[Pythonmac-SIG] building universal binaries

[Nicholas Riley]

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:41:32AM +0100, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> An alternative to fat might be 'ppc,i386'. That is longer, but is  
> clearer about which architectures are supported (just in case someone  
> decides to donate support for a threeway universal build). Patching  
> setuptools to know that an architecture string that contains a comma  
> is actually a list of architectures shouldn't be too hard.

This sounds like a good idea, and this is not just a legacy issue with
ppc64 - we'll likely have a 64-bit x86 Mac variant to handle within
the year.

-- 
Nicholas Riley <njriley at uiuc.edu> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley>