3hash. The version of dbmstorage.py that came with Spambayes 1.0a6 had no problem with this, so the new code is either failing to recognize my OS, failing to recognize my Python version, or failing to recognize my name for bsddb. I am just teaching myself Python, so that I can understand the Spambayes project. I can read just enough code to figure out the above, but nowhere near enough to figure out why. Okay, I could move to Python 2.3, but there is not yet a binary installer version of bsddb for Python 2.3 on Windows. What I have done is this: I have installed Spambayes 1.0a7, then copied the dbmstorage.py script from the 1.0a6 version into the site-packages/spambayes directory. Working great. Will try to learn enough more Python in the next few hours to come up with a more permanent solution. (snicker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 17:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe I have found the problem here, and checked in a fix (dbmstorage.py 1.10). You should be able to apply that change to your copy of dbmstorage.py, or use Python 2.3, or a pickle, until the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-25 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My wife's system (Win98) gets this now, too. I think it may be related to the change in the storage.open_storage code, although I'm not certain. It does appear to be a bug, though. I'll look into this more as soon as I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Date: 2003-10-31 11:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6988 This is a wild guess, but I wonder if my problem could be related to changing my linux headers version to 2.4.21 from 2.4.19, recompiling glibc, but not recompiling python. Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 01:21:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 01:21:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 00:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 01:29:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 01:29:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 00:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sethg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 00:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 03:13:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 03:13:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 17:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 07:58:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 07:58:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-854705 ] Detect "line noise" in subject and body Message-ID: Feature Requests item #854705, was opened at 2003-12-05 12:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Detect "line noise" in subject and body Initial Comment: Spell check words in the message subject and body, generate tokens for the count of misspellings in each. Perhaps also generate tokens for the ratio of incorrect/correct spellings? This could be chunked to make it easier to train eg: all, more than half, about half, less than half, none. These should be seperate for subject and for body since garble in the header is very predictive of spam. Also, there has to be some way to look for words with "impossible to pronounce" consonant clusters such as "dvgkbm". Could spambayes be made to look for "syllables"? Eg: by parsing words into syllables and generating tokens for each? I'm not sure there's a parsing technique that's sufficiently internationalized. Perhaps even just generating tokens for ASCII consonant clusters would be better than nothing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 08:53:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 08:53:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-854705 ] Detect "line noise" in subject and body Message-ID: Feature Requests item #854705, was opened at 2003-12-05 12:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Detect "line noise" in subject and body Initial Comment: Spell check words in the message subject and body, generate tokens for the count of misspellings in each. Perhaps also generate tokens for the ratio of incorrect/correct spellings? This could be chunked to make it easier to train eg: all, more than half, about half, less than half, none. These should be seperate for subject and for body since garble in the header is very predictive of spam. Also, there has to be some way to look for words with "impossible to pronounce" consonant clusters such as "dvgkbm". Could spambayes be made to look for "syllables"? Eg: by parsing words into syllables and generating tokens for each? I'm not sure there's a parsing technique that's sufficiently internationalized. Perhaps even just generating tokens for ASCII consonant clusters would be better than nothing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-12-05 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We spambayes developers spend a lot of time talking about smtp, pop3, cdo, mapi, tcpip, http, html, py2exe, rfc822, chi2, kmail, ie, oe, xmlrpc, bsddb... Now those things would be trained as ham clues, but your scheme would dilute them. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but just because something is unpronouncable and not in the dictionary doesn't make it the same class of thing as all the other tokens which are unpronouncable and not in the dictionary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 09:04:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 09:04:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-854705 ] Detect "line noise" in subject and body Message-ID: Feature Requests item #854705, was opened at 2003-12-05 12:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by julianm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Detect "line noise" in subject and body Initial Comment: Spell check words in the message subject and body, generate tokens for the count of misspellings in each. Perhaps also generate tokens for the ratio of incorrect/correct spellings? This could be chunked to make it easier to train eg: all, more than half, about half, less than half, none. These should be seperate for subject and for body since garble in the header is very predictive of spam. Also, there has to be some way to look for words with "impossible to pronounce" consonant clusters such as "dvgkbm". Could spambayes be made to look for "syllables"? Eg: by parsing words into syllables and generating tokens for each? I'm not sure there's a parsing technique that's sufficiently internationalized. Perhaps even just generating tokens for ASCII consonant clusters would be better than nothing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Date: 2003-12-05 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21754 Hmm, would it not merely learn token "unpronounceable:xmlrpc" as a ham indicator? Also, as a spellcheck hack: words that are already recognised tokens, and are ham indicators, should not count as misspelled even if the spell check rejects them. This would then quickly learn not to add "xmlrpc" into the misspelled-words count and ratio. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-12-05 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We spambayes developers spend a lot of time talking about smtp, pop3, cdo, mapi, tcpip, http, html, py2exe, rfc822, chi2, kmail, ie, oe, xmlrpc, bsddb... Now those things would be trained as ham clues, but your scheme would dilute them. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but just because something is unpronouncable and not in the dictionary doesn't make it the same class of thing as all the other tokens which are unpronouncable and not in the dictionary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 09:11:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 09:12:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-854705 ] Detect "line noise" in subject and body Message-ID: Feature Requests item #854705, was opened at 2003-12-05 12:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Detect "line noise" in subject and body Initial Comment: Spell check words in the message subject and body, generate tokens for the count of misspellings in each. Perhaps also generate tokens for the ratio of incorrect/correct spellings? This could be chunked to make it easier to train eg: all, more than half, about half, less than half, none. These should be seperate for subject and for body since garble in the header is very predictive of spam. Also, there has to be some way to look for words with "impossible to pronounce" consonant clusters such as "dvgkbm". Could spambayes be made to look for "syllables"? Eg: by parsing words into syllables and generating tokens for each? I'm not sure there's a parsing technique that's sufficiently internationalized. Perhaps even just generating tokens for ASCII consonant clusters would be better than nothing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-12-05 14:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 What's the difference between the tokeniser spitting out "xmlrpc" and spitting out ""unpronounceable:xmlrpc"? That doesn't make any difference. The difference is when you "generate tokens for the count of misspellings" (or unpronounceables) - then your system starts to decide that high unpronounceable conts are spammy, and techie messages get more spammy. (Unless the tech-speak outweighs the spam garbage, but even we're not *that* techie!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Date: 2003-12-05 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21754 Hmm, would it not merely learn token "unpronounceable:xmlrpc" as a ham indicator? Also, as a spellcheck hack: words that are already recognised tokens, and are ham indicators, should not count as misspelled even if the spell check rejects them. This would then quickly learn not to add "xmlrpc" into the misspelled-words count and ratio. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-12-05 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We spambayes developers spend a lot of time talking about smtp, pop3, cdo, mapi, tcpip, http, html, py2exe, rfc822, chi2, kmail, ie, oe, xmlrpc, bsddb... Now those things would be trained as ham clues, but your scheme would dilute them. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but just because something is unpronouncable and not in the dictionary doesn't make it the same class of thing as all the other tokens which are unpronouncable and not in the dictionary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 09:41:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 09:41:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-854705 ] Detect "line noise" in subject and body Message-ID: Feature Requests item #854705, was opened at 2003-12-05 12:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by julianm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Detect "line noise" in subject and body Initial Comment: Spell check words in the message subject and body, generate tokens for the count of misspellings in each. Perhaps also generate tokens for the ratio of incorrect/correct spellings? This could be chunked to make it easier to train eg: all, more than half, about half, less than half, none. These should be seperate for subject and for body since garble in the header is very predictive of spam. Also, there has to be some way to look for words with "impossible to pronounce" consonant clusters such as "dvgkbm". Could spambayes be made to look for "syllables"? Eg: by parsing words into syllables and generating tokens for each? I'm not sure there's a parsing technique that's sufficiently internationalized. Perhaps even just generating tokens for ASCII consonant clusters would be better than nothing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Date: 2003-12-05 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21754 Yeah you're right about "unpronounceable:xmlrpc", oops, my bad. Sorry, ignore that bit. The hack I suggested for misspellings can be extended to unpronounceability counts, or anything similar. If it's a known token and a statistical ham indicator, then never count it as "unpronounceable" or "misspelled". That approach would quickly enough learn tech-speak or whatever, but it would catch high incidence of garble. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-12-05 14:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 What's the difference between the tokeniser spitting out "xmlrpc" and spitting out ""unpronounceable:xmlrpc"? That doesn't make any difference. The difference is when you "generate tokens for the count of misspellings" (or unpronounceables) - then your system starts to decide that high unpronounceable conts are spammy, and techie messages get more spammy. (Unless the tech-speak outweighs the spam garbage, but even we're not *that* techie!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Julian Morrison (julianm) Date: 2003-12-05 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21754 Hmm, would it not merely learn token "unpronounceable:xmlrpc" as a ham indicator? Also, as a spellcheck hack: words that are already recognised tokens, and are ham indicators, should not count as misspelled even if the spell check rejects them. This would then quickly learn not to add "xmlrpc" into the misspelled-words count and ratio. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-12-05 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 We spambayes developers spend a lot of time talking about smtp, pop3, cdo, mapi, tcpip, http, html, py2exe, rfc822, chi2, kmail, ie, oe, xmlrpc, bsddb... Now those things would be trained as ham clues, but your scheme would dilute them. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but just because something is unpronouncable and not in the dictionary doesn't make it the same class of thing as all the other tokens which are unpronouncable and not in the dictionary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=854705&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 11:27:31 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 11:32:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-852137 ] sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Message-ID: Bugs item #852137, was opened at 2003-12-01 15:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tonylownds You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py AssertionError: hamcount <= nham Initial Comment: When I classify through sb_imapfilter.py, I am getting an AssertionError. Any ideas? I am using spambayes from CVS; courier IMAP; python 2.2.2; and a just-deleted database. See below for commands, and further below for database dumps. [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is a new database Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.Ham ************** 14 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.Spam ******************************************** 44 trained. Persisting hammie.db state in database Training took 2.87554502487 seconds, 58 messages were trained [tony ~]$ /usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py -c SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 44 spam and 10 ham Loading database hammie.db... Done. Classifying *.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 821, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 811, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 676, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 595, in Filter evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 158, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 395, in _getclues prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ classifier.py", line 242, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Date: 2003-12-05 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=24100 Web interface reports same numbers in front page as the command line does. The stats page did not load, it gave a traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 457, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ UserInterface.py", line 926, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "//usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string Training to a different folder seemed to work better -- there are still some number discrepancies however. The commands below show my config sans password and two runs through training; it reports training 45 spam and 16 ham the first time but only having 45 ham and 16 ham the second time. Note, I've added a few messages to my corpus since the original report. [tony ~]$ grep -v password bayescustomize.ini [imap] server:localhost username:tony ham_train_folders:INBOX.TrainedHam spam_train_folders:INBOX.TrainedSpam spam_folder:INBOX.NewSpam unsure_folder:INBOX.Unsure move_trained_spam_to_folder:INBOX.Spam move_trained_ham_to_folder:INBOX.Ham [globals] verbose:True [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db [tony ~]$ sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is a new database Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.TrainedHam **************** 16 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.TrainedSpam ********************************************* 45 trained. Persisting hammie.db state in database Training took 7.78080093861 seconds, 61 messages were trained [tony@habib ~]$ sb_imapfilter.py -t SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). Loading state from hammie.db database hammie.db is an existing database, with 45 spam and 11 ham Loading database hammie.db... Done. Training Training ham folder INBOX.TrainedHam 0 trained. Training spam folder INBOX.TrainedSpam 0 trained. Training took 0.0115129947662 seconds, 0 messages were trained I can set up an account on my server with webmail and IMAP access if it will help debug. Send me email directly if interested. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-03 01:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry, I missed that (was that in the mailing list post, too? I must have missed it twice). So there's something wrong then with it reporting that it trained on 58 messages, but having the db only have 54. If you use the web interface and look at the "stats" page, how many messages does it report there? (That goes off the messageinfo db rather than hammie.db). If you use the move_trained_[sp|h]am_to_folder options, do all the messages get moved? I'm not sure whether the problem here is that it's not actually training all those messages, or that something is going wrong saving the increased count to the hammie.db. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Lownds (tonylownds) Date: 2003-12-02 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=24100 I think this should be re-opened. Please look at the command below, included in the original report, carefully: [tony ~]$ rm hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db That command removes hammie.db as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-01 23:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As per Tim Stone's message on spambayes@python.org: Removing the messageinfo db and not the stats db is the *cause*of this problem. imapfilter relies on the messageinfo db to tell it which messages it should train on and which it has already processed. By deleting that, but not your stats (hammie) db, you're in for all sorts of trouble. You need to delete both if you want to start afresh. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=852137&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 11:41:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 11:42:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-807618 ] outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Message-ID: Bugs item #807618, was opened at 2003-09-17 05:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jonasbe You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: john (justaname) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outlook install fails to register dll - Error 0 Initial Comment: While testing build 11.5608.5606 the following error is recieved. spambayes_addin.dll unable to register the dll/ocx dllregisterservice failed; code 0x00000000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonas Bergman (jonasbe) Date: 2003-12-05 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=924735 I have seen this error on three different computers. I also tried to register the file manually with regsvr32. Failed. Checked the dependencies, but all were correct. Then I killed a few processes, ICQ, MSN, Panda Anti-virus and a few more (all in the tray): then I registered manually once more and it worked. On all of the computers I tried. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-25 00:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 Has anybody else had the following happen? After several days of using 8.1 version very successfully, quite suddenly it quits working? I locked my computer and then came back. Opened Outlook and clicked 'delete as spam' and nothing happened. The button clicks but nothing is deleted, nothing is moved, nothing happens even though the buttons are on the toolbar. I restarted the computer a few times and nothing. I even uninstalled Spambayes completely, reinstalled it and nothing. Anybody have a hint? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-24 00:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 The simplified pathname worked for me too, although not on the first try -- I had to hit Retry once, but that succeeded. It's now doing a nice job on the spam, since I had about 3000 emails in the Spam folder by the time I got it going... :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Regier (dregier) Date: 2003-10-23 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=326244 I was receiving the same error and also fixed it by installing to just a program files\spambayes folder. Since I had already had a failed install on the computer I had to delete the original default directory and also deleted a couple of extra registry keys that had the word spambayes in them. That seemed to resolve me issue with installing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-20 23:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. The above worked for me also. it's definitely something to do with a path statement in the registering utility. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-20 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 A quick follow-up to my post on 10.19. I uninstalled via Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel and then ran the installer again. This time, I didn't get the error and it seems to have installed correctly, although I didn't give it any emails for training, so it'll be a few days before I'll know if it's actually filtering correctly. Judging from the number of comments, the fact that it has yet to be resolved, and that I was able to get it to work on a re-install seems to point to some sort of race condition that may not be all that easy to reproduce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Psenak (tpsenak) Date: 2003-10-20 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890856 I had the same failure using XP SP1 and Outlook 2000. When I changed the install directory to \Program Files\Spambayes (eliminating the Outlook Addin) installation completed without problems. Maybe some type of path resolution error prevents the \Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin path from registering. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Trentham (ttrentham) Date: 2003-10-19 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=430640 Same problem. Install fails to register spambayes_addin.dll with error code 0xc0000005. Retry fails as well. I tried registering it manually with regsvr32 and got the same error. The log files are created, but they're empty. The install wizard doesn't appear. Latest SpamBayes 008.1 Windows XP SP1 with all latest patches. Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 It might be interesting to note that I tried installing on another computer with all of the same versions. I got the error, picked retry and it succeeded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Al Patzke (alpatzke) Date: 2003-10-19 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=890193 I have the exact same problem as reported. Spambayes 008.1 and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219), Service Pack 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Don Boettger (donnieb) Date: 2003-10-12 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=885365 I'm having the same problem when trying to install the Outlook plugin, version 008.1. A few more details: I'm running WinXP SP1 Build 2600, and Outlook 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627. I also run Norton AntiVirus 2003 Professional Edition, but I disabled it during the installation attempt. The install wizard starts and runs up to the point where it starts "Registering", then an "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error dialog is displayed for the file spambayes_addin.dll. I'm using the default installation location (C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook Addin). The file in question is present in that directory. The error dialog includes Retry and Ignore options, but neither of these is effective. All I can do is abort the install. An install log is created, but it has size 0 bytes after the install fails. This makes it rather unhelpful for debugging... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-21 14:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Version 008.1 gives me the same error. Outlook 2003 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: john (justaname) Date: 2003-09-17 06:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=868390 Sorry I forgot to add I was using version 8.1 of the spambayes outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=807618&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 5 16:39:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 5 16:39:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 00:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sethg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 02:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 00:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 6 13:27:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 6 13:28:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 01:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gillesmt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Date: 2003-12-06 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=925460 My XP pro does too except that it shut down completely as soon as it detect a message to DL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-12-02 16:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I tried leroypa's suggestion yesterday and Outlook has not yet hung again after receiving hundreds of messages and filtering them to dozens of folders through half a dozen email accounts. McAfee Virus Scan is running and I haven't seen a problem since I turned Spam Bayes back on yesterday. Again, all I did was tell Spam Bayes to ONLY filter the Inbox. I assume since Outlook puts the emails into the Inbox and then applies the Rules moving them to other folders, having Spam Bayes filter them in the Inbox then filter them again in sub-folders was somehow creating the problem. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-12-01 15:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I to have been having this problem (see previous posts). Like Basil, I to am running McAfee Virus Scan, but what I did was to filter only the 'Inbox' and not it's sub-folders as well as turning on 'background filtering'. Don't need to filter Inbox sub-folders as Outlook rules is setup to move messages I know I want to these folders. I also find that Spambytes does run slow and it does look like at times it is 'running into' Outlook processing. Thanks, PL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Basil Hussain (basil_hussain) Date: 2003-12-01 05:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=918906 I have been experiencing the same problem with Outlook hanging during download of messages. I tried setting SpamBayes to use background filtering, but that didn't help. I think it is definitely something to do with having McAfee VirusScan installed. I have VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 installed. I uninstalled the E-mail Scan feature (which integrates with Outlook) and all has been working well. This was with Outlook 2000 SP-3 9.0.0.6627. PGP Freeware 7.0.3 (with Outlook plug-in) is also installed, but seems to co- exist fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-10-31 14:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin binary 0.81. Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not hang. I don't understand how the Timer would help... John T. Jarrett john@logontexas.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-22 21:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can the other people having trouble with this let me know how the "background processing" option works for them? The original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2003-10-22 21:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail then reenable spambayes to get my mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-19 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-17 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-17 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-15 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-14 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-04 20:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 05:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 06:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-06 20:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-04 12:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 6 13:53:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 6 13:54:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855445 ] Outlook shuts down Message-ID: Bugs item #855445, was opened at 2003-12-06 14:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook shuts down Initial Comment: I have XP Pro with all the updates installed and SP1 ronning Outlook 2000 9.0.0.2711 and Spambayes 08.1 and Norton 2003 Installation went well. Outlook opens and check for messages. If there are messages, Outlook automatically shuts down without downloading them. I have to use Outlook express to get my mail. Prior to installing SB I could send & receive mail without problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 6 13:57:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 6 13:57:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855445 ] Outlook shuts down Message-ID: Bugs item #855445, was opened at 2003-12-06 14:53 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by gillesmt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook shuts down Initial Comment: I have XP Pro with all the updates installed and SP1 ronning Outlook 2000 9.0.0.2711 and Spambayes 08.1 and Norton 2003 Installation went well. Outlook opens and check for messages. If there are messages, Outlook automatically shuts down without downloading them. I have to use Outlook express to get my mail. Prior to installing SB I could send & receive mail without problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 6 15:23:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 6 15:23:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 01:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-06 15:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 03:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 01:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 7 12:47:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 7 12:47:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855835 ] cannot send mail shortly after downloading mail... Message-ID: Bugs item #855835, was opened at 2003-12-07 11:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855835&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Fischer (mfischer2) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: cannot send mail shortly after downloading mail... Initial Comment: Running with 1.0a7 on Windows 98 with Eudora 6.x. Shortly after downloading my messages, if I try to send a message, it will fail. I get a "connection refused from localhost(0)" message. If I wait 5 or 10 seconds and try to resend the message it goes out fine. This leads me to believe that the pop3proxy is busy doing something else and cannot handle the outgoing message. On a similar note, if I start bouncing messages back to spambayes_xxx@localhost, which I do fairly often, Eudora will start sending one before the other is finished. pop3proxy cannot seem to handle this either. Perhaps this is related. Is the underlying pop3proxy single-threaded??? If you need them, I can try to get more detailed error logs from Eudora on my next round of spam downloading... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855835&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 7 22:34:09 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 7 22:34:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Japanese (and/or other CJK languages) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-12-08 12:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 patch 1.0. Per-language corpus. Ham/spam ratio are different by language of message. This affects performance. NOTE: Format of corpus has been changed. It now contains per-language nham/nspam info and wordinfo. PICKLE_VERSION is 6. New configuration option: [Tokenizer] per_language_corpus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-29 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o hammie.py / sb_filter.py / sb_xmlrpcserver.py: - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidence: header will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-26 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 server patch 1.0a7-0.6 o Dibbler performs HTTP charset conversion (to/from internal UTF-8). o New configuration option: [html_ui] http_charset ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 09:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the sb_dbexpimp.py patch (v1.3). Will look at the rest, shortly - thanks for your patience! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-11 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 01:41:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 01:41:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-856078 ] Process "posts" as well as messages? Message-ID: Support Requests item #856078, was opened at 2003-12-08 00:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=856078&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott Marquardt (rasqual) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Process "posts" as well as messages? Initial Comment: In Outlook, it would be darned nice if Spambayes would process posts as well as email. My particular interest is in processing RSS feeds in intravnews, an excellent outlook RSS plugin. Being able to categorize material in the feeds would be a huge help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=856078&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 05:54:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 05:54:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856141 ] Spam field not added to unsure or empty folders Message-ID: Bugs item #856141, was opened at 2003-12-08 21:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856141&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam field not added to unsure or empty folders Initial Comment: The 'Spam' field is never added to the 'Unsure' folder - we currently only set this field up for folders we 'watch', and we don't watch unsure. Any empty folders also fail to add the field. We could fix this by creating a temp item, but only if we can tell for sure the field does not exist (ie, we can not afford to create a temp item each startup for each folder) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856141&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 19:51:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 19:52:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856583 ] Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Message-ID: Bugs item #856583, was opened at 2003-12-08 16:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rich Liebling (rliebling) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Initial Comment: I have tried several times installing/uninstalling but have not succeeded. Note that the installer doesn't tell me it failed. I get the Outlook toolbar, but am told spambayes is not enabled. I am running Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) on Win2k (5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)). One thing about my configuration that may make it "special" is that I attach to MSExchange server and connect to several additional mailboxes. I am attaching a log file showing the install error. In a different log file i get this message (presumably because of the install problem): *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** The install error is briefly: ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 310, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.processors", line 76, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 322, in OnClicked File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 20:10:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 20:11:05 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 19:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-07 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-06 10:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 21:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 20:17:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 20:17:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832070 ] bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Message-ID: Bugs item #832070, was opened at 2003-10-29 13:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') Initial Comment: I'm not able to start sb_server any more from its directory (though it will start from an empty directory): $ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 101, in ? import spambayes.message File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 149, in ? msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 114, in __init__ self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 53, in open return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 36, in open_best return f(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py", line 18, in open_dbhash return bsddb.hashopen(*args) bsddb.error: (22, 'Invalid argument') ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What you've said is correct. Basically 1.0a7 switched from using "open_best" (which knew not to use open_dbhash on Windoes with Python 2.2) to figuring out which function to use from the db itself (which is good for other reasons). However, it bypassed the intelligence to check the OS/Python version. The fix I checked in is a permanent solution to this (it reintroduces the checks). Using the 1.0a6 dbmstorage.py should be fine until the next release - if you don't change db format, then the change will have no effect anyway. BTW, Python 2.3 includes bsddb, so you don't need an installer. But spambayes *should* work with 2.2, so you don't have to upgrade if you don't want to. OTOH, the about to be released 2.3.3 has some important fixes that I don't think are going to be backported to 2.2, so maybe you should... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bruce Zollars (brucedog) Date: 2003-12-05 15:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=924285 I have had this problem on Win98 as well, although the error now occurs on line 20 of dbmstorage.py. (The updated code may have two inserted lines?) The docstring for open_dbhash reads """Open a bsddb hash. Don't use this on Windows, unless Python 2.3 or greater is used, in which case bsddb3 is actually named bsddb.""" I am on Windows, and using Python 2.2, so I should be using the immediately preceding function, open_db3hash. The version of dbmstorage.py that came with Spambayes 1.0a6 had no problem with this, so the new code is either failing to recognize my OS, failing to recognize my Python version, or failing to recognize my name for bsddb. I am just teaching myself Python, so that I can understand the Spambayes project. I can read just enough code to figure out the above, but nowhere near enough to figure out why. Okay, I could move to Python 2.3, but there is not yet a binary installer version of bsddb for Python 2.3 on Windows. What I have done is this: I have installed Spambayes 1.0a7, then copied the dbmstorage.py script from the 1.0a6 version into the site-packages/spambayes directory. Working great. Will try to learn enough more Python in the next few hours to come up with a more permanent solution. (snicker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe I have found the problem here, and checked in a fix (dbmstorage.py 1.10). You should be able to apply that change to your copy of dbmstorage.py, or use Python 2.3, or a pickle, until the next release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My wife's system (Win98) gets this now, too. I think it may be related to the change in the storage.open_storage code, although I'm not certain. It does appear to be a bug, though. I'll look into this more as soon as I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stephen Boulet (spboulet) Date: 2003-11-01 08:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6988 This is a wild guess, but I wonder if my problem could be related to changing my linux headers version to 2.4.21 from 2.4.19, recompiling glibc, but not recompiling python. Stephen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832070&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 20:31:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 20:31:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 00:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sethg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-08 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 I don't know the source code, so forgive the following comment if it's clueless. This message was downloaded via POP3, as neither of my ISP's supports MAPI. Since Outlook deals with POP3 and MAPI, I have no idea if it internally changes all messages as MAPI with the POP3 ones having limited properties as they don't exist as copies in remote directories. BTW, what's all the Tony Meyer stuff in the headers of the Seal_Props.txt file? Are you at the University of Massey in NZ? Friends of mine lived there a few years ago, liked it a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-08 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-06 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 02:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 00:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 20:41:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 20:41:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 19:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's clueless, but I forgive you . MAPI isn't how Outlook gets the messages (I suspect you're thinking of IMAP), but a way to communicate with Outlook. The props attachment is basically the information that Outlook stores about that message. The problem is determining whether a message was received, or created by the user (in which case it's not filterable). The current theory is that it needs to have one of two properties, and your message has neither. Mark may need a new theory ;) The "Tony Meyer" stuff coems about because Outlook must have modified it a bit when I dragged it into the inbox (I suppose I did place it on an exchange server). Not enough to change the non-filterable status, but enough to contaminate it a bit. And yes, I'm at Massey University in NZ - the Auckland campus, though, not the Palmerston North (or Wellington) ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-09 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 I don't know the source code, so forgive the following comment if it's clueless. This message was downloaded via POP3, as neither of my ISP's supports MAPI. Since Outlook deals with POP3 and MAPI, I have no idea if it internally changes all messages as MAPI with the POP3 ones having limited properties as they don't exist as copies in remote directories. BTW, what's all the Tony Meyer stuff in the headers of the Seal_Props.txt file? Are you at the University of Massey in NZ? Friends of mine lived there a few years ago, liked it a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-07 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-06 10:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 21:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 8 22:32:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 8 22:32:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856628 ] reload(Options) fails in windows binary Message-ID: Bugs item #856628, was opened at 2003-12-09 14:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856628&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: reload(Options) fails in windows binary Initial Comment: reload is used when the options file may have been modified externally. This fails in the binary, when Options.pyc is in a .zip file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856628&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 9 02:34:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 9 02:34:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856717 ] SB creates folders with preview pane Message-ID: Bugs item #856717, was opened at 2003-12-09 08:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856717&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stijn Hazen (haasje) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SB creates folders with preview pane Initial Comment: SB creates folders for Junk E-Mail and Junk-Suspects with a preview pane (if you have the preview pane selected in subfolders). This is something you don't want with SPAM messages. If possible, it's great if you can prevent this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856717&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 9 04:23:28 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 9 04:23:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856753 ] malformed message stop pop download Message-ID: Bugs item #856753, was opened at 2003-12-09 10:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856753&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Giovanni Coi (coig) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: malformed message stop pop download Initial Comment: Some kind of malformed messages, in my experience whitout blank line between e-mail headers and body, and without Subject:, From: header stop pop3 download. If I have 100 messages and, for example, 40th message is malformed I download 39 messages, the my e-mail client raise a timeout error and all 100 messages remain on the server. So the next time I download (again) previous 39 messages and the stop again, .... No error message. Platform: WinXp Python 2.3.2 (#49, Oct 2 2003, 20:02:00) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 e-mail client: Pegasus mail 4.12a msg sample1: ------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: my@adress.org Received: (qmail 45538 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 10:14:26 -0000 Delivered-To: mydomain-myreal@address.org Received: (qmail 45529 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 10:14:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.address.org) (192.168.100.11) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 10:14:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 64262 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 10:08:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO highway) (211.147.227.238) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 10:08:06 -0000 ------------------------------------------------------- sample2: ------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: my@adress.org Received: (qmail 62208 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 23:34:37 -0000 Delivered-To: mydomain-myreal@address.org Received: (qmail 62197 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 23:34:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.address.org) (192.168.100.11) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 23:34:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 66944 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 23:28:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailsport.mailserver) (203.149.7.153) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 23:28:21 -0000 Received: from melody (SERVER [218.18.84.213]) by mailsport.mailserver with SMTP (Microsof t Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id YJ2MGCQZ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:57:12 +0700 L0SEargentina WE1GHT acceptorsWHl1Escreenplay Y0U scienceS1EEP . --------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856753&group_id=61702 From belgix at globetrotter.net Tue Dec 9 11:38:10 2003 From: belgix at globetrotter.net (Francois Chenier) Date: Tue Dec 9 11:39:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Little bug with dial-up connection & long e-mails Message-ID: <003501c3be72$d5c284b0$0200a8c0@gecko.lan> It's more and annoyance than a bug but, if you are using a dial-up connection and you send long e-mails, Outlook Express (maybe Outlook too, I dunno) will pop-up a "Your SMTP server has not responded in 60 seconds. Would you like to wait another 60 seconds for the server to respond?" message. The pop-up window desappears after the mail is sent (e.g. when the ISP SMTP server has acknowledged). Francois Chenier -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031209/f14f565a/attachment.html From kennypitt at hotmail.com Tue Dec 9 11:54:49 2003 From: kennypitt at hotmail.com (Kenny Pitt) Date: Tue Dec 9 11:55:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Little bug with dial-up connection & long e-mails In-Reply-To: <003501c3be72$d5c284b0$0200a8c0@gecko.lan> Message-ID: If you haven't configured sb_server to proxy your SMTP connection then this is unlikely to be unique to SpamBayes. In Outlook Express, you can go to the Advanced tab on your account settings and increase the server timeout. This should allow you to get rid of the warning. -- Kenny Pitt _____ From: spambayes-bugs-bounces@python.org [mailto:spambayes-bugs-bounces@python.org] On Behalf Of Francois Chenier Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:38 AM To: spambayes-bugs@python.org Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Little bug with dial-up connection & long e-mails It's more and annoyance than a bug but, if you are using a dial-up connection and you send long e-mails, Outlook Express (maybe Outlook too, I dunno) will pop-up a "Your SMTP server has not responded in 60 seconds. Would you like to wait another 60 seconds for the server to respond?" message. The pop-up window desappears after the mail is sent (e.g. when the ISP SMTP server has acknowledged). Francois Chenier -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031209/5472e566/attachment.html From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 9 21:49:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 9 21:49:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-741914 ] Unable to Register DLL Error Message-ID: Bugs item #741914, was opened at 2003-05-23 04:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lpodmore You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Gary Thomas (garyt977) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to Register DLL Error Initial Comment: I'm running WinXP and Office 2000 Professional. When I attempt to install the binary version on my system I get the following error: ---- C:\Program files\Spambayes Outlook Addin\Spambayes_addin.dll Unable to register the DLL/OCX:DllRegister failed:code 0x00000000 Abort, Retry, Fail ---- After searching my hard drive, I was unable to find a log file for this program. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Podmore (lpodmore) Date: 2003-12-10 13:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=927835 I also encountered this error when installing on Windows XP and Outlook 2003. I used the default directory and I followed the suggestion of daveski but Outlook crashed when I tried to add the SpamBayes_addin.dll. Any other work arounds please? thanks Larry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bret A. Bennett (iambab) Date: 2003-08-16 03:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=845404 I received this error too when I chose a non-default installation directory for Spambayes. So I aborted the initial install and retried the install and let it use the default install directory: the failed dll registration error did not appear this time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Sutton (daveski) Date: 2003-08-13 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=843381 After chasing round various 'dupes' I think this report describes most accurately my experience. Same error (0x00000000) with Spambayes_addin.dll 007 binary on W2K SP4, OL2000 Corporate or Workgroup. After many attempts I clicked Ignore on the message and looked in my temp folder and all the .log files were zero bytes. I opened OL and went to: Tools / Options and chose Other Advanced Options and COM Add-Ins Clicked Add and located Spambayes_addin.dll. After restarting OL, Spambayes seems to work. Oddly if I got to the COM Add-Ins again, nothing is listed. I hope this helps some frustrated users. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-05-23 09:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Dupe of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=740198&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 00:31:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 00:31:22 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856141 ] Spam field not added to unsure or empty folders Message-ID: Bugs item #856141, was opened at 2003-12-08 21:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856141&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam field not added to unsure or empty folders Initial Comment: The 'Spam' field is never added to the 'Unsure' folder - we currently only set this field up for folders we 'watch', and we don't watch unsure. Any empty folders also fail to add the field. We could fix this by creating a temp item, but only if we can tell for sure the field does not exist (ie, we can not afford to create a temp item each startup for each folder) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-10 16:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Let's see what damage I did! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856141&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 09:25:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 09:25:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-857595 ] Same argument on the command line Message-ID: Patches item #857595, was opened at 2003-12-10 14:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857595&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Same argument on the command line Initial Comment: Hi, This is two patchs. Most of the script use -D for pickle but sb_imapfilter.py did not. So now it uses the same command argument to specify a pickle. Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857595&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 09:26:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 09:26:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-857597 ] On command line use -D for pickle Message-ID: Patches item #857597, was opened at 2003-12-10 14:26 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857597&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: On command line use -D for pickle Initial Comment: Hi, This is two patchs. Most of the script use -D for pickle but sb_dbexpimp.py did not. So now it uses the same command argument to specify a pickle. Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857597&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 12:01:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 12:01:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857706 ] Reset "unread Mail" Icon Message-ID: Bugs item #857706, was opened at 2003-12-10 18:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857706&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Reset "unread Mail" Icon Initial Comment: 1) All mails are read. The Outlook Icon "unread Mails" will be removed from task bar. 2) A SPAM mails comes in. The Icon "unread Mails" appears in the task bar. 3) The mail will be detected as SPAM, moved to folder "Spam" and will be marked as unread (as defined). 4) The icon "unread Mails" will NOT be removed even there is no unread Mail. I have to open and close any mail to remove the icon. It's possible to trigger a checker for that ? (I don't know if this exists in the API of Outlook.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857706&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 12:01:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 12:01:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857708 ] Reset "unread Mail" Icon Message-ID: Bugs item #857708, was opened at 2003-12-10 18:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857708&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Reset "unread Mail" Icon Initial Comment: 1) All mails are read. The Outlook Icon "unread Mails" will be removed from task bar. 2) A SPAM mails comes in. The Icon "unread Mails" appears in the task bar. 3) The mail will be detected as SPAM, moved to folder "Spam" and will be marked as unread (as defined). 4) The icon "unread Mails" will NOT be removed even there is no unread Mail. I have to open and close any mail to remove the icon. It's possible to trigger a checker for that ? (I don't know if this exists in the API of Outlook.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857708&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 12:03:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 12:03:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857708 ] Reset "unread Mail" Icon Message-ID: Bugs item #857708, was opened at 2003-12-10 18:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lukasg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857708&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Reset "unread Mail" Icon Initial Comment: 1) All mails are read. The Outlook Icon "unread Mails" will be removed from task bar. 2) A SPAM mails comes in. The Icon "unread Mails" appears in the task bar. 3) The mail will be detected as SPAM, moved to folder "Spam" and will be marked as unread (as defined). 4) The icon "unread Mails" will NOT be removed even there is no unread Mail. I have to open and close any mail to remove the icon. It's possible to trigger a checker for that ? (I don't know if this exists in the API of Outlook.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Date: 2003-12-10 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=974 That happens if you go back and press Reload... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857708&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 12:04:21 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 12:04:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857708 ] Reset "unread Mail" Icon Message-ID: Bugs item #857708, was opened at 2003-12-10 18:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lukasg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857708&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Deleted Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Reset "unread Mail" Icon Initial Comment: 1) All mails are read. The Outlook Icon "unread Mails" will be removed from task bar. 2) A SPAM mails comes in. The Icon "unread Mails" appears in the task bar. 3) The mail will be detected as SPAM, moved to folder "Spam" and will be marked as unread (as defined). 4) The icon "unread Mails" will NOT be removed even there is no unread Mail. I have to open and close any mail to remove the icon. It's possible to trigger a checker for that ? (I don't know if this exists in the API of Outlook.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Date: 2003-12-10 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=974 Now delete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Date: 2003-12-10 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=974 That happens if you go back and press Reload... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857708&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 12:24:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 12:25:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-850207 ] mailbox train does not put trained flag on Maildir messages Message-ID: Bugs item #850207, was opened at 2003-11-27 12:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by woakesd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850207&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Woakes (woakesd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mailbox train does not put trained flag on Maildir messages Initial Comment: I've noticed that after I run sb_mailboxtrain.py on a Maildir format mailbox no flags are put in the headers to say the message has been trained against. I noticed this header was added to mailboxes in mbox format. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David Woakes (woakesd) Date: 2003-12-10 17:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=604919 Dont quite know how I came to the conclusion that the trained header wasn't there, but it actually is there. My apologies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=850207&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 14:10:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 14:11:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857787 ] Errors in Log File Message-ID: Bugs item #857787, was opened at 2003-12-10 11:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Errors in Log File Initial Comment: Checked outstanding bugs and trouble shooting guide. Get errors in the log file on a consistent basis: Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating SpamBayes appears to be working correctly, except tool bar is overlaid a few seconds until Spambayes loads, then appears correct. Windows 2000 Professional SP4 Build 2195 5.0.2195 Outlook 2000 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 18:54:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 18:54:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-857937 ] sb_mboxtrain was not running on windows Message-ID: Patches item #857937, was opened at 2003-12-10 23:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857937&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain was not running on windows Initial Comment: Hi, The script sb_mboxtrain was not running on windows because of the way the lock was done. To make it work on windows I'm using the portalocker instead (If you need the file I can send it.) Remi Ricard papaDoc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857937&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 10 21:02:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 10 21:02:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857990 ] Net Folders Message-ID: Bugs item #857990, was opened at 2003-12-10 21:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Net Folders Initial Comment: When the client uses Outlook 2000 with the Net Folders feature enabled (shares calendars and contacts amongst users), every time there is a synchronization (an email with the form #Net Folders - ... appears), Outlook returns an error message concerning the form that couldn't be opened correctly. The message appears for every message of this kind. Does not affect the shares nor the SpamBayes filter, but annoying for the user, as it could be repeated many times during the day. Thanks for your help. ... Lorsque le client utilise Outlook 2000 avec la fonction Dossiers Partag?s activ?e (partage de calendriers et contacts entre les utilisateurs), ? chaque fois qu'une synchronisation est effectu?e (un message avec la forme #Dossier Partag?s - ... appara?t), Outlook donne un message d'erreur concernant un formulaire qu'il n'a pu ouvrir correctement. Le message appara?t ? chaque fois qu'un message de synchro est re?u. Ceci n'affecte ni les partages ni le filtrage de SpamBayes, mais est plut?t fatigant pour l'utilisateur, car ce message peut r?appara?tre plusieurs fois dans une journ?e. Merci de votre aide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 11 16:58:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 11 16:58:28 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858564 ] Save last set and use times in database Message-ID: Patches item #858564, was opened at 2003-12-11 15:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858564&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Save last set and use times in database Initial Comment: The attached patch adds a new database format to the database (that is, non-pickle) files: PICKLE_DATE_VERSION. In addition to spamcount and hamcount, it adds settime and usetime fields. It seems to work for me, but I'm uploading a patch instead of checking something in for several reasons: 1. I don't know if this is the correct way to do it (probably not, since it can't be used by the picklefile database). 2. Applications which sidestep the usual mechanisms for reading the database will need to be fixed (part of the uploaded context diff is a change to contrib/spamcounts.py which demonstrates what such applications need to do). spamcounts.py is the only one I've modified so far. I'm not sure if there are others, and if so, what they are. Also, there may be other applications which use the regular database access mechanisms which will need to be changed to sidestep them so as not to corrupt the usetime fields. 3. It's not obvious there's a huge demand for this, but it should be helpful for people experimenting with token aging. 4. The database balloons. The settime and usetime fields are datetime objects. 5. It's bound to be slower. The database is always opened for writing. 6. Because of #5, you will have to be careful to always lock the database, even when using nominally read-only applications like sb_filter.py. That said, after running with such a database for a little while (no more than 30 minutes or so), it seems to be doing the right thing (and is not yet corrupt :-): >>> len([k for k in db if len(db[k]) == 4 and db[k][3] > db[k][2]]) 896 >>> len(db) 14605 ... time passes ... >>> len([k for k in db if len(db[k]) == 4 and db[k][3] > db[k][2]]) 965 >>> len(db) 14605 ... more time passes ... >>> len([k for k in db if len(db[k]) == 4 and db[k][3] > db[k][2]]) 985 >>> len(db) 14605 Assigning to Tony since his SF id is at the top of the list. ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858564&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 11 18:27:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 11 18:27:41 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857990 ] Net Folders Message-ID: Bugs item #857990, was opened at 2003-12-11 13:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Net Folders Initial Comment: When the client uses Outlook 2000 with the Net Folders feature enabled (shares calendars and contacts amongst users), every time there is a synchronization (an email with the form #Net Folders - ... appears), Outlook returns an error message concerning the form that couldn't be opened correctly. The message appears for every message of this kind. Does not affect the shares nor the SpamBayes filter, but annoying for the user, as it could be repeated many times during the day. Thanks for your help. ... Lorsque le client utilise Outlook 2000 avec la fonction Dossiers Partag?s activ?e (partage de calendriers et contacts entre les utilisateurs), ? chaque fois qu'une synchronisation est effectu?e (un message avec la forme #Dossier Partag?s - ... appara?t), Outlook donne un message d'erreur concernant un formulaire qu'il n'a pu ouvrir correctement. Le message appara?t ? chaque fois qu'un message de synchro est re?u. Ceci n'affecte ni les partages ni le filtrage de SpamBayes, mais est plut?t fatigant pour l'utilisateur, car ce message peut r?appara?tre plusieurs fois dans une journ?e. Merci de votre aide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-12 10:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What exactly is this message? If the message is displayed by SpamBayes, then please attach a log for the session (see the "Troubleshooting Guide" for details) - this log will have the information we need to diagnose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 11 23:45:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 11 23:46:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857990 ] Net Folders Message-ID: Bugs item #857990, was opened at 2003-12-10 21:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmlafreniere You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Net Folders Initial Comment: When the client uses Outlook 2000 with the Net Folders feature enabled (shares calendars and contacts amongst users), every time there is a synchronization (an email with the form #Net Folders - ... appears), Outlook returns an error message concerning the form that couldn't be opened correctly. The message appears for every message of this kind. Does not affect the shares nor the SpamBayes filter, but annoying for the user, as it could be repeated many times during the day. Thanks for your help. ... Lorsque le client utilise Outlook 2000 avec la fonction Dossiers Partag?s activ?e (partage de calendriers et contacts entre les utilisateurs), ? chaque fois qu'une synchronisation est effectu?e (un message avec la forme #Dossier Partag?s - ... appara?t), Outlook donne un message d'erreur concernant un formulaire qu'il n'a pu ouvrir correctement. Le message appara?t ? chaque fois qu'un message de synchro est re?u. Ceci n'affecte ni les partages ni le filtrage de SpamBayes, mais est plut?t fatigant pour l'utilisateur, car ce message peut r?appara?tre plusieurs fois dans une journ?e. Merci de votre aide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Date: 2003-12-11 23:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928614 The error message (in french) is the following: "Impossible d'ouvrir le formulaire personnalis?. Outlook utilisera un formulaire Outlook ? la place." Which means approximately this: "Cannot open custom form. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead." It's an Outlook error message, but it happens only when using Net Folders and SpamBayes. If I uninstall one of them, I don't get the message... but I need both installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-11 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What exactly is this message? If the message is displayed by SpamBayes, then please attach a log for the session (see the "Troubleshooting Guide" for details) - this log will have the information we need to diagnose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 12 09:22:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 12 09:22:48 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858925 ] Add notification sound to Outlook addin Message-ID: Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-12 09:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin Initial Comment: This patch adds support for playing notification sounds when messages are processed by SpamBayes. The attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the Outlook2000 directory, and a notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the notification sound feature and how to configure it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 12 13:03:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 12 13:03:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857787 ] Errors in Log File Message-ID: Bugs item #857787, was opened at 2003-12-10 11:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by haapy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Errors in Log File Initial Comment: Checked outstanding bugs and trouble shooting guide. Get errors in the log file on a consistent basis: Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating SpamBayes appears to be working correctly, except tool bar is overlaid a few seconds until Spambayes loads, then appears correct. Windows 2000 Professional SP4 Build 2195 5.0.2195 Outlook 2000 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Date: 2003-12-12 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928373 more info: I uninstalled the plugin. The following registry entry was left behind {3556EDEE-FC91-4cf2-A0E4-7489747BAB10} which I deleted. I reinstalled plugin which now works much faster, however, in tools, options, other, com addins, the plugin is not an option. I tried the regsvr32 optin.. ran successfully, however no change to com addins. Yet, everything is working just fine and the error messages in the log file changed - Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.785854ms Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 12 14:18:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 12 14:18:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833861 ] invalid configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #833861, was opened at 2003-10-31 15:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ssims You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: james pepper (pepperink) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: invalid configuration Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000, on a new Dell, with XP. When I first installed version "081" of Spambayes, it worked flawlessly, and beautifully, too. Then it suddenly gave me the error "invalid configuration" and "you must configure spam folder." When I attempted to run the "configuration manager," nothing happened. I have tried the suggestions in the troubleshooting page. I have uninstalled Spambayes and reinstalled. I installed the previous version. I installed Outlook 2003 (don't like it much). Uninstalled Outlook 2003 and reinstalled Outlook 2000. Always with the same result. (Also, the "junk e-mail" folder is not created during installation.) Spambayes is a great program. I hope you can help me make it work! james pepper, California Central Coast jaypea@earthlink.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Sims (ssims) Date: 2003-12-12 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=929150 You can set the various directories by clicking on the "Filtering" Tab in SpamBayes Manager and then clicking on the various Browse buttons and set the directory. Be sure that the directory exists, if it doesn't create it in Windows Explorer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 12 17:34:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 12 17:34:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-859215 ] "Restore Defaults" causes assertion error at exit Message-ID: Bugs item #859215, was opened at 2003-12-13 09:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859215&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Restore Defaults" causes assertion error at exit Initial Comment: Start sb_server, go to the configuration page, and select "Restore Defaults". Then shut the server down. At shutdown, an assertion about "state not prepared" is raised. This appears to be my fault. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859215&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 12 23:21:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 12 23:21:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-859333 ] Outlook will not remove read messages from server Message-ID: Bugs item #859333, was opened at 2003-12-12 22:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook will not remove read messages from server Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes on outlook 2000 the advanced properties of 'Remove message from server when deleted from deleted items' no longer works. Now all the emails are saved on the server regardless of the fact that I have deleted them from the deleted items folder. This means all the spam that spambayes saves me from seeing in my inbox, still takes up space on my mail server. I must leave a copy on the server, I have it set to delete all emails 5 days after download regardless of them being saved. I must do this because I read my email from different locations. Some emails need to be saved on different machines. The emails are not getting deleted after this 5 day period either, outlook never, ever removes items from the server, this really needs to be looked into and fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 12 23:26:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 12 23:26:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Message-ID: Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-17 19:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sevsamp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Initial Comment: In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to remove that copy when the mail is deleted from the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem to be working with mail that has been checked by SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the same thing with mail that has not been checked by SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as expected. It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is because of the addition of the spam score to the local copy? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Date: 2003-12-12 22:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=930199 I just submitted another bug message with this same thing, sorry didn't see this one before submitting. I have email set to delete after 5 days, outlook never removes ANY mail from the server, ever. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-30 18:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, the save_spam_info option now appears to be doing what it is meant to do, but it hasn't solved the "delete from server" problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-29 17:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 Ah, OK. I didn't know about that website. I've now got v0.6 installed. I'll report back when I've seen some spam (shouldn't be too long). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-29 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you running the plugin from source? (and in particular, the 1.0a4 release?) If you are: this doesn't include the most recent changes to the Outlook plugin. The only way to get them is to get hold of the cvs source or the binary installer from Mark's website. (Although there have been a great number of improvements to the Outlook plugin since 1.0a4, there hasn't been much changed elsewhere, so it's not really worth releasing a 1.0a5 since most Outlook people use the binary or CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-29 16:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still working as it did before; I would have thought that this would stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't deleting from the server. On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog still says version 0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-29 00:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving the spam score with each message. Can you try this version and see if the behaviour changes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 05:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-20 08:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 12 23:45:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 12 23:45:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-859339 ] Add sqlite support for the dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Patches item #859339, was opened at 2003-12-12 23:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=859339&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vladimir Ulogov (vulogov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add sqlite support for the dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In addition to the BerkleyDB, I'd like to use sqlite as well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=859339&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 13 20:31:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 13 23:02:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-859215 ] "Restore Defaults" causes assertion error at exit Message-ID: Bugs item #859215, was opened at 2003-12-13 09:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859215&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: "Restore Defaults" causes assertion error at exit Initial Comment: Start sb_server, go to the configuration page, and select "Restore Defaults". Then shut the server down. At shutdown, an assertion about "state not prepared" is raised. This appears to be my fault. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-14 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Checking in scripts/sb_server.py; new revision: 1.13; previous revision: 1.12 Checking in windows/pop3proxy_service.py; new revision: 1.16; previous revision: 1.15 Checking in windows/pop3proxy_tray.py; new revision: 1.17; previous revision: 1.16 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859215&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 13 20:49:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 14 02:02:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857706 ] Reset "unread Mail" Icon Message-ID: Bugs item #857706, was opened at 2003-12-11 04:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857706&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lukas Gr?tzmacher (lukasg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Reset "unread Mail" Icon Initial Comment: 1) All mails are read. The Outlook Icon "unread Mails" will be removed from task bar. 2) A SPAM mails comes in. The Icon "unread Mails" appears in the task bar. 3) The mail will be detected as SPAM, moved to folder "Spam" and will be marked as unread (as defined). 4) The icon "unread Mails" will NOT be removed even there is no unread Mail. I have to open and close any mail to remove the icon. It's possible to trigger a checker for that ? (I don't know if this exists in the API of Outlook.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-14 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry, but please see http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i-get-rid-of-the-envelope-tray-icon-for-spam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857706&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 13 20:37:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 14 02:02:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856628 ] reload(Options) fails in windows binary Message-ID: Bugs item #856628, was opened at 2003-12-09 14:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856628&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: reload(Options) fails in windows binary Initial Comment: reload is used when the options file may have been modified externally. This fails in the binary, when Options.pyc is in a .zip file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-14 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Checking in spambayes/ImapUI.py; new revision: 1.26; previous revision: 1.25 Checking in spambayes/ProxyUI.py; new revision: 1.31; previous revision: 1.30 Checking in spambayes/ServerUI.py; new revision: 1.3; previous revision: 1.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856628&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 14 06:23:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 14 06:23:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833439 ] default_bayes_customize.ini is confusing Message-ID: Bugs item #833439, was opened at 2003-10-31 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833439&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: default_bayes_customize.ini is confusing Initial Comment: The one in the "program" directory is misleading - it is never used, but only used as the default for new users. It should be renamed. The comments in this should also be updated, to remove confusion about what INI file is what (as the user ends up with a few .INI files in their "data" dir) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-14 22:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Checking in default_bayes_customize.ini; new revision: 1.10; previous revision: 1.9 Checking in manager.py; new revision: 1.92; previous revision: 1.91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833439&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 15 10:34:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 15 10:35:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-15 15:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 15 16:31:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 15 16:31:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860599 ] Dead Button Issues... Message-ID: Bugs item #860599, was opened at 2003-12-15 16:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dead Button Issues... Initial Comment: I have the well documented problem ("Toolbar items appear, but fail to work") with a SpamBayes install on my boss' system. He has Outlook 2000 SP3 installed in Windows 2000. Please before responding to this read the first sentence of my post. I know this is a known issue and that there are fixes already posted on the FAQ pages and in the Troubleshooting guide. I have gone to great lengths to follow those tips to the letter in trying to solve this problem. My problem isn't that I can't read or follow instructions. I wouldn't be posting on here if that was who I am. That said. The problem I have (and many others, though they are happily running again with the fixes) is that the button "delete as spam" appears but then does nothing. I am able to "fix" this by either: renaming the outcmd.dat file to outcmd.bak or deleting my spambayes toolbar and restarting outlook or uninstalling/reinstalling spambayes (with antivirus disabled) Unfortunatly, none of these actually "fixes" the problem for long. After deleting 2 or 3 spam messages, the "delete as spam" button goes dead. I can click it, an hourglass will even show up indicating that it WANTs to move this message to the New Spam folder, but nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 15 16:35:58 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 15 16:36:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-828669 ] Toolbars refuse to work after reset Message-ID: Bugs item #828669, was opened at 2003-10-22 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jesse_custer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Toolbars refuse to work after reset Initial Comment: I noticed the toolbar was not working and followed your instructions about removing it and then I checked the log file for an error. See the attached log file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-15 16:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 I have the same issue. Tried everything. Uploaded a log to the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-03 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Another interesting tidbit: Throughout the day I randomly try the toolbar to see if it works, but it never does. However today, on one occasion it did it work. It has not worked since. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-11-01 12:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I sent the db file to your other address. I retrained the db. however I don't know if it was successful as the Dialog box said "Saving: Writing database" but it never changed the msg. I don't know if this is typical behavior or not. After doing this there appears to be no change in the functioning of the program, meaning that it is still filtering spam although my guess is that it is somehow not doing it as effectively as it should becuase the number of spam msgs that are appearing in my inbox is significant (approx 20) as opposed to 3 or 4 when it was working flawlessly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-31 00:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 mhammond at users.sourceforge.net should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 I just learned that the max file size is 256K and this file is almost 1 meg zipped. I could not locate an email address to send it to you directly. Please advise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 23:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 For some reason I got an invalid file type error when submitting the db file using its original name so I am trying it again zipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-30 23:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is the file you requested. However you should know that I the first thing I did after I tried all the toolbar fixets was to retrain the database. It had no effect. I am going to retrain it now. Do you want a copy of the db file after I train it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 18:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This appears to be a duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=807217&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which mentions the same error that appears in your log. The only solution I know of at the moment is to go to the "Training" tab, and do a complete re-train. If you could possibly attach a copy of your "default_bayes_database.db" before you do this, I would appreciate it - either mail it directly to me, or attach it here. However, that doesn't explain why you can't use the toolbars. The only reference to the toolbars is "Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons", which is what we expect after clobbering outcmd.dat. Are there any messages regarding toolbars in subsequent startups? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-26 14:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Toolbar Still Does Not Work...This problem developed while I was running version 6.xx. I installed the latest version avaliable. No change in symptoms. I closed Outlook and deleted the file outlook.dat and rebooted the computer. Symptoms remain the same: It is filtering messages but the toolbar does not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: William Hughes (w_hughes) Date: 2003-10-24 11:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892918 Here is some more information. SpamBayes is filtering messages. The toolbar does not work. I have tried all the fixets listed including deleting the file outlook.dat. Toolbar still does not work. If there are tests you would like me to run to help, please let me know. w_hughes ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=828669&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 16 09:18:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 16 09:18:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-861014 ] Install Error Message-ID: Support Requests item #861014, was opened at 2003-12-16 09:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=861014&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Melissa Phillips (mrphillips) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Install Error Initial Comment: I'm getting an error after installing saying the software cannot be initialized. Your troubleshooting pages says to send you a copy of the log file in this case............ Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\melissa.phillips\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\melissa.phillips\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=861014&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 16 13:21:56 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 16 13:22:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-15 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by majorhangover You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-16 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 01:02:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 01:02:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-16 04:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 07:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 01:11:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 01:11:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-16 02:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 17:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 05:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 01:51:13 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 01:51:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789319 ] storage.py verbose prints to stderr Message-ID: Patches item #789319, was opened at 2003-08-16 01:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) Summary: storage.py verbose prints to stderr Initial Comment: When the global verbose option is set, storage.py dumps a bunch of info messages to stdout. For people unfortunate enough to be running a SpamBayes tool which dumps email to stdout, this causes problems. The attached patch changes the prints so they go to stderr instead. I'd just apply this but I don't know if there was a valid reason for such messages go to stdout. Assigning to Anthony 'cuz it appears that most of the prints were added on his watch... (that will teach you to check stuff in! ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Just browsing, and saw this :) The patch includes functionality other than simply changing the prints - are these necessary or part of a different change? Otherwise, I think the print changes should just be checked in - no need to turn this patch into "better logging" - just s/print/print >>sys.stderr,/ should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-16 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not just storage.py that does this - corpus.py does as well (when using pop3proxy, for example). Although this doesn't actually cause a problem like when using a tool that needs the stdout output, it's still (IMO) a PITA. Two solutions come to mind: o We're happy that storage.py and corpus.py work as expected, and so a lot of these prints can be removed (and the ones that aren't can go to stderr) o We follow the example of the OL plug-in and change the verbose option to an integer, and have these messages print (to stderr) only at certain levels of verbosity. Hmm...maybe this should be going to spambayes-dev? (But then maybe Anthony will just do all of this ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 01:52:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 01:52:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789319 ] storage.py verbose prints to stderr Message-ID: Patches item #789319, was opened at 2003-08-16 01:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) Summary: storage.py verbose prints to stderr Initial Comment: When the global verbose option is set, storage.py dumps a bunch of info messages to stdout. For people unfortunate enough to be running a SpamBayes tool which dumps email to stdout, this causes problems. The attached patch changes the prints so they go to stderr instead. I'd just apply this but I don't know if there was a valid reason for such messages go to stdout. Assigning to Anthony 'cuz it appears that most of the prints were added on his watch... (that will teach you to check stuff in! ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Just browsing, and saw this :) The patch includes functionality other than simply changing the prints - are these necessary or part of a different change? Otherwise, I think the print changes should just be checked in - no need to turn this patch into "better logging" - just s/print/print >>sys.stderr,/ should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Just browsing, and saw this :) The patch includes functionality other than simply changing the prints - are these necessary or part of a different change? Otherwise, I think the print changes should just be checked in - no need to turn this patch into "better logging" - just s/print/print >>sys.stderr,/ should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-16 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not just storage.py that does this - corpus.py does as well (when using pop3proxy, for example). Although this doesn't actually cause a problem like when using a tool that needs the stdout output, it's still (IMO) a PITA. Two solutions come to mind: o We're happy that storage.py and corpus.py work as expected, and so a lot of these prints can be removed (and the ones that aren't can go to stderr) o We follow the example of the OL plug-in and change the verbose option to an integer, and have these messages print (to stderr) only at certain levels of verbosity. Hmm...maybe this should be going to spambayes-dev? (But then maybe Anthony will just do all of this ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 01:53:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 01:53:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-857937 ] sb_mboxtrain was not running on windows Message-ID: Patches item #857937, was opened at 2003-12-11 10:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857937&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain was not running on windows Initial Comment: Hi, The script sb_mboxtrain was not running on windows because of the way the lock was done. To make it work on windows I'm using the portalocker instead (If you need the file I can send it.) Remi Ricard papaDoc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 There is no patch attached :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=857937&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 01:55:47 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 01:55:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858925 ] Add notification sound to Outlook addin Message-ID: Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-13 01:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin Initial Comment: This patch adds support for playing notification sounds when messages are processed by SpamBayes. The attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the Outlook2000 directory, and a notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the notification sound feature and how to configure it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm reluctant to include this in the trunk at this stage. How would you feel about it going on a branch, and after 1.0 we integrate it? If we are really keen, we could build "experimental" binaries for people as we go (but these would not be official) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 02:18:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 02:18:42 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-29 08:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 18:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 02:27:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 02:28:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857787 ] Errors in Log File Message-ID: Bugs item #857787, was opened at 2003-12-11 06:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Errors in Log File Initial Comment: Checked outstanding bugs and trouble shooting guide. Get errors in the log file on a consistent basis: Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating SpamBayes appears to be working correctly, except tool bar is overlaid a few seconds until Spambayes loads, then appears correct. Windows 2000 Professional SP4 Build 2195 5.0.2195 Outlook 2000 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 There is no bug here. I will change the log message to: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' ...etc The above toolbar error is common - recreating the toolbar... Note that it is hard to remove the actual error message - hopefully this will make it clearer that we have recovered from the "error" in the log. Do you think that would have made it clear to you? If not, what wording would you suggest, given that I can't prevent the error line? Re uninstall - there is another bug on the fact that uninstall leaves turds. As far as I can tell, "regsvr32 -u dll_name" will remove all the cruft from the registry, but for some reason this is not being done at uninstall time. Re not appearing in "com addins" - another known bug that will be fixed in the next binary release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Date: 2003-12-13 05:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928373 more info: I uninstalled the plugin. The following registry entry was left behind {3556EDEE-FC91-4cf2-A0E4-7489747BAB10} which I deleted. I reinstalled plugin which now works much faster, however, in tools, options, other, com addins, the plugin is not an option. I tried the regsvr32 optin.. ran successfully, however no change to com addins. Yet, everything is working just fine and the error messages in the log file changed - Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.785854ms Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 05:24:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 05:24:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833346 ] Error upon exiting Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #833346, was opened at 2003-10-30 21:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dpdhamm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (secclest) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Error upon exiting Outlook Initial Comment: Every time I exit Outlook I am greeted with ?Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.? Error signature: AppName: outlook.exe AppVer: 10.0.4510.0 ModName: dccmsp32.dll ModVer: 10.0.2000.929 Offset: 00005346 I am running Windows XP Pro/Outlook XP both with the latest and greatest patches and updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2003-12-17 10:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 I have had this same problem and an told it is related to WINFAX integration with Outlook 2003 (never occurred before I upgraded to Outlook 2003;worked without problems in Outlook XP). Can disable dccmsp32.dll or stop Winfax but are ther any better solutions? Thanks. dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your spambayes log files? The troubleshooting guide has information about how to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 08:57:30 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 08:57:36 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-861656 ] Missing file for patch Message-ID: Patches item #861656, was opened at 2003-12-17 13:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=861656&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Missing file for patch Initial Comment: The patch was missing for the submitted patch # 857937. Since I'm not able to attach it to the above patch I'm creating a new submitted patch. Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=861656&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 09:16:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 09:16:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858925 ] Add notification sound to Outlook addin Message-ID: Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-12 09:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin Initial Comment: This patch adds support for playing notification sounds when messages are processed by SpamBayes. The attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the Outlook2000 directory, and a notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the notification sound feature and how to configure it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I agree that we shouldn't be adding any new features, especially experimental ones, to the 1.0 release. A branch sounds like a good idea, and fits with the branching strategy discussed earlier on spambayes-dev. Either a single branch for all new features or a separate branch per feature is fine with me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 01:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm reluctant to include this in the trunk at this stage. How would you feel about it going on a branch, and after 1.0 we integrate it? If we are really keen, we could build "experimental" binaries for people as we go (but these would not be official) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 11:26:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 11:26:12 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789319 ] storage.py verbose prints to stderr Message-ID: Patches item #789319, was opened at 2003-08-15 10:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) Summary: storage.py verbose prints to stderr Initial Comment: When the global verbose option is set, storage.py dumps a bunch of info messages to stdout. For people unfortunate enough to be running a SpamBayes tool which dumps email to stdout, this causes problems. The attached patch changes the prints so they go to stderr instead. I'd just apply this but I don't know if there was a valid reason for such messages go to stdout. Assigning to Anthony 'cuz it appears that most of the prints were added on his watch... (that will teach you to check stuff in! ;-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Date: 2003-12-17 10:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=44345 I think it's just out of date. As far as I could tell from a quick glance at the diff, all these changes (including the psycopg and utf-8 changes) have been added to the code base already. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 00:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Just browsing, and saw this :) The patch includes functionality other than simply changing the prints - are these necessary or part of a different change? Otherwise, I think the print changes should just be checked in - no need to turn this patch into "better logging" - just s/print/print >>sys.stderr,/ should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 00:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Just browsing, and saw this :) The patch includes functionality other than simply changing the prints - are these necessary or part of a different change? Otherwise, I think the print changes should just be checked in - no need to turn this patch into "better logging" - just s/print/print >>sys.stderr,/ should be fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-16 00:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not just storage.py that does this - corpus.py does as well (when using pop3proxy, for example). Although this doesn't actually cause a problem like when using a tool that needs the stdout output, it's still (IMO) a PITA. Two solutions come to mind: o We're happy that storage.py and corpus.py work as expected, and so a lot of these prints can be removed (and the ones that aren't can go to stderr) o We follow the example of the OL plug-in and change the verbose option to an integer, and have these messages print (to stderr) only at certain levels of verbosity. Hmm...maybe this should be going to spambayes-dev? (But then maybe Anthony will just do all of this ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 11:34:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 11:34:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 12:31:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 12:31:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-15 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by majorhangover You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thank you for responding to this bug. can you please tell me how to find the log? where is the outlook logfile kept locally? our sys admin doesn't seem to know where it's kept either. once i find it, i'd be happy to attach it. thanks, aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 06:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 06:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-16 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 12:40:05 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 12:40:15 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857787 ] Errors in Log File Message-ID: Bugs item #857787, was opened at 2003-12-10 11:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by haapy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Errors in Log File Initial Comment: Checked outstanding bugs and trouble shooting guide. Get errors in the log file on a consistent basis: Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating SpamBayes appears to be working correctly, except tool bar is overlaid a few seconds until Spambayes loads, then appears correct. Windows 2000 Professional SP4 Build 2195 5.0.2195 Outlook 2000 2000 SP3 9.0.0.6627 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Date: 2003-12-17 09:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928373 Given that the actual error message is hard to delete, perhaps just simply "Normal processing - recreating the toolbar." Would be appropriate. Then the user would not have to worry about the word "Error". Thanks. Andy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-16 23:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 There is no bug here. I will change the log message to: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' ...etc The above toolbar error is common - recreating the toolbar... Note that it is hard to remove the actual error message - hopefully this will make it clearer that we have recovered from the "error" in the log. Do you think that would have made it clear to you? If not, what wording would you suggest, given that I can't prevent the error line? Re uninstall - there is another bug on the fact that uninstall leaves turds. As far as I can tell, "regsvr32 -u dll_name" will remove all the cruft from the registry, but for some reason this is not being done at uninstall time. Re not appearing in "com addins" - another known bug that will be fixed in the next binary release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Haapanen (haapy) Date: 2003-12-12 10:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928373 more info: I uninstalled the plugin. The following registry entry was left behind {3556EDEE-FC91-4cf2-A0E4-7489747BAB10} which I deleted. I reinstalled plugin which now works much faster, however, in tools, options, other, com addins, the plugin is not an option. I tried the regsvr32 optin.. ran successfully, however no change to com addins. Yet, everything is working just fine and the error messages in the log file changed - Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.785854ms Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 12:51:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 12:51:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-15 10:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-17 12:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 >From the troubleshooting guide (which came with the addin, SpamBayes -> Help -> Troubleshooting Guide): """ If you are running the binary version, then the SpamBayes addin writes a log in your Windows temp directory. This directory is generally \WINDOWS\TEMP for Windows 9x, or \Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp for Windows 2000/XP. Note that by default, in Windows 2000 and XP, Windows Explorer will not show the Local Settings directory, as it is hidden. You can convince Windows Explorer to show this directory (and therefore allow you to see the Temp directory under it by doing either: - Select the folder \Documents and Settings\{username}. This directory should be reflected in the Address Bar. In the Address Bar, simply type at the end "\Local Settings" (thereby giving that full path name), and press Enter. Explorer will then show this folder. or - Select Tools->Folder Options, select the View tab, and in the list, select Show hidden files and folders. Select OK. This folder will now be visible. You may like to then reset this option back to the default value. The log file for the most recent execution of Outlook is named spambayes1.log, the second most recent is named spambayes2.log, and so on for the four previous runs. You can view this file with notepad. Usually, you will simply see messages which indicate that SpamBayes is doing its job; however in some cases there will be errors in this file. If there are errors, please report a bug. """ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thank you for responding to this bug. can you please tell me how to find the log? where is the outlook logfile kept locally? our sys admin doesn't seem to know where it's kept either. once i find it, i'd be happy to attach it. thanks, aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 01:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 01:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-16 13:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 13:00:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 13:00:45 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-15 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by majorhangover You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thanks, located the most recent logfile and attached. i appreciate your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-17 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 >From the troubleshooting guide (which came with the addin, SpamBayes -> Help -> Troubleshooting Guide): """ If you are running the binary version, then the SpamBayes addin writes a log in your Windows temp directory. This directory is generally \WINDOWS\TEMP for Windows 9x, or \Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp for Windows 2000/XP. Note that by default, in Windows 2000 and XP, Windows Explorer will not show the Local Settings directory, as it is hidden. You can convince Windows Explorer to show this directory (and therefore allow you to see the Temp directory under it by doing either: - Select the folder \Documents and Settings\{username}. This directory should be reflected in the Address Bar. In the Address Bar, simply type at the end "\Local Settings" (thereby giving that full path name), and press Enter. Explorer will then show this folder. or - Select Tools->Folder Options, select the View tab, and in the list, select Show hidden files and folders. Select OK. This folder will now be visible. You may like to then reset this option back to the default value. The log file for the most recent execution of Outlook is named spambayes1.log, the second most recent is named spambayes2.log, and so on for the four previous runs. You can view this file with notepad. Usually, you will simply see messages which indicate that SpamBayes is doing its job; however in some cases there will be errors in this file. If there are errors, please report a bug. """ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thank you for responding to this bug. can you please tell me how to find the log? where is the outlook logfile kept locally? our sys admin doesn't seem to know where it's kept either. once i find it, i'd be happy to attach it. thanks, aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 06:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 06:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-16 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 13:12:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 13:12:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-15 10:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-17 13:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 majorhangover, you're welcome! Mark, from the log, I'm betting the OP selected the "Personal Folders" top-level folder in the filtering dialog, and checked the "Include subfolders" box -- it's watching *everything*, including Outbox (and Journal, and Notes, ..., even Deleted Items). majorhangover, if that's what you did, you're the first , and it's not going to work without a bunch of changes in our code to stop you from accidentally watching folders that should never be watched. For now, painful as it may be, you should explicitly select each folder you really want to filter, and *do not* select the top-level "Personal Folders" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 13:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thanks, located the most recent logfile and attached. i appreciate your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-17 12:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 >From the troubleshooting guide (which came with the addin, SpamBayes -> Help -> Troubleshooting Guide): """ If you are running the binary version, then the SpamBayes addin writes a log in your Windows temp directory. This directory is generally \WINDOWS\TEMP for Windows 9x, or \Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp for Windows 2000/XP. Note that by default, in Windows 2000 and XP, Windows Explorer will not show the Local Settings directory, as it is hidden. You can convince Windows Explorer to show this directory (and therefore allow you to see the Temp directory under it by doing either: - Select the folder \Documents and Settings\{username}. This directory should be reflected in the Address Bar. In the Address Bar, simply type at the end "\Local Settings" (thereby giving that full path name), and press Enter. Explorer will then show this folder. or - Select Tools->Folder Options, select the View tab, and in the list, select Show hidden files and folders. Select OK. This folder will now be visible. You may like to then reset this option back to the default value. The log file for the most recent execution of Outlook is named spambayes1.log, the second most recent is named spambayes2.log, and so on for the four previous runs. You can view this file with notepad. Usually, you will simply see messages which indicate that SpamBayes is doing its job; however in some cases there will be errors in this file. If there are errors, please report a bug. """ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thank you for responding to this bug. can you please tell me how to find the log? where is the outlook logfile kept locally? our sys admin doesn't seem to know where it's kept either. once i find it, i'd be happy to attach it. thanks, aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 01:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 01:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-16 13:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 14:24:54 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 14:25:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-15 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by majorhangover You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: outgoing mail sits in outbox with error until resent Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 bingo! that fixed it...i unchecked personal folders and had to close and reopen outlook, but now everything seems to be working normally. thanks again...i will recommend Spam Bayes to others. aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-17 18:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 majorhangover, you're welcome! Mark, from the log, I'm betting the OP selected the "Personal Folders" top-level folder in the filtering dialog, and checked the "Include subfolders" box -- it's watching *everything*, including Outbox (and Journal, and Notes, ..., even Deleted Items). majorhangover, if that's what you did, you're the first , and it's not going to work without a bunch of changes in our code to stop you from accidentally watching folders that should never be watched. For now, painful as it may be, you should explicitly select each folder you really want to filter, and *do not* select the top-level "Personal Folders" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thanks, located the most recent logfile and attached. i appreciate your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-17 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 >From the troubleshooting guide (which came with the addin, SpamBayes -> Help -> Troubleshooting Guide): """ If you are running the binary version, then the SpamBayes addin writes a log in your Windows temp directory. This directory is generally \WINDOWS\TEMP for Windows 9x, or \Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp for Windows 2000/XP. Note that by default, in Windows 2000 and XP, Windows Explorer will not show the Local Settings directory, as it is hidden. You can convince Windows Explorer to show this directory (and therefore allow you to see the Temp directory under it by doing either: - Select the folder \Documents and Settings\{username}. This directory should be reflected in the Address Bar. In the Address Bar, simply type at the end "\Local Settings" (thereby giving that full path name), and press Enter. Explorer will then show this folder. or - Select Tools->Folder Options, select the View tab, and in the list, select Show hidden files and folders. Select OK. This folder will now be visible. You may like to then reset this option back to the default value. The log file for the most recent execution of Outlook is named spambayes1.log, the second most recent is named spambayes2.log, and so on for the four previous runs. You can view this file with notepad. Usually, you will simply see messages which indicate that SpamBayes is doing its job; however in some cases there will be errors in this file. If there are errors, please report a bug. """ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thank you for responding to this bug. can you please tell me how to find the log? where is the outlook logfile kept locally? our sys admin doesn't seem to know where it's kept either. once i find it, i'd be happy to attach it. thanks, aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 06:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 06:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-16 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 17:43:27 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 17:43:32 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] SpamBayes allows top-level folders to be selected Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-16 02:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: SpamBayes allows top-level folders to be selected Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 09:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks guys - updating the title accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-18 06:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 bingo! that fixed it...i unchecked personal folders and had to close and reopen outlook, but now everything seems to be working normally. thanks again...i will recommend Spam Bayes to others. aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 05:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 majorhangover, you're welcome! Mark, from the log, I'm betting the OP selected the "Personal Folders" top-level folder in the filtering dialog, and checked the "Include subfolders" box -- it's watching *everything*, including Outbox (and Journal, and Notes, ..., even Deleted Items). majorhangover, if that's what you did, you're the first , and it's not going to work without a bunch of changes in our code to stop you from accidentally watching folders that should never be watched. For now, painful as it may be, you should explicitly select each folder you really want to filter, and *do not* select the top-level "Personal Folders" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-18 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thanks, located the most recent logfile and attached. i appreciate your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 04:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 >From the troubleshooting guide (which came with the addin, SpamBayes -> Help -> Troubleshooting Guide): """ If you are running the binary version, then the SpamBayes addin writes a log in your Windows temp directory. This directory is generally \WINDOWS\TEMP for Windows 9x, or \Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp for Windows 2000/XP. Note that by default, in Windows 2000 and XP, Windows Explorer will not show the Local Settings directory, as it is hidden. You can convince Windows Explorer to show this directory (and therefore allow you to see the Temp directory under it by doing either: - Select the folder \Documents and Settings\{username}. This directory should be reflected in the Address Bar. In the Address Bar, simply type at the end "\Local Settings" (thereby giving that full path name), and press Enter. Explorer will then show this folder. or - Select Tools->Folder Options, select the View tab, and in the list, select Show hidden files and folders. Select OK. This folder will now be visible. You may like to then reset this option back to the default value. The log file for the most recent execution of Outlook is named spambayes1.log, the second most recent is named spambayes2.log, and so on for the four previous runs. You can view this file with notepad. Usually, you will simply see messages which indicate that SpamBayes is doing its job; however in some cases there will be errors in this file. If there are errors, please report a bug. """ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-18 04:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thank you for responding to this bug. can you please tell me how to find the log? where is the outlook logfile kept locally? our sys admin doesn't seem to know where it's kept either. once i find it, i'd be happy to attach it. thanks, aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 17:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 05:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 17 18:48:08 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 17 18:48:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858925 ] Add notification sound to Outlook addin Message-ID: Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-13 03:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin Initial Comment: This patch adds support for playing notification sounds when messages are processed by SpamBayes. The attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the Outlook2000 directory, and a notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the notification sound feature and how to configure it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-18 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. There are a *lot* of experimental/new features that will be present in the next release that weren't in 1.0a7 as a result of dumping the 1_0_release branch and the current popularity of 'x-' options. I suppose these don't effect the plug-in in any obvious way, but they are still there in the background (apart from the web interface changes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 03:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I agree that we shouldn't be adding any new features, especially experimental ones, to the 1.0 release. A branch sounds like a good idea, and fits with the branching strategy discussed earlier on spambayes-dev. Either a single branch for all new features or a separate branch per feature is fine with me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 19:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm reluctant to include this in the trunk at this stage. How would you feel about it going on a branch, and after 1.0 we integrate it? If we are really keen, we could build "experimental" binaries for people as we go (but these would not be official) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 04:28:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 04:28:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonkeen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 08:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 17:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 13:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 23:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 03:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 07:58:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 07:58:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonkeen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 12:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 08:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 17:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 13:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 23:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 03:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 11:56:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 12:00:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 11:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 07:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 04:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 03:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 20:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 09:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 23:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 12:10:11 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 12:10:16 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860599 ] Dead Button Issues... Message-ID: Bugs item #860599, was opened at 2003-12-15 16:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dead Button Issues... Initial Comment: I have the well documented problem ("Toolbar items appear, but fail to work") with a SpamBayes install on my boss' system. He has Outlook 2000 SP3 installed in Windows 2000. Please before responding to this read the first sentence of my post. I know this is a known issue and that there are fixes already posted on the FAQ pages and in the Troubleshooting guide. I have gone to great lengths to follow those tips to the letter in trying to solve this problem. My problem isn't that I can't read or follow instructions. I wouldn't be posting on here if that was who I am. That said. The problem I have (and many others, though they are happily running again with the fixes) is that the button "delete as spam" appears but then does nothing. I am able to "fix" this by either: renaming the outcmd.dat file to outcmd.bak or deleting my spambayes toolbar and restarting outlook or uninstalling/reinstalling spambayes (with antivirus disabled) Unfortunatly, none of these actually "fixes" the problem for long. After deleting 2 or 3 spam messages, the "delete as spam" button goes dead. I can click it, an hourglass will even show up indicating that it WANTs to move this message to the New Spam folder, but nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile indicates a known database corruption issue, although this may be the first report of it happening in the Outlook plug-in. For now, there is no fix, only a workaround. You will need to delete *.db in your data directory and then retrain. This is mentioned in the FAQ (#5.3), but not in the Outlook section. I apologize if this is one of the workarounds you've already tried, but it wasn't mentioned in your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 12:17:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 12:18:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860599 ] Dead Button Issues... Message-ID: Bugs item #860599, was opened at 2003-12-15 16:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Dead Button Issues... Initial Comment: I have the well documented problem ("Toolbar items appear, but fail to work") with a SpamBayes install on my boss' system. He has Outlook 2000 SP3 installed in Windows 2000. Please before responding to this read the first sentence of my post. I know this is a known issue and that there are fixes already posted on the FAQ pages and in the Troubleshooting guide. I have gone to great lengths to follow those tips to the letter in trying to solve this problem. My problem isn't that I can't read or follow instructions. I wouldn't be posting on here if that was who I am. That said. The problem I have (and many others, though they are happily running again with the fixes) is that the button "delete as spam" appears but then does nothing. I am able to "fix" this by either: renaming the outcmd.dat file to outcmd.bak or deleting my spambayes toolbar and restarting outlook or uninstalling/reinstalling spambayes (with antivirus disabled) Unfortunatly, none of these actually "fixes" the problem for long. After deleting 2 or 3 spam messages, the "delete as spam" button goes dead. I can click it, an hourglass will even show up indicating that it WANTs to move this message to the New Spam folder, but nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Wow! I've been trying to provoke database corruption on 3 different Outlooks for 3 months without success! jesse_custer, you're one lucky fellow . Did something very unusual happen while you've been fiddling with this ... like forced reboots, power outages, or killing Outlook manually from Task Manager while Outlook was in active use? Do you have other Outlook addins installed? A virus scanner? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile indicates a known database corruption issue, although this may be the first report of it happening in the Outlook plug-in. For now, there is no fix, only a workaround. You will need to delete *.db in your data directory and then retrain. This is mentioned in the FAQ (#5.3), but not in the Outlook section. I apologize if this is one of the workarounds you've already tried, but it wasn't mentioned in your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 12:36:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 12:36:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonkeen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 17:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 16:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 12:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 08:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 01:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 17:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 13:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 23:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-09 03:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 13:00:41 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 13:01:04 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Message-ID: Bugs item #802543, was opened at 2003-09-08 11:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 001-007 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: bill cann (newsguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb Initial Comment: Outlook 10 is configured to move email from inbox to other folders based on email address of incoming mail. Spambayes outlook plug-in filters the mail that remains in inbox appropriately, but doesn't filter the mail that the rules move. (either in the inbox prior to the move, or in the destination folder after the move). All folders inbox, and destination folders are specified for filtering. When rules to move mail are disabled, (leaving all mail in inbox), All mail is filtered appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 13:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Looks like SpamBayes is moving a message to your Spam folder and then the Outlook rules are moving it back out again. See the section of your log quoted below. SpamBayes detects when a message is moved out of the spam folder back to a filtered folder and takes that as an indication that the message was misclassified, so it trains it as a good message. This is the line that has "Training on message '...' - trained as good". The "Moving and spam training message..." line after it then indicates where you clicked Delete as Spam on the message. For some reason, SpamBayes is getting to the message first even with background filtering on. What are your background filtering delay values set to? How many different e-mail accounts do you retreive from? Are any of them accessed over dial-up or other slow links? """ Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam """ Is there any chance that your background filtering is not actually enabled? The log line "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms" should instead say "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" if background filtering is enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 12:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I do have all the destination mail boxes setup for filtering. I have added the spam user field to my view as I have only just started using the tool I wanted to see how it did. The scoring is excellent. Below is todays log, and you can see that I manually deleted as spam several messages. You can see that some were scored as unsure but none moved to my suspected folder. They all had scores higher than the threshold. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 183 spam and 1003 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 () using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (mfbn68) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Open Source) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Simon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (simon.keen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (skeen) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Small Office Tools) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox (Axiom) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox(Jack Smiler) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox/Outbox (Sharon) SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SPAM Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 169.808ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (mfbn68)' took 0.595048ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Open Source)' took 0.701206ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Simon)' took 133.575ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (simon.keen)' took 182.86ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (skeen)' took 2.27236ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox (Small Office Tools)' took 0.465143ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Axiom)' took 0.504533ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox(Jack Smiler)' took 0.425194ms Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox/Outbox (Sharon)' took 22.0567ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Message 'NEW ASP jobs - apply today! 1661460' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as good Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as good Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: old (as in longtime) friends' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest jobs from the IT Job Board' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Latest Jobs From CWJobs.co.uk' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Jobsite Jobs-by-Email Alert' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - Training on message 'Re: Happy X-Mas Time! aqvq' - trained as spam Moving and spam training message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - Training on message 'I b"ec.ame 10 ' times the man I use t:o b.e popsejt' - trained as spam Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as good Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Simon Keen\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini Moving and spam training message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - Training on message 'Stop sp@m the smart way homology' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'FW: xmas specials' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as good Moving and spam training message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - Training on message 'Re: My instant access jgazv ivaz' - trained as spam Message '[ spambayes-Bugs-802543 ] Outlook Plug-in does not filter mail moved by rules from inb' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The toolbar failure is normal, and SpamBayes just recreates the SpamBayes menu. The next release should include an improved message to indicate that this is expected. When using background filtering, SpamBayes will not see messages before they are moved out of your Inbox by Outlook rules. If you want moved messages to also be filtered for spam, make sure that you have included all folders that messages could be moved *to* in the "Filter the following folders" setting on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manger. How are you determining that messages are getting scored? If you are checking them with the "Show spam clues" command then that performs manual scoring of the message, and does not indicate that SpamBayes scored the message automatically. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 07:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I have now turned background filtering on and had it on for 3.5 hours, I have received more email and this is still not being moved even though it has a high score. I noticed this error message in every log put in at startup time: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simon Keen (simonkeen) Date: 2003-12-18 04:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=933621 I can report experiencing similar problems. If I knew how to add my logs files I would to assist. I am running XP Home, Outlook 2002 Messages are moved from my Inbox to other folders with rules. All messages are filtered, I get a score ( and a good one I must admit) but they are not moved to the Spam or suspect folders. As very few messages are left in my inbox I can not yet tell if those get moved correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nikolas Kyramarios (kyramas) Date: 2003-10-29 03:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=897174 I can confirm that Outlook 2002 (winXP -v. 0.81) actually IS filtering (even getting a score) my other folders but it does not move the spams to the spam folder. (only applies to emails that are moved by email-rules). Main inbox is filtered OK and spams moved correctly. I just read all the comments, since I am a new user, I will send a log as soon as (if) I get the same results with background proccessing enabled. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 20:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd like to see some logs for people who still see this problem. Note that we know we have problems in this scenario without Background mode enabled, so please make sure you are using that before you attach the log. Further, colforbin appears to have a different problem - that the mail *is* filtered by SpamBayes but then ends up back in the inbox! Everyone else seems to have the problem that SB simply isn't filtering these other folders. Please correct me if I am wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Pinto (colforbin) Date: 2003-09-26 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=875205 I am experiencing the same scenario, the filter correctly (and impressively!) identifies mail as spam, but the mail is not moved. My environment is Outlook XP and Windows 2000 professional. I can see the e-mail 'visiting' the suspected and junk mail folders while watching the folder view in Outlook, but invariably they end up back in my inbox. I have turned off my Rules, but it is still happening. BTW, kudos for undertaking this effort, I will donate because this is such a great cause (and I encourage others to not take a 'free ride' also). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: bill cann (newsguy) Date: 2003-09-25 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861868 I submitted the original report. At mhammond's suggestion, I installed .81 and after enabling the background mode, re- establishing all the fields for spam scoring, and filtering the recipient folders as well as the inbox, The folders handled by Outlook rules were also automatically filtered as intended. When mail arrives, I can watch the mail initially being moved from the inbox to the separate folders by outlook rules, and then subsequently being moved from these folders to the Spam & Possible Spam folders by SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Oded Agam (odedagam) Date: 2003-09-25 09:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=874251 Same thing happened to me as well. But, I checked and saw that the plug in does not appear in the com add-in manager. I've removed the spambayes software, deleted the spambayes folder under the application folder, deleted the spambayes toolbar from within Outlook and then installed the latest version 0081 of the plug-in. Then I configured the add-in again but all of this does not help. I can use the spambayes toolbar and click "delete as spam" manually and it does the job right, but the automatic filtering of spam while I receive emails does not work at all. If anyone has a resolution for this I would appreciate it. I'm using Office xp professional and Outlook xp (2002) with sp- 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jochen Tuchbreiter (whynot) Date: 2003-09-14 19:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=32629 I can confirm this for 0081. I am moving all mail from my inbox into 4 designated folders. Moving the mail detected as spam/unsure never works for me. I have tried to select background processing. Including or excluding Inbox in the list of filtered folders does not help either. Outlook XP (German version) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken McIntosh (informsystems) Date: 2003-09-11 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=864665 I just started using Version 0081 today and this problem is still occurring. (It was also occurring with the previous version I used, 007). Like the other fellow, I use rules to move mail immediately from the Inbox to one of 6 different folders. In my case, each of those folders represents a different email account. I've tried just filtering the Inbox, but the messages seem to get moved by the rules before SpamBaye filters them. I've also tried filtering just the 6 folders and not the Inbox and it seems to work sometimes but not other times. I have a feeling that I might workaround the problem by filtering my 6 folders (not Inbox), while setting SpamBaye to "filter in the background", but I haven't done enough experimenting to see if this works for sure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 23:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What version? If not version 008, can you please try it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802543&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 16:51:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 16:52:11 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 08:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bdipert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 06:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 16:53:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 16:53:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 08:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bdipert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 06:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 16:59:38 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 16:59:43 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 08:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bdipert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 06:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 17:00:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 17:02:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 08:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bdipert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 14:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 06:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 17:19:50 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 17:20:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 11:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 First you'll need to be running the plugin from source instead of the binary. If you're not already running from source then the steps involved are: * uninstall binary plug-in * install Python 2.3.2+ (http://www.python.org/2.3.2/) * install the win32all Python extensions (http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads .html) * get a copy of the source from CVS or download it from here (http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spambayes/spambayes- 1.0a7.zip?download) and extract it * register the source version of the plugin by running "addin.py --register" in the Outlook2000 subdirectory of the source Once you have the plugin up and running from source, get a copy of Larry Wall's patch utility (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm) and download the latest copy of the patch file from the referenced patch number. Put the empty_spam.patch file in the Outlook2000 subdirectory and run the following command: patch -i empty_spam.patch Hopefully this will apply the patch to the correct locations in your version of the source. Then restart Outlook and you should have it. Note that the Empty Spam Folder command is on the SpamBayes menu, not the right-click menu. If you do undertake this and get it running, please let me know how it works for you and if it solves your problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 18:21:23 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 18:23:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 08:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bdipert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 15:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Thanks, but I'm actually set (and I have NO clue why my last reply showed up four separate times!!!). After posting the last reply, I browsed through the message log and found the Visual Basic script that someone else posted earlier this year. It works great; I've also turned off the preview pane in Potential Spam and Spam folders (didn't realize before now that this was per-folder selectable, not a global setting). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 14:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 First you'll need to be running the plugin from source instead of the binary. If you're not already running from source then the steps involved are: * uninstall binary plug-in * install Python 2.3.2+ (http://www.python.org/2.3.2/) * install the win32all Python extensions (http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads .html) * get a copy of the source from CVS or download it from here (http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spambayes/spambayes- 1.0a7.zip?download) and extract it * register the source version of the plugin by running "addin.py --register" in the Outlook2000 subdirectory of the source Once you have the plugin up and running from source, get a copy of Larry Wall's patch utility (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm) and download the latest copy of the patch file from the referenced patch number. Put the empty_spam.patch file in the Outlook2000 subdirectory and run the following command: patch -i empty_spam.patch Hopefully this will apply the patch to the correct locations in your version of the source. Then restart Outlook and you should have it. Note that the Empty Spam Folder command is on the SpamBayes menu, not the right-click menu. If you do undertake this and get it running, please let me know how it works for you and if it solves your problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 14:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 06:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 18:41:24 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 18:41:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-29 08:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 03:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 18:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 18:43:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 18:43:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856717 ] SB creates folders with preview pane Message-ID: Bugs item #856717, was opened at 2003-12-09 18:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856717&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stijn Hazen (haasje) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SB creates folders with preview pane Initial Comment: SB creates folders for Junk E-Mail and Junk-Suspects with a preview pane (if you have the preview pane selected in subfolders). This is something you don't want with SPAM messages. If possible, it's great if you can prevent this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm afraid we can't do this. All we do is create a folder, and we have no control over how Outlook chooses to first display this folder. Note however that once you turn the preview pane off for this folder, Outlook remembers the setting for that folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856717&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 18:55:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 18:55:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-29 10:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-19 12:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 > Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" > works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently > does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) Surprisingly, yes. So if matching Outlook's behaviour is the way to go, then no prompt if empty. OTOH, if we're going to track folders by name at some point in the future, rather than via ID, then we're perhaps moving away from what Outlook does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 05:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 20:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 19:13:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 19:13:08 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What "Empty Deleted Items" does actually depends on how the user sets an option (something like "warn before deleting items permanently", true by default). So if you want to match Outlook's behavior seamlessly, we can add another 15 modules to try to figure out how that option is set ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-18 18:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 > Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" > works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently > does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) Surprisingly, yes. So if matching Outlook's behaviour is the way to go, then no prompt if empty. OTOH, if we're going to track folders by name at some point in the future, rather than via ID, then we're perhaps moving away from what Outlook does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 22:33:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 22:33:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 17:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 14:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the props Tony. I can't see a good way around this though, unless we drop the restriction completely, which I think would be bad. Seth - how many other messages have you seen this happen with? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's clueless, but I forgive you . MAPI isn't how Outlook gets the messages (I suspect you're thinking of IMAP), but a way to communicate with Outlook. The props attachment is basically the information that Outlook stores about that message. The problem is determining whether a message was received, or created by the user (in which case it's not filterable). The current theory is that it needs to have one of two properties, and your message has neither. Mark may need a new theory ;) The "Tony Meyer" stuff coems about because Outlook must have modified it a bit when I dragged it into the inbox (I suppose I did place it on an exchange server). Not enough to change the non-filterable status, but enough to contaminate it a bit. And yes, I'm at Massey University in NZ - the Auckland campus, though, not the Palmerston North (or Wellington) ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-09 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 I don't know the source code, so forgive the following comment if it's clueless. This message was downloaded via POP3, as neither of my ISP's supports MAPI. Since Outlook deals with POP3 and MAPI, I have no idea if it internally changes all messages as MAPI with the POP3 ones having limited properties as they don't exist as copies in remote directories. BTW, what's all the Tony Meyer stuff in the headers of the Seal_Props.txt file? Are you at the University of Massey in NZ? Friends of mine lived there a few years ago, liked it a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-07 07:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-06 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:07:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:07:25 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-839971 ] Outlook 2002 add-in not registered under WinXP Message-ID: Bugs item #839971, was opened at 2003-11-12 01:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839971&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Alfson (balfson) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 add-in not registered under WinXP Initial Comment: Running 8.1 with Outlook 2002 on Win2K-SP3, SpamBayes works fine, even though the "Add-ins available" box is empty. With the same setup on WinXP, there's also nothing in the "Add-ins available" box, but I get the message that SpamBayes is not registered. I have reinstalled several times, including a complete uninstall of SpamBayes. I have tried running "regsvr32.exe spambayes_addin.dll" after a fresh install as well as after having brought up Outlook to find that SB was unregistered. I'm stumped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No word from OP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 12:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't believe that SpamBayes ever appears in the list of add- ins any more, so that isn't relevant here. What is this message that SpamBayes isn't registered? I can't think of what would put up such a message - SpamBayes can't, because it isn't registered, and Outlook doesn't know that SpamBayes exists, so I can't see how it would. Are you sure it doesn't say SpamBayes needs to be "enabled"? (if so, see the FAQ). Do you have any log files that you could attach here? Or give the exact wording of the error message? (And describe what causes it to appear). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=839971&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:18:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:18:56 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856583 ] Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Message-ID: Bugs item #856583, was opened at 2003-12-09 11:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rich Liebling (rliebling) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Initial Comment: I have tried several times installing/uninstalling but have not succeeded. Note that the installer doesn't tell me it failed. I get the Outlook toolbar, but am told spambayes is not enabled. I am running Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) on Win2k (5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)). One thing about my configuration that may make it "special" is that I attach to MSExchange server and connect to several additional mailboxes. I am attaching a log file showing the install error. In a different log file i get this message (presumably because of the install problem): *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** The install error is briefly: ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 310, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.processors", line 76, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 322, in OnClicked File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you try opening the SpamBayes Manager, then select the "Filtering" tab, and define the folders your ham, spam and unsure folders. Then go to the "General" tab, and click the "enable SpamBayes" button. If any of that fails, please attach a new log from that session. I suspect you struck a known bug in the Config Wizard, but the above process should get you going again. Please follow up in this bug whether it works or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:21:01 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:21:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-05 07:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sure I followed this up earlier, but it seems to have got lost :( I've seen SpamBayes successfully score far more messages than that without an error. Could you please attach a log for the session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:41:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:41:55 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 17:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I struck a very similar issue myself recently, and found a way I could "mis-configure" my profile such that Outlook displayed an error message at startup, then immediately shut down. But I found an almost identical error to this in my log. The new version will be more graceful should it get this error. No messagebox will be shown, and SpamBayes will not be disabled. The log will get a bit of noise. I've also moved some of the initialize code to a "startup complete" event, in the hope that this will actually stop the error happening in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:43:40 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:43:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] message won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 00:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sethg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message won't filter Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-18 22:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 None that I know of, unfortunately. This was an oddball, but since it happened with no other (apparent) external cause and was repeatable, I submitted the bug report. AFAIK, this message was received the same as all my others: through POP3 (simple auth) queried every five minutes. Though this is probably not terribly relevant, my setup is: Win2K SP4 Outlook2K SP3 Kaspersky AV 4.5 BlackICE Defender 3.6cbz BOClean 4.11 AdAware Plus 6.181 Cisco 827 Router/DSL Modem 1.5Mbps DSL connection >From what I can tell, Kaspersky AV grabs port 110 traffic directly from the TCP socket and proxies it back to the application level (somehow with the same port number). Since there was no virus associated with this message, I don't think that's relevant either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 21:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the props Tony. I can't see a good way around this though, unless we drop the restriction completely, which I think would be bad. Seth - how many other messages have you seen this happen with? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-08 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's clueless, but I forgive you . MAPI isn't how Outlook gets the messages (I suspect you're thinking of IMAP), but a way to communicate with Outlook. The props attachment is basically the information that Outlook stores about that message. The problem is determining whether a message was received, or created by the user (in which case it's not filterable). The current theory is that it needs to have one of two properties, and your message has neither. Mark may need a new theory ;) The "Tony Meyer" stuff coems about because Outlook must have modified it a bit when I dragged it into the inbox (I suppose I did place it on an exchange server). Not enough to change the non-filterable status, but enough to contaminate it a bit. And yes, I'm at Massey University in NZ - the Auckland campus, though, not the Palmerston North (or Wellington) ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-08 19:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 I don't know the source code, so forgive the following comment if it's clueless. This message was downloaded via POP3, as neither of my ISP's supports MAPI. Since Outlook deals with POP3 and MAPI, I have no idea if it internally changes all messages as MAPI with the POP3 ones having limited properties as they don't exist as copies in remote directories. BTW, what's all the Tony Meyer stuff in the headers of the Seal_Props.txt file? Are you at the University of Massey in NZ? Friends of mine lived there a few years ago, liked it a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-08 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-06 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 15:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 02:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 00:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:44:26 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:44:33 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833861 ] invalid configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #833861, was opened at 2003-11-01 07:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: james pepper (pepperink) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: invalid configuration Initial Comment: I am using Outlook 2000, on a new Dell, with XP. When I first installed version "081" of Spambayes, it worked flawlessly, and beautifully, too. Then it suddenly gave me the error "invalid configuration" and "you must configure spam folder." When I attempted to run the "configuration manager," nothing happened. I have tried the suggestions in the troubleshooting page. I have uninstalled Spambayes and reinstalled. I installed the previous version. I installed Outlook 2003 (don't like it much). Uninstalled Outlook 2003 and reinstalled Outlook 2000. Always with the same result. (Also, the "junk e-mail" folder is not created during installation.) Spambayes is a great program. I hope you can help me make it work! james pepper, California Central Coast jaypea@earthlink.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please see http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html (sorry about the URL) and look for "Resetting SpamBayes Configuration". If you delete the INI file there, you should find SpamBayes config wizard will start correctly. This will not lose your training database ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Skip Sims (ssims) Date: 2003-12-13 06:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=929150 You can set the various directories by clicking on the "Filtering" Tab in SpamBayes Manager and then clicking on the various Browse buttons and set the directory. Be sure that the directory exists, if it doesn't create it in Windows Explorer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833861&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:44:52 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:44:57 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-04 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 23:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Me too (I routinely filter thousands more msgs than that). It's more likely a specific single message that's causing a problem. OTOH, we're simply moving a message (according to the error msg), and it's hard to imagine how that could provoke an out-of-memory response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sure I followed this up earlier, but it seems to have got lost :( I've seen SpamBayes successfully score far more messages than that without an error. Could you please attach a log for the session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 18 23:45:35 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 18 23:45:39 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-814099 ] Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Message-ID: Bugs item #814099, was opened at 2003-09-29 05:25 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Old filters still in place - 2 COM servers Initial Comment: While using an older version of SpamBayes (version 0.3) the filtering would continually move some good emails to my deleted items folder (the folder I selected for SPAM emails) no matter how much I trained it. I decided to remove this version and start over with the current version (0.81). After the uninstall of version 0.3 and then the install of version 0.81, the first thing I found was that I could no longer move SPAM to the deleted items folder since it was not a listed choice. (I hope this can be changed as I much prefer to move SPAM there when the program is working well. Otherwise it is a several step process to permanently delete emails). However, these same aforementioned emails were still being moved to the deleted items folder under version 0.81. (Note I have no other rules setup in Outlook and when SpamBayes is uninstalled this does not happen). I have also tried to uninstall and completely remove the SpamBayes directories both in C:\Program Files and under my Document and Settings profile and in the add- in sections for Outlook in the registry and then reinstall. Still the problem exists. I also noticed that while SpamBayes appears to work fine other than the above issue, the add-in does not appear in the Outlook Com add-ins any longer. The SpamBayes log states : Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Date: 2003-11-14 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=823907 Just a follow-up. Instead of waiting for a resolution, I uninstalled SpamBayes, wiped out my existing Windows profile and created a new one, and reinstalled SpamBayes. No more problems and everything works fine now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka) Date: 2003-11-05 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=823907 Mark, thanks for the analysis. The early versions of Spambayes did allow for the movement of SPAM to the Deleted Items folder which is how I had my plug-in setup. That may be the source of the problem. For me, assuming the filter was working correctly why not move the SPAM right to the Deleted Items Folder? Any way, I understand why that would not work for most people (I run a computer consulting business) but for me it was optimal. I have the program running with several of my clients. No one has this problem. However, no one was ever setup to push the SPAM to the deleted folders and of course with the later versions that is not a choice anyway. I've found no log indicating that email is getting moved to the deleted items folder. However, each log says that "Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist" thus, it must be so? I know that all email from some of my clients was always seen as SPAM and moved to my selected SPAM folder (which was deleted items). I wanted to start anew and the newer version did not allow the movement to the deleted items any more. However, the same clients still when to the deleted items folder as before. I've attached another log file showing the Spambayes reviewing the email as it comes in. There are no Com Add-in's listed in Outlook, not even SpamBayes is listed. I hope the problem can be found. I imagine wiping out and re-creating my desktop profile might be a work-a-round but it would be nice to not have to go there if possible. Thanks again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Unfortunately, we can not use "Deleted Items" as the destination for Spam, as this would screw up the way we train - all good items also moved to this folder would be assumed to be Spam - almost certainly not what you want. It should be impossible for 2 plugins to be running at the same time, as they use identical "Ids". Further, the log you attached does not show SpamBayes moving any items. Can you find a log where SpamBayes is indicating it is moving the Spam to "deleted items"? Are you sure there are no other installed plugins that could be doing this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=814099&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 01:30:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 01:30:47 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-803798 ] MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED error saving spam score Message-ID: Bugs item #803798, was opened at 2003-09-11 01:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED error saving spam score Initial Comment: Although my SpamBayes Outlook plug-in 008.1 seems to be working OK (Win2Ksp3, OL XPsp2), I suspect something isn't right under the covers - perhaps it's now not learning any more. This is what I often (but not always get) for new mails: Unexpected MAPI error saving the spam score for ObjectChangedException: Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE error 0x80040109 Message 'RE: Call 12574 : DAC access toodscommscausescrashonserverandDac itself' had a Spam classification of 'No' Actually, perhaps it's the tagging of messages that isn't working (which I wouldn't notice, since I haven't set anything up to show that). This seems similar to bug 787676 (at least this error message also appears there), but I do not use either Exchange or Hotmail, so I cannot detect whether this is a different issue or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Even though I said otherwise, this *is* a dupe of 787676, but my fix for that did not work. Hence that bug is incorrectly marked fixed. I just checked in a real fix for this, including support in the test suite for it, to check that my nice code to handle it is actually being called (it wasn't before). Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Holt (andyholtmacc) Date: 2003-11-23 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=863479 Hello Mark, thanks for the reply, sorry for the delay in mine. You are right, the filtering seems to be OK (well, not bad, but that's another story). The spam score doesn't seem to be being saved. I finally got round to adding the Spam score colunm to my Spam folder, and the column is completely empty, for spam mails received since the middle of September, OK before that. I can't think of anything particular that happened on my system around then, but hey it was two months ago. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 14:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is different to 787676. Am I correct in assuming that the filtering of these mail items seems to work fine, but simply the spam score isn't saved? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=803798&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 06:08:32 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 06:08:49 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833346 ] winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #833346, was opened at 2003-10-31 08:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (secclest) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Initial Comment: Every time I exit Outlook I am greeted with ?Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.? Error signature: AppName: outlook.exe AppVer: 10.0.4510.0 ModName: dccmsp32.dll ModVer: 10.0.2000.929 Offset: 00005346 I am running Windows XP Pro/Outlook XP both with the latest and greatest patches and updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 22:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 dccmsp32.dll is certainly a winfax DLL. I'm afraid I have no solution, but updating the summary accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2003-12-17 21:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 I have had this same problem and an told it is related to WINFAX integration with Outlook 2003 (never occurred before I upgraded to Outlook 2003;worked without problems in Outlook XP). Can disable dccmsp32.dll or stop Winfax but are ther any better solutions? Thanks. dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 12:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your spambayes log files? The troubleshooting guide has information about how to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 07:43:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 07:43:38 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830865 ] No dialog context-help button on Win9x Message-ID: Bugs item #830865, was opened at 2003-10-27 20:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Assigned to: Tim Peters (tim_one) Summary: No dialog context-help button on Win9x Initial Comment: >From spambayes-dev. At least I *think* it was win9x. Tim reports Ctrl+F1 (again, I *think* it was Ctrl) does work, but this obviously misses the visual cues of the '?' button. Interestingly, I can't get Win2k to show a "help" mouse cursor with any combination of F1 (but Ctrl+Shift+F1 does show help for the focused item) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 23:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I think I fixed this in: Checking in dialogs.rc; new revision: 1.43; previous revision: 1.42 Tim - if you don't mind, can you check the little help button now appears on your 9x box? (My test script on 9x worked, but I didn't test spambayes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 08:39:06 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 08:39:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 If you turn off the "Warn before deleting items permanently" option then Outlook will always empty Deleted Items without any confirmation prompt. Regardless of the warn setting, Outlook will silently ignore your request to empty Deleted Items if it is already empty. I like the idea of adding an OK-only message box to inform the user that the folder is already empty. It makes it obvious to the user what is going on, and requires no more clicks than the confirmation prompt would have required if there had been messages to remove. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What "Empty Deleted Items" does actually depends on how the user sets an option (something like "warn before deleting items permanently", true by default). So if you want to match Outlook's behavior seamlessly, we can add another 15 modules to try to figure out how that option is set ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-18 18:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 > Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" > works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently > does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) Surprisingly, yes. So if matching Outlook's behaviour is the way to go, then no prompt if empty. OTOH, if we're going to track folders by name at some point in the future, rather than via ID, then we're perhaps moving away from what Outlook does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 20:22:42 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 20:22:51 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856583 ] Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Message-ID: Bugs item #856583, was opened at 2003-12-08 16:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rliebling You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rich Liebling (rliebling) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Initial Comment: I have tried several times installing/uninstalling but have not succeeded. Note that the installer doesn't tell me it failed. I get the Outlook toolbar, but am told spambayes is not enabled. I am running Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) on Win2k (5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)). One thing about my configuration that may make it "special" is that I attach to MSExchange server and connect to several additional mailboxes. I am attaching a log file showing the install error. In a different log file i get this message (presumably because of the install problem): *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** The install error is briefly: ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 310, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.processors", line 76, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 322, in OnClicked File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Rich Liebling (rliebling) Date: 2003-12-19 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=926962 Actually, i uninstalled the version that wasn't working, and downloaded the source version. I expected it to fail, and figured i'd look for myself at what was going wrong. But, it installed fine and works great. I think the source version is actually a newer codebase, too. If it will help for me to repeat with the installer version, then i can uninstall and do that. But, if it's a known bug, then sounds like I'd only be wasting time. Let me know if there's a point to me bothering. thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 20:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you try opening the SpamBayes Manager, then select the "Filtering" tab, and define the folders your ham, spam and unsure folders. Then go to the "General" tab, and click the "enable SpamBayes" button. If any of that fails, please attach a new log from that session. I suspect you struck a known bug in the Config Wizard, but the above process should get you going again. Please follow up in this bug whether it works or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 20:46:14 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 20:46:19 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856583 ] Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Message-ID: Bugs item #856583, was opened at 2003-12-09 11:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rich Liebling (rliebling) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Install fails: ERROR enumerating a receive folder Initial Comment: I have tried several times installing/uninstalling but have not succeeded. Note that the installer doesn't tell me it failed. I get the Outlook toolbar, but am told spambayes is not enabled. I am running Outlook 2000 (9.0.0.2711) on Win2k (5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)). One thing about my configuration that may make it "special" is that I attach to MSExchange server and connect to several additional mailboxes. I am attaching a log file showing the install error. In a different log file i get this message (presumably because of the install problem): *** SpamBayes is NOT enabled, so will not filter incoming mail. *** The install error is briefly: ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 310, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dlgcore", line 262, in ApplyHandlingOptionValueError File "out1.pyz/dialogs.processors", line 76, in OnCommand File "out1.pyz/dialogs.dialog_map", line 322, in OnClicked File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 12:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Yes, the bug in 0.8 was fixed in the source code about 1 week later, so I'm glad to find it is a dupe of that old bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rich Liebling (rliebling) Date: 2003-12-20 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=926962 Actually, i uninstalled the version that wasn't working, and downloaded the source version. I expected it to fail, and figured i'd look for myself at what was going wrong. But, it installed fine and works great. I think the source version is actually a newer codebase, too. If it will help for me to repeat with the installer version, then i can uninstall and do that. But, if it's a known bug, then sounds like I'd only be wasting time. Let me know if there's a point to me bothering. thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you try opening the SpamBayes Manager, then select the "Filtering" tab, and define the folders your ham, spam and unsure folders. Then go to the "General" tab, and click the "enable SpamBayes" button. If any of that fails, please attach a new log from that session. I suspect you struck a known bug in the Config Wizard, but the above process should get you going again. Please follow up in this bug whether it works or not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 21:07:29 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 21:07:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-831105 ] SpamBayes resets Outlook "Startup in this folder" option Message-ID: Bugs item #831105, was opened at 2003-10-28 02:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831105&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeremy Johnson (webmasterj) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes resets Outlook "Startup in this folder" option Initial Comment: Summary pretty much says it all. After installation of SpamBayes, Outlook starts up in the INBOX regardless of what I select in "Startup in this folder" option! I even uninstalled SpamBayes, but it made no difference. Help! I usually start up in Calendar folder. webmastergpg@yahoo.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 13:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm afraid I have no idea, and no reason to believe it is related to SpamBayes - particularly when it happens after uninstall. It works fine for me, and has never been reported by anyone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=831105&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 21:31:22 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 21:31:27 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-825223 ] Does not mark mail as read Message-ID: Bugs item #825223, was opened at 2003-10-17 10:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Does not mark mail as read Initial Comment: When using the "Delete As Spam" button on new mail with the "Mark spam as read" feature checked. Does not mark as read. (Outlook addin version 0.81) Otherwise works awesome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 13:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Something else strange is going on here. Note that the end of the log has: Training on message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - trained as good Moving and spam training message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - Training on message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - trained as spam Somehow, this message ended up being trained as ham, them immediately as spam. I note you have 2 inboxes being watched - is this intentional? It may be and is quite common, but if not may point to a bigger issue. I think we will find some other bug is confusing us, which causes it to look like the read state is not being set (or possibly it is being set before/after some extra move we aren't expecting, etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak) Date: 2003-10-28 09:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=888770 Mark, this happens because I have preview turned on in Outlook. I can look at the email and see if it's spam without opening it and having Outlook mark it as read. If I open it and it gets marked as read then click on "Delete As Spam" it obviously stays marked as read in the spam folder. I don't know if this would be considered a bug or an enhancement. Also sorry about the duplicate attachements. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 12:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log from a session where you try this? See the "troubleshooting guide" for info. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 From bradley at kri.ch Wed Dec 10 05:24:23 2003 From: bradley at kri.ch (Bradley Richards) Date: Fri Dec 19 22:33:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Unable to start service on NT4 (sp6a) Message-ID: Hi, This may be a Python problem rather than a SpamBayes bug - but I'm just a naive sys-admin looking for a spam solution... I've installed Python 2.3.2, win32all-163 and spambayes 1.0a7 on our gateway machine, which is running NT4 sp6a. All users read e-mail through this machine, which makes it the logical place to hook in a spam filter. When I try to start the POP3 proxy service, I receive the error message The procedure entry point RegisterServiceCtrlHandlerExW could not be located in the dynamic link library ADVAPI32.dll The precise NT version info: 4.00.1381 The ADVAPE32.dll version is 4.00, dated 18 Nov 99 Any help appreciated! Cheers, Brad -------------------- Bradley Richards bradley@kri.ch From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 19 22:38:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 19 22:38:24 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860599 ] Outlook database corruption Message-ID: Bugs item #860599, was opened at 2003-12-16 08:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Outlook database corruption Initial Comment: I have the well documented problem ("Toolbar items appear, but fail to work") with a SpamBayes install on my boss' system. He has Outlook 2000 SP3 installed in Windows 2000. Please before responding to this read the first sentence of my post. I know this is a known issue and that there are fixes already posted on the FAQ pages and in the Troubleshooting guide. I have gone to great lengths to follow those tips to the letter in trying to solve this problem. My problem isn't that I can't read or follow instructions. I wouldn't be posting on here if that was who I am. That said. The problem I have (and many others, though they are happily running again with the fixes) is that the button "delete as spam" appears but then does nothing. I am able to "fix" this by either: renaming the outcmd.dat file to outcmd.bak or deleting my spambayes toolbar and restarting outlook or uninstalling/reinstalling spambayes (with antivirus disabled) Unfortunatly, none of these actually "fixes" the problem for long. After deleting 2 or 3 spam messages, the "delete as spam" button goes dead. I can click it, an hourglass will even show up indicating that it WANTs to move this message to the New Spam folder, but nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 14:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This makes it a dupe, but leaving it open in case it coaxes interesting facts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-19 04:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Wow! I've been trying to provoke database corruption on 3 different Outlooks for 3 months without success! jesse_custer, you're one lucky fellow . Did something very unusual happen while you've been fiddling with this ... like forced reboots, power outages, or killing Outlook manually from Task Manager while Outlook was in active use? Do you have other Outlook addins installed? A virus scanner? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 04:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile indicates a known database corruption issue, although this may be the first report of it happening in the Outlook plug-in. For now, there is no fix, only a workaround. You will need to delete *.db in your data directory and then retrain. This is mentioned in the FAQ (#5.3), but not in the Outlook section. I apologize if this is one of the workarounds you've already tried, but it wasn't mentioned in your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 20 00:39:45 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 20 00:39:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860410 ] SpamBayes allows top-level folders to be selected Message-ID: Bugs item #860410, was opened at 2003-12-16 02:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes allows top-level folders to be selected Initial Comment: weird bug. i have the latest version of Spam Bayes installed, and when i send emails using Outlook 2000 SP- 3 on Win2000 i get a sending error (Error Number: 0x80040601). so the outgoing mail sits in my outbox until i reopen the mail and click "send" again. then it goes out normally. i know this bug is caused by Spam Bayes because i've uninstalled and reinstalled twice and uninstalling fixes the problem. it also doesn't start having the problem until a day or two after i reinstall. i would really like to keep using Spam Bayes...can anyone help solve this problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 We no longer allow you to select the top-level folder. Checking in FolderSelector.py; new revision: 1.34; previous revision: 1.33 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 09:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks guys - updating the title accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-18 06:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 bingo! that fixed it...i unchecked personal folders and had to close and reopen outlook, but now everything seems to be working normally. thanks again...i will recommend Spam Bayes to others. aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 05:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 majorhangover, you're welcome! Mark, from the log, I'm betting the OP selected the "Personal Folders" top-level folder in the filtering dialog, and checked the "Include subfolders" box -- it's watching *everything*, including Outbox (and Journal, and Notes, ..., even Deleted Items). majorhangover, if that's what you did, you're the first , and it's not going to work without a bunch of changes in our code to stop you from accidentally watching folders that should never be watched. For now, painful as it may be, you should explicitly select each folder you really want to filter, and *do not* select the top-level "Personal Folders" folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-18 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thanks, located the most recent logfile and attached. i appreciate your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 04:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 >From the troubleshooting guide (which came with the addin, SpamBayes -> Help -> Troubleshooting Guide): """ If you are running the binary version, then the SpamBayes addin writes a log in your Windows temp directory. This directory is generally \WINDOWS\TEMP for Windows 9x, or \Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp for Windows 2000/XP. Note that by default, in Windows 2000 and XP, Windows Explorer will not show the Local Settings directory, as it is hidden. You can convince Windows Explorer to show this directory (and therefore allow you to see the Temp directory under it by doing either: - Select the folder \Documents and Settings\{username}. This directory should be reflected in the Address Bar. In the Address Bar, simply type at the end "\Local Settings" (thereby giving that full path name), and press Enter. Explorer will then show this folder. or - Select Tools->Folder Options, select the View tab, and in the list, select Show hidden files and folders. Select OK. This folder will now be visible. You may like to then reset this option back to the default value. The log file for the most recent execution of Outlook is named spambayes1.log, the second most recent is named spambayes2.log, and so on for the four previous runs. You can view this file with notepad. Usually, you will simply see messages which indicate that SpamBayes is doing its job; however in some cases there will be errors in this file. If there are errors, please report a bug. """ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-18 04:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 thank you for responding to this bug. can you please tell me how to find the log? where is the outlook logfile kept locally? our sys admin doesn't seem to know where it's kept either. once i find it, i'd be happy to attach it. thanks, aric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please attach a log. The specific error is MAPI_E_NOT_IN_QUEUE - it looks to me like you have configured SpamBayes to watch your Outbox - however, this should be impossible as SpamBayes filters this folder from the list it displays. Either way, *something* is trying to modify the message in the Outbox, and this modification is what prevents it being sent. Without a log, I am only guessing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 17:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks, but so do we all. Whoever it's assigned to, several people look at it, and the reason that Outlook problems get autoassigned to Mark is because he's most likely to know why stuff happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: aric boyles (majorhangover) Date: 2003-12-17 05:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931621 i changed the "assigned to" because it seems like mhammond already has quite a bit on his plate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860410&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 20 05:09:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 20 05:09:30 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824900 ] Spambayes incorrectly trains mail as good Message-ID: Bugs item #824900, was opened at 2003-10-17 01:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824900&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Ingenito (gates150) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes incorrectly trains mail as good Initial Comment: Initially I noticed that Spambayes was not moving messages to the Unsure folder or the Junk E-mail folder for certain messages that had high enough percentages. Spambayes would move some, but then would leave emails with a 90% or above score in my folders. It would also leave messages with a score of 15% or higher without moving them to the Unsure folder. Looking at the log, I noticed that these message are being trained as good, even though they have scores of 90% and above. Please look at the log. For example the last few lines of the log: Message 'Refinance Without Perfect Credit' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' - This had a score of 43% and stayed in the original folder. Message 'Quick Cash Loans up to $500 plus free groceries bonus' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' but then two lines later: Training on message 'Quick Cash Loans up to $500 plus free groceries bonus' - trained as good - This message has a score of 55% and stayed in the original folder. Message 'Get your Complimentary Credit Report' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Training on message 'Get your Complimentary Credit Report' - trained as good This had a score of 44% and stayed in the folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 21:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Best I can do with this one is to upgrade the logging to include the folder names when all this stuff happens - which I have done. So hopefully when people strike it in the next version, I will get a clue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824900&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 20 05:12:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 20 05:12:21 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-832183 ] uninstall leaves turds Message-ID: Bugs item #832183, was opened at 2003-10-29 16:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832183&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 3 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: uninstall leaves turds Initial Comment: Uninstalling SpamBayes apparently leaves lots of cruft around. I suspect the uninstaller is not doing the DLLUnregisterServer thing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 21:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 *sigh* - recent testing shows inno+py2exe does not leave uninstall turds in the registry - but *does* leave all files used by the .dll hanging around - presumably as inno is attempting to remove them as "regsvr32 -u ..." is still running. Dropping priority as a few files around is less harmfull than the regsitry referencing COM objects that no longer exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=832183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 20 05:14:43 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 20 05:15:06 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-819684 ] Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Message-ID: Bugs item #819684, was opened at 2003-10-08 10:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Initial Comment: When a MIME message is received from the Evolution Mail client the SpamBayes Outlook plugin truncates the message stream after the headers and only tokenizers the headers. Message source looks like this: ... Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ" Organization: Message-Id: <1065568187.23375.8.camel@wookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 07 Oct 2003 16:09:47 -0700 Content-Length: 5759 --=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable message here ... --- Show spam clues indicates the message stream is only the headers. The message appears to get truncated after the Date header. My guess is that this is because Evolution puts two blanks lines after the headers instead of one. Other mail clients I tried only put one blank line after the headers before the first MIME boundary. Surprisingly this really doesn't seem to matter. SpamBayes quickly learned these messages were not spam. SpamBayes rocks! And so does the Outlook plugin! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 21:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry for the delay here. The best thing you could do is install Python+SpamBayes source, and run the dump_props program against this message. Second best (but really just as good ) is to wait for the next binary release, which will include dump_props as an executable ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Date: 2003-10-08 12:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=556412 A little Googling turned up a comment from Tim Peters a year ago: > The Outlook client right now "loses" all > attachments, and even loses the msg body if the msg has been > digitally signed (because it turns out Outlook does Yet > Another Entirely Different Thing for signed msgs, leaving the > two "normal" body properties empty and stuffing the body > *plus* the signature into Yet Another property). So if it's possible to figure out the name of this "Yet Another property", I could probably test and submit a patch (to msgstore.GetEmailPackageObject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 20 14:41:12 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 20 14:41:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-20 22:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lsp85 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Finkel (lsp85) Date: 2003-12-20 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935221 upgraded Outlook (MS Office) from 2000 to 2003, on a Win2k 5.00.2195 SP4 OS computer. I am using version .81 of SpamBayes SpanBayes worked fantastic on Outlook 2000, however it is not working very good at all on 2003. I retrained, deleted and retrained. No good. I disabled the Outlook junk e-mail option, still not good. I am getting scores of 100, 97 etc... but the e-mails will not forward to the suspected spam folders, they stay in the in box. I know my settings are correct. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken (kenjin2) Date: 2003-10-27 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895882 The SB Outlook plug-in (0081) fails to move messages that are classified as Spam or Spam-Maybe. An earlier version of the plug-in worked fine after some installation anomalies were resolved. Also, this plug-in worked when first installed 9-12-03. I'm not certain, but the failure seemed to occur when Office update to SP3 was applied along with a security rollup from Microsoft. I'm runing Windows XP/Professional SP1 with Outlook 2000 SP3. The log files seem nominal. Thanks for your efforts on this projevt. Ken ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 01:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is it possible that SpamBayes is configured to leave these messages "Untouched" in the Filter dialog? I'm adding some debug output to SpamBayes to help track this down in future versions, but the log certainly shows nothing going wrong when doing the move. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Ingenito (gates150) Date: 2003-10-16 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=888404 I am having this same problem also. Rebooting the computer does not fix the problem. I am using Outlook XP, Win XP SP2 and Spambayes .81. I have also set the delay to 4 seconds and this did not help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Esterhai (esterhai) Date: 2003-10-03 18:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=879055 I am having the exact same problem and can't figure out a solution. Does anyone have a solution for us. Restarting the computer or Outlook doesn't solve my problem. I have been trying to make it work for 3 days now. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2003-09-22 14:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP (SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates). Except rebooting does not solve my problem. Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) but not moved. I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but can find no documentation. Can anyone tell me how to do this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-21 18:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-21 16:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 21 14:55:49 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 21 14:55:54 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830865 ] No dialog context-help button on Win9x Message-ID: Bugs item #830865, was opened at 2003-10-27 04:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: No dialog context-help button on Win9x Initial Comment: >From spambayes-dev. At least I *think* it was win9x. Tim reports Ctrl+F1 (again, I *think* it was Ctrl) does work, but this obviously misses the visual cues of the '?' button. Interestingly, I can't get Win2k to show a "help" mouse cursor with any combination of F1 (but Ctrl+Shift+F1 does show help for the focused item) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-21 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, Mark, no difference on Win98SE, OL2K SP-3, IMO, running from CVS. Still no question mark. Plain F1 shows help for the focused item. So does Ctrl+F1 and Shift+F1 and Ctrl+Shift+F1. Alt+F1 does not. Neither does Alt+Shift+F1. Ctrl+Alt+F1 *does*. The pattern is obvious . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 07:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I think I fixed this in: Checking in dialogs.rc; new revision: 1.43; previous revision: 1.42 Tim - if you don't mind, can you check the little help button now appears on your 9x box? (My test script on 9x worked, but I didn't test spambayes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 22 09:18:39 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 22 09:18:53 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-22 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Oops, the _GetParent() function is module-level in 'manager', not class-level in 'BayesManager', so do 'import manager' to get access to it. Also added an information message box when the spam folder is already empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 If you turn off the "Warn before deleting items permanently" option then Outlook will always empty Deleted Items without any confirmation prompt. Regardless of the warn setting, Outlook will silently ignore your request to empty Deleted Items if it is already empty. I like the idea of adding an OK-only message box to inform the user that the folder is already empty. It makes it obvious to the user what is going on, and requires no more clicks than the confirmation prompt would have required if there had been messages to remove. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What "Empty Deleted Items" does actually depends on how the user sets an option (something like "warn before deleting items permanently", true by default). So if you want to match Outlook's behavior seamlessly, we can add another 15 modules to try to figure out how that option is set ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-18 18:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 > Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" > works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently > does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) Surprisingly, yes. So if matching Outlook's behaviour is the way to go, then no prompt if empty. OTOH, if we're going to track folders by name at some point in the future, rather than via ID, then we're perhaps moving away from what Outlook does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 22 10:38:44 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 22 10:38:50 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855445 ] Outlook shuts down Message-ID: Bugs item #855445, was opened at 2003-12-06 12:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by talonius You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook shuts down Initial Comment: I have XP Pro with all the updates installed and SP1 ronning Outlook 2000 9.0.0.2711 and Spambayes 08.1 and Norton 2003 Installation went well. Outlook opens and check for messages. If there are messages, Outlook automatically shuts down without downloading them. I have to use Outlook express to get my mail. Prior to installing SB I could send & receive mail without problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Schkerke (talonius) Date: 2003-12-22 09:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=206805 Windows XP Professional SP1 (fully patched), Microsoft Outlook 2003 (fully patched through Office Update), Norton Antivirus Client 2003 Corporate Edition. After a fresh reboot I can load Outlook and SpamBayes and everything works wonderfully. If I shut Outlook down it will no longer load successfully. It only comes up, displays the first message, and then shuts itself back off. My log file looks like this (I do not see a way for me to attach files to this bug): Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 2197 spam and 7158 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.34334ms Error finding the MAPI folders for a folder switch event Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1071, in OnFolderSwitch File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010a (MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED): OLE error 0x8004010a Thank you! Brian Schkerke ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 22 14:02:00 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 22 14:03:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-825223 ] Does not mark mail as read Message-ID: Bugs item #825223, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Does not mark mail as read Initial Comment: When using the "Delete As Spam" button on new mail with the "Mark spam as read" feature checked. Does not mark as read. (Outlook addin version 0.81) Otherwise works awesome. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-22 14:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I've seen this training anomaly before with a person who had an Outlook rule that moved a message to one of the watched folders. SpamBayes moved the message to the spam folder before Outlook rules ran. A rule then moved it back to a watched folder, which SpamBayes detected as the user dragging a misclassified message out of the spam folder, and so trained it as good (which generates "Training on message..."). The user then saw that a spam message was in his good folder and clicked Delete as Spam (which generates "Moving and spam training..."). The "Processing n missed spam..." lines would seem to indicate that background filtering is not enabled. Enabling background filtering on the Advanced tab should eliminate the rules contention that is causing the training anomaly. Please report back as to whether or not this also fixes the original "mark as read" problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 21:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Something else strange is going on here. Note that the end of the log has: Training on message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - trained as good Moving and spam training message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - Training on message '75% Off on Inkjet&LaserToner! ' - trained as spam Somehow, this message ended up being trained as ham, them immediately as spam. I note you have 2 inboxes being watched - is this intentional? It may be and is quite common, but if not may point to a bigger issue. I think we will find some other bug is confusing us, which causes it to look like the read state is not being set (or possibly it is being set before/after some extra move we aren't expecting, etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Travis Cox (mejesusfreak) Date: 2003-10-27 17:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=888770 Mark, this happens because I have preview turned on in Outlook. I can look at the email and see if it's spam without opening it and having Outlook mark it as read. If I open it and it gets marked as read then click on "Delete As Spam" it obviously stays marked as read in the spam folder. I don't know if this would be considered a bug or an enhancement. Also sorry about the duplicate attachements. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-26 20:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log from a session where you try this? See the "troubleshooting guide" for info. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=825223&group_id=61702 From kennypitt at hotmail.com Mon Dec 22 14:27:32 2003 From: kennypitt at hotmail.com (Kenny Pitt) Date: Mon Dec 22 14:28:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Unable to start service on NT4 (sp6a) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Bradley Richards wrote: > This may be a Python problem rather than a SpamBayes bug - but I'm > just a naive sys-admin looking for a spam solution... > > I've installed Python 2.3.2, win32all-163 and spambayes 1.0a7 on our > gateway machine, which is running NT4 sp6a. All users read e-mail > through this machine, which makes it the logical place to hook in a > spam filter. > > When I try to start the POP3 proxy service, I receive the error > message > > The procedure entry point RegisterServiceCtrlHandlerExW > could not be located in the dynamic link library ADVAPI32.dll > > The precise NT version info: 4.00.1381 > The ADVAPE32.dll version is 4.00, dated 18 Nov 99 The Platform SDK docs for RegisterServiceCtrlHandlerEx say: """ Requirements Client: Included in Windows XP, Windows 2000 Professional. Server: Included in Windows .NET Server 2003, Windows 2000 Server. """ so not supported on NT4. This call is made in win32all, which provides the service framework. Unfortunately, it appears that win32all currently requires the additional functionality of the newer function. There may be a way to add support for NT4 in win32all, but it would be up to Mark (who develops win32all) to determine if it is worth the effort. In the meantime, you could possibly run the sb_server.py script directly, but it would require leaving the gateway machine logged into a user account that is running the script. I believe there are also utilities (maybe in the NT Resource Kit?) that allow you to register a command-line program as a service. You might also want to look at FAQ #6.2 (http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#are-there-plans-to-develop-a- server-side-spambayes-solution) before deciding to use SpamBayes on a gateway. -- Kenny Pitt From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 23 01:00:46 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 23 01:00:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830865 ] No dialog context-help button on Win9x Message-ID: Bugs item #830865, was opened at 2003-10-27 20:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Assigned to: Tim Peters (tim_one) Summary: No dialog context-help button on Win9x Initial Comment: >From spambayes-dev. At least I *think* it was win9x. Tim reports Ctrl+F1 (again, I *think* it was Ctrl) does work, but this obviously misses the visual cues of the '?' button. Interestingly, I can't get Win2k to show a "help" mouse cursor with any combination of F1 (but Ctrl+Shift+F1 does show help for the focused item) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-23 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks tim - i've had another go when you get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-22 06:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, Mark, no difference on Win98SE, OL2K SP-3, IMO, running from CVS. Still no question mark. Plain F1 shows help for the focused item. So does Ctrl+F1 and Shift+F1 and Ctrl+Shift+F1. Alt+F1 does not. Neither does Alt+Shift+F1. Ctrl+Alt+F1 *does*. The pattern is obvious . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 23:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I think I fixed this in: Checking in dialogs.rc; new revision: 1.43; previous revision: 1.42 Tim - if you don't mind, can you check the little help button now appears on your 9x box? (My test script on 9x worked, but I didn't test spambayes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 23 07:51:56 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 23 07:52:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 01:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cantics You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Bonzek (cantics) Date: 2003-12-23 07:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=936787 This exact thing started for me when I upgraded to Exchange 2003. Clients are Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002, both running on XP Pro, sp1. I have yet to figure out a fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 23:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I struck a very similar issue myself recently, and found a way I could "mis-configure" my profile such that Outlook displayed an error message at startup, then immediately shut down. But I found an almost identical error to this in my log. The new version will be more graceful should it get this error. No messagebox will be shown, and SpamBayes will not be disabled. The log will get a bit of noise. I've also moved some of the initialize code to a "startup complete" event, in the hope that this will actually stop the error happening in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 01:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 23 09:48:15 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 23 09:48:20 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-830865 ] No dialog context-help button on Win9x Message-ID: Bugs item #830865, was opened at 2003-10-27 04:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: No dialog context-help button on Win9x Initial Comment: >From spambayes-dev. At least I *think* it was win9x. Tim reports Ctrl+F1 (again, I *think* it was Ctrl) does work, but this obviously misses the visual cues of the '?' button. Interestingly, I can't get Win2k to show a "help" mouse cursor with any combination of F1 (but Ctrl+Shift+F1 does show help for the focused item) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-23 09:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 The good news is that F1 still works . Getting rid of every instance of DS_MODALFRAME in the entire source tree doesn't make the happy little question mark appear, though. Doesn't mean that wasn't relevant, but may mean it requires changing more than just that much. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-23 01:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks tim - i've had another go when you get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-21 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, Mark, no difference on Win98SE, OL2K SP-3, IMO, running from CVS. Still no question mark. Plain F1 shows help for the focused item. So does Ctrl+F1 and Shift+F1 and Ctrl+Shift+F1. Alt+F1 does not. Neither does Alt+Shift+F1. Ctrl+Alt+F1 *does*. The pattern is obvious . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 07:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I think I fixed this in: Checking in dialogs.rc; new revision: 1.43; previous revision: 1.42 Tim - if you don't mind, can you check the little help button now appears on your 9x box? (My test script on 9x worked, but I didn't test spambayes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=830865&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 23 10:01:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 23 10:01:58 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-865011 ] AddIn does not appear in COM Add-Ins list Message-ID: Bugs item #865011, was opened at 2003-12-23 10:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=865011&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pierre Goyette (pierregoyette) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: AddIn does not appear in COM Add-Ins list Initial Comment: I have Windows XP SP1a with all service packs, Outlook XP (2002) with SP2 install. In the Options / Other / Advanced Options / COM Add-Ins, the SpamBayes plugin does not appear. It is not listed as disabled under Help / About / Disable Items. The log file is attached. Before Office XP SP1, SpamBayes did not function automatically, even with the background engine enabled. With SP1, it appears to work but it does not appear as a valid plugin. There are two lines in the log which appear suspicious: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=865011&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 23 18:30:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 23 18:31:03 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815205 ] unsigned macro dialog raised Message-ID: Bugs item #815205, was opened at 2003-09-30 12:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gallde You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815205&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Barth (wbarth1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: unsigned macro dialog raised Initial Comment: unlike 0.7 version 0.81 raises the unsigned macro dialog requiring the user to " enable macros" to proceed after starting Outlook (Outlook 2000 sp3). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dean Gallea (gallde) Date: 2003-12-23 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=937108 I get this behavior as well, with Outlook 2002 on XP Pro SP-1, all latest updates, networked DSL connection to ISP. It does NOT happen at my workplace PC, which is Outlook 2000 connected through Exchange Server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815205&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 23 21:02:16 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 23 21:02:29 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-865011 ] AddIn does not appear in COM Add-Ins list Message-ID: Bugs item #865011, was opened at 2003-12-24 04:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=865011&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pierre Goyette (pierregoyette) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: AddIn does not appear in COM Add-Ins list Initial Comment: I have Windows XP SP1a with all service packs, Outlook XP (2002) with SP2 install. In the Options / Other / Advanced Options / COM Add-Ins, the SpamBayes plugin does not appear. It is not listed as disabled under Help / About / Disable Items. The log file is attached. Before Office XP SP1, SpamBayes did not function automatically, even with the background engine enabled. With SP1, it appears to work but it does not appear as a valid plugin. There are two lines in the log which appear suspicious: FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-24 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect to see the fix in the next binary release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=865011&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 25 05:06:37 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 25 05:06:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-807234 ] Active Sync Problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #807234, was opened at 2003-09-17 02:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by alecclews You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathaniel Gildersleeve (natgild) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Active Sync Problem Initial Comment: I am using the Outlook 2002 addin version .08 on a machine with Windows XP. After installing Spambayes, I am unable to sync my Ipaq Pocket PC using Activesync Version 3.7 and Windows Mobile 2003 on the Ipaq. My computer will no longer connect to the Ipaq. I recall I had a similar problem with Outlook Spam Filter Version 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alec Clews (alecclews) Date: 2003-12-25 21:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=202472 I have a similiar problem. Spambayes 0.8.1, activesync 3.7.1, Windows XP SP1 and Outlook 2002 SP-2. I installed Spambayes and had it working. I then installed Activesync and spampayes has just died. Spambayes produces no long files :-(. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 08:16:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 08:17:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-04 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tagrobicki You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2003-12-29 08:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 I have uploaded a log file (minus some "Message" lines to get it below size restrictions on uploads). The error appears at the bottom. I've added it here just so you don't have to download the file. Message 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. Message 'weekend entertainment' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 23:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Me too (I routinely filter thousands more msgs than that). It's more likely a specific single message that's causing a problem. OTOH, we're simply moving a message (according to the error msg), and it's hard to imagine how that could provoke an out-of-memory response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sure I followed this up earlier, but it seems to have got lost :( I've seen SpamBayes successfully score far more messages than that without an error. Could you please attach a log for the session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 11:55:56 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 11:56:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-867177 ] Problem reinstalling SpamBayes Message-ID: Support Requests item #867177, was opened at 2003-12-29 11:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=867177&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Lee (jlee418) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem reinstalling SpamBayes Initial Comment: Spambayes has been working fine for me when I first installed it. Just today, it stopped working. Trying to access the SpamBayes Manager or clicking the Delete as Spam button did nothing. At first, I thought a reboot would fix the problem, but it didn't. So I was left with the usual uninstall/reinstall approach to see if that fixed the problem, but it didn't. Upon uninstall, I noticed that the SpamBayes toolbar was still there in Outlook, so I removed that as according to one of your FAQs. After the removal of the SpamBayes toolbar, I then went ahead and downloaded the latest version of SpamBayes and installed that. The installation went through smoothly with no errors of any kind. However, upon loading Outlook, the SpamBayes toolbar is not there?! Here are the specifications of the environment SpamBayes was installed in: Windows 2000 SP4 Outlook XP Norton Antivirus (Completely disabled during this whole process) After this failed reinstalled, I have done numerous uninstalls and reinstalls including rebooting after an uninstall and rebooting after an install, to see if that fixed the problem, but it persists. I have also even tried removing the registry keys that SpamBayes still left behind by doing a search for spambayes. However after a reboot and then another install of SpamBayes with no success. I have also removed the Spambayes directory that's located in the C:\Documents and Settings\ directory as indicated in your FAQ where SpamBayes keeps it "trained" database. Is there a way for me to completely remove all the SpamBayes information from the system as though SpamBayes was never installed before? It seems as though there are still some reminiscent information left behind, maybe some dlls that needs to be removed that was not removed by the uninstall program? Please any insight or suggestions would be helpful, I'm being bombarded with tons of spam again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=867177&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 16:04:59 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 16:05:31 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-867321 ] Add 'Include Subfolders' to Wizard Message-ID: Feature Requests item #867321, was opened at 2003-12-29 16:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=867321&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Keith Royster (kroyster) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add 'Include Subfolders' to Wizard Initial Comment: During the wizard setup of the Outlook plugin, when selecting folders that containing spam and ham samples, you do not currently have the option to 'Include Subfolders'. This option is available through the Manager interface, but not through the wizard. Please consider adding it to the wizard as well. Thanks! Great program! I have been using Spammunition, but SpamBayes seems less buggy, more flexible, and easier to use! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=867321&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 18:13:07 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 18:14:17 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743384 ] Show Spam Clues Marks Message as Read Message-ID: Bugs item #743384, was opened at 2003-05-25 20:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743384&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Postponed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Paul C Coyle (pccoyle) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Show Spam Clues Marks Message as Read Initial Comment: After using "Show Spam Clues" on an unread message in the Spam folder, the message status changed form Read to Unread. My concern here is that an perhaps an acknowledge has been sent to the spammer showing the account as active? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-29 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have installed SpamBayes at work as well as home. I see this occurring at work where I am logging into an exchange server, but not at home where I am using POP3 and SMTP. At work I am using Windows 2000 SP4 and all of the latest patches, and MSOFFICE XP (Outlook 2002) with all of the latest patches. At Home I am using Windows XP Home SP1 with all of the latest patches, and MSOFFICE XP (Outlook 2002) with all of the latest patches. Can anyone else specify if they are logging into an exchange server when this occurs? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-06-16 20:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't fix this, as I don't know how. Adding the original as an attachment causes Outlook to mark the original as "read" - but this read status is not reflected in the message itself. I'm out of ideas for this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-05-25 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can reproduce this, but I am not at all sure I will be able to do anything about it. If you are concerned about auto-responses, then I suggest you customize outlook accordingly. Note however that spammers can check account details in other ways - especially if the body of the HTML message references anything that is downloaded from a server (such as an image). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743384&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 18:22:04 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 18:22:13 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-748199 ] Spam score now shows as decimal Message-ID: Bugs item #748199, was opened at 2003-06-03 10:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=748199&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Zalinski (pezalinski) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam score now shows as decimal Initial Comment: When I created a "Spam" column in Outlook 2000, and scored the folder using your product, everything was grand -- the scores showed up as percentages. Then I moved the "Spam" column by dragging it over a few columns, and the scores converted to decimals, and I can't seem to get them to convert back to a percentage, no matter what I try. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-29 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Have you right clicked on the SPAM column header and selected Format Columns? This will bring up a configuration screen. Change the field labeled "Format" to "ROUNDED" by selecting the dropdown to the right side, and click the "OK" button at the bottom of the configuration box. This should eliminate the decimals for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Rottenberg (halr9000) Date: 2003-08-26 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=93952 Have you tried removing and re-adding the field? This worked for me on OL2K3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=748199&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 18:32:33 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 18:32:40 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-859333 ] Outlook will not remove read messages from server Message-ID: Bugs item #859333, was opened at 2003-12-12 23:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook will not remove read messages from server Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes on outlook 2000 the advanced properties of 'Remove message from server when deleted from deleted items' no longer works. Now all the emails are saved on the server regardless of the fact that I have deleted them from the deleted items folder. This means all the spam that spambayes saves me from seeing in my inbox, still takes up space on my mail server. I must leave a copy on the server, I have it set to delete all emails 5 days after download regardless of them being saved. I must do this because I read my email from different locations. Some emails need to be saved on different machines. The emails are not getting deleted after this 5 day period either, outlook never, ever removes items from the server, this really needs to be looked into and fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-29 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Are you using personal folders and connecting to an exchange server? If the messages are copied to personal folders (.pst) then the "remove from server" command won't work. Perhaps you can create an autoArchive event to remove messages after 5 days to resolve this. Take a look at Outlook Help, searching for "delete copies" without the quotes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=859333&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 18:56:53 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 18:56:59 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857990 ] Net Folders Message-ID: Bugs item #857990, was opened at 2003-12-10 21:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Net Folders Initial Comment: When the client uses Outlook 2000 with the Net Folders feature enabled (shares calendars and contacts amongst users), every time there is a synchronization (an email with the form #Net Folders - ... appears), Outlook returns an error message concerning the form that couldn't be opened correctly. The message appears for every message of this kind. Does not affect the shares nor the SpamBayes filter, but annoying for the user, as it could be repeated many times during the day. Thanks for your help. ... Lorsque le client utilise Outlook 2000 avec la fonction Dossiers Partag?s activ?e (partage de calendriers et contacts entre les utilisateurs), ? chaque fois qu'une synchronisation est effectu?e (un message avec la forme #Dossier Partag?s - ... appara?t), Outlook donne un message d'erreur concernant un formulaire qu'il n'a pu ouvrir correctement. Le message appara?t ? chaque fois qu'un message de synchro est re?u. Ceci n'affecte ni les partages ni le filtrage de SpamBayes, mais est plut?t fatigant pour l'utilisateur, car ce message peut r?appara?tre plusieurs fois dans une journ?e. Merci de votre aide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-29 18:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 This is tough since I do not speak french, but I searched the French MS site and came up with some possibilities. See if this might be of some help. It relates specifically to forms, and comes from the Microsoft France site. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;fr;290657 This The english version is here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; [LN];290657 It would appear that it may have something to do with the Macro Security level. Try setting Macro Security to LOW in order to eliminate the message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Date: 2003-12-11 23:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928614 The error message (in french) is the following: "Impossible d'ouvrir le formulaire personnalis?. Outlook utilisera un formulaire Outlook ? la place." Which means approximately this: "Cannot open custom form. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead." It's an Outlook error message, but it happens only when using Net Folders and SpamBayes. If I uninstall one of them, I don't get the message... but I need both installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-11 18:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What exactly is this message? If the message is displayed by SpamBayes, then please attach a log for the session (see the "Troubleshooting Guide" for details) - this log will have the information we need to diagnose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 18:59:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 18:59:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860599 ] Outlook database corruption Message-ID: Bugs item #860599, was opened at 2003-12-15 16:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook database corruption Initial Comment: I have the well documented problem ("Toolbar items appear, but fail to work") with a SpamBayes install on my boss' system. He has Outlook 2000 SP3 installed in Windows 2000. Please before responding to this read the first sentence of my post. I know this is a known issue and that there are fixes already posted on the FAQ pages and in the Troubleshooting guide. I have gone to great lengths to follow those tips to the letter in trying to solve this problem. My problem isn't that I can't read or follow instructions. I wouldn't be posting on here if that was who I am. That said. The problem I have (and many others, though they are happily running again with the fixes) is that the button "delete as spam" appears but then does nothing. I am able to "fix" this by either: renaming the outcmd.dat file to outcmd.bak or deleting my spambayes toolbar and restarting outlook or uninstalling/reinstalling spambayes (with antivirus disabled) Unfortunatly, none of these actually "fixes" the problem for long. After deleting 2 or 3 spam messages, the "delete as spam" button goes dead. I can click it, an hourglass will even show up indicating that it WANTs to move this message to the New Spam folder, but nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-29 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 When this occurs, if you close Outlook, then view running tasks, is Outlook.exe still listed under processes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 22:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This makes it a dupe, but leaving it open in case it coaxes interesting facts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Wow! I've been trying to provoke database corruption on 3 different Outlooks for 3 months without success! jesse_custer, you're one lucky fellow . Did something very unusual happen while you've been fiddling with this ... like forced reboots, power outages, or killing Outlook manually from Task Manager while Outlook was in active use? Do you have other Outlook addins installed? A virus scanner? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile indicates a known database corruption issue, although this may be the first report of it happening in the Outlook plug-in. For now, there is no fix, only a workaround. You will need to delete *.db in your data directory and then retrain. This is mentioned in the FAQ (#5.3), but not in the Outlook section. I apologize if this is one of the workarounds you've already tried, but it wasn't mentioned in your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 19:30:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 19:30:44 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-867177 ] Problem reinstalling SpamBayes Message-ID: Support Requests item #867177, was opened at 2003-12-30 05:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=867177&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Lee (jlee418) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem reinstalling SpamBayes Initial Comment: Spambayes has been working fine for me when I first installed it. Just today, it stopped working. Trying to access the SpamBayes Manager or clicking the Delete as Spam button did nothing. At first, I thought a reboot would fix the problem, but it didn't. So I was left with the usual uninstall/reinstall approach to see if that fixed the problem, but it didn't. Upon uninstall, I noticed that the SpamBayes toolbar was still there in Outlook, so I removed that as according to one of your FAQs. After the removal of the SpamBayes toolbar, I then went ahead and downloaded the latest version of SpamBayes and installed that. The installation went through smoothly with no errors of any kind. However, upon loading Outlook, the SpamBayes toolbar is not there?! Here are the specifications of the environment SpamBayes was installed in: Windows 2000 SP4 Outlook XP Norton Antivirus (Completely disabled during this whole process) After this failed reinstalled, I have done numerous uninstalls and reinstalls including rebooting after an uninstall and rebooting after an install, to see if that fixed the problem, but it persists. I have also even tried removing the registry keys that SpamBayes still left behind by doing a search for spambayes. However after a reboot and then another install of SpamBayes with no success. I have also removed the Spambayes directory that's located in the C:\Documents and Settings\ directory as indicated in your FAQ where SpamBayes keeps it "trained" database. Is there a way for me to completely remove all the SpamBayes information from the system as though SpamBayes was never installed before? It seems as though there are still some reminiscent information left behind, maybe some dlls that needs to be removed that was not removed by the uninstall program? Please any insight or suggestions would be helpful, I'm being bombarded with tons of spam again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-30 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your log files? They should indicate what is going wrong. The 008.1 version can leave some stuff behind on uninstall - the next release will fix that. However, there shouldn't be anything left if you've done all the above. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=867177&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 19:41:51 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 19:42:00 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-05 09:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-30 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you using Exchange? Microsoft's support stuff has info saying that this can be something that Exchange can do (if I read it right). (It also said that this happened with copying messages with a lot of attachments, but only with NT4, so I presume that isn't relevant here). Are you able to find the 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' message and see if there's anything unusual about it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2003-12-30 02:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 I have uploaded a log file (minus some "Message" lines to get it below size restrictions on uploads). The error appears at the bottom. I've added it here just so you don't have to download the file. Message 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. Message 'weekend entertainment' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-19 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Me too (I routinely filter thousands more msgs than that). It's more likely a specific single message that's causing a problem. OTOH, we're simply moving a message (according to the error msg), and it's hard to imagine how that could provoke an out-of-memory response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sure I followed this up earlier, but it seems to have got lost :( I've seen SpamBayes successfully score far more messages than that without an error. Could you please attach a log for the session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 19:58:10 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 19:58:14 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-05 07:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-30 11:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have previously seen tracebacks similar to the one posted when filtering single incoming messages. IIRC, this was when I used the PGP plugin, but it had nothing to do with SpamBayes - Outlook itself was also screwed, and almost all Outlook operations would also fail, with Outlook displaying a dialog saying it too was out of memory. This happened after only 24 hours or so of uptime when PGP was enabled, and has never once happened when disabled. tagrobicki - is the error in the log you posted a result of doing a "bulk score" of a folder, or simply after normal filtering of (many) new incoming messages? If the latter, did Outlook itself also appear to be dead after you saw this message? If so, do you have any other addins loaded? If you do have the PGP plugin installed, please close this bug as "wont fix" (only as there is a 'can't fix' :) I'm reluctant to say that this is a simple memory leak in SpamBayes, else I would expect far more users to see it. My outlook shows no evidence of leaks after many many hours and messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-30 11:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you using Exchange? Microsoft's support stuff has info saying that this can be something that Exchange can do (if I read it right). (It also said that this happened with copying messages with a lot of attachments, but only with NT4, so I presume that isn't relevant here). Are you able to find the 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' message and see if there's anything unusual about it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2003-12-30 00:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 I have uploaded a log file (minus some "Message" lines to get it below size restrictions on uploads). The error appears at the bottom. I've added it here just so you don't have to download the file. Message 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. Message 'weekend entertainment' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-19 15:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Me too (I routinely filter thousands more msgs than that). It's more likely a specific single message that's causing a problem. OTOH, we're simply moving a message (according to the error msg), and it's hard to imagine how that could provoke an out-of-memory response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 15:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sure I followed this up earlier, but it seems to have got lost :( I've seen SpamBayes successfully score far more messages than that without an error. Could you please attach a log for the session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 29 23:19:48 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 29 23:20:01 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-836018 ] MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Message-ID: Bugs item #836018, was opened at 2003-11-04 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tagrobicki You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY when filtering lots of spam Initial Comment: I recieve the following error when filtering approximately 1247 spam messages: Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. At which point, it appears that SpamBayes stops working. Outlook continues to work, but the dialog recommends restarting it. This happened in version 0.81 running on WinXP Pro with all patches using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2003-12-29 23:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 In response to the various questions: (1) It does tend to happen after the system has been up for many hours to possibly many days (2) I do not have PGP installed, (3) I was doing normal filtering but of a "spam" account we have on our mail server which receives 1000-2000 messages, the purpose is to catch false positives from the mail server (4) The mail server is not MS Exchange, I did look at MSDN before reporting this and didn't see anything that applied to my situation (5) Outlook appears to continue working, in fact, it continues downloading the remaining spam messages but it doesn't do any SpamBayes filtering until I exit and re-enter at which point is filters out spam messages. I have not looked at the message preceeding the error, but I will the next time it comes up. I do have Norton ISS installed, but its spam filter is disabled. I also have a few Outlook filtering rules to move specific messages into some folders. However, the dialog clearly says that it is SpamBayes that is having issue possibly due to underlying Outlook problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-29 19:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have previously seen tracebacks similar to the one posted when filtering single incoming messages. IIRC, this was when I used the PGP plugin, but it had nothing to do with SpamBayes - Outlook itself was also screwed, and almost all Outlook operations would also fail, with Outlook displaying a dialog saying it too was out of memory. This happened after only 24 hours or so of uptime when PGP was enabled, and has never once happened when disabled. tagrobicki - is the error in the log you posted a result of doing a "bulk score" of a folder, or simply after normal filtering of (many) new incoming messages? If the latter, did Outlook itself also appear to be dead after you saw this message? If so, do you have any other addins loaded? If you do have the PGP plugin installed, please close this bug as "wont fix" (only as there is a 'can't fix' :) I'm reluctant to say that this is a simple memory leak in SpamBayes, else I would expect far more users to see it. My outlook shows no evidence of leaks after many many hours and messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-29 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you using Exchange? Microsoft's support stuff has info saying that this can be something that Exchange can do (if I read it right). (It also said that this happened with copying messages with a lot of attachments, but only with NT4, so I presume that isn't relevant here). Are you able to find the 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' message and see if there's anything unusual about it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas A. Grobicki (tagrobicki) Date: 2003-12-29 08:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901893 I have uploaded a log file (minus some "Message" lines to get it below size restrictions on uploads). The error appears at the bottom. I've added it here just so you don't have to download the file. Message 'discounted Rx Xanax segundo' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. ERROR: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\nException 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.\r\n\r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\nThis message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1075, in MoveToReportingError File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1062, in MoveTo File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 1059, in _DoCopyMove MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x8007000e (MAPI_E_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY): Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. Message 'weekend entertainment' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 23:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Me too (I routinely filter thousands more msgs than that). It's more likely a specific single message that's causing a problem. OTOH, we're simply moving a message (according to the error msg), and it's hard to imagine how that could provoke an out-of-memory response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm sure I followed this up earlier, but it seems to have got lost :( I've seen SpamBayes successfully score far more messages than that without an error. Could you please attach a log for the session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=836018&group_id=61702 From spambayes at connecting4income.com Tue Dec 30 04:42:03 2003 From: spambayes at connecting4income.com (Bruce) Date: Tue Dec 30 04:43:37 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Suggestion for Outlok version of Spambayes Message-ID: <002d01c3ceb9$333d41b0$0202a8c0@ibmt8cji949cus> I would recommend that you have Spambayes able to be set up as a "Rules" This would allow much more flexability with processing messages. I could have certain rules running before spambayes, and then have spambayes process the messages, and then have more rules if I would like to. I do find that Spambayes is by FAR, the BEST spam tool out there!!!! Thanks Bruce -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20031230/22febb39/attachment.html From tim.one at comcast.net Tue Dec 30 10:09:33 2003 From: tim.one at comcast.net (Tim Peters) Date: Tue Dec 30 10:09:34 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Suggestion for Outlok version of Spambayes In-Reply-To: <002d01c3ceb9$333d41b0$0202a8c0@ibmt8cji949cus> Message-ID: > I would recommend that you have Spambayes able to be set up as a > ?Rules? This would allow much more flexability with processing > messages. I could have certain rules running before spambayes, and > then have spambayes process the messages, and then have more rules if > I would like to. That would be nice. Unfortunately, it doesn't look possible -- the Outlook Rules system is a "closed box" that doesn't allow adding external programs of this kind in a useful way. Worse, you can't write an Outlook rule that looks at the value of a user-defined field either, so you can't write an Outlook rule that looks at the value of the Spam Score field we add. I'm afraid we already did the best we can do here, and that to do better, Microsoft would have to change Outlook. BTW, note that spambayes-bugs@python.org isn't a good place to suggest features. Normally only a program sends email to this address (a program at SourceForge sends email to this address whenever an item in the spambayes bug database is changed). General discussion should go to spambayes@python.org. Glad you like the program, anyway! From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 30 14:27:36 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 30 14:27:46 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855445 ] Outlook shuts down Message-ID: Bugs item #855445, was opened at 2003-12-06 13:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ima_user You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook shuts down Initial Comment: I have XP Pro with all the updates installed and SP1 ronning Outlook 2000 9.0.0.2711 and Spambayes 08.1 and Norton 2003 Installation went well. Outlook opens and check for messages. If there are messages, Outlook automatically shuts down without downloading them. I have to use Outlook express to get my mail. Prior to installing SB I could send & receive mail without problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-30 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have sporadic problems with Outlook as well. After closing Outlook, check your task manager for running processes to see if Outlook is still running. If it is, select the process (Outlook.exe) and end task. I will look into how to resolve this Outlook related issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Schkerke (talonius) Date: 2003-12-22 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=206805 Windows XP Professional SP1 (fully patched), Microsoft Outlook 2003 (fully patched through Office Update), Norton Antivirus Client 2003 Corporate Edition. After a fresh reboot I can load Outlook and SpamBayes and everything works wonderfully. If I shut Outlook down it will no longer load successfully. It only comes up, displays the first message, and then shuts itself back off. My log file looks like this (I do not see a way for me to attach files to this bug): Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 2197 spam and 7158 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.34334ms Error finding the MAPI folders for a folder switch event Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1071, in OnFolderSwitch File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010a (MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED): OLE error 0x8004010a Thank you! Brian Schkerke ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 31 09:11:03 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 31 09:11:09 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842984 ] No browser found Message-ID: Bugs item #842984, was opened at 2003-11-16 02:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842984&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0a6 Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bip (bippo312) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: No browser found Initial Comment: Using Mandrake 9.2 and spambayes vsn 1.0a7. I just installed spambayes and was trying to set up the preferences. (mail server, pwd, etc...) so I tried running the web interface. # sb_imapfilter.py -b SpamBayes IMAP Filter Beta1, version 0.1 (September 2003), using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha2, version 0.02 and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003). User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 825, in ? run() File "/usr/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 802, in run Dibbler.run(launchBrowser=launchUI) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 688, in run webbrowser.open_new("http://localhost:%d/" % context._HTTPPort) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/webbrowser.py", line 47, in open_new get().open(url, 1) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/webbrowser.py", line 39, in get raise Error("could not locate runnable browser") webbrowser.Error: could not locate runnable browser .. Couldn't this just notify you that you need to go to 'http://localhost:8880' instead of throwing an error? konqueror is installed and mozilla should be installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-12-31 14:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 If webbrowser.open_new() fails, we now print a message saying "Please point your web browser at http://localhost:8880/" rather than bombing out. Dibbler.py 1.12 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-18 03:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 By using the "-b" switch, you are requesting that the browser be opened - if you run it without the "-b" switch, then it will give the behaviour you request. As to why the browser doesn't open - this is a python issue rather than a spambayes one (you could try "import webbrowser; webbrowser.open("http://url.here")" from python, and it should give the same results. The help pages for the webbrowser module in python give hints about how to set things up so that a browser correctly opens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842984&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 31 12:37:57 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 31 12:38:02 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860599 ] Outlook database corruption Message-ID: Bugs item #860599, was opened at 2003-12-15 16:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jesse_custer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook database corruption Initial Comment: I have the well documented problem ("Toolbar items appear, but fail to work") with a SpamBayes install on my boss' system. He has Outlook 2000 SP3 installed in Windows 2000. Please before responding to this read the first sentence of my post. I know this is a known issue and that there are fixes already posted on the FAQ pages and in the Troubleshooting guide. I have gone to great lengths to follow those tips to the letter in trying to solve this problem. My problem isn't that I can't read or follow instructions. I wouldn't be posting on here if that was who I am. That said. The problem I have (and many others, though they are happily running again with the fixes) is that the button "delete as spam" appears but then does nothing. I am able to "fix" this by either: renaming the outcmd.dat file to outcmd.bak or deleting my spambayes toolbar and restarting outlook or uninstalling/reinstalling spambayes (with antivirus disabled) Unfortunatly, none of these actually "fixes" the problem for long. After deleting 2 or 3 spam messages, the "delete as spam" button goes dead. I can click it, an hourglass will even show up indicating that it WANTs to move this message to the New Spam folder, but nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2003-12-31 12:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 !!!!UPDATE!!!! Thanks! Clearing the Old .DB fixed this. I actually went and deleted all the spambayes related directories before reinstalling and retraining. I hope the log file I sent has helped you guys with this project. You obviously care enough to monitor and participate in the troubleshooting and support of SpamBayes. I look forward to more of these kind of Open software experiences. By the way. The system this was on has a HUGE Outlook database (.pst file): 1.5 GB. Maybe none of you have tried to get SpamBayes corrupted with such a large Outlook file. The other thing I can think of is AntiVirus. Though I reinstalled SpamBayes several times with AntiVirus unloaded to try and fix the problem before deleting the .db, I'm not 100% sure it was off the first time it was installed. Do you think that would have corrupted the SpamBayes program? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-29 18:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 When this occurs, if you close Outlook, then view running tasks, is Outlook.exe still listed under processes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 22:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This makes it a dupe, but leaving it open in case it coaxes interesting facts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Wow! I've been trying to provoke database corruption on 3 different Outlooks for 3 months without success! jesse_custer, you're one lucky fellow . Did something very unusual happen while you've been fiddling with this ... like forced reboots, power outages, or killing Outlook manually from Task Manager while Outlook was in active use? Do you have other Outlook addins installed? A virus scanner? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile indicates a known database corruption issue, although this may be the first report of it happening in the Outlook plug-in. For now, there is no fix, only a workaround. You will need to delete *.db in your data directory and then retrain. This is mentioned in the FAQ (#5.3), but not in the Outlook section. I apologize if this is one of the workarounds you've already tried, but it wasn't mentioned in your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 31 17:37:18 2003 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 31 17:37:23 2003 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-868648 ] Document restriction against training on Sent Items folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #868648, was opened at 2004-01-01 11:37 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=868648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Document restriction against training on Sent Items folder Initial Comment: Bob Coe on spambayes@python.org. > If you think training on the "sent" folder is a bad > idea, say so in the installation instructions; but don't > incorporate another unexpected restriction. It seems that he's asking for the restriction to be lifted and changed into a suggestion in the documentation instead. Lifting the restriction seems unlikely to have any effect, apart from maybe confusing people if they try to manually train on messages in it (since they'll get the "No filterable items" message). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=868648&group_id=61702