[scikit-learn] Vote on SLEP009: keyword only arguments

[Gael Varoquaux]

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:28:57PM +1000, Joel Nothman wrote:
> That is, we could consider this resolved after 14 votes in favour.

> So far, if I've interpreted correctly:

> +1 (adrin, nicolas, hanmin, joel, guillaume, jeremie, thomas, vlad, roman) = 9.

> I've not understood a clear position from Alex. I'm assuming Andreas is in
> favour given his comments elsewhere, but we've not seen comment here.

I was planning to vote -0 mostly to avoid the vote to seem like bandwagon
(and because I am not fully sold on the idea), but I actually want this
to move forward, and it seems that my vote is needed.

Hence, I vote +1.

Hopefully Andreas and Alex make their position clear and we can adopt the
SLEP.

Thank you to you all.

Gaël

> On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 20:06, Roman Yurchak <rth.yurchak at gmail.com> wrote:

>     +1 assuming we are careful about continuing to allow some frequently
>     used positional arguments, even in __init__.

>     For instance,

>     n_components = 10
>     pca = PCA(n_components)

>     is still more readable, I think, than,

>     pca = PCA(n_components=n_components)
-- 
    Gael Varoquaux
    Research Director, INRIA 
    http://gael-varoquaux.info            http://twitter.com/GaelVaroquaux