[SciPy-dev] Inclusion of cython code in scipy
Neal Becker
ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 12:47:55 EDT 2008
Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
> Brian Granger wrote:
>>> > C++ STL containers are truly great for things like this. I would
>>> > write a simple c++ header file that defines the Particle class,
>>> > create an std::vector<Particle> to hold them and wrap the whole thing
>>> > into
>>> > Cython. I have already done stuff like this (templated c++ with STL)
>>> > with cython and it works great. Furthermore, you end up with an
>>> > actual C/Python extension type that 1) is super fast 2) has its own C
>>> > api that can be called from other C extensions.
>
> For some strange reason I still haven't gotten this email but Brian,
> that is the point I was making, STL has all the needed container classes
> for this and this is precisely what I use. I just use SWIG to wrap this
> C++ code and it works great. Much of the STL is already wrapped via
> SWIG and with numpy.i it interfaces quite well with numpy, in addition
> you can inject doxygen generated documentation almost automatically so
> your generated wrapper code is fully documented.
>
> I've also explored using D and PyD and it makes for a fantastic
> combination. D seems to be (gdc) about 1.7 times slower than C++ but is
> really nice to work with. PyD's support for numpy is lacking but could
> be fixed.
>
> The point is (and what I understand of what Nathan was saying), pyrex
> and cython let you wrap the code to an extent but do not provide the
> underlying solution. People were arging that Cython may be used in
> place of C, and I think our point is that it isn't there yet and for
> people used to C or C++ it is much easier to just use those instead.
>
>> Unfortunately, the context I have done this in is proprietary code for
>> my employer. But, I will try to put together a simple example this
>> weekend and post it to launchpad. The documentation on these
>> capabilities of Cython isn't great right now for sure, so some example
>> code would sure help.
>
> So why don't we do this together. I'll put together my tiny example of
> a shootout with Python C++ and D and lets see how they stack up. If you
> would be so kind you can add the cython/pyrex parts to this. Thanks.
>
Is pyd still actively developed? Seems to be rather quiet for a while.
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list