[SciPy-Dev] branching 0.19.x soon?

[Ralf Gommers]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Andrew Nelson <andyfaff at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm currently running all the module tests on OSX=10.12.3, Python=3.5.2,
> NumPy (nomkl) =1.12.0, with the master branch.
>
> scipy.integrate is reporting one test failure, #7038.
> scipy.sparse is reporting lots of errors, then segfaults.
>

Can you put your build log in a gist and open an issue with a link to that?
Likely something recent if it's real.

Ralf



> On 13 February 2017 at 20:27, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Evgeni Burovski <
>> evgeny.burovskiy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Evgeni Burovski
>>> > <evgeny.burovskiy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > We had planned the 0.19.0 release for the end of January. We won't
>>> make
>>> >> > that
>>> >> > anymore, but branching this month seems doable (nothing particularly
>>> >> > large
>>> >> > or blocking in https://github.com/scipy/scipy/milestone/30).
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for bringing this up Ralf!
>>> >>
>>> >> The dblquad regression would be good to fix.
>>> >> (Ah, as noted on GH already)
>>> >> Can't think of other blockers off the top of my head. Some more time
>>> >> for merging open PRs would be nice to have, but optional.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > It seems like we're always hovering around 130-140 PRs, no matter how
>>> much
>>> > time we take. But probably good to give it say two weeks, so everyone
>>> has a
>>> > chance to go and review/merge the PRs they would really like to get in?
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > @Evgeni, did you plan / want to be the release manager for this
>>> release
>>> >> > again, or do you want someone else to take that role?
>>> >>
>>> >> If someone wants it, great. Volunteers?
>>> >> Otherwise I'll happily do it.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > "want" is a big word:) I'm also happy to take a turn again, either for
>>> this
>>> > release or a following one. But if someone new to the role volunteers,
>>> > that'd be quite nice.
>>>
>>>
>>> Having discussed this with Ralf off-list, I am volunteering to do the
>>> release legwork.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks again Evgeni!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> The contents of the milestone: https://github.com/scipy/scipy
>>> /milestones/0.19.0.
>>> Several of these are rolled over from a previous release or even
>>> earlier ones, where an issue or a PR does not make the release X, and
>>> gets re-milestoned to X+1 so that we don't forget (tm).
>>>
>>> These look like blockers:
>>>
>>> A flaky test in linalg: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/6984
>>> A regression in integrate: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/6898
>>
>>
>> There's a PR which needs completing (tests to add):
>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/6965. If someone would want to have
>> a go at that, that'd be great.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> A failure in stats with numpy-dev:
>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/7012#issuecomment-278368718
>>>
>>> The rest seem to be possible to roll over again unless fixed.
>>
>>
>> I'll check the ``make dist`` issue mentioned in gh-3250; from the
>> description it can't be rolled over but isn't a problem for RC1.
>>
>>
>>> Of
>>> course, any help with troubleshooting, reviewing and merging is most
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>> If you think something is missing and should go into 0.19.0, please
>>> add it to the milestone, or comment on github or in this email thread.
>>>
>>> Here's an optimistic schedule:
>>>
>>> 15 Feb : branch 0.19.x, cut 0.19.0rc1
>>> 22 Feb : 0.19.0rc2, if needed
>>> 09 Mar : 0.19.0 final
>>>
>>> Please speak up if the timing does not work for you.
>>>
>>
>> LGTM
>>
>> Ralf
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
>> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________
> Dr. Andrew Nelson
>
>
> _____________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20170213/aecc4b7a/attachment.html>