[SciPy-dev] Scipy workflow (and not tools).

[Nathan Bell]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think at this point we would be better off trying to recruit at least one
> person to "own" each package. For new packages that is usually the person
> who committed it but we also need ownership of older packages. Someone with
> a personal stake in a package is likely to do more for quality assurance at
> this point than any amount of required review.
>

+1

This ought to be at the top of everyone's list.

-- 
Nathan Bell wnbell at gmail.com
http://graphics.cs.uiuc.edu/~wnbell/