Task board

[Johannes Schönberger]

> On 20 Sep 2016, at 19:34, Stefan van der Walt <stefanv at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 01:35, François Boulogne wrote:
>> I think we need to determine how many boards we want (what github call
>> project, I don't like this word... anyway).
>> A big one with the progress or small ones, one per submodule? or one per
>> core dev?
> 
> I think each board is associated with an outcome.  So, e.g., we will
> decide on some projects such as "Improve Documentation", or "Add 3D
> capability", or "Catch up on review backlog".  Each of those will then
> have a few standard columns that we have to decide on.
> 
> An initial suggestion would be:
> 
> Inbox (list all relevant PRs)
> In Progress (someone is working on it)
> Ready for Review (please review this work)
> Done
> 
> Would that cover 80% of use cases, or do we need more columns?

This sounds good to me and we can add more columns as needed and as we gain some experience with the workflow. Grouping comments into reviews and then having a separate approval status is already a big step forward in my view. 


> 
> Stéfan
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send an email to scikit-image at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/scikit-image/1474392890.2276972.731679577.39AE1588%40webmail.messagingengine.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20160920/e49773e5/attachment.html>