[SciPy-User] scipy.optimize named argument inconsistency

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers at googlemail.com
Wed Sep 14 16:01:37 EDT 2011


On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde at mcgill.ca>wrote:

> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:30:14 -0400,
> Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:08:22 +0200,
> > Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > > Could you make an overview of which functions should be changed, and
> your
> > > proposed new unified interface? The best solution could depend on the
> > > details of the changed needed.
> >
> > The first thing to do is to improve names consistency, imo. I will
> > review all functions of the package and then post a list of possible
> > improvements. Then, I need to think a bit more about the new « unified
> > interfaces » idea as it could indeed solve some issues. As
> > suggested, I'll create a page on <http://projects.scipy.org/scipy> when
> > things will be more clear.
>
> I've drafted a proposal for improvements that I would like to discuss.
> Initially, I planned to post it on the dev wiki but I cannot edit
> anything there. Is any restriction for editing?
> (Also, is it the right list for this discussion or should I continue
> on -dev?)
>
> Can you edit existing pages? If so, I can create the page. If not, either
open a ticket or use a rest doc on your github account. The latter may is
less permanent but allows for inline commenting/reviewing.

Probably best to move this to scipy-dev.

Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20110914/17b43664/attachment.html>


More information about the SciPy-User mailing list