[SciPy-Dev] Supporting numpy/scipy in an IDE

[David Verelst]

Have you looked at Jedi [1] and/or Rope [2]? Rope has been used for quite a
while in the Spyder [3] editor, and future versions will also support Jedi
[4]

[1] http://jedi.jedidjah.ch/en/latest/
[2] http://rope.sourceforge.net/
[3] http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/
[4] http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1213


On 25 November 2013 19:00, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Sven Brauch <svenbrauch at googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > 2013/11/25 Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com>:
> > > They should. Did you look at the documentation?
> > They should, but they don't ;)
> > If you click through the docs there's quite a few examples which only
> > mention it somewhere in the text, e.g.
> >
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.frombuffer.html.
>
> I'm sorry, but you were presenting it as if it weren't policy to include a
> Returns section, whereas the HOWTO_DOCUMENT.rst document you were pointed
> to shows otherwise. There are errors and omissions in our documentation, of
> course, and these need to be fixed, but there is already agreement that we
> have this information (in human-understandable form). Of course, these
> errors and omissions only demonstrate how inaccurate this approach would
> be. It's easy to spot an omission of a Returns section. It will be much
> harder to spot a semantic error.
>
> --
> Robert Kern
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20131125/5b2d61c1/attachment.html>