[SciPy-User] ANN: SciPy 0.9.0 release candidate 3

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Tue Feb 15 13:14:31 EST 2011


On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Bruce Southey <bsouthey at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 02/14/2011 09:24 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Ralf Gommers
> > <ralf.gommers at googlemail.com>  wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the third release
> >> candidate of SciPy 0.9.0. This will be the first SciPy release to
> >> include support for Python 3 (all modules except scipy.weave), as well
> >> as for Python 2.7.
> >>
> >> Sources, binaries and release notes can be found at
> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/scipy/0.9.0rc3/. Note that
> >> due to the issues Sourceforge is still having the binaries are not
> >> visible at this moment, even though they are uploaded. They should
> >> appear within a day I expect.
> >>
> > All binaries are visible now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ralf
> >
> >> Changes since release candidate 2:
> >> - a high-priority bugfix for fftpack (#1353)
> >> - a change in ndimage for compatibility with upcoming numpy 1.6
> >> - fixes for compatibility with Python 2.4
> >> - fixed test failures reported for RC2 built against MKL
> >>
> >> If no more issues are reported, 0.9.0 will be released in the weekend
> >> of 19/20 February.
> >>
> >> Enjoy,
> >> Ralf
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SciPy-User mailing list
> > SciPy-User at scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
> As you can tell from the numpy version, I have not played around with
> numpy/scipy for a while. I do not see any failures on Fedora 14 with
> Python2.4 (numpy 2.0.0.dev),  Python2.5 (numpy 2.0.0.dev), Python2.6
> (numpy 2.0.0.dev), Python2.7(numpy 2.0.0.dev-f72c605) or Python3.1
> (numpy 1.5.1).
>
> The Python2.7 output is given below because I get the CObject
> deprecation warning. I think this is addressed by ticket 1237 (scheduled
> milestone 0.9.0) that needs to be applied to Python 2.7 as well as
> Python3.1.
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1237
>
>
We only use the capsule object for python 3.*, for 2.7 we decided to stick
with PyCObject for backwards compatibility.

<snip>

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20110215/c6321ab5/attachment.html>


More information about the SciPy-User mailing list