[Pythonmac-SIG] Future 64-bit installers
Russell E. Owen
rowen at uw.edu
Tue Jul 20 21:15:46 CEST 2010
In article <44F47665-6748-41BF-A4E3-64AE5D88DA39 at mac.com>,
Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had a short discussion on the 2.7-macosx10.5 installer for python 2.7 at
> the europython language summit due to the unfortunate problems with IDLE and
> Tkinter in that installer: tkinter doesn't work in 64-bit due to being linked
> with Tk 8.4 and for some reason IDLE.app doesn't work either (even though
> that worked earlier in the develpment process).
>
> The consensus at the summit was to replace the macosx10.5 installer (ppc,
> x86, x86_64) by a macosx10.6 (x86, x86_64) installer for future releases.
> That enables linking with Tk 8.5 and that would solve a number of issues
> other than being available in 64-bit code.
>
> Users of OSX 10.5 (or earlier) can still use the macosx10.3 installer, that
> would stay the same. The only difference for OSX 10.5 users is that they
> cannot use 64-bit code without building their own binaries.
>
> The alternative to raising the OSX requirement is to ship Tk 8.5 in the
> installer and that would grow the installer, and would increase my load.
>
> Ronald
>
> P.S. It should be possible to use the future macosx10.6 installer to install
> on 10.5 as well if you install Tk 8.5 yourself, but this won't be prominently
> advertised.-------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
I assume users of 106 can also use the 10.3.9 version if they wish --
e.g. for people building applications that need to run on a wide range
of Macs.
If so, this sounds fine to me. Users who need maximum compatibility can
use the 10.3.9 version. Users who want 64-bit can install the 10.6-only
version.
-- Russell
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG
mailing list