[SciPy-User] Pylab - standard packages

[Ralf Gommers]

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Thomas Kluyver <takowl at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 22 September 2012 11:55, Almar Klein <a.klein at science-applied.nl>
> wrote:
> > That's how I see it too. Thanks for wording it more clearly. So I think
> > we're converging towards an agreement. I don't know enough about the
> > notebook to decide whether it should be included now or later. I go with
> > whatever you guys think is best.
>
> Thanks Almar. I think it would be nice to write tutorials around
> something a bit more advanced and more friendly than a terminal
> interface, but I can also see the argument that it's not quite mature
> enough to put in a standard yet. So I put it to the community.
>
> To get a better overview, I've made a poll. By all means express your
> opinions here as well, but please go and vote on whether or not to
> require IPython notebook now:
>

Can you please first explain what the IPython devs think about stability of
the format? Are there any backward or forward incompatible changes in the
pipeline?

Thanks,
Ralf


> http://www.misterpoll.com/polls/567610
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-User mailing list
> SciPy-User at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20120922/718c3b1f/attachment.html>