From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  1 08:23:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  1 10:23:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-781503 ] Hotmail account is not
	Filtered
Message-ID: <E19iaoQ-0004rB-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #781503, was opened at 2003-08-01 09:23
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781503&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matthew J. Burke (sanloublues)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hotmail account is not Filtered

Initial Comment:
I'm running Outlook 2002 on a Win2k box, with three 
accounts (IMAP, Hotmail, and Exchange).  
This worked with v003 of the plugin, but now that I've 
upgraded to v006 only the imap and exchange accounts 
are filtered.  
Not even running Filter Now on the hotmail folders 
works.  It just runs through without doing anything.  
Delete As Spam still functions though, but it has to be 
pressed twice for each message.

For the attached log, I started, then ran filter now on 
just the hotmail folders.  Then I used delete as spam to 
get rid of my spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781503&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  1 13:09:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  1 15:09:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19ifH8-00065h-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 13:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xaviorm
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-08-01 08:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

Ok from the logs here is the error I am getting. I still have 
this problem with the 06 intaller. on NT with Outlook 2000

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in 
RegisterClasses
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in 
RegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in 
_cat_registrar
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface 
supported', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-30 13:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

For most people, the problem is the MS "Designer" object
spontaneously unregistering.  The 006 binary attempts to fix
this by not requiring the object to be installed at all!

This particular error code generally means a Python failure
that will be written to a log.  Please see the
troubleshooting guide and attach the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-07-30 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

I am having this problem on an NT 4 sp6a box with the 06 
version. Using Outlook 2000. any clues what is causing this? 
so far it just seems to be fixing it's self for people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Elmar Bransch (elmar71)
Date: 2003-07-28 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832399

After digging in the Mailing List and the bug base I found the 
interim version posted on 25-07 in this thread.
I was very lucky having SpamBayes 002 installed on Win2000 
Prof. with Outlook 2000 SR-1. Since upgrading to 003 it had 
the DLL-Register-0x80040201-problem, still remaining with the 
binary 005 installer. Finally the interim bug catcher release did 
the trick for me and installed fine - there has been even no 
errors in the spambayes1.log on startup so far :-)

Thanks! Keep on ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-28 06:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and 
unable to test on my Win 2000 machine.  This morning, 
however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly 
there.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 04:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 04:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 03:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 03:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 12:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 06:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 04:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-03 17:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 06:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  1 18:45:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  1 20:46:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19ikWw-0006yh-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 10:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-02 10:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It appears you can fix this by upgrading your Internet
Explorer.  Please see
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/InstallationProblems.html#comcat_version_screwup
for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-08-02 05:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

Ok from the logs here is the error I am getting. I still have 
this problem with the 06 intaller. on NT with Outlook 2000

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in 
RegisterClasses
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in 
RegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in 
_cat_registrar
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface 
supported', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 10:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

For most people, the problem is the MS "Designer" object
spontaneously unregistering.  The 006 binary attempts to fix
this by not requiring the object to be installed at all!

This particular error code generally means a Python failure
that will be written to a log.  Please see the
troubleshooting guide and attach the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-07-31 09:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

I am having this problem on an NT 4 sp6a box with the 06 
version. Using Outlook 2000. any clues what is causing this? 
so far it just seems to be fixing it's self for people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Elmar Bransch (elmar71)
Date: 2003-07-29 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832399

After digging in the Mailing List and the bug base I found the 
interim version posted on 25-07 in this thread.
I was very lucky having SpamBayes 002 installed on Win2000 
Prof. with Outlook 2000 SR-1. Since upgrading to 003 it had 
the DLL-Register-0x80040201-problem, still remaining with the 
binary 005 installer. Finally the interim bug catcher release did 
the trick for me and installed fine - there has been even no 
errors in the spambayes1.log on startup so far :-)

Thanks! Keep on ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-29 03:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and 
unable to test on my Win 2000 machine.  This morning, 
however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly 
there.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 01:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-26 01:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 00:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 00:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 09:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 05:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 01:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 14:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-03 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  2 16:48:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug  2 19:01:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782122 ] Stopped loading
Message-ID: <E19j5Ay-0006yN-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782122, was opened at 2003-08-02 15:48
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Stopped loading

Initial Comment:
Version 0.2 binary was working fine, making life *much* 
easier!  Buttons disappeared from the toolbar.  Installed 
version 0.3, got:
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
This occurs every time I launch Outlook.  I've uninstalled 
and reinstalled several times.

Log record follows:
Migrating old pickle 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\John\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  2 18:04:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug  2 20:04:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782122 ] Stopped loading
Message-ID: <E19j6Mh-0007u0-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782122, was opened at 2003-08-03 08:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Stopped loading

Initial Comment:
Version 0.2 binary was working fine, making life *much* 
easier!  Buttons disappeared from the toolbar.  Installed 
version 0.3, got:
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
This occurs every time I launch Outlook.  I've uninstalled 
and reinstalled several times.

Log record follows:
Migrating old pickle 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\John\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-03 10:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try just ignoring that error, and re-configuring
SpamBayes again (ie, nominate the Spam and good folders). 
This should fix it.  (The plugin is having trouble migrating
your old configuration.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  2 23:00:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug  3 01:00:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782122 ] Stopped loading
Message-ID: <E19jAyv-0001OY-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782122, was opened at 2003-08-02 15:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by john_hopkins
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Stopped loading

Initial Comment:
Version 0.2 binary was working fine, making life *much* 
easier!  Buttons disappeared from the toolbar.  Installed 
version 0.3, got:
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
This occurs every time I launch Outlook.  I've uninstalled 
and reinstalled several times.

Log record follows:
Migrating old pickle 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\John\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Date: 2003-08-02 22:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=223069

Well, I couldn't directly re-config because although the addin 
was checked in COM addins, the toolbar wasn't visible or on 
the toolbar list.  I ended up uninstalling the app and deleting 
the info in my profile, then reinstalling and reconfiguring (I 
figured if it was choking on my old config, I'd just go around 
the problem).  It seems to be working fine, I just need to 
collect another couple of spam messages (won't take long) to 
get filtering going.

Thanks again!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-02 17:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try just ignoring that error, and re-configuring
SpamBayes again (ie, nominate the Spam and good folders). 
This should fix it.  (The plugin is having trouble migrating
your old configuration.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  2 23:01:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug  3 01:01:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782122 ] Stopped loading
Message-ID: <E19jAzN-0001Ph-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782122, was opened at 2003-08-02 15:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by john_hopkins
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Stopped loading

Initial Comment:
Version 0.2 binary was working fine, making life *much* 
easier!  Buttons disappeared from the toolbar.  Installed 
version 0.3, got:
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
This occurs every time I launch Outlook.  I've uninstalled 
and reinstalled several times.

Log record follows:
Migrating old pickle 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\John\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Date: 2003-08-02 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=223069

Well, I couldn't directly re-config because although the addin 
was checked in COM addins, the toolbar wasn't visible or on 
the toolbar list.  I ended up uninstalling the app and deleting 
the info in my profile, then reinstalling and reconfiguring (I 
figured if it was choking on my old config, I'd just go around 
the problem).  It seems to be working fine, I just need to 
collect another couple of spam messages (won't take long) to 
get filtering going.

Thanks again!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Date: 2003-08-02 22:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=223069

Well, I couldn't directly re-config because although the addin 
was checked in COM addins, the toolbar wasn't visible or on 
the toolbar list.  I ended up uninstalling the app and deleting 
the info in my profile, then reinstalling and reconfiguring (I 
figured if it was choking on my old config, I'd just go around 
the problem).  It seems to be working fine, I just need to 
collect another couple of spam messages (won't take long) to 
get filtering going.

Thanks again!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-02 17:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try just ignoring that error, and re-configuring
SpamBayes again (ie, nominate the Spam and good folders). 
This should fix it.  (The plugin is having trouble migrating
your old configuration.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug  3 04:19:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug  3 06:19:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782122 ] Stopped loading
Message-ID: <E19jFxH-0004uR-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782122, was opened at 2003-08-03 08:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Stopped loading

Initial Comment:
Version 0.2 binary was working fine, making life *much* 
easier!  Buttons disappeared from the toolbar.  Installed 
version 0.3, got:
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
This occurs every time I launch Outlook.  I've uninstalled 
and reinstalled several times.

Log record follows:
Migrating old pickle 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\John\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 226, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 499, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 513, in MigrateOldPickle
EOFError


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-03 20:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm closing this, as newer versions will not die on an error
loading the pickle anyway!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Date: 2003-08-03 15:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=223069

Well, I couldn't directly re-config because although the addin 
was checked in COM addins, the toolbar wasn't visible or on 
the toolbar list.  I ended up uninstalling the app and deleting 
the info in my profile, then reinstalling and reconfiguring (I 
figured if it was choking on my old config, I'd just go around 
the problem).  It seems to be working fine, I just need to 
collect another couple of spam messages (won't take long) to 
get filtering going.

Thanks again!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Hopkins (john_hopkins)
Date: 2003-08-03 15:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=223069

Well, I couldn't directly re-config because although the addin 
was checked in COM addins, the toolbar wasn't visible or on 
the toolbar list.  I ended up uninstalling the app and deleting 
the info in my profile, then reinstalling and reconfiguring (I 
figured if it was choking on my old config, I'd just go around 
the problem).  It seems to be working fine, I just need to 
collect another couple of spam messages (won't take long) to 
get filtering going.

Thanks again!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-03 10:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try just ignoring that error, and re-configuring
SpamBayes again (ie, nominate the Spam and good folders). 
This should fix it.  (The plugin is having trouble migrating
your old configuration.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug  3 05:43:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug  3 07:43:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782280 ] Outlook crashes when
	"More Buttons" Clicked
Message-ID: <E19jHGy-0001V3-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782280, was opened at 2003-08-03 11:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782280&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Manning (johngm)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook crashes when "More Buttons" Clicked

Initial Comment:
The SpamBayes toolbar can be positioned so that there 
isn't enough room for all of the buttons (3 in Possibly 
Spam folder) to display. In this case, a "More Buttons" 
button is displayed at the end of the toolbar.

If you click on this button, Outlook will crash = "Outlook 
has generated errors and will be closed by Windows...."

Nothing is added to the SpanBayes log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782280&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug  3 10:41:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug  3 12:41:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776808 ] Expanding toolbar
	crashes outlook
Message-ID: <E19jLv5-0006FH-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776808, was opened at 2003-07-24 04:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
If the spambayes toolbar is not completely visible in 
Outlook you can open/expand it using the '>>' button at 
the end of the toolbar. Clicking on this button crashes 
outlook completely with the following message:

"Program Error: Outlook.exe has generated errors and will 
be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the 
program."

Outlook's own toolbars don't have this problem.

Versions:
Outlook 2000 on W2K
Spambayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.5 (july 
2003)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-03 12:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

See also bug 782280 (now closed).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 05:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I get this too.  I'm at a loss though

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-31 05:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I get this on Outlook 2000 SP1, with the Spambayes addin 
binary installer 006.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-24 17:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

FYI, I've seen this too, on Win2K and Win98SE, using Outlook 
2000, and CVS spambayes, Python 2.2.3.  Just reproduced it 
after a CVS up.  This happens when I'm in my Unsure folder, 
which tries to display both buttons, and often my Outlook 
window is too small.  I first saw it shortly after we switched 
to building our own toolbar.  It doesn't bother me, especially 
since I can't imagine we're at fault <0.5 wink>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-24 17:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just for reference, I do not experience this with current CVS 
and Outlook 2k2 sp2 with WinXP SP1.  (I never have enough 
room in my possible spam folder, because both buttons are 
present, so I use this every now and then).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug  3 10:41:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug  3 12:42:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782280 ] Outlook crashes when
	"More Buttons" Clicked
Message-ID: <E19jLvj-0006Fs-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782280, was opened at 2003-08-03 07:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782280&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Manning (johngm)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook crashes when "More Buttons" Clicked

Initial Comment:
The SpamBayes toolbar can be positioned so that there 
isn't enough room for all of the buttons (3 in Possibly 
Spam folder) to display. In this case, a "More Buttons" 
button is displayed at the end of the toolbar.

If you click on this button, Outlook will crash = "Outlook 
has generated errors and will be closed by Windows...."

Nothing is added to the SpanBayes log file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-03 12:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Closed; a duplicate of bug 776808 (which is still open).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782280&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug  4 03:35:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug  4 05:35:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19jbkl-0005oq-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 11:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug  4 09:42:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug  4 11:42:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during
	message download
Message-ID: <E19jhTR-0006YH-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 00:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hbrackett
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook hangs during message download

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-04 11:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual 
desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it
filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly.
It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not
work correctly on virtual desktops. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug  4 16:45:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug  4 18:45:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19jo4i-0007r0-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 21:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 10:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 00:51:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 02:51:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19jvfL-00072I-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 11:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 00:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 00:58:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 02:58:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19jvll-0007H0-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 11:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 00:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 02:48:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 04:49:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19jxUv-0003uJ-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-20 01:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sculshaw
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Culshaw (sculshaw)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=248664

I'm also finding this problem when I attempted to install 0.6
- WinXP Pro SP1
- Outlook XP SP2
and NO Python installed

Cheers,
Steve C.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-09 12:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

I've had both 002 and 003 installed, but either both have 
been uninstalled or 003 is still left on the machine.

I also have Python installed and that's why I tried what you 
suggested to another user.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 05:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version are you running?  It looks like binary 002 - if
so, please try version 003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-08 22:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

mhammond:

you said

>> * Go to a command prompt, and change to the
>> \Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client 
>> directory 
>> * Execute "python makepy.py -i"
>> * Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if
>> necessary, repeat for each one).
>> * You should get a coupld of lines of Python 
>> code generated.
>> 
>> Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new 
>> version to test.

Here's what I get:

Microsoft Outlook View Control
 {0006F062-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}, lcid=0, 
major=1, minor=0
 >>> # Use these commands in Python code to auto 
generate .py support
 >>> from win32com.client import gencache
 >>> gencache.EnsureModule('{0006F062-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046}', 0, 1, 0)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 11:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 03:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 01:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 01:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 16:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-23 02:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 23:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 04:49:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 06:49:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783434 ] UnicodeError in
	site-packages\email\Header.py
Message-ID: <E19jzNt-0003ve-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783434, was opened at 2003-08-05 12:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: UnicodeError in site-packages\email\Header.py

Initial Comment:
Got a
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII 
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	C:\Python22\lib\site-packages\email\Header.py 
line
	230: ustr = unicode(s, incodec)

while getting a piece of spam via pop3proxy

Python 2.2.3 (#42, May 30 2003, 18:12:08) [MSC 32 bit 
(Intel)] on win32


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 11:00:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 13:00:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19k5Ad-0008CB-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-19 21:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rdesantos
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-08-05 13:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Version 006 solved the problem for me and SpamBayes is 
working just fine now. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Culshaw (sculshaw)
Date: 2003-08-05 04:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=248664

I'm also finding this problem when I attempted to install 0.6
- WinXP Pro SP1
- Outlook XP SP2
and NO Python installed

Cheers,
Steve C.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-09 08:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

I've had both 002 and 003 installed, but either both have 
been uninstalled or 003 is still left on the machine.

I also have Python installed and that's why I tried what you 
suggested to another user.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 01:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version are you running?  It looks like binary 002 - if
so, please try version 003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-08 18:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

mhammond:

you said

>> * Go to a command prompt, and change to the
>> \Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client 
>> directory 
>> * Execute "python makepy.py -i"
>> * Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if
>> necessary, repeat for each one).
>> * You should get a coupld of lines of Python 
>> code generated.
>> 
>> Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new 
>> version to test.

Here's what I get:

Microsoft Outlook View Control
 {0006F062-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}, lcid=0, 
major=1, minor=0
 >>> # Use these commands in Python code to auto 
generate .py support
 >>> from win32com.client import gencache
 >>> gencache.EnsureModule('{0006F062-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046}', 0, 1, 0)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 23:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-22 22:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 11:02:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 13:02:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19k5CK-0008H7-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-19 21:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rdesantos
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-08-05 13:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Version 006 solved the problem for me and SpamBayes is 
working just fine now. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-08-05 13:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Version 006 solved the problem for me and SpamBayes is 
working just fine now. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Culshaw (sculshaw)
Date: 2003-08-05 04:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=248664

I'm also finding this problem when I attempted to install 0.6
- WinXP Pro SP1
- Outlook XP SP2
and NO Python installed

Cheers,
Steve C.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-09 08:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

I've had both 002 and 003 installed, but either both have 
been uninstalled or 003 is still left on the machine.

I also have Python installed and that's why I tried what you 
suggested to another user.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 01:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version are you running?  It looks like binary 002 - if
so, please try version 003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-08 18:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

mhammond:

you said

>> * Go to a command prompt, and change to the
>> \Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client 
>> directory 
>> * Execute "python makepy.py -i"
>> * Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if
>> necessary, repeat for each one).
>> * You should get a coupld of lines of Python 
>> code generated.
>> 
>> Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new 
>> version to test.

Here's what I get:

Microsoft Outlook View Control
 {0006F062-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}, lcid=0, 
major=1, minor=0
 >>> # Use these commands in Python code to auto 
generate .py support
 >>> from win32com.client import gencache
 >>> gencache.EnsureModule('{0006F062-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046}', 0, 1, 0)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 23:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-22 22:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 11:09:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 13:09:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19k5JO-0005be-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-20 01:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sculshaw
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Culshaw (sculshaw)
Date: 2003-08-05 17:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=248664

I had the same problem, but I tried to install a second time 
and it worked fine !!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-08-05 17:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Version 006 solved the problem for me and SpamBayes is 
working just fine now. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-08-05 17:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Version 006 solved the problem for me and SpamBayes is 
working just fine now. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Culshaw (sculshaw)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=248664

I'm also finding this problem when I attempted to install 0.6
- WinXP Pro SP1
- Outlook XP SP2
and NO Python installed

Cheers,
Steve C.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-09 12:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

I've had both 002 and 003 installed, but either both have 
been uninstalled or 003 is still left on the machine.

I also have Python installed and that's why I tried what you 
suggested to another user.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 05:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version are you running?  It looks like binary 002 - if
so, please try version 003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-08 22:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

mhammond:

you said

>> * Go to a command prompt, and change to the
>> \Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client 
>> directory 
>> * Execute "python makepy.py -i"
>> * Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if
>> necessary, repeat for each one).
>> * You should get a coupld of lines of Python 
>> code generated.
>> 
>> Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new 
>> version to test.

Here's what I get:

Microsoft Outlook View Control
 {0006F062-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}, lcid=0, 
major=1, minor=0
 >>> # Use these commands in Python code to auto 
generate .py support
 >>> from win32com.client import gencache
 >>> gencache.EnsureModule('{0006F062-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046}', 0, 1, 0)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 11:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 03:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 01:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 01:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 16:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-23 02:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 23:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 18:07:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 20:08:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783839 ] external lock on
	database file causes crash
Message-ID: <E19kBqM-00077G-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783839, was opened at 2003-08-05 17:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783839&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ned Smith (nedsmith)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: external lock on database file causes crash

Initial Comment:
If outlook is launched after an external program has 
locked spambayes database file (e.g. enterprise backup 
utility). Spambayes will not start and likely be in an 
unknown state. 

I discovered the spambayes dropdown menu became 
wedged and would not popup the menu choices. 

I tried deinstalling/reinstalling spambayes without 
success. Finally, deleted spambayes toolbar and tried 
again - this worked but was rather inconvenient. The 
backup utility runs daily (can be very annoying to 
reinstall daily - worse than just deleting spam!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783839&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 18:31:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 20:31:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-783846 ] Generalize!
Message-ID: <E19kCDM-0007ra-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #783846, was opened at 2003-08-06 00:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Kruchten (simnick66)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Generalize!

Initial Comment:
I think that the spambayes engine (which works great 
btw) could be generalized to classify way more than just 
spam, it could completely replace rule-based filtering.

As i understand it (correct me if i'm wrong!) there is 
nothing spam-specific about this software, it could be 
used to classify any message into any folder, while 
retaining its spam-filtering abilities.

the way this would work would be to specify a default 
folder (the inbox) and then a set of other folders (ie 
spam, folder1, folder2, folder3) and when a message 
comes in, it could be shuttled to the appropriate folder if 
the threshold for that folder's bayesian rating is crossed. 
if multiple thresholds are crossed, it could then go into 
an unsure folder, or the values could be compared to 
see where it should go. each folder could have 
independently set thresholds...

is there an easy way to hack the current outlook plugin 
to do this for testing purposes? (ie to install multiple 
versions and spoof them into comparing different folders 
or... ?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 18:51:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 20:51:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-783846 ] Generalize!
Message-ID: <E19kCWN-00005C-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #783846, was opened at 2003-08-05 20:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Kruchten (simnick66)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Generalize!

Initial Comment:
I think that the spambayes engine (which works great 
btw) could be generalized to classify way more than just 
spam, it could completely replace rule-based filtering.

As i understand it (correct me if i'm wrong!) there is 
nothing spam-specific about this software, it could be 
used to classify any message into any folder, while 
retaining its spam-filtering abilities.

the way this would work would be to specify a default 
folder (the inbox) and then a set of other folders (ie 
spam, folder1, folder2, folder3) and when a message 
comes in, it could be shuttled to the appropriate folder if 
the threshold for that folder's bayesian rating is crossed. 
if multiple thresholds are crossed, it could then go into 
an unsure folder, or the values could be compared to 
see where it should go. each folder could have 
independently set thresholds...

is there an easy way to hack the current outlook plugin 
to do this for testing purposes? (ie to install multiple 
versions and spoof them into comparing different folders 
or... ?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-05 20:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

The spambayes engine doesn't really know anything 
about "ham" and "spam", it starts for each user as a blank 
slate and knows only what they teach it.  So in that sense it 
could be more general, although the tokenization strategies 
were specifically designed for, and tuned on, the ham-vs-
spam task.

A higher hurdle is that spambayes is "deeply" a binary (two-
way) classifier.  Classic Bayesian classifiers are N-way, but 
spambayes threw away that part of the math, replacing it 
with a two-way classifier based on very different theory.

I know at least one person tried to do N-way classification by 
training N distinct spambayes classifiers, and running them in 
sequence.  That was quite a while ago, and I don't know how 
happy they were with the results.

In any case, trying to hack the Outlook plugin will have you 
crawling on your belly for a month <wink -- but dealing with 
Outlook is massively complicated>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 19:18:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug  5 21:18:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783859 ] IMAP - Failed to Process
	Missed Messages
Message-ID: <E19kCwf-0000zX-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783859, was opened at 2003-08-06 01:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP - Failed to Process Missed Messages

Initial Comment:
Running CVS version. (Verbose is set to 1)
Mail that comes in whilst outlook is open seems
to be filtered correctly. New Mail (unread)
that has arrived outside of an outlook session is Never 
Filtered scored or touched, including running a manual
filter. 

(Also note the following occurs prior to Outlook actually
making the connection to the IMAP Server)

Looking at the logs shows that Spambayes begins to 
process missed messages but usually only gets through
one message until it encounters an error and stops 
processing any further messages. Restarting Outlook
produces the same results ie Spambayes fails on the 
same message, if I delete the problem message and 
restart it will filter one or two messages until it 
comes to an email it doesnt like again and stops. 

The error Message is always
"FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-Sieve: cmu-
sieve 2.0\r\nReturn-Path: " 
followed by the email.. And then
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1067, in OnConnection
    self.ProcessMissedMessages()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1352, in ProcessMissedMessages
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 211, in ProcessMessage
    disposition = filter.filter_message(msgstore_message, 
manager)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\filter.py", line 16, in filter_message
    prob = mgr.score(msg)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\manager.py", line 678, in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\msgstore.py", line 775, in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME 
related error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' 
header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 22:31:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 00:31:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19kFxm-00023L-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 14:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 22:33:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 00:33:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783915 ] hammiefilter garbles
	message
Message-ID: <E19kFz2-0003Iu-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783915, was opened at 2003-08-05 21:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783915&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matthew Eldridge (eldie1)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: hammiefilter garbles message

Initial Comment:
hammiefilter -f garbles the attached message.  It drops 
the original headers, and replaces them with a single X-
Spambayes-Classification header.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783915&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 22:41:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 00:41:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19kG7K-0003aR-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 14:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 14:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug  5 23:59:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 01:59:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783839 ] external lock on
	database file causes crash
Message-ID: <E19kHKE-0000rk-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783839, was opened at 2003-08-06 10:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783839&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ned Smith (nedsmith)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: external lock on database file causes crash

Initial Comment:
If outlook is launched after an external program has 
locked spambayes database file (e.g. enterprise backup 
utility). Spambayes will not start and likely be in an 
unknown state. 

I discovered the spambayes dropdown menu became 
wedged and would not popup the menu choices. 

I tried deinstalling/reinstalling spambayes without 
success. Finally, deleted spambayes toolbar and tried 
again - this worked but was rather inconvenient. The 
backup utility runs daily (can be very annoying to 
reinstall daily - worse than just deleting spam!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 15:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I can't reproduce a problem here.  Can you please attach a log?

What I see is a messagebox at startup telling you SpamBayes
could not be loaded (which is correct - not much we can do
without a database).  When I next start Outlook after
removing the lock, it starts correctly and catches the Spam
it missed last time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783839&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:09:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:09:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19kHUA-0006nB-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 19:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:11:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:11:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-781503 ] Hotmail account is not
	Filtered
Message-ID: <E19kHW3-0006tM-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #781503, was opened at 2003-08-02 00:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781503&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matthew J. Burke (sanloublues)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hotmail account is not Filtered

Initial Comment:
I'm running Outlook 2002 on a Win2k box, with three 
accounts (IMAP, Hotmail, and Exchange).  
This worked with v003 of the plugin, but now that I've 
upgraded to v006 only the imap and exchange accounts 
are filtered.  
Not even running Filter Now on the hotmail folders 
works.  It just runs through without doing anything.  
Delete As Spam still functions though, but it has to be 
pressed twice for each message.

For the attached log, I started, then ran filter now on 
just the hotmail folders.  Then I used delete as spam to 
get rid of my spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781503&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:13:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:13:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-781061 ] SpamBayes Addin quit
	working
Message-ID: <E19kHXt-0006zV-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #781061, was opened at 2003-08-01 05:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781061&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sherry (slbergh)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes Addin quit working

Initial Comment:
The SpamBayes configuration button suddenly quit 
working in Outlook. Clicking Delete as Spam brings up a 
message to configure the spam folder, which is 
impossible to do since the button appears dead. Any 
ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

See the troubleshooting guide (docs/troubleshooting.html in
your SpamBayes directory) and reset the toolbars.  If you
still have problems, please attach a log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781061&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:14:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:15:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777856 ] Outlook freezes on
	folder "browse" dialogs
Message-ID: <E19kHZZ-00074u-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777856, was opened at 2003-07-26 09:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Geoffrey Linnell (glinnell)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook freezes on folder "browse" dialogs

Initial Comment:
I installed V .2, and it worked fine.  I uninstalled, and 
installed V .3, and since then when I go into Manager, 
select Train Now, and click on browse, Outlook 2000 
freezes...I have to kill the process to end it.  I've since 
tried V .5...the same.  I've uninstalled Office, Re-
installed, patched to SP3...nothing.  Any SpamBayes 
dialog that has a Browse button still halts Outlook.  
Office is 9.0.6926 SP3, Outlook is SP3, 9.0.0.6627.  All 
running on Windows 2000 Build 2195 SP3.

-Geoff 
ilx@cypress.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm happy to put this down to Outlook :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Geoffrey Linnell (glinnell)
Date: 2003-07-30 02:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=830627

Hmmm...now it works.  I installed W2K-SP4 and MS03-026 
RPC patch yesterday.  I hadn't tried SpamBayes in about a 
week, and in an effort to record a recent log to send you, 
tried SpamBayes again...this time it worked properly.  All of 
the old logfiles have been overwriten, but I'm attaching the 
current one if it's of any use.  Thanks for the quick response!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please check for a log file, and attach it here -
see the "troubleshooting guide" for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:16:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:16:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771256 ] Filter misses messages
Message-ID: <E19kHbG-0007Bg-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771256, was opened at 2003-07-15 08:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771256&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Hagie (shagie)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filter misses messages

Initial Comment:
For the most part the Outlook version works pretty well, 
but in two cases so far Spambayes will refuse to give it 
a score on the main page or sort it. One of the e-mails 
was spam, the other was not. The e-mails do not appear 
at all in the log. I can view the spam clues and it will 
give me accurate information of what score it should 
have given it though. For instance, the Spam got:

'*H*'                               3.14121e-008        -      -
'*S*'                               0.999976            -      -

and the good e-mail got:

'*H*'                               0.999994            -      -
'*S*'                               7.60678e-010        -      -

The good e-mail was unusual in that it had no subject 
line, the bad is pretty typical html spam. I won't bother 
adding the log since it does not show anything.

I really like this program, I can not wait until you get all 
the bugs out.

Scott

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is probably a timing issue that a few people see, and
the new "timer" in version 006 is designed to address (and
does for everyone who has got back to me).   Please re-open
if the timer doesn't work for you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Similar to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=737619&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
except that report indicates that an invalid spam score
*did* end up on the message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771256&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:18:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:18:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775601 ] latest message not
	checked on outlook startup
Message-ID: <E19kHcZ-0007Eh-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775601, was opened at 2003-07-22 22:23
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: matt tagliaferri (mtagliaf)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: latest message not checked on outlook startup

Initial Comment:
When I first turn on Outlook and the filter begins 
slogging through all the messages I've received 
overnight, it always skips the latest message (the one 
at the top if the listview is sorted by date received).

It would also be useful to add something in the loop that 
would allow other Windows task to get some time - the 
loop pretty much takes over the PC while it's running. 
Don't know how this is done in Python, in VB6 it's 
Application.DoEvents. 

matt tag

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to try version 006, and enable the new
experimental "timer"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Henry Happ (hankster2000)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832150

I have version 0.5 installed and have seen the same thing.  
This is the only issue I have come across.  
The spam catch rate has been 99+%!!!  Outstanding!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:21:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:22:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761250 ] .dll doesn't stay
	checked in COM Add-Ins window
Message-ID: <E19kHg1-0001qw-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761250, was opened at 2003-06-27 01:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761250&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Noser (byjiminy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: .dll doesn't stay checked in COM Add-Ins window

Initial Comment:
I downloaded some Windows security patches yesterday 
and SpamBayes no longer appeared in the toolbar.  

I uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and 
Outlook.  I tried to instal Spambayes using the binary 
and the addin.py source.  

The COM add-in appeared in the Outlook menu, I 
checked it, and chose OK.  Then when I opened the 
COM add-in window again, the Spam Bayes add-in 
wasn't checked.  The attached log file documents three 
tries.

I removed the .dll from the COM add-in window, and 
then added it in again.  Sometimes this caused Outlook 
to Crash.  

Strangely enough, the log file shows the application 
trying to access files on the E: drive.  Both Outlook and 
Spambayes are installed on my C: drive.  

As a note, I've passed this program to several 
associates who love the software.  They worry though, 
that my problems may come their way.  Let me know if I 
can offer any other information.  

Thanks

PS - Windows 2000 Professional, Office 2000 
Proffessional

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version of the addin is being used here?  The
tracebacks look like very early binary versions.  Later ones
have many unicode problems fixed.  One other remains in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=779319&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which is where I will track this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: James Noser (byjiminy)
Date: 2003-07-12 06:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810155

Here are the updates I installed the day SpamBayes gave up.

Successful Wednesday, June 25, 2003 814078: Security 
Update (Microsoft Jscript version 5.6, Windows 2000, 
Windows XP) Automatic update 
Successful Wednesday, June 25, 2003 330994: April 2003, 
Security Update for Outlook Express 6 SP1 Automatic update 
Successful Wednesday, June 25, 2003 818529: June 2003, 
Cumulative Patch for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 
Automatic update 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: James Noser (byjiminy)
Date: 2003-07-01 01:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810155

I've added the log file from an installation attempt.  I ran 
addin.py.  Here is the log.  

Thanks again

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Hihn (jhihn1)
Date: 2003-06-28 11:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=142836

PLEASE PEOPLE, BE ADVISED:
That it is not actually looking for a E: drive. When the
python code was compiled, it stored the path information of
the source files. It is telling the developers what function
in what file had the problem, along with how it got there.
It is not actually looking for a file.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Behring (jbehring20)
Date: 2003-06-28 03:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=811023

I am also running into the same problems on Windows 98 with Outllok 
2000. removed the .dll and tried to add it again manually and this is the 
error I got: 
 
OUTLOOK caused an invalid page fault in 
module PYTHON23.DLL at 0187:1e03ff78. 
Registers: 
EAX=505c3a43 CS=0187 EIP=1e03ff78 EFLGS=00010246 
EBX=005a3b70 SS=018f ESP=0056b834 EBP=1e0b8ec0 
ECX=005fdc70 DS=018f ESI=005fdc70 FS=4daf 
EDX=00705130 ES=018f EDI=1e03ff70 GS=0000 
Bytes at CS:EIP: 
8b 48 54 f6 c5 40 74 1f 8b 80 a4 00 00 00 85 c0 
Stack dump: 
00000000 1e0352fd 005fdc70 00000000 1e0b8ea8 005a3b60 00000002 
005f4da0 
00000020 1e03ff5d 005fdc70 1e03ff70 00000000 1e0b8ea8 00000001 
1e03fd38 
 
This is my first post and I don't see where to upload the log file, so I'll 
just add it here. 
 
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook 
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher 
Traceback (most recent call last): 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, in 
dispatch 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 322, in 
_InvokeEx_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, in 
GetManager 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141, in 
__init__ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182, in 
LocateDataDirectory 
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir 
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions registered: can't 
find encoding 
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook 
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher 
Traceback (most recent call last): 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, in 
dispatch 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 322, in 
_InvokeEx_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, in 
GetManager 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141, in 
__init__ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182, in 
LocateDataDirectory 
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir 
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions registered: can't 
find encoding 
 
 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Johan Nilsson (gnistan)
Date: 2003-06-27 17:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810664

I ran it on Outlook 2002 Swedish, this result did I get:
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Created new configuration file 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\bheljoni\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 156, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 71, in 
import_core_spambayes_stuff
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\spambayes\tokenizer.py", line 659, 
in ?
exceptions.AttributeError: 'OptionsClass' object has no 
attribute 'skip_max_word_size'

Removed it from COM addins and added it again:

Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Created new configuration file 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\bheljoni\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 156, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 71, in 
import_core_spambayes_stuff
exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name tokenize


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Hihn (jhihn1)
Date: 2003-06-27 05:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=142836

I have the same problem. here's my log:

SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line
170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475,
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141,
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182,
in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line
170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475,
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141,
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182,
in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761250&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 00:56:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 02:56:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780819 ] Images pasted to
	clipboard each startup
Message-ID: <E19kIE1-0008UM-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780819, was opened at 2003-07-31 22:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780819&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Images pasted to clipboard each startup

Initial Comment:
There is no need to load the bitmaps and set toolbar
button images each time we start, but only when we we
actually need to create the button as we can't find it

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Checking in addin.py;
new revision: 1.87; previous revision: 1.86


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780819&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 02:19:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 04:19:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783434 ] UnicodeError in
	site-packages\email\Header.py
Message-ID: <E19kJVo-0002hg-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783434, was opened at 2003-08-05 12:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by strobl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

>Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: UnicodeError in site-packages\email\Header.py

Initial Comment:
Got a
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII 
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	C:\Python22\lib\site-packages\email\Header.py 
line
	230: ustr = unicode(s, incodec)

while getting a piece of spam via pop3proxy

Python 2.2.3 (#42, May 30 2003, 18:12:08) [MSC 32 bit 
(Intel)] on win32


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Date: 2003-08-06 10:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311771

same with python23:
-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError('ascii' 
codec can't
	decode byte 0xd6 in position 24: ordinal not in range
(128))
	in append() at c:\python23\lib\email\Header.py line 
272: ustr
	= unicode(s, incodec, errors)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 03:04:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 05:04:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19kKDB-0000ky-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 14:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 14:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 03:18:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 05:18:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783859 ] IMAP - Failed to Process
	Missed Messages
Message-ID: <E19kKRC-0007iX-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783859, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP - Failed to Process Missed Messages

Initial Comment:
Running CVS version. (Verbose is set to 1)
Mail that comes in whilst outlook is open seems
to be filtered correctly. New Mail (unread)
that has arrived outside of an outlook session is Never 
Filtered scored or touched, including running a manual
filter. 

(Also note the following occurs prior to Outlook actually
making the connection to the IMAP Server)

Looking at the logs shows that Spambayes begins to 
process missed messages but usually only gets through
one message until it encounters an error and stops 
processing any further messages. Restarting Outlook
produces the same results ie Spambayes fails on the 
same message, if I delete the problem message and 
restart it will filter one or two messages until it 
comes to an email it doesnt like again and stops. 

The error Message is always
"FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-Sieve: cmu-
sieve 2.0\r\nReturn-Path: " 
followed by the email.. And then
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1067, in OnConnection
    self.ProcessMissedMessages()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1352, in ProcessMissedMessages
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 211, in ProcessMessage
    disposition = filter.filter_message(msgstore_message, 
manager)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\filter.py", line 16, in filter_message
    prob = mgr.score(msg)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\manager.py", line 678, in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\msgstore.py", line 775, in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME 
related error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' 
header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

As you are running from source code, are you willing to run
a custom version I send you?  Also, can you please post the
message that failed, as it was printed in the log file?




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 03:51:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 05:51:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783434 ] UnicodeError in
	site-packages\email\Header.py
Message-ID: <E19kKx2-0000ex-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783434, was opened at 2003-08-05 13:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by megari
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: UnicodeError in site-packages\email\Header.py

Initial Comment:
Got a
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII 
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	C:\Python22\lib\site-packages\email\Header.py 
line
	230: ustr = unicode(s, incodec)

while getting a piece of spam via pop3proxy

Python 2.2.3 (#42, May 30 2003, 18:12:08) [MSC 32 bit 
(Intel)] on win32


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ari Sundholm (megari)
Date: 2003-08-06 12:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=198924

I got this, too when using pop3proxy (spambayes 1.0a4). It is 
printed in the headers instead of spam rating (as it should; 
I've read other reports here - good that this works), causing 
occasionally some spam messages get through. This would be 
nice to be fixed - maybe a bit more tolerance to the unicode 
function(s)? I know these can be a pain in the..erm...backside 
since I'm working with Unicode support myself.

The funny thing about this is that when I look at the Web 
interface of pop3proxy and use the Review function to train 
the filter, the email is correctly classified as spam and it can 
be trained w/o any errors along with the other ones as such.

Best regards,
Ari Sundholm
megari at freedb.org
freedb core team

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Date: 2003-08-06 11:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311771

same with python23:
-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError('ascii' 
codec can't
	decode byte 0xd6 in position 24: ordinal not in range
(128))
	in append() at c:\python23\lib\email\Header.py line 
272: ustr
	= unicode(s, incodec, errors)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 05:34:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 07:34:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771541 ] "Recover from" button
	not present in "Unsure" folder
Message-ID: <E19kMYh-00048Q-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771541, was opened at 2003-07-15 21:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Recover from" button not present in "Unsure" folder

Initial Comment:
In the 003 release of the Outlook Add-in, the "Recover 
from" button does not display in the Unsure folder. Onlt 
the "Delete As Spam" displays.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 21:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

std toolbar issues

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Date: 2003-07-29 22:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53269

Your suggestion fixes the problem. Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try doing a reset of your toolbars, as per
the troubleshooting guide.  Go the brutal "delete
outcmd.dat" route.  Let me know if that fixes it

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 07:31:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 09:32:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19kOOQ-0003iN-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 04:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mobri2a
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 09:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 04:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 08:50:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 10:50:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784214 ] imap filter problems
Message-ID: <E19kPcJ-0001Dl-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784214, was opened at 2003-08-06 09:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784214&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Josh Goodman (jogoodma)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: imap filter problems

Initial Comment:

This is a follow up to issue 765042.  Not sure if this is 
still related but I am basically experiencing the same 
problems as I was in issue 765042.  SPAM comes in and 
fails to get filtered.  I have to manually "Delete as 
Spam" to get it to work.  This is happening with an IMAP 
SSL server and Outlook 2000.

I am now using the binary outlook plugin version 006.  I 
have attached a log file with the error messages being 
displayed for several failed SPAM filter attempts.

Josh

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784214&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 10:56:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 12:56:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784283 ] cannot install SpamBayes
	without elevated privileges
Message-ID: <E19kRaf-0006aF-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784283, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784283&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew (andrewz)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: cannot install SpamBayes without elevated privileges

Initial Comment:
Under an administrated Windows Domain it is important 
that some users not have the ability to install their own 
software or modify their registry. And yet it is important 
that These same users, running Outlook & Exchange, 
have Spam filtering capability like SpamBayes.

It is not currently possible to install SpamBayes for a 
user from the Administrator account, it is also not 
possible to install SpamBayes from a locked down 
account. 

it would be great to have this feature in an upcoming 
version.

thanks,
AndrewZ

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784283&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 11:27:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 13:30:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784296 ] imapfilter broken with
	Python 2.3
Message-ID: <E19kS4o-0007K7-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784296, was opened at 2003-08-06 19:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784296&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastian Kaliszewski (sebaska)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: imapfilter broken with Python 2.3

Initial Comment:
imapfilter.py does not work properly with newly 
released Python 2.3
The problem is in fact bug/stupidity in 2.3's imaplib, 
but since it's released and workaround is simple, it 
would be nicwe if workaround were in fact implemented 
in spambayes.

The solution is to change line 231 of imapfilter.py 
from:
            response = self.select(folder, False)
into:
            response = self.select(folder, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784296&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 11:40:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 13:40:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19kSGr-0006bI-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 00:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by buzz4209
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-06 13:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes 
current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched.

I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic 
functionality and still had error.

Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory 
worked.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 09:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 05:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 12:47:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 14:47:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784323 ] Plug-in will not
	intialize/watch in offline mode
Message-ID: <E19kTJM-0001vn-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784323, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784323&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kelly Jones (kejones)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Plug-in will not intialize/watch in offline mode

Initial Comment:
Spambayes plugin had been working fine, in both online 
and offline mode.  Now, when starting up Outlook in 
offline mode, I get the error 

There was an error initializing the spam plugin.
SPam filtering has been disable. Please re-configure, and 
re-enable this plugin.

Error details: Could not watch the specified folders.

The watch folder, "Inbox", seems to be fine.

logfile attached, seems to say something about 
syncronization errors existing.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784323&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 13:06:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 15:06:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783434 ] UnicodeError in
	site-packages\email\Header.py
Message-ID: <E19kTcL-00044J-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783434, was opened at 2003-08-05 10:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
>Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: UnicodeError in site-packages\email\Header.py

Initial Comment:
Got a
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII 
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	C:\Python22\lib\site-packages\email\Header.py 
line
	230: ustr = unicode(s, incodec)

while getting a piece of spam via pop3proxy

Python 2.2.3 (#42, May 30 2003, 18:12:08) [MSC 32 bit 
(Intel)] on win32


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

This is already fixed in CVS.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ari Sundholm (megari)
Date: 2003-08-06 09:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=198924

I got this, too when using pop3proxy (spambayes 1.0a4). It is 
printed in the headers instead of spam rating (as it should; 
I've read other reports here - good that this works), causing 
occasionally some spam messages get through. This would be 
nice to be fixed - maybe a bit more tolerance to the unicode 
function(s)? I know these can be a pain in the..erm...backside 
since I'm working with Unicode support myself.

The funny thing about this is that when I look at the Web 
interface of pop3proxy and use the Review function to train 
the filter, the email is correctly classified as spam and it can 
be trained w/o any errors along with the other ones as such.

Best regards,
Ari Sundholm
megari at freedb.org
freedb core team

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Wolfgang Strobl (strobl)
Date: 2003-08-06 08:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=311771

same with python23:
-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError('ascii' 
codec can't
	decode byte 0xd6 in position 24: ordinal not in range
(128))
	in append() at c:\python23\lib\email\Header.py line 
272: ustr
	= unicode(s, incodec, errors)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783434&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 14:07:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 17:02:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784380 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19kUYq-0006yp-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784380, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784380&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784380&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 14:33:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 17:02:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784392 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19kUxy-0008GZ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784392, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 14:19:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 17:02:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784385 ] SpamBayes buttons not
	created
Message-ID: <E19kUl2-0003Pb-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784385, was opened at 2003-08-06 13:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784385&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dave Bachmann (daveinredmond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes buttons not created

Initial Comment:
I first installed the package yesterday and the buttons 
were there, but as I didn't have any spam to train 
against (I had a utility that permanently deleted the 
spam previously), I waited until today to try and start 
the training process. Outlook is unable to create the 
buttones. There have been no changes to Outlook (2000 
SP3) since yesterday and the only other software 
installed was the Google toolbar rev 2 Beta.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784385&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 17:04:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 19:04:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784296 ] imapfilter broken with
	Python 2.3
Message-ID: <E19kXKT-0004SY-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784296, was opened at 2003-08-07 05:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784296&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastian Kaliszewski (sebaska)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: imapfilter broken with Python 2.3

Initial Comment:
imapfilter.py does not work properly with newly 
released Python 2.3
The problem is in fact bug/stupidity in 2.3's imaplib, 
but since it's released and workaround is simple, it 
would be nicwe if workaround were in fact implemented 
in spambayes.

The solution is to change line 231 of imapfilter.py 
from:
            response = self.select(folder, False)
into:
            response = self.select(folder, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-07 11:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks for this.  Fixed in cvs, imapfilter.py v1.50

Even in Python 2.2 the correct parameter to pass was None, 
it was just that the way the test was written False would 
also pass.  So my bug, really.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784296&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 17:14:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 19:14:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783859 ] IMAP - Failed to Process
	Missed Messages
Message-ID: <E19kXTr-0003bz-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783859, was opened at 2003-08-06 01:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shaunbroadbent
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP - Failed to Process Missed Messages

Initial Comment:
Running CVS version. (Verbose is set to 1)
Mail that comes in whilst outlook is open seems
to be filtered correctly. New Mail (unread)
that has arrived outside of an outlook session is Never 
Filtered scored or touched, including running a manual
filter. 

(Also note the following occurs prior to Outlook actually
making the connection to the IMAP Server)

Looking at the logs shows that Spambayes begins to 
process missed messages but usually only gets through
one message until it encounters an error and stops 
processing any further messages. Restarting Outlook
produces the same results ie Spambayes fails on the 
same message, if I delete the problem message and 
restart it will filter one or two messages until it 
comes to an email it doesnt like again and stops. 

The error Message is always
"FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-Sieve: cmu-
sieve 2.0\r\nReturn-Path: " 
followed by the email.. And then
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1067, in OnConnection
    self.ProcessMissedMessages()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1352, in ProcessMissedMessages
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 211, in ProcessMessage
    disposition = filter.filter_message(msgstore_message, 
manager)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\filter.py", line 16, in filter_message
    prob = mgr.score(msg)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\manager.py", line 678, in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\msgstore.py", line 775, in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME 
related error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' 
header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-06 23:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Firstly yes happy to run anything you send me. 
Re the failed message, I realized after posting the bug 
yesterday you had made some changes to the CVS version
(addin.py/1.86 and config.py/1.20) must have missed it 
because I was travelling. Since updating it still fails to 
process missed messages but no longer has any errors. 
It now runs like I remember it in the past where it simply
says "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
165.368ms"... no scrap that, just restarted and encountered 
the same error have attached the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 09:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

As you are running from source code, are you willing to run
a custom version I send you?  Also, can you please post the
message that failed, as it was printed in the log file?




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 17:25:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 19:25:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19kXeX-0004bS-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 14:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

One user saw this traceback:
Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 16, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-07 03:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes 
current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched.

I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic 
functionality and still had error.

Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory 
worked.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 23:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 14:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 17:37:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 19:37:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during
	message download
Message-ID: <E19kXqY-0005b8-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook hangs during message download

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html
seems to blame McAfee.  Is anyone else seeing this bug
running McAfee?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-05 01:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual 
desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it
filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly.
It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not
work correctly on virtual desktops. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 17:51:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 19:51:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-784283 ] cannot
	install SpamBayes without elevated privileges
Message-ID: <E19kY4O-0002nT-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #784283, was opened at 2003-08-07 02:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702

>Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew (andrewz)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: cannot install SpamBayes without elevated privileges

Initial Comment:
Under an administrated Windows Domain it is important 
that some users not have the ability to install their own 
software or modify their registry. And yet it is important 
that These same users, running Outlook & Exchange, 
have Spam filtering capability like SpamBayes.

It is not currently possible to install SpamBayes for a 
user from the Administrator account, it is also not 
possible to install SpamBayes from a locked down 
account. 

it would be great to have this feature in an upcoming 
version.

thanks,
AndrewZ

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I agree, it would be great to have in the next version.  Any
takers?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 18:30:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug  6 20:30:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784323 ] Plug-in will not
	intialize/watch in offline mode
Message-ID: <E19kYfw-0005vV-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784323, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kejones
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784323&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kelly Jones (kejones)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Plug-in will not intialize/watch in offline mode

Initial Comment:
Spambayes plugin had been working fine, in both online 
and offline mode.  Now, when starting up Outlook in 
offline mode, I get the error 

There was an error initializing the spam plugin.
SPam filtering has been disable. Please re-configure, and 
re-enable this plugin.

Error details: Could not watch the specified folders.

The watch folder, "Inbox", seems to be fine.

logfile attached, seems to say something about 
syncronization errors existing.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Kelly Jones (kejones)
Date: 2003-08-06 17:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839142

Update from user:  Problem went away after finding, and 
resolving, synchronization errors in Inbox.  Not sure if this is 
still a bug or not:  Seems the plugin could probably handle 
this more gracefully, but the source of the problem was in the 
users data.

kejones

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784323&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug  6 23:05:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 01:05:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-756413 ] Add a SQL-based
	storage class
Message-ID: <E19kcy9-0007Vk-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #756413, was opened at 2003-06-18 16:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=756413&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Add a SQL-based storage class

Initial Comment:
The attached patches add a SQL based storage class 
that can be used via pop3proxy.  It assumes that the 
user has mySQL and MySQLdb installed, and has already 
set up the table as suggested on the spambayes mailing 
list.

There is a great deal of room for improvement here.  In 
particular, having a separate table for the tokens is 
probably a waste (as discussed somewhat abstractly on 
the list).

If anyone wants an SQL solution, here it is.  This should 
be able to be patched into the current cvs for a 
reasonable while yet.

If you do end up using this, please let the list know.  If a 
suitably large number of people do (at least 2!), then it 
could be checked in to the main code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-07 17:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

A much better version, partly based on this, but more based 
on Skip's great SQLClassifier base case is now in cvs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-06-19 12:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

"diff -c oldfile newfile" should be sufficient to generate a patch
that will be more forgiving of slight changes to the files being
patched.  I don't know if the patch command will even accept
plain diffs.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-06-19 11:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Is there a diff how-to somewhere?  I looked for one a while 
back, but couldn't find anything (apart from the manual for 
diff itself).  I was just guessing...

The connect call connects to the mySQL server.  The USE 
command just after that connects to the appropriate 
database.  I haven't used mySQLdb much, so I don't know for 
sure this is the correct way to do it, but it did work.

The base class is a good idea.  I'll do this if I ever put this in 
the main code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-06-18 23:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

A couple quick observations without having tried the code:
* the diffs all seem to be reversed and are not context
  diffs, so it will be tough to apply them if the surrounding
  code changes at all

* don't you need to specify a database name in the connect
  call?

* maybe it should be called MySQLClassifier to admit other
  SQL implementations later.  For the short term, perhaps
  a dummy SQLClassifier could inherit from classifier.Classifier
  and be the base class for MySQLClassifier.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=756413&group_id=61702

From BOppermann at ACNielsen.com  Wed Aug  6 12:03:09 2003
From: BOppermann at ACNielsen.com (Oppermann, Brian)
Date: Thu Aug  7 01:39:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] PDA and Outlook 2003 Beta
Message-ID: <370A88DE125E944D8495AC409E783EE9F73820@acn001grbmsx01.enterprisenet.org>

Since I installed SpamBayes I have had several crashes of Outlook.  Usually
when I try to use the Delete As Spam button.

My information: 
Windows 2000 Pro SP4 
Outlook 2003 Beta - Connected to Exchange 2000 server 
Dell Axim attached w/Synch turned on for Inbox. 

If you need more information, let me know. 

Brian 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20030806/fe69fc2b/attachment.htm
From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 03:04:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 05:04:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19kggn-0003eP-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 11:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-07 11:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to the latest cvs (updationg all files to HEAD), and 
installed python 2.3 (and win32 ext 1.5.7) and removed 
ptyhon 2.2 from my PC.

I then ran "filter now" on my HAM-folder.  after finishing, the 
message prompted is: "Found 1 spam, 11 unsure and 238 
good messages".  previosly (with the old version of 
spambayes, all mails were HAM in this folder).  The value of 
the spam-field in outlook actually changed, so something is 
definitly going on.

ok - looking at one of the messages:

I inserted the print-statement in the code as you instructed 
me to:

>>>>  Message  grattis med hus!  has score:  
0.92635444709 , perc:  92.635444709

however, looking at this messages with "show spam clues for 
current message" returns a Spam Score of 0.0139373 - i.e. 
1,4 %

the latter 1.4% is correct - i.e. the same as the old version of 
spambayes returned when filtering.

It seems to me as the filtering process is using another 
database than the "show spam clues".  
content of C:\Documents and 
Settings\Fredrik\Programdata\SpamBayes:
	default_bayes_customize.ini
	default_bayes_database.db
	default_message_database.db
	Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini



SHOW SPAM CLUES FOR CURRENT MESSAGE
===================================

Spam Score: 0.0139373


word                                spamprob         #ham  #spam
'*H*'                               0.974866            -      -
'*S*'                               0.00274039          -      -
'to:addr:fredrik'                   0.0918367           2      0
'to:addr:rodland.no'                0.0990722          45      7
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'    0.155172            1      0
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'from:name:knut dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com' 0.155172            
1      0
'subject:grattis'                   0.155172            1      0
'subject:hus'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:med'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:!'                         0.714406            8     30
'header:Received:1'                 0.739915            2      9

Message Stream:


Return-Path: <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
Received: from exchangedelft.intec-hou.com 
([195.64.83.132])
	by ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912
	for <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 2003 
11:55:09 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: grattis med hus!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: grattis med hus!
Thread-Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==
From: "Knut Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
To: <fredrik@rodland.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id
	h4F9t44f024912
Status: 



Message Tokens:

26 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'
'from:name:knut dohlen'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:!'
'subject:grattis'
'subject:hus'
'subject:med'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:fredrik'
'to:addr:rodland.no'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'


RESULT OF dump_props.py FOR SAME MESSAGE:
=========================================
0x1035001e          : '<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B1
01EDA@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com>'
0x1046001e          : 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com'
0x3fde0003          : 28591
0x80000003          : 2
0x8084001e          : 'FMR@RODLAND'
0x8085001e          : '00000008\x01frodland@aston.no'
PR_ACCESS           : 3
PR_ACCESS_LEVEL     : 1
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:00>
PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_CREATION_TIME    : <PyTime:15.05.2003 10:01:04>
PR_DISPLAY_BCC_A    : ''
PR_DISPLAY_CC_A     : ''
PR_DISPLAY_TO_A     : 'fredrik@rodland.no'
PR_ENTRYID          : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\xa4UU\x00'
PR_HASATTACH        : False
PR_IMPORTANCE       : 1
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME: <PyTime:07.08.2003 
08:46:25>
PR_MAPPING_SIGNATURE: '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_MESSAGE_ATTACHMENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_CLASS_A  : 'IPM.Note'
PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:09>
PR_MESSAGE_FLAGS    : 1
PR_MESSAGE_RECIPIENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_SIZE     : 2405
PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_OBJECT_TYPE      : 5
PR_PARENT_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x02\x8d\x00\x00'
PR_PRIORITY         : 0
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston
.no'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Fredrik 
Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@AS
TON.NO\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston.no'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Fredrik Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@ASTON.NO
\x00'
PR_RECORD_KEY       : '\xa4UU\x00'
PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '@WT\x17\x13\xd1\xeeK\x85\x06
\x8e^\xa9\xe0\x16d'
PR_SENDER_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENDER_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineerin
g.com'
PR_SENDER_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENDER_NAME_A    : 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENDER_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@INTECENGINE
ERING.COM\x00'
PR_SENSITIVITY      : 0
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@in
tecengineering.com'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@
INTECENGINEERING.COM\x00'
PR_STORE_ENTRYID    : '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05
\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
PR_STORE_RECORD_KEY : '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK: 79869
PR_SUBJECT_A        : 'grattis med hus!'
PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX_A : ''
PR_TNEF_CORRELATION_KEY: '\x00'
PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A: 'Return-Path: 
<Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nReceived: from 
exchangedelft.intec-hou.com ([195.64.83.132])\r\n\tby 
ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912\r\n\tfor <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 
2003 11:55:09 +0200\r\ncontent-class: urn:content-
classes:message\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: 
text/plain;\r\n\tcharset="iso-8859-1"\r\nSubject: grattis med 
hus!\r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0\r\nDate: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
\r\nMessage-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>\r\nX-MS-Has-Attach: \r\nX-MS-TNEF-
Correlator: \r\nThread-Topic: grattis med hus!\r\nThread-
Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==\r\nFrom: "Knut 
Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nTo: 
<fredrik@rodland.no>\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit\r\nX-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit 
by ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912\r\nStatus:   \r\n\r\n'
Spam                : 0.92635444708974979
SpamBayesOriginalFolderID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x82\x80\x00\x00'
SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID: '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1
\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
X-MIME-Autoconverted: 'from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912'
X-MS-Has-Attach     : ''
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: ''
X-MimeOLE           : 'Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0'



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 08:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 00:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 03:23:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 05:23:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during
	message download
Message-ID: <E19kgzG-0007je-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lba
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook hangs during message download

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Date: 2003-08-07 19:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820545

Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still 
occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails 
can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the 
same email (ie cout of xx of yy)  I have not been able to see 
what actual email causes the problem at this stage.
Running the filter after a download works fine.
The log does not seem to show anything conclusive.
I do have McAfee running - current version.  

I will try disabling it next time I get a hang.  Note, the 
incidence  seems less frequent than originally reported.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html
seems to blame McAfee.  Is anyone else seeing this bug
running McAfee?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-05 01:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual 
desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it
filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly.
It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not
work correctly on virtual desktops. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 06:44:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 08:44:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784392 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19kk82-0008UE-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784392, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jydoyon
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 06:44:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 08:44:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784392 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19kk8P-0004ze-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784392, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jydoyon
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 07:06:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 09:06:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784392 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19kkTE-0005yB-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784392, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by coalliera
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi ...

I've got exactly the same configuration of you and the same 
error too ...

I think SpamBayes is not compatible with Exchange cause if i 
try in pop3 mode on the same computer, it work!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 07:59:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 10:00:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19klIu-0003wm-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-05 23:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by barry99
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839327

I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install 
error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 18:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

One user saw this traceback:
Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 16, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-06 12:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes 
current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched.

I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic 
functionality and still had error.

Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory 
worked.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 08:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 04:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-05 23:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 09:52:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 11:52:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19kn3b-0001if-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-29 03:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by romanito
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Vallet (romanito)
Date: 2003-08-07 17:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=515976

I have exactly the same problem with the source distribution.

SpamBayes 1.0a4
Python 2.3
win32all-155
Windows 2000 SP4 Pro French
Outlook 2002 French

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 08:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

I added the following two lines to my configuration file but I 
still get the same error message:
[general]
data_directory: c:\temp

Also my default data directory does not seem to have non 
ascii chars:
D:\Documents and Settings\hmoret\Application 
Data\SpamBayes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 07:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 07:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 04:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 11:10:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 13:10:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784891 ] initializing
Message-ID: <E19koH4-0005TL-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784891, was opened at 2003-08-07 13:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784891&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrice Ethier (patricee)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: initializing

Initial Comment:
initializing bug Bayesian anti-spam

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784891&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 15:34:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 17:34:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784392 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19ksOa-0005rw-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784392, was opened at 2003-08-07 08:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are many people who are using SpamBayes successfully 
with Exchange (including me), so it's not that.

Do either of you have a data directory that includes non-
English characters? (your username might, for example).  I 
think a similar error was reported for that reason (but can't 
find the tracker, offhand).  If this is the case then this has 
been fixed in cvs, and so will show up in the next release.  
Until then, your best solution would probably be to look at the 
configuration.html file and read the instructions about moving 
your data directory, and move it to somewhere that doesn't 
include non-English characters.

Please let us know if this is the case, and if this works for you 
so that we can close this, or keep trying if it's something else.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-08 01:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi ...

I've got exactly the same configuration of you and the same 
error too ...

I think SpamBayes is not compatible with Exchange cause if i 
try in pop3 mode on the same computer, it work!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 00:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 00:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 15:36:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 17:36:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784380 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19ksQq-0005xj-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784380, was opened at 2003-08-07 08:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784380&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Dupe of 784392.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784380&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 15:40:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 17:40:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19ksUv-0006AT-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-29 13:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting probable dupes (they might be fixed by the data dir fix, 
but if not they seem to be dupes) in:

[ 784392 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin
[ 784380 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Vallet (romanito)
Date: 2003-08-08 03:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=515976

I have exactly the same problem with the source distribution.

SpamBayes 1.0a4
Python 2.3
win32all-155
Windows 2000 SP4 Pro French
Outlook 2002 French

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 18:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

I added the following two lines to my configuration file but I 
still get the same error message:
[general]
data_directory: c:\temp

Also my default data directory does not seem to have non 
ascii chars:
D:\Documents and Settings\hmoret\Application 
Data\SpamBayes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 17:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 17:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 14:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 15:38:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 17:44:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784392 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19ksSo-000634-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784392, was opened at 2003-08-07 08:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Actually, if this doesn't fix it, then this is almost certainly a 
dupe of [ 779319 ] ntpath Unicode error.  So if the data 
directory fix doesn't work for you, please track the bug here:

<https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702>

(Closed as either fixed or a dupe).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are many people who are using SpamBayes successfully 
with Exchange (including me), so it's not that.

Do either of you have a data directory that includes non-
English characters? (your username might, for example).  I 
think a similar error was reported for that reason (but can't 
find the tracker, offhand).  If this is the case then this has 
been fixed in cvs, and so will show up in the next release.  
Until then, your best solution would probably be to look at the 
configuration.html file and read the instructions about moving 
your data directory, and move it to somewhere that doesn't 
include non-English characters.

Please let us know if this is the case, and if this works for you 
so that we can close this, or keep trying if it's something else.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-08 01:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi ...

I've got exactly the same configuration of you and the same 
error too ...

I think SpamBayes is not compatible with Exchange cause if i 
try in pop3 mode on the same computer, it work!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 00:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 00:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 16:07:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 18:08:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19ksvP-0002kU-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 13:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xaviorm
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-08-07 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

I believe the problem I am having is related to registry 
corruption. This is a NT box that was built 4 years ago. It's 
been patched but when I removed IE and reinstalled it gave a 
bunch of errors trying to register the DLL's for IE. 

Thanks for the Help

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-01 13:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It appears you can fix this by upgrading your Internet
Explorer.  Please see
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/InstallationProblems.html#comcat_version_screwup
for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-08-01 08:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

Ok from the logs here is the error I am getting. I still have 
this problem with the 06 intaller. on NT with Outlook 2000

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 405, in 
RegisterClasses
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 259, in 
RegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.register", line 85, in 
_cat_registrar
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface 
supported', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-30 13:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

For most people, the problem is the MS "Designer" object
spontaneously unregistering.  The 006 binary attempts to fix
this by not requiring the object to be installed at all!

This particular error code generally means a Python failure
that will be written to a log.  Please see the
troubleshooting guide and attach the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-07-30 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

I am having this problem on an NT 4 sp6a box with the 06 
version. Using Outlook 2000. any clues what is causing this? 
so far it just seems to be fixing it's self for people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Elmar Bransch (elmar71)
Date: 2003-07-28 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832399

After digging in the Mailing List and the bug base I found the 
interim version posted on 25-07 in this thread.
I was very lucky having SpamBayes 002 installed on Win2000 
Prof. with Outlook 2000 SR-1. Since upgrading to 003 it had 
the DLL-Register-0x80040201-problem, still remaining with the 
binary 005 installer. Finally the interim bug catcher release did 
the trick for me and installed fine - there has been even no 
errors in the spambayes1.log on startup so far :-)

Thanks! Keep on ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-28 06:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and 
unable to test on my Win 2000 machine.  This morning, 
however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly 
there.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 04:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 04:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 03:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 03:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 12:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 06:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 04:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-03 17:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 06:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 16:10:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 18:10:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19ksxt-0003BR-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 05:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-07 18:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

I can confirm this:  I noticed today that the scores in my 
Spam columns looked wrong, and indeed the scores reported 
by "show spam clues" are correct, given the *H* and *S* 
scores reported there.  I did the full bit, asking to retrain the 
database from scratch, and to rescore all the messages 
trained on afterwards.  Don't know why yet, and (alas) no 
time to dig now.  Sometimes the spam score Outlook displays 
is larger than the correct value, sometimes smaller.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-07 05:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to the latest cvs (updationg all files to HEAD), and 
installed python 2.3 (and win32 ext 1.5.7) and removed 
ptyhon 2.2 from my PC.

I then ran "filter now" on my HAM-folder.  after finishing, the 
message prompted is: "Found 1 spam, 11 unsure and 238 
good messages".  previosly (with the old version of 
spambayes, all mails were HAM in this folder).  The value of 
the spam-field in outlook actually changed, so something is 
definitly going on.

ok - looking at one of the messages:

I inserted the print-statement in the code as you instructed 
me to:

>>>>  Message  grattis med hus!  has score:  
0.92635444709 , perc:  92.635444709

however, looking at this messages with "show spam clues for 
current message" returns a Spam Score of 0.0139373 - i.e. 
1,4 %

the latter 1.4% is correct - i.e. the same as the old version of 
spambayes returned when filtering.

It seems to me as the filtering process is using another 
database than the "show spam clues".  
content of C:\Documents and 
Settings\Fredrik\Programdata\SpamBayes:
	default_bayes_customize.ini
	default_bayes_database.db
	default_message_database.db
	Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini



SHOW SPAM CLUES FOR CURRENT MESSAGE
===================================

Spam Score: 0.0139373


word                                spamprob         #ham  #spam
'*H*'                               0.974866            -      -
'*S*'                               0.00274039          -      -
'to:addr:fredrik'                   0.0918367           2      0
'to:addr:rodland.no'                0.0990722          45      7
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'    0.155172            1      0
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'from:name:knut dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com' 0.155172            
1      0
'subject:grattis'                   0.155172            1      0
'subject:hus'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:med'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:!'                         0.714406            8     30
'header:Received:1'                 0.739915            2      9

Message Stream:


Return-Path: <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
Received: from exchangedelft.intec-hou.com 
([195.64.83.132])
	by ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912
	for <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 2003 
11:55:09 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: grattis med hus!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: grattis med hus!
Thread-Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==
From: "Knut Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
To: <fredrik@rodland.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id
	h4F9t44f024912
Status: 



Message Tokens:

26 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'
'from:name:knut dohlen'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:!'
'subject:grattis'
'subject:hus'
'subject:med'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:fredrik'
'to:addr:rodland.no'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'


RESULT OF dump_props.py FOR SAME MESSAGE:
=========================================
0x1035001e          : '<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B1
01EDA@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com>'
0x1046001e          : 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com'
0x3fde0003          : 28591
0x80000003          : 2
0x8084001e          : 'FMR@RODLAND'
0x8085001e          : '00000008\x01frodland@aston.no'
PR_ACCESS           : 3
PR_ACCESS_LEVEL     : 1
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:00>
PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_CREATION_TIME    : <PyTime:15.05.2003 10:01:04>
PR_DISPLAY_BCC_A    : ''
PR_DISPLAY_CC_A     : ''
PR_DISPLAY_TO_A     : 'fredrik@rodland.no'
PR_ENTRYID          : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\xa4UU\x00'
PR_HASATTACH        : False
PR_IMPORTANCE       : 1
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME: <PyTime:07.08.2003 
08:46:25>
PR_MAPPING_SIGNATURE: '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_MESSAGE_ATTACHMENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_CLASS_A  : 'IPM.Note'
PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:09>
PR_MESSAGE_FLAGS    : 1
PR_MESSAGE_RECIPIENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_SIZE     : 2405
PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_OBJECT_TYPE      : 5
PR_PARENT_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x02\x8d\x00\x00'
PR_PRIORITY         : 0
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston
.no'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Fredrik 
Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@AS
TON.NO\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston.no'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Fredrik Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@ASTON.NO
\x00'
PR_RECORD_KEY       : '\xa4UU\x00'
PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '@WT\x17\x13\xd1\xeeK\x85\x06
\x8e^\xa9\xe0\x16d'
PR_SENDER_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENDER_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineerin
g.com'
PR_SENDER_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENDER_NAME_A    : 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENDER_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@INTECENGINE
ERING.COM\x00'
PR_SENSITIVITY      : 0
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@in
tecengineering.com'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@
INTECENGINEERING.COM\x00'
PR_STORE_ENTRYID    : '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05
\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
PR_STORE_RECORD_KEY : '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK: 79869
PR_SUBJECT_A        : 'grattis med hus!'
PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX_A : ''
PR_TNEF_CORRELATION_KEY: '\x00'
PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A: 'Return-Path: 
<Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nReceived: from 
exchangedelft.intec-hou.com ([195.64.83.132])\r\n\tby 
ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912\r\n\tfor <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 
2003 11:55:09 +0200\r\ncontent-class: urn:content-
classes:message\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: 
text/plain;\r\n\tcharset="iso-8859-1"\r\nSubject: grattis med 
hus!\r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0\r\nDate: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
\r\nMessage-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>\r\nX-MS-Has-Attach: \r\nX-MS-TNEF-
Correlator: \r\nThread-Topic: grattis med hus!\r\nThread-
Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==\r\nFrom: "Knut 
Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nTo: 
<fredrik@rodland.no>\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit\r\nX-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit 
by ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912\r\nStatus:   \r\n\r\n'
Spam                : 0.92635444708974979
SpamBayesOriginalFolderID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x82\x80\x00\x00'
SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID: '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1
\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
X-MIME-Autoconverted: 'from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912'
X-MS-Has-Attach     : ''
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: ''
X-MimeOLE           : 'Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0'



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 02:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 02:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 02:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-04 18:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 16:57:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 18:57:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19kth5-00058T-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 21:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 10:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I have to go now, but I've narrowed it down a little.  When 
filtering, for some reason the email only has a few headers 
(even doing a Filter Now, not just when it arrives).  When 
showing clues, the email has them all.  (by email, I mean the 
result of msg.GetEmailPackageObject()).

For example (the first is from filtering, the second is the same 
message with show clues).  Bodies are identical and left out.

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:51:09 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb
From: Mrs. Victoria Rinma.
"""

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:53:24 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from wibble.net [210.55.12.113] 
	by grunt3.ihug.co.nz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
	id 18nriD-0006El-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:54:26 
+1300
X-Wibble-Envelope-To: <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>
Received: from orson.icl.net (orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10])
	by wibble.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with 
ESMTP id PAA19831
	for <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 
15:54:23 +1300
From: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Authentication-Warning: wibble.net: Host orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10]
	claimed to be orson.icl.net
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=orson.vip.uk.com)
	by orson.icl.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 18nrBv-0000O7-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 02:21:03 
+0000
Content-Disposition: inline
To: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Originating-Ip: 216.139.169.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: mrs.victoria@caramail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 2:21:02 GMT
X-Mailer: EMUmail 4.5
Subject: ! message !
X-Webmail-User: 
mrs.victoria*breathe.com@pophost1.breathe.com
Message-Id: <E18nrBv-0000O7-00@orson.icl.net>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to base64 by wibble.net id 
PAA19831
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-08 10:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

I can confirm this:  I noticed today that the scores in my 
Spam columns looked wrong, and indeed the scores reported 
by "show spam clues" are correct, given the *H* and *S* 
scores reported there.  I did the full bit, asking to retrain the 
database from scratch, and to rescore all the messages 
trained on afterwards.  Don't know why yet, and (alas) no 
time to dig now.  Sometimes the spam score Outlook displays 
is larger than the correct value, sometimes smaller.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-07 21:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to the latest cvs (updationg all files to HEAD), and 
installed python 2.3 (and win32 ext 1.5.7) and removed 
ptyhon 2.2 from my PC.

I then ran "filter now" on my HAM-folder.  after finishing, the 
message prompted is: "Found 1 spam, 11 unsure and 238 
good messages".  previosly (with the old version of 
spambayes, all mails were HAM in this folder).  The value of 
the spam-field in outlook actually changed, so something is 
definitly going on.

ok - looking at one of the messages:

I inserted the print-statement in the code as you instructed 
me to:

>>>>  Message  grattis med hus!  has score:  
0.92635444709 , perc:  92.635444709

however, looking at this messages with "show spam clues for 
current message" returns a Spam Score of 0.0139373 - i.e. 
1,4 %

the latter 1.4% is correct - i.e. the same as the old version of 
spambayes returned when filtering.

It seems to me as the filtering process is using another 
database than the "show spam clues".  
content of C:\Documents and 
Settings\Fredrik\Programdata\SpamBayes:
	default_bayes_customize.ini
	default_bayes_database.db
	default_message_database.db
	Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini



SHOW SPAM CLUES FOR CURRENT MESSAGE
===================================

Spam Score: 0.0139373


word                                spamprob         #ham  #spam
'*H*'                               0.974866            -      -
'*S*'                               0.00274039          -      -
'to:addr:fredrik'                   0.0918367           2      0
'to:addr:rodland.no'                0.0990722          45      7
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'    0.155172            1      0
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'from:name:knut dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com' 0.155172            
1      0
'subject:grattis'                   0.155172            1      0
'subject:hus'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:med'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:!'                         0.714406            8     30
'header:Received:1'                 0.739915            2      9

Message Stream:


Return-Path: <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
Received: from exchangedelft.intec-hou.com 
([195.64.83.132])
	by ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912
	for <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 2003 
11:55:09 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: grattis med hus!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: grattis med hus!
Thread-Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==
From: "Knut Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
To: <fredrik@rodland.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id
	h4F9t44f024912
Status: 



Message Tokens:

26 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'
'from:name:knut dohlen'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:!'
'subject:grattis'
'subject:hus'
'subject:med'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:fredrik'
'to:addr:rodland.no'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'


RESULT OF dump_props.py FOR SAME MESSAGE:
=========================================
0x1035001e          : '<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B1
01EDA@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com>'
0x1046001e          : 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com'
0x3fde0003          : 28591
0x80000003          : 2
0x8084001e          : 'FMR@RODLAND'
0x8085001e          : '00000008\x01frodland@aston.no'
PR_ACCESS           : 3
PR_ACCESS_LEVEL     : 1
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:00>
PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_CREATION_TIME    : <PyTime:15.05.2003 10:01:04>
PR_DISPLAY_BCC_A    : ''
PR_DISPLAY_CC_A     : ''
PR_DISPLAY_TO_A     : 'fredrik@rodland.no'
PR_ENTRYID          : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\xa4UU\x00'
PR_HASATTACH        : False
PR_IMPORTANCE       : 1
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME: <PyTime:07.08.2003 
08:46:25>
PR_MAPPING_SIGNATURE: '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_MESSAGE_ATTACHMENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_CLASS_A  : 'IPM.Note'
PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:09>
PR_MESSAGE_FLAGS    : 1
PR_MESSAGE_RECIPIENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_SIZE     : 2405
PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_OBJECT_TYPE      : 5
PR_PARENT_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x02\x8d\x00\x00'
PR_PRIORITY         : 0
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston
.no'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Fredrik 
Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@AS
TON.NO\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston.no'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Fredrik Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@ASTON.NO
\x00'
PR_RECORD_KEY       : '\xa4UU\x00'
PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '@WT\x17\x13\xd1\xeeK\x85\x06
\x8e^\xa9\xe0\x16d'
PR_SENDER_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENDER_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineerin
g.com'
PR_SENDER_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENDER_NAME_A    : 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENDER_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@INTECENGINE
ERING.COM\x00'
PR_SENSITIVITY      : 0
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@in
tecengineering.com'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@
INTECENGINEERING.COM\x00'
PR_STORE_ENTRYID    : '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05
\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
PR_STORE_RECORD_KEY : '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK: 79869
PR_SUBJECT_A        : 'grattis med hus!'
PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX_A : ''
PR_TNEF_CORRELATION_KEY: '\x00'
PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A: 'Return-Path: 
<Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nReceived: from 
exchangedelft.intec-hou.com ([195.64.83.132])\r\n\tby 
ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912\r\n\tfor <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 
2003 11:55:09 +0200\r\ncontent-class: urn:content-
classes:message\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: 
text/plain;\r\n\tcharset="iso-8859-1"\r\nSubject: grattis med 
hus!\r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0\r\nDate: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
\r\nMessage-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>\r\nX-MS-Has-Attach: \r\nX-MS-TNEF-
Correlator: \r\nThread-Topic: grattis med hus!\r\nThread-
Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==\r\nFrom: "Knut 
Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nTo: 
<fredrik@rodland.no>\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit\r\nX-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit 
by ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912\r\nStatus:   \r\n\r\n'
Spam                : 0.92635444708974979
SpamBayesOriginalFolderID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x82\x80\x00\x00'
SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID: '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1
\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
X-MIME-Autoconverted: 'from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912'
X-MS-Has-Attach     : ''
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: ''
X-MimeOLE           : 'Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0'



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 18:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 18:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 18:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 10:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 17:10:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 19:10:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19kttv-0005aE-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 19:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
>Priority: 7
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What Tony said is exactly where I got to last night from the
log here - if you look at the OPs reports, you see the exact
same thing.  "Show Spam Clues" below shows only headers. 
However, I was assuming it was only for *that* user.

Fuck.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I have to go now, but I've narrowed it down a little.  When 
filtering, for some reason the email only has a few headers 
(even doing a Filter Now, not just when it arrives).  When 
showing clues, the email has them all.  (by email, I mean the 
result of msg.GetEmailPackageObject()).

For example (the first is from filtering, the second is the same 
message with show clues).  Bodies are identical and left out.

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:51:09 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb
From: Mrs. Victoria Rinma.
"""

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:53:24 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from wibble.net [210.55.12.113] 
	by grunt3.ihug.co.nz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
	id 18nriD-0006El-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:54:26 
+1300
X-Wibble-Envelope-To: <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>
Received: from orson.icl.net (orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10])
	by wibble.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with 
ESMTP id PAA19831
	for <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 
15:54:23 +1300
From: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Authentication-Warning: wibble.net: Host orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10]
	claimed to be orson.icl.net
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=orson.vip.uk.com)
	by orson.icl.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 18nrBv-0000O7-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 02:21:03 
+0000
Content-Disposition: inline
To: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Originating-Ip: 216.139.169.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: mrs.victoria@caramail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 2:21:02 GMT
X-Mailer: EMUmail 4.5
Subject: ! message !
X-Webmail-User: 
mrs.victoria*breathe.com@pophost1.breathe.com
Message-Id: <E18nrBv-0000O7-00@orson.icl.net>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to base64 by wibble.net id 
PAA19831
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

I can confirm this:  I noticed today that the scores in my 
Spam columns looked wrong, and indeed the scores reported 
by "show spam clues" are correct, given the *H* and *S* 
scores reported there.  I did the full bit, asking to retrain the 
database from scratch, and to rescore all the messages 
trained on afterwards.  Don't know why yet, and (alas) no 
time to dig now.  Sometimes the spam score Outlook displays 
is larger than the correct value, sometimes smaller.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-07 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to the latest cvs (updationg all files to HEAD), and 
installed python 2.3 (and win32 ext 1.5.7) and removed 
ptyhon 2.2 from my PC.

I then ran "filter now" on my HAM-folder.  after finishing, the 
message prompted is: "Found 1 spam, 11 unsure and 238 
good messages".  previosly (with the old version of 
spambayes, all mails were HAM in this folder).  The value of 
the spam-field in outlook actually changed, so something is 
definitly going on.

ok - looking at one of the messages:

I inserted the print-statement in the code as you instructed 
me to:

>>>>  Message  grattis med hus!  has score:  
0.92635444709 , perc:  92.635444709

however, looking at this messages with "show spam clues for 
current message" returns a Spam Score of 0.0139373 - i.e. 
1,4 %

the latter 1.4% is correct - i.e. the same as the old version of 
spambayes returned when filtering.

It seems to me as the filtering process is using another 
database than the "show spam clues".  
content of C:\Documents and 
Settings\Fredrik\Programdata\SpamBayes:
	default_bayes_customize.ini
	default_bayes_database.db
	default_message_database.db
	Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini



SHOW SPAM CLUES FOR CURRENT MESSAGE
===================================

Spam Score: 0.0139373


word                                spamprob         #ham  #spam
'*H*'                               0.974866            -      -
'*S*'                               0.00274039          -      -
'to:addr:fredrik'                   0.0918367           2      0
'to:addr:rodland.no'                0.0990722          45      7
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'    0.155172            1      0
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'from:name:knut dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com' 0.155172            
1      0
'subject:grattis'                   0.155172            1      0
'subject:hus'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:med'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:!'                         0.714406            8     30
'header:Received:1'                 0.739915            2      9

Message Stream:


Return-Path: <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
Received: from exchangedelft.intec-hou.com 
([195.64.83.132])
	by ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912
	for <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 2003 
11:55:09 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: grattis med hus!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: grattis med hus!
Thread-Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==
From: "Knut Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
To: <fredrik@rodland.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id
	h4F9t44f024912
Status: 



Message Tokens:

26 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'
'from:name:knut dohlen'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:!'
'subject:grattis'
'subject:hus'
'subject:med'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:fredrik'
'to:addr:rodland.no'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'


RESULT OF dump_props.py FOR SAME MESSAGE:
=========================================
0x1035001e          : '<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B1
01EDA@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com>'
0x1046001e          : 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com'
0x3fde0003          : 28591
0x80000003          : 2
0x8084001e          : 'FMR@RODLAND'
0x8085001e          : '00000008\x01frodland@aston.no'
PR_ACCESS           : 3
PR_ACCESS_LEVEL     : 1
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:00>
PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_CREATION_TIME    : <PyTime:15.05.2003 10:01:04>
PR_DISPLAY_BCC_A    : ''
PR_DISPLAY_CC_A     : ''
PR_DISPLAY_TO_A     : 'fredrik@rodland.no'
PR_ENTRYID          : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\xa4UU\x00'
PR_HASATTACH        : False
PR_IMPORTANCE       : 1
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME: <PyTime:07.08.2003 
08:46:25>
PR_MAPPING_SIGNATURE: '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_MESSAGE_ATTACHMENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_CLASS_A  : 'IPM.Note'
PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:09>
PR_MESSAGE_FLAGS    : 1
PR_MESSAGE_RECIPIENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_SIZE     : 2405
PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_OBJECT_TYPE      : 5
PR_PARENT_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x02\x8d\x00\x00'
PR_PRIORITY         : 0
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston
.no'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Fredrik 
Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@AS
TON.NO\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston.no'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Fredrik Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@ASTON.NO
\x00'
PR_RECORD_KEY       : '\xa4UU\x00'
PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '@WT\x17\x13\xd1\xeeK\x85\x06
\x8e^\xa9\xe0\x16d'
PR_SENDER_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENDER_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineerin
g.com'
PR_SENDER_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENDER_NAME_A    : 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENDER_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@INTECENGINE
ERING.COM\x00'
PR_SENSITIVITY      : 0
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@in
tecengineering.com'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@
INTECENGINEERING.COM\x00'
PR_STORE_ENTRYID    : '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05
\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
PR_STORE_RECORD_KEY : '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK: 79869
PR_SUBJECT_A        : 'grattis med hus!'
PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX_A : ''
PR_TNEF_CORRELATION_KEY: '\x00'
PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A: 'Return-Path: 
<Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nReceived: from 
exchangedelft.intec-hou.com ([195.64.83.132])\r\n\tby 
ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912\r\n\tfor <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 
2003 11:55:09 +0200\r\ncontent-class: urn:content-
classes:message\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: 
text/plain;\r\n\tcharset="iso-8859-1"\r\nSubject: grattis med 
hus!\r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0\r\nDate: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
\r\nMessage-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>\r\nX-MS-Has-Attach: \r\nX-MS-TNEF-
Correlator: \r\nThread-Topic: grattis med hus!\r\nThread-
Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==\r\nFrom: "Knut 
Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nTo: 
<fredrik@rodland.no>\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit\r\nX-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit 
by ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912\r\nStatus:   \r\n\r\n'
Spam                : 0.92635444708974979
SpamBayesOriginalFolderID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x82\x80\x00\x00'
SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID: '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1
\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
X-MIME-Autoconverted: 'from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912'
X-MS-Has-Attach     : ''
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: ''
X-MimeOLE           : 'Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0'



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 17:59:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 19:59:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-785089 ] Outlook
	misbehaves after installing Spambayes
Message-ID: <E19kufP-0007C0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-07 23:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785089&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook misbehaves after installing Spambayes

Initial Comment:
I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by 
spambayes but I just installed it this morning and 
noticed the following.

I did a search for a message using the advanced search 
tool.  It brought up a list of messages matching the 
search.  I tried to drag the message from the search 
folder to a different folder and got a message

"Can't move the items."

I can however move the message as long as it isn't in 
the search window.

I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows 
XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook 
spambayes plugin.  Sorry, I can't seem to find the 
spambayes version number anywhere.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785089&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 19:07:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 21:07:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19kvjI-0000Vv-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 21:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 13:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You might have progressed further, but if you haven't, here's 
more narrowing down.

In the __init__ of a MapiMsgStoreMessage it tries to get the 
headers, and has:
   if PROP_TYPE(headers_tag)==PT_STRING8:
to check if the headers were all received or not.  However, I 
get headers_tag == PT_STRING8, but only the first 255 
characters of the headers for every message in the __init__  
(and never a PT_ERROR), *while filtering*.

This of course later means that the message thinks that it 
has all the headers required, but only has a portion of them.

In the same __init__ call, during a "Show Clues" event, I get 
all the headers received.

Given that Mark knows a lot more about what's going on with 
the MAPI stuff, he can probably tell us why this is.  In any 
case, an easy solution is to just re get the headers in the 
_GetMessageText function.  (This may not be the correct 
solution, of course, but it does solve the problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 11:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What Tony said is exactly where I got to last night from the
log here - if you look at the OPs reports, you see the exact
same thing.  "Show Spam Clues" below shows only headers. 
However, I was assuming it was only for *that* user.

Fuck.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 10:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I have to go now, but I've narrowed it down a little.  When 
filtering, for some reason the email only has a few headers 
(even doing a Filter Now, not just when it arrives).  When 
showing clues, the email has them all.  (by email, I mean the 
result of msg.GetEmailPackageObject()).

For example (the first is from filtering, the second is the same 
message with show clues).  Bodies are identical and left out.

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:51:09 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb
From: Mrs. Victoria Rinma.
"""

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:53:24 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from wibble.net [210.55.12.113] 
	by grunt3.ihug.co.nz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
	id 18nriD-0006El-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:54:26 
+1300
X-Wibble-Envelope-To: <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>
Received: from orson.icl.net (orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10])
	by wibble.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with 
ESMTP id PAA19831
	for <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 
15:54:23 +1300
From: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Authentication-Warning: wibble.net: Host orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10]
	claimed to be orson.icl.net
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=orson.vip.uk.com)
	by orson.icl.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 18nrBv-0000O7-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 02:21:03 
+0000
Content-Disposition: inline
To: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Originating-Ip: 216.139.169.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: mrs.victoria@caramail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 2:21:02 GMT
X-Mailer: EMUmail 4.5
Subject: ! message !
X-Webmail-User: 
mrs.victoria*breathe.com@pophost1.breathe.com
Message-Id: <E18nrBv-0000O7-00@orson.icl.net>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to base64 by wibble.net id 
PAA19831
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-08 10:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

I can confirm this:  I noticed today that the scores in my 
Spam columns looked wrong, and indeed the scores reported 
by "show spam clues" are correct, given the *H* and *S* 
scores reported there.  I did the full bit, asking to retrain the 
database from scratch, and to rescore all the messages 
trained on afterwards.  Don't know why yet, and (alas) no 
time to dig now.  Sometimes the spam score Outlook displays 
is larger than the correct value, sometimes smaller.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-07 21:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to the latest cvs (updationg all files to HEAD), and 
installed python 2.3 (and win32 ext 1.5.7) and removed 
ptyhon 2.2 from my PC.

I then ran "filter now" on my HAM-folder.  after finishing, the 
message prompted is: "Found 1 spam, 11 unsure and 238 
good messages".  previosly (with the old version of 
spambayes, all mails were HAM in this folder).  The value of 
the spam-field in outlook actually changed, so something is 
definitly going on.

ok - looking at one of the messages:

I inserted the print-statement in the code as you instructed 
me to:

>>>>  Message  grattis med hus!  has score:  
0.92635444709 , perc:  92.635444709

however, looking at this messages with "show spam clues for 
current message" returns a Spam Score of 0.0139373 - i.e. 
1,4 %

the latter 1.4% is correct - i.e. the same as the old version of 
spambayes returned when filtering.

It seems to me as the filtering process is using another 
database than the "show spam clues".  
content of C:\Documents and 
Settings\Fredrik\Programdata\SpamBayes:
	default_bayes_customize.ini
	default_bayes_database.db
	default_message_database.db
	Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini



SHOW SPAM CLUES FOR CURRENT MESSAGE
===================================

Spam Score: 0.0139373


word                                spamprob         #ham  #spam
'*H*'                               0.974866            -      -
'*S*'                               0.00274039          -      -
'to:addr:fredrik'                   0.0918367           2      0
'to:addr:rodland.no'                0.0990722          45      7
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'    0.155172            1      0
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'from:name:knut dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com' 0.155172            
1      0
'subject:grattis'                   0.155172            1      0
'subject:hus'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:med'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:!'                         0.714406            8     30
'header:Received:1'                 0.739915            2      9

Message Stream:


Return-Path: <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
Received: from exchangedelft.intec-hou.com 
([195.64.83.132])
	by ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912
	for <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 2003 
11:55:09 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: grattis med hus!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: grattis med hus!
Thread-Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==
From: "Knut Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
To: <fredrik@rodland.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id
	h4F9t44f024912
Status: 



Message Tokens:

26 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'
'from:name:knut dohlen'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:!'
'subject:grattis'
'subject:hus'
'subject:med'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:fredrik'
'to:addr:rodland.no'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'


RESULT OF dump_props.py FOR SAME MESSAGE:
=========================================
0x1035001e          : '<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B1
01EDA@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com>'
0x1046001e          : 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com'
0x3fde0003          : 28591
0x80000003          : 2
0x8084001e          : 'FMR@RODLAND'
0x8085001e          : '00000008\x01frodland@aston.no'
PR_ACCESS           : 3
PR_ACCESS_LEVEL     : 1
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:00>
PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_CREATION_TIME    : <PyTime:15.05.2003 10:01:04>
PR_DISPLAY_BCC_A    : ''
PR_DISPLAY_CC_A     : ''
PR_DISPLAY_TO_A     : 'fredrik@rodland.no'
PR_ENTRYID          : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\xa4UU\x00'
PR_HASATTACH        : False
PR_IMPORTANCE       : 1
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME: <PyTime:07.08.2003 
08:46:25>
PR_MAPPING_SIGNATURE: '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_MESSAGE_ATTACHMENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_CLASS_A  : 'IPM.Note'
PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:09>
PR_MESSAGE_FLAGS    : 1
PR_MESSAGE_RECIPIENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_SIZE     : 2405
PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_OBJECT_TYPE      : 5
PR_PARENT_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x02\x8d\x00\x00'
PR_PRIORITY         : 0
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston
.no'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Fredrik 
Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@AS
TON.NO\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston.no'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Fredrik Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@ASTON.NO
\x00'
PR_RECORD_KEY       : '\xa4UU\x00'
PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '@WT\x17\x13\xd1\xeeK\x85\x06
\x8e^\xa9\xe0\x16d'
PR_SENDER_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENDER_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineerin
g.com'
PR_SENDER_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENDER_NAME_A    : 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENDER_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@INTECENGINE
ERING.COM\x00'
PR_SENSITIVITY      : 0
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@in
tecengineering.com'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@
INTECENGINEERING.COM\x00'
PR_STORE_ENTRYID    : '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05
\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
PR_STORE_RECORD_KEY : '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK: 79869
PR_SUBJECT_A        : 'grattis med hus!'
PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX_A : ''
PR_TNEF_CORRELATION_KEY: '\x00'
PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A: 'Return-Path: 
<Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nReceived: from 
exchangedelft.intec-hou.com ([195.64.83.132])\r\n\tby 
ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912\r\n\tfor <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 
2003 11:55:09 +0200\r\ncontent-class: urn:content-
classes:message\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: 
text/plain;\r\n\tcharset="iso-8859-1"\r\nSubject: grattis med 
hus!\r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0\r\nDate: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
\r\nMessage-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>\r\nX-MS-Has-Attach: \r\nX-MS-TNEF-
Correlator: \r\nThread-Topic: grattis med hus!\r\nThread-
Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==\r\nFrom: "Knut 
Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nTo: 
<fredrik@rodland.no>\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit\r\nX-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit 
by ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912\r\nStatus:   \r\n\r\n'
Spam                : 0.92635444708974979
SpamBayesOriginalFolderID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x82\x80\x00\x00'
SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID: '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1
\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
X-MIME-Autoconverted: 'from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912'
X-MS-Has-Attach     : ''
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: ''
X-MimeOLE           : 'Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0'



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 18:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 18:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 18:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 10:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 20:31:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 22:31:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19kx1w-0003oN-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 19:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yikes.  Yes, this is documented by MAPI :(

This then exposes another bug in my testing - I get:

  File "E:\src\spambayes/Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 768,
in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME related
error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' header

Which I can also see.  Damn damn damn.  Oh well, if we also
clobber the ntpath unicode error very soon, a new release
will be worth it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You might have progressed further, but if you haven't, here's 
more narrowing down.

In the __init__ of a MapiMsgStoreMessage it tries to get the 
headers, and has:
   if PROP_TYPE(headers_tag)==PT_STRING8:
to check if the headers were all received or not.  However, I 
get headers_tag == PT_STRING8, but only the first 255 
characters of the headers for every message in the __init__  
(and never a PT_ERROR), *while filtering*.

This of course later means that the message thinks that it 
has all the headers required, but only has a portion of them.

In the same __init__ call, during a "Show Clues" event, I get 
all the headers received.

Given that Mark knows a lot more about what's going on with 
the MAPI stuff, he can probably tell us why this is.  In any 
case, an easy solution is to just re get the headers in the 
_GetMessageText function.  (This may not be the correct 
solution, of course, but it does solve the problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What Tony said is exactly where I got to last night from the
log here - if you look at the OPs reports, you see the exact
same thing.  "Show Spam Clues" below shows only headers. 
However, I was assuming it was only for *that* user.

Fuck.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I have to go now, but I've narrowed it down a little.  When 
filtering, for some reason the email only has a few headers 
(even doing a Filter Now, not just when it arrives).  When 
showing clues, the email has them all.  (by email, I mean the 
result of msg.GetEmailPackageObject()).

For example (the first is from filtering, the second is the same 
message with show clues).  Bodies are identical and left out.

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:51:09 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb
From: Mrs. Victoria Rinma.
"""

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:53:24 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from wibble.net [210.55.12.113] 
	by grunt3.ihug.co.nz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
	id 18nriD-0006El-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:54:26 
+1300
X-Wibble-Envelope-To: <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>
Received: from orson.icl.net (orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10])
	by wibble.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with 
ESMTP id PAA19831
	for <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 
15:54:23 +1300
From: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Authentication-Warning: wibble.net: Host orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10]
	claimed to be orson.icl.net
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=orson.vip.uk.com)
	by orson.icl.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 18nrBv-0000O7-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 02:21:03 
+0000
Content-Disposition: inline
To: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Originating-Ip: 216.139.169.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: mrs.victoria@caramail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 2:21:02 GMT
X-Mailer: EMUmail 4.5
Subject: ! message !
X-Webmail-User: 
mrs.victoria*breathe.com@pophost1.breathe.com
Message-Id: <E18nrBv-0000O7-00@orson.icl.net>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to base64 by wibble.net id 
PAA19831
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

I can confirm this:  I noticed today that the scores in my 
Spam columns looked wrong, and indeed the scores reported 
by "show spam clues" are correct, given the *H* and *S* 
scores reported there.  I did the full bit, asking to retrain the 
database from scratch, and to rescore all the messages 
trained on afterwards.  Don't know why yet, and (alas) no 
time to dig now.  Sometimes the spam score Outlook displays 
is larger than the correct value, sometimes smaller.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-07 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to the latest cvs (updationg all files to HEAD), and 
installed python 2.3 (and win32 ext 1.5.7) and removed 
ptyhon 2.2 from my PC.

I then ran "filter now" on my HAM-folder.  after finishing, the 
message prompted is: "Found 1 spam, 11 unsure and 238 
good messages".  previosly (with the old version of 
spambayes, all mails were HAM in this folder).  The value of 
the spam-field in outlook actually changed, so something is 
definitly going on.

ok - looking at one of the messages:

I inserted the print-statement in the code as you instructed 
me to:

>>>>  Message  grattis med hus!  has score:  
0.92635444709 , perc:  92.635444709

however, looking at this messages with "show spam clues for 
current message" returns a Spam Score of 0.0139373 - i.e. 
1,4 %

the latter 1.4% is correct - i.e. the same as the old version of 
spambayes returned when filtering.

It seems to me as the filtering process is using another 
database than the "show spam clues".  
content of C:\Documents and 
Settings\Fredrik\Programdata\SpamBayes:
	default_bayes_customize.ini
	default_bayes_database.db
	default_message_database.db
	Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini



SHOW SPAM CLUES FOR CURRENT MESSAGE
===================================

Spam Score: 0.0139373


word                                spamprob         #ham  #spam
'*H*'                               0.974866            -      -
'*S*'                               0.00274039          -      -
'to:addr:fredrik'                   0.0918367           2      0
'to:addr:rodland.no'                0.0990722          45      7
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'    0.155172            1      0
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'from:name:knut dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com' 0.155172            
1      0
'subject:grattis'                   0.155172            1      0
'subject:hus'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:med'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:!'                         0.714406            8     30
'header:Received:1'                 0.739915            2      9

Message Stream:


Return-Path: <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
Received: from exchangedelft.intec-hou.com 
([195.64.83.132])
	by ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912
	for <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 2003 
11:55:09 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: grattis med hus!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: grattis med hus!
Thread-Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==
From: "Knut Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
To: <fredrik@rodland.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id
	h4F9t44f024912
Status: 



Message Tokens:

26 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'
'from:name:knut dohlen'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:!'
'subject:grattis'
'subject:hus'
'subject:med'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:fredrik'
'to:addr:rodland.no'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'


RESULT OF dump_props.py FOR SAME MESSAGE:
=========================================
0x1035001e          : '<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B1
01EDA@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com>'
0x1046001e          : 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com'
0x3fde0003          : 28591
0x80000003          : 2
0x8084001e          : 'FMR@RODLAND'
0x8085001e          : '00000008\x01frodland@aston.no'
PR_ACCESS           : 3
PR_ACCESS_LEVEL     : 1
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:00>
PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_CREATION_TIME    : <PyTime:15.05.2003 10:01:04>
PR_DISPLAY_BCC_A    : ''
PR_DISPLAY_CC_A     : ''
PR_DISPLAY_TO_A     : 'fredrik@rodland.no'
PR_ENTRYID          : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\xa4UU\x00'
PR_HASATTACH        : False
PR_IMPORTANCE       : 1
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME: <PyTime:07.08.2003 
08:46:25>
PR_MAPPING_SIGNATURE: '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_MESSAGE_ATTACHMENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_CLASS_A  : 'IPM.Note'
PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:09>
PR_MESSAGE_FLAGS    : 1
PR_MESSAGE_RECIPIENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_SIZE     : 2405
PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_OBJECT_TYPE      : 5
PR_PARENT_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x02\x8d\x00\x00'
PR_PRIORITY         : 0
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston
.no'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Fredrik 
Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@AS
TON.NO\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston.no'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Fredrik Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@ASTON.NO
\x00'
PR_RECORD_KEY       : '\xa4UU\x00'
PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '@WT\x17\x13\xd1\xeeK\x85\x06
\x8e^\xa9\xe0\x16d'
PR_SENDER_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENDER_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineerin
g.com'
PR_SENDER_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENDER_NAME_A    : 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENDER_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@INTECENGINE
ERING.COM\x00'
PR_SENSITIVITY      : 0
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@in
tecengineering.com'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@
INTECENGINEERING.COM\x00'
PR_STORE_ENTRYID    : '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05
\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
PR_STORE_RECORD_KEY : '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK: 79869
PR_SUBJECT_A        : 'grattis med hus!'
PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX_A : ''
PR_TNEF_CORRELATION_KEY: '\x00'
PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A: 'Return-Path: 
<Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nReceived: from 
exchangedelft.intec-hou.com ([195.64.83.132])\r\n\tby 
ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912\r\n\tfor <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 
2003 11:55:09 +0200\r\ncontent-class: urn:content-
classes:message\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: 
text/plain;\r\n\tcharset="iso-8859-1"\r\nSubject: grattis med 
hus!\r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0\r\nDate: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
\r\nMessage-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>\r\nX-MS-Has-Attach: \r\nX-MS-TNEF-
Correlator: \r\nThread-Topic: grattis med hus!\r\nThread-
Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==\r\nFrom: "Knut 
Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nTo: 
<fredrik@rodland.no>\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit\r\nX-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit 
by ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912\r\nStatus:   \r\n\r\n'
Spam                : 0.92635444708974979
SpamBayesOriginalFolderID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x82\x80\x00\x00'
SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID: '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1
\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
X-MIME-Autoconverted: 'from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912'
X-MS-Has-Attach     : ''
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: ''
X-MimeOLE           : 'Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0'



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug  7 20:55:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug  7 22:55:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-782709 ] not match between actual
	score and what's shown in outlook
Message-ID: <E19kxPt-00043j-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #782709, was opened at 2003-08-04 19:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: not match between actual score and what's shown in outlook

Initial Comment:
I noticed this for the first time today - running on the 
latest CVS.  Not sure how long this has been the case.

I've got folders wioth HAMs & SPAMs, and looked at the 
spam-score shown in outlooks Spam-field.  these does 
NOT match the actual score of a message - shown with 
the button 'shown spam clues for current message'.  this 
is the case also after scoring/filtering the messages.

filtering the messages (with 'score, but don't perform 
action') actually modifies the values of the Spam-field (I 
saw it during filtering), but these values are NOT equal 
to the actual values shown using the method above.

I use the spam-field as sort-criteria to track hams with 
high score and spams with low score, but the values are 
of no good anymore.

no traceback in the logs during filtering or viewing of 
manual spam-score.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 12:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm getting a little excited here :)  It doesn't expose that
assertion - my fix was just wrong.  I have had that
assertion reported in the wild tho, and can see how it could
happen.  Oh well.

Fixed on the trunk:
Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.62; previous revision: 1.61
And on the Outlook dialog branch:
Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.61.2.1; previous revision: 1.61


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yikes.  Yes, this is documented by MAPI :(

This then exposes another bug in my testing - I get:

  File "E:\src\spambayes/Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 768,
in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME related
error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' header

Which I can also see.  Damn damn damn.  Oh well, if we also
clobber the ntpath unicode error very soon, a new release
will be worth it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You might have progressed further, but if you haven't, here's 
more narrowing down.

In the __init__ of a MapiMsgStoreMessage it tries to get the 
headers, and has:
   if PROP_TYPE(headers_tag)==PT_STRING8:
to check if the headers were all received or not.  However, I 
get headers_tag == PT_STRING8, but only the first 255 
characters of the headers for every message in the __init__  
(and never a PT_ERROR), *while filtering*.

This of course later means that the message thinks that it 
has all the headers required, but only has a portion of them.

In the same __init__ call, during a "Show Clues" event, I get 
all the headers received.

Given that Mark knows a lot more about what's going on with 
the MAPI stuff, he can probably tell us why this is.  In any 
case, an easy solution is to just re get the headers in the 
_GetMessageText function.  (This may not be the correct 
solution, of course, but it does solve the problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 09:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What Tony said is exactly where I got to last night from the
log here - if you look at the OPs reports, you see the exact
same thing.  "Show Spam Clues" below shows only headers. 
However, I was assuming it was only for *that* user.

Fuck.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I have to go now, but I've narrowed it down a little.  When 
filtering, for some reason the email only has a few headers 
(even doing a Filter Now, not just when it arrives).  When 
showing clues, the email has them all.  (by email, I mean the 
result of msg.GetEmailPackageObject()).

For example (the first is from filtering, the second is the same 
message with show clues).  Bodies are identical and left out.

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:51:09 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb
From: Mrs. Victoria Rinma.
"""

"""
>From nobody Fri Aug 08 10:53:24 2003
Return-Path: <mrs.victoria@breathe.com>
Delivered-To: ta-meyer@backend.pop.ihug.co.nz
Received: (qmail 11735 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from grunt3.ihug.co.nz (203.109.254.43)
	by baldrick.ihug.co.nz with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 
02:54:26 -0000
Received: from wibble.net [210.55.12.113] 
	by grunt3.ihug.co.nz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
	id 18nriD-0006El-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:54:26 
+1300
X-Wibble-Envelope-To: <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>
Received: from orson.icl.net (orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10])
	by wibble.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with 
ESMTP id PAA19831
	for <tonym@madsods.gen.nz>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 
15:54:23 +1300
From: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Authentication-Warning: wibble.net: Host orson.vip.uk.com 
[194.176.218.10]
	claimed to be orson.icl.net
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=orson.vip.uk.com)
	by orson.icl.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 18nrBv-0000O7-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 02:21:03 
+0000
Content-Disposition: inline
To: mrs.victoria@breathe.com
X-Originating-Ip: 216.139.169.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: mrs.victoria@caramail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 2:21:02 GMT
X-Mailer: EMUmail 4.5
Subject: ! message !
X-Webmail-User: 
mrs.victoria*breathe.com@pophost1.breathe.com
Message-Id: <E18nrBv-0000O7-00@orson.icl.net>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to base64 by wibble.net id 
PAA19831
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

I can confirm this:  I noticed today that the scores in my 
Spam columns looked wrong, and indeed the scores reported 
by "show spam clues" are correct, given the *H* and *S* 
scores reported there.  I did the full bit, asking to retrain the 
database from scratch, and to rescore all the messages 
trained on afterwards.  Don't know why yet, and (alas) no 
time to dig now.  Sometimes the spam score Outlook displays 
is larger than the correct value, sometimes smaller.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-07 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to the latest cvs (updationg all files to HEAD), and 
installed python 2.3 (and win32 ext 1.5.7) and removed 
ptyhon 2.2 from my PC.

I then ran "filter now" on my HAM-folder.  after finishing, the 
message prompted is: "Found 1 spam, 11 unsure and 238 
good messages".  previosly (with the old version of 
spambayes, all mails were HAM in this folder).  The value of 
the spam-field in outlook actually changed, so something is 
definitly going on.

ok - looking at one of the messages:

I inserted the print-statement in the code as you instructed 
me to:

>>>>  Message  grattis med hus!  has score:  
0.92635444709 , perc:  92.635444709

however, looking at this messages with "show spam clues for 
current message" returns a Spam Score of 0.0139373 - i.e. 
1,4 %

the latter 1.4% is correct - i.e. the same as the old version of 
spambayes returned when filtering.

It seems to me as the filtering process is using another 
database than the "show spam clues".  
content of C:\Documents and 
Settings\Fredrik\Programdata\SpamBayes:
	default_bayes_customize.ini
	default_bayes_database.db
	default_message_database.db
	Microsoft Outlook Internet Settings.ini



SHOW SPAM CLUES FOR CURRENT MESSAGE
===================================

Spam Score: 0.0139373


word                                spamprob         #ham  #spam
'*H*'                               0.974866            -      -
'*S*'                               0.00274039          -      -
'to:addr:fredrik'                   0.0918367           2      0
'to:addr:rodland.no'                0.0990722          45      7
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'    0.155172            1      0
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'from:name:knut dohlen'             0.155172            1      0
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com' 0.155172            
1      0
'subject:grattis'                   0.155172            1      0
'subject:hus'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:med'                       0.155172            1      0
'subject:!'                         0.714406            8     30
'header:Received:1'                 0.739915            2      9

Message Stream:


Return-Path: <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
Received: from exchangedelft.intec-hou.com 
([195.64.83.132])
	by ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912
	for <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 2003 
11:55:09 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: grattis med hus!
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
Message-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: grattis med hus!
Thread-Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==
From: "Knut Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>
To: <fredrik@rodland.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id
	h4F9t44f024912
Status: 



Message Tokens:

26 unique tokens

'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'from:addr:intecengineering.com'
'from:addr:knut.dohlen'
'from:name:knut dohlen'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-ID:1'
'header:Received:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message-id:@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com'
'reply-to:none'
'sender:none'
'subject: '
'subject:!'
'subject:grattis'
'subject:hus'
'subject:med'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:fredrik'
'to:addr:rodland.no'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'x-mailer:none'


RESULT OF dump_props.py FOR SAME MESSAGE:
=========================================
0x1035001e          : '<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B1
01EDA@exchangedelft.intec-hou.com>'
0x1046001e          : 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com'
0x3fde0003          : 28591
0x80000003          : 2
0x8084001e          : 'FMR@RODLAND'
0x8085001e          : '00000008\x01frodland@aston.no'
PR_ACCESS           : 3
PR_ACCESS_LEVEL     : 1
PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:00>
PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_CREATION_TIME    : <PyTime:15.05.2003 10:01:04>
PR_DISPLAY_BCC_A    : ''
PR_DISPLAY_CC_A     : ''
PR_DISPLAY_TO_A     : 'fredrik@rodland.no'
PR_ENTRYID          : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\xa4UU\x00'
PR_HASATTACH        : False
PR_IMPORTANCE       : 1
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME: <PyTime:07.08.2003 
08:46:25>
PR_MAPPING_SIGNATURE: '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_MESSAGE_ATTACHMENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_CLASS_A  : 'IPM.Note'
PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME: <PyTime:15.05.2003 09:55:09>
PR_MESSAGE_FLAGS    : 1
PR_MESSAGE_RECIPIENTS: 1
PR_MESSAGE_SIZE     : 2405
PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT_A: 'grattis med hus!'
PR_OBJECT_TYPE      : 5
PR_PARENT_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x02\x8d\x00\x00'
PR_PRIORITY         : 0
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston
.no'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Fredrik 
Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RCVD_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@AS
TON.NO\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'frodland@aston.no'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Fredrik Rodland\x00SMTP\x00frodland@aston.no\x00'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_NAME_A: 'Fredrik Rodland'
PR_RECEIVED_BY_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:FRODLAND@ASTON.NO
\x00'
PR_RECORD_KEY       : '\xa4UU\x00'
PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '@WT\x17\x13\xd1\xeeK\x85\x06
\x8e^\xa9\xe0\x16d'
PR_SENDER_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENDER_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@intecengineerin
g.com'
PR_SENDER_ENTRYID   : '\x00\x00\x00\x00\x81+\x1f\xa4
\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02\x00\x00\x00
\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENDER_NAME_A    : 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENDER_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@INTECENGINE
ERING.COM\x00'
PR_SENSITIVITY      : 0
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ADDRTYPE_A: 'SMTP'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_EMAIL_ADDRESS_A: 'Knut.Dohlen@in
tecengineering.com'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_ENTRYID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00
\x81+\x1f\xa4\xbe\xa3\x10\x19\x9dn\x00\xdd\x01\x0fT\x02
\x00\x00\x00\x00Knut 
Dohlen\x00SMTP\x00Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com\x00'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_NAME_A: 'Knut Dohlen'
PR_SENT_REPRESENTING_SEARCH_KEY: 'SMTP:KNUT.DOHLEN@
INTECENGINEERING.COM\x00'
PR_STORE_ENTRYID    : '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1\xbb\x10\x05
\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
PR_STORE_RECORD_KEY : '\xee.-\x06\x1a!\xebJ\x91
\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac'
PR_STORE_SUPPORT_MASK: 79869
PR_SUBJECT_A        : 'grattis med hus!'
PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX_A : ''
PR_TNEF_CORRELATION_KEY: '\x00'
PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A: 'Return-Path: 
<Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nReceived: from 
exchangedelft.intec-hou.com ([195.64.83.132])\r\n\tby 
ally.servicenett.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 
h4F9t44f024912\r\n\tfor <fredrik@rodland.no>; Thu, 15 May 
2003 11:55:09 +0200\r\ncontent-class: urn:content-
classes:message\r\nMIME-Version: 1.0\r\nContent-Type: 
text/plain;\r\n\tcharset="iso-8859-1"\r\nSubject: grattis med 
hus!\r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0\r\nDate: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:55:00 +0200
\r\nMessage-ID: 
<AE4AEBADBE3523498B45FB184E32921B101EDA@exchangedelf
t.intec-hou.com>\r\nX-MS-Has-Attach: \r\nX-MS-TNEF-
Correlator: \r\nThread-Topic: grattis med hus!\r\nThread-
Index: AcMayAzVrfaY8ftMT6+n6YK7bFSqgA==\r\nFrom: "Knut 
Dohlen" <Knut.Dohlen@intecengineering.com>\r\nTo: 
<fredrik@rodland.no>\r\nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 
8bit\r\nX-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit 
by ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912\r\nStatus:   \r\n\r\n'
Spam                : 0.92635444708974979
SpamBayesOriginalFolderID: '\x00\x00\x00\x00\xee.-\x06\x1a!
\xebJ\x91\xb6X\x19>\xb1r\xac\x82\x80\x00\x00'
SpamBayesOriginalFolderStoreID: '\x00\x00\x00\x008\xa1
\xbb\x10\x05\xe5\x10\x1a\xa1\xbb\x08\x00+*V\xc2\x00
\x00PSTPRX.DLL\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00NITA\xf9
\xbf\xb8\x01\x00\xaa\x007\xd9n\x00\x00\x00C:\Documents 
and Settings\Fredrik\Lokale 
innstillinger\Programdata\Microsoft\Outlook\outlook.pst\x00
'
X-MIME-Autoconverted: 'from quoted-printable to 8bit by 
ally.servicenett.no id h4F9t44f024912'
X-MS-Has-Attach     : ''
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: ''
X-MimeOLE           : 'Produced By Microsoft Exchange 
V6.0.6249.0'



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 16:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you are running from source, can you add a couple
of print statements to help diagnose?

At the top of filter.py you will find:

def filter_message(msg, mgr, all_actions=True):
    config = mgr.config.filter
    prob = mgr.score(msg)

Add, say, 
    print "Message", msg.subject, "has score", prob

And see if that helps track it down.

Another possibility would be to run "sandbox/dumprops.py"
over one of the messages, and make sure we are actually
saving the value in the correct field (as, eg, the ini file
allows you to change the field name we use)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Backing up my last comment, i just re-iunstalled a CVS-
version lying around (from about 030701) addin beta 1, 
version 0.3 (july 2003), which proves my point.  after a train 
(and selecting "score messages after training" the Spam-field 
in outlook is updated to the correct value.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-05 16:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

Tony's comment is just not right.  as I describe in my original 
post, the spam-field actually changes after a retrain now, but 
the value is just not the correct one.

this used to work just like I commented - after a retrain the 
spam-field shows the LAST (not first) score.

Reopened bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-05 08:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The value in Outlook's spam field is the score of the message 
at the time it was first processed.  The score in the "show 
spam clues" is what the message would score if it arrived at 
that point in time.  If you've done any training at all between 
the two events, the scores will be different.

Mark did consider including a "This message scored X when 
first processed.  The following information relates to scoring 
the message with current training" type message in the "show 
clues" info, but has been busy with other things (or maybe 
decided it wasn't worth it).  If this would be helpful, then feel 
free to open a feature request for it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 00:46:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 02:46:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784323 ] Plug-in will not
	intialize/watch in offline mode
Message-ID: <E19l111-0002Pz-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784323, was opened at 2003-08-07 04:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784323&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kelly Jones (kejones)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Plug-in will not intialize/watch in offline mode

Initial Comment:
Spambayes plugin had been working fine, in both online 
and offline mode.  Now, when starting up Outlook in 
offline mode, I get the error 

There was an error initializing the spam plugin.
SPam filtering has been disable. Please re-configure, and 
re-enable this plugin.

Error details: Could not watch the specified folders.

The watch folder, "Inbox", seems to be fine.

logfile attached, seems to say something about 
syncronization errors existing.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 16:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yeah, that shouldn't be fatal - I fixed that.

Checking in addin.py;
new revision: 1.88; previous revision: 1.87


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kelly Jones (kejones)
Date: 2003-08-07 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839142

Update from user:  Problem went away after finding, and 
resolving, synchronization errors in Inbox.  Not sure if this is 
still a bug or not:  Seems the plugin could probably handle 
this more gracefully, but the source of the problem was in the 
users data.

kejones

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784323&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 00:47:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 02:47:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784214 ] imap filter problems
Message-ID: <E19l11k-0002Sk-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784214, was opened at 2003-08-07 00:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784214&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Josh Goodman (jogoodma)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: imap filter problems

Initial Comment:

This is a follow up to issue 765042.  Not sure if this is 
still related but I am basically experiencing the same 
problems as I was in issue 765042.  SPAM comes in and 
fails to get filtered.  I have to manually "Delete as 
Spam" to get it to work.  This is happening with an IMAP 
SSL server and Outlook 2000.

I am now using the binary outlook plugin version 006.  I 
have attached a log file with the error messages being 
displayed for several failed SPAM filter attempts.

Josh

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 16:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784214&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 00:59:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 02:59:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783859 ] IMAP - Failed to Process
	Missed Messages
Message-ID: <E19l1Dc-00031P-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783859, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP - Failed to Process Missed Messages

Initial Comment:
Running CVS version. (Verbose is set to 1)
Mail that comes in whilst outlook is open seems
to be filtered correctly. New Mail (unread)
that has arrived outside of an outlook session is Never 
Filtered scored or touched, including running a manual
filter. 

(Also note the following occurs prior to Outlook actually
making the connection to the IMAP Server)

Looking at the logs shows that Spambayes begins to 
process missed messages but usually only gets through
one message until it encounters an error and stops 
processing any further messages. Restarting Outlook
produces the same results ie Spambayes fails on the 
same message, if I delete the problem message and 
restart it will filter one or two messages until it 
comes to an email it doesnt like again and stops. 

The error Message is always
"FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-Sieve: cmu-
sieve 2.0\r\nReturn-Path: " 
followed by the email.. And then
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1067, in OnConnection
    self.ProcessMissedMessages()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1352, in ProcessMissedMessages
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 211, in ProcessMessage
    disposition = filter.filter_message(msgstore_message, 
manager)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\filter.py", line 16, in filter_message
    prob = mgr.score(msg)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\manager.py", line 678, in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\msgstore.py", line 775, in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME 
related error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' 
header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 16:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

OK - this is caused my attempt to fix '[ 779049 ]
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen' -
which is the error you would have seen had I not made a
change.  As this isn't actually a regression, I am stuck.  I
need the exact text of an email this code fails for.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Firstly yes happy to run anything you send me. 
Re the failed message, I realized after posting the bug 
yesterday you had made some changes to the CVS version
(addin.py/1.86 and config.py/1.20) must have missed it 
because I was travelling. Since updating it still fails to 
process missed messages but no longer has any errors. 
It now runs like I remember it in the past where it simply
says "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
165.368ms"... no scrap that, just restarted and encountered 
the same error have attached the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

As you are running from source code, are you willing to run
a custom version I send you?  Also, can you please post the
message that failed, as it was printed in the log file?




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 01:32:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 03:32:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783859 ] IMAP - Failed to Process
	Missed Messages
Message-ID: <E19l1jH-0000Xt-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783859, was opened at 2003-08-06 01:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shaunbroadbent
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP - Failed to Process Missed Messages

Initial Comment:
Running CVS version. (Verbose is set to 1)
Mail that comes in whilst outlook is open seems
to be filtered correctly. New Mail (unread)
that has arrived outside of an outlook session is Never 
Filtered scored or touched, including running a manual
filter. 

(Also note the following occurs prior to Outlook actually
making the connection to the IMAP Server)

Looking at the logs shows that Spambayes begins to 
process missed messages but usually only gets through
one message until it encounters an error and stops 
processing any further messages. Restarting Outlook
produces the same results ie Spambayes fails on the 
same message, if I delete the problem message and 
restart it will filter one or two messages until it 
comes to an email it doesnt like again and stops. 

The error Message is always
"FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-Sieve: cmu-
sieve 2.0\r\nReturn-Path: " 
followed by the email.. And then
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1067, in OnConnection
    self.ProcessMissedMessages()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1352, in ProcessMissedMessages
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 211, in ProcessMessage
    disposition = filter.filter_message(msgstore_message, 
manager)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\filter.py", line 16, in filter_message
    prob = mgr.score(msg)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\manager.py", line 678, in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\msgstore.py", line 775, in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME 
related error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' 
header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-08 07:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Sorry I thought the log included the whole email.
"FAILED to create email.message from: ", `text` <-- 
Obviously this trims the email ?

I can send you several example of messages that fail. I have 
been playing around with this today, the processing of missed 
messages does actually work perfectly as long as it doesnt 
encounter any of these emails it doesnt like. 
Actually looks like I have deleted the offending emails so I 
could keep testing the processing. I will gather some over the 
weekend and attach them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 06:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

OK - this is caused my attempt to fix '[ 779049 ]
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen' -
which is the error you would have seen had I not made a
change.  As this isn't actually a regression, I am stuck.  I
need the exact text of an email this code fails for.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-06 23:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Firstly yes happy to run anything you send me. 
Re the failed message, I realized after posting the bug 
yesterday you had made some changes to the CVS version
(addin.py/1.86 and config.py/1.20) must have missed it 
because I was travelling. Since updating it still fails to 
process missed messages but no longer has any errors. 
It now runs like I remember it in the past where it simply
says "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
165.368ms"... no scrap that, just restarted and encountered 
the same error have attached the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 09:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

As you are running from source code, are you willing to run
a custom version I send you?  Also, can you please post the
message that failed, as it was printed in the log file?




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 01:40:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 03:40:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783859 ] IMAP - Failed to Process
	Missed Messages
Message-ID: <E19l1rT-0000nh-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783859, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP - Failed to Process Missed Messages

Initial Comment:
Running CVS version. (Verbose is set to 1)
Mail that comes in whilst outlook is open seems
to be filtered correctly. New Mail (unread)
that has arrived outside of an outlook session is Never 
Filtered scored or touched, including running a manual
filter. 

(Also note the following occurs prior to Outlook actually
making the connection to the IMAP Server)

Looking at the logs shows that Spambayes begins to 
process missed messages but usually only gets through
one message until it encounters an error and stops 
processing any further messages. Restarting Outlook
produces the same results ie Spambayes fails on the 
same message, if I delete the problem message and 
restart it will filter one or two messages until it 
comes to an email it doesnt like again and stops. 

The error Message is always
"FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-Sieve: cmu-
sieve 2.0\r\nReturn-Path: " 
followed by the email.. And then
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1067, in OnConnection
    self.ProcessMissedMessages()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1352, in ProcessMissedMessages
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 211, in ProcessMessage
    disposition = filter.filter_message(msgstore_message, 
manager)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\filter.py", line 16, in filter_message
    prob = mgr.score(msg)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\manager.py", line 678, in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\msgstore.py", line 775, in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME 
related error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' 
header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 17:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Sorry - my mistake - I was confused about what bug was what
:)  That log has all I need.  (back-ticks are shorthand for
repr())

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-08 17:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Sorry I thought the log included the whole email.
"FAILED to create email.message from: ", `text` <-- 
Obviously this trims the email ?

I can send you several example of messages that fail. I have 
been playing around with this today, the processing of missed 
messages does actually work perfectly as long as it doesnt 
encounter any of these emails it doesnt like. 
Actually looks like I have deleted the offending emails so I 
could keep testing the processing. I will gather some over the 
weekend and attach them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 16:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

OK - this is caused my attempt to fix '[ 779049 ]
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen' -
which is the error you would have seen had I not made a
change.  As this isn't actually a regression, I am stuck.  I
need the exact text of an email this code fails for.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Firstly yes happy to run anything you send me. 
Re the failed message, I realized after posting the bug 
yesterday you had made some changes to the CVS version
(addin.py/1.86 and config.py/1.20) must have missed it 
because I was travelling. Since updating it still fails to 
process missed messages but no longer has any errors. 
It now runs like I remember it in the past where it simply
says "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
165.368ms"... no scrap that, just restarted and encountered 
the same error have attached the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

As you are running from source code, are you willing to run
a custom version I send you?  Also, can you please post the
message that failed, as it was printed in the log file?




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 06:16:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 08:16:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19l6AE-0003sw-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-28 21:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jydoyon
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

Problem solved!!!

Go into the control panel/courrier. Then click on "afficher les 
profils" and you will probably find that your profile is set to 
default "Param?tres Microsoft Exchange". Just click on copy 
and give it an ASCII compatible name. (Don't forget to set it 
as the new default profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-07 17:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting probable dupes (they might be fixed by the data dir fix, 
but if not they seem to be dupes) in:

[ 784392 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin
[ 784380 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Vallet (romanito)
Date: 2003-08-07 11:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=515976

I have exactly the same problem with the source distribution.

SpamBayes 1.0a4
Python 2.3
win32all-155
Windows 2000 SP4 Pro French
Outlook 2002 French

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 02:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

I added the following two lines to my configuration file but I 
still get the same error message:
[general]
data_directory: c:\temp

Also my default data directory does not seem to have non 
ascii chars:
D:\Documents and Settings\hmoret\Application 
Data\SpamBayes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 01:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 01:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 06:22:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 08:22:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-784392 ] Error
	initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19l6GB-0007pY-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #784392, was opened at 2003-08-06 16:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by coalliera
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
I just installed Spambayes and when I restarted Outlook 
I got this error message:

'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. 
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

My configuration is:

Windows XP with office 2000, both in french.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-08 08:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi...

I Fix my problem ...

I look in 
"C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application 
Data\SpamBayes"

and didn't see the {Outlook profile}.ini file ...

My Outlook profile name was something like "Param?tres 
Microsoft Exchange" ... and here is the "non english 
character" :-)

So i rename my Exchange profil and now it work!

Thank you.

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-07 17:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Actually, if this doesn't fix it, then this is almost certainly a 
dupe of [ 779319 ] ntpath Unicode error.  So if the data 
directory fix doesn't work for you, please track the bug here:

<https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702>

(Closed as either fixed or a dupe).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-07 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are many people who are using SpamBayes successfully 
with Exchange (including me), so it's not that.

Do either of you have a data directory that includes non-
English characters? (your username might, for example).  I 
think a similar error was reported for that reason (but can't 
find the tracker, offhand).  If this is the case then this has 
been fixed in cvs, and so will show up in the next release.  
Until then, your best solution would probably be to look at the 
configuration.html file and read the instructions about moving 
your data directory, and move it to somewhere that doesn't 
include non-English characters.

Please let us know if this is the case, and if this works for you 
so that we can close this, or keep trying if it's something else.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi ...

I've got exactly the same configuration of you and the same 
error too ...

I think SpamBayes is not compatible with Exchange cause if i 
try in pop3 mode on the same computer, it work!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

BTW, I'm connected to an exchange server, but my messages 
are delivered in a personal folder.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=784392&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 07:19:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 09:19:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785375 ] Folders missing in
	Spambayes manager
Message-ID: <E19l79Q-0006xm-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785375, was opened at 2003-08-08 08:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785375&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jared (jared71)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folders missing in Spambayes manager

Initial Comment:
Afer installing Spambayes on win2k pro /outlook 2000, I 
create my spam folders and open up the manager from 
the toolbar. When I click on "train now" and 
then "browse" after "folders with know good messges" 
the window that pops up does not contain any outloook 
folders. 

A coworker has successfully installed this on the same 
os/office dist. and folders appear under his manager.

thanks,

jared

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785375&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 07:43:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 09:43:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785389 ] Folders missing in
	Spambayes manager
Message-ID: <E19l7WO-0002yD-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785389, was opened at 2003-08-08 08:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jared (jared71)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folders missing in Spambayes manager

Initial Comment:
Afer installing Spambayes on win2k pro /outlook 2000, I 
create my spam folders and open up the manager from 
the toolbar. When I click on "train now" and 
then "browse" after "folders with know good messges" 
the window that pops up does not contain any outloook 
folders. 

A coworker has successfully installed this on the same 
os/office dist. and folders appear under his manager.

thanks,

jared

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 09:46:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 11:47:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19l9S3-0001Xq-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-28 18:53
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by emoret
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 05:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

Problem solved!!!

Go into the control panel/courrier. Then click on "afficher les 
profils" and you will probably find that your profile is set to 
default "Param?tres Microsoft Exchange". Just click on copy 
and give it an ASCII compatible name. (Don't forget to set it 
as the new default profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-07 14:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting probable dupes (they might be fixed by the data dir fix, 
but if not they seem to be dupes) in:

[ 784392 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin
[ 784380 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Vallet (romanito)
Date: 2003-08-07 08:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=515976

I have exactly the same problem with the source distribution.

SpamBayes 1.0a4
Python 2.3
win32all-155
Windows 2000 SP4 Pro French
Outlook 2002 French

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-28 23:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

I added the following two lines to my configuration file but I 
still get the same error message:
[general]
data_directory: c:\temp

Also my default data directory does not seem to have non 
ascii chars:
D:\Documents and Settings\hmoret\Application 
Data\SpamBayes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 19:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 10:04:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 12:04:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19l9j1-0000yl-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-29 11:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 02:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'd still like to track this down.  I don't really consider
asking users to edit the config file is reasonable.  So
romanito, your help is still appreciated (even if you
comment your "data_directory" for the duration of that help)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 22:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

Problem solved!!!

Go into the control panel/courrier. Then click on "afficher les 
profils" and you will probably find that your profile is set to 
default "Param?tres Microsoft Exchange". Just click on copy 
and give it an ASCII compatible name. (Don't forget to set it 
as the new default profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 07:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting probable dupes (they might be fixed by the data dir fix, 
but if not they seem to be dupes) in:

[ 784392 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin
[ 784380 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Vallet (romanito)
Date: 2003-08-08 01:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=515976

I have exactly the same problem with the source distribution.

SpamBayes 1.0a4
Python 2.3
win32all-155
Windows 2000 SP4 Pro French
Outlook 2002 French

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 16:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

I added the following two lines to my configuration file but I 
still get the same error message:
[general]
data_directory: c:\temp

Also my default data directory does not seem to have non 
ascii chars:
D:\Documents and Settings\hmoret\Application 
Data\SpamBayes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 12:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 10:04:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 12:04:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785375 ] Folders missing in
	Spambayes manager
Message-ID: <E19l9jV-00010P-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785375, was opened at 2003-08-08 23:19
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785375&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jared (jared71)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folders missing in Spambayes manager

Initial Comment:
Afer installing Spambayes on win2k pro /outlook 2000, I 
create my spam folders and open up the manager from 
the toolbar. When I click on "train now" and 
then "browse" after "folders with know good messges" 
the window that pops up does not contain any outloook 
folders. 

A coworker has successfully installed this on the same 
os/office dist. and folders appear under his manager.

thanks,

jared

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785375&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 10:15:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 12:15:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785389 ] Folders missing in
	Spambayes manager
Message-ID: <E19l9tx-0001dJ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785389, was opened at 2003-08-08 23:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jared (jared71)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folders missing in Spambayes manager

Initial Comment:
Afer installing Spambayes on win2k pro /outlook 2000, I 
create my spam folders and open up the manager from 
the toolbar. When I click on "train now" and 
then "browse" after "folders with know good messges" 
the window that pops up does not contain any outloook 
folders. 

A coworker has successfully installed this on the same 
os/office dist. and folders appear under his manager.

thanks,

jared

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 02:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach a log?  See the "troubleshooting guide"

Mark.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 10:25:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 12:26:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784385 ] SpamBayes buttons not
	created
Message-ID: <E19lA3y-00027l-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784385, was opened at 2003-08-07 06:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784385&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dave Bachmann (daveinredmond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes buttons not created

Initial Comment:
I first installed the package yesterday and the buttons 
were there, but as I didn't have any spam to train 
against (I had a utility that permanently deleted the 
spam previously), I waited until today to try and start 
the training process. Outlook is unable to create the 
buttones. There have been no changes to Outlook (2000 
SP3) since yesterday and the only other software 
installed was the Google toolbar rev 2 Beta.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 02:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know
how to fix at this stage.  If you follow the "troubleshooting
guide"  - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html.
You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which
generally fixes all toolbar related issues.  If it doesn't,
please reopen this bug giving further details.

We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it
continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the
spambayes-announce list -
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784385&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 10:26:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 12:26:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784385 ] SpamBayes buttons not
	created
Message-ID: <E19lA4G-00028s-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784385, was opened at 2003-08-07 06:19
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784385&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dave Bachmann (daveinredmond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes buttons not created

Initial Comment:
I first installed the package yesterday and the buttons 
were there, but as I didn't have any spam to train 
against (I had a utility that permanently deleted the 
spam previously), I waited until today to try and start 
the training process. Outlook is unable to create the 
buttones. There have been no changes to Outlook (2000 
SP3) since yesterday and the only other software 
installed was the Google toolbar rev 2 Beta.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 02:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know
how to fix at this stage.  If you follow the "troubleshooting
guide"  - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html.
You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which
generally fixes all toolbar related issues.  If it doesn't,
please reopen this bug giving further details.

We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it
continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the
spambayes-announce list -
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784385&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 10:49:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 12:49:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783859 ] IMAP - Failed to Process
	Missed Messages
Message-ID: <E19lAR8-0000GS-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783859, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP - Failed to Process Missed Messages

Initial Comment:
Running CVS version. (Verbose is set to 1)
Mail that comes in whilst outlook is open seems
to be filtered correctly. New Mail (unread)
that has arrived outside of an outlook session is Never 
Filtered scored or touched, including running a manual
filter. 

(Also note the following occurs prior to Outlook actually
making the connection to the IMAP Server)

Looking at the logs shows that Spambayes begins to 
process missed messages but usually only gets through
one message until it encounters an error and stops 
processing any further messages. Restarting Outlook
produces the same results ie Spambayes fails on the 
same message, if I delete the problem message and 
restart it will filter one or two messages until it 
comes to an email it doesnt like again and stops. 

The error Message is always
"FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-Sieve: cmu-
sieve 2.0\r\nReturn-Path: " 
followed by the email.. And then
Error processing missed messages!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1067, in OnConnection
    self.ProcessMissedMessages()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 1352, in ProcessMissedMessages
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\addin.py", line 211, in ProcessMessage
    disposition = filter.filter_message(msgstore_message, 
manager)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\filter.py", line 16, in filter_message
    prob = mgr.score(msg)
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\manager.py", line 678, in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "C:\Program Files\Spambayes\Outlook2000
\msgstore.py", line 775, in GetEmailPackageObject
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: email package croaked with a MIME 
related error, but there appears to be no 'Content-Type' 
header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 02:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The log show that most of the headers are missing.  This is
almost certainly a side effect of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=782709&group_id=61702,
which had a fix checked in.  A new binary should be out
tomorrow.  Please reopen if the new version doesn't fix it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 17:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Sorry - my mistake - I was confused about what bug was what
:)  That log has all I need.  (back-ticks are shorthand for
repr())

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-08 17:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Sorry I thought the log included the whole email.
"FAILED to create email.message from: ", `text` <-- 
Obviously this trims the email ?

I can send you several example of messages that fail. I have 
been playing around with this today, the processing of missed 
messages does actually work perfectly as long as it doesnt 
encounter any of these emails it doesnt like. 
Actually looks like I have deleted the offending emails so I 
could keep testing the processing. I will gather some over the 
weekend and attach them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 16:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

OK - this is caused my attempt to fix '[ 779049 ]
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen' -
which is the error you would have seen had I not made a
change.  As this isn't actually a regression, I am stuck.  I
need the exact text of an email this code fails for.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Firstly yes happy to run anything you send me. 
Re the failed message, I realized after posting the bug 
yesterday you had made some changes to the CVS version
(addin.py/1.86 and config.py/1.20) must have missed it 
because I was travelling. Since updating it still fails to 
process missed messages but no longer has any errors. 
It now runs like I remember it in the past where it simply
says "Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
165.368ms"... no scrap that, just restarted and encountered 
the same error have attached the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

As you are running from source code, are you willing to run
a custom version I send you?  Also, can you please post the
message that failed, as it was printed in the log file?




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783859&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 11:11:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 13:11:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780612 ] Outlook incorrectly
	trains on moved messages
Message-ID: <E19lAm4-0005kM-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780612, was opened at 2003-07-31 10:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Outlook incorrectly trains on moved messages

Initial Comment:
Consider:

* SpamBayes set to filter "inbox" and "my folder".
* Item arrives in "inbox".  SpamBayes scores as 'ham'
* Outlook rule kicks in - message moved to "My Folder"
* SpamBayes sees this message, notices we have scored
it, and assumes it is a "recover" operation - trains as
Ham.

Not sure how to tackle this!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 03:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Checking in addin.py;
new revision: 1.89; previous revision: 1.88


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 18:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Except that "classification" does not imply "trained".  Eg,
a spam comes in, so we filter it.  User drags it back.  We
notice spam classification, so we train as good.  If we look
for "was previously trained", it will fail.

But yeah, I you are basically correct - we should only train
as good on a drag if the existing score did not put it in
the "good" range already.  In fact, we do already do that
for Spam - "Delete as Spam" only trains if it would not
already fall in the spam range.

In fact, we
"If I am being moved into a ham folder, and I was trained as 
spam, then I am being reclassified."


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

If you remember the classification, can't the rule simply be:

If I am being moved into a ham folder, and I was trained as 
spam, then I am being reclassified.
If I am being moved into a spam folder, and I was not trained 
as spam, then I am being reclassified.
Otherwise, I am just being moved.

(Where 'reclassified' checks to see if it already is the correct 
classification).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We do remember the classification - that is how the training
is triggered.  It is *because* we remember that we do the train.

What we could do is also remember the folder we origianlly
filtered it in.  Then, when it is moved we would be able to
determine if it is being "moved back" (ie, should be
trained) or simply moved by the user (and should be ignored
- other than probably updating the name of the folder we
"trained" it in)

I should get the test case failing first.

The message database is simply a dictionary of msgid:
trained_as_spam.  No entry means "never trained", otherwise
we know how it was trained.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Couldn't you remember the classification for each message?  

This is what pop3proxy et al do - the message class provides 
the necessary information.  (This could be your chance to 
switch to using that and finish the rather uncomplete "master 
db" thing in there!) <wink>

What exactly is stored in the default_message_database 
anyway?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 12:37:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 14:37:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-785549 ] Can't enable
	SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager
Message-ID: <E19lC7T-0007vh-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #785549, was opened at 2003-08-08 14:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't enable SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager

Initial Comment:
I've been having problems with SpamBayes that I hope 
you can help me with.
 
It's been working superbly until today. Last night, our 
Exchange server was shut down. I think as a result of 
this, every time I would open Outlook it would crash. A 
dialog came up (I think it was an Outlook dialog) asking 
if I wanted to disable SpamBayes. I said yes, figuring I 
would just re-enable once Outlook was back up. After 
that, Outlook did in fact came back up, but ever since I 
have been unable to re-enable SpamBayes.
 
The symptom is that you go into the add-in manager, 
you click on SpamBayes (ie. there's a check mark), and 
exit the addin manager. If you go back in immediately, 
SpamBayes is UNCHECKED. Damn thing won't stay 
checked. Nothing I have tried allows me to enable 
SpamBayes.
 
I tried uninstalling, and reinstalling the latest version. I 
tried uninstalling, rebooting, and reinstalling. I tried 
uninstalling, removing all registry entries for SpamBayes, 
rebooting, and reinstalling. Nothing seems to work.
 
Have you seen this type of behavior before?
 
Lee Herman


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 13:56:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 15:56:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-785549 ] Can't enable
	SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager
Message-ID: <E19lDLO-0002Vv-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #785549, was opened at 2003-08-08 14:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lee_herman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't enable SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager

Initial Comment:
I've been having problems with SpamBayes that I hope 
you can help me with.
 
It's been working superbly until today. Last night, our 
Exchange server was shut down. I think as a result of 
this, every time I would open Outlook it would crash. A 
dialog came up (I think it was an Outlook dialog) asking 
if I wanted to disable SpamBayes. I said yes, figuring I 
would just re-enable once Outlook was back up. After 
that, Outlook did in fact came back up, but ever since I 
have been unable to re-enable SpamBayes.
 
The symptom is that you go into the add-in manager, 
you click on SpamBayes (ie. there's a check mark), and 
exit the addin manager. If you go back in immediately, 
SpamBayes is UNCHECKED. Damn thing won't stay 
checked. Nothing I have tried allows me to enable 
SpamBayes.
 
I tried uninstalling, and reinstalling the latest version. I 
tried uninstalling, rebooting, and reinstalling. I tried 
uninstalling, removing all registry entries for SpamBayes, 
rebooting, and reinstalling. Nothing seems to work.
 
Have you seen this type of behavior before?
 
Lee Herman


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Date: 2003-08-08 15:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=840726

Ooops. Just found the documentation regarding this exact 
issue. Sorry to bother you.

What a strange place for the list of diabled COM objects 
(under Help)....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 13:58:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 15:58:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-785549 ] Can't enable
	SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager
Message-ID: <E19lDNg-0002bi-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #785549, was opened at 2003-08-08 14:37
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lee_herman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't enable SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager

Initial Comment:
I've been having problems with SpamBayes that I hope 
you can help me with.
 
It's been working superbly until today. Last night, our 
Exchange server was shut down. I think as a result of 
this, every time I would open Outlook it would crash. A 
dialog came up (I think it was an Outlook dialog) asking 
if I wanted to disable SpamBayes. I said yes, figuring I 
would just re-enable once Outlook was back up. After 
that, Outlook did in fact came back up, but ever since I 
have been unable to re-enable SpamBayes.
 
The symptom is that you go into the add-in manager, 
you click on SpamBayes (ie. there's a check mark), and 
exit the addin manager. If you go back in immediately, 
SpamBayes is UNCHECKED. Damn thing won't stay 
checked. Nothing I have tried allows me to enable 
SpamBayes.
 
I tried uninstalling, and reinstalling the latest version. I 
tried uninstalling, rebooting, and reinstalling. I tried 
uninstalling, removing all registry entries for SpamBayes, 
rebooting, and reinstalling. Nothing seems to work.
 
Have you seen this type of behavior before?
 
Lee Herman


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Date: 2003-08-08 15:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=840726

Ooops. Just found the documentation regarding this exact 
issue. Sorry to bother you.

What a strange place for the list of diabled COM objects 
(under Help)....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 13:56:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 15:59:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-785549 ] Can't enable
	SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager
Message-ID: <E19lDLv-0002Wb-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #785549, was opened at 2003-08-08 14:37
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by lee_herman
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't enable SpamBayes in the Outlook COM add-in manager

Initial Comment:
I've been having problems with SpamBayes that I hope 
you can help me with.
 
It's been working superbly until today. Last night, our 
Exchange server was shut down. I think as a result of 
this, every time I would open Outlook it would crash. A 
dialog came up (I think it was an Outlook dialog) asking 
if I wanted to disable SpamBayes. I said yes, figuring I 
would just re-enable once Outlook was back up. After 
that, Outlook did in fact came back up, but ever since I 
have been unable to re-enable SpamBayes.
 
The symptom is that you go into the add-in manager, 
you click on SpamBayes (ie. there's a check mark), and 
exit the addin manager. If you go back in immediately, 
SpamBayes is UNCHECKED. Damn thing won't stay 
checked. Nothing I have tried allows me to enable 
SpamBayes.
 
I tried uninstalling, and reinstalling the latest version. I 
tried uninstalling, rebooting, and reinstalling. I tried 
uninstalling, removing all registry entries for SpamBayes, 
rebooting, and reinstalling. Nothing seems to work.
 
Have you seen this type of behavior before?
 
Lee Herman


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Lee Herman (lee_herman)
Date: 2003-08-08 15:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=840726

Ooops. Just found the documentation regarding this exact 
issue. Sorry to bother you.

What a strange place for the list of diabled COM objects 
(under Help)....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=785549&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  8 15:25:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug  8 17:25:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785637 ] Spam score gets set to 0%
Message-ID: <E19lEjq-0006Ev-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785637, was opened at 2003-08-08 16:25
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam score gets set to 0%

Initial Comment:
Outlook 2000 SP1 (9.0.0.3821)
SpamBayes 0.6

Immediately after processing an unread Spam message 
to the Spam folder, navigate to the folder and run 
SpamBayes Manager. Choose Define Filters then OK (you 
might need to make a subtle change to initate 
a 'dirtycount'.

When the SpamBayes Manager is closed, the spam score 
of the most recent Spam message will probably get set 
to 0%.

The correct score can be restored by Recover from 
Spam and then Delete as Spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  9 08:34:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug  9 10:35:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785902 ] Toolbar buttons don't
	work
Message-ID: <E19lUnx-0001xk-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785902, was opened at 2003-08-09 10:34
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785902&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Geringer (sgeringe)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbar buttons don't work

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes Outlook Addin v0.7 (I've been 
using it since v0.2) on both my home PC and my office 
PC. Both PC's are running Windows XP Professional 
Service Pack 1 with all updates installed. In addition to 
my own email account, there are 4 other users on my 
home PC, each with their own email accounts. I have 
Admin rights on both my office PC and my home PC. 
Everything works fine on both PC's, with the exception 
of my own email account (of course!). For some reason, 
for my own email account on my home PC, the drop-
down button for the SpamBayes Manager just does not 
work. The application still functions correctly and is 
continuing to filter out my spam messages correctly -- I 
just can't access any of the options, because the drop-
down button does not work. The other 4 email accounts 
on this PC and my office PC work just fine. Very weird. 
Any ideas??

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785902&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  9 12:10:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug  9 14:10:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785902 ] Toolbar buttons don't
	work
Message-ID: <E19lYAn-0002O0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785902, was opened at 2003-08-09 10:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sgeringe
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785902&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Geringer (sgeringe)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbar buttons don't work

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes Outlook Addin v0.7 (I've been 
using it since v0.2) on both my home PC and my office 
PC. Both PC's are running Windows XP Professional 
Service Pack 1 with all updates installed. In addition to 
my own email account, there are 4 other users on my 
home PC, each with their own email accounts. I have 
Admin rights on both my office PC and my home PC. 
Everything works fine on both PC's, with the exception 
of my own email account (of course!). For some reason, 
for my own email account on my home PC, the drop-
down button for the SpamBayes Manager just does not 
work. The application still functions correctly and is 
continuing to filter out my spam messages correctly -- I 
just can't access any of the options, because the drop-
down button does not work. The other 4 email accounts 
on this PC and my office PC work just fine. Very weird. 
Any ideas??

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Steve Geringer (sgeringe)
Date: 2003-08-09 14:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=841168

Mark, just trying to make sure I give you enough info here. 
Prior to installing Version 0.7 on my home PC, I only had 
SpamBayes installed for my own email account. It was doing 
such a great job, I decided to add it to the other email 
accounts on my home PC (for my wife and kids) after I 
installed v0.7 for my account. Don't know if that helps any, 
but I just figured you might want to know the sequence of 
events. Like I said, everything was fine until I added the 
other email accounts on my home PC. They all work fine, but 
mine doesn't. If you need any additional information, just let 
me know. Thanks for any assistance you can offer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785902&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  9 16:32:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug  9 18:32:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785902 ] Toolbar buttons don't
	work
Message-ID: <E19lcGY-0004mm-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785902, was opened at 2003-08-10 00:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785902&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Geringer (sgeringe)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbar buttons don't work

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes Outlook Addin v0.7 (I've been 
using it since v0.2) on both my home PC and my office 
PC. Both PC's are running Windows XP Professional 
Service Pack 1 with all updates installed. In addition to 
my own email account, there are 4 other users on my 
home PC, each with their own email accounts. I have 
Admin rights on both my office PC and my home PC. 
Everything works fine on both PC's, with the exception 
of my own email account (of course!). For some reason, 
for my own email account on my home PC, the drop-
down button for the SpamBayes Manager just does not 
work. The application still functions correctly and is 
continuing to filter out my spam messages correctly -- I 
just can't access any of the options, because the drop-
down button does not work. The other 4 email accounts 
on this PC and my office PC work just fine. Very weird. 
Any ideas??

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-10 08:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know
how to fix at this stage.  If you follow the "troubleshooting
guide"  - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html.
You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which
generally fixes all toolbar related issues.  If it doesn't,
please reopen this bug giving further details.

We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it
continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the
spambayes-announce list -
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Geringer (sgeringe)
Date: 2003-08-10 04:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=841168

Mark, just trying to make sure I give you enough info here. 
Prior to installing Version 0.7 on my home PC, I only had 
SpamBayes installed for my own email account. It was doing 
such a great job, I decided to add it to the other email 
accounts on my home PC (for my wife and kids) after I 
installed v0.7 for my account. Don't know if that helps any, 
but I just figured you might want to know the sequence of 
events. Like I said, everything was fine until I added the 
other email accounts on my home PC. They all work fine, but 
mine doesn't. If you need any additional information, just let 
me know. Thanks for any assistance you can offer.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785902&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  9 16:53:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug  9 18:53:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-784283 ] cannot
	install SpamBayes without elevated privileges
Message-ID: <E19lca8-0007a5-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #784283, was opened at 2003-08-07 02:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew (andrewz)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: cannot install SpamBayes without elevated privileges

Initial Comment:
Under an administrated Windows Domain it is important 
that some users not have the ability to install their own 
software or modify their registry. And yet it is important 
that These same users, running Outlook & Exchange, 
have Spam filtering capability like SpamBayes.

It is not currently possible to install SpamBayes for a 
user from the Administrator account, it is also not 
possible to install SpamBayes from a locked down 
account. 

it would be great to have this feature in an upcoming 
version.

thanks,
AndrewZ

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-10 08:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

A non-admin user can't get far at all here - such users
can't register COM objects in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, so is
pretty much screwed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I agree, it would be great to have in the next version.  Any
takers?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug  9 16:54:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug  9 18:54:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-784891 ] initializing
Message-ID: <E19lcbM-0007ct-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #784891, was opened at 2003-08-08 03:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784891&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrice Ethier (patricee)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: initializing

Initial Comment:
initializing bug Bayesian anti-spam

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-10 08:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

If this is a bug report, please give more details - see the
"troubleshooting" guide for more info -
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=784891&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 10 05:08:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 10 07:09:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves
	email back to wrong inbox folder
Message-ID: <E19lo4H-00052P-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 13:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

Initial Comment:
Hi

In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" 
from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail 
back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder.

I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook.

One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder 
under Personal Folders.

Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is 
configured only for the imap-Inbox.

Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap.

The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back 
to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the 
Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders.

Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 

Regards



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 10 09:23:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 10 11:24:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786284 ] Outlook XP Corrupted
Message-ID: <E19ls2z-0006Bb-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786284, was opened at 2003-08-10 11:23
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786284&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Dominguez (moonraker69)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook XP Corrupted

Initial Comment:
I installed the lates version of Bayesian Anti-Spam 
software (007) onto my XP Professional box using 
Outlook XP with all of the latest patches as of 8/8/03.  I 
also use McAfee 6.0 with the latest virus dat and 
updates, inluding it's Outlook Hawk add-in.

I pull mail from several internet services and from an 
Exchange server.   

The install seemed to work fine and Outlook started and 
all appeared fine.  I couldn't do much with the tool since 
it needed at least 5 valid and 5 invalid emails to begin 
classifying them.  But at one point, as I was receiving 
mail and Outlook locked up for a moment, then 
terminated.  When I restarted, I received an immediate 
error message said that it failed to start and the check 
box asking whether I wanted a restart was checked.  
When I said OK, it asked me if I wanted to restart 
in "Safe mode"  - that's Outlook's safe mode.  I said yes, 
and it took me into a generic Outlook profile that was 
partially functional, as you'd expect from a "safe mode".

I have tried everything, including uninstalling the 
Bayesian Anti-Spam, Outlook itself, and even a system 
checkpoint restoration to a day before.  I have disabled 
all profiles, created a new profile and basically started a 
generic Outlook with no mail POPs or Exchange servers 
configured.

No matter what I do, when I run Outlook now, it always 
runs in safe mode.

I'd like a list of all new DLLs or DLLs that have been 
overwritten as well as registry keys so I can purge 
Bayesian Anti-Spam from the system and try a new 
Outlook re-install.

Suggestions would also be helpful.  Short of a full 
system re-install, I am at a loss as to what to do.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786284&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 10 11:28:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 10 13:28:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-784283 ] cannot
	install SpamBayes without elevated privileges
Message-ID: <E19ltzO-00043F-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #784283, was opened at 2003-08-06 11:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andrewz
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew (andrewz)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: cannot install SpamBayes without elevated privileges

Initial Comment:
Under an administrated Windows Domain it is important 
that some users not have the ability to install their own 
software or modify their registry. And yet it is important 
that These same users, running Outlook & Exchange, 
have Spam filtering capability like SpamBayes.

It is not currently possible to install SpamBayes for a 
user from the Administrator account, it is also not 
possible to install SpamBayes from a locked down 
account. 

it would be great to have this feature in an upcoming 
version.

thanks,
AndrewZ

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andrew (andrewz)
Date: 2003-08-10 12:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=588328

You certainly don't want non-admin users installing anything 
or making registry changes, agreed. But it would be nice to 
allow the admin to install for a user or class of users. Or have 
a separate util which enables for a user after SpamBayes is 
installed. Nero does this with a separate util called 'Burn 
Rights'. 

Thanks,
Andrew

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 17:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

A non-admin user can't get far at all here - such users
can't register COM objects in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT, so is
pretty much screwed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 18:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I agree, it would be great to have in the next version.  Any
takers?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=784283&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 01:28:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 03:30:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785637 ] Spam score gets set to 0%
Message-ID: <E19m76s-0008Fo-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785637, was opened at 2003-08-08 23:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam score gets set to 0%

Initial Comment:
Outlook 2000 SP1 (9.0.0.3821)
SpamBayes 0.6

Immediately after processing an unread Spam message 
to the Spam folder, navigate to the folder and run 
SpamBayes Manager. Choose Define Filters then OK (you 
might need to make a subtle change to initate 
a 'dirtycount'.

When the SpamBayes Manager is closed, the spam score 
of the most recent Spam message will probably get set 
to 0%.

The correct score can be restored by Recover from 
Spam and then Delete as Spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-11 09:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

This actually happens for me every morning.  the first spam-
message (not 100% sure if it's the first, but at least there's 
(only) one) has score 0% in outlook's spam-field.  
viewing "spam score for current message" shows the correct 
score.  Not a big problem, but a bit annoying.

Think I saw another bug on this issue earlier.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 03:05:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 05:10:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785637 ] Spam score gets set to 0%
Message-ID: <E19m8bx-0004BM-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785637, was opened at 2003-08-09 07:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam score gets set to 0%

Initial Comment:
Outlook 2000 SP1 (9.0.0.3821)
SpamBayes 0.6

Immediately after processing an unread Spam message 
to the Spam folder, navigate to the folder and run 
SpamBayes Manager. Choose Define Filters then OK (you 
might need to make a subtle change to initate 
a 'dirtycount'.

When the SpamBayes Manager is closed, the spam score 
of the most recent Spam message will probably get set 
to 0%.

The correct score can be restored by Recover from 
Spam and then Delete as Spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-11 19:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is this still true in the 007 release?  I can't repro as
described.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-11 17:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

This actually happens for me every morning.  the first spam-
message (not 100% sure if it's the first, but at least there's 
(only) one) has score 0% in outlook's spam-field.  
viewing "spam score for current message" shows the correct 
score.  Not a big problem, but a bit annoying.

Think I saw another bug on this issue earlier.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 03:13:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 05:13:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786513 ] Initial configuration
	too clunky
Message-ID: <E19m8jn-0005ec-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786513, was opened at 2003-08-11 19:13
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786513&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initial configuration too clunky

Initial Comment:
>From the mailing list:

* Should be enabled by default, monitoring the inbox.
* I would also recommend that you automatically add a
"Junk E-mail" and "Junk Suspects" folder during install
and use those as the default destination for flagged
messages. If you get a copy of Outlook 2003 beta2
Technical Refresh, Microsoft automatically adds a "Junk
E-Mail" folder. Even better, they allow you to
right-click the folder and delete spam directly from
that folder. This would be a cool dovetail of features
with 2003.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786513&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 03:15:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 05:15:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786516 ] Need initial training
	database
Message-ID: <E19m8mA-0005oO-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786516, was opened at 2003-08-11 19:15
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786516&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Need initial training database

Initial Comment:
We should try and provide a database seeded with some
spam, do some training on ham already in the inbox, and
enable filtering by default.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786516&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 03:53:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 05:53:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743122 ] Outlook 2002
	auto-complete breaks
Message-ID: <E19m9MT-0006XC-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743122, was opened at 2003-05-25 14:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kim_friis
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes and I think it breaks the
auto-complete popup list for email addresses used in
the To field in Outlook.  The popup still appears but
only with the first letter of each email address - the
rest of the email address doesn't appear.  I've
uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes several times to
confirm this problem.  I'm running Outlook 2002 (SP2)
on Windows 2000 (SP3).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kim Friis (kim_friis)
Date: 2003-08-11 11:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=89418

Im running Outlook 2002 on Windows XP and I do NOT see 
the bug. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sean True (seantrue)
Date: 2003-06-17 03:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=114311

Fixing this bug will require a complete rewrite to remove all 
MFC based dialogs from SpamBayes.
We're about 80% of the way there on SpamAtBay, and it's 
_not_ fun.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-17 02:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Apparently this problem only happens *after* a SpamBayes
dialog has been shown, but works fine until then.  Can
someone else confirm this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-06-02 11:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

I am running the same - W2K SP3 & OL2K and get the same 
problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jonathan Evatt (spidawebs)
Date: 2003-06-01 22:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=48654

I am also getting this problem. Have installed the app on 
Outlook XP (2002) SP2 over Win XP SP1.
If I start up Outlook the problem only seems to occur AFTER 
I actually run the spambayes configuration routine. If I do not 
access that then the problem does not (so far - limited 
testing) seem to occur.

Jonathan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 09:06:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 11:08:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785637 ] Spam score gets set to 0%
Message-ID: <E19mEFc-00057L-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785637, was opened at 2003-08-08 16:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gladdys
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam score gets set to 0%

Initial Comment:
Outlook 2000 SP1 (9.0.0.3821)
SpamBayes 0.6

Immediately after processing an unread Spam message 
to the Spam folder, navigate to the folder and run 
SpamBayes Manager. Choose Define Filters then OK (you 
might need to make a subtle change to initate 
a 'dirtycount'.

When the SpamBayes Manager is closed, the spam score 
of the most recent Spam message will probably get set 
to 0%.

The correct score can be restored by Recover from 
Spam and then Delete as Spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Date: 2003-08-11 10:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=840787

Downloaded the James Bond release (007) and can still 
reproduce the problem. Additionally, I'm running Windows 
2000 (SP 4, build 2195). When I get a moment, I'll record the 
process and upload the file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-11 04:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is this still true in the 007 release?  I can't repro as
described.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-11 02:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

This actually happens for me every morning.  the first spam-
message (not 100% sure if it's the first, but at least there's 
(only) one) has score 0% in outlook's spam-field.  
viewing "spam score for current message" shows the correct 
score.  Not a big problem, but a bit annoying.

Think I saw another bug on this issue earlier.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 09:21:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 11:21:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-751348 ] Problem
	registering DLL/OCX
Message-ID: <E19mETo-00089G-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #751348, was opened at 2003-06-09 10:22
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sgroulx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kathy Gauvin (kmgauvin)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem registering DLL/OCX

Initial Comment:
I got the follwoing error:

Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed. 

Abort Retry Ignore

Ignore to proceed anyway(not recommended). 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Date: 2003-08-11 11:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842228

just desable your Anti-virus and the instalation works well

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Graybill (graystarr)
Date: 2003-06-11 12:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=340885

I get this same error. And I c annot get it to install! Please 
help?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: mike dee (miked_187)
Date: 2003-06-09 10:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=797254

i had this one too, outlook 2k.  had cloudmark spam program 
installed as an active plugin.  had to go to tools|options etc 
to get to the plugin screen and then uncheck the cloudmark 
program.  exit and close outlook, reinstall went fine.

mike

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 09:37:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 11:37:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786756 ] pop3proxy
	Assertion error
Message-ID: <E19mEji-000568-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786756, was opened at 2003-08-11 22:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786756&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Roy Feldman (royfeldman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy Assertion error

Initial Comment:

I just installed SpamBayes on my RedHat 9 system running
Python python-2.2.2-26.  I have configured the
pop3proxy and set my email client (evolution) to
connect to the proxy.  

Running pop3proxy, I amI receiving my mail in
evolution,  but every email has the header
X-Spambayes-Exception with the following body:
exceptions.AssertionError() in probability() at
spambayes/classifier.py line 310: assert spamcount <=nspam

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

thanks,

roy




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786756&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 09:39:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 11:39:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786759 ] Outlook
	French
Message-ID: <E19mEm3-0003va-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786759, was opened at 2003-08-11 11:39
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook French

Initial Comment:
I use W2k pro french and outlook 2000 french,
After installion, I open outlook and I have a message 
say"There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin
please re-start outlook and try again.??

SpamBayes addin does works with french 
environment????

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 12:36:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 14:39:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-786912 ] Delete spam
	from server but leave ham
Message-ID: <E19mHWo-0006in-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #786912, was opened at 2003-08-11 18:36
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=786912&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Arto Rantala (artranta)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Delete spam from server but leave ham

Initial Comment:
The pop3proxy should have the option to delete all spam 
from the pop3 server after download. This would allow 
the possibility of keeping only ham available on the server 
for downloads with other simple, secondary clients 
without spam filtering capability (mobile phones, PDAs).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=786912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 13:53:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 15:53:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786952 ] Outlook forgets
	filtering rules
Message-ID: <E19mIiy-00060r-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786952, was opened at 2003-08-11 14:53
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook forgets filtering rules

Initial Comment:
Running Outlook 2003 BETA against a 2000 Exchange 
server (clustered)
Also running Activesync 3.7 for a Dell Axim

Each time outlook is shutdown, Spambayes forgets all 
the filtering options I setup.

Just downloaded the installer today from this site.  
Should be latest ver

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 13:59:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 15:59:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786956 ] unable to activate
	toolbar buttons
Message-ID: <E19mIpJ-0004BD-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786956, was opened at 2003-08-11 21:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: unable to activate toolbar buttons

Initial Comment:
After installing (sb-007.exe) on my 

Win XP Pro Danish SP1, 
Office XP SBE Danish SP1

i'm unable to use any buttons at the toolbar. Nothing 
just happens.

Also tried installing source version with same result.

logfile attached


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 15:45:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 17:45:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-786912 ] Delete spam
	from server but leave ham
Message-ID: <E19mKTU-0003Jc-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #786912, was opened at 2003-08-11 18:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=786912&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Arto Rantala (artranta)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Delete spam from server but leave ham

Initial Comment:
The pop3proxy should have the option to delete all spam 
from the pop3 server after download. This would allow 
the possibility of keeping only ham available on the server 
for downloads with other simple, secondary clients 
without spam filtering capability (mobile phones, PDAs).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-11 21:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Nice idea.  For those who read their email from multiple 
clients, it's a good compromise between automatically 
deleting spam (too dangerous IMHO) and having to wade 
through it every time you look at your email.  This way,
the messages are kept on your main client but don't clutter
up the others.  I don't think I'll have time to implement
it, but if someone wants to have go I'll be glad to help.

Shameless plug: Entrian wapmail (http://entrian.com/wapmail)
has a feature whereby you can hide a message once you've
seen it - it remains on the POP3 server, but wapmail doesn't
show it to you any more.  (And yes, I'd love to integrate
Spambayes with wapmail, but I don't have the time.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=786912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 18:23:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 20:23:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786952 ] Error when profile name
	has invalid filename characters
Message-ID: <E19mMwr-0003dq-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786952, was opened at 2003-08-12 05:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Error when profile name has invalid filename characters

Initial Comment:
Running Outlook 2003 BETA against a 2000 Exchange 
server (clustered)
Also running Activesync 3.7 for a Dell Axim

Each time outlook is shutdown, Spambayes forgets all 
the filtering options I setup.

Just downloaded the installer today from this site.  
Should be latest ver

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-12 10:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Doh.  We use the profile name as a file name - but the
profile name can include invalid characters.  I will fix
this for the next release, but in the meantime you will
either need to run the source-code version (and then wait
for my fix) or rename your profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 11 18:59:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 11 20:59:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786759 ] Outlook
	French
Message-ID: <E19mNV9-0006Bj-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786759, was opened at 2003-08-11 11:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by coalliera
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook French

Initial Comment:
I use W2k pro french and outlook 2000 french,
After installion, I open outlook and I have a message 
say"There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin
please re-start outlook and try again.??

SpamBayes addin does works with french 
environment????

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-11 20:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi, ...

Check your Outlook profil name ... if there is character like "?" 
that's your problem!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 01:00:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 03:01:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785637 ] Spam score gets set to 0%
Message-ID: <E19mT9K-0000Z4-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785637, was opened at 2003-08-08 23:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam score gets set to 0%

Initial Comment:
Outlook 2000 SP1 (9.0.0.3821)
SpamBayes 0.6

Immediately after processing an unread Spam message 
to the Spam folder, navigate to the folder and run 
SpamBayes Manager. Choose Define Filters then OK (you 
might need to make a subtle change to initate 
a 'dirtycount'.

When the SpamBayes Manager is closed, the spam score 
of the most recent Spam message will probably get set 
to 0%.

The correct score can be restored by Recover from 
Spam and then Delete as Spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-12 09:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I can confirm this also happens here (with latest CVS as of 
2003-08-11).  I'll post a log the next time it happens - lost 
todays due to a restart of outlook - due to non-functional 
toolbar :-(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ladd Nelson (gladdys)
Date: 2003-08-11 17:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=840787

Downloaded the James Bond release (007) and can still 
reproduce the problem. Additionally, I'm running Windows 
2000 (SP 4, build 2195). When I get a moment, I'll record the 
process and upload the file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-11 11:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is this still true in the 007 release?  I can't repro as
described.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-11 09:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

This actually happens for me every morning.  the first spam-
message (not 100% sure if it's the first, but at least there's 
(only) one) has score 0% in outlook's spam-field.  
viewing "spam score for current message" shows the correct 
score.  Not a big problem, but a bit annoying.

Think I saw another bug on this issue earlier.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785637&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 01:05:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 03:05:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786756 ] pop3proxy
	Assertion error
Message-ID: <E19mTDf-00083S-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786756, was opened at 2003-08-12 03:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786756&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Roy Feldman (royfeldman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy Assertion error

Initial Comment:

I just installed SpamBayes on my RedHat 9 system running
Python python-2.2.2-26.  I have configured the
pop3proxy and set my email client (evolution) to
connect to the proxy.  

Running pop3proxy, I amI receiving my mail in
evolution,  but every email has the header
X-Spambayes-Exception with the following body:
exceptions.AssertionError() in probability() at
spambayes/classifier.py line 310: assert spamcount <=nspam

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

thanks,

roy




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-12 19:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This means the database is screwed, and you need to retrain 
from scratch.  Please also read FAQ 5.2 
<http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted>, as it may be relevant.

If FAQ 5.2 doesn't apply, and your db still gets corrupted 
repeatedly, please open a bug report about that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786756&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 02:36:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 04:36:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-787251 ] Problem
	refreshing message list
Message-ID: <E19mUds-0003AN-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #787251, was opened at 2003-08-12 08:36
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David McNab (davidmcnab)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem refreshing message list

Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've just installed SpamBayes from CVS.

Got a small problem with the SpamBayes message cache.

Firstly, I retrieve messages with my pop3 client
(Evolution) via SpamBayes pop3proxy.

Then when I click on the Review Messages link in
SpamBayes web interface, the newly retrieved messages
don't appear.

I've found a workaround - by clicking on the
Configuration link, then saving the configuration
unchanged, I can then click on 'Review Messages' and
see all the messages I've just retrieved.

It would feel more convenient if I didn't need to do
this, especially in these early days while I'm training
SpamBayes.

Am I doing anything wrong? Is there anything I can do?

Cheers
David




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 02:44:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 04:44:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787258 ] Can't set Outlook folder
	for "unsure" messages.
Message-ID: <E19mUlS-0003UG-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787258, was opened at 2003-08-12 08:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787258&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Helge Stenstr?m (helge)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't set Outlook folder for "unsure" messages.

Initial Comment:
This is illustrated in 5 pictures:
spambayes1.jpg
 The spambayes manager before I try to set the folder
for unsure messages
spambayes2.jpg
 Filter rules before I try to set the folder for unsure
messages
spambayes3.jpg
 Browsing and selecting the folder to use for unsure
messages
spambayes4.jpg
 Filter rules seem to be updated, but after clicking OK...
spambayes5.jpg
 ... the filter is not updated in the SpamBayes manager.


Software: SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, Binary version
3(July 2003)
Outlook 2000
Windows 2000


The last few lines from the log file:
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and
Settings\erahege\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange
Settings.ini
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Attempted to set [Filter] spam_folder_id with invalid
value
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0037D96E000000483A5C6D7957696E646F77735C6D736F66666963655C706572736F6E616C20666F6C646572732E70737400',
'00000000830208102DE3784D9226D8C77E30F86902830000')
(<type 'tuple'>)
Attempted to set [Filter] unsure_folder_id with invalid
value
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C20000454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C000000455345414C4E54383633002F6F3D4572696373736F6E2F6F753D5345322F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D4552414845474500',
'00000000439171BECB0ED411B9390008C7E6752001001F55F6582266314A85A55F6241509B6700000818B4260000')
(<type 'tuple'>)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  ieee
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  bayes
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and
Settings\erahege\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange
Settings.ini


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787258&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 03:55:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 05:55:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787296 ] Local installation
	problem: hammiefilter_persistent_storage
Message-ID: <E19mVs5-0004OQ-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787296, was opened at 2003-08-12 11:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787296&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Volker Stolz (volkersf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Local installation problem: hammiefilter_persistent_storage

Initial Comment:
I have a local python 2.3 installation into $HOME/Linux and setup.py installed everything in the correct places (~/Linux/bin ~/Linux/lib/..python../site-packages/..), but when I run 'hammie.py' to train, I get:

Mail@atlas [11:53:46]> hammie.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/stolz/Linux/bin/hammie.py", line 4, in ?
    import spambayes.hammiebulk
  File "/home/stolz/Linux/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammiebulk.py", line 62, in ?
    DEFAULTDB = os.path.expanduser(options.hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file)
AttributeError: 'OptionsClass' object has no attribute 'hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file'

A 'regular' /usr/local-setup with Python 2.2 on FreeBSD works fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787296&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 07:09:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 09:09:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786952 ] Error when profile name
	has invalid filename characters
Message-ID: <E19mYtv-0005Gi-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786952, was opened at 2003-08-11 14:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by biggziff
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Error when profile name has invalid filename characters

Initial Comment:
Running Outlook 2003 BETA against a 2000 Exchange 
server (clustered)
Also running Activesync 3.7 for a Dell Axim

Each time outlook is shutdown, Spambayes forgets all 
the filtering options I setup.

Just downloaded the installer today from this site.  
Should be latest ver

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Date: 2003-08-12 08:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842457

Thanks..renaming the profile did the trick.

This stuff rocks!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-11 19:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Doh.  We use the profile name as a file name - but the
profile name can include invalid characters.  I will fix
this for the next release, but in the meantime you will
either need to run the source-code version (and then wait
for my fix) or rename your profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 08:42:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 10:42:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19maLZ-0005T5-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 04:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by warb
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dan Warburton (warb)
Date: 2003-08-12 14:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=83150

I encountered this problem. I think it was an backgroud office 
in my startup folder. 
 
Kill some QZ... something process and install completed. 
 
sorry I did not make a note of the process name. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99)
Date: 2003-08-07 13:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839327

I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install 
error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 23:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

One user saw this traceback:
Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 16, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-06 17:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes 
current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched.

I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic 
functionality and still had error.

Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory 
worked.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 09:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 04:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 15:09:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 17:09:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787664 ] registration error for
	spaybayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: <E19mgOu-00060a-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787664, was opened at 2003-08-12 17:09
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tom Klarner (tklarner)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error for spaybayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
Tried installing v007 on two different machines, one an 
NT4 w/Outlook 2000, second machine WinXP w/Outlook 
2000. Got error message "Unable to register the 
DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201"
for the spambayes_addin.dll file on both machines.
No anti-virus software running on either machine. Word 
not default editor nor running.
Was able to install v006 on a third XP machine 
w/Outlook 2000 with no problems.

BTW: have been using v006 at home; great software; 
keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 15:13:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 17:13:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787664 ] registration error for
	spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: <E19mgS3-00043h-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787664, was opened at 2003-08-12 17:09
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by tklarner
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tom Klarner (tklarner)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: registration error for spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
Tried installing v007 on two different machines, one an 
NT4 w/Outlook 2000, second machine WinXP w/Outlook 
2000. Got error message "Unable to register the 
DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201"
for the spambayes_addin.dll file on both machines.
No anti-virus software running on either machine. Word 
not default editor nor running.
Was able to install v006 on a third XP machine 
w/Outlook 2000 with no problems.

BTW: have been using v006 at home; great software; 
keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 15:32:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 17:32:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787676 ] in outlook xp,
	hotmail inbox does not filter
Message-ID: <E19mgkp-0007Oo-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787676, was opened at 2003-08-12 14:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: in outlook xp, hotmail inbox does not filter

Initial Comment:
i know that this should've been fixed with the latest 
latest outlook plugin used. here's the log.

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 161 spam and 13 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
6.66118ms
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
1.11914ms
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Checked 11 in folder Inbox - 3 new entries found.
Checked 4 in folder Inbox - 0 new entries found.
Checked 41 in folder Junk Mail - 26 new entries found.
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Moving and spam training message 'Ab Girls that Just 
Shut Up & Spread Yoo Yr Ip Cleqt' -  trained as spam
Moving and spam training message 'Hey' -  trained as 
spam
Training on message 'Hey' -  already was trained as spam
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
Current version is 0.7, latest is 0.6.
Message 'RE: Outlook E-Mail' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Message 'Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' had a 
Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training 
message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' -  
trained as ham
Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes-announce" mailing 
list' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'RE: Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'shared fax error' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification 
of 'Yes'
Moving and spam training message 'Take Advantage of 
the Benefits of Your Individualized BankCard Services 
Credit Card  ' -  trained as spam
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 67 messages, finding 41 spam and 
5 unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 15:33:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 17:33:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787258 ] Can't set Outlook folder
	for "unsure" messages.
Message-ID: <E19mglj-0004vc-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787258, was opened at 2003-08-12 04:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787258&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Helge Stenstr?m (helge)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't set Outlook folder for "unsure" messages.

Initial Comment:
This is illustrated in 5 pictures:
spambayes1.jpg
 The spambayes manager before I try to set the folder
for unsure messages
spambayes2.jpg
 Filter rules before I try to set the folder for unsure
messages
spambayes3.jpg
 Browsing and selecting the folder to use for unsure
messages
spambayes4.jpg
 Filter rules seem to be updated, but after clicking OK...
spambayes5.jpg
 ... the filter is not updated in the SpamBayes manager.


Software: SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, Binary version
3(July 2003)
Outlook 2000
Windows 2000


The last few lines from the log file:
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and
Settings\erahege\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange
Settings.ini
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Attempted to set [Filter] spam_folder_id with invalid
value
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C200006D737073742E646C6C00000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA0037D96E000000483A5C6D7957696E646F77735C6D736F66666963655C706572736F6E616C20666F6C646572732E70737400',
'00000000830208102DE3784D9226D8C77E30F86902830000')
(<type 'tuple'>)
Attempted to set [Filter] unsure_folder_id with invalid
value
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C20000454D534D44422E444C4C00000000000000001B55FA20AA6611CD9BC800AA002FC45A0C000000455345414C4E54383633002F6F3D4572696373736F6E2F6F753D5345322F636E3D526563697069656E74732F636E3D4552414845474500',
'00000000439171BECB0ED411B9390008C7E6752001001F55F6582266314A85A55F6241509B6700000818B4260000')
(<type 'tuple'>)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  ieee
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  bayes
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and
Settings\erahege\Application Data\SpamBayes\MS Exchange
Settings.ini


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-08-12 17:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Your log shows that you are using an old version (003). This 
problem was fixed in a later release. Please upgrade. Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787258&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 17:32:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 19:32:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-741914 ] Unable to Register DLL
	Error
Message-ID: <E19midK-0001pl-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #741914, was opened at 2003-05-22 18:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by daveski
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gary Thomas (garyt977)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Unable to Register DLL Error

Initial Comment:
I'm running WinXP and Office 2000 Professional.  When I
attempt to install the binary version on my system I
get the following error:

----
C:\Program files\Spambayes Outlook
Addin\Spambayes_addin.dll

Unable to register the DLL/OCX:DllRegister failed:code
0x00000000

Abort, Retry, Fail
----

After searching my hard drive, I was unable to find a
log file for this program.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dave Sutton (daveski)
Date: 2003-08-12 23:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=843381

After chasing round various 'dupes' I think this report 
describes most accurately my experience.

Same error (0x00000000) with Spambayes_addin.dll

007 binary on W2K SP4, OL2000 Corporate or Workgroup.

After many attempts I clicked Ignore on the message and 
looked in my temp folder and all the .log files were zero bytes. 
I opened OL and went to:

Tools / Options and chose Other
Advanced Options and COM Add-Ins
Clicked Add and located Spambayes_addin.dll.

After restarting OL, Spambayes seems to work.

Oddly if I got to the COM Add-Ins again, nothing is listed.

I hope this helps some frustrated users.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 23:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Dupe of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=740198&group_id=61702&atid=498103


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 19:18:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 21:18:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787676 ] in outlook xp,
	hotmail inbox does not filter
Message-ID: <E19mkHO-0004nk-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787676, was opened at 2003-08-13 07:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: in outlook xp, hotmail inbox does not filter

Initial Comment:
i know that this should've been fixed with the latest 
latest outlook plugin used. here's the log.

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 161 spam and 13 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
6.66118ms
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
1.11914ms
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Checked 11 in folder Inbox - 3 new entries found.
Checked 4 in folder Inbox - 0 new entries found.
Checked 41 in folder Junk Mail - 26 new entries found.
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Moving and spam training message 'Ab Girls that Just 
Shut Up & Spread Yoo Yr Ip Cleqt' -  trained as spam
Moving and spam training message 'Hey' -  trained as 
spam
Training on message 'Hey' -  already was trained as spam
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
Current version is 0.7, latest is 0.6.
Message 'RE: Outlook E-Mail' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Message 'Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' had a 
Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training 
message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' -  
trained as ham
Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes-announce" mailing 
list' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'RE: Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'shared fax error' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification 
of 'Yes'
Moving and spam training message 'Take Advantage of 
the Benefits of Your Individualized BankCard Services 
Credit Card  ' -  trained as spam
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 67 messages, finding 41 spam and 
5 unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It isn't clear from the log what is failing.  There are alot
of exceptions relating to being unable to save the "Spam"
score, but we know we can't do this.  The entry:

Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'

Does imply it is working, and I see no exception relating to
making a copy of the message.  I'd like to clean this up
though, and we probably could save the Spam field *after* we
have moved a message into the nominated folder.  Are you
able to run from source code?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 19:22:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 21:23:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786952 ] Error when profile name
	has invalid filename characters
Message-ID: <E19mkLq-0004MJ-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786952, was opened at 2003-08-12 05:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Error when profile name has invalid filename characters

Initial Comment:
Running Outlook 2003 BETA against a 2000 Exchange 
server (clustered)
Also running Activesync 3.7 for a Dell Axim

Each time outlook is shutdown, Spambayes forgets all 
the filtering options I setup.

Just downloaded the installer today from this site.  
Should be latest ver

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks.  The bug still exists, so I'm reopening.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Date: 2003-08-12 23:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842457

Thanks..renaming the profile did the trick.

This stuff rocks!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-12 10:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Doh.  We use the profile name as a file name - but the
profile name can include invalid characters.  I will fix
this for the next release, but in the meantime you will
either need to run the source-code version (and then wait
for my fix) or rename your profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 12 19:24:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 12 21:24:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787676 ] in outlook xp,
	hotmail inbox does not filter
Message-ID: <E19mkNF-0005X0-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787676, was opened at 2003-08-12 14:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by image57
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: in outlook xp, hotmail inbox does not filter

Initial Comment:
i know that this should've been fixed with the latest 
latest outlook plugin used. here's the log.

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 161 spam and 13 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
6.66118ms
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
1.11914ms
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Checked 11 in folder Inbox - 3 new entries found.
Checked 4 in folder Inbox - 0 new entries found.
Checked 41 in folder Junk Mail - 26 new entries found.
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Moving and spam training message 'Ab Girls that Just 
Shut Up & Spread Yoo Yr Ip Cleqt' -  trained as spam
Moving and spam training message 'Hey' -  trained as 
spam
Training on message 'Hey' -  already was trained as spam
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
Current version is 0.7, latest is 0.6.
Message 'RE: Outlook E-Mail' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Message 'Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' had a 
Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training 
message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' -  
trained as ham
Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes-announce" mailing 
list' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'RE: Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'shared fax error' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification 
of 'Yes'
Moving and spam training message 'Take Advantage of 
the Benefits of Your Individualized BankCard Services 
Credit Card  ' -  trained as spam
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 67 messages, finding 41 spam and 
5 unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-08-12 18:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

i'm sorry, i should've explained. i am also running an exchange 
connector at the same time. i have it monitoring both 
inboxes, and having all spam/unsure spam moved to a folder 
in exchange. doesn't automatically filter anything in the 
hotmail. but spam in the exchange inbox works, and manually 
doing filtering also works.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-12 18:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It isn't clear from the log what is failing.  There are alot
of exceptions relating to being unable to save the "Spam"
score, but we know we can't do this.  The entry:

Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'

Does imply it is working, and I see no exception relating to
making a copy of the message.  I'd like to clean this up
though, and we probably could save the Spam field *after* we
have moved a message into the nominated folder.  Are you
able to run from source code?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

From WengSing at crimsonlogic.com  Wed Aug 13 12:52:53 2003
From: WengSing at crimsonlogic.com (Weng Sing, Tang)
Date: Tue Aug 12 23:53:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] SpamBayes Feature Request
Message-ID: <1FE28AE304D1B84292BE2B92FDF6FEB002C82999@SG01PVEXCH00.snshub.org>

Hi,
    I would think it's a good idea to extend SpamBayes to go beyond just
removing spam mails to include automatically categorizing mails into
their respective folders.
    Thanks.
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20030813/1951d589/attachment.htm
From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 03:07:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 05:08:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19mrbi-0003BI-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 06:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wernerpro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842937

I can't install SpamBayes, even when I kill all unnecessary 
processes. Now only the following processes activ:
smss, csrss, winlogon, services, lsass,
svchost (3 times) spoolsv, taskmgr, regsvc, mstask, winmgmt 
and explorer. 
Are there any ideas what I can do, to come over registration 
error 0x0000000?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dan Warburton (warb)
Date: 2003-08-12 16:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=83150

I encountered this problem. I think it was an backgroud office 
in my startup folder. 
 
Kill some QZ... something process and install completed. 
 
sorry I did not make a note of the process name. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99)
Date: 2003-08-07 15:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839327

I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install 
error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 01:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

One user saw this traceback:
Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 16, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes 
current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched.

I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic 
functionality and still had error.

Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory 
worked.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 15:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 11:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 06:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 06:18:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 08:18:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-788001 ] mboxtrain.py maildir
	bugfix and feature
Message-ID: <E19muaG-0007wr-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #788001, was opened at 2003-08-13 14:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788001&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: mboxtrain.py maildir bugfix and feature

Initial Comment:
hello,

the attached patch fixes wrong behaviour of
mboxtrain.py on Maildir mailboxes (creation of tmp
directory) and adds a parameter -r which removes each
mail after it has been used for training (Maildir only).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788001&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 06:20:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 08:20:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-788002 ] hammiebulk.py uses
	wrong option name
Message-ID: <E19mubx-00080p-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #788002, was opened at 2003-08-13 14:20
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788002&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: hammiebulk.py uses wrong option name

Initial Comment:
hammiebulk.py uses a wrong option name to get
persistent storage file. this little patch fixes it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788002&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 06:23:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 08:23:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743122 ] Outlook 2002
	auto-complete breaks
Message-ID: <E19mufN-0005ro-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743122, was opened at 2003-05-25 06:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gbrucker
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes and I think it breaks the
auto-complete popup list for email addresses used in
the To field in Outlook.  The popup still appears but
only with the first letter of each email address - the
rest of the email address doesn't appear.  I've
uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes several times to
confirm this problem.  I'm running Outlook 2002 (SP2)
on Windows 2000 (SP3).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Garrett Brucker (gbrucker)
Date: 2003-08-13 06:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=843726

I'm running Outlook 2002/XP on Windows XP Pro and had this 
same problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kim Friis (kim_friis)
Date: 2003-08-11 03:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=89418

Im running Outlook 2002 on Windows XP and I do NOT see 
the bug. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sean True (seantrue)
Date: 2003-06-16 19:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=114311

Fixing this bug will require a complete rewrite to remove all 
MFC based dialogs from SpamBayes.
We're about 80% of the way there on SpamAtBay, and it's 
_not_ fun.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-16 18:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Apparently this problem only happens *after* a SpamBayes
dialog has been shown, but works fine until then.  Can
someone else confirm this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-06-02 03:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

I am running the same - W2K SP3 & OL2K and get the same 
problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jonathan Evatt (spidawebs)
Date: 2003-06-01 14:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=48654

I am also getting this problem. Have installed the app on 
Outlook XP (2002) SP2 over Win XP SP1.
If I start up Outlook the problem only seems to occur AFTER 
I actually run the spambayes configuration routine. If I do not 
access that then the problem does not (so far - limited 
testing) seem to occur.

Jonathan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 06:23:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 08:24:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788008 ] smtpproxy.py assumes too
	good format for addresses
Message-ID: <E19mufT-0008AA-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788008, was opened at 2003-08-13 14:23
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788008&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: smtpproxy.py assumes too good format for addresses

Initial Comment:
if smtpproxy.py is fed with addresses without <>'s it
fails because it uses index() method to locate < and >
(methods BayesSMTPProxy.strip{Address,To}).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788008&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 06:35:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 08:35:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788019 ] decoding of headers for
	some emails fails
Message-ID: <E19muqU-0004pj-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788019, was opened at 2003-08-13 14:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788019&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: decoding of headers for some emails fails

Initial Comment:
some mails are incorrectly formed and so the default
error handling in Header.append() (strict) causes
spambayes to insert X-Spambayes-Exception in the mail
instead of continuing and classifying the mail. dirty
solution would be to set the errors parameter to 'ignore'.

unfortunately i don't have the exception message
already or the mail (spam), but remember that the mail
encoding was set to us-ascii and the character that
caused the exception in a call to unicode() wha
CURRENCY SIGN (0xa4)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788019&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 07:16:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 09:16:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19mvUc-00088T-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 00:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by buzz4209
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-13 09:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

wernerpro,
Per my comment below I had same issue.
I got around it by running "regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll" 
from the directory in which spambayes_addin.dll resides.
I did this while the error message was on the screen then 
chose ignore to continue with the install.

Hope this helps,
Buzz

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro)
Date: 2003-08-13 05:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842937

I can't install SpamBayes, even when I kill all unnecessary 
processes. Now only the following processes activ:
smss, csrss, winlogon, services, lsass,
svchost (3 times) spoolsv, taskmgr, regsvc, mstask, winmgmt 
and explorer. 
Are there any ideas what I can do, to come over registration 
error 0x0000000?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dan Warburton (warb)
Date: 2003-08-12 10:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=83150

I encountered this problem. I think it was an backgroud office 
in my startup folder. 
 
Kill some QZ... something process and install completed. 
 
sorry I did not make a note of the process name. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99)
Date: 2003-08-07 09:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839327

I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install 
error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

One user saw this traceback:
Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 16, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-06 13:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes 
current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched.

I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic 
functionality and still had error.

Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory 
worked.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 09:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 05:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 07:48:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 09:48:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788051 ] database corruption
	(bdddb)
Message-ID: <E19mvz0-0007ZM-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788051, was opened at 2003-08-13 15:48
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: database corruption (bdddb)

Initial Comment:
when the pop3proxy.py is run for some longish time (2
hours) the database file (DBM) gets corrupted and each
mail then contains:

X-Spambayes-Exception:
bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30989,
        'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error,
        run database recovery')) in __getitem__() at
        /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py line 86:
return
        self.db[key]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 09:37:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 11:37:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788051 ] database corruption
	(bdddb)
Message-ID: <E19mxgT-0004UM-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788051, was opened at 2003-08-13 09:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: database corruption (bdddb)

Initial Comment:
when the pop3proxy.py is run for some longish time (2
hours) the database file (DBM) gets corrupted and each
mail then contains:

X-Spambayes-Exception:
bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30989,
        'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error,
        run database recovery')) in __getitem__() at
        /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py line 86:
return
        self.db[key]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Which operating system, and which version of Sleepycat's 
Berkeley code (spambayes shouldn't be able to corrupt a 
Berkeley DB, so the problem is probably specific to the bsddb 
version in use)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 09:58:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 11:58:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787296 ] Local installation
	problem: hammiefilter_persistent_storage
Message-ID: <E19my1O-000612-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787296, was opened at 2003-08-12 05:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ooglek
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787296&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Volker Stolz (volkersf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Local installation problem: hammiefilter_persistent_storage

Initial Comment:
I have a local python 2.3 installation into $HOME/Linux and setup.py installed everything in the correct places (~/Linux/bin ~/Linux/lib/..python../site-packages/..), but when I run 'hammie.py' to train, I get:

Mail@atlas [11:53:46]> hammie.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/stolz/Linux/bin/hammie.py", line 4, in ?
    import spambayes.hammiebulk
  File "/home/stolz/Linux/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammiebulk.py", line 62, in ?
    DEFAULTDB = os.path.expanduser(options.hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file)
AttributeError: 'OptionsClass' object has no attribute 'hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file'

A 'regular' /usr/local-setup with Python 2.2 on FreeBSD works fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Peter Beckman (ooglek)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=68540

You can fix this:

Replace this line in hammiebulk.py (line 62):

DEFAULTDB =
os.path.expanduser(options.hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file)

with this line:

DEFAULTDB = os.path.expanduser(options.persistent_storage_file)

That fixed it for me.  I'm not a developer, so I may have
just broke it more, but SB is doing well at the moment, so
it must either have no effect, or I'm right. :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787296&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 10:01:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 12:01:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788051 ] database corruption
	(bdddb)
Message-ID: <E19my43-00068p-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788051, was opened at 2003-08-13 15:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fufsource
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: database corruption (bdddb)

Initial Comment:
when the pop3proxy.py is run for some longish time (2
hours) the database file (DBM) gets corrupted and each
mail then contains:

X-Spambayes-Exception:
bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30989,
        'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error,
        run database recovery')) in __getitem__() at
        /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py line 86:
return
        self.db[key]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Date: 2003-08-13 18:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=698198

the operating system is RH 7.2 with those versions of the
Berkeley DB:
db1-1.85-7
db2-2.4.14-7
db3-3.2.9-4

sorry i didn't include this in right away with the bug report.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-13 17:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Which operating system, and which version of Sleepycat's 
Berkeley code (spambayes shouldn't be able to corrupt a 
Berkeley DB, so the problem is probably specific to the bsddb 
version in use)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 11:15:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 13:15:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786759 ] Outlook
	French
Message-ID: <E19mzDQ-0001az-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786759, was opened at 2003-08-11 11:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sgroulx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook French

Initial Comment:
I use W2k pro french and outlook 2000 french,
After installion, I open outlook and I have a message 
say"There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin
please re-start outlook and try again.??

SpamBayes addin does works with french 
environment????

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Date: 2003-08-13 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842228

Hi,
In my profil name, they have no special carater like ? ? ? ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-11 20:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi, ...

Check your Outlook profil name ... if there is character like "?" 
that's your problem!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 11:46:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 13:47:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-675811 ] Dead buttons left on
	uninstall
Message-ID: <E19mzhz-0002Lv-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #675811, was opened at 2003-01-27 18:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hbrackett
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Dead buttons left on uninstall

Initial Comment:
The toolbar buttons are temporary, which causes 
problems if they are moved.  If they are permanent, then 
we are left with dead buttons if we uninstall the plugin 
(why would we do this? ;p ).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-13 13:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

Dead buttons - Less drastic is to customize the toolbar and 
drag the spambayes buttons off. This avoids loosing all your 
customizations. I also had to select the spambayes toolbar in 
the View menu to see the real 0.6 buttons.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-03 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Still in the latest version, even with the new toolbar :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-06-30 20:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

For anyone reading this because they have buttons left over 
after uninstalling, you can get rid of them by resetting the 
toolbar.

(Right click on the toolbar, click
customize, then select the standard toolbar, then click reset).

Presumably the next release, when we have our own toolbar, 
will remove this issue and this can be closed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 12:10:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 14:10:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788019 ] decoding of headers for
	some emails fails
Message-ID: <E19n04l-0008Le-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788019, was opened at 2003-08-13 08:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hbrackett
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788019&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: decoding of headers for some emails fails

Initial Comment:
some mails are incorrectly formed and so the default
error handling in Header.append() (strict) causes
spambayes to insert X-Spambayes-Exception in the mail
instead of continuing and classifying the mail. dirty
solution would be to set the errors parameter to 'ignore'.

unfortunately i don't have the exception message
already or the mail (spam), but remember that the mail
encoding was set to us-ascii and the character that
caused the exception in a call to unicode() wha
CURRENCY SIGN (0xa4)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-13 14:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

This message failed to filter due to a Header Parse Error so it 
is probably related. 
Error training message '<MAPIMsgStoreMsg, 'Polaroid Digital 
Camera Liquidation' id=
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C20000505354
5052582E444C4C00000000000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA00
37D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E6420536574
74696E67735C65627261636B6574745C4C6F63616C2053657474
696E67735C4170706C69636174696F6E20446174615C4D696372
6F736F66745C4F75746C6F6F6B5C6F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400
', '00000000E789B2E04680BC4384E3C07593D3337F44B02500')
>'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/train", line 91, in train_folder
  File "out1.pyz/train", line 46, in train_message
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 734, in GetEmailPackageObject
  File "out1.pyz/email", line 52, in message_from_string
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 64, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 239, in _parsebody
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 62, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 111, in _parseheaders
HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before first header
Checked 63 in folder Inbox - 59 new entries found.
Checked 38 in folder Inz_SpamSlammer - 31 new entries 
found.
Checked 909 in folder Spam - 752 new entries found.
FAILED to create email.message from:  'Return-path: 
<support@greenbamboo.net>\r\nReceived: from mtain04 
(mtain04-qfe0.icomcast.net [172.20.3.52])\r\n by 
msgstore04.icomcast.net\r\n (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 
HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003))\r\n with ESMTP id 
<0HJJ00H9I6UUS7@msgstore04.icomcast.net> for\r\n 
ebrackett@comcast.net; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:04:06 -0400 
(EDT)\r\nReceived: from sccrgxc02.comcast.net 
(sccrgxc02.comcast.net [204.127.202.62])\r\n by 
mtain04.icomcast.net\r\n (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 
HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003))\r\n with ESMTP id 
<0HJJ00FE36UU1N@mtain04.icomcast.net> for 
example@comcast.net\r\n (ORCPT example@comcast.net); 
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:04:06 -0400 (EDT)\r\nReceived: from 
office2.csi.net.uk (unknown[212.15.82.31](misconfigured 
sender))\r\n by comcast.net (sccrgxc02) with SMTP id 
<20030813000356e0200cmmeme>; Wed,\r\n 13 Aug 2003 
00:04:06 +0000\r\nReceived: from em20.greenbamboo.net 
(em20.greenbamboo.net [216.243.234.150])\r\n\tby 
office2.csi.net.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 3729A4807\tfor\r\n 
<mp3tour@illudium.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:03:46 +0000 
(GMT)\r\nDate: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:10:58 -0600\r\nFrom: 
Andy Adams <support@greenbamboo.net>\r\nSubject: 
Polaroid Digital Camera Liquidation\r\nTo: 
mp3tour@illudium.com\r\nMessage-id: 
<1060733458.1154@em20.greenbamboo.net>\r\nMIME-
version: 1.0\r\nContent-type: multipart/alternative;\r\n 
boundary=Amazon.com_multipart_boundary____________\r\nO
riginal-recipient: 
rfc822;ebrackett@comcast.net\r\n\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<HTML>\r\n<H
EAD></HEAD>\r\n<BODY BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF LEFTMARGIN=0 
TOPMARGIN=0 MARGINWIDTH=0 
\r\n\r\nMARGINHEIGHT=0>\r\n<TABLE WIDTH=600 BORDER=0 
CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    
\r\n\r\n<TD COLSPAN=5> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
target="_blank"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_01.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=600 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=48 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 HEIGHT=48 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=5> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_02.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=600 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=23 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 HEIGHT=23 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=3> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_03.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=336 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=47 border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=2 ROWSPAN=2> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
\r\n\r\ntarget="_blank"><IMG 
SRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroidemail/ph
otomax_email_2_04.gif" ALT="" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=264 
HEIGHT=202 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" WIDTH=1 HEIGHT=47 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
\r\n\r\nCOLSPAN=3 ROWSPAN=2> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
target="_blank"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_05.jpg" ALT="" WIDTH=336 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=168 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 
HEIGHT=155 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=2> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
\r\n\r\ntarget="_blank"><IMG 
SRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroidemail/ph
otomax_email_2_06.jpg" \r\n\r\nALT="" WIDTH=218 
HEIGHT=91 border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=2> <IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_07.gif" WIDTH=46 HEIGHT=91 
\r\n\r\nALT=""></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" WIDTH=1 \r\n\r\nHEIGHT=13 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=3> <IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_08.gif" WIDTH=8 HEIGHT=223 
\r\n\r\nALT=""></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD ROWSPAN=2> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_09.jpg" ALT="" WIDTH=147 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=219 border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=3> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_10.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=181 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=223 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 HEIGHT=78 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=2 ROWSPAN=2> <a 
\r\n\r\nhref="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
target="_blank"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_11.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=264 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=145 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 
HEIGHT=141 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD> <IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://wwwbluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_12.gif" WIDTH=147 HEIGHT=4 
\r\n\r\nALT=""></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" WIDTH=1 \r\n\r\nHEIGHT=4 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n</TABLE>\r\n<p> 
</p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<IMG SRC="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/view?v=7&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" WIDTH=1 
HEIGHT=1 
ALT="">\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br
><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><table 
border="0" width="515" cellspacing="0"cellpadding="0" 
align=center>\r\n\r\n<tr><td><font 
color="#000000">*********************************
***************************************</tr></td
>\r\n\r\n<tr><td>\r\n\r\n<font color="#000000">The 
preceding advertisement was sent you by virtue of your 
participation in the Special Product Offerings of Greenbamboo 
or our partners.  To\r\nunsubscribe from receiving further 
emails from Greenbamboo Special Product Offerings please <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/unsub.cgi?
m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com">click 
here</a>.\r\n\r\n<br><br>\r\n\r\nFor information about how 
Greenbamboo obtained your name and how Greenbamboo 
operates this list, please review our <A 
href="http://www.greenbamboo.net/privacy.html">Privacy 
Policy</A>.\r\nAs is stated in our Privacy Policy, 
Greenbamboo does not promote or endorse any of the 
companies advertising through us. Please contact 
Greenbamboo for any comments you may have regarding your 
participation.  We may transfer your e-mail address to our 
partners at\r\nany time.zc3gbhe^vyyhqvhz
(pbz</td></tr>\r\n\r\n<tr><td><font 
color="#000000">*********************************
**************************************</font><br
><br><br>\r\n\r\n</td></tr></table></pre></body></html>--
Amazon.com_multipart_boundary____________\n #Polaroid 
PhotoMAX PDC 330 Digital Camera! Great Camera\r\nBetter 
Price! 3 in 1 Camera - Digital, Web & Video Cam.\r\n\r\nClick 
Here\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=14&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\nSAVE OVER 
$350 on this great bundle. \r\n\r\nGet Over 80% off AND $200 
of software FREE!\r\n\r\nClick 
Here\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=14&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\nThis Polaroid 
Digital Camera Special comes with everything you 
need:\r\n\r\n- Polaroid PhotoMAX PDC 330 Digital Camera\r\n- 
Over $200 of FREE Software\r\n- Award winning image editing 
software\r\n- Batteries, Wrist Strap and USB Cable\r\n- And a 
BONUS GIFT!\r\n\r\nA Great Digital Camera from a brand you 
can trust!\r\n\r\nClick Here!!\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?
c=14&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
**********************************************
**********************************************
**\r\nThe preceding advertisement was sent you by virtue of 
your participation\r\nin the Special Product Offerings of 
Greenbamboo or our partners.  To \r\nunsubscribe from 
receiving further emails from Greenbamboo\'s Special 
\r\nProduct Offerings please click 
here:\r\n\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/unsub.cgi?
m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\nFor information 
about how Greenbamboo obtained your name and how 
\r\nGreenbamboo operates this list, please review 
http://www.greenbamboo.net/privacy.html \r\nAs is stated in 
our Privacy Policy, Greenbamboo does not \r\npromote or 
endorse any of the companies advertising through us. Please 
\r\ncontact Greenbamboo for any comments you may have 
regarding your \r\nparticipation. We may transfer your e-mail 
address to our partners at \r\nany time.zc3gbhe^vyyhqvhz
(pbz\r\n****************************************
**********************************************
*****\r\n'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788019&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 12:15:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 14:16:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786956 ] unable to activate
	toolbar buttons
Message-ID: <E19n09z-0003dd-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786956, was opened at 2003-08-11 15:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hbrackett
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: unable to activate toolbar buttons

Initial Comment:
After installing (sb-007.exe) on my 

Win XP Pro Danish SP1, 
Office XP SBE Danish SP1

i'm unable to use any buttons at the toolbar. Nothing 
just happens.

Also tried installing source version with same result.

logfile attached


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-13 14:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

Try this:
Enable the SpamBayes toolbar:
View>Toolbars>SpamBayes

Customize main toolbar, drag old SpamBayes buttons off.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 14:30:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 16:30:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786956 ] unable to activate
	toolbar buttons
Message-ID: <E19n2G7-0006Yc-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786956, was opened at 2003-08-11 21:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by adamsen
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: unable to activate toolbar buttons

Initial Comment:
After installing (sb-007.exe) on my 

Win XP Pro Danish SP1, 
Office XP SBE Danish SP1

i'm unable to use any buttons at the toolbar. Nothing 
just happens.

Also tried installing source version with same result.

logfile attached


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Date: 2003-08-13 22:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=511191

Didn't help - still gets same error. The buttons are on their 
own toolbar (spambayes), but doesn't work.

Also there is nothing listed under 
Tools/Options/Advanced/COM-setting - and there should be 
what ?

new log attached

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-13 20:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

Try this:
Enable the SpamBayes toolbar:
View>Toolbars>SpamBayes

Customize main toolbar, drag old SpamBayes buttons off.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 16:39:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 18:40:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-675811 ] Dead buttons left on
	uninstall
Message-ID: <E19n4HW-000468-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #675811, was opened at 2003-01-28 12:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Dead buttons left on uninstall

Initial Comment:
The toolbar buttons are temporary, which causes 
problems if they are moved.  If they are permanent, then 
we are left with dead buttons if we uninstall the plugin 
(why would we do this? ;p ).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 10:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

That's right - I wrote that solution before SpamBayes had it's 
own toolbar.

If you right-click on the toolbar, then choose customize, then 
select the spambayes toolbar, then choose delete, it goes 
away and everything else is left alone.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-14 05:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

Dead buttons - Less drastic is to customize the toolbar and 
drag the spambayes buttons off. This avoids loosing all your 
customizations. I also had to select the spambayes toolbar in 
the View menu to see the real 0.6 buttons.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-04 00:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Still in the latest version, even with the new toolbar :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-01 12:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

For anyone reading this because they have buttons left over 
after uninstalling, you can get rid of them by resetting the 
toolbar.

(Right click on the toolbar, click
customize, then select the standard toolbar, then click reset).

Presumably the next release, when we have our own toolbar, 
will remove this issue and this can be closed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=675811&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 16:47:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 18:47:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787296 ] Local installation
	problem: hammiefilter_persistent_storage
Message-ID: <E19n4OY-0004Lm-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787296, was opened at 2003-08-12 21:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787296&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Volker Stolz (volkersf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Local installation problem: hammiefilter_persistent_storage

Initial Comment:
I have a local python 2.3 installation into $HOME/Linux and setup.py installed everything in the correct places (~/Linux/bin ~/Linux/lib/..python../site-packages/..), but when I run 'hammie.py' to train, I get:

Mail@atlas [11:53:46]> hammie.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/stolz/Linux/bin/hammie.py", line 4, in ?
    import spambayes.hammiebulk
  File "/home/stolz/Linux/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammiebulk.py", line 62, in ?
    DEFAULTDB = os.path.expanduser(options.hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file)
AttributeError: 'OptionsClass' object has no attribute 'hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file'

A 'regular' /usr/local-setup with Python 2.2 on FreeBSD works fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 10:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This is what comes of having too much backwards-
compatibility code all interacting with each other.

I've checked in a fix to cvs for this.

(Technically, the fix should be changing the line to:
DEFAULTDB = os.path.expanduser(options
["Storage", "persistent_storage_file"])
but the below suggestion will also work).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Peter Beckman (ooglek)
Date: 2003-08-14 03:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=68540

You can fix this:

Replace this line in hammiebulk.py (line 62):

DEFAULTDB =
os.path.expanduser(options.hammiefilter_persistent_storage_file)

with this line:

DEFAULTDB = os.path.expanduser(options.persistent_storage_file)

That fixed it for me.  I'm not a developer, so I may have
just broke it more, but SB is doing well at the moment, so
it must either have no effect, or I'm right. :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787296&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 16:48:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 18:48:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-788002 ] hammiebulk.py uses
	wrong option name
Message-ID: <E19n4Px-0004Of-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #788002, was opened at 2003-08-14 00:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788002&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: hammiebulk.py uses wrong option name

Initial Comment:
hammiebulk.py uses a wrong option name to get
persistent storage file. this little patch fixes it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 10:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Too much backwards compat options code trying to do too 
many things.

I've checked in a fix for this to cvs, thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788002&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 16:59:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 19:00:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-788001 ] mboxtrain.py maildir
	bugfix and feature
Message-ID: <E19n4b1-00011Q-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #788001, was opened at 2003-08-14 00:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788001&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: mboxtrain.py maildir bugfix and feature

Initial Comment:
hello,

the attached patch fixes wrong behaviour of
mboxtrain.py on Maildir mailboxes (creation of tmp
directory) and adds a parameter -r which removes each
mail after it has been used for training (Maildir only).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 10:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks.  A fix for the tmp directory problem has already been 
checked into cvs, but I've now checked in your improvements 
as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=788001&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 17:03:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 19:04:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788019 ] decoding of headers for
	some emails fails
Message-ID: <E19n4eJ-00016l-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788019, was opened at 2003-08-14 00:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788019&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: decoding of headers for some emails fails

Initial Comment:
some mails are incorrectly formed and so the default
error handling in Header.append() (strict) causes
spambayes to insert X-Spambayes-Exception in the mail
instead of continuing and classifying the mail. dirty
solution would be to set the errors parameter to 'ignore'.

unfortunately i don't have the exception message
already or the mail (spam), but remember that the mail
encoding was set to us-ascii and the character that
caused the exception in a call to unicode() wha
CURRENCY SIGN (0xa4)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 11:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

It's better for us to insert the exception header than crash.  
As ways that mail can be malformed are identified, a fix is 
checked in for them.  I'm fairly sure that your one has already 
had a fix checked into cvs - does it match this?

<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-
August/006779.html>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-14 06:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

This message failed to filter due to a Header Parse Error so it 
is probably related. 
Error training message '<MAPIMsgStoreMsg, 'Polaroid Digital 
Camera Liquidation' id=
('0000000038A1BB1005E5101AA1BB08002B2A56C20000505354
5052582E444C4C00000000000000004E495441F9BFB80100AA00
37D96E000000433A5C446F63756D656E747320616E6420536574
74696E67735C65627261636B6574745C4C6F63616C2053657474
696E67735C4170706C69636174696F6E20446174615C4D696372
6F736F66745C4F75746C6F6F6B5C6F75746C6F6F6B2E70737400
', '00000000E789B2E04680BC4384E3C07593D3337F44B02500')
>'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/train", line 91, in train_folder
  File "out1.pyz/train", line 46, in train_message
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 734, in GetEmailPackageObject
  File "out1.pyz/email", line 52, in message_from_string
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 64, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 239, in _parsebody
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 62, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 111, in _parseheaders
HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before first header
Checked 63 in folder Inbox - 59 new entries found.
Checked 38 in folder Inz_SpamSlammer - 31 new entries 
found.
Checked 909 in folder Spam - 752 new entries found.
FAILED to create email.message from:  'Return-path: 
<support@greenbamboo.net>\r\nReceived: from mtain04 
(mtain04-qfe0.icomcast.net [172.20.3.52])\r\n by 
msgstore04.icomcast.net\r\n (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 
HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003))\r\n with ESMTP id 
<0HJJ00H9I6UUS7@msgstore04.icomcast.net> for\r\n 
ebrackett@comcast.net; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:04:06 -0400 
(EDT)\r\nReceived: from sccrgxc02.comcast.net 
(sccrgxc02.comcast.net [204.127.202.62])\r\n by 
mtain04.icomcast.net\r\n (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 
HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003))\r\n with ESMTP id 
<0HJJ00FE36UU1N@mtain04.icomcast.net> for 
example@comcast.net\r\n (ORCPT example@comcast.net); 
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 20:04:06 -0400 (EDT)\r\nReceived: from 
office2.csi.net.uk (unknown[212.15.82.31](misconfigured 
sender))\r\n by comcast.net (sccrgxc02) with SMTP id 
<20030813000356e0200cmmeme>; Wed,\r\n 13 Aug 2003 
00:04:06 +0000\r\nReceived: from em20.greenbamboo.net 
(em20.greenbamboo.net [216.243.234.150])\r\n\tby 
office2.csi.net.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 3729A4807\tfor\r\n 
<mp3tour@illudium.com>; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:03:46 +0000 
(GMT)\r\nDate: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:10:58 -0600\r\nFrom: 
Andy Adams <support@greenbamboo.net>\r\nSubject: 
Polaroid Digital Camera Liquidation\r\nTo: 
mp3tour@illudium.com\r\nMessage-id: 
<1060733458.1154@em20.greenbamboo.net>\r\nMIME-
version: 1.0\r\nContent-type: multipart/alternative;\r\n 
boundary=Amazon.com_multipart_boundary____________\r\nO
riginal-recipient: 
rfc822;ebrackett@comcast.net\r\n\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<HTML>\r\n<H
EAD></HEAD>\r\n<BODY BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF LEFTMARGIN=0 
TOPMARGIN=0 MARGINWIDTH=0 
\r\n\r\nMARGINHEIGHT=0>\r\n<TABLE WIDTH=600 BORDER=0 
CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=0>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    
\r\n\r\n<TD COLSPAN=5> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
target="_blank"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_01.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=600 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=48 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 HEIGHT=48 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=5> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_02.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=600 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=23 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 HEIGHT=23 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=3> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_03.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=336 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=47 border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=2 ROWSPAN=2> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
\r\n\r\ntarget="_blank"><IMG 
SRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroidemail/ph
otomax_email_2_04.gif" ALT="" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=264 
HEIGHT=202 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" WIDTH=1 HEIGHT=47 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
\r\n\r\nCOLSPAN=3 ROWSPAN=2> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
target="_blank"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_05.jpg" ALT="" WIDTH=336 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=168 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 
HEIGHT=155 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=2> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
\r\n\r\ntarget="_blank"><IMG 
SRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroidemail/ph
otomax_email_2_06.jpg" \r\n\r\nALT="" WIDTH=218 
HEIGHT=91 border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=2> <IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_07.gif" WIDTH=46 HEIGHT=91 
\r\n\r\nALT=""></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" WIDTH=1 \r\n\r\nHEIGHT=13 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=3> <IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_08.gif" WIDTH=8 HEIGHT=223 
\r\n\r\nALT=""></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD ROWSPAN=2> <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_09.jpg" ALT="" WIDTH=147 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=219 border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
ROWSPAN=3> <a href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_10.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=181 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=223 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 HEIGHT=78 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD 
COLSPAN=2 ROWSPAN=2> <a 
\r\n\r\nhref="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=15&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" 
target="_blank"><IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://www.bluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_11.gif" ALT="" WIDTH=264 
\r\n\r\nHEIGHT=145 
border="0"></a></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" \r\n\r\nWIDTH=1 
HEIGHT=141 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n\t<TR>\r\n\t\t\r\n    <TD> <IMG 
\r\n\r\nSRC="http://wwwbluepinstripes.com/eimages/polaroide
mail/photomax_email_2_12.gif" WIDTH=147 HEIGHT=4 
\r\n\r\nALT=""></TD>\r\n\t\t<TD>\r\n\t\t\t<IMG 
SRC="polaroidimages/spacer.gif" WIDTH=1 \r\n\r\nHEIGHT=4 
ALT=""></TD>\r\n\t</TR>\r\n</TABLE>\r\n<p> 
</p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<IMG SRC="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/view?v=7&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com" WIDTH=1 
HEIGHT=1 
ALT="">\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br
><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><table 
border="0" width="515" cellspacing="0"cellpadding="0" 
align=center>\r\n\r\n<tr><td><font 
color="#000000">*********************************
***************************************</tr></td
>\r\n\r\n<tr><td>\r\n\r\n<font color="#000000">The 
preceding advertisement was sent you by virtue of your 
participation in the Special Product Offerings of Greenbamboo 
or our partners.  To\r\nunsubscribe from receiving further 
emails from Greenbamboo Special Product Offerings please <a 
href="http://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/unsub.cgi?
m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com">click 
here</a>.\r\n\r\n<br><br>\r\n\r\nFor information about how 
Greenbamboo obtained your name and how Greenbamboo 
operates this list, please review our <A 
href="http://www.greenbamboo.net/privacy.html">Privacy 
Policy</A>.\r\nAs is stated in our Privacy Policy, 
Greenbamboo does not promote or endorse any of the 
companies advertising through us. Please contact 
Greenbamboo for any comments you may have regarding your 
participation.  We may transfer your e-mail address to our 
partners at\r\nany time.zc3gbhe^vyyhqvhz
(pbz</td></tr>\r\n\r\n<tr><td><font 
color="#000000">*********************************
**************************************</font><br
><br><br>\r\n\r\n</td></tr></table></pre></body></html>--
Amazon.com_multipart_boundary____________\n #Polaroid 
PhotoMAX PDC 330 Digital Camera! Great Camera\r\nBetter 
Price! 3 in 1 Camera - Digital, Web & Video Cam.\r\n\r\nClick 
Here\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=14&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\nSAVE OVER 
$350 on this great bundle. \r\n\r\nGet Over 80% off AND $200 
of software FREE!\r\n\r\nClick 
Here\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/clickthru?
c=14&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\nThis Polaroid 
Digital Camera Special comes with everything you 
need:\r\n\r\n- Polaroid PhotoMAX PDC 330 Digital Camera\r\n- 
Over $200 of FREE Software\r\n- Award winning image editing 
software\r\n- Batteries, Wrist Strap and USB Cable\r\n- And a 
BONUS GIFT!\r\n\r\nA Great Digital Camera from a brand you 
can trust!\r\n\r\nClick Here!!\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-
bin/clickthru?
c=14&m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
**********************************************
**********************************************
**\r\nThe preceding advertisement was sent you by virtue of 
your participation\r\nin the Special Product Offerings of 
Greenbamboo or our partners.  To \r\nunsubscribe from 
receiving further emails from Greenbamboo\'s Special 
\r\nProduct Offerings please click 
here:\r\n\r\nhttp://216.243.234.150/cgi-bin/unsub.cgi?
m=1005&e=mp3tour@illudium.com\r\n\r\nFor information 
about how Greenbamboo obtained your name and how 
\r\nGreenbamboo operates this list, please review 
http://www.greenbamboo.net/privacy.html \r\nAs is stated in 
our Privacy Policy, Greenbamboo does not \r\npromote or 
endorse any of the companies advertising through us. Please 
\r\ncontact Greenbamboo for any comments you may have 
regarding your \r\nparticipation. We may transfer your e-mail 
address to our partners at \r\nany time.zc3gbhe^vyyhqvhz
(pbz\r\n****************************************
**********************************************
*****\r\n'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788019&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 17:08:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 19:09:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788008 ] smtpproxy.py assumes too
	good format for addresses
Message-ID: <E19n4jV-00087q-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788008, was opened at 2003-08-14 00:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788008&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: smtpproxy.py assumes too good format for addresses

Initial Comment:
if smtpproxy.py is fed with addresses without <>'s it
fails because it uses index() method to locate < and >
(methods BayesSMTPProxy.strip{Address,To}).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 11:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Note that RFC821 says that the < and > are required, so this 
is really a bug in whatever program is feeding mail to the 
proxy.

However, in the interests of compatibility, I've checked in a 
fix for this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788008&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 18:37:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 20:37:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-788447 ] Outlook
	plugin great - POP3???????????
Message-ID: <E19n677-0003mH-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #788447, was opened at 2003-08-14 00:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook plugin great - POP3???????????

Initial Comment:
No documentation!!!!!!

Really great install info!!!!!!!!!!

No troubleshooting info!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can it be that the Windows version is better ....tell
me it isn't so!!!!!

All I get for ./pop3proxy.py -b is this cryptic response

SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2,
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).
 
Loading database... Done.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 760, in run
    CreateProxies(servers, proxyPorts, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 488, in CreateProxies
    listener = BayesSMTPProxyListener(server,
serverPort, proxyPort, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 228, in __init__
    Dibbler.Listener.__init__(self, proxyPort,
BayesSMTPProxy, proxyArgs)
  File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 267, in __init__
    self.bind(port)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line 311, in bind
    return self.socket.bind (addr)
socket.error: (98, 'Address already in use')

Looks like an IBM core dump ....yes I am that old!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 19:02:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 21:02:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-788447 ] Outlook
	plugin great - POP3???????????
Message-ID: <E19n6V8-0002C2-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #788447, was opened at 2003-08-14 12:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook plugin great - POP3???????????

Initial Comment:
No documentation!!!!!!

Really great install info!!!!!!!!!!

No troubleshooting info!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can it be that the Windows version is better ....tell
me it isn't so!!!!!

All I get for ./pop3proxy.py -b is this cryptic response

SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2,
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).
 
Loading database... Done.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 760, in run
    CreateProxies(servers, proxyPorts, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 488, in CreateProxies
    listener = BayesSMTPProxyListener(server,
serverPort, proxyPort, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 228, in __init__
    Dibbler.Listener.__init__(self, proxyPort,
BayesSMTPProxy, proxyArgs)
  File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 267, in __init__
    self.bind(port)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line 311, in bind
    return self.socket.bind (addr)
socket.error: (98, 'Address already in use')

Looks like an IBM core dump ....yes I am that old!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 13:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The important bit in a traceback is usually at the end.  In this 
case, it's telling you that the "Address [is] already in use".  
IOW, it's trying to use a port that is already taken by 
something else.  You're probably using port 110, so try some 
other port - 1110, perhaps.

pop3proxy is cross-platform, BTW.  And yes, in terms of 
usability, the Outlook plug-in probably is better.  This is 
because it's a plug-in, not because it's on Windows, though.

There is documentation, too, it's just not as easy to find as 
you might hope.  The website (particularly the FAQ) is the 
best place to start, although it wouldn't have answered this 
question.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 19:13:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 21:14:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-788447 ] Outlook
	plugin great - POP3???????????
Message-ID: <E19n6gH-0002Ya-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #788447, was opened at 2003-08-14 00:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by oldcyberdude
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook plugin great - POP3???????????

Initial Comment:
No documentation!!!!!!

Really great install info!!!!!!!!!!

No troubleshooting info!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can it be that the Windows version is better ....tell
me it isn't so!!!!!

All I get for ./pop3proxy.py -b is this cryptic response

SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2,
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).
 
Loading database... Done.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 760, in run
    CreateProxies(servers, proxyPorts, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 488, in CreateProxies
    listener = BayesSMTPProxyListener(server,
serverPort, proxyPort, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 228, in __init__
    Dibbler.Listener.__init__(self, proxyPort,
BayesSMTPProxy, proxyArgs)
  File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 267, in __init__
    self.bind(port)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line 311, in bind
    return self.socket.bind (addr)
socket.error: (98, 'Address already in use')

Looks like an IBM core dump ....yes I am that old!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude)
Date: 2003-08-14 01:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=495386

Yes  I guess I understand that it thinks the port is in use
but since the configuration tool won't come up with a -b how
can I change the port configuration.

OBTW the FAQ etc says to configure using 110 since that is
POP3 standard. Why do the docs recommend 110 when it just
conflicts with standard POP3. BTW, I didn't have any e-mail
clients running when I used pop3proxy. I am running a pretty
vanilla RH 9.0   I normally use web mail  and  occasionally
Ximian Evolution for ISP mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 01:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The important bit in a traceback is usually at the end.  In this 
case, it's telling you that the "Address [is] already in use".  
IOW, it's trying to use a port that is already taken by 
something else.  You're probably using port 110, so try some 
other port - 1110, perhaps.

pop3proxy is cross-platform, BTW.  And yes, in terms of 
usability, the Outlook plug-in probably is better.  This is 
because it's a plug-in, not because it's on Windows, though.

There is documentation, too, it's just not as easy to find as 
you might hope.  The website (particularly the FAQ) is the 
best place to start, although it wouldn't have answered this 
question.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 19:21:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 21:21:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-788447 ] Outlook
	plugin great - POP3???????????
Message-ID: <E19n6nf-0000Vb-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #788447, was opened at 2003-08-14 12:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook plugin great - POP3???????????

Initial Comment:
No documentation!!!!!!

Really great install info!!!!!!!!!!

No troubleshooting info!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can it be that the Windows version is better ....tell
me it isn't so!!!!!

All I get for ./pop3proxy.py -b is this cryptic response

SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2,
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).
 
Loading database... Done.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "./pop3proxy.py", line 760, in run
    CreateProxies(servers, proxyPorts, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 488, in CreateProxies
    listener = BayesSMTPProxyListener(server,
serverPort, proxyPort, state)
  File "./smtpproxy.py", line 228, in __init__
    Dibbler.Listener.__init__(self, proxyPort,
BayesSMTPProxy, proxyArgs)
  File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 267, in __init__
    self.bind(port)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line 311, in bind
    return self.socket.bind (addr)
socket.error: (98, 'Address already in use')

Looks like an IBM core dump ....yes I am that old!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 13:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Well, you must have entered a port somehow, otherwise it 
wouldn't be trying to bind one - unless it's the http binding 
that is failing.  In any case, you can use the command line 
args - just run "pop3proxy.py -h" for information.  If it's the 
http that is conflicting, then you need to use the -u switch, 
otherwise just pass along the correct information.

Information about how to edit the config without the web 
interface is in the FAQ, 4.11 and 4.12:
<http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-do-i-
configure-pop3proxy-imapfilter-etc-without-a-web-browser>

Port 110 is recommended because this means that you don't 
have to change the port in your MUA (quite difficult in some, 
like Eudora).  It doesn't conflict unless you are running 
something (a POP3 server or proxy, probably) on your local 
machine - not many people do this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude)
Date: 2003-08-14 13:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=495386

Yes  I guess I understand that it thinks the port is in use
but since the configuration tool won't come up with a -b how
can I change the port configuration.

OBTW the FAQ etc says to configure using 110 since that is
POP3 standard. Why do the docs recommend 110 when it just
conflicts with standard POP3. BTW, I didn't have any e-mail
clients running when I used pop3proxy. I am running a pretty
vanilla RH 9.0   I normally use web mail  and  occasionally
Ximian Evolution for ISP mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-14 13:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The important bit in a traceback is usually at the end.  In this 
case, it's telling you that the "Address [is] already in use".  
IOW, it's trying to use a port that is already taken by 
something else.  You're probably using port 110, so try some 
other port - 1110, perhaps.

pop3proxy is cross-platform, BTW.  And yes, in terms of 
usability, the Outlook plug-in probably is better.  This is 
because it's a plug-in, not because it's on Windows, though.

There is documentation, too, it's just not as easy to find as 
you might hope.  The website (particularly the FAQ) is the 
best place to start, although it wouldn't have answered this 
question.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=788447&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 21:12:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 13 23:13:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788495 ] Filter fails when folder
	full
Message-ID: <E19n8Xb-0008Ea-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788495, was opened at 2003-08-14 13:12
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788495&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filter fails when folder full

Initial Comment:
As reported on the mailing list and to me personally. 
MAPI_E_TABLE_FULL error needs to be caught and reported.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788495&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 13 23:26:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 14 01:27:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783914 ] registration error
	0x0000000 during install
Message-ID: <E19nAcs-0007Vc-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783914, was opened at 2003-08-06 06:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by wernerpro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error 0x0000000 during install

Initial Comment:
Reported twice.  Both times XP as the OS, once with
Outlook XP SP2, other not specified.

NFI :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro)
Date: 2003-08-14 07:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842937

Hi Buzz,
it helped, but first at the second attempt. The first try failed 
and showed the return code 0x80040201.
Now I will see how it works and start with configuring.

Regards Werner.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-13 15:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

wernerpro,
Per my comment below I had same issue.
I got around it by running "regsvr32 spambayes_addin.dll" 
from the directory in which spambayes_addin.dll resides.
I did this while the error message was on the screen then 
chose ignore to continue with the install.

Hope this helps,
Buzz

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Werner Prothmann (wernerpro)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842937

I can't install SpamBayes, even when I kill all unnecessary 
processes. Now only the following processes activ:
smss, csrss, winlogon, services, lsass,
svchost (3 times) spoolsv, taskmgr, regsvc, mstask, winmgmt 
and explorer. 
Are there any ideas what I can do, to come over registration 
error 0x0000000?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dan Warburton (warb)
Date: 2003-08-12 16:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=83150

I encountered this problem. I think it was an backgroud office 
in my startup folder. 
 
Kill some QZ... something process and install completed. 
 
sorry I did not make a note of the process name. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Merrill (barry99)
Date: 2003-08-07 15:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839327

I found that stopping Norton Anti-Virus eliminated this install 
error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-07 01:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

One user saw this traceback:
Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 16, in DllRegisterServer
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1205, in RegisterAddin
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 299, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Buzz Aldrich (buzz4209)
Date: 2003-08-06 19:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=436678

I experienced the same error on windows XP SP1a, all hotfixes 
current (8/6/03) using Outlook XP also Patched.

I killed all running tasks except those required by OS for basic 
functionality and still had error.

Running Regsvr32.exe by hand from spambayes directory 
worked.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mike OBrien (mobri2a)
Date: 2003-08-06 15:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838924

Outlook 2000 SP-1 and SP-3 on Win2K - encountered the 
same problem.  Closed ALL Windows apps and killed 
unnecessary processes a wowexec.exe NTVM that I couldn't 
identify, QuickTime systray process, PWComm.exe 
(Photoworks uploader).  Afterwards the install ran clean.  If I 
can identify exactly which process caused the error I'll post 
an update.

(Word is *not* my default email editor)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 11:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From one of the reporters:
I tried killing lots of background processes and managed to
get it to install.  It turns out that WINWORD.EXE was
running (even though no windows were open).  I think this
happens when Word is the default e-mail editor.

MH: Which probably means the installer should also ensure
WinWord is down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 06:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Other reporter has Outlook 2000. Existing add-ins include
both VirusScan7 related stuff and a Windows CE addin for
ActiveSync 3.7, along with the optional WinFax plugin


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 14 06:31:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 14 09:03:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786759 ] Outlook
	French
Message-ID: <E19nHGh-0002zY-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786759, was opened at 2003-08-11 11:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by coalliera
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook French

Initial Comment:
I use W2k pro french and outlook 2000 french,
After installion, I open outlook and I have a message 
say"There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin
please re-start outlook and try again.??

SpamBayes addin does works with french 
environment????

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-14 08:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

...

Not in your profil, but in your "outlook profil".

Right click on your Outlook Icon and choose "Propri?t?s" ...

Then click on "afficher les profils"

The default name is "Param?tres Microsoft Exchange" ... if so, 
rename it (You must use "copie" and after delete the other 
one)

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Date: 2003-08-13 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842228

Hi,
In my profil name, they have no special carater like ? ? ? ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-11 20:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi, ...

Check your Outlook profil name ... if there is character like "?" 
that's your problem!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 14 07:42:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 14 09:45:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786759 ] Outlook
	French
Message-ID: <E19nIN9-0006LH-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786759, was opened at 2003-08-11 11:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sgroulx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook French

Initial Comment:
I use W2k pro french and outlook 2000 french,
After installion, I open outlook and I have a message 
say"There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin
please re-start outlook and try again.??

SpamBayes addin does works with french 
environment????

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Date: 2003-08-14 09:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842228

Thanks you Alex, your solution works :)
Sebas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-14 08:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

...

Not in your profil, but in your "outlook profil".

Right click on your Outlook Icon and choose "Propri?t?s" ...

Then click on "afficher les profils"

The default name is "Param?tres Microsoft Exchange" ... if so, 
rename it (You must use "copie" and after delete the other 
one)

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Date: 2003-08-13 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842228

Hi,
In my profil name, they have no special carater like ? ? ? ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-11 20:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi, ...

Check your Outlook profil name ... if there is character like "?" 
that's your problem!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 14 09:15:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 14 11:15:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty
	Spam, Potential Spam folders
Message-ID: <E19nJob-000656-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 08:15
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Next Release (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders

Initial Comment:
I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the 
way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam 
going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your 
plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list 
which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, 
as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That 
would save me the added steps of selecting all the 
messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and 
then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day 
message retention, and after that time deletion, but I 
try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have 
time.......


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 14 11:37:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 14 13:37:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788845 ] imapfilter training fails
Message-ID: <E19nM2K-0005bV-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788845, was opened at 2003-08-14 17:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: imapfilter training fails

Initial Comment:
Using latest CVS, Python 2.2.2, connecting to a Courier 
IMAP server.  Web interface of imapfilter can connect 
and see the imap folders on the server.  When I try 
training (with messages in the TrainSpam folder) I get 
the following traceback, I am willing to help anyone 
debug this:

[gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 
spambayes/imapfilter.py -v -t
SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, 
version 0.01
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from 
hammie.db database
hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 
ham
Done.
Training
   Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam
       0 trained.
   Training spam folder INBOX.SB.TrainSpam
*.Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ?
    run()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run
    imap_filter.Train()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 607, in Train
    num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True)
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train
    msg.Save()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save
    response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS 
INTERNALDATE)")
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid
    typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, 
command) + args)
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in 
_simple_command
    return self._command_complete(name, apply
(self._command, (name,) + args))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in 
_command
    data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in 
_checkquote
    if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')):
IndexError: string index out of range

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 01:31:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 03:31:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788051 ] database corruption
	(bdddb)
Message-ID: <E19nZ3D-0006vw-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788051, was opened at 2003-08-13 13:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: database corruption (bdddb)

Initial Comment:
when the pop3proxy.py is run for some longish time (2
hours) the database file (DBM) gets corrupted and each
mail then contains:

X-Spambayes-Exception:
bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30989,
        'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error,
        run database recovery')) in __getitem__() at
        /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py line 86:
return
        self.db[key]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-15 07:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

We still don't know what causes this, but as a workaround
you can delete your spambayes.messageinfo.db file - that
file doesn't (yet) do anything important for pop3proxy, and
it's that file that's becoming corrupt.  A new one will be
created, which may eventually become corrupt as well -
again, just delete it.  You'll need to stop pop3proxy while
you delete it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Date: 2003-08-13 16:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=698198

the operating system is RH 7.2 with those versions of the
Berkeley DB:
db1-1.85-7
db2-2.4.14-7
db3-3.2.9-4

sorry i didn't include this in right away with the bug report.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-13 15:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Which operating system, and which version of Sleepycat's 
Berkeley code (spambayes shouldn't be able to corrupt a 
Berkeley DB, so the problem is probably specific to the bsddb 
version in use)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 02:59:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 04:59:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785389 ] Folders missing in
	Spambayes manager
Message-ID: <E19naQG-0001cZ-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785389, was opened at 2003-08-08 15:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bassettg
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jared (jared71)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folders missing in Spambayes manager

Initial Comment:
Afer installing Spambayes on win2k pro /outlook 2000, I 
create my spam folders and open up the manager from 
the toolbar. When I click on "train now" and 
then "browse" after "folders with know good messges" 
the window that pops up does not contain any outloook 
folders. 

A coworker has successfully installed this on the same 
os/office dist. and folders appear under his manager.

thanks,

jared

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Bassett (bassettg)
Date: 2003-08-15 10:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=845112

I have the same problem and can send another log file with 
errors if it is useful.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 18:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach a log?  See the "troubleshooting guide"

Mark.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 03:07:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 05:07:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789130 ] gets
	X-Spambayes-Exception on some spam messages
Message-ID: <E19naYc-0001zE-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789130, was opened at 2003-08-15 13:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789130&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexey Klimkin (klimkin)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: gets X-Spambayes-Exception on some spam messages

Initial Comment:
For a lot of spam messages I get the following exception:

From: willy@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Subject: AAxta, &#1076;&#1053;&#1071;&#1056;&#1070;&#1041;&#1049;&#1070; &#1061; &#1056;&#1070;&#1051;&#1053;&#1060;&#1045;&#1052;&#1052;&#1070;&#1066; &#1053;&#1042;&#1061;&#1071;&#1056;&#1049;&#1070; ceBIpEni
Message-ID: <B56HC2D68DHF5DEI@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
  charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-UIDL: ~?B!!4fK!!nAc"!CRf!!
Status: RO
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 272: ustr =
unicode(s,
	incodec, errors)

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;
Charset=Windows-1251">
<HTML>
...

I have tried to reproduce an exception, but the same
message don't generate an exception the second time
(after redirection).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789130&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 03:46:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 05:46:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789142 ] ERROR: 'There was an
	error initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19nbAS-0001ZW-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789142, was opened at 2003-08-15 09:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789142&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas K?hler (rovema)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
After opening Outlook I received the following error:
'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin.
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

The log-file contains the following detailed informations:

Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 248, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 519, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/ntpath", line 101, in join
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte
0xf6 in position 9: ordinal not in range(128)
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'

WORKAROUND:
===========
As I found that the character 0xf6 (representing "?", a
german umlaut) is part of my Outlook profile name, I
copied the profile to a name without the umlaut and
than i could start Outlook successfully !

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789142&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 05:09:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 07:09:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785389 ] Folders missing in
	Spambayes manager
Message-ID: <E19ncSY-00023X-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785389, was opened at 2003-08-08 15:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bassettg
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jared (jared71)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folders missing in Spambayes manager

Initial Comment:
Afer installing Spambayes on win2k pro /outlook 2000, I 
create my spam folders and open up the manager from 
the toolbar. When I click on "train now" and 
then "browse" after "folders with know good messges" 
the window that pops up does not contain any outloook 
folders. 

A coworker has successfully installed this on the same 
os/office dist. and folders appear under his manager.

thanks,

jared

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Bassett (bassettg)
Date: 2003-08-15 13:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=845112

In my case, the cause of the problem is a new, empty, un-
accessed personal folder file (used for Possible SPAM). 
Remove, access, or place something in that personal folder, 
and the problem disappears and everything works correctly 
(in my case).

I hope this helps.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Bassett (bassettg)
Date: 2003-08-15 10:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=845112

I have the same problem and can send another log file with 
errors if it is useful.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-08 18:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach a log?  See the "troubleshooting guide"

Mark.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 09:16:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 11:17:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786284 ] Outlook XP Corrupted
Message-ID: <E19ngK3-0008Bx-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786284, was opened at 2003-08-10 11:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by moonraker69
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786284&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Deleted
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Dominguez (moonraker69)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook XP Corrupted

Initial Comment:
I installed the lates version of Bayesian Anti-Spam 
software (007) onto my XP Professional box using 
Outlook XP with all of the latest patches as of 8/8/03.  I 
also use McAfee 6.0 with the latest virus dat and 
updates, inluding it's Outlook Hawk add-in.

I pull mail from several internet services and from an 
Exchange server.   

The install seemed to work fine and Outlook started and 
all appeared fine.  I couldn't do much with the tool since 
it needed at least 5 valid and 5 invalid emails to begin 
classifying them.  But at one point, as I was receiving 
mail and Outlook locked up for a moment, then 
terminated.  When I restarted, I received an immediate 
error message said that it failed to start and the check 
box asking whether I wanted a restart was checked.  
When I said OK, it asked me if I wanted to restart 
in "Safe mode"  - that's Outlook's safe mode.  I said yes, 
and it took me into a generic Outlook profile that was 
partially functional, as you'd expect from a "safe mode".

I have tried everything, including uninstalling the 
Bayesian Anti-Spam, Outlook itself, and even a system 
checkpoint restoration to a day before.  I have disabled 
all profiles, created a new profile and basically started a 
generic Outlook with no mail POPs or Exchange servers 
configured.

No matter what I do, when I run Outlook now, it always 
runs in safe mode.

I'd like a list of all new DLLs or DLLs that have been 
overwritten as well as registry keys so I can purge 
Bayesian Anti-Spam from the system and try a new 
Outlook re-install.

Suggestions would also be helpful.  Short of a full 
system re-install, I am at a loss as to what to do.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bobby Dominguez (moonraker69)
Date: 2003-08-15 11:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=841167

I have gone through the system and removed everything 
dealing with outlook from the Documents sections and was 
able to get it to re-install properly. I'll close this, however, I 
wish I had more info on why this occured before I reinstall 
this cool addin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786284&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 09:59:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 11:59:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789319 ] storage.py verbose
	prints to stderr
Message-ID: <E19ngz2-00056q-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #789319, was opened at 2003-08-15 10:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter)
Summary: storage.py verbose prints to stderr

Initial Comment:
When the global verbose option is set, storage.py 
dumps a bunch of info messages to stdout.  For people
unfortunate enough to be running a SpamBayes tool
which dumps email to stdout, this causes problems.

The attached patch changes the prints so they go to
stderr instead.  I'd just apply this but I don't know if there
was a valid reason for such messages go to stdout.

Assigning to Anthony 'cuz it appears that most of the prints
were added on his watch... (that will teach you to check
stuff in! ;-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 10:53:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 12:53:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747945 ] apparent corruption of
	Received lines
Message-ID: <E19nhpN-0003eC-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747945, was opened at 2003-06-03 06:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rmanfredi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: apparent corruption of Received lines

Initial Comment:
It looks like the message header is corrupted by
hammiefilter.py.  Here's my evidence:

I'm running the 1.0a2 release.

I use "mailagent" to filter my mail, which is like
procmail (with a much cleaner code base and readable
rules) and I've set up the rules like that:

### Begin SPAM filtering section ###
       
{
    FEED ~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py;
    RESYNC;
    REJECT;
};
         
X-Spambayes-Classification:
    /^spam/     { REJECT SPAM }
    /^ham/      { REJECT INITIAL }
    /^unsure/   { REJECT LOST };
       
# Dispatch to spam/lost, keep going if ham...
<LOST,SPAM>     { VACATION off; BIFF off; REJECT };   
<LOST>          { SAVE lost };
<SPAM>          { SAVE spam };
         
### End of SPAM filtering section ###

The "FEED" command pipes the message to the specified
scripts and gets the output back as the new message.
The RESYNC command reparses the headers, since they
might have been changed by the command (and indeed,
they are since X-Spambayes-Classification is added!).

However, here are the logs I see:

------------------------------
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: FROM
<tvd_documentation@nai.com>
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: RELAYED
hbs43-138.hbs.edu, orb.pobox.com, pop.free.fr, lyon.ram.loc
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: ABOUT Approved
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #68
in mode INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:39 mailagent[277851]: FED [qm16938]
through '~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: WARNING no by in
first Received: line 'from localhost (mail@localhost
[127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for <ram@localhost>; Tue, 3
Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: weird Received:
line 'from localhost (mail@localhost
[127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for <ram@localhost>; Tue, 3
Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: RESYNCED [qm16938]
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: REJECTED [qm16938]
in state INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #69
in mode INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: entering new state
SPAM
---------------------------------

Look at the WARNING about the absence of "by" in
Received.  The problem is that no such warning is
originally emitted, but it appears during RESYNC when
the headers are reparsed after the message went through
hammiefilter.py.

This indicates a corruption problem, since mailagent
uses the same code to reparse the headers during RESYNC
as it used originally, and no warning were emitted
before FEED was run.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi)
Date: 2003-08-15 16:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=13887

Upon looking, it does not seem to happen any longer with the
beta4 version.  I'll keep monitoring the logs for a few days.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 02:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Could you try this with alpha4 and let us know if it still occurs?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 11:51:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 13:51:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-741914 ] Unable to Register DLL
	Error
Message-ID: <E19nijr-0001C9-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #741914, was opened at 2003-05-22 18:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by iambab
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gary Thomas (garyt977)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Unable to Register DLL Error

Initial Comment:
I'm running WinXP and Office 2000 Professional.  When I
attempt to install the binary version on my system I
get the following error:

----
C:\Program files\Spambayes Outlook
Addin\Spambayes_addin.dll

Unable to register the DLL/OCX:DllRegister failed:code
0x00000000

Abort, Retry, Fail
----

After searching my hard drive, I was unable to find a
log file for this program.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bret A. Bennett (iambab)
Date: 2003-08-15 17:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=845404

I received this error too when I chose a non-default 
installation directory for Spambayes. So I aborted the initial 
install and retried the install and let it use the default install 
directory: the failed dll registration error did not appear this 
time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dave Sutton (daveski)
Date: 2003-08-12 23:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=843381

After chasing round various 'dupes' I think this report 
describes most accurately my experience.

Same error (0x00000000) with Spambayes_addin.dll

007 binary on W2K SP4, OL2000 Corporate or Workgroup.

After many attempts I clicked Ignore on the message and 
looked in my temp folder and all the .log files were zero bytes. 
I opened OL and went to:

Tools / Options and chose Other
Advanced Options and COM Add-Ins
Clicked Add and located Spambayes_addin.dll.

After restarting OL, Spambayes seems to work.

Oddly if I got to the COM Add-Ins again, nothing is listed.

I hope this helps some frustrated users.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 23:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Dupe of
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=740198&group_id=61702&atid=498103


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 12:07:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 14:07:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789394 ] SpamBayes Manager
	Filtering Config
Message-ID: <E19niyl-00021J-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789394, was opened at 2003-08-15 11:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789394&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Vincent (hired_goon)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes Manager Filtering Config

Initial Comment:
While defining my filters for where to put spam / good
mail etc. I clicked on a bad folder and hit OK before I
noticed (wish I could tell you what folder that was...)

For "Possible Spam" I then had the folder "IPM_SUBTREE"
listed in the "Moved to folder:" box.  Clicking on
"Browse" again presented me with a blank folder list
(no possible selections).  Clicking around that window
triggered a "Selected 0 folders" message to appear at
the bottom of the dialog, but I could not change this
setting.

Changing to "Copied to folder" did not help. 
Uninstalling and reinstalling did not help.

I fixed my issue by closing Outlook and making sure all
OUTLOOK.EXE processes were closed, locating the INI
file and removing everything on the same line after the
"unsure_folder_id:" field, restarting Outlook and then
reconfiguring the Possible Spam Folder.

This was on a Windows 2000 SP4 workstation with Outlook
2000 SP3 and all other patches installed.

-hg

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789394&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 14:38:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 16:38:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789130 ] gets
	X-Spambayes-Exception on some spam messages
Message-ID: <E19nlKo-0004B6-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789130, was opened at 2003-08-15 09:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789130&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexey Klimkin (klimkin)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: gets X-Spambayes-Exception on some spam messages

Initial Comment:
For a lot of spam messages I get the following exception:

From: willy@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Subject: AAxta, &#1076;&#1053;&#1071;&#1056;&#1070;&#1041;&#1049;&#1070; &#1061; &#1056;&#1070;&#1051;&#1053;&#1060;&#1045;&#1052;&#1052;&#1070;&#1066; &#1053;&#1042;&#1061;&#1071;&#1056;&#1049;&#1070; ceBIpEni
Message-ID: <B56HC2D68DHF5DEI@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
  charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-UIDL: ~?B!!4fK!!nAc"!CRf!!
Status: RO
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 272: ustr =
unicode(s,
	incodec, errors)

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;
Charset=Windows-1251">
<HTML>
...

I have tried to reproduce an exception, but the same
message don't generate an exception the second time
(after redirection).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-15 20:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

This is fixed in CVS - see 
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-
August/006779.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789130&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 14:40:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 16:40:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-787251 ] Problem
	refreshing message list
Message-ID: <E19nlN5-0004HL-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #787251, was opened at 2003-08-12 08:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David McNab (davidmcnab)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem refreshing message list

Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've just installed SpamBayes from CVS.

Got a small problem with the SpamBayes message cache.

Firstly, I retrieve messages with my pop3 client
(Evolution) via SpamBayes pop3proxy.

Then when I click on the Review Messages link in
SpamBayes web interface, the newly retrieved messages
don't appear.

I've found a workaround - by clicking on the
Configuration link, then saving the configuration
unchanged, I can then click on 'Review Messages' and
see all the messages I've just retrieved.

It would feel more convenient if I didn't need to do
this, especially in these early days while I'm training
SpamBayes.

Am I doing anything wrong? Is there anything I can do?

Cheers
David




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-15 20:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

David,

Is this still happening for you?  I've seen this happen the
first time a new installation of Spambayes is run, but it's
always sorted itself out after the first time.  (Not that I'm
denying it's a problem, just looking for more information.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 15:46:39 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 15 17:46:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-789534 ] Error
Message-ID: <E19nmP9-0002yG-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #789534, was opened at 2003-08-15 14:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error

Initial Comment:
I'm using the pop3proxy in windows. I get the following 
header added from spambayes:



X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at C:\my path\spambayes-1.0a4
\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert hamcount <= 
nham


Any idea what is causing this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 23:27:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 01:27:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-789534 ] Error
Message-ID: <E19ntas-0006n0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #789534, was opened at 2003-08-16 09:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error

Initial Comment:
I'm using the pop3proxy in windows. I get the following 
header added from spambayes:



X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at C:\my path\spambayes-1.0a4
\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert hamcount <= 
nham


Any idea what is causing this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-16 17:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This means that your database has become corrupted.  The 
only reasonable solution is to retrain from scratch.  If this is a 
recurring problem, please read FAQ 5.2:

http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 23:31:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 01:31:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789319 ] storage.py verbose
	prints to stderr
Message-ID: <E19ntev-0006uH-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #789319, was opened at 2003-08-16 03:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter)
Summary: storage.py verbose prints to stderr

Initial Comment:
When the global verbose option is set, storage.py 
dumps a bunch of info messages to stdout.  For people
unfortunate enough to be running a SpamBayes tool
which dumps email to stdout, this causes problems.

The attached patch changes the prints so they go to
stderr instead.  I'd just apply this but I don't know if there
was a valid reason for such messages go to stdout.

Assigning to Anthony 'cuz it appears that most of the prints
were added on his watch... (that will teach you to check
stuff in! ;-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-16 17:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

It's not just storage.py that does this - corpus.py does as 
well (when using pop3proxy, for example).  Although this 
doesn't actually cause a problem like when using a tool that 
needs the stdout output, it's still (IMO) a PITA.

Two solutions come to mind:
 o We're happy that storage.py and corpus.py work as 
expected, and so a lot of these prints can be removed (and 
the ones that aren't can go to stderr)
 o We follow the example of the OL plug-in and change the 
verbose option to an integer, and have these messages print 
(to stderr) only at certain levels of verbosity.

Hmm...maybe this should be going to spambayes-dev?  (But 
then maybe Anthony will just do all of this ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 15 23:33:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 01:33:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789142 ] ERROR: 'There was an
	error initializing the SpamBayes addin
Message-ID: <E19ntgh-0006wO-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789142, was opened at 2003-08-15 21:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789142&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas K?hler (rovema)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin

Initial Comment:
After opening Outlook I received the following error:
'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin.
Please re-start Outlook and try again.'

The log-file contains the following detailed informations:

Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 248, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 519, in LoadConfig
  File "out1.pyz/ntpath", line 101, in join
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte
0xf6 in position 9: ordinal not in range(128)
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'

WORKAROUND:
===========
As I found that the character 0xf6 (representing "?", a
german umlaut) is part of my Outlook profile name, I
copied the profile to a name without the umlaut and
than i could start Outlook successfully !

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-16 17:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks!  This is a known issue and will be fixed in the next 
release.

For the moment, the workaround is exactly as you described...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789142&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 16 09:34:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 11:34:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-789534 ] Error
Message-ID: <E19o34t-0006SR-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #789534, was opened at 2003-08-15 14:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jasonsf
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error

Initial Comment:
I'm using the pop3proxy in windows. I get the following 
header added from spambayes:



X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at C:\my path\spambayes-1.0a4
\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert hamcount <= 
nham


Any idea what is causing this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Date: 2003-08-16 08:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=728935

I didn't have the which_database.py file so I downloaded it
and when I run I get the following error:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\My
Path\spambayes-1.0a4\utilities\which_database.py", line 33, in ?
    import bsddb3
ImportError: No module named bsddb3

I'm new to Python but am familiar to Perl. Is there a path
to the include files I need to add?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-15 22:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This means that your database has become corrupted.  The 
only reasonable solution is to retrain from scratch.  If this is a 
recurring problem, please read FAQ 5.2:

http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 16 11:11:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 13:11:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789815 ] Failure Adding Toolbar
	Command Items: Manager, Clues, ...
Message-ID: <E19o4aY-0004nU-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789815, was opened at 2003-08-16 10:11
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789815&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Kenny (bjkenny)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failure Adding Toolbar  Command Items: Manager, Clues, ...

Initial Comment:
I recently installed spambayes version 006 for use with 
Outlook (I'm running XP) The product worked with no 
problem and was soon filtering my email. 
 

A few days later I was experiencing problems with my 
emails. In an attempt to isolate the problem, I removed 
spambayes from my system (It later turned out the email 
problem had nothing to do with spambayes). After 
resolving my email problem, I then reinstalled 
spambayes. Since the re-install I have not been able to 
get spambayes enabled, The spambayes button does 
appear on the toolbar but attempts to get too the 
spambayes configuration options since the spambayes 
button appears to be dead (it offers only toolbar 
options). I have since retried the 
removal/shutdown/restart/reinstall process several times 
but it still does not work.
 

I then went to the web and found a newer version of 
spambayes (007). I downloaded and installed that 
version today, but it has done nothing to resolve the 
problem. I have checked through your documentation 
and bug reports along with the subscription mailings and 
have not really found any answers for my problem.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789815&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 16 16:16:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 18:16:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789916 ] Outlook Express
	mailboxes training
Message-ID: <E19o9L9-0004zt-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #789916, was opened at 2003-08-17 00:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789916&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook Express mailboxes training

Initial Comment:
This patch allows to train Outlook Express mailboxes in
SpamBayes Web management interface. Instead of
uploading an mbox file, just upload a .dbx file. This
patch will check if the uploaded file is a DBX one. If
it is not, it is treated as a regular mbox one. It the
uploaded file *is* a DBX one, it is converted into a
regular mbox content.

If there is an easy way to retrieve the uploaded file
extension, we could enhance the code. For instance, we
could have a dictionary mapping files extensions to
conversion functions (to convert file content to mbox).
Nonetheless this patch works fine and does not alter
training speed of regular mbox files.

The attached file contains the .diff file for
spambayes/UserInterface.py, and a new Python module,
named "oe", to put in spambayes/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789916&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 16 16:21:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 18:21:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789916 ] Outlook Express
	mailboxes training
Message-ID: <E19o9Qb-00057Z-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #789916, was opened at 2003-08-17 00:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789916&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook Express mailboxes training

Initial Comment:
This patch allows to train Outlook Express mailboxes in
SpamBayes Web management interface. Instead of
uploading an mbox file, just upload a .dbx file. This
patch will check if the uploaded file is a DBX one. If
it is not, it is treated as a regular mbox one. It the
uploaded file *is* a DBX one, it is converted into a
regular mbox content.

If there is an easy way to retrieve the uploaded file
extension, we could enhance the code. For instance, we
could have a dictionary mapping files extensions to
conversion functions (to convert file content to mbox).
Nonetheless this patch works fine and does not alter
training speed of regular mbox files.

The attached file contains the .diff file for
spambayes/UserInterface.py, and a new Python module,
named "oe", to put in spambayes/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-17 00:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

By the way, you might find some (C)2003 Romain GUY in my
files but know that I've applied the PSF license to my oe
module and after a discussion with one of the main
developers I agreed to remove my copyrights from the files
to fullfill the PSF requirements.  So you can just remove
that (C)2003 Romain GUY line.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789916&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 06:25:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 08:25:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages if
	probability header is turned on
Message-ID: <E19oMaz-0001gv-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-17 12:25
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages if probability header is turned on

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 12:35:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 14:35:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages if
	probability header is turned on
Message-ID: <E19oSNY-0002fx-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-17 12:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jridley
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages if probability header is turned on

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-17 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 13:55:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 15:55:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-789534 ] Error
Message-ID: <E19oTcu-00047s-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #789534, was opened at 2003-08-15 21:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error

Initial Comment:
I'm using the pop3proxy in windows. I get the following 
header added from spambayes:



X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at C:\my path\spambayes-1.0a4
\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert hamcount <= 
nham


Any idea what is causing this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-17 19:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You need bsddb3-4.1.6.win32-py2.2.exe from 
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13900


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Date: 2003-08-16 15:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=728935

I didn't have the which_database.py file so I downloaded it
and when I run I get the following error:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\My
Path\spambayes-1.0a4\utilities\which_database.py", line 33, in ?
    import bsddb3
ImportError: No module named bsddb3

I'm new to Python but am familiar to Perl. Is there a path
to the include files I need to add?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-16 05:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This means that your database has become corrupted.  The 
only reasonable solution is to retrain from scratch.  If this is a 
recurring problem, please read FAQ 5.2:

http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 18:41:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 20:42:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages if
	probability header is turned on
Message-ID: <E19oY5r-0005Wd-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-18 00:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages if probability header is turned on

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 12:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'll add the version info to the interface page, although note 
that this information is displayed in the window that you start 
pop3proxy in.  (If you double-click it, or run it as a service, 
then you won't see this, but you can always run it once to 
see the version info).

I'll close this for the moment, but if you can track down a 
problem where messages aren't displayed for review, please 
re-open.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-18 06:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 20:52:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 22:52:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-698036 ] pop3proxy
	security
Message-ID: <E19oa7q-0007mh-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #698036, was opened at 2003-03-05 16:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Assigned to: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Summary: pop3proxy security

Initial Comment:
Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy, so anyone can 
access the user interface from any computer, given a web browser 
and knowledge of the ip address and port.  Even if you didn't know the 
port, figuring it out wouldn't necessarily be difficult.  This allows 
several operations that could be security problems, including 
reading at least the first couple hundred characters of each mail 
body.

It would seem that the correct solution is to 
implement a challenge/authentication on the pop3proxy http 
server.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 04:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

What about middle-term solution ? A simple, handy solution
is similar to what many routers offer : just allow user to :

- set a list of trusted remote IPs
- set access to any remote IP
- reject any remote access

This is not hard to implement and should satisfy everybody.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Date: 2003-03-05 18:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=645698

Ya, the problem here is that I might want to allow remote connections, but 
I certainly don't want just anybody to be able to connect.  Skip's 
suggestion doesn't help here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-03-05 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

[Tim Stone]
> Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy

Not true - you can use the html_ui_allow_remote_connections
setting to reject connections from anywhere other than the local
machine.  This is a bit draconian - as you say, we should have
a better solution - but it's not as bad as you make out.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-03-05 17:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

I don't think this is a problem.  Just tell the webserver to listen on "localhost"
or "127.0.0.1", or maybe even "".  Connections from remote hosts won't be accepted.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 20:56:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 22:56:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-698036 ] pop3proxy
	security
Message-ID: <E19oaC1-0000wc-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #698036, was opened at 2003-03-06 04:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Assigned to: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Summary: pop3proxy security

Initial Comment:
Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy, so anyone can 
access the user interface from any computer, given a web browser 
and knowledge of the ip address and port.  Even if you didn't know the 
port, figuring it out wouldn't necessarily be difficult.  This allows 
several operations that could be security problems, including 
reading at least the first couple hundred characters of each mail 
body.

It would seem that the correct solution is to 
implement a challenge/authentication on the pop3proxy http 
server.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 14:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Sounds fine to me.  If you write a patch, I'll check it in.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 14:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

What about middle-term solution ? A simple, handy solution
is similar to what many routers offer : just allow user to :

- set a list of trusted remote IPs
- set access to any remote IP
- reject any remote access

This is not hard to implement and should satisfy everybody.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Date: 2003-03-06 06:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=645698

Ya, the problem here is that I might want to allow remote connections, but 
I certainly don't want just anybody to be able to connect.  Skip's 
suggestion doesn't help here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-03-06 06:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

[Tim Stone]
> Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy

Not true - you can use the html_ui_allow_remote_connections
setting to reject connections from anywhere other than the local
machine.  This is a bit draconian - as you say, we should have
a better solution - but it's not as bad as you make out.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-03-06 05:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

I don't think this is a problem.  Just tell the webserver to listen on "localhost"
or "127.0.0.1", or maybe even "".  Connections from remote hosts won't be accepted.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 20:56:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 22:56:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-790340 ] Don't cache
	Base64 mail attachements ?
Message-ID: <E19oaBz-0007ss-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #790340, was opened at 2003-08-18 04:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Don't cache Base64 mail attachements ?

Initial Comment:
I don't know how SpamBayes is treating mail
attachements but I guess it does not base its work on
Base64 ones (binary files). My mailbox is always full
of emails containing large attached files and this
makes my Spambayes cache grow large very quickly.

Is it possible to add an option in the configuration
panel preventing SpamBayes from caching such attached
files ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 17 20:58:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 22:58:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-698036 ] pop3proxy
	security
Message-ID: <E19oaDu-0007vm-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #698036, was opened at 2003-03-05 16:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Assigned to: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Summary: pop3proxy security

Initial Comment:
Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy, so anyone can 
access the user interface from any computer, given a web browser 
and knowledge of the ip address and port.  Even if you didn't know the 
port, figuring it out wouldn't necessarily be difficult.  This allows 
several operations that could be security problems, including 
reading at least the first couple hundred characters of each mail 
body.

It would seem that the correct solution is to 
implement a challenge/authentication on the pop3proxy http 
server.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 04:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Okay, I'll try to achieve this within the next few days.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 04:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Sounds fine to me.  If you write a patch, I'll check it in.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 04:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

What about middle-term solution ? A simple, handy solution
is similar to what many routers offer : just allow user to :

- set a list of trusted remote IPs
- set access to any remote IP
- reject any remote access

This is not hard to implement and should satisfy everybody.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Date: 2003-03-05 18:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=645698

Ya, the problem here is that I might want to allow remote connections, but 
I certainly don't want just anybody to be able to connect.  Skip's 
suggestion doesn't help here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-03-05 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

[Tim Stone]
> Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy

Not true - you can use the html_ui_allow_remote_connections
setting to reject connections from anywhere other than the local
machine.  This is a bit draconian - as you say, we should have
a better solution - but it's not as bad as you make out.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-03-05 17:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

I don't think this is a problem.  Just tell the webserver to listen on "localhost"
or "127.0.0.1", or maybe even "".  Connections from remote hosts won't be accepted.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 01:45:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 03:45:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790406 ] delay-param in new GUI
Message-ID: <E19oehb-0000Q1-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790406, was opened at 2003-08-18 09:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790406&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: delay-param in new GUI

Initial Comment:
In my ini-file, I had a timer_interval:500.  This value is 
read as the value '0' in the new dialogs (which only has 
1 second interval for setting timer_interval and 
timer_start_delay.

The new dialog should accept intervals of at least as 
small values as 0.5 seconds - possibly also finer grade.

when saving the configuration the value '0' is written 
instead of the original 500 (.5 seconds).  It is not 
possible having a value smaller than 1 second for either 
of these fields.

This gives the following traceback when filtering should 
start:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in 
_Invoke_
    return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in 
_invoke_
    return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, 
args, None, None)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, 
lcid, wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_
    return func(*args)
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 383, in OnItemAdd
    self._StartTimer()
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 324, in _StartTimer
    self._DoStartTimer(delay)
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 313, in _DoStartTimer
    assert delay, "No delay means no timer!"
exceptions.AssertionError: No delay means no timer!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790406&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 02:09:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 04:09:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788051 ] database corruption
	(bdddb)
Message-ID: <E19of5E-0000d3-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788051, was opened at 2003-08-13 15:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fufsource
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: database corruption (bdddb)

Initial Comment:
when the pop3proxy.py is run for some longish time (2
hours) the database file (DBM) gets corrupted and each
mail then contains:

X-Spambayes-Exception:
bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30989,
        'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error,
        run database recovery')) in __getitem__() at
        /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py line 86:
return
        self.db[key]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Date: 2003-08-18 10:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=698198

i did some experimenting with various bsddb3 versions:
  - with db-3.3.11 the python segfaults and core is dumped
  - with db-3.2.9 the database is corrupted
  - with db-4.1.25 everything works as it should (no db
corruption)

hth,

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-15 09:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

We still don't know what causes this, but as a workaround
you can delete your spambayes.messageinfo.db file - that
file doesn't (yet) do anything important for pop3proxy, and
it's that file that's becoming corrupt.  A new one will be
created, which may eventually become corrupt as well -
again, just delete it.  You'll need to stop pop3proxy while
you delete it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Date: 2003-08-13 18:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=698198

the operating system is RH 7.2 with those versions of the
Berkeley DB:
db1-1.85-7
db2-2.4.14-7
db3-3.2.9-4

sorry i didn't include this in right away with the bug report.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-13 17:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Which operating system, and which version of Sleepycat's 
Berkeley code (spambayes shouldn't be able to corrupt a 
Berkeley DB, so the problem is probably specific to the bsddb 
version in use)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 03:23:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 05:24:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790406 ] delay-param in new GUI
Message-ID: <E19ogF2-0003SP-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790406, was opened at 2003-08-18 17:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790406&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: delay-param in new GUI

Initial Comment:
In my ini-file, I had a timer_interval:500.  This value is 
read as the value '0' in the new dialogs (which only has 
1 second interval for setting timer_interval and 
timer_start_delay.

The new dialog should accept intervals of at least as 
small values as 0.5 seconds - possibly also finer grade.

when saving the configuration the value '0' is written 
instead of the original 500 (.5 seconds).  It is not 
possible having a value smaller than 1 second for either 
of these fields.

This gives the following traceback when filtering should 
start:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in 
_Invoke_
    return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in 
_invoke_
    return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, 
args, None, None)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, 
lcid, wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_
    return func(*args)
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 383, in OnItemAdd
    self._StartTimer()
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 324, in _StartTimer
    self._DoStartTimer(delay)
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 313, in _DoStartTimer
    assert delay, "No delay means no timer!"
exceptions.AssertionError: No delay means no timer!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-18 19:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Dialogs may be flakey for a little while.  I agree we should
give finer grained control and 1 second.  Please re-open if
this doesn't happen in a week or so.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790406&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 04:42:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 06:42:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743122 ] Outlook 2002
	auto-complete breaks
Message-ID: <E19ohSk-0006at-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743122, was opened at 2003-05-25 12:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by neugi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes and I think it breaks the
auto-complete popup list for email addresses used in
the To field in Outlook.  The popup still appears but
only with the first letter of each email address - the
rest of the email address doesn't appear.  I've
uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes several times to
confirm this problem.  I'm running Outlook 2002 (SP2)
on Windows 2000 (SP3).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gerhard (neugi)
Date: 2003-08-18 10:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=846779

i've the same problem. 
running winXp SP1 and Outlook 2k SP2


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Garrett Brucker (gbrucker)
Date: 2003-08-13 12:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=843726

I'm running Outlook 2002/XP on Windows XP Pro and had this 
same problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kim Friis (kim_friis)
Date: 2003-08-11 09:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=89418

Im running Outlook 2002 on Windows XP and I do NOT see 
the bug. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sean True (seantrue)
Date: 2003-06-17 01:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=114311

Fixing this bug will require a complete rewrite to remove all 
MFC based dialogs from SpamBayes.
We're about 80% of the way there on SpamAtBay, and it's 
_not_ fun.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-17 00:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Apparently this problem only happens *after* a SpamBayes
dialog has been shown, but works fine until then.  Can
someone else confirm this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-06-02 09:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

I am running the same - W2K SP3 & OL2K and get the same 
problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jonathan Evatt (spidawebs)
Date: 2003-06-01 20:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=48654

I am also getting this problem. Have installed the app on 
Outlook XP (2002) SP2 over Win XP SP1.
If I start up Outlook the problem only seems to occur AFTER 
I actually run the spambayes configuration routine. If I do not 
access that then the problem does not (so far - limited 
testing) seem to occur.

Jonathan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 08:23:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 10:24:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790406 ] delay-param in new GUI
Message-ID: <E19okvP-00032X-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790406, was opened at 2003-08-18 03:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790406&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: delay-param in new GUI

Initial Comment:
In my ini-file, I had a timer_interval:500.  This value is 
read as the value '0' in the new dialogs (which only has 
1 second interval for setting timer_interval and 
timer_start_delay.

The new dialog should accept intervals of at least as 
small values as 0.5 seconds - possibly also finer grade.

when saving the configuration the value '0' is written 
instead of the original 500 (.5 seconds).  It is not 
possible having a value smaller than 1 second for either 
of these fields.

This gives the following traceback when filtering should 
start:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in 
_Invoke_
    return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in 
_invoke_
    return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, 
args, None, None)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, 
lcid, wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python23\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_
    return func(*args)
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 383, in OnItemAdd
    self._StartTimer()
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 324, in _StartTimer
    self._DoStartTimer(delay)
  
File "C:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 313, in _DoStartTimer
    assert delay, "No delay means no timer!"
exceptions.AssertionError: No delay means no timer!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-08-18 10:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Fixed in cvs to allow half increments. Allow 4-24 hours for 
anon-cvs to update.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-18 05:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Dialogs may be flakey for a little while.  I agree we should
give finer grained control and 1 second.  Please re-open if
this doesn't happen in a week or so.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790406&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 09:32:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 11:32:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-790615 ] Allowed remote
	connections management
Message-ID: <E19olzM-0003n6-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #790615, was opened at 2003-08-18 17:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Allowed remote connections management

Initial Comment:
Right now, SpamBayes let the user choose between
allowing either any one to log into the web interface,
either localhost only.

This patch let the user managed the remote connections
in a better way, with a single field. It appears in the
Proxy options, in the configuration page and accepts
the following values :

* - Allows any remote connection to log in
localhost - Only localhost is allowed
192.168.0.4 - A specific IP is allowed
192.168.0.4,192.168.0.5 - Two specific IPs are allowed
192.168.0.* - A range of IPs is allowed
192.*.1.* - Another kind of range

Note that * (the default value) is similar to *.*.*.*

The regex used check if the IPs are valid. Thus,
257.1.2.3 won't be allowed. The attached zip file
contains the diff against current CVS version as well
as the .py files if you want to overwrite your files
directly.

I only have a two computers LAN here and it worked
well. Yet, I'll be glad if you helped testing this
patch :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 09:34:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 11:34:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-790615 ] Allowed remote
	connections management
Message-ID: <E19om1H-0003tH-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #790615, was opened at 2003-08-18 17:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Allowed remote connections management

Initial Comment:
Right now, SpamBayes let the user choose between
allowing either any one to log into the web interface,
either localhost only.

This patch let the user managed the remote connections
in a better way, with a single field. It appears in the
Proxy options, in the configuration page and accepts
the following values :

* - Allows any remote connection to log in
localhost - Only localhost is allowed
192.168.0.4 - A specific IP is allowed
192.168.0.4,192.168.0.5 - Two specific IPs are allowed
192.168.0.* - A range of IPs is allowed
192.*.1.* - Another kind of range

Note that * (the default value) is similar to *.*.*.*

The regex used check if the IPs are valid. Thus,
257.1.2.3 won't be allowed. The attached zip file
contains the diff against current CVS version as well
as the .py files if you want to overwrite your files
directly.

I only have a two computers LAN here and it worked
well. Yet, I'll be glad if you helped testing this
patch :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

One more thing : you can perfectly mix specific IPs with
ranges like this :
192.168.0.*,253.94.17.2,80.53.*.*

Maybe could we consider adding subranges (for instance :
192.168.0.[4-10])

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 10:21:39 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 12:21:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788051 ] database corruption
	(bsddb)
Message-ID: <E19omlH-0007pI-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788051, was opened at 2003-08-13 08:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: database corruption (bsddb)

Initial Comment:
when the pop3proxy.py is run for some longish time (2
hours) the database file (DBM) gets corrupted and each
mail then contains:

X-Spambayes-Exception:
bsddb._db.DBRunRecoveryError((-30989,
        'DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error,
        run database recovery')) in __getitem__() at
        /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py line 86:
return
        self.db[key]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-08-18 11:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Just a point of reference.  I use bsddb with Berkeley DB 3.3.11
on Mac OS X via the hammie and hammiefilter programs
with no problem.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Date: 2003-08-18 03:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=698198

i did some experimenting with various bsddb3 versions:
  - with db-3.3.11 the python segfaults and core is dumped
  - with db-3.2.9 the database is corrupted
  - with db-4.1.25 everything works as it should (no db
corruption)

hth,

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-15 02:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

We still don't know what causes this, but as a workaround
you can delete your spambayes.messageinfo.db file - that
file doesn't (yet) do anything important for pop3proxy, and
it's that file that's becoming corrupt.  A new one will be
created, which may eventually become corrupt as well -
again, just delete it.  You'll need to stop pop3proxy while
you delete it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michal Vitecek (fufsource)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=698198

the operating system is RH 7.2 with those versions of the
Berkeley DB:
db1-1.85-7
db2-2.4.14-7
db3-3.2.9-4

sorry i didn't include this in right away with the bug report.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-13 10:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Which operating system, and which version of Sleepycat's 
Berkeley code (spambayes shouldn't be able to corrupt a 
Berkeley DB, so the problem is probably specific to the bsddb 
version in use)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 13:27:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 15:27:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790757 ] signal handler created
	with wrong # of args
Message-ID: <E19opel-0007g4-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790757, was opened at 2003-08-18 19:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790757&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leper (assworth)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: signal handler created with wrong # of args

Initial Comment:
Line 102 of mailsort.py reads:
    signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, lambda s: sys.exit(1))
but should read:
    signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, lambda s, f: sys.exit(1))


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790757&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 18 16:33:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 18 18:34:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages
Message-ID: <E19osZa-00025m-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-17 12:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jridley
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: Can't review messages

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-18 22:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I now have a reproducible issue.  I can now NEVER review
messages unless I go into the configuration page and exit by
hitting "save".  I don't have to change anything.  Unless I
do this, no messages ever become available for review.  Once
I do this, all prior rounds become available.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'll add the version info to the interface page, although note 
that this information is displayed in the window that you start 
pop3proxy in.  (If you double-click it, or run it as a service, 
then you won't see this, but you can always run it once to 
see the version info).

I'll close this for the moment, but if you can track down a 
problem where messages aren't displayed for review, please 
re-open.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-17 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 01:14:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 03:22:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-791027 ] pop3proxy hangs when
	starting to receiving emails
Message-ID: <E19p0h6-0006bI-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #791027, was opened at 2003-08-19 09:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791027&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ingo Schmiegel (cfi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy hangs when starting to receiving emails

Initial Comment:
I'm running:
===========
Linux foo 2.4.20 #4 Sat Mar 15 11:36:12 CET 2003 i686
unknown

Python 2.2.2 (#1, Oct 27 2002, 21:53:16) 
[GCC 3.2] on linux2

Email package:
__version__ = '2.4.3'
===========

For the last two weeks I have successfully been using
spambayes. It is setup to be used with pop3proxy.py and
local users' email clients to parse incoming email upon
request of the client.
I am using the webinterface to train messages.

Today I got the following hang:
 /usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py -u 29291
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2,
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database... Done.
Listener on port 29292 is proxying pop.gmx.net:110
User interface url is http://localhost:29291/
error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel
<__main__.ServerLineReader connected at 0x8351f14>
(exceptions.UnicodeError:ASCII decoding error: ordinal
not in range(128)
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|99]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|396]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|handle_read|130]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|found_terminator|148]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onServerLine|216]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onResponse|277]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onTransaction|378]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onRetr|485]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py|__init__|164]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py|append|230])
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 778, in ?
    run()
  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 772, in run
    main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort,
state.launchUI)
  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 711, in main
    Dibbler.run(launchBrowser=launchUI)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py",
line 528, in run
    asyncore.loop(map=context._map)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line
205, in loop
    poll_fun (timeout, map)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line 83,
in poll
    r,w,e = select.select (r,w,e, timeout)
KeyboardInterrupt
==============================

As you can see the whole thing hung (for more than 15
minutes) before I finally sent it a kill thyself signal.

The corresponding log of the pop3 email client
(sylpheed) looks like this:
===============================
* Connecting to POP3 server: localhost...
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK obsfuscated POP3 StreamProxy ready
<obsfuscated>
[08:42:15] POP3> USER obsfuscated
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK May I have your password, please?
[08:42:15] POP3> PASS ********
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK mailbox has 14 messages (153406
octets)
[08:42:15] POP3> STAT
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK 14 160574
[08:42:15] POP3> UIDL
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK mailbox has 14 messages (153406
octets)
[08:42:15] POP3> LIST
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK mailbox has 14 messages (153406
octets)
[08:42:15] POP3> RETR 1
** Connection closed by the remote host.
====================================
The "connection closed" only appears after killing
pop3proxy.py.


I can workaround this problem by reconfiguring my email
client to not use pop3proxy.py but my email provider
directly. Then I can retrieve those 14 emails. Finally
I can switch back to using spambayes' pop proxy and
everything works fine again.
(Including retrieving new emails)

Unfortunately I did not check which of those 14 emails
I got was the first one - which may have caused the
hang. It looks like it had been the usual "CRISIS IN
LIBERIA". That emails source code does not contain
unusual/unicode characters. But that impression might
be wrong, because it's already been fitlered/converted
by my email client.

Still, I'd like to thank ye all for this great tool.
Even with only a hundred or so messages it is very good
at seperating ham from spam.

Cheers,
  cfi





----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791027&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:17:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:17:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775977 ] pop3proxy reports an
	exception in shelve.py
Message-ID: <E19p1fp-0007rq-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775977, was opened at 2003-07-23 11:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775977&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gary Herron (herron)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy reports an exception in shelve.py

Initial Comment:
Using pop3proxy  
  from spambayes-1.0a4 
  with Python 2.3b1 
  on Linux, 
 
the attached email comes throught pop3proxy with the following 
exception reported in the headers: 
 
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.EOFError() in __getitem__() 
at 
        /usr/local/lib/python2.3/shelve.py line 119: value = 
        Unpickler(f).load() 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This *looks* more like a database problem than a problem 
with this one email.  Does it definately only occur with this 
email?  Does it still occur if you use a fresh database?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775977&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:19:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:19:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788845 ] imapfilter training fails
Message-ID: <E19p1ht-0007yU-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788845, was opened at 2003-08-15 05:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: imapfilter training fails

Initial Comment:
Using latest CVS, Python 2.2.2, connecting to a Courier 
IMAP server.  Web interface of imapfilter can connect 
and see the imap folders on the server.  When I try 
training (with messages in the TrainSpam folder) I get 
the following traceback, I am willing to help anyone 
debug this:

[gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 
spambayes/imapfilter.py -v -t
SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, 
version 0.01
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from 
hammie.db database
hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 
ham
Done.
Training
   Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam
       0 trained.
   Training spam folder INBOX.SB.TrainSpam
*.Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ?
    run()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run
    imap_filter.Train()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 607, in Train
    num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True)
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train
    msg.Save()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save
    response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS 
INTERNALDATE)")
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid
    typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, 
command) + args)
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in 
_simple_command
    return self._command_complete(name, apply
(self._command, (name,) + args))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in 
_command
    data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in 
_checkquote
    if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')):
IndexError: string index out of range

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I have very occasionally seen this too, but whenever I've 
tried to reproduce it (to fix it) I haven't been able to.  Do you 
get this consistently?  If you do, could you run imapfilter with 
the "-i4" switch and tell me/the list what you get?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:21:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:21:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-790340 ] Don't cache
	Base64 mail attachements ?
Message-ID: <E19p1k7-000843-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #790340, was opened at 2003-08-18 14:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Don't cache Base64 mail attachements ?

Initial Comment:
I don't know how SpamBayes is treating mail
attachements but I guess it does not base its work on
Base64 ones (binary files). My mailbox is always full
of emails containing large attached files and this
makes my Spambayes cache grow large very quickly.

Is it possible to add an option in the configuration
panel preventing SpamBayes from caching such attached
files ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What about a "don't cache files that are larger than x" 
option?  Would that do?  (it's easier to implement, so I would 
be able to do it soon, rather than someone do it at some 
point).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:23:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:24:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-787251 ] Problem
	refreshing message list
Message-ID: <E19p1mG-0008Ak-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #787251, was opened at 2003-08-12 20:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David McNab (davidmcnab)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem refreshing message list

Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've just installed SpamBayes from CVS.

Got a small problem with the SpamBayes message cache.

Firstly, I retrieve messages with my pop3 client
(Evolution) via SpamBayes pop3proxy.

Then when I click on the Review Messages link in
SpamBayes web interface, the newly retrieved messages
don't appear.

I've found a workaround - by clicking on the
Configuration link, then saving the configuration
unchanged, I can then click on 'Review Messages' and
see all the messages I've just retrieved.

It would feel more convenient if I didn't need to do
this, especially in these early days while I'm training
SpamBayes.

Am I doing anything wrong? Is there anything I can do?

Cheers
David




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe [ 790051 ] Can't review messages is a dupe of this.

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

It's odd that more people don't report this if it is occuring.  
Maybe they don't notice?

(no ideas about the cause, but willing to believe it was 
something I checked in ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-16 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

David,

Is this still happening for you?  I've seen this happen the
first time a new installation of Spambayes is run, but it's
always sorted itself out after the first time.  (Not that I'm
denying it's a problem, just looking for more information.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:24:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:24:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages
Message-ID: <E19p1ms-0008CD-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-18 00:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this is a duplicate of:
[ 787251 ] Problem refreshing message list

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

The bad news is that we don't know why this is happening.  
We'll keep trying to track it down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-19 10:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I now have a reproducible issue.  I can now NEVER review
messages unless I go into the configuration page and exit by
hitting "save".  I don't have to change anything.  Unless I
do this, no messages ever become available for review.  Once
I do this, all prior rounds become available.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 12:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'll add the version info to the interface page, although note 
that this information is displayed in the window that you start 
pop3proxy in.  (If you double-click it, or run it as a service, 
then you won't see this, but you can always run it once to 
see the version info).

I'll close this for the moment, but if you can track down a 
problem where messages aren't displayed for review, please 
re-open.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-18 06:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:25:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:25:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787251 ] Problem refreshing
	message list
Message-ID: <E19p1nf-0008Du-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787251, was opened at 2003-08-12 20:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787251&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David McNab (davidmcnab)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem refreshing message list

Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've just installed SpamBayes from CVS.

Got a small problem with the SpamBayes message cache.

Firstly, I retrieve messages with my pop3 client
(Evolution) via SpamBayes pop3proxy.

Then when I click on the Review Messages link in
SpamBayes web interface, the newly retrieved messages
don't appear.

I've found a workaround - by clicking on the
Configuration link, then saving the configuration
unchanged, I can then click on 'Review Messages' and
see all the messages I've just retrieved.

It would feel more convenient if I didn't need to do
this, especially in these early days while I'm training
SpamBayes.

Am I doing anything wrong? Is there anything I can do?

Cheers
David




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe [ 790051 ] Can't review messages is a dupe of this.

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

It's odd that more people don't report this if it is occuring.  
Maybe they don't notice?

(no ideas about the cause, but willing to believe it was 
something I checked in ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-16 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

David,

Is this still happening for you?  I've seen this happen the
first time a new installation of Spambayes is run, but it's
always sorted itself out after the first time.  (Not that I'm
denying it's a problem, just looking for more information.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787251&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:28:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:28:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-789534 ] Error
Message-ID: <E19p1qW-0008Ir-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #789534, was opened at 2003-08-16 09:46
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error

Initial Comment:
I'm using the pop3proxy in windows. I get the following 
header added from spambayes:



X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at C:\my path\spambayes-1.0a4
\spambayes\classifier.py line 307: assert hamcount <= 
nham


Any idea what is causing this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-18 07:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You need bsddb3-4.1.6.win32-py2.2.exe from 
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13900


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Fleisher (jasonsf)
Date: 2003-08-17 03:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=728935

I didn't have the which_database.py file so I downloaded it
and when I run I get the following error:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\My
Path\spambayes-1.0a4\utilities\which_database.py", line 33, in ?
    import bsddb3
ImportError: No module named bsddb3

I'm new to Python but am familiar to Perl. Is there a path
to the include files I need to add?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-16 17:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This means that your database has become corrupted.  The 
only reasonable solution is to retrain from scratch.  If this is a 
recurring problem, please read FAQ 5.2:

http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=789534&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:28:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:28:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-786759 ] Outlook
	French
Message-ID: <E19p1r6-0008KM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #786759, was opened at 2003-08-12 03:39
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

Category: Install Problem (example)
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook French

Initial Comment:
I use W2k pro french and outlook 2000 french,
After installion, I open outlook and I have a message 
say"There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin
please re-start outlook and try again.??

SpamBayes addin does works with french 
environment????

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Date: 2003-08-15 01:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842228

Thanks you Alex, your solution works :)
Sebas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-15 00:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

...

Not in your profil, but in your "outlook profil".

Right click on your Outlook Icon and choose "Propri?t?s" ...

Then click on "afficher les profils"

The default name is "Param?tres Microsoft Exchange" ... if so, 
rename it (You must use "copie" and after delete the other 
one)

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx)
Date: 2003-08-14 05:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842228

Hi,
In my profil name, they have no special carater like ? ? ? ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Alexandre Coallier (coalliera)
Date: 2003-08-12 12:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839670

Hi, ...

Check your Outlook profil name ... if there is character like "?" 
that's your problem!

Alex

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=786759&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:30:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:30:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-721664 ] mboxtrain.py doesn't
	find Maildir tmp/ directory properly
Message-ID: <E19p1t3-0008RM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #721664, was opened at 2003-04-15 20:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=721664&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David M. Cooke (dmcooke)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: mboxtrain.py doesn't find Maildir tmp/ directory properly

Initial Comment:
The Maildir handler for mboxtrain.py tries to use a
tmp/ under 
the directory passed to it. It should use a tmp/
directory at the same level (so given a ~/Maildir/cur,
it should use ~/Maildir/tmp).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Whoops.  I checked in the fix for this some time ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon)
Date: 2003-06-04 02:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=184577

Hi, just wanted to confirm this bug as of CVS 2003-06-03.
The patch attached by dmcooke fixes the bug for me too, so I 
agree with dripton, it would be nice if the patch could be 
applied.

Thanks. :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Ripton (dripton)
Date: 2003-05-18 00:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=9425

This is still broken as of latest CVS on 2003-05-17

Example output from an mboxtrain cron job very similar to
the one in HAMMIE.txt:

Training ham (/home/dripton/Maildir/):
  Reading as Maildir
  1052838601.29078_0.ludo:2,RS        
  1052472674.1616_0.ludo:2,RS        
  1049307199.16131_1.dydimus,S=829:2,S        
  1047587487.1367_2.hoggle:2,S        
  1051558961.21629_2.willum:2,RS        
  1053034631.15484_1.willum:2,S        
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dripton/src/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 294,
in ?
    main()
  File "/home/dripton/src/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 281,
in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "/home/dripton/src/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 216,
in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"), is_spam, force)
  File "/home/dripton/src/spambayes/mboxtrain.py", line 113,
in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/home/dripton/Maildir/cur/tmp/1053163264.21320_6.vidar'

The one-line patch already attached to this bug works for
me.  Please apply it to CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=721664&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:35:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:35:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789130 ] gets
	X-Spambayes-Exception on some spam messages
Message-ID: <E19p1xj-0000G6-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789130, was opened at 2003-08-15 21:07
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789130&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexey Klimkin (klimkin)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: gets X-Spambayes-Exception on some spam messages

Initial Comment:
For a lot of spam messages I get the following exception:

From: willy@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Subject: AAxta, &#1076;&#1053;&#1071;&#1056;&#1070;&#1041;&#1049;&#1070; &#1061; &#1056;&#1070;&#1051;&#1053;&#1060;&#1045;&#1052;&#1052;&#1070;&#1066; &#1053;&#1042;&#1061;&#1071;&#1056;&#1049;&#1070; ceBIpEni
Message-ID: <B56HC2D68DHF5DEI@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
  charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-UIDL: ~?B!!4fK!!nAc"!CRf!!
Status: RO
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 272: ustr =
unicode(s,
	incodec, errors)

<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;
Charset=Windows-1251">
<HTML>
...

I have tried to reproduce an exception, but the same
message don't generate an exception the second time
(after redirection).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-16 08:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

This is fixed in CVS - see 
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-
August/006779.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789130&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:37:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:37:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-791027 ] pop3proxy hangs when
	starting to receiving emails
Message-ID: <E19p1zt-0000Nj-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #791027, was opened at 2003-08-19 19:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791027&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ingo Schmiegel (cfi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy hangs when starting to receiving emails

Initial Comment:
I'm running:
===========
Linux foo 2.4.20 #4 Sat Mar 15 11:36:12 CET 2003 i686
unknown

Python 2.2.2 (#1, Oct 27 2002, 21:53:16) 
[GCC 3.2] on linux2

Email package:
__version__ = '2.4.3'
===========

For the last two weeks I have successfully been using
spambayes. It is setup to be used with pop3proxy.py and
local users' email clients to parse incoming email upon
request of the client.
I am using the webinterface to train messages.

Today I got the following hang:
 /usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py -u 29291
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2,
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database... Done.
Listener on port 29292 is proxying pop.gmx.net:110
User interface url is http://localhost:29291/
error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel
<__main__.ServerLineReader connected at 0x8351f14>
(exceptions.UnicodeError:ASCII decoding error: ordinal
not in range(128)
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|poll|99]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|396]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asynchat.py|handle_read|130]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|found_terminator|148]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onServerLine|216]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onResponse|277]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onTransaction|378]
[/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py|onRetr|485]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py|__init__|164]
[/usr/local/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py|append|230])
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 778, in ?
    run()
  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 772, in run
    main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort,
state.launchUI)
  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 711, in main
    Dibbler.run(launchBrowser=launchUI)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py",
line 528, in run
    asyncore.loop(map=context._map)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line
205, in loop
    poll_fun (timeout, map)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/asyncore.py", line 83,
in poll
    r,w,e = select.select (r,w,e, timeout)
KeyboardInterrupt
==============================

As you can see the whole thing hung (for more than 15
minutes) before I finally sent it a kill thyself signal.

The corresponding log of the pop3 email client
(sylpheed) looks like this:
===============================
* Connecting to POP3 server: localhost...
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK obsfuscated POP3 StreamProxy ready
<obsfuscated>
[08:42:15] POP3> USER obsfuscated
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK May I have your password, please?
[08:42:15] POP3> PASS ********
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK mailbox has 14 messages (153406
octets)
[08:42:15] POP3> STAT
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK 14 160574
[08:42:15] POP3> UIDL
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK mailbox has 14 messages (153406
octets)
[08:42:15] POP3> LIST
[08:42:15] POP3< +OK mailbox has 14 messages (153406
octets)
[08:42:15] POP3> RETR 1
** Connection closed by the remote host.
====================================
The "connection closed" only appears after killing
pop3proxy.py.


I can workaround this problem by reconfiguring my email
client to not use pop3proxy.py but my email provider
directly. Then I can retrieve those 14 emails. Finally
I can switch back to using spambayes' pop proxy and
everything works fine again.
(Including retrieving new emails)

Unfortunately I did not check which of those 14 emails
I got was the first one - which may have caused the
hang. It looks like it had been the usual "CRISIS IN
LIBERIA". That emails source code does not contain
unusual/unicode characters. But that impression might
be wrong, because it's already been fitlered/converted
by my email client.

Still, I'd like to thank ye all for this great tool.
Even with only a hundred or so messages it is very good
at seperating ham from spam.

Cheers,
  cfi





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This is fixed in CVS - see 
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-
August/006779.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=791027&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:40:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:40:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-783846 ] Generalize!
Message-ID: <E19p22G-0000V7-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #783846, was opened at 2003-08-06 12:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Kruchten (simnick66)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Generalize!

Initial Comment:
I think that the spambayes engine (which works great 
btw) could be generalized to classify way more than just 
spam, it could completely replace rule-based filtering.

As i understand it (correct me if i'm wrong!) there is 
nothing spam-specific about this software, it could be 
used to classify any message into any folder, while 
retaining its spam-filtering abilities.

the way this would work would be to specify a default 
folder (the inbox) and then a set of other folders (ie 
spam, folder1, folder2, folder3) and when a message 
comes in, it could be shuttled to the appropriate folder if 
the threshold for that folder's bayesian rating is crossed. 
if multiple thresholds are crossed, it could then go into 
an unsure folder, or the values could be compared to 
see where it should go. each folder could have 
independently set thresholds...

is there an easy way to hack the current outlook plugin 
to do this for testing purposes? (ie to install multiple 
versions and spoof them into comparing different folders 
or... ?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You can now try Skip's n-way.py script in the contrib 
directory in cvs, which does the cascade of n spambayes 
classifiers as Tim describes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-06 12:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

The spambayes engine doesn't really know anything 
about "ham" and "spam", it starts for each user as a blank 
slate and knows only what they teach it.  So in that sense it 
could be more general, although the tokenization strategies 
were specifically designed for, and tuned on, the ham-vs-
spam task.

A higher hurdle is that spambayes is "deeply" a binary (two-
way) classifier.  Classic Bayesian classifiers are N-way, but 
spambayes threw away that part of the math, replacing it 
with a two-way classifier based on very different theory.

I know at least one person tried to do N-way classification by 
training N distinct spambayes classifiers, and running them in 
sequence.  That was quite a while ago, and I don't know how 
happy they were with the results.

In any case, trying to hack the Outlook plugin will have you 
crawling on your belly for a month <wink -- but dealing with 
Outlook is massively complicated>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:53:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:53:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-790615 ] Allowed remote
	connections management
Message-ID: <E19p2FI-0005IW-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #790615, was opened at 2003-08-19 03:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Allowed remote connections management

Initial Comment:
Right now, SpamBayes let the user choose between
allowing either any one to log into the web interface,
either localhost only.

This patch let the user managed the remote connections
in a better way, with a single field. It appears in the
Proxy options, in the configuration page and accepts
the following values :

* - Allows any remote connection to log in
localhost - Only localhost is allowed
192.168.0.4 - A specific IP is allowed
192.168.0.4,192.168.0.5 - Two specific IPs are allowed
192.168.0.* - A range of IPs is allowed
192.*.1.* - Another kind of range

Note that * (the default value) is similar to *.*.*.*

The regex used check if the IPs are valid. Thus,
257.1.2.3 won't be allowed. The attached zip file
contains the diff against current CVS version as well
as the .py files if you want to overwrite your files
directly.

I only have a two computers LAN here and it worked
well. Yet, I'll be glad if you helped testing this
patch :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checked in, thanks.

(BTW, I trusted the regex and the non */localhost bit of the 
code - I presume you tested it enough... :)

If you want to improve on it to add subranges, then go ahead 
and submit a patch; I think this is sufficient for most people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 03:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

One more thing : you can perfectly mix specific IPs with
ranges like this :
192.168.0.*,253.94.17.2,80.53.*.*

Maybe could we consider adding subranges (for instance :
192.168.0.[4-10])

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:54:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:54:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-698036 ] pop3proxy
	security
Message-ID: <E19p2GL-0005Lg-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #698036, was opened at 2003-03-06 04:41
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Assigned to: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Summary: pop3proxy security

Initial Comment:
Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy, so anyone can 
access the user interface from any computer, given a web browser 
and knowledge of the ip address and port.  Even if you didn't know the 
port, figuring it out wouldn't necessarily be difficult.  This allows 
several operations that could be security problems, including 
reading at least the first couple hundred characters of each mail 
body.

It would seem that the correct solution is to 
implement a challenge/authentication on the pop3proxy http 
server.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

[ 790615 ] Allowed remote connections management
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=790615&group_id=61702&atid=498105

Has a fix for this, and I've checked this in.

I don't think there is a need for a more complicated 
challenge/authentication system, but if anyone wants to 
submit one, go ahead!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 14:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Okay, I'll try to achieve this within the next few days.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 14:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Sounds fine to me.  If you write a patch, I'll check it in.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 14:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

What about middle-term solution ? A simple, handy solution
is similar to what many routers offer : just allow user to :

- set a list of trusted remote IPs
- set access to any remote IP
- reject any remote access

This is not hard to implement and should satisfy everybody.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4)
Date: 2003-03-06 06:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=645698

Ya, the problem here is that I might want to allow remote connections, but 
I certainly don't want just anybody to be able to connect.  Skip's 
suggestion doesn't help here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-03-06 06:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

[Tim Stone]
> Currently, there is no security on the pop3proxy

Not true - you can use the html_ui_allow_remote_connections
setting to reject connections from anywhere other than the local
machine.  This is a bit draconian - as you say, we should have
a better solution - but it's not as bad as you make out.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-03-06 05:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

I don't think this is a problem.  Just tell the webserver to listen on "localhost"
or "127.0.0.1", or maybe even "".  Connections from remote hosts won't be accepted.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 02:55:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 04:55:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-790615 ] Allowed remote
	connections management
Message-ID: <E19p2HJ-0005Oc-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #790615, was opened at 2003-08-19 03:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Allowed remote connections management

Initial Comment:
Right now, SpamBayes let the user choose between
allowing either any one to log into the web interface,
either localhost only.

This patch let the user managed the remote connections
in a better way, with a single field. It appears in the
Proxy options, in the configuration page and accepts
the following values :

* - Allows any remote connection to log in
localhost - Only localhost is allowed
192.168.0.4 - A specific IP is allowed
192.168.0.4,192.168.0.5 - Two specific IPs are allowed
192.168.0.* - A range of IPs is allowed
192.*.1.* - Another kind of range

Note that * (the default value) is similar to *.*.*.*

The regex used check if the IPs are valid. Thus,
257.1.2.3 won't be allowed. The attached zip file
contains the diff against current CVS version as well
as the .py files if you want to overwrite your files
directly.

I only have a two computers LAN here and it worked
well. Yet, I'll be glad if you helped testing this
patch :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Note that this closes:
[ spambayes-Feature Requests-698036 ] pop3proxy security
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checked in, thanks.

(BTW, I trusted the regex and the non */localhost bit of the 
code - I presume you tested it enough... :)

If you want to improve on it to add subranges, then go ahead 
and submit a patch; I think this is sufficient for most people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 03:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

One more thing : you can perfectly mix specific IPs with
ranges like this :
192.168.0.*,253.94.17.2,80.53.*.*

Maybe could we consider adding subranges (for instance :
192.168.0.[4-10])

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 05:15:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 07:15:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-790340 ] Don't cache
	Base64 mail attachements ?
Message-ID: <E19p4S5-00079T-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #790340, was opened at 2003-08-18 04:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Don't cache Base64 mail attachements ?

Initial Comment:
I don't know how SpamBayes is treating mail
attachements but I guess it does not base its work on
Base64 ones (binary files). My mailbox is always full
of emails containing large attached files and this
makes my Spambayes cache grow large very quickly.

Is it possible to add an option in the configuration
panel preventing SpamBayes from caching such attached
files ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I would be enough for me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 10:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What about a "don't cache files that are larger than x" 
option?  Would that do?  (it's easier to implement, so I would 
be able to do it soon, rather than someone do it at some 
point).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 05:16:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 07:16:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-790615 ] Allowed remote
	connections management
Message-ID: <E19p4To-0007FE-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #790615, was opened at 2003-08-18 17:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Allowed remote connections management

Initial Comment:
Right now, SpamBayes let the user choose between
allowing either any one to log into the web interface,
either localhost only.

This patch let the user managed the remote connections
in a better way, with a single field. It appears in the
Proxy options, in the configuration page and accepts
the following values :

* - Allows any remote connection to log in
localhost - Only localhost is allowed
192.168.0.4 - A specific IP is allowed
192.168.0.4,192.168.0.5 - Two specific IPs are allowed
192.168.0.* - A range of IPs is allowed
192.*.1.* - Another kind of range

Note that * (the default value) is similar to *.*.*.*

The regex used check if the IPs are valid. Thus,
257.1.2.3 won't be allowed. The attached zip file
contains the diff against current CVS version as well
as the .py files if you want to overwrite your files
directly.

I only have a two computers LAN here and it worked
well. Yet, I'll be glad if you helped testing this
patch :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 13:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

As for the subranges it is a bit complicated to do properly
so I won't do before weeks I guess :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 10:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Note that this closes:
[ spambayes-Feature Requests-698036 ] pop3proxy security
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498106&aid=698036&group_id=61702


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 10:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checked in, thanks.

(BTW, I trusted the regex and the non */localhost bit of the 
code - I presume you tested it enough... :)

If you want to improve on it to add subranges, then go ahead 
and submit a patch; I think this is sufficient for most people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-18 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

One more thing : you can perfectly mix specific IPs with
ranges like this :
192.168.0.*,253.94.17.2,80.53.*.*

Maybe could we consider adding subranges (for instance :
192.168.0.[4-10])

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=790615&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 07:57:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 09:57:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages
Message-ID: <E19p6zI-0006cW-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-17 12:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jridley
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-19 13:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

FWIW, I get this occasionally.  I first noticed it when a
piece of spam got through, but reviewing my messages, it's
happening quite a bit.
I'm going to reinstall since I think SB is just messed up on
my machine.  I will wait 24 hours in case you want some data
from my machine for debugging.

X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in
probability() at
C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\classifier.py line
307: assert hamcount <= nham

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 08:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this is a duplicate of:
[ 787251 ] Problem refreshing message list

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

The bad news is that we don't know why this is happening.  
We'll keep trying to track it down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-18 22:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I now have a reproducible issue.  I can now NEVER review
messages unless I go into the configuration page and exit by
hitting "save".  I don't have to change anything.  Unless I
do this, no messages ever become available for review.  Once
I do this, all prior rounds become available.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'll add the version info to the interface page, although note 
that this information is displayed in the window that you start 
pop3proxy in.  (If you double-click it, or run it as a service, 
then you won't see this, but you can always run it once to 
see the version info).

I'll close this for the moment, but if you can track down a 
problem where messages aren't displayed for review, please 
re-open.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-17 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 08:31:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 10:31:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791246 ] IMAP: keep
	new messages unread
Message-ID: <E19p7WP-0008Qk-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791246, was opened at 2003-08-19 14:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791246&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Patrik Reali (patrik_reali)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: IMAP: keep new messages unread

Initial Comment:
With the IMAP processor, incoming mesasges are copied 
and read. It would be practical to keep (or reset) the 
processed messages to the "not read" status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791246&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 08:35:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 10:35:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-790340 ] Don't cache
	Base64 mail attachements ?
Message-ID: <E19p7aQ-0004pd-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #790340, was opened at 2003-08-18 04:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Don't cache Base64 mail attachements ?

Initial Comment:
I don't know how SpamBayes is treating mail
attachements but I guess it does not base its work on
Base64 ones (binary files). My mailbox is always full
of emails containing large attached files and this
makes my Spambayes cache grow large very quickly.

Is it possible to add an option in the configuration
panel preventing SpamBayes from caching such attached
files ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 16:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Using the standard email and email.* modules couldn't help
achieving this quickly ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I would be enough for me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 10:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What about a "don't cache files that are larger than x" 
option?  Would that do?  (it's easier to implement, so I would 
be able to do it soon, rather than someone do it at some 
point).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 08:40:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 10:40:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791254 ] Advance
	configuration panel
Message-ID: <E19p7f2-00058O-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791254, was opened at 2003-08-19 16:40
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Advance configuration panel

Initial Comment:
When developping the remote connections patches I've
discovered a lot of options which are not available
through the web interface. Would it be possible to make
them be available through an advanced configuration
page in the web interface ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 09:55:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 19 11:55:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791319 ] HTTP
	Authentication
Message-ID: <E19p8p9-0000O7-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791319, was opened at 2003-08-19 17:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791319&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
Besides the remote connections issue, could you
consider adding an HTTP authentication system
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt) ? The user could
activate/deactivate it in the configuration page and
specify a login/password.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 21 14:26:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:42:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792752 ] "More Buttons" in
	toolbar crashes outlook 2000
Message-ID: <E19pw0m-0006Q2-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792752, was opened at 2003-08-21 20:26
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792752&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ed Morra (edmorra)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "More Buttons" in toolbar crashes outlook 2000

Initial Comment:
Version 0.7
Outlook 2000 IMHO 
Win2K SP2
IE 5.5SP2
Dual PIII 600Mhz, 256MB

When the focus is on the "spam" or "unsure" folders the 
toolbar sports a "More Buttons" listbox arrow on the far 
left. Clicking on it consistently crashes outlook.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792752&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 21 12:16:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:42:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-792666 ] Messages scored properly, but unfiltered
Message-ID: <E19ptzN-0005yi-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792666, was opened at 2003-08-21 14:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Messages scored properly, but unfiltered

Initial Comment:
I am getting spam messages scored properly, however 
they fail to make it to spam folder.  I have filtering 
enabled, I've trained it on ~5000 good messages and 
~700 spam, so it should have a decent grasp on things.  
I do have it set to move messages scored as "spam" 
(80% for me) to the spam folder and messages of at 
least 20% sent to unsure.  Nothing ever gets filtered 
into these folders unless I manually tell it to filter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 21 11:55:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:43:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792652 ] SMTP proxy not starting
Message-ID: <E19pteU-0000dW-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792652, was opened at 2003-08-21 12:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792652&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wade Ford (cwford)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: SMTP proxy not starting

Initial Comment:
Just installed 1.0a4 on win2k. 

When I run the pop3proxy.py from the command line 
everything works fine. If I install as service and run 
as "net start pop3proxy" the pop proxy starts and works 
as expected. However the smtp proxy doesn't start. 
Neither my mail client (Eudora) nor telnet to the proper 
port produces a response.

Not being a python programmer, I am a little lost as to 
how to debug. Since everything is fine from the 
command line, my guess is that since it is running as a 
service it is somehow losing the correct directory and is 
unable to load the smtpproxy.py file. 

Help would be appreciated.


===== bayescustomize.ini below ======
[Headers]
include_evidence:False
include_score:True
include_thermostat:True
[html_ui]
display_to:True
[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:header
listen_ports:1110,1111
remote_servers:mail.dallas.net,postoffice.dallas.agency.c
om
[smtpproxy]
ham_address:ham@localhost
listen_ports:2500
remote_servers:postoffice.dallas.agency.com
spam_address:spam@localhost

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792652&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 21 09:53:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:43:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792582 ] Outlook changes button
	styles on startup
Message-ID: <E19prl2-0004bs-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792582, was opened at 2003-08-21 15:53
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792582&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alan Davies (cs96and)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook changes button styles on startup

Initial Comment:
If you customize the button styles of the SpamBayes 
toolbar in outlook (e.g. to only display the smileys 
without the text), then this setting is not kept when 
outlook is restarted

I am using outlook 2000, windows 2000 SP4, python 2.3, 
spam bayes v1.0a4


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792582&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 21 09:39:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:44:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792572 ] Message encoding causing
	errors
Message-ID: <E19prXN-0001bx-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792572, was opened at 2003-08-21 17:39
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792572&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Message encoding causing errors

Initial Comment:
Here's an example message with an added header
indicating the error:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404)
From: "HELION S.A." <helion@helion.pl>
To: "U&#380;ytkownicy onet.poczty" <-@-.->
Subject: 30% zni&#380;ki na ksi&#261;&#380;ki informatyczne
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:25:19 +0200
Status: O
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Header.py line 272:
	ustr = unicode(s, incodec, errors)

Odwied&#378; ksi&#281;garni&#281; internetow&#261; helion.pl. 
Codziennie inna ksi&#261;&#380;ka z 30% ZNI&#379;K&#260;.
Do ko&#324;ca sierpnia trwa "wakacyjna promocja
fotografii cyfrowej", a tak&#380;e... 
>>> [ http://helion.pl/page971k~promocje/ ]

Bestsellery informatyki:
============================================
BIOS. LEKSYKON KIESZONKOWY
============================================
Przygl&#261;dnij si&#281; opcjom w BIOS-ie p&#322;yt g&#322;?wnych. Dowiesz
si&#281; 
jak zaktualizowa&#263; BIOS i jak go skonfigurowa&#263;, by komputer 
pracowa&#322; z maksymaln&#261; wydajno&#347;ci&#261;, na kt?r&#261; go sta&#263;.
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~bioslk ]

============================================
ANATOMIA PC. KOMPENDIUM
============================================
Gdy Tw?j komputer odm?wi pos&#322;usze&#324;stwa, gdy instalacja 
kolejnej karty rozszerze&#324; czy wymiana procesora sko&#324;czy
si&#281; 
pora&#380;k&#261;, ksi&#261;&#380;ka ta oka&#380;e si&#281; niezast&#261;piona.
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~anpcko ]

============================================
VADEMECUM HAKERA. EDYCJA PLIK?W BINARNYCH
============================================
Samodzielna modyfikacja rozmaitych program?w! Dowiesz si&#281;,
jak "oszuka&#263;" gr&#281;, jak zmienia&#263; teksty w programach, 
jak odnajdywa&#263; furtki pozostawione przez programist?w...
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~vahace ]

============================================
SZTUKA PODST&#280;PU. &#321;AMA&#321;EM LUDZI NIE HAS&#321;A
============================================
&#346;ci&#347;le tajne to fikcja bezpiecze&#324;stwa -- udowadnia 
Kevin Mitnick. Najs&#322;ynniejszy haker &#347;wiata opowiada
o najs&#322;abszych ogniwach system?w bezpiecze&#324;stwa. 
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~artdec ]

============================================
PHOTOSHOP 7. SKUTECZNE ROZWI&#260;ZANIA
============================================
Sprawd&#378;, co mo&#380;na "wycisn&#261;&#263;" z Photoshopa! 
Setki kolorowych przyk&#322;ad?w i wskaz?wek poka&#380;&#261; Ci 
sztuczki stosowane przez prawdziwych profesjonalist?w.
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~ph7skr ]

============================================
Je&#347;li chcesz otrzymywa&#263; e-mailem informacje 
o nowo&#347;ciach wydawniczych zagl&#261;dnij na stron&#281;: 
[ http://helion.pl/page971k~emaile.cgi ]
============================================
  
  
********************************************
Wiadomo&#347;&#263; przes&#322;ana przez Onet.pl w imieniu:

Wydawnictwo HELION, http://helion.pl
Informatyka w najlepszym wydaniu
ul. Chopina 6, 44-100 Gliwice	
********************************************

List zosta&#322; wys&#322;any za zgod&#261; u&#380;ytkownik?w OnetPoczty
i zgodnie z jej regulaminem.

Weryfikacja listu:
http://poczta.onet.pl/mailing/01981147253805125995

Zasady wysy&#322;ania mailingu:
http://poczta.onet.pl/mailing/




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792572&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 21 09:37:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:44:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-792569 ] spambayes
	banner 468x60 
Message-ID: <E19prUm-0002w6-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #792569, was opened at 2003-08-21 12:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=792569&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andre Felipe Machado (andremachado)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: spambayes banner 468x60 

Initial Comment:
Hello,
I have a site, newsletter, and a banner system.
I would like to display spambayes 468x60 jpeg or gif 
banner.
Is there one available? Where?
regards.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=792569&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 21 07:24:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:45:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792255 ] Problems installing as
	windows service...
Message-ID: <E19ppQG-0004QJ-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792255, was opened at 2003-08-21 02:24
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gordon Hartley (ghartley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problems installing as windows service...

Initial Comment:
Not sure whether this is just a result of my environment, 
or whether its useful for others as well.

Environment : Windows (XP Prof.) + Cygwin + Python 
2.3 + win32all-155.exe

Tried:

[NOTEBOOK] /cygdrive/c/programs/spambayes-
1.0a4/windows$ python pop3proxy_service.py install
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 38, in ?
    os.chdir(sb_dir)
OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: ''

# ---

Resolved by moving the file up a directory and 
commenting out the following lines near the top of the 
file (pop3proxy_service.py) :

sb_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(this_filename))

sys.path.insert(0, sb_dir)
# and change directory here, so pop3proxy uses the 
default
# config file etc
os.chdir(sb_dir)

# ---

Then successfully installed service, tried to start it, and 
got the following in the event log:

Python could not import the service's module 
  File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4
\pop3proxy_service_modified.py", line 45, in ?
    import pop3proxy
  File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4\pop3proxy.py", line 
96, in ?
    import spambayes.message
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\message.py", line 137, in ?
    msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\message.py", line 113, in __init__
    self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 59, in open
    return f(*args)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 41, in 
open_best
    return f(*args)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
    return bsddb.hashopen(*args)
  File "c:\python\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 162, in 
hashopen
    d.open(file, db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) 

# ---

Resolved by the following:

chmod a+w *.db

# ---

Not sure if the permissions problem is a result of having 
cygwin installed, but thought I'd mention it in case its a 
general windows issue, or is useful to someone else...




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-21 15:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

You should try to run SpamBayes through Windows shell and
not Cygwin. And installed and run the SpamBayes service on
several computers with no problem (Windows XP, Python 2.3,
win32all-155).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 18:24:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:47:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792255 ] Problems installing as
	windows service...
Message-ID: <E19pdFD-0000gy-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792255, was opened at 2003-08-21 00:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gordon Hartley (ghartley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problems installing as windows service...

Initial Comment:
Not sure whether this is just a result of my environment, 
or whether its useful for others as well.

Environment : Windows (XP Prof.) + Cygwin + Python 
2.3 + win32all-155.exe

Tried:

[NOTEBOOK] /cygdrive/c/programs/spambayes-
1.0a4/windows$ python pop3proxy_service.py install
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "pop3proxy_service.py", line 38, in ?
    os.chdir(sb_dir)
OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument: ''

# ---

Resolved by moving the file up a directory and 
commenting out the following lines near the top of the 
file (pop3proxy_service.py) :

sb_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(this_filename))

sys.path.insert(0, sb_dir)
# and change directory here, so pop3proxy uses the 
default
# config file etc
os.chdir(sb_dir)

# ---

Then successfully installed service, tried to start it, and 
got the following in the event log:

Python could not import the service's module 
  File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4
\pop3proxy_service_modified.py", line 45, in ?
    import pop3proxy
  File "c:\programs\spambayes-1.0a4\pop3proxy.py", line 
96, in ?
    import spambayes.message
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\message.py", line 137, in ?
    msginfoDB = MessageInfoDB(message_info_db_name)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\message.py", line 113, in __init__
    self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 59, in open
    return f(*args)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 41, in 
open_best
    return f(*args)
  File "c:\python\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\dbmstorage.py", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
    return bsddb.hashopen(*args)
  File "c:\python\lib\bsddb\__init__.py", line 162, in 
hashopen
    d.open(file, db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) 

# ---

Resolved by the following:

chmod a+w *.db

# ---

Not sure if the permissions problem is a result of having 
cygwin installed, but thought I'd mention it in case its a 
general windows issue, or is useful to someone else...




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792255&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 16:34:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:48:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743122 ] Outlook 2002
	auto-complete breaks
Message-ID: <E19pbXF-0005dX-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743122, was opened at 2003-05-25 05:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by happycamp
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes and I think it breaks the
auto-complete popup list for email addresses used in
the To field in Outlook.  The popup still appears but
only with the first letter of each email address - the
rest of the email address doesn't appear.  I've
uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes several times to
confirm this problem.  I'm running Outlook 2002 (SP2)
on Windows 2000 (SP3).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Date: 2003-08-20 15:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=661531

This happens for me also.  Windows XP (w/ Service Pack 1)
and Outlook 2002 from Office XP (w/Service Pack 2).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gerhard (neugi)
Date: 2003-08-18 03:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=846779

i've the same problem. 
running winXp SP1 and Outlook 2k SP2


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Garrett Brucker (gbrucker)
Date: 2003-08-13 05:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=843726

I'm running Outlook 2002/XP on Windows XP Pro and had this 
same problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kim Friis (kim_friis)
Date: 2003-08-11 02:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=89418

Im running Outlook 2002 on Windows XP and I do NOT see 
the bug. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sean True (seantrue)
Date: 2003-06-16 18:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=114311

Fixing this bug will require a complete rewrite to remove all 
MFC based dialogs from SpamBayes.
We're about 80% of the way there on SpamAtBay, and it's 
_not_ fun.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-16 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Apparently this problem only happens *after* a SpamBayes
dialog has been shown, but works fine until then.  Can
someone else confirm this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-06-02 02:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

I am running the same - W2K SP3 & OL2K and get the same 
problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jonathan Evatt (spidawebs)
Date: 2003-06-01 13:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=48654

I am also getting this problem. Have installed the app on 
Outlook XP (2002) SP2 over Win XP SP1.
If I start up Outlook the problem only seems to occur AFTER 
I actually run the spambayes configuration routine. If I do not 
access that then the problem does not (so far - limited 
testing) seem to occur.

Jonathan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 15:36:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:48:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-783846 ] Generalize!
Message-ID: <E19paci-0005Tg-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #783846, was opened at 2003-08-06 00:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simnick66
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolas Kruchten (simnick66)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Generalize!

Initial Comment:
I think that the spambayes engine (which works great 
btw) could be generalized to classify way more than just 
spam, it could completely replace rule-based filtering.

As i understand it (correct me if i'm wrong!) there is 
nothing spam-specific about this software, it could be 
used to classify any message into any folder, while 
retaining its spam-filtering abilities.

the way this would work would be to specify a default 
folder (the inbox) and then a set of other folders (ie 
spam, folder1, folder2, folder3) and when a message 
comes in, it could be shuttled to the appropriate folder if 
the threshold for that folder's bayesian rating is crossed. 
if multiple thresholds are crossed, it could then go into 
an unsure folder, or the values could be compared to 
see where it should go. each folder could have 
independently set thresholds...

is there an easy way to hack the current outlook plugin 
to do this for testing purposes? (ie to install multiple 
versions and spoof them into comparing different folders 
or... ?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Nicolas Kruchten (simnick66)
Date: 2003-08-20 21:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=838551

ok, i'll try it, thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You can now try Skip's n-way.py script in the contrib 
directory in cvs, which does the cascade of n spambayes 
classifiers as Tim describes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-06 00:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

The spambayes engine doesn't really know anything 
about "ham" and "spam", it starts for each user as a blank 
slate and knows only what they teach it.  So in that sense it 
could be more general, although the tokenization strategies 
were specifically designed for, and tuned on, the ham-vs-
spam task.

A higher hurdle is that spambayes is "deeply" a binary (two-
way) classifier.  Classic Bayesian classifiers are N-way, but 
spambayes threw away that part of the math, replacing it 
with a two-way classifier based on very different theory.

I know at least one person tried to do N-way classification by 
training N distinct spambayes classifiers, and running them in 
sequence.  That was quite a while ago, and I don't know how 
happy they were with the results.

In any case, trying to hack the Outlook plugin will have you 
crawling on your belly for a month <wink -- but dealing with 
Outlook is massively complicated>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=783846&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 15:11:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:48:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787676 ] in outlook xp,
	hotmail inbox does not filter
Message-ID: <E19paFI-0004Ry-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787676, was opened at 2003-08-12 14:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by image57
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: in outlook xp, hotmail inbox does not filter

Initial Comment:
i know that this should've been fixed with the latest 
latest outlook plugin used. here's the log.

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 161 spam and 13 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
6.66118ms
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
1.11914ms
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Checked 11 in folder Inbox - 3 new entries found.
Checked 4 in folder Inbox - 0 new entries found.
Checked 41 in folder Junk Mail - 26 new entries found.
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Moving and spam training message 'Ab Girls that Just 
Shut Up & Spread Yoo Yr Ip Cleqt' -  trained as spam
Moving and spam training message 'Hey' -  trained as 
spam
Training on message 'Hey' -  already was trained as spam
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
Current version is 0.7, latest is 0.6.
Message 'RE: Outlook E-Mail' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Message 'Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' had a 
Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training 
message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' -  
trained as ham
Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes-announce" mailing 
list' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'RE: Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'shared fax error' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification 
of 'Yes'
Moving and spam training message 'Take Advantage of 
the Benefits of Your Individualized BankCard Services 
Credit Card  ' -  trained as spam
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 67 messages, finding 41 spam and 
5 unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-08-20 14:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

ok, after much experimenting, i've found that the hotmail 
inbox filters randomly on recieve. There has been a time 
where i can get it to filter all the time... first time you open 
outlook, all new messages gets filtered when you click on 
inbox.

secondly, bprimack's problem is because you probably dont 
have a local copy of the junk mails synced. i ran thru that 
problem when first training. spambayes will only see msgs 
downloaded already and will not pull any from the server.

on a tangent, i should be filling out another bug report, but if 
HOTMAIL is the only account you have, outlook xp still makes 
you have a personal folder open. when you "Recover from 
Spam" in the maybe folder, it sends the piece of email to the 
personal folder, not back to the hotmail inbox. if i need to do 
another bugreport, i will.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brian Primack (bprimack)
Date: 2003-08-20 03:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=848405

I have the same "not filtering" issue ocurring in my Hotmail 
Inbox of Outlook add-in 007 binary code, but (hotmail's) 
Junk Mail box seems to auto-filter fine.  There's over 50 
unread (mostly spam) emails in my Hotmail Inbox that 
SpamBayes should have processed.  

I'm not running Outlook Exchange, but I am running Outlook 
XP & Windows XP.  Filter Actions = Perform All....; Filter 
Restrictions = (none selected).  Here's my log file (note the 
identical exception errors as Jose's (image57) log file):

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Brian Primack\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Brian Primack\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 247 spam and 63 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. To 
save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to Folder" 
command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Junk Mail'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. To 
save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to Folder" 
command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  SPAM
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 42.0481ms
Message 'QbAos Great_Mortgage_Rates' had a Spam 
classification of 'Unsure'
Processing 1 missed spam in folder 'Junk Mail' took 
1280.21ms
Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-08-12 18:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

i'm sorry, i should've explained. i am also running an exchange 
connector at the same time. i have it monitoring both 
inboxes, and having all spam/unsure spam moved to a folder 
in exchange. doesn't automatically filter anything in the 
hotmail. but spam in the exchange inbox works, and manually 
doing filtering also works.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-12 18:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It isn't clear from the log what is failing.  There are alot
of exceptions relating to being unable to save the "Spam"
score, but we know we can't do this.  The entry:

Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'

Does imply it is working, and I see no exception relating to
making a copy of the message.  I'd like to clean this up
though, and we probably could save the Spam field *after* we
have moved a message into the nominated folder.  Are you
able to run from source code?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 11:27:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:49:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792047 ] Messages still marked
	unread after reading
Message-ID: <E19pWkL-0004Fe-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792047, was opened at 2003-08-20 17:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792047&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Messages still marked unread after reading

Initial Comment:
When I open an email, Outlook doesn't recognise that 
the email has been read - Outlook still thinks it's unread 
mail (bold text, etc).  If I close the email and then open 
it again, it *does* get set as read.

I'm not sure if this is a SpamBayes issue or not, but it 
certainly didn't happen before I installed SpamBayes.  
There may be some kind of wierd interaction going on 
here (possibly involving specific Outlook settings? dunno).

For reference, I'm using Outlook 2000 (version 
9.0.0.2711), and SpamBayes beta version 0.5 (July 
2003).

Graham.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792047&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 06:31:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:50:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19pS7O-0001ws-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 04:56:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:50:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787676 ] in outlook xp,
	hotmail inbox does not filter
Message-ID: <E19pQdu-0006IS-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787676, was opened at 2003-08-12 21:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bprimack
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: in outlook xp, hotmail inbox does not filter

Initial Comment:
i know that this should've been fixed with the latest 
latest outlook plugin used. here's the log.

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 161 spam and 13 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
6.66118ms
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
1.11914ms
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Checked 11 in folder Inbox - 3 new entries found.
Checked 4 in folder Inbox - 0 new entries found.
Checked 41 in folder Junk Mail - 26 new entries found.
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. 
To save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to 
Folder" command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk 
Mail
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\jr\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Moving and spam training message 'Ab Girls that Just 
Shut Up & Spread Yoo Yr Ip Cleqt' -  trained as spam
Moving and spam training message 'Hey' -  trained as 
spam
Training on message 'Hey' -  already was trained as spam
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
Current version is 0.7, latest is 0.6.
Message 'RE: Outlook E-Mail' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Message 'Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' had a 
Spam classification of 'Unsure'
Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training 
message 'confirm 
0999103686beba1039966b860f29acfaf2813e1d' -  
trained as ham
Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes-announce" mailing 
list' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'RE: Thanks' had a Spam classification of 'No'
Message 'shared fax error' had a Spam classification 
of 'No'
Unexpected MAPI error opening message
Exception 0x80040109 (MAPI_E_OBJECT_CHANGED): OLE 
error 0x80040109
Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification 
of 'Yes'
Moving and spam training message 'Take Advantage of 
the Benefits of Your Individualized BankCard Services 
Credit Card  ' -  trained as spam
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 67 messages, finding 41 spam and 
5 unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brian Primack (bprimack)
Date: 2003-08-20 10:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=848405

I have the same "not filtering" issue ocurring in my Hotmail 
Inbox of Outlook add-in 007 binary code, but (hotmail's) 
Junk Mail box seems to auto-filter fine.  There's over 50 
unread (mostly spam) emails in my Hotmail Inbox that 
SpamBayes should have processed.  

I'm not running Outlook Exchange, but I am running Outlook 
XP & Windows XP.  Filter Actions = Perform All....; Filter 
Restrictions = (none selected).  Here's my log file (note the 
identical exception errors as Jose's (image57) log file):

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Brian Primack\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Brian Primack\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 247 spam and 63 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Inbox'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. To 
save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to Folder" 
command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Inbox
Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in 
folder 'Junk Mail'
 (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft 
Outlook', 'Messages on this server cannot be modified. To 
save changes please use the File menu\'s "Copy to Folder" 
command.', None, 0, -2147164169), None)
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  Junk Mail
SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder  SPAM
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 42.0481ms
Message 'QbAos Great_Mortgage_Rates' had a Spam 
classification of 'Unsure'
Processing 1 missed spam in folder 'Junk Mail' took 
1280.21ms
Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' had a Spam 
classification of 'No'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57)
Date: 2003-08-13 01:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=686578

i'm sorry, i should've explained. i am also running an exchange 
connector at the same time. i have it monitoring both 
inboxes, and having all spam/unsure spam moved to a folder 
in exchange. doesn't automatically filter anything in the 
hotmail. but spam in the exchange inbox works, and manually 
doing filtering also works.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-13 01:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It isn't clear from the log what is failing.  There are alot
of exceptions relating to being unable to save the "Spam"
score, but we know we can't do this.  The entry:

Message 'Great home advise ' had a Spam classification of 'Yes'

Does imply it is working, and I see no exception relating to
making a copy of the message.  I'd like to clean this up
though, and we probably could save the Spam field *after* we
have moved a message into the nominated folder.  Are you
able to run from source code?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787676&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 12:02:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:57:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791319 ] HTTP
	Authentication
Message-ID: <E19pAor-0006eJ-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791319, was opened at 2003-08-19 17:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791319&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
Besides the remote connections issue, could you
consider adding an HTTP authentication system
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt) ? The user could
activate/deactivate it in the configuration page and
specify a login/password.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

This feature request is closed by the Patch #791393.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 01:44:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:59:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791756 ] Auto-report
	of UCE
Message-ID: <E19pNdt-0001Ya-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791756, was opened at 2003-08-20 16:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791756&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rick Cogley (rcogley)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Auto-report of UCE

Initial Comment:
Thank you for this great Plugin to outlook. For 
particularly noxious spam, it would be good if spambayes 
could also send a report re the spam to the ISP uce or 
abuse mail addresses, with the mail headers. 

--Rick Cogley

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791756&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 12:02:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 11:59:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19pAo5-0006bw-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 20 02:34:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 12:09:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-789916 ] Outlook Express
	mailboxes training
Message-ID: <E19pOPw-0003Jb-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #789916, was opened at 2003-08-17 10:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789916&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook Express mailboxes training

Initial Comment:
This patch allows to train Outlook Express mailboxes in
SpamBayes Web management interface. Instead of
uploading an mbox file, just upload a .dbx file. This
patch will check if the uploaded file is a DBX one. If
it is not, it is treated as a regular mbox one. It the
uploaded file *is* a DBX one, it is converted into a
regular mbox content.

If there is an easy way to retrieve the uploaded file
extension, we could enhance the code. For instance, we
could have a dictionary mapping files extensions to
conversion functions (to convert file content to mbox).
Nonetheless this patch works fine and does not alter
training speed of regular mbox files.

The attached file contains the .diff file for
spambayes/UserInterface.py, and a new Python module,
named "oe", to put in spambayes/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-20 20:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checked in.  Testing the committed version would be great.

Thanks very much for the contribution!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-17 10:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

By the way, you might find some (C)2003 Romain GUY in my
files but know that I've applied the PSF license to my oe
module and after a discussion with one of the main
developers I agreed to remove my copyrights from the files
to fullfill the PSF requirements.  So you can just remove
that (C)2003 Romain GUY line.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=789916&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 19 17:44:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 13:48:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages
Message-ID: <E19pG8x-00039F-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-18 00:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-20 11:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Yes, that means that your database has become corrupted.  
See also FAQ 5.2:
<http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted>

I'm not sure that this is the cause of the review messages 
problem, though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-20 01:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

FWIW, I get this occasionally.  I first noticed it when a
piece of spam got through, but reviewing my messages, it's
happening quite a bit.
I'm going to reinstall since I think SB is just messed up on
my machine.  I will wait 24 hours in case you want some data
from my machine for debugging.

X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in
probability() at
C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\classifier.py line
307: assert hamcount <= nham

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this is a duplicate of:
[ 787251 ] Problem refreshing message list

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

The bad news is that we don't know why this is happening.  
We'll keep trying to track it down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-19 10:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I now have a reproducible issue.  I can now NEVER review
messages unless I go into the configuration page and exit by
hitting "save".  I don't have to change anything.  Unless I
do this, no messages ever become available for review.  Once
I do this, all prior rounds become available.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 12:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'll add the version info to the interface page, although note 
that this information is displayed in the window that you start 
pop3proxy in.  (If you double-click it, or run it as a service, 
then you won't see this, but you can always run it once to 
see the version info).

I'll close this for the moment, but if you can track down a 
problem where messages aren't displayed for review, please 
re-open.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-18 06:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 22 03:48:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 17:31:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793058 ] pop3proxy fails to start
Message-ID: <E19q8X7-0003ME-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793058, was opened at 2003-08-22 11:48
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793058&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy fails to start

Initial Comment:
After killing pop3proxy I am unable to start it again.
I'm getting the followong errors:

 Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 778, in ?
    run()
  File "/usr/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 753, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "/usr/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 595, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 147, in __init__
    self.load()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 71, in
__getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object
has no attribute 'error'" in <bound method
_Database.__del__ of <dumbdbm._Database instance at
0x8287cd4>> ignored



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793058&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 22 18:23:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 21:25:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792652 ] SMTP proxy not starting
Message-ID: <E19qMBs-0006bA-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792652, was opened at 2003-08-22 05:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792652&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wade Ford (cwford)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: SMTP proxy not starting

Initial Comment:
Just installed 1.0a4 on win2k. 

When I run the pop3proxy.py from the command line 
everything works fine. If I install as service and run 
as "net start pop3proxy" the pop proxy starts and works 
as expected. However the smtp proxy doesn't start. 
Neither my mail client (Eudora) nor telnet to the proper 
port produces a response.

Not being a python programmer, I am a little lost as to 
how to debug. Since everything is fine from the 
command line, my guess is that since it is running as a 
service it is somehow losing the correct directory and is 
unable to load the smtpproxy.py file. 

Help would be appreciated.


===== bayescustomize.ini below ======
[Headers]
include_evidence:False
include_score:True
include_thermostat:True
[html_ui]
display_to:True
[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:header
listen_ports:1110,1111
remote_servers:mail.dallas.net,postoffice.dallas.agency.c
om
[smtpproxy]
ham_address:ham@localhost
listen_ports:2500
remote_servers:postoffice.dallas.agency.com
spam_address:spam@localhost

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-23 12:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This was recently fixed in cvs, and so will be fixed for the 
next release.

The problem was much simpler than you speculated; the 
service code simply wasn't starting smtpproxy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792652&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 22 10:08:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 22:05:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793329 ] toobar missing afer
	install of new version
Message-ID: <E19qESJ-0008Fu-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793329, was opened at 2003-08-22 09:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793329&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ren Hoek (cavehoark)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: toobar missing afer install of new version

Initial Comment:
Environment: Windows XP, Professional, SP1
                     Outlook 2002 (10.2627.3501) SP-1
                     win32all-157

I installed version 007 over the top of 006. I have 
previously used 005 and 006 with success. The toolbar 
did not appear.
   I then tried uninstalling, and made sure to remove 
any files I found related to SpamBayes in:
C:\Documents and Settings\{user}\Application 
Data\SpamBayes, then I reinstalled. Still no toolbar.
   The first log file after the latest install contains a 
pythoncom error related to universal dispatcher (see 
attachment).
   For security reasons, I recently changed to manual 
start for a few windows services I thought I were not 
needed. Could one of these be trouble?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793329&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 22 11:30:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 22:15:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786956 ] unable to activate
	toolbar buttons
Message-ID: <E19qFk3-00008u-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786956, was opened at 2003-08-11 14:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dtopping
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: unable to activate toolbar buttons

Initial Comment:
After installing (sb-007.exe) on my 

Win XP Pro Danish SP1, 
Office XP SBE Danish SP1

i'm unable to use any buttons at the toolbar. Nothing 
just happens.

Also tried installing source version with same result.

logfile attached


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David (dtopping)
Date: 2003-08-22 12:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=850209

I solved this problem: I removed the buttons from Outlook,
deleted all data from the SpamBayes application data
directory AND program files directory (WITHOUT
uninstalling), then re-installed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David (dtopping)
Date: 2003-08-22 12:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=850209

I've experienced the same problem. I'm running Windows XP
Pro English SP1, and I can't active the latest SpamBayes plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Date: 2003-08-13 15:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=511191

Didn't help - still gets same error. The buttons are on their 
own toolbar (spambayes), but doesn't work.

Also there is nothing listed under 
Tools/Options/Advanced/COM-setting - and there should be 
what ?

new log attached

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-13 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

Try this:
Enable the SpamBayes toolbar:
View>Toolbars>SpamBayes

Customize main toolbar, drag old SpamBayes buttons off.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 22 11:20:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 23 08:56:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786956 ] unable to activate
	toolbar buttons
Message-ID: <E19qFZw-0003LC-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786956, was opened at 2003-08-11 14:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dtopping
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: unable to activate toolbar buttons

Initial Comment:
After installing (sb-007.exe) on my 

Win XP Pro Danish SP1, 
Office XP SBE Danish SP1

i'm unable to use any buttons at the toolbar. Nothing 
just happens.

Also tried installing source version with same result.

logfile attached


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David (dtopping)
Date: 2003-08-22 12:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=850209

I've experienced the same problem. I'm running Windows XP
Pro English SP1, and I can't active the latest SpamBayes plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Carsten Adamsen (adamsen)
Date: 2003-08-13 15:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=511191

Didn't help - still gets same error. The buttons are on their 
own toolbar (spambayes), but doesn't work.

Also there is nothing listed under 
Tools/Options/Advanced/COM-setting - and there should be 
what ?

new log attached

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett)
Date: 2003-08-13 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=837287

Try this:
Enable the SpamBayes toolbar:
View>Toolbars>SpamBayes

Customize main toolbar, drag old SpamBayes buttons off.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786956&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 22 14:52:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 23 11:41:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793478 ] Plugin for
	Mozilla Mail
Message-ID: <E19qItN-000502-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #793478, was opened at 2003-08-22 15:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Urberg (tim273)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Plugin for Mozilla Mail

Initial Comment:
Create a plugin for Mozilla Mail/Mozilla Thunderbird that 
is similar to the Outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:01:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:10:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-792569 ] spambayes
	banner 468x60 
Message-ID: <E19r4ni-00009l-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #792569, was opened at 2003-08-22 03:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=792569&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andre Felipe Machado (andremachado)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: spambayes banner 468x60 

Initial Comment:
Hello,
I have a site, newsletter, and a banner system.
I would like to display spambayes 468x60 jpeg or gif 
banner.
Is there one available? Where?
regards.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 12:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

At the moment, your best bet would be the sblogo.bmp file 
which is in the spambayes/Outlook2000/dialogs/resources 
directory in cvs.  This will be used by the Outlook plug-in in 
its next release, and at some point by the other apps, too.  A 
non-bmp version hasn't been checked in yet, though.  I've 
attached a jpg version to this tracker, so you don't have to 
dig through cvs for it.

Feel free to come up with your own, and submit it back to us.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=792569&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 15:38:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:10:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19r2Yt-0003fu-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 18:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 21:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 11:14:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:10:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792572 ] Message encoding causing
	errors
Message-ID: <E19qyRS-00039Q-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792572, was opened at 2003-08-21 15:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792572&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Message encoding causing errors

Initial Comment:
Here's an example message with an added header
indicating the error:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.411 (Entity 5.404)
From: "HELION S.A." <helion@helion.pl>
To: "U&#380;ytkownicy onet.poczty" <-@-.->
Subject: 30% zni&#380;ki na ksi&#261;&#380;ki informatyczne
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:25:19 +0200
Status: O
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal
	not in range(128)) in append() at
	/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/email/Header.py line 272:
	ustr = unicode(s, incodec, errors)

Odwied&#378; ksi&#281;garni&#281; internetow&#261; helion.pl. 
Codziennie inna ksi&#261;&#380;ka z 30% ZNI&#379;K&#260;.
Do ko&#324;ca sierpnia trwa "wakacyjna promocja
fotografii cyfrowej", a tak&#380;e... 
>>> [ http://helion.pl/page971k~promocje/ ]

Bestsellery informatyki:
============================================
BIOS. LEKSYKON KIESZONKOWY
============================================
Przygl&#261;dnij si&#281; opcjom w BIOS-ie p&#322;yt g&#322;?wnych. Dowiesz
si&#281; 
jak zaktualizowa&#263; BIOS i jak go skonfigurowa&#263;, by komputer 
pracowa&#322; z maksymaln&#261; wydajno&#347;ci&#261;, na kt?r&#261; go sta&#263;.
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~bioslk ]

============================================
ANATOMIA PC. KOMPENDIUM
============================================
Gdy Tw?j komputer odm?wi pos&#322;usze&#324;stwa, gdy instalacja 
kolejnej karty rozszerze&#324; czy wymiana procesora sko&#324;czy
si&#281; 
pora&#380;k&#261;, ksi&#261;&#380;ka ta oka&#380;e si&#281; niezast&#261;piona.
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~anpcko ]

============================================
VADEMECUM HAKERA. EDYCJA PLIK?W BINARNYCH
============================================
Samodzielna modyfikacja rozmaitych program?w! Dowiesz si&#281;,
jak "oszuka&#263;" gr&#281;, jak zmienia&#263; teksty w programach, 
jak odnajdywa&#263; furtki pozostawione przez programist?w...
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~vahace ]

============================================
SZTUKA PODST&#280;PU. &#321;AMA&#321;EM LUDZI NIE HAS&#321;A
============================================
&#346;ci&#347;le tajne to fikcja bezpiecze&#324;stwa -- udowadnia 
Kevin Mitnick. Najs&#322;ynniejszy haker &#347;wiata opowiada
o najs&#322;abszych ogniwach system?w bezpiecze&#324;stwa. 
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~artdec ]

============================================
PHOTOSHOP 7. SKUTECZNE ROZWI&#260;ZANIA
============================================
Sprawd&#378;, co mo&#380;na "wycisn&#261;&#263;" z Photoshopa! 
Setki kolorowych przyk&#322;ad?w i wskaz?wek poka&#380;&#261; Ci 
sztuczki stosowane przez prawdziwych profesjonalist?w.
>>> [ http://helion.pl/url971k~ph7skr ]

============================================
Je&#347;li chcesz otrzymywa&#263; e-mailem informacje 
o nowo&#347;ciach wydawniczych zagl&#261;dnij na stron&#281;: 
[ http://helion.pl/page971k~emaile.cgi ]
============================================
  
  
********************************************
Wiadomo&#347;&#263; przes&#322;ana przez Onet.pl w imieniu:

Wydawnictwo HELION, http://helion.pl
Informatyka w najlepszym wydaniu
ul. Chopina 6, 44-100 Gliwice	
********************************************

List zosta&#322; wys&#322;any za zgod&#261; u&#380;ytkownik?w OnetPoczty
i zgodnie z jej regulaminem.

Weryfikacja listu:
http://poczta.onet.pl/mailing/01981147253805125995

Zasady wysy&#322;ania mailingu:
http://poczta.onet.pl/mailing/




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 17:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Fixed in CVS.  See 
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-
August/006779.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792572&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 23 11:47:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:12:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793837 ] pop3proxy notate_to okay
	for spam, nothing for ham/unsure
Message-ID: <E19qcUM-0007Y8-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793837, was opened at 2003-08-23 17:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793837&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Ball (ericball)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy notate_to okay for spam, nothing for ham/unsure

Initial Comment:
I want to shunt the unsure messages into a separate 
folder so I can train based on the unsure messages 
only.  (My OE rules drop the spam so I never see it.)

I've checked the _pop3proxy.log and it doesn't show up 
there, so it isn't a problem with Outlook Express.

add_mailid_to:body doesn't seem to work either, what 
should I be seeing?

using version 1.0a4
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2, 
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

[globals]
verbose:True

[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:body
listen_ports:1101,1102
remote_servers:pop.arvotek.net,mail.eol.ca
notate_to:True


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793837&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 23 11:52:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:12:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793844 ] pop3proxy gives
	different results for TOP and RETR
Message-ID: <E19qcYd-0003of-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793844, was opened at 2003-08-23 17:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Ball (ericball)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy gives different results for TOP and RETR

Initial Comment:
output (editted) from _pop3proxy.log:

TOP 1 0
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user@concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
	[192.168.1.8])
	by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14) 
with LMTP;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP 
id B26E71F5E6F
	for <user@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05672-02 for 
<w9726@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com 
[12.158.34.194])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP 
id B08241F5ED3
	for <user@arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by 
exprod5mx37.postini.com
	([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug 
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID: 
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user@concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user@concentric.net>
To: user@arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure

.
RETR 1
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user@concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
	[192.168.1.8])
	by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14) 
with LMTP;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP 
id B26E71F5E6F
	for <user@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05672-02 for 
<w9726@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com 
[12.158.34.194])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP 
id B08241F5ED3
	for <user@arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by 
exprod5mx37.postini.com
	([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug 
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID: 
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user@concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user@concentric.net>
To: spam,user@arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: spam


using version 1.0a4
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2, 
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

[globals]
verbose:True

[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:body
listen_ports:1101,1102
remote_servers:pop.arvotek.net,mail.eol.ca
notate_to:True

[smtpproxy]
ham_address:good@localhost
spam_address:junk@localhost


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 17:48:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:12:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791319 ] HTTP
	Authentication
Message-ID: <E19r4b4-0007X1-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791319, was opened at 2003-08-20 03:55
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791319&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
Besides the remote connections issue, could you
consider adding an HTTP authentication system
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2617.txt) ? The user could
activate/deactivate it in the configuration page and
specify a login/password.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 06:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

This feature request is closed by the Patch #791393.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:56:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:13:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789394 ] SpamBayes Manager
	Filtering Config
Message-ID: <E19r5f3-0005iM-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789394, was opened at 2003-08-16 04:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789394&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Vincent (hired_goon)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes Manager Filtering Config

Initial Comment:
While defining my filters for where to put spam / good
mail etc. I clicked on a bad folder and hit OK before I
noticed (wish I could tell you what folder that was...)

For "Possible Spam" I then had the folder "IPM_SUBTREE"
listed in the "Moved to folder:" box.  Clicking on
"Browse" again presented me with a blank folder list
(no possible selections).  Clicking around that window
triggered a "Selected 0 folders" message to appear at
the bottom of the dialog, but I could not change this
setting.

Changing to "Copied to folder" did not help. 
Uninstalling and reinstalling did not help.

I fixed my issue by closing Outlook and making sure all
OUTLOOK.EXE processes were closed, locating the INI
file and removing everything on the same line after the
"unsure_folder_id:" field, restarting Outlook and then
reconfiguring the Possible Spam Folder.

This was on a Windows 2000 SP4 workstation with Outlook
2000 SP3 and all other patches installed.

-hg

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 10:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I can't make this happen - can you try and reproduce it for
me?  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789394&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 17:45:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:14:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792752 ] "More Buttons" in
	toolbar crashes outlook 2000
Message-ID: <E19r4YH-0007SM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792752, was opened at 2003-08-22 08:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792752&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ed Morra (edmorra)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "More Buttons" in toolbar crashes outlook 2000

Initial Comment:
Version 0.7
Outlook 2000 IMHO 
Win2K SP2
IE 5.5SP2
Dual PIII 600Mhz, 256MB

When the focus is on the "spam" or "unsure" folders the 
toolbar sports a "More Buttons" listbox arrow on the far 
left. Clicking on it consistently crashes outlook.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 11:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Dupe of [ 776808 ] Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=776808&group_id=61702&atid=498103>


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792752&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 17:47:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:14:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791254 ] Advance
	configuration panel
Message-ID: <E19r4a0-0007VQ-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791254, was opened at 2003-08-20 02:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Advance configuration panel

Initial Comment:
When developping the remote connections patches I've
discovered a lot of options which are not available
through the web interface. Would it be possible to make
them be available through an advanced configuration
page in the web interface ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 11:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The problem is that there are so many options, and you really 
have to understand a lot about what is going on under the 
surface to use a lot of them.  I wonder if, even on 
an "advanced" page, they would be too overwhelming.

Are there any options in particular that you're thinking of?

(Note that technically this should be a relatively easy thing to 
do).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 23 11:58:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:15:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793844 ] pop3proxy gives
	different results for TOP and RETR
Message-ID: <E19qceK-0003x8-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793844, was opened at 2003-08-23 17:52
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ericball
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702

>Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Ball (ericball)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy gives different results for TOP and RETR

Initial Comment:
output (editted) from _pop3proxy.log:

TOP 1 0
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user@concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
	[192.168.1.8])
	by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14) 
with LMTP;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP 
id B26E71F5E6F
	for <user@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05672-02 for 
<w9726@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com 
[12.158.34.194])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP 
id B08241F5ED3
	for <user@arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by 
exprod5mx37.postini.com
	([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug 
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID: 
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user@concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user@concentric.net>
To: user@arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure

.
RETR 1
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user@concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
	[192.168.1.8])
	by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14) 
with LMTP;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP 
id B26E71F5E6F
	for <user@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05672-02 for 
<w9726@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com 
[12.158.34.194])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP 
id B08241F5ED3
	for <user@arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by 
exprod5mx37.postini.com
	([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug 
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID: 
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user@concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user@concentric.net>
To: spam,user@arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: spam


using version 1.0a4
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2, 
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

[globals]
verbose:True

[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:body
listen_ports:1101,1102
remote_servers:pop.arvotek.net,mail.eol.ca
notate_to:True

[smtpproxy]
ham_address:good@localhost
spam_address:junk@localhost


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:47:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:17:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19r5WT-0003Kn-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-24 00:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 10:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:49:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:17:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-792666 ] Messages scored properly, but unfiltered
Message-ID: <E19r5Y0-0000wN-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792666, was opened at 2003-08-22 04:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Messages scored properly, but unfiltered

Initial Comment:
I am getting spam messages scored properly, however 
they fail to make it to spam folder.  I have filtering 
enabled, I've trained it on ~5000 good messages and 
~700 spam, so it should have a decent grasp on things.  
I do have it set to move messages scored as "spam" 
(80% for me) to the spam folder and messages of at 
least 20% sent to unsure.  Nothing ever gets filtered 
into these folders unless I manually tell it to filter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 10:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is filtering enabled in the SpamBayes manager?  If so, can
you please attach a log file (as per the "troubleshooting
guide")?  When you do, please change the bug status back to
"Open"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 06:30:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:19:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793058 ] pop3proxy fails to start
Message-ID: <E19qu0w-0001Km-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793058, was opened at 2003-08-22 09:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793058&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy fails to start

Initial Comment:
After killing pop3proxy I am unable to start it again.
I'm getting the followong errors:

 Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 778, in ?
    run()
  File "/usr/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 753, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "/usr/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 595, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 147, in __init__
    self.load()
  File
"/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 71, in
__getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object
has no attribute 'error'" in <bound method
_Database.__del__ of <dumbdbm._Database instance at
0x8287cd4>> ignored



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 12:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

See http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-
database-keeps-getting-corrupted

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793058&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:53:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:22:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792582 ] Outlook changes button
	styles on startup
Message-ID: <E19r5bt-00014X-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792582, was opened at 2003-08-22 01:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792582&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alan Davies (cs96and)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook changes button styles on startup

Initial Comment:
If you customize the button styles of the SpamBayes 
toolbar in outlook (e.g. to only display the smileys 
without the text), then this setting is not kept when 
outlook is restarted

I am using outlook 2000, windows 2000 SP4, python 2.3, 
spam bayes v1.0a4


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 10:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792582&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 23 11:41:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:23:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on
	Server not filtered when starting
Message-ID: <E19qcNq-0003Sc-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 17:41
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting

Initial Comment:
Hi, 

I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an 
Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 
Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client.

I observe that when starting the client, all messages in 
the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the 
Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, 
***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered 
and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show 
spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. 
Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) 
rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly.

If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such 
effect. It seems to be related to the code initially 
examining the Inbox when starting Outlook.

Juergen Kremp




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 23 08:49:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:24:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19qZi6-0006m9-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-23 15:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:04:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:28:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791756 ] Auto-report
	of UCE
Message-ID: <E19r4qJ-0000D0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791756, was opened at 2003-08-20 19:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791756&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rick Cogley (rcogley)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Auto-report of UCE

Initial Comment:
Thank you for this great Plugin to outlook. For 
particularly noxious spam, it would be good if spambayes 
could also send a report re the spam to the ISP uce or 
abuse mail addresses, with the mail headers. 

--Rick Cogley

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 12:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The problem with this is that it is very difficult to determine 
where spam comes from, in a lot of cases (as a result 
of 'spoofing' addresses).  More than likely, you will end up 
reporting an innocent person, and these auto-messages end 
up being more of a pain than the original spam (look at the 
flood of "you have a virus" messages from SoBig...)

The FAQ about white/black listing discusses this in a bit more 
detail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791756&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 19:28:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:28:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793837 ] pop3proxy notate_to okay
	for spam, nothing for ham/unsure
Message-ID: <E19r6A3-0001wV-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793837, was opened at 2003-08-24 05:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793837&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Ball (ericball)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy notate_to okay for spam, nothing for ham/unsure

Initial Comment:
I want to shunt the unsure messages into a separate 
folder so I can train based on the unsure messages 
only.  (My OE rules drop the spam so I never see it.)

I've checked the _pop3proxy.log and it doesn't show up 
there, so it isn't a problem with Outlook Express.

add_mailid_to:body doesn't seem to work either, what 
should I be seeing?

using version 1.0a4
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2, 
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

[globals]
verbose:True

[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:body
listen_ports:1101,1102
remote_servers:pop.arvotek.net,mail.eol.ca
notate_to:True


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 13:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

> I want to shunt the unsure messages into a separate folder 
so
> I can train based on the unsure messages only.  (My OE 
rules 
> drop the spam so I never see it.)

This is a feature, not a bug ;) Because notate_to is such an 
ugly way to include the classification, it only tags spam 
messages, since you probably don't want to reply to those.  I 
suppose I could change the option to allow you to 
select 'none', 'ham', 'spam' and 'unsure'.  What do other 
people think about this?

> add_mailid_to:body doesn't seem to work either, what 
should I
> be seeing?

Nothing ;)  When things got moved around the option was 
broken.  It's unlikely to be fixed, and will probably be removed.

> Some other comments:
> - Since using dumbdbm is a bad idea (it choked on my 2000
> message training corpus), why not make pickle the default 
and 
> let the power-users select the db they want?

Well, from the next release dumbdbm isn't usable.  This means 
that anyone that tries to use a dbm that doesn't have 
something better will have no option but to use a pickle (or 
install something better).  Anyone using Python 2.3, though, 
does have something better.  This also means that when a 
binary version of pop3proxy (et al) is made, bsddb will be 
available.

> - Can someone create a simple command-line version 
of "print
> Options.options" for those of us with no desire to use 
Python?

"print Options.options" gives you "<OptionsClass.OptionsClass 
object at 0x00E1D7F0>" (your address may differ).  Why 
would you want this?  Do you want a list of all the available 
options, or a list of the current options, or what?  You should 
be able to do all the manipulations of the options you need 
via the web ui.

> - pop3proxy doesn't appear to pick up configuration changes
> made via the webpage until it is restarted, this should be 
fixable.

This shouldn't be the case.  Are you certain?  (you 
said "appear").  If you are, then please open a bug - with the 
current problems with the list, things are likely to get lost 
otherwise.

=Tony Meyer


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793837&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:28:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:29:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791254 ] Advance
	configuration panel
Message-ID: <E19r5E5-0004ox-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791254, was opened at 2003-08-19 16:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Advance configuration panel

Initial Comment:
When developping the remote connections patches I've
discovered a lot of options which are not available
through the web interface. Would it be possible to make
them be available through an advanced configuration
page in the web interface ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

cache_expiry_days, cache_use_gzip options would be cool for
instance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 01:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The problem is that there are so many options, and you really 
have to understand a lot about what is going on under the 
surface to use a lot of them.  I wonder if, even on 
an "advanced" page, they would be too overwhelming.

Are there any options in particular that you're thinking of?

(Note that technically this should be a relatively easy thing to 
do).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 18:30:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:29:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19r5FJ-0004rH-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest
sources from CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 17:42:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:31:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-792047 ] Messages still marked
	unread after reading
Message-ID: <E19r4Ur-0007KM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792047, was opened at 2003-08-21 05:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792047&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Messages still marked unread after reading

Initial Comment:
When I open an email, Outlook doesn't recognise that 
the email has been read - Outlook still thinks it's unread 
mail (bold text, etc).  If I close the email and then open 
it again, it *does* get set as read.

I'm not sure if this is a SpamBayes issue or not, but it 
certainly didn't happen before I installed SpamBayes.  
There may be some kind of wierd interaction going on 
here (possibly involving specific Outlook settings? dunno).

For reference, I'm using Outlook 2000 (version 
9.0.0.2711), and SpamBayes beta version 0.5 (July 
2003).

Graham.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 11:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Dupe of [ 716684 ] Filtering marks message as unread:

<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=716684&group_id=61702&atid=498103>

Not that this has been fixed.  You should upgrade to the 
latest version - see
<http://spambayes.org/download.html>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792047&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 17:14:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:31:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794381 ] win32com gencache files
	still being generated
Message-ID: <E19r44M-0002nQ-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #794381, was opened at 2003-08-25 09:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794381&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: win32com gencache files still being generated

Initial Comment:
As reported on mailing list (Wright, Frankie
[FWright@sccd.ctc.edu])
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\fwright\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\fwright\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.7 (August 9,
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version
0.2 (July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug  6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 170, in dispatch
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 322, in
_InvokeEx_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 601, in
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1228, in OnStartupComplete
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client", line 302, in WithEvents
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 427,
in EnsureModule
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 236,
in MakeModuleForTypelib
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.makepy", line 259, in
GenerateFromTypeLibSpec
exceptions.IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied:
'C:/Program Files/Spambayes Outlook
Addin\support\gen_py\00062FFF-0000-0000-C000-000000000046x0x9x1.py'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794381&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 19:31:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:31:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793844 ] pop3proxy gives
	different results for TOP and RETR
Message-ID: <E19r6CF-000210-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793844, was opened at 2003-08-24 05:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Ball (ericball)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy gives different results for TOP and RETR

Initial Comment:
output (editted) from _pop3proxy.log:

TOP 1 0
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user@concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
	[192.168.1.8])
	by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14) 
with LMTP;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP 
id B26E71F5E6F
	for <user@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05672-02 for 
<w9726@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com 
[12.158.34.194])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP 
id B08241F5ED3
	for <user@arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by 
exprod5mx37.postini.com
	([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug 
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID: 
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user@concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user@concentric.net>
To: user@arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure

.
RETR 1
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user@concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
	[192.168.1.8])
	by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14) 
with LMTP;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP 
id B26E71F5E6F
	for <user@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net 
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 05672-02 for 
<w9726@lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
	Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com 
[12.158.34.194])
	by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP 
id B08241F5ED3
	for <user@arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by 
exprod5mx37.postini.com
	([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug 
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID: 
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user@concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user@concentric.net>
To: spam,user@arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: spam


using version 1.0a4
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2, 
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

[globals]
verbose:True

[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:body
listen_ports:1101,1102
remote_servers:pop.arvotek.net,mail.eol.ca
notate_to:True

[smtpproxy]
ham_address:good@localhost
spam_address:junk@localhost


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There is a warning about this in the pop3proxy code.

It is impossible for TOP and RETR to guarentee the same 
classification unless TOP also retrieves the whole message or 
RETR only classifies on headers (I'm sure you see why).

This shouldn't be a problem in general use cases, if it's a 
specific problem, then you'll have to figure out a way around 
it (feel free to ask for advice).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 19:33:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 24 21:33:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788495 ] Filter fails when folder
	full
Message-ID: <E19r6Ek-0002HO-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788495, was opened at 2003-08-14 13:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788495&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filter fails when folder full

Initial Comment:
As reported on the mailing list and to me personally. 
MAPI_E_TABLE_FULL error needs to be caught and reported.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 11:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Checking in addin.py;
new revision: 1.97; previous revision: 1.96
Checking in filter.py;
new revision: 1.31; previous revision: 1.30
Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.65; previous revision: 1.64


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788495&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 24 23:33:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 01:33:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786952 ] Error when profile name
	has invalid filename characters
Message-ID: <E19r9z6-0002ig-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786952, was opened at 2003-08-12 05:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Error when profile name has invalid filename characters

Initial Comment:
Running Outlook 2003 BETA against a 2000 Exchange 
server (clustered)
Also running Activesync 3.7 for a Dell Axim

Each time outlook is shutdown, Spambayes forgets all 
the filtering options I setup.

Just downloaded the installer today from this site.  
Should be latest ver

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 15:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Checking in manager.py;
new revision: 1.79; previous revision: 1.78


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-13 11:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks.  The bug still exists, so I'm reopening.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: James Arnold (biggziff)
Date: 2003-08-12 23:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=842457

Thanks..renaming the profile did the trick.

This stuff rocks!!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-12 10:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Doh.  We use the profile name as a file name - but the
profile name can include invalid characters.  I will fix
this for the next release, but in the meantime you will
either need to run the source-code version (and then wait
for my fix) or rename your profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786952&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 00:21:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 02:21:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-789815 ] Failure Adding Toolbar
	Command Items: Manager, Clues, ...
Message-ID: <E19rAit-0001Gl-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #789815, was opened at 2003-08-17 03:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789815&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Brian Kenny (bjkenny)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failure Adding Toolbar  Command Items: Manager, Clues, ...

Initial Comment:
I recently installed spambayes version 006 for use with 
Outlook (I'm running XP) The product worked with no 
problem and was soon filtering my email. 
 

A few days later I was experiencing problems with my 
emails. In an attempt to isolate the problem, I removed 
spambayes from my system (It later turned out the email 
problem had nothing to do with spambayes). After 
resolving my email problem, I then reinstalled 
spambayes. Since the re-install I have not been able to 
get spambayes enabled, The spambayes button does 
appear on the toolbar but attempts to get too the 
spambayes configuration options since the spambayes 
button appears to be dead (it offers only toolbar 
options). I have since retried the 
removal/shutdown/restart/reinstall process several times 
but it still does not work.
 

I then went to the web and found a newer version of 
spambayes (007). I downloaded and installed that 
version today, but it has done nothing to resolve the 
problem. I have checked through your documentation 
and bug reports along with the subscription mailings and 
have not really found any answers for my problem.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 16:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know
how to fix at this stage.  If you follow the "troubleshooting
guide"  - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html.
You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which
generally fixes all toolbar related issues.  If it doesn't,
please reopen this bug giving further details.

We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it
continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the
spambayes-announce list -
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=789815&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 00:22:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 02:22:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves
	email back to wrong inbox folder
Message-ID: <E19rAkW-0001Jw-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 21:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

Initial Comment:
Hi

In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" 
from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail 
back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder.

I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook.

One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder 
under Personal Folders.

Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is 
configured only for the imap-Inbox.

Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap.

The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back 
to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the 
Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders.

Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 

Regards



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 16:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried
this (and set the status back to Open)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 00:31:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 02:31:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785389 ] Folders missing in
	Spambayes manager
Message-ID: <E19rAsm-0001aa-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #785389, was opened at 2003-08-08 23:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jared (jared71)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folders missing in Spambayes manager

Initial Comment:
Afer installing Spambayes on win2k pro /outlook 2000, I 
create my spam folders and open up the manager from 
the toolbar. When I click on "train now" and 
then "browse" after "folders with know good messges" 
the window that pops up does not contain any outloook 
folders. 

A coworker has successfully installed this on the same 
os/office dist. and folders appear under his manager.

thanks,

jared

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 16:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks - I have fixed the exception in the attached log -
any else reading this may like to check the exception
details are the same as the attached log, else your problem
may not be fixed.

Checking in FolderSelector.py;
new revision: 1.24; previous revision: 1.23

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Bassett (bassettg)
Date: 2003-08-15 21:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=845112

In my case, the cause of the problem is a new, empty, un-
accessed personal folder file (used for Possible SPAM). 
Remove, access, or place something in that personal folder, 
and the problem disappears and everything works correctly 
(in my case).

I hope this helps.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Bassett (bassettg)
Date: 2003-08-15 18:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=845112

I have the same problem and can send another log file with 
errors if it is useful.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 02:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach a log?  See the "troubleshooting guide"

Mark.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785389&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 00:31:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 02:32:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-783839 ] external lock on
	database file causes crash
Message-ID: <E19rAtL-0004LO-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #783839, was opened at 2003-08-06 10:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783839&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ned Smith (nedsmith)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: external lock on database file causes crash

Initial Comment:
If outlook is launched after an external program has 
locked spambayes database file (e.g. enterprise backup 
utility). Spambayes will not start and likely be in an 
unknown state. 

I discovered the spambayes dropdown menu became 
wedged and would not popup the menu choices. 

I tried deinstalling/reinstalling spambayes without 
success. Finally, deleted spambayes toolbar and tried 
again - this worked but was rather inconvenient. The 
backup utility runs daily (can be very annoying to 
reinstall daily - worse than just deleting spam!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 16:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

No word from reporter

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-06 15:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I can't reproduce a problem here.  Can you please attach a log?

What I see is a messagebox at startup telling you SpamBayes
could not be loaded (which is correct - not much we can do
without a database).  When I next start Outlook after
removing the lock, it starts correctly and catches the Spam
it missed last time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=783839&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 01:19:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 03:19:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-788845 ] imapfilter training fails
Message-ID: <E19rBdK-0003A7-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #788845, was opened at 2003-08-14 17:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tvongaza
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: imapfilter training fails

Initial Comment:
Using latest CVS, Python 2.2.2, connecting to a Courier 
IMAP server.  Web interface of imapfilter can connect 
and see the imap folders on the server.  When I try 
training (with messages in the TrainSpam folder) I get 
the following traceback, I am willing to help anyone 
debug this:

[gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 
spambayes/imapfilter.py -v -t
SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, 
version 0.01
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from 
hammie.db database
hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 
ham
Done.
Training
   Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam
       0 trained.
   Training spam folder INBOX.SB.TrainSpam
*.Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ?
    run()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run
    imap_filter.Train()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 607, in Train
    num_spam_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, True)
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train
    msg.Save()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save
    response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS 
INTERNALDATE)")
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid
    typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, 
command) + args)
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in 
_simple_command
    return self._command_complete(name, apply
(self._command, (name,) + args))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in 
_command
    data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in 
_checkquote
    if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')):
IndexError: string index out of range

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tys von Gaza (tvongaza)
Date: 2003-08-25 07:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=844717

Here is some more using a more verbose debug:

[gaza@games gaza]$ python2.2 spambayes/imapfilter.py -v -
t -i4
SpamBayes IMAP Filter Alpha1, version 0.01 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes IMAP Filter Web Interface Alpha1, version 
0.01
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

Loading database hammie.db... Loading state from hammie.db 
database
hammie.db is an existing database, with 0 spam and 0 ham
Done.
  18:45.14 > FPNB1 LOGIN **** "******"
  18:45.19 < FPNB1 OK LOGIN Ok.
Training
  18:45.19 > FPNB2 SELECT INBOX.SB.TrainHam
  18:45.19 < * FLAGS (\Draft \Answered \Flagged \Deleted 
\Seen \Recent)
  18:45.19 < * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\* \Draft \Answered 
\Flagged \Deleted
\Seen)] Limited
  18:45.19 < * 1 EXISTS
  18:45.19 < * 0 RECENT
  18:45.19 < * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1060841558] Ok
  18:45.19 < FPNB2 OK [READ-WRITE] Ok
   Training ham folder INBOX.SB.TrainHam
  18:45.19 > FPNB3 UID SEARCH UNDELETED
  18:45.19 < * SEARCH 157
  18:45.19 < FPNB3 OK SEARCH done.
  18:45.19 > FPNB4 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.HEADER
  18:45.19 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822.HEADER {2075}
  18:45.19 read literal size 2075
  18:45.19 < )
  18:45.19 < FPNB4 OK FETCH completed.
  18:45.20 > FPNB5 UID FETCH 157 RFC822.PEEK
  18:45.20 < FPNB5 NO Error in IMAP command received by 
server.
  18:45.20 NO response: Error in IMAP command received by 
server.
  18:45.20 > FPNB6 UID FETCH 157 RFC822
  18:45.20 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 RFC822 {5442}
  18:45.20 read literal size 5442
  18:45.20 < )
  18:45.20 < FPNB6 OK FETCH completed.
  18:45.22 > FPNB7 UID FETCH 157 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE)
  18:45.22 < * 1 FETCH (UID 157 FLAGS (\Seen) 
INTERNALDATE "19-Aug-2003
10:07:21 -0600")
  18:45.23 < FPNB7 OK FETCH completed.
  18:45.24 > FPNB8 APPEND INBOX.SB.TrainHam (\Seen) "19-
Aug-2003 10:07:21
-0600" {5476}
  18:45.24 < + OK
  18:45.24 write literal size 5476
  18:45.29 < FPNB8 OK [APPENDUID 1060841558 158] APPEND 
Ok.
  18:45.29 > FPNB9 UID STORE 157 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted)
  18:45.29 < FPNB9 OK STORE completed.
  18:45.29 > FPNB10 UID SEARCH (UNDELETED HEADER X-
Spambayes-MailId
1061320725)
  18:45.29 < * SEARCH
  18:45.29 < * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted))
  18:45.29 < FPNB10 OK SEARCH done.
  18:45.29 > FPNB11 UID SEARCH RECENT
  18:45.29 < * SEARCH
  18:45.29 < FPNB11 OK SEARCH done.
*.Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 782, in ?
    run()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 768, in run
    imap_filter.Train()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 594, in Train
    num_ham_trained = folder.Train(self.classifier, False)
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 543, in Train
    msg.Save()
  File "spambayes/imapfilter.py", line 365, in Save
    response = imap.uid("FETCH", self.uid, "(FLAGS 
INTERNALDATE)")
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 622, in uid
    typ, dat = apply(self._simple_command, (name, command) 
+ args)
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 925, in 
_simple_command
    return self._command_complete(name, apply
(self._command, (name,) + args))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 699, in _command
    data = '%s %s' % (data, self._checkquote(arg))
  File "//usr/lib/python2.2/imaplib.py", line 908, in _checkquote
    if (arg[0],arg[-1]) in (('(',')'),('"','"')):
IndexError: string index out of range



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 08:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I have very occasionally seen this too, but whenever I've 
tried to reproduce it (to fix it) I haven't been able to.  Do you 
get this consistently?  If you do, could you run imapfilter with 
the "-i4" switch and tell me/the list what you get?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=788845&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 01:58:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 03:58:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-790340 ] Don't cache
	Base64 mail attachements ?
Message-ID: <E19rCFD-0004dm-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #790340, was opened at 2003-08-18 14:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Don't cache Base64 mail attachements ?

Initial Comment:
I don't know how SpamBayes is treating mail
attachements but I guess it does not base its work on
Base64 ones (binary files). My mailbox is always full
of emails containing large attached files and this
makes my Spambayes cache grow large very quickly.

Is it possible to add an option in the configuration
panel preventing SpamBayes from caching such attached
files ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 19:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I've added this; I'll check it in shortly.  I've gone with the 
length rather than checking for attachments for two reasons:

 * It is the easiest by far (a len() call, rather than fiddling 
about with the email package).
 * It is more versitile - the idea is to avoid large messages, 
which could be ones with attachments in different encodings, 
or ones that are simply huge amounts of text.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 02:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Using the standard email and email.* modules couldn't help
achieving this quickly ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-19 23:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I would be enough for me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 20:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What about a "don't cache files that are larger than x" 
option?  Would that do?  (it's easier to implement, so I would 
be able to do it soon, rather than someone do it at some 
point).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=790340&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 02:11:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 04:11:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19rCRK-0004zi-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-23 15:49
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by sbrozius
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 01:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 02:14:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 04:14:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves
	email back to wrong inbox folder
Message-ID: <E19rCUa-0005R1-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 13:08
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by otomi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

Initial Comment:
Hi

In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" 
from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail 
back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder.

I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook.

One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder 
under Personal Folders.

Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is 
configured only for the imap-Inbox.

Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap.

The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back 
to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the 
Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders.

Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 

Regards



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 08:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried
this (and set the status back to Open)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 03:04:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 05:05:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793837 ] pop3proxy
	notate_to okay for spam, nothing for ham/unsure
Message-ID: <E19rDHW-0007bn-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #793837, was opened at 2003-08-24 05:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793837&group_id=61702

>Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Ball (ericball)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy notate_to okay for spam, nothing for ham/unsure

Initial Comment:
I want to shunt the unsure messages into a separate 
folder so I can train based on the unsure messages 
only.  (My OE rules drop the spam so I never see it.)

I've checked the _pop3proxy.log and it doesn't show up 
there, so it isn't a problem with Outlook Express.

add_mailid_to:body doesn't seem to work either, what 
should I be seeing?

using version 1.0a4
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2, 
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).

[globals]
verbose:True

[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:body
listen_ports:1101,1102
remote_servers:pop.arvotek.net,mail.eol.ca
notate_to:True


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 21:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checked into cvs today.  From the next release you will be 
able to set the notate_to (and notate_subject) options to 
either nothing, "ham", "spam", "unsure", or any combination 
thereof.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 13:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

> I want to shunt the unsure messages into a separate folder 
so
> I can train based on the unsure messages only.  (My OE 
rules 
> drop the spam so I never see it.)

This is a feature, not a bug ;) Because notate_to is such an 
ugly way to include the classification, it only tags spam 
messages, since you probably don't want to reply to those.  I 
suppose I could change the option to allow you to 
select 'none', 'ham', 'spam' and 'unsure'.  What do other 
people think about this?

> add_mailid_to:body doesn't seem to work either, what 
should I
> be seeing?

Nothing ;)  When things got moved around the option was 
broken.  It's unlikely to be fixed, and will probably be removed.

> Some other comments:
> - Since using dumbdbm is a bad idea (it choked on my 2000
> message training corpus), why not make pickle the default 
and 
> let the power-users select the db they want?

Well, from the next release dumbdbm isn't usable.  This means 
that anyone that tries to use a dbm that doesn't have 
something better will have no option but to use a pickle (or 
install something better).  Anyone using Python 2.3, though, 
does have something better.  This also means that when a 
binary version of pop3proxy (et al) is made, bsddb will be 
available.

> - Can someone create a simple command-line version 
of "print
> Options.options" for those of us with no desire to use 
Python?

"print Options.options" gives you "<OptionsClass.OptionsClass 
object at 0x00E1D7F0>" (your address may differ).  Why 
would you want this?  Do you want a list of all the available 
options, or a list of the current options, or what?  You should 
be able to do all the manipulations of the options you need 
via the web ui.

> - pop3proxy doesn't appear to pick up configuration changes
> made via the webpage until it is restarted, this should be 
fixable.

This shouldn't be the case.  Are you certain?  (you 
said "appear").  If you are, then please open a bug - with the 
current problems with the list, things are likely to get lost 
otherwise.

=Tony Meyer


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793837&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 05:43:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 07:43:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19rFl7-0005sp-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-24 00:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 21:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is there anything "unusual" about this machine?  Does it
have any kind of special logon to the server?  This error is
getting the "default message store" for the machine, which
is where the primary "Inbox" etc is located.  I've never
seen an error fetching this before, so I need a few more
clues...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 10:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 07:09:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 09:09:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves
	email back to wrong inbox folder
Message-ID: <E19rH6E-0004xe-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 13:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by otomi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

Initial Comment:
Hi

In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" 
from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail 
back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder.

I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook.

One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder 
under Personal Folders.

Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is 
configured only for the imap-Inbox.

Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap.

The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back 
to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the 
Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders.

Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 

Regards



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Date: 2003-08-25 15:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=841583

This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know
how to fix at this stage.  If you follow the "troubleshooting
guide"  - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html.
You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which
generally fixes all toolbar related issues.  If it doesn't,
please reopen this bug giving further details.

We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it
continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the
spambayes-announce list -
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 08:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried
this (and set the status back to Open)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 07:48:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 09:48:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-792666 ] Messages scored properly, but unfiltered
Message-ID: <E19rHhT-0002WC-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792666, was opened at 2003-08-21 14:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by snadsnad
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Messages scored properly, but unfiltered

Initial Comment:
I am getting spam messages scored properly, however 
they fail to make it to spam folder.  I have filtering 
enabled, I've trained it on ~5000 good messages and 
~700 spam, so it should have a decent grasp on things.  
I do have it set to move messages scored as "spam" 
(80% for me) to the spam folder and messages of at 
least 20% sent to unsure.  Nothing ever gets filtered 
into these folders unless I manually tell it to filter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Date: 2003-08-25 09:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849440

I was able to fix it.  My problem was with the 5 filters I had 
setup in Outlook to sort my various email accounts.  I had to 
use the timer_start_delay variable (I set it to 2000) and now 
everything works great!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Date: 2003-08-25 09:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849440

I was able to fix it.  My problem was with the 5 filters I had 
setup in Outlook to sort my various email accounts.  I had to 
use the timer_start_delay variable (I set it to 2000) and now 
everything works great!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-24 20:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is filtering enabled in the SpamBayes manager?  If so, can
you please attach a log file (as per the "troubleshooting
guide")?  When you do, please change the bug status back to
"Open"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 07:47:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 09:51:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-792666 ] Messages scored properly, but unfiltered
Message-ID: <E19rHhB-0002VO-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792666, was opened at 2003-08-21 14:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by snadsnad
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Messages scored properly, but unfiltered

Initial Comment:
I am getting spam messages scored properly, however 
they fail to make it to spam folder.  I have filtering 
enabled, I've trained it on ~5000 good messages and 
~700 spam, so it should have a decent grasp on things.  
I do have it set to move messages scored as "spam" 
(80% for me) to the spam folder and messages of at 
least 20% sent to unsure.  Nothing ever gets filtered 
into these folders unless I manually tell it to filter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Date: 2003-08-25 09:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849440

I was able to fix it.  My problem was with the 5 filters I had 
setup in Outlook to sort my various email accounts.  I had to 
use the timer_start_delay variable (I set it to 2000) and now 
everything works great!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-24 20:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is filtering enabled in the SpamBayes manager?  If so, can
you please attach a log file (as per the "troubleshooting
guide")?  When you do, please change the bug status back to
"Open"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 08:18:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 10:22:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19rIAT-00045R-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-23 15:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbrozius
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-25 15:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Dunno what Windows Server 2003 does different than XP 
does in this. I've installed the program as administrator, 
where it runs fine (one single e-mail account to exchange-
server). Then I logged in as my personal account and it never 
ran properly. I've tried installing it again using my personal 
user account (with enterprise admin-rights) over the existing 
install, but to na avail. It still works under the administrator-
account.

I've got three e-mail accounts; 2 POP3's and one Exchange. 
I've already removed one POP3 and the exchange-account, 
but that doesn't do the trick. I've only got one Outlook-
profile, that's set to default and "always use", so that 
shouldn't be the problem (I hope...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is there anything "unusual" about this machine?  Does it
have any kind of special logon to the server?  This error is
getting the "default message store" for the machine, which
is where the primary "Inbox" etc is located.  I've never
seen an error fetching this before, so I need a few more
clues...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 01:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 09:20:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 11:21:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793478 ] Plugin for
	Mozilla Mail
Message-ID: <E19rJ8z-0002xx-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #793478, was opened at 2003-08-22 22:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Urberg (tim273)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Plugin for Mozilla Mail

Initial Comment:
Create a plugin for Mozilla Mail/Mozilla Thunderbird that 
is similar to the Outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 17:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Can somebody describe me exactly what does the Outlook
plugin do ? I'm volunteer to create a Mozilla Mail plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 08:58:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 11:28:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-792666 ] Messages scored properly, but unfiltered
Message-ID: <E19rIne-0004Va-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #792666, was opened at 2003-08-21 14:16
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by snadsnad
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Messages scored properly, but unfiltered

Initial Comment:
I am getting spam messages scored properly, however 
they fail to make it to spam folder.  I have filtering 
enabled, I've trained it on ~5000 good messages and 
~700 spam, so it should have a decent grasp on things.  
I do have it set to move messages scored as "spam" 
(80% for me) to the spam folder and messages of at 
least 20% sent to unsure.  Nothing ever gets filtered 
into these folders unless I manually tell it to filter.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Date: 2003-08-25 09:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849440

I was able to fix it.  My problem was with the 5 filters I had 
setup in Outlook to sort my various email accounts.  I had to 
use the timer_start_delay variable (I set it to 2000) and now 
everything works great!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: jim grumbles (snadsnad)
Date: 2003-08-25 09:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849440

I was able to fix it.  My problem was with the 5 filters I had 
setup in Outlook to sort my various email accounts.  I had to 
use the timer_start_delay variable (I set it to 2000) and now 
everything works great!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-24 20:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is filtering enabled in the SpamBayes manager?  If so, can
you please attach a log file (as per the "troubleshooting
guide")?  When you do, please change the bug status back to
"Open"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=792666&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 15:27:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 17:28:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rOrd-0001hZ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-25 14:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jvr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 15:32:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 17:32:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794935 ] pop3proxy: Configuration
	page traces back
Message-ID: <E19rOwW-0001wG-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #794935, was opened at 2003-08-25 23:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy: Configuration page traces back

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3, spambayes from CVS, MacOSX 10.2.6, 
pop3proxy.py started with -D.

When I click the "Configuration page" link I get this 
traceback:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 398, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 487, in onConfig
    if type(options.valid_input(sect, opt)) in 
types.StringTypes:

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/OptionsClass.py", line 561, in valid_input
    return self._options[sect, opt].valid_input()

KeyError: ('pop3proxy', 'add_mailid_to')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 16:14:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 18:14:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rPba-00055Z-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-25 12:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-25 22:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You have configured a POP3 server to connect to (or
you're specifying one on the command line), yes?

If not, well no, it won't work.  8-)

If so, same question to you, Just: please tell me your
command line, your ini file, and the "netstat -a" output
before and after starting the proxy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 21:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 19:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 16:29:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 18:30:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rPpx-0001W3-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-25 14:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jvr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

My command line is:

nohup sudo python2.3 -u pop3proxy.py -D MySpamData.pkl -l 110 
<myrealpophost> &

If I leave out the -l 100 option, there is nothing listening on port 
110. netstat confirms that. Maybe I'm just reading the doco wrong, 
but --help says that -l defaults to 110 so I would expect that -l 110 
would be superfluous...

(Needless to say, *with* -l 110, pop3proxy.py works like a 
charm!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You have configured a POP3 server to connect to (or
you're specifying one on the command line), yes?

If not, well no, it won't work.  8-)

If so, same question to you, Just: please tell me your
command line, your ini file, and the "netstat -a" output
before and after starting the proxy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 16:34:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 18:34:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rPua-0001lQ-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-25 14:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jvr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

Sorry, you asked about an "ini" file. If I had one, where would I 
find it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

My command line is:

nohup sudo python2.3 -u pop3proxy.py -D MySpamData.pkl -l 110 
<myrealpophost> &

If I leave out the -l 100 option, there is nothing listening on port 
110. netstat confirms that. Maybe I'm just reading the doco wrong, 
but --help says that -l defaults to 110 so I would expect that -l 110 
would be superfluous...

(Needless to say, *with* -l 110, pop3proxy.py works like a 
charm!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You have configured a POP3 server to connect to (or
you're specifying one on the command line), yes?

If not, well no, it won't work.  8-)

If so, same question to you, Just: please tell me your
command line, your ini file, and the "netstat -a" output
before and after starting the proxy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 16:53:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 18:54:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794982 ] Scanning with nmap
	breaks pop3proxy's web interface
Message-ID: <E19rQDh-0000oz-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #794982, was opened at 2003-08-26 00:53
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794982&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Piotr Wajnberg (petevine)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Scanning with nmap breaks pop3proxy's web interface

Initial Comment:
As a result of such scans pop3proxy stops accepting any
connections to 8880 although email proxying works fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794982&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:22:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:23:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794992 ] Outlook should attempt
	to save information after move
Message-ID: <E19rQfT-0006AS-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #794992, was opened at 2003-08-26 09:22
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794992&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook should attempt to save information after move

Initial Comment:
In some cases, we can't save stuff (spam score, folder
name) back to the original message (eg, IMAP, Hotmail).
 However, we almost certainly *can* save it after we
have moved the message (assuming we do move it).  This
would allow people to see the Spam score for their Spam
and unsure, and would allow "recover from" to restore
to the correct folder.

The restore issue is reported in [ 786212 ] Recover
from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794992&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:23:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:24:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves
	email back to wrong inbox folder
Message-ID: <E19rQgG-0006DR-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 21:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder

Initial Comment:
Hi

In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" 
from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail 
back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder.

I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook.

One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder 
under Personal Folders.

Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is 
configured only for the imap-Inbox.

Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap.

The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back 
to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the 
Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders.

Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 

Regards



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-26 09:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I
thought it did.  However, I am guessing the problem is that
we can't save properties on the IMAP message.  I have just
opened another bug
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
which when fixed should also solve this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=841583

This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know
how to fix at this stage.  If you follow the "troubleshooting
guide"  - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html.
You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which
generally fixes all toolbar related issues.  If it doesn't,
please reopen this bug giving further details.

We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it
continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the
spambayes-announce list -
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 16:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried
this (and set the status back to Open)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:08:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:24:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19rQRy-0002wu-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-24 00:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-26 09:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Has your user account successfully configured Outlook?  Can
you see folders and send messages when logged in as this
user?  Is there anything else different about this users
Outlook config versus the Admins - eg, lack of/extra
personal folders or exchange server configs?

If you were willing to run the source-code version we could
track this further.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Dunno what Windows Server 2003 does different than XP 
does in this. I've installed the program as administrator, 
where it runs fine (one single e-mail account to exchange-
server). Then I logged in as my personal account and it never 
ran properly. I've tried installing it again using my personal 
user account (with enterprise admin-rights) over the existing 
install, but to na avail. It still works under the administrator-
account.

I've got three e-mail accounts; 2 POP3's and one Exchange. 
I've already removed one POP3 and the exchange-account, 
but that doesn't do the trick. I've only got one Outlook-
profile, that's set to default and "always use", so that 
shouldn't be the problem (I hope...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 21:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is there anything "unusual" about this machine?  Does it
have any kind of special logon to the server?  This error is
getting the "default message store" for the machine, which
is where the primary "Inbox" etc is located.  I've never
seen an error fetching this before, so I need a few more
clues...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 10:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:33:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:34:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793478 ] Plugin for
	Mozilla Mail
Message-ID: <E19rQqE-0003zm-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #793478, was opened at 2003-08-23 08:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Urberg (tim273)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Plugin for Mozilla Mail

Initial Comment:
Create a plugin for Mozilla Mail/Mozilla Thunderbird that 
is similar to the Outlook plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 11:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The plugin provides a toolbar with three buttons: "delete as 
spam" moves the currently selected message to the spam 
folder and does the appropriate training (this is not visible in 
the spam folder).  "recover from spam" does the opposite, 
basically.

The third button opens up a dialog that lets the user 
configure the plugin, train, and filter one or more folders.

Once setup, the plug-in also filters all incoming mail in the 
folders it is set to watch.

Let me know if you need any more details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-26 03:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Can somebody describe me exactly what does the Outlook
plugin do ? I'm volunteer to create a Mozilla Mail plugin.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:37:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:38:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794935 ] pop3proxy: Configuration
	page traces back
Message-ID: <E19rQu0-000486-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #794935, was opened at 2003-08-26 09:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy: Configuration page traces back

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3, spambayes from CVS, MacOSX 10.2.6, 
pop3proxy.py started with -D.

When I click the "Configuration page" link I get this 
traceback:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 398, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 487, in onConfig
    if type(options.valid_input(sect, opt)) in 
types.StringTypes:

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/OptionsClass.py", line 561, in valid_input
    return self._options[sect, opt].valid_input()

KeyError: ('pop3proxy', 'add_mailid_to')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Can you re cvs-up and see if this still happens?  I removed 
this option yesterday, but might have checked ProxyUI.py 
and Options.py in separately (I was checking in lots of 
changes and trying to split them up a bit).  I think you got a 
CVS in between the two check-ins.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:49:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:49:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794935 ] pop3proxy: Configuration
	page traces back
Message-ID: <E19rR5b-00078M-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #794935, was opened at 2003-08-25 21:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy: Configuration page traces back

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3, spambayes from CVS, MacOSX 10.2.6, 
pop3proxy.py started with -D.

When I click the "Configuration page" link I get this 
traceback:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 398, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 487, in onConfig
    if type(options.valid_input(sect, opt)) in 
types.StringTypes:

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/OptionsClass.py", line 561, in valid_input
    return self._options[sect, opt].valid_input()

KeyError: ('pop3proxy', 'add_mailid_to')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

I'm bang up to date from CVS and this is happening to me too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Can you re cvs-up and see if this still happens?  I removed 
this option yesterday, but might have checked ProxyUI.py 
and Options.py in separately (I was checking in lots of 
changes and trying to split them up a bit).  I think you got a 
CVS in between the two check-ins.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:55:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:56:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rRBV-0000Nr-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-26 00:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 11:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Either ~/.spambayesrc or bayescustomize.ini in the current 
working directory, or the envar BAYESCUSTOMIZE can be set 
to a list of files.

"pop3proxy.py -D hammie.pkl pop.myisp" and pop3proxy -D 
hammie.pkl -l 110 pop.myisp" both work here (win32).  Is this 
some *nix thing?  What happens if you change pop3proxy to 
default to port 1110 (line 798) and leave out the -l?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 10:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

Sorry, you asked about an "ini" file. If I had one, where would I 
find it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 10:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

My command line is:

nohup sudo python2.3 -u pop3proxy.py -D MySpamData.pkl -l 110 
<myrealpophost> &

If I leave out the -l 100 option, there is nothing listening on port 
110. netstat confirms that. Maybe I'm just reading the doco wrong, 
but --help says that -l defaults to 110 so I would expect that -l 110 
would be superfluous...

(Needless to say, *with* -l 110, pop3proxy.py works like a 
charm!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 10:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You have configured a POP3 server to connect to (or
you're specifying one on the command line), yes?

If not, well no, it won't work.  8-)

If so, same question to you, Just: please tell me your
command line, your ini file, and the "netstat -a" output
before and after starting the proxy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 09:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-03 07:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 17:57:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 19:57:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rRDB-00034Q-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-25 12:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
>Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

No need for the ini file - the feature was just plain broken,
and is now fixed.

If I *had* needed your ini file, this is what I'd have said:
The ini file is optional, so you may not have one.  If you
do, and it has the default name (which I guess it will for
you) it will be in either your home directory or the current
working directory of pop3proxy, and it will be called either
'.spambayesrc' or 'bayescustomize.ini'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Either ~/.spambayesrc or bayescustomize.ini in the current 
working directory, or the envar BAYESCUSTOMIZE can be set 
to a list of files.

"pop3proxy.py -D hammie.pkl pop.myisp" and pop3proxy -D 
hammie.pkl -l 110 pop.myisp" both work here (win32).  Is this 
some *nix thing?  What happens if you change pop3proxy to 
default to port 1110 (line 798) and leave out the -l?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 22:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

Sorry, you asked about an "ini" file. If I had one, where would I 
find it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 22:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

My command line is:

nohup sudo python2.3 -u pop3proxy.py -D MySpamData.pkl -l 110 
<myrealpophost> &

If I leave out the -l 100 option, there is nothing listening on port 
110. netstat confirms that. Maybe I'm just reading the doco wrong, 
but --help says that -l defaults to 110 so I would expect that -l 110 
would be superfluous...

(Needless to say, *with* -l 110, pop3proxy.py works like a 
charm!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-25 22:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You have configured a POP3 server to connect to (or
you're specifying one on the command line), yes?

If not, well no, it won't work.  8-)

If so, same question to you, Just: please tell me your
command line, your ini file, and the "netstat -a" output
before and after starting the proxy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 21:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 19:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 18:02:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 20:02:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-794935 ] pop3proxy: Configuration
	page traces back
Message-ID: <E19rRHf-0000Zt-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #794935, was opened at 2003-08-26 09:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy: Configuration page traces back

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3, spambayes from CVS, MacOSX 10.2.6, 
pop3proxy.py started with -D.

When I click the "Configuration page" link I get this 
traceback:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 398, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 487, in onConfig
    if type(options.valid_input(sect, opt)) in 
types.StringTypes:

  File "/Volumes/TitaData/Users/just/code/spambayes/
spambayes/OptionsClass.py", line 561, in valid_input
    return self._options[sect, opt].valid_input()

KeyError: ('pop3proxy', 'add_mailid_to')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 12:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Opps.  Sorry, I hadn't checked ProxyUI.py in, which is why 
this was happening.  Did so just now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 11:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

I'm bang up to date from CVS and this is happening to me too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Can you re cvs-up and see if this still happens?  I removed 
this option yesterday, but might have checked ProxyUI.py 
and Options.py in separately (I was checking in lots of 
changes and trying to split them up a bit).  I think you got a 
CVS in between the two check-ins.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=794935&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 18:02:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 20:02:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rRIN-0007W4-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-25 12:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Tony: It's bizarre that it worked for you... makes me
wonder whether I misunderstood the bug.  Does it fail
(without my fix in place) if you run with no -l and no
ini file?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

No need for the ini file - the feature was just plain broken,
and is now fixed.

If I *had* needed your ini file, this is what I'd have said:
The ini file is optional, so you may not have one.  If you
do, and it has the default name (which I guess it will for
you) it will be in either your home directory or the current
working directory of pop3proxy, and it will be called either
'.spambayesrc' or 'bayescustomize.ini'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 23:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Either ~/.spambayesrc or bayescustomize.ini in the current 
working directory, or the envar BAYESCUSTOMIZE can be set 
to a list of files.

"pop3proxy.py -D hammie.pkl pop.myisp" and pop3proxy -D 
hammie.pkl -l 110 pop.myisp" both work here (win32).  Is this 
some *nix thing?  What happens if you change pop3proxy to 
default to port 1110 (line 798) and leave out the -l?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 22:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

Sorry, you asked about an "ini" file. If I had one, where would I 
find it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 22:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

My command line is:

nohup sudo python2.3 -u pop3proxy.py -D MySpamData.pkl -l 110 
<myrealpophost> &

If I leave out the -l 100 option, there is nothing listening on port 
110. netstat confirms that. Maybe I'm just reading the doco wrong, 
but --help says that -l defaults to 110 so I would expect that -l 110 
would be superfluous...

(Needless to say, *with* -l 110, pop3proxy.py works like a 
charm!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-25 22:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You have configured a POP3 server to connect to (or
you're specifying one on the command line), yes?

If not, well no, it won't work.  8-)

If so, same question to you, Just: please tell me your
command line, your ini file, and the "netstat -a" output
before and after starting the proxy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-25 21:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 19:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 18:05:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 20:06:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743131 ] connection refused with
	pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19rRLF-0000hX-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743131, was opened at 2003-05-26 00:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bernie Gardner (berniegardner)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: connection refused with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
I'm just starting to use spambayes and need a little
assistance. I am using SuSE linux 8.2 and Evolution as
a mail program.  When I set up the localhost:port
address in Evolution and start pop3proxy with the same
port number, I get a connection refused error when I
try to check mail on the isp server.  
I started pop3proxy first,and in fact I can access the
setup pages in my browser from localhost:8880 with no
problem.  I think it is Evolution which is refused by
my local computer, not pop3proxy by the isp.  The error
message definitely comes from Evolution and comes up
immediately after I press send/recieve.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 12:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Bah.  I thought it was bizarre too when I saw your checkin, 
so I dug deeper.  The console window I was in had another ini 
file in the BAYESCUSTOMIZE envar, which I had forgotten, 
and it was filling in the missing detail for me.

So, sorry (this isn't my day!), I was wrong, and your fix is 
correct.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 12:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Tony: It's bizarre that it worked for you... makes me
wonder whether I misunderstood the bug.  Does it fail
(without my fix in place) if you run with no -l and no
ini file?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 11:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

No need for the ini file - the feature was just plain broken,
and is now fixed.

If I *had* needed your ini file, this is what I'd have said:
The ini file is optional, so you may not have one.  If you
do, and it has the default name (which I guess it will for
you) it will be in either your home directory or the current
working directory of pop3proxy, and it will be called either
'.spambayesrc' or 'bayescustomize.ini'.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 11:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Either ~/.spambayesrc or bayescustomize.ini in the current 
working directory, or the envar BAYESCUSTOMIZE can be set 
to a list of files.

"pop3proxy.py -D hammie.pkl pop.myisp" and pop3proxy -D 
hammie.pkl -l 110 pop.myisp" both work here (win32).  Is this 
some *nix thing?  What happens if you change pop3proxy to 
default to port 1110 (line 798) and leave out the -l?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 10:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

Sorry, you asked about an "ini" file. If I had one, where would I 
find it?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 10:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

My command line is:

nohup sudo python2.3 -u pop3proxy.py -D MySpamData.pkl -l 110 
<myrealpophost> &

If I leave out the -l 100 option, there is nothing listening on port 
110. netstat confirms that. Maybe I'm just reading the doco wrong, 
but --help says that -l defaults to 110 so I would expect that -l 110 
would be superfluous...

(Needless to say, *with* -l 110, pop3proxy.py works like a 
charm!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 10:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

You have configured a POP3 server to connect to (or
you're specifying one on the command line), yes?

If not, well no, it won't work.  8-)

If so, same question to you, Just: please tell me your
command line, your ini file, and the "netstat -a" output
before and after starting the proxy.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Just van Rossum (jvr)
Date: 2003-08-26 09:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=92689

I just saw the same thing: if I start pop3proxy.py *without* 
specifying the port number with -l, it won't accept connections on 
the default port. The only other option I specified was -D.

This was on MacOSX 10.2.6, using Python 2.3, spambayes fresh 
from CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-03 07:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you tell me the exact command line you're using to
start the proxy, and attach a copy of your .ini file?  Also,
could you run "netstat -a" before and after starting the
proxy, and attach both sets of output to this bug
report?  Thanks.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 19:23:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 21:23:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages
Message-ID: <E19rSYC-0003DC-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-17 12:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 01:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

John: I believe I've now fixed this messages-not-appearing
bug.  If you're in a position to test the CVS version, I'd
appreciate it if you could verify that the fix works for you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 23:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Yes, that means that your database has become corrupted.  
See also FAQ 5.2:
<http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted>

I'm not sure that this is the cause of the review messages 
problem, though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-19 13:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

FWIW, I get this occasionally.  I first noticed it when a
piece of spam got through, but reviewing my messages, it's
happening quite a bit.
I'm going to reinstall since I think SB is just messed up on
my machine.  I will wait 24 hours in case you want some data
from my machine for debugging.

X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in
probability() at
C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\classifier.py line
307: assert hamcount <= nham

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 08:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this is a duplicate of:
[ 787251 ] Problem refreshing message list

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

The bad news is that we don't know why this is happening.  
We'll keep trying to track it down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-18 22:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I now have a reproducible issue.  I can now NEVER review
messages unless I go into the configuration page and exit by
hitting "save".  I don't have to change anything.  Unless I
do this, no messages ever become available for review.  Once
I do this, all prior rounds become available.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'll add the version info to the interface page, although note 
that this information is displayed in the window that you start 
pop3proxy in.  (If you double-click it, or run it as a service, 
then you won't see this, but you can always run it once to 
see the version info).

I'll close this for the moment, but if you can track down a 
problem where messages aren't displayed for review, please 
re-open.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-17 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 19:24:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 21:24:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787251 ] Problem refreshing
	message list
Message-ID: <E19rSZ0-0005hi-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787251, was opened at 2003-08-12 08:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787251&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David McNab (davidmcnab)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Problem refreshing message list

Initial Comment:
Hi,

I've just installed SpamBayes from CVS.

Got a small problem with the SpamBayes message cache.

Firstly, I retrieve messages with my pop3 client
(Evolution) via SpamBayes pop3proxy.

Then when I click on the Review Messages link in
SpamBayes web interface, the newly retrieved messages
don't appear.

I've found a workaround - by clicking on the
Configuration link, then saving the configuration
unchanged, I can then click on 'Review Messages' and
see all the messages I've just retrieved.

It would feel more convenient if I didn't need to do
this, especially in these early days while I'm training
SpamBayes.

Am I doing anything wrong? Is there anything I can do?

Cheers
David




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 01:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

David: I believe I've now fixed this messages-not-appearing
bug.  If you're in a position to test the CVS version, I'd
appreciate it if you could verify that the fix works for you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 08:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe [ 790051 ] Can't review messages is a dupe of this.

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

It's odd that more people don't report this if it is occuring.  
Maybe they don't notice?

(no ideas about the cause, but willing to believe it was 
something I checked in ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-15 20:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

David,

Is this still happening for you?  I've seen this happen the
first time a new installation of Spambayes is run, but it's
always sorted itself out after the first time.  (Not that I'm
denying it's a problem, just looking for more information.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787251&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 19:24:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Aug 25 21:25:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790051 ] Can't review messages
Message-ID: <E19rSZp-0005jE-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #790051, was opened at 2003-08-17 12:25
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Ridley (jridley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't review messages

Initial Comment:
I turned on the option "Add probability (score)
header:" and then whenever I went to "Review Messages"
it told me that there were no messages to review, even
though there were.  This continued even if I retrieved
a new batch of messages through the proxy.  If I turned
the "Add probability" option back off, then went into
review messages, I got to see and review all the
messages that I knew should have been there.

Also it'd be nice if the version of SpamBayes showed up
on the web interface home page, maybe at the bottom.  I
can't tell what version I'm running but I just DL'd and
installed it less than a week ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-26 01:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

John: I believe I've now fixed this messages-not-appearing
bug.  If you're in a position to test the CVS version, I'd
appreciate it if you could verify that the fix works for you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 23:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Yes, that means that your database has become corrupted.  
See also FAQ 5.2:
<http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#my-database-
keeps-getting-corrupted>

I'm not sure that this is the cause of the review messages 
problem, though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-19 13:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

FWIW, I get this occasionally.  I first noticed it when a
piece of spam got through, but reviewing my messages, it's
happening quite a bit.
I'm going to reinstall since I think SB is just messed up on
my machine.  I will wait 24 hours in case you want some data
from my machine for debugging.

X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in
probability() at
C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\classifier.py line
307: assert hamcount <= nham

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-19 08:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this is a duplicate of:
[ 787251 ] Problem refreshing message list

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498104&aid=787251&group_id=61702

The bad news is that we don't know why this is happening.  
We'll keep trying to track it down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-18 22:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I now have a reproducible issue.  I can now NEVER review
messages unless I go into the configuration page and exit by
hitting "save".  I don't have to change anything.  Unless I
do this, no messages ever become available for review.  Once
I do this, all prior rounds become available.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-18 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I'll add the version info to the interface page, although note 
that this information is displayed in the window that you start 
pop3proxy in.  (If you double-click it, or run it as a service, 
then you won't see this, but you can always run it once to 
see the version info).

I'll close this for the moment, but if you can track down a 
problem where messages aren't displayed for review, please 
re-open.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Ridley (jridley)
Date: 2003-08-17 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=507076

OK, I think the cause is in error.  I was just unable to
review messages again, this time turning ON the probability
header allowed me to review messages from the last
retrieval.  Perhaps just changing a setting will do it.  I
will try changing something else next timethis happens.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790051&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 25 22:36:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 00:36:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791254 ] Advance
	configuration panel
Message-ID: <E19rVYo-00015J-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791254, was opened at 2003-08-20 02:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Advance configuration panel

Initial Comment:
When developping the remote connections patches I've
discovered a lot of options which are not available
through the web interface. Would it be possible to make
them be available through an advanced configuration
page in the web interface ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 16:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checked into cvs.  Once sf anon cvs updates, it would be 
great if you could try it out and let me know what you think.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 12:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

cache_expiry_days, cache_use_gzip options would be cool for
instance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 11:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The problem is that there are so many options, and you really 
have to understand a lot about what is going on under the 
surface to use a lot of them.  I wonder if, even on 
an "advanced" page, they would be too overwhelming.

Are there any options in particular that you're thinking of?

(Note that technically this should be a relatively easy thing to 
do).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 00:26:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 02:26:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795145 ] pop3proxy review page
	dies with mixed gzip/non messages
Message-ID: <E19rXHN-0000nl-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795145, was opened at 2003-08-26 18:26
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795145&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy review page dies with mixed gzip/non messages

Initial Comment:
If the Advanced Options are set to store the message 
cache gzipped, then having un-gzipped messages in the 
cache kills the review page (traceback below).

This happens if you have outstanding messages cached 
and not trained, and you go into the Advanced 
Configuration, and enable gzip compression of the cache.

Basically, if the option is set, the Review Messages page 
assumes the cache is only gzipped messages, and then 
dies trying to display the first non-gzipped message.

Looks like the best fix for this is for the Review 
Messages page to check whether each message is 
compressed before attempting to process it, rather than 
assuming that if the option is set True, then all
messages are compressed, or if the option is set to 
False, that no messages are compressed.  (In other 
words, the option should only control saving, not 
loading).

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

   File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 
398, in 
found_terminator
     getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

   File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 
392, in onReview
     message = spambayes.mboxutils.get_message
(cachedMessage.getSubstance())

   File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 
349, in getSubstance
     return self.hdrtxt + self.payload

   File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 
292, in __getattr__
     self.load()

   File "C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\FileCorpus.py", 
line 316, in load
     self.setSubstance(fp.read())

   File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 217, in read
     self._read(readsize)

   File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 260, in _read
     self._read_gzip_header()

   File "C:\Python23\lib\gzip.py", line 161, in 
_read_gzip_header
     raise IOError, 'Not a gzipped file'

IOError: Not a gzipped file

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795145&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 00:59:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 02:59:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19rXnU-00027K-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-23 16:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shamran
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jesper Rasmussen (shamran)
Date: 2003-08-26 08:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=852337

The same happens to me ! Have reinstalling ! where 
should i send my logfile ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-26 01:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Has your user account successfully configured Outlook?  Can
you see folders and send messages when logged in as this
user?  Is there anything else different about this users
Outlook config versus the Admins - eg, lack of/extra
personal folders or exchange server configs?

If you were willing to run the source-code version we could
track this further.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-25 16:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Dunno what Windows Server 2003 does different than XP 
does in this. I've installed the program as administrator, 
where it runs fine (one single e-mail account to exchange-
server). Then I logged in as my personal account and it never 
ran properly. I've tried installing it again using my personal 
user account (with enterprise admin-rights) over the existing 
install, but to na avail. It still works under the administrator-
account.

I've got three e-mail accounts; 2 POP3's and one Exchange. 
I've already removed one POP3 and the exchange-account, 
but that doesn't do the trick. I've only got one Outlook-
profile, that's set to default and "always use", so that 
shouldn't be the problem (I hope...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 13:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is there anything "unusual" about this machine?  Does it
have any kind of special logon to the server?  This error is
getting the "default message store" for the machine, which
is where the primary "Inbox" etc is located.  I've never
seen an error fetching this before, so I need a few more
clues...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 01:29:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 03:30:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19rYGw-0005Su-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-23 15:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbrozius
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-26 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

No differences in Exchange-configs. I already rules that out 
by deleting all but a pop3-account from my profile. Still 
nothing.

I've done as you asked and installed the source-code version 
but it has the same result.

Python Trace Collector shows these messages:
# This window will display output from any programs that 
import win32traceutil
# win32com servers registered with '--debug' are in this 
category.
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 1127, 
in OnConnection
    self.manager = manager.GetManager(application)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
825, in GetManager
    _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
377, in __init__
    self.message_store = msgstore.MAPIMsgStore(outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
158, in __init__
    self._GetMessageStore(None)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
222, in _GetMessageStore
    mapi.MDB_WRITE |
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 1127, 
in OnConnection
    self.manager = manager.GetManager(application)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
825, in GetManager
    _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
377, in __init__
    self.message_store = msgstore.MAPIMsgStore(outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
158, in __init__
    self._GetMessageStore(None)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
222, in _GetMessageStore
    mapi.MDB_WRITE |
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)

The error also occurs when I use only me exchange-account, 
with no PST-file used in my profile....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jesper Rasmussen (shamran)
Date: 2003-08-26 07:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=852337

The same happens to me ! Have reinstalling ! where 
should i send my logfile ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Has your user account successfully configured Outlook?  Can
you see folders and send messages when logged in as this
user?  Is there anything else different about this users
Outlook config versus the Admins - eg, lack of/extra
personal folders or exchange server configs?

If you were willing to run the source-code version we could
track this further.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-25 15:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Dunno what Windows Server 2003 does different than XP 
does in this. I've installed the program as administrator, 
where it runs fine (one single e-mail account to exchange-
server). Then I logged in as my personal account and it never 
ran properly. I've tried installing it again using my personal 
user account (with enterprise admin-rights) over the existing 
install, but to na avail. It still works under the administrator-
account.

I've got three e-mail accounts; 2 POP3's and one Exchange. 
I've already removed one POP3 and the exchange-account, 
but that doesn't do the trick. I've only got one Outlook-
profile, that's set to default and "always use", so that 
shouldn't be the problem (I hope...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is there anything "unusual" about this machine?  Does it
have any kind of special logon to the server?  This error is
getting the "default message store" for the machine, which
is where the primary "Inbox" etc is located.  I've never
seen an error fetching this before, so I need a few more
clues...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 01:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 02:04:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 04:54:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786513 ] Initial configuration
	too clunky
Message-ID: <E19rYoE-0004uL-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #786513, was opened at 2003-08-11 19:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786513&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initial configuration too clunky

Initial Comment:
>From the mailing list:

* Should be enabled by default, monitoring the inbox.
* I would also recommend that you automatically add a
"Junk E-mail" and "Junk Suspects" folder during install
and use those as the default destination for flagged
messages. If you get a copy of Outlook 2003 beta2
Technical Refresh, Microsoft automatically adds a "Junk
E-Mail" folder. Even better, they allow you to
right-click the folder and delete spam directly from
that folder. This would be a cool dovetail of features
with 2003.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-26 18:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The wizard and new config is as good as we are getting for a
while :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786513&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 02:03:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 04:54:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19rYnV-0002lD-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-29 11:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-26 18:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

It all makes sense now :)

Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.68; previous revision: 1.67

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-09 02:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'd still like to track this down.  I don't really consider
asking users to edit the config file is reasonable.  So
romanito, your help is still appreciated (even if you
comment your "data_directory" for the duration of that help)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jean-Yves Doyon (jydoyon)
Date: 2003-08-08 22:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=839198

Problem solved!!!

Go into the control panel/courrier. Then click on "afficher les 
profils" and you will probably find that your profile is set to 
default "Param?tres Microsoft Exchange". Just click on copy 
and give it an ASCII compatible name. (Don't forget to set it 
as the new default profile.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-08 07:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting probable dupes (they might be fixed by the data dir fix, 
but if not they seem to be dupes) in:

[ 784392 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin
[ 784380 ] Error initializing the SpamBayes addin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Vallet (romanito)
Date: 2003-08-08 01:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=515976

I have exactly the same problem with the source distribution.

SpamBayes 1.0a4
Python 2.3
win32all-155
Windows 2000 SP4 Pro French
Outlook 2002 French

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 16:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

I added the following two lines to my configuration file but I 
still get the same error message:
[general]
data_directory: c:\temp

Also my default data directory does not seem to have non 
ascii chars:
D:\Documents and Settings\hmoret\Application 
Data\SpamBayes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 12:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 04:50:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 06:52:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-795257 ] mboxtrain.py & cyrus
Message-ID: <E19rbPa-000445-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #795257, was opened at 2003-08-26 10:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=795257&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alon (arohter)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: mboxtrain.py & cyrus

Initial Comment:
Attached is a patched 1.0a4 mboxtrain.py to work with 
the Cyrus IMAPd.

Taken from

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-
August/006544.html

"I believe that all you should have to do is modify one 
line in mboxtrain - the regex in line 185 - to include '.' as 
well as 0-9 (change it from "[0-9]*" to "[0-9\.]*"), and 
it should work just as normal."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=795257&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 09:13:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 11:14:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795414 ] Missing [SpamBayes]
	button after install
Message-ID: <E19rfW3-00080y-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795414, was opened at 2003-08-26 17:13
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Niels Hosbond Petersen (hosbond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Missing [SpamBayes] button after install

Initial Comment:
After installing the "SpamBayes" button is blank (no 
visible text) and nothing happens, when I press it. Not 
having this button prevents me from getting started with 
SpamBayes Manager etc.

I have uninstalled/reinstalled several times without any 
luck.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 11:55:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 13:56:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-748199 ] Spam score now shows as
	decimal
Message-ID: <E19ri2R-0004Vd-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #748199, was opened at 2003-06-03 10:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by halr9000
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=748199&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Zalinski (pezalinski)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam score now shows as decimal

Initial Comment:
When I created a "Spam" column in Outlook 2000, and 
scored the folder using your product, everything was 
grand -- the scores showed up as percentages. Then I 
moved the "Spam" column by dragging it over a few 
columns, and the scores converted to decimals, and I 
can't seem to get them to convert back to a 
percentage, no matter what I try. 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hal Rottenberg (halr9000)
Date: 2003-08-26 13:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=93952

Have you tried removing and re-adding the field?  This worked 
for me on OL2K3.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=748199&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 15:48:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 17:52:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743408 ] Install fails Outlook
	2000, WinXP
Message-ID: <E19rlgN-00076D-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743408, was opened at 2003-05-26 01:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by oregonsteve
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743408&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Scott (kaleid)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Install fails Outlook 2000, WinXP

Initial Comment:
During install of version 002 for Outlook 2000 in Win Xp 
Pro, I get this error:

---------------------------
Error
---------------------------
C:\Program Files\Spambayes Outlook 
Addin\spambayes_addin.dll

Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; 
code 0x00000000.

Click Retry to try again, Ignore to proceed anyway (not 
recommended), or Abort to cancel installation.
---------------------------
Abort   Retry   Ignore   
---------------------------

There is a spambayes1.log file in my %TEMP%, but it 
is empty.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Smothers (oregonsteve)
Date: 2003-08-26 21:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=852837

Received this error when installing binary version 0.7 to 
WinXPsp1 using OL2002 10.4219.4219 (SP2); Reinstalled over 
the top with the same results; uninstalled and reinstalled with 
same results;  Manually added SpamBayes_addin.dll through 
COM Add-ins in Outlook and reinstalled without incident.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-04 08:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Dupe of #740198

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-06-04 03:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Hmm.  I've never had Python installed so that doesn't 
explain why I have this problem or how to work around 
it.   
-Rob 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ernie Oporto (shokk)
Date: 2003-06-04 03:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3668

I fixed this by removing Python 2.3b1.  After that it 
immediately installed correctly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ernie Oporto (shokk)
Date: 2003-06-04 02:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3668

I am also seeing this for Outlook 2002 on WinXPPro Sp1.   I 
have no log files available anywhere.  I have Python 2.3b1 
installed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-05-26 17:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

My fault I suppose for failing to detail it but I saw this 
same error message when my problem occurred.  Also 
see posting #741914.  I suspect all three bug reports 
are the same regsvr error.
-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Scott (kaleid)
Date: 2003-05-26 17:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=20330

I saw item #740198, but the symptoms reported were different 
than this one, so I didn't consider this a dupe.  Causes may 
be the same, however.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-05-26 17:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

This is the same as my submitted item #740198. 
-Rob (rdesantos)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Scott (kaleid)
Date: 2003-05-26 05:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=20330

I tried re-installing (no other actions)....and it worked.  Weird.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mylene Reiners (mylene)
Date: 2003-05-26 04:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=20281

This problem seems to occur when not only Spambayes is
installed, but also Python (2.3b1 ?)

Mylene

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743408&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 16:30:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 18:31:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-791254 ] Advance
	configuration panel
Message-ID: <E19rmL3-0004bQ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #791254, was opened at 2003-08-19 16:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Advance configuration panel

Initial Comment:
When developping the remote connections patches I've
discovered a lot of options which are not available
through the web interface. Would it be possible to make
them be available through an advanced configuration
page in the web interface ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-27 00:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I love the new configuration panels :) Thanks a lot.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-26 06:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Checked into cvs.  Once sf anon cvs updates, it would be 
great if you could try it out and let me know what you think.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

cache_expiry_days, cache_use_gzip options would be cool for
instance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 01:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The problem is that there are so many options, and you really 
have to understand a lot about what is going on under the 
surface to use a lot of them.  I wonder if, even on 
an "advanced" page, they would be too overwhelming.

Are there any options in particular that you're thinking of?

(Note that technically this should be a relatively easy thing to 
do).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=791254&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 19:38:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 21:38:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761318 ] Moved mail is unfiltered
Message-ID: <E19rpGS-0001q6-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761318, was opened at 2003-06-26 13:22
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by schwit
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761318&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Welsh (markw_x)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Moved mail is unfiltered

Initial Comment:
When I use Outlook's rules wizard to move my emails to 
a different folder, they aren't filtered by the add-in.

Both the inbox, where the message arrives for a second 
before the rule is used, and the destination folder, 
where the message is moved by the rule, are listed as 
folders that should be filtered by the add-in.

The spam that arrives is given a spam score but not 
filtered accordingly.

This is an excerpt from the log for a piece of spam that 
was given a rating of 100%:
Message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' had a Spam 
classification of 'Yes'
Training on message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' -  trained 
as good
Training on message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' -  trained 
as spam

It was trained as spam because I clicked the "Delete as 
Spam" button, not because of the filtering.

I have Outlook 2002 SP-2.  I'm using the latest binary of 
the add-in (SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-002.exe).  The 
spam filtering works fine for all other mail that's left in 
the inbox and not moved by a rule.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: ted schwind (schwit)
Date: 2003-08-26 21:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=852250

Same problem here with v0.7 and Outlook 2003b2 refresh. Even
if Spambayes is filtering the folder where mail is moved to.
Messages are scored at 100%, but not moved to the spam folder.

Filtering does work on those messages not touched by rules.

One other item, Spambayes will not let me move spam to the
deleted items folder. It's not one of the folders that is
selectable when defining filters.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dylan Ginsburg (dginsburg)
Date: 2003-07-10 15:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820134

I have the same problem. I was able to get the filtering to 
work by only watching the sub-folder to which I move certain 
emails. When I watch both the master and sub-folder the 
filtering doesn't work (though the spam % is correct).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Welsh (markw_x)
Date: 2003-07-01 21:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=809756

I just got the latest binary (SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
003.exe) and the bug still exists.

I set SpamBayes to mark all spam as read.  Although the 
spam doesn't get moved to the spam directory, it does get 
marked as read automatically.  Unfortunately, it's still trained 
as good until I delete it manually.

I thought maybe that observation would help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761318&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 19:38:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 21:38:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795749 ] "Score after training"
	doesn't in CVS
Message-ID: <E19rpGf-0006Ty-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795749, was opened at 2003-08-26 21:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795749&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Score after training" doesn't in CVS

Initial Comment:
If "Score messages after training" is selected in current 
CVS, it dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 436, in 
__bootstrap
    self.run()
  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 416, in run
    self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000
\dialogs\async_processor.py", line 224, in thread_target
    self.func( self.window.manager, self.window.config, 
progress)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\train.py", line 
183, in trainer
    filter.filterer(mgr, progress)
TypeError: filterer() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

Attempting to repair this via changing the call to

    filter.filterer(mgr, config, progress)

dies in a different way:

  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 436, in 
__bootstrap
    self.run()
  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 416, in run
    self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000
\dialogs\async_processor.py", line 224, in thread_target
    self.func( self.window.manager, self.window.config, 
progress)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\train.py", line 
183, in trainer
    filter.filterer(mgr, config, progress)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\filter.py", line 
120, in filterer
    config = config.filter_now
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\config.py", line 
278, in __getattr__
    return self._options.get(self._section, attr)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\spambayes\OptionsClass.py", 
line 594, in get
    return self.get_option(sect, opt).get()
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\spambayes\OptionsClass.py", 
line 588, in get_option
    return self._options[sect, opt]
KeyError: ('Filter_Now', 'filter_now')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795749&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 20:26:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 22:26:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795765 ] Spambayes Manager Not
	Displaying
Message-ID: <E19rq0X-0007yR-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795765, was opened at 2003-08-27 02:26
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes Manager Not Displaying

Initial Comment:
Can't see that this has been reported (sorry if it has).
I am back running off CVS after processing missed 
messages stopped working again in the 007 binary.

All is working well except the Spambayes Manager
is not Displaying anything. It brings up the box and the 
tabs but clicking on each tab reveals nothing.
Log attached.

running XP outlook 2002 SP2 
Spambayes - current CVS ver.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 21:35:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Aug 26 23:35:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795749 ] "Score after training"
	doesn't in CVS
Message-ID: <E19rr5W-0001O6-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795749, was opened at 2003-08-27 11:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795749&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Score after training" doesn't in CVS

Initial Comment:
If "Score messages after training" is selected in current 
CVS, it dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 436, in 
__bootstrap
    self.run()
  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 416, in run
    self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000
\dialogs\async_processor.py", line 224, in thread_target
    self.func( self.window.manager, self.window.config, 
progress)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\train.py", line 
183, in trainer
    filter.filterer(mgr, progress)
TypeError: filterer() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

Attempting to repair this via changing the call to

    filter.filterer(mgr, config, progress)

dies in a different way:

  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 436, in 
__bootstrap
    self.run()
  File "C:\PYTHON23\lib\threading.py", line 416, in run
    self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000
\dialogs\async_processor.py", line 224, in thread_target
    self.func( self.window.manager, self.window.config, 
progress)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\train.py", line 
183, in trainer
    filter.filterer(mgr, config, progress)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\filter.py", line 
120, in filterer
    config = config.filter_now
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\Outlook2000\config.py", line 
278, in __getattr__
    return self._options.get(self._section, attr)
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\spambayes\OptionsClass.py", 
line 594, in get
    return self.get_option(sect, opt).get()
  File "C:\Code\spambayes\spambayes\OptionsClass.py", 
line 588, in get_option
    return self._options[sect, opt]
KeyError: ('Filter_Now', 'filter_now')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 13:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Close - it needed the full config object :)

>         filter.filterer(mgr, mgr.config, progress)

Checking in train.py;
new revision: 1.32; previous revision: 1.31


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795749&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 26 22:18:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 00:19:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795765 ] Spambayes Manager Not
	Displaying
Message-ID: <E19rrlq-0006r2-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795765, was opened at 2003-08-26 22:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes Manager Not Displaying

Initial Comment:
Can't see that this has been reported (sorry if it has).
I am back running off CVS after processing missed 
messages stopped working again in the 007 binary.

All is working well except the Spambayes Manager
is not Displaying anything. It brings up the box and the 
tabs but clicking on each tab reveals nothing.
Log attached.

running XP outlook 2002 SP2 
Spambayes - current CVS ver.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-08-27 00:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Looks like your copy of spambayes/OptionClass.py is old. Try
getting a fresh copy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 00:52:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 02:52:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795833 ] Browsing folders crashes
	outlook
Message-ID: <E19ruAY-0007Oq-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795833, was opened at 2003-08-27 08:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Browsing folders crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
Help!  really!

I've not got much here, but this is critical:

browsing the folders either from the "filter now"-dialog or 
from any of the buttons in the "spambayes manager" 
dialog crashes outlook.  No traceback is reported.

outlook just dissapears, and no process is left behind in 
the task-manager.  I think I moved som folders 
yesterday.  To enable spambayes I've deleted all watch-
folders-entries in the ini-file except the first one (which 
was my inbox).  prior to this spambayes reported (via 
dialog) that it couldn't initialize due to some folders not 
found.

Browsing the folders from the outlook rule-wizard works 
perfectly well.

Is there a way to detect the values (folder-ids) that 
should be in the watch_folder_ids in the ini-file so I can 
set this up manually for now?

I'm running on latest CVS (just updated 030827 - though 
the same bug applied to the version I was running 
yesterday which was appr. one week old), win xp home, 
outlook 2000

I hope this can be fixed soon....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 00:58:39 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 02:58:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795833 ] Browsing folders crashes
	outlook
Message-ID: <E19ruGN-000398-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795833, was opened at 2003-08-27 18:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Browsing folders crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
Help!  really!

I've not got much here, but this is critical:

browsing the folders either from the "filter now"-dialog or 
from any of the buttons in the "spambayes manager" 
dialog crashes outlook.  No traceback is reported.

outlook just dissapears, and no process is left behind in 
the task-manager.  I think I moved som folders 
yesterday.  To enable spambayes I've deleted all watch-
folders-entries in the ini-file except the first one (which 
was my inbox).  prior to this spambayes reported (via 
dialog) that it couldn't initialize due to some folders not 
found.

Browsing the folders from the outlook rule-wizard works 
perfectly well.

Is there a way to detect the values (folder-ids) that 
should be in the watch_folder_ids in the ini-file so I can 
set this up manually for now?

I'm running on latest CVS (just updated 030827 - though 
the same bug applied to the version I was running 
yesterday which was appr. one week old), win xp home, 
outlook 2000

I hope this can be fixed soon....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-27 18:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Mark's been trying to fix this for me for the last day or two, 
and has just right this moment done so.

Please try cvs-upping again and confirm that it works for you 
as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 01:02:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 03:02:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795833 ] Browsing folders crashes
	outlook
Message-ID: <E19ruK6-0003K1-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795833, was opened at 2003-08-27 08:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fmmr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Browsing folders crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
Help!  really!

I've not got much here, but this is critical:

browsing the folders either from the "filter now"-dialog or 
from any of the buttons in the "spambayes manager" 
dialog crashes outlook.  No traceback is reported.

outlook just dissapears, and no process is left behind in 
the task-manager.  I think I moved som folders 
yesterday.  To enable spambayes I've deleted all watch-
folders-entries in the ini-file except the first one (which 
was my inbox).  prior to this spambayes reported (via 
dialog) that it couldn't initialize due to some folders not 
found.

Browsing the folders from the outlook rule-wizard works 
perfectly well.

Is there a way to detect the values (folder-ids) that 
should be in the watch_folder_ids in the ini-file so I can 
set this up manually for now?

I'm running on latest CVS (just updated 030827 - though 
the same bug applied to the version I was running 
yesterday which was appr. one week old), win xp home, 
outlook 2000

I hope this can be fixed soon....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-27 09:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to an old version I had lying around (maybe 1 
month old) with the old dialogs.  No problem browsing the 
folders here, so something fishy is introduced somewhere.

Managed to set up the folders to watch through this GUI.  
I've reverted to the latest cvs-version which seems to work 
ok.  It processed all missing files in the folder, but still 
CRASHES outlook if I try to browse the folders.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-27 08:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Mark's been trying to fix this for me for the last day or two, 
and has just right this moment done so.

Please try cvs-upping again and confirm that it works for you 
as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 01:28:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 03:28:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795833 ] Browsing folders crashes
	outlook
Message-ID: <E19rujL-00038r-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795833, was opened at 2003-08-27 16:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Browsing folders crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
Help!  really!

I've not got much here, but this is critical:

browsing the folders either from the "filter now"-dialog or 
from any of the buttons in the "spambayes manager" 
dialog crashes outlook.  No traceback is reported.

outlook just dissapears, and no process is left behind in 
the task-manager.  I think I moved som folders 
yesterday.  To enable spambayes I've deleted all watch-
folders-entries in the ini-file except the first one (which 
was my inbox).  prior to this spambayes reported (via 
dialog) that it couldn't initialize due to some folders not 
found.

Browsing the folders from the outlook rule-wizard works 
perfectly well.

Is there a way to detect the values (folder-ids) that 
should be in the watch_folder_ids in the ini-file so I can 
set this up manually for now?

I'm running on latest CVS (just updated 030827 - though 
the same bug applied to the version I was running 
yesterday which was appr. one week old), win xp home, 
outlook 2000

I hope this can be fixed soon....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 17:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - thanks Tony.  If it still happens for you with r1.26
of FolderSelector.py, please reopen.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-08-27 17:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I reverted to an old version I had lying around (maybe 1 
month old) with the old dialogs.  No problem browsing the 
folders here, so something fishy is introduced somewhere.

Managed to set up the folders to watch through this GUI.  
I've reverted to the latest cvs-version which seems to work 
ok.  It processed all missing files in the folder, but still 
CRASHES outlook if I try to browse the folders.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-27 16:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Mark's been trying to fix this for me for the last day or two, 
and has just right this moment done so.

Please try cvs-upping again and confirm that it works for you 
as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795833&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 01:44:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 03:44:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795851 ] Cannot change folder
	where to move spam
Message-ID: <E19ruyP-0005QS-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795851, was opened at 2003-08-27 09:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot change folder where to move spam

Initial Comment:
Hello,

i am using Spambayes with Outlook 2000 and Windows 
XP prof. and i am just configuring the filter rules, that 
Certain spam will be moved to a folder and it works so 
far.
Now i want to change this folder, but when i open the 
button "BROWSE", there will be displayed no folders and 
i can not even remove the folder i've specified before.

I've reinstalled SpamBayes, but afterwards this settings 
were like before. Also, i've looked into the registry, but i 
did not find an entry for that configuration.

Does somebody know where Spambayes saves it's 
configuration or how to chose another folder for certain 
spam?

Thank you in advance.

Horst

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 01:52:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 03:52:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795854 ] Email notification
Message-ID: <E19rv6G-000439-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795854, was opened at 2003-08-27 07:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795854&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Email notification

Initial Comment:
Hello,
is it possible that when I receive new mail that is spam 
that my email notification in my system tray is not 
activated so i dont have to check everytime I see this 
notification only to realise that it is spam?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795854&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 02:01:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 04:01:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795854 ] Email notification
Message-ID: <E19rvF0-0005iY-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795854, was opened at 2003-08-27 19:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795854&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Email notification

Initial Comment:
Hello,
is it possible that when I receive new mail that is spam 
that my email notification in my system tray is not 
activated so i dont have to check everytime I see this 
notification only to realise that it is spam?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-27 20:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Please see FAQ 3.9:

<http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.
html#how-can-i-get-rid-of-the-envelope-tray-icon-for-spam>

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795854&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 02:36:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 04:36:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795851 ] Cannot change folder
	where to move spam
Message-ID: <E19rvmd-0007hn-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795851, was opened at 2003-08-27 17:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot change folder where to move spam

Initial Comment:
Hello,

i am using Spambayes with Outlook 2000 and Windows 
XP prof. and i am just configuring the filter rules, that 
Certain spam will be moved to a folder and it works so 
far.
Now i want to change this folder, but when i open the 
button "BROWSE", there will be displayed no folders and 
i can not even remove the folder i've specified before.

I've reinstalled SpamBayes, but afterwards this settings 
were like before. Also, i've looked into the registry, but i 
did not find an entry for that configuration.

Does somebody know where Spambayes saves it's 
configuration or how to chose another folder for certain 
spam?

Thank you in advance.

Horst

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 18:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This should be fixed in version 007 of the plugin - please
try that version.  If you are using 007, please reopen this
bug, and see the "troubleshooting guide" and attach the log file

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 02:37:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 04:41:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795765 ] Spambayes Manager Not
	Displaying
Message-ID: <E19rvoP-0007nZ-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795765, was opened at 2003-08-27 12:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes Manager Not Displaying

Initial Comment:
Can't see that this has been reported (sorry if it has).
I am back running off CVS after processing missed 
messages stopped working again in the 007 binary.

All is working well except the Spambayes Manager
is not Displaying anything. It brings up the box and the 
tabs but clicking on each tab reveals nothing.
Log attached.

running XP outlook 2002 SP2 
Spambayes - current CVS ver.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 18:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The attached log is from binary version 003.  Please attach
a new log and reopen if this is still a problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-08-27 14:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Looks like your copy of spambayes/OptionClass.py is old. Try
getting a fresh copy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 02:52:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 04:52:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795851 ] Cannot change folder
	where to move spam
Message-ID: <E19rw2Q-0008Up-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795851, was opened at 2003-08-27 09:44
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by eos-hg
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot change folder where to move spam

Initial Comment:
Hello,

i am using Spambayes with Outlook 2000 and Windows 
XP prof. and i am just configuring the filter rules, that 
Certain spam will be moved to a folder and it works so 
far.
Now i want to change this folder, but when i open the 
button "BROWSE", there will be displayed no folders and 
i can not even remove the folder i've specified before.

I've reinstalled SpamBayes, but afterwards this settings 
were like before. Also, i've looked into the registry, but i 
did not find an entry for that configuration.

Does somebody know where Spambayes saves it's 
configuration or how to chose another folder for certain 
spam?

Thank you in advance.

Horst

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 10:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This should be fixed in version 007 of the plugin - please
try that version.  If you are using 007, please reopen this
bug, and see the "troubleshooting guide" and attach the log file

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 02:58:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 04:58:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795851 ] Cannot change folder
	where to move spam
Message-ID: <E19rw82-0000LV-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795851, was opened at 2003-08-27 09:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eos-hg
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot change folder where to move spam

Initial Comment:
Hello,

i am using Spambayes with Outlook 2000 and Windows 
XP prof. and i am just configuring the filter rules, that 
Certain spam will be moved to a folder and it works so 
far.
Now i want to change this folder, but when i open the 
button "BROWSE", there will be displayed no folders and 
i can not even remove the folder i've specified before.

I've reinstalled SpamBayes, but afterwards this settings 
were like before. Also, i've looked into the registry, but i 
did not find an entry for that configuration.

Does somebody know where Spambayes saves it's 
configuration or how to chose another folder for certain 
spam?

Thank you in advance.

Horst

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg)
Date: 2003-08-27 10:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853131

I am using version 007.
What do you mean with reopen this bug and see 
the "troubleshooting guide" ?
I cannot find any log-file in the programm or user folder.

grettz

Horst Geisler

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 10:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This should be fixed in version 007 of the plugin - please
try that version.  If you are using 007, please reopen this
bug, and see the "troubleshooting guide" and attach the log file

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 02:59:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 04:59:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776808 ] Expanding toolbar
	crashes outlook
Message-ID: <E19rw9R-0004C2-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776808, was opened at 2003-07-24 18:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
If the spambayes toolbar is not completely visible in 
Outlook you can open/expand it using the '>>' button at 
the end of the toolbar. Clicking on this button crashes 
outlook completely with the following message:

"Program Error: Outlook.exe has generated errors and will 
be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the 
program."

Outlook's own toolbars don't have this problem.

Versions:
Outlook 2000 on W2K
Spambayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.5 (july 
2003)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 18:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed for me in 1.103 of addin.py

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-04 02:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

See also bug 782280 (now closed).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 19:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I get this too.  I'm at a loss though

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-31 19:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I get this on Outlook 2000 SP1, with the Spambayes addin 
binary installer 006.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 07:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

FYI, I've seen this too, on Win2K and Win98SE, using Outlook 
2000, and CVS spambayes, Python 2.2.3.  Just reproduced it 
after a CVS up.  This happens when I'm in my Unsure folder, 
which tries to display both buttons, and often my Outlook 
window is too small.  I first saw it shortly after we switched 
to building our own toolbar.  It doesn't bother me, especially 
since I can't imagine we're at fault <0.5 wink>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-25 07:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just for reference, I do not experience this with current CVS 
and Outlook 2k2 sp2 with WinXP SP1.  (I never have enough 
room in my possible spam folder, because both buttons are 
present, so I use this every now and then).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 03:24:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 05:24:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795851 ] Cannot change folder
	where to move spam
Message-ID: <E19rwX8-00011Q-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795851, was opened at 2003-08-27 17:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot change folder where to move spam

Initial Comment:
Hello,

i am using Spambayes with Outlook 2000 and Windows 
XP prof. and i am just configuring the filter rules, that 
Certain spam will be moved to a folder and it works so 
far.
Now i want to change this folder, but when i open the 
button "BROWSE", there will be displayed no folders and 
i can not even remove the folder i've specified before.

I've reinstalled SpamBayes, but afterwards this settings 
were like before. Also, i've looked into the registry, but i 
did not find an entry for that configuration.

Does somebody know where Spambayes saves it's 
configuration or how to chose another folder for certain 
spam?

Thank you in advance.

Horst

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 19:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

See docs/troubleshooting.html - the log file is in the
"temp" directory.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Horst Geisler (eos-hg)
Date: 2003-08-27 18:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853131

I am using version 007.
What do you mean with reopen this bug and see 
the "troubleshooting guide" ?
I cannot find any log-file in the programm or user folder.

grettz

Horst Geisler

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 18:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This should be fixed in version 007 of the plugin - please
try that version.  If you are using 007, please reopen this
bug, and see the "troubleshooting guide" and attach the log file

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795851&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 11:45:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 13:46:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796129 ] 'Keep as
	Good' Button
Message-ID: <E19s4Mj-0007lp-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #796129, was opened at 2003-08-27 13:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Unterste (aunterste)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: 'Keep as Good' Button

Initial Comment:
I use my InBox as storage for the good mail (in order to 
use outlooks rules for further moving and classification). 
When a message arrives with a relatively high spam 
score, but below the threshold, I think a button 'Keep as 
Good' would be useful which trains SpamBayes that this 
is ham. 

The only other way to achieve that at the moment is to 
move the message somewhere and trigger the set of the 
SpamScore to 0% by moving it back into the InBox. 

Something right next to the 'Delete as Spam'.

Otherwise: TERRIFIC PRODUCT !!!!!



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796129&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 14:28:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 16:28:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796239 ] database
	viewer / reporter
Message-ID: <E19s6u0-00055P-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #796239, was opened at 2003-08-27 20:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796239&group_id=61702

Category: Interface Improvements (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ryan Malayter (rmalayter)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: database viewer / reporter

Initial Comment:
For debugging purposes, as well as for curiousity's sake, 
I'd like to see a way to view the training database. 
Maybe you can already do this, but I'm unfamiliar with 
python and I can't really figure it out.

Perhaps editing it might even be an option, 
deleting "incorrect" entires that cause problems, 
although things could certainly get heiry if that feature 
were generally available.

Then again, this might be a bad idea, because it could 
give a spammer a clue as to what to avoid. But isn't 
that the whole point of an adaptive filter like 
SpamBayes? If spammers start using "innocent" words, 
they stop being innocent after a short while, or am I 
wrong?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796239&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 15:49:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 17:49:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796298 ] Outlook plugin: 0.7
	Check for new version doesn't use proxy
Message-ID: <E19s8A9-0006cL-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796298, was opened at 2003-08-27 14:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Clark (clach04)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: 0.7 Check for new version doesn't use proxy

Initial Comment:
Very low priority, the "Check for new version" option fails 
after a few seconds. I'm behind a http proxy (IE is 
configured for proxy access so the plugin could lookup 
IE's proxy settings and use that). Fragment of 
spambayes.log:

Error checking the latest version
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open
URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')>
ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest 
version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see 
the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet 
connection, or try again later'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open
URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')>
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 18:06:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 20:06:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sAIr-0003Wo-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 10:06
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 18:19:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 20:22:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sAVJ-0003vV-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 12:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-28 12:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this could be as a result of having "_" in your 
disposition names.  The UI currently uses "_" to fudge 
together section/option names.  It's a bit of a hack (and it 
says so in the code), but it works, for the most part.

Could you try it without having any "_"s in your disposition 
names?  If this fixes it, then either we need to come up with 
a new method for the interface, or you need to use 
something else for the names.  Is there a reason that you are 
using non-standard names?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 18:49:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 20:50:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796298 ] Outlook plugin: 0.7
	Check for new version doesn't use proxy
Message-ID: <E19sAyr-0005rn-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796298, was opened at 2003-08-28 07:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Clark (clach04)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: 0.7 Check for new version doesn't use proxy

Initial Comment:
Very low priority, the "Check for new version" option fails 
after a few seconds. I'm behind a http proxy (IE is 
configured for proxy access so the plugin could lookup 
IE's proxy settings and use that). Fragment of 
spambayes.log:

Error checking the latest version
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open
URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')>
ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest 
version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see 
the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet 
connection, or try again later'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open
URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')>
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-28 10:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We do try and use the IE proxy configuration, but currently
can't use the "auto configuration" option - we need to have
the proxy explicitly specified.

How is your IE proxy configured?  If configured for auto,
then Tony Meyer is looking at that too, but we aren't even
sure yet if it is practical.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Aug 27 21:19:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Aug 27 23:20:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796434 ] email package link is
	defunct
Message-ID: <E19sDKH-0001lu-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796434, was opened at 2003-08-27 22:19
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796434&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kevin C. (lebleu)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: email package link is defunct

Initial Comment:
The link for downloading the email package on
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/download.html is
useless. According to the messages in the mailing list
archive, they have shut down the mimelib.sf.net project
due to it being integrated into the main python project.

Could someone please tell me where to get an up to date
copy of the email package? I'm running Debian stable,
which currently only has Python 2.2.1 (w/ email 1.0) as
the most recent version.

Thanks--Kevin

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796434&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 01:04:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 03:05:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sGpc-0003HL-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 00:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-28 07:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Another problem is this:

hammie_header_name: To

The hammie_header_name is intended to be a *new*
header that gets added to the message, not an existing
header name.  If you want the To header to tell you
whether a message is spam or not, you should set the
'notate_to' option to a comma-separated list of any of the
classification values (in your case, 'spambayes_is_spam'
and family).  For instance:

notate_to: spambayes_is_spam, spambayes_is_unsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-28 00:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this could be as a result of having "_" in your 
disposition names.  The UI currently uses "_" to fudge 
together section/option names.  It's a bit of a hack (and it 
says so in the code), but it works, for the most part.

Could you try it without having any "_"s in your disposition 
names?  If this fixes it, then either we need to come up with 
a new method for the interface, or you need to use 
something else for the names.  Is there a reason that you are 
using non-standard names?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 01:16:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 03:16:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795765 ] Spambayes Manager Not
	Displaying
Message-ID: <E19sH10-0006YL-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795765, was opened at 2003-08-27 02:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shaunbroadbent
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes Manager Not Displaying

Initial Comment:
Can't see that this has been reported (sorry if it has).
I am back running off CVS after processing missed 
messages stopped working again in the 007 binary.

All is working well except the Spambayes Manager
is not Displaying anything. It brings up the box and the 
tabs but clicking on each tab reveals nothing.
Log attached.

running XP outlook 2002 SP2 
Spambayes - current CVS ver.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-28 07:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

I should pay a little bit more attention to the logs.. 
God knows what I have done, I have cleaned out all 
spambayes files/folders and checked it out again.
I now have the new manager displaying but the help menu
fails probably something equally as stupid as somehow using 
the wrong version..

Error is pasted in below --
(I will attach the log also)

FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowAbout' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowTroubleshooting' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowSpamBayes Website' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowFAQ' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.BugTacker' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 08:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The attached log is from binary version 003.  Please attach
a new log and reopen if this is still a problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-08-27 04:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Looks like your copy of spambayes/OptionClass.py is old. Try
getting a fresh copy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 01:45:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 03:46:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-795257 ] mboxtrain.py & cyrus
Message-ID: <E19sHTc-0002oN-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #795257, was opened at 2003-08-26 10:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by arohter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=795257&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alon (arohter)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: mboxtrain.py & cyrus

Initial Comment:
Attached is a patched 1.0a4 mboxtrain.py to work with 
the Cyrus IMAPd.

Taken from

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-
August/006544.html

"I believe that all you should have to do is modify one 
line in mboxtrain - the regex in line 185 - to include '.' as 
well as 0-9 (change it from "[0-9]*" to "[0-9\.]*"), and 
it should work just as normal."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Alon (arohter)
Date: 2003-08-28 07:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=36549

UPDATE:

I would suggest NOT using mboxtrain.py on cyrus mail 
systems.  Seems to mess up the mail headers when training 
(afaik it strips out carriage returns).  Use imapfilter.py to 
train instead.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=795257&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 06:13:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 08:13:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793775 ] Initialization Error
	SpamBayes in Outlook XP
Message-ID: <E19sLec-0005gW-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #793775, was opened at 2003-08-23 15:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbrozius
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Initialization Error SpamBayes in Outlook XP

Initial Comment:
When I install SpamBayes, the first time I can run it 
normally. However, when I log in as a different user on 
the same machine, I get the dialog that says "There 
was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin. Please 
restart Outlook and try again.". When I restart Outlook, 
however, I get the same message. Already tried 
reinstalling SpamBayes, but that doesn't seem to do the 
trick.

I'm using Windows Server 2003, Outlook XP (no SP's 
applied) and SpamBayes Outlook Plugin Beta 007....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-28 13:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

I've just retrieved the latest CVS-version (7 minutes ago) and 
everything seems to work fine, now.... I'll leave it open until 
I've got a response from you that the incident can be/is 
closed....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-26 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

No differences in Exchange-configs. I already rules that out 
by deleting all but a pop3-account from my profile. Still 
nothing.

I've done as you asked and installed the source-code version 
but it has the same result.

Python Trace Collector shows these messages:
# This window will display output from any programs that 
import win32traceutil
# win32com servers registered with '--debug' are in this 
category.
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 1127, 
in OnConnection
    self.manager = manager.GetManager(application)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
825, in GetManager
    _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
377, in __init__
    self.message_store = msgstore.MAPIMsgStore(outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
158, in __init__
    self._GetMessageStore(None)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
222, in _GetMessageStore
    mapi.MDB_WRITE |
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 1127, 
in OnConnection
    self.manager = manager.GetManager(application)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
825, in GetManager
    _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 
377, in __init__
    self.message_store = msgstore.MAPIMsgStore(outlook)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
158, in __init__
    self._GetMessageStore(None)
  File "D:\Apps\SpamBayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 
222, in _GetMessageStore
    mapi.MDB_WRITE |
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)

The error also occurs when I use only me exchange-account, 
with no PST-file used in my profile....

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jesper Rasmussen (shamran)
Date: 2003-08-26 07:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=852337

The same happens to me ! Have reinstalling ! where 
should i send my logfile ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-26 00:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Has your user account successfully configured Outlook?  Can
you see folders and send messages when logged in as this
user?  Is there anything else different about this users
Outlook config versus the Admins - eg, lack of/extra
personal folders or exchange server configs?

If you were willing to run the source-code version we could
track this further.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-25 15:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Dunno what Windows Server 2003 does different than XP 
does in this. I've installed the program as administrator, 
where it runs fine (one single e-mail account to exchange-
server). Then I logged in as my personal account and it never 
ran properly. I've tried installing it again using my personal 
user account (with enterprise admin-rights) over the existing 
install, but to na avail. It still works under the administrator-
account.

I've got three e-mail accounts; 2 POP3's and one Exchange. 
I've already removed one POP3 and the exchange-account, 
but that doesn't do the trick. I've only got one Outlook-
profile, that's set to default and "always use", so that 
shouldn't be the problem (I hope...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Is there anything "unusual" about this machine?  Does it
have any kind of special logon to the server?  This error is
getting the "default message store" for the machine, which
is where the primary "Inbox" etc is located.  I've never
seen an error fetching this before, so I need a few more
clues...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-25 01:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please attach the log file from the failed machine?
 Please change the bug status back to "Open" when you do. 
Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793775&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 06:16:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 08:16:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787664 ] registration error for
	spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: <E19sLhK-0005nn-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787664, was opened at 2003-08-12 22:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbrozius
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tom Klarner (tklarner)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error for spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
Tried installing v007 on two different machines, one an 
NT4 w/Outlook 2000, second machine WinXP w/Outlook 
2000. Got error message "Unable to register the 
DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201"
for the spambayes_addin.dll file on both machines.
No anti-virus software running on either machine. Word 
not default editor nor running.
Was able to install v006 on a third XP machine 
w/Outlook 2000 with no problems.

BTW: have been using v006 at home; great software; 
keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-28 13:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Could it be that you are installing using an account that 
doesn't have admin-rights on those machines??? (I know, 
dumb Q, but hey....how else should we be able to give dumb 
answers!!!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 06:46:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 08:46:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795414 ] Missing [SpamBayes]
	button after install
Message-ID: <E19sMAN-0003Dj-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795414, was opened at 2003-08-26 17:13
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by hosbond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 9
Submitted By: Niels Hosbond Petersen (hosbond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Missing [SpamBayes] button after install

Initial Comment:
After installing the "SpamBayes" button is blank (no 
visible text) and nothing happens, when I press it. Not 
having this button prevents me from getting started with 
SpamBayes Manager etc.

I have uninstalled/reinstalled several times without any 
luck.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795414&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 11:00:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 13:00:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796298 ] Outlook plugin: 0.7
	Check for new version doesn't use proxy
Message-ID: <E19sQ8D-0000Ql-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796298, was opened at 2003-08-27 14:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by clach04
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Clark (clach04)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: 0.7 Check for new version doesn't use proxy

Initial Comment:
Very low priority, the "Check for new version" option fails 
after a few seconds. I'm behind a http proxy (IE is 
configured for proxy access so the plugin could lookup 
IE's proxy settings and use that). Fragment of 
spambayes.log:

Error checking the latest version
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open
URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')>
ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest 
version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see 
the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet 
connection, or try again later'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open
URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')>
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Chris Clark (clach04)
Date: 2003-08-28 10:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=379468

My PC has some imposed login scripts that set the proxy 
method to autodetect so you where spot on there. I usually 
manually specify the proxy (I'd just rebooted to ensure 
a "clean" bug report). I just set it manually and re-tried and 
the log now complains about getting an authentication error. 
Log attached at end.

For MS products I usually don't have to provide 
authentication information as the machine is logged into a 
domain server (i.e. my current OS user is 
DOMAINNAME\username) for non MS products I usually have 
to feed it the id/pw, e.g. Mozzilla, lynx, wget, my own python 
scripts, etc. I've not figured out what makes MS 
apps "special" in not needing to manually specify the auth. 
info).

Error checking the latest version
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default
HTTPError: HTTP Error 407: Proxy Authentication Required
ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest 
version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the 
SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, 
or try again later'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in 
fetch_latest_dict
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain
  File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default
HTTPError: HTTP Error 407: Proxy Authentication Required


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 17:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We do try and use the IE proxy configuration, but currently
can't use the "auto configuration" option - we need to have
the proxy explicitly specified.

How is your IE proxy configured?  If configured for auto,
then Tony Meyer is looking at that too, but we aren't even
sure yet if it is practical.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796298&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 11:33:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 13:34:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query
	should show all words starting with certain text 
Message-ID: <E19sQel-0005Q3-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-28 20:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text 

Initial Comment:
Word query should show all words starting with certain
text if the user adds * in the end

For example: url:great*

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 11:34:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 13:35:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796832 ] Word query
	should show all words starting with certain text 
Message-ID: <E19sQfQ-0005Sc-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #796832, was opened at 2003-08-28 20:33
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by fuerte
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte)
>Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Word query should show all words starting with certain text 

Initial Comment:
Word query should show all words starting with certain
text if the user adds * in the end

For example: url:great*

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796832&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 11:35:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 13:35:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796836 ] Show message
	tokens
Message-ID: <E19sQgE-0005Vj-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #796836, was opened at 2003-08-28 20:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Show message tokens

Initial Comment:
"Show spam clues" does not show all of them. Perhaps
the list should be just paged. The Outlook add-in
already does this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 11:36:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 13:36:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796836 ] Show message
	tokens
Message-ID: <E19sQgt-0005XU-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #796836, was opened at 2003-08-28 20:35
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by fuerte
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Harri Pesonen (fuerte)
>Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Show message tokens

Initial Comment:
"Show spam clues" does not show all of them. Perhaps
the list should be just paged. The Outlook add-in
already does this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796836&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 12:15:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 14:15:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796855 ] Arrow to show more
	buttons crashes OL
Message-ID: <E19sRIv-00049y-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796855, was opened at 2003-08-28 18:15
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796855&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: four corners (fourcorners)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Arrow to show more buttons crashes OL

Initial Comment:
Clicking the little >> button displayed when there
isn't enough room for all the spam bayes buttons on the
toolbar crashes my OL 2K running on Win 2K or Win98. 
Normally I see all the buttons, but if the OL window is
small and the spam folder is chosen, there are 3
SpamBayes buttons and only the first is displayed.

The error msg is simply that outlook.exe has generated
errors.  It does say that an error log is being
generated but I don't know where that is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796855&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 15:34:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 17:34:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787664 ] registration error for
	spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: <E19sUP9-000727-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787664, was opened at 2003-08-12 14:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mkerr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tom Klarner (tklarner)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error for spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
Tried installing v007 on two different machines, one an 
NT4 w/Outlook 2000, second machine WinXP w/Outlook 
2000. Got error message "Unable to register the 
DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201"
for the spambayes_addin.dll file on both machines.
No anti-virus software running on either machine. Word 
not default editor nor running.
Was able to install v006 on a third XP machine 
w/Outlook 2000 with no problems.

BTW: have been using v006 at home; great software; 
keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Kerr (mkerr)
Date: 2003-08-28 14:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=854480

I have installed Spambayes on 3 workstations now (XP [1], 
Windows 2000 Pro [2].  The XP installed without a problem, 
the two W2K machines both gave me the same error with 
being unable to register the dll spambayes_addin.dll.

All service packs are current and I am an administrator


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-28 05:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Could it be that you are installing using an account that 
doesn't have admin-rights on those machines??? (I know, 
dumb Q, but hey....how else should we be able to give dumb 
answers!!!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 15:38:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 17:38:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796984 ] Sudden error after
	functioning normally
Message-ID: <E19sUTb-0008O6-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796984, was opened at 2003-08-28 23:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796984&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rene Goldsweer (floortje)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Sudden error after functioning normally

Initial Comment:
After using Spambayes 1.04 with Python 2.3 
succesfully, all of the sudden the message header in my 
emails are showing this error:

X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at
? ? ? ? C:\spambayes-1.0a4\spambayes\classifier.py line 
307: assert
? ? ? ? hamcount <= nham

I'm using WindowsXP SP1 with Pocomail 3.01. I use 
pop3proxy of which I use the default settings, I've only 
put in my pop3 adresses and the smtp address.

Greetz,
Floortje.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796984&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 16:02:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 18:02:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796996 ] smtp server not started
	until restart
Message-ID: <E19sUqn-0007Nw-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796996, was opened at 2003-08-29 00:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796996&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolai Dufva Nielsen (ndufva)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: smtp server not started until restart

Initial Comment:
Version 1.0a4:

First-time config:

 1/ Run pop3proxy.py -b
 2/ Click "Configuration page"
 3/ Enter names and port numbers for smtp and pop3
 4/ Click Save

Now the pop3 proxy is started and listening, but the
smtp proxy isn't.

Restart of pop3proxy.py started smtp proxy.

Parameters for proxies (if important):

  pop3 servers: localhost:8110
  pop3 ports: 110

  smtp servers: localhost:8025
  smtp ports: 25

(I am already running pop3 and smtp on port 8110 and
8025, respectively)




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796996&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 16:07:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 18:07:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sUvQ-0007ae-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 10:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msolutions
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 08:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

I seemed to have fixed the problem. It seems to me that if 
you use SpamBayes before updating the hammie section of 
bayescustomize.ini you run into the problem. So I did the 
following and all seems fine now:

1. Close pop3proxy.py
2. deleted contents of pop3proxy-ham-cache, pop3proxy-
spam-cache & pop3proxy-unknown-cache folders.
3. Deleted spambayes.messageinfo.db and hammie.db. 
4. Updated bayescustomize.ini as required
5. All seems great now.

I've change the hammie section of bayescustomize.ini to:

[Hammie] 
hammie_header_name: CC 
header_spam_string: spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string: spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string: spambayes_is_unsure

================================

Thanks for the help. Great product once you work out how to 
install it.



 Great product once you get it going.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-28 17:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Another problem is this:

hammie_header_name: To

The hammie_header_name is intended to be a *new*
header that gets added to the message, not an existing
header name.  If you want the To header to tell you
whether a message is spam or not, you should set the
'notate_to' option to a comma-separated list of any of the
classification values (in your case, 'spambayes_is_spam'
and family).  For instance:

notate_to: spambayes_is_spam, spambayes_is_unsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-28 10:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this could be as a result of having "_" in your 
disposition names.  The UI currently uses "_" to fudge 
together section/option names.  It's a bit of a hack (and it 
says so in the code), but it works, for the most part.

Could you try it without having any "_"s in your disposition 
names?  If this fixes it, then either we need to come up with 
a new method for the interface, or you need to use 
something else for the names.  Is there a reason that you are 
using non-standard names?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 16:46:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 18:47:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-787664 ] registration error for
	spambayes_addin.dll
Message-ID: <E19sVXA-0005cY-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #787664, was opened at 2003-08-12 14:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mkerr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tom Klarner (tklarner)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: registration error for spambayes_addin.dll

Initial Comment:
Tried installing v007 on two different machines, one an 
NT4 w/Outlook 2000, second machine WinXP w/Outlook 
2000. Got error message "Unable to register the 
DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201"
for the spambayes_addin.dll file on both machines.
No anti-virus software running on either machine. Word 
not default editor nor running.
Was able to install v006 on a third XP machine 
w/Outlook 2000 with no problems.

BTW: have been using v006 at home; great software; 
keep up the good work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Kerr (mkerr)
Date: 2003-08-28 15:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=854480

spambayes_addin.dll failed to register when installing the 
app.  I selected ignore when prompted to retry/cancel/ignore 
thinking I could manually register this dll.
When I ran regsvr32 it was able to register the dll and 
spambayes appears to have installed ok

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Kerr (mkerr)
Date: 2003-08-28 14:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=854480

I have installed Spambayes on 3 workstations now (XP [1], 
Windows 2000 Pro [2].  The XP installed without a problem, 
the two W2K machines both gave me the same error with 
being unable to register the dll spambayes_addin.dll.

All service packs are current and I am an administrator


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sebastiaan Brozius (sbrozius)
Date: 2003-08-28 05:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=676587

Could it be that you are installing using an account that 
doesn't have admin-rights on those machines??? (I know, 
dumb Q, but hey....how else should we be able to give dumb 
answers!!!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=787664&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 16:57:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 18:58:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sVhP-00026W-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 12:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-29 10:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Well, yes, that was always going to work because, as I said, 
it's the interface that uses "_", not anything in the options 
themselves.  By this can I assume that you don't care 
whether the interface works in this particular case?  If not, 
please reopen.

BTW, you need to re-read Richie's comment.  Using the CC 
header will end up causing you strife.  You will probably loose 
any information that is previously in the CC header (i.e. 
people that the message was CC'd to).  You need to use a 
header that doesn't previously exist - like X-SpamBayes-
Classification.  If you want the notatation in a standard 
header (perhaps you can only work with those), then you 
need to use the notate_to or notate_subject options, as 
Richie said.  If you want a notate_cc option, then please 
open a feature request.

BTW, your options will break in the 1.0a6 release, as you are 
using deprecated names.  These options should all be in 
the "Headers" section, and the hammie_header_name option 
should be classification_header_name.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 10:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

I seemed to have fixed the problem. It seems to me that if 
you use SpamBayes before updating the hammie section of 
bayescustomize.ini you run into the problem. So I did the 
following and all seems fine now:

1. Close pop3proxy.py
2. deleted contents of pop3proxy-ham-cache, pop3proxy-
spam-cache & pop3proxy-unknown-cache folders.
3. Deleted spambayes.messageinfo.db and hammie.db. 
4. Updated bayescustomize.ini as required
5. All seems great now.

I've change the hammie section of bayescustomize.ini to:

[Hammie] 
hammie_header_name: CC 
header_spam_string: spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string: spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string: spambayes_is_unsure

================================

Thanks for the help. Great product once you work out how to 
install it.



 Great product once you get it going.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-28 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Another problem is this:

hammie_header_name: To

The hammie_header_name is intended to be a *new*
header that gets added to the message, not an existing
header name.  If you want the To header to tell you
whether a message is spam or not, you should set the
'notate_to' option to a comma-separated list of any of the
classification values (in your case, 'spambayes_is_spam'
and family).  For instance:

notate_to: spambayes_is_spam, spambayes_is_unsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-28 12:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this could be as a result of having "_" in your 
disposition names.  The UI currently uses "_" to fudge 
together section/option names.  It's a bit of a hack (and it 
says so in the code), but it works, for the most part.

Could you try it without having any "_"s in your disposition 
names?  If this fixes it, then either we need to come up with 
a new method for the interface, or you need to use 
something else for the names.  Is there a reason that you are 
using non-standard names?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 17:08:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 19:11:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796855 ] Arrow to show more
	buttons crashes OL
Message-ID: <E19sVsv-0001O9-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796855, was opened at 2003-08-29 06:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796855&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: four corners (fourcorners)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Arrow to show more buttons crashes OL

Initial Comment:
Clicking the little >> button displayed when there
isn't enough room for all the spam bayes buttons on the
toolbar crashes my OL 2K running on Win 2K or Win98. 
Normally I see all the buttons, but if the OL window is
small and the spam folder is chosen, there are 3
SpamBayes buttons and only the first is displayed.

The error msg is simply that outlook.exe has generated
errors.  It does say that an error log is being
generated but I don't know where that is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-29 11:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796855&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 17:37:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 19:38:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sWKa-0007Ns-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 10:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msolutions
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 09:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

OK I've re-read the Richies message and his method of 
notate_to:SpamBayesIsSpam,SpamBayesIsUnsure does not 
work. Loading pop3proxy.py results in many errors. 

So combining your comments with Richie's I've come up with 
the following ini file that seems to work. I'm not using the 
standard spam and unsure to values because Outlook Express' 
message rules works part of values so if someone's email 
address was say info@spamstopper.com my message rule 
would treat it as spam. Here's my new ini file, any comments?

[html_ui]
display_to:True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports:110,11002
remote_servers:pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au
notate_to:True

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports:25,2502
remote_servers:smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Headers]
header_ham_string:SpamBayesIsHam
header_spam_string:SpamBayesIsSpam
header_unsure_string:SpamBayesIsUnsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-29 08:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Well, yes, that was always going to work because, as I said, 
it's the interface that uses "_", not anything in the options 
themselves.  By this can I assume that you don't care 
whether the interface works in this particular case?  If not, 
please reopen.

BTW, you need to re-read Richie's comment.  Using the CC 
header will end up causing you strife.  You will probably loose 
any information that is previously in the CC header (i.e. 
people that the message was CC'd to).  You need to use a 
header that doesn't previously exist - like X-SpamBayes-
Classification.  If you want the notatation in a standard 
header (perhaps you can only work with those), then you 
need to use the notate_to or notate_subject options, as 
Richie said.  If you want a notate_cc option, then please 
open a feature request.

BTW, your options will break in the 1.0a6 release, as you are 
using deprecated names.  These options should all be in 
the "Headers" section, and the hammie_header_name option 
should be classification_header_name.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 08:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

I seemed to have fixed the problem. It seems to me that if 
you use SpamBayes before updating the hammie section of 
bayescustomize.ini you run into the problem. So I did the 
following and all seems fine now:

1. Close pop3proxy.py
2. deleted contents of pop3proxy-ham-cache, pop3proxy-
spam-cache & pop3proxy-unknown-cache folders.
3. Deleted spambayes.messageinfo.db and hammie.db. 
4. Updated bayescustomize.ini as required
5. All seems great now.

I've change the hammie section of bayescustomize.ini to:

[Hammie] 
hammie_header_name: CC 
header_spam_string: spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string: spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string: spambayes_is_unsure

================================

Thanks for the help. Great product once you work out how to 
install it.



 Great product once you get it going.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-28 17:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Another problem is this:

hammie_header_name: To

The hammie_header_name is intended to be a *new*
header that gets added to the message, not an existing
header name.  If you want the To header to tell you
whether a message is spam or not, you should set the
'notate_to' option to a comma-separated list of any of the
classification values (in your case, 'spambayes_is_spam'
and family).  For instance:

notate_to: spambayes_is_spam, spambayes_is_unsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-28 10:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this could be as a result of having "_" in your 
disposition names.  The UI currently uses "_" to fudge 
together section/option names.  It's a bit of a hack (and it 
says so in the code), but it works, for the most part.

Could you try it without having any "_"s in your disposition 
names?  If this fixes it, then either we need to come up with 
a new method for the interface, or you need to use 
something else for the names.  Is there a reason that you are 
using non-standard names?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 17:46:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 19:48:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sWTZ-0002n9-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 12:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-29 11:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

That file looks good to me.  It should work with the UI, too.

Are you using spambayes from cvs or 1.0a4?  The format of 
the notate_to and notate_subject options has changed since 
1.0a4.  The format Richie gave works for 1.0a5 (about to be 
released) and cvs, but if you're using 1.0a4 then notate_to 
and notate_subject should just be "True" or "False".  Note, 
though, that only spam will be notated, not unsures or ham 
(this is the reason for the change in 1.0a5).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

OK I've re-read the Richies message and his method of 
notate_to:SpamBayesIsSpam,SpamBayesIsUnsure does not 
work. Loading pop3proxy.py results in many errors. 

So combining your comments with Richie's I've come up with 
the following ini file that seems to work. I'm not using the 
standard spam and unsure to values because Outlook Express' 
message rules works part of values so if someone's email 
address was say info@spamstopper.com my message rule 
would treat it as spam. Here's my new ini file, any comments?

[html_ui]
display_to:True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports:110,11002
remote_servers:pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au
notate_to:True

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports:25,2502
remote_servers:smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Headers]
header_ham_string:SpamBayesIsHam
header_spam_string:SpamBayesIsSpam
header_unsure_string:SpamBayesIsUnsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-29 10:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Well, yes, that was always going to work because, as I said, 
it's the interface that uses "_", not anything in the options 
themselves.  By this can I assume that you don't care 
whether the interface works in this particular case?  If not, 
please reopen.

BTW, you need to re-read Richie's comment.  Using the CC 
header will end up causing you strife.  You will probably loose 
any information that is previously in the CC header (i.e. 
people that the message was CC'd to).  You need to use a 
header that doesn't previously exist - like X-SpamBayes-
Classification.  If you want the notatation in a standard 
header (perhaps you can only work with those), then you 
need to use the notate_to or notate_subject options, as 
Richie said.  If you want a notate_cc option, then please 
open a feature request.

BTW, your options will break in the 1.0a6 release, as you are 
using deprecated names.  These options should all be in 
the "Headers" section, and the hammie_header_name option 
should be classification_header_name.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 10:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

I seemed to have fixed the problem. It seems to me that if 
you use SpamBayes before updating the hammie section of 
bayescustomize.ini you run into the problem. So I did the 
following and all seems fine now:

1. Close pop3proxy.py
2. deleted contents of pop3proxy-ham-cache, pop3proxy-
spam-cache & pop3proxy-unknown-cache folders.
3. Deleted spambayes.messageinfo.db and hammie.db. 
4. Updated bayescustomize.ini as required
5. All seems great now.

I've change the hammie section of bayescustomize.ini to:

[Hammie] 
hammie_header_name: CC 
header_spam_string: spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string: spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string: spambayes_is_unsure

================================

Thanks for the help. Great product once you work out how to 
install it.



 Great product once you get it going.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-28 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Another problem is this:

hammie_header_name: To

The hammie_header_name is intended to be a *new*
header that gets added to the message, not an existing
header name.  If you want the To header to tell you
whether a message is spam or not, you should set the
'notate_to' option to a comma-separated list of any of the
classification values (in your case, 'spambayes_is_spam'
and family).  For instance:

notate_to: spambayes_is_spam, spambayes_is_unsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-28 12:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this could be as a result of having "_" in your 
disposition names.  The UI currently uses "_" to fudge 
together section/option names.  It's a bit of a hack (and it 
says so in the code), but it works, for the most part.

Could you try it without having any "_"s in your disposition 
names?  If this fixes it, then either we need to come up with 
a new method for the interface, or you need to use 
something else for the names.  Is there a reason that you are 
using non-standard names?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 17:56:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 20:06:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796351 ] server on review messages
Message-ID: <E19sWcm-0004rB-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796351, was opened at 2003-08-28 10:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msolutions
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: server on review messages

Initial Comment:
I have a new install of spambayes and think I've set it 
OK but after receiving some messages I now get the 
following when attempting to review messages:

500 Server error
Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\Dibbler.py", line 398, in 
found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File "C:\PROGRA~1\Python23\Lib\site-
packages\spambayes\ProxyUI.py", line 369, in onReview
    keyedMessageInfo[judgement].append((key, 
messageInfo))

KeyError: 'jdgandia@hotmail.com'

==============================

My bayescustomize.ini is as follows:

[html_ui]
display_to: True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports: 110,11002
remote_servers: pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports: 25,2502
remote_servers: smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Hammie] 
# The name of the header that hammie adds to an E-
mail in filter mode 
# It contains the "classification" of the mail, plus the 
score. 
hammie_header_name: To 

# The three disposition names are added to the header 
as the following 
# Three words: 
header_spam_string= spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string= spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string= spambayes_is_unsure

================================


The following is the email I suspect that is causing the 
problem.

Return-Path: <luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
Received: from eex2.Experteilag.no ([193.212.211.162])
	by mail016.syd.optusnet.com.au 
(8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
	h7RFDaF29195
	for <msolutions@optusnet.com.au>; Thu, 28 
Aug 2003 01:13:36 +1000
Received: from smtp0371.mail.yahoo.com 
([200.90.104.92]) by
	eex2.Experteilag.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:16:45 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:06:34 GMT
From: ""<luvenia_makte52@cs.com>
X-Priority: 3
To: jdgandia@hotmail.com
Subject: .WS (WebSite) Domains Still 75%+ Available 
(But Going Fast).
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
<EEX26vhSaRM4vNQXzkN00001d27@eex2.Experteilag.no>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2003 15:16:48.0929 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[3C5C3110:01C36CAE]
To: spambayes_is_unsure



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 09:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

I'm using 1.0a4. When 1.0a5 is released I'll change the ini file 
appropiately.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-29 09:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

That file looks good to me.  It should work with the UI, too.

Are you using spambayes from cvs or 1.0a4?  The format of 
the notate_to and notate_subject options has changed since 
1.0a4.  The format Richie gave works for 1.0a5 (about to be 
released) and cvs, but if you're using 1.0a4 then notate_to 
and notate_subject should just be "True" or "False".  Note, 
though, that only spam will be notated, not unsures or ham 
(this is the reason for the change in 1.0a5).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 09:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

OK I've re-read the Richies message and his method of 
notate_to:SpamBayesIsSpam,SpamBayesIsUnsure does not 
work. Loading pop3proxy.py results in many errors. 

So combining your comments with Richie's I've come up with 
the following ini file that seems to work. I'm not using the 
standard spam and unsure to values because Outlook Express' 
message rules works part of values so if someone's email 
address was say info@spamstopper.com my message rule 
would treat it as spam. Here's my new ini file, any comments?

[html_ui]
display_to:True

[pop3proxy]
listen_ports:110,11002
remote_servers:pop3server,mail.optusnet.com.au
notate_to:True

[smtpproxy]
listen_ports:25,2502
remote_servers:smtpserver,mail.optusnet.com.au

[Headers]
header_ham_string:SpamBayesIsHam
header_spam_string:SpamBayesIsSpam
header_unsure_string:SpamBayesIsUnsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-29 08:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Well, yes, that was always going to work because, as I said, 
it's the interface that uses "_", not anything in the options 
themselves.  By this can I assume that you don't care 
whether the interface works in this particular case?  If not, 
please reopen.

BTW, you need to re-read Richie's comment.  Using the CC 
header will end up causing you strife.  You will probably loose 
any information that is previously in the CC header (i.e. 
people that the message was CC'd to).  You need to use a 
header that doesn't previously exist - like X-SpamBayes-
Classification.  If you want the notatation in a standard 
header (perhaps you can only work with those), then you 
need to use the notate_to or notate_subject options, as 
Richie said.  If you want a notate_cc option, then please 
open a feature request.

BTW, your options will break in the 1.0a6 release, as you are 
using deprecated names.  These options should all be in 
the "Headers" section, and the hammie_header_name option 
should be classification_header_name.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Murphy (msolutions)
Date: 2003-08-29 08:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=853728

I seemed to have fixed the problem. It seems to me that if 
you use SpamBayes before updating the hammie section of 
bayescustomize.ini you run into the problem. So I did the 
following and all seems fine now:

1. Close pop3proxy.py
2. deleted contents of pop3proxy-ham-cache, pop3proxy-
spam-cache & pop3proxy-unknown-cache folders.
3. Deleted spambayes.messageinfo.db and hammie.db. 
4. Updated bayescustomize.ini as required
5. All seems great now.

I've change the hammie section of bayescustomize.ini to:

[Hammie] 
hammie_header_name: CC 
header_spam_string: spambayes_is_spam
header_ham_string: spambayes_is_ham
header_unsure_string: spambayes_is_unsure

================================

Thanks for the help. Great product once you work out how to 
install it.



 Great product once you get it going.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-28 17:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Another problem is this:

hammie_header_name: To

The hammie_header_name is intended to be a *new*
header that gets added to the message, not an existing
header name.  If you want the To header to tell you
whether a message is spam or not, you should set the
'notate_to' option to a comma-separated list of any of the
classification values (in your case, 'spambayes_is_spam'
and family).  For instance:

notate_to: spambayes_is_spam, spambayes_is_unsure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-28 10:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I believe this could be as a result of having "_" in your 
disposition names.  The UI currently uses "_" to fudge 
together section/option names.  It's a bit of a hack (and it 
says so in the code), but it works, for the most part.

Could you try it without having any "_"s in your disposition 
names?  If this fixes it, then either we need to come up with 
a new method for the interface, or you need to use 
something else for the names.  Is there a reason that you are 
using non-standard names?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796351&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 19:08:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Aug 28 21:09:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797064 ] Problems moving messages
	between pst and Exchange
Message-ID: <E19sXkx-0001o4-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797064, was opened at 2003-08-29 13:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange

Initial Comment:
If a message's clues are viewed when on the Exchange 
server, and compared to the same message moved to a 
pst file, the clues are not the same.  It appears (I 
haven't examined closely yet; can do on request) that 
on Exchange the html part of the message is used, and 
in the pst, it isnt'.

Probably related to this is the problem that moving a 
message back and forwards between Exchange and a 
pst file (showing clues each time) results in an ever-
increasing number of tokens.

It doesn't appear to be the PR_SEARCH_KEY changing:

>>> key1 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6
\xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'"
>>> key2 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6
\xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'"
>>> key1 == key2
True

Next thing to try?  :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 28 22:01:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 29 00:01:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-795765 ] Spambayes Manager Not
	Displaying
Message-ID: <E19saS0-00014k-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #795765, was opened at 2003-08-27 02:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shaunbroadbent
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes Manager Not Displaying

Initial Comment:
Can't see that this has been reported (sorry if it has).
I am back running off CVS after processing missed 
messages stopped working again in the 007 binary.

All is working well except the Spambayes Manager
is not Displaying anything. It brings up the box and the 
tabs but clicking on each tab reveals nothing.
Log attached.

running XP outlook 2002 SP2 
Spambayes - current CVS ver.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-29 04:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

Updated via cvs this afternoon, new versions of 
manager.py, addin.py etc.. Problem solved menus are
back and working.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Date: 2003-08-28 07:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=818011

I should pay a little bit more attention to the logs.. 
God knows what I have done, I have cleaned out all 
spambayes files/folders and checked it out again.
I now have the new manager displaying but the help menu
fails probably something equally as stupid as somehow using 
the wrong version..

Error is pasted in below --
(I will attach the log also)

FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowAbout' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowTroubleshooting' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowSpamBayes Website' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.ShowFAQ' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar 
item 'SpamBayesCommand.Help.BugTacker' - (-
2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -
2147467259), None)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-27 08:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The attached log is from binary version 003.  Please attach
a new log and reopen if this is still a problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-08-27 04:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Looks like your copy of spambayes/OptionClass.py is old. Try
getting a fresh copy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=795765&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 29 04:32:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 29 06:32:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797200 ] UnicodeError(ASCII
	decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)
Message-ID: <E19sgYJ-0000Cu-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797200, was opened at 2003-08-29 10:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797200&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gisli Ottarsson (gisli)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: UnicodeError(ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)

Initial Comment:

I received a message which generated an exception
during classification.  The message header contains the
following:

X-Spambayes-Exception:  exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)) in append()
at /usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 272: ustr =
unicode(s, incodec, errors)

I have attached the message.  Please do not be
confuesed by the upstream spam filtering provided by my
company.  This filtering is very conservative and I am
trying to supplement it with SpamBayes.

Thanks



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797200&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 29 08:29:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 29 10:30:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797316 ] Extra CRLF to smtp
	server causes garbage error.
Message-ID: <E19skFf-0002xq-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797316, was opened at 2003-08-29 14:29
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dudley Fox (grieve)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Extra CRLF to smtp server causes garbage error.

Initial Comment:
In version 1.0a4 of smtpproxy.py on line 200 it reads
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked + '\r\n')
It should read
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked)

The first line sends an empty command to the smtp
server, and causes it to return an error. Different
smtp servers and mail clients handle it differently,
but Eudora will complain that when it sent the QUIT
command an error was returned. Agent will just fail
silently. In both cases the message is actually sent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 29 16:43:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Aug 29 18:43:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections
	to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts
Message-ID: <E19srxj-0008GT-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-29 18:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts

Initial Comment:
I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my
machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy
redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want
the whole company able to poke at my machine.

On the config page, you can now allow or disallow
connections from remote machines. There are separate
settings for POP3 and SMTP.

Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted
or rejected, will be logged to the console. This
applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection.

As a bonus...

Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages:

1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to
accomodate every subject, every line took two lines
because "Show clues" would line break on the space.
That space is now non-breaking.

2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+),
the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column
of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard,
Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S,
respectively.

3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons
didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they
have their own columns.

These three changes will be applied if you update
ui.html and ui_html.py.

The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for
several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4.

Note:

I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to
me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In
reality, connections are always accepted. The
"rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that
they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there
is way to check the peer address without accepting the
connection.

TODO:

For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections
should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba
accepts a list of host/netmasks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 29 23:38:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 01:38:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797200 ] UnicodeError(ASCII
	decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)
Message-ID: <E19syRK-0002S0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797200, was opened at 2003-08-29 22:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797200&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gisli Ottarsson (gisli)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: UnicodeError(ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)

Initial Comment:

I received a message which generated an exception
during classification.  The message header contains the
following:

X-Spambayes-Exception:  exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal not in range(128)) in append()
at /usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 272: ustr =
unicode(s, incodec, errors)

I have attached the message.  Please do not be
confuesed by the upstream spam filtering provided by my
company.  This filtering is very conservative and I am
trying to supplement it with SpamBayes.

Thanks



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-30 17:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797200&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 29 23:40:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 01:40:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections
	to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts
Message-ID: <E19syTC-0002VB-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-30 10:43
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano)
>Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts

Initial Comment:
I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my
machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy
redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want
the whole company able to poke at my machine.

On the config page, you can now allow or disallow
connections from remote machines. There are separate
settings for POP3 and SMTP.

Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted
or rejected, will be logged to the console. This
applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection.

As a bonus...

Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages:

1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to
accomodate every subject, every line took two lines
because "Show clues" would line break on the space.
That space is now non-breaking.

2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+),
the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column
of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard,
Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S,
respectively.

3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons
didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they
have their own columns.

These three changes will be applied if you update
ui.html and ui_html.py.

The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for
several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4.

Note:

I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to
me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In
reality, connections are always accepted. The
"rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that
they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there
is way to check the peer address without accepting the
connection.

TODO:

For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections
should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba
accepts a list of host/netmasks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 29 23:49:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 01:50:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797679 ] Recovered Mails filtered
	again
Message-ID: <E19sycZ-0002h5-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797679, was opened at 2003-08-30 07:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Recovered Mails filtered again

Initial Comment:
Hi,

I don't know if this a bug or a design problem, so I 
posting it here.
When I recover a mail from Spam Folder in my opinion it 
should be marked as good on the database.
I have reapperaing mails, which we're marked as spam. 
But no matter how often I recover them from spam, the 
next mail from these events will be filtered again. 
Is this the normail behaviour or a known problem?

Thanks 

Jan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 02:14:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 04:14:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797316 ] Extra CRLF to smtp
	server causes garbage error.
Message-ID: <E19t0si-0000uD-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797316, was opened at 2003-08-30 02:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dudley Fox (grieve)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Extra CRLF to smtp server causes garbage error.

Initial Comment:
In version 1.0a4 of smtpproxy.py on line 200 it reads
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked + '\r\n')
It should read
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked)

The first line sends an empty command to the smtp
server, and causes it to return an error. Different
smtp servers and mail clients handle it differently,
but Eudora will complain that when it sent the QUIT
command an error was returned. Agent will just fail
silently. In both cases the message is actually sent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-30 20:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You are correct that there is a problem that Eudora complains 
about an error after the QUIT command.

However, if the '\r\n' is removed, then *no* commands work 
(at least here).  Certainly this is the way that the RFC says 
that SMTP is meant to work (specifically, that there is a CRLF 
after each command, including QUIT).

Can you confirm for me that removing the '\r\n' means that 
you can still use smtpproxy?  If I remove it here, it hangs 
forever on the first command sent (ELHO, in this case).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 03:07:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 05:08:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections
	to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts
Message-ID: <E19t1i5-0006cI-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-29 22:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts

Initial Comment:
I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my
machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy
redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want
the whole company able to poke at my machine.

On the config page, you can now allow or disallow
connections from remote machines. There are separate
settings for POP3 and SMTP.

Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted
or rejected, will be logged to the console. This
applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection.

As a bonus...

Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages:

1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to
accomodate every subject, every line took two lines
because "Show clues" would line break on the space.
That space is now non-breaking.

2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+),
the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column
of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard,
Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S,
respectively.

3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons
didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they
have their own columns.

These three changes will be applied if you update
ui.html and ui_html.py.

The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for
several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4.

Note:

I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to
me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In
reality, connections are always accepted. The
"rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that
they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there
is way to check the peer address without accepting the
connection.

TODO:

For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections
should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba
accepts a list of host/netmasks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 09:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Thanks for the patch, Khouri!  A couple of notes:

 o The "Show clues" line-split is already fixed in CVS.
 o We now have a more sophisticated connection-
   management system for the web interface, so that
   should probably be applied here in place of your fix
   (as you say in your TODO section).
 o The reason the radio buttons are not in their own
   columns in so that they are a consistent width apart.
   Call me trivial, but I think that's important, partly for
   the look of the thing and partly because it makes it
   ergonomically easier to click them with the mouse.
   The radio buttons should line up fairly well under their
   headings already - if they're out by a large margin for
   you, could you tell us the OS and browser you're using,
   and attach a screenshot?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 03:32:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 05:33:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797064 ] Problems moving messages
	between pst and Exchange
Message-ID: <E19t268-0008WA-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797064, was opened at 2003-08-29 13:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange

Initial Comment:
If a message's clues are viewed when on the Exchange 
server, and compared to the same message moved to a 
pst file, the clues are not the same.  It appears (I 
haven't examined closely yet; can do on request) that 
on Exchange the html part of the message is used, and 
in the pst, it isnt'.

Probably related to this is the problem that moving a 
message back and forwards between Exchange and a 
pst file (showing clues each time) results in an ever-
increasing number of tokens.

It doesn't appear to be the PR_SEARCH_KEY changing:

>>> key1 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6
\xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'"
>>> key2 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6
\xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'"
>>> key1 == key2
True

Next thing to try?  :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-30 21:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The dump_props are attached.

If I just move the messages about, doing 'show clues', then 
no training takes place.  I think my original comment was 
wrong - trying now, I get the same number of tokens no 
matter how many times I move (although the exchange count 
and pst count are different).  Anyway, the log (at verbose=1) 
doesn't show anything apart from the "already trained as 
ham" message.

If I train a message I get not that much more.  pst first:
"""
Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' -  trained as 
spam
Saving bayes database with 4637 spam and 410 good 
messages
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db
Saved databases in 896.138ms
"""
and moving it back to Exchange:
"""
Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' -  trained as 
good
Saving bayes database with 4636 spam and 411 good 
messages
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db
Saved databases in 850.026ms
"""

Does this help?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 06:16:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 08:16:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797739 ] Still does not read all
	headers
Message-ID: <E19t4eB-0008Dy-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797739, was opened at 2003-08-30 12:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797739&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Pearce (tcp1)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Still does not read all headers

Initial Comment:
I thought the new version of outlook spam bayes had 
rectified the problem of not accessing all headers in 
messages. But it seems not. I have just retrained my 
spam and ham using version 007 and it still ignores the 
server generated header spam report which will be very 
useful to spambayes for finding spam. Example message 
below (generated by spambayes) and here is the part of 
the header I would like spambayes to interpret (none of 
the these items ever seem to be interpreted by 
spambayes):

X-Spam-Score: (+++++++++++++++) 15.3
X-Spam-Report: 15.3/5.0
	NO_REAL_NAME       (0.7 points)  From: does 
not include a real name
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (0.7 points)  From: 
ends in numbers
	TRACKER_ID (4.3 points) BODY: Incorporates a 
tracking ID number
	OFFER              (0.1 points)  BODY: Free Offer
	HTML_30_40         (0.8 points)  BODY: 
Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME (0.2 points) BODY: 
HTML font color has unusual
	name
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is red
	HTML_MESSAGE       (0.1 points)  BODY: HTML 
included in message
	HTML_FONT_BIG (0.1 points) BODY: FONT Size 
+2 and up or 3 and up
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is blue
	HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.1 points) BODY: 
HTML link text says "click
	here"
	HTML_SHOUTING3 (0.8 points) BODY: HTML 
has very strong "shouting"
	markup
	SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID   (0.8 points)  Subject 
contains a unique ID
	DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 (2.8 points) Date: is 
12 to 24 hours after
	Received: date
	FORGED_MUA_IMS (2.8 points) Forged mail 
pretending to be from IMS
	MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only 
has text/html MIME parts
	CLICK_BELOW        (0.1 points)  Asks you to 
click below
	FROM_ALL_NUMS (0.6 points) From an address 
that is all numbers
	(non-phone)


===============

Spam Score: 1


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               0                   -      -
'*S*'                               1                   -      -
'x-mailer:internet mail service (5.5.2653.19)' 
0.0493829          56      3
'url:info'                          0.0681493          52      4
'copying'                           0.16448            42      9
'original'                          0.198828          160     44
'able'                              0.282561          192     84
'copy'                              0.300619          155     74
'swedish'                           0.313233           18      9
'format'                            0.354496           46     28
'computer'                          0.355363          142     87
'spend'                             0.641237           18     36
'standard'                          0.648117           36     74
'home'                              0.654816           70    148
'heard'                             0.658648           12     26
'(i.e.'                             0.659267            5     11
'immediate'                         0.660244           17     37
'create'                            0.667571           33     74
'without'                           0.68148            57    136
'our'                               0.682849          325    779
'price:'                            0.689351           10     25
'own'                               0.689898           54    134
"subject:'"                         0.696123           34     87
'******'                            0.696864            3      8
"you've"                            0.697367           26     67
'special'                           0.702608           98    258
'header:Message-Id:1'               0.703421          392   
1035
'upgraded'                          0.705258            4     11
'everything'                        0.710206           27     74
'here'                              0.715414          155    434
'film'                              0.717526            8     23
'learn'                             0.719277           43    123
'buying'                            0.719934           10     29
'*****'                             0.720474            3      9
'play'                              0.724933           21     62
'video'                             0.725325           23     68
'header:Received:3'                 0.725418          307    
903
'right'                             0.728689           38    114
'news.'                             0.739192           10     32
'***'                               0.740209            9     29
'cd.'                               0.740672            3     10
"it's"                              0.750199           57    191
'step'                              0.750624           10     34
'keep'                              0.753278           49    167
'free'                              0.75815           134    468
"you'll"                            0.769174           26     97
'minutes'                           0.772264           38    144
'reply-to:no real name:2**0'        0.78037           101    
400
'transfer'                          0.781323           27    108
'__________'                        0.793875            1      5
'games'                             0.795149            4     18
'****'                              0.798819            3     14
'*******'                           0.798819            3     14
'skip:_ 10'                         0.798819            3     14
'easy'                              0.800081           27    121
'instructions'                      0.803521           24    110
'sony'                              0.819613            2     11
'header:Reply-To:1'                 0.820402          181    
921
'___'                               0.820948            1      6
'stay'                              0.825333            8     43
'instantly'                         0.837602            4     24
'view'                              0.83792            65    375
'subject:copy'                      0.841735            1      7
'offers'                            0.841987           44    262
'to:addr:t.c.pearce'                0.843817          153    
921
'click'                             0.851061           97    618
'save'                              0.852853           24    156
'computer,'                         0.857315            4     28
'skip:* 10'                         0.860358            9     63
'time!'                             0.861106            3     22
'pro'                               0.861942            6     43
'player'                            0.866281            3     23
'simple,'                           0.867776            2     16
'***********'                       0.871558            1      
9
'skip:1 40'                         0.871558            1      9
'burn'                              0.874479            2     17
'dvd,'                              0.882618            1     10
'english,'                          0.882618            1     10
'too!'                              0.886034            2     19
'now!'                              0.8948             11    106
'movies'                            0.903754            2     23
'blank'                             0.920269           17    221
'retail'                            0.926516            3     45
'burning'                           0.926761            1     17
'______'                            0.944367            0      4
'_______'                           0.954481            0      5
'subject:Now'                       0.959444            1     32
'dvd'                               0.961145            2     61
'reply-to:addr:msn.com'             0.961483            0      
6
'subject:Languages'                 0.961483            0      6
"dvd's"                             0.963757            1     36
'skip:a 40'                         0.966618            0      7
'from:addr:delphi.com'              0.970545            0      8
'favorite'                          0.973588            1     50
'$39.95!'                           0.973645            0      9
'$69.95'                            0.973645            0      9
'4.0!'                              0.973645            0      9
'600mb'                             0.973645            0      9
'another!'                          0.973645            0      9
'burner.'                           0.973645            0      9
'cd-r.'                             0.973645            0      9
'cd;'                               0.973645            0      9
'cdr!'                              0.973645            0      9
'condition!'                        0.973645            0      9
'download!!'                        0.973645            0      9
'dutch,'                            0.973645            0      9
'encodings'                         0.973645            0      9
'etc...)'                           0.973645            0      9
'extras!'                           0.973645            0      9
'finnish,'                          0.973645            0      9
'french,'                           0.973645            0      9
'games!'                            0.973645            0      9
'greek,'                            0.973645            0      9
'hungarian,'                        0.973645            0      9
'italian,'                          0.973645            0      9
'languages!'                        0.973645            0      9
'packet'                            0.973645            0      9
'polish,'                           0.973645            0      9
'portuguese,'                       0.973645            0      9
'recorder?'                         0.973645            0      9
'ripper'                            0.973645            0      9
'russian,'                          0.973645            0      9
'spanish,'                          0.973645            0      9
'tapes?'                            0.973645            0      9
'urdu!'                             0.973645            0      9
'vhs'                               0.973645            0      9
'message-id:@artemis.le.ac.uk'      0.974931            9    
399
'divx'                              0.976155            0     10
'german,'                           0.976155            0     10
'hurry!'                            0.976155            0     10
'playstation'                       0.976155            0     10
'skip:7 40'                         0.976155            0     10
'television,'                       0.976155            0     10
'worry!'                            0.976155            0     10
'$1000'                             0.978228            0     11
'tapes'                             0.978228            0     11
'anytime!'                          0.981454            0     13
'payment!'                          0.981454            0     13
'single,'                           0.981454            0     13
'yes!'                              0.981454            0     13
'product.'                          0.985693            0     17
'skip:2 40'                         0.98716             0     19
'backups'                           0.987786            0     20
'download!'                         0.990181            0     25
'magick'                            0.990181            0     25
'url:dvd'                           0.990181            0     25
'url:adv166'                        0.990552            0     26
'pc!'                               0.992051            0     31
'dvds'                              0.992296            0     32
'burner'                            0.992742            0     34
'subject:DVD'                       0.992947            0     35
'subject:! '                        0.994942            0     49
Message Stream:


Received: from SUMAC.cfs.le.ac.uk ([143.210.35.10]) by 
saffron.cfs.le.ac.uk
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:01:41 +0100
Received: from artemis.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.126]) by 
SUMAC.cfs.le.ac.uk with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sat, 30 
Aug 2003 13:01:41 +0100
Received: from ca-glendora-cuda1-c3a-a-
110.arcdca.adelphia.net ([68.68.4.110]
	helo=68.68.4.110) by artemis.le.ac.uk with 
smtp (Exim 4.21)
	id 19t4QF-0002dP-87
	for t.c.pearce@leicester.ac.uk; Sat, 30 Aug 
2003 13:01:40 +0100
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:05:29 -0500
From: 239039@delphi.com
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Reply-To: 239039@msn.com
Organization: 2050690133
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
To: t.c.pearce@leicester.ac.uk
Subject: Now copy DVD's in 14 Languages! 239039
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E19t4QF-0002dP-87@artemis.le.ac.uk>
X-Spam-Score: (+++++++++++++++) 15.3
X-Spam-Report: 15.3/5.0
	NO_REAL_NAME       (0.7 points)  From: does 
not include a real name
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (0.7 points)  From: 
ends in numbers
	TRACKER_ID (4.3 points) BODY: Incorporates a 
tracking ID number
	OFFER              (0.1 points)  BODY: Free Offer
	HTML_30_40         (0.8 points)  BODY: 
Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME (0.2 points) BODY: 
HTML font color has unusual
	name
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is red
	HTML_MESSAGE       (0.1 points)  BODY: HTML 
included in message
	HTML_FONT_BIG (0.1 points) BODY: FONT Size 
+2 and up or 3 and up
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is blue
	HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.1 points) BODY: 
HTML link text says "click
	here"
	HTML_SHOUTING3 (0.8 points) BODY: HTML 
has very strong "shouting"
	markup
	SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID   (0.8 points)  Subject 
contains a unique ID
	DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 (2.8 points) Date: is 
12 to 24 hours after
	Received: date
	FORGED_MUA_IMS (2.8 points) Forged mail 
pretending to be from IMS
	MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only 
has text/html MIME parts
	CLICK_BELOW        (0.1 points)  Asks you to 
click below
	FROM_ALL_NUMS (0.6 points) From an address 
that is all numbers
	(non-phone)
Return-Path: be99naj@bigfoot.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2003 12:01:41.0489 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[796BDE10:01C36EEE]

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; 
charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>DVD Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create 
DVDs in Your Own Home</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#3A6EA5">
<center>
<table border="0" width="600" cellspacing="0" 
cellpadding="14">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FF6600" height="10" valign="middle" 
align="center">
<font size="5">Copy your favorite DVD's to a standard 
CD - without a DVD Burner. Free extras! It's easy to 
use. Retail Price: <font 
color="white"><s>$69.95</s></font> and For a limited 
time it is Only <a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="white">$39.95!
</a></font></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<b> <center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">DVD 
Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create DVDs in 
Your Own Home</font></a></center><br>
Don't spend $1000 on a DVD Burner. Get our all-inclusive 
software right now and within minutes you will be on 
your way to copying any DVD video to a single, standard 
CD. You've seen us in the news. You've heard so much 
about our product. Now available for download! Get your 
software instantly following payment!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">***************
7875F88C-6E1E6ADF-1AD8F189-35BFF8F1-1B5129E
************ </font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">DVD 
Copying Features</font></a></center><br>
<ul>
<li>No DVD Burner Required</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">***
239039
*****</font>
<li>Simple, Convenient Step by Step 
Instructions</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">___
195790194
_______</font>
<li>Burn to any standard CD; play on any standard DVD 
player (i.e. Television, Computer, etc...) OR computer 
CD Drive</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">*
1202620547
*************</font>
<li>Don't have a CD recorder? Don't worry! You can save 
your favorite movies to your computer and view anytime!
</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">_____________
239039
_______</font>
<li>Yes! They will play on your CD and DVD 
player</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">***************
239039
****</font>
<li>Now you can copy movies from DVD to the new DiVX 
format. One standard film will take 600mb of your space, 
that means you can keep around 70 films at the same 
time on your PC!</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">______
1778882172
_______</font>
<li>Create your new video collection now!</li><font 
color="#FFFFFF" size="1">******
6280745
***</font>
<li>After buying our packet you will learn how to work 
with digital video in no time! Our packet includes easy 
instructions on how to work with encodings + copying 
from one format to another!</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">_________________
647574259
__________</font><br><br>
</ul>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Copy 
VHS tapes to CD too!</font></a></center><br>
Just upgraded to a DVD and have a library of video 
tapes? With your software not only can you copy & burn 
ANY DVD, you'll also be able to transfer all your VHS 
tapes to DVD format on CD using CDR!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">****************
1ECBCA09-6ADDE12B-34A18763-30AD5F2A-5004EFA2
*******</font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Back up 
your favorite Playstation 2 Games!
</font></a></center><br>
Order the DVD PRO 4.0! ripper NOW and included will be 
directions for burning Sony Playstation 2 games! 
Everything you need to make a working copy on a 
standard, blank CD-R. Use these as backups so that 
your original PlayStation 2 games stay in the best 
condition!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">***
AF51DD2-6E5E3DB4-2F48D28B-7D8A3F57-62B2B842
***</font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Now 
copy DVD's in 14 Languages!</font></a></center><br>
Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, 
Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, 
Swedish and Urdu!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">************ 
20AF94B0-298F8D05-3B268F5B-1C0417CA-1A9A6214
***********</font><br><br>

<center><font size="4"><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="red">Hurry! 
Limited Time Special Offers Immediate download!!<br>
Click Here for More Info or Order Online Now!
</font></font></a></b><br><br><br><br><br><br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">
239039
     
2C5AD477-4C272EF3-171BE48D-1AA57190-258DFC00
          
1258863973
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</body>
</html>


Copy your favorite DVD's to a standard CD - without a 
DVD Burner. Free
extras! It's easy to use. Retail Price: $69.95 and For a 
limited time it
is Only $39.95! <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 	 
DVD Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create DVDs in 
Your Own Home
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Don't spend $1000 on a DVD Burner. Get our all-inclusive 
software right
now and within minutes you will be on your way to 
copying any DVD video
to a single, standard CD. You've seen us in the news. 
You've heard so
much about our product. Now available for download! 
Get your software
instantly following payment!
*************** 7875F88C-6E1E6ADF-1AD8F189-
35BFF8F1-1B5129E
************ 

DVD Copying Features <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 


*	No DVD Burner Required
	*** 239039 ***** 
*	Simple, Convenient Step by Step Instructions
	___ 195790194 _______ 
*	Burn to any standard CD; play on any standard 
DVD player (i.e.
Television, Computer, etc...) OR computer CD Drive
	* 1202620547 ************* 
*	Don't have a CD recorder? Don't worry! You 
can save your
favorite movies to your computer and view anytime!
	_____________ 239039 _______ 
*	Yes! They will play on your CD and DVD player
	*************** 239039 **** 
*	Now you can copy movies from DVD to the 
new DiVX format. One
standard film will take 600mb of your space, that means 
you can keep
around 70 films at the same time on your PC!
	______ 1778882172 _______ 
*	Create your new video collection now!
	****** 6280745 *** 
*	After buying our packet you will learn how to 
work with digital
video in no time! Our packet includes easy instructions 
on how to work
with encodings + copying from one format to another!
	_________________ 647574259 __________
	
	

Copy VHS tapes to CD too! <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Just upgraded to a DVD and have a library of video 
tapes? With your
software not only can you copy & burn ANY DVD, you'll 
also be able to
transfer all your VHS tapes to DVD format on CD using 
CDR!
**************** 1ECBCA09-6ADDE12B-34A18763-
30AD5F2A-5004EFA2 *******

Back up your favorite Playstation 2 Games!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Order the DVD PRO 4.0! ripper NOW and included will be 
directions for
burning Sony Playstation 2 games! Everything you need 
to make a working
copy on a standard, blank CD-R. Use these as backups 
so that your
original PlayStation 2 games stay in the best condition!
*** AF51DD2-6E5E3DB4-2F48D28B-7D8A3F57-62B2B842 
***

Now copy DVD's in 14 Languages!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, 
Hungarian, Italian,
Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish and Urdu!
************  20AF94B0-298F8D05-3B268F5B-
1C0417CA-1A9A6214 ***********


Hurry! Limited Time Special Offers Immediate download!!
Click Here for More Info or Order Online Now!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 





239039 2C5AD477-4C272EF3-171BE48D-1AA57190-
258DFC00 1258863973 
Message Tokens:

254 unique tokens

'$1000'
'$39.95!'
'$69.95'
'(i.e.'
'***'
'****'
'*****'
'******'
'*******'
'***********'
'1202620547'
'1258863973'
'1778882172'
'195790194'
'239039'
'4.0!'
'600mb'
'6280745'
'647574259'
'___'
'______'
'_______'
'__________'
'able'
'about'
'after'
'all'
'also'
'and'
'another!'
'any'
'anytime!'
'around'
'available'
'back'
'backups'
'best'
'blank'
'burn'
'burner'
'burner.'
'burning'
'buying'
'can'
'cc:none'
'cd-r.'
'cd.'
'cd;'
'cdr!'
'click'
'collection'
'computer'
'computer,'
'condition!'
'content-type:text/plain'
'convenient'
'copy'
'copying'
'create'
'digital'
'directions'
'divx'
"don't"
'download!'
'download!!'
'drive'
'drive*'
'dutch,'
'dvd'
"dvd's"
'dvd,'
'dvds'
'easy'
'encodings'
'english,'
'etc...)'
'everything'
'extras!'
'favorite'
'features'
'film'
'films'
'finnish,'
'following'
'for'
'format'
'format.'
'free'
'french,'
'from'
'from:addr:239039'
'from:addr:delphi.com'
'from:no real name:2**0'
'games'
'games!'
'german,'
'get'
'greek,'
'have'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-Id:1'
'header:Organization:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Reply-To:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'heard'
'here'
'home'
'how'
'hungarian,'
'hurry!'
'immediate'
'included'
'includes'
'info'
'instantly'
'instructions'
"it's"
'italian,'
'just'
'keep'
'languages!'
'learn'
'library'
'limited'
'magick'
'make'
'means'
'message-id:@artemis.le.ac.uk'
'minutes'
'more'
'movies'
'much'
'need'
'new'
'news.'
'not'
'now'
'now!'
'now!******'
'offers'
'one'
'online'
'only'
'order'
'original'
'our'
'own'
'packet'
'payment!'
'pc!'
'pc!______'
'play'
'player'
'playstation'
'polish,'
'portuguese,'
'price:'
'pro'
'product.'
'proto:http'
'recorder?'
'reply-to:addr:239039'
'reply-to:addr:msn.com'
'reply-to:no real name:2**0'
'required'
'required***'
'retail'
'right'
'ripper'
'russian,'
'same'
'save'
'seen'
'sender:none'
'simple,'
'single,'
'skip:* 10'
'skip:1 40'
'skip:2 40'
'skip:7 40'
'skip:_ 10'
'skip:a 10'
'skip:a 20'
'skip:a 40'
'skip:i 10'
'skip:p 20'
'skip:r 10'
'software'
'sony'
'space,'
'spanish,'
'special'
'spend'
'standard'
'standard,'
'stay'
'step'
'subject: '
'subject:! '
"subject:'"
'subject:239039'
'subject:DVD'
'subject:Languages'
'subject:Now'
'subject:copy'
'swedish'
'take'
'tapes'
'tapes?'
'television,'
'that'
'the'
'these'
'they'
'time'
'time!'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:leicester.ac.uk'
'to:addr:t.c.pearce'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'too!'
'transfer'
'upgraded'
'urdu!'
'url:adv166'
'url:dvd'
'url:info'
'url:ultra-software'
'url:www'
'use'
'use.'
'using'
'vhs'
'video'
'view'
'way'
'will'
'with'
'within'
'without'
'work'
'working'
'worry!'
'x-mailer:internet mail service (5.5.2653.19)'
'yes!'
'you'
"you'll"
"you've"
'your'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797739&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 07:54:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 09:54:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797768 ] OUtlook hangs after
	running SpamBayes
Message-ID: <E19t6BI-0000lx-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797768, was opened at 2003-08-30 08:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Philippe G Herve (marindeaudouce)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: OUtlook hangs after running SpamBayes

Initial Comment:
I have installed SpamBayes 7.0 on OUtlook 2000 SP3 
running Windows 2000 SP4

Everything works well except that Outlook hangs after 
running for sometimes. (Multiple times per day).  Only 
way out is to kill Outlook.

This repeats and I am now going to learn how to remove 
SpamBayes until the bug is fixed.

I had Outlook hanging 4 times already but can only trace 
one error in all the log files. I am not convinced the error 
I am facing is logged.

The error log I can trace:


Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1053, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 724, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 247, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 142, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 206, in _GetMessageStore
com_error: (-2147221223, 'OLE error 0x80040119', None, 
None)
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Addin terminating: 0 COM client and 1 COM servers exist.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797768&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 08:01:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 10:02:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections
	to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts
Message-ID: <E19t6IV-0000FI-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-30 00:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts

Initial Comment:
I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my
machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy
redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want
the whole company able to poke at my machine.

On the config page, you can now allow or disallow
connections from remote machines. There are separate
settings for POP3 and SMTP.

Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted
or rejected, will be logged to the console. This
applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection.

As a bonus...

Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages:

1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to
accomodate every subject, every line took two lines
because "Show clues" would line break on the space.
That space is now non-breaking.

2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+),
the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column
of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard,
Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S,
respectively.

3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons
didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they
have their own columns.

These three changes will be applied if you update
ui.html and ui_html.py.

The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for
several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4.

Note:

I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to
me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In
reality, connections are always accepted. The
"rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that
they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there
is way to check the peer address without accepting the
connection.

TODO:

For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections
should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba
accepts a list of host/netmasks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Concerning the TODO : check my patch #790615 (state :
closed) which handles the remote connections problem for the
web interface. It allows to define allowed hosts as a list
of IPs, as ranges of IPs and so on. It is mainly regex
based. See onIncomingConnection() in UserInterface.py from
the CVS.

I guess you might use this code to achieve the same thing in
the proxies, thus having something more flexible than the
simple "remote hosts allowed/refused". The code itself is 6
or 8 lines long.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Thanks for the patch, Khouri!  A couple of notes:

 o The "Show clues" line-split is already fixed in CVS.
 o We now have a more sophisticated connection-
   management system for the web interface, so that
   should probably be applied here in place of your fix
   (as you say in your TODO section).
 o The reason the radio buttons are not in their own
   columns in so that they are a consistent width apart.
   Call me trivial, but I think that's important, partly for
   the look of the thing and partly because it makes it
   ergonomically easier to click them with the mouse.
   The radio buttons should line up fairly well under their
   headings already - if they're out by a large margin for
   you, could you tell us the OS and browser you're using,
   and attach a screenshot?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 08:03:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 10:03:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19t6KB-0000Jn-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest
authentication support (which, as said in patch description,
is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest
sources from CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 08:09:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 10:12:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-797776 ] Label change
	in Web interface
Message-ID: <E19t6Q8-0001JM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #797776, was opened at 2003-08-30 16:09
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=797776&group_id=61702

Category: Interface Improvements (example)
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Label change in Web interface

Initial Comment:
As SpamBayes web interface now allows to train on
Outlook Express's dbx files, the label in "Train on a
given message" box should be changed in order to show
user he can train on his DBX files.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=797776&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 08:18:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 10:18:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections
	to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts
Message-ID: <E19t6YJ-0008Lp-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-30 00:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts

Initial Comment:
I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my
machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy
redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want
the whole company able to poke at my machine.

On the config page, you can now allow or disallow
connections from remote machines. There are separate
settings for POP3 and SMTP.

Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted
or rejected, will be logged to the console. This
applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection.

As a bonus...

Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages:

1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to
accomodate every subject, every line took two lines
because "Show clues" would line break on the space.
That space is now non-breaking.

2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+),
the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column
of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard,
Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S,
respectively.

3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons
didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they
have their own columns.

These three changes will be applied if you update
ui.html and ui_html.py.

The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for
several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4.

Note:

I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to
me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In
reality, connections are always accepted. The
"rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that
they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there
is way to check the peer address without accepting the
connection.

TODO:

For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections
should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba
accepts a list of host/netmasks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I'm volunteer to adapt the web interface remote connections
management to pop3 and smtp proxies (but if kgiordano wants
to do it) code. I was only wondering wether there should be
only one settings for the three servers (web, pop3 and smtp)
or there should be one setting per server (thus allowing an
IP to fetch mails but not to change the administration
options). Note that this question becomes quite irrevelant
if HTTP authentication is added to the web interface. In
this case, only one setting should be enough (and I guess it
would suit most users needs).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Concerning the TODO : check my patch #790615 (state :
closed) which handles the remote connections problem for the
web interface. It allows to define allowed hosts as a list
of IPs, as ranges of IPs and so on. It is mainly regex
based. See onIncomingConnection() in UserInterface.py from
the CVS.

I guess you might use this code to achieve the same thing in
the proxies, thus having something more flexible than the
simple "remote hosts allowed/refused". The code itself is 6
or 8 lines long.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Thanks for the patch, Khouri!  A couple of notes:

 o The "Show clues" line-split is already fixed in CVS.
 o We now have a more sophisticated connection-
   management system for the web interface, so that
   should probably be applied here in place of your fix
   (as you say in your TODO section).
 o The reason the radio buttons are not in their own
   columns in so that they are a consistent width apart.
   Call me trivial, but I think that's important, partly for
   the look of the thing and partly because it makes it
   ergonomically easier to click them with the mouse.
   The radio buttons should line up fairly well under their
   headings already - if they're out by a large margin for
   you, could you tell us the OS and browser you're using,
   and attach a screenshot?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 08:38:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 10:38:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797782 ] Broken link typo in
	WHAT_IS_NEW.txt
Message-ID: <E19t6sL-0002Lz-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797782, was opened at 2003-08-30 14:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797782&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emile van Sebille (evansebille)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Broken link typo in WHAT_IS_NEW.txt

Initial Comment:
The final line of the file gives a base url which is 
completed by appending the feature request number. It 
works properly when where it reads atid=498104 is 
changed to read atid=498106.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797782&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 11:15:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 13:16:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764806 ] Filtering Halted
Message-ID: <E19t9Js-0006vH-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764806, was opened at 2003-07-02 19:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ransj
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764806&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering Halted

Initial Comment:
Outlook2k on Win2k -> Ive had an occasional problem 
where certain messages would not be caught as spam.
(where they very obviously were spam)
For these messages, "view spam clues" did nothing.  Also, 
"delete as spam" did nothing.
For a long time this was just an occasional thing, but now 
it's become locked this way.  It is no longer filtering 
anything at all, and I can't view spam clues for any 
message anywhere.  2 maybe-signifigant things: I have 
been using the AVG antivirus Outlook plugin for a while 
now; today it uptaded itself (I believe the first update 
since my installation of Spambayes).  I'll play with things 
and see if I can fix it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Ranson (ransj)
Date: 2003-08-30 17:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=855618

I was just going to post a bug report for the same problem.

Outlook XP on WinXP running AVG anti-virus v6 (with the 
latest signatures), Spambayes Outlook Plugin v0.7.

I have noticed that if an e-mail virus is detected the following 
two or three e-mail are not spam checked (no spam ranking 
given and mails remain unfiltered in inbox).

Subsequent mails are processed by Spambayes in the correct 
manner.

Simon

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Date: 2003-07-08 16:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=254856

Haha- just so it's clear, it still has the problem of some messages just 
being unable to be filtered. (but its an occasional thing so not a big deal)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 11:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm glad I added this error :)  I just wish we could find
the cause :(

Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Date: 2003-07-02 19:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=254856

Well- I saw that the new version of the outlook plugin was 
released today. so I installed it and it complained about a 
corrupt database, I retrained and everything seems to be 
working :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764806&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 13:37:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:38:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797890 ] Assertion errors from
	classifier for new messages
Message-ID: <E19tBXn-0003SM-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797890, was opened at 2003-08-30 12:37
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Assertion errors from classifier for new messages

Initial Comment:
Installed from CVS latest version as of 8/30/03 (1.0a4 
wouldn't work for me so reinstalled).  Python version is 2.
2.3 on Windows XP with latest pybsddb installed.  Trained 
with recent spam/ham collections (about equal numbers 
of messages, approx. 400 each), configured proxy.  Using 
Mahogany mail client pointed to pop3proxy (localhost).

Each new message retrieved results in an assertion 
failure:

AssertionError
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 439, in 
onRetr
    evidence=True)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
223, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
451, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
307, in probability
    assert hamcount <= nham

(from console running pop3proxy.py)

Also inserted into headers of each message:
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at
	D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py line 
307: assert
	hamcount <= nham


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 14:01:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 16:01:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797890 ] Assertion errors from
	classifier for new messages
Message-ID: <E19tBuf-0004It-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797890, was opened at 2003-08-30 19:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Assertion errors from classifier for new messages

Initial Comment:
Installed from CVS latest version as of 8/30/03 (1.0a4 
wouldn't work for me so reinstalled).  Python version is 2.
2.3 on Windows XP with latest pybsddb installed.  Trained 
with recent spam/ham collections (about equal numbers 
of messages, approx. 400 each), configured proxy.  Using 
Mahogany mail client pointed to pop3proxy (localhost).

Each new message retrieved results in an assertion 
failure:

AssertionError
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 439, in 
onRetr
    evidence=True)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
223, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
451, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
307, in probability
    assert hamcount <= nham

(from console running pop3proxy.py)

Also inserted into headers of each message:
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at
	D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py line 
307: assert
	hamcount <= nham


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 20:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

This is a bug that's been cropping up from time to time,
but we haven't been able to reproduce it.  It sounds from
your description that you have a way to reproduce it - just
train on your corpuses and it fails straight away...?  If that's
true, could you attach your corpuses to this bug report?
Or if you've private messages in there, would you be willing
to send the corpuses to me directly?  I'd love to be able to
track this one down.

If you do send/attach your corpuses, please zip them up
to guarantee they don't get mangled by intermediate
mail/web servers.

How are you training?  Through the web, or on the command
line?  If on the command line, what is the exact command
you're using?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 15:39:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 17:39:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-797776 ] Label change
	in Web interface
Message-ID: <E19tDR1-0003LT-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #797776, was opened at 2003-08-30 14:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=797776&group_id=61702

Category: Interface Improvements (example)
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
>Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: Label change in Web interface

Initial Comment:
As SpamBayes web interface now allows to train on
Outlook Express's dbx files, the label in "Train on a
given message" box should be changed in order to show
user he can train on his DBX files.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 21:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Implemented in:
 o UserInterface.py 1.20
 o ui.html 1.19
 o ui_html.py 1.20


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=797776&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 15:46:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 17:46:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19tDYS-0001Mg-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 18:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 21:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol,
please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic
authentication.  (You should know that we're planning a
feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the
end of next week.  I don't know how long the freeze will 
last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 14:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest
authentication support (which, as said in patch description,
is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 00:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest
sources from CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 21:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 15:55:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 17:55:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797890 ] Assertion errors from
	classifier for new messages
Message-ID: <E19tDgz-0001ek-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797890, was opened at 2003-08-30 12:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by avitous
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Assertion errors from classifier for new messages

Initial Comment:
Installed from CVS latest version as of 8/30/03 (1.0a4 
wouldn't work for me so reinstalled).  Python version is 2.
2.3 on Windows XP with latest pybsddb installed.  Trained 
with recent spam/ham collections (about equal numbers 
of messages, approx. 400 each), configured proxy.  Using 
Mahogany mail client pointed to pop3proxy (localhost).

Each new message retrieved results in an assertion 
failure:

AssertionError
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 439, in 
onRetr
    evidence=True)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
223, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
451, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
307, in probability
    assert hamcount <= nham

(from console running pop3proxy.py)

Also inserted into headers of each message:
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at
	D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py line 
307: assert
	hamcount <= nham


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Date: 2003-08-30 14:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=353986

I'd love to help track this down, but I cannot send you my 
corpuses (private data) and don't have time right now to 
'sanitize' it.  Perhaps later this weekend I can find the time, 
but I don't want to give away anybody's emails in the process.

I'm training through the web interface, with culled most-recent 
message data for spam/ham corpuses.  No errors show up 
during this exercise; messages are imported as a single mbox 
file for each corpus.  Subsequently I can query on various 
words and the responses seem to be reasonable.

Error shows up when I subsequently shut down, restart 
pop3proxy.py (was having problem with smtp proxy not 
working with 1.0a4 so got used to doing that...), connect with 
my mail client, and retrieve new messages; every message 
results in the assertion error.

Please let me know what else I can do besides sending private 
data:  what kind of debug logs can be written while exercise 
this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

This is a bug that's been cropping up from time to time,
but we haven't been able to reproduce it.  It sounds from
your description that you have a way to reproduce it - just
train on your corpuses and it fails straight away...?  If that's
true, could you attach your corpuses to this bug report?
Or if you've private messages in there, would you be willing
to send the corpuses to me directly?  I'd love to be able to
track this one down.

If you do send/attach your corpuses, please zip them up
to guarantee they don't get mangled by intermediate
mail/web servers.

How are you training?  Through the web, or on the command
line?  If on the command line, what is the exact command
you're using?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 17:19:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 19:20:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797890 ] Assertion errors from
	classifier for new messages
Message-ID: <E19tF0E-0003xg-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797890, was opened at 2003-08-30 12:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by avitous
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Assertion errors from classifier for new messages

Initial Comment:
Installed from CVS latest version as of 8/30/03 (1.0a4 
wouldn't work for me so reinstalled).  Python version is 2.
2.3 on Windows XP with latest pybsddb installed.  Trained 
with recent spam/ham collections (about equal numbers 
of messages, approx. 400 each), configured proxy.  Using 
Mahogany mail client pointed to pop3proxy (localhost).

Each new message retrieved results in an assertion 
failure:

AssertionError
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 439, in 
onRetr
    evidence=True)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
223, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
451, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
307, in probability
    assert hamcount <= nham

(from console running pop3proxy.py)

Also inserted into headers of each message:
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at
	D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py line 
307: assert
	hamcount <= nham


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=353986

Just got 1.0a4 working (adding pybsddb helped) and although 
it has a particular training issue thru smtp proxy it works 
against the corpuses which caused the error documented here 
in CVS snapshot version.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Date: 2003-08-30 14:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=353986

I'd love to help track this down, but I cannot send you my 
corpuses (private data) and don't have time right now to 
'sanitize' it.  Perhaps later this weekend I can find the time, 
but I don't want to give away anybody's emails in the process.

I'm training through the web interface, with culled most-recent 
message data for spam/ham corpuses.  No errors show up 
during this exercise; messages are imported as a single mbox 
file for each corpus.  Subsequently I can query on various 
words and the responses seem to be reasonable.

Error shows up when I subsequently shut down, restart 
pop3proxy.py (was having problem with smtp proxy not 
working with 1.0a4 so got used to doing that...), connect with 
my mail client, and retrieve new messages; every message 
results in the assertion error.

Please let me know what else I can do besides sending private 
data:  what kind of debug logs can be written while exercise 
this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

This is a bug that's been cropping up from time to time,
but we haven't been able to reproduce it.  It sounds from
your description that you have a way to reproduce it - just
train on your corpuses and it fails straight away...?  If that's
true, could you attach your corpuses to this bug report?
Or if you've private messages in there, would you be willing
to send the corpuses to me directly?  I'd love to be able to
track this one down.

If you do send/attach your corpuses, please zip them up
to guarantee they don't get mangled by intermediate
mail/web servers.

How are you training?  Through the web, or on the command
line?  If on the command line, what is the exact command
you're using?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 17:23:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 19:24:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797890 ] Assertion errors from
	classifier for new messages
Message-ID: <E19tF4Y-0006mg-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797890, was opened at 2003-08-30 19:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Assertion errors from classifier for new messages

Initial Comment:
Installed from CVS latest version as of 8/30/03 (1.0a4 
wouldn't work for me so reinstalled).  Python version is 2.
2.3 on Windows XP with latest pybsddb installed.  Trained 
with recent spam/ham collections (about equal numbers 
of messages, approx. 400 each), configured proxy.  Using 
Mahogany mail client pointed to pop3proxy (localhost).

Each new message retrieved results in an assertion 
failure:

AssertionError
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", line 439, in 
onRetr
    evidence=True)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
223, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
451, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)
  File "D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py", line 
307, in probability
    assert hamcount <= nham

(from console running pop3proxy.py)

Also inserted into headers of each message:
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.AssertionError() in 
probability() at
	D:\apps\spambayes\spambayes\classifier.py line 
307: assert
	hamcount <= nham


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 23:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you please clarify something?  You say "adding pybsddb
helped", but your initial problem description says "...with
latest
pybsddb installed."  When you were seeing the problems, did
you have pybsddb installed or not?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Date: 2003-08-30 23:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=353986

Just got 1.0a4 working (adding pybsddb helped) and although 
it has a particular training issue thru smtp proxy it works 
against the corpuses which caused the error documented here 
in CVS snapshot version.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Anderson J. Vitous (avitous)
Date: 2003-08-30 21:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=353986

I'd love to help track this down, but I cannot send you my 
corpuses (private data) and don't have time right now to 
'sanitize' it.  Perhaps later this weekend I can find the time, 
but I don't want to give away anybody's emails in the process.

I'm training through the web interface, with culled most-recent 
message data for spam/ham corpuses.  No errors show up 
during this exercise; messages are imported as a single mbox 
file for each corpus.  Subsequently I can query on various 
words and the responses seem to be reasonable.

Error shows up when I subsequently shut down, restart 
pop3proxy.py (was having problem with smtp proxy not 
working with 1.0a4 so got used to doing that...), connect with 
my mail client, and retrieve new messages; every message 
results in the assertion error.

Please let me know what else I can do besides sending private 
data:  what kind of debug logs can be written while exercise 
this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 20:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

This is a bug that's been cropping up from time to time,
but we haven't been able to reproduce it.  It sounds from
your description that you have a way to reproduce it - just
train on your corpuses and it fails straight away...?  If that's
true, could you attach your corpuses to this bug report?
Or if you've private messages in there, would you be willing
to send the corpuses to me directly?  I'd love to be able to
track this one down.

If you do send/attach your corpuses, please zip them up
to guarantee they don't get mangled by intermediate
mail/web servers.

How are you training?  Through the web, or on the command
line?  If on the command line, what is the exact command
you're using?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797890&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 17:38:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 19:38:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19tFIJ-0007AF-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 01:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I'll take care of this, counting from tomorrow. I expect
none of you to play with Dibbler.py during the next days,
since at first sight it might requires some important
changes to add Digest (MD5) authentication support.

Anyway, if I am not able to make it for the freeze, I guess
Basic support might still be enough for most users. After
all, if it is very easy to catch somebody's HTTP Basic
login/password couple by sniffing the network, it is even
easier to intercept one's POP3 login informations.

I'll try to do it, but think of keeping the authentication
Basic. As I said before, it might requires important changes
within the web server. I did not dig deep enough in HTTP
documentation yet, but as far as I know it might require the
Dibbler web server to keep a UID for each HTTP client.

I hope I'll be surprised by the ease of implementation. I'll
get back to you tomorrow evening to tell you wether
important changes are required or not. If they are, maybe it
will be a good idea to discuss about them since I don't know
what are your plans concerning the Dibbler code. I do not
want to mess up the code too much :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 23:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol,
please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic
authentication.  (You should know that we're planning a
feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the
end of next week.  I don't know how long the freeze will 
last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest
authentication support (which, as said in patch description,
is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest
sources from CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 17:51:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 19:51:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19tFVH-0004p5-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 18:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 23:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Dibbler.py doesn't change much (it's only ever had three
edits!) so you shouldn't worry about huge conflicts.

That said, I've just checked in an edit to it before reading
this - you can't expect people not to touch it, but you
don't need to because CVS will cope with non-conflicting
edits.  Unless you're planning on changing it beyond all
recognition that is, in which case we really need to
discuss it first as you say - the reason it's barely changed
is that no-one's ever found a bug in it, and I wouldn't want
to jeopardise that.  Plus, adding authentication really
shouldn't require major restructuring work.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I'll take care of this, counting from tomorrow. I expect
none of you to play with Dibbler.py during the next days,
since at first sight it might requires some important
changes to add Digest (MD5) authentication support.

Anyway, if I am not able to make it for the freeze, I guess
Basic support might still be enough for most users. After
all, if it is very easy to catch somebody's HTTP Basic
login/password couple by sniffing the network, it is even
easier to intercept one's POP3 login informations.

I'll try to do it, but think of keeping the authentication
Basic. As I said before, it might requires important changes
within the web server. I did not dig deep enough in HTTP
documentation yet, but as far as I know it might require the
Dibbler web server to keep a UID for each HTTP client.

I hope I'll be surprised by the ease of implementation. I'll
get back to you tomorrow evening to tell you wether
important changes are required or not. If they are, maybe it
will be a good idea to discuss about them since I don't know
what are your plans concerning the Dibbler code. I do not
want to mess up the code too much :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 21:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol,
please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic
authentication.  (You should know that we're planning a
feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the
end of next week.  I don't know how long the freeze will 
last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 14:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest
authentication support (which, as said in patch description,
is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 00:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest
sources from CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 21:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 12:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 18:00:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 20:00:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19tFdR-0003HE-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 02:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I was not thinking of major structural changes, but to many
code additions, especially new instance members. We'll see
that tomorrow :)

P.S : concerning CVS, I use it for quite a long time, and I
was just afraid to run into conflicts (the way CVS merges
code is sometimes... surprising), I hate fixing this kind of
issues ;-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-31 01:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Dibbler.py doesn't change much (it's only ever had three
edits!) so you shouldn't worry about huge conflicts.

That said, I've just checked in an edit to it before reading
this - you can't expect people not to touch it, but you
don't need to because CVS will cope with non-conflicting
edits.  Unless you're planning on changing it beyond all
recognition that is, in which case we really need to
discuss it first as you say - the reason it's barely changed
is that no-one's ever found a bug in it, and I wouldn't want
to jeopardise that.  Plus, adding authentication really
shouldn't require major restructuring work.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 01:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I'll take care of this, counting from tomorrow. I expect
none of you to play with Dibbler.py during the next days,
since at first sight it might requires some important
changes to add Digest (MD5) authentication support.

Anyway, if I am not able to make it for the freeze, I guess
Basic support might still be enough for most users. After
all, if it is very easy to catch somebody's HTTP Basic
login/password couple by sniffing the network, it is even
easier to intercept one's POP3 login informations.

I'll try to do it, but think of keeping the authentication
Basic. As I said before, it might requires important changes
within the web server. I did not dig deep enough in HTTP
documentation yet, but as far as I know it might require the
Dibbler web server to keep a UID for each HTTP client.

I hope I'll be surprised by the ease of implementation. I'll
get back to you tomorrow evening to tell you wether
important changes are required or not. If they are, maybe it
will be a good idea to discuss about them since I don't know
what are your plans concerning the Dibbler code. I do not
want to mess up the code too much :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 23:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol,
please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic
authentication.  (You should know that we're planning a
feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the
end of next week.  I don't know how long the freeze will 
last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest
authentication support (which, as said in patch description,
is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest
sources from CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 19:03:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Aug 30 21:03:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797739 ] Still does not read all
	headers
Message-ID: <E19tGd0-0004zr-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797739, was opened at 2003-08-30 08:16
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797739&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Pearce (tcp1)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Still does not read all headers

Initial Comment:
I thought the new version of outlook spam bayes had 
rectified the problem of not accessing all headers in 
messages. But it seems not. I have just retrained my 
spam and ham using version 007 and it still ignores the 
server generated header spam report which will be very 
useful to spambayes for finding spam. Example message 
below (generated by spambayes) and here is the part of 
the header I would like spambayes to interpret (none of 
the these items ever seem to be interpreted by 
spambayes):

X-Spam-Score: (+++++++++++++++) 15.3
X-Spam-Report: 15.3/5.0
	NO_REAL_NAME       (0.7 points)  From: does 
not include a real name
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (0.7 points)  From: 
ends in numbers
	TRACKER_ID (4.3 points) BODY: Incorporates a 
tracking ID number
	OFFER              (0.1 points)  BODY: Free Offer
	HTML_30_40         (0.8 points)  BODY: 
Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME (0.2 points) BODY: 
HTML font color has unusual
	name
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is red
	HTML_MESSAGE       (0.1 points)  BODY: HTML 
included in message
	HTML_FONT_BIG (0.1 points) BODY: FONT Size 
+2 and up or 3 and up
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is blue
	HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.1 points) BODY: 
HTML link text says "click
	here"
	HTML_SHOUTING3 (0.8 points) BODY: HTML 
has very strong "shouting"
	markup
	SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID   (0.8 points)  Subject 
contains a unique ID
	DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 (2.8 points) Date: is 
12 to 24 hours after
	Received: date
	FORGED_MUA_IMS (2.8 points) Forged mail 
pretending to be from IMS
	MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only 
has text/html MIME parts
	CLICK_BELOW        (0.1 points)  Asks you to 
click below
	FROM_ALL_NUMS (0.6 points) From an address 
that is all numbers
	(non-phone)


===============

Spam Score: 1


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               0                   -      -
'*S*'                               1                   -      -
'x-mailer:internet mail service (5.5.2653.19)' 
0.0493829          56      3
'url:info'                          0.0681493          52      4
'copying'                           0.16448            42      9
'original'                          0.198828          160     44
'able'                              0.282561          192     84
'copy'                              0.300619          155     74
'swedish'                           0.313233           18      9
'format'                            0.354496           46     28
'computer'                          0.355363          142     87
'spend'                             0.641237           18     36
'standard'                          0.648117           36     74
'home'                              0.654816           70    148
'heard'                             0.658648           12     26
'(i.e.'                             0.659267            5     11
'immediate'                         0.660244           17     37
'create'                            0.667571           33     74
'without'                           0.68148            57    136
'our'                               0.682849          325    779
'price:'                            0.689351           10     25
'own'                               0.689898           54    134
"subject:'"                         0.696123           34     87
'******'                            0.696864            3      8
"you've"                            0.697367           26     67
'special'                           0.702608           98    258
'header:Message-Id:1'               0.703421          392   
1035
'upgraded'                          0.705258            4     11
'everything'                        0.710206           27     74
'here'                              0.715414          155    434
'film'                              0.717526            8     23
'learn'                             0.719277           43    123
'buying'                            0.719934           10     29
'*****'                             0.720474            3      9
'play'                              0.724933           21     62
'video'                             0.725325           23     68
'header:Received:3'                 0.725418          307    
903
'right'                             0.728689           38    114
'news.'                             0.739192           10     32
'***'                               0.740209            9     29
'cd.'                               0.740672            3     10
"it's"                              0.750199           57    191
'step'                              0.750624           10     34
'keep'                              0.753278           49    167
'free'                              0.75815           134    468
"you'll"                            0.769174           26     97
'minutes'                           0.772264           38    144
'reply-to:no real name:2**0'        0.78037           101    
400
'transfer'                          0.781323           27    108
'__________'                        0.793875            1      5
'games'                             0.795149            4     18
'****'                              0.798819            3     14
'*******'                           0.798819            3     14
'skip:_ 10'                         0.798819            3     14
'easy'                              0.800081           27    121
'instructions'                      0.803521           24    110
'sony'                              0.819613            2     11
'header:Reply-To:1'                 0.820402          181    
921
'___'                               0.820948            1      6
'stay'                              0.825333            8     43
'instantly'                         0.837602            4     24
'view'                              0.83792            65    375
'subject:copy'                      0.841735            1      7
'offers'                            0.841987           44    262
'to:addr:t.c.pearce'                0.843817          153    
921
'click'                             0.851061           97    618
'save'                              0.852853           24    156
'computer,'                         0.857315            4     28
'skip:* 10'                         0.860358            9     63
'time!'                             0.861106            3     22
'pro'                               0.861942            6     43
'player'                            0.866281            3     23
'simple,'                           0.867776            2     16
'***********'                       0.871558            1      
9
'skip:1 40'                         0.871558            1      9
'burn'                              0.874479            2     17
'dvd,'                              0.882618            1     10
'english,'                          0.882618            1     10
'too!'                              0.886034            2     19
'now!'                              0.8948             11    106
'movies'                            0.903754            2     23
'blank'                             0.920269           17    221
'retail'                            0.926516            3     45
'burning'                           0.926761            1     17
'______'                            0.944367            0      4
'_______'                           0.954481            0      5
'subject:Now'                       0.959444            1     32
'dvd'                               0.961145            2     61
'reply-to:addr:msn.com'             0.961483            0      
6
'subject:Languages'                 0.961483            0      6
"dvd's"                             0.963757            1     36
'skip:a 40'                         0.966618            0      7
'from:addr:delphi.com'              0.970545            0      8
'favorite'                          0.973588            1     50
'$39.95!'                           0.973645            0      9
'$69.95'                            0.973645            0      9
'4.0!'                              0.973645            0      9
'600mb'                             0.973645            0      9
'another!'                          0.973645            0      9
'burner.'                           0.973645            0      9
'cd-r.'                             0.973645            0      9
'cd;'                               0.973645            0      9
'cdr!'                              0.973645            0      9
'condition!'                        0.973645            0      9
'download!!'                        0.973645            0      9
'dutch,'                            0.973645            0      9
'encodings'                         0.973645            0      9
'etc...)'                           0.973645            0      9
'extras!'                           0.973645            0      9
'finnish,'                          0.973645            0      9
'french,'                           0.973645            0      9
'games!'                            0.973645            0      9
'greek,'                            0.973645            0      9
'hungarian,'                        0.973645            0      9
'italian,'                          0.973645            0      9
'languages!'                        0.973645            0      9
'packet'                            0.973645            0      9
'polish,'                           0.973645            0      9
'portuguese,'                       0.973645            0      9
'recorder?'                         0.973645            0      9
'ripper'                            0.973645            0      9
'russian,'                          0.973645            0      9
'spanish,'                          0.973645            0      9
'tapes?'                            0.973645            0      9
'urdu!'                             0.973645            0      9
'vhs'                               0.973645            0      9
'message-id:@artemis.le.ac.uk'      0.974931            9    
399
'divx'                              0.976155            0     10
'german,'                           0.976155            0     10
'hurry!'                            0.976155            0     10
'playstation'                       0.976155            0     10
'skip:7 40'                         0.976155            0     10
'television,'                       0.976155            0     10
'worry!'                            0.976155            0     10
'$1000'                             0.978228            0     11
'tapes'                             0.978228            0     11
'anytime!'                          0.981454            0     13
'payment!'                          0.981454            0     13
'single,'                           0.981454            0     13
'yes!'                              0.981454            0     13
'product.'                          0.985693            0     17
'skip:2 40'                         0.98716             0     19
'backups'                           0.987786            0     20
'download!'                         0.990181            0     25
'magick'                            0.990181            0     25
'url:dvd'                           0.990181            0     25
'url:adv166'                        0.990552            0     26
'pc!'                               0.992051            0     31
'dvds'                              0.992296            0     32
'burner'                            0.992742            0     34
'subject:DVD'                       0.992947            0     35
'subject:! '                        0.994942            0     49
Message Stream:


Received: from SUMAC.cfs.le.ac.uk ([143.210.35.10]) by 
saffron.cfs.le.ac.uk
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:01:41 +0100
Received: from artemis.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.126]) by 
SUMAC.cfs.le.ac.uk with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sat, 30 
Aug 2003 13:01:41 +0100
Received: from ca-glendora-cuda1-c3a-a-
110.arcdca.adelphia.net ([68.68.4.110]
	helo=68.68.4.110) by artemis.le.ac.uk with 
smtp (Exim 4.21)
	id 19t4QF-0002dP-87
	for t.c.pearce@leicester.ac.uk; Sat, 30 Aug 
2003 13:01:40 +0100
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:05:29 -0500
From: 239039@delphi.com
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Reply-To: 239039@msn.com
Organization: 2050690133
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
To: t.c.pearce@leicester.ac.uk
Subject: Now copy DVD's in 14 Languages! 239039
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E19t4QF-0002dP-87@artemis.le.ac.uk>
X-Spam-Score: (+++++++++++++++) 15.3
X-Spam-Report: 15.3/5.0
	NO_REAL_NAME       (0.7 points)  From: does 
not include a real name
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (0.7 points)  From: 
ends in numbers
	TRACKER_ID (4.3 points) BODY: Incorporates a 
tracking ID number
	OFFER              (0.1 points)  BODY: Free Offer
	HTML_30_40         (0.8 points)  BODY: 
Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME (0.2 points) BODY: 
HTML font color has unusual
	name
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is red
	HTML_MESSAGE       (0.1 points)  BODY: HTML 
included in message
	HTML_FONT_BIG (0.1 points) BODY: FONT Size 
+2 and up or 3 and up
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is blue
	HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.1 points) BODY: 
HTML link text says "click
	here"
	HTML_SHOUTING3 (0.8 points) BODY: HTML 
has very strong "shouting"
	markup
	SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID   (0.8 points)  Subject 
contains a unique ID
	DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 (2.8 points) Date: is 
12 to 24 hours after
	Received: date
	FORGED_MUA_IMS (2.8 points) Forged mail 
pretending to be from IMS
	MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only 
has text/html MIME parts
	CLICK_BELOW        (0.1 points)  Asks you to 
click below
	FROM_ALL_NUMS (0.6 points) From an address 
that is all numbers
	(non-phone)
Return-Path: be99naj@bigfoot.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2003 12:01:41.0489 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[796BDE10:01C36EEE]

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; 
charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>DVD Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create 
DVDs in Your Own Home</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#3A6EA5">
<center>
<table border="0" width="600" cellspacing="0" 
cellpadding="14">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FF6600" height="10" valign="middle" 
align="center">
<font size="5">Copy your favorite DVD's to a standard 
CD - without a DVD Burner. Free extras! It's easy to 
use. Retail Price: <font 
color="white"><s>$69.95</s></font> and For a limited 
time it is Only <a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="white">$39.95!
</a></font></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<b> <center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">DVD 
Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create DVDs in 
Your Own Home</font></a></center><br>
Don't spend $1000 on a DVD Burner. Get our all-inclusive 
software right now and within minutes you will be on 
your way to copying any DVD video to a single, standard 
CD. You've seen us in the news. You've heard so much 
about our product. Now available for download! Get your 
software instantly following payment!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">***************
7875F88C-6E1E6ADF-1AD8F189-35BFF8F1-1B5129E
************ </font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">DVD 
Copying Features</font></a></center><br>
<ul>
<li>No DVD Burner Required</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">***
239039
*****</font>
<li>Simple, Convenient Step by Step 
Instructions</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">___
195790194
_______</font>
<li>Burn to any standard CD; play on any standard DVD 
player (i.e. Television, Computer, etc...) OR computer 
CD Drive</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">*
1202620547
*************</font>
<li>Don't have a CD recorder? Don't worry! You can save 
your favorite movies to your computer and view anytime!
</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">_____________
239039
_______</font>
<li>Yes! They will play on your CD and DVD 
player</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">***************
239039
****</font>
<li>Now you can copy movies from DVD to the new DiVX 
format. One standard film will take 600mb of your space, 
that means you can keep around 70 films at the same 
time on your PC!</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">______
1778882172
_______</font>
<li>Create your new video collection now!</li><font 
color="#FFFFFF" size="1">******
6280745
***</font>
<li>After buying our packet you will learn how to work 
with digital video in no time! Our packet includes easy 
instructions on how to work with encodings + copying 
from one format to another!</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">_________________
647574259
__________</font><br><br>
</ul>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Copy 
VHS tapes to CD too!</font></a></center><br>
Just upgraded to a DVD and have a library of video 
tapes? With your software not only can you copy & burn 
ANY DVD, you'll also be able to transfer all your VHS 
tapes to DVD format on CD using CDR!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">****************
1ECBCA09-6ADDE12B-34A18763-30AD5F2A-5004EFA2
*******</font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Back up 
your favorite Playstation 2 Games!
</font></a></center><br>
Order the DVD PRO 4.0! ripper NOW and included will be 
directions for burning Sony Playstation 2 games! 
Everything you need to make a working copy on a 
standard, blank CD-R. Use these as backups so that 
your original PlayStation 2 games stay in the best 
condition!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">***
AF51DD2-6E5E3DB4-2F48D28B-7D8A3F57-62B2B842
***</font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Now 
copy DVD's in 14 Languages!</font></a></center><br>
Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, 
Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, 
Swedish and Urdu!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">************ 
20AF94B0-298F8D05-3B268F5B-1C0417CA-1A9A6214
***********</font><br><br>

<center><font size="4"><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="red">Hurry! 
Limited Time Special Offers Immediate download!!<br>
Click Here for More Info or Order Online Now!
</font></font></a></b><br><br><br><br><br><br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">
239039
     
2C5AD477-4C272EF3-171BE48D-1AA57190-258DFC00
          
1258863973
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</body>
</html>


Copy your favorite DVD's to a standard CD - without a 
DVD Burner. Free
extras! It's easy to use. Retail Price: $69.95 and For a 
limited time it
is Only $39.95! <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 	 
DVD Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create DVDs in 
Your Own Home
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Don't spend $1000 on a DVD Burner. Get our all-inclusive 
software right
now and within minutes you will be on your way to 
copying any DVD video
to a single, standard CD. You've seen us in the news. 
You've heard so
much about our product. Now available for download! 
Get your software
instantly following payment!
*************** 7875F88C-6E1E6ADF-1AD8F189-
35BFF8F1-1B5129E
************ 

DVD Copying Features <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 


*	No DVD Burner Required
	*** 239039 ***** 
*	Simple, Convenient Step by Step Instructions
	___ 195790194 _______ 
*	Burn to any standard CD; play on any standard 
DVD player (i.e.
Television, Computer, etc...) OR computer CD Drive
	* 1202620547 ************* 
*	Don't have a CD recorder? Don't worry! You 
can save your
favorite movies to your computer and view anytime!
	_____________ 239039 _______ 
*	Yes! They will play on your CD and DVD player
	*************** 239039 **** 
*	Now you can copy movies from DVD to the 
new DiVX format. One
standard film will take 600mb of your space, that means 
you can keep
around 70 films at the same time on your PC!
	______ 1778882172 _______ 
*	Create your new video collection now!
	****** 6280745 *** 
*	After buying our packet you will learn how to 
work with digital
video in no time! Our packet includes easy instructions 
on how to work
with encodings + copying from one format to another!
	_________________ 647574259 __________
	
	

Copy VHS tapes to CD too! <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Just upgraded to a DVD and have a library of video 
tapes? With your
software not only can you copy & burn ANY DVD, you'll 
also be able to
transfer all your VHS tapes to DVD format on CD using 
CDR!
**************** 1ECBCA09-6ADDE12B-34A18763-
30AD5F2A-5004EFA2 *******

Back up your favorite Playstation 2 Games!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Order the DVD PRO 4.0! ripper NOW and included will be 
directions for
burning Sony Playstation 2 games! Everything you need 
to make a working
copy on a standard, blank CD-R. Use these as backups 
so that your
original PlayStation 2 games stay in the best condition!
*** AF51DD2-6E5E3DB4-2F48D28B-7D8A3F57-62B2B842 
***

Now copy DVD's in 14 Languages!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, 
Hungarian, Italian,
Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish and Urdu!
************  20AF94B0-298F8D05-3B268F5B-
1C0417CA-1A9A6214 ***********


Hurry! Limited Time Special Offers Immediate download!!
Click Here for More Info or Order Online Now!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 





239039 2C5AD477-4C272EF3-171BE48D-1AA57190-
258DFC00 1258863973 
Message Tokens:

254 unique tokens

'$1000'
'$39.95!'
'$69.95'
'(i.e.'
'***'
'****'
'*****'
'******'
'*******'
'***********'
'1202620547'
'1258863973'
'1778882172'
'195790194'
'239039'
'4.0!'
'600mb'
'6280745'
'647574259'
'___'
'______'
'_______'
'__________'
'able'
'about'
'after'
'all'
'also'
'and'
'another!'
'any'
'anytime!'
'around'
'available'
'back'
'backups'
'best'
'blank'
'burn'
'burner'
'burner.'
'burning'
'buying'
'can'
'cc:none'
'cd-r.'
'cd.'
'cd;'
'cdr!'
'click'
'collection'
'computer'
'computer,'
'condition!'
'content-type:text/plain'
'convenient'
'copy'
'copying'
'create'
'digital'
'directions'
'divx'
"don't"
'download!'
'download!!'
'drive'
'drive*'
'dutch,'
'dvd'
"dvd's"
'dvd,'
'dvds'
'easy'
'encodings'
'english,'
'etc...)'
'everything'
'extras!'
'favorite'
'features'
'film'
'films'
'finnish,'
'following'
'for'
'format'
'format.'
'free'
'french,'
'from'
'from:addr:239039'
'from:addr:delphi.com'
'from:no real name:2**0'
'games'
'games!'
'german,'
'get'
'greek,'
'have'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-Id:1'
'header:Organization:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Reply-To:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'heard'
'here'
'home'
'how'
'hungarian,'
'hurry!'
'immediate'
'included'
'includes'
'info'
'instantly'
'instructions'
"it's"
'italian,'
'just'
'keep'
'languages!'
'learn'
'library'
'limited'
'magick'
'make'
'means'
'message-id:@artemis.le.ac.uk'
'minutes'
'more'
'movies'
'much'
'need'
'new'
'news.'
'not'
'now'
'now!'
'now!******'
'offers'
'one'
'online'
'only'
'order'
'original'
'our'
'own'
'packet'
'payment!'
'pc!'
'pc!______'
'play'
'player'
'playstation'
'polish,'
'portuguese,'
'price:'
'pro'
'product.'
'proto:http'
'recorder?'
'reply-to:addr:239039'
'reply-to:addr:msn.com'
'reply-to:no real name:2**0'
'required'
'required***'
'retail'
'right'
'ripper'
'russian,'
'same'
'save'
'seen'
'sender:none'
'simple,'
'single,'
'skip:* 10'
'skip:1 40'
'skip:2 40'
'skip:7 40'
'skip:_ 10'
'skip:a 10'
'skip:a 20'
'skip:a 40'
'skip:i 10'
'skip:p 20'
'skip:r 10'
'software'
'sony'
'space,'
'spanish,'
'special'
'spend'
'standard'
'standard,'
'stay'
'step'
'subject: '
'subject:! '
"subject:'"
'subject:239039'
'subject:DVD'
'subject:Languages'
'subject:Now'
'subject:copy'
'swedish'
'take'
'tapes'
'tapes?'
'television,'
'that'
'the'
'these'
'they'
'time'
'time!'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:leicester.ac.uk'
'to:addr:t.c.pearce'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'too!'
'transfer'
'upgraded'
'urdu!'
'url:adv166'
'url:dvd'
'url:info'
'url:ultra-software'
'url:www'
'use'
'use.'
'using'
'vhs'
'video'
'view'
'way'
'will'
'with'
'within'
'without'
'work'
'working'
'worry!'
'x-mailer:internet mail service (5.5.2653.19)'
'yes!'
'you'
"you'll"
"you've"
'your'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-30 21:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

By design (due to testing results), spambayes ignores most 
headers.  Note that the example you gave here supplies no 
reason for change:  it showed that spambayes nailed the 
email in question perfectly (internal *H* score of 0 and 
internal *S* score of 1 -- it's impossible to get a stronger 
outcome than that!).

There are two specific reasons for continuing to ignore 
SpamAssassin-like header decorations:  (1) spammers can 
spoof them, supplying tons of bogus clues; and, (2) because 
many people use spambayes on their own box after some 
server uses a SpamAssassin-like system first to inject 
headers, getting a spambayes judgment independent of what 
a rule-based system thought truly helps to recover from 
mistakes made by the rule-based system.  If spambayes 
counted what the rule-based system thought, it would act to 
reinfiorce the rule-based system's mistakes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797739&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 23:32:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 01:32:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798029 ] Outlook missing HTML in
	all pst mail
Message-ID: <E19tKpX-0003yO-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #798029, was opened at 2003-08-31 15:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798029&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook missing HTML in all pst mail

Initial Comment:
Discovered via [ 797064 ] Problems moving messages
between pst and Exchange

I am confused how this *ever* worked for me, but I am
sure it did.  Particularly, MSKB Q268440 "INFO: MAPI Is
Not Suitable for HTML Messages" tells me it never
should have worked.

That KB tells us PR_BODY_HTML is useless everywhere. 
It is for me, but people with Exchange Server report it
*does* work in the server mailbox, but not in the .pst
mailbox (and moving the *same* message between stores
seems to magically transform this property - see
797064).  "Spam Clues" never shows HTML tokens.  I
instrumented the test suite, and got the following result:

Checked 4975 items, 0 non-filterable items found
of these items, 0 had no headers, 179 had no text body
and 4840 had no HTML

I wonder what the 130 that *do* have the HTML are? 
*sigh*  Either way, a google search looks like I need
to process the "compressed RTF" property (which means a
new win32all method, and a dumb RTF parser) *sigh**2*

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798029&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Aug 30 23:34:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 01:34:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797064 ] Problems moving messages
	between pst and Exchange
Message-ID: <E19tKrD-00042k-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797064, was opened at 2003-08-29 11:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange

Initial Comment:
If a message's clues are viewed when on the Exchange 
server, and compared to the same message moved to a 
pst file, the clues are not the same.  It appears (I 
haven't examined closely yet; can do on request) that 
on Exchange the html part of the message is used, and 
in the pst, it isnt'.

Probably related to this is the problem that moving a 
message back and forwards between Exchange and a 
pst file (showing clues each time) results in an ever-
increasing number of tokens.

It doesn't appear to be the PR_SEARCH_KEY changing:

>>> key1 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6
\xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'"
>>> key2 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY       : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6
\xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'"
>>> key1 == key2
True

Next thing to try?  :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-08-31 15:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The underlying bug seems to be
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=798029&group_id=61702&atid=498103
- however, as it looks like we will be almost
"hand-crafting" the HTML of the message, I will leave this
open, as we may still end up with bugs if the html we
generate isn't identical (token-wise) to the MS one.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-30 19:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The dump_props are attached.

If I just move the messages about, doing 'show clues', then 
no training takes place.  I think my original comment was 
wrong - trying now, I get the same number of tokens no 
matter how many times I move (although the exchange count 
and pst count are different).  Anyway, the log (at verbose=1) 
doesn't show anything apart from the "already trained as 
ham" message.

If I train a message I get not that much more.  pst first:
"""
Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' -  trained as 
spam
Saving bayes database with 4637 spam and 410 good 
messages
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db
Saved databases in 896.138ms
"""
and moving it back to Exchange:
"""
Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' -  trained as 
good
Saving bayes database with 4636 spam and 411 good 
messages
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db
 -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db
Saved databases in 850.026ms
"""

Does this help?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 05:26:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 07:26:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798085 ] object has no attribute
	'register'
Message-ID: <E19tQLd-0000fK-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #798085, was opened at 2003-08-31 11:26
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798085&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Roger Booth (rogbot)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: object has no attribute 'register'

Initial Comment:
I got this result when I tried to install the Outlook plugin 
on Windows 2000

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798085&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 08:40:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 10:40:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-791393 ] HTTP Authentication
Message-ID: <E19tTNP-0007v4-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #791393, was opened at 2003-08-19 20:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: HTTP Authentication

Initial Comment:
This patch closes Feature Request #791319.

This patch adds HTTP Authentication support to the
Dibbler HTTP server. There are four new methods which
can be overloaded (by default, no authentifcation is
required) :

requestAuthentication()
getRealm()
isValidUser()
getCancelMessage()

This patch works against current CVS release and does
include the remote connections one. The configuration
page now show three new options : enable/disable HTTP
authentication, user name and user password.

This is based on Basic HTTP Authentication and not on
Digest (MD5) one which is more secure (but more
complicated to implement, particularily in such a
simple web server). I guess that HTTP Authentication
and Remote connections management souhld be enough to
prevent the vast majority of security issues.

The attached zip contains diff and py files.

P.S : it is easy to mix this patch with the remote
connections one

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 16:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

It was much simpler than I originnaly thought. This is not a
complete Digest implementation since the patch does not take
care of the "opaque" value (this would have meant to keep
track of each visitor on the HTTP server). Yet, after having
read the RFC, I don't think it is worth the work. Anyway,
this patch allows encrypted authentication.

I've modified the configuration page so that the user can
choose between no authentication, basic (base64) and digest
(md5).

I've submitted two files : one containing the .py files and
the .diff files, and another one which is a context diff
with today's CVS code.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 02:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I was not thinking of major structural changes, but to many
code additions, especially new instance members. We'll see
that tomorrow :)

P.S : concerning CVS, I use it for quite a long time, and I
was just afraid to run into conflicts (the way CVS merges
code is sometimes... surprising), I hate fixing this kind of
issues ;-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-31 01:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Dibbler.py doesn't change much (it's only ever had three
edits!) so you shouldn't worry about huge conflicts.

That said, I've just checked in an edit to it before reading
this - you can't expect people not to touch it, but you
don't need to because CVS will cope with non-conflicting
edits.  Unless you're planning on changing it beyond all
recognition that is, in which case we really need to
discuss it first as you say - the reason it's barely changed
is that no-one's ever found a bug in it, and I wouldn't want
to jeopardise that.  Plus, adding authentication really
shouldn't require major restructuring work.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 01:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I'll take care of this, counting from tomorrow. I expect
none of you to play with Dibbler.py during the next days,
since at first sight it might requires some important
changes to add Digest (MD5) authentication support.

Anyway, if I am not able to make it for the freeze, I guess
Basic support might still be enough for most users. After
all, if it is very easy to catch somebody's HTTP Basic
login/password couple by sniffing the network, it is even
easier to intercept one's POP3 login informations.

I'll try to do it, but think of keeping the authentication
Basic. As I said before, it might requires important changes
within the web server. I did not dig deep enough in HTTP
documentation yet, but as far as I know it might require the
Dibbler web server to keep a UID for each HTTP client.

I hope I'll be surprised by the ease of implementation. I'll
get back to you tomorrow evening to tell you wether
important changes are required or not. If they are, maybe it
will be a good idea to discuss about them since I don't know
what are your plans concerning the Dibbler code. I do not
want to mess up the code too much :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 23:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

If you have the time to implement the more secure protocol,
please do - people might be reluctant to use the Basic
authentication.  (You should know that we're planning a
feature freeze fairly soon - probably sometime towards the
end of next week.  I don't know how long the freeze will 
last... a couple of weeks, perhaps?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I have some free time this week, should I add the Digest
authentication support (which, as said in patch description,
is based on a MD5 algorithm rather than a basic Base64 one) ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-25 02:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Here is the context diff you requested (made with the latest
sources from CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-24 23:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Romain,

Many thanks for the patch, but would it be possible for you
to resubmit it as a context diff?  Plain diffs are difficult to
apply once the source has changed in CVS.  You should be
able to produce a single-file context diff using this command:

cvs diff -c

in the top-level spambayes directory.  (If you're using
WinCVS, you can run that command via "Admin / Command
line")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-20 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Oops sorry, this patch DOES NOT include remote connections
one (nor the outlook express one).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=791393&group_id=61702

From brian at brightrock.com  Mon Aug 25 11:35:40 2003
From: brian at brightrock.com (Brian Schwarz)
Date: Sun Aug 31 17:44:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] Spambayes repeatedly classifies messages from
	mailing list as SPAM despite multiple (20+) recoveries from
	spam folder
Message-ID: <006301c36b30$dca774b0$bed2f10a@amr.corp.intel.com>

It's not a big issue, but I've noticed that my m-w.com "word of the day" is
consistently flagged by Spambayes as spam despite mutliple (20+) recoveries
from the spam folder.  Below is the source of the email.  Not a big deal,
but thought it was worth reporting because it seems to indicate some kind of
flaw in the way the database is being built.  Must be something in this
message that flags it as spam despite all of the recoveries.  I'm just
surpried that these messages, which always have the same structure and a
similar subject line, keep getting flagged as spam.

Other than that, spambayes is working very well on my system.

Here is an example of the mailing list messages that keep getting mislabeled
as spam.

<begin source of original message>


Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
<<removed internal mail server information>
 with SMTP id M2003082501292106476
 for <email_address_removed@example.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 01:29:21 -0700
Received: from caduceus.sc.example.com (caduceus.sc.example.com
[10.3.252.4])
 by talaria.sc.example.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/d: inner.mc,v 1.35 2003/05/22
21:18:01 rfjohns1 Exp $) with ESMTP id h7P8Mo208635
 for <email_address_removed@example.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:22:50 GMT
Received: from blast1.myfree.com (blast1.myfree.com [64.132.70.201])
 by caduceus.sc.example.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/d: outer.mc,v 1.76 2003/08/21
22:58:26 rfjohns1 Exp $) with SMTP id h7P8Rx406436
 for <email_address_removed@example.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:27:59 GMT
Received: from niihau.startsampling.com ([64.85.80.195]) by
blast1.myfree.com with SMTP (Lyris ListManager WIN32 version 6.1b); Tue, 19
Aug 2003 14:56:43 -0500
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
 by niihau.startsampling.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h7JJrbZ21377;
 Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:53:37 -0700
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 23:30:00 -0500
Message-Id:
<LYRIS-20182749-1089724-2003.08.24-23.30.04--emailaddressremoved#example.com
@blast1.myfree.com>
From: word@m-w.com
To: <email_address_removed@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: condone: M-W's Word of the Day
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:leave-mw-20182749R@blast1.myfree.com>
Reply-To: word@m-w.com
Return-Path: bounce-mw-20182749@blast1.myfree.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2003 08:29:21.0781 (UTC)
FILETIME=[FBE5F250:01C36AE2]




<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Merriam Webster - Word of the Day</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<STYLE type=text/css>
<!--
.text {  font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:
x-small}
-->
</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 marginheight="0"
marginwidth="0"><B>From:</B> word@m-w.com<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, August 24,
2003 9:30 PM<BR><B>To:</B>  Brian W<BR><B>Subject:</B> condone: M-W's
Word of the Day<BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=720 border=0>
  <TBODY>
  <TR>
    <TD><IMG
      src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/wotdemail_head.gif"
      border=0></TD></TR>
  <TR>
    <TD vAlign=top>
      <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0>
        <TBODY>
        <TR>
          <TD vAlign=top width=122>
            <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=122 border=0>
              <TBODY>
              <TR>
                <TD><IMG height=110

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/wotdemail_pic.gif"
                  width=122 border=0></TD></TR>
              <TR bgColor=#ffffff>
                <TD><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/webster_wotdemail_nav.gif"
                  border=0></TD></TR>
              <TR bgColor=#ffffff>
                <TD><A href="http://www.merriam-webster.com"><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/webster_wotdemail_mwon.gif"
                  border=0></A></TD></TR>
              <TR bgColor=#ffffff>
                <TD><A href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/game/"><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/webster_wotdemail_wg.gif"
                  border=0></A></TD></TR>
              <TR>
                <TD vAlign=top align=middle><A
                  href="http://www.wordcentral.com"><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/webster_wotdemail_wc.gif"
                  border=0></A></TD></TR>
              <TR>
                <TD vAlign=top align=middle><A
                  href="http://www.merriam-websterunabridged.com"><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/webster_wotdemail_unab.gif"
                  border=0></A></TD></TR>
              <TR>
                <TD vAlign=top align=left>
                  <TABLE borderColor=#ffffff cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0
                  width=100 border=0>
                    <TBODY>
                    <TR>
                      <TD><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/wod_underlink_filler.gif"></
TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/webster_haveasay_wide.gif"><
/TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD bgColor=#f5f5f5>
                        <FORM

action=http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/poll_report.iphtml
                        method=get><INPUT type=hidden value=401
name=poll_id>
                        <INPUT type=hidden
                        value="Have you seen our ads in People, Real Simple,
Time, Newsweek, or US News and World Report?"
                        name=poll_question>
                        <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 border=0>
                          <TBODY>
                          <TR>
                            <TD class=text vAlign=top colSpan=2>
                              <DIV align=center><FONT size=1><B>Have you
seen
                              our ads in People, Real Simple, Time,
Newsweek, or
                              US News and World
Report?</B></FONT></DIV></TD></TR>
                          <TR align=right>
                            <TD class=text><INPUT type=radio value=1
name=q1>
                            </TD>
                            <TD class=text align=left><FONT
                          size=1>No</FONT></TD></TR>
                          <TR align=right>
                            <TD class=text><INPUT type=radio value=2
name=q1>
                            </TD>
                            <TD class=text align=left><FONT
                            size=1>Yes</FONT></TD></TR>
                          <TR align=middle>
                            <TD class=text colSpan=2><INPUT type=submit
value=Vote name=submit>
                            </TD></TR></FORM></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD align=middle
                  bgColor=#3399cc>&nbsp;</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
                  <P>&nbsp;</P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD>
          <TD vAlign=top>
            <TABLE class=text cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%"
              border=0><TBODY>
              <TR>
                <TD vAlign=top width=414>
                  <TABLE class=text cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=12 border=0>
                    <TBODY>
                    <TR>
                      <TD vAlign=bottom align=left colSpan=2><FONT
                        color=#666666 size=2>The Word of the Day for Aug 25
                        is:</FONT> </TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD>
                        <P><FONT color=#000000 size=3></FONT><FONT
color=#000000
                        size=3><B>condone</B> \kun-DOHN\ <I>verb</I>
<BR><BR>:
                        to regard or treat (something bad or blameworthy) as
                        acceptable, forgivable, or harmless </FONT></P></TD>
                      <TD vAlign=top align=left><FONT color=#000000><A

href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/sound/c/condon02.wav"><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/webster_sound2.gif"
                        border=0></A></FONT></B>
                        <P></P></TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD colSpan=2>
                        <P><B>Example sentence:<BR></B>"If you are
disrespectful
                        of other students in my classroom," Ms. Pace warned
on
                        the first day of school, "I won't condone it."
</P></TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD colSpan=2>
                        <P><B>Did you know?<BR></B>Since some folks don't
                        condone even minor usage slips, you might want to
get
                        the meaning of this word straight. Although English
                        speakers sometimes use "condone" with the intended
                        meaning "approve of" or "encourage," the more
                        established meaning is closer to "pardon" or
"overlook."
                        "Condone" comes from the Latin verb "condonare,"
which
                        means "to give" or "to forgive." "Condonare" in turn
                        combines the Latin prefix "con-," indicating
                        thoroughness, and "donare," meaning "to give" or "to
                        grant." Not surprisingly, "donare" is also the
source of
                        our words "donate" and "pardon."</P>
                        <P>*Indicates the sense illustrated in the example
                        sentence.</P>
                        <P>&nbsp;</P>
                        <P><A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/redirector.iphtml?item=2043&amp;ur
l=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Emerriam%2Dwebstercollegiate%2Ecom%2Finfo%2Feleventh%2Eh
tm&amp;image=http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r3c2.gif&amp;r3
c2=2043_r3c2.gif"><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r3c2.gif"
                        border=0></A> </P></TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD colSpan=2>
                        <DIV align=center></DIV>
                        <HR>

                        <P><FONT size=1>You Are Subscribed As:
                        brian@_example_.com</FONT></P></TD></TR>
                    <TR>
                      <TD colSpan=2>
                        <DIV align=center></DIV>
                        <HR>

                        <P><FONT size=1>Subscribe to Word of the Day via the
                        Web: <A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/register.iphtml">click
                        here</A><BR>Unsubscribe to Word of the Day via the
Web:
                        <A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/changeofaddress.iphtml?email=brian
@_example_.com">click
                        here</A><BR>To change the email format from html to
                        text: <A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/changeofaddress.iphtml">click
                        here</A><BR>
                        <P><FONT size=1>Questions about your subscription?
<A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/faq.html">click
                        here</A><BR></FONT></P>
                        <P><FONT size=1>? 2003 by <A

href="http://www.Merriam-Webster.com">Merriam-Webster</A>,
                        Incorporated</FONT></P>
                        <P></P></P? <p><FONT size=1>*mf mwh 082503
                       brian@_example_.com mf*</FONT>
                        <P></P></FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD>
                <TD vAlign=top align=middle width=125 bgColor=#e5e5e5>
                  <P align=center><A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/redirector.iphtml?item=2043&amp;ur
l=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Emerriam%2Dwebstercollegiate%2Ecom%2Finfo%2Feleventh%2Eh
tm&amp;image=http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r1c3.gif&amp;r1
c3=2043_r1c3.gif"><IMG
                  height=125

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r1c3.gif"
                  width=125 border=0></A> </P>
                  <HR>

                  <P align=left><FONT size=1>School, office, or the comfort
of
                  home-cover all the bases with the new Eleventh Edition of
our
                  Collegiate? Dictionary! <A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/redirector.iphtml?html=1&amp;item=
2043&amp;url=http://www.merriam-webstercollegiate.com/info/eleventh.htm">cli
ck
                  here</A> </FONT></P>
                  <HR>

                  <P><A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/redirector.iphtml?item=2043&amp;ur
l=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efranklin%2Ecom%2Festore%2Fdetails%2Easp%3FID%3DSCD%2D18
70%26nettrackerid%3Dmw%2Dbanner%26referral%5Fcode%3DCRAMW4IO&amp;image=http:
//www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r2c3.gif&amp;r2c3=2043_r2c3.gif">
<IMG
                  height=125

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r2c3.gif"
                  width=125 border=0></A></P>
                  <P><A

href="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/redirector.iphtml?item=2043&amp;ur
l=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Emerriam%2Dwebster%2Ecom%2Fgame%2F&amp;image=http://www.
startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r3c3.gif&amp;r3c3=2043_r3c3.gif"><IMG
                  height=125

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/2043_r3c3.gif"
                  width=125 border=0></A></P>
                  <P align=left><IMG

src="http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/redirector.iphtml?item=2043&amp;ima
ge=http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/images/pixel.gif&amp;email_open=1"

border=0></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><
/TBODY></TABLE><MAP
name=Map><AREA shape=RECT coords=2,2,123,123
href="webster_survey.htm"></MAP><MAP name=webster_wodemail_r1_c1Map><AREA
  shape=RECT coords=136,53,552,65
href="http://www.m-w.com/book/diction/c10.htm"></MAP>If you cannot read this
email, please copy and paste the following address into your web browser to
subscribe to the text version of the Merriam-Webster Word of the Day:
http://www.startsampling.com/sm/wod/changeofaddress.iphtml </BODY></HTML>


From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 17:16:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 19:16:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections
	to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts
Message-ID: <E19tbR7-0003iT-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-30 10:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts

Initial Comment:
I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my
machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy
redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want
the whole company able to poke at my machine.

On the config page, you can now allow or disallow
connections from remote machines. There are separate
settings for POP3 and SMTP.

Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted
or rejected, will be logged to the console. This
applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection.

As a bonus...

Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages:

1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to
accomodate every subject, every line took two lines
because "Show clues" would line break on the space.
That space is now non-breaking.

2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+),
the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column
of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard,
Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S,
respectively.

3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons
didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they
have their own columns.

These three changes will be applied if you update
ui.html and ui_html.py.

The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for
several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4.

Note:

I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to
me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In
reality, connections are always accepted. The
"rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that
they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there
is way to check the peer address without accepting the
connection.

TODO:

For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections
should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba
accepts a list of host/netmasks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 11:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Restricting pop3/smtp access should be a different setting to 
restricting http access.  Realistically, there's no reason why 
you should want to restrict pop3/smtp access, since the 
proxy is only a proxy (no access to the machine or your mail 
is provided) - and a firewall is a better way of restricting this 
if you do want to do it for some reason.

Restricting http access, OTOH, is something that you would 
want to do.  I think even if http auth is added, the permitted 
ip code should stay, so that you can set ips that don't have 
to jump through the auth stuff (which is a PITA, IMO).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 02:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I'm volunteer to adapt the web interface remote connections
management to pop3 and smtp proxies (but if kgiordano wants
to do it) code. I was only wondering wether there should be
only one settings for the three servers (web, pop3 and smtp)
or there should be one setting per server (thus allowing an
IP to fetch mails but not to change the administration
options). Note that this question becomes quite irrevelant
if HTTP authentication is added to the web interface. In
this case, only one setting should be enough (and I guess it
would suit most users needs).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-31 02:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Concerning the TODO : check my patch #790615 (state :
closed) which handles the remote connections problem for the
web interface. It allows to define allowed hosts as a list
of IPs, as ranges of IPs and so on. It is mainly regex
based. See onIncomingConnection() in UserInterface.py from
the CVS.

I guess you might use this code to achieve the same thing in
the proxies, thus having something more flexible than the
simple "remote hosts allowed/refused". The code itself is 6
or 8 lines long.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 21:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Thanks for the patch, Khouri!  A couple of notes:

 o The "Show clues" line-split is already fixed in CVS.
 o We now have a more sophisticated connection-
   management system for the web interface, so that
   should probably be applied here in place of your fix
   (as you say in your TODO section).
 o The reason the radio buttons are not in their own
   columns in so that they are a consistent width apart.
   Call me trivial, but I think that's important, partly for
   the look of the thing and partly because it makes it
   ergonomically easier to click them with the mouse.
   The radio buttons should line up fairly well under their
   headings already - if they're out by a large margin for
   you, could you tell us the OS and browser you're using,
   and attach a screenshot?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 17:23:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 19:24:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-797579 ] Disable connections
	to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts
Message-ID: <E19tbY4-0003u6-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #797579, was opened at 2003-08-30 00:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gfx
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Khouri Giordano (kgiordano)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Disable connections to POP3 and SMTP from remote hosts

Initial Comment:
I wasn't comfortable having ports 25 and 110 open on my
machine at work. The mail servers that the proxy
redirects to are public, but that doesn't mean I want
the whole company able to poke at my machine.

On the config page, you can now allow or disallow
connections from remote machines. There are separate
settings for POP3 and SMTP.

Any connection from a remote machine, whether accepted
or rejected, will be logged to the console. This
applies to any POP3, SMTP or config (port 8880) connection.

As a bonus...

Three things annoyed me while reviewing messages:

1) Unless I made the browser window large enough to
accomodate every subject, every line took two lines
because "Show clues" would line break on the space.
That space is now non-breaking.

2) Since I get huge amounts of spam every day (200+),
the table is very tall. I kept forgetting which column
of radio buttons was which. So I labeld each Discard,
Defer, Ham and Spam radio button with X, O, H and S,
respectively.

3) The Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam radio buttons
didn't actually line up with the headers, so now they
have their own columns.

These three changes will be applied if you update
ui.html and ui_html.py.

The NoRemotes.zip file contains replacements for
several files. I made these changes based on v1.0a4.

Note:

I am a native C++ programmer and Python is very new to
me. There may be better ways to do what I did. In
reality, connections are always accepted. The
"rejected" ones are closed immediately. This means that
they DO show up on a port scan. I don't know if there
is way to check the peer address without accepting the
connection.

TODO:

For ultimate flexibility, some remote connections
should be alllowed. I'm thinking of the way that Samba
accepts a list of host/netmasks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-09-01 01:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I agree HTTP auth and IP filtering must be kept together. I
was just saying that using different settings was not useful
if HTTP auth is here. Anyway I agree with you : proxies are
not very annoying when opened. By the way, what does "PITA"
mean ? :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 01:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Restricting pop3/smtp access should be a different setting to 
restricting http access.  Realistically, there's no reason why 
you should want to restrict pop3/smtp access, since the 
proxy is only a proxy (no access to the machine or your mail 
is provided) - and a firewall is a better way of restricting this 
if you do want to do it for some reason.

Restricting http access, OTOH, is something that you would 
want to do.  I think even if http auth is added, the permitted 
ip code should stay, so that you can set ips that don't have 
to jump through the auth stuff (which is a PITA, IMO).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

I'm volunteer to adapt the web interface remote connections
management to pop3 and smtp proxies (but if kgiordano wants
to do it) code. I was only wondering wether there should be
only one settings for the three servers (web, pop3 and smtp)
or there should be one setting per server (thus allowing an
IP to fetch mails but not to change the administration
options). Note that this question becomes quite irrevelant
if HTTP authentication is added to the web interface. In
this case, only one setting should be enough (and I guess it
would suit most users needs).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx)
Date: 2003-08-30 16:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6845

Concerning the TODO : check my patch #790615 (state :
closed) which handles the remote connections problem for the
web interface. It allows to define allowed hosts as a list
of IPs, as ranges of IPs and so on. It is mainly regex
based. See onIncomingConnection() in UserInterface.py from
the CVS.

I guess you might use this code to achieve the same thing in
the proxies, thus having something more flexible than the
simple "remote hosts allowed/refused". The code itself is 6
or 8 lines long.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-08-30 11:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Thanks for the patch, Khouri!  A couple of notes:

 o The "Show clues" line-split is already fixed in CVS.
 o We now have a more sophisticated connection-
   management system for the web interface, so that
   should probably be applied here in place of your fix
   (as you say in your TODO section).
 o The reason the radio buttons are not in their own
   columns in so that they are a consistent width apart.
   Call me trivial, but I think that's important, partly for
   the look of the thing and partly because it makes it
   ergonomically easier to click them with the mouse.
   The radio buttons should line up fairly well under their
   headings already - if they're out by a large margin for
   you, could you tell us the OS and browser you're using,
   and attach a screenshot?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=797579&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 18:02:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 20:03:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797782 ] Broken link typo in
	WHAT_IS_NEW.txt
Message-ID: <E19tc9i-0002R6-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797782, was opened at 2003-08-31 02:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797782&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emile van Sebille (evansebille)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Broken link typo in WHAT_IS_NEW.txt

Initial Comment:
The final line of the file gives a base url which is 
completed by appending the feature request number. It 
works properly when where it reads atid=498104 is 
changed to read atid=498106.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 12:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks, fixed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797782&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 18:09:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 20:09:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-798318 ] Blackberry
	redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM
Message-ID: <E19tcFn-0005J4-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #798318, was opened at 2003-08-31 17:09
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM

Initial Comment:
Hi!.

I installed SpamBayes 0.7 on my Windows XP Pro SP1 
system late Thursday evening 8/28.  Here it is Sunday 
8/31, and SB is working very nicely!

BUT, it doesn't seem to have learned that RIM / 
Blackberry Redirector e-mails or non-spam.  It pretty 
regularly puts them in the "maybe spam" folder.

I've included the detailed "spam report" on one such 
message below.

Otherwise, SB is working great with my Blackberry -- if it 
identifies an inbox message as Spam it moves it out of 
the inbox before the Blackberry Redirector has a chance 
to send it to my Blackberry!

Please let me know if I can provide more information.

Thank you!
--Ben Slivka
Ben [at] Slivka [dot] com
Clyde Hill, WA (near Seattle)

Spam Score: 0.207205


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               0.663497            -      -
'*S*'                               0.0779066           -      -
'between'                           0.0221876        2566      0
'blackberry'                        0.0815819        3592      1
'processed'                         0.249116          120      0
'move'                              0.264701         1577      2
'data'                              0.270535         1529      2
'header:Message-Id:1'               0.302488         
5573      9
'used'                              0.318698         2332      4
'not'                               0.37607         14097     32
'reply-to:none'                     0.390848        27683     67
'to:addr:ben'                       0.60174         18381    105
'header:MIME-Version:1'             0.614831        
13414     81
'to:addr:slivka.com'                0.616083        17303    
105
'from:no real name:2**0'            0.669564         
2714     21
'to:no real name:2**0'              0.687821        12466    
104
'header:Return-Path:1'              0.744835         9939    
110
'carry'                             0.779405          332      5
Message Stream:


X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers 
Version 2.0
Received: from BlackBerry.NET ([206.51.26.40]) by 
janus.slivka.org with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 31 
Aug 2003 16:06:27 -0700
Received: from smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry
	(smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
[172.16.147.240])
	by BlackBerry.NET (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with 
ESMTP id h7VN6hvs008489
	for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 
19:06:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
(etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry
	[172.16.147.237])
	by smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
(8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
	h7VMxtAg013832
	for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 
19:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: 
<200308312302.h7VMxtAg013832@smtprelay01.etp.prod.
on.blackberry>
From: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net
Subject: RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-00600811c6a2
To: ben@slivka.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/mixed; BOUNDARY="-
1824071167-23478-1062370948=:1404"
Return-Path: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2003 23:06:28.0062 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[8215A7E0:01C37014]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" 
CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange 
Server version 6.0.6249.1">
<TITLE>RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-
00600811c6a2</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=2>This message is used to carry data 
between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry 
Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this 
message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry 
Redirector.</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
This message is used to carry data between the 
BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do 
not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be 
processed by the BlackBerry Redirector.
Message Tokens:

47 unique tokens

'and'
'between'
'blackberry'
'carry'
'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'data'
'delete,'
'from:addr:etp'
'from:addr:etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net'
'from:no real name:2**0'
'handheld.'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-Id:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message'
'message-id:@smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry'
'move'
'not'
'please'
'processed'
'redirector'
'redirector.'
'reply-to:none'
'respond'
'sender:none'
'skip:r 40'
'subject:-'
'subject:00600811c6a2'
'subject:11d1'
'subject:87fe'
'subject:RIM_bca28a80'
'subject:e9c0'
'the'
'this'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:ben'
'to:addr:slivka.com'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'used'
'will'
'x-mailer:none'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 19:35:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 21:35:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-798318 ] Blackberry
	redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM
Message-ID: <E19tdb4-0008Ap-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #798318, was opened at 2003-08-31 20:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM

Initial Comment:
Hi!.

I installed SpamBayes 0.7 on my Windows XP Pro SP1 
system late Thursday evening 8/28.  Here it is Sunday 
8/31, and SB is working very nicely!

BUT, it doesn't seem to have learned that RIM / 
Blackberry Redirector e-mails or non-spam.  It pretty 
regularly puts them in the "maybe spam" folder.

I've included the detailed "spam report" on one such 
message below.

Otherwise, SB is working great with my Blackberry -- if it 
identifies an inbox message as Spam it moves it out of 
the inbox before the Blackberry Redirector has a chance 
to send it to my Blackberry!

Please let me know if I can provide more information.

Thank you!
--Ben Slivka
Ben [at] Slivka [dot] com
Clyde Hill, WA (near Seattle)

Spam Score: 0.207205


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               0.663497            -      -
'*S*'                               0.0779066           -      -
'between'                           0.0221876        2566      0
'blackberry'                        0.0815819        3592      1
'processed'                         0.249116          120      0
'move'                              0.264701         1577      2
'data'                              0.270535         1529      2
'header:Message-Id:1'               0.302488         
5573      9
'used'                              0.318698         2332      4
'not'                               0.37607         14097     32
'reply-to:none'                     0.390848        27683     67
'to:addr:ben'                       0.60174         18381    105
'header:MIME-Version:1'             0.614831        
13414     81
'to:addr:slivka.com'                0.616083        17303    
105
'from:no real name:2**0'            0.669564         
2714     21
'to:no real name:2**0'              0.687821        12466    
104
'header:Return-Path:1'              0.744835         9939    
110
'carry'                             0.779405          332      5
Message Stream:


X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers 
Version 2.0
Received: from BlackBerry.NET ([206.51.26.40]) by 
janus.slivka.org with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 31 
Aug 2003 16:06:27 -0700
Received: from smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry
	(smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
[172.16.147.240])
	by BlackBerry.NET (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with 
ESMTP id h7VN6hvs008489
	for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 
19:06:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
(etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry
	[172.16.147.237])
	by smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
(8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
	h7VMxtAg013832
	for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 
19:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: 
<200308312302.h7VMxtAg013832@smtprelay01.etp.prod.
on.blackberry>
From: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net
Subject: RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-00600811c6a2
To: ben@slivka.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/mixed; BOUNDARY="-
1824071167-23478-1062370948=:1404"
Return-Path: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2003 23:06:28.0062 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[8215A7E0:01C37014]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" 
CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange 
Server version 6.0.6249.1">
<TITLE>RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-
00600811c6a2</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=2>This message is used to carry data 
between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry 
Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this 
message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry 
Redirector.</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
This message is used to carry data between the 
BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do 
not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be 
processed by the BlackBerry Redirector.
Message Tokens:

47 unique tokens

'and'
'between'
'blackberry'
'carry'
'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'data'
'delete,'
'from:addr:etp'
'from:addr:etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net'
'from:no real name:2**0'
'handheld.'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-Id:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message'
'message-id:@smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry'
'move'
'not'
'please'
'processed'
'redirector'
'redirector.'
'reply-to:none'
'respond'
'sender:none'
'skip:r 40'
'subject:-'
'subject:00600811c6a2'
'subject:11d1'
'subject:87fe'
'subject:RIM_bca28a80'
'subject:e9c0'
'the'
'this'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:ben'
'to:addr:slivka.com'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'used'
'will'
'x-mailer:none'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-31 21:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Looks like you trained on a great many more ham msgs than 
spam msgs.  If so, try training on an approximately equal 
number of each.  The code was designed, tested, and tuned 
by people who trained on approximately equal numbers of 
each, and we don't have yet have a good approach to dealing 
with wildly unbalanced training sets.

You can find your default_bayes_customize.ini file and change 
the line

experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: True

to

experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False

and then these msgs will almost certainly be scored as solid 
ham.  However, you'll probably get a much higher false 
negative rate (spam erroneously classified as ham) then too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 20:26:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 22:26:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797316 ] Extra CRLF to smtp
	server causes garbage error.
Message-ID: <E19teOO-0007FD-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797316, was opened at 2003-08-30 02:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dudley Fox (grieve)
>Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Extra CRLF to smtp server causes garbage error.

Initial Comment:
In version 1.0a4 of smtpproxy.py on line 200 it reads
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked + '\r\n')
It should read
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked)

The first line sends an empty command to the smtp
server, and causes it to return an error. Different
smtp servers and mail clients handle it differently,
but Eudora will complain that when it sent the QUIT
command an error was returned. Agent will just fail
silently. In both cases the message is actually sent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 14:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Bah.  I've had one other person tell me that they experienced 
this problem and that this fixed it, and one other person tell 
me that they experience this problem, and that this doesn't fix 
it (they get the same result as me).

I really need to know whether this was the only change made 
or not.  I don't see how it could possibly work!  If you could 
download 1.0a5 (probably out later today) and try it 
unchanged, and then (if necessary) with this alternation, that 
would be fantastic.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-30 20:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You are correct that there is a problem that Eudora complains 
about an error after the QUIT command.

However, if the '\r\n' is removed, then *no* commands work 
(at least here).  Certainly this is the way that the RFC says 
that SMTP is meant to work (specifically, that there is a CRLF 
after each command, including QUIT).

Can you confirm for me that removing the '\r\n' means that 
you can still use smtpproxy?  If I remove it here, it hangs 
forever on the first command sent (ELHO, in this case).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:03:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:03:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797316 ] Extra CRLF to smtp
	server causes garbage error.
Message-ID: <E19teyb-0008SU-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797316, was opened at 2003-08-30 02:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dudley Fox (grieve)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Extra CRLF to smtp server causes garbage error.

Initial Comment:
In version 1.0a4 of smtpproxy.py on line 200 it reads
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked + '\r\n')
It should read
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked)

The first line sends an empty command to the smtp
server, and causes it to return an error. Different
smtp servers and mail clients handle it differently,
but Eudora will complain that when it sent the QUIT
command an error was returned. Agent will just fail
silently. In both cases the message is actually sent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 15:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

One other thing: two of the people that have reported this 
have been using Norton Anti-Virus to scan mail.  One suspects 
that the problem lies with the Norton-spambayes relationship 
(although I'm not convinced).  Are you using Norton?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 14:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Bah.  I've had one other person tell me that they experienced 
this problem and that this fixed it, and one other person tell 
me that they experience this problem, and that this doesn't fix 
it (they get the same result as me).

I really need to know whether this was the only change made 
or not.  I don't see how it could possibly work!  If you could 
download 1.0a5 (probably out later today) and try it 
unchanged, and then (if necessary) with this alternation, that 
would be fantastic.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-30 20:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You are correct that there is a problem that Eudora complains 
about an error after the QUIT command.

However, if the '\r\n' is removed, then *no* commands work 
(at least here).  Certainly this is the way that the RFC says 
that SMTP is meant to work (specifically, that there is a CRLF 
after each command, including QUIT).

Can you confirm for me that removing the '\r\n' means that 
you can still use smtpproxy?  If I remove it here, it hangs 
forever on the first command sent (ELHO, in this case).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:08:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:08:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747945 ] apparent corruption of
	Received lines
Message-ID: <E19tf32-00009b-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747945, was opened at 2003-06-03 18:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: apparent corruption of Received lines

Initial Comment:
It looks like the message header is corrupted by
hammiefilter.py.  Here's my evidence:

I'm running the 1.0a2 release.

I use "mailagent" to filter my mail, which is like
procmail (with a much cleaner code base and readable
rules) and I've set up the rules like that:

### Begin SPAM filtering section ###
       
{
    FEED ~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py;
    RESYNC;
    REJECT;
};
         
X-Spambayes-Classification:
    /^spam/     { REJECT SPAM }
    /^ham/      { REJECT INITIAL }
    /^unsure/   { REJECT LOST };
       
# Dispatch to spam/lost, keep going if ham...
<LOST,SPAM>     { VACATION off; BIFF off; REJECT };   
<LOST>          { SAVE lost };
<SPAM>          { SAVE spam };
         
### End of SPAM filtering section ###

The "FEED" command pipes the message to the specified
scripts and gets the output back as the new message.
The RESYNC command reparses the headers, since they
might have been changed by the command (and indeed,
they are since X-Spambayes-Classification is added!).

However, here are the logs I see:

------------------------------
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: FROM
<tvd_documentation@nai.com>
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: RELAYED
hbs43-138.hbs.edu, orb.pobox.com, pop.free.fr, lyon.ram.loc
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: ABOUT Approved
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #68
in mode INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:39 mailagent[277851]: FED [qm16938]
through '~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: WARNING no by in
first Received: line 'from localhost (mail@localhost
[127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for <ram@localhost>; Tue, 3
Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: weird Received:
line 'from localhost (mail@localhost
[127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for <ram@localhost>; Tue, 3
Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: RESYNCED [qm16938]
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: REJECTED [qm16938]
in state INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #69
in mode INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: entering new state
SPAM
---------------------------------

Look at the WARNING about the absence of "by" in
Received.  The problem is that no such warning is
originally emitted, but it appears during RESYNC when
the headers are reparsed after the message went through
hammiefilter.py.

This indicates a corruption problem, since mailagent
uses the same code to reparse the headers during RESYNC
as it used originally, and no warning were emitted
before FEED was run.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 15:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Haven't heard back in a fortnight, so assume that this is fixed.  
Please re-open if this is not the case.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi)
Date: 2003-08-16 04:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=13887

Upon looking, it does not seem to happen any longer with the
beta4 version.  I'll keep monitoring the logs for a few days.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Could you try this with alpha4 and let us know if it still occurs?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:09:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:09:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-705378 ] Cancelled "full train"
	leaves bad database.
Message-ID: <E19tf3u-0000BO-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #705378, was opened at 2003-03-18 15:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=705378&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cancelled "full train" leaves bad database.

Initial Comment:
If you go to the training dialog, select "rebuild
entire database", start the train, then cancel it, the
database is left in a useless state.

We should probably train to a new database, then move
it over once complete.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 15:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This is fixed in cvs, at least according to the check in 
messages.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=705378&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:09:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:10:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743122 ] Outlook 2002
	auto-complete breaks
Message-ID: <E19tf4l-0000Dj-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743122, was opened at 2003-05-26 00:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes and I think it breaks the
auto-complete popup list for email addresses used in
the To field in Outlook.  The popup still appears but
only with the first letter of each email address - the
rest of the email address doesn't appear.  I've
uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes several times to
confirm this problem.  I'm running Outlook 2002 (SP2)
on Windows 2000 (SP3).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 15:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This is now fixed in cvs (at least according to the check in 
messages), and so will be fixed in the next binary release.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Date: 2003-08-21 10:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=661531

This happens for me also.  Windows XP (w/ Service Pack 1)
and Outlook 2002 from Office XP (w/Service Pack 2).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gerhard (neugi)
Date: 2003-08-18 22:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=846779

i've the same problem. 
running winXp SP1 and Outlook 2k SP2


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Garrett Brucker (gbrucker)
Date: 2003-08-14 00:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=843726

I'm running Outlook 2002/XP on Windows XP Pro and had this 
same problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kim Friis (kim_friis)
Date: 2003-08-11 21:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=89418

Im running Outlook 2002 on Windows XP and I do NOT see 
the bug. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sean True (seantrue)
Date: 2003-06-17 13:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=114311

Fixing this bug will require a complete rewrite to remove all 
MFC based dialogs from SpamBayes.
We're about 80% of the way there on SpamAtBay, and it's 
_not_ fun.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-17 12:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Apparently this problem only happens *after* a SpamBayes
dialog has been shown, but works fine until then.  Can
someone else confirm this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-06-02 21:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

I am running the same - W2K SP3 & OL2K and get the same 
problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jonathan Evatt (spidawebs)
Date: 2003-06-02 08:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=48654

I am also getting this problem. Have installed the app on 
Outlook XP (2002) SP2 over Win XP SP1.
If I start up Outlook the problem only seems to occur AFTER 
I actually run the spambayes configuration routine. If I do not 
access that then the problem does not (so far - limited 
testing) seem to occur.

Jonathan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:10:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:10:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-796996 ] smtp server not started
	until restart
Message-ID: <E19tf5d-0000FO-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #796996, was opened at 2003-08-29 10:02
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796996&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nicolai Dufva Nielsen (ndufva)
>Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: smtp server not started until restart

Initial Comment:
Version 1.0a4:

First-time config:

 1/ Run pop3proxy.py -b
 2/ Click "Configuration page"
 3/ Enter names and port numbers for smtp and pop3
 4/ Click Save

Now the pop3 proxy is started and listening, but the
smtp proxy isn't.

Restart of pop3proxy.py started smtp proxy.

Parameters for proxies (if important):

  pop3 servers: localhost:8110
  pop3 ports: 110

  smtp servers: localhost:8025
  smtp ports: 25

(I am already running pop3 and smtp on port 8110 and
8025, respectively)




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=796996&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:12:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:12:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797739 ] Still does not read all
	headers
Message-ID: <E19tf6n-0006o0-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797739, was opened at 2003-08-31 00:16
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797739&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Pearce (tcp1)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Still does not read all headers

Initial Comment:
I thought the new version of outlook spam bayes had 
rectified the problem of not accessing all headers in 
messages. But it seems not. I have just retrained my 
spam and ham using version 007 and it still ignores the 
server generated header spam report which will be very 
useful to spambayes for finding spam. Example message 
below (generated by spambayes) and here is the part of 
the header I would like spambayes to interpret (none of 
the these items ever seem to be interpreted by 
spambayes):

X-Spam-Score: (+++++++++++++++) 15.3
X-Spam-Report: 15.3/5.0
	NO_REAL_NAME       (0.7 points)  From: does 
not include a real name
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (0.7 points)  From: 
ends in numbers
	TRACKER_ID (4.3 points) BODY: Incorporates a 
tracking ID number
	OFFER              (0.1 points)  BODY: Free Offer
	HTML_30_40         (0.8 points)  BODY: 
Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME (0.2 points) BODY: 
HTML font color has unusual
	name
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is red
	HTML_MESSAGE       (0.1 points)  BODY: HTML 
included in message
	HTML_FONT_BIG (0.1 points) BODY: FONT Size 
+2 and up or 3 and up
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is blue
	HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.1 points) BODY: 
HTML link text says "click
	here"
	HTML_SHOUTING3 (0.8 points) BODY: HTML 
has very strong "shouting"
	markup
	SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID   (0.8 points)  Subject 
contains a unique ID
	DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 (2.8 points) Date: is 
12 to 24 hours after
	Received: date
	FORGED_MUA_IMS (2.8 points) Forged mail 
pretending to be from IMS
	MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only 
has text/html MIME parts
	CLICK_BELOW        (0.1 points)  Asks you to 
click below
	FROM_ALL_NUMS (0.6 points) From an address 
that is all numbers
	(non-phone)


===============

Spam Score: 1


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               0                   -      -
'*S*'                               1                   -      -
'x-mailer:internet mail service (5.5.2653.19)' 
0.0493829          56      3
'url:info'                          0.0681493          52      4
'copying'                           0.16448            42      9
'original'                          0.198828          160     44
'able'                              0.282561          192     84
'copy'                              0.300619          155     74
'swedish'                           0.313233           18      9
'format'                            0.354496           46     28
'computer'                          0.355363          142     87
'spend'                             0.641237           18     36
'standard'                          0.648117           36     74
'home'                              0.654816           70    148
'heard'                             0.658648           12     26
'(i.e.'                             0.659267            5     11
'immediate'                         0.660244           17     37
'create'                            0.667571           33     74
'without'                           0.68148            57    136
'our'                               0.682849          325    779
'price:'                            0.689351           10     25
'own'                               0.689898           54    134
"subject:'"                         0.696123           34     87
'******'                            0.696864            3      8
"you've"                            0.697367           26     67
'special'                           0.702608           98    258
'header:Message-Id:1'               0.703421          392   
1035
'upgraded'                          0.705258            4     11
'everything'                        0.710206           27     74
'here'                              0.715414          155    434
'film'                              0.717526            8     23
'learn'                             0.719277           43    123
'buying'                            0.719934           10     29
'*****'                             0.720474            3      9
'play'                              0.724933           21     62
'video'                             0.725325           23     68
'header:Received:3'                 0.725418          307    
903
'right'                             0.728689           38    114
'news.'                             0.739192           10     32
'***'                               0.740209            9     29
'cd.'                               0.740672            3     10
"it's"                              0.750199           57    191
'step'                              0.750624           10     34
'keep'                              0.753278           49    167
'free'                              0.75815           134    468
"you'll"                            0.769174           26     97
'minutes'                           0.772264           38    144
'reply-to:no real name:2**0'        0.78037           101    
400
'transfer'                          0.781323           27    108
'__________'                        0.793875            1      5
'games'                             0.795149            4     18
'****'                              0.798819            3     14
'*******'                           0.798819            3     14
'skip:_ 10'                         0.798819            3     14
'easy'                              0.800081           27    121
'instructions'                      0.803521           24    110
'sony'                              0.819613            2     11
'header:Reply-To:1'                 0.820402          181    
921
'___'                               0.820948            1      6
'stay'                              0.825333            8     43
'instantly'                         0.837602            4     24
'view'                              0.83792            65    375
'subject:copy'                      0.841735            1      7
'offers'                            0.841987           44    262
'to:addr:t.c.pearce'                0.843817          153    
921
'click'                             0.851061           97    618
'save'                              0.852853           24    156
'computer,'                         0.857315            4     28
'skip:* 10'                         0.860358            9     63
'time!'                             0.861106            3     22
'pro'                               0.861942            6     43
'player'                            0.866281            3     23
'simple,'                           0.867776            2     16
'***********'                       0.871558            1      
9
'skip:1 40'                         0.871558            1      9
'burn'                              0.874479            2     17
'dvd,'                              0.882618            1     10
'english,'                          0.882618            1     10
'too!'                              0.886034            2     19
'now!'                              0.8948             11    106
'movies'                            0.903754            2     23
'blank'                             0.920269           17    221
'retail'                            0.926516            3     45
'burning'                           0.926761            1     17
'______'                            0.944367            0      4
'_______'                           0.954481            0      5
'subject:Now'                       0.959444            1     32
'dvd'                               0.961145            2     61
'reply-to:addr:msn.com'             0.961483            0      
6
'subject:Languages'                 0.961483            0      6
"dvd's"                             0.963757            1     36
'skip:a 40'                         0.966618            0      7
'from:addr:delphi.com'              0.970545            0      8
'favorite'                          0.973588            1     50
'$39.95!'                           0.973645            0      9
'$69.95'                            0.973645            0      9
'4.0!'                              0.973645            0      9
'600mb'                             0.973645            0      9
'another!'                          0.973645            0      9
'burner.'                           0.973645            0      9
'cd-r.'                             0.973645            0      9
'cd;'                               0.973645            0      9
'cdr!'                              0.973645            0      9
'condition!'                        0.973645            0      9
'download!!'                        0.973645            0      9
'dutch,'                            0.973645            0      9
'encodings'                         0.973645            0      9
'etc...)'                           0.973645            0      9
'extras!'                           0.973645            0      9
'finnish,'                          0.973645            0      9
'french,'                           0.973645            0      9
'games!'                            0.973645            0      9
'greek,'                            0.973645            0      9
'hungarian,'                        0.973645            0      9
'italian,'                          0.973645            0      9
'languages!'                        0.973645            0      9
'packet'                            0.973645            0      9
'polish,'                           0.973645            0      9
'portuguese,'                       0.973645            0      9
'recorder?'                         0.973645            0      9
'ripper'                            0.973645            0      9
'russian,'                          0.973645            0      9
'spanish,'                          0.973645            0      9
'tapes?'                            0.973645            0      9
'urdu!'                             0.973645            0      9
'vhs'                               0.973645            0      9
'message-id:@artemis.le.ac.uk'      0.974931            9    
399
'divx'                              0.976155            0     10
'german,'                           0.976155            0     10
'hurry!'                            0.976155            0     10
'playstation'                       0.976155            0     10
'skip:7 40'                         0.976155            0     10
'television,'                       0.976155            0     10
'worry!'                            0.976155            0     10
'$1000'                             0.978228            0     11
'tapes'                             0.978228            0     11
'anytime!'                          0.981454            0     13
'payment!'                          0.981454            0     13
'single,'                           0.981454            0     13
'yes!'                              0.981454            0     13
'product.'                          0.985693            0     17
'skip:2 40'                         0.98716             0     19
'backups'                           0.987786            0     20
'download!'                         0.990181            0     25
'magick'                            0.990181            0     25
'url:dvd'                           0.990181            0     25
'url:adv166'                        0.990552            0     26
'pc!'                               0.992051            0     31
'dvds'                              0.992296            0     32
'burner'                            0.992742            0     34
'subject:DVD'                       0.992947            0     35
'subject:! '                        0.994942            0     49
Message Stream:


Received: from SUMAC.cfs.le.ac.uk ([143.210.35.10]) by 
saffron.cfs.le.ac.uk
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); 
	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:01:41 +0100
Received: from artemis.le.ac.uk ([143.210.16.126]) by 
SUMAC.cfs.le.ac.uk with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sat, 30 
Aug 2003 13:01:41 +0100
Received: from ca-glendora-cuda1-c3a-a-
110.arcdca.adelphia.net ([68.68.4.110]
	helo=68.68.4.110) by artemis.le.ac.uk with 
smtp (Exim 4.21)
	id 19t4QF-0002dP-87
	for t.c.pearce@leicester.ac.uk; Sat, 30 Aug 
2003 13:01:40 +0100
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:05:29 -0500
From: 239039@delphi.com
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Reply-To: 239039@msn.com
Organization: 2050690133
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
To: t.c.pearce@leicester.ac.uk
Subject: Now copy DVD's in 14 Languages! 239039
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E19t4QF-0002dP-87@artemis.le.ac.uk>
X-Spam-Score: (+++++++++++++++) 15.3
X-Spam-Report: 15.3/5.0
	NO_REAL_NAME       (0.7 points)  From: does 
not include a real name
	FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (0.7 points)  From: 
ends in numbers
	TRACKER_ID (4.3 points) BODY: Incorporates a 
tracking ID number
	OFFER              (0.1 points)  BODY: Free Offer
	HTML_30_40         (0.8 points)  BODY: 
Message is 30% to 40% HTML
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_NAME (0.2 points) BODY: 
HTML font color has unusual
	name
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is red
	HTML_MESSAGE       (0.1 points)  BODY: HTML 
included in message
	HTML_FONT_BIG (0.1 points) BODY: FONT Size 
+2 and up or 3 and up
	HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.1 points)  BODY: 
HTML font color is blue
	HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE (0.1 points) BODY: 
HTML link text says "click
	here"
	HTML_SHOUTING3 (0.8 points) BODY: HTML 
has very strong "shouting"
	markup
	SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID   (0.8 points)  Subject 
contains a unique ID
	DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 (2.8 points) Date: is 
12 to 24 hours after
	Received: date
	FORGED_MUA_IMS (2.8 points) Forged mail 
pretending to be from IMS
	MIME_HTML_ONLY (0.1 points) Message only 
has text/html MIME parts
	CLICK_BELOW        (0.1 points)  Asks you to 
click below
	FROM_ALL_NUMS (0.6 points) From an address 
that is all numbers
	(non-phone)
Return-Path: be99naj@bigfoot.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2003 12:01:41.0489 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[796BDE10:01C36EEE]

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; 
charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>DVD Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create 
DVDs in Your Own Home</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#3A6EA5">
<center>
<table border="0" width="600" cellspacing="0" 
cellpadding="14">
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FF6600" height="10" valign="middle" 
align="center">
<font size="5">Copy your favorite DVD's to a standard 
CD - without a DVD Burner. Free extras! It's easy to 
use. Retail Price: <font 
color="white"><s>$69.95</s></font> and For a limited 
time it is Only <a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="white">$39.95!
</a></font></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<b> <center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">DVD 
Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create DVDs in 
Your Own Home</font></a></center><br>
Don't spend $1000 on a DVD Burner. Get our all-inclusive 
software right now and within minutes you will be on 
your way to copying any DVD video to a single, standard 
CD. You've seen us in the news. You've heard so much 
about our product. Now available for download! Get your 
software instantly following payment!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">***************
7875F88C-6E1E6ADF-1AD8F189-35BFF8F1-1B5129E
************ </font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">DVD 
Copying Features</font></a></center><br>
<ul>
<li>No DVD Burner Required</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">***
239039
*****</font>
<li>Simple, Convenient Step by Step 
Instructions</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">___
195790194
_______</font>
<li>Burn to any standard CD; play on any standard DVD 
player (i.e. Television, Computer, etc...) OR computer 
CD Drive</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">*
1202620547
*************</font>
<li>Don't have a CD recorder? Don't worry! You can save 
your favorite movies to your computer and view anytime!
</li><font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">_____________
239039
_______</font>
<li>Yes! They will play on your CD and DVD 
player</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">***************
239039
****</font>
<li>Now you can copy movies from DVD to the new DiVX 
format. One standard film will take 600mb of your space, 
that means you can keep around 70 films at the same 
time on your PC!</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">______
1778882172
_______</font>
<li>Create your new video collection now!</li><font 
color="#FFFFFF" size="1">******
6280745
***</font>
<li>After buying our packet you will learn how to work 
with digital video in no time! Our packet includes easy 
instructions on how to work with encodings + copying 
from one format to another!</li><font color="#FFFFFF" 
size="1">_________________
647574259
__________</font><br><br>
</ul>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Copy 
VHS tapes to CD too!</font></a></center><br>
Just upgraded to a DVD and have a library of video 
tapes? With your software not only can you copy & burn 
ANY DVD, you'll also be able to transfer all your VHS 
tapes to DVD format on CD using CDR!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">****************
1ECBCA09-6ADDE12B-34A18763-30AD5F2A-5004EFA2
*******</font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Back up 
your favorite Playstation 2 Games!
</font></a></center><br>
Order the DVD PRO 4.0! ripper NOW and included will be 
directions for burning Sony Playstation 2 games! 
Everything you need to make a working copy on a 
standard, blank CD-R. Use these as backups so that 
your original PlayStation 2 games stay in the best 
condition!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">***
AF51DD2-6E5E3DB4-2F48D28B-7D8A3F57-62B2B842
***</font><br>

<center><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="blue">Now 
copy DVD's in 14 Languages!</font></a></center><br>
Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, 
Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, 
Swedish and Urdu!<br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">************ 
20AF94B0-298F8D05-3B268F5B-1C0417CA-1A9A6214
***********</font><br><br>

<center><font size="4"><a href="http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/"><font color="red">Hurry! 
Limited Time Special Offers Immediate download!!<br>
Click Here for More Info or Order Online Now!
</font></font></a></b><br><br><br><br><br><br>
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">
239039
     
2C5AD477-4C272EF3-171BE48D-1AA57190-258DFC00
          
1258863973
</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</body>
</html>


Copy your favorite DVD's to a standard CD - without a 
DVD Burner. Free
extras! It's easy to use. Retail Price: $69.95 and For a 
limited time it
is Only $39.95! <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 	 
DVD Magick Pro - A Revolutionary Way to Create DVDs in 
Your Own Home
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Don't spend $1000 on a DVD Burner. Get our all-inclusive 
software right
now and within minutes you will be on your way to 
copying any DVD video
to a single, standard CD. You've seen us in the news. 
You've heard so
much about our product. Now available for download! 
Get your software
instantly following payment!
*************** 7875F88C-6E1E6ADF-1AD8F189-
35BFF8F1-1B5129E
************ 

DVD Copying Features <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 


*	No DVD Burner Required
	*** 239039 ***** 
*	Simple, Convenient Step by Step Instructions
	___ 195790194 _______ 
*	Burn to any standard CD; play on any standard 
DVD player (i.e.
Television, Computer, etc...) OR computer CD Drive
	* 1202620547 ************* 
*	Don't have a CD recorder? Don't worry! You 
can save your
favorite movies to your computer and view anytime!
	_____________ 239039 _______ 
*	Yes! They will play on your CD and DVD player
	*************** 239039 **** 
*	Now you can copy movies from DVD to the 
new DiVX format. One
standard film will take 600mb of your space, that means 
you can keep
around 70 films at the same time on your PC!
	______ 1778882172 _______ 
*	Create your new video collection now!
	****** 6280745 *** 
*	After buying our packet you will learn how to 
work with digital
video in no time! Our packet includes easy instructions 
on how to work
with encodings + copying from one format to another!
	_________________ 647574259 __________
	
	

Copy VHS tapes to CD too! <http://www.ultra-
software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Just upgraded to a DVD and have a library of video 
tapes? With your
software not only can you copy & burn ANY DVD, you'll 
also be able to
transfer all your VHS tapes to DVD format on CD using 
CDR!
**************** 1ECBCA09-6ADDE12B-34A18763-
30AD5F2A-5004EFA2 *******

Back up your favorite Playstation 2 Games!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Order the DVD PRO 4.0! ripper NOW and included will be 
directions for
burning Sony Playstation 2 games! Everything you need 
to make a working
copy on a standard, blank CD-R. Use these as backups 
so that your
original PlayStation 2 games stay in the best condition!
*** AF51DD2-6E5E3DB4-2F48D28B-7D8A3F57-62B2B842 
***

Now copy DVD's in 14 Languages!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 

Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, 
Hungarian, Italian,
Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish and Urdu!
************  20AF94B0-298F8D05-3B268F5B-
1C0417CA-1A9A6214 ***********


Hurry! Limited Time Special Offers Immediate download!!
Click Here for More Info or Order Online Now!
<http://www.ultra-software.info/dvd/adv166/> 





239039 2C5AD477-4C272EF3-171BE48D-1AA57190-
258DFC00 1258863973 
Message Tokens:

254 unique tokens

'$1000'
'$39.95!'
'$69.95'
'(i.e.'
'***'
'****'
'*****'
'******'
'*******'
'***********'
'1202620547'
'1258863973'
'1778882172'
'195790194'
'239039'
'4.0!'
'600mb'
'6280745'
'647574259'
'___'
'______'
'_______'
'__________'
'able'
'about'
'after'
'all'
'also'
'and'
'another!'
'any'
'anytime!'
'around'
'available'
'back'
'backups'
'best'
'blank'
'burn'
'burner'
'burner.'
'burning'
'buying'
'can'
'cc:none'
'cd-r.'
'cd.'
'cd;'
'cdr!'
'click'
'collection'
'computer'
'computer,'
'condition!'
'content-type:text/plain'
'convenient'
'copy'
'copying'
'create'
'digital'
'directions'
'divx'
"don't"
'download!'
'download!!'
'drive'
'drive*'
'dutch,'
'dvd'
"dvd's"
'dvd,'
'dvds'
'easy'
'encodings'
'english,'
'etc...)'
'everything'
'extras!'
'favorite'
'features'
'film'
'films'
'finnish,'
'following'
'for'
'format'
'format.'
'free'
'french,'
'from'
'from:addr:239039'
'from:addr:delphi.com'
'from:no real name:2**0'
'games'
'games!'
'german,'
'get'
'greek,'
'have'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-Id:1'
'header:Organization:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Reply-To:1'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'heard'
'here'
'home'
'how'
'hungarian,'
'hurry!'
'immediate'
'included'
'includes'
'info'
'instantly'
'instructions'
"it's"
'italian,'
'just'
'keep'
'languages!'
'learn'
'library'
'limited'
'magick'
'make'
'means'
'message-id:@artemis.le.ac.uk'
'minutes'
'more'
'movies'
'much'
'need'
'new'
'news.'
'not'
'now'
'now!'
'now!******'
'offers'
'one'
'online'
'only'
'order'
'original'
'our'
'own'
'packet'
'payment!'
'pc!'
'pc!______'
'play'
'player'
'playstation'
'polish,'
'portuguese,'
'price:'
'pro'
'product.'
'proto:http'
'recorder?'
'reply-to:addr:239039'
'reply-to:addr:msn.com'
'reply-to:no real name:2**0'
'required'
'required***'
'retail'
'right'
'ripper'
'russian,'
'same'
'save'
'seen'
'sender:none'
'simple,'
'single,'
'skip:* 10'
'skip:1 40'
'skip:2 40'
'skip:7 40'
'skip:_ 10'
'skip:a 10'
'skip:a 20'
'skip:a 40'
'skip:i 10'
'skip:p 20'
'skip:r 10'
'software'
'sony'
'space,'
'spanish,'
'special'
'spend'
'standard'
'standard,'
'stay'
'step'
'subject: '
'subject:! '
"subject:'"
'subject:239039'
'subject:DVD'
'subject:Languages'
'subject:Now'
'subject:copy'
'swedish'
'take'
'tapes'
'tapes?'
'television,'
'that'
'the'
'these'
'they'
'time'
'time!'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:leicester.ac.uk'
'to:addr:t.c.pearce'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'too!'
'transfer'
'upgraded'
'urdu!'
'url:adv166'
'url:dvd'
'url:info'
'url:ultra-software'
'url:www'
'use'
'use.'
'using'
'vhs'
'video'
'view'
'way'
'will'
'with'
'within'
'without'
'work'
'working'
'worry!'
'x-mailer:internet mail service (5.5.2653.19)'
'yes!'
'you'
"you'll"
"you've"
'your'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-31 13:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

By design (due to testing results), spambayes ignores most 
headers.  Note that the example you gave here supplies no 
reason for change:  it showed that spambayes nailed the 
email in question perfectly (internal *H* score of 0 and 
internal *S* score of 1 -- it's impossible to get a stronger 
outcome than that!).

There are two specific reasons for continuing to ignore 
SpamAssassin-like header decorations:  (1) spammers can 
spoof them, supplying tons of bogus clues; and, (2) because 
many people use spambayes on their own box after some 
server uses a SpamAssassin-like system first to inject 
headers, getting a spambayes judgment independent of what 
a rule-based system thought truly helps to recover from 
mistakes made by the rule-based system.  If spambayes 
counted what the rule-based system thought, it would act to 
reinfiorce the rule-based system's mistakes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797739&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:21:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:22:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798362 ] Toolbar becomes
	unresponsive and must be recreated
Message-ID: <E19tfGO-0002Ni-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #798362, was opened at 2003-09-01 15:21
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated

Initial Comment:
Periodically (I'm not sure exactly when it happens), the 
spambayes toolbar stops functioning (latest cvs).  
Clicking the buttons has no effect, and I have to delete 
the toolbar and restart Outlook (to recreate it) to get it 
working again (simply restarting Outlook doesn't help).

When the toolbar is 'bad', I get this in the trace:
"""
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
"""

My machine crashes fairly regularly <wink/sigh>.  I 
wonder, although I'm not sure, if this problem occurs 
when Outlook crashes instead of being closed properly.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:25:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:25:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-798318 ] Blackberry
	redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM
Message-ID: <E19tfJm-0003KM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #798318, was opened at 2003-08-31 17:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by benslivka
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM

Initial Comment:
Hi!.

I installed SpamBayes 0.7 on my Windows XP Pro SP1 
system late Thursday evening 8/28.  Here it is Sunday 
8/31, and SB is working very nicely!

BUT, it doesn't seem to have learned that RIM / 
Blackberry Redirector e-mails or non-spam.  It pretty 
regularly puts them in the "maybe spam" folder.

I've included the detailed "spam report" on one such 
message below.

Otherwise, SB is working great with my Blackberry -- if it 
identifies an inbox message as Spam it moves it out of 
the inbox before the Blackberry Redirector has a chance 
to send it to my Blackberry!

Please let me know if I can provide more information.

Thank you!
--Ben Slivka
Ben [at] Slivka [dot] com
Clyde Hill, WA (near Seattle)

Spam Score: 0.207205


word                                spamprob         #ham  
#spam
'*H*'                               0.663497            -      -
'*S*'                               0.0779066           -      -
'between'                           0.0221876        2566      0
'blackberry'                        0.0815819        3592      1
'processed'                         0.249116          120      0
'move'                              0.264701         1577      2
'data'                              0.270535         1529      2
'header:Message-Id:1'               0.302488         
5573      9
'used'                              0.318698         2332      4
'not'                               0.37607         14097     32
'reply-to:none'                     0.390848        27683     67
'to:addr:ben'                       0.60174         18381    105
'header:MIME-Version:1'             0.614831        
13414     81
'to:addr:slivka.com'                0.616083        17303    
105
'from:no real name:2**0'            0.669564         
2714     21
'to:no real name:2**0'              0.687821        12466    
104
'header:Return-Path:1'              0.744835         9939    
110
'carry'                             0.779405          332      5
Message Stream:


X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers 
Version 2.0
Received: from BlackBerry.NET ([206.51.26.40]) by 
janus.slivka.org with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 31 
Aug 2003 16:06:27 -0700
Received: from smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry
	(smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
[172.16.147.240])
	by BlackBerry.NET (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with 
ESMTP id h7VN6hvs008489
	for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 
19:06:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
(etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry
	[172.16.147.237])
	by smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry 
(8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
	h7VMxtAg013832
	for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 
19:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: 
<200308312302.h7VMxtAg013832@smtprelay01.etp.prod.
on.blackberry>
From: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net
Subject: RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-00600811c6a2
To: ben@slivka.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/mixed; BOUNDARY="-
1824071167-23478-1062370948=:1404"
Return-Path: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2003 23:06:28.0062 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[8215A7E0:01C37014]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" 
CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange 
Server version 6.0.6249.1">
<TITLE>RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-
00600811c6a2</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=2>This message is used to carry data 
between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry 
Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this 
message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry 
Redirector.</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
This message is used to carry data between the 
BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do 
not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be 
processed by the BlackBerry Redirector.
Message Tokens:

47 unique tokens

'and'
'between'
'blackberry'
'carry'
'cc:none'
'content-type:text/plain'
'data'
'delete,'
'from:addr:etp'
'from:addr:etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net'
'from:no real name:2**0'
'handheld.'
'header:Date:1'
'header:From:1'
'header:MIME-Version:1'
'header:Message-Id:1'
'header:Received:3'
'header:Return-Path:1'
'header:Subject:1'
'header:To:1'
'message'
'message-id:@smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry'
'move'
'not'
'please'
'processed'
'redirector'
'redirector.'
'reply-to:none'
'respond'
'sender:none'
'skip:r 40'
'subject:-'
'subject:00600811c6a2'
'subject:11d1'
'subject:87fe'
'subject:RIM_bca28a80'
'subject:e9c0'
'the'
'this'
'to:2**0'
'to:addr:ben'
'to:addr:slivka.com'
'to:no real name:2**0'
'used'
'will'
'x-mailer:none'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka)
Date: 2003-08-31 20:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=856287

Dear Tim_One,

I have tons of ham (29,000+) and barely any spam (now up 
to 189 from 80 when I first trained SpamBayes).

Have you considered having some additional filter rules that 
would allow me to indicate that mail from certain domains 
and/or with certain reg_exp subject lines was SPAM/NOT-
SPAM?

I understand this would violate the "pure" Bayesian approach, 
but might be a simple, practical solution?

Thanks!
--ben@slivka.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-08-31 18:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Looks like you trained on a great many more ham msgs than 
spam msgs.  If so, try training on an approximately equal 
number of each.  The code was designed, tested, and tuned 
by people who trained on approximately equal numbers of 
each, and we don't have yet have a good approach to dealing 
with wildly unbalanced training sets.

You can find your default_bayes_customize.ini file and change 
the line

experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: True

to

experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False

and then these msgs will almost certainly be scored as solid 
ham.  However, you'll probably get a much higher false 
negative rate (spam erroneously classified as ham) then too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 21:41:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 23:42:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-743122 ] Outlook 2002
	auto-complete breaks
Message-ID: <E19tfZf-0003oq-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #743122, was opened at 2003-05-25 22:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2002 auto-complete breaks

Initial Comment:
Just installed SpamBayes and I think it breaks the
auto-complete popup list for email addresses used in
the To field in Outlook.  The popup still appears but
only with the first letter of each email address - the
rest of the email address doesn't appear.  I've
uninstalled and reinstalled SpamBayes several times to
confirm this problem.  I'm running Outlook 2002 (SP2)
on Windows 2000 (SP3).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-09-01 13:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Actually, I will leave this open, as it hasn't actually been
confirmed by anyone.  I *think* it is fixed, simply as MFC
is no longer used.  If anyone can confirm it that would be
great.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 13:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This is now fixed in cvs (at least according to the check in 
messages), and so will be fixed in the next binary release.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: John Villalovos (happycamp)
Date: 2003-08-21 08:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=661531

This happens for me also.  Windows XP (w/ Service Pack 1)
and Outlook 2002 from Office XP (w/Service Pack 2).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gerhard (neugi)
Date: 2003-08-18 20:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=846779

i've the same problem. 
running winXp SP1 and Outlook 2k SP2


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Garrett Brucker (gbrucker)
Date: 2003-08-13 22:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=843726

I'm running Outlook 2002/XP on Windows XP Pro and had this 
same problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kim Friis (kim_friis)
Date: 2003-08-11 19:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=89418

Im running Outlook 2002 on Windows XP and I do NOT see 
the bug. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sean True (seantrue)
Date: 2003-06-17 11:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=114311

Fixing this bug will require a complete rewrite to remove all 
MFC based dialogs from SpamBayes.
We're about 80% of the way there on SpamAtBay, and it's 
_not_ fun.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-17 10:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Apparently this problem only happens *after* a SpamBayes
dialog has been shown, but works fine until then.  Can
someone else confirm this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-06-02 19:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

I am running the same - W2K SP3 & OL2K and get the same 
problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jonathan Evatt (spidawebs)
Date: 2003-06-02 06:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=48654

I am also getting this problem. Have installed the app on 
Outlook XP (2002) SP2 over Win XP SP1.
If I start up Outlook the problem only seems to occur AFTER 
I actually run the spambayes configuration routine. If I do not 
access that then the problem does not (so far - limited 
testing) seem to occur.

Jonathan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=743122&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 22:26:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Sep  1 00:27:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-798362 ] Toolbar becomes
	unresponsive and must be recreated
Message-ID: <E19tgH7-0005BD-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #798362, was opened at 2003-09-01 15:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Toolbar becomes unresponsive and must be recreated

Initial Comment:
Periodically (I'm not sure exactly when it happens), the 
spambayes toolbar stops functioning (latest cvs).  
Clicking the buttons has no effect, and I have to delete 
the toolbar and restart Outlook (to recreate it) to get it 
working again (simply restarting Outlook doesn't help).

When the toolbar is 'bad', I get this in the trace:
"""
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
Clues' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
FilterNow' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, 
None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
"""

My machine crashes fairly regularly <wink/sigh>.  I 
wonder, although I'm not sure, if this problem occurs 
when Outlook crashes instead of being closed properly.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 16:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ok, I get this with the new addin.py:
"""
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' 
- (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 
0, -2147467259), None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 894, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=temporary)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 451, in __getattr__
    return self._ApplyTypes_(*args)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_.
InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args))
, user, resultCLSID)
com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Clues' - 
(-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, 
-2147467259), None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 894, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=temporary)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 451, in __getattr__
    return self._ApplyTypes_(*args)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_.
InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args))
, user, resultCLSID)
com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.FilterNow' 
- (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 
0, -2147467259), None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 894, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=temporary)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 451, in __getattr__
    return self._ApplyTypes_(*args)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_.
InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args))
, user, resultCLSID)
com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
CheckVersion' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 894, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=temporary)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 451, in __getattr__
    return self._ApplyTypes_(*args)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_.
InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args))
, user, resultCLSID)
com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
HelpPopup' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 894, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=temporary)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 451, in __getattr__
    return self._ApplyTypes_(*args)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_.
InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args))
, user, resultCLSID)
com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.
TestSuite' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\cvs\spambayes\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 894, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=temporary)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 451, in __getattr__
    return self._ApplyTypes_(*args)
  File "C:\Python23\lib\site-packages\win32com\client\__init__.
py", line 445, in _ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(self._oleobj_.
InvokeTypes(*((dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, argTypes) + args))
, user, resultCLSID)
com_error: (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, 
None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)"""

BTW, my machine hasn't crashed yet, so that theory is gone...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=798362&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Aug 31 23:23:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Sep  1 01:23:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797316 ] Extra CRLF to smtp
	server causes garbage error.
Message-ID: <E19th9t-00078F-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #797316, was opened at 2003-08-30 02:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Pending
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dudley Fox (grieve)
Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Summary: Extra CRLF to smtp server causes garbage error.

Initial Comment:
In version 1.0a4 of smtpproxy.py on line 200 it reads
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked + '\r\n')
It should read
     self.serverSocket.push(cooked)

The first line sends an empty command to the smtp
server, and causes it to return an error. Different
smtp servers and mail clients handle it differently,
but Eudora will complain that when it sent the QUIT
command an error was returned. Agent will just fail
silently. In both cases the message is actually sent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 17:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Bah.  Forget all that.  I was making the change in the wrong
place, because I didn't look up the line number in 1.0a4 and
there wasn't any context code around the change.  I made the
change (it's in smtpproxy v1.13) and my smtpproxy still
works, so 1.0a5 should work for you.  Hopefully this will
fix it for everyone.

I *think* that the problem was not actually anything to do
with the QUIT command.  The extra \r\n was sent after the
end of the data (which is usually immediately followed by
the QUIT), which is handled in a different place, and did
have an extra \r\n.  The error response just came back after
the QUIT was sent.  This explains a lot.

I'm changing this to pending - if anyone does have this
problem with smtpproxy v1.13 or 1.0a5 then please reopen. 
I'll close it once I've confirmed that it fixes it for the
other people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 15:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

One other thing: two of the people that have reported this 
have been using Norton Anti-Virus to scan mail.  One suspects 
that the problem lies with the Norton-spambayes relationship 
(although I'm not convinced).  Are you using Norton?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-09-01 14:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Bah.  I've had one other person tell me that they experienced 
this problem and that this fixed it, and one other person tell 
me that they experience this problem, and that this doesn't fix 
it (they get the same result as me).

I really need to know whether this was the only change made 
or not.  I don't see how it could possibly work!  If you could 
download 1.0a5 (probably out later today) and try it 
unchanged, and then (if necessary) with this alternation, that 
would be fantastic.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-30 20:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

You are correct that there is a problem that Eudora complains 
about an error after the QUIT command.

However, if the '\r\n' is removed, then *no* commands work 
(at least here).  Certainly this is the way that the RFC says 
that SMTP is meant to work (specifically, that there is a CRLF 
after each command, including QUIT).

Can you confirm for me that removing the '\r\n' means that 
you can still use smtpproxy?  If I remove it here, it hangs 
forever on the first command sent (ELHO, in this case).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797316&group_id=61702