[SciPy-User] Scikits statuses?
klo uo
klonuo at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 19:39:48 EST 2012
I browsed scikits (http://scikits.appspot.com/scikits) and looking at one
of the packages I noticed that it's in poor state - project started long
ago but finished right at it. That give me an idea to try and determine the
state of available scikits.
I copied text from scikits page and saved it as text file. Then I used pypi
as reference and results are in this little script:
http://nbviewer.ipython.org/url/dl.dropbox.com/u/6735093/scikits.ipynb
As a bonus I attached also a bar plot of pypi download counts per package.
Scikits not hosted on pypi, are mainly hosted on scipy.org and versioned by
subversion:
delaunay
eartho
hydroclimpy
mlabwrap
pymat
rsformats
scattpy
timeseries
umfpack
Their status is questionable, and if I'm not wrong all those are released
years ago, w/o documentation, not even description, neither their names are
correct.
Exceptions are timeseries (author abandoned it), and hydroclimpy which
doesn't look as a scikit to me at all, but universe for itself.
Others, listed by last update (note: two duplicate packages, because of
naming transition):
scikit-aero 20121125
scikits.odes 20121122
scikits.optimization 20121114
scikits.fitting 20121029
scikit-fmm 20121016
scikit-image 20121014
scikits-image 20121014
scikit-learn 20121008
scikits.bvp_solver 20120926
scikit-rf 20120925
scikits.bootstrap 20120822
scikit-vi 20120609
scikit-commpy 20120404
scikits.learn 20110921
scikits.statsmodels 20110824
scikits.cuda 20110523
scikits.datasmooth 20110414
scikits.audiolab 20100723
scikits.sparse 20091214
scikits.bvp1lg 20091012
scikits.talkbox 20090827
scikits.samplerate 20090722
scikits.vectorplot 20081202
scikits.example 20081105
scikits.ann 20080131
What I want to suggest from this little adventure is to sort scikits
packages by last update, on scikits home page. Then maybe scikits not
updated for more then a year, flag with new status column, describing the
state of the package. I believe it would help general user from start, and
to potential developer for takeover. Also it will show that scikits idea is
active, instead current static display with half packages in unknown state.
As for those in first listing, "abandoned" or "deprecated" is IMHO
suitable, if not necessary.
[image: Inline image 1]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20121219/f559e07e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8910 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20121219/f559e07e/attachment.png>
More information about the SciPy-User
mailing list